PJB: Afghanistan South

PJB: Afghanistan South

>>> Join the forum discussion on this post… – (49) Posts

By Patrick J. Buchanan

Heeding the advice of Gen. David Petraeus, Barack Obama has committed 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan and will keep 50,000 in Iraq after U.S. combat operations end in August 2010.

But are U.S. vital interests more threatened by what happens in Anbar or Helmand than in the war raging along our southern border?

Prediction: After all U.S. troops in Iraq, Afghanistan and Korea have come home, there will be a U.S. army on the Mexican border. For this is where the fate of our republic will be decided, as the fate of Europe will be decided by the millions streaming north from the Maghreb and Middle East, sub-Sahara and South Asia.

Last year, 6,000 Mexicans died in drug-related killings in a war where the tactics are massacre, murder, kidnapping and beheading.

President Felipe Calderon has ordered another 5,000 troops and 1,000 police to the border. Primary target: Ciudad Juarez, across the Rio Grande from El Paso.

Some 2,500 federal troops are already in Juarez, where in 2008 there were 1,600 drug-related murders. Gun battles occur every day. Nationally, 45,000 army troops and police are committed to this war that Mexico is not winning. For, according to the March 3 Washington Times, the Pentagon now estimates the cartels field more than 100,000 foot soldiers.

The chief of police of Juarez just resigned after a cartel threatened to kill an officer even 48 hours if he did not. To prove its seriousness, the cartel murdered four cops, including the chief’s deputy. Last year, 50 police officers in Juarez were murdered.

“The decision I am taking is one of life over death,” said Chief Roberto Oduna. The chief would seem to have a point. In January, his predecessor’s head was found in an ice cooler outside a police station. The mayor keeps his family in El Paso, as they have been threatened with decapitation.

Friday, the State Department declared, “Corruption throughout Mexico’s public institutions remains a key impediment to curtailing the power of the drug cartels.” Calderon retorts that, while the murders may be committed in Mexico, the cash and guns come from the United States.

With oil revenue down since the price dropped $100 a barrel, and remittances down from Mexican workers in the United States as the U.S. economy tanks, tourism, too, has begun to die. Beheadings in and around Acapulco have not helped. Warnings have been issued to U.S. college kids to avoid Mexico on spring break, as kidnappings for ransom are rampant. Restaurants and bars in Juarez that catered to folks from El Paso and soldiers from Fort Bliss are shutting down.

In February, in the resort town of Cancun, a retired army general sent to create an elite anti-crime unit was kidnapped, tortured and shot. Mexican troops raided Cancun’s police headquarters and arrested the chief and dozens of his officers in connection with the murder.

Add a collapsing global economy to a losing war with drug cartels, and Mexico is at grave risk of becoming a failed state, a narco-state, with a 2,000-mile border with the United States.

How does one win a drug war when millions of Americans who use recreational drugs are financing the cartels bribing, murdering and beheading to win the war and keep self-indulgent Americans supplied with drugs?

There are two sure ways to end this war swiftly: Milton’s way and Mao’s way. Mao Zedong’s communists killed users and suppliers alike, as social parasites. Milton Friedman’s way is to decriminalize drugs and call off the war.

When Richard Nixon declared the War on Drugs in 1972, Milton, writing in Newsweek, objected on ethical grounds:

“On ethical grounds, do we have the right to use the machinery of government to prevent an individual from becoming an alcoholic or a drug addict? For children, almost everyone would answer at least a qualified yes. But for responsible adults, I, for one, would answer no. Reason with the potential addict, yes. Tell him the consequences, yes. Pray for and with him, yes. But I believe that we have no right to use force, directly or indirectly, to prevent a fellow man from committing suicide, let alone from drinking alcohol or taking drugs.”

“Am I my brother’s keeper?’” asked Milton, answering, “No.”

Americans are never going to adopt the Maoist solution. For the users of drugs are all too often classmates, colleagues, friends, even family. Indeed, our last three presidents did not deny using drugs.

Once, a Christian America outlawed and punished homosexuality, abortion, alcohol, loan-sharking and gambling, all as criminal vice. Now, homosexuality and abortion are constitutional rights. Gambling and booze are a rich source of government revenue. And loan-sharking is done by credit-card companies, and not just the Corleones.

Will we raise the white flag in the drug war, as well?

Which is the greater evil? Legalized narcotics for America’s young or a failed state of 110,000 million on our southern border?

Some choice. Some country we’ve become.

Only 6-12 months until Full-Fledged Facsist Martial Law

Only 6-12 months until Full-Fledged Facsist Martial Law

  • Text size
  • Larger
  • Smaller

The Citizen
March 4, 2009

Pastor Lindsey Williams called the meltdown, along with dropping crude oil prices on 7-28-08 in an interview with Alex Jones. If you have never listened or watched Jones’ program I suggest you start. He has the truth about this world and what is coming and has been broadcasting the warning for over a decade now. (www.infowars.com, www,prisonplanet.tv, also on shortwave radio)

The United States of America and its citizenry has been assessed, warned, plotted against, and sold out by internationalists in government, business, and the banking industry. Its workforce has been decimated, its standard of living shredded and its working people made financial slaves through unjust taxation, socialist government practices, rules and regulations at all levels in society that would make any communist dictator grin with envy.

Our role as partners in governmental affairs has been reduced to a whisper that is not heard by any elected official anywhere—with very, very few exceptions. Our representative government has become 535 regional dictators who live a life of luxury, self-importance and as arrogant master over the populace. The congress of the United States has carefully exempted itself from virtually all repressive laws they choose not to adhere to and have given themselves retirement pensions, health care and other perks, the rest of us can only dream of. They have become the Duma (Soviet Parliament) types who exemplify nothing other than crass selfishness at the expense of every American working citizen.

The past and present Administration has been pursuing a blending of Canada, America and Mexico into the “North American Union.” They have done it under the cover of governmental darkness. They have been running a race as to how fast they can manipulate our great nation into a “no going back” strategic position with these other two nations. The president and his cabal of sell-out White House/Congressional turncoats have intentionally kept the American people in a state of confusion (war on terror, etc.) so that organized resistance to this national sovereignty killing plan can not be formulated. Business and banking interests are salivating at the thought of trillions of dollars in “free trade” being exchanged throughout North America.

The cultures of Canada and Mexico are not that of the United States and its citizens. A disaster of Biblical proportions is on its way WHEN this plan is forced upon our nation. It is only one of several scenarios that are nearing completion and will spell the absolute end of the United States as we know it. Some will argue that the USA needs drastic overhauling and that this is the natural result of “planned obsolescence” in American culture. There are huge problems that must be addressed now by the American public, or the last opportunity to do so under “open and free” conditions will be lost. There is no more time to talk this sorry state of affairs to death. Decisive and uncompromising action must be taken. Here is what I suggest to my fellow victims:

TAKE THIS BULL BY THE HORNS AND PUT IT ON ITS BACKSIDE

Unless you accept that this country is in its LAST days, you will continue to shake your heads and laugh at all who have written week after week on this and other web sights to help you realize just how much will SOON be lost to our nation forever. You will be counted among those who were as responsible as the complicit socialist Washington government for our national demise precisely because you were intentionally ignorant. The power through information written by authors of brilliant and inciteful backgrounds has given a massive amount of data that could have and should have made a difference in your lives, your interest in government actions, and a marvelous treasure chest of debate justifications when you discuss these issues with others.

There is NO TIME LEFT for you to take the luxury of non-involvement. You will face a time when you will give an account to your family as to why you couldn’t or wouldn’t take the time to educate yourself about your nation’s sacred history. You will stand alone as the verdict comes in that you were negligent in NOT preparing to protect and care for your family and friends during military government (Martial Law) because of a “terrorist” attack, financial/stock market collapse or any other number of possibilities real or contrived that gives the government the justification for arrest and indefinite incarceration in detention camps already built for you and your loved ones. THEY ALREADY EXIST!! These detention/ re-education camps are for those who aren’t willing to submit to the new global order that is about to be established.

Precisely because you are uninformed and intentionally ignorant, you will blindly board the truck that takes you to your likely last destination. You will trust the government to help you one last time. Some of you will stumble around the camp looking for your welfare check, prescription drugs or how you can contact the nearest legal defense or ACLU attorney so that you can take the camp commander to court for mistreatment. You, who I have just described, deserve a detention camp. “…..may your chains rest lightly upon your wrists.”

All of us MUST take responsibility for what is coming. Many of us have adamantly fought against the rising tide of a police state government. We are losing badly. NOT because we don’t care, NOT because we haven’t tried, and certainly NOT because we haven’t committed to resisting this complete sell-out of the Founders dream for this nation and its people. We are failing because YOU have not protested at the school board meetings, the city council chambers, the county commission boards and the state and federal legislatures while you still have freedom of speech. Because, out of indifference or fear, you have not stood up to this criminal neglect and criminal actions against our constitution, these elected sell-outs have sensed your negligence and have had the boldness to give America away to the highest bidder.

You have allowed the Federal Reserve to “regulate” our currency into a mountain of debt and steer the dollar into oblivion. You have allowed Congress to abandon gold and silver and encouraged the mighty international consortium of bankers to call every political policy in Washington. You have allowed presidents and representatives to subvert our constitution to the point of irrelevance because many of you who were constitutional experts would not challenge these republic killing “laws” at their source or in the courts. Above all, you have allowed yourself to be compromised when serving on the jury, a good example is how a brainwashed jury convicted 2 innocent border agents for shooting an illegal drug smuggler.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods

Many of you in the medical field have believed your own myth building lifestyle that suggests you are some type of god that sells pharmaceuticals like snake oil to unsuspecting people who can neither understand nor challenge your control of their lives, let alone afford the drugs that they “needed.” You have refused to endorse less expensive, natural remedies that could have made the critical difference for some or avoided the pain and expense of chemo “cures” for cancer in others that in most cases only prolonged the agony of those buying in to your version of medicine. There is a movement to ban natural vitamins and you are silent there, as well.

You business owners who scammed the public or charged obscene prices for your products, and then squeezed the worker and his family into poverty, take a short second place in shame to America’s bankers. The oldest professions in the world are not prostitution or politicians, but bankers. You alone shoulder the responsibility along with the Federal Reserve for bankrupting America’s families and our nation’s financial system. Jail for individuals mentioned here is kind compared to a hangman’s noose in my view.

Regardless of the cause or the effect, America is on her knees. She is a haggard old woman unable to understand who she used to be. No longer are the strong arms of brave young men and women able to help her to her feet. There are few left who knows this original America or cares.

What can we do

Well, let’s agree to stand together as necessary and in the manner in which our nation requires us to stand. Not government politics nor embedded traitors dictates, but the needs of our constitution, our Declaration of Independence with its new relevance for our time, and for the dedication of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, coast guardsmen, merchant marines and police officers at all levels who have answered the call and given their all so that you and I, our children and grandchildren could be free. Fellow Americans, we are ALL needed NOW. Get involved, NOW. Call these arrogant self-serving, liberal bureaucrats and DEMAND change NOW. Show up at the city and county meetings where your community is being fenced in around an Agenda 21 model that will kill private property usage and ownership. Don’t be fooled into accepting an unelected, unaccountable county manager who doesn’t represent you, but rather serves the good-ol-boy system. Keep your county commissioners, who are elected and accountable to we, the people.

Winston Churchill said it best when he declared in a speech to the British Parliament in 1943, “you may have to fight knowing that there is absolutely no chance for success and you will surely not survive, but to live on as a slave is a far worse fate.” Let’s do all that we can now before government moves against its people to institute martial law or implement a “North American Union,” or sign on to the United Nations World Government, will you let our communities and beloved homes be sold to international elites? My heart says NOT EVER! What does yours say?

Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust

Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust

  • Text size
  • Larger
  • Smaller

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, February 29th, 2008

featured-stories - Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust
Vilnai featured-stories - Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust
Israel’s Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai has provoked outrage after threatening Palestinians with a “holocaust.”
featured-stories - Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust

Israel’s Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai has provoked outrage after threatening Palestinians with a “holocaust,” but the same media who obsessed about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s “wipe Israel off the map” misquote are scurrying to defend Vilnai’s disgraceful comments.

“The more Qassam (rocket) fire intensifies and the rockets reach a longer range, they (the Palestinians) will bring upon themselves a bigger holocaust because we will use all our might to defend ourselves,” Vilnai told the Army Radio on Friday.

However, in a Reuters report, despite the fact that the rest of the statement was translated into English, the incendiary word “holocaust” remained in its original Hebrew version – “shoah”.

Why Reuters would choose to print the rest of the statement in English yet cherry-pick one word to remain in Hebrew is obvious – they don’t want to draw any attention to the fact that Vilnai is threatening the Palestinians with a holocaust.

Vilnai’s spokesman has attempted to diffuse the controversy by claiming Vilnai was speaking in terms of a “disaster” and not a holocaust.

But you can’t have your cake and eat it.

featured-stories - Israeli War Minister Threatens Palestinian Holocaust
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad allegedly called for Israel to be “wiped off the map,” the media blindly repeated the quote ad infinitum.

When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad allegedly called for Israel to be “wiped off the map,” the media blindly repeated the quote ad infinitum, and it became second nature for them to carelessly drop it into any propaganda piece intended to hype Iran’s supposed threat to Israel and the world.

Barely a day goes by that Israeli, American and British warhawks don’t spew the phrase like a broken record in an attempt to create a catchy cliché and brand market the next jaunt of imperial blood-letting.

No matter that, according to numerous different translations, Ahmadinejad never used the word “map,” instead his statement was in the context of time and applied to the Zionist regime occupying Jerusalem. Ahmadinejad was expressing his future hope that the Zionist regime in Israel would fall, not that Iran was going to physically annex the country and its population.

To claim Ahmadinejad has issued a rallying cry to ethnically cleanse Israel is akin to saying that Churchill wanted to murder all Germans when he stated his desire to crush the Nazis. This is about the demise of a corrupt occupying power, not the deaths of millions of innocent people.

On the other hand, even as Reuters is forced to admit, Vilnai’s use of the word “shoah” is intrinsically allied to the context of “Discussions of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews,” adding, “Many Israelis are loath to countenance its use to describe other contemporary events.”

So will the media make reference to one of Israel’s top minister’s expressing his wish to inflict a Palestinian “holocaust” in all future reports about Israel’s geopolitical motives, just as they do with Ahmadinejad’s supposed call to wipe Israel off the map?

There’s more chance of Yasser Arafat and Menachem Begin coming back from the dead to broker a peace settlement.

The United Nations: Our Children’s New Parents?

The United Nations: Our Children’s New Parents?

  • Text size
  • Larger
  • Smaller

Dana Gabriel
Borderfire Report
March 6, 2009

Through its various agencies and treaties, the United Nations seeks to undermine individual, as well as national sovereignty. It has been almost 15 years since President Clinton signed on to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The U.S. remains one of the last holdouts as the treaty lies dormant, yet to be ratified. The UNCRC grants children new civil, social, cultural and economic rights that could override parental decisions. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), is pushing for a vote as there is a real sense that under an Obama presidency, the UNCRC could finally be ratified.

featured-stories - The United Nations: Our Childrens New Parents?
United Nations
Under the guise of human rights, the UN agenda is to further breakup the family.

If the UNCRC is ratified, parents could be prohibited from homeschooling and spanking their children. It undermines parental authority and gives more power to the state to further dictate how children are raised. It grants children dangerous new rights thus encouraging more rebellious behavior. The truth is that in many cases, children do not have the wisdom and maturity to make sound decisions. The treaty also gives children the mechanism by which they could dispute any parental judgment. The UNCRC transfers more parental authority to the state while granting children radical new rights.

Under the UNCRC, an 18-member committee has been established to review children’s rights and any other disputes that might arise. In many cases, we are already bound by international treaties and the UNCRC gives unaccountable UN bureaucrats the power to make decisions concerning our children’s well-being. Parents are being demoted to simple caregivers, while the state assumes the role of the prime authoritative figure. The UNCRC is an assault on parental authority and is essentially a blank check for governmental interference in family matters. It is meant to further promote child autonomy and freedom from parental guidance.

In the U.S., homeschooling numbers continue to rise as a growing number of parents look to better control their child’s moral instruction. Under the UNCRC, homeschooling could be interpreted as a violation of a child’s well being. Some states have tried to ban and outlaw homeschooling and the UNCRC could make it a UN-sponsored activity. Public school education is designed to correct any perceived errors in rearing and home training. The ideology of globalism and world government is at the very core of the educational system. The UN seeks to undermine parental authority, traditional values and biblical principles. They wish to gain more control over our children’s upbringing and education.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • efoods

Under the guise of human rights, the UN agenda is to further breakup the family. At recent meetings held in Mexico City, United Nations Population Fund representative, Arie Hoekman, told participants that high divorce rates and out-of-wedlock births were not a social crisis, but instead a triumph for human rights. Traditional values and principles instilled by parents, are being manipulated and pushed aside. The breakdown of the family is bringing about a rise in new values. Children’s love and loyalty to their family and country is being systematically destroyed. Under a new global order, there is no room for nationalism or individuality and a strong family unit represents a threat to this system.

Being a parent is a huge responsibility and undertaking that should not be taken lightly. Parents are not always right and some may be unfit. The reality is that children thrive in an environment where there is love and structure which includes consequences for their behavior. The UNCRC infringes upon parental authority and represents a massive intrusion by the state into family affairs. It has the potential to radically alter parent-child relationships. The UN definitely has no business telling parents how to raise their children and neither does the government unless there is evidence of neglect or abuse. The UN is a morally bankrupt institution with a horrible record of protecting human rights around the world and the U.S ratifying the UNCRC will not change that.

More Great Stuff from guywhite.wordpress.com: How Bad Was Apartheid? And Fighting PC in non-traditional venues.

I used the word Oriental in reference to Kazakhs when discussing Borat (he used Romanian gypsies instead of real Kazakhs).

Someone wrote in response: “are kazakhs rugs? maybe you don’t know any better…….the word is asian…..”

So I figured to use this as an opportunity to push our agenda in a non-traditional venue where politics is never discussed. Ok, ok, I wrote about the race of Kazakhs vs. gypsies and used the term Oriental knowing that I would provoke a liberal so that I could respond to him. But I think we should use various venues to fight PC.

Leftists do it all the time. Their ideas are pushed in math and science classes, at corporate conferences, everywhere. So no reason why we shouldn’t do the same.

Come on! Every day PC words change … people only embrace PC in order to make themselves feel better… why don’t you just write, “I am better than you”.

An Asian is a person who lives in Asia. South Asians are also Asians, as are Arabs, Turks, Israelis, New Zealanders (I think it counts as Asia) and half of the Russians.

Asia is enormous with the most diverse populations of any continent.

Indigenous Europeans are of the same race, as are native Americans and Africans.

Asians are radically different. Look at Syrians and look at Koreans. Do they look the same to you?

So if I were to say that Kazakhs look Asian, what would that tell you? How would that help someone understand what they look like?

The term Asian says absolutely nothing except the place where the person lives.

Oriental is a term that’s easy for everyone to understand. When I say it, you know that it means East and Central Asian. Your goal however wasn’t to make sure that people understand what I am saying, but rather to make yourself feel superior to me.

The whole move towards Political Correctness is to make sure that nobody understands what you are saying because it supports ideas that go against all common sense.

Thus, instead of using the word “special” for gifted people, we use it for the disabled. And so on, so forth. What crazy religionists used to do with sex, the forces of political correctness now do with genetics and evolution.

PC was invented by Russian Communists precisely because they realized that by changing words, one can destroy people’s psyche. It’s a typical form of brainwashing that is meant to destroy the way people think and re-structure it the way that you would want them to think. You should read up on the roots of political correctness before you embrace it.

Interesting: Another person wrote that Borat should be referred to as “Asian-American”. Asian… umm… American?! Really? I missed his citizenship swear-in ceremony. Must’ve been when I went to get pop corn.

Tells you something about how much PC destroys people’s brains. They use terms and don’t even understand what’s coming out of their mouth.

This is a good article by the Irish Savant.

Apartheid was the cause celebre of the latter half of the last century. It was the only one which united all moral and principled people. Opposition became a kind of morality play by which we could all demonstrate our worthiness. In my case I gave up eating Outspan oranges (replacing them with an Israeli variety) while others made even more draconian sacrifices to bring down the hated regime.

And of course the wheels started falling off in the late eighties and the system collapsed entirely in 1994.

The common image of SA was that of a violent seething cauldron with the lid kept on only through the means of a highly militarized police state. Gun-toting police and soldiers on every corner no less, whites fearfully barricaded behind multiple layers of security. If true, this would indeed have represented a damning verdict on the system.

However, it was not true.

In fact it grotesquely misrepresents the real situation. SA in fact, even in the latter decades of apartheid (the most violent time) had a police/population ratio of about 1:2000. This was lower than in most other countries, including advanced Western ones such as the USA, France and Germany. Military spending as a proportion of GDP was also lower than in most Western states. It’s anecdotally indicated that most whites left their doors unlocked at night until well into the eighties.

And by the way, since ‘freedom’ was gained in 1994 there have been an incredible 300,000 murders, despite a huge ramp-up in the numbers of police. Just like India has become an outsourced destination for call centres, SA has become one for crime management. It now stands proudly as an international centre of excellence for money laundering, international prostitution rings, drug-trafficking and child pornography services.

So how bad was apartheid?

Well, it should first be realized that South Africa as a state was the creation of (white) European immigrants. It was run for their benefit, blacks were seen as a source of cheap labour, to be kept out of sight and sound as much as possible. They were not permitted to own land outside designated areas and were of course effectively excluded from the political system. They were deprived of various other rights, frequently humiliated and subjected to rough justice.

None of this was nice, but in terms of cosmic injustice it doesn’t even register. Comparatively few people were directly killed by way of the system. Sure, executions of blacks were at a rate which made GW Bush’s Texas seem almost liberal, and then there was the infamous Sharpeville massacre.

Let’s talk about Sharpeville. 69 people killed. Let’s assume that they were all killed in cold blood (they weren’t, in fact). But how in God’s name has this become a byword for state terrorism and criminality? Leave aside the tens of millions killed by the systems of Hitler, Stalin and Mao. Four million have been killed in the Congo. When Robert Mugabe sorted out Matabeleland in the early eighties (well after Sharpeville) he, within the space of six weeks, killed more than 2000 civilians. Most of the dead were killed in public executions involving between one and 12 people at a time. And he was a hero to us in the West at this time. I could in fact list 1000 other examples incomparably worse than Sharpeville or anything else under apartheid.

It should also be borne in mind, as I’ve mentioned in other posts, that nobody – nobody – treats, or treated Africans worse than they do themselves. It was the first thing that hit me when I went there. Africans themselves know that, which partially explained why they flooded into apartheid SA at every opportunity and at great personal risk.

The only ones, in terms of lousy treatment of Africans, to give the Africans themselves a close run are the Arabs. Arabs see, and treat, Africans as lesser humans. And they don’t make any apologies for it (their ‘holy’ book justifies it, by the way). And they still do it. Associates of mine in Abu Dhabi recoil in horror at the thought of allowing blacks into the UAE. They believe deep down that they should be treated as slaves.

Hindus see blacks, literally, as the lowest form of life

So why then, given that its offences in comparative terms were small beer, did apartheid and SA draw such odium? Let me think. No, can’t think of any reason, seems no logic to it.

Ha wait! Of course – the South Africans were white! Silly me. I forgot, only whites are racists. Same reason why the Israelis get such attention while non-whites can continue slaughtering away in peace.

http://irishsavant.blogspot.com/2008/02/how-bad-was-apartheid.html

More TV Ads Project Images of Racial Harmony

More TV Ads Project Images of Racial Harmony

More news stories on Multiculturalism and Diversity

Todd Lewan, AP, March 1, 2009

Ever see an inner-city schoolyard filled with white, Asian and black teens shooting hoops? Or middle-aged white and Latino men swigging beer and watching the Super Bowl on their black neighbor’s couch? Or Asians and Latinos dancing the night away in a hip-hop club?

All it takes is a television.

Yes, that mesmerizing mass purveyor of aspiration, desire and self-awareness regularly airs commercials these days that show Americans of different races and ethnicities interacting in integrated schools, country clubs, workplaces and homes, bonded by their love of the products they consume.

{snip}

Ads like these are part of a subtle, yet increasingly visible strategy that marketers refer to as “visual diversity”—commercials that enable advertisers to connect with wider audiences while conveying a message that corporate America is not just “in touch,” racially speaking, but inclusive.

It wasn’t always like this. For much of the past century, “minorities were either invisible in mainstream media, or handed negative roles that generally had them in a subservient position,” says Jerome Williams, a professor of advertising and African-American studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

{snip}

These “multiculti” ads may be evidence of the vitality of assimilation, America’s distinctive, master trend. To advertisers, though, they’re simply smart business—a recognition of a new cultural mainstream that prizes diversity, a recognition that we are fast approaching a day when the predominant hue in America will no longer be white.

“Going forward, all advertising is going to be multicultural by definition, because in most states, majority ethnic populations will no longer exist,” says Danny Allen, managing director at SENSIS, an ad agency in Los Angeles that specializes in reaching multicultural audiences through digital and online media.

{snip}

And yet, some critics wonder if depicting America as a racial nirvana today may have an unintended downside—that of airbrushing out of the public consciousness the economic and social chasms that still separate whites, blacks and Latinos.

Even on Madison Avenue, which is generating the inclusive messages, recent studies find few nonwhites in decision-making and creative positions within the advertising industry itself.

Are multiculti ads, then, an accurate barometer of our racial progress, a showcase of our hopes in that direction—or a reminder of how far we still have to go?

___

{snip}

Whites still hold most of the economic clout in the United States—85.5 percent of the nation’s annual buying power of $10 trillion, according to a 2007 study by the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia.

In recent years, though, marketers have been revising old assumptions and campaigns in anticipation of profound shifts in the nation’s demographics, and in reaction to changes already under way in what the Selig Center describes as “The Multicultural Economy.”

They note that:

_African-American buying power has risen from $318 billion in 1990 to $845 billion in 2007—a 166 percent gain. Whites’ buying power rose 124 percent during that period.

_The combined buying power of African-Americans, Asians and Native Americans was $1.4 trillion in 2007, a gain of 201 percent since 1990. Meanwhile, the economic clout of Latinos rose by 307 percent, to $862 billion, over that span.

_The number of black-owned companies rose 45 percent from 1997 to 2002—4 1/2 times faster than the national average—and their receipts grew slightly faster than all others. Native American-owned businesses increased by 67 percent, Asian firms 24 percent, Latino companies 31 percent.

{snip}

If current trends continue, demographers say, nonwhites will be in the majority in America by 2042—a prospect not lost on advertisers, says Melanie Shreffler, editor of Marketing to the Emerging Majorities, an industry newsletter.

{snip}

The ads may play well now, but Carter [Karl Carter, chief executive of the Atlanta marketing agency GTM Inc. (Guerrilla Tactics Media)] wonders how long they will be effective—particularly as America “beiges” and race becomes less essential to how individuals self-identify. Over the long run, advertisers would do better, he says, to focus on a cultural approach with versatile images and campaigns easily adapted to highly individualized tastes. Put another way: How do hip-hoppers feel? What are the common desires of surfers, or skateboarders, or kayakers?

{snip}

“Advertising has to reflect reality, to some degree,” she says. “So, now that the president is African-American, I think companies that were once afraid to put members of multiple ethnic groups in their ads might see a chance here to go ahead and take a risk, or even see it as necessary.”

___

Four men in suits and ties are eating in a Holiday Inn Express breakfast bar when they see a pretty white woman enter.

{snip}

This 2008 spot is clever not only for its humor, but because it gingerly tests one of several racial boundaries most advertisers are still loath to cross: The presentation of interracial courting or romance.

{snip}

Other no-nos?

There aren’t many ads depicting multiracial families or biracial couples interacting normally at home, whether having supper or watching a movie. And in ads that depict professional settings, people of color rarely appear in charge—as CEOs, say, giving presentations to their board of directors.

{snip}

One reason that racial distortions persist may be the relatively low numbers of blacks in the $31 billion advertising industry, and a dearth of blacks in positions of power.

A report released in January by the Madison Avenue Project, a coalition of legal, civil rights and ad industry leaders, found dramatic levels of bias in the industry, with African-American professionals lagging in pay, hiring, promotions and assignments.

Some findings:

_Black college graduates earn 80 cents for every dollar made by their equally qualified, white counterparts, and salaries of $100,000 are disproportionately less likely for African-American managers and professionals.

_Sixteen percent of large advertising firms employ no black managers or professionals; in the overall labor market, 7 percent of companies are without blacks in those positions.

_Blacks are only 62 percent as likely as whites to work in the powerful “creative” and “client contact” functions.

{snip}

And yet, might today’s ads also be implanting false assumptions that our race problems have been fixed, that all Americans are living comfortable, upper-middle-class lifestyles in racially harmonious settings?

{snip}

“If you were to come down from another planet and watch TV, you’d think that all of these human beings share a lot of intimacy, regardless of the way they look,” Gallagher [Charles Gallagher, chair and professor of the sociology department at La Salle University] says. “But the reality is, people of different races don’t share social space like that.”

{snip}

About 80 percent of whites live in neighborhoods in which 95 percent of their neighbors are also white, and census data shows 90 percent of the neighborhoods that were predominantly or exclusively black in 1990 remained that way a decade later.

“My students always say to me, ‘Isn’t it better to have these ads? It’s kind of a fake-it-‘til-you-make-it kind of thing,’” Gallagher says. “The problem with that, I tell them, is that distortions and false impressions never do anyone any good.”

{snip}

“Advertising is aspirational,” [Schreffler] adds. “It’s who we want to be, a lifestyle we want—not always who we are.”

Original article

(Posted on March 2, 2009)


Comments

“minorities were either invisible in mainstream media, or handed negative roles that generally had them in a subservient position,” says Jerome Williams, a professor of advertising and African-American studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

Really so why does every cop show, have a good black cop and a corrupt white one?

Posted by Anonymous at 6:21 PM on March 2


Confirmation of what we’ve long known.

While much of this is done to deliberately put a positive perspective on interracial interactions, Mad Ave needs to push the envelope to get attention. They are ads out there that show ambiguous relationships between black men and white women (are they a couple or just sitting in close proximity?). Soon, it’s going to be front and center.

Posted by sbuffalonative at 6:47 PM on March 2


Yes, these corporate advertisers are “faking it,” pretending that this is just one big, happy national family, instead of acknowledging the ethnic and racial tensions that always accompany a polyglot society — especially one as large as the U.S. Their desire to depict an “America as it ought to be” rather than an America as it really is, I believe is the real reason for the multi-culti commercials — not a belief that this is the most effective way to sell the product.

But I also believe that TV commercials nowadays aren’t nearly as “integrated” as this AP article would like us to believe. For instance: Notice how the ads almost always depict a “warm, loving family” as black — despite the 70 percent illegitimacy rate among blacks. The black father, especially, is always played by an actor who is tall, well-built and handsome.

A White father, on the other hand, is likely to be portrayed by an actor who is chubby, balding, and acts like a doofus. In fact, that description fits most of the White male actors who appear in TV commercials nowadays — no taller than medium height, overweight, losing their hair, acting as if they’re afraid of their wives. That gives away the mindset of those who make the commercials: Yes, they want to sell the product. But on a social level, they also want to help undermine what they view as the dominant position of White males in this society. What better way than making them seem physically unimposing, not very bright, and hen-pecked?

Posted by Wayne Engle at 6:48 PM on March 2


Most of the commercials that I see show a stupid White person and a smart minority showing him or her how to do it.

Posted by Spartan24 at 6:49 PM on March 2


I have to so agree. I see commercials where black, brown, white an oriental people are together on college campuses, in restuarants, at various events of all kinds, and so on. Now some of these situations might exist in special circumstances, like for instance, company meetings, company outings, occasionally school rallies, and that’s about it. The claims of libeal progressives aside, the truth is the truth.

Posted by Bobby at 6:57 PM on March 2


Some of these commercials border on the absurd. It’s nothing more than the usual multicultural liberal progressive attempt at brainwashing the American public. Now some of these situations might exist at company meetings, a few school rallies, or maybe some company outings, and those are about the only situations in which I have seen black, Chinese, White, Hispanic, Indian, and what have you, people, all playing, congregating, etc. together.

Posted by Bobby at 7:02 PM on March 2


I’ve noticed this for awhile now. Verizon is the worst.

Posted by Carolinayankee at 7:02 PM on March 2


I am so sick of this garbage.

What kind of fantasy land is this country living in?

I just did a job in NYC with a crew from Paris. The soundman brought me a few magazines : Paris Match, Le Point, Marianne.

Right now the French press is talking alot about the “unrest” in their territories in the Caribbean and elsewhere (Guadeloupe, Martinique, La Reunion). They are much more bold than the US press would ever be, though they do still dance around the issue of race rather spinelessly (but nowhere near like here in the US).

But what truly blew me away in these French magazines, and was an incredible breath of fresh air in an otherwise bleak and depressing week (visiting NYC after reading Amren daily for two years can be an eye-opening and disturbing experience), was their near total lack of the relentless 24/7 non-stop in-your-face diversity that is force-fed to us over here in advertising.

In ALL of the big ads in Paris Match, for ALL of the big-name French companies like Chanel or Peugeot, the people depicted in the ads are typical Frenchmen, period. NOT the gaggle of opposite racial types perpetually depicted as living side by side in perfect harmony as seen in EVERY SINGLE ADVERTISEMENT featured here in the USA.

I have posted here before about how this same phenomenon – lack of contrived artificial diversity on tv and in advertising (or should I say instead: “Accurate portrayal of demographic realities in ads and on tv”?) – exists on your local Spanish-language cable channel. Last time I watched a movie (the beautiful “Anita no pierde el tren”, 2001, set in Spain) on Telemundo, I was SHOCKED to see not a single black face, either in the film itself, or on any of the commercials during the breaks, NOT A SINGLE ONE.

I am so aghast at what is happening in this country that sometimes I can barely think straight: all of the wishful thinking of the social engineers that you see, plain as day, in print or on tv, the dishonesty and untruthfulness of the propaganda simply staggering, that’s without even mentioning the MIND BOGGLING fraudulence of this thing in the White House, this invention of the left, a mere seven years after 9/11….

Sometimes I want to start planning my emigration out of the US, a lot like the remaining Afrikaners in SA.

Somebody please: suggest something. Something needs to happen and it needs to start happening soon.

Posted by from NOLA at 7:13 PM on March 2


I’m surprised the white baby in the E-Trade ad is the one who seems to know the most. More often we see blacks who are the one in charge or the only one with any sense.

Of course they are trying to suggest to people that blacks are just like them, maybe better. But then we hear about the education gap, and how blacks are sent to prison so much more ofter. To the average idiot who these ads target, it must be confusing. On one hand they are being told that blacks are doing well, and on the other they are told that they still need to step back and let a black person ahead of them for a job since blacks still need help to level the field.

That young people see nothing wrong with interracial romance show how successful these sorts of campaigns are. Of course maybe the kids do see it as wrong, but they know that they are never allowed to let anyone know that they think that way.

Posted by Cogitator at 7:26 PM on March 2


That’s like it is in the TV markets of my native St. Louis and my current Cape Girardeau-Carbondale-Paudcah — you’ll see TV commercials advertising these fly-by-night “colleges” where you learn to be a criminal justice expert in three weeks. The images you’ll see are of black cops arresting white criminals, and of black scientists working in labs, fast forward to white criminal being sent to prison.

On these same channels, the news will almost always (in the case of St. Louis), or on occasion (in the case of Carbondale) have black criminality predominate its first segment, the images you will see are of white cops arresting black criminals.

Posted by Question Diversity at 7:50 PM on March 2


“If you were to come down from another planet and watch TV, you’d think that all of these human beings share a lot of intimacy…”

You’d also think that all white males were either burglars breaking into someone’s house, or else dumb doofuses who have to be educated by some smarter, hipper nonwhite. If whites really do “still hold most of the economic clout,” why do advertisers want to insult us?

Posted by Ellen at 7:53 PM on March 2


That’s why it is called TV “Programing” To indoctrinate (program) even more dumbed down Whites who seem to believe everything the media, movies, music etc. throw at them.

Posted by Anonymous at 7:57 PM on March 2


And yet, some critics wonder if depicting America as a racial nirvana today may have an unintended downside—that of airbrushing out of the public consciousness the economic and social chasms that still separate whites, blacks and Latinos.

No problemo. All any white has to do is is drive through Los Angeles, Detroit, or any other largely black or hispanic area for a strong dose of reality. And of course, there will always be race hustlers like Prof. Jerome Williams to remind whites of how racist they, and only they, have been down through history.

Are multiculti ads, then, an accurate barometer of our racial progress, a showcase of our hopes in that direction—or a reminder of how far we still have to go?

…or a sheer fantasy that will never come to pass in reality? Funny how the writer completely overlooked that possibility.

If current trends continue, demographers say, nonwhites will be in the majority in America by 2042

And why are whites are the only ethnic group on earth that should celebrate their own dwindling numbers and influence?

Posted by Tim in Indiana at 8:00 PM on March 2


“These ‘multiculti’ ads may be evidence of the vitality of assimilation, America’s distinctive, master trend. To advertisers, though, they’re simply smart business—a recognition of a new cultural mainstream that prizes diversity, a recognition that we are fast approaching a day when the predominant hue in America will no longer be white.”

But what if the day never comes, “when the predominant hue in America will no longer be white?”

What if the day comes instead, when the “predominant hue in America” is back to 90% white, or greater?

It is only shortsighted: greed, stupidity, and arrogance, that guides today’s “advertisers!”

In their lust for money (and ironically, the protection it might buy them from the “multiculti” realities of life,) they foolishly foster a kaleidoscopic fantasy world via the idiot box. In this, we see that their greed and stupidity merges together to produce an arrogance, that reduces them to abject absurdity.

After all, should the “cultural mainstream” suddenly change for the better, might not they be fed to the pigs?

That is, if the pigs would have them?

Posted by John PM at 8:03 PM on March 2


of course, if you pay close attention, its always the “stupid white guy” who screws everything up and gets the pie in the face while the wise minority rolls her eyes and takes advantage of the great product being pitched. Pure fantasy garbage, and its by accident buit by design. Thats the scary part.

Posted by Anonymous at 8:19 PM on March 2


My mother who is in her early 70s and not at all racially aware said to me the other day, “there sure are a lot of black people on TV nowadays, I hardly ever see a commercial with white people.” There it was a 70ish year old woman noticing a distinct increase or over representation of blacks on TV.

Posted by Steve at 8:21 PM on March 2


TV commercials are a great source of information about the mental condition of Americans. It’s important to consider when analysing commercials, always to note the product being advertised as well as the program and time slot. This will fairly well indicate the demographics of the audience. For example: The commercials, shown in conjunction with auto racing, do not denigrate White men. Commercials shown with soaps for electronic products show White men as unpleasant or ineffectual.

Posted by Anonymous at 9:14 PM on March 2


The most memorable and truly humorous of these types of ads was one I remember from the early eighties, for Bic pens.

The catch-phrase was “Go with the flow”. One of the sequences showed three white guys and one black man, all named Thomas and all apparently partners in a legal firm. The camera panned from one to the next, with the black man last. All three white men wore identical horn-rimmed glasses and conservative suits; the black man was in a flashy outfit.

The three white men stated their names in identical monotones while holding up a Bic pen: “Thomas”, “Thomas”, “Thomas”

The camera then pans to the black man: “And THOM-ASSSS, ARE GOIN’ WITH THE FLOOOOOW!!!”
It was genuinely hilarious, but probably someone in the NAACP complained. I only saw the ad a couple of times.

Posted by generalquagmyer at 9:27 PM on March 2


“These multiculti ads may be evidence of the vitality of assimilation, America’s distinctive, master trend. To advertisers, though, they’re simply smart business…”

“Whites still hold most of the economic clout in the United States—85.5 percent of the nation’s annual buying power of $10 trillion, according to a 2007 study by the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the University of Georgia.”
Smart buisness? I get angry at the advertizers who depict the false illusion of racial harmony in their ads and I get VERY angry at these same airheads who depict whites as incompetent boobs who need a non white to come to their rescue in their ads. And Mr Advertiser I am putting you on notice that I am a white who refuses to buy your product if you in any way insult my race, heritage or culture. This has been my practice for years. Whites hold more than 85 percent of American consumer buying power. And you expect us to purchase your products after insulting the hell out of us, while praising minorities as our superiors at the same time? No thank you. My money will not be enriching you. And I have a very long memory.

Posted by Mike Harrigan at 9:28 PM on March 2


“The combined buying power of African-Americans, Asians and Native Americans was $1.4 trillion in 2007,

Yeah..this “buying power” is probably gathered from reports of
credit based purchases..sub prime loans for houses,cars, etc..
I’d like to see the stats in 5 more years.

Posted by Anonymous at 10:39 PM on March 2


My father said recently that if you judged America only by looking at TV, you’d think 90% of the country was black. I’ve also noticed what others have, that every white male on american tv is shown as a big overgrown child, dorky, fat and balding and too dumb to tie his shoelaces unless a black is showing him how. White females are often shown either as frumpy dorks or as some blonde sexpot whispering seductively at you. Blacks and every other minority however, male or female, are shown as being smart, attractive, capable and upper class in every way and giving whites clear instructions on everything from how to do their taxes or which car to buy.

Posted by KC at 10:54 PM on March 2


Here’s the NYT talking about this same subject, but form TWENTY YEARS AGO.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=950DE0D61239F931A25752C1A96F948260&pagewanted=4

Even way back in 1989, the Times was just as myopic and unrealistic about race as it is today.

Posted by Anonymous at 10:54 PM on March 2


“If current trends continue, demographers say, nonwhites will be in the majority in America by 2042—”

That’s a big IF. A lot can happen between now and then to totally change things. However, if America does become majority non-white and made up of various ethnic groups, it will simply cease to exist as it is today. It will be just another 3rd world country in a globalized economy. Madison Ave. advertisers won’t have much to advertise because the country will be made up of a small ruling class of elites with widespread poverty and economic depression among the mostly non-white masses.

““My students always say to me, ‘Isn’t it better to have these ads? It’s kind of a fake-it-‘til-you-make-it kind of thing,’” Gallagher says.

As someone else has said, when you have a multiracial society, in any country,there will NEVER be nirvana. This is a multiculuralist fairy tale. The truth is people are racial creatures by nature and different races will automatically self-segregate. Multiracial societies are and will always be fraught with balkenization, discord and self-segragation as well as being much weaker and less unified than racially homogenous countries.

“The problem with that, I tell them, is that distortions and false impressions never do anyone any good.”that of airbrushing out of the public consciousness the economic and social chasms that still separate whites, blacks and Latinos.”“

First of all, the group of Americans that have the highest annual income is not whites but asian-americans. If America were “racist” this would not be. Blacks/Latinos make less money because they are more likely to drop out of school, less likely to go to college despite the fact that they can get government aid easier then whites, are more likely to be single parent families and have kids out of wedlock and they have more kids.

Posted by Anonymous at 11:09 PM on March 2


Whatever happened to configuring a marketing campaign towards the product and/or service’s target market?

Posted by Anonymous at 11:48 PM on March 2


The MSM is becoming far far departed from reality . This will spell their continued demise .

Good riddance!

Posted by Scott at 12:11 AM on March 3


Hotels.com—-THE WORST!!! Seen the commercial with a black man lounging in a tub, while two white men down on their knees blow bubbles into the tub with straws? Now if it was a white man with two black men on their knees blowing bubbles…These freaks need to be put out of business!!

Posted by Ken/Seattle at 12:16 AM on March 3


Actually these ads work in our favor. They lead to a phenomenon known as “cognitive dissonance.” That’s what happens when there’s a huge disconnect between fictional beliefs and harsh reality.

The smart black person who solves the “stupid white guy’s” problem is the fiction shown on TV. What ordinary people experience on the street, in the store, and in the company office day in and day out is the exact opposite, the facts of daily life if you will.

Eventually something’s got to give. Either the reality of daily life will give way, producing a schizophrenic person who lives in a total imaginary world, or the fiction of TV will be seen for what it is, sheer fiction with no foundation in reality. A person who figures that out then becomes immune to the propaganda, as most people posting on this site have become. The sheer contrast between the fiction and fact is thus actually maximized by these shows and commercials.

Still it is annoying to have all that anti-white racism shoved in your face all the time, but there is a remedy: the on-off button on the remote. Click off the TV and spend your quality time doing something else. Or be wise and rent movies and shows online that you know will not have this in-your-face propaganda.

Posted by Roland at 12:18 AM on March 3


Perhaps these advertising people should move into a “Black” neighborhood so that they could learn what diversity is really all about.

Ronald

Posted by Ronald at 12:36 AM on March 3


NOLA – I hear you loud and clear. It’s frustrating. This insanity will forever change the country in an awful way. I don’t know if we will ever take a stand. We may just be mimicking Rome, only much quicker. I find myself looking at other countries also, but Europe seems busy destroying its indigenous populations. Argentina looks nice,demographically speaking, as well as Uruguay.

I don’t believe people just decide to no longer exist. Who is pulling the strings here?

Posted by mike at 12:37 AM on March 3


It is not racial harmony but the goofy white guys and the smart black guys that make up the advertising narratives. Look for future Madison Ave. & Hollywood productions of white girl swept off her feet by cool black guy.

Race mixing has no sales value. Whites don’t need blacks using products to convince them to buy. Common sense would tell you white people want to see white people enjoying the product.

Maybe the minorities, who do sense their inferiority, want to see themselves mixed in with white people, but as Attorney General Eric Holder pointed out white people don’t want to mix.

Advertising is supposed to sell products, not sell multiculturalism. Multiculturalism runs against the grain of basic human instincts. Advertisers are experts at manipulating the unconscious. Yet there is a universal conformity for this counter productive behavior. One is forced to conclude that a powerful force is behind the race mixing in advertising and Hollywood productions.

My adult children express their consternation at my reminders of the non-white take over of America. Although they don’t consider minorities’ life threatening to our culture, they do see them as drag on it. After all there is really nothing they can do about. My sons, the best sons in the world, like the TV show Burn Notice. I recorded an episode and saw something odd. In the background of a scene a blond woman and black man walked by together. A minute later another blond woman and black man heading in the same direction stop and kiss. Slow motion revealed it was the same couple.

Nothing is haphazard in commercials or movies. The writers, directors, and producers carefully stage every foot of film. Since our aversion to other races is deep in the unconscious the anti-white elites must attack it on that level even more aggressively than on the conscious level.

A picture is worth a thousand words. I did get a positive reaction after the kissing revelation. My sons are now conscious of the anti-white subliminal message sent. Now if they would only stop watching the NBA.

Posted by P Noctura at 1:50 AM on March 3


A unwritten rule for tv shows and commercials is a black must never ever be portrayed as commiting a crime(the statitics be damned)In fact they are portrayed as police,judges and in general noble people fighting white crime.

Posted by Gene at 2:32 AM on March 3


I too have noticed that white men are usually portrayed in commercials as clownish, inept men. One reason for this is whites are the only racial group not allowed to organize for their own racial self-interest so no one cares if whites are ridiculed. However, if blacks or latinos or American Indians were habitually presented as losers and clowns in commercials, their civil rights groups would protest and even file suit.

The other reason for our being poorly depicted is that those who dislike whites are jealous of our accomplishments and annoyed by our perceived status. They want to denigrate us while simultaneously raising up all other ethnic groups to our former level of dignity.

Our youth are being subliminally brainwashed that to be a white male in multi-culti America is to be a loser. Every other group, including white women and children, dominate white males in commercials. We all know that alpha white males exist, but they are rarely shown in commercials. Instead, we are habitually shown alpha black males, alpha latina females, alpha every ethnic group, but always an emasculated, goofy white male to provide comic relief.

One more point: Isn’t something like 70% of all burglaries in America perpetrated by blacks and mestizos? Yet in all the ads for security services they feel the need to show a white burglar lurking in the bushes, never a black or mestizo. I am insulted.

Posted by Anonymous at 3:09 AM on March 3


If current trends continue, demographers say, nonwhites will be in the majority in America by 2042

And why are whites are the only ethnic group on earth that should celebrate their own dwindling numbers and influence?
Posted by Tim in Indiana
— — — — — —
Let’s put the shoe on the other foot.

Suppose it were announced that blacks had fallen from 13% of the population to 10%, and it is further expected in another 40 years that they will be only 5%.

Suppose it were also announced that X% of jobs that were traditionally held by blacks are now held by Hispanics and other immigrants. And that further “progress” is expected to continue in this area.

Would blacks be expected to welcome that news and even “celebrate” it?

Many whites may be smug about their high IQs, but who are the lemmings in this picture?

Posted by browser at 3:55 AM on March 3


It is only shortsighted: greed, stupidity, and arrogance, that guides today’s “advertisers!”
In their lust for money (and the protection it might buy them from the “multiculti” realities of life,) they foolishly foster a kaleidoscopic fantasy world via the idiot box.

After all, should the “cultural mainstream” suddenly change for the better, might not they be fed to the pigs?
Posted by John PM
— — — — — —
They are shortsighted indeed. Do they really suppose that this country can undergo a racial transformation, and yet they and their companies will magically float above it all, remaining untouched?

That is fantasy! EVERYTHING will be changed…. including their positions and their wealth. Nothing will survive and be the same as it is today. Somehow, they foolishly think that they can sell out everyone else, but still preserve themselves. Not likely!

Posted by browser at 4:05 AM on March 3


“That’s the cable talking, Jim – why, that program isn’t even in HD!”
I’ve mentioned this before, but can anyone tell me of a Brink’s Home Security commercial where the guy kicking in the door isn’t white?

Posted by Dave at 7:07 AM on March 3


The absolute worst ads have to be the ones for the alarm and protection companies. Always always whites casing or looking to break into a house. The only saving grace is that I have not seen any with whites looking to break into a house occupied by blacks. The next worst are some dumb ads with a lawyer interviewing his client inside a jail or prison. Care to venture a guess as to the race of his client? Just an aside, has anybody kept score on how many black champs Jeopardy has? This I think really calls for an investigation by that guy Holder.

Posted by Great White Observer at 7:31 AM on March 3


Can you spell P-R-O-P-A-G-A-N-D-A?

I mean what else would you call these asinine commercials depicting Black researchers, Black ‘experts’ that seem to have all the answers for their befuddled White associates?

I always get a laugh out of these artificial universes depicted in sitcom-like commercials… the White families with the obligatory best friends… who just happen to be Blacks. About as true-to-life as a Mickey Mouse cartoon. By definition, my wife and I are midd-class, White-collar types. A decent income, decent education. Yet neither we, nor ANYONE I know have Blacks for friends.

Why on earth would we choose to socialize with Blacks? Granted we all buy more or less the same consumer products (within our respective financial reach). With that, communality ends. We’re WHITE, they’re BLACK. No communications. No interest in each other. You might have Black faces at work… after hours, you go separate ways. Interracial fraternization? Thank you, but NO THANK YOU!

Granted, the youngsters, particularly girls get pressured with the “am I too Black for you” garbage. The pigs end up breeding mulatto babies; the sensible ones fend off unwanted advances. So who really would take those ludicrous commercials seriously? An artifical life in an artificial universe. I’d venture a guess not even Blacks fall for that unrealistic picture.

Posted by Fed Up at 7:57 AM on March 3


When our kids became teenagers, they were made to understand very emphatically… A Black boyfriend is unacceptable. Marry or have sex with a Black and the price will be losing your family. FOREVER! The choice is yours. Make the wrong one and be disowned and rejected by us the rest of your life! No turning back, EVER!

Sure it’s hard. Call it “tough love.” But the only way to make your teenager understand. That too many families are too gutless to take a firm stand is the reason for the many mulatto faces you encounter daily. The grandmother with a mixed-breed child in the supermarket parking lot. The tweny-year old White girl with a mixed-breed brat. Draw your own conclusions.

Posted by Fed Up at 8:14 AM on March 3


The multicult advertisements are a self-fulfilling prophecy. They program you and your children every time you watch them. You may think that awareness makes you immune, but it doesn’t – bit by tiny bit, they reprogram your brain’s definition of normalcy. The conditioning that is effected by this programming, is a significant contributor to the meek reaction of Whites to being displaced in their own nation.

50 years ago, Whites would not have accepted the conditions we accept in our nation today. What was different then? They were not programmed 24/7 to be accepting of multiculturalism. Their descendants however have bought into the notion that they need to be entertained every moment of the day, and voluntarily inject the programming directly into their consciousness.

It’s time to throw off the programming, and WAKE UP. You don’t HAVE to watch those good Black / bad White TV dramas, or allow your kids to buy rap music, or purchase products from companies that are forcing miscegenation into your world. Turn the tables on them – when you see adverts for products that feature traditional White families, buy those products and spread the word to your friends and family.

Most importantly, contact the companies that you champion as well as the ones you boycott, and TELL THEM exactly why you aren’t buying their products. Let’s start using that #1 buying power clout to OUR advantage, instead of our opponents.

Posted by Visine at 8:22 AM on March 3


There is a flip side. If you portray racial realities accurately in ads, then you will be accused of perpetuating stereotypes.

No matter how you portray blacks, they’ll complain.

Posted by Jason at 9:27 AM on March 3


On the one hand, I agree with advertisers who want to show things in a positive light, and we do have to get along until such time as we have our own. On the other hand, it is best for whites if they have as little as possible or nothing at all to do with nonwhites, kind of like what the old south was said to be like, simply ignoring then whenever it’s possible. At some point you have to do what’s best for yourself.

Posted by Anonymous at 9:32 AM on March 3


Really so why does every cop show, have a good black cop and a corrupt white one?

And white criminals, never black ones.

Posted by SKIP at 9:35 AM on March 3


“The Multicultural Economy” will never truly exist. It will be the multicultural economies, in the plural. Just one more thing to divide us into separate nations.

Posted by Anonymous at 9:35 AM on March 3


“It’s kind of a fake-it-‘til-you-make-it kind of thing”

That one line sums up the entire white liberal philosophy, and explains all their Orwellian techniques.

Posted by Anonymous at 9:36 AM on March 3


I never thought of myself a HATING anyone I Just find it very hard to understand where a group of people who seem to have a penchant for crime, perverted sex (see CDC reports on hiv/aids) and what seem to be an aversion to helping ANYONE including themselves can have picked up so much power and exposure? Then I realized its NOT them pushing this AGENDA it’s our own white race that is raising these people up to the level of demigods? WHY is what I would like to know WHY? I for one avoid buying any product advertised using this all black or black with a blonde female, who is always so excited and proud to be with him, mix. They are under 14% of the population and that should be their representation on TV, etc. And the power these muslims seem to exert over our schools and public arena’s far exceeds anything a Christian or Jew has ever been able to exert. Will we EVER say enough is enough already and take back what is Our Country?

Posted by Ted at 10:14 AM on March 3

The GOP’s Suicide

The GOP’s Suicide

More news stories on Pandering Politicians

John Tait, buchanan.org, March 3, 2009

{snip}

The GOP’s diminishing influence—clearly demonstrated by its greatly-reduced power in Washington—is the result of Republicans ignoring their traditional White European American base of support, while pursuing the traditional Democratic support base of non-White minorities. According to the PEW Research Center, White Americans will be a minority in the U.S. population by 2042. Instead of advocating and enacting policies that would prevent the decline of America’s white population, the Republicans have decided to embrace the fateful change that has been underway since 1965, and has elevated Michael Steele to the Republican Party chairmanship.

Michael Steele could not have been elevated to the chairmanship without a racially diverse electorate. (In my book _Plain Truth_, I explain why such diversity makes political representation impossible.) While registered Republicans in all 50 states are predominantly white, U.S. territories which also vote on such matters are predominantly non-white. On the 6th ballot, Steele won by a final tally of 91-77. However, he won all 15 votes—one vote more than his margin of victory—from U.S. territories. Guam , American Samoa , Puerto Rico , The Virgin Islands, and The Northern Marianas all held firmly for Steele. Thus, it was non-whites, that is, non-traditional Republicans that turned the Republican Party over to Michael Steele. {snip}

Chairman Steele is a non-traditional Republican not only racially and culturally, but he is also a non-traditional Republican ideologically. In addition to favoring affirmative action and opposing the death penalty, Steele is soft on the 2nd Amendment. {snip}

In addition to electing leaders who disagree with the traditional party platform, the Republican response to their 2008 debacle was an embarrassing attempt to beat the Democrats at their own game by tapping Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal to delivery the Republican response to Obama’s State of the Union Address. It was an ineffective, even comical attempt by the GOP to show that it, too, is racially diverse. It seems the Republicans are trying to recreate themselves in the image of the Democratic Party’s notion of “diversity” by matching the Democrats minority-for-minority. But as recent history has proved, Republican efforts to reach out to minorities have not only been fruitless, but have also irritated an already disappointed base. During the 2000 election against Al Gore, then Governor George Bush made strong overtures to the NAACP. He said, “Discrimination is still a reality, even when it takes different forms. Instead of Jim Crow, there’s racial redlining and profiling. Instead of separate but equal, there is separate and forgotten. Strong civil rights enforcement will be a cornerstone of my administration.” Bush’s rhetoric was for naught. In 2000, Gore won 90% of all Black votes while John Kerry received 88% four years later. Asians have become a more reliable voting bloc for the Democrats this decade. Gore received 55% while Kerry managed to earn 56%.” Despite Republicans betraying their base supporters to pursue minority voters, the perception will remain that Democrats champion the helpless little guy, and Republicans side with exploitative big business and greedy rich white men. No matter what Republicans promise during the campaigns or what they enact when they manage to get elected, they will never receive substantial support from minority voters.

The key demographic that both parties hope can give them a monopoly on power is the Hispanic population. However, the Democrats already possess a near insurmountable advantage. In addition to Democrats winning a plurality of Hispanic votes since becoming a significant portion of the voting pool in 1980, a poll conducted by the Latino Coalition before the 2008 election cycle stated that 61% of all Hispanic voters identify themselves as Democrats while only 21% are registered Republicans. Even before the opportunity for a minority to vote for a non-white candidate presented itself, they came out in huge numbers for the Democrats.

Generational demographics is another element that is contributing to the demise of the Republican Party. {snip} The decreasing Republican membership is reflecting the population trend that shows the numerical decline in the white birth rate. Since the GOP has been the traditional political-cultural home for white people, it follows that with fewer white people entering the human race, then there will be fewer white people in the Republican Party. With less new blood within the ranks, the GOP will contain an aging population, which will present additional image problems that will affect recruitment. {snip}

In attempting to woo voters who will never convert to the GOP, Republicans have alienated their traditional supporters, who now are refusing to back a party they rightly think has betrayed them. {snip}

Original article

(Posted on March 4, 2009)


Comments

Once again, Buchanan hits the proverbial nail on the head:
The only way the Republican Party can hope to recieve widespread “minority” support is if it becomes even more Leftist than the Democratic Party (which it looks like it’s well on the way to doing).

The Republican Party has abandoned you, white America – will you in turn abandon it, or will you become 21st Century Jews desperately supporting the Nazi Party in the meager hope that they just might end your persecution if you click your heels and shout “Heil Hitler” enough?

Posted by Obscuratus at 6:07 PM on March 4


Despite Republicans betraying their base supporters to pursue minority voters, the perception will remain that Democrats champion the helpless little guy, and Republicans side with exploitative big business and greedy rich white men. No matter what Republicans promise during the campaigns or what they enact when they manage to get elected, they will never receive substantial support from minority voters.

Also because of welfare, Democrats will always outspend Republicans, no matter how big spending the Republicans get. Therefore, they’ll always get the minority vote because the Democrats can outpromise the Republicans. This is why Obama got significantly more of the Hispanic vote than Kerry did four years ago, in spite of black-Hispanic feuds — Obama was just better at promising everyone everything.

Posted by Question Diversity at 6:08 PM on March 4


John Tait is 100% correct, as usual. The only way that Republicans could possibly gain the support of minorities would be to become more liberal than Democrats. Hence, the Republican Party would have to become ultra-Leftest Democrats.

Also, as Tait points out, virtually all illegal immigrants and most legal immigrants into the USA will become Democrats. Hence, by endorsing immigration, the Republican Party is signing its own death warrant.

It may already be too late, but there still is a slight chance that the Republican Party can survive if it returned to its conservative values and pandered to European-Americans instead of to Minorities and recent immigrants.

Posted by Anonymous at 6:15 PM on March 4


GOP is done. White nationalists should go into the Democratic party just to spoil their fun. If we are going to be a one party nation, might as well shake things up from within.

Posted by Civilized Neighbor at 6:50 PM on March 4


Who is so optimistic that he thinks the US will exist in its present form in 2042?

Or that Mexico will not have been taken over by the drug cartels, mandating a US takeover of Mexico with a complete revamping of government into a democracy, free of corruption?

I appreciate this man’s warning, but the right should be trying to grow some cajones and tell it like it really is, instead of acting as if everything is going to carry on with business as usual.

Don’t look now, but the stock market is heading downward towards 5000, and there’s a more than an even chance that Eastern Europe will collapse, causing a global meltdown all on its own.

Better worry about next year instead of decades down the road, eh?

Posted by q at 6:53 PM on March 4


In the last election, I refused to vote for the lesser of two evils and resolved that I’ll never vote for the lesser of two evils again. Better to simply abstain when there is no choice. We need a strong, aggressive, intelligent and blunt-spoken party that isn’t embarrassed to represent the interests of white Americans. Clearly, the Republican Party has abandoned us in favor of their unrequited love of non-whites. It’s senseless for whites to hang on after the love has gone.

Posted by Belle at 7:02 PM on March 4


Well put. For every minority vote the GOP gets, they’ll lose 5 white votes. And as for the diversity ploy of Steele and Jindal, that only make the betrayal of the base that much more obvious. I predict that this will be the impetus of the emergence of a viable third party in our lifetime. Unfortunately, as a college-educated, urban, heterosexual, young white male, I cannot see how my interests can be reconciled with that of the GOP. Funny, considering that I graduated from a college just a few blocks from William Buckley’s home. Our demographic is now a people without a party.

Jordan NYC

Posted by Jordan NYC at 7:14 PM on March 4


I did not vote for John McCain in the presidential election because I was so disgusted with his support for legalizing 12,000,000 to 20,000,000 illegal aliens, most of whom were Hispanic, and thus ensuring a despised and persecuted minority status for our people at an even faster pace.

John McCain’s Hispandering was utterly worthless. Like Benjamin Franklin once said, “…will gain neither and lose both.” He was refering to government protection and civil liberties, but in the same sense John McCain gained neither the Hispanic or white vote, but instead lost both because Hispanics still voted Democratic and many whites, such as myself, felt betrayed and thus didn’t vote for him.

If the GOP had the tiniest ounce of common sense, they would act to reverse the changing demographics which would put their party out of business for good. Working with the changing demographics has proven time and time again to not work, so why not try Plan B, which should have been the first plan of action: Reverse the immigration policies that will make Americans a minority, a despised minority, in our own country to ensure that power is retained.

Posted by Anonymous at 7:35 PM on March 4


“According to the PEW Research Center, White Americans will be a minority in the U.S. population by 2042. Instead of advocating and enacting policies that would prevent the decline of America’s white population, the Republicans have decided to embrace the fateful change that has been underway since 1965, and has elevated Michael Steele to the Republican Party chairmanship.”

Wham and Bam, you hit the nail right on the head there Mr. Tait!

The only hope the Republican Party has (or a very smart splinter group of that party, from its zombified parents’ “multicultural” ruins) is to openly advocate for white majority preservation. Moreover, be it from the party as a whole or a more dynamic “splinter group,” a return to an 85% to 90% white majority in the USA, should be unapologetically and aggressively
demanded!

Any criticisms of this policy, be they by internal rainbow traitors or external Red enemies, should be openly denounced as advocating for the genocide of the white race in the USA and North America, respectively.

Or put another way; Bobby Jindal and Michael Steele are not my brothers when it comes to politics, or even my cousins.

Thus, why or how, would I ever see them as worthy of being the majority of my party, or worse my country?

As always, God help us all!

Posted by John PM at 7:41 PM on March 4


If you check you will find that most of the Hispanics who voted
Republican are or consider themselves to be white people.
Why should I vote for a Republican Party that says it does not represent white men and no longer wants to be a white party and elects a Black Chairman who pushes the race discrimination against whites usually called affirmative action and plans to recruit in Hip Hop and other anti-white subcultural groups and fields candidates like McCain (told the Republican base to shut and about immigration) and Lindsay Graham who said America is an idea and everyone should come…, at the expense of the whites who built America , of course. McCain adopts foreign children when there are many children in the US that need homes.That is another piece of evidence that McCain and his wife do not care about American children who need homes. Look at a picture of John McCain and Cindy with their adopted children and then tell me if this does not look like a preference for foreigners over Americans.
Chairman Steele thinks that hip hop fans will make good party members or he would not try to recruit them. Find the actual words to some hip hop music and then tell everyone what you think of Steel who wants to recruit this anti-white group. Read the words before you answer.
Why support this ?

Posted by Oldman at 7:55 PM on March 4


I’ve come to the dismal conclusion that too many members of the white race (maybe even a majority now) have nothing less than a mania for extinction. “Competitive altruism,” and the social status among whites which attaches to being perceived as “not racist” and “celebrating diversity,” while descriptive in part of the motivation of white race liberals, doesn’t begin to probe the dark heart (so to speak) of such white psychopathology.

I see articles like the above all the time here on Amren. It’s always some variation on a theme: either on a large scale, such as, the GOP must abandon its white voter base; Europe must import Third World colored immigrants; America must become majority non-white; or on a smaller scale, Reginald Denny hugs his vicious attackers at their public trial; the mothers of white girls, savagely attacked in Brooklyn without provocation by black females on MLK Day, publicize their “forgiveness” of their daughters’ feral assailants, etc.

The theme is, “We white people want to be exterminated, we would rather not exist any more…” If this isn’t a mental illness, it sure looks like one, and it is being reinforced daily, relentlessly by our media, academic, political and even religious institutions. How can white people, their race, their society, their culture, languages and civilization survive in the face of such officially sanctioned madness?

Posted by Zorba_the_Geek at 8:30 PM on March 4


Do you think any of the neo-con talk show hosts will ever touch this article with a ten foot pole? We Whites will soon disappear and never be mentioned again in this country. The Founders will magically all be blacks in the very near future. I can see the writing on the wall unless we stand up NOW! Michael Steel is a black first and always will be. Just like 99% of them are.

Posted by Anonymous at 9:06 PM on March 4


The decreasing Republican membership is reflecting the population trend that shows the numerical decline in the white birth rate. Since the GOP has been the traditional political-cultural home for white people, it follows that with fewer white people entering the human race, then there will be fewer white people in the Republican Party.

It didn’t have to be this way. As Ann Coulter pointed out, everything was poised for the Democrats to be the declining party. With their pro-abortion, feminist, anti-family agenda, it was their numbers that showed every sign of declining. Then came “immigration reform” and the enormous influx into the Democrat’s voting bloc.

This ought to make the Republican base mad as hell, this conniving, manipulative meddling with the political structure and the population mix in this country, for the sheer purpose of political gain.

But as recent history has proved, Republican efforts to reach out to minorities have not only been fruitless, but have also irritated an already disappointed base.

If this is true, if the Republican base is so “irritated,” then why isn’t the base shaking the Republican leadership by the scruff of its neck and demanding fair representation and accountability? Or is the Republican base, contrary to what this article implies, just as deluded as the leadership? I suspect the latter. Otherwise, matters wouldn’t have gotten this bad in the first place.

Posted by Tim in Indiana at 9:14 PM on March 4


WHITE BREAD, THAT’S YOU

Considering all the excitement about the verbal battles within the Conservative Movement, there has been an absence of reporting on Steele’s willingness to use slurs to describe the diverse white Americans who support the Republican Party.

Micheal S. Steele is willing to use unappetizing labels for Euro-Americans like “white bread,” a food-based slur made popular by the Dick Van Dyke TV show to show contempt toward European Americans, and to smother white American diversity and nationality under an unwanted label.

Michael S. Steele was reported on Politico on 12/9/08 as saying “The Republican Party’s strength comes in many forms and many hues. We have to understand now it’s not all white bread.” To have the insult of “white bread” used by a former Republican Lieutenant Governor of Maryland who is now the chairman of the National Republican Party tells us our status in that political party as loudly and clearly as anything can.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16336.html

Go to the second page, third paragraph.

Posted by Stanley at 9:46 PM on March 4


“Michael Steel is a black first and always will be. Just like 99% of them are.”

No, only 96%.

Posted by Anonymous at 10:20 PM on March 4


according to Tait- “Steele won by 91-77. However, he won all 15 votes—one vote more than his margin of victory—from (majoriy non-white)U.S. territories. Guam , American Samoa , Puerto Rico , The Virgin Islands, and The Northern Marianas. Why on earth are territories that are not alloted any electoral votes and thus have no say when it comes to who wins the presidency allowed to decide the head of the republican party?!! If this flaw were to be rectified by the party, we wouldn’t have to deal with phonies like Steele anymore. But I wouldn’t bank on it happening. As for the demographic transformation underway since 1965, the chief achitect, Ted Kennedy was just knighted by the queen of England!Simply appaling.

Posted by Anonymous at 10:57 PM on March 4


So? We already have a pretty good third party. It’s called
the Constitution Party. And it ran Chuck Baldwin for President.
Come on aboard. What’s stopping you?

Posted by Leif the Lucky at 12:32 AM on March 5


Embrace the change? They created the change and are the ones pushing for the extinction of white white race! The GOP hasn’t been for white people since the last century. Don’t fool yourself, because no amount of voting is going to change anything. Only turning inward will accomplish anything in the upcoming collapse.

Posted by Mike at 3:10 AM on March 5


Screw the GOP. Anyone can see they have sold out first to the neo-cons, and secondly, to anything that keeps them in power, even if it means screwing whites. I no longer support them as a political party that represents my interests. I also, no longer listen to Rush Limbaugh. Why? Because he is an expert at talking around the major issues. I heard him the other day mention that we are going to experience disaster because of Obama and the Democrats expansion of the central government. What! Where has Limbaugh been the last eight years? Bush expanded the central governmetn by 3X. The GOP is dead, as far as I’m concerned. Ann Coulter is also a cop out. She and Limbaugh, O’Riley, Hannity,etc. should be supporting the formation of a third party. This is where they could actually do some good.

Posted by Bobby at 3:21 AM on March 5


I totally agree with Zorba_the _greek!!!!

Posted by Sonny at 6:56 AM on March 5


As long as the Republicans plays “me too” with regards to the Welfare State for minorities, they will be between the proverbial “rock and a hard place.” As previous posters have stated, minority voters (especially black and Hispanic) will vote for the Democrat Party simply because they offer more taxpayer-funded “goodies” than the GOP.

Stupid Party, indeed.

In addition, the Republicans threw away a golden opportunity from 2001-2007 when they had control of both Congress and the White House. They could have controlled spending and bureaucracy. They didn’t.

Goldwater and Reagan, if still alive, wouldn’t recognize today’s GOP. Why would they? The GOP has turned downright socialist in the last eight years.

Posted by Truly Disgusted in TN at 9:25 AM on March 5


The stupid whites will not get up off their sofas to go and vote even when there is a principled man risking the lives of his family to stand on the ballot.

Posted by Joe at 9:26 AM on March 5


“The only way the Republican Party can hope to receive widespread “minority” support is if it becomes even more Leftist than the Democratic Party (which it looks like it’s well on the way to doing). The Republican Party has abandoned you, white America – will you in turn abandon it, or will you become 21st Century Jews desperately supporting the Nazi Party in the meager hope that they just might end your persecution if you click your heels and shout “Heil Hitler” enough?”

Just wanted to see that in print again.

I wonder if the republican party or anyone will every really defends whites too, the way they all seem so eager to help any group that isn’t white. Will it Ever happen? It might disillusion the nonwhites who have so much faith in business as usual and even in the republican party. Cant have that.

Posted by Anonymous at 11:25 AM on March 5


To: Anonymous at 10:57 PM
I could not agree more with you sentiments. However, Teddy was not the architect of the 1965 Immigration Bill. It was sponsored in the House by Emanuel Celler and in the Senate by Jacob Javits. Javits persuaded Sen Philip Hart of Michigan to replace his name with that of Hart. I doubt that Teddy was smart or sober enough to help craft that bill. Publisher
David Lawrence of USN&WR magazine correctly predicted at the time that the passage of the bill would change the US to an entirely different country.

Posted by Bill at 11:38 AM on March 5


I say Relax, people! Since the Dems had “their” colored guy, the Repubs were saying, “We got one, too!” when they elected this guy Steele. The GOP is going to do what it’s going to do, regardless of who is “at the helm” as president.

Posted by Mai Opinion at 12:16 PM on March 5


To Zorba the Greek:

I appreciate your comments. I think that white people are not consciously trying to commit suicide as a people. But some of them are now waking up to the fact that it is happening, some of them have known for years. And most are still brainwashed liberals. When I see what is going on all around the world in Western countries, it is terrifying. Muslims invading Europe and putting the native populations in virtual subjection. Russia. South Africa, Australia. All under the thrall of liberal leftism. Who is CONTROLLING this and COORDINATING it around the world?

Posted by Jonathan at 1:02 PM on March 5


It’s time to abandon the GOP
It’s time to reject the liberal paradigm of “multiculturalism” and fake “harmony”.

When whites are outnumbered in America, their worst nightmares will come true, as happened in South Africa.

Why not be wise and recognize the realities of life: That people naturally group themselves by race first and religion second.

Politics in America WILL become race based. In about 40 years parties will be based on skin color. It is inevitable. Only white liberals, if they still exist, will continue the charade of “multiculturalism.” But America will look more and more like Africa every day, with law of the jungle as the rule of the day, and the strong survives.

Whites need to form a new fiscal and social conservative party based on our ancient Western culture and ways, and I would like to see it based on the so-called Judeo Christian foundation.

Posted by Jonathan at 1:13 PM on March 5


Who cares about the GOP. Their finished, they had their time in the sun. Why dont we form a new party and support it. Clearly we are all sick of the monopolies that the DEMS and REPUBS have set in to play. We shouldnt be sitting behind our computers complain about them when we should form a new party or get behind another one. People here always complain about minorities seeing a problem and not doing anything about yet what are whites doing. Absolutely nothing and thats one of the main reasons why Obama won the election.

Posted by rational thinker at 1:18 PM on March 5


“While registered Republicans in all 50 states are predominantly white, U.S. territories are predominantly non-white. …..he won all 15 votes, one vote more than his margin of victory, from U.S. territories.
Guam , American Samoa , Puerto Rico , The Virgin Islands, and The Northern Marianas all held firmly for Steele. Thus, it was non-whites, that turned the Republican Party over to Michael Steele.”
————————————-

Time to get rid of all those overseas territories! They are a burden that cost more than they are worth. And now they cost us politically as well. Many people have been saying this all along, for years, but now is the time more so than ever to get rid of them. (Besides, many of those territories, eg.Puerto Rico, don’t even want to be with us. Our Big Business interests are determined to keep them “in family”. Let them go!)

Posted by Anonymous at 2:02 PM on March 5


“Also because of welfare, Democrats will always outspend Republicans…Therefore, they’ll always get the minority vote because the Democrats can outpromise the Republicans.
This is why Obama got significantly more of the Hispanic vote than Kerry did four years ago, in spite of black-Hispanic feuds — Obama was just better at promising everyone everything.”

Posted by Question Diversity
……………………………….

But it’s much simpler than that. It boils down to race, pure and simple.

I was very recently a seatmate, on a flight from South America, with a very well-educated gentleman —- a PhD, a scholar, a fluent speaker of several languages, an employee of the UN and a large American foundation. He is a Colombian (by family and birth) but now a citizen and resident of the US, and apparently also of Switzerland. (He now lives in New York but spends a lot of time in Geneva.)

He is also tri-racial.

When we got to the subject of Obama, he was rhapsodic. He told me, frankly and straight out, that he identified with Obama because Obama was of mixed-race …. LIKE HIM. He thought Obama presented a wonderful example to the world. He expressed no interest in Obama’s politics, nor his economic plan, nor ANYTHING else, other than his race (or his “races” in this case!) I was amazed at his candor about this. Even with this cosmopolitan, educated person, it was all about race.

How much more so then, with the ordinary, uneducated Third Worlder in the street! They know nothing about politics or economics, but they all adore Obama simply because he LOOKS LIKE THEM.

Posted by ghw at 2:34 PM on March 5


It didn’t have to be this way. As Ann Coulter pointed out, everything was poised for the Democrats to be the declining party. With their pro-abortion, feminist, anti-family agenda, it was their numbers that showed every sign of declining.

Then came “immigration reform” and the enormous influx into the Democrat’s voting bloc. This ought to make the Republican base mad as hell, this conniving, manipulative meddling with the political structure and the population mix in this country, for the sheer purpose of political gain.
Posted by Tim in Indiana
————-
This is amazingly similar to what has happened in Europe — in countries such as Britain, Belgium and the Netherlands — where the political parties have simply imported a NEW electorate to outnumber and replace the old one. Same strategy. Same results.

Posted by Anonymous at 2:59 PM on March 5


“As for the demographic transformation underway since 1965, the chief achitect, Ted Kennedy was just knighted by the queen of England! Simply appaling.”
Posted by Anonymous
——————-

Worse than appalling. Incomprehensible!

I always thought that American citizens could not hold titles of nobility from foreign governments or they would lose their citizenship. What explains this?

Lately, more and more people have been getting away with this (people like Elizabeth Taylor). Well, maybe a British-born movie star can get away with it and slip by. But a US Senator???

Posted by Anonymous at 3:14 PM on March 5


“I also no longer listen to Rush Limbaugh. Why? Because he is an expert at talking around the major issues. …Where has Limbaugh been the last eight years? Bush expanded the central governmetn by 3X. The GOP is dead, as far as I’m concerned. Ann Coulter is also a cop out. She and Limbaugh, O’Riley, Hannity,etc. should be supporting the formation of a third party.” — Bobby
———————————————-
Right again, Bobby! They are ALL servants of the System. If not, they wouldn’t be on the air or in the public forum at all. You never hear anything really outrageous or original from them. Certainly nothing racial! Otherwise, they would be silenced in an instant. They know where their bread is buttered, and their careers come first. They pretend to take this side, or that side… but always “safe” sides, within what is allowable. But in the long run, it’s just two sides of THE SAME COIN.

Posted by voter at 3:27 PM on March 5


Vote, talk to people, pass out flyers, inform yourselves. Do anything you can no matter how small!

The racists are intentionally trying to nurture a defeatist attitude among whites. Why be defeatist? There are tens of millions of us! The people who think like we do are massive in number and extremely powerful economically and politically.

The problem? Whites are disorganized. Whites are uninformed. Whites are fearful. Address these problems. It can be done!
Many whites are waking up now. Don’t give up hope!

Posted by Fight the Racists at 4:36 PM on March 5


Non-White immigration is inimical to all conservative parties. The Conservatives in Britain, the Conservative party in Canada and the Republican party in America. Yet none of them make any effort to stop it. It is just crazy.

Posted by Anonymous at 5:08 PM on March 5


“Screw the GOP. Anyone can see they have sold out first to the neo-cons, and secondly, to anything that keeps them in power, even if it means screwing whites. I no longer support them as a political party that represents my interests. I also, no longer listen to Rush Limbaugh. Why? Because he is an expert at talking around the major issues. I heard him the other day mention that we are going to experience disaster because of Obama and the Democrats expansion of the central government. What! Where has Limbaugh been the last eight years? Bush expanded the central governmetn by 3X. The GOP is dead, as far as I’m concerned. Ann Coulter is also a cop out. She and Limbaugh, O’Riley, Hannity,etc. should be supporting the formation of a third party. This is where they could actually do some good.

Posted by Bobby at 3:21 AM on March 5”

Wake up and smell the coffee Bobby. These people are nothing more than mouthpieces for the neoconservatives. Their only motivation is to do what they’re told to get their paycheck every week. Every one of them has cheerleaded the war on “terror” and co-opted it as a conservative issue to fool the bungling masses. What’s conservative about it? It stands to reason that people who really believe in conservatism would live their lives in a similar way. Hannity trashes Ron Paul at every opportunity. Take the blinders off and look at what’s right under your nose. I know it’s hard but when Republicans controlled everything our nation seemed to get even more liberal and it took three steps backwards. It took a while to figure out it’s because the politicians are only paying lip service to White voters and their concerns. I’ve had my awakening and there’s no going back to the neoconservative camp.

Posted by Anonymous at 6:53 PM on March 5


One, Two, Three Strikes and Steele’s OUT!

Actually, Steele’s got four strikes already… First, the racist “white bread” remark; then the big-headed “I’m the head of the Republican Party” nonsense; then agreeing with some fool’s ridiculous comment that the CPAC was “Nazi-like” and finally, insulting Rush! Of course, Steele had no choice but to grovel and apologize later; but as far as I’m concerned, the damage is done!

As for the Republican Party… They just don’t want to get it! They continue to ignore the silent white majority while trying ever so hard to cater to the non-white minorities, and we all know that these non-whites will never ever vote Republican! They will always go for the nanny party! I guess the Republican Party would rather shrivel up and die then represent White American… FOOLS!

Which now leaves us, still the majority, with absolutely NO representation! Wish we could start our own third party… Something like Chuck Baldwin and the Constitution Party!

Posted by Jackers at 6:59 PM on March 5


Goldwater and Reagan, if still alive, wouldn’t recognize today’s GOP. Why would they? The GOP has turned downright socialist in the last eight years.

Truely disgusted, I always LMAO when I read the stuff from Reagan worshippers. Who do you think did this to the country? Reagan had all the momentum on his side to stop immigration after Carter’s stupid mariel boatlift. He could have used the bully pulpit and gotten all immigration stopped. However, Reagan wanted NOTHING to do with stopping immigration or keeping illegals out.

http://www.otisgraham.com/otis_graham/about_otis_graham.html

Otis Graham has researched the whole mess when Reagan nixed any discussion of it in staff meetings. It was left to Congress to work on. Graham has written that besides the indifference, James Baker nixed the idea of a trigger on amnesty that would only have an amnesty once the border was secure.

The Republican party was too interested in what was good for Wall Street and corporate boardrooms. The meatpackers sent busses down to Mexico for illegals as strikebreakers.

http://www.citypaper.com/special/story.asp?id=6045

Do you think the unions didn’t tell the administration this was going on? Peter Brimlow of VDARE was on staff and was told by other staffers that illegal immigration was good because it undermined unions.

Juan Mann at VDARE has chronicled how impossible it is to deport even criminals under the law Ronnie signed.

Just like the economy, an extremely stupid, lazy and worthless person in the White house cannot destroy America overnight, but allow that stupidity to go on for 30 years and you have both a demographic and economic nightmare.

Posted by Mark in LA at 11:23 PM on March 5


Anonymous at 6:53PM on March5

“Wake up and smell the coffee Bobby………………….”

Excuse me, but I don’t get the point of your post. I expressed essentially the same ideas in my post that you did in yours.

Posted by Bobby at 1:09 AM on March 6


Agree with Jonathan 3/5. The MSM controlled DNC has successfully overcome a once white founded nation. It has done so by passing laws making whites subordinate to other races. It also included other things like sex and religion to divide US into parts for destruction. The success of such laws are evident. Adding insult to injury, DNC has successfully funded the chosen (payback voters) groups with every kind of taxpayer entitlement to overcome US heritage. Most groups representing the MSM controlled DNC depend upon US entitlements. If available it may reveal the GOP pays taxes to support mostly DNC party voters. Especially the newest usurpers of our land/money/culture/language – illegal immigrants.

Posted by Anonymous at 2:45 AM on March 6


I’d say the GOP abandoned its conservative base a long time ago.

That’s why I voted for the Constitution Party candidate in ‘04 and ‘08.

Posted by Alexandra at 10:18 AM on March 6


Tim in Indiana writes; “…Or is the Republican base, contrary to what this article implies, just as deluded as the leadership? I suspect the latter. Otherwise, matters wouldn’t have gotten this bad in the first place…”

Exactly! We live amongst dullards who believe what they’re told instead of their “lieing eyes”. How clueless is the general population that they can’t see the blatant propagandizing of the media. T.V. is so full of clean cut halfricans and bit-o-kins that are dumb whites think represent the typical full on black.

Let clueless whites live in these black neighborhoods of “equals” and the conservative party with be over flowing with converts.

Posted by Anonymous at 12:11 PM on March 6


“Wake up and smell the coffee Bobby………………….”

Excuse me, but I don’t get the point of your post. I expressed essentially the same ideas in my post that you did in yours.
Posted by Bobby

I agree with Bobby, as other posters above seem to have done, that he was sayng essentially the same thing. And I agree also with what he said.
===============

“I always LMAO when I read the stuff from Reagan worshippers. Who do you think did this to the country? Reagan had all the momentum on his side to stop immigration. He could have gotten all immigration stopped. However, Reagan wanted NOTHING to do with stopping immigration or keeping illegals out. Reagan nixed any discussion of it in staff meetings. The Republican party was too interested in what was good for Wall Street. The meatpackers sent buses down to Mexico for illegals as strikebreakers.”
Mark in LA.

And many thanks to Mark for being realistic and putting the Reagan years in their proper perspective — accompanied with solid documentation!

The present crisis did not come from any one administration, president, or party, but is the cumulative result of many years of indifference, greed, ethnic pandering, and gross mismanagement. Especially, it’s from putting politics above patriotism, and short-term benefits over long-term considerations.

Posted by ghw at 12:34 PM on March 6


Remember white people,

When the United States is gone, you have NOWHERE to go. Not like the illegal Mexicans and the Muslims in Europe. The nations they come from aren’t as charitable as we are. The other nations of the world are realists; they LAUGH at your misplaced kindness and generosity and openness.

The United States is your Alamo. You’d better get to defending it, because I hear someone or some thing right outside, pounding away at the door.

Posted by Jonathan at 2:26 PM on March 6


I’ve proposed many times a viable broadly-based third party as the only solution to the duopoly headlock we find ourselves in. How about a Productive Party? No more than minimal welfare for the “traditionally” unemployed with a promise of a competitive economy based on full employment for the willing. Forget race and ethnicity for the time being; it is too divisive and leaves out many who would rally to a cause that is forward-looking and realistic. Race and ethnicity, anyway, maybe don’t really belong in a political party except insofar as that party would pledge to honor the the right to associate privately with whom one wishes, with no obnoxious commentary ( a la Holder ) on the subject.
It seems to me the Republican Party is carrying a heavy historical load based on its enmeshment with Lincoln and the causes of his era; similarly the Democrats are burdened with FDR. Away with them both, I say. The weight of the ideological carapace they both carry around renders debate about what really matters today clumsy and confused. Our country faces such a profound jeopardy from foreign financial control that the secessionistic impulse is sure to grow.
It is not that I am not ethno-centric; like most people I prefer my own. It just seems that the best way to preserve one’s ethnic community is by ensuring the negative freedom of being left alone by the social engineers. There will always be those who, possibly for genetic reasons, are extremely endogamous and search out partners of other races. The huge mistake of politicizing this impulse, which is what Obama has done, leaves that whole movement open to a simple economic end-around.

Posted by mark at 3:07 PM on March 6


ghw, Jupiter et al.:

You’re so right. The first Presidential campaign ad by a candidate on a major party in Spanish was Reagan’s 1984 ad in several border states.

Posted by Question Diversity at 3:34 PM on March 6


“ghw, Jupiter et al.:

You’re so right. The first Presidential campaign ad by a candidate on a major party in Spanish was Reagan’s 1984 ad in several border states.

Posted by Question Diversity at 3:34 PM on March 6”

That is incorrect. The first televised Spanish language presidential campaign ad was broadcast for Kennedy in 1960.

Posted by Anonymous at 4:40 PM on March 6

Hispanics Wary of Future in GOP

Hispanics Wary of Future in GOP

More news stories on Non-White Pressure Groups

David R. Sands, Washington Times, March 3, 2009

Five years after former President George W. Bush attracted nearly half of the Hispanic vote in the 2004 presidential election, Hispanic Republicans are worrying that support for the party among Latinos is in a free fall.

The mood was distinctly downbeat at times at a recent Capitol Hill gathering sponsored by the Republican National Hispanic Assembly (RHNA) on the “Future of Hispanics in the GOP.” For some, the basic question was whether there was any future to discuss.

Leading Hispanic Republican strategists say the natural attraction the party should enjoy with churchgoing, socially conservative Latino voters is being overwhelmed by a single issue: the party’s hard-line stance on illegal immigration.

“We know that the party will not recover its majority until we get this right,” said RHNA Chairman Danny Vargas.

{snip}

Party leaders say they recognize the need to mend fences. According to exit polls, Democrats scored a net gain of 13 percent in the presidential election and 15 percent in House races between 2004 and 2008. Republican defections have been particularly severe in states where Hispanics make up at least 30 percent of the electorate, including Arizona, California, Texas and New Mexico.

President Bush received 44 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, compared with Sen. John Kerry’s 53 percent—a record showing for a Republican candidate. In 2008, Republican nominee Sen. John McCain received just 31 percent of the national Hispanic vote, compared to Mr. Obama’s 67 percent.

In 2004, Republicans held five of the nine congressional districts along the U.S.-Mexican border; in 2009, all nine seats are occupied by liberal Democrats.

{snip}

“We need messengers to really capture that region—young, Hispanic, black, a cross section,” he said. “We want to convey that the modern-day GOP looks like the conservative party that stands on principles. But we want to apply them to urban-suburban hip-hop settings.”

{snip}

Said Mr. McConnell, “In the last election, Hispanic voters turned out in far greater numbers for the Democrat candidates, and sadly, the party that was founded on the principle of racial equality attracted just 4 percent of the African-American vote in the last presidential election. These are not reasons to abandon the effort. They are reasons to work twice as hard.”

{snip}

The backlash among legal Hispanic voters to the party’s policies to date “has destroyed conservative prospects in the Southwest, weakened them in the West, and wiped them out in New England,” [Richard Nadler, president of Kansas-based conservative think tank Americas Majority foundation] said.

Former Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen told the Capitol Hill forum the immigration issue had to be handled in a “rational, thoughtful way,” but said the party would do better to focus on economic and social issues as a way to woo Hispanic voters. But he said the party as a whole must continue to insist on securing the country’s borders against new illegal immigrants before any discussion on how to deal with illegals already here.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on March 4, 2009)


Comments

Didn’t the Republican Party try the Hispandering strategy in 2008?

Bush gets 44 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, and this is said to be a great success. Last time I looked, 53 percent for your opponent compared to 44 percent to you is a defeat.

Posted by Question Diversity at 6:05 PM on March 4


Hispanics are obviously waging a race war against Native Born White Americans. Numbersusa.com opposes a high level immigration because a high level of immigration-numbersusa.com claims- is bad for hispanics-even though hispanics are enthusiastic about increasing hispanic immigration. Why does anyone give $$$$ to numbersusa.com?

Posted by Jupiter at 6:08 PM on March 4


You CANNOT out-promise the Democratic Party. You can only stand on principles if you want votes consistantly. That’s why putting a Black at the head of the GOP is transparent NONSENSE of the first order.

Posted by Anonymous at 6:19 PM on March 4


And so we continue to exit stage Left. Does this look like a rerun of Clinton-Bush? Yes, it does. Let me explain. After Clinton came to power, the Republicans spent eight years convincing us that ANYTHING was better than another Democrat. Even the feckless son of a man who inherited Ronald Reagan’s control of the presidency merely because he managed to hang on to some of the things that made Reagan popular. Thus, indirectly, Son of Bush came to be seen as Ronald II, although everyone who encountered his record in Texas tried to tell the country he was a simple/soft minded Wilsonian.

Now comes Obama. The same Republican drum beat we had during Clinton is already pounding out is message. ANYTHING is better than Obama. Even an open borders, pro amnesty minority Republican candidate in 2012 and/or 2016? Yes. And all those dying White people will be so happy to have a Caudillo and his narcotrafficking praetorian guard step in to save them. Will they not?

No White man will ever be president of the United States again, especially no traditionally conservative White man. Sounds like we need an alternative to the United States, doesn’t it?

Posted by Deporter at 6:21 PM on March 4


“Hispanics: GOP will not regain majority until it gets immigration right.”

Immigration?

You mean there are still people so dumb they’re trying to board a sinking ship?

Pray tell where they’ll be working.

And tell me also that there’s not going to be one giant fight over jobs and unjust race preferences in this country and Europe in the coming months.

And what good is amnesty if there’s no place to work and overpriced food and necessities?

These pitiful pro-mestizos are acting like it’s business as usual.

For them it will take a complete collapse before they understand that this isn’t the land of easy pickings any longer……and conditions are worsening.

The blacks will be calling for them to leave in the coming months.

Mark…my….words…..

Posted by ice at 6:47 PM on March 4


I used to feel more optimistic about assimilated Mexicans-Americans. I grew up around them and never noticed it. I recently looked at one of those schoolmates websites and was surprised to see so many Spanish names, Garcia, Rodriguez, Martinez, etc. I suppose that they were the sorts of families that could afford to live in a middle class neighborhood because they acted White, so I never saw them as different.
But things are different now. It’s as if every good Mexican has a bunch of marginal relatives that need to be here too. You can’t be friends with a Mexican if you don’t support unlimited immigration, because they’ll call you racist and turn their backs on you, I know from experience. Non-Spanish speaking, French culture-loving, American music-listening 3rd generation Americans, will still see my acceptance of my own dispossession as a litmus test of human decency. They seem to be unable to conceive that I should want my own culture to be preserved, even when they show, by the choices they make, that they prefer White culture too. I was astonished that they would place La Raza before country. These are not cholos, these people over the years pay tens of thousands of dollars to send their kids to private schools just to avoid the low class Mexicans. I have taught some of their children, I’ve known them for years, I trusted them enough to speak honestly, and they ran to tell one another that I was not a good gringo, but instead, a racist.
It saddens me, because I have loved many of the Hispanic kids I’ve taught, but it seems that when they have to make a choice, they’re Mexicans, not Americans. No American of Dutch ancestry is telling the politicians, Get right with the Netherlands or I’ll vote the other party. Nor does any American of Mexican ancestry say Get right with Mexico. These people are just not Americans.

Posted by Schoolteacher at 7:09 PM on March 4


“Former Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen told the Capitol Hill forum the immigration issue had to be handled in a ‘rational, thoughtful way,’ but said the party would do better to focus on economic and social issues as a way to woo Hispanic voters. But he said the party as a whole must continue to insist on securing the country’s borders against new illegal immigrants before any discussion on how to deal with illegals already here.”

Talk about chasing your tail and then biting it?

There is one way, and only one way, to deal with “securing the country’s borders” and in a “rational, thoughtful way,” Comrade Sen. Allen. That would be to reduce all illegal incursions through the force of arms, end of story.

What a joke this country has become, where we even have to gauge what the “backlash among legal Hispanic voters” was. As opposed to what, the impact of illegal “Hispanic voters?”

As always, God help us all!

Posted by John PM at 7:13 PM on March 4


Leading Hispanic Republican strategists say the natural attraction the party should enjoy with churchgoing, socially conservative Latino voters is being overwhelmed by a single issue: the party’s hard-line stance on illegal immigration.

Uh, duh…let’s see if there’s some message in here we can learn from all this. Hmmm, one issue trumps all with Hispanics. Gee, no, I can’t think of anything. Maybe we should call in Sherlock Holmes. In other words, no matter what issues the GOP appeals to Hispanics with, as long as they keep a hard-line stance on immigration, they lose thee Hispanic vote? What could this possibly MEAN???

If the conservatives are interested in conserving the population balance in the US, conserving our borders, conserving our natural resources, conserving the two-party system, etc. they won’t win over these “conservative” Hispanics? Well, obviously the GOP had better drop all this in order to appeal to those Hispanics. Yeah, that’s the answer.

No wonder they’re called the stupid party.

Posted by Tim in Indiana at 7:20 PM on March 4


When will the Republicans realize that most nonwhites will always vote for the Democrats because they offer more handouts?

Posted by Madison Grant at 7:53 PM on March 4


Non-whites will not vote for the Republicans as long as they are the party of white people. That is why the Republicans elected Steele but the change leaves white people with no reason to vote for the Republican Party that Steele has said he intends to recruit.
If the leaders of the Republicans do get the non-white votes then the whites have no reason to stay in the party because the new members have little in common interests with the white Republican base.
A new Party needs to be formed that absolutely demands that affirmative action is over and all illegal immigrants are deported with their non-citizen anchor babies. Amren.com recently noted that La Raza is aware that the interpretation that children of illegal immigrants is not the intent of the Amendment cited to claim citizenship and is a wrong interpretation but the cited article said nothing can be done about it. A new party can do something about many things and if the economy continues to get worse we may see violence and demonstrations in the US. Several prominent commentators and economists have already predicted a time of riots and breakup in the US within the next 2 years. What will be the trigger- I do not know but the anger is growing as more lose their jobs.

Posted by Oldman at 8:04 PM on March 4


churchgoing, socially conservative Latino voters

Oh, so that’s what explains the 48 percent illegitimacy rate.

Said Mr. McConnell, “In the last election…the party that was founded on the principle of racial equality attracted just 4 percent of the African-American vote

Memo to Mitch McConnell: they don’t want “equality.” They want your house, your job, and your money. If that’s not obvious from watching the last 30 years I don’t know what is.

The backlash among legal Hispanic voters to the party’s policies to date “has … wiped them out in New England,” Nadler said.

Have Judd Gregg, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins all been stripped of their party affiliation in the last few months? I wasn’t aware. Granted, they lost their last Republican in the House in ‘08 — Chris Shays — but he went down 100% because of his support for the war.

Finally — this was all tried before, in ‘06, and it failed disastrously. Does the name Ken Mehlman ring a bell? It was such as a disaster that apparently the solution is to try even harder. Keep hitting your head against that brick wall and it’s just bound to give way!

Posted by Dave at 9:45 PM on March 4


Bush getting 44% of the Hispanic vote has been debunked. It was more like 38%.

Posted by Joe at 10:27 PM on March 4


The feminists/women’s movement was invented by leftists to split the white vote. The feminist/womens movement was never aimed at black women or Latino women, in fact, they can’t stand white feminists. No, it was aimed at white women. The political shakers on the left successfully convinced white women they were victims and that the solution to their victimhood was to to join forces with the minority political structure. Most white women vote for democrats and many are supportive or at best indifferent to affirmative action.

The GOP should spend energy reuniting the white vote. Whites need to vote as a bloc; otherwise, the GOP will be left with the losing strategy of trying to out-pander the Democrats, which they will never be able to do.

Posted by Anonymous at 11:29 PM on March 4


“President Bush received 44 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004….”

That’s a lie.

Posted by Anonymous at 12:32 AM on March 5


bush/ clinton, obama/ clinton – all the same difference. two sides of the same New World Order coin. hilldog got obama inaugurated into the rothchild’s nwo meeting last year, and bingo, he’s the next president. when will people see this and stop getting wound up in the NWO’s agenda to split people based on income, values, etc. ? they are violating us daily and we’re split in half and quartered by race, etc. etc. etc./ and no one cares to lift one hand against any of them.

Posted by Anonymous at 1:53 AM on March 5


Deporter

Reagan worshipping has been a catastrophe for Native Born White Americans. WE are living with the consequences of Reagan’s 1986 amnesty:the anti-white Kenyan bigot Barack Obama. Who do you think imposed him on Native Born White America? Here is the answer:the hispanic aliens who were amnestied by Reagan and their children who just recently became of voting age. Also, Reagan’s Cold War empire require the ideology of the blessings of diversity and as a consequence …. more non-whites in the US military recieving m-16 training. One day,Native Born White Americans will be on the recieving end of this military trianing given to post-1965 non-whites. The Cold War has been a death sentence for Native Born White Americans.

Posted by Jupiter at 7:36 AM on March 5


Some pundits have said that the Republican party should become more liberal to attract more minorities. Nonsense! Never abandon core principals in order to gain votes.

Posted by sandstorm at 9:57 AM on March 5


Want to “get immigration right?” Here’s the ONLY answer: MASS ROUND-UPS, MASS DEPORTATION! No Amnesty. No right to appeal. Round ‘em up and shove ‘em across the border. A soldier urging a few illegals over with a loaded rifle makes it work.

Why in the name of hell, do Americans have to pander to 30 million CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS? This takes absurdity to a new low!

Posted by Fed Up at 10:01 AM on March 5


Let’s INVERT the issue regarding… IMMIGRATION

Let’s define what Hispanics need to do, for Americans to allow them to stay…

Clean up your collective act. Stop expecting American TAXPAYERS to provide you with FREE healthcare, welfare supplements and food stamps.

Learn OUR language, OUR customs. Don’t try to live here with the anything goes mentality you had back in Mexico. We don’t like trash flung around. We don’t enjoy the spectacle of public urination, even defecation. We don’t appreciate “extended families” sharing a single-family dwelling.

We also don’t appreciate thousands of DWI accidents… by UNINSURED Mexicans either. Nor do we appreciate the vast number of crimes some of these illegal aliens perpetrate after crossing the border. (Hint: HIDING the racial identity of the perps is not the answer. We are only too aware that Hispanics do some 45% of our crimes; Blacks another 45%.)

Try living like human beings… THEN let’s talk about amnesty and welcome you into OUR country.

Posted by Fed Up at 10:12 AM on March 5


By the way, even if the Republican party could attract a majority of asians,blacks,muslims and hispanics to the Republican party…why would this be good for Native Born White Americans? Obviously it would still be a demographic disaster for Native Born White Americans. Some of you here who claim that “Republican values” are anathema to post-1965 non-whites are conceding way to much to the race replacers in the Republican party. Concievably-and maybe..quite possible-there could be a post-1965 non-white version of the Republican party.

The Republican party is repellant. Recently, the head of the Republican party was the homosexual multimillionaire race replacement enthusiast Ken Mehlman. Today, the head of the Republican party is the anti-white black Male bigot Steele. The unoffcial head of the Republican party is the childless, fat chickenhawk Rush Limbaugh who during the Vietnam war era avoided miltary service with a doctors note claiming that Rush was physically unfit for miltary duty because Rush had ingrown hairs in a cetain part of his body. Conservative Evangelical Christians in South Carolina voted into high office the effeminate looking and speaking race replacement enthusiast Lindsay Grant over an authentic immigation reformer. The Republicans is looking more and more like a party of clowns,freaks and wierdos. Why would any normal White American want anyting to do with the Repulican party?

Posted by Jupiter at 10:47 AM on March 5


FED UPs post is an example of what I wrote about in my last post. Some people who post here just do not get it. White Nationalists are opposed to the idea that America is an idea nation:Republican variety or Democratic variety. WE oppose America as an idea nation because it will lead to Native Born White Americans being reduced an ever dwindling racial minority within the borders of America.

Unfotunatley, White Americans such as FED UP will happily vote for Bobby Jindal, race replacement enthusiast and son of LEGAL IMIGRANT hindus because he embodies Republican values such as the race replacement of Native Born White Americans and a war criminals foreign policy(goverment employment program for Southern White Males(military industrial complex(defense spending))).

Posted by Jupiter at 11:52 AM on March 5


Let’s say Bush DID get 44% of the hispanic vote. Hispanics are less than 10% of the voting population. So, that’s about 4% of the total vote. With all-out hispandering, maybe the Republicans could get to 2/3rds of the hispanic vote. That’s a big bump of what? Maybe 2.5%? Whoop-de-dooo!

PLUS, hispanics are concentrated in a few states. Some, like New York, California, New Jersey and Texas are big but not battleground states. Some, like Arizona, may be swing states but aren’t that big. Therefore, the hispanic vote doesn’t change as much as they want you to think.

Whites, on the other hand, are still about 75% of the voting population. So, if the Republicans lost 100% of the hispanic vote by cracking down on immigration, they’d lose at most 4%. If by doing so the GOP increased its share of the middle-class white vote by even 5% it would be a wash.

(I didn’t figure this out all by myself. credit goes to Steve Sailor.

Posted by Paul at 1:50 PM on March 5


How did Hispanics have anything to do with the GOP being wiped out in New England?

Posted by Joe at 7:33 PM on March 5


Schoolteacher’s rather poignant and well spoken comments underscore what happens when two countries with hugely disparate living standards share a common border which is not rigorously policed.

Mexicans have only done what earlier European immigrants would have done had they been able to. Fortunately for us, we were separated from Europe by 3000 miles of Atlantic ocean, making it relatively easy to regulate immigration to our liking. We could do the same with Mexico, albeit somewhat more expensively, were we to muster the political will to do so.

Posted by john at 2:23 AM on March 6


“We could do the same with Mexico, albeit somewhat more expensively, were we to muster the political will to do so.”
Posted by john
And we DID it! Up until recent decades, the border and immigration WERE enforced! This illegal situation is something relatively new…. and all because of our lax government and our greedy corporations. Add to that our out-of-control ethnic interest groups, vote-seeking politicians and soul-seeking clergymen, and you have the present mess we’re in.

Posted by voter at 2:12 PM on March 6


Hispanics: GOP will not regain majority until it gets immigration right.

That is very true.

Throw out of America all deportable Hispanics and their offspring!

Posted by A Reader at 2:17 PM on March 6


Let me get this straight, unless we agree to an immigration policy that will guarantee we go from a white country to a Hispanic country, Hispanics won’t vote for Republicans. This is like someone telling me they will only love me if I give them the gun that they will use to kill me,. Bush got at best 40% of the Hispanic vote. We need to ask out loud a very simple question. That is “What is the justification of having an immigration policy that will turn the USA from a majority white country to a majority Hispanic country”. Ask this to others and keep on asking and expose their racial hypocrisy.

Posted by William Witten at 7:20 PM on March 6

Issues Most Important to Hispanic Population

Issues Most Important to Hispanic Population

More news stories on Hispanic Immigrants

KARK-TV (Little Rock), March 2, 2009

What are the issues most important to Hispanics? Immigration, healthcare, education?

The answer might not be what you would think.

{snip}

Immigration ranked just 6th out of the top 7 concerns, behind national security and the environment, but ahead of energy policy.

Here’s why: unemployment in the Latino community is just shy of ten percent, compared to nearly seven percent for whites.

“Latino’s have paid a price, a higher price, than many other groups in terms of the consequences of the current economic crisis.”

With the housing downturn, many Hispanics who first flocked to the construction industry years ago … Have since lost their jobs.

“Education is an important issue for many Hispanics because large number of Hispanic families have children in public schools. In fact, about 20 percent of all students in public schools are Hispanic, which is higher than their share in the general population, which is at about 15 percent.”

As for health care, half of the nation’s Hispanics are uninsured, compared to roughly a quarter of whites and a third of African Americans.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on March 5, 2009)


Comments

Of course the legal Hispanics and Blacks are aware of the dangers of out-of-control immigration. For the most part, they’re the ones competing for those unskilled menial jobs.

As with most racial issues, it’s mostly the brainwashed ultra-liberal whites who champion these insane suicidal causes.

Posted by Anonymous at 5:44 AM on March 6


The mestizos will start worrying about immigration once we start deporting them. Until then why would they have no problem with the USA being invaded and colonized the Mexicans. What they are concerned with is goodies from the government. Any government will do; USA, Mexico, United Nations.

Posted by Flamethrower at 7:39 AM on March 6


Try deporting hispanic illegal aliens. Immigration will quickly jump to number one. Every time the amnesty issue comes up, hispanics speak with one voice:AMENESTY FOR OUR PEOPLE.

The mass deportaion of millions of illegal hispanic aliens will very likely trigger a race war within the borders of America. It will start with massive hispanic student protests on high school and college campuses. The hispanic youth population is highly radicalized. White Americans haven’t a clue just how racially radicalized they are.

Posted by Jupiter at 7:51 AM on March 6


I thought it was blacks (always blacks) who suffered the most because of the economic downturns.

Now Hispanics want to jump to the head of the line when it comes to playing the “victims” role.

Does anybody in their right mind think Hispanics are more interested in the environment than they are in immigration?

Posted by Nick at 3:37 PM on March 6

Border Violence Leads to Armor-Plated Vehicles

Border Violence Leads to Armor-Plated Vehicles

More news stories on Crime

Michelle Roberts, AP, March 4, 2009

The drug violence in Mexico has gotten so bad that booming numbers of Mexican and American professionals are having their cars fitted with armor plates, bulletproof glass and James Bond-style gadgets such as electrified door handles and push-button smokescreens.

Until recently, it was mostly movie stars, business moguls and politicians who took such precautions. But now, industry officials say, the customers include factory owners, doctors, newspaper publishers and others who have business on both sides of the border and fear killings, kidnappings and carjackings by drug dealers or people in their debt.

The customers “don’t have to be very big,” said Mark Burton, CEO of International Armoring Corp. of Ogden, Utah. “This becomes almost a necessity.”

{snip}

The modifications typically cost $80,000 to $100,000, and they are being done not just on limousines, but on Toyotas, Hondas, pickup trucks and SUVs.

{snip}

The war between Mexican authorities and the country’s cocaine, marijuana and methamphetamine cartels has killed 1,000 people so far this year. Last year, Juarez alone had more than 1,100 slayings. The cartels have killed police, military officers and civilians from Cancun to Tijuana as they battle for control of drug-trafficking corridors.

Customers get not only armor plating but tires that will run when flat and bulletproof glass, which bursts into a spider web pattern but won’t break, even when shot with an AR-15 assault rifle, a weapon of choice among drug smugglers.

Other customers buy a package that will turn a Ford F-150 pickup or SUV into something out of a Batman movie: A button releases a cloud of white smoke for escaping a pursuing car. If the assailant makes it through that, the driver can release spikes to flatten the pursuer’s tires. And finally, if the attacker makes it to the car, electrified door handles can give him a non-lethal jolt.

{snip}

Companies that install bulletproofing—or “blindaje” in Spanish—have been doing a booming business in Mexico, too. But some businessmen, like the Juarez factory owner, who lives in the United States, are convinced the armoring is better in the U.S.

{snip}

Texas Armoring, which started in the 1970s armoring limousines and other vehicles for world leaders, did about 100 cars last year and expects to complete 150 this year, Kimball [Trent Kimball, CEO of San Antonio-based Texas Armoring Corp.] said.

Original article

(Posted on March 5, 2009)


Comments

We have hundreds of thousands of troops overseas and none on our border.

Like almost all problems in our country, it has its first cause in government policy. The drug war prevents no one from obtaining drugs. It is a price support system for gangsters and a jobs program for law enforcement. The drugs themselves would be worth pennies if legal.

Let the illegals in this country get high legally. They’ll be easier to find, collect, and deport.

Posted by Flamethrower at 8:21 PM on March 5


The phony drug war, the war for oil, and foreign nation building
are grouped in to one road and that road stems from gangster
syndicates in Washington.

Posted by AmericanThunder at 11:47 PM on March 5


Yeah, I agree with above, spend too much money on that kind of thing. I’d like to see a Republican party that truly stands for personal freedoms.

Posted by Tex at 2:08 AM on March 6


Maybe if the stupid Mexican officials had a “shoot on sight” order authorizing its military and police to literally shoot armed men on sight, the body count of the bad guys would rise, and the crime rate would fall. I understand it is illegal to own or carry weapons in Mexico, so any armed man is certainly not going to be a law-abiding citizen.

As an American, I cheer every time I read in our news, of another criminal killed by a police officer. For saving taxpayers the cost of a trial and subsequent imprisonment. For the fact one less criminal is out there, plying his trade.

Posted by Fed Up at 7:41 AM on March 6


How about just legalizing the stuff (drugs) already? It would stop funding the criminal infrastructure inside and outside this country. It would allow for some semblance of control and regulation of currently illicit substances that are killing people who want to use them with HIV, uncontrolled drug quality and purity.

I think it’s time to stop this “war on drugs”. It’s not stopping people from using as evidence by dropping prices for drugs and the ever present consistent number of abusers.

We’re going into severe economic times. The last thing I want to see are drug rings coming out as government resources are withdrawn, armed to the teeth with military grade weapons bought by the drug trade. It’s time to call at least a truce if not a capitulation to people who are going to abuse drugs legal or not.
I’d rather deal with addicts than these criminal enterprises which in Mexico and Columbias case morph into paramilitary interests fully funded by drugs and capable of challenging the state.

Posted by openyoureyes at 7:40 PM on March 6

Chinese Calgarians Outraged at Call to Limit Ethnic Malls

Chinese Calgarians Outraged at Call to Limit Ethnic Malls

More news stories on Canada

Joel Kom, Calgary Herald, March 6, 2009

Members of Calgary’s Chinese community are enraged after a consultant’s report commissioned by the city called for Calgary to avoid the development of “Asian” malls that serve only one ethnic group.

The report, meanwhile, raises the debate over whether cities should be encouraging ethnic enclaves to pop up or whether those enclaves only isolate certain communities from the larger population.

Chinese residents are angry at being singled out by the consulting company—whose president is Chinese—in a report on how the city should deal with future commercial and retail development.

Calgary should “avoid the development of ‘Asian’ malls that cater only to a specific ethnic group,” says the report, posted on the city’s website.

“An effort must be made to avoid ‘exclusive’ cultural-specific retail developments, as they lead to marginalized ethnic enclaves which can diminish overall community cohesiveness.”

Wayne Chiu, chief executive of Trico Homes who immigrated to Calgary from Hong Kong in 1982, said the report angered him.

“They’ve kind of singled out the Asian community,” he said. “I find it kind of offensive.

“If Asian was replaced with ‘Jewish’ or ‘Italian,’ other people would be offended.”

Chiu also took exception to the suggestion ethnic centres should be discouraged, saying they act as linchpins for minority communities while also exposing others to different cultures.

Ald. John Mar, a Chinese-Canadian and the only minority member of council, was also peeved.

“That’s not kosher,” he said. “I take umbrage to this because we want to encourage ethnic diversity. How does it marginalize these communities? I think it could actually have the opposite effect.”

Ald. Ric McIver said he agreed with Chiu and Mar’s assessment.

“They’re offended, and I think they’re right to be offended,” he said. “This needs to be corrected in a report that we paid for.”

Tom Leung, president of Global Retail Strategies, which wrote the report, said the suggestions were emphasizing that Calgary should avoid putting ethnocentric developments in new communities for fear of creating “ethnic islands.”

“I understand why certain people are concerned about it,” he said. “I’m a very strong supporter of the Asian community. But we also have to take a look at the commercial realities.”

Leung said Calgary’s demographics don’t justify ethnic-oriented development in new areas. He cited cities such as Burnaby and Richmond, B.C., where failed ethnic developments led to shuttered buildings and “black holes.”

He cited T&T Supermarket, an Asian grocery store with two local outlets, as a successful business because it opens itself to the wider community.

Byron Miller, a geography and urban studies professor at the University of Calgary, said it’s often up to ethnic communities themselves—not the city—as to whether they isolate themselves.

“Ethnic communities can be very beneficial in some cases, and in other cases they become what we call ghettos,” he said.

Pat Gordon, manager of the sustainable city program, said the city wouldn’t heed the “Asian mall” suggestion, adding it wasn’t even within the city’s mandate to look at ethnicity. The report, she added, wasn’t saying avoid ethnic-centred developments in all cases.

“He’s not saying don’t do it,” she said. “He’s saying do it right.”

Original article

Email Joel Kom at jkom@theherald.canwest.com.

(Posted on March 6, 2009)


Comments

Members of Calgary’s Chinese community are enraged after a consultant’s report commissioned by the city called for Calgary to avoid the development of “Asian” malls that serve only one ethnic group.

Yeah, that’s right! “Diversity” is for whites, not us!

The report, meanwhile, raises the debate over whether cities should be encouraging ethnic enclaves to pop up or whether those enclaves only isolate certain communities from the larger population.

Judging from the numerous “race and culture” ‘sociology’ books in my university library, I’ve discovered that – according to these (almost-entirely white) authors, whites are always wrong in whether non-whites “assimilate” or not:

Want Ethnicity X to retain it’s own race and culture outside White America’s? That’s racist and exclusionary!
Want Ethnicity X to merge it’s own race and culture into White America’s? That’s racist and assimilative!

Whites can’t win, people.

“An effort must be made to avoid ‘exclusive’ cultural-specific retail developments, as they lead to marginalized ethnic enclaves which can diminish overall community cohesiveness.”

That’s one of the nasty side-effects of “multi-culturalism”, as not every “culture” or “race” is as openly suicidal as Western white culture and races are.

“They’ve kind of singled out the Asian community,” he said. “I find it kind of offensive.

Well, from what I’ve seen the “Asian community” are probably the most clannish out of all non-white communities.

“If Asian was replaced with ‘Jewish’ or ‘Italian,’ other people would be offended.”

Be that as it may, the Italians would probably be harangued for “racism” (Jews 50/50)

Just goes to show that blacks and “Hispanics” don’t have a monopoly on racial hypocrisy…

Posted by Obscuratus at 6:12 PM on March 6


In Ottawa, the capital city of Canada, a white man was the driving force behind hanging China-town banners all over the old Italian district.

Now that the banners are up, the Chinese are pleased at their new ghetto, and will probably fight to keep the banners in place.

Posted by Anonymous at 6:41 PM on March 6


If they need examples, simply come to Metro Vancouver and see if ehtnic malls cause ethnic enclaves. There’s no use arguing over this if there are already examples. Metro Vancouver has the Yaohan Mall, Aberdeen Mall, Crystal Mall, and Tinseltown as examples of Chinese ethnic malls. There are also many smaller strip malls that cater exclusively to Chinese, Koreans and Vietnamese – and yes, they are ethnic enclaves. I have visited these malls extensively, and I am almost always the “only” Canadian within sight. These malls usually situate within already established communities, so this brings about more demographic shifts, which follows that Canadians move out as Chinese or others move in. It’s rather funny, but it needs pointing out that Chinese people want to live amongst other Chinese people. Speak Chinese. Shop at Chinese stores. Do business with Chinese car salesmen, and enroll their children into schools that are largely Chinese. The results, in Metro Vancouver, are large majority swaths of the city now being, for all intents and purposes, Chinese. The stores are entirely Chinese and in some schools they are exclusively Chinese. The Chinese like it this way. Now, if a Canadian was to express the same inclination for living amonst others like himself, speaking English and showing a desire for his children to be able to play with other Canadian children – why that would be intolerable. And that tells you the kind of people we are dealing with. Some people are just natural cowards and capitulaters, and would sell their grandmother’s house to the first ethnic who bid on it just so he could stick his arms under his armpits and declare his liberality. If it weren’t so grotesque, it would be funny.

Posted by John of Vancouver at 7:08 PM on March 6


Wayne Chiu: “If Asian was replaced with ‘Jewish’ or ‘Italian,’ other people would be offended.”

But the idea of replacing Canadians with Chinese immigrants is not offensive to Wayne Chiu. It sounds perfectly natural to him.

Since the Canadian government insists on having Chinese immigrants, and since the Chinese would rather live by themselves, the best solution is to sell the Western half of Canada to China and let the Eastern half of the country to Canadians who would like to remain Canadian.

Posted by Limpet at 7:46 PM on March 6