Kill Whitey Propaganda

Eye on Hollywood

Reel Bad Whites

Edmund Connelly

July 28, 2008

As I wrote back in early June, Arab-American professor Jack Shaheen has long been concerned about the consistently negative images Hollywood comes up with when portraying Arabs. Over the years he has written three books on the topic: The TV Arab; Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People; and Guilty: Hollywood’s Verdict on Arabs After 9/11. In the massive second book Reel Bad Arabs, he canvassed 900 films, “the vast majority of which portray Arabs by distorting at every turn what most Arab men, women, and children are really like.”

Shaheen was wise to point to the selective framing of Arabs and how it is repeated endlessly. Naturally, such repetition has a goal, one captured in an old Arabic saying: “Al tikrar biallem il hmar. By repetition even the donkey learns.”

With respect to an ethnic group—nay, a whole race—closer to my own heart, I worry about the images of the white majority. You know, the Leave It to Beaver types that we were (and were surrounded by) in our youth. 

Hollywood, it seems, has not favored us over the last half century or so. Either they supplant favorable white images with favorable images of African Americans and more recent Americans such as Jews. Or they create images of whites that are far more negative than typical of the first half of Hollywood’s existence. Why the change?

Further, why has the “reel,” or contrived studio image of whites, especially men, taken such a hit? Have whites really become that bad? Or have we always been evil, but our oppressive powers hid that truth?

Allow me to illustrate. Consider the following actual, or “real,” stories:

The Ithaca Christmas Massacre of 1989: Ithaca, New York, home to Cornell University, is small, like many such towns in the Finger Lakes region. A white man, Tony Harris, married with two children, felt it was a good place to raise a family. Unfortunately, he, his wife, son and daughter were murdered there three days before Christmas 1989. Sixteen-year-old daughter Shelby was raped before she was killed. The suspect was African American Michael Kinge. Records indicate that Kinge had ridden his bicycle to the country setting of the Harris’s home, assaulted them with a gun, then tied all four to beds in two upstairs bedrooms. He shot all four, then attempted to dispose of the evidence by burning the bodies.

The Wichita Massacre of 2000: Pat Buchanan was one of the few nationally-known personalities to reference the Wichita Massacre of 2000. In his book The Death of the West, he described the crimes that took place on the night of Dec. 14, 2000:

Five young people were at a party when their home was invaded by brothers, ages twenty-three and twenty. The five were put into a car, driven to an ATM machine, forced to withdraw their money, and taken onto a soccer field. The two women were forced to strip and were raped. Then the victims were forced to have sex with each other at gunpoint. All were made to kneel down. Each was shot in the ear. The three young men and one woman died. The other woman, left for dead, ran bleeding and naked for a mile in the cold to find help, as the brothers drove back to ransack the house.

One of the victims had decided to become a priest. Another had bought an engagement ring and was about to propose, but “in the minutes before he died, Jason Befort was forced to watch as the woman he hoped to marry was raped.”

The Knoxville Torture Murders of 2007: On the night of January 6, 2007, a young white couple, Channon Christian, 21, and Christopher Newsom, 23, were on a date. On the streets of Knoxville, they were allegedly carjacked by black men, then kidnapped, beaten, gang-raped, tortured and murdered. The national press was silent.

As with the Wichita Massacre cited above, Hollywood wanted nothing to do with the story of black men anally gang-raping a 23-year-old white man. They did not want to graphically portray black men pouring cleaning fluid down Ms. Christian’s throat after orally, anally, and vaginally gang-raping her. Nor did they want to discuss how Newsom’s body, with “multiple gunshot wounds,” was discarded and set afire next to railroad tracks. Ms. Christian’s body was found wrapped in garbage bags in a trash can. Some have suggested the body had been dismembered.

Now consider how Hollywood portrays interracial crime:

A Time to Kill (1996): In A Time to Kill, two Southern rednecks, dirty and disheveled, race their souped up yellow pickup trick across the red dirt of rural Mississippi. Sweaty and drunk, they hurl a full bottle of beer at black youths innocently playing basketball outside a small grocery store. Inside the store, the rednecks cruelly harass the long-suffering blacks of the neighborhood, including a young black girl.

Walking home alone along a country lane, groceries in hand, the girl is struck down by a can of beer thrown by one of the rednecks. As the bag of groceries flies out of her hands, a broken egg on the ground with its yoke running into the dirt symbolizes what is about to take place with the girl. Lying prone on the ground, she is filmed from various angles as the two white men take turns brutally raping her. Once finished, the men intend to leave no witness alive, so they roughly fit a rope around her frail neck and lynch her.

Déjà vu (2006): This film portrays a young white self-styled “patriot,” not unlike executed Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. The villain here has planted a bomb on a New Orleans ferry, killing 543 innocent Americans in the process. The scene accesses Americans’ memories of three traumatic events—the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina (complete with its overtones of racist whites).

A previous victim had been a beautiful young African American woman brutally butchered by the white man. He tied her hands behind her back, placed a burlap hood over her head, then poured gasoline over her in preparation for her immolation. Next, he sadistically brandished pruning shears as he approached the thrashing black captive, slowly picked up her hand and cut off the fingers of her right hand in order to remove evidence from under her fingernails.

Transforming Politically Incorrect Reality to Suit Hollywood’s Anti-white Agenda

But It goes beyond creating fictitious cases of whites preying on blacks. Hollywood has taken real cases where blacks have brutalized whites and portrayed them as the exact opposite: White men brutalizing innocent blacks.

For instance, in October 2001, African American Chante Mallard, a young nurse’s assistant, hit a homeless white man, Greg Biggs, leaving him half lodged in her windshield. Ms. Mallard then drove home, parked her car in the garage, and left Mr. Biggs stuck in the window. For two days she checked on Biggs’ condition, talked to him, and when he finally bled to death, she and her boyfriend dumped the body in a park.

Hollywood transformed this into an episode of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation as well as a film. In the CSI episode Anatomy of a Lye (the twenty-first of the second season), the driver became a white lawyer. In the 2007 film Stuck, Mena Suvari, the actress who played Lester Burnham’s blonde, blue-eyed high school love interest in American Beauty, starred in the role of Ms. Mallard.

The film was directed and co-written by Stuart Gordon, a Jewish American who has evidenced a highly critical view of majority culture, beginning with his founding of Screw Theater in 1968 and an adaptation of Peter Pan that featured nudity and hallucinogenics, for which Gordon was arrested. His Organic Theater Company later staged Sexual Perversity in Chicago.

Hollywood, of course, has not limited its inversions of politically incorrect reality to portrayals of white-on-black crime. A plethora of films have portrayed women or African Americans in high-status positions such as doctors, lawyers, or professors that were traditionally dominated by white males. An exception — until recently — was that Hollywood continued to portray airline pilots as white males. But even here, Hollywood now often shows a preference for women or African Americans as pilots.

For instance, in Turbulence (1997), a blonde flight attendant flies a 747 while a crazed white man played by Ray Liotta stalks her. In the Tom Hanks flick Cast Away (2000), we see both a female and a black pilot. And in a related theme, Jodi Foster plays an aeronautical engineer in Flightplan (2005). This, of course, is all part and parcel of the forward march of multiculturalism in the United States, as in the West more generally.

Another common example is for a Jewish character to rescue people in distress. A classic in this genre is the 1996 film Independence Day, which starred Jeff Goldblum as a hero fighter pilot along with African American Will Smith. (In this film, President Thomas J. Whitmore was still played by a white man; but, as we all know, portrayals of blacks as president have become commonplace, to the point that such portrayals have been suggested as paving the way for Barack Obama’s looming presidency.)

It is so common for Jews to be such heroes in film that one film expert has created a category specifically called “Jews to the Rescue.”

Then of course there are the numerous films in which the engineering genius is played by a black. One genius that comes to mind is Dr. Miles Bennett Dyson, “the original inventor of the neural-net processor which would lead to the development of Skynet, a computer A.I. intended to control and defend the United States, but which would later seize control of the world and launch a global war of extermination against humanity.” His appearance, of course, was in Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

Speaking only for myself, I fear that such fictional images of the dispossession of white males signal a real desire on the part of some segments of society to dispossess white males in real life. What then will future films look like when in fact the majority has been eclipsed?

Locust says: lets not forget, Day after Tomorrow, The Happening, every single Mass destruction movie involving asteroids hitting the Earth, and at least four dozen recent Hollywood movies showing White America under distress, and whitey getting whats coming to him.  I call these Kill Whitey Propaganda.

Racial Double-Standards: How the Media Ignores Anti-White Racism

By Michael D

Takeaways A black Harvard Prof. said live on C-SPAN: “We have to exterminate White people.” Quanel X on O’Reiley: “if you find any good White people, kill them now.”

There seems to be a double-standard in America today where the elements of free-speech and media collide. Unless you’ve been living on a deserted island in the middle of the Atlantic for the past week, you know all about the Imus fiasco. What Don Imus said is considered to be racist, sexist, and intolerant to the Black community, and to a point, they’re correct. But, what happens when Black personalities use racist remarks on television and radio? What most people are unaware of is that there have been Blacks that have used racist and down-right hateful language on television as well. On October 14, 2005 and Black Professor by the name of Kamau Kambon, while addressing a panel at Howard University Law School, used these words live on C-SPAN: “We have to exterminate White people off the face of the planet.” During an interview on the O’Reilly Factor with Bill O’Reilly, a Black author and radio personality named Quanell X made these extremely racist remarks: “I say in the words of Malcolm X, if you find any good White people, kill them now before they turn bad.” There was no media backlash. No pickets. No “Stop the Hate” marches. And there certainly were no live media conferences discussing hate and racism in the media as there was for the Imus comment. Today, media outlets across the country are talking about why Imus was fired from MSNBC. It seems that they think it’s for political reasons. The simple truth of it all is that Imus’ remarks have made such a stir simply because he’s White. The ugly double-standards monster has raised its head yet again. Do you think that if a Black personality had used the term ‘nappy-headed hoes’ while discussing the Rutgers Girls Basketball Team there would have been the same reaction? Better yet, would there have been any criticism on a Black personality for saying the same thing about an all White girls team? If the media will ignore a Black personality that says, “..if you find any good White people, kill them now before they turn bad.”, or “We need to exterminate White people off the face of the planet.”, wouldn’t it be fair to say there is indeed a double-standard against Whites where racial matters are concerned? The awful truth that we all should speak loudly about is, yes. I’ve mention only two examples of this double-standard. There are hundreds more on TV, radio, and even big budget movies. Speak up against it if you truly believe in racial-equality.But don’t take my word for any of this. I urge everyone reading this to do your own research. Look up the Wichita massacre where six white people were brutally raped, robbed, and murdered during a home invasion in the Winter of 2000 in Wichita, KS by two black brothers named Reginald and Jonathan Carr. Also the recent carjacking that led to the double-murder of a white couple barely in their 20’s named Channon Christian and Christopher Newsome in Knoxville, TN in January of 2007. Their killers, 6 African-Americans, raped, dismembered, and murdered both of them. Neither of these atrocious murders made the slightest dent in the airtime of any of the “big 3″ (FOX, MSNBC, CNN). Why? That’s for you to decide.

NBC’s Law & Order: Anti-White Propaganda in the Culture War

It’s 10 p.m.; do you know where the truth is? While the mainstream, socialist news media lurch from one embarrassing scandal to another, social engineers operate with impunity, using “realistic” entertainment programs as propaganda tools.

Consider NBC’s Law & Order. L&O’s liberal producer, Dick Wolf, controls a stable of five crime-oriented shows (also Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, Law & Order: Criminal Intent, L.A. Dragnet and Crime & Punishment), making him one of the most powerful men in Hollywood.

For years, Law & Order, which is filmed in Manhattan, advertised its episodes as being “ripped from the headlines,” a claim Wolf and star Jerry Ohrbach still make in interviews. But instead of depicting reality, Wolf’s scriptwriters take high-profile crimes committed by blacks, and replace the bad guys with whites, and invent white racist monsters that bear no relation to anything seen in New York during the past 100 years. And so, while according to NYPD crime reports, over 89 percent of suspects in violent crimes are black or Hispanic, L&O presents a looking-glass world in the grips of a white crime wave.

In “Teenage Wasteland,” an episode that originally aired on February 7, 2001, the true case of a group of black teenagers who ordered Chinese food, and murdered the delivery man, is turned into a group of middle-class, white kids.

“Myth of Fingerprints” (November 14, 2001) tells of a white, female forensics chief whose years of false testimony has sent many innocent men to jail. One of those innocents was murdered in prison, resulting in the official’s conviction for manslaughter.

“Fingerprints” was clearly based on the real case of former Oklahoma City supervising forensic chemist Joyce Gilchrist, nicknamed “black magic,” based on her longtime success at bringing about convictions. On September 25, 2001, as Ken Raymond reported the following day in the Oklahoman, “Oklahoma City Police Chief M.T. Berry … fired forensic chemist Joyce Gilchrist, whose lab techniques and testimony have been under scrutiny by federal, state and local investigators for several months.

“Gilchrist, 53, was fired for a variety of reasons, including ‘laboratory mismanagement, criticism from court challenges and flawed casework analysis,’ according to a police statement.” (Registration is required; see the Oklahoman’s Joyce Gilchrist file.)

For years, Gilchrist’s critics claimed she had falsified evidence and given false testimony, which caused 23 men to be sentenced to death, eleven of whom were executed. Note, however, that Joyce Gilchrist is black, and unlike the fictional white official, has never been prosecuted.

Seven months after the October, 2002 Washington, D.C. sniper case was closed with the arrest of suspects John Muhammad and Lee Malvo, L&O dramatized the case, but with the shooter as a white man! (“Sheltered”; May 14, 2003.)

“Smoke” (May 21, 2003) opens with the death of a child, whose adoptive father, a famous entertainer, had dropped him, while dangling him from a hotel room window. The detectives eventually discover that the entertainer would also arrange for underage boys to accompany him to his mansion, where he would sexually violate them.

When I told a not particularly media-savvy neighbor who is the mother of four small children that story line, she immediately said, “Michael Jackson!” But on L&O, the character is depicted as a WHITE comedian.

Remember the Danny Almonte case? Almonte was the 14-year-old Dominican fraud who — through the connivance of his father, Felipe de Jesus Almonte, and Bronx-based, Dominican Little League coach Rolando Paulino — passed himself off as a 12-year-old, in order to play in the 2001 Little League championships. But in “Foul Play” (May 1, 2002), the coach magically becomes a blond-haired, white man, who is somehow convicted of a murder committed by the player’s father.

L&O’s creative team must read some interesting publications, since many of their “ripped from the headlines” stories never happened. Consider their obsession with non-existent, murderous white supremacists, whom they depict as besieging Manhattan.

In “Open Season” (November 20, 2002), a William Kunstler-like defense attorney is murdered while celebrating the acquittal of a guilty-as-hell black defendant for shooting a white policeman. The killer, a member of a white supremacist group, then uses his defense attorney to unwittingly pass along information to his co-conspirators, who murder a prosecutor in another state. The defense attorney is charged with aiding and abetting the supremacists, before she is shot by a female supremacist.

Note that the real basis of the episode was the indictment of radical attorney, Lynne Stewart “with helping terrorist conspirator Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman maintain contact with the outlaw terror organization Islamic Group [IG] from behind the bars of a federal prison,” as Mark Hamblett wrote in the July 23 New York Law Journal, resulting in the 1997 murder of 62 people by IG in Luxor, Egypt. Sheik Abdul Rahman, is the convicted ringleader of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The most serious charges against Stewart were dismissed in July.

In “Prejudice” (December 12, 2001), a racist, white real estate agent progresses from writing a letter to his co-op board, to try and keep an interracial couple out of his building, to flashing a gun at a black colleague, to murdering a black man who beat him to a taxi. Such a case would have been fantastic in 1951, let alone in 2001.

In “Genius” (April 2, 2003), a white, violence-embracing ex-con-writer stabs a white cabby to death. Viewers are then given mixed messages, as the cab driver turns out to be a fugitive, white supremacist racial murderer. In another surreal, L&O touch, ordinary black New Yorkers are repeatedly shown to be so erudite that they are routinely experts on French poetry.

In “Kid Pro Quo” (April 30, 2003), the dedicated director of admissions at a tony private school, is murdered by her corrupt, racist boss. The victim sought to get a deserving but poor black girl admitted, but was overridden by the boss, who’d taken a bribe to accept the inferior child of a Jewish pornographer.

And then there’s the homophobia angle. In the real world, Manhattan is, with San Francisco, one of the two most gay-friendly areas in America. But not in L&O’s alternate universe. In “Girl Most Likely” (March 27, 2002), a private school student murders her lesbian lover, in order to hide the fact that she is gay.

Last, but not least, comes xenophobia. In “Patriot” (May 22, 2002), a pale, blonde-haired former special forces officer kills a Moslem immigrant he had surveilled, and whom he suspected of being a terrorist. The prosecutor presents the imaginary patriot as a monster, even as the story suggests that the dead man WAS a terrorist.

Now beginning its fourteenth season, Law & Order, still a top-rated show and perennial Emmy nominee for Outstanding Drama Series, serves in socialists’ culture war against whites. While Dick Wolf has succeeded at endearing himself to black, gay, and Hispanic pressure groups, if he seeks to cause whites to hate other whites, while being more sympathetic towards blacks, he has failed miserably. It is no secret which groups are committing almost all of the violent crimes in New York and other urban areas. All of the propaganda in the world won’t change that reality, or erase the public’s knowledge of it.

Here is a full list of Movies and assorted films that either are blatenly anti-white or have a tinge of anti-white within the film itself:

Love Field (1992): Michelle Pfeiffer, Dennis Haysbert. Dir. Jonathan Kaplan.
The Pelican Brief: Denzel Washington
Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner: Sidney Poitier
Save The Last Dance:
Wild Things 2: Isaiah Washington
Jungle Fever: Wesley Snipes
White Lies (1996): Julie Warner and Larry Gilliard, Jr.
Black and White (1999): Jew director James Toback.
Liberty Stands Still (2004): Wesley Snipes, Linda Fiorentino.
A Patch of Blue (1965): Sidney Poitier and Elizabeth Hartman
The Lost Man (1969): Sidney Poitier and Joanna Shimkus
Shaft (1971): Richard Roundtree and ________
187 (1997): Samuel Jackson and Kelly Rowan
Slaughter (1972): Jim Brown and Stella Stevens
I, Robot – Will Smith and Bridget Moynahan
Captive Heart: The James Mink Story – Louis Gossett Jr., Kate Nelligan
Bad Boys – Will Smith and Tea Leoni
Daybreak (1993) Cuba Gooding Jr. and Moira Kelly
Suburbia (1984)
Courage Under Fire (1996)
Moll Flanders (1996): Morgan Freeman and Robin Wright Penn
Bad Company (1995): Lawrence Fishburne, Ellen Barkin.
Mandingo (1975)

2004
Bag of Bones–___________ & ______________ *
Neo Ned–Gabrielle Union & Jeremy Renner

2003
House of the Dead–Enuka Okuma & Tyron Leitso
Malibu’s Most Wanted–Regina Hall & Jamie Kennedy (as a Jew)

2002 28 Days Later…–Naomie Harris & Cillian Murphy
Austin Powers in Goldmember–Beyonce’ Knowles & Mike Myers
Director–Jay Roach, Executive Producer–Toby Emmerich (Jews)
Dark Blue–Michael Michelle & Scott Speedman
Die Another Day–Halle Berry & Pierce Brosnan
Director–Lee Tamahori (1/2 Pacific Islander)
Queen of the Damned–Aaliyah & Stuart Townsend
The Time Machine–Samantha Mumba & Guy Pearce
Executive producer–Arnold Leibovit (Jew)
The Truth About Charlie–Thandie Newton & Mark Wahlberg
Executive producer–Ilona Herzberg

2001
Glitter–Mariah Carey & Max Beesley
Director–Vondie Curtis-Hall (negro)
Monsters’ Ball–Halle Berry & Billy Bob Thornton
Rocky Road–Nicole Smith & Will Wallace
The Score–Angela Bassett & Robert DeNiro
Co-director–Frank Oz (Jew)
Swordfish–Halle Berry & John Travolta; Halle Berry & Hugh Jackman
Producer–Joel Silver (Jew)

2000
High Fidelity–Lisa Bonet & John Cusack
Mission: Impossible II–Thandie Newton & Tom Cruise
Director–John Woo, executive producer–Terrence Chang (Chinese)
Road Trip–Mia Amber Davis & DJ Qualls
Writer/Director–Todd Phillips, Producer–Daniel Goldberg, Executive Producer Ivan Reitman (Jews)
Supernova–Angela Bassett & James Spader

1999

1998
Bulworth–Halle Berry & Warren Beatty
Executive producer–Lauren Donner Shuler (Jewess)
Mystery Men–Jennifer Lewis & William H. Macy
Producer–Lloyd Levin (Jew)
Pariah–Elexa Williams & Damon Jones (et al.*)
The Wedding–Halle Berry & Eric Thal
Director–Charles Burnett (negro)

1997
Jackie Brown–Pam Grier & Robert Forster
Producer–Lawrence Bender, co-executive producers–Bob & Harvey Weinstein (Jews)

1996
Mr. & Mrs. Loving–Lela Rochon & Timothy Hutton
Writer & Director–Richard Friedenberg (Jew)
The Rich Man’s Wife–Halle Berry & Christopher McDonald
Producer–Roger Birnbaum (Jew)
That Thing you Do!–__________ (a “Chantrelline”) & Ethan Embry
A Time to Kill–Rae’ven Kelly & _________ & _____________* Director–Joel Schumacher (Jew)

1995
Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls–Sophie Okonedo & Jim Carrey
Illegal in Blue–Stacey Dash & Dan Gauthier
Director–Stu Segall, executive producer–Martin W. Greenwald (Jew)
Jefferson in Paris–Thandie Newton & Nick Nolte
Director–James Ivory (homosexual), executive producer–Donald Rosenfeld (Jew)
Palookaville–Lisa Gay Hamilton & Adam Trese
Writer–David Epstein (Jew)

1994
Corrina, Corrina–Whoopi Goldberg & Ray Liotta
Writer/Director–Jessie Nelson, executive producer–Bernie Goldman (Jew)
Pulp Fiction–Vanessa Valentino & Quentin Tarantino
Producer–Lawrence Bender, co-executive producers–Bob & Harvey Weinstein (Jews)

1993
A Bronx Tale–Taral Hicks & Lillo Brancato
Producer–Jane Rosenthal (Jewess)

1992
The Bodyguard–Whitney Houston & Kevin Costner
Writer/Producer–Lawrence Kasdan (Jew)
One False Move–Cynda Williams & Billy Bob Thornton
Director–Carl Franklin (negro)
Sister Act–Whoopi Goldberg & Harvey Keitel (Jew)
Director–Emile Ardolini (homosexual), executive producer–Scott Rudin (homosexual Jew)
Zebrahead–N’Bushe Wright & Michael Rappaport (Jew)

1991
Flirting–Thandie Newton & Noah Taylor
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country–Iman & William Shatner (Jew)
Co-writer & director–Nicholas Meyer (Jew)

1990

1980-1989
Harlem Nights (1989) Lela Rochon & Vic Polizos
Writer/Director–Eddie Murphy (negro)
Angel Heart (1987) Lisa Bonet & Mickey Rourke
Jumpin’ Jack Flash (1986) Whoopi Goldberg & ___________
Producer–Joel Silver (Jew)
Soul Man (1986) Rae Dawn Chong & C. Thomas Howell
Associate producer–Bernie Goldman (Jew)
Brewster’s Millions (1985) Lonette McKee & Stephen Collins
Silverado (1985) Lynn Whitfield & Jeff Goldblum (Jew)
Co-Writer & Director–Lawrence Kasdan, Co-Writer–Mark Kasdan (Jews)

1970-1979
Nightmare in Badham County (1976) Lynne Moody & Chuck Connors* Live & Let Die (1973) Gloria Hendry & Roger Moore
Omega Man (1971) Rosalind Cash & Charlton Heston

1960-1969

1950-1959
Show Boat (1951) Ava Gardner (as a mulatto) & Robert Sterling

Black/White team movies: note that the villains are almost always white.
Lethal Weapon (1987): white villains Mitchell Ryan and Gary Busey.
Bait (2000) Uptight white David Morse uses Jaime Foxx to catch white crook Doug Hutchison.
Lethal Weapon 2 (1989): White South-African diplomats are race-hating drug dealers.
Lethal Weapon III (1992): white villain Stuart Wilson selling guns to black youths.
Lethal Weapon IV (1996): Chinese villain Kim Chan.
48 Hours
Bubba Ho-Tep (2002): Bruce Campbell and Ossie Davis v. white Bob Ivey.
Trading Places: Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd v. Old White Men.
Nothing To Lose (1997): Tim Robbins, Martin Lawrence.
Another 48 Hours
Men in Black
Men in Black: Alien Attack
Men in Black II
Wild Wild West: White villain Kenneth Branagh.
Die Hard (1988) White villain Alan Rickman.
Die Hard II (1990)
Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995) White villain Jeremy Irons.
Rising Sun
Money Talks (1997): white villains Frank Bruynbroek and Gerard Ismael.
Running Scared: Gregory Hines and Jew Billy Crystal. Nonwhite villain Jimmy Smits.
The Last Boy Scout: Bruce Willis, Damon Wayans.
Blue Streak (2004): white villain Peter Greene.
National Security (2003): villain white Eric Roberts.
Fled (1996): Lawrence Fishburne, Stephen Baldwin.
Bulletproof (1996): cop Damon Wayans, crook Adam Sandler (as a white).
The Glimmer Man (1996): Steven Seagal, Keenen Ivory Wayans.
I Spy (2002): Owen Wilson, Eddie Murphy. Script by Morton Fine and David Friedkin.
Bad Company: Anthony Hopkins, Chris Rock
Half Past Dead (2002): Stephen Seagal, Morris Chestnut.
Exit Wounds (2001): Stephen Seagal, DMX.
Showtime (2002): Robert DeNiro, Eddie Murphy.
Four Brothers (2005)

Movies with blacks as God
Bruce Almighty: Morgan Freeman as God.
It’s A Very Muppett Christmas Movie (2002): Whoopi Goldberg as God.
The Stand (1994): Ruby Dee as God-like figure.
In God We Trust (1980): Richard Pryor as God. Dir. Marty Feldman.
As Devil: The Devil and Max Devlin (1981): Bill Cosby

Movies with black presidents
The Fifth Element: Tom “Tiny” Lister, Jr.
Deep Impact: Morgan Freeman
Head of State (2003): Chris Rock
Stealth Fighter (2000): Ernie Hudson

Movies with “wise/magical blacks” helping “not-so-wise whites”
The Legend of Bagger Vance: Will Smith
The Green Mile: Michael Clarke Duncan
The Shawshank Redemption: Morgan Freeman
Something the Lord Made: Mos Def
About Schmidt (2002): Abdallah Mtulu as Ndugu.
The Family Man: Don Cheadle as an angel.
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves: Morgan Freeman
The Matrix: Larry Fishburne, and the Oracle
The Matrix Reloaded: Larry Fishburne and the Oracle
The Matrix Revolutions: Larry Fishburne and the Oracle
O Brother, Where Art Thou: Lee Weaver
Girl, Interrupted: Whoopi Goldberg
Grumpy Old Men: Ossie Davis
Happy Gilmore: Carl Weathers (helping Jewish Adam Sandler)
Rocky III: Carl Weathers
Seven (1995): Morgan Freeman
Rudy: Charles S. Dutton
Bringing Down the House: Queen Latifah
Soul Man: James Earl Jones
The Sandlot: James Earl Jones
Species: Forrest Whitaker
Ghost: Whoopi Goldberg
The United States of Leland: Don Cheadle
Journey Back to Oz (1974 – animated) Bill Cosby as voice of Wizard of Oz.
The Bonfire of the Vanities (1990): Morgan Freeman
That Was Then, This Is Now (1985) Morgan Freeman as understanding cop.
Grand Canyon (1991) Danny Glover helps Kevin Kline. Dir. Lawrence Kasdan.
The Stand
Jerry Maguire: Cuba Gooding Jr.
Radio (2003): Cuba Gooding, Jr.
The Big Bounce (2004): Morgan Freeman
Money Train: Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson.
To Sir with Love (1967) Sidney Poitier
To Sir with Love II (1996) apparently a remake of Lean on Me.
The Slender Thread (1965): Sidney Poitier.
Brother John (1971): Sidney Poitier, dir. James Goldstone.
Pressure Point (1962): Sidney Poitier.
Lilies of the Field (1963): Sidney Poitier.
All the Young Men (1960): Sidney Poitier.
The Toughest Man in the World (TV, 1988): Mr. T
Johnny Mnemonic (1995): Ice-T
The Shining: Scatman Crothers
Never Die Alone (2004): DMX, David Arquette.
Gladiator (1992): Ossie Davis
The Super (1991): bad Joe Pesci is educated about life on the streets.
Twilight Zone, The Movie (1983): Scatman Crothers in nursing home segment (part 2).
An Officer and a Gentleman (1982): Louis Gossett Jr. giving “tough love.”

Movies with “cool blacks”, uncool whites
The New Guy (2002): Eddie Griffin
Houseguest (1995): Sinbad
Beverly Hills Cop (1984): Eddie Murphy and Judge Reinhold.
Beverly Hills Cop II (1987): Eddie Murphy and Judge Reinhold.
Sister Act: Whoopi Goldberg
Sister Act 2: Whoopi Goldberg
Bullworth: Halle Barry
White Chicks (2004)
Putney Swope (1969): Arnold Johnson.
First Kid (1996): Sinbad.
The Toy (1982): Richard Pryor.
Blue Streak (1999): Martin Lawrence enlightens Luke Wilson.
Head of State (2003): Chris Rock.
Malibu’s Most Wanted (2003): white is shown as absolutely ridiculous, blacks as cool. Note that the white is Jewish.
South Park – Bigger, Longer and Uncut: Isaac Hayes.
Black and White (1999): Jew director James Toback. Whites trying to be like blacks. Jew lawyer helps blacks get recording contracts.
Fear of a Black Hat (1994): “Vanilla Sherbert” is the joke.
Soul Plane (2004): Tom Arnold as clueless white man.
Preferred by white women
Me, Myself and Irene (2000) White Traylor Howard leaves husb Jim Carey for black midget Tony Cox.
Freddy Got Fingered (2001) Julie Hagerty leaves husband for Shaquille O’Neal

Blacks as very strong/tough
Police Academy (1984): Bubba Smith
Police Academy 2 (1985): Bubba Smith
Police Academy 3 (1986): Bubba Smith
Police Academy 4 (1987): Bubba Smith
Police Academy 5 (1988): Bubba Smith
Police Academy 6 (1989): Bubba Smith
Striptease: Ving Rhames
Revenge of the Nerds
Higher Learning: with obese black pummeling hulking white.
The Adventures of Baron Munchausen
The Program: scene w/black linebacker abusing white QB “Mayday, mayday”

Black/White surprise long-lost child
Made in America (1993)
Carbon Copy (1981)

White misfit coaching black sports team
Wildcats (1986): Goldie Hawn
Sunset Park (1996): Rhea Perlman (Jew).
Hard Ball (2001): Keanu Reeves
Dangerous Minds (1995): Michelle Pfeiffer
Music of the Heart (1999): Meryl Streep

Action/Suspense movies with black hero, white villain(s)
Sweet Sweetback’s Baad Asssss Song (1971)
Collateral (2004): Jamie Foxx v. Tom Cruise.
Catwoman (2004): Halle Berry v. Sharon Stone.
Pulp Fiction: evil white rednecks rape Ving Rhames.
Posse (1993): Mario Van Peebles v. Richard Jordan.
Man On Fire: Denzel Washington protecting white family.
Detour to Terror (1980): O.J. Simpson v. Lorenzo Lamas.
Slaughter (1972): Jim Brown v. Rip Torn.
Tougher than Leather (1988): Run DMC v. mafia, racist bikers. Dir. Jew Rick Rubin.
Jumpin’ Jack Flash (1986)
Virtuousity (1995): Denzel Washington v. Russell Crowe.
Slaughter’s Big Rip Off (aka Slaughter II, 1973): Jim Brown v. Ed McMahon.
Bad Boys: Will Smith, Martin Lawrence, Tea Leoni
Kiss the Girls: Morgan Freeman (w/ white Ashley Judd) v. Cary Elwes.
The Brother from Another Planet (1984): Joe Morton v. John Sayles, David Strathairn.
XXX (2002): Vin Diesel v. Marton Csokas. Dir. Rob Cohen.
Shaft (2000): Samuel L. Jackson, Christian Bale. Dir. black John Singleton.
Another 48 Hours
Black Gunn (1972): Jim Brown v. Martin Landau. Tagline: “For every drop of black blood spilled … a white man pays.”
Beverly Hills Cop: Eddie Murphy, Stephen Berkoff.
Action Jackson (1988): Carl Weathers, Craig T. Nelson. Producer Joel Silver.
I, Robot – Will Smith, Bruce Greenwood
Enemy of the State (1998) – Will Smith, John Voight.
Wild, Wild West – Will Smith (with Jewish Kevin Kline), Kenneth Branagh. Dir. Barry Sonnenfeld.
The Negotiator (1998): Samuel L. Jackson. (I’m assuming here that the villain is white).
Walking Tall (2004): Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Neal McDonough. Real-life white Buford Pusser is transformed into black Chris Vaughn.
Blade (1998): Wesley Snipes, Stephen Dorff.
Blade II (2002): Wesley Snipes, Luke Goss.
Blade III (2004): Wesley Snipes, villains Parker Posey and Dominic Purcell
The Art of War (2000): Wesley Snipes and I’m assuming the villain is white. Snipes with Asian love interest.
The Fan (1996): Wesley Snipes, Robert DeNiro.
Cleopatra Jones (1973): Tamara Dobson v. Bill McKinney and Shelley Winters.
Murder at 1600 (1997): Wesley Snipes, Alan Alda
U.S. Marshalls (1998): Wesley Snipes (co-hero with Tommy Lee Jones) v. Robert Downey Jr.
Money Train: Wesley Snipes (co-hero with Woody Harrelson) v. Chris Cooper.
Little Nikita (1988): Sidney Poitier, Richard Lynch
Shaft (1971)
Black Caesar (1973): Fred Williamscon v. Art Lund and Val Avery. Dir. Larry Cohen.
Passenger 57 (1992): Wesley Snipes, Bruce Payne. “Always bet on black.”
Shaft in Africa (1973): Richard Roundtree, Frank Finlay
Shaft’s Big Score (1972): Richard Roundtree, Joe Mascolo. Note hostile look Shaft gives white cop while ordering “black coffee.”
The Mack (1973): Max Julien.
Deep Cover (1992): Lawrence Fishburne, jew Jeff Goldblum playing “David Jason.”
Hoodlum (1997): Lawrence Fishburne, jew Tim Roth playing “Dutch Schultz.”
Anaconda (1997): Ice Cube, John Voight.
The Rundown (2003): Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Christopher Walken
The Scorpion King (2002): Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, Steven Brand
Crimson Tide (1995): Denzel Washington, Gene Hackman
Foxy Brown (1974): Pam Grier, Peter Brown, Katheryn Loder.
Coffy (1973): Pam Grier, Allan Arbus, Sid Haig.
Bucktown (1975): Fred Williamson and Pam Grier v. Art Lund and white cops.
Hurricane Smith (1992): Carl Weathers fights white Australians.
Braker (1985 TV) Carl Weathers. Failed pilot for cop drama w/black vet & white rookie.
Cocaine and Blue Eyes (1983): O. J. Simpson.
Three the Hard Way (1974): Fred Williamson, Jim Brown and Jim Kelly v. Jay Robinson.
Panther (1995):
…Tick…Tick…Tick…(1970): Jim Brown.
Drop Zone (1994): Wesley Snipes v. Gary Busey.
Suburbia (1984)
Devil in a Blue Dress (1995): Denzel Washington
The Glass Shield (1994) Ice Cube
The Manchurian Candidate (2004): Denzel Washington v. Meryl Streep, Liev Schreiber.

Comedy with Black Hero, White Villain
Brewster’s Millions (1985)
Harlem Nights (1989): Eddie Murphy v. Danny Aiello and Michael Lerner.
The Cherokee Kid (1996): Sinbad v. James Coburn
I’m Gonna Get You Sucka
Dolemite (1975)
The Human Tornado: Dolemite II (1976): Rudy Ray Moore v. J. B. Baron
Marci X (2003) Jew and black unite to protect gangsta rap from conservative white man.
Black Knight
Pootie Tang (2003): Lance Crouther v. Robert Vaughn.
Surf Nazis Must Die (1987): Gail Neely kills neo-Nazis.

Black hero in general
Goldie and the Boxer (1979): O.J. Simpson as father figure to white Melissa Michaelsen.
Goldie and the Boxer go to Hollywood (1981): more of the same.
Independence Day (1996): Will Smith saving us from aliens.
Night of the Living Dead (1968): Duane Jones.
Night of the Living Dead (1990): Tony Todd
Dawn of the Dead (2004). Ving Rhames.
Osmosis Jones (2001): blood cell with Chris Rock’s voice saves whites from germs.
Lean on Me (1989) Morgan Freeman overcomes schemes by white officials to make him fail.
Children of the Dust (1995): Sidney Poitier.
Michael Jordan: An American Hero (1999 TV)
Undercover Brother: Eddie Griffin, Chris Kattan
Space Jam (1996): Michael Jordan.

Black Victim, White Villain
White Slavery of Blacks
Roots
Amistad (1997)
Roots: the next generation
Amistad
Mandingo (1975)
Beloved (1998)
Captive Heart: The James Mink Story (1996)
Down in the Delta (1998)
Enslaved (1999)
Fields of Endless Day (1978)
I is a Long Memoried Woman (1990)
Loyalties (1999)
No Master Over Me (1998)
Of Kith and Kin (1998)
Sankofa (1993)
Shadrach (1998)
Solomon Northrup’s Odyssey (1994)
Songs are Free (1991)
The Underground Railroad (1999)
Waking in Mississippi (1998)

White abuse of Blacks other than Slavery (e.g. discrimination, violence…)
A Time to Kill: Samuel Jackson, RaeVen Larrymore Kelly
Walking Tall (2004): The Rock
Ghosts of Mississippi (1996) dir. Rob Reiner (Jewish)
Mississippi Burning
Monster’s Ball
For Us the Living: The Medgar Evers Story
4 Little Girls
Rosewood (1997) dir. John Singleton (black)
Once Upon a Time… When We Were Colored (1995)
The Long Walk Home (1990)
The Craft (1996): blonde Christine Taylor picks on black Rachel True.
The Rosa Parks Story (2002)
The Court-Martial of Jackie Robinson (1990)
The Tuskegee Airmen (1995)
George Wallace (1997)
A Soldier’s Story (1984) dir. Norman Jewison (Jewish)
In the Heat of the Night (1967) dir. Norman Jewison
White Lie (1991): Gregory Hines.
A Lesson Before Dying (1999) Don Cheadle.
Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry (1978)
The Color Purple (1985)
White Man’s Burden (1995): “reverse-world”: blacks are vicious oppressors and whites are humble, honest underclass. Lesson: blacks are really the humble, honest…
Freedom Song (2000)
A Raisin in the Sun (1989)
A Raisin in the Sun (1961)
Mandela (1987)
Good Fences (2003)
Men of Honor (2000)
Chiefs (1983 miniseries)
Mandela and de Klerk (1997) Sidney Poitier, Michael Caine
Separate but Equal (1991): Sidney Poitier
Carter’s Army (aka Black Brigade, 1970)
To Kill a Mockingbird (1962)
Hart’s War (2002)
The Atlanta Child Murders (1985 mini) says black convicted killer Wayne Williams was innocent.
Beloved (1998)
…Tick…Tick…Tick…(1970): Jim Brown.
Black Like Me
The Hurricane (1999): black boxer falsely imprisoned by racist white establishment.
Cry Freedom (UK 1987): discrimination in Apartheid South Africa.
O, Brother, Where Art Thou: Jim Crow, Klan, lynching. Dir. Jewish Coen brothers.
The Glass Shield (1994) Ice Cube. Discrimination in LAPD.
The Wilby Conspiracy (1975). South African govt tries to murder black activist.
Jasper, Texas (2003)
Bring It On (2000) white protagonists inadvertently steal blacks’ cheer routine.

White movies remade black or blacker

Walking Tall (2004)
The Muppet’s Wizard of Oz (2005 TV)
The Manchurian Candidate (2004)
Ocean’s Eleven (2001)
Hook (1991) very sweet scene where black kid looks into Robin Williams’ face.
Four Brothers (2005) remake of The Sons of Katie Elder
Wild Wild West (1999) Will Smith as Jim West

Blacks Inserted Into White Historical Settings
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves: Morgan Freeman
Texas Rangers (2001): Usher Raymond
Silverado: Danny Glover
Blazing Saddles (1974): Cleavon Little. Dir and written by Mel Brooks.
Posse (1993): Mario Van Peebles and others as black cowboys.
Gang of Roses
Girl Interrupted: based on a true story. The character played by Whoopie Goldberg was actually white.

Movies with White Hero/Victim, Black Villain (for comparison)
Demolition Man: Sylvester Stallone, Wesley Snipes. Note that the boss villain is white.
A Stranger in Town (1995 TV): Jean Smart, Gregory Hines as stalker.
Candyman (1992): Virginia Madsen, Tony Todd.
Candyman II: Farewell to the Flesh (1995): Kelly Rowan, Tony Todd.
The Even Stevens Movie (2003): Shia Lebouef v. Tim Meadows.
Marked for Death (1990) Steven Seagal (Jew, with black Keith David) v. Basil Wallace.
Birth of a Nation (1915)
Training Day: Ethan Hawke v. Denzel Washington (who is evil because he hurts blacks).
The Principal: James Belushi (love interest black Rae Dawn Chong).
Rocky II: Sylvester Stallone (with black Carl Weathers) v. Mr. T.
Zulu: blacks are enemies in war, but not really shown as “villains.”
Black Hawk Down
Unbreakable (2000): Bruce Willis v. Samuel L. Jackson.
Conan the Barbarian: Arnold Schwarzenegger, white woman & 2 Asians v. James Earl Jones and whites.

Protesting Against Israel or Hating Jews?

By Richard L. Cravatts

The anti-Israel demonstration of some 200 to 300 people outside the Ft. Lauderdale courthouse on December 30^th , which took place on the same day in other major American and European cities, gave Palestinian supporters yet another excuse to decry Israel: this time because of its recent incursions into Gaza to counterstrike Hamas personnel and infrastructure, and the Jewish state’s attempt to stop the barrages of 6300 rockets that have rained down on southern Israel since 2005.

The members of A.N.S.W.E.R. Coalition: Act Now to Stop War & End Racism and the Muslim American Society who attended Tuesday’s demonstration apparently were not sufficiently concerned when rockets and mortars were launched almost daily into Israel from Gaza by Hamas, aimed at civilian targets for no other reason than the intended victims were Jews. Once Israel retaliated with targeted strikes against Hamas, however, and some 400 Palestinians were killed (most of whom were Hamas terrorists), civilian casualties were immediately elevated by Israel’s worldwide critics to “crimes against humanity,” “genocide,” and “disproportionate” responses.

What was particularly revealing, and chilling, about the Ft. Lauderdale demonstration was the virulence of the chants and messages on the placards, much of it seeming to suggest that more sinister hatreds and feelings-over and above concern for the current military operations-were simmering slightly below the surface. Several of the protestors, for instance, carried signs saying “Nuke Israel,” a sentiment that was also shouted out to pro-Israel counter-demonstrators standing across the street.

Now the notion of using of a nuclear device to eliminate Israel and thereby attempting to kill its roughly 5 million Jews is not a unique one, since words to that effect are regularly uttered, among others, by Iran’s raving president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who dreams of such apocalyptic final solutions. What is unique is the morally-defective logic that would enable someone to justify a second Holocaust, the mass murder of Jews, on the basis of Israel having defended itself from years of rocket attacks and having killed several hundred murderous terrorists in the process. Making the Middle East free of Jews, Judenfrein, is exactly what Hamas, the group of murderous thugs being cheered on by the demonstrators here, ardently longs for; Hamas’ charter, in fact, expresses as one of its core tenets that Israel should be eliminated, that “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it.”

Other protestors were less overt in their angry protestations, carrying signs and shouting out the oft-heard slogan, “Free Palestine,” or, as it is generally expressed when the odious messenger has sufficient time and space, “Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea.” That phrase suggests the same situation that the nuclear option would help bring about, namely that if “Palestine” is “liberated,” is free, there will of course be no Israel between the Jordan River and Mediterranean, and no Jews.

So the careless talk about the so-called “occupation” of the West Bank and previously of Gaza, or disputes over the 1967 borders, or the division of Jerusalem, or the construction of Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria is obviously all meaningless, merely a smokescreen put up by the enemies of Israel to disguise the fact that they have no intention of living peacefully in their own state beside a Jewish one because they have no intention of letting the Jewish one exist. Hamas’ charter announces quite clearly “that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgment Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up.”

The most frightening incident during the demonstration, caught on video tape by Tom Trento, director of the Florida Security Council, and one which reveals the actual nature of the naked hatred of the pro-Hamas demonstrators, involved a Muslim-American woman in headscarf who was taunting the (presumably) Jewish counter-protestors across the street. She first screams that someone’s “mother is a whore,” but finding that a little ineffective she then reaches for something that captures the particularity of the event and screams, “Go back to the ovens. You need a big oven. That’s what you need,” suggesting, in a rather insensitive way, that if Hamas is not able to eliminate Jews in the Middle East successfully, wouldn’t it be convenient to be able to ship Jews back to the crematoria of the Nazi’s Final Solution?

This demonstrator’s ugly and revealing comments expose what many have thought of Israel’s most virulent critics for some time — that if you scratch the surface of an Israel-hater long enough, you will eventually find a Jew-hater lurking below. Even critics of Israel as odious as Ahmadinejad never publicly admit that they despise Jews. He merely loathes the “Zionist regime.” The argument always goes something like this: it’s not that they hate Jews; it’s only Zionism or Israeli policies they abhor.

So the British university lecturers union can call for boycotts of Israeli academics because of Zionist policies; or two American professors can write about an ominous “Israel Lobby” while they actually question the motives, and loyalty, of American Jews; or a former American president can accuse Israel of “apartheid” as opposed to peace; or Arab states and the UN can continually denounce the alleged ongoing “ethnic cleansing” or “genocide” of the Palestinians at the hands of the brutal Zionist regime; and all of them can escape what should be painfully obvious: that they despise and want to dismantle Israel not because its policies or actions are so beyond acceptable standards of nationhood, but precisely because Israel is, and always will be, the Jew among nations.

Grimmest Economics Forecasts for 2009

When the hopeful news for the 2009 economy is that an unknown hedge fund may be buying a distressed bank (IndyMac), you know we’re getting desperate. That news offers at least a glint of hope that there may be a resolution in sight to the banking mess, says Seeking Alpha. (Hey, it’s better than giant snow globes acting like firestarting magnifying glasses.) Alas, Stephen King (chief economist at HSBC, not the master of horror) is less upbeat about 2009 with his gory vision that the entire global economy will shrink for the first time since 1947. Washington’s Institute for International Finance has similar thoughts of a “globally synchronized recession,” according to Real Time Economics. “That probably means that even countries which have had extraordinary growth like China could move into deep recession,” says 24/7 Wall St. “The slowdown in global demand will mean more job cuts, factory closures and bankruptcies, as well as budget-stretching rescue plans and government bailouts running into hundreds of billions of dollars,” says LiveMint.com. Now there are two worldviews, blogs James Howard Kunstler at Energy Bulletin: one view says this “rough patch” will play out and technology will rescue us, and one says “it will be necessary to make radically new arrangements for daily life and rather soon.”

“As if things weren’t bad enough…starts a Wall Street Journal story today, a Russian professor is predicting the dissolution of the United States in 2009. Igor Panarin figures “economic, financial and demographic trends will provoke a political and social crisis…wealthier states will withhold funds from the federal government and effectively secede…social unrest up to and including a civil war will follow.” You know –stuff like that. Different states will go to Canada, Mexico, Russia, etc. “Sarah Palin will not only be able to see Russia from her house, she will actually be Russian,” says The E&P Pub. Adds Attytood: “This makes an enormous amount of sense. Because I’ve long suspected that Canada secretly has a plan to capture the economic goldmine that is North Dakota.”

But cheer up: being cheery is the human way, says Live Science: “In the face of a sliding economy, lost jobs, vanishing retirement and checkbooks in the red, everyone just keeps on going. In fact, we keep on smiling….it helps us stay alive, and sane.” And Contrarian Profits, for one, isn’t giving up on the USA: Yes, “pain will precede the promise,” the blog says, but “we have the potential to end up with a new, fair, transparent and judiciously regulated environment where capital formation can again spread its wings and the U.S. economy can fly.”

Thursday, 28 February 2008 – predictions for 2008 through 2009, Was he right or wrong?

2008 to 2009 Predictions

Thursday, 28 February 2008

span.joshide { display:none; } Predictions for all of The Nations of The World. Aries Ingres 20 March 2008 The economy of the world will not be very strong during this time.  In fact in many countries around the world taxation and national debts may be seen to increase this may also include a very pronounced increase in inflation which will further burden nations and their citizens.There can be some sudden and drastic market swings during the first six months. The possibility of high unemployment and or a worldwide depression is very strong during this year – though I would guess that this would very likely occur after the USA presidential election. There will be much conflict with regard to the following countries Macedonia, Albania, Bulgaria, all regions of former Yugoslavia, Greece, Lithuania, India, Afghanistan, and Mexico. This may also be a difficult year for Greece, Iraq, Syria, France, Brazil, Turkey, Switzerland and the countries of the West Indies. There will be much dissension politically within these countries and there will be much internal discord and in some of these countries there will almost be, or in fact be breakouts of civil war or major unrest.  This unrest will be principally focused against the upper class and the ruling party’s of these countries so in essence these are anarchic revolutions. On the plus side, people will be turning towards higher spirituality and religion in an effort to combat their growing frustration.  There will be many surprises coming from the leaders of the world and many of them will again make misguided decisions. Many leaders around the world will become increasingly dictatorial towards their own people in countries which have elections during this year there will be major changes with the people voting for the party that will bring the most change to their countries so in a way people are rife with discontent.  This would mean that we could expect a democratic majority within the United States including the presidency. Foreign affairs around the world during this year will not all be successful and diplomacy will practically be put aside.  The definition of what a family is will continue to undergo change throughout the world.  The citizenry of the world will be very discontent with their lot in life and will be seeking much change. During this time when you read a newspaper and watch news reports remember they may not be completely accurate. Countries as a whole will have the abilities to manipulate the press.  Yet during this time the people the world will continue to divert themselves by having fun, paying attention to sports, and other diversions such as dancing and music – however this can also lead to an increas in negative escapism such as drug and alcohol abuse. Again the economy will suffer due to the continuing collapse of the mortgage and housing markets and individually people will be very prone to gambling and will suffer many losses to this vice. Again during this year crimes involving women and their exploitation will continue to increase throughout the world. Instances of sabotage and spying even among allied(friendly) countries will increase during this time. As a result they could also be many instances of terrorist attacks within countries. Libra Ingres 22 September 2008 Much of what was written above will continue.  Finances will be doing horribly during this time.  The people will be seeking major political reformations and as usual governments will seek to prevent these changes.  There could be accidents involving short distance travel such as highway and roadway accidents.  On the plus side as stated above a more universal spirituality will be developing in conjunction with those who seek political change.  There could be serious misfortune with regard to Libra (e.g. Vladimir Putin) ruled leaders in countries the leaders of the world will be much disposed to warfare and may even resort to that including police actions to solve their own internal and external disputes. Predictions for the USA Aries Ingres The focus of the country during this time will be the status of the economy which will be going through much transformation and will not be performing very well during the six months beginning March 20 of 2008.  The country will be very much focused on issues involving our leadership and who will be replacing our current president. The first six months of the astrological new year will not be wholly unfortunate for the economy of the US.  During this time the press will be rife with all kinds of surprising news though it will probably just turn out to be hype or some form of misinformation-seeing as this is an election year this will be nothing out of the ordinary-expect much bashing between the candidates and the parties with all kinds are shocking and surprising news making headlines but keep in mind much of this information will be false. This year could be marked by an increase in in the unemployment rate and mine accidents.  Agriculture will be also doing poorly and it would seem to indicate some kind of declined in crop production though this could also indicate something negatively affecting aquaculture, fisheries etc. So our oceans and rivers will be suffering. These crops could be affected by an overabundance of rain versus drought.  The people will be much interested in a return to old style American democracy something which has eroded over the past eight to 16 years.  There may be some sort of new legislation involving presidential or congressional powers that may cause a great furor over the six months.  This could involve issues of prisons hospitals or even spying.  What ever this issue is will not leave the people very content and it will be nearly impossible for them  (congress) to implement and pass the legislation – probably some tightening of the USA PATRIOT Act before Bush leaves ofice. The democrats will have a complete victory during the November elections and will be in charge of the presidency and both houses of Congress. All that remains to see is if they will live up to their promises.  The citizens of this country will seek this change because they’re tired of governmental abuse and in particular the fact that there has been no change with regard to the war in Iraq.  So this would indicate that the people would like to see a return to normalcy and not the continual stress of the Iraqi war and this nebulous war on terror.  Peace movements should increase as this will be the will of the people. Issues involving children could come to the fore during these six months.  Perhaps funds that were going to children will be cancelled or there will be more governmental scandals such as the congressional page scandal of the past or involvement with  prostitution or infidelity among governmental officials. There will very likely be an increase in taxes during the next year.  Issues involving real estate do not look at all fortunate and the real estate and mortgage markets will continue to perform poorly.  Over the next year it will seem that many more troops will be harmed from combat action so an intensification of combat in the Middle East seems likely and this may very well be why the citizens of United States will want a change of course in that theater of combat. During this time some statesmen may die but it is impossible to say whom it could be either a Leo, Cancer or Virgo individual (Sun Sign or Ascendant).  I prefer not to say who these individuals may be but anyone with access to Wikipedia can search for themselves. Issues involving prisoners within the United States may reach crisis proportions and the quality of their incarceration and violence within prisons will make headlines this will not be a fortunate time for long distance travel nor for overseas trade. As far as news reports -  remember that at this time the press is very much controlled by the governmental apparatus. As mentioned in last year’s predictions the people will be much disposed to pleasure seeking and incidences of alcoholism and drug addiction will be seen to increase.  The quality of American military leadership has to be called into question and neither the rank and file of  the military nor the citizenry of this country will have much faith in them.  This may also be directed towards the current president’s advisers.  Perhaps they are over influencing war making strategy and as a result the troops could be suffering and very discontent with senior military leadership.  So a change in course is very much needed if victory in Iraq and in the war in terror are desired. For example, many Generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff seem more like businessmen than warriors. More wariors are needed – warriors who know that politics and warfare must be separate and that there are just some wars that are best not fought. With this being mentioned it must be stressed that this country does have enemies which seek to harm it.  It is very important that the people demand competency and integrity within all police, military and governmental agencies which are in charge of maintaining our citizens safety.  It is also very important that these agencies not trust those who they feel our Allies.  As they could actually be working on the side of our enemies. Any future military operations in Iraq must be done with a cynical attitude toward the Iraqi government as at this point in time it cannot be trusted.  Other Allies such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and others must also be dealt with cynically and is my recommendation that in the best interest of our troops the United States act unilaterally and without giving these countries any foreknowledge of military operations, troop movements or emplacements. By election time, I believe that the lot of the country will not be good. I believe that Barak Obama will be the next president of the United States, and he will completely revamp the military and the war in Iraq and the war on terror. He will do this before April of 2009. However the end of conflict is no where near so I am not suggesting that the country will completely withdraw from Iraq (Think more along the lines of South Korea – a prolonged US presence), but there will be many changes inside of the pentagon. Of course these changes will not at all be popular among the military-industrial complex. Barak Obama is being viewed by the electorate as an “American Savior” of sorts. As one can expect and as history has shown this can be a mixed blesing. Expect some major tax reforms from Obama. He may even do something so drastic as to completely replace all senior military leadership. Regardless of this, between July 2008 and July 2009 the level of debt within the US will have reached crisis proportions. I think that Obama will not only inherit a mess of a war, but he will have to figure out drastic changes to alleviate the country’s economic woes, which will be worse post election – we could either be in a severe recession or worse. The people may very well be all for these changes, as a new wave of optimism could sweep the country – sort of a new American Revolutionary spirit- but this spirit can also have groups that try to split from the “system”. So a return of groups wishing to cede from the union may be possible. The important thing is for all of us to focus on the positive – to pray for the welfare of the earth and all of its inhabitants.

Last Updated ( Thursday, 28 February 2008 )

Mexico: Annexation or Desolation

Mexico: Annexation or Desolation

By Erik Rush
MichNews.com

In my various treatises addressing the prudence of the United States government initiating overtures toward a negotiated annexation of Mexico, I attend to the oft-considered tribulations that have been thrashed out in political circles and media venues since September 11, 2001, when issues of national security gave vibrant new life to the predicament concerning our southern border. What to do about the border is a question Americans have been asking for decades, with Republican and Democrat administrations sharing equal blame in their failure to provide answers. In the book Annexing Mexico: Solving the Border Problem Through Annexation and Assimilation, I present comprehensive research on the subject and a proposal – radical though it may seem at first blush – delineating precisely how this annexation might be accomplished and the impressive benefits to both nations.

I was motivated to write this column in part due to the incomprehensibly audacious, grotesque and profane “May Day 2007” marches that were held mere days ago in many American cities (ostensibly in support of “undocumented migrant workers”), but there are other critical aspects vis-à-vis illegal aliens from Mexico which I believe merit deliberation and even further validate the case for annexing Mexico.

Over the last two years, I have had the opportunity to converse with hundreds of people on this subject through the course of media interviews, speaking engagements and face-to-face encounters. Individuals’ reactions have been widely varied (as one may expect), but seldom fell along the lines of political affiliation or identification, which initially surprised me.

The volume of feedback has increased dramatically of late; one group of people I’ve spoken with who proved to be among the most enthusiastic apropos the strategy I’ve outlined have been – guess who – Mexican immigrants.

Now, many informed folks have found this to be no surprise; 10% of Mexico’s population have voted with their feet and are already here, then there’s the August 2005 poll by the Pew Hispanic Center that indicated more than 40 percent of Mexican adults would move to the United States if they could.

One might be surprised, however, if one’s exposure is limited to major media accounts and well-funded campaigns of those who claim to represent Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans at large, such as MEChA, La Raza and the Mexica Movement.

The fact that organizations such as these possess the temerity to support nebulous “civil rights” for people who entered the United States illegally notwithstanding, it is generally known by a relative few that these groups not only don’t represent the majority of Mexican immigrants, but they take their marching orders from American socialists (whose sentiments parallel those in the farthest-Left vicinity of our new congressional majority). What I find appalling is that a high school student on several bong hits could easily research this and come to the same stark, undeniable conclusion based upon the associations these groups have claimed for years and the political leanings of other organizations and prominent individuals support them. The reason most Americans aren’t aware of this, of course is due to the alignment of major media outlets and the modus operandi of these activist groups.

These concerns are racist, plain and simple, and the majority of the marchers we’ve seen (who resemble newsreel mobs of anti-American Islamic radicals more than anything else in attitude and countenance) are not migrant workers, those who either the border back and forth as laborers or those who seek more permanent socioeconomic asylum and want to assimilate. Those folks were probably at work during the marches. The bulk of the sneering chanting haters we’ve seen are Mexican-American Leftists; they’re already assimilated (socioeconomically if not culturally), spoiled victims of the same entitlement mentality the Left sold to blacks. They have little concept of the struggles those who live in the Third World oligarchy just across the border endure and why so many wish to be here. If they did they would realize how fortunate they are, how tolerant America has been, and that the key is to Americanize Mexico rather than Mexicanizing America. Go ask a few Mexican immigrants if they want The U.S. to become more like Mexico if you still stand in doubt.

The methodology of these so-called immigrant solidarity groups consists of impelling the Latino community toward misplaced action and inundating the airwaves with their propaganda; platitudes, slogans and placards are lent credence by sympathetic politicians and co-conspirators in the media.

How can one chant an asinine phrase like “No Human Being is Illegal” and expect to be taken seriously? When one has politicians who operate out of either fear or lust for power and those who rely on cheap labor on the north side of the border, and politicians legendary in their corruption on the south all fighting to maintain the status quo: A porous border. The far Left at large is only interested in leveraging its socialist agenda.

Like the black civil rights activists who answer to the same masters and also stage-manage those they allegedly serve, these champions of Mexamerica keep indictments of racism ever-ready in hip holsters for those rash enough to criticize their actions or their mission. And they’ve become frighteningly fast on the draw. Terrified to incontinence at the prospect of being so labeled, Americans who should vehemently condemn the marches and their organizers sit feebly by while these gangsters gain ground.

This being the case, comparisons of these marches to communist commemorations occurring during the month of May is an apt comparison and a sad irony, but one which will be overlooked by freedom-loving Americans at their extreme peril.

Which brings us to another even weightier matter that has nevertheless gone without discussion; it’s the sort that shortsighted American political and corporate power brokers typically overlook or ignore until it develops into a situation that warrants military action. I shall assume I needn’t even approach that issue in detail at this juncture.

Mexico has a fast-growing socialist contingent. Who’d have guessed? Civil unrest has exploded in pockets and through mass demonstrations in favor of Andrés Manuel López Obrador of the PRD (Partido Revolucionario Democratico), a socialist whom a disturbing number of Mexicans believe was beaten by the current Mexican president Felipe Calderón in a stolen election. The PRD has ties to Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan dictator whose dream it is to ignite a socialist revolution throughout Latin America. This includes Mexico, to be sure; should such efforts succeed, we’ll have much more to worry about coming across our border than illegal immigrants. Chavez has ties, albeit loose ones at the moment, to Iran and individuals involved with Islamic terrorist groups.

Given the current makeup of Congress, the annexation proposal will likely be a more difficult sell to our lawmakers than a year or two ago. The 8% or so of predominantly Spanish-descended Mexicans are the ones our government will need to approach, as they’re the ones with the real power in that country and those whose throats will be slit first if a popular socialist revolution does take place in Mexico. They are internationally invested, educated, and savvy. The frank yet grim appeal should be: Throw in with us now and prosper together, or see your children and grandchildren butchered, as usually happens when the “oppressed masses have their day”.

The greatest tragedy given the existing cultural similarities between the U.S. and Mexico and the affinity of Mexicans and Americans for each other if this takes place will be that – like other nations in which our government’s foreign policy has proved abysmally lacking – the leaders of the new socialist Mexico will point to the United States as a complicit partner in their socioeconomic oppression.

And they’ll be right.

Russia Cuts Off Gas Deliveries to Ukraine

Konstantin Chernichkin/Reuters

An employee turning a valve last month at the Mashivske gas field, about 250 miles east of Kiev. Despite a Russian cutoff of natural gas, Ukraine says it has enough gas in reserve for the winter.

By ANDREW E. KRAMER

Published: January 1, 2009

MOSCOW — In the face of mounting economic troubles, Russia cut off deliveries of natural gas to Ukraine on Thursday after Ukraine rejected the Kremlin’s demands for a sharp increase in gas prices.

A similar reduction in supplies to Ukraine in 2006 caused a drop in pressure throughout Europe’s integrated natural gas pipeline system and led to shortages in countries as far away as Italy and France.

But with a recessionary drop in demand, ample supplies and assurances from both countries that gas would flow westward without interruption, there were few signs of the near hysteria in Europe that accompanied the 2006 cutoff.

The authorities in Poland and Italy issued soothing statements on Thursday, noting the existence of high reserves and the distant likelihood of an immediate effect on gas supplies.

Even Ukraine, which says it has enough gas in reserve to last through the winter, took Russia’s action in stride, underscoring how the political potency of the Kremlin’s energy card has plunged along with the price of oil and gas. Its normally fractious political leadership rallied together in the face of the supply cutoff, united in their demand that the Kremlin pay more for the right to transship gas through Ukraine.

Gazprom, the Russian natural gas monopoly, likened its actions to a utility cutting off service to a deadbeat customer. “The message is very simple,” Ilya Y. Kochevrin, the executive director of Gazprom’s export arm, Gazexport, said in a telephone interview. “If you receive a product, you have to pay for it. If you don’t pay, you don’t receive it.”

But energy experts said that the Kremlin’s decision to employ the gambit again in a pricing dispute with Ukraine was an indication as well of Russia’s deepening economic woes.

Plagued by the sharp fall in oil prices, Russia has been scrambling to make up the revenue shortfall as prices have slipped below $40 a barrel. Gazprom, too, is heavily in debt and sinking along with the energy market.

“They do need the money,” Chris Weafer, the chief equity analyst at UralSib bank in Moscow, said in a telephone interview, speaking of Gazprom. “That is the bottom line.”

Under Prime Minister Vladimir V. Putin, who takes a strong interest in energy matters, Moscow has tried a number of tactics in recent months to raise energy prices. It is cooperating more closely with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, whose members recently agreed to cut daily production by 4.2 million barrels. It is also trying to organize a parallel group for gas exporting nations.

Talks over price and transit fees unraveled late Wednesday with Gazprom demanding about $50 more per 1,000 cubic meters of gas than Ukraine’s president, Viktor A. Yushchenko, said the country — which itself has severe financial problems — was willing to pay. Later Thursday, Gazprom’s chief executive raised the asking price to $418 per 1,000 cubic meters from $250, saying that Ukraine had missed its chance to accept the lower rate. Currently, European nations pay around $500 per 1,000 cubic meters.

At $418 per 1,000 cubic meters, Gazprom would earn about $14 billion more a year than it received from Ukraine last year. While a considerable sum, the revenue would provide only a respite from Russia’s broader financial problems.

The Russian authorities have yet to release a detailed plan of how they would fill the hole in the budget presented by tumbling prices. Taxes on oil and gas finance about 60 percent of the government’s annual budget. Russia’s finance minister, Aleksei L. Kudrin, has said the country will run a deficit next year if crude oil prices remain below $70; they are now about half that.

Once large foreign currency reserves are increasingly committed to defending the ruble and are running out; the central bank has spent $162 billion since midsummer and still was forced to devalue the ruble three times last week. Russia’s gold and currency reserves stand at $438 billion.

The shutoff at the peak of the heating season carried more than financial overtones; it is the most confrontational move by Russia toward a neighboring country since the August war in Georgia.

In comments broadcast Wednesday evening on Russian state television, Mr. Putin said any interference with Russia’s gas exports to Europe would carry “serious consequences for the transit country itself.” He did not elaborate, but Ukrainian officials did not need to be reminded that Russia issued a series of threats and provocations against Georgia, leading in part to the war last summer.

Underlying the gas dispute are long-running tensions between Russia and Ukraine, a former Soviet republic of 46 million. In 2004, after the street protests known as the Orange Revolution led to the installation of a pro-Western government in Ukraine, talks over gas supply and its transit became strained. This time, however, the political coloring is less clear.

Grigoriy N. Perepelitsa, director of the Foreign Policy Research Institute, an arm of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, said in an interview that in addition to raising much-needed revenue, Russia was seeking to undermine President Yushchenko by stalling on the gas deal.

Russia is trying to exploit fissures in Ukraine’s mercurial internal politics, offering to negotiate with Ukraine’s prime minister, Yulia V. Tymoshenko, who has recently leaned closer to Moscow. Ms. Tymoshenko, for example, was slow to criticize the Russian military intervention in Georgia in August.

Also, the role of an opaque gas trading company that is the exclusive intermediary for gas shipments to Ukraine from Russia and Central Asia carries political ramifications for Ukraine. The Swiss-based trader RosUkrEnergo is jointly owned by Gazprom and by a Ukrainian businessman, Dmitry Firtash, who has close ties to the country’s president.

Energy analysts, however, said Gazprom’s motives seemed clear.

“The financial crisis puts raising cash as everybody’s priority,” Simon Blakey, European gas researcher with Cambridge Energy Research Associates, said in telephone interview from London.

“On the Russian side, they are eager to raise cash,” he said. “And on the Ukrainian side, they have difficulty finding it.”

Mexico Destabilizing: Is War With USA Imminent?

See Also: PUA Letter To Congress (regarding these issues)

Now risen to the level of an insurgent war, the battle between the falling Kleptocratic Mexican government and supra-wealthy organized crime groups who now control much of Mexico’s land areas, police forces, and even some of its military has hit a new milestone.

Exasperating political climates, the violence, bloodshed, and hatred for Americans South of the border, coupled with rising injustices and racism against and by US citizens, compounded by an incompetent  federal government North of the border, are propagating the fires of civil discontent on both sides and about to strip-away the last veneers of civility.

Toss into the ugly political salad the mix of illegal immigration, free trade, high treason, disdain for the Constitution by US leaders, anti-rule-of-law anarchists groups and members of Congress (i.e. pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration groups), and increasing economic pressures and uncertainties on both sides of the border, the climate is now ripe for growing a civil war.

Corrupted Mexican officials are driving an ever-increasing political wedge against Americans, demanding non-existent rights for millions of their invading hordes in direct violation of the Treaty of Guadalupe–giving the US the unilateral legal right to militarily invade Mexico and seize its oil fields and other natural assets. However, at the highest level of government, both countries remain safe from such political unthinkables–but then the choice as to whether the US goes to war with Mexico is not in either government’s hands.

Somewhere, anywhere, perhaps along any stretch of the  border where Mexican militants are becoming extremely aggressive, or within any US city where illegal aliens have coalesced, a violent event is now likely to unfold that could trigger a powerful domino effect, bringing both countries to war with lightening speed–citizen national against citizen national!

Along the borders, many patriotic Americans are often working side by side to prop up a greatly understaffed Border Patrol, as well as aid what many pundits claim is an incompetent, bureaucratically quagmired Department of Homeland Security. Such private groups, uncensored by government regulations, are now reporting that aggressive actions by both armed and unarmed Mexican citizens, coupled with high tensions on both sides of the border, are threatening to erupt into full-scale war–a war that neither government will be able to quell once ignited, they suggest. [1]

Please Keep  Our Journalism Efforts Alive By Donating Thank You!

Gun fights between Mexicans and Americans on the borders are not unusual and many Border Patrol agents have lost their lives while others have been used, and even jailed, as international political fodder in a fight fraught with political and economic complexities and racial and nationalistic tensions.

Hatred is now growing on all sides of the issues and fences.

“The Brown Berets de Aztlan [in the US] have undertaken an active campaign to recruit more soldiers and form new chapters throughout Aztlan,” said Chairman David Rico this month. (Aztlan is defined by this group as Southwest United States and parts of Mexico–to be a new country ruled by militant Mestizos–i.e. Mexicans).[3]

Making matters worse is the fact that Mexican human and drug smugglers have hired gang members, such as the international Mara Salvatrucha street gang, to kill U.S. Border Patrol agents.[4]

Across the country in cities like Los Angeles and Chicago, Latino gangs made-up of largely illegal aliens, are routinely practicing race-based murder against Whites and Blacks. [5]

Even members of Congress have splintered into race-biased groups, such as the Hispanic Caucus lead by Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a known anti-rule-of-law proponent of illegal immigration and original signatory to the unconstitutional Kennedy/McCain “comprehensive amnesty” bill proposal expected to cost taxpayers an estimated $7 to $36 trillion dollars over 30-years if approved. [5.2] (He is not alone in his disdain for the Constitution and law or anti-Americanisms, given Democratic House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s blocking of all progress on the SAVE Act, which would markedly end illegal immigration by forcing criminal employers to quit hiring illegal aliens).

[PUA Note: Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have both refused to support the Safe America Act, which would seal our borders within 6 months and safely and humanely repatriate all illegal aliens within 16 months (without a need for law enforcement round-ups), permanently ending illegal immigration, and more--its the only bill proposal of its kind to date that would actually save taxpayers from $1 - $7 trillion dollars and help reduce the national debt while increasing security for all Americans while still offering aid to those who repatriate voluntarily.]

In the mean time, White and Black supremacist groups have remained largely benign, showing little retaliation against illegal alien Latino gangs to date, which could be a sign of a dangerous smoldering time bomb looking for an excuse to explode.

Activist groups, as well as state law makers, are routinely pointing out that the federal government has breeched its Constitutionally required duty under Article IV, Section IV to protect citizens and states from foreign invasion, instead choosing to play politics with the law and mislabeling the invasion (of an estimated 11-16 million armed and unarmed Mexican citizens and another 4-8 million nonMexicans) as merely unfortunate–ignoring the $300+ billion yearly impact on local and state governments and landslide of negative impacts on Americans.[6]

Donation Reminder Thank You!

Each year, foreign invaders murder an estimated 4,380 Americans in their undeclared war on Americans, a death toll totaling more than the 5 years of war in Iraq combined. [7] Compounding the impacts, another 4,735 innocent Americans are slaughtered by illegal alien drunk drivers who should not be in the country at all but are allowed to remain by local, state, and federal law enforcement. [sic] Equally sickening is the fact that over 243 innocent children are brutally molested or raped each month by  foreign intruders–tragic crimes that could have been avoided by simply enforcing our immigration laws–clearly Pelosi and Gutierrez stand against American children, given their Draconian positions and respective outcroppings. [sic]

Many journalist and researchers now conclude that President Bush and Congress have raised their collective incompetency to the level of criminal negligence, and even treason, for failing to deal with these issues as required by law and Constitution.[8] Criticism, legal, and political issues aside in the US, the war South of the border continues to escalate and threaten the US.

A United Nations survey of security and criminalization of 38 countries ranked Mexico “number one” in the category of “violent crime” in the use of firearms–a country where privately owned guns are largely illegal–much to the detriment of its defenseless citizens.[9]

In the state of Sinaloa, unarmed and unprotected families have locked themselves inside their homes in fear of being gunned down by pervasive local drug cartels who have killed over 46 Mexicans so far this month.[10] State and federal leaders have gathered in secret locations in a desperate attempt to figure out how to retake control. [11]

Organized crime, which collectively earns an estimated $23 to $40+ billion annually from the illegal drug and human trafficking markets in the US, are growing bolder throughout Mexico and using their funding to corrupt anything and everything that stands in their way. They have hit an all-time high in both infiltration of government, as well as murder of prominent families, police, and army officials–racking up 102 executions nationally in just the last seven days.[12] Mexican armies are now spread thin, trying to quell the violence and warfare across one third of its territories but are losing ground–government leaders are highly alarmed. [13]

The raging war in Mexico has gotten so bad that three high ranking federal officers resigned their posts and asked the US government for “political asylum” last month.[13.2] The obvious implication is that the Mexican government can no longer protect its own and is now being seen as a political threat to upstanding citizens–such is the infiltration and corruption level within government by organized crime that now appears to be running much of the government (for all intents and purposes).

Please Keep  Our Journalism Efforts Alive By Donating Thank You!

In the city of Tijuana, Wild West style shoot-outs on city streets have become common place between the forces of good and evil, with evil largely winning with impunity. A major cash cow for Mexican mafias, kidnapping along the border areas of both American and Mexican citizens has escalated to such a point that mayors of cities from Tijuana to Juarez have requested help from the Mexican Secretary of Government. [sic]

Even the US has entertained the idea of sending a billion dollar stipend to Mexico’s deep dark financial hole (where so much money is known to mysteriously disappear). [14] Ironically, given the state of the Mexican government’s corruption at all levels, such funds may ultimately end up in the hands of the very organized crime groups it was meant to fight–imagine Americans funding their own foe and demise!

Fueling the war fires by showing their lack of concern for opening the deadly Pandor’a Box onto American society, President Bush, Mexican President Calderon, and Canadian Prime Minister Harper are pressing forward aggressive plans to permanently open the border with Mexico to the US in advancement of their free trade agenda under the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). The SPP, according to many research analyst, journalist, state legislators and other officials, has been deemed the precursor to the North American Union (NAU). The goal, they claim, is to eventually combine the US, Canada, and Mexico into one country under one currency–the “Amero”– much like the European Union. It is a claim the three leaders flatly deny, but their actions, and those of all three governments, dictate the plan is well underway.[15]

The result has been that state legislators, like Arizona’s State Senator Karen Johnson, have taken bold steps to stop the NAU and have threatened to secede their states from the union in the event unconstitutional mandates such as the SPP are attempted by the federal government. [16] Twelve states have some form of anti-SPP/NAU laws either secured or in the works. [17]

Citizens across the US are awakening to the facts with much anger and bitterness, pointing hatful fingers at both federal leaders and millions of unwanted foreign invaders stealing their resources and opportunities.

Compounding problems, Mexico’s government has proven itself equally incompetent.

Admitting its own abuse of immigrants coming to Mexico from its South, the Mexican oligarchy of super-wealthy families who puppet-master the Congress and President, have perennially proven themselves unwilling and unable to deal with their own country’s economic and immigration problems, or its endemic corruption. Their last resort agenda for their own failures has been to push their citizens out of Mexico and into the US toward keeping their economy from collapsing–using the ploy of blaming the US for criminalizing the trespass of its borders while crying racism–even though Mexico is comprised of many races and ethnicities–counting on the ignorance and assistance of the national mainstream new media in the US to swallow the bait and promote its smoke-screen rhetoric. [18]

Mexico will become one of the main expellers of its countrymen because of the high degree of violence and insecurity, according to Marion Hoffmann, regional representative of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees in the Distrito Federal.[19]

Then there are, of course, the drug and human trafficking wars still raging on and threatening the US in too many ways.

Mexican border cities everywhere can be exampled by Juarez where deadly violence has become a mainstay and is spilling across into the US with tragic consequences–that city alone reported 31 dead for the first twelve days of May.

Donation Reminder Thank You!

Characterized as ” very dangerous”…”potentially deadly” by Rob Daniels of Border Patrol, Mexican gunmen stormed an armed National Guard unit in Arizona between Lukeville and Nogales showing their disdain for the US and its security measures. [20]

“There has been an over-100 percent increase in the last fiscal year in border violence aimed at our Border Patrol agents, and that ranges from gunshots fired across the border to rocks being thrown, sometimes flaming rocks,” said Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.[21]

Mexicans have heavily armed themselves and are increasingly prepared to use force to ensure their continued US invasion via both drug and human trafficking.[22]

“They’ve got weapons, high-tech radios, computers, cell phones, Global Positioning Systems, spotters and can react faster than we are able to,” said Shawn P. Moran, a 10-year U.S. Border Patrol veteran who serves as vice president of the National Border Patrol Council Local 1613 in San Diego. [sic]

“And they have no hesitancy to attack the agents on the line, with anything from assault rifles and improvised Molotov cocktails to rocks, concrete slabs and bottles,” he said. “There are so many agent ‘rockings’ that few are even reported anymore. If we wrote them all up, that’s all we would be doing,” he said. [sic]

In Arizona and California, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) scratched the surface of criminal overspill into the US from Mexico when they raided two dwellings to save over a hundred illegal alien kidnapped victims being held hostage by Mexican organized crime. [22.1]

The political artifice that unsecured borders and immigration is merely a minor issue unworthy of solving by US leaders contrasts the hard reality that we are now engaged in a low level war with Mexico–a war that could escalate at any moment.

Compounding the violent aspects are the racist aspects from both camps, on both sides of the border.

In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US–Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works–the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others. [22.4] This has not gone unnoticed by US citizen workers.

In the US, growing worker frustration from wage devaluation and job losses due to illegal immigration and free trade, as well as a faltering economy is spurring increased intolerance for both illegal aliens and those in the Hispanic communities who are increasingly seen as co-conspirators for their failure to speak-out loud and clear against the foreign invasion. Hate crimes have been on a steady increase since 2005 with 7,722 reported in 2007 alone (the majority race-based), according to the FBI. [23]

Raising its ugly head in 2002 and making a recent comeback, the Flash video game known as Border Patrol is again increasing its popularity across the US on the Net. In what is seen as racist or hate-mongering content, the video features the US-Mexican border and illegal aliens trying to cross–points are scored for killing illegal aliens.

Such social trends tend to show increasing frustrations and underlying anger of US citizens that is fueling an undercurrent mix of nationalism and racial tensions between Americans and Mexicans in particular. [24]

Please Keep  Our Journalism Efforts Alive By Donating Thank You!

Adding unwanted fuel to race tensions is the mainstream news media’s insistence on not reporting the facts on illegal immigration or the dangers of open borders while focusing on the agendas and rhetoric of race-based groups. For example, pro illegal immigration activist Alfredo Gutierrez, an alleged Latino racist, revealed the group’s agenda and strategy that is still in use to this day.

“We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works.”  [25]

Such statements have been turned into a mainstream news media platform, which has been consistently brought forward in the press and is actually racist in and of itself–for it promotes the race-based agenda of those who support illegal immigration, which devalues fact exploration, rule-of-law, Constitutional respect, and logical conclusions surrounding highly complex issues that are severely and negatively impacting Americans–and now skewing both camps toward a war footing.

The sad irony is that illegal aliens come in all races and ethnicities, including Euro-whites, so while racism clearly plays a role on both sides of the issue toward fueling hatred in both camps, racism itself in not the central issue–not by a long shot.

This administration and this Congress are and will be responsible for the deaths of thousands of our citizens for their failure to secure our borders and they should be held [legally] accountable, said Lou Dobbs, of CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight. [26]

If anything is clear from these trends and developments, it is that Congress’s dereliction of duty to ensure the enforcement of our current laws, and the President’s preoccupation with his treasonous SPP project that is undermining trust in government and fueling nationalism, are two major underlying weights pressuring a frustrated citizenry toward a predilection for violence that has, as yet, remained well constrained. For there are two camps of citizens in America–those who clearly see the threats to their nation and are ready to fight for their country–and those who have kept their heads in the sands and are ready to run away from their country–the former will likely do all the deciding for the latter.

The issue, although clearly not about race at its roots, is quickly becoming a political wildfire about race and nationalism due to the rudderless and incompetent national leadership of two countries whose failed policies and lack of solution-making on behalf of their citizens is outcropping us all toward yet another preventable catastrophe. Citizens are being forced to solve the problems government refuses to deal with, and as we all know, that’s when things go to hell.

Americans will never tolerate an open border with Mexico and they want control of their country, immigration, borders, and security returned to them, while Mexico’s citizens will likely tire of living in fear in their own land–they will, at some point, as in their historical past, rise up to take matters into their own hands. We could very well be in the midst of the starting stages of the next Mexican Revolution where both mafias and governments may soon learn to fear the people–but it’s a civil war more likely than not to ignite first on American soil–where one stupid act mislabeled as “racism” by one side or the other, could trigger it all.

One thing is certain for both country’s citizens–they each deserve better from their government and leaders–and they each deserve a country that works!

Xelan Bonn is founder of the Patriot Union of America, a nonpartisan, nonprofit citizen’s advocacy. Learn more at www.patriotunion.org

(TAKE OUR POLL)

It Takes A Lot Of Work To Keep These Good Stories Coming To You… Please Help By Donating Thank You!

Mexican Civil Unrest: Revolution Coming Soon, maybe 2012?

Mexican Civil Unrest: Revolution Coming Soon

Is Mexico to be the next Flashpoint, preceeding Iran? You would never guess it reading the news or by watching Keith Oberman.
Ominous signs that civil unrest is about to permeate the entire nation are occurring. The Tribunal that decides on the legality of the July 2nd election between Obrador and Calderon for president is about to deliver a judgement. The judgement may declare a winner, annul the election or call for a complete recount. A complete recount is what Obrador is demanding. If it is not delivered he has promised to engage in “peaceful” civil disobedience.In the state of Oaxaca ( South of Mexico City) there are abductions, people are being disappeared. There is a work stoppage this week, with 80,000 people participating state wide. Access to banks and ATM’s is being blocked. 8 radio stations have been taken over by protestors in Oaxaca, the police are expected to make an attempt to remove them. The city center of Zocalo in Mexico City is being occupied by thousands of protestors who are demanding a full recount of the recent Mexican presidential election.
From Znet:

Throughout the past week gunmen of have opened fire on members of the People’s Assembly of Oaxaca (APPO for its initials in Spanish) killing four and wounding at least 10.

Organizations and citizens across Oaxaca formed the APPO shortly after the governor, Ulises Ruiz Ortiz’s (Institutional Revolutionary Party) failed June 14 raid on a teachers’ encampment in downtown Oaxaca City. The teachers had been camping out, on strike, since May 22. The APPO united the teachers’ union and a broad swath of political and social organizations to demand the immediate renunciation or destitution of Ulises Ruiz. The APPO led massive marches with up to half a million people in attendance before deciding to step up their civil disobedience tactics on July 26 by shutting down all branches of the state government, setting up encampments around government office buildings. On August 1, some 3000 women led a women’s only march through town that led to the unarmed take over of the state television and radio corporation, CORTV. APPO’s explicit strategy is to generate “ungovernability” (ingobernabilidad) to force Ulises Ruiz’s exit from office.

These tactics of civil disobedience are the same tactics employed by Obrador in Mexico City. Mexico, especially Southern Mexico appears ripe for Revolutionary activity.
There is something going on in Mexico. Millions of people are taking to the streets in Mexico City under the leadership of Obrador. In the South, Mexicans are protesting in Oaxaca. Further South in Chiapas (which borders Guatemala and whose Indian population in Guatemala is the same historically) sits Subcommandante Marcos who is a cultural hero to the Indian community and many Mexicans and who led an attack on San Cristobal De Las Casas in 1994, briefly taking over the city until he returned to the jungle where he has since been surrounded by Mexican troops.This week of August 20th he has been warned that he is not protected by any agreement and he may in fact be attacked by the army.  In Guerrero, there has long been an unspoken guerilla movement.
Though it may not be critical to what’s happening in Mexico right now, the U.S. policy on immigration and it’s attitude toward immigrants will be a contributing factor to what may be the next Mexican Revolution.
It seems Obrador will not stop unless he is given the presidency. He appears to be determined to either become president or lead a revolution in Mexico. For weeks he and his followers have been camped out in the Zocalo in Mexico City.  They are blocking three main roads into the city. They vow to stay there until a full recount of the election is made. Obrador is also  threatening to block other areas of commerce including the airport. Obrador has said that if the tribunal endorses the fraudulent election he will have no choice but to bring down the fraudulent government that simply promotes it’s own fraudulent activities. This is clearly a call to revolution. Obrador say he will stop Mexico from functioning through peaceful resistence.
Fox has threatened to call in the army to remove the protestors. A battle seems to be developing. Obrador, has the support of Castro, and most importantly Chavez. Hugo Chavez may be helping to fund him and certainly would should he be called upon.

If Fox calls in the armed forces there will be violence. It appears likely he will have to call the army in if the tribunal does not overturn its decision and grant another full recount. If Fox brings in the army and there is violence, Obrador will probably be arrested, and the working class anger toward the government will boil over and there will be civil unrest.
There is next to nothing on American television about what appears to be a very volatile situation in Southern and Central Mexico.

The APPO’s explicit aim has been to generate “ungovernability.” They have succeeded. In over a month in Oaxaca, I have not seen one uniformed police officer. The idea that the state maintains its monopoly of the legitimate use of violence has been obliterated. But the APPO has refrained from resorting to violence itself in this total power vacuum. Their tactics are extreme—shutting off access to all government buildings; commandeering government vehicles; occupying the town square; taking over the state television station—but never violent. The state, in turn, responds with outright violence such as the failed June 14 police raid, or covert violence such as the arbitrary detentions, beatings, shootings, sabotage attempts and assassinations of the past week.

Army intelligence officers videotape over land travelers to and from Oaxaca. Spies follow journalists throughout the day. Plainclothes cops with machine guns pick APPO leaders off the street. No one knows where the governor is, not even his press secretary. Gunmen fire into crowds.

On Friday, Flavio Sosa, one of the APPO spokespeople, publicly called for a meeting with Carlos Abascal, the Minister of the Interior, to discuss possible solutions to the conflict in Oaxaca. “Ulises Ruiz is leading us into a situation practically of civil war, and our movement is non-violent,” he said in a press conference in the occupied town square. “Our movement is non-violent. In fact, it is a movement against violence, against a system of violence that excludes us, against the violence of police brutality.”

Obrador will attempt to shut Mexico down if Calderon is certified as president by the tribunal without a full recount. What role will America play? What role is America playing at this time? Is the U.S. preparing to send first technical advisors, then military hardware, then the United States Navy, then the airforce and finally ground troops into Mexico to protect American “citizens” and American “interests”? That’s the American pattern of response in Latin America. It has only been subdued recently because of American preoccupation in the Mid East. But Mexico is too close to home to be ignored.
Perhaps these “contingency” plans are already in effect.
Just today a Mexican government spokesman had to downplay the idea of civil unrest should the tribunal support Calderon.

MEXICO CITY, Aug. 24 (Xinhua) — A Mexican government spokesman dismissed suggestions on Thursday that a social explosion would follow the Electoral Tribunal’s ruling on the country’s contested July 2 election, due within a week.
This is highly unlikely to happen even if the Tribunal nominates Felipe Calderon Hinojosa, of the ruling National Action Party, president-elect, Presidential spokesman Ruben Aguilar Valenzuela said.

But Obrador seems to see things differenlty. Here is what he said in Spanish followed by my translation:
AMLO: Si se convalida el fraude, nuestro deber ciudadano será terminar con este sistema político basado en la farsa democrática y en instituciones que sólo sirven para legalizar el abuso de poder”
Translation:

“If they validate the fraude. It is out duty as citizens  to end this poltical system based in a false democracy, (a farce) and in the institiutions that serve only to legalize the abuse of power.”
Obrador’s comment above is a clear call to revolution. How else can it be interpreted?
The tribunal must decide by September 6th. September 15th is like the American July 4th in Mexico. And November 20th is the day of Revolution when the long standing dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz was overthrown. Watch these dates as they may be dates around which Obrador will begin major acts of civil disobedience in an attempt to shut down the nation.
Obrador is as far left as Hugo Chavez. He is a populist and is not acceptable to the United States. He cannot be permitted to become President of Mexico. American business and American political interests are opposed to the programs he is in favor of instituting. With Chavez as an anchor in South America and Obrador an Anchor for Mexico, the Carribean and Central America, the United States will feel threatened. Unnecessarily threatened but that unfortunately becomes irrelevant. America is a nation that see enemies everywhere. And if a nation is not an enemy but is percieved as one it will be attacked until it becomes an enemy and is either defeated or defeats the U.S. through guerilla war.
Salvador Allende was not permitted to continue as president of Chile in the 1970’s. Perhaps the same fate will occur should Obrador be skillful enough to work his way into the Presidential office. Or pehaps the same fate awaits him  should he engage in civil disobedience and become the leader of a “peaceful “revolutionary movement.

From The “Panic” Of 2008 To The “Collapse” Of 2009

From The “Panic” Of 2008 To The “Collapse” Of

2009

Top trends forecaster gives chilling prediction for next year

Paul Joseph Watson

The country’s top trends forecaster, who accurately predicted the “panic” of 2008 nearly a year before it unfolded, is now ominously suggesting that next year will come to be known as “the collapse of 2009″.

Gerald Celente, CEO of Trends Research Institute, sent out a letter to his subscribers announcing that he had purchased a domain name called “Collapseof09.com”.

Around this time last year, Celente sent the following message to his subscribers;

In 2008, Americans will wake up to the worst economic times that anyone alive has ever seen. And they won’t know what hit them. Just as they were in a state of shock on 9/11, they’ll be frozen in fear when the Economic 9/11 strikes at the heart of Wall Street.

Dismiss this trend forecast at your own peril. If you believe everything will be all right, and that the ship of state is sailing along just fine, toss this out and go about your business.

Having correctly forecast the “Economic 9/11″, Celente is warning that people should prepare for something much worse in 2009.

As we reported last month, Celente recently told Fox News that by 2012 America will become an undeveloped nation, that there will be a revolution marked by food riots, squatter rebellions, tax revolts and job marches, and that holidays will be more about obtaining food, not gifts.

Celente’s accuracy is widely heralded since he correctly predicted the 1997 Asian Currency Crisis, the subprime mortgage collapse and the massive devaluation of the U.S. dollar.

In 2007, Celente forewarned that “giants (would) tumble to their deaths,” which is exactly what we have witnessed with the collapse of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and others.

Celente has stated that the current financial downturn will ultimately lead to nothing less than revolution.

“There will be a revolution in this country,” he said. “It’s not going to come yet, but it’s going to come down the line and we’re going to see a third party and this was the catalyst for it: the takeover of Washington, D. C., in broad daylight by Wall Street in this bloodless coup. And it will happen as conditions continue to worsen.”

Greece-Style Riots Coming To U.S.

Troops and mercenaries will be used to detain Americans in prison camps, warns deadly accurate trends forecaster

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, December 15, 2008

Frighteningly accurate trends forecaster Gerald Celente says that America will see riots similar to those currently ongoing in Greece and that the cause will be a hyper-inflationary depression, leading to the inevitable use of troops and mercenaries to deal with the crisis as Americans are incarcerated in internment camps.

As we have highlighted before, Celente’s accuracy is stunning – he predicted the 1987 crash, the sub-prime mortgage crisis and the “panic of 2008,” and is routinely cited even by mainstream news networks as highly credible.

The cause of the riots would be a hyper-inflationary depression, Celente told interviewer Lew Rockwell, causing Americans to revolt in similar circumstances that we have witnessed recently in Iceland and Greece. The trouble would be sparked off by Obama declaring a “bank holiday” whereby people won’t be able to withdraw their money.

“What’s going on in Greece with these riots has nothing to do with a 15-year-old boy being killed, that was only the spark that ignited the pent up, really hatred and disdain, people have for the scandals and corrupt government and the same thing is going on in this country as well,” said Celente.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

Celente reiterated his prediction of a revolution and riots in America, and said that the first signs of it could even emerge before the end of the year.

Celente said that the troops now being brought back to America for “domestic security” would be used to suppress the riots.

“There’s talk of opening all these detention centers and hiring the goon squads, the Blackwaters to run them, so these are realities going on as we speak,” said Celente, adding that the Halliburton subsidiary KBR had been awarded a half a billion dollar contract to build “national emergency” internment camps in the name of detaining illegal immigrants but that they would be used to hold rioting Americans.

“We’re really in a period of ‘off with their heads’ and its going to be the people against the politicians,” said Celente.

Celente said that a breakup of the United States was possible and that the secessionist movement was strong.

“The government owns and runs the largest mortgage company, owns the largest insurance company, they’re going to be owning a piece of the oil industry, so it’s a fight against a totalitarian government…so there’s going to be rebellions and things will change for the better if we break up these criminal governments that are in place now,” said Celente.

The forecaster added that the government was killing people for a false reason in Iraq and robbing people blind with the bailouts at home.

Listen to the interview here.