Locust blog

November 15, 2008

Drug Cartels Flex Muscle In American Southwest

Filed under: Liberalism — whitelocust @ 11:46 pm

Drug Cartels Flex Muscle In Southwest

CBS Evening News: Explosion Of Kidnappings, Torture Connected To Mexican Drug Rings

‘Drug War Crosses Border’, ‘description’: ‘Phoenix, Ariz., has become ground zero for an increasing number of kidnappings and home invasions involving Mexican drug cartels. Armen Keteyian reports.

Play Video
PlayVideo
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4597349n

Drug War Crosses Border

Phoenix, Ariz., has become ground zero for an increasing number of kidnappings and home invasions involving Mexican drug cartels. Armen Keteyian reports. | Share/Embed

Answers.com

(CBS) It’s a phone call few Americans will ever hear: “He’s going to lose his finger, don’t let him lose his life.”

That’s the terrifying sound of a kidnapper demanding money in exchange for the life of a loved one. It’s hard to believe but calls like these come in virtually every single day in Phoenix, Ariz., which last year set up a special task force to battle back, CBS News chief investigative correspondent Armen Keteyian reports.

“The status of the problem is one that is going to explode across our country,” said Lt. Lauri Burgett of the Phoenix Police Department’s Violent Crimes Bureau.

Just last weekend a mother and her 3-year-old daughter were kidnapped by Mexican meth dealers seeking money owed by the dad. She was eventually released unharmed.

So was another man, but only after being tortured for three days by smugglers. His wife had to listen to his screams over the phone – as well as field $100,000 for ransom.

“They tried to take out the eyes and the ears and the finger, also,” she said.

In fact, law enforcement sources tell CBS News that Phoenix has become ground zero for the explosion in the reported number of kidnappings and home invasions involving drug traffickers and criminals with connections to the Mexican drug cartels.

A CBS News investigation has discovered that as of last weekend, there have been 266 reported kidnappings and 300 home invasions this year alone. Sources say the real figures could run as much as three times higher because so many go unreported.

“It wasn’t uncommon to have a new kidnapping case coming into our offices on a daily basis,” Burgett said.

Law-enforcement sources say the kidnappings signal the brutal expansion of the raging Mexican drug wars spilling across the border. And one map reveals just how widely Mexican drug organizations have spread across the country – 195 cities in all.


Check out National Drug Intelligence Center maps and data about Mexican drug operations in the United States. (16 pgs.)


In June, three Mexican nationals were arrested by Phoenix police after a violent home invasion and murder at a drug “safe house.” They were dressed head-to-toe just like the local S.W.A.T. team – and just as heavily armed.

Now CBS News has learned enforcer gangs just south of the Mexican border have added military-grade hand grenades to their arsenal – something special agent Jose Wall expects to see in Phoenix any day.

“There’s nothing to make me believe that it won’t happen,” said Wall, an agent at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

It’s not just hand grenades, kidnappings and home invasions that have law enforcement on edge. They say it’s only a matter of time before innocent civilians are caught in the crossfire.

Real Change!

Filed under: Death of the Nation, Liberalism, Socialism, Western Giants Awaken — whitelocust @ 11:34 pm
Change

Change

Do You own one?  You better if you know whats good for you!

The West and Global Mathematics

Filed under: The West — whitelocust @ 11:24 pm

The West and Global Mathematics

by Baron Bodissey

The Fjordman Report
The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report via Gates of Vienna.
For a complete Fjordman blogography, see The Fjordman Files. There is also a multi-index listing here.

This post is adapted from Fjordman’s comments on earlier posts here and here.

I’ve been reading Greek Thought, Arab Culture by Dimitri Gutas, which is a surprisingly boring book. Gutas treats the Arabic translation movement in Baghdad as a major achievement. It was an achievement in some ways, but he admits that they benefited greatly from the pre-established Zoroastrian Persian ideology of translation and libraries. He also admits that Muslims only translated scientific works, not the Homeric epics, for instance. He does briefly mention that they translated some Sanskrit and Persian works, but says almost nothing about the Indian ones. The Indian numeral system was important and should be mentioned, although the Greek texts were clearly the most important.

Muslims had access to Greek, Persian and Sanskrit works. Theoretically speaking, they could have explored the Indo-European linguistic tree. But they didn’t. Europeans did. It is true that Muslims made some worthwhile works in mathematics, but we should remember that the three most important mathematical traditions in the ancient world were the Greek, the Mesopotamian (which the Greeks head learned from, and which the Persian continued) and the Indian. This means that Middle Eastern Muslims had direct access to all of the most important mathematical traditions on Earth simultaneously. They did make some progress in algebra, but it would almost be surprising if they didn’t manage to produce any significant mathematical works.

One book on my reading list which I haven’t read so far is The Shape of Ancient Thought: Comparative Studies in Greek and Indian Philosophies by Thomas McEvilley. My impression from what I have read about it is that he places too much emphasis on the Indian influence on Greek culture. Everybody says nowadays that Greek culture was “really” invented somewhere else (think Black Athena). We do know that the Egyptians, Mesopotamians and Phoenicians influenced the Greeks, but the Greeks openly admitted this, and these cultures all belonged to the Eastern Mediterranean world whereas India was far away.

There is a school of thought which claims that Plato’s political system in The Republic mirrors the Hindu caste system, and that Greek atomism was imported from Indian atomism. I haven’t seen convincing evidence of this so far, and it’s difficult to see how this influence should have been transferred to Greece prior to Hellenistic times, but the question is worth exploring. We can find traces of a commonly shared Proto-Indo-European mythological heritage with India, however faint.
- – - - – - – - -
The Chinese mathematical tradition was significant, but less influential than the Indian one. I would be tempted to say that China was a hardware civilization whereas India was a software civilization. The truth is that given the size of their economy and their population, the Chinese were surprisingly weak in mathematics and in the abstract sciences in general. This proves that although some minimum level of wealth is certainly a necessary cause for the growth of modern science (extremely poor people concentrate on surviving, not on inventing calculus or comparative linguistics), it is by no means a sufficient one. The Chinese believed the Earth was flat until the seventeenth century AD, and they only corrected this error after their astronomy had been virtually displaced by European astronomy. This was after European (Greek) astronomers had known that the Earth was spherical for more than two thousand years, a knowledge which, despite popular myths to the contrary, was never lost during medieval times.

Asian rockets weighed a couple of kilograms at most and were powered by gunpowder. None of them would have been able to challenge the Earth’s gravity, leave the atmosphere and explore the Solar System. In fact, Asians never coined the concept of “gravity” in the first place. Space travel is the invention of only one civilization, the Western one. None of the Asian nations ever came remotely close to achieving something similar on their own, not even the Japanese. In fact, without Europeans mankind might not have been able to explore the Solar System for many centuries yet.

From the fourteenth century AD, which is to say the Italian Renaissance, until the twentieth century, almost all important global advances in mathematics were European. I would be tempted to say that European leadership was stronger in mathematics than in any other scholarly discipline. Perhaps the simplest explanation for why the Scientific Revolution happened in Europe is because the language of nature is written in mathematics, and Europeans did more than any other civilization to develop — or discover — the vocabulary of this language.

France: Train Sabotage By Leftists

Filed under: The West — whitelocust @ 11:21 pm

France: Train Sabotage By Leftists

by Baron Bodissey

Eurostar sabotagedLast night’s news feed included an ANSAmed article about two incidents in France in which high-speed trains were sabotaged by anarchist groups (a.k.a. Antifa or Autonomer).

Gates of Vienna reader and correspondent Aviel (who reported on his experience in Cologne during the Pro-Köln incidents in September) sent us the following excerpts from a more extensive article in Der Spiegel, and included with them his commentary.

First, excerpts from the article:

Terror Officials Explore Possible Germany Link

French police arrested a number of people Tuesday suspected of having taken part in a coordinated series of attacks on the country’s high-speed rail network that left thousands of commuters stranded and saw one train plough through two concrete slabs at 150 kph (90 mph).

The police stated that those arrested are believed to belong to a far-left anarchist group waging protests against nuclear waste that was being transported from France to the Gorleben radioactive waste storage site in northwest Germany, according to the BBC.

In Germany, these protests saw 16,000 police battle an estimated 15,000 protesters, who succeeded in causing a 20-hour delay in the shipment of 123 tons of radioactive waste.

The arrests were carried out in three cities by members of France’s anti-terrorist police force. In a statement, France’s interior ministry said Tuesday that several hundred officers from the domestic intelligence service and anti-terror police had been monitoring members of the “anarcho-autonomous” movement for months.

[…]

The four attacks on Saturday involved sabotaging high-speed TGV lines by hooking metal bars on overhead 25,000-volt power cables. The attacks took place on lines north, east and south of Paris, causing sudden and widespread delays in traffic national traffic, Eurostar services to Brussels and London, and on Thalys routes to the Netherlands and northern Europe. Over 20,000 passengers were delayed and 160 trains disrupted as a result of the attacks, according to the SCNF.

In a separate and possibly related attack on Sunday, saboteurs placed two concrete slabs across railway tracks near the southern French town of Narbonne. The train, which was estimated to be travelling at 150 kph when it met the slabs, sustained some damage but remained on the tracks and arrived in Perpignan only an hour behind schedule. No passengers were injured.

Displaced: A White American Talks About Home

Filed under: Death of the Nation, Race Realism, The West — whitelocust @ 10:55 pm

Displaced: A White American Talks About Home

More news stories on the Demographic Transformation

Interview by Robert S. Griffin, American Renaissance, June 2004

Denis Ruiz is a 50-year-old computer programmer who lives with his wife and daughter near Philadelphia. A short time before I interviewed him, he learned he had non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a form of cancer. He was in significant pain at the start of our conversation, and I wasn’t sure he could complete it, but as the interview progressed his voice grew stronger, and his manner became that of a healthy man.

I grew up in the 1950s in a little town called Fairview Village in south Jersey. It was a planned community designed by a fellow named Litchfield, and offered a pleasant environment for people who worked in the shipyard in nearby Camden. Fairview Village had what you could call garden community architecture. Brick houses were attached to each other in clusters of four, and sometimes two, so the houses were in rows, but the rows were broken up. The houses all had yards, and there were common areas on every block where they didn’t build houses. Some blocks had no houses at all; there was just grass and trees. Neighbors would walk their dogs, and kids would play football.

People planted lovely oak trees, so by the time I lived there the trees were mature, maybe sixteen to eighteen inches in diameter. There was a town square with park benches, and people would sit and talk and get to know each other, and there were stores and businesses. It was a socially and economically self-contained unit. Looking back on it, the neighborhood where I grew up seems idyllic, with its parks and shaded streets. In fact, one fellow who had lived in England remarked that Fairview Village was like a little English town.

In the late 1950s, economic changes had a big effect on my hometown. The shipyard folded, as did an iron and forge plant where a lot of people worked. So the town was weakened. But I think it would have rebounded by the end of the 1970s as other businesses reflecting the change away from industrialization came into that area—like the business I am in, the computer business. But that never happened because a second process was at work: the integration of non-whites.

Before it became illegal, realtors in Fairview Village showed houses only to white families. Although this has been painted as unfair, it reflected the desires of the people who lived there. They wanted to live among their own people. They wanted to live in a white community. Now, I see this as the highest form of self-determination: people defining their own community, deciding what comes into their collective lives, determining their own standards.

It doesn’t matter if their standards don’t seem rational or moral to someone else. People have a right to decide who they will live with. This is not a matter of rationality or of morality. It is simply human. It’s not that they have ill will toward anyone; it’s just that they know what atmosphere they like. When realtors screened people and showed houses only to whites, it wasn’t a dark conspiracy. They were being true to the community, part of the community. But, of course, the issue was never defined this way, and in the late ’60s–early ’70s lawsuits forced realtors to sell houses to blacks and anyone else who wanted to move in.

A lot of the blacks who moved in have been “section eights.” Section eight is part of a law according to which the government helps pay the rent for poor minorities, so they can afford to move into white areas. “Section eight” has turned out to be deadly poison for the Fairview Village of my youth.

The neighborhood where I grew up is now a wasteland. Whites are still a majority—55 percent—but Fairview Village has gone the way of a typical urban black area. When I was living there, when a tree died, an Irish guy named Fred Fagan would plant a new one. Now, those saplings are mighty trees. When a tree dies these days, no one plants a new one. There is broken glass everywhere, and things like busted up shopping carts block the alleys. Many of the old brick houses are covered with some kind of awful siding. When I was a kid, people made repairs and restorations in the mode of the architecture of the town. Now, the houses are all different, from one to the next, and there is no common thread to their appearance. There used to be hedges and white picket fences that lent a common feel to the area—no more.

My mother still lives there. When I get out of my car I wonder, “Is this an ambush? Is someone going to jump me?” Recently, a black teenager knocked my mother to the ground injuring her, and took her purse. This sort of thing was unheard of in the old neighborhood, but it is common now. The black woman across the street was just arrested for robbing 7-Eleven stores.

When I was growing up, kids could go anywhere in town. We could go in the woods and explore down by the creek. Now, you would never allow your child even to walk around the block. Just this year, two black men abducted a young white woman, took her where we used to play ball, and raped, and murdered her. Heinous crimes happen regularly there.

There is no sense of connectedness among the people in my old hometown. A white teenager hanged himself in his bedroom. The word is he spent a lot of time alone, listening to rap music. So much popular music these days is dark and sinister, and for someone already on the edge, as I assume this kid was, that can be deadly. In the old days, the risk of a terrible thing like this was much less. Back then, this boy would have had a supportive white community and way of life.

Back in 1967 or so, I listened to Jim Morrison—he was the lead singer of the Doors—and took what he sang very seriously, as if he were Keats or Walt Whitman or somebody like that. I remember one Morrison song—I think it was “Alabama.” The message was, “I must have whiskey or your wife.” It was about drunks going from house to house looking for alcohol and sex, and there is Morrison recasting it in a way that glamorized and legitimized scum of the earth. That was what I was taking in. But I lived in a place that counteracted that poison. I had something the boy down the street didn’t have. I had a community.

The place I live in now, on the outskirts of Philadelphia, was clean and safe when my wife and I moved here 15 years ago, but the pattern of my childhood home has been repeated. Non-whites have moved in, and the neighborhood has deteriorated drastically. Before, there was a fair number of poor white people, but they were never a problem.

We have problems now, and I increasingly find this isn’t a suitable place for my family. It doesn’t reflect our heritage and values. The Catholic school here pushes multiracialism and doesn’t emphasize academic excellence. My daughter, who went there for a time, told us the black boys were aggressive, and that she didn’t like them. That didn’t come from us; we hadn’t said a word to her about race. We learned first hand, and the hard way, that these liberal, multicultural schools don’t work. We realized that we wanted a school of our own flavor. The school that provides the closest thing to a European-type education is unfortunately 35 miles from where we live. So, every day, either my wife or I drive 35 miles there and back. At the same time, because of the expansion of office parks, what used to be a nine-mile drive to my work is now a 25-mile drive.

What this means is that there is no neighborhood here for me at all. A neighborhood is where your friends are, and where your kids go to school, and where you work—that’s what makes a neighborhood. Our people like to be bound to the earth. I need to belong to a certain soil, to a certain locality, and I need to stay in that locality, and for that process to go on for generations. I really believe that my desire to be grounded—literally—is a basic white or European impulse. There are cultural factors working against us, like increased consumerism and individualism, and there’s the globalization of the economy. But whatever is going on, I have to go to some other part of the region to find work. I feel like a migrant worker.

A lot of whites have been building gigantic houses on three-quarter-acre lots in the far reaches of the suburbs, and this makes them pretty much impervious to encroachment; blacks are not going to go there. But these white people lose in the process, too, because they have to own a $350,000 house, and they are paying out of their ears to keep up with the mortgage. All that money could be used to have a richer life on another level with their children and family. If they lived in an old-style house, they could get by on one salary. They wouldn’t have to work two jobs. If they could build a simple three bedroom semi-detached house in a town like the one I grew up in, where the lots are small and there are little gardens and walkways and so on, they could have something affordable, and experience something really worthwhile: living in a tight-knit community of white people.

Because of what has happened to the neighborhood, if my wife and I move we won’t get more than we paid for our house fifteen years ago. Without those changes, I would be in much better financial shape. At one time, my mother’s house was a desirable property, but it is worth very little now. I don’t want to end up like my mother, or in a situation like the one I’m in now, where the neighborhood is declining, and I have to either stay and feel trapped or get out.

I’d like to grow apple trees, and it takes years to do that, and you can’t take trees with you when you move. So we are probably going to rent near where I work, and also buy a rural place and go there on the weekends and fix it up. When I retire in fifteen years we’ll move there.

What I would really like to do is turn back the clock 50 years. I have been going to homesteading sites on the Internet, and reading homesteading magazines to get guidance and inspiration. I’m reading about people who are forming small communities in places like Kentucky, and I correspond with people who are actually doing this, to get a sense of what homesteading entails and what their lives are like. They are all white, and though they don’t talk about race, I suspect there is a racial impulse behind what they are doing, at least to some extent. Some homesteaders in rural Pennsylvania have invited me to visit, which I plan to do when I get over my current health problem.

It saddens me to think that I can no longer live where my mother lives and where I grew up. There would be nothing more rewarding than to have a property like that passed down to me in the condition it was once in. Everywhere my family has lived in, we made improvements, such as putting in a nice garden or gutting the walls and putting in new sheet rock, and improving the drainage. Over decades, these changes add up to significant improvements: a better garden, a vineyard, fruit trees, a nice deck. By staying in one place, your property improves and you improve the community, and you form deep, lasting connections with people. That is the way our ancestors in Europe lived. They were tied to a place. I feel that I am all the time planting and that I am never going to get the harvest; that I am never going to live in a true community.

I talked with my daughter about the country place I’m thinking about buying or building. I asked her, “If Mom and I build a place like that, would you like to stay there, live there after we are gone?” She said yes, she would. She is only seventeen years old, but I think she understands the costs of having to pick up and start over, and she doesn’t want to get into that pattern. That house will reflect 20 years of our labor. We will plant gardens and fruit trees and a vineyard, and make improvements. And we will be in a community where we are with people who see the world as we do, and we will know people and they will know us. And then we will give the house to our daughter. I’ll bet when my wife and I pass on she won’t just sell it and move. She will consider it the place where she should live, and she’ll build on it herself. My sickness has come out of nowhere, but once I get over this, I’m going to get that house.

Denis didn’t get the house. He died a few months after telling me this.

Original article

(Posted on November 14, 2008)


Comments

This article reflects exactly what happened to millions of us, to our communities. It is a perfect before and after picture and better gets to the heart of what we are losing as a nation and as a race than any reciting of statistics. Someone should go across the country collecting old pictures and films of our places before the invasion and then go back and film them as they are now, from the same camera angles if possible. Put it on a series of DVDs and distribute them to places that are still white and ask them again why they think diversity would be a good idea for their town.

Posted by Mike from not-Queens at 6:14 PM on November 14


A lot of whites have been building gigantic houses on three-quarter-acre lots in the far reaches of the suburbs, and this makes them pretty much impervious to encroachment; blacks are not going to go there. But these white people lose in the process, too, because they have to own a $350,000 house, and they are paying out of their ears to keep up with the mortgage. All that money could be used to have a richer life on another level with their children and family.

Or they could give it to organizations like the CofCC and publications like AR who are trying to do something about this sort of tragedy.

I keep hearing over and over again that blacks don’t succeed because they live in bad environments. Read this story closely — Denis Ruiz’s environment was good when it was all white, and became bad when it became majority black. Same area, same economic opportunity (affirmative action and welfare notwithstanding), but far different results. Snooty lib can’t blame environment in this case.

Posted by Question Diversity at 6:16 PM on November 14


Not to take anything away from what this poor deceased gentleman had to say — I found his account of urban decay very sad and disturbing — but I’m afraid he must have misheard those Doors lyrics. The song in question is called “Alabama Song (Whisky Bar)” and was not written by Jim Morrison or any other members of The Doors, but is in fact an English translation of a number from a 1920s German musical by Bertolt Brecht and Kurt Weill, the (Communist) songwriting team of “Threepenny Opera” and “Mack the Knife” fame.

Here, for the record, are the complete English “Alabama Song (Whisky Bar)” lyrics. In the original musical, they are sung by sailors in a bar. Although I would never try to argue that they promote good morals, they are not actually about cuckolding other men’s wives. As you will see, there is no mention of “wife” or “wives” at all:
Well, show me the way
To the next whisky bar
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

Show me the way
To the next whisky bar
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

For if we don’t find
The next whisky bar
I tell you we must die
I tell you we must die
I tell you, I tell you
I tell you we must die

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why

Well, show me the way
To the next little girl
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

Show me the way
To the next little girl
Oh, don’t ask why
Oh, don’t ask why

For if we don’t find
The next little girl
I tell you we must die
I tell you we must die
I tell you, I tell you
I tell you we must die

Oh, moon of Alabama
We now must say goodbye
We’ve lost our good old mama
And must have whisky, oh, you know why

Posted by at 6:31 PM on November 14


We ran and ran from the blacks. They followed us to the suburbs.
So we ran and ran to rural areas. And what happened? The elites built factory farms and food processing plants in the rural areas and imported illegal hispanic thugs to destroy those areas.

So where can we run? Nowhere.

It took only 20 years, 1970 to 1990 to destroy California.

Posted by at 7:05 PM on November 14


This is a beautiful and sad narrative that millions of Americans, undoubtedly, can relate to. Whenever I speak to someone who rhapsodizes about the greatness of ‘diversity’ and ‘multi-culturalism’, I ask them a very simple question that always stuns them into silence:

When has any neighborhood ever improved by minorities moving into it?

Posted by at 7:23 PM on November 14


In Europe, in White villages, and towns, some people live in 500-yr-old houses, yet these house and the neighborhood still looks nice and are safe. Compare this to anyplace where Blacks or Hispanics live — in just a few years, the houses (even relatively new houses) are all torn up and the neighborhoods are destroyed. Blacks are like a plague on civilization and society — not all Blacks, mind you, but a large enough percentage of them to assure that any place they gather will be ruined. This is why it is the number 1 goal of most Blacks to move away from Black neighborhoods, to white neighborhoods. Even Blacks are racist against their kind.

Posted by at 7:58 PM on November 14


“Although this (realitor screening) has been painted as unfair, it reflected the desires of the people who lived there. They wanted to live among their own people. They wanted to live in a white community”.

If we’re going to say common folks have nothing to do with immigration – it’s at the beheast of the elites, we should also be fair and blame the ‘elites’ for this realitor practice during the 50’s. We shouldn’t paint these 50’s people as all racists. Just, realists. lol

“The neighborhood where I grew up is now a wasteland. Whites are still a majority—55 percent—”

I wonder how many of those are young people? And if the census is accurate.

Posted by Mr. Pibb at 8:37 PM on November 14


This story is so familiar it hurts to read it. Denis wrote about his own experiences but could have included my name and millions of other white people.

I will never understand why blacks follow whites knowing they are not wanted.

Posted by Chet at 9:17 PM on November 14


An article that has hit most of us, yet Whites on the left and the right will still deny it has anything to do with the “color” of ones’s skin. It is getting harder and harder to find ANY forum that doesn’t want to ban a poster for speaking the truth about race. Listen to any “conservative” talk show and you will find that THEY defend minorities in their little ways. They will hang up or ridicule any caller who speaks the truth and says it is ALL about race.

They constantly say that it isn’t about Obama’s race that is the problem, it is his policies otherwise if it were Thomas Sowell, Condi, etc they would vote for them in a heartbeat! WHAT? They have no concept of race, period.

I listened to Billy Cunningham and Alan Hunt one night and I had to shut off the radio, they got my blood boiling so, when they started saying this very thing! These eggheads would never defend the White race and their heritage, just so they can appear non-racist and pander to the blacks and hispanics in their audiences. Christian radio does the same thing!

Posted by at 10:23 PM on November 14


Familiar story for me. I grew up in Chicago in the fifties through the late sixties. My family fled due to the black riots and threat of busing. Five years later it was a war zone thanks to the Great Society and the curse of diversity.

My family lived in a nice suburb, but that only lasted 20 years. Now it’s a ghetto. I moved to Seattle and have lived here for 30 years. Sad to say, it too is becoming a multicultural hell hole. I have one more ace in the hole and that is some land on an island in Puget Sound. I think I might be able to live out the rest of my days there while America crumbles. I have encouraged my kids to consider Australia or Ireland.

Posted by at 10:24 PM on November 14


“The neighborhood where I grew up is now a wasteland. Whites are still a majority—55 percent—”

Crime statistics show that when a formerly white neighborhood nears 50% Black, the chances of a White person in that area being a victim of crime is 100%. He’s not being paranoid or prejudiced to worry if he’ll be jumped when he visits what used to be his old neighborhood. He will be. As Thomas Wolfe said, “You can never go home again.”

Posted by at 11:20 PM on November 14


In Houston, where my kids and I live and where I make my living (in manufacturing), you find few places where Whites can live in peaceful, pleasant, and secure neighborhoods among other Whites. This is especially true for working-class folks.
Right now, we’re looking for a home to lease and almost everything available in our price range ($1250/month max.) is in an area dominated by mexicans. From Mexico mexicans. You may ask ‘so what? What’s the problem?’ and there would be no problem if these people were generally quiet, clean, friendly, law-abiding and courteous… which they are generally not.
Trashy yards, cars parked blocking the street, gang graffiti spray-painted on garage doors and fences, sullen, hateful stares, gangs of boys wandering around playing ‘chicken’ with drivers, loud, thumping ‘music’, taco stands…
The Houston my wife and I grew up in, in the ‘50’s, is dead.
My wife was talking in her sleep after a long disappointing day of house-hunting… she said “I wanna go home.”
Broke my heart.

Posted by steve at 11:55 PM on November 14


Same thing happened to Yonkers NY where my father grew up. Same thing happened to the suburban NJ town where I grew up.

And the same thing is going to happen to the town I now live in which is 99% white. The state of NJ is now forcing every town in the state to take in their ‘fair share’ of low income housing.

This will result in a 20-30% increase in population in our town – which will be mostly blacks and hispanics. Goodbye nice town, time to move again…

Posted by at 12:11 AM on November 15


“It took only twenty years to destroy California 1970-1990”

Absolutely true. Only twenty short years. It is a mindboggling thought, but what the poster said is true and I can attest to it. In fact, it is sometimes still unbelievable even to people like me who lived through it. If this isn’t a lesson and a warning to Americans in other states on how illegal immigration and mass unassimilated immigration of all kinds is capable of totally destroying traditional America in a super short time, then nothing will be. Get ready for press 2 for, bankrupt hospitals, and just plain assaults on your common sensibilities.

Posted by Bobby at 1:45 AM on November 15


I’m new on here so forgive my ignorance. I understand all of this started in the 1960s when they changed the immigration laws but I don’t understand why they did it. It’s illogical and unnatural for a race of people to allow themselves to be replaced by another. These political leaders pursuing this agenda are guaranteed to be swept from power leaving their children to live in a bleak future. Having all the money in the world won’t make a bit of difference if your a tiny minority with all sides pushing against you. It just doesn’t make any sense. We used to be the greatest nation in the world and now we are a bankrupt country facing a third world future.

Posted by Richard at 3:28 AM on November 15


“I’d like to grow apple trees, and it takes years to do that, but you can’t take trees with you when you move. So we are probably going …to buy a rural place and go there on weekends and fix it up. When I retire in fifteen years we’ll move there

“Over decades, these changes add up to significant improvements… By staying in one place, your property improves and you improve the community… That is the way our ancestors in Europe lived. They were tied to a place. I feel that I am never going to live in a true community, that I am all the time planting and that I am never going to get the harvest.”

(Denis didn’t get the house. He died a few months after telling me this.)

………………………………………

What a sad story! It left tears in my eyes. And it’s so true for so many of us.

I was prompted to look up Fairview Village. It’s part of Camden, and I came up with some interesting stuff.

“Yorkship Village (known as Fairview today) is historically the nation’s first federally-funded planned community. The concept of a planned community came from Europe in 1918. The architectural theory was to incorporate the ingredients that made the ideal self-contained community”. Subsequently, Yorkship Village was the creation of architects that resulted in a new village, reminiscent of an old English village, that appears to reach back further in history, yet utilizes the innovative planning concepts of that era.”
http://www.fairview.ws/maps/maps.html

Based on statistics reported to the FBI, Camden was the third-most dangerous city in the United States in 2002, and has been ranked the nation’s most dangerous city in 2004 and 2005.

In 2004, Camden was declared “America’s Most Dangerous City”, up from third place in 2003 and topping the 354 cities studied. The city was named “Most Dangerous” again in 2005 out of 369 cities ranked nationwide, with Detroit, Michigan and St. Louis, Missouri in second and third places. In the 2006 survey, Camden dropped down to the fifth spot — behind St. Louis, Detroit, Flint, Michigan and Compton, California. The fact is that Camden remains one of the most dangerous cities in the country.

From 1899 to 1967, Camden was the home of New York Shipbuilding Corp, which at its World War II peak was the largest and most productive shipyard in the world. In 1962, the first commercial nuclear-powered ship, the NS Savannah, was launched in Camden.

The “Fairview Village” section of Camden was a planned European-style garden village built during World War I to house New York Shipbuilding Corp. workers.
At Camden’s peak, 40,000 worked at New York Shipbuilding, and another 10,000 were employed at RCA. RCA had 23 out of 25 of its factories in Camden. Campbell Soup was a major employer. However, by 1969, Camden had been losing jobs and residents due in large part to urban decay and racial tensions.

In 1950, Camden’s population numbered 125,000. Now it iis 80,000.The population is presently 53%black, 39% Latino, and 16.8% white. In 2000, 29% of Camden residents identified themselves as being of Puerto Rican heritage. This was the third highest proportion of Puerto Ricans in a municipality on the US mainland, behind only Holyoke, Mass. and Hartford, Conn.

The population is quite young with 34.6% under the age of 18. 44% of the city’s residents live in poverty, the highest poverty rate in the nation. The city had a median household income of $18,007, the lowest of all U.S. communities over 65,000, making it America’s poorest city. [as well as the most dangerous]
[Wikipedia]

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
In other words: It is America’s poorest, youngest, and most dangerous city! And 5/6 non-white.

I’ll wager, furthermore, that if you were to break down those classified by the census as “white” (Arabs, Pakistanis, etc.) many would not be what most Amreners would consider white, thus reducing the real white American-born population to an even tinier figure. This is a microcosm of what has been happening in many American cities today, and what will be happening in other cities tomorrow.

Posted by ghw at 4:07 AM on November 15


At the large establishment where I work in NY City, there are many blacks and other so-called “minorities” (actually the majority).

Many or most of the whites there have a long commute in from the exurbs. Very few live in the city, and few even live close to it. One friend of mine drives 60 miles in to work. That’s 120 miles a day round trip! It’s nothing unusual. Others have an even longer commute. I understand there are even people who commute now from Pensylvania to NYC.

Of these co-workers, most of their parents had fled to the [still white] suburbs way back when the city started darkening in the 50s and 60s. Now, the children of those urban refugees have moved farther out into the rural exurbs as the colored tide has followed them into the nearer suburbs.

Nonetheless, race being the tabooed subject that it is, you almost never hear anyone make any reference to it. They claim they’re looking for “better schools”, “open space”, “nice neighborhoods”, “low crime”, etc. These are all code words, of course. But do they realize it? I wonder. Many of these people are (at least superficially) good liberals who conform to the official colorblind ideology; and I often wonder if they even can be honest enough with themselves – even inside their own minds!!! – to admit that race had anything to do with it at all. Are their minds so numbed by brainwashing that they can’t realize, or honestly face, WHY they keep moving farther and farther out? Oh, but it has NOTHING to do with race! Of course not. How dare you suggest it!

But going beyond that, what’s still more ironic and completely illogical is that some of them, trying to be genuinely helpful, even advise their colored co-workers on how to buy a house in the suburbs, where to look, which are “nice” neighborhoods, etc. (though maybe not in THEIR area!). They have bought the leftist notion that blacks just need to get out of the “bad” areas in order to improve their lives; and if they can just go to a “good” school [ie. white] in a “good” neighborhood [white], then everything will be fine. But if that happens, then these schools and neighborhoods won’t be white anymore!

Don’t these fools have the sense to think it through and realize that this is going to bring about the very conditions that they and their parents ran away from? Did they ever THINK about this? Do they DARE to? They seem to think that Tyrone and his wife are nice people, so Tyrone’s family wouldn’t be objectionable to have around — but just them. They limit their thinking to just one example. Sure, but it doesn’t work that way. And there’s the flaw. What about when Tyrone’s friends and relatives come around and like what they see, and then THEIR friends and relatives? When there are just two or three black families scattered thinly through the community — they’re no problem. But it never ends at that. In twenty years, the neighborhood will be shot and whites (and blacks too) will be fleeing again. We’ve all seen this happen. Do sappy well-meaning whites never learn? They foul their own nest out of their wish to be generous, but without thinking of the consequences. In another generation, THEIR children will be fleeing to the outer-outer-exurbs and driving 200 miles a day, in search of “nice” schools and “better” neighborhoods! Are they unable to see that these are just euphemisms for “white”?

Posted by at 5:42 AM on November 15


Big changes like this happened all over the country. I know of several towns that were nice places to live, until the government set about to destroy them with welfare housing and forcing lawful neighborhoods to accept lawbreakers.
The changes were intended by government. They wanted to destroy quiet American communities where people trusted each other.

Posted by at 7:43 AM on November 15


I grew up in Baltimore City in the late 50’s and 60’s. Today, growing up in a major city would be dangerous but back then, we had a neighborhood too. All the kids knew each other. Some of us went to the Public School #215 and some went to the local Catholic schools. We all rode our bikes together in the summer, skated, played dodge ball in the school yard, hopscotch and on Halloween night (the only night we were allowed out after the street lights came on), we would go all over the place. The schools I attended were all white, except for one year, 1963, when they tried to integrate our elementary school. It was a catastrophe and thankfully, they shipped the blacks back to their own neighborhood schools. When I reached high school, my school was 98% white. Today, my former high school has been renamed for a Communist – W.E.B. Du Bois. Sad because Northern High School at the time I attended there, was ranked as having one of the best high school cirriculums in the city.

Today, my old neighborhood (Highlandtown), now renamed Little Canton, is one of three neighborhoods in Baltimore City that are all white. Old row homes, with their marble steps, have been renovated and are now selling for over $200,000. My parents paid $7,800.00 for their Highlandtown house. Larger Canton and Littly Italy are the only other 2 remaining neighborhoods left to whites in Baltimore City. Even back during the 1968 riots, the people of Littly Italy, with only baseball bats to defend themselves, threatened to bash the heads in of any black who came into their neighborhood to try and destroy their homes and businesses and Little Italy, Highlandtown and Canton remained the only 3 neighborhoods not ravaged by the rioting and looting.

I think back on my old neighborhood and all the fun we had growing up. My kids got a taste of that same fun because we moved to Johnson City, Tennessee when they were very young. Today, 16 years later, I see the same things happening to JC. We get a swarm of hispanics every picking season and while the blacks still remain in their own neighborhood, there has been a steady increase of black crime and the only high school is having it’s share of increased black violence.

I feel really sad that so many kids will NEVER experience the same childhood that we did.

Posted by Gayle Sollenberger at 8:07 AM on November 15

Britain- ‘Economic Benefits of Mass Immigration Are Close to Zero’, Lords Told

Filed under: The West — whitelocust @ 10:54 pm

‘Economic Benefits of Mass Immigration Are Close to Zero’, Lords Told

More news stories on Britain

Daily Mail (London), November 14, 2008

The economic benefits from record levels of immigration to Britain are ‘small and close to zero’, the Lords was told today.

A report by a committee of peers, including two former Chancellors and several former Cabinet ministers, called on ministers to set an ‘explicit target range’ for immigration and make rules to keep within that limit.

Tory former Cabinet Minister Lord Wakeham said the report by the Economic Affairs Committee, which he chaired, rejected the Government’s claim that immigration is needed to prevent labour shortages as ‘fundamentally flawed’.

He told peers the Government had said immigrants brought large economic benefits to the UK in boosting economic growth, filling job vacancies that Britons could not or would not do and paying more tax than British-born workers.

But there was no evidence of such benefits, which had been ‘wildly overstated’ by ministers.

In a debate on the report, Lord Wakeham said: ‘The committee found no evidence of these large economic benefits.

‘What we did find was serious flaws in the Government’s arguments and we concluded that on average the economic benefits of immigration were small and close to zero.’

The report found certain groups in Britain—the low-paid, some ethnic minorities and some young people looking for a foot on the job ladder—may have suffered because of competition from immigrants.

It said ministers should set an ‘explicit target range’ for immigration and set the rules to keep within that limit.

And it raised the prospect of cutting the number of partners and other family members allowed to settle in Britain because a relative is already here.

Peers also warned that the much-trumpeted new points-based immigration system carried a ‘clear danger of inconsistencies and overlap’.

The Government’s decision to use GDP as the main measure of immigration’s economic contribution was ‘irrelevant and misleading’, added the report. Instead, the yardstick should be income per head of population or GDP per capita.

The Tories last month said the Government’s immigration policy was in ‘chaos’ after new Immigration Minister Phil Woolas suggested there could be a population cap of 70 million, before appearing to row back.

Last week a Commons cross-party group on Balanced Migration said immigration rules should be further tightened during the economic downturn.

Lord Wakeham stressed that Britain ‘as a whole’ had not lost out from immigration and neither had particular groups lost out significantly. The committee also recognised the very ‘valuable contribution’ made by immigrants, he added.

He said the Government had rejected the committee’s report—suggesting it contained ‘combined conclusions that were overspun with analysis’.

‘Thoughts of pots and kettles immediately came to mind. The minister’s words accurately describe the Government’s position—not our report,’ Lord Wakeham added.

Liberal Democrat Lord Vallance of Tummel, former BT chairman, said that when large numbers of immigrants arrived in a limited number of locations, the ‘shoe will begin to pinch’.

Councils, particularly in the popular parts of London and the south east, complained they had not had the right resources to deal with this.

The report recommended that the Government should have an explicit and reasoned indicative target range for net immigration.

‘There is no excuse for confusing our recommendation with a call for a cap on gross immigration—a different kettle of fish altogether and one which is neither necessary or desirable.’

The Government’s response seemed to have confused net with gross and a reasoned target range with an arbitrary cap, he said.

Lord Dholakia, former Liberal Democrat president, said there were potentially huge economic benefits from attracting the best talent to the UK.

Migration had already brought substantial benefits to the country and may become even more important at a time when the population was ageing.

Crossbencher Baroness Valentine, chief executive of the London First business organisation, said the report asked the right questions and she agreed with some of its conclusions.

‘We must have better and more meaningful data if we are to fully understand the implications—both positive and negative—that immigration has for our country.

‘Our challenge is to ensure that the best talent is found in, and keeps coming to, the UK.

‘Allowing British businesses to recruit globally does not open the doors to an unstoppable influx of immigrants if education and training systems equip British workers to compete.

‘I’d like UK workers to win on merit not because we have changed the rules to prevent the best competing at all.’

Labour’s Lord Paul, a committee member, said the reliance on the measurement of GDP per capita was ‘fundamentally flawed’ because it could not take into account the long-term benefits offered by migrants’ families.

Indian-born Lord Paul, who described himself as ‘proud to be an immigrant’, said the UK’s wealth and status owed a lot to its history of welcoming migrants.

He said: ‘In my view the status Britain has enjoyed through history, compared to its size and population, is largely due to the fact that we welcome immigrants from all over the world and have recognised their value and contribution.’

Crossbencher Lord Moser criticised the narrow focus of the committee’s inquiry.

‘To try to isolate the economic aspect, however dictated by the terms of reference of the committee, is bound to be unsatisfactory both for public consumption and for policy making.’

Labour’s Lord Peston was even more strident in his attack on the committee’s report.

He said: ‘I dislike this report intensely. Indeed, I regard this report as the worst report produced in this House in my 21-and-a-half years here.

‘I’d like to make sure that’s on the record.’

Lord Peston added: ‘The committee, if it really believed this subject was a top priority, would have proceeded with the utmost caution.

‘What we have is something quite different, there is no historical perspective at all, the emphasis is entirely on the period of power of the present Government.

‘In addition we have, to my amazement, a report in which the opinions of a xenophobic front group such as Migration Watch is given the same weight as the Institute of Public Policy Research, an outstanding research body.

‘Again the lack of judgment on the part of the committee I find amazing.’

Crossbencher Lord Best, president of the Local Government Association and former chief executive of the Joseph Rowntree Housing Trust, said immigrant labour made a ‘substantial’ contribution to construction and social care.

‘I have been hugely impressed by the energy, cheerfulness, honesty and reliability of the new migrants and of course by their willingness to work at wage levels that are unattractive to the established population, which keeps down the costs of providing services, not least charges in care homes.’

Tory Lord Griffiths of Fforestfach, a committee member and former director at the Bank of England, revealed that Lord Peston had been his first teacher of economics.

He told him: ‘I don’t think I have ever had such a withering attack on any essay I would ever have written as you have given us.’

Lord Griffiths stressed the committee had made every attempt to not be party-political. He added: ‘There is no way in my judgment that it advances a racist or xenophobic agenda.

‘Having said that I have one regret and that is I accept that in some paragraphs we should have been more explicit and fulsome in our praise of the contribution of immigrants to the UK economy.’

Labour’s Lord Dubs, a former minister, said he was disappointed by the report and its tone.

‘Whatever the intentions of its authors, the anti-immigration lobby had a field day when it was published.

‘It maybe that it was misunderstood. But the fact is that they drew some comfort from the conclusions of the report.’

Lord Dubs said he had long believed that immigration had been of benefit to Britain and found it difficult to relate the report’s conclusions to practical experience.

‘If every immigrant left Britain tomorrow this House could not function on Monday because so many of the staff who support the Palace of Westminster are immigrants,’ he added.

Original article

(Posted on November 14, 2008)


Comments

They don’t CARE if immigration is a benefit to Britain. It’s a benefit to Labour, and that’s all that matters.

Posted by Dave at 7:22 PM on November 14


If massive immigration of Third World peoples was of any economic benefit, then California (the state with the highest foreign immigration) would not be having a $15-Trillion deficit at this very moment. Anyone with 2 neurons knows that importing millions of uneducated, techno-ignorant, non-English-speaking diseased foreigners with no skills other than baby-making would result in economic disaster. And this is exactly what has happened.

Notice how our governments always try to sell immigration in terms of “economy,” meanwhile ignoring the 100’s of other reasons why it is insane to import millions of people into the USA (environment, cultural incompatibility, crime, urban stress, foreign diseases, job competition, etc.).

Any way you cut it (economic, environmental, education, quality of life, taxes, crime, hospital closing, social cohesion, etc.), massive immigration is a bad idea. Worst of all, you and I will be paying for these visions of multicultural paradise through increased taxes for the rest of our lives and our children’s lives. You will be forced to give far, far less to your children, because our government will need to transfer your earnings to the children of Mexicans, Haitians, Nigerians, Somalians, Iraqis, Kurds, Samoans, Guatemalans, Pakistanis, etc, etc.

Don’t believe me? Check your 401Ks

Posted by at 7:30 PM on November 14


They try to tell us that Third World immigrants will improve the economy. Yea, right! What do you think will happen when 50 million Mexican immigrants get old and apply for Social Security and Medicare? Remember, many of these immigrants worked for slave wages and had large families — they never saved a dime. How will our nation support them?

Our nation will support them by reducing Social Security and Medicare benefits for everyone, and by taking money away from those who have saved money (i.e., you) and giving it to them. I think that Obama calls it “Spreading the Wealth Around.” Lenin phrased it: “Each according to their need.”

Posted by at 7:37 PM on November 14


It’s banks, developers, speculators, social service providers and other elites who make money off immigration.

Government, and an informed populace, are supposed to keep them in check and safeguard the country’s wealth. When Enoch Powell tried to do just that, he was falsely accused of ‘racism’.

Posted by at 8:02 PM on November 14


“The economic benefits from record levels of immigration to Britain are ‘small and close to zero’, the Lords was told today.”

I don’t believe that for one minute. Because of all the social payments, the court costs and incarceration costs, to say nothing of the extra costs for providing special services in the schools bringing in these third world hordes is costing them dearly.

What was the cost for the bus bombings economically as well as to the morale of the white public in general? How about the cost of the numerous riots, and didn’t they have hundreds of car arsons at the same time as France?

Zero benefit, my foot. They’re a bunch of left wing liars.

Imigration of third world blaks and other criminals will continue until the country suffers from a war.

Their economy is no better than the US’s and they’re predicting massive job losses too.

There’s only two things that will influence a leftist moron’s thinking. One is an economic collapse so severe it causes him/her to lose their money, and the second one is massive violence that has the potential to threaten them personally.

Posted by mitch at 10:15 PM on November 14


What, the British government is lying to its own people?! How can this be?

Slow down, Soprano Fan. This is, the same British government that lied to its people about the “Lusitania” not carrying munitions (the ship WAS carrying munitions, which made it a ship of war), and about its great “victory” at Narvik, Norway during World War II.

Posted by Soprano Fan at 10:47 PM on November 14


Even if illegal immigrants did improve the economy(and they don’t), that still does not make it morally right to force them on your neighbors and our society. Slavery, illegal drugs, prostitution and child labor all would improve the economy, so, should we allow those also?

Posted by at 11:30 PM on November 14

Obama Win Triggers Run on Guns

Filed under: Uncategorized — whitelocust @ 10:53 pm

Obama Win Triggers Run on Guns

More news stories on Barack Obama

Howard Witt, Chicago Tribune, November 12, 2008

A week after the election of Barack Obama, gun buyers across the country are voting with their feet, flocking to gun stores to stock up on assault rifles, handguns and ammunition.

Some say they are worried that the incoming Obama administration will attempt to reimpose the ban on assault weapons that expired in 2004. Others fear the loss of their right to own handguns. A few say they are preparing to protect themselves in the event of a race war.

But whatever the reason, gun dealers in red and blue states alike say they’ve never seen anything like the run on weaponry they’ve been experiencing since Election Day—surpassing even the panic buying in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

{snip}

But anecdotal reports from around the nation suggest the sudden surge of November gun-buying is far surpassing the normal hunting-season spike that often occurs this time of year.

At the Memorial Shooting Center in Houston, which shares a building with a church, managers said they sold out of assault weapons a day after the election and are now adding new orders, at more than $1,000 each, to a monthlong waiting list. In Colorado, state authorities said they set a record for background checks on gun purchasers on the Saturday before the election—and the requests have been growing ever since.

And in Obama’s home state of Illinois, business at gun stores is brisk.

{snip}

Obama’s record on gun rights is conflicting enough to give ammunition to either side.

His campaign Web site said he “respects the constitutional rights of Americans to bear arms” and promised that he would “protect the rights of hunters and other law-abiding Americans to purchase, own, transport and use guns.”

Seeking to reassure gun owners, Obama told a campaign audience in Ohio in October: “I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away.”

But Obama also has said he favors “common sense” gun laws, and as an Illinois state legislator he voted to support a ban on semiautomatic assault weapons and tighter restrictions on all firearms. He has said in the past that he opposes allowing gun owners to carry concealed weapons.

And Obama’s controversial comment last April that some rural Americans “cling to guns or religion” in difficult times suggested to many gun owners that he was fundamentally hostile toward them.

The sum of those positions prompted the National Rifle Association to warn its members during the campaign that Obama “would be the most anti-gun president in American history.”

{snip}

One expert sees a darker motive driving some post-election gun purchasers.

“Why are white people buying assault weapons?” said Ben Agger, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Arlington who wrote a book about the Virginia Tech slayings. “I almost hate to say it, but there is a deep-seated fear of the armed black man, because Obama now commands the military and other instruments of the justice system. They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”

Original article

Email Howard Witt at hwitt@tribune.com.

(Posted on November 14, 2008)


Comments

The media kept saying that it was because of 2nd amendment issues, but I avoid monocausal explanations for matters sociocultural. Not that 2nd amendment issues aren’t a cause, but I agree with Agger — white fear of black crime and arrogance-fueled hate crimes is the main reason.

Posted by Question Diversity at 6:04 PM on November 14


“I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away.”
________
He won’t, but he will appoint Supreme Court Justices who might.

Posted by at 6:18 PM on November 14


“Why are white people buying assault weapons?” said Ben Agger, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Arlington who wrote a book about the Virginia Tech slayings. “I almost hate to say it, but there is a deep-seated fear of the armed black man, because Obama now commands the military and other instruments of the justice system. They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”

Great example of why sociology is the dollar store of the social sciences.

Posted by at 6:34 PM on November 14


They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”
What? If that is the case, why didn’t we increase arms purchases when Colin Powell was running the military? Obama is a Democrat from Illinois, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the U.S., especially Chicago. Yes, alot of people think there will be stricter gun laws. But it would be political suicide to take the gun ban to the extreme. At least until his 2nd term.
If Ben Agger would do some research, he would also know that Obama is half-Kenyan. His bloodline has nothing to do with the U.S. slave trade, which was mostly Eastern Africa. Unless his wife pushes his button to do that. Obama is President, not Emperor. There needs to be alot of law changes before he does the military junta on White America.

Posted by at 6:59 PM on November 14


No doubt millions of Americans weren’t listening when the following came out of our president-elect’s mouth:

“I don’t [yet] have the votes to take your guns.”
—Barack Obama

Americans are not going to just “cling” to their guns and religion; they’re going to exercise their constitutional rights to do so, no matter how much Obama hates it. This recent run on gun sales is a more powerful statement than any vote cast for Obama via an electronic voting machine.

Posted by at 7:56 PM on November 14


“Why are white people buying assault weapons?” said Ben Agger, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Arlington who wrote a book about the Virginia Tech slayings. “I almost hate to say it, but there is a deep-seated fear of the armed black man, because Obama now commands the military and other instruments of the justice system. They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”
Getting information on guns from a politically correct academic is like getting data from a feminist to find out how many males are rapists. Both are so bogus as to be useless.

I wonder if this Ben Agger might even want to give any consideration at all to why whites are buying guns, because of the ibcredibly high rates of black on white violence, and also because the Obamanation said in July, 2008, that, “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set,” We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”

If he’s not telling us that he’s going to have a civilian army on a par with the military (Probably mostly non-white) then pigs fly for certain.

Posted by mitch at 8:21 PM on November 14


This is the tripe that the media and people like Agger fantasize about. They really believe every black and liberal are reincarnated Nat Turner and John Brown. And what does obama have to do with the institution of slavery? Other than his white mother may have had ancestors that may have supported the institution. Obama could use the military to attack some pro-slave country in Africa. Other than that; What ax does obama have to grind with people who legally owned slaves? When will this insanity end? Do this people want a race riot? Whites have already been threatened by the media regarding an obama loss. I really believe these ungrateful people will not be satisfied until the entire country resembles Uganda or South Africa. DeoVindice

Posted by GrayGhost at 8:27 PM on November 14


“Why are white people buying assault weapons?” said Ben Agger, a sociology professor at the University of Texas at Arlington who wrote a book about the Virginia Tech slayings. “I almost hate to say it, but there is a deep-seated fear of the armed black man, because Obama now commands the military and other instruments of the justice system. They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”

Such a ridiculous comment from a Sociology “professor” does not surprise me in the least. Sociology (aside from African American “studies”) has got to be the most anti-white college major in America today. Somehow they always find a way to make white people the villain…

Posted by at 8:38 PM on November 14


Obama’s “assurances” about not taking anyone’s guns are as hollow as Hitler’s claims of wanting “peace”just before the Nazis invaded Poland in 1939.

The same people trying to assure us about Obama, are the same ones who assured us that the government would never come after our guns.

Of course, that was before Hurricane Katrina came into the town of New Orleans.

Posted by Soprano Fan at 9:13 PM on November 14


“They are afraid Obama will exact retribution for the very deep-seated legacy of slavery.”

You mean for the very imaginary legacy of slavery? Oh, excuse me. You’re a sociology professor. Of course you don’t mean that.

Posted by Tim in Indiana at 9:50 PM on November 14


“Great example of why sociology is the dollar store of the social sciences.” Posted by at 6:34 PM on November 14

- Good comment. I just had lunch with a friend I haven’t seen in a while. We’re both retired. She has a Ph.D. in biology and I have a Master’s in biology. We were discussing sociologists and how most don’t seem to have much in the brains department and we came to the conclusion that they became sociologists because they couldn’t cut it in the real sciences. You know, things like calculus, physics, chemistry, genetics, etc. I have a part-time job in a sociology department so I know whereof I speak.I keep my head down and a very low profile at work. I need the job.

Posted by at 10:14 PM on November 14


Dont let them take your guns away.

The politicians in the UK did just that after one madman killed some children and now ONLY criminals have guns.

They need a pretext – its easy to get one.

Dont give in. The first step to a socialist police state like the UK is to disarm the populace.

Posted by Geoff M at 4:13 AM on November 15


Obtaining a firearm is not the problem, keeping them from the gestapo will be the catch. They would be better served with a club if they are unwilling to use a gun. PS. are we to believe only whites are purchasing guns, or is this a statistic that only reflects legally obtained firearms?

Posted by WHITE SLAVE at 9:23 AM on November 15


Soprano Fan…
brush up on your history. Hitler had no interest in war, except for the USSR, and then only in the medium term. The Z Plan (rearmament) ruled out war before 1946 – Germany had other problems at the time, i.e. reconstruction and recovery.

Anyways… “the military and other instruments of the JUSTICE system”?

Posted by nokangaroos at 10:19 AM on November 15

Filed under: Death of the Nation, Race Realism — whitelocust @ 10:53 pm

Minorities Press Obama

More news stories on Barack Obama

Sam Youngman and Alexander Bolton, The Hill, November 11, 2008

Identity politics in the Democratic Party are already presenting challenges to President-elect Barack Obama, who is under pressure to appoint Hispanics and African-Americans to key posts in his administration.

Both groups were crucial to Obama’s victory last week over Republican John McCain. Ninety-six percent of African-American voters cast ballots for Obama, while 67 percent of Hispanic voters supported him, according to exit polls.

Both are now counting on Obama to appoint Hispanic and African-American politicians to his Cabinet as a way of rewarding their support.

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, a Hispanic who ran for the Democratic presidential nomination but later endorsed Obama, should be secretary of State, a coalition of 35 Hispanic groups said in a Nov. 11 letter to the president-elect obtained by The Hill.

{snip}

The letter did not allude directly to the role Hispanic voters played in helping Obama win states such as Florida, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada, all of which went to President Bush four years ago. But it did congratulate Obama on his “historic and decisive victory” in the election.

Hilary Shelton, the director of the NAACP’s Washington bureau, has called on Obama to appoint a Cabinet with more diversity than the Cabinets of Presidents Bush and Clinton. Shelton has also called for an African-American to fill Obama’s Senate seat, a decision over which the incoming president is expected to have much influence.

{snip}

While Blagojevich [Gov.[Rod Blagojevich of Illinois] will make the two-year temporary appointment, Illinois political insiders say that Obama will have significant influence over the decision.

Two members of the Congressional Black Caucus are vying for the seat: Reps. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-Ill.) and Danny Davis (D-Ill.).

Obama is expected to assemble a racially diverse Cabinet. One Democratic insider told The Hill that Obama, aware of the importance of the country’s fastest-growing group, is looking to surpass the bar set by Clinton, who appointed two Hispanics to his Cabinet at the beginning of his administration.

{snip}

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), an early Obama supporter, is widely seen as a possible pick as secretary of State. If Richardson gets the nod instead, it would bump the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee.

As the first black president, Obama will be under pressure to appoint African-Americans. But he may be under even more pressure to appoint Hispanics, whose support could prove critical to Democrats’ retaining power in Washington.

Democrats see an opportunity to seize and hold onto Hispanics after Republican efforts to do the same under President Bush were devastated by an inflammatory debate over immigration that was viewed by many Hispanics as racist in tone.

{snip}

Talk about Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) becoming secretary of the Department of the Interior is so loud in Colorado political circles that some in the state are already discussing who might take his Senate seat.

Guillermo Meneses, a Democratic strategist who advised Richardson’s presidential run, said Hispanics are “certainly going to have an important role in the Cabinet,” given the way they supported Obama.

{snip}

Original article

The Great Silencing – white people will become a minority in the US by 2042.

Filed under: Uncategorized — whitelocust @ 10:38 pm

The Great Silencing

By Ian Jobling • 10/10/08

the great silencing
Whites are terrified
of criticizing minorities.

Recently, many Republicans have been complaining bitterly about John McCain’s failure to take advantage of many of Barack Obama’s obvious weaknesses. In particular, why has the McCain campaign ignored Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s white-bashing pastor? Today, McCain finally released an ad revealing Obama’s history with the disgraced minority activist group ACORN, which pressured banks to make risky loans and has a history of voter registration fraud. But why did it take McCain so long to raise this association when it is so embarrassing for Obama? And why hasn’t McCain used the financial crisis as an occasion to denounce affirmative action, which is deeply unpopular with voters? After all, government policies that pressure banks to make loans on easier terms to non-whites than whites are certainly a form of affirmative action.

McCain’s avoidance of these topics is an example of the great silence on racial issues that leukophobia, or the fear and loathing of white people, forces on America. As we saw in a previous article, leukophobia attributes to whites a uniquely racist, intolerant, greedy, and violent nature. So entrenched are these hostile stereotypes in the minds of Americans, and particularly of the elites, that any white who criticizes non-whites is immediately suspect. It is as though criticism of minorities were the thin end of a wedge that will end in lynchings and genocide. This paranoia is particularly pronounced when it comes to Republicans, since they are, in Howard Dean’s words, the “white, Christian party.”

Leukophobia makes fundamental issues of race entirely unmentionable. The most momentous problem in America today is the coming of white minority status, a process that will bring with it enormous changes and conflict. Yet the demographic transition is virtually never mentioned by politicians, and, when it is, always welcomed as a wonderful boon.

Imagine this scenario. Someone in last week’s town hall debate between Barack Obama and John McCain, in which the candidates answered questions from the audience, stands up and asks, “According to the Census Bureau, white people will become a minority in the US by 2042. Given these demographic trends and the widespread acceptance of interracial marriage, American whites will probably cease to exist as a distinct people within two or three centuries. Senators McCain and Obama, do you believe the extinction of the white race in America is a good thing?”

Of course, the people responsible for vetting the audience for the debate would never allow such a wild-eyed maniac in. However, if one did manage to get past the gatekeepers, how would the candidates react? They might well refuse to answer. If they did, they would no doubt brush the questioner off with a few stern words about intolerance and racism and do their best to move on quickly. No matter how reasonable it is, our elites put concern for white survival on par with neo-Nazism.

Leukophobia not only prevents the discussion of fundamental racial issues but also more superficial ones. Consider the regime of censorship that the McCain campaign has imposed on its own supporters. Last month, Didi Lima, a Hispanic Republican Party official who was working for McCain, was removed from her post for saying, “I’m very much afraid that the Democratic Party is going to do [to Hispanics] the same thing that they did with the African-American culture and make them all dependent on the government and we don’t want that.” A McCain spokesman said Lima’s comments “are not tolerated on [McCain’s] campaign.” Apparently, Republicans are no longer allowed to notice high black poverty and welfare dependence rates.

Similarly, some young immigration restrictionists attending the Republican National Convention were told to take down a sign saying “Build a Fence” by the Secret Service on the orders of the Republican Control Room. Signs reading “Viva McCain” were welcome, however.

Of course, none of this discourages the liberal media, who accuse Republicans of racism on the most contrived of pretexts. When Sarah Palin impugned Barack Obama for “palling around with terrorists” like William Ayers, an Associated Press article called the remark “racially tinged,” despite the fact that Ayers is white. When McCain put out an ad comparing Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton, the New York Times accused him of appealing to whites’ fears of interracial sex.

The very racial makeup of the Republican Party is enough to put some commentators on edge. Thus, Harold Meyerson of the Washington Post called the Republican National Convention “shockingly—unAmericanly—white.” Last month The Huffington Post’s Nora Ephron seethed, “I forget how white [Republicans] are, and mean-spirited, and thin-lipped.” For these commentators, the very whiteness of the Republican Party renders it suspect and dangerous. A more consummate expression of leukophobia could scarcely be imagined. When they are pilloried for the color of their skin, no wonder Republicans are afraid to complain about Jeremiah Wright.

A recent experiment performed by psychologists shows that whites are nervous about even mentioning race when talking to non-whites, even when race is crucial to the conversation. “Whites are strategically avoiding the topic of race because they’re worried that they’ll look bad if they admit they notice it in other people,” said one of the researchers.

This week, we witnessed the terrible consequences of the great silencing. After all, the current financial crisis and terrifying stock market crash are in part due to America’s failure to confront racial reality. Given their tendency to seek immediate gratification regardless of long-term costs, blacks and Hispanics are naturally worse credit risks than whites are. Thus America’s decades-long effort to create a world in which “the improvident races” have rates of home ownership equal to that of whites was a sure way to destroy the credit markets. If America were capable of confronting hard truths about race, we would all likely be better off today.

No matter how much money we may be losing as a result of the financial crisis, and no matter how devastating the long-term effects on our economy, it is impossible for a race realist to watch the current debacle without some degree of satisfaction. A country that silences fundamental truths deserves to crash. We are finally seeing a castle built upon the sands of cowardice and wishful thinking crack at the foundations. Hopefully, a more courageous and honest nation will emerge from the rubble.

PROUD TO BE WHITE? By Michael Richards (aka Kramer)

Filed under: Race Realism — whitelocust @ 10:32 pm
PROUD TO BE WHITE

I have been wondering about why Whites are racists, and no other race is.
Proud to be White
Michael Richards makes his point…

Michael Richards better known as Kramer from TVs Seinfeld does make a good point.

This was his defense speech in court after making racial comments in his comedy act.
He makes some very interesting points…

Someone finally said it… How many are actually paying attention to this?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans.  You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction.
You call me ‘White boy,’ ‘Cracker,’ ‘ Honkey ,’  ’Whitey,’ ‘Caveman’ … and that’s OK.

But when I call you, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner,
Gook, or Chink … You call me a racist. You say that whites commit a lot of
violence against you… so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?

You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luther King Day.
You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Yom Hashoah.
You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi. You have the NAACP. You have BET…
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we’d be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day, you would call us racists.
If we had White History Month, we’d be racists.

If we had any organization for only whites to ‘advance’ OUR lives we’d be racists.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that??

A white woman could not be in the Miss Black American pageant, but any color can be in the Miss America pageant.

If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships…You know we’d be racists.
There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US .

Yet if there were ‘White colleges’ That would be a racist college.

In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights.

If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you’re not afraid to announce it.

But when we announce our white pride, you call us racists.

You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society, you call him a racist.

I am proud…But you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists??


There is nothing improper about this e-mail…
Let’s see which of you are proud enough to send it on.

I sadly don’t think many will. That’s why we have lost most of OUR RIGHTS
in this country. We won’t stand up for ourselves !
BE PROUD TO BE WHITE !
It’s not a crime yet, but getting real close!

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.