Change

Change

Do You own one?  You better if you know whats good for you!

What do you think?

Why is America headed towards economic, social, and political collapse?  Everything you need to know and more.

Watch all of these Videos they give you the background of what we are now just barely starting to realize, our nation is going to collapse, ethnic groups will fight, genocide will rule, those who own the guns, ( 95% white Americans) are going to kill the other groups.  A new constitution will be written that will support the rights of the majority, our right to exists, and live in a nation that we want to live in, a nation that will protect our children, and protect our civilization, the western civilization, not one that of our enemies.  Get ready, you have only a few years left, a year to buy what you need, and then send your family away, because you are going to have to fight.

The last Video is most important.

http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/tescosuicide/ALa2/ALa3/amnestynow_audacity.jpghttp://www.borev.net/olliecamp.jpg

http://www.bnp.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/us-population-graph.jpghttp://thelastgringo.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/gang-prison-tattoos.jpghttp://www.thirdworldcounty.us/wp-content/uploads/2006/03/upsidedown-L.jpghttp://www.digitaljournal.com/img/8/5/9/6/6/8/i/4/1/4/o/MS-13_Face.jpghttp://www.moonbattery.com/third-world_poverty.jpghttp://www.warriorsfortruth.com/images/illegal-alien-gangs.jpghttp://www.cbsnews.com/images/2006/03/29/imageGFX55303272221.jpghttp://www.commonsensejournal.com/wp-content/images/illegal_immigration/mexiracists.jpghttp://www.foxnews.com/images/197673/2_23_032706_immigration1.jpghttp://controlcongress.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Aztec_Terrorist.jpghttp://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/131166819_f5275890b2.jpghttp://www.moonbattery.com/archives/Racist_Pro-Illegal_Alien.jpghttp://enemiesforeignanddomestic.com/brownberets%20(2).jpghttp://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/border_dees.jpg

I want Obama to win.  I may die during the conflict, but we will fight when the time comes, and we will win.

Here is how we win this new conflict with an old history.  We must allow everything to occur as it is intended.

I want Obama to do everything he and his anti-white communist elites have planned, I want them to break the economic back of this nation with massive spending, I want him to fire all white heterosexual males currently working within the government and only hire minorities, I want Obama to push every liberal agenda to mainstream and break the moral and linguistic heritage of this nation.  I want this nation to die, a slow and painful death.  I want Obama to weaken our nation militarily, I want Obama to break down our central intelligence agency, making it easier for terrorists to infiltrate this nation.  I want communist and islamists to run freely over the landscape, I want the islamists terrorists to detonate a nuclear bomb in ten major metropolitan cities.  I want Obama to declare our constitution illegal, and no longer needed in the brave new world order.  The left in the west are moving towards the creation of a communist block federation of nations once called the western world.  I want them to open the borders and allow every illegal alien to enter this nation from all over the world, and bankrupt and destroy the local and state economies.

Why do I want these things?  Because these events will destroy this nation, economically first, riots and crime will skyrocket. Second they will destroy this nation socially, education will collapse, madness and insanity will reign supreme. The left will destroy this nation there is nothing we can do about, only when whites realize that non-white males must go, will we even begin to wake the hell up, and I have one thing to fall back on, my 12 gauge shot gun, my 6.8 spc AR-15 assault rifle, other planned weapons, and my various home made weapon systems.  Not to mention multiply levels of body armor, and other homemade defensive systems.

This nation must die politically, socially and economically, so that the white males who own 95% of the fire arms in this nation can do something about it.  The nation must die so when can rebuild, 1 in 3 of us must sacrifice our lives, we must embrace the destruction of the west, only then will the white males rise up and destroy our enemies, take back what’s rightfully ours, and kill everyone who moved against us.  A world wide race war is what’s needed, and America is the lynch pin of the liberal democracies within the west, when America goes, the west will follow, and then the rise of white Nationalist is all but assured.

White Nationalist government will come to power after the collapse of the west!!!  Think about it, don’t fight it, buy guns and ammo, buy food and water, buy body armor and NBC gear for you and your family, get ready and be prepared, and when the time comes my brothers, I will see you on the battlefield from the streets of L.A. to New York’s Central park, it will not occur in the next 4-5 years, but soon afterwards, we will retake what is ours, allow the world to see the first African Dictator of America, allow this nation to die, be joyful when terrorist attack us, allow this nation to die, and then and only then will we rise to power.  Many of us will die, but the West will be reborn, and our constitution will be reborn in our image, it will protect the ethnic nature of our nation and that of the west, and we must make ready for time is coming when you will no longer be able to purchase what you need to survive.  Be ready, buy plenty of guns and ammo, our organization will come when it is intended to occur, when we need it to save our people, and not a moment sooner.  Obama will fail, liberalism will fail, you cannot defy human nature for very long, until you face the consequences of your defiance.

Black Locust

Republican Party must fall.

Why do I say this, because they are holding the nationalist movement down.  Democrats must finish the republican party off, all I hear from Republicans is that we must evolve and accept the future of America, don’t fight population replacement and ethnic cleaning, embrace what is to come, don’t fight it, enjoy your death.  I say NO!  Time for the Republicrats to step down, embrace their own demise, and allow ethnic nationalism to rise to power.  These morons don’t get it, the Latinos, Blacks, and Asians will continue to vote for their own race, since Regan, the Latino share of the republican party has declined, Bush Jr. received fewer Latinos votes in 2004 then his father received in the 80‘s, and still he pandered to them.  The republican party panders to Latinos, Blacks, and Asians while the white base continues to erode and falter.  This strategy cannot win, eventually we will have a one party nation, probably within the next couple of years, the time has come for whites to pull their collective heads out of their rears, and wake the hell up, why can Latinos, Blacks, and Asians vote for their own race, while whites should not?  Why can 95% of blacks vote for Obama and not be called racists, understand this, Latinos, Blacks, and Asians are all for their own race, you white devils need to follow their example.

Black Locust

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg/800px-Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg

Killzone by alltheoriginalnames, member since Apr 5, 2005 (homepage)

http://www.renderosity.com/homepage.php?Who=alltheoriginalnames

http://stockton.edu/~gilmorew/0colhis/awash.jpg

http://www.oknation.net/blog/home/blog_data/43/43/images/History/joinordie.jpg

You know what must be done, prepare for what is to come!

http://aycu28.webshots.com/image/49867/2004763753019879333_rs.jpg

What islam is not:

If you are concerned with Islam and the Islamization of YOUR country, this video has a message for YOU.

The Threat of Islam
This is a video that seeks to demonstrate the consequences of allowing Islam to make inroads into a nation. It presents examples of civilizations whose populations are some percent Moslem (e.g., 5, 10, 25, 50 percent) and the social effects associated with each percentage. A critic could accuse it of being long on drama and short on explanations, but, nevertheless, it’s an effective and, I think, an essentially accurate presentation.

I do have to fault the video’s producer for having only shallow philosophical understanding, however. The narrator states that Islam is not a religion, that instead it is a way of life. But this is in fact a definition of any complete religion. If you understand the Truth, you’ll realize that a person who believes he knows it will understand that you cannot compartmentalize Truth. You cannot say, “I’ll be a Christian in church on Sundays but not when I do business.” In fact, anyone who understands Christianity deeply will realize that it addresses much of what Islam does; it just prescribes different behavior.

Also understand that the elements of society mentioned in the video have to be organized and governed by some values. Call them Islamic, Christian, Buddhist, secular or Fig Newton values, but they are values nonetheless. And, at the end of the day, the distinction between “religious” and “secular” is largely a false one. For there really are only two kinds of ideas: True ones and untrue ones. If God exists, than the idea that He does is true, and that is the only thing that matters. And if an ideology is invalid, such as communism, calling it secular doesn’t in any way mitigate its invalidity.

Anyway, I can’t do this subject justice here, but suffice it to say that the problem with Islam isn’t that it’s a way of life. It’s that it is a relatively dark way of life — much like secularism.

American Revolution is the only Solution, WE must retake our nation at all costs, the last hope of humanity, of the western people is at stake.

The Nation of Aztlan

WE MUST STAND-UP AMERICA OR KNEEL AND LOSE OUR SOVEREIGNTY

Patriots,

Are you like me, just totally fed up with the taking apart of our nation, unbelievable incompetence and purposeful betrayal by the so-called leadership in America?

It boils down to two variables: Power and greedwe the people are irritants to the power-brokers, of no consequence to the disgraceful government. The deceivers, manipulators are in our face, view us with disdain…I mean are you mad as hell, ready to make a meaningful difference, do whatever it takes to put “boots on the ground?

I would be preaching to the choir if I listed all the bottom feeder illegal and immoral actions that are destroying our nation…I will mention one item. Can you imagine our Founding Fathers reaction over a statement by the occupant of the White House that refers to a problem in America being “excessive greed”? Obama (and by the way he’s not my president) in commenting on the upheaval in Washington used the above phrase…as if greed is ok, (probably a Freudian slip on his part) the problem comes as he views it, with “excessive greed”. Is there any doubt that his compass has gone south?

How can we as Americans stand-by and do nothing, allowing our nation and hundreds of thousands of warrior lives to be treated as so much fodder for the political grist mill? Now I know patriots are doing things, maybe you, but we’re not doing enough. We’re not stopping the insanity in Washington, D.C. and other greedy and power-hungry pockets of power that is creating national destruction. It goes on and on and cannot stand…we simply must rise up, come together and reduce the fragmented, isolated pockets of patriotic support…act as a massive force of millions, shoulder to shoulder.

The time is here…we cannot wait. Americans can no longer risk losing our nation to the greedy, self-serving, despicable politicians, corporations, money launderers, immoral murderers, that are making a mockery of our US Constitution and Republic principles.

This note is not about business as usual…we have been talking a good game but the talking must stop with millions of Americans taking to the streets on April 15 Tea Party Day. We must let our numbers do the talking all across America…this is not an invitation to stand-up, it demands our attention because we have no alternative but to stand-up…if we don’t we are contributing to national destruction by our absence.

The April 15 Tea Party folks have a nation-wide organization, all States, many cities in each State already making preparations to field millions of Americans to raise our voices in a “massed force” that will totally jolt the entire nation. This is not about some few hundred or a few thousand people in specific cities…this is about millions in major cities, hundreds of thousands in medium cities, and tens of thousands in smaller cities all across America……there are other dates and times for Tea Parties which is good, but April 15th must be a gigantic outpouring or the media and politicians will view us as a weak, fragmented movement and they will continue their dishonorable direction.

Click here for the main web site for Nation Wide TaxDay Tea Party…visit it, get in touch with the point of contact for your State and make it known where you will be on Tea Party Day…you must be on the street in a large crowd with signs that reflect the myriad of crimes against America by politicians and courts. We must send a “roar” that we want, no we demand in no uncertain terms that the thievery in America end, the corruption will no longer be tolerated, greedy leadership will be put on notice, ignoring our Constitution and Republic principles will be treated as treason.

Find five(5) patriots that you can confirm who will attend a large gathering on April 15th……if everyone of us does this, we will send a “shock and awe” message that will dwarf Baghdad…..we must commit to “massing America” on April 15th. We simply cannot allow over 233 years of sacrifice for freedom be swept aside by ungrateful, self-serving slime balls…..

This is no game patriots…we can do this now, rise up in a non-violent gathering to convince a shameful, rudderless, out-of-control government to mend behavior or risk a potential implosion in America of devastating proportion.

Find a rally point and commit, without qualification, to be on the street April 15th 2009.

Harry Riley, COL, USA, Ret

Americans on the March – this is only the beginning, we will retake our nation

But protests are not enough, what we need is revolution, so continue to buy guns and ammo, you will need them when the time comes. when the political elites realize their time is up, that is the most dangerous time for Americans, they will not let go of power easily, they will turn towards genocide and target those ethnic groups they see as responsible, this means white people.

Words from the beast himself, he hates white people, and those white people who voted for him, you are sick, suicidal liberal morons. When this nation collapses, and you run for cover, don’t seek it in my home or those of my brothers, we will strike you down like the stupid ignorant animal that you are, for you have brought destruction to the greatest nation on Earth, you have made your bed now YOU will sleep in it, those of who know, we will be ready and when the time comes to kill or be killed, we will not hesitate.

65128 - Ultra Light  Ghillie Suit GMwF - Israeli Civilian Gas Mask 9217 - MREs

Liberals are leading us to hell, they know it! The black community is fundamentally at its core anti-white, their goals are black supremacy over white supremacy, which cannot stand, we will not become South Africa, or Zimbabwe, we will fight!

You must understand that this is a white nation, not a black nation, not a brown nation, we created this nation, if you don’t like it you can leave, everyone is invited to live amongst our people so long as they do not attempt to destroy our communities or our nation.

The current system cannot last, what goes up must come down, the status quo, cannot maintain this game forever.  We cannot retake this nation though the vote, the sickness is intertwined deeply within the system itself, Alexander the great was offered a puzzle to solve, a knot of great complexity, none before him could solve the puzzle, his solution was to hack the knot to pieces, this is the grand solution for America, we must burn this nation to the ground kill what needs killing, and rebuild, there is no other solution, I’m not advocating violence of any kind, only to be ready to defend yourself and your families.

Not something you would compose  in some back water Islamic  hell hole, or behind the ruins of some human sacrifical temple, or around a bush fire with the drums and naked brests pounding, is it?

Western Giants Embrace who you are.

The 912 Project - GlenBeck.com

CampaignForLiberty.com

US War on Domestic and Foreign Terrorism

The peoples of the Western Nations are the strongest people in the world! We have fought the greatest of wars and have always triumphed over evil. Now the time is approaching when together we will unite the free loving nations of Earth and stand against the darkness that threatens to engulf us all. We must stay vigilant and never give in. the Politically correct would have us surrender our right to life, they would allow the Muslim insurrection to dominate us all, they would allow the masses of the Earths poor overwhelm our industrialized nations, I say we stand and fight, we go on the offensive and destroy those who would destroy us!

The America we love is no more. Like a thief in the night she was stolen from us, and given to the unclean mass of ignorance and stupidity, how well will the future Non-Americans rule over the lands of our fore fathers? Will they excel in technology, will they provide a shining example for all to follow, can the Aztec warrior, the Zulu priest, and Mongol emperor share America, and make it greater then the sum of its people? I don’t think so, unless we fight and take back what is ours, it will surely be the end of mankind, and a new dark ages will sweep across the lands.

Guns bought this year could outfit 2 armies

Report cites surge that coincided with last year’s election

By Bob Unruh
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Guns purchased legally in the United States this year could outfit two armies – and not just any armies, the armies of China and India, according to new government reports cited by a website for sport-shooting enthusiasts.

The federal National Instant Criminal Background Check System database statistics show there were more than 3.7 million background checks during the first three months of this year, compared to about 8 million annually not even a decade ago, according to the documentation assembled by Ammoland.com.

That’s not individual guns, that’s background checks, the organization pointed out. If a purchaser obtains two, three or even four guns at a time, often there is only one background check.

“You also bought 1,529,635,000 rounds of ammunition in just the month of December. Yeah, that is right, that is billion with a ‘b.’ This number takes no account of reloading or reloaded ammunition,” the report said.

According to the Global Security website, the Indian army is estimated to have about 1 million soldiers. A news report from several years ago estimated the Chinese army at 1.7 million, although recent estimates put that at 2.25 million.

Here is a table documenting the federal gun background checks by month:


Federal statistics on gun background checks

The report cites the quote from Admiral Isoruko Yamamota, a World War II leader for Japan, who said, “You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.”

The report said the evaluation on firearms and ammunition purchases are “based on low end numbers.”

“The numbers presented are only PART of the overall numbers of arms and ammunition that have been sold. The actual numbers are much higher.”

That’s because no private individual-to-individual sales would be included, and there’s no assessment of how many guns are purchased through each background check.

“Law abiding citizens appear to be concerned about our ‘right to own and bear arms,’” said one forum page participant.

The statistics show that U.S consumers sought 3.1 million gun background checks every three months last year, for an annual total of 12.7 million. The annual averages had been about 8.4 million for a number of recent years, but there was a surge starting last October, when check requests rose suddenly from 970,000 a month to nearly 1.2 million. Totals have remained at that higher level.

The answer is finally here to the real reason why guns and church must mix!

Another forum participant added, “It’s logical that gun sales took sharp upturn. The concern is that the super majority of Democrats in Washington will make firearms either harder to obtain or outright contraband. … As for myself, I have all the weapons I could possibly need, so I’ve just been stocking up on ammo because I think ammo will be subject to new regulations and increased taxes under this president and Congress.”

Steve Sanetti, the head of a shooting sports organization, said, “Americans concerned about their ability to purchase many types of home defense, hunting and target shooting firearms in the future are continuing to purchase these products in record numbers today.”

WND reported that the usually liberal 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms is “deeply rooted in this nation’s history and tradition” and long has been regarded as the “true palladium of liberty,” so it therefore must be applied against state and local government weapon restrictions as well as federal gun limits.

But the decision appears to run counter to the general direction sought by the administration of President Obama three months into his tenure.

He’s already advocated for a treaty that would require a federal license for hunters to reload their ammunition, has expressed a desire to ban “assault” weapons, has seen a plan to require handgun owners to submit to mental health evaluations and sparked a rush on ammunition purchases with his history of anti-gun positions.

Obama also supported the handgun ban in Washington, D.C., before it was tossed out last year by the Supreme Court.

Mexico’s Take Over Of California: Complete By 2014?

By Joe Guzzardi

In March, April and May, I wrote a series of columns about the sorry condition of California’s GOP (here, here and here). I also handicapped the party’s dismal prospects for winning any of the three most critical elections—either of the two U.S. Senate seats currently held by Democrats Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein or the 2010 governor’s race to replace termed-out Republican incumbent Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Although Boxer will also run in 2010 for re-election, California is in such dire straits that all eyes will be on the governor’s contest. That shapes up as a probable match between Republican political novice Meg Whitman versus either of two Democratic veterans, Feinstein or the omnipresent former governor and current Attorney General Jerry Brown.

But since early spring when I gave my first assessment, California’s political sands have shifted. And with the change, a Republican has suddenly vaulted into the forefront of the state’s politics.

In fact, although it’s way early, I make State Senator Abel Maldonado the odds-on pick in 2014 to become California’s governor.

For immigration reform patriots, that’s much more bad news than it is good news. While Maldonado is indeed a Republican—technically—he points to his migrant farm worker parents as the reason for his fierce illegal immigration advocacy.

How a relatively obscure state representative from Santa Maria will become California’s first Hispanic governor since Romualdo Pacheco, Jr., in 1875 is an interesting tale. [Senator Abel Maldonado Has Made A Name for Himself, by Steve Chawkins and Patrick McGreevy, Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2009]

Maldonado will pull it off with a combination of luck and skill.

Specifically, this is how he’ll do it:

In a stroke of good fortune for Maldonado, Lt. Governor John Garamendi recently announced that he was abandoning his moribund gubernatorial effort to run instead for the congressional seat about to be vacated when Ellen Tauscher leaves for Washington DC to serve as Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. [Ellen Tauscher Is Off to the State Department for Sure, by Anne Schroeder Mullens, POLITICO.com, March 19, 2009]

That means Schwarzenegger must appoint Garamendi’s replacement. And, as it happens, Republican Schwarzenegger owes Republican Maldonado a favor.

During Schwarzenegger’s bitter dispute with the state legislature to close California’s $40 billion budget deficit (via higher taxes and more debt), Maldonado infuriated his conservative Republican colleagues when he sided with the governor.

But at the same time, Maldonado ingratiated himself, not only with Schwarzenegger, but also with California’s Democrats and independents eager to end the impasse.

Step one in Maldonado’s ascent, then, will take place in a few weeks when Schwarzenegger appoints him to replace Garamendi.

Suddenly, Maldonado will emerge from relative political obscurity to become a key player who, because of his Mexican immigrant background, will be hyped to the max by California’s adoring MainStream Media.

Step two will occur in November 2010 when either Feinstein or Brown easily defeat the Republican candidate—presumably Whitman.

By 2014—the next year the gubernatorial election rolls around—several things will have evolved, all of which play in Maldonado’s favor.

  • California’s overall economic health will remain on life support—horrible news for an incumbent hoping for another term.
  • Feinstein will be 81, Brown 76 but Maldonado only 47. In age-obsessed California that creates a huge edge for Maldonado. According to census data, in 2014 the average age of California’s Hispanics will be about 30. Ask yourself this simple question: will those young Hispanics vote for the fossilized white incumbent or the polished Maldonado who can appeal to their ethnic roots?
  • California’s demographics will have shifted even more dramatically toward Hispanic domination. The state’s population will be about 40 percent Hispanic—the largest voting bloc.
  • Add to Feinstein and Brown’s age and demographic negatives is that they have knocked around California politics for nearly four decades. If voters of all stripes aren’t sick of them by 2014, then I don’t know what.

Maldonado has been building toward his political ascendancy since 2000.

As a freshman state assemblyman he accepted an invitation from then-presidential candidate George W. Bush to give a Spanish-language speech to the Republican presidential convention aimed at wooing Hispanic voters. (Vainly, of course).

And in 2008, again addressing the Republican convention, Maldonado closed with these words (translated from Spanish):

John McCain and my father would be good amigos. Ladies and gentlemen, que viva the immigrant story.”

Maldonado’s bracero father, it is worth noting, has lived in California as a permanent resident for more than forty years without becoming a citizen.

In his own words, Maldonado calls himself the future of this party” and claims that the GOP needs more Latinos to be its public face.

“If we don’t change, we’re going to go back to the old ways, and we’re going to continue to lose,” said Maldonado, who faulted the party’s hard line against illegal immigration. “They don’t get it on illegal immigration,” he said.

Republican old-timers who may disagree with Maldonado “can beat me up all they want,” he told reporters at a luncheon while he was surrounded by erstwhile allies who, since his support of Schwarzenegger’s budget compromise, now view him as an enemy. [GOP Withering Away in California Heat? by Alex Isenstadt, Politico.Com, April 14, 2009]

Another Maldonado bonus: his campaign will attract a broader base of non-Hispanic California voters, who cannot support other would-be Hispanic candidates like the sleazy Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, but can stomach the vastly smoother, more intelligent Maldonado.

Last but certainly not least, Maldonado will play his immigrant success story to the hilt. His family’s strawberry farm is a 6,000-acre multi-million dollar business that ships produce worldwide.

By the time Maldonado reaches the governor’s mansion, Mexico’s takeover of California—what remains of it—will be complete.

Thousands of educated, wage-earning Californians like me move away every month. Moving in are under-educated, low earning but needy aliens.

Maldonado’s family succeeded. But the vast majority of immigrant newcomers fail.

For those optionless Californians left behind, the picture will not be pretty.

By 2014, Hispanics could control state politics, both the legislature and the governor’s seat.

Whatever token resistance now exists to defeat illegal immigrant measures like driver’s licenses for aliens or reduced access to health care will vanish. Don’t expect Maldonado to get religion once he becomes California’s chief executive.

Of course, none of this is inevitable. As Peter Brimelow recently pointed out, the GOP has so completely failed to mobilize its base in California that in 2008 John McCain actually failed to carry the white vote there. But there is no sign that Republican strategists are going to get the message.

California’s tragedy has been a long time coming. Immigration reform patriots have predicted the state’s demise for years.

Still, for this California native, watching it actually happen is unbearably sad.

Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.

Remember: NO VIOLENCE!

We are all facing a very dangerous time. Our evil liberal-controlled government is just looking for excuses to jail us and kill us. And one of the quickest ways to get arrested in this now highly censored, politically correct police state is to promote violence against this government or any individual, regardless of how blatantly evil and treasonous he is, or how innocuous the threat.

They’re not really looking for genuine threats; they’re looking for excuses. Take Bill White for example. There is no way under the sun that he really intended any harm to that kike-loving liberal judge. The judge knew it, and the feds knew it. But he had pissed those arrogant pricks off, so they wanted to make an example out of him.

Most of these evil elitists have egos the size of the Grand Canyon, even though none of them are worth the price of a roll of TP. Lowlifes come in all sizes, shapes and social classes, and believe me, the rich have more than any other sector of our population. That’s because most of them got rich by making a career out of cheating others.

Take that thieving maggot Bernie Madoff. He was sentenced to 150 years in prison with no parole. He should have been shot. The court has ordered him to cough up over 170 billion that he has stashed away in foreign bank accounts. And that’s what they know of, or should I say, can prove at this point. This weasel bilked people and companies out of over 700 billion! They can’t find it, and the maggot isn’t talking. Like all Jews, he’s so stinking maniacally greedy that he’d rather die in prison than turn loose of all that hard-stolen money. That bastard wrecked countless lives, and has forced ancient seniors out of retirement just to eat because he cleaned them out. He has absolutely no conscience whatsoever. None. He’s exactly like all his brothers.

Madoff was thrown to the wolves to divert public attention away from the 1000 or so there kikes that stole even more. Adding them all together would total to almost all the missing money, with the exception of at least several hundred billion that was paid out in bribes to our so-called honest leaders in DC. To bust those Jews would force them to squeal on all those crooked politicians, effectively emptying out Washington. So all we get is Madoff…for now.

Now, there are those in our Movement who still say that as evil as all these bastards are, and as much as we’d all like to lynch them in the streets, we are a nation of laws. We must take this government back from these gangsters legally, although no one seems to have any realistic idea as to how we might accomplish this. We must re-institute the Constitution legally, despite the fact that all three branches of government are in the hands of people who hate White people and want us dead. Violence, except in a time of war, serves no purpose. And bombing a building here and there, or taking out a random lowlife here and there does nothing but hinder our cause.

True, we must prepare for the very strong possibility of this corrupt government attempting a complete takeover, and at that point we must resort to force of arms because it is our sacred duty to protect our freedom from all enemies both foreign and domestic. And right now, most of our worst enemies are working for various departments of this government, which no longer represents the people even remotely.

But the pacifist line is that we must not give these criminals the excuse they’re looking for. We must always remember that we are dealing with an enemy that has no morals, no mercy, and no conscience whatsoever. These are career criminals of the worst sort, and they would happily throw you in prison and destroy your family, and finally have some lifer buck kill you in your cell. It’s only a matter of time before Bill White or Hal Turner is found dead. Trust me.

Already several valued associates of mine have vanished without a trace. All of them live in different parts of the country, yet they all have one thing in common; they’re White activists. In fact another family I know very well has just turned up missing as well, though I haven’t found out what happened to them either. So far I can’t say for sure yet, but it’s sure starting to look like a grab campaign has started. Keep your eyes peeled.

These are dangerous times folks. Anyone that’s not a mindless, rabid liberal is now considered a terrorist by this liberal police state. This means you. All the more reason for all of you to watch what you say, and who you say it to. Political correctness has morphed into political survival.

Our time is coming, and it’s almost here. But until then, I must officially advise you all be good little boys and girls, keep your traps shut, and do absolutely nothing that would give these goons the excuse they need to screw with you. Because alone we’re vulnerable, but together we’re a force to be feared..and they know it. Be harmless as sheep but wise as serpents.

Our time is coming.

-The Lone Haranguer

P.S. The only thing the meek ever inherited was a grave.

Locust Says: NO VIOLENCE! NOT YET anyways.  Buy guns and ammo, beacuse you will need them, when the time comes.

Slow Coming Dark

Earlier this year, Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y. introduced H. J. Res. 5, a bill that would repeal the Constitution’s 22nd Amendment which prohibits a president from being elected to more than two terms in office, thus potentially paving the way to make Barack Hussein Obama president for life. Not surprisingly, we have heard nothing about this in the state-controlled media, which is fully in the hands of Obama cultists.

Not only have the Jews who control Obama established their election-fraud organization ACORN nationwide, his adherents have now begun the process to ensure perpetual power to the Democratic Party in a one-party state.

Don’t say you weren’t warned.

Don’t Let America be Californicated! Donate to VDARE.COM!!!

(Karen Bass, Speaker of California’s Assembly)

Our appeal has got off to a rather sluggish start – we hope because many of our readers have pleasanter things to do on a summer long weekend than look at websites. Warmest thanks to those who responded.

However, a fascinating feature has been relatively heavy Californian donations. The reason is obvious: Californians are living now what will be America’s future—unless mass immigration is stopped.

Part of the responsibility for this lies with the California GOP, which fled rather than defend its voters—as we consistently stress.

And the Democrats are responding with – plans for repression.

Recently, California Assembly Speaker Karen Bass explicitly told the Los Angeles Times “I don’t know why we allow that kind of terrorism [pressure on Republicans not to capitulate] to exist. I guess it’s about free speech, but it’s extremely unfair…”

Add that to Senator Feinstein’s claim that the Hate Crime Bill should pass because the immigration debate “has been a part of hate…” (See below).

All coming soon to a state near you—unless you give to VDARE.COM now!!!!

p.s. Did you know that the girl suspected of killing ex-QB Steve McNair was…an Iranian immigrant? Only on VDARE.COM!

By Peter Brimelow, Editor, VDARE.COM

Independence Day—or Immigration Day?

For several years, we happy few at VDARE.COM have amused ourselves on the July 4th weekend by ridiculing the shameless way in which immigration enthusiasts try to steal Independence Day and convert it into a celebration of immigration.

(Why not? They’ve already stolen the Statue of Liberty. It was originally just a centennial gift from France to memorialize American liberty—not mass immigration, which at that point had barely begun.)

The immigration enthusiasts’ efforts range from repeated Wall Street Journals editorial page effusions explicitly equating immigration with Independence Day—they even called annually for an “Open Borders” constitutional amendment until public outrage got too much—to federal bureaucrats’ scheduling mass citizenship swearing-in ceremonies.

Needless to say, this is quite contrary to the spirit of the Founding Fathers (remember the Founding Fathers?) They were judiciously cool about immigration, which was then very low anyway. The Declaration of Independence, fiercely anti-multicultural in its defense of “a free System of English Laws”, was about, well, independence from foreign influence. And the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution says its objective is to “secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity—i.e. the Founders’ descendants, not the world at large.

But, of course, American history means nothing to immigration enthusiasts.

This year, they’ve been at it again more than ever.

But this year, we’re not poking gentle fun at them.

The situation is just too grave.

Not just Independence Day, but America itself, is on the point of being stolen.

That’s why we need your help—now.

Consider these signs:

Barack Obama’s nomination of self-proclaimed “perfect Affirmative Action baby” Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court

At VDARE.COM, we predicted that Sotomayor would be selected over apparently more qualified liberals. As Steve Sailer pointed out in his VDARE.COM book America’s Half-Blood Prince, Barack Obama is fundamentally motivated by race.

But we did not predict, and the Obama Administration did certainly not predict, the way in which Sotomayor’s nomination would cause the long-smoldering issue of Affirmative Action—quotas—to flare up.

The Supreme Court’s just-announced 5-4 Ricci decision upholding the white New Haven firefighter victims of anti-white discrimination was catastrophic for Sotomayor and the Obama Administration. Not merely was she overruled, but even the dissenting justices disagreed with her attempt to suppress the firefighters’ litigation. And the closeness of the deciding vote emphasizes how close America is to having an alien regime of quotas and anti-white discrimination imposed upon it.

Quotas, particularly the interaction of quotas and mass immigration of members of the so-called “protected classes” who are eligible for them, are a Doomsday Machine working to dispossess the historic American nation.

I’ve been trying to write about this issue for thirty years, since I was on the U.S. Senate staff. I say “trying”,, because it been extraordinarily difficult to get editors (let alone politicians, especially the one I worked for) to address the issue—even though quotas are fantastically unpopular with the American public.

The reason: the usual—fear of being called “racist”.

That’s why I am so thankful to have VDARE.COM. No-one has published more about the workings of Affirmative Action than VDARE.COM. We will go on doing so.

But we can only do so with your help.

A final point about Sotomayor that you won’t see anywhere else: she’s also the perfect Immigration Disaster baby. Although born in the U.S.—and although her parents were Puerto Ricans, technically U.S. citizens—she nevertheless identifies, not with the American majority, but as a “Latina”, part of the peculiar anti-national faction that is being assembled inside the U.S. by activists and liberal bureaucrats and showered with privileges.

Sotomayor shows that the melting pot is broken.

But that’s not news to VDARE.COM readers.

Another sign of the stealing of America:

The Democrats’ Stealth Drive To Pass a Federal “Hate Crimes” Bill

Amazingly, the Democrats’ drive to pass the so-called “Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act” has proceeded with almost no coverage or opposition from the conservative, libertarian media, or immigration reform organizations.

Yet the offenses that this proposed legislation covers are already criminal. So its only possible purpose is (1) to make crimes against certain classes of individuals more serious than crimes against others—a massive violation of the Founders’ principle of equal protection under laws; (2) to criminalize speech which can be blamed, in any way, however implausibly, for inspiring criminal actions, no matter how unrelated.

Even more amazingly, the bill’s proponents have actually admitted their intentions in the one Senate hearing they were compelled reluctantly to hold.

Attorney General Eric Holder said that white Christian males by definition could not be victims of “hate crimes”—only groups (blacks, Hispanics, Jews, homosexuals etc.) who had been victimized during what he called “the unfortunate history of our nation”.
California Senator Diane Feinstein directly said: “I come from a state where the immigration debate has—some of it—has been a part of hate…”

And “hate” is going to be a federal crime.

How much clearer could she be?

Why haven’t the conservative/ libertarian/ immigration reform groups spoken up on the “Hate Crimes” bill? In a word, fear. The lobbies supporting this bill are just too powerful and ruthless for even the moderately brave, by Beltway standards, to dare oppose.

I have never been more proud of VDARE.COM than for its lonely role in exposing this “Hate Crime” legislation and the atrocities it inflict on Americans—as similar legislation has already caused in other countries that share America’s legal heritage. So much so that I will ignore our fundraising advisers’ protest and link to our coverage here.

Without VDARE.COM, these “Hate Crime” exposes could not have happened—and they will not happen in future, without your help.

A final sign of the stealing of America:

Amnesty for illegals, what we at VDARE.COM call the “Obamnesty”, is still alive.

Obama held a White House meeting with amnesty advocates as recently as June 26 and promised them a bill this year or next. We covered it extensively.

But note—amnesty hasn’t happened yet. Our Joe Guzzardi has repeatedly predicted it won’t happen. Maybe he’s right. After the shattering defeats of 2006 and 2007, the Treason Lobby apparently just doesn’t have the votes.

Of course, they will try to get what they want by stealth—by loosening enforcement and by mini-amnesty measures. It’s a very real danger. At VDARE.COM, we will be watching for it.

And America is still a long way from positive patriotic immigration reform—cutting legal immigration, systematically eliminating illegals, an immigration moratorium.

But nevertheless, it looks like immigration patriots may have won a defensive but epochal victory—if they can keep up the pressure.

It wasn’t done by elected officials. It wasn’t even done by Main Stream Media Big Feet. It was done by individual Americans organizing themselves spontaneously. That is what stopped amnesty—and it’s what is stalling the “Hate Crimes” Bill and has even begun to stagger Sotomayor.

It’s what will stop the stealing of America.

In the amnesty wars, individual Americans were crucially armed with facts and analysis about America’s immigration disaster. At a more detailed level than is possible over talk radio—much as we love it—this can only be done via the internet.

Remember Carlos Sanchez, the pro-amnesty newspaper editor of the Waco Tribune-Herald, who wrote ruefully after amnesty was defeated

“The opponents of the bill prevailed and they did so in a grand manner that I had to respect. It was democracy at its best—and an instructive lesson for anyone interested in politics. Countless times a day, I received messages from a variety of groups that had Freedom or American or Liberty as part of their title.

“The discipline of these groups was a sight to behold. Someone created a set of talking points that declared opponents need only focus on one word—amnesty—to denounce the legislation. And every group that came out against it did precisely that.”

Note that Sanchez was getting “messages” i.e. email—and that he had obviously never heard of the groups he was getting messages from, i.e., they were grass-roots organizations.

At VDARE.COM, our role is to create those “talking points”, and the sophisticated arguments behind them, and make them available to patriots. (Our archives are all online—and we don’t charge!) And I’m happy to say we ran an article discussing the critical importance of the word “amnesty” way back in 2004.

But this vital work, essential to stopping the stealing of America, can only be done if we can pay our writers.

We post every day at VDARE.COM, an enormous amount of material. There are just so many targets!

And what we post is prepared to the highest professional standards—I’ve not been working in the Mainstream Media for 30 years for nothing. And we use hyperlinks, not the least of the advantages of this wonderful new medium, better than anyone else on the internet…at least, I think so. They help us document our case. Readers who are new to the cause of patriotic immigration reform find our hyperlinks particularly compelling. But the whole process is very labor-intensive.

Money is our secret weapon at VDARE.COM. Our fixed costs are very low, we operate entirely virtually. We don’t have to pay printing and postage (thank goodness!).

What this means: essentially everything you give goes to pay writers and editors.

Our writers and editors are not paid as much as I would like. But they do get something. This ability to pay our writers is what has distinguished VDARE.COM from a host of excellent but evanescent blogs which have come and gone.

Writers will often write for love—because they passionately believe in our cause. But in the long run, they need to be able to justify the time spent, to their families and to themselves.

At VDARE.COM, we are in this for the long haul. We are building an institution. We need money to do that. We can only do it with your help.

To me as a professional journalist, the quantity and quality of non-professional writing on the immigration issue that comes in over the e-transom has been a revelation. Many of these writers have full-time careers in other fields, some are students; I encourage these to write anonymously because of the very real reign of terror imposed by the curse of Political Correctness. Others are struggling, idealistic free-lancers; I shudder for them. All are patriots deprived of outlets because of the orthodoxy of the Mainstream Media.

And, as a professional journalist, I am constantly amazed at the huge immigration-driven stories that are just not covered in the Main Stream Media—liberal or “conservative”.

I mean, how can they resist? But they do. (See above)

Experienced observers have no doubt that this creeping totalitarianism reflects the influence of the Southern Poverty Law Center—as we call it, the $PLC. VDARE.COM had numerous clashes with the $PLC since it named us a “hate group” in 2004. (We named the $PLC a “Treason Group“a shakedown scam that preys on the elderly, Holocaust-haunted rich”.) We have no doubt that the $PLC operates a black list to which many MSM print and electronic media outlets kowtow. Recently, we published the most sophisticated analysis of its (vast) finances yet. This will certainly hurt it in the competitive left-wing fund-raising world, which is what it really cares about.

Threats of the $PLC terrify most conservative, libertarian and immigration reform groups. (Examples available on request). They do not terrify VDARE.COM.

All of which means:

Please help us now!

So give what you can. I, and all of us at VDARE.COM, and I believe future generations of Americans, will be profoundly grateful.

Peter Brimelow

There are several options for making your tax-deductible donation!  Just click on one of the following links and it will bring you to the page you need to make a donation in the manner you’ve chosen.

  1. Make a onetime tax-deductible donation through Paypal
  2. Set up a monthly tax-deductible donation through PayPal
  3. Mail a tax-deductible donation by check
  4. Fax in your tax-deductible credit card donation

  5. You can also donate stock—for details email office@vdare.com

You can get a gift for your donation! We appreciate all of your support and would like to share a gift with you.

Currently available are the following items:

For a donation of $200.00 –

A copy of both Steve Sailer’s book America’s Half-Blood Prince: Barack Obama’s “Story of Race and Inheritance” & the 2008 VDARE.COM issue of The Social Contract

For a donation of $150.00 –

A copy of America’s Half-Blood Prince: Barack Obama’s “Story of Race and Inheritance”

For a donation of $75.00 –

Both the 2007 & 2008 VDARE.COM issues of The Social Contract

For a donation of $50.00 –

A copy of either the 2007 OR the 2008 edition of The Social Contract

** Whatever your choice – you MUST email office@vdare.com with both your choice AND your mailing address. THANK YOU!!**

NOTE: VDARE.COM is no longer associated with the Center For American Unity, which is now focused on litigation.  We are grateful for their past help and wish them well in the future.  Our sponsor is now the VDARE Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charity.

RED ALERT — La Raza: “If the American people found out…”

Action: Contact Senator Robert Menendez at 202 224-4744, 973 645-3030 and 856 757-5353 and politely tell him we know what he’s up to with this health care bill, that illegal immigration is not tolerated by the citizens of New Jersey, and that we will expose him — as the anti-American traitor that he is — to the public.

“Suzanne”, a female caller to Mark Levin’s show on June 25th, revealed the ominous secret of the Democrat health care reform effort.

I want to tell you that last week I attended a conference on health care reform sponsored by La Raza. And I will tell you that what they had to say, Mark, is scarier than anything that’s been said so far on the health care plan.

The kind of comments that were made and the notes that I took… they started the conference out by saying “America does not need health care reform, but Latino immigrants need health care reform.”

And someone from Menendez’ office [Ed.: Sen. Robert Menendez, D-NJ] promised that he would make sure that “the useless barriers of citizenship would not be in this bill” and that he would make sure that they would use keywords like “streamline”…

It was La Raza, the Childrens Defense Fund and Senator Menendez from New Jersey, a representative from his office…

…Yes [they said they would get free health care for illegal aliens], these are my notes, Mark. They actually got up and said “Latino children need health care more than whites“. And then they would say things like “you must go out into your communities, use words like ’streamline’, use phrases like ‘all workers’ and ‘all families’,” because they said — and I quote — “If the American people find out that this bill is about giving health care to non-citizens, they will rise up against it.”

…One of the quotes they said was, “We want to make sure we take care of barriers like verification, but we can streamline programs to the more affluent” and, quote, “Useless treatments for the elderly can be gone because we don’t need to spend money for people who are going to die anyway.”

That’s a direct quote from that meeting. They also said, “We are very concerned there will be an effort to include” the illegal immigrants in this argument, so “we must make sure that we focus this” to the American people that it’s looking like we want “health care for everyone”.

And they also said that 75% of the children who will be picked up in this will be non-citizens and that 44% of the uninsured are non-citizens and they can’t possibly allow the American people to know this.” [Ed: Oops!]

Menendez’ office said that he’s going to make sure that “a family of four that makes $66,000 a year or less will pay nothing at all for the new health care. And he was the one who said he was going to get rid of specifics like “citizenship status” and focus on, quote, “equity for all workers”.

And he said he’s going to make sure that the Latino immigrants are the focus of the health care reform.

And La Raza said if they get this, they don’t even care about amnesty, because they’ve fixed it so that one family member can apply for all extended family members. And… Mark, if you think we have a problem with illegal immigration now, wait ’til you see the borders when this thing gets passed.

“If the American people found out?”

Gee, what a surprise. A group that preaches racial superiority and divisiveness wants to enact a stealth illegal immigration bill — not dissimilar to chain migration. The bill will reward illegal immigration to the direct detriment of all American taxpayers and especially the elderly.

Source:
RED ALERT — La Raza: “If the American people found out…”
directorblue.blogspot.com

Kind of puts Judge Sotomayor’s membership in La Raza in a new light, doesn’t it?

Groups like La Raza encourage the Balkanization of America. They promote mutually hostile political groups that do not form a “melting pot”, that do not utilize a common language, and that do not share the principles of America’s founding.

Fifty years from now, if La Raza gets its way, America will look more like Yugoslavia in 1993 than America.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Action: Contact Senator Robert Menendez at 202 224-4744, 973 645-3030 and 856 757-5353 and politely tell him we know what he’s up to with this health care bill, that illegal immigration is not tolerated by the citizens of New Jersey, and that we will expose him — as the anti-American traitor that he is — to the public.

As for those who belong to or support either La Raza or The Children’s Defense Fund, I would strongly encourage you to drop your membership and support. The racial divisiveness promoted by these outrageous groups is antithetical to America’s civil society.

It’s time to politically punish these cretins who are out to dismantle our country.

Update: A press release issued by La Raza on 6/15 mirrors the caller’s report (hat tip: Oil for Immigration):

As our nation’s leaders consider health care reform in the coming weeks, NCLR (National Council of La Raza), the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States, strongly urges President Obama and Congress to make every effort to ensure that health care reform reaches all communities. No single community stands to gain as much from this important debate as Latinos. In the U.S., one out of every three uninsured persons and roughly 40% of all uninsured children are Latino. NCLR stands for health care reform that makes coverage affordable and accessible for everyone—all families and all children.

…”This debate should be about health care for all, and setting the nation on a pathway to future health and well-being. Adding layers of immigrant verification and bureaucratic red tape to a new health care system would guarantee that millions of citizen children are effectively barred from accessing preventive care and would raise the cost of health care… we are extremely concerned that some view health reform as a way to scapegoat immigrants… Making health care easier to use and accessible for all workers and children is simple common sense.”

Aryan Brotherhood Support Obama – Find Out Why?

Video comments:

vistathrash666 (10 hours ago) Show Hide
0

Marked as spam

fuck maetas!!!
0

Marked as spam

fuck this guy he is a dumb ass i clicked this video thinking that he might have some sense but he doesn’t fuck him
DrontheimV (1 day ago)
Comment removed by author
TheJS13 (1 day ago) Show Hide
0

Marked as spam

I hate racism!
estonian1986 (1 day ago) Show Hide
+1

Marked as spam

Ragnarök!
Bielocke (2 days ago) Show Hide
-1

Marked as spam

Shut the fuck up u fucking racist piece of shit…
JoshuaH688 (3 days ago) Show Hide
0

Marked as spam

It isn’t ever hard to understand the reasoning of a viewpoint, even if that viewpoint happens to be wrong. Throughout all of human recorded history, groups have distinguished themselves from one another and engaged in competition for supremecy; the human desire to be unique and considered great remains the chief motivation for more motivational movements as well, such as the areospace science. The key to succesful reason is to emulate extremism in the framework of logic rather than visa versa.
0xr00t (3 days ago) Show Hide
0

Marked as spam

die spic
0

Marked as spam

I am white and my family is the Powell which is a german family who moved to briton thousands of years ago. My heritage is of a long descent and is one of white pride and love for my culture.
ZRANCIS (1 day ago) Show Hide
-1

Marked as spam

Its not that that you have white pride, its that you have hate for non-whites. no one is saying you cant be proud, but you CANT say your better than others.
LATIN KINGS RU TRAIN ON DEM FOLK

Democracy has failed.

We have given the world everything, and in return the world is trying to destroy Western Civilization, our only course of action left open to us is Total war. War to rebuild our nations, war to reclaim the birth lands of the west, war to expel the parasites that are feeding off the blood of our nations, and war to eliminate those that threaten our rights to exist.

Look at every Democratic republic throughout history, and they all follow the same path, democracy allows the poor to vote themselves more benefits at a cost to the wealth producers, the nation stagnates as more parasites bleed the nation dry through immigration and wealth redistribution, eventually the state becomes a kind of dictatorship/oligarchy interfering in the lives of everyone while the elites live high on the hog and standard of livings decline.  Eventually all wealth is gone as innovation and hard work is punished by politicians too eager to expand the welfare state for a seat at the table of power. This is the state of the American system, starting with 1965 immigration act, 3rd worlders who know nothing of our nation and its history, pouring in from every cave around the world, diluting our peoples vote, while the parasitic nature of these people is all to obvious, many come to work, and save their money only to return home with the spoils of economic war.  Our population is replaced though a new ethnic cleansing, our taxes continue to increase punishing those of us who work hard to make a living, while continuing to reward the parasites.  Our constitution is flawed, its missing one key ingredient that every nation around the world, except those in the west, follow, the government exists to serve the interests of the core population, I mean Americans and we all know who Americans are, they are not Mexicans, Korean, or African with or without the hyphenation. We Americans have been told, to shut up, enjoy and embrace population/political replacement, by those less fortunate then us, that we deserve anti-white affirmative action laws, that whites need not apply unless they are gay, or subscribe to the communist way of thinking. Our economy crumbles as political elites funnel our tax monies to their pets, and divide up our lands amongst our enemies. Our government has hollowed out our constitution, devalued our rights as citizens in the pursuit of a utopian ideal that can never be achieved, simply because man is imperfect himself.  Violation of our contract with the state, our constitution, by the state, has voided any allegiance we may once have had with the state, consciously allowing uncontrolled immigration from the 3rd world particularly Mexico, has segregated our society, dumb down our school system, crippled our healthcare system, turned inner cities into the hell holes they came from, and worse yet, they have gained control of political system in major cities and several states, they hold public office over my people, but swear allegiance to foreign powers, and ethnic separatist movements.  The elites fear only one thing, economic collapse, my Americans are buying up every gun and every round of ammunition available, and for what you might ask, just in the last 6 months we have purchased enough fire power to do what needs to be done, and you know what that is, because you fear it, you know what it means for non-Americans, you know that once we gain control of our homelands, you will not be allowed to continue to drain our nation dry, you will return home, one way or another, and no my parasitic friend you will not be taking anything that you have stolen from my people, with you.  If you are luck you may leave with your life, and if you refuse to leave, like my “African American” friends are expected to, then we will bury you where you stand.  The Game is nearly over, the state is playing every trick in the book to keep the boat afloat, but they can only delay the inevitable, we will retake our nation, and once we do there’ll be hell to pay to every nation who colluded with these traitors, we will hunt everyone of you down, you will be brought back, and tried and executed for the damage you have done.
Do you believe that a people have a right to decide their own destiny? That nations and societies have rights? Rights to exist, rights to life, right liberty, property, and the pursuit of happiness? Do western people have a right to exist, if you say yes, then why does the world continue to allow ethnic cleansing in the west through population replacement, as European population within the west continues to shrink through direct and indirect policies of the liberal politically correct unrepresentative soft-Marxist governments their numbers are in decline, while non-European population within the west is exploding.  Within two generations many European nations will no longer be European, Italy, Spain, France, and others are rapidly on decline.  Anti-White Marxist like yourself have no answers for these questions, you see diversity as the answer to everything, not diversity in your home (True homelands) but diversity in our homelands.  These immigration policies are the new ethnic cleansing of our time, the deliberate transfer of Western wealth to non-western nations, and the transfer of non-western peoples to western nations.
You maybe thinking, Scientists came out years ago and stated that there is truly no such thing as race as we think of it. Secondly, there have been multi-racial people in the US since slavery. It is only recently that multi-racial Blacks began to feel comfortable with embracing heritages from all sides of their families. The one drop rule prevented this and then, as a matter of pride, only the Black side was recognized as this was how they were identified in society. Next, there are issues which face those of mixed heritage, where it is apparent from their appearance, that do not face members that do not have an obvious mixed heritage. Folks need to get over the whole race thing. It is backwards and holds the US as a country back.
So, I guess the fact that a racially conscious America, as traditional America was, was a much better-educated, better-functioning, safer country is just a coincidence. And the fact that our present multi racial, PC America, where ignorant people say ‘there is no such thing as race’, is dysfunctional, divided, and dangerous is just mere coincidence.  Anglo-America is disparaged and derided from all sides, and those few of us who defend it and our ancestors are accused of divisiveness and ‘exclusivist’ attitudes, if not outright bigotry. And if I accept the current PC opinion that there is no White American culture or people, if WASPs are just nobodies, without race, nation, ethnicity, or culture, what do we have, then, to unify us here in America, what’s left of our constitution, our broken laws?  I say there is nothing left to unify us as a nation, except maybe the only future left for Americans, is a violent revolution to retake our nation.

July 01, 2009

Our Melting President

By Bruce Walker

Slowly, methodically, consistently, the reliable Rasmussen Poll has been tracking the most vital numbers of the Obama Presidency.  General, soft numbers like “Do you approve of the way the president is handlings his job?” really mean nothing.  In times of crisis, most people will answer “yes.”   This is particularly true when a young articulate president who is splattered over every single magazine in every grocery checkout line with happy photos with his wife and kids, and when every tough question — both of them — in his press conferences is simply ignored.
It is not the soft, fluffy feelings about Obama that really matter.  It is the intense feelings about him.  Obama began his presidency with a lot of very enthusiastic support.  About forty-five percent of Americans “strongly approved” of the job he was doing, while an anemic fifteen percent of Americans “strongly disapproved” of the job he was doing.  In a couple of months, that gap between the “strongly approve” and “strongly disapprove” closed to a gap of between eight and ten points.  The number who strongly approved glided down into the high thirties, while the number who strongly disapproved just about doubled, into the low thirties.
From April to mid-June, Obama seemed to have a fairly comfortable margin between his strong supporters and strong opponents, sometimes closing to a point or less and sometimes widening to about ten points.  But the last couple of weeks have not been kind.  Several days, the percentage of Americans who strongly disapproved of Obama was actually greater than the percentage of Americans who strongly approved of Obama.  As of June 30, the number of strongly disapprove is actually two points greater than the number who strongly approve.
What does this mean?  Well, it does not mean that the flighty, rock star popularity of Obama is fading, but it does mean that any deep enthusiasm for him has grown progressively weaker, just as the number of Americans who are deeply worried about him has kept growing.  It means — and the polls show this too — that more and more Americans are holding Obama accountable for our economy and no longer blame President Bush.   It means that action, or inaction, about the riots against the mullahs in Iran will hurt Obama if our position is perceived as causing failure.  It means that the far left Kool Aid drinkers who thought that after inauguration day Obama would simply withdraw close Gitmo feel like idiots (mainly, of course, because they look like idiots.)
When your political opponents are more energized and upset than your political allies, that is a very bad sign.  In the rapidly approaching 2009 elections in New Jersey and Virginia, the decline and fall of Barack Obama may translate into Democrat losses.  If Americans grow tired and impatient with a celebrity president who presides over our troubles and poverty, then the big slam could come in 2010.  Republicans who turned out in 1994 were turning out against Clinton.  Democrats who stayed home were staying home because Clinton went from inspiring celebrity to just another vote-trading politician in a couple of years.
Republicans do not need a 1994 Tsunami to de-rail Obama.  A couple of dozen House seats and a handful of Senate seats will force Obama’s last two years in the White House into a Jimmy Carter holding action.  The key poll to watch is not the goofy and doctored nonsense of the Leftist press, but the day by day scrupulous polling of Scott Rasmussen.  If the slow, and sometimes uneven, trend continues, and by September the percentage of Americans who “strongly disapprove” of Obama is in the low forties, then the American people have gotten wise to this Chicago politician and his demands that Congress pass huge unread (even unwritten) bills as a way to cure our problems.
Paraphrasing a famous Chicago minister (who — so eloquently! — preached the Gospel of Love) Obama’s Chickens will have come home to roost.

Bruce Walker is the author of two books:  Sinisterism: Secular Religion of the Lie, and his recently published book, The Swastika against the Cross: The Nazi War on Christianity.

The ugly face of liberalism
Selwyn Duke
Obama has sided with a thug in Honduras, a man who — for completely self-serving reasons — sought to subvert his nation’s constitution. More

Obama’s True Colors Shine in Honduras
Kyle-Anne Shiver
Obama’s response to the Honduran military removing a dictator-wannabe from office tells us who he is. More

Behind the cancellation of the Atlanta/Gwinnett Mall Tea Party
Jason Lee
Proprty rights alone do not explain this sabotage. More

Islam’s Victimization of Iran
Amil Imani
Islam swept out of the Arabian desert to conquer the world for Allah. An early victim of these marauding conquerors was Persia. More

The Squandered Emancipation of Iranian Women
Andrew G. Bostom
Women’s liberation is not a one-way street. Iran’s women once before were freed from theocratic repression. More

Previous Articles

June 27, 2009

June 25, 2009

June 23, 2009

June 21, 2009

Alex Jones Tv- Gerald Celente Everybody Knows whats coming, only a Major Revolution Can Save America

“Great empires do not die by murder, but by suicide,” observed English historian Arnold Toynbee. The poison of the West is multiculturalism and mass immigration.

Two people cannot sit on the same chair, without one eventually being pushed off. There can be an uncomfortable sharing of the same seat for some time, but eventually both sides will become tired of the arrangement, and either one person will have to leave or the two people will get into a fight.

There is no society where diversity did not lead to hostility. It is true that similar ethnicities – e.g., Caribbean, African and American Blacks – can eventually integrate voluntarily (usually in one generation, sometimes faster). But that is because the values of these people are close enough that a compromise is possible. But when two strangers with different moral and cultural values are forced to not only live together, but share power, violence is inevitable and usually immediate.

Diversity, real diversity between radically different people, is a failure throughout the world. The only result of diversity is war. Different African tribes are at each other’s throats in every country they are forced to share. Muslims fight each other, Sunni against Shia, Arabs against Persians. Certainly we’ve seen tremendous warfare in Europe, which involved diversity (Britain vs. France much more than Holland vs. Germany). As hard it may be to bring bring people of the same race together, it’s that much more difficult to cross racial race.

Races develop when people evolve in different environments, which place different biological and social pressures on people. Social norms, therefore, must be as radically different as the differences in people’s appearances.

We are told repeatedly that Mexican Indians, Moslems and Africans will successfully integrate into Western societies. But what proof is there? It is true that allowing a small number of immigrants will force them to join the greater society by learning the language and the customs of the dominant people. But if you are a majority, why should you adopt to the minority, even if the minority resided in your land before you? When Mexicans are a majority of the people in this country, why would they adopt to our values? When Moslems are the majority of Europeans, why would they choose to speak French and Spanish instead of Arabic?

Mexicans, Africans and Muslims may become wealthier than they were in their native land. They may be nice. They may be pleasant. They may be hardworking. None of this is relevant to this discussion, however. Just because someone is wealthy, nice and hardworking, does not make them Western.

The people of Hong Kong are wealthy (as compared to most of the world), usually nice and usually hardworking – but they are not Western. Being Western has nothing to do with any of these qualities. The term “Western” does not describe whether a person is good or bad, it describes a distinct culture created by a distinct people. Theirs is the East Asian culture, a product of East Asian people. The Indian culture is likewise the product of the Indian people. The African culture too is the product of the Black people. And yes, the Western culture is the product of the white people. Blacks are no more likely to want to watch Opera than whites are to want to run around the jungle with a stick.

To the extent diversity works anywhere, it is a result of the White Westerners’ belief in the God of Multiculturalism and Peace. During the first half of the 20th century, European and Western nations fought the two bloodiest wars of all time. This was not a result of some inherent White brutality, but rather a product of innovation that created airplanes, tanks, rockets, missiles, machine guns.

Coming out of World War Two, the White man was simply tired and could not go on fighting. The idea of embracing each other seemed like a way out of a permanent disaster with constant warfare. And so the West agreed to look beyond one’s tribal instincts and embrace one another. Of course, that is relatively easy for nations that are similar. The French embraced the Walloons. The Germans embraced the Dutch. The Norwegians embraced the Danes. The English embraced the Irish. But it’s easy for people who are already similar to join hands and sing the kumbaya around the campfire.

But what to do when Muslims who believe in cover up their women from head to toe arrive in Holland, a place famous for its libertine sexual mores?

What to do when Africans arrive into Western countries and set fire in the middle of their hotel rooms when they want to cook food? Or when Mexicans demand that the City of Los Angeles spends its money celebrating Cinco De Mayo rather than Fourth of July?

Most cultures would fight back. But Whites simply backed down and went along with their own cultural destruction. The City of Los Angeles now sponsors Cinco De Mayo, but not the Fourth of July. One holiday is not inherently better than the other. But when you consider that the second largest city in the United States prefers celebrating a Mexican military victory rather than American independence, you begin to understand the kind of cultural destruction that awaits us in the near future.

Most people understand what diversity means, and hardly anyone believes it. Italians can live in the same neighborhood with Jews, their fellow Mediterraneans, and Germans can live with the English. But outside of their own race, people feel uncomfortable.

No White person will admit publicly that he is opposed to integration. They will sing praises to the Brown v. Board of Ed decision. And yet, the White people who joined Civil Rights demonstrations and sang “We Shall Overcome” were no different from those who stood in front of school doors to prevent integration.

Both groups opposed integration when it came to their own children. The rich got to move to neighborhoods that excluded blacks with unnecessarily high prices, and in cities, through coop boards.

The poor couldn’t afford to do that, so they stood in front of school doors screaming at black students. The media reported their actions as “hate”, but the reality was that they were mad out of frustration and fear. If your son got beaten (like Mike Berman) and your daughters raped (like Mike’s two sisters) by blacks, with the school and the courts refusing to punish the criminals, and you could not afford to send your child to private school, you too would stand in front of school doors screaming “Nigger”.

The history of the rise of American suburbs is a history of a desperate White flight away from schools that were being filled with Black children. It is undeniable that suburbs would not be even a quarter of their current size but for school integration.

White teachers fled from the schools that turned black, and even government programs giving educators significant additional benefits, such as full tuition reimbursement in a Master’s degree program, cannot attract whites into predominantly black schools.

So how can you tell if a person is a “racist” and opposed to diversity? He lives in a white town or neighborhood. Ultimately, that is all you need to know about a person. White neighborhoods are much more expensive than minority areas and usually have poor public transportation (which is what prevents poor blacks from moving in). Why are Whites traveling for hours to and from work when they can buy a similar house for much less right near their job in the center of the city where they work? They will never admit it in public, and in many cases they will never admit it to themselves – but they are paying a premium merely to avoid diversity.

And that’s all you need to know about the success of American multiculturalism and diversity.

Next time a white liberal tells you to support non-white immigration, ask him where he lives. If he’s not from Gary, IN or South Central LA, you can safely tell him that he’s lying – to you and to himself.

Gerald Celente speaks on Cap and Trade and other handicaps to the US economy

The final peg holding white america back from revolting, whats left of the economy, is now coming down.

The two party system has failed America

Shawn Connors
Infowars
June 30, 2009

While America’s wealthy continue to enjoy economic and recreational comforts, many parts of the world are being plunged into economic collapse, depression, and civil unrest. American elitist politicians enjoy the safety and protection provided by our military and secret service.  Meanwhile, the American citizen’s freedoms are attacked non-stop by Police State agencies in their homes, schools and neighborhoods.  The writing has been on the wall for some time, nothing has changed, and the plan for the New World Order is full force.

election politics   The two party system has failed America

In America, the two party system has failed the people; the politicians feign fighting in front of cameras, while they sleep together at night.  Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., and now Obama have expressly followed elitist world power orders.  Nothing has changed and the class assault on America’s values, morals and freedoms continues.  George W. Bush, widely considered one of the worst presidents in US history, initiated legislation that stripped Americans of every right they thought they had.  This includes the Patriot Acts I and II, FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, Amended Presidential Executive Orders, and the revocation of Posse Comitatus Act.  These actions were specifically designed for DOMESTIC control – under the illusion and disguise they “help” you.  These are only a few of the many fascist laws the Bush Administration championed.  As a result, they effectively changed the Judicial, Legislative and Executive powers forever. With financial ruin, a contrived illegal war, amnesty for illegal aliens, and wide-open borders, the 8 year agenda becomes glaringly clear… American people do not matter.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods

Barack Hussein Obama ran on the platform of “change”.  Like every politician the two party system and mainstream media offer us, his campaign promises immediately disappeared once elected.  Despite his fictional campaign rhetoric, his immediate actions paint the picture of what to expect.  He strongly condemned lobbyists and claimed his cabinet would NOT allow them.  Today, his cabinet has more “special interest” lobbyists than any cabinet in history.  He made assertions of repealing Bush laws that infringed American rights.  He hasn’t repealed one.  In fact he is using the same laws to his benefit and further strip firearm and free speech rights.  The Obama Administration bailout dwarfs what Bush initiated.  With the illusion “it helps you,” but it is designed specifically for elitist entitlement.  Obama ran on an Anti-war platform, promising to pull troops and get out of Iraq.  He’s done the opposite, increasing troops and extending war to Afghanistan and perhaps Iran.  Remember Ross Perot’s famous quote?  “You hear that sucking sound?  That’s your American jobs going overseas” due to NAFTA and the government “sell out” of American jobs.  Independent Ross Perot was right.  Obama made promises in his campaign mantra that he would change foreign trade agreements.  Today, he shows little interest in NAFTA or foreign trade policy.  In a time of recession/depression with massive debt, Barack Obama spent 3 times more money than any president in US history for his inauguration.  Scholars and Historians liken the Obama youth to Hitler Youth, complete with combat training for “domestic safety”.  He made assertions Bush would be held accountable for his actions in Iraq and 9/11 – Today he won’t touch it.  They are on the same Globalist team, and he continues where Bush left off with the NAU plan to combine USA, Canada and Mexico thereby eliminating our borders and our sovereignty; essentially declaring our Declaration of Independence void.

Our ranking two party politicians can no longer be trusted because they are not making decisions in our interest.  World bankers, corporations, and elitists with an agenda have infiltrated our government.  These two party politicians are puppets.  They serve the elite and only have one goal, globalism.  They are not loyal to country or people.  Likewise, our main stream media only serve to reinforce that agenda and manipulate the minds of the people.  Fox News, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC corporate news appear to take their marching orders from Washington and other elitists.  They are equivalent to NAZI propaganda in the 1930s. Diversion, deception, misleading, and boycotting REAL news is the name of their game.  It’s not a coincidence.

These NEWS organizations spend hours diluting you with Hollywood drivel, American Idol, Sports, Dancing with the stars, and everything ridiculous WHILE at the same time major American legislation is passed to destroy your future.  Yet, this legislation goes on and is seldom heard about.  They serve to divert attention away from real issues.

Everything is a “sellout” and the American people eat popcorn and watch movies instead of compiling arms, food, and preparing for a revolution.  When the masses finally get clued into reality, it may be entirely too late.

Yes indeed, the two party system has failed the American people.  Politicians are bought and paid for and they disregard your children’s future with unabashed arrogance.

Everyone from legislators, to judges, to presidents, is manipulated and lopsided in the Democratic and Republican royalty.  The media gives the illusion you have a choice, while simultaneously stifling and ridiculing third party candidates and alternative media.  It is time for independence once again. We need independent candidates, media, and independence from corporate greed and lobbyists.  Independence from freedom-stripping legislators is the last hope that exists for a country founded on freedom.  The independent thinkers of America have long suffered ridicule and labels such as “conspiracy theorists”.  300 million people corralled into two parties is insanity, it is time the American citizen is heard.  It is time for American Independence again. People, turn off the television, think for yourself, stand up.

California’s Empty Wallet: Turning Crisis into Opportunity

Ellen Brown
Global Research
June 30, 2009

California State Controller John Chiang has warned that without a balanced budget in place by July 1, he will begin using IOUs to pay most of the state’s bills. On June 25, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger rejected a plan that would save the state $3 billion by cutting school spending, saying he would rather see the state issue IOUs than delay the funding problem with a piecemeal approach. The state’s total budget deficit is $24.3 billion.

Meanwhile, other funding doors are slamming closed. The Obama administration has said it will not use federal stimulus money to prop up California; and Fitch Ratings, a bond rating agency, announced that it was downgrading the credit rating of the state, which already has the lowest in the nation. Once downgraded, California’s rating is likely to fall below the minimum level legally required for most money market funds, forcing the funds to sell their California bonds. The result could be a cost of millions of additional dollars in higher interest rates for the state.

What to do? Perhaps California could take a lesson from the island state of Guernsey, located in the English Channel off the French Coast, which faced similar funding problems in the 19th century. Toby Birch, an asset manager who hails from there, tells the story in Gold News:

“As weary troops returned from a protracted foreign war [the Napoleonic Wars ending in 1815], they encountered a land racked with debt, high prices and a crumbling infrastructure, whose flood defenses were about to be overwhelmed . . . . While 1815 brought an end to the conflict on the battlefront, . . . severe austerity ensued on the home front. The application of the Gold Standard meant that loans issued over many years were then recalled to balance the ratio of money to precious metals. This led to economic gridlock as labor and materials were abundant, but much-needed projects could not be funded for want of cash.

“This led to a period of so-called ‘poverty amongst plenty’. . . . The situation seemed insoluble; existing borrowing costs were consuming 80% of the island’s revenues. What was already an unsustainable debt burden would need to be doubled to fund the two most essential infrastructure projects. This was when a committee of States members was formed . . . . The committee realized that if the Guernsey States issued their own notes to fund the project, rather than borrowing from an English bank, there would be no interest to pay. This would lead to substantial savings. Because as anyone with a mortgage should understand, the debtor ends up paying at least double the amount borrowed over the long-term.”

To prevent an unwanted inflation of the money supply, the Guernsey States issued the notes with a date due, and on that date the bearer was paid in gold. The money came from rents on the finished infrastructure, supplemented with a tax on liquor. Birch goes on:

“The end result of the Guernsey Experiment was spectacular – new roads, sea defenses and public buildings were established, fostering widespread trade and prosperity. Full employment was achieved, no deficits resulted and prices were stable, all without a penny paid in interest. What started as a trial led to a string of construction projects, which still stand and function to this day. Money was used in its purest form: as a convenient mechanism for oiling the wheels of commerce and development.”

Like Guernsey, California is facing “poverty amidst plenty.” The state has the eighth largest economy in the world, larger than Russia’s, Brazil’s, Canada’s and India’s.  It has the resources, labor, and technical expertise to make just about anything its citizens put their minds to.  The only thing lacking is the money to do it.  But money is merely a medium of exchange, a means of getting suppliers, laborers and customers together so that they can produce and exchange products.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods

As has been explained elsewhere, today money is simply credit. All of our money except coins is created by banks when they make loans. The current crisis stems from a credit freeze that began on Wall Street in the fall of 2007, when banks were required to revalue their assets due to a change in accounting rules, from “mark to fantasy” to “mark to market.” Banks that were previously considered in good shape, with plenty of capital for making loans, suddenly came up short. Lending fell off, and so did the available money supply.

Just understanding the problem is enough to see the solution. If a private bank can create credit on its books, so can the mighty state of California. It merely needs to form its own bank. Under the “fractional reserve” lending system, banks are allowed to extend credit – or create money as loans – in a sum equal to many times their deposit base. Congressman Jerry Voorhis, writing in 1973, explained it like this:

“[F]or every $1 or $1.50 which people – or the government – deposit in a bank, the banking system can create out of thin air and by the stroke of a pen some $10 of checkbook money or demand deposits. It can lend all that $10 into circulation at interest just so long as it has the $1 or a little more in reserve to back it up.”

The 10 percent reserve requirement is now largely obsolete, in part because banks have figured out how to get around it. What chiefly limits bank lending today is the 8 percent capital requirement imposed by the Bank for International Settlements, the head of the private global central banking system in Basel, Switzerland. With an 8 percent capital requirement, a state with its own bank could fan its revenues into 12.5 times their face value in loans (100 ÷ 8 = 12.5). And since the state would actually own the bank, it would not have to worry about shareholders or profits. It could lend to creditworthy borrowers at very low interest, perhaps limited only to a service charge covering its costs; and on loans the bank made to the state, the state would ultimately get the interest, making the loans essentially interest-free.

Precedent for this approach is to be found in North Dakota, one of only three states currently able to meet its budget. North Dakota is not only solvent but now boasts the largest surplus it has ever had. The Bank of North Dakota, the only state-owned bank in the nation, was established by the legislature in 1919 to free farmers and small businessmen from the clutches of out-of-state bankers and railroad men. By law, the state must deposit all its funds in the bank, and the state guarantees its deposits. The bank’s surplus profits are returned to the state’s coffers. The bank operates as a bankers’ bank, partnering with private banks to loan money to farmers, real estate developers, schools and small businesses. It makes 1% loans to startup farms, has a thriving student loan business, and purchases municipal bonds from public institutions.

Looking at California’s budget figures, projected state revenues for 2009 are $128 billion. At a reserve requirement of 10%, if California deposited all $128 billion in its own state-owned bank, it could issue $1.28 trillion in loans, far more than it would need to cover its $23 billion budget shortfall. To lend itself the money to cover the shortfall, it would need only $2.3 billion in

deposits and about $2 billion in capital (assuming an 8% capital requirement). What Sheldon Emry wrote of nations is equally true of states:

“It is as ridiculous for a nation to say to its citizens, ‘You must consume less because we are short of money,’ as it would be for an airline to say, ‘Our planes are flying, but we cannot take you because we are short of tickets.’”

As a card-carrying member of the banking elite, California could create all the credit it needs to fund its operations, with money to spare.

funny money schemes R Us Says:

Really? Production has been systematically moved out of the United States and expensive penniless refugees from drug-lord controlled Mexico are being allowed to pour by the many thousands into Calif. and being put on the state welfare roles — and yet creating ‘money’ out of nothing is somehow going to solve the state’s basic problem of living beyond its means?

So, the basic idea is for each troubled state to become a little counterfeiting operation, like the one operated since 1913 by the Fed and US govt. working as partners — howsomever, that counterfeiting operation is in trouble – right? Big trouble, having enabled so much federal-govt. deficit spending that all of ‘us’ are now willy nilly in debt even unto x (the number of the indebted generations keeps growing) number of future, of yet unborn, generations?

But, you say, just create that money-out-of nothing, BUT don’t charge the public any interest on it, and all will be well? With that one little change of not charging the public interest on the ‘money-for nothing’, CREATING ‘MONEY’ OUT OF THIN AIR IS GOING TO SOMEHOW SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF HAVING MORE OUTGO THAN INCOME?

I thought all that created was inflation – ie, a diminished purchasing power of the currency being created out of nothing in whatever amount needed to ‘pay the bills.’ Create enough of it and you’ve got hyperinflation. It’s just the law of supply and demand – the supply of ‘money’ goes up, and its purchasing power goes down. Don’t need a Ph.D. in economics to understand that.

Let’s review… the fed govt. and the private bankers creating ‘money’ out of nothing has in 100 years damaged the value of the dollar such that no nation wants it anymore… and yet somehow doing the same thing – WITH THE ONE DIFFERENCE OF NOT CHARGING INTEREST ON THE VALUELESS ‘MONEY’ THAT IS CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR … just not charging interest on the counterfeit ‘money’ is going to make this ‘money-for-nothing’ scheme somehow fly, somehow work, SOMEHOW SOLVE THE BASIC PROBLEM OF LIVING BEYOND ONE’S MEANS, whether one is an individual, or a state, or a country? Creating ‘money’ out of nothing is going to solve the basic problem of living beyond one’s means? (And, it is humanly possible to have that power to create money out of nothing and NOT abuse it, just so long as your name is ‘government’? Get real, dudes! That bridge won’t sell.)

Lincoln’s ‘greenbacks’ are cited by ‘funny money YES! just make it non-interest-bearing’ advocates (”Moneymasters”, Ellen Brown, and Co.) as being such a ’success’. REALLY? Lincoln’s greenbacks, non-interest-bearing ‘money’ created out of nothing, inflated – lost 40-some % of their nominal value – in only 4 years or so. THIS IS A SUCCESSFUL, a viable, CURRENCY? That means that whoever was holding their wealth in those greenbacks lost 40% of that wealth in only about 4 years. Wowza – where do I sign up for that?

Or rather, how do I sign out of it. Answer – do NOT denominate your wealth – including your labor, the only wealth most of us possess – in any fiat currency. What? You say by law I HAVE TO, have to denomenate my labor in an intrinsically worthless fiat currency, because every currency in the world is now intrinsically worthless, its value manipulated – ever downward – by spendy governments and ever richer central banks working in tandem? And somehow just making those fiat currencies NON-INTEREST BEARING is going to solve all our economic woes, somehow balance all these unbalanced books of all these debt-ridden nations? Uh-huh. Makes sense. Yup. Sure does.

The ‘Continental’, the non-interest-bearing unbacked fiat currency of the nascent US of A, lost so much of its value that it was immortalized in that phrase still known to (if not understood by) most of us, dumbed down though we are – ‘not worth a Continental.’

And yet Ellen Brown and the Moneymasters creators would have us believe that this basic plan is gonna work – somehow – ‘this time.’ Ya sure you betcha. Honey, I’d sooner trust my great-aunt Maude with the power to created money-out-of-nothing than I would any government or banker-type suit. They’re from the government (and if you got government, you got them banker-fellers, just like if you got honey, you got flies and if you’re a dog, you got fleas) and they’re here to help…

Next Page »


  • How well a nonwhite majority will perform economically in America 2042?

    How well a nonwhite majority will perform economically in America 2042? Fortunately, we already have a gigantic test case: California, which is now only 43 percent non-Hispanic white. So what can we learn about the future of America from California, where the state government may run out of money next month without a federal bailout? For most of this decade, the financial wizards poured hundreds of billions of dollars into mortgage-backed securities originating in California. In other words, they made a colossal bet on diversity. And lost. It turned out that, while California’s new diverse population could certainly consume and speculate like old-fashioned white Americans, they couldn’t produce like them.
  • Massive civil unrest and a NEW American Revolution

    Notes from letter from Finland reader. Letter from Finland Yes, history will absolve us indeed. And the best thing is that the wheel of history has taken yet another violent turn this fall. I am absolutely ecstatic how the new world is forming before our eyes - the collapse of global capitalism is here and how neatly it happens just when the ethnic tension is growing in western societies. It is as if all this was a product of some heavenly Hollywood script writer who brings all the plot lines to a climax right at the end of the movie. To an unsuspecting viewer these different plots are accidental and have nothing to with each other—BUT WE, THE FEW, THE OUTCASTS OF THE STUDIO SYSTEM, who knew the script even before it was written know that all the crises and plot lines stem from the same source. Unlike most people we can see the big picture and we can recognize the pattern. An unsuspecting viewer is also equally unaware of how the movie will end but once again WE, THE FEW will know the end of this movie. And luckily for those viewers with a very short attention span everything is going fast forward. This is not the rise and fall of Rome—the pace of collapse is so quick that the global economy can be wrecked by the time you have finished watching an episode of Friends. Chaos theory in action makes the world an interesting place - when tension has reached its height a flutter of butterfly’s wing may bring everything to an end. WE,THE FEW saw this coming, of course, but still it was difficult to estimate the exact time when everything would change. Now, however the dominos are falling and there is no turning back. The current economic crisis will wipe out the structures of global liberal capitalism, the current economic crisis will bring the corporate world on its knees and crush the hubris of the economists and corporate captains - these high priests of liberal capitalism will have to admit that they know nothing and that their god is dead. The current economic crisis will destroy the naive optimism of middle class and deprive the working class of any hope for stability and prosperity. The current economic crisis will ruin the western societies and drive them to chaos so that in the end the Europeans will have nothing left but hate, fear and despair. All the symptoms are clearly visible: The out break of FUROR EUROPEICUS is nigh. Everything that happens today serves our cause - the old dying world cannot save itself and the elite of the dying world cannot do even one thing right. Everything the elite does will only prepare ground for its own downfall. The elite is always the mirror image of the world it rules - in a world that is destined to die, a reverse evolution takes place and only inept fools will rule - Louis XVI and Nicholas II were no unfortunate accidents but examples of a pattern in history. Soon the elite of the western civilization will taste the bitter pill of dialectics in history: Force creating its counterforce! Everything we have been doing in the white western world since 1945 and especially since the mid 60’s has been a counterreaction to the horrors of the Second World War and the Third Reich. The dominance of left-green humanism is the residue of the generation conflict of the 60’s between the baby boomers and their parents. The more the Europeans have tried to escape the ghosts of nationalism, racism and militarism the more feverishly they have embraced leftist humanism spiced with a hefty dose of self-hatred. LOCUST: What does all of this mean? Keep reading... Posted by skeptical on Friday, November 21, 2008 at 09:28 PM | #: I have also been coming to similar conclusions as of late. A few observations from my perch in multiracial America. 1) The Left has lost its patience and abandoned all prudence in its desire to liquidate the West, and its organic race, immediately. Pronto. The safe bet would have been to continue its brainwashing regimen at a reasonable pace while continuing to install White male puppets. The consequences for such an overreach, especially at this critical juncture for international capitalism, could be as profound as Germany’s military overreach in WWII. 2) By denying all legitimacy to those who would preserve the Euro-White heritage(s) the Left has been fostering the creation of monsters who will give back a double portion for what has been done to us when our cages are finally loosed. The consequences for what they have done will be the permanent eradication of the humanist Left from the Western cosmos, the first order of business when anything resembling our views reclaims political power. 3) By foolishly excusing the barbaric behavior of non-White ethnics while simultaneously encouraging their immigration the Left is brewing nothing less then the very societal chaos and disorder that will be its own undoing. History will not stand such a contradiction in governance to go interminably unpunished. 4) The societal breakdown, and the chaos that it will unleash, is only being staved off by shared consumerist habits and economic fears, once the end comes it will seem obvious (in hindsight) that the economy was always the Left’s countdown clock. On that note, middle class White America may be unhappy with their situation but they aren’t about to risk the destruction of the very consumerist society that they rely upon for their daily bread (esp. at the urgings of nationalists). Time, Providence, and internal contradictions will have to be the undoing of this arrangement. 5) America is the lynchpin, the spiritual center, for the West’s professed faith in Left humanism [cultural Bolshevism]. The collapse of our government will do for the soft totalitarian Left what the collapse of the U.S.S.R. did for the hard totalitarian Left and herald the disintegration of the modern Left everywhere within the enervated West. Recent events make it hard not to feel optimistic; however it is still our responsibility to envision a future political system that will intelligently absorb the technological innovations of the 20th century. We must find a way to properly integrate our technological innovations into a society that is spiritually meaningful and politically protected from malevolent influence. Locust: These bailouts now totaling approx. 7.5 Trillion dollars, Our Federal Debt will total 17.5 trillion, combined with unpaid liabilities, the total public and private Debt of America will be more then 65 trillion dollars, lock and load, nearly a third of the population will be unemployed by DEC 31st 2011, that’s a hundred million people, before this happens riots will break out, spiraling deflation will be replaced with HYPER Inflation, the only short term solution for the elites is socialism/communism, and they know this will lead towards massive civil unrest and a NEW American Revolution. Lock and load, and buy plenty of Ammo. America must collapse, so we the Euro-Americans can save our people, it must occur, the elites on the left and right are part of the status quo, this is the last thing they want to see, it will bring about the end of leftist humanism and Egalitarianism thought process. Egalitarianism is considered a protean (communist) doctrine; as a social philosophy it has been applied to society in a wide variety of different ways. Common forms of egalitarianism include economic egalitarianism, legal egalitarianism, luck egalitarianism, political egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism, racial equality, asset-based egalitarianism, and Christian egalitarianism. All of these doctrines will come to an end when the rational thought process dominates society, we will look for those whom will be blamed, the leeches, the parasites, those who contribute nothing but take everything, welfare recipients, you know who I‘m talking about, and you know what to do next.
  • When your own country sucks because your people have ruined it, the only thing to do is to go steal someone else’s…

    When your own country sucks because your people have ruined it, the only thing to do is to go steal someone else's... "We [Latinos] are going to dominate this country also, and it’s going to take, the way things are going, another 25 years and we are going to be the majority of people, period!" Edward James Olmos longtime Hollywood actor and Miami Vice star (you can listen to2001 interview with Univision here. And send him a letter, or email here!] ** Read the whole article which features this quote and others: Celebrity Citizens—And Traitors Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/oublyette/flagquote.jpg http://www.vdare.com/awall/070331_memo.htm posted by jillosophy at 4/04/2007 10:38:00 AM
  • Time for Conflict is near, give me liberty or give me death

    http://i12.tinypic.com/6ahb3ma.jpgwidth=295 The enemy http://www.oknation.net/blog/home/blog_data/43/43/images/History/joinordie.jpg http://stockton.edu/~gilmorew/0colhis/awash.jpg
  • Weekly guywhite.wordpress.com – Read the thoughts of a True American

    Diversity: Greatest Strength or Greatest Threat? March 2, 2009 by guywhite “We didn’t have the wonderful diversity of people that you have here today,” said Hillary Clinton during her 1995 trip to the Chicago school she attended as a child. “I’m sad we didn’t have it because it would have been a great value, as I’m sure you will discover.” At the time when Hillary made this declaration, her own daughter was a High School student. Neither Mrs. Clinton, nor her husband (“America’s First Black President”) thought it advisable to send their child to a “diverse” school. President Bill Clinton may open a library near the Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas – a school at the center of integration battles in the 1950s – but he won’t let his child anywhere near it. Are we to believe that Bill and Hillary refused to send their daughter to a diverse school because they hate Chelsea? Are we to believe that the rich always send their children to lily-white private or suburban schools because they want to make sure that space is open in “multicultural” schools for the poor who cannot afford either private schools or homes in wealthy suburbs with non-diverse schools? There’re practically no Whites who had a choice who’ve opted for “diversity”. After the U.S. Supreme Court imposed integration and forbade segregation, the rich and the middle class escaped to suburbs as soon as minorities began moving into their neighborhoods. It was the so-called “White Flight” that led to the creation of not only the suburbs, but also the building of most American highways built since the Brown v. Board of Ed decision. For Whites to live in the suburbs, they needed effective infrastructure to move from the suburbs to the major cities where they worked. The rich and the middle class used their political clout to lobby for highways that allowed them to escape “diversity”. Many of the highways and other public works projects were built in a way to protect urban White areas from “multiculturalism” by leaving minorities on the “other” side of the government project, thus slowing the flight of Whites (and the taxes they pay) from cities. Diversity is a failure not only in the United States, but throughout the world. Over the long term, the only result of diversity is war. Different African tribes are at each other’s throats in every country they are forced to share. Muslims fight each other, Sunnis against the Shia, Arabs against Kurds against Persians. We are told to believe that Mexicans, Muslims and Africans will integrate into Western societies. But what proof is there? Similar people may overlook their differences and integrate within a generation or two. But where do we see people of different races successfully integrate into one? To the extent diversity works anywhere, it is a result of the White Westerners’ belief in the God of Multiculturalism and Peace. During the first half of the 20th century, European and Western nations fought the two bloodiest wars of all time. This was not a result of White brutality, but rather a product of innovation that created airplanes, tanks, rockets, missiles, machine guns and other deadly weapons. Coming out of World War Two, the White Man was simply tired and could not go on fighting. The idea of embracing each other seemed like a way out of a permanent disaster with constant warfare. And so the West agreed to look beyond one’s tribal instincts and embrace one another. Of course, that is relatively easy for nations that are similar. The French embraced the Walloons. The Germans embraced the Dutch. The Norwegians embraced the Danes. The WASPs embraced the Irish. The Askhenazi (European) Jews embraced the Sephardic (Middle Eastern, Central Asian and Spanish) Jews. But it’s easy for people who are already similar to join hands and sing the kumbaya around the campfire. But what to do when Muslims who believe in covering up their women from head to toe arrive in Holland, a place famous for its libertine sexual mores? What to do when Africans arrive into Western countries and set fire in the middle of their hotel rooms when they want to cook food? Or when Mexicans demand that the City of Los Angeles spend money celebrating Cinco De Mayo rather than the Fourth of July? Most cultures would fight back. But Whites simply back down and go along with their own cultural destruction for the fear of being called racist. Italians can live in the same neighborhood with Jews, and Germans can live with the English. But outside of their own race, they all feel uncomfortable. No White person will admit that he is unhappy about de-segregation forced upon them, but all Whites – those who joined Civil Rights marches singing “We Shall Overcome” and those who stood in front of school doors to prevent integration – oppose de-segregation when it comes time to choose the neighborhoods where they lived and schools where they sent their children. Research by Harvard University’s liberal Professor Robert Putnam shows that the more diverse communities are, less its inhabitants trust anyone – from their next-door neighbor to the mayor. “The effect of diversity is worse than had been imagined. And it’s not just that we don’t trust people who are not like us. In diverse communities, we don’t trust people who do look like us…. They don’t trust the local mayor, they don’t trust the local paper, they don’t trust other people and they don’t trust institutions. The only thing there’s more of is protest marches and TV watching.” This is true not only for Whites, but for people around the world. Almost every conflict around the world has a racial/ethnic character, usually because “diverse” people are forced to live together. When Sudanese Arabs meet Sudanese Blacks, they do not discuss the benefits of diversity – they brutally slaughter each other. Hutus and Tutsis prefer murder to being enriched by multiculturalism. Israel repeatedly clashed with its Arab neighbors. Christian Armenians locked horns with Muslims, whether in Turkey or in Nagorno-Karabakh. In the nearby Georgia, terror and warfare is seen in the diverse regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. The USSR, which for generations used force, shame and propaganda to create a New Soviet Man who did not care about nationalism, fell apart as everyone reverted back to their ethnic groups. Whites in Africa were largely kicked out of almost every country, from Algeria to Mozambique, and even the last white communities in Zimbabwe and South Africa will likely be gone within a generation. The most consistent and significant problem in the United States has come from racial diversity. When groups of kids clash in high schools or when gangs attack each other in jail, we do not see class warfare – we see diversity wars. It is not the rich fighting with the poor – it is usually Blacks engaging Hispanics (and sometimes other races, ethnicities or nationalities). South Californian Blacks do not consider illegal Mexican immigration “enriching” – they see it as a threat. Were it not for security guards and police, as well as metal detectors, schools in poor South Californian districts that feature large Hispanic and Black populations would’ve been filled with rivers of blood. The history of the rise of American suburbs is a history of a desperate White flight away from schools that were being filled with Black children. It is undeniable that suburbs would not be even a quarter of their current size but for school integration and busing of kids into schools outside their neighborhoods to forcibly mix races. White teachers ran from the schools that turned Black, and even government programs giving educators significant additional benefits (such as full tuition reimbursement in a Master’s degree program) cannot attract Whites into predominantly Black schools. But while the rich and the upper middle class built a virtual wall around themselves in their suburbs and neighborhoods, the poor couldn’t just abandon their homes because they didn’t have the money for a second house, and could not sell the home they lived because of the drop in property values caused by crime and decay brought on by the Blacks. Even those renting their apartments often found it impossible to move out of “inner cities.” Many couldn’t afford to buy cars needed to move from suburbs to their city jobs, or they couldn’t afford to spend 3-4 hours a day traveling because they had to be home to cook, clean, paint, fix the car and perform other duties for which the rich hire help. They also could not afford to “buy” protection from diversity by donating time and money to the campaigns of influential politicians who would then build shields in the form of government buildings, colleges and highways around their remaining neighborhoods to prevent minorities from moving in, as was done for the upper class Whites. The poor were stuck with “diversity”. Most of the poor were not educated, and could not articulate their arguments properly. Due to their lack of education, they could not explain that they want to live in their own culture, and do not want to face all the benefits of multiculturalism: “white bitches” raped in building stairways, guns brought to schools, drugs sold in parks, elevators treated as bathrooms, and vicious gangs beings the normal after-school activity for 13-year-olds. Instead of properly articulating their concerns about crime and shockingly different cultural norms of minorities, the uneducated poor yelled racial epithets. The so-called “rednecks” may not have read Henry David Thoreau and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, but they surely could understand when their daughter came home brutally beaten and raped by Tyrone and Darnell, as their girlfriends Laquisha and Uneeq pulled out the hair of the “white bitch”. The rich could afford to support diversity and integration in theory precisely because they could afford to avoid it by moving into different neighborhoods or the suburbs where their children could attend schools that were near-exclusively White. The poor opposed integration because there was no way for them to escape it other than by preventing minorities from moving into their neighborhood or attending their schools. For the poor, integration laws had a direct effect on their lives. To the wealthy, it was a politically popular theory support for which made them “nice” and “open-minded”. Racial self-flagellation became a way to improve one’s reputation. That the rich were usually educated and the poor weren’t also made the integrationists feel not only that they are good people, but that they are also smart for taking a politically-correct point of view. And so the rich felt morally and intellectually superior to the “rednecks”. They would never yell racial epithets in public. And they usually worked with a limited number of exceptionally-well educated minorities without a problem. In fact, a few exceptionally well-educated and high-income minority families may even live in their neighborhood. Of course, nobody in their neighborhood is named Tyrone or Laquisha, nobody has two children at the age of 15, nobody sells guns in schools and nobody urinates in elevators. The few Black people they see are exceptional and do not “Stay Black” or consider education and marriage a sign of “acting White”. You don’t live in a “diverse” neighborhood if none of your neighbors are named ‘Uneeq’ – and everyone spells the word as ‘Unique’ … Posted in Dialogue on Race | Tagged diversity, multiculturalism, race, race realism, racialism, racism | 8 Comments » The Gay Right March 2, 2009 by guywhite I find it very interesting that the anti-Moslem right in Europe has so many gay people. Pim Fortuyn was a flamboyant gay man. He was also an admirer of former Dutch Prime Minister Joop den Uyl, a socialist, and in general was not the right-winger the media made him out to be. Joerg Haider was also semi-openly gay. He didn’t discuss it, but not did he hide it. He frequented gay bars and since almost everyone knew who he was, it was certain that at least people would recognize him there. Those are just the two most prominent far-right gays. There are others, some openly and some I’ve heard rumors about, and whether those are smears or truth is not known to me. But at least some might be gay. I wonder how much of the anti-Islamic message is driven by “Moslems will stone me to death if they take over” fear. More practically, I wonder if gays could be potential allies for us. If not in the US, then at least in Europe. Austrian far-right parties have made gains at the cost of the governing Social Democrats in two regional polls. In Carinthia, the main winner was the Alliance for the Future of Austria of the late Joerg Haider, with 45.5%. The Social Democrats trailed with 28.6%. The centre-left Social Democrats also lost ground in Salzburg, but still came first with 39.5%. The far-right Freedom Party won 13% there. The far-right gained nearly 29% of the vote in September’s general election. However, neither the Alliance nor the Freedom Party were invited to join the reconstituted coalition government formed two months later by the Social Democrats and the conservative People’s Party. Sunday’s regional elections in Salzburg and Carinthia were the first to put to the test the popularity of the government, which has focused in recent months on dealing with the problems confronting Austria in the face of the global economic downturn. Correspondents say that in Carinthia the Alliance had led a campaign focused on the legacy of Haider, who was the state’s governor for 10 years. “We will look after your Carinthia,” the party’s posters said. Haider was killed in a high-speed car crash near Klagenfurt last October. His blood-alcohol level had been well above the legal limit. He became a potent force in the 1980s and 90s, championing what he called traditional family values and an end to immigration. Posted in Islam | Tagged gay, homosexual, Islam, moslem | No Comments » Are Whites Wealthier than Blacks because of slavery? March 2, 2009 by guywhite By the way on the issue of the wealth built on slavery going on to our generation: everyone conveniently forgets that the Emancipation Proclamation provided for UNCOMPENSATED emancipation, thus wiping out the wealth that a slave represented. A slave was worth roughly what a Mercedes-Benz is today in inflation- and buying power-adjusted dollars. When millions of Southern slaves were emancipated without compensation, that meant that slaveowners were ruined and the entire region economically devastated. That’s not even counting the scorched earth tactics: the farm burning, city flattening efforts of the Union Army that caused even more economic catastrophe. And the enormous fraction of Southern manhood that was killed or maimed. - Irish This is a good observation. I also pointed out before that white countries without any history of African slavery are just as wealthy as white countries that had black slaves. (The money made off of slaves would be long gone by now, destroyed by inflation and maintenance of families for 150 years.) Never mind that only a tiny percentage of whites are descendants of slave owners and most - Irish, Italians, Jews, Poles - didn’t even arrive here until after slavery was eliminated in the country or at least the state where they lived. But one more thing: compare the South to the North. The slave-owning South was poorer and remains poorer than the North. If white wealth is/was the product of slavery, wouldn’t you think that the South would be wealthy and the North would be poor? And states that never had any slavery, like Washington State and Alaska, would look like Haiti? Even if all whites in non-slave states magically benefited from slavery, wouldn’t you still think that those in the South would benefit more than those in the North? And those in the United States prior to 1861 would benefit more than those who showed up here after the last former slave was already dead? Why is it then that we do not see any correlation between slave ownership and wealth? The idea that whites do well today not because of their intelligence and culture, but due to the history of slavery does not survive the most basic logical reasoning. Posted in Slavery & Africa | Tagged legacy of slavery, race, race realism, racialism, racism, slavery | 1 Comment » Moslems Are A Priority For Scots March 2, 2009 by guywhite This is from Gates of Vienna: Scottish forces ordered to give priority to crimes against Muslims by Dean Herbert Police in Scotland have been ordered to give special priority to crimes where the victims are Muslim. In a move that last night sparked a fresh row over political correctness, a senior officer revealed that the race and religion of a victim has now become a crucial factor in how police respond to crime. Inspector Tom Galbraith, of Lothian and Borders Police’s diversity unit, told a conference on tackling terrorism that it was important to stop Scottish Muslims feeling “vulnerable” in case they were driven towards radicalism. Mr. Galbraith said the force encouraged officers to consider the religious or ethnic backgrounds of victims to assess their needs in dealing with hate crimes. He said that both an attack and a perceived lack of action by police could turn Islamic youths into future terrorists. Mr. Galbraith also revealed that police officers, Special Branch and BAA security staff were being given special lessons about Islamic culture after Muslims complained that being questioned when entering the country about whether they pray and attend mosques was offensive to their faith. Speaking at a national security conference in Edinburgh on Thursday, Mr. Galbraith said, “It is not about treating everybody the same. “If I have a young Asian man who has been subjected to a hate crime, I would rather put more resources into that than if it had happened to a white male because the white male is far less likely to end up becoming radicalised.” He later confirmed that his remarks were in line with Lothian and Borders Police policy, saying that cases of hate crime were assessed “by need”. He added: “You have to consider cases according to need. The idea of treating people all the same is a bit naive and we have to remember that there are vulnerable individuals who can be put on the path of radicalism.” Last night, the police were criticised for being too politically correct in dealing with hate crimes. - - - - - - - - - […] During the conference, Mr. Galbraith also said that police officers and airport security staff were being given lessons in Islamic culture to avoid offending arrivals. He said: “Sometimes they will be asked “Do you pray?” or “Do you visit mosques?” when they arrive in the country. “This kind of thing is derogatory to the Islamic faith. A lot of people then wonder what is wrong with going to mosques in this country. “It is about making an effort in learning about other cultures and faiths.” He later confirmed that training in Islamic culture was now on-going among officers. Posted in Islam | Tagged Islam, moslem, scotland | 2 Comments » Naked Assertions With No Proof March 2, 2009 by guywhite I promised to respond to Catherine because her arguments are typical of leftist college students. As do all liberal students, she has spectacularly high self-confidence. She wrote that “white people are too threatened by my arguments and intelligence” and was extremely proud that she could get her “point across in such an articulate and eloquent fashion.” I will give you a second to stop laughing. Ok, done laughing? The reality of course is radically different. She’s clearly incapable of analyzing ideas or creating coherent arguments of her own. Everything she wrote was regurgitation of her professors’ leftist propaganda. I’ve heard it many, many times before. There is no reason for me to allow her “contribution” to this blog because every time a liberal shows up here, they write the same thing. We already have the exact same arguments, probably a dozen times. Furthermore, she cannot comprehend the difference between a conclusion or a statement on one hand and a reason or proof on the other. She thinks she can just say things. And in response, she responds with “WTF!!! Okay, first of all, I’m a GRADUATE STUDENT, so I’m well aware what “peer-reviewed” scholastic journals are. Secondly, I don’t need any references, statistics, or citations.” Honestly, “wtf” would be the only proper response to a sentence like that. Her other “eloquent” writings included phrases like “horse shit”. When I don’t want to allow that on my blog, she thinks I am threatened by her intelligence. Now let me respond to her “eloquence” and “intelligence” directly. Okay, “Guy White”… I WILL prove that white privilege exists. Prove involves some kind of proof. Not naked assertions. I won’t go into word roots and other concepts you won’t understand, but how’s this: do you think it’s a coincidence that the word “proof” and the word “prove” sound similar? What I WON’T do is waste my time proving that Blacks have LONG been stereotyped in the media as criminals and thugs, because any idiot can already see that. This is the kind of intelligence that I feel so threatened by. It’s amazing how nobody can find a single example, they just choose to attack me. And I don’t care what “any idiot” can see. I’d like to know what intelligent people can see. What idiots like you see does not really concern or bother me. It’s really not rocket science. Show me the proof. I am now convinced that white people are delusional. Naked assertion, not proof. No wonder you people are consistently playing the victim role Assertion, not proof. I know how you are against peer reviewed scholarly publications and studies, but please cite a few examples at least. Also, I wonder how you would react is someone wrote that “you people are consistently playing the victim role” in reference to blacks. God help any white person who uses the term “you people” in reference to blacks. when it’s CLEAR that you are at an advantage in this country. Just an assertion, please give us some proof. So, for the sake of your hallucinogenic mentality Personal attack meant to intimidate me so that I will agree with you in hopes that you won’t call me psychotic anymore. I will list the reasons that prove that you are at an advantage in this country. Now watch her inability to grasp the difference between a list of reasons and a list of assertions. – When you walk into a store, you are not immediately followed by employees who think you will steal something. (Edit: And if you ARE followed, it is because you just LOOK suspicious… but you can be SURE that it has nothing to do with your race. Meanwhile, a Black person could be dressed very nicely and STILL be followed). Both statements are naked assertions supported by nothing. You don’t know if I am followed, you don’t know what I look like, and most importantly, you have no studies to back this up. And if blacks are followed more, it is for the same reason that teenagers and elderly women are followed more than adults: some people are just more likely to steal. – If you drive down the street in a nice, expensive car, you are not followed by police who assume that you probably stole the vehicle or acquired it through illegal means. In fact, this has been disproven. The whole “driving while black” theory is bogus. After the NJ racial profiling scandal a study was conducted and found that the whole idea is a lie. But again, you just made a naked assertion, and failed to back it up with either scientific studies or even anecdotal examples. – When you do well in school and excel above your classmates, you don’t have to worry about your instructor being shocked, saying, “Wow! You’re really smart!” as if that’s unusual for someone of your race. I never saw this done for blacks. I did have a black professor who told me in my freshman year Speech class that she was shocked that I gave a good speech when the whole semester to date I left an impression as someone who is a troublemaker (she used the word ‘playboy’ but that’s what she meant) who came to class only to cause trouble and crack jokes. – Since this society is still controlled by Whites Just a conclusion, not proof. you don’t have to worry about the insitution of racism. Again, just a conclusion, not proof. Whites have to deal with affirmative action, racist scholarships for minorities only, and the legal system discriminates in favor of blacks and against whites. There are no laws that favor whites, and many that discriminate against them. Every standardized test has a commission that makes sure that questions on which blacks fair poorly or whites fair well are dumped. For this reason, all the admissions tests such as SAT, GRE, GMAT, LSAT and so on, over-predict black performance and under-predict white performance. See, what I just wrote about tests is called proof. What you wrote is just an assertion. Even if you are discriminated against because you are White, what effect can it really have on you other than getting your feelings hurt?? I could lose my job or not get it in the first place; I could not get admitted into college; I could get a longer prison sentence; I could get arrested for a minor crime like public drunkenness for which blacks are far less likely to get arrested. All of these are facts I’ve written about before - and I actually cited evidence for all these assertions. On the other hand, Blacks and other minorities can be passed over for jobs and have their resumes tossed out simply because they have an ethnic-sounding name. Again, this is just an assertion without proof. And a false one too. Blacks are so rarely discriminated against that you have to come up with all sorts of concepts like “unconscious discrimination” so that they could the law suit gravy grain. At most, you argue “disparate impact”, as if the lack of blacks in management and in other high IQ occupations has nothing to do with the lower average black IQ. (And affirmative action does not hurt you Naked assertion It only gives an equal chance, preventing discrimination Naked assertion. Maybe the Whites who think that unqualified Blacks get into schools and jobs over them are just too racist to believe that perhaps it’s just that the Black person was MORE QUALIFIED THAN YOU. If blacks were more qualified, then businesses would be tripping over themselves for their services without any affirmative action. Those businesses that did not hire blacks would lose in a marketplace competition. Instead, Washington Mutual - which would always win “diversity” prizes - went bankrupt. Consider this: if a black student with a 2.7 GPA and 950 SAT score (out of 1,600, not sure how the new thing works) gets accepted over a white student with a 3.7 GPA and 1,300 SAT score, is it not the case that a less qualified person was admitted? In what way is 950 more qualified than 1,300? Again, what you are doing is trying to intimidate people by calling them racist unless they disagree with your naked assertions backed by nothing. Stop and think about that for a minute. That, in and of itself, shows white privilege So if we recognize that affirmative action means accepting a student who got 950 ahead of someone who got 1,300, then we are racists and have white privilege? In what way does it prove white privilege? Again, this is just a naked assertion. White people will ALWAYS assume Isn’t saying “whites always” … ummm…. how do you say… racist? that if you get into a good school or a good job, it’s only because of affirmative action and you just COULDN’T have really been qualified… which goes back to my previous point). That’s because it is true. George Mason Law School tried to recruit blacks without giving them affirmative action. But nobody wanted to go there. You know why? Because if a black person deserved to go to GM Law, they also could get affirmative action to go to Harvard. So GM Law needed to give affirmative action to someone from a lesser law school or someone who couldn’t go to law school period in order to get any black students. I’ve written about this before. The fact is that ALL the blacks in ALL competitive and semi-competitive schools are there on affirmative action. If you actually deserved to go to whatever school you are going to now, you would’ve also had the option of getting affirmative action to a better school, so you’d have gone there. – You are recognized as an individual. Like when you called us “you people” and said that “all white people” do bad things to you. Again, naked assertion on your part. You can chew your food with your mouth open, join a gang, have bad credit, flunk out of school, or be a serial rapist without having it being attributed to your race! And yet, I can’t live my life without being told that I am responsible for slavery and that if I have any money, it must be because my grandparents were mobsters during the prohibition. That very few whites were either slave-owners or mobsters (nobody in my family) isn’t a concern for you. Just as long as any white person somewhere did something bad, you attribute it to whites. Your assertion - without any proof, of course - is just the opposite of reality. If a Black person or other minority did any one of those things, it would be blamed on our entire race. Naked assertion. The reality is the opposite. You can never say anything about blacks, even as individuals. Otherwise, you are - horrors! - a racist. When we step out into the world, we are essentially representative of our entire race. We are NOT seen as individuals by society. Again, just a naked assertion with no proof. I am getting tired typing “naked assertions with no proof”. – If you don’t make it in this world, you only have yourself to blame. I tend to agree, though affirmative action is responsible for at least some people. But whites are to blame for their own problems. Blacks are never to blame. They are just helpless victims. Right? A poor white person has a greater chance of making it than a rich black person A poor white person also has a higher IQ on average than a rich black person. IQ is a better predictor of success than anything else. If Shameika Johnson is going up for a job against Becky Sue Taylor… even if Shameika came from a good home and a rich neighborhood and Becky Sue came from the backwoods of Kentucky, Shameika will be discriminated against solely because of her name and race. In fact, it has been proven that the reason that Shameika might not get a call for interview after the employer sees her resume is that ghetto names signify low class, which in turn mean violence and low IQ. People with low class names always get discriminated against in all societies. Blacks with normal names don’t get discriminated against and whites with low class names do. People will make assumptions about her and may choose not to hire her. And about a white person with a low class name. And blacks in Africa do the same thing even when race doesn’t matter there. (If one believes racism no longer exists, they need only to turn on their television or read a newspaper!!) Naked assertion with no proof. Please cite a few examples at least. – If White privilege does not exist, then why is there such a disproportionate amount of minorities living in poverty in comparison to Whites?? Low IQ. This is a scientific fact acknowledged by the American Psychological Association. Do you think these people would CHOOSE to live in poverty? No, but they are just unlucky enough to have been born - and it’s proven that this is genetic - with low IQ. You may think that the effects of slavery are over, but they aren’t. Naked assertion with no proof. How come other people can get over their troubles from the 19th century, but never blacks? Many Whites gained wealth from the work of slaves that still exists within their families today None did. None. Literally. Zero. None. First, even among those whites who lived in pre-1861 America only a small percentage owned slaved. Today, most whites are descendants of post-1861 immigrants. Most importantly, the few whites who actually were slave owners didn’t make enough money to last them 150 years. Nor is the amount large by today’s standards considering inflation. Inflation alone would’ve killed whatever the person made had his descendants not made money on their own. Black slaves were the ones that did the work and they and their families never benefitted from it. White countries like Switzerland and Finland which had no slaves are just as wealthy as the US. Blacks who live without a white majority that sponsors them with welfare and affirmative action turn their habitat into… Africa! Filthy, disgusting, destroyed, poor Africa. There’s no doubt that whites would’ve been just as successful without blacks because, well, we are just as successful in all the countries, except those recently under Communism (and they are rapidly growing since the fall of Communism). Then, there was segregation which forced Blacks into unequal housing and schooling Nothing to do with you. Black-majority schools today receive far more funding on average than white-majority schools. Washington DC spends more than 300% more than Utah per student, yet blacks there still underperform Utah’s white students. What does that tell you about funding not making a difference, or at least not as much as IQ? As for housing, nobody forced blacks into the housing. They got free apartments in the projects, but were welcome to get a job and pay their own way. It’s amazing how whites are forced to pay for black housing, then blacks destroy it, and blame whites for making them live in bad neighborhoods. Again, I’d like to use your favorite word here: wtf! this has been a viscious cycle No, it’s just the low average IQ. If you are being unequally educated Right now you get more school funding, so what’s the problem now? then how do you acquire the skills to make it in this world and bring yourself out of poverty??? The way that European Jews have. As soon as legal discrimination was over, they didn’t complain about past persecution, but instead educated themselves. But then again, they don’t have low IQ. Money doesn’t just drop out of the sky for these people. And neither does it for anyone else. Your hateful assertion that it does for white people is, ummm… racist. – You can turn on the television and see people of your race WIDELY represented That’s because whites are a majority in this country. The Japanese are widely represented in Japan. Arabs are widely represented in Yemen. Blacks are widely represented in Nigeria. What’s the problem here? from preppy to goth to skater to jock and everything inbetween. Yes, and meanwhile all the blacks on TV look like graduate students if they are young and like lawyers/doctors/professors if they are middle aged. Also, “inbetween” is not a word. Minorities turn on the television and see stereotypes of people within their race. Naked assertion without any proof. Care to cite at least one example? As a result, society assumes that ALL Blacks or ALL Hispanics have the SAME opinions and act the SAME way Maybe it’s because 90% of Blacks vote the same way every election. In any event, what you wrote is a naked assertion with no proof. They fail to recognize that we are as diverse as Whites. Naked assertion with no proof about white failure to recognize that. Or about black diversity for that matter. If a Black person even SPEAKS, then supposedly that is the “Black voice of America.” Naked assertion with no proof. That is seen as the “Black opinion.” WTF? I see you once again use “wtf” as proof. Or is it a sign of your eloquence? (but you have the nerve to complain about our separate networks like BET. Hmmm wonder why we would have those???) I don’t wonder, I know. It’s because you are racist. – You can be pretty sure that an argument with a colleague of another race is more likely to jeopardize HIS/HER chances of advancement than yours. Just the opposite. Any day you can find an ongoing law suit against a corporation for some racism that wasn’t overt, but unconscious or institutional or whatever the racism flavor of the month is. There are hardly any whites who sue, and when it happens, racism is clearly on display. I’ve touched on it in several posts. I also posted information about whites being scared to talk about race and blacks constantly talking about it. This is because blacks are lauded for it, while whites get fired. How come we can’t discuss low black IQ and high black crime? Do you think whites don’t discuss it because we don’t know? Of course not! We know! Almost everyone around me, even apolitical people who’d never watch CNN or FoxNews, know full well about the low black IQ and the high black crime. Yet we can’t talk about it. Why? Because we’d be punished. But when you accuse whites of everything in the world - such as media portrayals of blacks being unfairly negative - you get away with it, even when you have no proof at all. – If you even acknowledge that racism exists, you are a HERO…. But if a Black or other minority brings up racism, they are “playing the race card”. That’s because a white person blames himself and tries to help another, while a black person tries to help himself and attack all others. This is where it would be helpful for me to once again use your favorite phrase: wtf! You can talk about how Whites have it soooo bad (LOL… WTF) There we go, again with the WTF! Whites don’t have it so bad because we have high IQ. But we are discriminated against through affirmative action and otherwise, as I stated above and in other posts. and how they are reversely discriminated against (again, LOL) “LOL” is not an argument. It’s an attempt to intimidate by laughing at a person to make him feel embarrassed and therefore unwilling to debate you. It won’t work here. with no one saying anything, as if that’s okay… but if a Black person talks about the discrimination they have faced, they are “playing the race card.” That’s because they are. When you get admitted to college ahead of someone who scored 300 points more than you on the SATs, the least you can do is shut up. – You never even have to worry about the POSSIBILITY of being discriminated against, to the point that it could severely affect the direction in which your life takes. Tell that to all those who didn’t get accepted because of affirmative action or didn’t get a scholarship because it was limited to minorities. Again, what you said is just a naked assertion with no proof. – You can go through life every day without being reminded of your race. Naked assertion without proof. In fact, whites are constantly reminded about their race in a negative way. I am pretty sure that EVERY Black person has, at some point, been the ONLY Black person somewhere, or one of a few When you will be blamed for all the troubles of every other race in the world, then talk. For now, just shut up. so we are constantly reminded that we are Black By your own race hustlers. And by college admissions counselors who want to admit you ahead of whites. – If you wanted to, you could arrange your life so that you would never have to deal with another person of color ever again Not if I am an employer or a university because I would get sued. and all of this could be done with you living a successful lifestyle in a nice, upscale neighborhood. You people need to decide what all white people are: are we all rich millionaires or are we all trailer park rednecks? – White women can walk into any store that sells makeup and find their shade of foundation in any texture, brand, or type that they like! Stores sell whatever customers buy. (BTW, why do most makeup brands carry like FIFTEEN shades of white and only 3-4 shades for darker skin tones???… when white people are all generally the same color, yet there is a HUGE diversity in the skin color of Black people…. HOW does that even make sense???) Again, stores sell whatever customers like. Blacks spend a lot more on their hair, so there are far, far more hair products for blacks than for whites. – If a movie starring all white characters comes out, everyone is going to go see it… White, black, doesn’t matter… because it’s considered mainstream. That’s because whites are a majority here. A Polish movie with only Poles is mainstream in Poland. A Japanese movie with only Japanese is mainstream in Japan. (Even Blacks who don’t particularly like whites watch “white” movies… because they are mainstream). So what? I know white people who like watching Indian movies, so? However, If a movie with all black characters comes out (even if they are A list actors), it is labeled “a black movie” and very few white people will go see it That’s because those movies are meant for blacks specifically. Look at “Barber Shop” or “House Party”. They are not stories of love or tragedy or whatever else that all people may experience. They are black stories. For blacks, with blacks. I mean… Dude, I could go on and on Is this your “eloquent” and “intelligent” argument? but, for the White people who insist that white privilege no longer exists… I have one question… ARE YOU SERIOUS??? I guess this is. Seriously… this is nothing more than intimidation by ridiculing those who disagree with you. It may work on people without any self-confidence, but it won’t pass here. White people have all of these privileges Naked assertion without any proof. Please cite an actual example. and yet STILL somehow manage to complain about the little that we DO get like Black history month, Black colleges, and BET. Very nice. Those are examples of black privilege. You see, when something exists, it’s very easy to give examples. (How selfish can you really be???) Another attempt at intimidation. Well I’ve already explained BET No you didn’t. You just wrote: “you have the nerve to complain about our separate networks like BET. Hmmm wonder why we would have those???” That’s not an explanation, that’s just an intimidation (”you have the nerve”). and as for Black history month, it is recognized because, in general, our history is not recognized at any other time throughout the year You have no history, just a list of black people who were fighting to promote black interest. That’s it. You go to school and learn about White inventors and White scientists and White politicians That’s because white investors and scientists exist. Blacks invented nothing - and I mean NOTHING - of major significance (like a computer or a car or an airplane). And those who invented anything were at least half-white. How often do you even hear mention of Black people, except during the slavery segment in history class???? Yes, I hear about black race hustlers, rappers and athletes all the time. When blacks succeed, they are talked about. So, just because you don’t have a particular period LABELED White history month does not mean that your history isn’t celebrated all day every day In fact, great white people can never be acknowledged as being white. If you say, “white guy invented X”, you will be declared a racist and will lose your job. Wake up! You sure are a selfish bunch. This is an attack, not proof. Your history is consistently celebrated throughout the YEAR, and that isn’t enough for you. Naked assertion with no proof. In fact, nobody can ever point out that someone who did something good is white. You still want to devote a month with a LABEL on it to celebrate your accomplishments even MORE. That’s because nobody good can be acknowledged as being part of the white community and white civilization. There is not a minority alive who isn’t aware of the accomplishments of white people And yet, the only thing you ever say about whites is that we owned slaves and persecuted you. Why do I never hear blacks say anything good about whites? We have these things shoved in our faces in our classrooms for our whole lives It’s called history. I am sorry that your African relatives never invented a legitimate study of history (as opposed to unscientific bullshit called “oral tradition”), but we whites have. And being in our society gives you the privilege to learn it. but there are white people who couldn’t even name a Black inventor or any Black person who has made a contribution to society (other than Obama… lol) There aren’t any. Computers, cars, printing press, phones, internet, airplanes, tanks, nuclear bombs, etc. were all invented by whites. Blacks have some inventions, but nothing on that level. We are taught that Christopher Columbus discovered America, for Heaven’s sake… which is completely FALSE… How do you discover land where people were already living?? You are an idiot. Nobody says that he invented America, he discovered it. Like I can discover a supermarket in my town. Doesn’t mean that it didn’t exist before me. Doesn’t mean that others weren’t aware of it. But I discovered it for myself and my family. Just as Columbus discovered it for himself and Europeans. Native Americans were there first… yet you hear nothing of their history except their depictions as savages… Yes, all the time. They are noble and whites are cruel. Do you remember the Pocahontas craze? But you have the nerve to complain that minorities have their own history months??? How incredibly egotistical! Another attempt at intimidation. And Black colleges existed because WHITE PEOPLE (your great people) wouldn’t allow Blacks to attend their schools And what happened after we allowed you into our schools? The reason that whites didn’t want blacks in their schools is that young black men are violent, as I’ve documented in several posts. Black men commit murder at least 20 times more than white men. Naturally, nobody wants to be near a high-crime population. so Black people decided to educate themSELVES! More like blacks decided to give themselves a diploma because what happens in black colleges can hardly be termed education. Black colleges are only slightly more rigorous than online diploma mills where you can buy a PhD for $300. And you didn’t even use your money for these black diploma mills: the government had to tax whites to sponsor these non-educational institutions. As a white person, You are more than welcome to attend a Black college if you choose to Why, thank you, but let’s remember that blacks had no college in Africa (black parts of Africa, I mean. The Arab parts had universities). These black colleges are paid for by the predominantly white taxpayers, but I thank you for letting me attend them. I understand that most white people are delusional See, and you said that I don’t have to worry about biased statements about white people. Even if you aren’t aware of EVERYTHING that we, as minorities, go through some things are just OBVIOUS. Like what? Some privileges and advantages that you have are OBVIOUS. Again, what is it? You can’t be THAT oblivious. Why was it so easy for you to give me examples of black privilege, yet you can’t do the same for white privilege? There isn’t a white person alive that could truly deny that they have MANY advantages over minorities in this country. And yet you can’t list any. However, some still will. That’s because you can’t even cite one example. Oh sure, they recognize that they have MANY MANY more privileges and advantages over the blacks and other minorities in America Ummm… like what? You keep repeating the same naked assertion over and over, but can you actually give me an example? but admitting this would mean that they could no longer play the “victim” role. I’d like to tell you the same thing, but I actually listed many examples of black privilege in this and other posts. Can you give me one? and Whites soooo love to play the victim. How so? Why is it that blacks sue so much more then? Again, just a naked assertion with no proof. They have a victim mentality without a real reason for it Naked assertion with no proof. They complain about Blacks complaining… and they say that we “play the race card” You already said that. Now give me some examples. but who’s REALLY playing the race card?? You are. Check law suits for discrimination. (They HATE to hear about other people complaining…. even when it’s warranted.. but they don’t mind complaining about stuff that’s not even reality). Naked assertion with no proof. When I can’t even read a news story online without the comments section underneath spewing racist comments So don’t read the comments. God forbid we are allowed to speak our mind. just because the story may have happened to be about a Black man or woman Again, look at all the negative things you’ve said about whites just in this one post. Imagine if a white person had said that. And you are typical of most blacks. who is playing the race card?? Again, you are repeating yourself. I already told you: you are! (Hint: White people think that ANY news story about ANY person of color warrants an attack on the person’s race… even if the story has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with race). Naked assertion without any proof. The reality, as I’ve already pointed out, is the direct opposite. When Whites accuse Blacks of getting into good schools and good jobs SOLELY because they are Black I already explained that all blacks in all competitive and semi-competitive schools are there due to affirmative action so this believe is warranted and justified. … not even recognizing the fact that PERHAPS the Black person was just more qualified then them…. Just because you repeat yourself, doesn’t make it anymore true now than it was earlier in your post. who’s REALLY playing the race card?? Dammit, you are! Sure, Blacks complain of racism and discrimination Exactly. You get affirmative action, free tutoring, racist frats/sororities and racist scholarships, and then you spend your college years complaining about racism to get even more. That’s playing the race card. because it HAPPENS to them Welfare and affirmative action is what happens to them. What you said is just a naked assertion with no proof. “Racism happens to blacks because I said it does!” is your whole argument. but white people sure hate to hear about it If we accept you on affirmative action and give you free tutoring and a scholarship, then the least you could do is not call us names like racists and rednecks. they love to dish it out In fact, they are scared to death of dishing out anything. You can shut up 90% of whites just by screaming racism totally out of the blue, even on a topic not related to race. but then they expect us to sweep it under a rug Sweep what exactly under the rug? Give me an example? but, as complainants, white people are TEN TIMES WORSE than Black people Is that figure based on a scientific study? Then how come blacks sue so much more than whites? because AT LEAST when Black people complain about discrimination, they actually have a REASON to Naked assertion without any proof. Care to give us some examples rather than repeating the same thing for the 10th time? When White people complain of so-called “reverse discrimination,” they are trying to play the victim with NO JUSTIFIABLE reason! So affirmative action and racist scholarships aren’t a reason? Why is that? Naked assertion without any proof. They have all the privilege in America Naked assertion without any proof. HOW IN THE WORLD could they be victims?? I already told you. It’s like a case of “Who has it worse??” The person who loses out due to affirmative action has it worse. You know that friend you have who, if you complain that you broke a nail, she will complain that she broke her NOSE?? Yeah… that’s white people. Instead of an unrealistic hypothetical, how about you give us a real life example? Why didn’t you do that here? Maybe because you don’t have one. They ALWAYS want to look like the victim You are just repeating yourself thinking that if you say it enough times, people will not notice that you give no reasons for your assertions. and they know that admitting their privilege will mean they cannot play the victim role anymore You already said that before. this is why they choose to deny racism against blacks Ok, and why is it that in this long post you still did not give me one real-life example? even when it’s right in their face. Like what? You’ve said this before and you keep repeating it, yet you don’t give us any examples. It’s like the elephant in the room that everyone tries to forget is there. Care to give me an example instead of an assertion? So, how’d I do??? You did well enough to get an A in most college courses. You just stated some leftist assertions, repeated them 12-13 times and finally shut up without giving any proof for what you’ve said. Unfortunately, this is what passes for education today, so long as you are a liberal. Being a liberal means you can just get away with saying whatever you want and never proving it. In real life, you just embarrassed yourself and by being unable to cite any examples, you’ve shown that there are none. You’ve rambled on and on, stated the same assertions repeatedly, but never once gave any proof. And that’s evidence that proof does not exist. Posted in Dialogue on Race | Tagged race, race realism, racialism, racism | 4 Comments » Joe McCarthy was right March 1, 2009 by guywhite This reads like a joke, but according to AfricanCrisis.org, it really is how it went. Notice what happened in the end to the person who pointed out the obvious. [This is a story from one of my American friends. I removed the names. Subsequent history has proven that Senator Joe McCarth was indeed correct in his assertions back then. He was in fact, a hero. Jan] My American friend wrote:- I have a friend who writes comic books and magazines (his name is jj) He tells this story of one of his publishers - very famous in the comic book community for being the classic leftist hippie with the scraggly long hair, ginham anle-length dress, extreme left wing views — but a damned good publisher. her name is xx, but she goes by “yy.” Anyway, one day she starts on this rant in the office on Joe McCarthy, and jj being the right-winger he is, is holding his tongue silen! tly. She goes on and on for a while, and when she finally stopped for air, jj asked her why she got so worked up about McCarthy. She said that McCarthy had persecuted her parents right out of the State Department when she was a little girl, and she never forgot it. xx said that they had been persecuted for their views, and that it was “un-American.” jj asked her what views they were persecuted for. xx said that they were communists. jj blinked hard, then started laughing. He said to her, “So, I guess McCarthy was right. There WERE communists in the State Department!” That was the last day jj worked for xx. Posted in News Commentary | Tagged communism, mccarthy, mccarthyism, unamerican | No Comments » DailyKos calls me a Poopie-Head March 1, 2009 by guywhite My article on the Diversity Depression was re-published on several other web sites. Someone else posted it on FreeRepublic. Here’s what mainstream conservatives think about it: “Great article.” “Great explanation of a somewhat complicated topic.” “Nail. Hit. Head.” “He’s right, but don’t expect anyone in the political world to have the courage to agree.” “very excellent discussion.” “All of these economic plans are simply reparations without calling it that.” “posting it on twitter… Bingo….We have a winner!” Note, however, the far-left DailyKos response. They didn’t put up the main part of the article explaining how the CRA caused the problem, but even in the part that they chose to criticize, they explained nothing. Bank marketing people are salesmen. Oh the horror! Everyone else tries to sell their services: news stands, lawyers, colleges. Every time I turn on the TV, I see a commercial for some medication or a hospital, but that doesn’t mean that I get unnecessary brain surgery. If blacks didn’t want to borrow money, they didn’t have to. But banks were forced by the CRA to lend as much as they possibly could to any black person who would stop by. The DailyKos argues that when the bank gave a $13,000 loan instead of a $6,000 loan it benefited. Not unless the loan was actually paid back! And the whole problem now is that loans were not paid back! Otherwise there would be no recession and nobody would care about banks’ mortgage practices. Whether the original bank kept the mortgage or sold it to someone else, so long as the money were paid back, there was no problem for anyone. The reason banks had to lend to unqualified minorities is the CRA-imposed reparations in the form of loans and mortgages. Banks were forced by race hustlers and politicians to lend ridiculous amounts to blacks and Hispanics. Now they are being blamed for it! But blacks never have any responsibility for anything. That was really the only thing resembling an argument that the DailyKos put up. The rest of the way, they just said that things are very complicated (but how so?) and I am a victim of anti-intellectualism. They must’ve figured, “why argue when we can just call him stupid”. It’s amazing how the liberals’ arguments did not progress from the time they were three years old calling others “poopie-heads”. Posted in Diversity Training & Affirmative Action | Tagged Affirmative Action, crisis, dailykos, depression, diversity, economy, loans, mortgage, race, race realism, racialism, racism, recession, reparations | 5 Comments » Threats Against Me February 28, 2009 by guywhite This is from Christopher Moebs (mebzart@hotmail.com, mebzart@aol.com and crmoebs@earthlink.net). He’s a creator of $3 a book “lefty comics”, obviously a very intellectually challenging job for a 55-year-old. Yet another balding hippie with long, feminine hair. I am so scared! I read your article on the Diversity recession, and I must say, I am amazed. Are you motivated by greed, or is it just pure racism? And, no, greed is not a “code word”, it is a universal absolute, an ancient and fundamental vice and a sin, if you prefer a religious spin. Of course, upon reading your article I see it would be to expect far too much for you to recognize the difference between truth and right wing racist blather. And for your information, I’m a highly educated white guy considered to be a scholar by those who know me, I’m not fooled by the nom de plume “White Guy”. Unfortunatley for you and your criminally traitorous cronies, even the slow witted are beginning to see through your lies. There are millions like me out there who are not only fed up with your racist garbage, but are determined that your kind wiil ultimately face justice (though true justice would be to crucify all corporate executives, bankers, crooked mortgage lenders and politicians along the road to Washington D.C. - Roman justice). The proof that you’re a liar (besides the article) is the fact that you hide behind an assumed name - people such as myself proudly proclaim who we are. I could go into specifics and rebut every misleading statement you make line by line, but you are not worth the effort, you slimy weasel. Crawl back into your hole before you are dealt the street justice you so deserve. Chris Moebs, a proud patriot Ok, Mr. Moebs. I agree. I deserve street justice. I travel quite a bit and I will probably be somewhere near you in Michigan at some point. (Did you realize that your address and phone are listed online in several places? Another person may not be as nice as I am in response to your threats.) So please just tell me when to stop by. I won’t attack you, I promise. Unlike you, I am not violent. I just want to see a liberal hippie try to assault me. Your greatest military hero, 2004 Democratic nominee Jean-Francois Karrie, threw a hand grenade during the War in Vietnam and hit … his own butt! When Arnold Schwarzenegger called him a girlie-man, it was an insult to women. I don’t know a single woman who throws that badly. As you try to hit me, you’ll probably miss and fall forward. Just like another liberal did when he tried sucker punching Ann Coulter. (Remember, it’s always wrong to hit a woman, unless she’s a conservative.) The only way a liberal will be able to harm someone is if he accidentally crashes his bicycle into them. And to answer your question why you can state your name and those who disagree with you can’t: our side is not made up of wanna-be stormtroopers who want to destroy anyone they disagree with. You see, Mr. Moebs, I can disagree with people without wanting to kill them or even destroy their career. But you can’t. As for being an intellectual among your friends, it’s not necessarily that hard because most people are surrounded by those of similar IQ to them. Even a person with an IQ of 75 is likely to be treated as an intellectual by at least some of his friends. When you establish yourself as an intellectual among other people’s friends, then we’ll talk. I am pretty certain that this weed-smoking genius (also from Taylor, Michigan; has the same name; also has red hair; also like leftist politics and art) is your relative. Reading the blog of the younger Chris Moebs, it is no wonder that you feel like an intellectual among your friends and relatives. It’s like being the greatest athlete in a nursing home for paraplegics. Posted in Dialogue on Race | Tagged crisis, depression, diversity, economy, mortgage, race, race realism, racialism, racism, recession | 3 Comments » Open and Honest Questions for Eric Holder & Michelle Obama February 28, 2009 by guywhite Not to beat this to death, but the Barack Obama administration keeps on harping on it, with new statements calling for an open and honest dialogue being issued by EPA administrator Lisa Jackson and First Baby Mama Michelle “I was never proud of America until it began voting for my husband” Obama. So here are some open and honest topics from someone who’s not a coward: 1. It is a fact that whites have more than blacks in every way possible: education, money, lack of criminal record. There are only two possible explanations for it: whites did something wrong or whites did something right. If you will talk about all the evils whites allegedly perpetuated on blacks, today and hundreds of years ago, can we list something the good things whites may have done and some errors common in the black community? 2. What proof is there that black people still suffer from slavery 150 years ago besides your claims? Do Russians still suffer from the legacy of serfdom? If so, why did Russia get rapidly wealthier after the fall of the Soviet Union and the people of Moscow are now wealthier than most Americans? If blacks still suffer from the legacy of segregation into the black ghetto, does that mean that Jews must still suffer from the legacy of the Jewish ghetto? If so, then why are Jews the wealthiest people in the United States and every other country? Why do they score the highest on academic and IQ tests? 3. Can we discuss the fact that according to surveys of crime victims (not a survey of arrest rates, but rather a survey of victims who usually desperately want the real criminal to be caught), blacks commit 7 times more crime per capita and 10 times more violent crime per capita than whites? Furthermore, blacks commit 20 times more murders per capita than whites? Can we discuss the fact that 32% of black men spend over a year in prison, plus at all those who did time in county jails, received probation or were never caught? Can we discuss the fact that black criminals commit more crime against whites than their fellow African-Americans, despite usually living in neighborhoods with few whites, meaning that they purposely target Caucasians. Can we discuss the fact that poverty does not cause crime, as evidenced by the fact that America’s crime rates were lowest during the Great Depression and highest during the booming 1960s and 1980s? When crime-prone people win the lottery or become professional athletes, they still commit crime, and when low-risk people suddenly become poor, they still don’t. A person does not go out and rape someone, or even rob someone, just because he loses a job. But a dysfunctional person is unlikely to have a job, while at the same time likely to commit a crime, whether the economy is good or bad. Can we discuss that the reason blacks serve more time is that they are more likely to have prior criminal records? That they are more likely to use a weapon? That they are more likely to injure a victim in commission of a crime? Can we discuss the fact that when we count for past criminal records and the level of the offense (for example, first degree battery with a gun in a dark alley vs. fourth degree battery with just fists in a bar), the criminal system discriminates against whites and not blacks? An 1996 analysis of 55,000 big-city felony cases found that black defendants were convicted at a lower rate than whites in 12 of the 14 federally designated felony categories. Several other major studies confirmed this. Rather than harping on the 2 categories where blacks come out behind (such as crack vs. cocaine), can we discuss the fact that in 12 out of 14 categories of crime, 86%, whites are discriminated against? Why is the 14% when blacks lose so much more worthy of constant talk than 86% of categories that persecute white defendants? Can we discuss that? 4. Can we discuss the radically different loan default rates between races? Blacks default almost 40% of the time on college loans, for example, while whites default only about 6% of the time. Can we discuss the fact that banks for forced to issue over $4.5 trillion ($4,500,000,000,000) to unqualified black borrowers which is what caused the present recession? 5. Can we discuss IQ differences? Do they exist? Does intelligence exist? Does the IQ measure real intelligence differences? Is IQ research science or pseudo-science? Who’s trying to prevent the real science about intelligence, the science that’s recognized by all the professionals in the field, from becoming known to regular people? What role does IQ play in educational and occupational achievement? How much of it is genetic and how much environmental? Does the fact that there may be some environmental causes of IQ differences mean that whites are to blame? Could it be that blacks cause those environmental factors, such as due to the fact that they are less likely to breast-feed their children, a known IQ factor? The American Psychological Association’s Board of Scientific Affairs set up a Task Force on intelligence research which concluded that IQ scores do have high predictive validity for individual differences in school achievement. They confirmed the predictive validity of IQ for adult occupational status, even when variables such as education and family background have been statistically controlled. They agree that individual differences in intelligence are substantially influenced by genetics and that both genes and environment, in complex interplay, are essential to the development of intellectual competence. They state there is little evidence to show that childhood diet influences intelligence except in cases of severe malnutrition. The task force agrees that large differences do exist between the average IQ scores of blacks and whites, and that these differences cannot be attributed to biases in test construction. Can we discuss this? Could this be the source of black failure? Could this be the reason blacks go to college less and fail out of school more? Could this be the reason for crime? For high loan default rates? 6. Can we discuss the fact that black-majority schools receive far more funding than white schools, but lag behind only because the students destroy everything from the books to the walls? The state that spends least on education per student is Utah, which is almost all white. The state that spends most is New York, with a large black population. Cities spend more than suburbs and rural areas, with black-majority cities such as Washington D.C. coming out at the top. Can we discuss why is it that black kids are more deserving of funding when everything merely gets destroyed? 7. And while we are discussing spending, can we discuss why is it that whites who are about 65% of the population pay over 90% of the taxes? Why do whites pay a higher percentage of their salary than blacks? At the same time that they pay a higher percentage of their salary in taxes, whites get far less from the government. Only 38% of welfare recipients, for example, are white. Even fewer residents in housing projects are white. Can we discuss the massive transfer of wealth from whites to blacks every year where each and every black man, woman and child receives on an average over $10,000 more in government spending than what they pay in taxes? 8. Can we discuss the fact that affirmative action costs our whole economy about 8% of its GDP due to the inefficiencies it creates where businesses and the government are forced to hire based on race rather than ability? Can we discuss the fact that affirmative action costs the average white family almost $25,000 and the average Asian family over $40,000, while the average black family benefits in the amount over $17,500? 9. Can we discuss why other colonies succeed upon independence, but Africa, Haiti and the Caribbean collapsed economically? When Hong Kong was under British rule, it was wealthier than its rules in the United Kingdom and actually wealthier almost all the world’s countries. Yet black countries cannot succeed no matter what economic or political system they try, and no matter how much aid is sent to them. Why are all black-run countries poor? If white countries keep Africa down, then show us how? Is it all those hundreds of billions of dollars in government and private aid that goes to Africa? Why is it that other countries can overcome international pressure, but Africa is always helpless? Why is it that despite a global boycott of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe), it was wealthier under white rule than under black rule? Same question for South Africa. 10. If black people are portrayed poorly in the media, as you claim with no proof, please give us some examples? Can we discuss the fact that when Law & Order producers use real life stories, they nearly always change the race of criminals from black to white? All the alarm commercials feature white criminals. In all the movies I can think of where the criminal was portrayed as a purely unsympathetic figure, he was white. In rare cases when a black person is seen breaking the law, he’s usually fighting a bigger evil or defending his family, and the movie-watchers are supposed to sympathize with him. Whites are far more likely to commit crime in fictional media than real life, while blacks are far less likely. Is that media bias that you speak of? Bias against whom? If you have examples of blacks portrayed negatively (other than on the news with real life stories), can you please tell us what they are? Finally and most importantly, can we discuss how you never have any proof for anything you say? You just make naked assertions about “racism” and “legacies”, and then intimidate people by calling them names in hope of suppressing all two-way debates, thus turning people into cowards! Can we discuss that? No? Then, Mr. Holder, stop calling us cowards. You turned us into cowards by suppressing all debate. The only explanations that you want to allow are those that blame whites for black failure. If you don’t allow any statements about white success or black shortcomings, then the only other explanation that is available is to blame whitey. And isn’t that what you really want when you are calling for a dialogue on race? Posted in Dialogue on Race | Tagged barack obama, eric holder, lisa jackson, race, race realism, racialism, racism | 3 Comments » Quote of the Day February 28, 2009 by guywhite “You can’t reason someone out of something that they didn’t reason themselves into.” - Ben Franklin Not sure where I found this quote. I have been ridiculously busy the last few days and remember reading it during the brief work breaks, but not sure if it’s one of the posters on this blog or elsewhere who wrote it. Whoever it is, thank you, excellent quote and certainly does apply to all the liberals who try to argue here. I will write a lengthy response to Catherine. I deleted and marked as spam comments where she personally attacked others with words such as ‘moron’ and ‘idiot’. I am sure in her mind it proves that I am afraid of being proven wrong with her phenomenal arguments. (Not one of which was new - I heard all of them a million times in school. Like so many college kids, she’s incapable of thinking, just regurgitating her professors’ propaganda.) Ah yes, as soon as I read that she called Californian a moron and HardLogic an idiot, I immediately saw the light and began singing “We Shall Overcome”. Are you kidding me?! And when asked to prove her assertions with some evidence, she either outright stated that she refuses to do so or responded with “WTF, lol”. Calling someone a moron and ridiculing their question with “wtf, lol” may pass as proper academic discourse in most universities (so long as the attacker is a liberal and the person on the receiving end isn’t), but I have no reason to allow that on this blog. It does not add anything of value to our discussions. If anything, it will drive away the intellectuals who would not want to be involved in such mud. I haven’t had a chance to respond to her idiotism because I’ve been busy, but she follows the standard Nazi propaganda technique where if a lie is repeated enough times, people will eventually believe it, and therefore, one must repeat false conclusions as often as possible, even though it is impossible to back them up with any evidence. The point of the propaganda technique is to repeat something enough times, from enough different sources, that people will start to believe you. Anyway, I am falling asleep here, but I will write more on this later. She’s really very typical of indoctrinated college students. Almost everyone here has a college degree and a large number went to grad school, so I doubt anything she said came as any surprise to you. To those who didn’t go to college, as you can see, you didn’t miss much. I will use her garbage to pick apart the typical liberal college student screaming “Yes, We Can”, thinking she knows something, but who in reality is utterly incapable of analyzing and thinking on her own.
  • Culturalism is only a start, and race does Matter.

    I have read the book, culturalism is a great idea, but it is only a start. The book says race does not play a part, tell that to those who live in the many china towns and mini-mexicos across the United States. Culture is connected to ethnicity just as culture is connected to language, some on the left, even charge that to enforce assimilation is tantamount to ethnic genocide. It is only we whites who they say have no culture, we are clay to be molded in whatever image they choose for us.