My Answer to a Black man on how it will all end. It’s Starting to Smell Like Violence, I Am Sorry To Say.

My Answer to a Black man on how it will all end.

I don’t think blacks or browns want to live with equality, you want to dominate, that’s exactly what your people do in every single city, state and nation that you take from the white race. you bring crime, you bring your brand of “we hate whitey,” you bring ignorance, and eventually economic ruin. We are now awakening from the politically correct drug your 1960’s commi’s injected into our nation, and my question is now not will you leave my people alone and go back to Africa or Latin America as you should, but how much ammo you have? None of this will end peacefully, it never has, and never will, history though is on our side.

European Americans: Yes, We Can!
Audio; Posted on: 2009-07-26 14:00:14 [ Print / Instant Flyer |
To rally European Americans from all walks of life around a common purpose

by Frank Roman

Audio Version

When the hard core black socialist Barack Barry Sotero Hussein Obama was running for president he coined the phrase “yes we can.” Three innocuous words which seemed to incorporate a kind of static energy, a phrase that became a battle cry from the George Bush haters to the Che Guevara wannabes. However, no one could actually articulate what he meant by “yes we can” because he never laid out a rational diagram as to what he meant. Instead they relied on high rhetoric which produced in them fantasy land good times, hypnotized by a resounding voice in a large setting with a good sound system (and a teleprompter).

Consequently, in the minds of many white dupes it means they can now assuage the feelings of white guilt they had long ago accepted through manufactured consent by casting an Obama vote. Equally, in the minds of many blacks it was get back time for whitey, simple as that. And the insolent knuckleheads I know you see everyday driving around with Obama/Biden bumper stickers on their vehicles don’t have a clue as to the long term damage the community activist in chief is actually doing to our nation up there in Washington DC. All they know is that a so-called conservative, George Bush, is finally out of office and they have proudly put a “progressive” (marginal) black guy in the White House who promises everyone little to no responsibility for their actions. That’s it. Other than recalling how good he made them feel with yes we can, anything else is beyond their comprehension. When we boil away all the analysis that’s how it is hands down. Yes, they can and they did.

What Does The Establishment Have to Hide?
Report; Posted on: 2009-07-28 15:52:18 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
In a puzzling editorial in Friday’s edition, the Washington Post blasted the Federal Reserve Transparency Act as “an unserious answer to a serious question.” The Post, which tends to be predictably liberal and quite bland in its editorial pronouncements, used unusually harsh language, calling the bill “wrongheaded in the extreme.” The Post fears the legislation “would destroy financial markets’ faith in the Fed and, by extension, the value of the U.S. dollar, just as surely as a political ‘audit’ of the Supreme Court’s deliberations would undercut public faith in the justice system.”

That’s rather like saying Postal Service letter carriers should drive around in tanks, because the Army does and they both consist of uniformed government employees. The Fed and the Supreme Court both have big marble buildings in downtown Washington, but that’s about all they have in common.

The bill, H.R. 1207 in the House and, under the name the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, S. 604 in the Senate, would simply amend Title 31 of the U.S. Code to remove restrictions on how the Government Accountability Office can audit the Fed. The GAO would be able to examine the Fed’s discount window operations, funding facilities, open market operations, and agreements with foreign banks and governments, and would be required to tell Congress what it discovers by the end of 2010.
That’s it. It would not shut down the Fed, or fire the Fed’s Board of Governors, or overrule the Fed’s decisions. The current legislation would just let us know what is going on in that big marble building.
Strangely, this is what has the Post all in a dither. While the newspaper has rightly called for transparency and open government on many other matters, it believes the Fed should be exempt. Within the same editorial, the Post says the Fed has recently “expanded its role in the U.S. economy to an unprecedented extent,” and that current law provides “no clear mechanism to hold the Fed accountable.” The Post’s editorial board seems to see no contradiction in lamenting the lack of accountability while simultaneously trashing a basic attempt to merely gain information about possible misdoings.
A dollar today is worth less than one-twentieth what it was worth on the day the Federal Reserve was created 96 years ago. Yet over all that time, the unelected Fed has never had to face the full scrutiny of our elected representatives that other powerful agencies must. Even our intelligence agencies must report to Congress — but not the Fed, which has helped rack up an $11 trillion national debt, and an additional $13 trillion in dubious loans and bailouts.
The Fed will not say where that money is going. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has refused to tell Congress, and why should he? There is no means to compel him, and no way to find out what he’s been doing. The Federal Reserve Transparency Act would change that.
As Rep. Ron Paul said in introducing the bill in February, “Since its inception, the Federal Reserve has always operated in the shadows, without sufficient scrutiny or oversight of its operations. While the conventional excuse is that this is intended to reduce the Fed’s susceptibility to political pressures, the reality is that the Fed acts as a foil for the government. Whenever you question the Fed about the strength of the dollar, they will refer you to the Treasury, and vice versa. The Federal Reserve has, on the one hand, many of the privileges of government agencies, while retaining benefits of private organizations, such as being insulated from Freedom of Information Act requests.”
Thankfully — and somewhat surprisingly — a majority of the House is tired of this century-long status quo. The Federal Reserve Transparency Act has 276 cosponsors — 177 Republicans and 99 Democrats. So far in the Senate, the Federal Reserve Sunshine Act, introduced by independent Sen. Bernard Sanders in March, has 17 cosponsors. While 14 are Republicans, including 2008 presidential nominee John McCain, two of the three Democrats, Russell Feingold and Tom Harkin, are along with Sanders among the most liberal members of the upper chamber.
The Post seems to think a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. These members of Congress know that a little sunshine is a powerful thing. This legislation is a first step toward reclaiming America’s economic freedom.
The European Elections and Euro-Nationalism
Report; Posted on: 2009-07-27 19:29:22 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
Not willing to surrender a hard earned sovereignty to Brussels, multiculturalism or global capitalism.

Nationalism has been slowly but steadily gaining ground in Europe. Euro-nationalism is based on an opposition to the European Union political project, multiculturalism, mass immigration, globalisation and libertarian laissez-faire policies. Chiefly it builds on the growing alienation that the liberalised modern life has brought; the collapse of local communities, the destruction of traditions, unemployment, the attack on our Christian faith, culturally and spiritually, and the inadequacy of materialism and consumerism to fill the holes in ours lives.

People are fed up. The arrogance of the European establishment can be seen in the failure of many countries to give referendums on the Lisborn Treaty aka. the European Constitution as well as the fact they ignored the Irish and Netherlands ‘No.’ Instead they have called for another referendum to get the answer they wanted, ‘Yes.’

It is clear that the Christian Europe of nations does not want to become a globalised, multicultural Europe under a distant liberal political elite. Additionally the recession and banking crisis has exposed the greed and moral collapse in our societies with the mindless spending of money we don’t have on goods that are not needed coming back to haunt us, whilst the bankers are bailed out by massive government subsidies, subsidies that should have gone into rejuvenating local communities and small businesses.

Today in European politics a mixture of liberal and culturally Marxist (stemming from the Frankfurt school) ideas dominate our institutions, government and establishment and through these the meaningless but almost fascistically dominant abstract ideas of ‘equality’, ‘diversity’, ‘racism’, ‘freedom’ have become the tenants of our new religion that would have us create a heaven here on earth. To many people the cracks in these utopian ideas are becoming  more visible as the real ’stuff’ of societies is being abandoned; traditions, ethnicity, the family, spirituality, community, history and experience.  Not all have given up on the concept of the nation-state, the concept in which our political traditions, our historical realities, our morals lie; the organic community forged by history, Burke’s contract between the living and the dead.


Why Anti-Racism Is Anti-Civilization
Race; Posted on: 2009-07-27 17:10:31 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
This is remarkable and reveals 1) the depth of harm done by liberal society to ours, 2) how the significance of political theory gives way to race and ethnicity…, and 3) the intractable nature of this mindset.

Yesterday I
began watching Craig Bodeker’s DVD, A Conversation about Race (previously discussed here), but had to stop half way through due to technical problems. I had never heard of Bodeker before the DVD came out. It is exceptional, and exactly what’s needed. It takes us into the heart of the contemporary liberal psychology like nothing I’ve seen.

The moment that most strikes me so far is when a young, pretty white woman is asked to give an example of the racism that according to her is everywhere in our society.

She says that sometimes when she is around black people who are being loud, she thinks to herself that black people are loud. But then she realizes that her objection to loudness is just a part of the “white culture,” the white racist culture in which she has grown up and which she must battle against.

When she said this, I felt I was hearing something new, or at least understanding something familiar in a new light. It is of course a staple of modern liberalism that we must overcome our “stereotypes” about black people and other minorities. For example, if we think that blacks are generally less intelligent or more disorderly or more loud, those are racist “stereotypes” that we must identify and root out of our mind. But what this young woman was saying went beyond that. She was saying that the objection to loudness is itself a racist idea that she needs to root out of her mind. Her underlying reasoning goes like this: because she objects to loudness, and because blacks tend to be loud, the dislike of loudness is a racist feeling and must be eliminated. Which further means that any common standard of white people, any normal criterion of goodness or excellence in our society in which blacks on average happen to be deficient, is by that very fact racist and to be spurned.


It’s Starting to Smell Like Violence, I Am Sorry To Say.
News/Comment; Posted on: 2009-07-26 19:28:52 [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
Will there be open political war on white males?

I was reading the comments to this article on Salon:

It’s entitled “My GOP: Too old, too white to win.” I didn’t even read the article. It’s familiar advice to the GOP that they have to “reach out” to minorities if they expect to win.

But the comments (which are called “letters” at Salon) are amazing, an incredible amount of pure hatred directed toward white males. There is triumphalism in it: White males are outnumbered! They are on the way out! And there’s nothing they can do about it! Also frequently expressed in these comments is the notion that white males are the cause of all the world’s problems.

It’s starting to smell like violence, I am sorry to say. Depending on how the U.S. economy unravels, violence could be coming quite soon to a neighborhood near you.

Here are examples of the anti-white comments at Salon following the article “My GOP: Too old, too white to win,” which I told you about in my previous comment:

The section of North America we call the United States never should have been a land of powerful white Christian males. The land was taken; Plymouth Rock landed on the non-Elect. May the City on a Hill turn something other than lily white. The modern-day GOP represents the entrenched powers who have used political clout and, from time to time, physical violence, to rob dignity and extract profit from the masses. -schenka


“The Base” is dedicated to keeping hippies, sluts, spics, homos, gooks, ragheads, and blacks (I’ll leave out the real word) in their place. Good luck with finding enough people to vote against their own interest to side with the brownshirts. I hope this helps.–anon anon


“he would have won the popular vote before a single non-white vote was cast.” Because of course in the good ole days, whites voted first. Right? Interesting what your use of language reveals about your subconscious, you f*cking stupid racist Republican.–SB


What a transparent attempt… …to respin the class white male persecution complex. It’s not the fault of your policies or ideology! The tides of demography have run against you! There is absolutely no, do you hear me, no need to examine what you advocate as a party and how you’ve chosen to lead this country! Just figure out how to trick those brown skinned people onto your side!–StephenAshley


I believe that following a fullscale federal investigation of high crimes committed in office the entire assets of the GOP and its coorporate partners should following prosecution be seized and reimbursed to the US Treasury and a constitutional convention convened to reaffirm and ammend our founding documents to prevent any form of government secrecy or collusion with any business interest or religious institution what so ever in the future. You are not the loosers you are the winners and for the protection of society most of you should be exiled from the US and fobidden to return.–grmorrison


Soon we’ll be able to round up all the white eyes and herd them into camps for extermination.–NP NP


Simple as addition and subtraction The article covers the “too white” part. Here’s the “too old” part. Every year young, open-minded 17-year-olds turn 18, and every year, old, racist Republicans turn over in their graves.–IBelieveInSanta


core values? Just what are the GOP’s core principles. I think I know what they are. Xenophobia, homophobia, and hatred of women! Get off that BS and you may survive as a party, otherwise go away. We are tired of your over moralizing and your walking in lockstep with racist fools.–teresa


Anyone other than rich white men would be foolish indeed to vote for any Republican. The Democrats are no dreamboats either, not by a long shot, but the Republicans are murderous greedy lunatics. They must be driven into sobbing defeat and never allowed to run the country again.–No-Doz


As the monopoly on power enjoyed by Caucasian-Christian males over the last several centuries of Western Civilization continues to fade, it’s inevitable that many of those who benefited from the stacked deck will not easily give up “the good old days” when their rule was unquestioned and they could dole out crumbs to the “inferior” races and “weaker” sex as they wished. -bpai99


I see an America where Liberals and Republicans Hack each other to bits with machetes a-la Rwanda. And I am cheering.–NP NP


Yes “demographics” are against the Republicans, but far worse, and what will cause the current Limbaugh Corporatist Republican Party to become the modern Whig Party, is their anti-science “delusions”, phony Christian “values”, their belief in endless war & EMPIRE, their belief in gut decisions over rational, intelligent decision making, their “complete” ownership by the CORPORATIONS, their deep rooted ancestry & connection to the old Confederacy of the Civil War South, their blind suicidal jihad that worships GREED & the Supremacy of the Wealthy, where every problem can be solved by their holy mantra of tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts… especially when those tax cuts go almost exclusively to their CORPORATE OWNERS & their fellow brethren, the VERY RICH! When Rush Limbaugh THE symbol of GREED & Piggish Excess is your leading spokesman, then only the “true believers” & “cult fanatics” remain to drink the deadly Kool-Aid leading to the Republicans ultimate & well deserved EXTINCTION! Demographics is “the least” of the Republicans problems. May the Republican Party & their OUTMODED & DESTRUCTIVE IDEAS–rest in peace & forever be banished from the EARTH–good riddance!–exoevolution


F*ck The GOP I’m a 39 year old white male independent voter and I absolutely DESPISE the GOP and everything it stands for. I hate Republicans like cancer and can’t wait to see their sick, insane party die the death that it deserves. Not that I think the Dems are all that great–they sure do manage to f*ck up alot–but Republicans are downright EVIL. Their failed ideology and cruel, inhumane policies have been dragging us down for years. F*ck ANYBODY who wants to drown our government in a bathtub–I happen to LOVE my country and its government, so F*CK YOU, GOP! I can’t wait to see these Republican deadender dumbf*cks dwindle into irrelevance. Maybe if they had been a little nicer and a little more decent as human beings when they were in power, the rest of us wouldn’t hate them now. Please die off soon, motherf*ckers–nobody wants to hear your shit anymore!–Giant Bastard


I wish I wasn’t an atheist so I could pray to God everyday that “conservatives” become politically extinct or self-secluded into little harmless enclaves like the Amish and Mennonites and let the rest of us get on with attempting to create a new modern world that works for everyone.–rrheard


I Have A Solution In A Bottle For Republicans It’s called rat poison. Drink up, you motherf*cking Republican rats. The sooner you dumbf*cks all die off, the sooner we can fix your goddamn messes. A**holes!–Giant Bastard


We learned what black voters already knew: that when Republicans choose to demagogue race, white voters react like a lynch mob. It’s not pretty, and we don’t need to encourage it. I’m even disappointed that only 60% of Latinos or so vote Democratic. I’d like to see a 90% supermajority like in the black community. The point is, this party has done a lot of damage to racial and group relationships and it needs to pay or keep paying for it. Obama represents the future, McCain the past.–G.A. Reyes


To Quote Wyatt Earp in TOMBSTONE, You Righttard Traitors (and that is ALL of you!): “You called down the thunder? Well, Now You Got It!” You couldn’t play wedge-issue, hate-filled, divisive politics forever and expect to keep winning–not when hate-filled White Americans are increasing a dying-out minority voting bloc, you can’t. So me–as a NON-Righttard White Male? I just look at what’s happening to you all with a DEEP sense of the Balance of the Universe correcting itself…all over your fat, treasonous, bloated, hate-filled, puffed-up worthless bodies…. Selah.–drdarkeny


Dopey Republicans Are all Republicans this stupid? That article is ridiculous. Just another whiney WASP male bellyaching that he can’t have slaves anymore. If there’s anything wrong with the USA today, it is ENTIRELY the fault of the white male. This is what you wanted–a president like Dough Boy Bush and his disgusting sidekick Cheney. It’s bad enough to have to constantly see dirtbag Liz Cheney (a nobody if I’ve ever seen one) vomitting her balogna all over the airwaves. Why don’t you creepy Republicans crawl into the hole that you alone dug for yourselves? I’d be more than happy to cover the hole and be done with you altogether. GO SARA 2012! Another dingdong Republican product that we can laugh at. Take Boehner with you–his pasty white deer-in-the-headlights look is getting old.–ItWasAFumble


Thanks, Sherlock Given the title alone, I’m going to go ahead and file this one under “Duh”. Oh, and the fact that Republicans are spiritual patsies, willfully ignorant, homophobic, xenophobic, bigoted racists might want to be a consideration whilst they are pondering their navels.–Letterer98

Source VFR

More stuff from:

#113. Waiting Until Graduation to Start Stripping

High school in the United States is an exciting time for members of every race. Football games, the first parties with alcohol and prom season all leave lasting memories and impressions that will last a lifetime.

John Hughes, the incredible director of 1980s movies, chronicled life for white people in high school in many of his films, from The Breakfast Club to Sixteen Candles. However, his talents and artistic mind would be incapable of creating the video and story you are about learn about, once again coming to you live from Clayton County, Georgia.
The county that is quickly becoming the blueprint for all other majority Black, government controlled by Black people for the benefit of only Black people, Post-Obama America, is also the home to yet another inclusion in Stuff Black People Don’t Like: waiting until graduation to start stripping.
Jonesboro High School, that crown jewel of Georgia educational system – and one of the schools of the only county in the last 40 years to lose its accreditation – is roughly 65 percent Black and 42 percent of its students are eligible for free lunches. It boasts a graduation of 64 percent.
In 2008, the Jonesboro High School dance team made national news when a video of their halftime performance made it on Youtube and reminded some that the Gold Club might have shut down in Atlanta, but it had found permanent residence in the Jonesboro High Basketball Arena:
A provocative dance performed at a basketball game has forced Jonesboro High School to shut down the dance team for the rest of the season…From the beginning, some parents say they noticed the uniform — the short shorts, the tight shirts, the thigh-high socks — and then, the moves.
The girls pulled six boys from the bleachers — who sat back and watch from orange chairs, while the dancers bounced, shook and squatted around them.Trailed by parent complaints, the eight-member dance team was suspended — banned from practicing and performing for the rest of the season.
Their dance advisor was removed from the team.“I told my husband they look like the future hookers of America,” said one parent, Joanne Holt. “It’s terrible! And it’s the teachers that’s teaching ‘em!”

Black people gyrating to music and dancing provocatively is nothing new, as any rap video will display misogynistic behavior toward females. High school students doing this, though, is a step in a direction that will provide a new generation of voracious advocates of the practice of “Making it Rain“.

Stuff Black People Don’t Like will include waiting until graduation to start stripping, for rap videos glorify the debasement of women and thus, the trickle-down theory of the pervision of morality has affected even the fine citizens of Clayton County, the county that epitomizes the coming Black rule in America.
Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 7:51 AM 9 comments

Thursday, July 23, 2009

#602. The Morning After ‘Making It Rain’

All people throughout history have secretly desired the ability to control the weather. Farmers who saw their crop ruined due to droughts; high school football players who dreaded the 100 degree weather during two-a-days in the summer; and George W. Bush, just days before Katrina hit New Orleans, all wished the ability to manipulate the weather.

However, only Black people have mastered the idea of controlling precipitation and this amazing skill is known as “Making it Rain”:

“When you’re in da club with a stack (of money), and you throw the money up in the air at the strippers. The effect is that it seems to be raining money.”

Black people, particularly Black athletes, are highly adroit at channeling the weather Gods and creating a monetary monsoon at their command when visiting strip clubs.
Adam “Pacman” Jones, a prime example of the modern Black athlete, was involved in one particular magical evening, when he was able to conjure up a financial flood that reminded some people at the strip club of the old saying, “Apres-je, le deluge”:
“…what happened inside a Las Vegas strip club on Feb. 19, 2007, when Adam “Pacman” Jones showered scantily clad dancers with money. Just minutes after “making it rain,” Jones was involved in a fight inside the club. A short time later, three people were shot outside the club.
Shortly after 2 a.m. on Feb. 19, Jones and an entourage of about seven people — a group that included his stylist; his business manager, Chris Horvath; and Robert Reid, Jones’ massive bodyguard for the evening — arrived at the Minxx Gentlemen’s Club & Lounge…
Jones told police he arrived at the club with “close to $100,000.” He took $40,000 out of his Louis Vuitton bag and exchanged it for several stacks of $1 bills, which he put in a black trash bag, according to his statement. So much money was thrown onto the main stage that dancers, after their sets, started filling buckets with the loose bills covering the stage.”
Adam “Pacman” Jones uncanny ability to “make it rain” was upstaged by the exploits of fellow NFL player Vince Young, who also has the God-like ability to perform feats of down-pour of dollars at a moments whim:

“The last time a member of the Tennessee Titans decided to “make it rain” while hanging out at an event with Nelly — people got shot and lives were ruined. But Vince Young isn’t one to learn from other people’s mistakes…While onstage with the rapper during a performance in Houston last week, Vince rolled out a wad of cash and started showering the crowd with dollar bills. But unlike the incident with his former teammate Pacman Jones, everyone emerged unharmed this time.”

“Making It Rain” is a popular rap song, that contains these wonderful lyrics that allow the world to see how Black people can conjure up the ability to perform daring feats of weather manipulation:

“Oww Scottie lets make it rain on these niggas…

I’m in this bitch with the terror got a handful of stacks Better grab an umbrella

I make it rain, (I make it rain)

I make it rain on them hoes make it rain,(I make It rain)

I make it rain on them hoes I make it rain,(I make it rain)

I make it rain on them hoes I make it rain(I make it rain)

I make it rain on them hoes”

Black people – particulary Black athletes and rappers – can “make it rain” with an authority unlike any Indian chieftan performing the most elaborate rain dance. However, the idea of “making it rain” does have horrible ramifications, as the celebratory evening can leave devastating memories in the morning after, not to mention the financial lunacy of unloading massive amounts of cash with a low return on investment proposition.

The morning after “Making it Rain” can be a traumatic experience for Black people, as Pacman Jones found out:

“Police seized $81,020 in cash belonging to Tennessee Titans cornerback Adam “Pacman” Jones, money they said sparked a melee and a triple shooting at a strip club over the weekend, court documents show

Jones was showering more than 40 strippers onstage at Minxx Gentlemen’s Club & Lounge early Monday with the cash “intended as a visual effect,” according to a search warrant. But a scuffle broke out when the Houston promoter who hired the strippers told them to pick the money up.”

Jones was suspended from the NFL for one year after this incident, and Vince Young has never recovered from his bout with “Making it Rain”, nearly committing suicide and losing his starting job to a white quarterback.

Stuff Black People Don’t Like includes the morning after “Making it Rain” for the ability to create spontaneous weather patterns yielding wads of cash for strippers, strips away the judgement skills of the person performing the feat. Yet, this is one of the few instances when Black people do leave a solid tip, however the ramifications the morning after are to great to warrant “Making it Rain”.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 2:39 PM 0 comments

#112. The Reality of Clayton County

Clayton County, a thriving majority Black suburb of Atlanta, Georgia, has already been covered here at Stuff Black People Don’t Like. It is home to one of the shining examples of No Child Left Behind, as the Clayton County School System is the first system in the United States in the last 40 years to lose its accreditation.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the main paper in Atlanta that is losing thousands of subscribers each month, wrote this about Clayton County:

“In recent years, Clayton County has been. The school system lost its accreditation because of a “dysfunctional” board. Home foreclosures skyrocketed. And the African-American sheriff fired a large group of deputies, mostly white, after coming to office and marched them off with snipers on the roof.

Since then, Bell feuded incessantly with Sheriff Victor Hill and District Attorney Jewel Scott, both of whom defeated longtime incumbents who are white. The 2004 victories came after the county’s once majority-white voter pool grew to nearly 70 percent African-American.

For those incapable of reading those last paragraphs clearly, in Pre-Obama America – a country that Black people repudiated on November 4, 2008 by a margin of 96-1 – Black people were able to have snipers put on a roof and point their weapons at recently fired white police officers.

This is not a joke. Black people, led by Sheriff Victor Hill in 2005, celebrated the “liberation” of Clayton County from white rule and into the worthy hands of Black people dominion:

“Driven by an influx of African-American professionals to a suburb long steeped in Civil War history and legend, Clayton County opened the year with its first black-majority government, including the County Commission, district attorney, solicitor general, magistrate and sheriff.

”It’s a time of great excitement for the county,” said Wole Ralph, a black 27-year-old financial consultant whose first try for public office landed him a seat on the five-member commission.

But the celebratory moment in the land of Tara where Margaret Mitchell set her 1936 novel, ”Gone With the Wind,” has been all but eclipsed by the uproar over the new sheriff’s mass firing of 27 supervisors, deputies and correction officers, many of them white. They had been summoned by their new boss, Sheriff Victor Hill, to the Clayton County Jail on Monday under the pretext of being sworn in. Instead, they were relieved of their weapons, badges and official cars by armed colleagues and offered rides home in prisoner vans under the eyes of snipers posted on the roof.”

Since this wonderful moment for Black people, which preceded the election of Barack Obama by three years, Clayton County has lost its accreditation for its School System; had to pay $7 million in suits made by those white police officers who were illegally fired; and more importantly, rated second in the nation for subprime mortgages and highest for foreclosures in metro Atlanta:

“The national housing market meltdown was particularly cruel to Clayton residents. In June 2007, the county had the highest foreclosure rate in the metro region. It also ranked second in the nation for homes purchased with subprime mortgages, an astonishing 38.9 percent. By this May, one in 10 homes faced the risk of foreclosure.”

Worse – if it could be worse – is the crime wave that is plaguing Clayton County:

“The FBI’s report of a double-digit rise in violent crime in Clayton County stings a community already reeling from lost school accreditation and a staggering foreclosure rate.

It also foreshadows a possible spiraling out of economic control.

Violent crime in Clayton rose by 21 percent in 2007 to 1,366 reports, up from 1,126 in 2006, according to the federal report.

To the head of Clayton County’s Chamber of Commerce, the crime statistics are the final blow.”

Post-Obama America is marked by the most triumphant moment in mankind’s history – the election of Barack Hussein Obama, the Black version of Alexander the Great.

However, cities run by Black people, such as Detroit, Baltimore, Birmingham, Atlanta, Memphis and the Clayton County, Georgia, work to eradicate the notion that a post-racial era will ever occur in America.

If, as the scores of Black kids who attacked the white family in Akron, Ohio and yelled, “This is a Black world,” are correct in their assertion, then the example of Clayton County doesn’t bode well for that future.

Stuff Black People Don’t Like includes the reality of Clayton County, Georgia, because years of white flight from and Black migration into the county have made it a test case for Black rule in America.

The results, as discussed above, aren’t pretty.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 8:17 AM 2 comments

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

#402. Being Dragged From Meetings

Black people in 21st century America have it pretty well. The media is completely on their side in every issue and will do whatever possible to try and agitate Black people against white people when given the chance.

Take for instance the case of two stories, separated by days. Black children were denied the right to swim at a private club, because they couldn’t swim and represented a hazard to the pool. Black people screamed about the trauma that would be inflicted upon these kids in the future for seeing racism up close.
Then, in Akron, Ohio on July 4th, a family of white people were attacked by scores of Black people, who chanted, “This is a Black world“. The father was hospitalized.
Now, try and ascertain which family or group of people will actually be traumatized by the experiences. Being denied swimming or being attacked and injured by scores of people who hated them?
Still though, the media’s handling of the stories listed above should alleviate any notion of the media being pro-white: as the Henry Louis Gates episode has shown all Black people, the media is firmly the friend of Black people in Post-Obama America.
However, one thing that Black people are not fond of is being accused of something and then having to be held responsible for that in a subsequent meeting:
“Leland Alderwoman Mala Brooks was dragged screaming for a Board of Aldermen meeting last week.
Last year, former Leland Mayor Barbara Brooks and her daughter, Mala Brooks, wrote several checks totaling nearly $12,000 without approval from the Board of Aldermen, current Leland Mayor James Lowe said. The two went to the Mississippi Coast and stayed at the Beau Rivage Casino and Resort for a conference, but the Board of Aldermen hadn’t given approval to the trip, Lowe said.Two weeks ago, the city asked the two to pay the nearly $12,000 back. Mala Brooks said the checks involved payments for legitimate expenses.”
Brooks, who is Black, refused to cooperate with the police and instead carried on like a child denied chicken wings and caused a major scene. She even called the people – all are Black – who were responsible for her undoing:

“racists evil Black ni**ers in here”

Once again, had Brooks visited Stuff Black People Don’t Like, she could have followed the advice that Rodney King, Henry Gates and countless other Black people have failed to do: cooperate with the police.

Instead, Brooks has been another example of Stuff Black People Don’t Like: being dragged from meetings.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 7:27 AM 4 comments

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

#62. “Hate Facts”

Admit it, whenever you see the nightly news cast that corresponds with the major city you live closest to and a story about a horrible murder or horrifying crime is broadcast your first inclination is a Black person did it.

Black people know the chances your hypothesis is correct are close to 100 percent. Whenever white people discuss crime together or the most recent murder in their town, they speak in hushed dialect and a usually posed with the same query: “Was it a Black person?” or with the declaration; “it must have been a Black person.”

Black people at work always look at their white counterparts congregating around the water cooler and wonder what they are discussing. “It is probably something about me,” the Black person thinks to himself, “they wonder if I’m here because of affirmative action.”

Black people dislike, no, they wish to see the criminalization of “Hate Facts“:

“that is, facts that no one refutes but everyone ignores because of their connotation.”

Black people don’t like to discuss hate facts, because they point to uncomfortable truths about The United States of America and the quadrillions that have been spent trying to eradicate the racial gap in learning since The Great Society was launched in the 1960s.

Black people don’t like to discuss hate facts, because they point to much different conclusions on crime in America and the causes of the high rates of murder in the Black community and the incredible epidemic of Black-on-white murder across the America.

Black people consider any conversation about race that paints Black people in a negative light, that also relies heavily on documented and irrefutable facts as definable as a “Hate Fact” debate and thus null and void.

Only disingenuous white liberals may discuss race with Black people, albeit in lukewarm terms and without any mention of “Hate Facts” in the dialogue at all.

Recently, President Barack Hussein Obama addressed the NAACP at its 100th anniversary gala, and said a number of things that one commentator, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, said of:

You know, a white guy can’t say that. I mean that. It’s very hard for somebody like me to make that speech.”

Obama, said in that speech:

“We’ve got to say to our children, “Yes, if you’re African American, the odds of growing up amid crimes and gangs are higher. Yes, if you live in a poor neighborhood, you will face challenges that somebody in a wealthy suburb does not have to face. But that’s not a reason to get bad grades. That’s not a reason to cut class. That’s not a reason to give up on your education and drop out of school. No one has written your destiny for you. Your destiny is in your hands. You cannot forget that.” That’s what we have to teach all of our children. No excuses!”As Matthews made clear – and he is a disingenuous white liberal – a white person can not say the things Obama said to his Black counterparts. They constitute “Hate Facts”, are in polite society, they are to be ignored, much like the vagabond asking for change.

Black people know that white people (and many Black people) believe that the corruption of major cities – which have majority Black populations – is the sole responsibility of those governing themselves and that white racism is not to blame.

In some major cities, such as Washington D.C., Atlanta, Detroit and Birmingham, the corruption of Black people is so pungent that it is almost palpable. But to even point out that major cities such as Birmingham are in trouble because of the racial composition of the city is a “Hate Fact” and therefore not part of the accepted vernacular of the Post-Obama America.

“Hate Facts” included the use of gratuitous Black crimes, such as the one in Akron, Ohio, against a white family by scores of Black people, chanting, “This is a Black world.” It is considered a “Hate Fact” to even consider pointing out media double standards in how crime is reported.

“Hate Facts” include criticism of affirmative action, as this noble practice is the penalty for centuries of abuse towards non-whites by white people and is perfectly acceptable as a form of punishment against white males. To criticise affirmative action is to engage in “Hate Facts” usage and Black people find that offensive.

Black people consider any undue criticism of them – regardless of the legitimacy of the facts at hand – as relying on “Hate Fact’s” to make your point and thus disqualifying from the debate.

Consider, in the Health Care Bill that is being discussed currently in Washington, affirmative action will be codified into law as to how federal funds will be allocated to colleges and universities in forms of grants government contracts:

“In awarding grants or contracts under this section, the Secretary shall give preference to entities that have a demonstrated record of the following: . . . Training individuals who are from underrepresented minority groups or disadvantaged backgrounds.”

In Post-Obama America, merely pointing out that the Federal Government is about to engage in the reckless legalization of total discrimination against white males is a “Hate Fact”.

Black people are well aware that “Hate Facts” are true and that a Faustian pact between disingenuous white liberals and Black people was made long ago. Rumors of a painting commemorating this event have surfaced, but this image is hidden from public for fear that Oscar Wilde’s imaginative idea behind the book “The Portrait of Dorian Gray” has taken hold of the painting, bespeaking the horrible reality of integrated America in 2009.

For “Hate Facts” to be allowed into the discussion of race relations in contemporary America would be a sin greater than any mentioned in the Bible and that is reason Stuff Black People Don’t Like includes this idea: for all Black people know the reality of race, but Black people don’t want white people to grasp that same concept.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 7:21 PM 6 comments

#99. Cooperating with Police

Black people don’t like to be told what to do. This is a fact and an irrefutable one. They were told to sit in the back of the bus, and refused. They were told to not eat at the same restaurants as others, and they refused.

They were told not violate the anti-miscegenation laws of states and they refused. They have been told not to violate the laws of the United States of America, and yet, they refuse steadfastly.
More so, Black people have been told to cooperate with the police, the only protection that law abiding citizens have from the miscreants of society, and yet Black people retain that stubborn streak and refuse to comply with police demands.
Rodney King, the man who started one of the biggest riots in the past thirty years, could have avoided his fate – and absolved Los Angeles from over $1 billion worth of damagebut he failed to cooperate with police:

“The truth is more complicated. There were three people in King’s car that night. After the 8-mile high-speed chase on which King led the California Highway Patrol and the Los Angeles police, a CHP officer demanded that everyone get out of the car with his hands on his head. King’s passengers did as they were told. King, for reasons that remain mysterious, refused to comply and did not speak intelligibly to the officer. An ex-con on probation, King certainly knew the arrest drill. He says he smoked dope and drank malt liquor that night. The police were convinced that he was high on PCP.

The whole world thinks that the police next engaged in an orgy of violence. But that is because the first 13 seconds of the tape — which showed King charging at Officer Laurence Powell — were edited out. The first jury saw the whole tape.

King simply would not get down. The police accordingly escalated their violence. They attempted a maneuver called the swarm, in which four officers would overcome King. He was able to throw them off. Sgt. Stacey Koon, the officer in charge, next attempted to subdue King with a Taser. It had no effect. Frightened now of this large and seemingly preternaturally strong suspect, the officers began to hit him with their batons, all the while shouting for him to get down on the ground. King continued to stay up on all fours. Powell told the first jury that he feared King was going to wrest his gun away from him, leading to a shooting.”

Had Rodney King just acknowledged the police officers with a simple ‘yes sir’, instead of being obstinate, he wouldn’t have been beaten, sent to jail and then directly caused a massive riot that left many devoid of their lives.
Another recent example of a Black person failing to cooperate with the police is Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, a Black man who is perpetually incapable of dealing with any situation without finding the acrid scent of racism attached to it. He is a vital part of the Black community in America and respected for his strong stances in defense of his people, and yet, in a recent incident with police, he showed himself to be yet another SBPDL example of not cooperating with police.
Gates was trying to enter his home, and to his neighbors it appeared a Black person was breaking into his home. They called the police. What follows is a great example of why you should cooperate with the police and also why you should not berate them, regardless of your skin color or your stance in the professional race racketeering industry:

“As soon as Officer Crowley arrived and got to the front door, he encountered, standing inside the door, none other than Gates, who instantly began yelling at him in an extremely loud voice that he was a “racist police officer.” Instead of defusing the situation by cooperating with the officer, who was, after all, only doing his job, instead of simply explaining politely that he lived in the house and that his house had not been broken into (though it’s still not clear who the two young men were), Gates continued his “tumultuous,” threatening (“you don’t know who I am, you’ll be sorry for messing with me”), and extremely insulting behavior for a long time, first inside the house, where his voice was so loud that the officer could not conduct a conversation over his police radio, then outside the house, alarming passersby, until, after warning Gates twice that he was behaving disorderly, Crowley arrested him. And during the whole time Gates kept bellowing that Crowley was a “racist police officer.”Also, from early on in the incident, Officer Crowley repeatedly began to leave Gates’ house, but Gates stopped him, insisting that Crowley first tell him his name. But each time Crowley gave his name, Gates kept shouting so loudly that he couldn’t hear the officer’s answer. And when Crowley would again start to leave the house, Gates would again demand his name.”

Gates was of course arrested, sparking national coverage of the victim hood of Mr. Gates at the hands of the racist police. In a world run by evil white supremacists - as so many Black people believe America is run by – Mr. Gates would have had a black bag put over head and shot for his insolence. Instead, the truth of Gates’ uncooperative attitude with the police has been silenced and the supposed racial angle of the profiling of a Black man – even more so one who is a ‘respected’ Black scholar – has been the focal point of the story.

Black people do not yet understand that in Post-Obama America, they run the show and call the shots and have a complicit media prepared to cover up any negative portrayal of Black people. The media will showcase only positive images of Black people, even when a prominent Black person does not cooperate with the police. White racism will always be the culcript, not a Black person failing to cooperate with the police and yelling at him and calling him a racist for daring to arrest a great Black scholar.

They can in turn make the story one of racial profiling, instead of yet another example of Stuff Black People Don’t Like; cooperating with the police. Even in Pre-Obama America, as evidenced by the Rodney King affair, the truth of any crime and not cooperating with the police was made to look like another example of white racism, not Black people failing to cooperate with the police.

Posted by Stuff Black People Don’t Like at 9:25 AM 8 comments

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

100 Items Which Will Disappear First

100 Items Which Will Disappear First

[On surviving the coming Crisis of Obama. Personally, I think we should be confronting and resisting rather than running and hiding, but that's just me. No, really, it seems to be just me, and the Lone Haranguer. Anyway, for all you folks who think you can hole up in the woods somewhere and wait for JEEEE-ZUS to come back and split the sky open, or otherwise just wait for it all magically to pass somehow (how will that happen if nobody fights back?) --never mind, here's the list. - HAC]

1. Generators (Good ones cost dearly. Gas storage, risky. Noisy…target of thieves; maintenance etc.)

2. Water filters/purifiers

3. Portable toilets

4. Seasoned firewood. Wood takes about 6 – 12 months to become dried for home uses.

5. Lamp oil, wicks, lamps (First choice: Buy clear oil. If scarce, stockpile any!)

6. Coleman fuel. Impossible to stockpile too much.

7. Guns, ammunition, pepper spray, knives, clubs, bats & slingshots.

8. Hand-can openers, & hand egg beaters, whisks.

9. Honey/syrups/ white, brown sugar

10. Rice – beans – wheat

11. Vegetable oil (for cooking.) Without it food burns/must be boiled etc.

12. Charcoal, lighter fluid (will become scarce suddenly)

13. Water containers (urgent item to obtain.) Any size. Small: hard clear plastic only – note – food grade if for drinking.

14. Mini heater head (propane) (Without this item, propane won’t heat a room.)

15. Grain grinder (Non-electric)

16. Propane cylinders (Urgent: definite shortages will occur.)

17. Survival guide book.

18. Mantles: Aladdin, Coleman, etc. (Without this item, longer-term lighting is difficult.)

19. Baby supplies: diapers/formula. ointments/aspirin, etc.

20. Washboards, mop bucket w/wringer (for laundry)

21. Cook stoves (Propane, Coleman & Kerosene)

22. Vitamins

23. Propane cylinder handle-holder (Urgent: small canister use is dangerous without this item)

24. Feminine hygiene/hair care/skin products.

25. Thermal underwear (tops & bottoms)

26. Bow saws, axes and hatchets, wedges (also, honing oil)

27. Aluminum foil reg. & heavy duty (great cooking and barter ttem)

28. Gasoline containers (plastic & metal)

29. Garbage bags (impossible to have too m,any).

30. Toilet paper, Kleenex, paper towels

31. Milk – powdered & condensed (shake liquid every 3 to 4 months)

32. Garden seeds (non-hybrid- a must.)

33. Clothes pins/line/hangers (a must.)

34. Coleman’s pump repair kit

35. Tuna fish (in oil, not water)

36. Fire extinguishers (or..large box of baking soda in every room)

37. First aid kits

38. Batteries (all sizes…buy furthest-out for expiration dates)

39. Garlic, spices & vinegar, baking supplies

40. Big dogs (and plenty of dog food)

41. Flour, yeast & salt

42. Matches. {“Strike Anywhere” preferred.) Boxed, wooden matches will go first.

43. Writing paper/pads/pencils, solar calculators

44. Insulated ice chests (good for keeping items from freezing in wintertime.)

45. Workboots, belts, Levis & durable shirts

46. Flashlights/ LIGHTSTICKS & torches, “No. 76 Dietz” Lanterns

47. Journals, diaries & scrapbooks (jot down ideas, feelings, experience; historic times)

48. Garbage cans plastic (great for storage, water, transporting – if with wheels)

49. Men’s hygiene: shampoo, toothbrush/paste, mouthwash/floss, nail clippers, etc

50. Cast iron cookware (sturdy, efficient)

51. Fishing supplies/tools

52. Mosquito coils/repellent, sprays/creams

53. Duct tape

54. Tarps/stakes/ twine/nails/ rope/spikes

55. Candles

56. Laundry detergent (liquid)

57. Backpacks, duffel bags

58. Garden tools & supplies

59. Scissors, fabrics & sewing supplies

60. Canned fruits, veggies, soups, stews, etc

61. Bleach (plain, not scented: 4 to 6% sodium hypochlorite)

62. Canning supplies, (Jars/lids/wax)

63. Knives & sharpening tools: files, stones, steel

64. Bicycles…tires/ tubes/pumps/ chains, etc

65. Sleeping bags & blankets/pillows/ mats

66. Carbon monoxide alarm (battery powered)

67. Board games, cards, dice

68. D-con Rat poison, MOUSE PRUFE II, roach killer

69. Mousetraps, ant traps & cockroach magnets

70. Paper plates/cups/ utensils (stock up, folks)

71. Baby wipes, oils, waterless & antibacterial soap (saves a lot of water)

72. Rain gear, rubberized boots, etc.

73. Shaving supplies (razors & creams, talc, after shave)

74. Hand pumps & siphons (for water and for fuels)

75. Soy sauce, vinegar, bullions/gravy/ soup base

76. Reading glasses

77. Chocolate/cocoa/ Tang/punch (water enhancers)

78. “Survival-in- a-Can”

79. Woolen clothing, scarves/ear- muffs/mittens

80. Boy Scout Handbook, / also Leaders Catalog

81. Roll-on window insulation kit (MANCO)

82. Graham crackers, saltines, pretzels, trail mix/jerky

83. Popcorn, peanut butter, nuts

84. Socks, underwear, T-shirts, etc. (extras)

85. Lumber (all types)

86. Wagons & carts (for transport to and from)

87. Cots & inflatable mattresses

88. Gloves: work/warming/ gardening, etc.

89. Lantern hangers

90. Screen patches, glue, nails, screws, nuts & bolts

91. Teas

92. Coffee

93. Cigarettes

94. Wine/liquors (for bribes to the niggers we won’t actually fight, medicinal, etc,)

95. Paraffin wax

96. Glue, nails, nuts, bolts, screws, etc.

97. Chewing gum/candies

98. Atomizers (for cooling/bathing)

99. Hats & cotton neckerchiefs

100. Goats/chickens


1. Stockpiling helps. but you never know how long trouble will last, so locate near renewable food sources.

2. Living near a well with a manual pump is like being in Eden.

3. After a while, even gold can lose its luster. But there is no luxury in war quite like toilet paper. Its’ value is greater than gold’s.

4. If you had to go without one utility, lose electricity – it’s the easiest to do without (unless you’re in a very nice climate with no need for heat.)

5. Canned foods are awesome, especially if their contents are tasty without heating. One of the best things to stockpile is canned gravy – it makes a lot of the dry unappetizing things you will find to eat in the Crisis of Obama somewhat edible. Only needs enough heat to warm, not to cook. It’s cheap too, especially if you buy it in bulk.

6. Bring some books – escapist ones like romance or mysteries become more valuable as the Obama Crisis continues. Sure, it’s great to have a lot of survival guides, but you’ll figure most of that out on your own anyway – trust me, you’ll have a lot of time on your hands.

7. The feeling that you’re human can fade pretty fast. I can’t tell you how many people I knew who would have traded a much needed meal for just a little bit of toothpaste, rouge, soap or cologne. Not much point in surviving if you have to lose your humanity. These things are morale-builders like nothing else.

8. Slow burning candles and matches, matches, matches…


I can see everything is now happening just as it should, those that have awoken to the collapse are buying up everything they can to survive what’s coming, and most importantly guns and ammo for the ethnic cleansing that will be needed to retake our nation, guns that will be needed to kill the parasites and white liberals.  All those pieces of shit out there, stupid white liberals bastards that deserve nothing more then a bullet in the head. I cannot wait for the shit to hit the fan, I have been praying for this day for years, and now I can clearly see it coming down the road, we don’t have to wait, it will happen during the monkeys first term or within a year of his 2nd term.  I have so many people on my list of white liberals and parasites that must be cleansed, so many and I will take my time, and send them off based on how much anger I have for what they are, and what they have done to destroy my nation, and they know what’s coming, they just don’t have the stones to prepare, for if they did it would destroy everything they believe in, it would be an admission of guilt on their part, and it would mean that we will be coming for them.  I have already begun buy many guns and hundreds of rounds of ammo, eventually thousands of rounds. I have be dreaming of all the ways I can finally put these animals down, once and for all, no turning back, slow, painful, ways that will stitch the last hours of their life in my own memory, and punish them in the most severe manner possible.  Their mere existence is a crime in my mind, their offspring is a kick in the balls for my civilization, and every day they breath is a crime against humanity, I could say its gods will, but that would be too much, it’s the will of reality, if reality were a living thing, it would demand we put them down, nature would praise us, and god would reward us.  I can see the rivers of blood flowing out of the coastal cities into the pacific and Atlantic ocean, I can see our people arming themselves and finally putting realism where it belongs, in reality.  I can finally see what is to come.

Democrats Shroud the Truth, the Better to Bury Us

Democrats Shroud the Truth, the Better to Bury Us

by Dymphna

This Democrat-controlled Congress is proving more and more picayune and pettifogging.

Unlike those times when the Republicans were in the majority and played by the rules, these feckless Dems look for new ways to obfuscate and delay, or to rush to pass laws and steamroll their opponents.

But then for the last generation or so the Democrat party has been opportunistic. As an example, they dragged their feet most dishonorably during the legislative battles over the Racial Equality Act of 1964. Once the law passed (through the Herculean efforts of the Party of Lincoln) Dems not only got on the bandwagon, they took over the reins. They did this through fear-mongering, shoving through federal legislation that would prove to infantilize the black minority by “protecting” them against the rich, country club Republicans. By such means they secured the black vote and have owned it ever since. The Republicans never saw it coming.

Up until that point, most self-respecting black people were conservative and Republican. Socially, they’re still conservatives, but they trust the federal government to take care of them and they do not trust local government to be color-blind, even when blacks are the local government. See Detroit and Washington, D.C. for prime examples of how this operates.

Obamacare Chart
Such is my preface for the latest pettiness of the Dems in the 111th Congress. The Republicans have created a most entertaining (and scary) chart of what will happen in this country under ObamaCare. A picture being worth a thousand words from a gasbag, the Republican members of Congress wish to send this informative chart to their constituents, using their franking privileges to do so [click on image for larger .pdf version]

From Roll Call:
- – – - – – – – -

Democrats are preventing Republican House Members from sending their constituents a mailing that is critical of the majority’s health care reform plan, blocking the mailing by alleging that it is inaccurate.

House Republicans are crying foul and claiming that the Democrats are using their majority to prevent GOP Members from communicating with their constituents.

The dispute centers on a chart created by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Republican staff of the Joint Economic Committee to illustrate the organization of the Democratic health care plan.

At first glance, Brady’s chart resembles a board game: a colorful collection of shapes and images with a web of lines connecting them.

But a closer look at the image reveals a complicated menagerie of government offices and programs that Republicans say will be created if the leading Democratic health care plan becomes law.

In a memo sent Monday to Republicans on the House franking commission, Democrats argue that sending the chart to constituents as official mail would violate House rules because the information is misleading.


The dispute over Brady’s chart is being reviewed by the franking commission, which must approve any mail before it can be sent. No decision had been made on the matter by press time.

Brady adamantly denied that the chart was misleading and said Democrats are simply threatened by the content of the graphic.

“I think their review was laughable,” Brady said. “It’s … downright false in most of the cases. The chart depicts their health care plan as their committees developed it.”

“The chart reveals how their health care bureaucracy works, and people are frightened by it,” he added. “So this is their effort to try and discredit” the chart.

Republican Members have made 20 requests to mail a version of the chart to their constituents and have been told that the requests are being delayed while the commission reviews allegations that the chart is misleading.

“Hiding the truth about wildly unpopular policies is a Democrat specialty,” said one GOP aide. “I’d like to see the flow chart on how Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi plans on implementing the open and transparent government she keeps promising everyone.”

“We have initiated discussions with the minority to try and resolve current differences and are operating in good faith to achieve that goal,” said Kyle Anderson, a spokesman for House Administration Chairman Robert Brady (D-Pa.). The committee has oversight of the commission.

Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Calif.), ranking member of the committee and a member of the franking commission, said through a spokeswoman that he is also aware of the situation and is working with the members of the franking commission to resolve the differences, but he added that he believed Democrats on the commission were overreaching.

That chart is a transparent illustration of what will become of us under the socialist medical care the Dems have planned for the rest of us. Remember, none of these rules will apply to Congress, who will continue to have the very best medical care and coverage in the country. This one is for us hoi polloi; it will not affect any Congressman’s health benefits.

No wonder they want to shroud the truth in preparation to burying it…and us.

This situation demonstrates a weakness in the Republican Party. The Dems are masters of propaganda, always have been. The Republicans, above all that and not wanting to get their skirts muddied, have been slow to catch on to any technology and use it to their advantage.

You could see this in the elections in 1960. Kennedy’s team had the concept of appearances well in hand, despite the reality of Bobby’s thuggish attacks. You could see it in the last election as McCain proved to be a technophobe.

We can see it in operation in this case: the Republicans have created a wonderful image, a great illustration of the future. And what do they do? Bury it in a .pdf that is hell to scrape out and pass around in emails, or put up on Facebook pages.

Get a clue, you guys in the Republican National Committee. Quit mumbling “me, too” and strike out on your own for a change. Those lines you see when you look in the mirror are the tire tracks of Dem steamrollers.

For a good look at a state Republican who has mastered the medium, see the Pubs’ candidate for governor of Virginia. McDonnell is leading a good race, keeping his opponent on the defensive. For example, he’s a good debater and his voice has that generic Eastern seaboard accent. His opponent, a country boy from the rural southwestern part of the state, is not going to go over well with the urban Democrats in Northern Virginia. When Mr. Deeds opens his mouth and they hear that country twang, northern Virginians will turn off. Thus, Mr. McDonnell has challenged him to ten debates. Mr. Deeds is desperate to limit their face-offs to three.

In fact, McDonnell looks so good that he has attracted the endorsement of Virginia’s only black billionaire, who also happens to be a Democrat. Sheila Johnson is crossing party lines to support Mr. McDonnell.

The deep and wide Democrat coffers will do little good against the likes of Ms. Johnson. Makes you wonder: will Obie show up in Virginia to campaign for Deeds? Should be interesting. One thing is for sure: if he does, it won’t be in rural areas.

How UC Bureaucrats Use Advanced Placement Tests To Help Asians, Hurt Whites

How UC Bureaucrats Use Advanced Placement Tests To Help Asians, Hurt Whites

By Steve Sailer

My article last week on Advanced Placement (AP) tests provoked my favorite type of letter: one that tells me I don’t know what I’m talking about and then proceeds to be so informative that I finally do know.

I focused on AP tests’ emergence as a sort of tacit tracking mechanism for high schools and the sharp racial differences in students’ taking and passing them.

My correspondent, a test tutor called Mitchell Carr, emails:

“I know more about AP, SAT, and ACT test scores and their use in college admissions than you do, and that’s saying a lot. … Your AP article’s focus is totally screwy … The public policy issue about AP has nothing to do with the pass rate of APs, but rather AP’s influence on college admissions via Grade Point Average (GPA).”

Carr proceeds to document that the proliferation of Advanced Placement classes in high schools has harmed the chances to get into the University of California of white (and to some extent middle class black and Hispanic) kids. It benefits some inner city blacks and Latinos—but mostly it boosts upscale Asians. Result: as USA Today reported in April:

Asian-Americans are the single largest ethnic group among UC’s 173,000 undergraduates. In 2008, they accounted for 40% at UCLA and 43% at UC Berkeley — the two most selective campuses in the UC system — as well as 50% at UC San Diego and 54% at UC Irvine. Asian-Americans are about 12% of California’s population …” [University of Calif. admissions rule angers Asian-Americans, April 24, 2009]

Why? It’s largely due to a complicated (and, not surprisingly, not terribly competent) ploy by University of California administrators to get around the ban on affirmative action in government imposed by California voters in 1996. Their stratagems have been quickly deciphered by workaholic Asians. As the May 2008 Minutes of the University of California Academic Council state, “… Asian students seem to be very good at figuring out the technical requirements of UC eligibility.”

Admissions to the nine University of California campuses are a big deal for several reasons:

  • California makes up one-eighth of the population of the country
  • Tuition for California residents at world-famous UC Berkeley or UCLA is still under $10,000 per year, which means that Californians who win admission can save huge sums relative to comparably prestigious colleges.
  • Taken as a whole, the University of California ranks with Harvard as the most influential institution of higher learning. My correspondent Carr writes: “Whatever the UC does trickles down to everyone else”.

For example, when UC President Richard C. Atkinson noticed his “granddaughter, then in 6th grade, already diligently preparing for the SAT by testing herself on long lists of verbal analogies”, he wrote an Op-Ed [PDF] criticizing the make-up of the SAT. To please their largest customer, the College Board quickly dropped the useful analogy questions and added the expensive and dubious Writing section.

Ever since Proposition 209, UC administrators have searched for sneakier ways to admit more Latinos and blacks. The California Latino Legislative Caucus made clear to the UC Board of Regents that they’d better manipulate the system to admit more Hispanics or they’d have their budget cut.

In response, Carr emails me, the UC schools downplayed absolute test scores in favor of relativistic high school grades: “Once affirmative action was outlawed, UCs made GPA ever more important, and it now represents 75% of admissions decisions.”

Berkeley education professors Saul Geiser and Maria Veronica Santelices confirmed that in a 2007 study, Validity of High-School Grades in Predicting Student Success beyond the Freshman Year [PDF]:

“After California voters approved Proposition 209 in 1995, former UC President Richard Atkinson … instituted several major changes in admissions policy that became effective in 2001. UC introduced ‘comprehensive review,’ an admissions policy that more systematically took into account the impact of socioeconomic factors, such as parents’ education and family income, on students’ test scores and related indicators of academic achievement.”

Thus UCLA, which gets more applications than any other college in America, started giving brownie points to applicants claiming to have been shot. (For some reason, I doubt that hunting accidents count.) Geiser and Santelices continue:

“UC also revised its Eligibility Index, a numerical scale which sets minimum HSGPA [High School GPA] and test-score requirements for admission to the UC system; the revised index gave roughly three-quarters of the weight to HSGPA and the remainder to standardized tests.”

UC’s purpose, of course, was to let in more Non-Asian Minority students (NAMs). It’s easy to earn a high GPA at inner city high schools because students are graded on the curve and there’s so little competition. Some NAMs attend schools where the valedictorian’s SAT score (Math plus Verbal) might not reach 1000, which is roughly the minimum level at which it’s plausible to consider a four year degree anywhere—much less at the notoriously unaccommodating UC campuses.

In 2004, for instance, among the 1041 seniors at the three high schools in Compton, CA (birthplace of the Crips gang and West Coast gangsta rap), a grand total of fourteen 12th graders scored 1000 or higher (which is the equivalent of 890 under the tougher scoring system used before 1995):

Moreover, my correspondent Mitchell Carr adds, UC adopted

“… a new policy called ‘Eligibility in the Local Context’, which extended eligibility for UC admission to the top four percent of graduates from each California high school.”

So Compton’s three high schools automatically get 42 students admitted to UC schools—even though 28 of them have three-digit SAT scores and will likely flunk out.

Yet this California policy of automatically letting in the top four percent of each school isn’t as bad as the top ten percent policy in Texas. That was pushed through in the 1990s by Gov. George W. Bush (where have we heard that name before?) to sleaze around a court ruling banning quotas.

Inevitably, UC’s decision to give more weight to grades led to schools engaging in a grade inflation arms race. The main trick: classes designated “AP” by the high schools come with a “bonus point” when calculating GPA. That makes an A in an AP class worth 5 on the traditional 0 to 4 scale. Thus, freshmen admitted to UC Berkeley in 2003 averaged an absurd GPA of 4.31 on a 0 to 4 scale.

Of course, there’s no evidence that giving AP classes a bonus point helps UC make better admissions decisions. Geiser and Santelices found in 2004 [The Role Of Advanced Placement And Honors Courses In College Admissions (PDF)] that a multiple regression model counting bonus points for AP classes did a worse job of predicting college freshmen’s GPA than one that simply ignored bonus points.

But, again, the UC administrators don’t want better students—they want minority students.

Moreover, the University of California admissions process gives no weight to getting a good score on the actual AP Test. Hence the rush by many high schools to rig the system by sticking the “AP” label on sundry mediocre classes.

My correspondent argues:

“The emphasis on GPA allows predominantly Under-Represented Minority schools (inner city and charter schools, mostly) to call a course an AP course but in fact teach something very different. (The AP curriculum checks are a joke.) But it allows their students to present transcripts to colleges with high GPAs. The colleges know they are a joke, but it gives them affirmative action cover.”

For example, I’ve seen a document (not online) from a typical California public high school with a couple of thousand students, mostly Hispanic. Last year, 400 students received letter grades in classes designated Advanced Placement. (I’m not counting Spanish Language AP courses here, which have less to do with education than with gifts to immigrants. I’m also excluding the school’s more exclusive magnet programs.)

Here’s a chart summarizing report card grades awarded by the school in its official AP classes versus the scores earned by these same students on the actual College Board AP Tests.

AP Class Grade

AP Test Score

A or 5



B or 4



C or 3



D or 2



F or 1 / Not Taken



In other words, this public school bestowed As (counting as 5s for UC admissions purposes) upon 30 percent of its students taking AP classes. Nonetheless, only three percent scored 5s on their AP Tests.

Only 8 percent scored 4s or 5s. And only 24 percent simply passed the AP tests with a 3 or better.

Similarly, only 4 percent of report card grades were Fs. On the other hand, 49 percent of the school’s AP students either scored the minimum 1 on the AP Test (33 percent) or didn’t even attempt it (15 percent)

The average GPA in this high school’s AP classes was a 3.7. In contrast, the average AP score, counting AP students who didn’t take the test as 1s, was 1.7 on the 1 to 5 scale, or the equivalent of a D- in a typical college intro class.

Still, these AP scores aren’t bad by public school standards. In 2006, the Washington Post reported about one local high school: “Last year, 59 of 60 tests taken at Potomac drew a score of 1, the lowest on the 5-point scale.” [Pair Crack AP Test Barrier By Daniel de Vise, September 1, 2006]

In contrast, my younger son’s quite rigorous high school calls few classes “AP” because it doesn’t want to impose the College Board’s curriculum on its star teachers. Furthermore, unlike so many schools, it doesn’t want to pretend it’s teaching the AP curriculum when it isn’t. And the school flat doesn’t like grade inflation, which gives students swelled heads.

Instead, this school gives a more reasonable 0.3 point GPA boost for taking an “Honors” class. Yet, its typical student takes four to five AP tests during his career, and averages 4.3 out of 5.

Clearly, the name of the class matters less than the quality of the teacher and students.

At this school, it’s not uncommon for students to get higher scores on AP Tests than they get grades on their report cards.

This honest grading gives them a better picture of what competition will be like in UC colleges—but not a better chance of getting into one in the first place.

AP classes for Non-Asian Minorities have been heavily pushed over the last decade. For example, Jay Matthews, the education reporter for the Washington Post, [click here and scroll down for Peter Brimelow’s review of his review of Worm In The Apple] created his Challenge Index that Newsweek turned into its annual Best Public High Schools in America cover story. The Index’s formula is derisible:

“The number of Advanced Placement, Intl. Baccalaureate, and/or Cambridge tests taken by all students at a school in 2007 divided by the number of graduating seniors.”

In other words, it doesn’t matter whether the students pass the test, just that they take the test. Mitchell Carr scoffs in his email to me:

“Lots of low-income schools with hideous average SAT scores and horrible academic stats make the Newsweek Challenge Index, which leads to thousands of AP tests being turned in with randomly bubbled-in multiple-choice sections and “THEY MADE ME TAKE THIS TEST” scribbled across an otherwise empty essay section.”

Carr comments:

“The lack of control of content allows low performing schools to just label courses ‘AP,’ while high performing schools often strictly ration access for their own purposes.”


“Many high achieving kids in competitive schools, to say nothing of reasonably bright but not hyper-motivated kids, are not getting access to AP classes.”

Middle class black and Hispanic families in expensive suburbs are particularly hard hit by this rationing of AP classes. Carr writes:

“Suburban minority students often have respectable SAT/ACT scores coupled with God-awful GPAs. … UC Berkeley could almost certainly get better-educated minorities by looking in Palo Alto than Oakland. But the NAM kids in Paly will have awful grades.”

Paradoxically, the big winners from the UC’s attempt to discriminate in favor of Non-Asian Minorities are…Asian Minorities. Carr points out:

“Once GPA became increasingly important in UC admissions, the strongest kids started taking all the AP courses they could, because of the bonus points. The irony, of course, is that grades became important because of the low achieving kids, but the public universities have to be consistent, so it rippled up. The emphasis on GPA after affirmative action was banned is the reason for the explosion of Asian students—Asians have much higher GPAs than whites (but not much higher test scores, for the most part).”

Carr notes:

“Fifteen years ago, a student with outstanding test scores and a high 3.8 GPA in AP courses could get into UC Berkeley. Today, a student who doesn’t have higher than a 4.0 doesn’t have a chance at Berkeley unless he’s a NAM or an athlete.”

Asians tend to be harder working, more organized, more conformist, and more devoted to gaming the system. In contrast, white Americans tend to have a touching faith that experts have no doubt devised fair methods for selection, so it wouldn’t be sporting to try to find an edge … an assumption that immigrants find most amusing.

Carr continues:

“As for the reason white students are underrepresented in AP classes, it’s probably because access is granted by GPA in most suburban schools. Asians have a better GPA, while not higher competence, than whites, and this keeps whites (particularly boys) from getting into AP classes. Parents can challenge this, but few choose to—because few white parents understand the impact that AP has on GPA.”

Thus, Asians take three times as many AP Tests as whites per capita. Yet, passing rates on the AP Tests are almost identical, suggesting that whites could take a lot more AP classes if they merely got their acts together.

Currently, the UC system is talking about changing the admissions rules to make the process even more subjective—no doubt so that even more NAMs are eligible for admission.

Asian-American advocates”, always looking out for the interests of Asian-Americans, are strenuously protesting. USA Today notes:

“Asian-American advocates, parents and lawmakers are angrily calling on the university to rescind the policy … They point to a UC projection that said the new standards would sharply reduce Asian-American admissions while resulting in little change for blacks and Hispanics, and a big gain for white students. ‘I like to call it affirmative action for whites,’ said Ling-chi Wang, [Email him] a retired professor at UC Berkeley. ‘I think it’s extremely unfair to Asian-Americans on the one hand and underrepresented minorities on the other.’

Yeah—it would be grossly unfair for the primary taxpayers of California to become less underrepresented in the universities they built.

For that matter, what have white guys ever done for the human race? I mean, besides antibiotics and electromagnetism and almost all the other good ideas of the last 500 years

The un-PC truth: If anybody cares about where the next set of creative ideas that will shake up the world will come from, then we ought to be thinking about the next generation of white guys.

Sure, the kids from intact upper middle class families won’t have much more than the usual trouble. But there are an awful lot of white boys being raised today by single moms who can’t quite figure out males, and don’t have the energy left over to figure out how to game the system for them, either.

And these kids are growing up in a culture where “white boys” are portrayed as either bad guys or buffoons.

Why put up with the hassle? There are more video games than ever to disappear into.

In summary, when it comes to university admissions, it’s time to read the fine print.

There are no “White American advocates” to to do it for you.

[Steve Sailer (email him) is movie critic for The American Conservative. His website features his daily blog. His new book, AMERICA’S HALF-BLOOD PRINCE: BARACK OBAMA’S "STORY OF RACE AND INHERITANCE", is available here.]

Socialist America Sinking

Socialist America Sinking

By Patrick J. Buchanan

After half a century of fighting encroachments upon freedom in America, journalist Garet Garrett published The People’s Pottage.  A year later, in 1954, he died.  The People’s Pottage opens thus:

“There are those who still think they are holding the pass against a revolution that may be coming up the road. But they are gazing in the wrong direction. The revolution is behind them. It went by in the Night of Depression, singing songs to freedom.” [Full book, PDF]

Garrett wrote of a revolution within the form. While outwardly America appeared the same, a revolution within had taken place that was now irreversible. One need only glance at where we were before the New Deal, where we are and where we are headed to see how far we are off the course the Founding Fathers set for our republic.

Taxes drove the American Revolution, for we were a taxaphobic, liberty-loving people. That government is best that governs least is an Americanism. When “Silent Cal” Coolidge went home in 1929, the U.S. government was spending 3 percent of gross domestic product.

And today? Obama’s first budget will consume 28 percent of the entire GDP; state and local governments another 15 percent. While there is some overlap, in 2009, government will consume 40 percent of GDP, approaching the peak of World War II.

The deficit for 2009 is $1.8 trillion, 13 percent of the whole economy. Obama is pushing a cap-and-trade bill to cut carbon emissions that will impose huge costs on energy production, spike consumer prices and drive production offshore to China, which is opting out of Kyoto II. The Chinese are not fools.

Obama plans to repeal the Bush tax cuts and take the income tax rate to near 40 percent. Combined state and local income tax rates can run to 10 percent. For the self-employed, payroll taxes add up to 15.2 percent on the first $106,800 for all wages of all workers. Medicare takes 2.9 percent of all wages above that. Then there are the state sales taxes that can run to 8 percent, property taxes, gas taxes, excise taxes, and “sin taxes” on booze, cigarettes and, soon, hot dogs and soft drinks.

Comes now national health insurance from Nancy Pelosi’s House. A surtax that runs to 5.4 percent of all earnings of the top 1 percent of Americans, who already pay 40 percent of all federal income taxes, has been sent to the Senate. Included also is an 8 percent tax on the entire payroll of small businesses that fail to provide health insurance for employees.

Other ideas on the table include taxing the health benefits that businesses provide their employees.

The D.C.-based Tax Foundation says New Yorkers could face a combined income tax rate of near 60 percent.

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson called George III a tyrant for having “erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

What did George III do with his Stamp Act, Townshend Acts or tea tax to compare with what is being done to this generation of Americans by their own government?

While the hardest working and most productive are bled, a third of all wage-earners pay no U.S. income tax, and Obama plans to free almost half of all wage-earners of all income taxes. Yet, tens of millions get Medicaid, rent supplements, free education, food stamps, welfare and an annual check from Uncle Sam called an Earned Income Tax Credit, though they never paid a nickel in income taxes.

Oh, yes. Obama also promises everybody a college education.

Coming to America to feast on this cornucopia of freebies is the world. One million to 2 million immigrants, legal and illegal, arrive every year. They come with fewer skills and less education than Americans, and consume more tax dollars than they contribute by three to one.

Wise Latina women have more babies north of the border than they do in Mexico and twice as many here as American women.

As almost all immigrants are now Third World people of color, they qualify for ethnic preferences in hiring and promotions and admissions to college over the children of Americans

All of this would have astounded and appalled the Founding Fathers, who after all, created America—as they declared loud and clear in the Constitution—for ourselves and our posterity.”

China saves, invests and grows at 8 percent. America, awash in debt, has a shrinking economy, a huge trade deficit, a gutted industrial base, an unemployment rate surging toward 10 percent and a money supply that’s swollen to double its size in a year. The 20th century may have been the American Century. The 21st shows another pattern.

“The United States is declining as a nation and a world power with mostly sighs and shrugs to mark this seismic event,” writes Les Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, in CFR’s Foreign Affairs magazine. “Astonishingly, some people do not appear to realize that the situation is all that serious.”[Necessity, Choice, and Common Sense, May/June 2009]

Even the establishment is starting to get the message.


Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his book State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, can be ordered from His latest book is Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World, reviewed here by Paul Craig Roberts.

Captive Teenagers Comment On Craig Bodeker’s “Conversation About Race”

Captive Teenagers Comment On Craig Bodeker’s “Conversation About Race

By Athena Kerry

Which of the following actions would you expect to be labeled as “racist” by a normal person?

  1. A woman notices a man walking in her neighborhood. She makes a mental note that his race is different from the people usually seen walking around in this area.
  2. A woman is engaged in conversation with a co-worker, who responds by saying “Yeah, sister, I understand what you mean”.
  3. A man comments to another man at a club, “You’re a good dancer”.
  4. When asked what he would do as “immigration czar” of America, a young man responds “deport them all!”

Stumped? The answer, according to the interviewees in Craig Bodeker’s documentary A Conversation about Race is every situation except #4.

Startling? On its face, yes. But VDARE.COM readers shouldn’t find too much comfort in #4. Here’s some extra information: the woman in situation #1, the co-worker in situation #2 and the compliment giver in situation #3 are whites while the noticed man, the sister co-worker, the dancer in the club and the potential immigration czar are black.

Now it’s not so surprising. Even #4’s immigration czar would be easily identified as a “racist” if he were white. But he’s black—so he can’t be a racist!

(Don’t laugh. Obama Attorney General Eric Holder has just testified that only whites can be guilty of hate crimes).

Bodeker’s excellent debut documentary is intended to demonstrate the “disconnects” and double standards inherent in the “anti-racists’” belief system. The term “belief system” is used intentionally, since the interviewees say that racism is “all around them, everywhere all the time” and yet are unable to come up with any definition of the word or examples of it in action.

Peter Brimelow once defined a racist as “someone winning an argument with a liberal. Well, as Bodeker discovers, that’s just the beginning:

  • “Racism is when we chop ourselves into categories…when you really look at the quantum level or the basic fabric of the universe there is no separation. I am you, I am the chair, I am the wall, I’m the rug, I’m the rock, I’m the tree, I’m the grass.”
  • “It’s as if saying, once I’ve put a boundary, you and I can no longer communicate.”
  • “Racism could be anything, like I could be racist against him per se, he could be gay and I could be straight. That’s still racism.”

Strikingly, the most dogmatic “anti-racist” interviewed was also the prettiest person in the film: a young blond haired, blue eyed college girl who berated herself for observing that “black people are so loud” (it’s true, I used to teach them) and explained to the camera that while black people are better than white people at some things, white people only succeed when they cheat.

These are the definitions of racism provided by those who also professed to see it every single day. With these bizarre vagaries as their foundation, it’s no surprise that the anti-racist faithful are quickly befuddled when Bodeker presents them with facts.

Befuddled, but not deterred.

The point Bodeker makes is not a new one to VDARE.COM readers, but it is a good one, made invaluable by the clear, accessible presentation. Addressing the camera, Bodeker frankly describes his methodology—from advertising for interviewees on Craigslist to stopping random people on a busy street corner in downtown Denver. He cuts back and forth between his own commentary and the interviews, with a seamless flow from one clip to another. He is never sarcastic or vicious, and the interviewees always seem completely at ease. Bodeker himself looks the part of a new breed of male celebrities like John Corbett (of Sex in the City hunk-dom) or the country singer Keith Urban: casual, friendly and presentable.

In that sense, this DVD is an excellent jumping-off point for an audience that may not be ready for much of the franker debate about race that VDARE.COM readers are used to. It seems perfectly adaptable to a middle or high-school classroom and could provide an excellent spark for debates in college environments. I can even see sending the film to a few of my own relatives who might need a polite kick-in-the-pants towards reality.

With this in mind, I hosted a little showing with the first two teenagers I could find. At first indignant at the prospect of abandoning their summertime allotment of video games for a whole hour (oh, the humanity!), they were consoled with popcorn. And after the first few minutes, they were riveted.

Occasionally, one or the other of them would blurt out in exasperation, or laugh at the ridiculous responses that Bodeker managed to get on film, at which point they would pause the movie to discuss their disgust.

Now, these particular kids have heard criticism of the “racism” concept before and are even familiar with some of the more incorrect ideas regarding the race debate in America, hearing about them regularly at home. But even so, they inevitably have absorbed some of the conventional blame-whites propaganda that they get stuffed into their ears at school and on television and everywhere else in the world.

And the extent to which this movie laid out in explicit terms how exploitative the “racism” racket has become was very educational for them. They brought it up days later, clearly having been turning it over in their minds for some time.

When I asked the two of them if either could imagine the movie being shown in their school, both answered negatively. The younger of the two, a girl, qualified her answer, saying “Well, maybe some teachers, but I don’t know who”.

I’m afraid she’s being naïve. In her private school in the past two years, she has never had a white guest speaker. Instead, she’s had an Indian tribal leader explain how whites killing Indians was historically comparable to Hitler’s holocaust (he visits every year); a black congressman talk about Martin Luther King; a black storyteller share African folklore; and an African dance troupe teach them how to beat African drums.

Bodeker is neither the right color nor does he convey the right message.

Noting Bodeker’s race, the older of my two guinea pigs, a boy, tried to think of ways that the documentary could be more viewer-friendly for race believers. His suggestion was to replace Bodeker with a black man giving the commentary. Or, perhaps Bodeker should disguise his conclusions and only reveal them little by little, waiting for a dramatic end with all of his footage serving as evidence after the fact.

I don’t disagree with the boy’s points: yes, the public has come to bridle when faced with a white man discussing race. Yes, the public is taught to believe black people are allowed to talk about it and whites aren’t. Yes, it is a bit jarring for newbies to hear Bodeker say calmly into the camera that he can’t think of anything more, “artificial, manufactured and manipulated than this whole construct called racism” and that he has “grown suspicious of the term itself and the people who use it frequently.

But that’s kinda the point.

This film is a response to Obama’s call for a “conversation” about race. For Bodeker, it is an achievement. For Obama and other racism-believers, it is an indictment.

Blacks have done enough talking about race. It’s time to let us—and not just brainwashed blondes—into the conversation.

[A Conversation About Race can be bought directly from Bodeker’s website—scroll down—or through Amazon.]

Athena Kerry (email her) recently graduated from a Catholic university somewhere in America.

The American Revolution Revisited

The American Revolution Revisited

By Chuck Baldwin’s Son: Timothy Baldwin, Esq.

[Note: My son, Tim, writes today's column. He is an attorney who received his Juris Doctor degree from Cumberland School of Law in Birmingham, Alabama. He is a former prosecutor for the Florida State Attorney's Office and now owns his own private law practice. He is married to the former Miss Jennifer Hanssen.]

Let’s be honest, America is facing the same legal, moral and ethical questions that our Founding generation did, especially regarding the issue of “Who Is Sovereign in the United States.” For our Founders, they fought, bled and died on the principles that no man or government has the right to rule over others contrary to their agreement (i.e. compact, constitution) and contrary to the principles of natural law as revealed in the Creation of God; that all men are born in nature with the power to govern themselves; and that no Sovereign government, established lawfully by the consent of we the people, can be usurped and controlled by any other entity. Thus, today in America, the question once again comes down to “Who is Sovereign in the United States?”

Today, there are 3 basic options for “Who is Sovereign in the United States”: (1) the Federal government, (2) the State governments or (3) We the People. I feel confident in stating that most contemporary Americans believe that the answer to this critical question is the Federal government–especially as it concerns any practical effect on the power of and over government. For years, Americans have been brainwashed though public education, major media networks and politicians that ALL federal laws are the “supreme law of the land” and that no state law or action to the contrary is valid, citing Article 6, paragraph 2 of the US Constitution as their “irrefutable” proof. Of course they are completely wrong: American ideology and legal fact states that sovereignty rests with “we the people.” However, the question must be more narrowly defined.

That is, does the sovereign power of we the people rest with all the people in the nation as one body, or does the power rest with the people THROUGH the respective States? The answer to this question cannot be overstated, because if the sovereign power rests with we the people collectively as one body, then the States have absolutely no power and at the ratification of the US Constitution, the States lost all powers originally granted to them by their respective sovereigns (the people of that State). To the contrary, if Sovereignty rests within or through their respective States, then the States conversely have more power than what is being admitted today by the “Centralists” of our day.

Through an honest study of the history and the context of the Articles of Confederation, the US Constitution, the Constitutional Convention and subsequent Ratification debates, the Federalist Papers, the Anti-Federalist Papers, the rulings of subsequent US Supreme Court Rulings and the writings of political philosophers and statesmen of the 1700s and 1800s, the conclusion is undeniable and clear: We the People are the Sovereigns of the States respectively and of the States United through our respective States.

Thus, the issue is not who is Sovereign, because we know that We the People are sovereign in the US and that the Sovereigns of each State have never ceded to the Federal government any power not expressly granted to it by the Compact (the US Constitution). But rather, the issue is one of JURISDICTION: in other words, who has the power to act on behalf of and in compliance with the Sovereign? The issue of jurisdiction is so important because it acknowledges that since the Sovereign has “paramount authority” in government, any powers that are granted from the Sovereign to government are to remain within that grant of authority. Put another way, the States can no more grant authority to the Federal government against the will of the Sovereign–the people–than the Executive branch of the Federal government can give to the Judiciary branch the powers that we the people granted to it alone. To deny that such a grant exists or conversely to ignore the limitations placed on the governments by the Sovereign is to suggest that tyranny is a lawful act and that it must be complied with. America’s founders would have considered such a political theory to be treasonous. Do we the people think so seriously of the matter? According to recent events, the answer to this question will likely be answered sooner than later.

As some of you may know, several states have and are passing legislation regarding the independence and sovereignty of the people of their respective states. More specifically, the states of Tennessee and Montana have passed “Firearms Freedom Acts,” which have become law and which reaffirm their Sovereignty under the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution. This law states that any firearms that are made, sold and bought in that state are NOT subject to the Federal regulations of firearms, because they are inherently internal affairs, which exempt them from the commerce clause of the US Constitution.

As you would imagine, the Federal government, through its agency, the Department of Justice, did not take too kindly to Tennessee’s assertion of jurisdiction over this matter and position that the federal laws did not apply to the subject matter at hand. This federal opposition has become known through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), whereby they informed the firearms licensees in an “open letter” (PDF ) in Tennessee that the recently enacted law (Firearms Freedom Act) does not apply and is void and that they (the firearms licensees) must still obey and submit to the federal laws, regardless of the State’s statute.

This ATF response tells us the following about the federal government’s ideology of Sovereignty: (1) the federal government does not recognize the lawful and independent jurisdiction of the Sovereigns of Tennessee to operate their internal affairs as they deem proper and fitting; (2) the Sovereigns of Tennessee do not possess lawful jurisdiction to govern themselves through constitutional means; (3) the federal government has the power and authority to control the internal affairs of all States, as they deem fit. Bottom line, the Federal government is Sovereign. With their theory in mind, however, what commodity, what relationship, what contract, what service, or what molecule in this entire country would not be subject to their control and power?

This issue is the very same reason why the Colonists declared their independence from Great Britain in 1776 and why Great Britain declared the Colonies to be in a state of rebellion against the government. The conflict was in fact the application of their Constitution: whether it be a “living” constitution or whether it be “fundamental laws” based upon the intent and will of the people. The fact is, it was the Great-Britain-view of their constitution verses the American-view of their constitution that caused the conflict between the crown and the colonies. One historian summarizes the conflict this way:

“The contrast cannot be too strongly insisted upon. [The colonists], on the one hand, believed that the British Constitution was fixed by ‘the law of God and nature,’ and founded in the principles of law and reason so that Parliament could not alter it, but [Great Britain believed] that ‘the constitution of this country has been always in a moving state, either gaining or losing something,’ and ‘there are things even in Magna Charta which are not constitutional now’ and others which an act of Parliament might change. Between two such conceptions of the powers of government compromise was difficult to attain . . . Such differences in ideals were as important causes of a breaking-up of the empire [of Great Britain] as more concrete matters like oppressive taxation.” (Claude Halstead Van Tyne, The Causes of the War of Independence, Volume 1, [University of Michigan, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1922], 235, 237).

Indeed, the issues of taxation during the 1760s and 1770s were only fruits of the underlying issue, and that is, who is Sovereign in America. According to Great Britain, the government had the power to impose its will on the people of America despite the will of the colonies and despite the natural laws governing the compact between the English people and their government. In other words, the government believed that their constitution was “living,” giving the government power to impose its will on the people, without the people’s consent. The colonists, however, saw the matter to be a usurpation of their God-given right to be governed by their consent and in compliance with their constitution. The end result: the Sovereigns in each colony seceded from the empire of Great Britain because of Great Britain’s refusal to follow their constitution.

Do Sovereigns throughout our States United not see the significance of the issue we are facing today? Are we so blind to history that we cannot compare this scenario to the very scenarios that led to the American Revolution? Are we so ignorant as to the intents and purposes of the US Constitution? Consider that the “supreme laws of the land” were never meant to be carte blanche powers of the Federal government, but instead federal laws were expressly limited by the terms of the compact between and for the States, found in the Constitution. This concept of “supreme law of the land” was expressed by a founding father, whom many would consider to be a “centralist” in belief, Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist Paper #27:

“[T]hat the laws of the Confederacy [meaning, the United States of America--yes, even Hamilton, along with many other founders, such as George Washington, called the US Constitution a Confederacy, because they knew that the nature and character of the compact of the US Constitution did not change from the Articles of Confederation] as to the ENUMERATED and LEGITIMATE objects of its jurisdiction, will become the SUPREME LAW of the land, to the observance . . . in each State, will be bound by the sanctity of an oath. Thus the legislatures, courts, and magistrates, of the respective members, will be incorporated into the operation of the national government AS FAR AS ITS JUST AND CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY EXTENDS.”

Hamilton’s legal position concerning the limited power of the federal government and the “supreme law of the land” was the consensus of the founders, the States and we the people. Nowhere in America’s founding was there the notion that the supreme laws of the land were anything contrary to the compact FOR the States. The supreme laws of the land are simply those “fundamental laws” that we the people have created and imposed upon the government to follow and uphold.

Of course, the question has been raised over the past 150 years of “who has the power to determine whether or not the Federal government has usurped their constitutional authority?” The popular answer is (wrongfully), the US Supreme Court. God forbid that the Sovereigns of each State must wait and rely on 9 federal judges to make rulings of this nature before a State would have any legal rights or justification to act in accordance with the will of their Sovereigns. Indeed, the ATF interpreted the Constitution unilaterally without the opinion of the US Supreme Court and without opinion or order denied the constitutionality of Tennessee’s Firearms Freedom Act. The Sovereigns in each state have the same power, and the historical and legal evidence is plentiful. Consider Thomas Jefferson’s position:

“[T]he States should be watchful to note every material usurpation on their rights; denounce them as they occur in the most peremptory terms; to protest against them as wrongs to which our present submission shall be considered, not as acknowledgments or precedents of right, but as a temporary yielding to the lesser evil, until their accumulation shall overweigh that of separation.” (Thomas Jefferson and John P. Foley, ed., The Jeffersonian Cyclopedia, A Comprehensive Collection of the Views of Thomas Jefferson, [New York and London: Funk & Wagnalls Co., 1900], 133)

I will not attempt to persuade the reader at this point on the fallacious position that only the US Supreme Court can make a determination of constitutional actions. However, for those who would argue that the US Supreme Court is in fact the only legal means by which a State can say “no” to the federal government, then I believe that such a person has reached the point of voluntary slavery, and such a person is dangerous to the concepts of federalism, American-sovereignty, and constitutional limits and freedom, as expressed by thousands of the most influential men in our history. And such a person has accepted only those political means of redress whereby the Sovereigns of each State drudge through the treacherous mud of tyranny and get absolutely nowhere.

What we are seeing today, and have seen for over 100 years in America, is the usurpation of the federal government over Sovereignty–we the people–and over Jurisdiction–the States. While this article cannot begin to expound in depth the true character and nature of the US Constitution, a study of history reveals that the US Constitution was an agreement between the Sovereigns of each State whereby they acceded to give up only certain parts of their sovereignty for the “more perfect union” of the people within those States. As with any sovereign people or government, accession may be limited to whatever means and ways necessary to protect the freedom of that society. This is in fact what the Colonists did in 1776 when declaring independence from Great Britain, what the States did in 1781 when ratifying the Articles of Confederation, and what the States did in 1787 when ratifying the US Constitution. It was the Sovereigns, through their respective States, who declared their natural rights under God, who secured their natural rights through independence from governments and who expressed that any act outside of their consent is tyranny.

When this recognition resounds in the hearts and minds of the people, as our Declaration of Independence states, “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Do you really think after only 11 years from the signing of the Declaration of Independence that those same people who risked everything for independence from those “living-constitutionalists” in Great Britain and who believed in the principles seen in the Articles of Confederation would have completely renounced their understanding of a Confederacy and Federalism and would have resigned the same and delegated all of their powers that they fought and died to secure for each State and for their citizens? If you think so silly a notion, you severely impose injustice upon the intelligence and intentions of our founders.

However, the record is clear that the Sovereigns of each State never ceded to the federal government powers not expressly vested to it and never waived the ability to reclaim that power through their proper channels–the States–the same channels by which the US Constitution was ratified. Consider the Sovereigns’ voice in the State of Virginia in 1787:

“We the delegates of the people of Virginia . . . Do, in the name and in behalf of the people of Virginia, declare and make known, that the powers granted under the constitution, being derived from the people of the United States, may be resumed by them whensoever the same shall be perverted to their injury or oppression, and that every power not granted thereby, remains with them and at their will; that therefore no right, of any denomination, can be cancelled, abridged, restrained or modified by the congress, by the senate or house of representatives acting in any capacity, by the president or any department, or officer of the United States, EXCEPT IN THOSE INSTANCES IN WHICH POWER IS GIVEN BY THE CONSTITUTION FOR THOSE PURPOSES.” (Emphasis added.)

However, the Federal government today does not recognize the Sovereignty in the people of the respective states; it does not recognizes the respective States’ jurisdiction over all matters not expressly delegated to the federal government; and it does not seem to acknowledge State Sovereignty under the 10th amendment of the US Constitution. Given their evident intent and purposes to continually grow in power and to continually oppress and suppress the sovereignty of we the people, against our respective states, the question becomes, how will they be made to understand this? It is of course up to the Sovereigns in each state to answer this question. And we see the answers arriving through State laws such as the Firearms Freedom Act.

TThe time has come in America where to be free necessarily means to resist status quo and federal usurpation and to actively change the course and philosophy being shoved down our throats. There really is no middle ground any more. This is not a matter of politics anymore. This is not a matter of Republican and Democrat. This is a matter of FREEDOM, as much so as were the matters of 1775 and 1776. It is staring you in the face, daring you to make a move. May we never be guilty of causing, whether by our apathy, indifference, laziness or comfort, this nation to lose the freedoms that our founders attempted to secure with infinite pains and labors. We the people must once again reassert our Sovereignty in this country and the States must recognize and act upon their God-ordained role as Freedom protectors and tyranny resisters.

Dr. Chuck Baldwin is the pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola, Florida. He hosts a weekly radio show. His website is here.

Revolution and Counter-Revolution

Revolution and Counter-Revolution

‘Rugged Individuals’ – Rough Riders on San Juan Hill, Cuba (circa 1898)

In the course of centuries it is sometimes forgotten that the American Revolution of 1776 was fully intended to be spread worldwide.  It was a revolution of a radically new understanding of the self (ie man the individual and his place in relationship to the universe) which was intended to wholly replace the understanding of old.  An economic philosophy, based largely upon Adam Smith’s book The Wealth of Nations (published in 1776) eventually having the name Capitalism, would in time be a part of this Revolution as well. The US Constitution, as the idea of this worldwide revolution evolved, was to be the foundation document for a constellation of Republics that was to span the globe and incorporate all peoples.  The means to spread this Revolution, besides thru the publication of media, was primarily by the direct annexation of lands that had been purchased, ceded, or conquered, to the United States.  Examples of this were the attempts to annex/conquer Canada in 1775 (the invasion of Canada) and in 1782 (peace negotiations with Britain and the idea proposed then to cede Canada to the US) and in the War of 1812 (invasion of Canada), the Louisiana Purchase from France (1803), the ceding of Florida by Spain (1819), the ceding of the Oregon Territory by Great Britain (1844), the annexation of Texas (1845), the conquest/purchase/annexation of the North American far west from Mexico (1845-48), the Gadsen Purchase from Mexico (1853), the purchase of the Alaskan Territory from Russia (1867), various quasi-private ventures (with strongly suspected US government support) to invade Central America and Cuba thru-out the 1800’s and culminating in the US invasion (and what amounted to economic annexation) of Cuba, and the conquest/purchase/ceding/ annexation of the Phillipines, Puerto-Rico, and Guam from Spain in the Spanish-American War (1898), and lastly Hawaii’s annexation (1898).

By the time of the Mexican-American War of 1845-48 this process described would have acquired a name…”Manifest Destiny”…which was the belief that in time all of North America would be a part of the United States.  Sometimes, quite a bit less often, Manifest Destiny would refer to the idea of annexing the states of South America in addition to North America, and much less oftener still the term would refer to the annexation by the US of the Far East (ie Japan, China, Phillipines, etc.), in addition to that of the Americas.

A term that also began appearing in the 1840’s and that went beyond “Manifest Destiny” in describing the wholeness of the world-wide revolution being promoted was “The United States of the World” of which are some examples below which appeared, amongst others, in the media of the nineteenth century…

From a history book regarding the state of Deleware published in 1870…

“But even should its stormy waves in the lapse of eventful time totally destroy our State; wash away both hill and plain and leave not a vestige of its territory, save what was covered by its waters, Deleware would still live in history and the minds of men; from the glorious deeds of her sons in the Revolution, and from her being the first to adopt the constitution of what will be the greatest and mightiest nation the world has ever seen, which now known as the United States of America, may hereafter be the United States of the world.  The mortal body of our State may be destroyed, but its soul will live, “till time is old, and hath forgot itself….”

“This consolidation of territory also enabled us to show a united front to Great Britain, when we threw off her yoke, declared our independence, and formed the mighty Republic of the United States of North America, which who shall say hereafter may not be the United States of the World.

From a book describing British visiters to the United States and their commentary published in 1864.  This is an excerpt from the book and an accompanying reference it makes, both of which are insightful…

[B]“What is more befitting for us Englishmen, than to watch with intense study and deepest sympathy the momentous strivings of this noble people?  It is the same fight we are fighting – the true and absolute supremacy of Right.  Surely nothing can more beseem two great and kindred nations, than to aid and comfort one another in that career of self-ennoblement, which is the end of all national as well as individual existence.”*

*”The stupendous greatness of England is factitious, and will only become natural when that empire shall have found its real centre:  that centre is the United States.” The New Rome; or, The United States of the World (New York, 1843).

A remarkably bold and comprehehensive theory of American progress, unity, and empire, by Theodore Porsche and Charles Goepp – one an Americanized German, the other a Teutonic philosopher.  In this little treatise [ed. The New Rome] the geography, politics, races, and social organization of the United States are analyzed, and shown to be “at work upon the fusion of all nations – not of this continent alone, but of all continents – into one people.”

An excerpt from an article published in May 1898 which sought “An Anglo-American Understanding”…

“Let us suppose, then, that Great Britain and the United States were to enter into an alliance involving these three elements:  first, absolute reciprocity of trade; second, a tribunal to which should be referred for settlement, as a matter of course, all question arising between the two nations, as now all question arising between the various States of this Union are referred to the Supreme Court of the United States; third, a mutual pledge that an assault on one should be regarded as an assault on both, so that as towards other nations these two would be united as the various States of this Union stand united toward all other States.  Such an alliance would include not only our own country and the British Isles, but all the colonies and dependencies of Great Britain – Canada, Australasia, and in time such provinces in Asia and Africa as are under British domination and administration.  It would unite in the furtherance of a Christian civilization all the Anglo-Saxon people, and all the peoples acting under the guidance and controlling influence of Anglo-Saxon leaders.  It would gradually draw into itself other people of like minds though of foreign race, such as, in the Far East, the people of Japan.  It would create a new confederation based on principles and ideas not on tradition, and bounded by the possibilities of human development, not by geographical lines.  It would give a new significance to the motto E Pluribus Unum, and would create a new United States of the World of which the United States would be a component part.”

Lastly, a quote from a journal published in 1859 advocating the “acquisition” of Cuba.  Though this quote does not use the term it does quite accurately define what the idea of “The United States of the World” was intended to be.

“The nation owes to the Democratic party its greatness, progress, and prosperity, and through its irresistable power will yet be planted upon every quarter of this vast continent, and ultimately, throughout the globe, the American theory of local and independent sovereignty of States, with dissimilar social organizations, existing and prospering in political union and brotherhood, each moving harmoniously in its own sphere, and all revolving with unerring precision within the orb of our Magna Charta – the Constitution of the United States.”

However, before the new revolutionary government in North America had even started building its capital city Washington DC (1791) an event would take place across the Atlantic that would greatly complicate the planned for worldwide revolution of the self…

‘New Soviet Men’ – Red Army Being Reviewed In Moscow (Circa 1921)

In 1789 a counter-revolution to the American would erupt in France which emphasized the collective (that is man as part of a group) rather than the self.  This different emphasis of the French counter-revolutionaries would be crystalised and made much more clear by the events in France of 1792.  The French Revolution promoted a radically new understanding of the collective and fully intended to replace the old understanding of the same worldwide.  While in a very shallow sense the American and French revolutions would seem to be opposites, this was not so, but rather the two revolutions, with their radically new understandings of the self and collective, simply emphasized a different part, of two primary ones, of what defines a man’s identity as a whole.  Nevertheless, as each of the two revolutions grew stronger and initially attracted primarily Europeans, and in time many non-Europeans as well, to their respective causes, they would oppose, fight, and compete, with each other.

It would be by the mid 1800’s that the term “socialism” would widely be used to describe the collectivist ideals of the French Revolution.  Socialist revolutions in 1848 would attempt to overthrow many of the European governments but would fail.  In the same year Karl Marx would publish Das Kapital which would make the economic arguments for socialism…particularly those amongst them who would be called Marxists and Communist.  In 1870 Socialist would take the capital of France and form the “Paris Commune”… they would once more be crushed as in 1848.  It would be in 1917 that the very aggressive variant of socialism known as Communism would take socialisms’ greatest prize yet…Russia.

The Comintern would be founded by Lenin in 1918 to actively spread the Communist Revolution worldwide.  After an initial attempt by the Bolsheviks to physically invade Europe was thrown back in Poland in 1920, the concentration would be on written media to spread the revolution.  With WWII, the Reds having built up their strength. would gain half of Europe and shortly thereafter China, North Korea, and North Vietnam, etc.

American and Soviet Forces Meet at Torgau – North Central Europe (1945)

However, almost immediately upon the founding of the USSR, a most astonishing and bewildering thing began to take place, particularly to those who had believed strongly and firmly in their respective revolutions, and though the process had started earlier, it would become especially pronounced in the 20th century with the rise of the Soviet Union, WWII, and the “Cold War”.  American Capitalists, in fits and starts, would begin to “borrow” concepts that the Soviets would use….the Soviet Communists in a reversal of this process would do the same regarding the ideas of American Capitalism.  To understand the why of this it is important to understand a certain ideal that both the revolution of the self and the counter-revolution of the collective espoused.

The ultimate expression (as it turned out) of the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, and the American Revolution of 1776, each had a “new man” as an ideal….respectively Leonid Brezhnev would have referred to this person as the “New Soviet Man” and Teddy Roosevelt would have referred to him as the “Rugged Individual”. The “New Soviet Man” and the “Rugged Individual” both had a problem in that figuratively each was only half of a man.  The Soviet Man was all collective and no self, while similarly the Rugged Individual was all self and no collective.  In reality a healthy person is made up in part by certain measures of both a self and collective identity.  At the most basic a man is an individual in that he has personal likes and dislikes…ie hobbies, beliefs…favorite books and music, etc…while simultaneously he is also part of a group….ie a family, and having a mother and father, and very often brothers and sisters…should he choose to marry, he will have a wife, and should the husband and wife choose sons and daughters.  He also is part of what might be termed the extended family of a people…this is all the more true depending on how homogenous the people are physically and culturally.  He will naturally have his friends as well.

As if attempting to fill in the vacuam each of the “new men” sensed they had, they would start taking ideas and concepts from the other…ie Lenin’s New Economic Policy (NEP) of the early 1920’s….Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal policy of the 1930’s…limited private property in the Soviet Union (ie gardens to plant vegetables in)…the “Great Society” program in the US of the mid 1960’s.  As time went on it became apparent that Capitalism and Communism were each in effect converging upon the other and in the process forming something new.  This process of “convergance” was greatly accelerated in the West by the Marxist cultural revolution of 1968…and in the East by the collapse of the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloc in 1989 and the subsequent infusion of Capitalism there, Capitalism also becoming a part of much of the rest of the Communist world (ie China, Vietnam, etc).  With the official cessation of the Cold War by the early 1990’s, the convergance of Capitalism and Communism would gain a name for itself…”multi-culturalism”.

And so it was that between the forces of revolution and counter-revolution, their respective radically new ideas of the self and the collective, and in the course of barely two centuries, that the classical identity of man in both his individual and group sense had largely been swept away.  Indeed, this would be true of the most natural basis of man’s identity as well…the self, family, and a people.  The Capitalist Rugged Individual and the New Soviet Man would in their convergance give rise to a new revolutionary man….the New Multi-Cultural Man.


“The Hegelian dialectic involves a struggle between two extremely opposed cultural forces–the thesis and antithesis–which are then resolved to form a synthesis”

The convergance of Capitalism and Communism, and the subsequant formation of Multi-Culturalism as a direct result, appears to very much fit into the perhaps somewhat dubious view of how history is made known as the “Hegelian Dialectic”.  Georg Hegel (1770-1831), espoused the idea that seeming cultural opposites, thesis and anti-thesis, in their struggle with one another would form a synthesis… the synthesis so Hegel’s theory goes is always supposed to be an improvement over thesis and anti-thesis.

Could it be that some, believing in the well known theory of the Hegelian Dialectic, engaged in self-deceit and wishful thinking, and that many of the events leading up to the formation of Multi-Culturalism were hardly spontaneous at all but rather in effect manipulated, if but a bit unconsciously on their part, and that Multi-Culturalism’s formation was much more akin to a self-fulfilling prophecy than anything else?

From the website linked below

“Hegel believed in an idealistic conception of history, whereby the spirit progresses through the process of a continual dialectic. The Hegelian dialectic involves a struggle between two extremely opposed cultural forces–the thesis and antithesis–which are then resolved to form a synthesis. The goal of the dialectic is to arrive at the ultimate synthesis, which Hegel calls the absolute idea, at which point the spirit will have resolved the dialectic between the temporal and the eternal. Hegel’s major works include The Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), The Philosophy of History (1833), Outlines of the Phenomenology (1840), and Outlines of the Logic (1840).”


“Hegelian thought has directly influenced Marxism, existentialism, and the Frankfurt School.”







Why Labor Leaders Favor Genocidal Immigration

Why Labor Leaders Favor Genocidal Immigration

It’s jewish “social justice”.

New Labor Leaders Take a Page From History, from The Jewish Daily Forward:

Washington — If you want to see the movers and shakers behind the tumult in today’s labor movement, the place to be is Stephen Lerner and Marilyn Sneiderman’s modest home in Washington after sunset concludes Judaism’s holiest day of the year.

Last year’s dinner had an air of momentous imminence, coming, as it did, on the eve of Barack Obama’s election as president, amid a world economic crisis that recalled the collapse of laissez-faire capitalism in the 1930s. The labor movement itself was approaching the end of a year in which it would record an uptick in union membership for the second time in a row after decades of decline. Lerner began the evening by telling his guests, “The months and years ahead are our chance, our moment to be part of making history.”

Lerner and the other Break Fast attendees are at the core of a resurgence of Jewish involvement in the labor movement. Like the legendary Jewish labor leaders of the ’30s, the folks at Lerner’s house by no means represent a majority of union leaders. But like those earlier leaders, they are exerting an outsized influence, working at the front end of some of the most innovative, and occasionally divisive, union campaigns of today.

“When you are there, you physically experience the number of Jews in Washington who are in the labor movement — but also the larger passion for social justice that is driving that,” Lerner told the Forward.

There is, of course, a firm precedent for this quiet, mostly unacknowledged trend. Before World War II, an explicitly Jewish labor movement was an engine of change for the broader American society. Morris Hillquit helped found the United Hebrew Trades labor federation in 1888, and in the ’30s this body morphed into the Jewish Labor Committee, which was one of the most powerful Jewish organizations in America. At that time, the heads of the heavily Jewish garment unions — men like David Dubinsky and Sidney Hillman — helped pass the legislation that created America’s social safety net and labor protections. These were Eastern European immigrants who had risen from the factory floors and moved easily among the labor community, the Jewish community and the leftist political world.

The current moment shares many similarities with the ’30s, due to the election of a president friendly to labor, the plunge in the stock market, and the resulting openness to new economic models and social reforms. The Employee Free Choice Act, which is currently moving slowly through Congress, is said to be the most significant labor legislation since the ’30s.

But the labor leaders of today are a very different breed from those of the ’30s. Jewish union leaders such as Stern of the SEIU and Booth of AFSCME — along with Larry Cohen, president of the Communications Workers of America; Randi Weingarten, head of the American Federation of Teachers, and Bruce Raynor, general president of Unite-Here — did not rise up from the working class. They have college degrees and are part of a new, sophisticated leadership that has come to the fore over the past decade and devised innovative tactics to battle the labor movement’s long decline.

You really have the leaders of some of the largest unions — certainly some of the most progressive unions — being Jews,” said Simon Greer, a former labor activist and the current president of the Jewish Funds for Justice. “That comes out of history — and it ties back to the history.”

Unlike in the ’30s, many of the Jews involved in the labor movement today have little affiliation with the organized Jewish community — and the presence of Jews in the labor movement can be an uncomfortable topic at times, because of the relative paucity of Jews in the rank and file of union membership. But for many inside the labor movement, the Jewish presence — not just in leadership roles, but also throughout the professional staff — occasionally becomes so obvious that it cannot be ignored.

“One night last Passover, I was here trying to finish something just before Seder, and people were like, why are you here?” said Jessica Champagne, a young researcher at the SEIU. “There are just those moments where you realize that whether or not people are observant, there are a lot of Jewish folks who have found their way here.”

- – -

Despite some continuity between the earlier generation of Jewish labor leaders and the current one, the two are not connected by a simple unbroken line.

While the Jewish garment unions were national players before World War II, their political clout afterward began to fade. Then, it was industrial unions, like the steel workers, autoworkers and teamsters, that became the face of the union movement. These tended to have few Jewish members. Because many of these unions had a policy of taking leaders from the rank and file, there ended up being few big Jewish labor leaders.

“Labor was not particularly welcoming” back then, recalled Marshall Ganz, the son of a rabbi who got involved in social movements in the 1960s.

When he left the Cesar Chavez-run United Farm Workers — a progressive and open labor group — Ganz said: “For me to go work for a [conventional] union would have been a strange thing. The unions had to be reopened to a certain extent.”

This was the situation when one of the most prominent labor leaders of today, Stern, became involved. Stern joined his union of government social workers in 1972 after graduating from the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school. Sitting recently at the SEIU’s sleek new headquarters in Washington, Stern told the Forward that back then, “my vision of unions was Teamster white guys and construction workers.”

Stern himself had become a social activist through his involvement in protests against the Vietnam War. But under AFL-CIO chief George Meany, a staunch anti-communist, the big unions had lined up in support of the war.

“The first thing I learned about unions was not a very good one,” said Stern. “In 1968 or 9, I was watching construction workers beat up anti-war protesters.”

But then, after Stern was elected to lead his local union, he attended the meetings of the local labor council in Philadelphia. There, he ran into a number of holdouts from the Jewish garment unions, and other Jewish union activists who “had a kind of ethical, cultural set of values that I understood better than people who had grown up in a more working-class — in many cases, Catholic — background.”

“I had never thought of the union movement as a place of Jewish activism in my growing up,” Stern said. His father had been a lawyer for small businesses in suburban New Jersey. But, Stern said, he saw at the Philadelphia labor council that “there was really a disproportionate number of labor leaders who were Jewish in major positions — and a lot of them were ones that were more involved in, I would say, the more progressive side of the labor movement.”

This was not true in many other parts of the country — and in many parts of the labor movement at that time. Stern said he sometimes thinks back on the serendipity of where he got his start.

“I always think, what would have happened if I had started my union career in, say, Ohio?” Stern said. “I don’t know what would have happened if there hadn’t been a lot of Jewish leaders. It just didn’t seem odd where I was to be a labor leader and be Jewish.”

- – -

The progressive tradition that Stern noticed was legendary in an earlier era. Tony Michels, a professor of Jewish and labor history at the University of Wisconsin, said that in the ’30s, labeling a union as Jewish was often a shorthand way of describing its socialist politics. A number were further to the left, which is to say, communist.

The two most powerful Jewish unions were the ones for workers in the men’s and women’s garment industries in New York City — the largest unions in the city at that time. It was no coincidence that both unions had close ties to the nation’s largest Jewish newspaper, the Jewish Daily Forward, with executives moving frequently between the publishing offices and the union halls. The head of the women’s garment union, Dubinsky, and the head of the men’s garment union, Hillman, were both immigrants from Eastern Europe who spoke with Yiddish accents. Together they helped found the socialist American Labor Party. Their socialist politics also shaped the unique structure and aims of the garment unions.

The view of the Jewish socialists was that unions should be a vehicle for social change — not just a defense of narrow interests like wages and hours,” said Michels, who wrote the book “A Fire in Their Hearts: Yiddish Socialists in New York.” “They were involved in cooperative housing, and educational programming and culture. Other unions just weren’t doing that.”

The Jewish labor movement itself was divided internally for decades by a bitter feud between socialists and communists. The socialists originally coalesced between 1897 and 1900 around the Socialist Party founded by Hillquit and Eugene V. Debs. The Forward, founded in 1897, was established originally as an organ for their more moderate views. The communists, who split off from the Socialist Party after the 1917 Russian Revolution, favored a more militant, confrontational approach in the workplace and in politics. The two groups battled for decades over control of union locals, newspapers and even Yiddish schools, until communists were expelled en masse from the major unions in 1948.

Historians and labor activists have given a number of explanations for the distinctive character of the Jewish garment unions. Ray Scannell, a labor researcher and historian, said that unlike many other immigrant groups, Jewish immigrants had already been isolated minorities in the places from which they had migrated. As a result, they were well practiced in banding together to protect their own rights.

“When you go back, one of the interesting things about the history of the Jewish labor movement is that they have these common organizational roots,” said Scannell, who has taught a class on Jewish labor history at the Washington, D.C. Jewish Community Center. “Whether it’s in Vilna or Warsaw, or the Lower East Side, the poor and the oppressed in the community know how to organize themselves to protect themselves.”

Scannell, director of research at the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers, and Grain Millers International Union, has watched these dynamics play out in his own life. He is from an Irish Catholic family in New York, but his wife and children are Jewish, and he has been fascinated to see the lingering influences of history in families like his own.

“It’s such an interesting story, because as Jews in America become more assimilated, nonetheless they continue this idea, that is frankly not as well rooted in the white Protestant community, of community self-help and organization,” Scannell said. “Even as they moved out to the suburbs and married the non-Jews, there was a continuation of these ideals of social justice that connected them back with community traditions that they might not have been entirely aware of.

- – -

By the 1980s, as Stern was beginning to rise through the SEIU, the progressive spirit in the labor movement had all but disappeared. Union membership was in a tailspin. Federal law had made it more difficult to organize workers, and most of the big unions were committing few resources to organizing new members.

In order to combat the decline, a few peripheral unions began looking to new, more sophisticated strategies to win new members and stop the decline. Both the hotel workers and the SEIU led the charge in hiring college graduates to serve in research departments that had the task of developing elaborate organizing campaigns. Stern and Lerner were both brought into the SEIU leadership during this period by Sweeney, an Irish Catholic labor leader who had gotten his own start in the New York garment unions before becoming the SEIU chief.

A major turning point came when the AFL-CIO, the largest federation of national unions, decided to open up the Organizing Institute, which was designed to provide college graduates a direct entry point into unions so that they would not have to first pass through the rank and file. The institute was founded in 1989 by a young Jew from Kentucky, Richard Bensinger, who had been recruited into the union movement by Richard Rothstein, a Jewish labor organizer and activist at one of the garment unions.

Bensinger, who is a labor consultant today, remembers when his team began looking over applications from college students who wanted to attend the institute.

“It used to be almost a joke. They would all say, ‘I’m interested because my grandmother or my grandfather was in one of the garment unions,’” Bensinger told the Forward. “It was incredible how many people who came to the institute came out of families that were involved with that union. It was application after application.”

Amy Dean, who was the head of the labor council in California’s Silicon Valley during the 1990s, said that in the years after the Organizing Institute was founded, when Sweeney won the presidency of the AFL-CIO, she saw the first steps of a process that brought a “huge influx of Jews coming to the table and wanting to be a part of the labor movement.”

“It was exciting to be in there,” said Dean, who is currently finishing a book on the modern labor movement. “We were looking outward for the first time in many years.”

Dean herself had decided to join the labor movement rather than attend graduate school at the University of Chicago. A number of the other major labor leaders of today came into their unions after law school. This sort of influx has not happened at every union; many unions have maintained old policies of promoting leaders and organizers from the rank and file only. But it has been unions that took people from the outside, such as the SEIU and the hotel workers union, that have experienced the fastest growth. The SEIU, for example, has grown to more than 2 million today under Stern, from 625,000 members in 1980, when Sweeny took its reins.

But there is a potential downside: Stern and others in the new generation of union leadership have been criticized by more traditional union leaders for giving union jobs to people who did not get their start in the working class. The generation of college-educated leaders have also been involved in a number of recent fights that have divided the labor movement (see sidebar). Paul Buhle, a labor historian at Brown University, said that in the current era, when unions are largely trying to organize black and Latino populations, the presence of so many educated Jewish leaders can be an “embarrassing detail.”

“Not to be the rank and file is embarrassing — because Jews are giving orders even in progressive unions,” Buhle said. “It comes back to a conspiratorial view of Jews in American life.”

- – -

The labor movement is, of course, not the only progressive movement that has drawn well-educated Jews, but many progressive Jewish activists say that the labor movement has a different character to it.

On a practical level, the labor movement is one of the few progressive causes offering young people both steady work and a reliable institutional structure — in short, a career. Michael Perry, who works for the AFSCME in Illinois, observed: “These are kids like me, who grew up in middle-class life. They won’t go back and work minimum wage. They want to do justice. But I still have a middle-class job here — with decent wages and benefits.”

But Perry and others also point to the unique historical connection.

“The labor connection is more than 100 years old,” Greer noted. “This puts it in another category than other progressive causes.”

Even with the history, though, the current demographic gap between union membership and leadership has, at times, required some negotiating.

Lerner’s first job was in North Carolina, organizing workers for the garment union. During that campaign, Lerner said, one of the local newspapers wrote an article implying that the organizers were a bunch of “northern Jews and rabble rousers.” Lerner recalled what happened when the organizers next met: “After we all got indignant, we looked around the room, and there really were so many Jews in the room.”

It is no coincidence that the two most prominent films about unions in recent times have both been about the cultural exchanges that happened when a Jewish organizer pushed to organize non-Jewish workers. In the 1979 movie “Norma Rae,” the Northerner is Reuben Warshowsky, who is said to be a composite of a number of Jewish organizers who worked for the textile unions. The more recent movie, “Bread and Roses,” is based on a Jewish organizer, Jono Schaffer, who worked on Lerner’s Justice for Janitors campaign.

While the current generation of Jewish labor leaders has risen up in a largely non-Jewish labor movement, their work has nevertheless helped some of them find their Jewish roots.

Greer got his start at a campaign that was being run by Cohen, who is now the head of the Communication Workers of America. Greer said that at the campaign, known as Jobs With Justice, “I really came into my Jewish identity in noticing that among all these people I was working with, there was a disproportionate number of Jews.

Greer said it made him want to explore “what led me in my background and what led them in their backgrounds to want to be in this kind of work.”

Outside of organizations like Greer’s, though, the connection is seldom made so explicitly and with such pride. Many Jewish labor leaders see few reasons to connect their labor work and their ethnic heritage, at least as they have experienced the latter. Most Jewish organizations today have not made labor a central theme in their political platforms. The Jewish Labor Committee, which has served as a meeting point between organized Jewish community and organized labor, is a fraction of the size it was when Dubinsky and Hillman founded it in the ’30s.

There are efforts underway to change that. Stuart Applebaum, president of the Jewish Labor Committee, says he sees a greater willingness among labor leaders to identify with the Jewish community.

“There is a renewal now,” Applebaum told the Forward. “You find that the Jewish leaders have not run away from their Jewishness as they once did.”

Sneiderman, a longtime official at the AFL-CIO and wife of Lerner, said that the idea of the couple’s Yom Kippur Break Fast event is part of a “conscious effort to try to make the link for people who work in the labor movement and are Jewish, so that they see that it’s not by accident that they are doing this work — and that is tied to their roots and values.”

“We’ve lost a lot of our history,” said Sneiderman, who recently left the labor world to take a job at the Jewish youth group BBYO as chief field officer.

For his part, Stern said that he recently looked back through a family scrapbook to try to recover some of his own history.

“You do wonder how you get here — you know, what were my parents teaching me?” Stern said. Stern had a Jewish education; he became a bar mitzvah at a Reform synagogue in northern New Jersey. But at the dinner table, labor was never a subject for discussion. In his scrapbook, though, Stern found the project he had done for his synagogue confirmation. It was an ethical will that went into depth “about being ethical, and trying to use your life to help other people.”

“Clearly, the values that had been instilled in me by my parents had been much more of service than of success in a traditional sense,” Stern said, looking back.

“Underneath kind of a very normal middle-class, New Jersey life, they did actually teach me some things,” he said.

After a pause, he added, with a laugh, “I’m praying it’s true for my son.”

Via a comment by Lucius Vorenus on Sailer’s “Amnesty: Our betters are back at it”.

SEIU – Service Employees International Union home page. SEIU on immigration.

Global Guerrillas

Global Guerrillas

Via John Robb on Tribalism at The Occidental Quarterly I followed a link to Robb’s blog Global Guerrillas where he focuses on:

Networked tribes, systems disruption, and the emerging bazaar of violence. Resilient Communities, decentralized platforms, and self-organizing futures.

Here’s his About page.

I’m not sure what to make of Robb, but here’s what I think so far. His analysis of globalism is broad, incisive, and critical, and comes from a technologically informed point of view outside the false dichotomy of partisan politics. He provides interesting opinions and links, though his writing is larded with jargon. Only cryptically, by reading between the lines, can he be understood to recognize the tribal jewish influence that so dominates the West’s politics, finance, and media. He seems a typical deracinated White, for whom even a keen interest in tribalism and communities and opposition to globalism appears not at all motivated by an overt awareness of or sympathy for his own tribe.

His essay Containing Chaos (unfortunately no longer freely visible in it’s entirety) begins:

We are now engaged in a conflict that will dictate whether we succeed or fail in the 21st century. Our adversary in this conflict is, in short, the threat posed by globalization.

and concludes (my emphasis):

Disruptions that result in societal and economic chaos occur most readily in societies where the health and vigor of a society has decayed. In other words, the social and economic system that the nation-state administers must be seen as fair and just, and it must deliver tangible results to the greatest number of people possible. Anything less than this and societal breakdown becomes extremely likely should disruption occur, since the allure of participation in oppositional groups, from black-market crime to guerrilla/terrorist groups, will outweigh outcomes available through participation in the status quo. In short, the nation-state will lose its legitimacy with large subsets of its population.

Here’s an example of not delivering results: The incomes of the bottom four-fifths of Americans have fallen 10 percent, adjusted for inflation, over the last three decades, despite massive improvements in worker productivity. For an example of not being just and fair, we need not go far: Self-dealing financial elites defrauded markets and the government of trillions of dollars realized during the 2008 financial panic, and not one of them went to jail.

In order to retain legitimacy at a level that allows some freedom of action, the government must endeavor to deliver real economic progress to its constituents. That means that every policy should be slaved to increasing incomes in line with increases in worker productivity, and improving the long-term financial wealth of the greatest number. (The best way to measure the success of government efforts in this regard are increases in the median incomes of individuals.) One method of achieving this, already mentioned above, is to remove barriers to community resilience. Community resilience has the potential to substantially improve the incomes and quality of life for the greatest number by reducing end-user costs, creating jobs, and spurring massive leaps in innovation.

The greatest threat to achieving this outcome lies in the potential for parasitic interests to gain control of government function, since one of the quickest routes to illegitimacy is through the appearance of corruption. This unfortunate outcome was evident in the 2008 financial meltdown, as special interests proved capable of snaring trillions in subsidies from the public treasure for no apparent improvement in the lives of most citizens.

Robb’s analysis is clouded by his conflation of both pro-globalist “self-dealing financial elite” tribalists and anti-globalist al-qaeda-like tribalists (mentioned earlier in his essay) as “parasitic interests”. While Robb sees the jihadi threat clearly enough he seems unwilling or unable to confront the implications of his own analysis regarding the “parasitic interests” who control finance and drive globalism. That their fraud going unpunished implies not the potential to gain control of government function, but that they have already gained it. That this control goes unheralded and uncriticized in the mainstream media implies that the “parasitic interests” also effectively control media function.

The “parasitic interests” who illegitimately control the Eurosphere’s government, finance, and media have made it clear that their most feared and detested enemies are White tribalists. For us repression and punishment are considered normal and deserved, especially in response to opposition to the “parasitic interests” whose genocidal immigration policies are swamping our homelands with hostile non-White tribalists.

UPDATE 16 July 2009: A bit more of Robb’s essay Containing Chaos is available at The Occidental Quarterly Online, including this paragraph:

News in the age of the global supernetwork is often startling. It features an endless procession of crushing financial panics, unexpected food shortages, sharp commodity price spikes, brazen terrorist attacks that have shut down major cities from New York to Sao Paulo to Mumbai, and much more. These extreme events form a pattern of behavior that should serve as an alarm. They are an indication that the system we have come to rely upon, the global supernetwork that connects us to each other and all manner of goods and services is entering a period of extreme turbulence, where we careen from crisis to crisis at an increasing rate and incremental severity. At worst, it may even be an indication of a looming catastrophic failure of indeterminable duration.

The Big Fear: a white backlash

The Big Fear: a white backlash

The one thing former Conservative MP K Harvey Proctor constantly warned of was a white backlash.  To keep the indigenous people under control the Caste has devised various underhand and undemocratic methods. The idea was to manage the population into a sort of utopian state. But ideologies need an enemy, and that was “whites”.  We were all held responsible for the slave trade, which meant only a heavily-censored version of slavery with the main dealers – the Arabs – left out of the account.  We are, after all, only allowed to think “correct” thoughts.

What Alan Clarke, the former Conservative government minister and famous diarist, lauded as “the British military spirit” and a matter of honour and pride is scorned as yobbery by the Establishment.

The people who were the backbone of our traditional military prowess are slandered and misused. They are misused because they are not wanted in the armed forces, where they should be cherished as heroes ready to defend our country and control our borders to repel the current invasion. Our troops are held in contempt and not even provided with adequate equipment to save their lives.

People who have committed youthful misadventures but who naturally belong in the forces are barred. At one time young men who were at risk of being sent to young offenders institutions were given the opportunity of joining the military. To the traditional aristocratic-ruling warrior class, they would have been ideal recruits possessed of potential noble virtues.  Now those virtues are now left unexplored, and the young are left in their criminality.

A classic example of how these virtues are presented as wrong or even low-class was in the Daily Mail of 5th July. In this deceitful piece of fiction – a real hatchet piece – the scribbler Niall Firth linked several disconnected phenomena.

Neo-Nazis are plotting a ‘spectacular’ terrorist attack on Britain to fuel racial tension, Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism officers fear.

Senior officers have increased their surveillance of suspects to monitor their ability to carry out a deadly attack aimed at causing a ‘breakdown in community cohesion’.

The chilling warning comes after last month’s startling gains by the BNP in the local and European elections which many fear may ‘embolden’ violent Far-Right extremists.

Typical of his old-fashioned kind he used the usual faded cliches to trigger negative responses in his readers. “Far-right” and “Neo-Nazis” were trotted out as usual to deter us from our natural instinct to defend our communities and protect our young girls from being child-raped by men from the rival Muslim communities.

The actual quotes from Commander Shawn Sawyer show how the police work in league with Muslims and against their own people. Sawyer, who is from the Met’s specialist operations wing, told a meeting of British Muslims:

”I fear that they will have a spectacular … They will carry out an attack that will lead to a loss of life or injury to a community somewhere. They’re not choosy about which community.”

These are the corrupt police who stop “whites” under terrorist laws to avoid upsetting Muslims and who warn Muslim community leaders before they stage a raid looking for bombs and weapons. If the police continue to act in concert with Muslim extremists against the indigenous people we will have to consider with-holding the portion of council tax that pays their wages.

The Caste’s scribblers are not beneath using class-distinction to distance their white targets from the rest of polite and enlightened society.  One way, if they protest, is to caricature them as “banner-waving drunks”.  Such things are said solely to discredit them and put them outside what is respectable.  These are attempts to stifle our population … to prevent a “White backlash”.  But the scribblers’ prospects are bleak as people are feeling threatened now, and are realizing what the corrupt Caste has been doing all this time behind their backs.  The scribblers try to shift the focus of blame by making things up.

A recent farrago of lies and made up examples was the Birmingham Post’s so-called report of the St.Georges’ Day parade in West Bromwich.  The scribbler hid his invention behind the word “allegedly”. But he turned out something so different from the truth that I am thinking of recommending him for “The Booker Prize”!  These imaginative concoctions do not just appear out of nowhere, they are part of an ideology that filters down from “The Ideological Caste” and binds the Caste and the media together in a common political aim of destroying us and installing Islam as the dominant European belief and legal system.  Everything slots in to that.  This is why news items have a repetitive quality – there is no original treatment by reporters.  The new event is interpreted through the old ideology.

This ideology, of course, sees us as the enemy and the scapegoat every time the multiracial dream falters.  The recent hysterical reports blaming Ulster people for disputes with Roma gypsies is a classic example.  The media never told us what caused the dispute but just accused local people of “racist attacks.” Well, I don’t believe them.  I think these people were defending their communities.

Around the world, ethno-nationlism is being asserted.  Western rulers, lost in orbit on golden fantasies of globalisation, have so far fallen back on legal sanctions, police action and snooping by the security apparatus.  If they need to do more at some stage they already have the example of the communist government of China.  It, too, is engaged in reducing indigenous populations to minorities, and stifling religious, ethnic and linguistic diversity – the indigenous populations in question being those of China’s borderlands, of course, and the flooding being done by the transfer of millions of Han, as was done in the past in Manchuria.  The objective now is to ensure possession of Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang.  Xinjiang is a large, oil-rich province on the border with Pakistan, Afghanistan and several Central Asian countries that seceded from the Soviet Union.

China’s government deals with the resultant ethno-nationalism very differently to governments in the West.  There are claimed to have been 158 dead, 1,080 injured and a thousand arrested in the ethnic violence between Han Chinese and the native Muslim, Turkic-speaking Uighurs.  The Chinese are not decadent, and do not flinch at putting combat troops into Xinjiang with strict orders to quell the conflict.  The Communist Party chief has promised to execute those responsible for the killings.

But the Chinese policy on ethno-nationalism is not simply one of suppression.  The Soviet Union was wholly suppressive, but it imploded very quickly.  The Chinese are cute and have tried to go with the flow and harness the ethno-nationalism of the Han majority.  This appears to be too subtle for our Western rulers, who are doing the very opposite with their native population, retrospectively altering history and fibbing that we were never blood-and-soil people, but a propositional nation, a nation of ideas.  A belief in tolerance, diversity, and equality supposedly define us and make us different from all other nations.  This is how they hope to break down our natural need for belonging to a people in a traditional homeland.  They think they are converting our natural, organic, Christian nation into a rationalist construct that only requires a modicum of social engineering, a political police and one or two other totalitarian structures to come to fruition.  They are pressing on even in the teeth of a deep economic recession with growing mass unemployment.

The reality is, as we know, a chaotic multiracial, multi-ethnic, multilingual, multicultural Tower of Babel in which Muslims will become the dominant demographic. But the Caste has closed its eyes to that chaos.  It does not object to chaos.  It does not care about chaos.  All it cares about is that the project of native British dispossession is completed.

Not even Muslim terrorism ripping through the heart of London shakes the Caste’s determination to press on.  There are something like 200 investigations into Muslim terror plots being conducted by security services and the courts as I write.  But the project will not fail because of Muslim terrorism.  It does not threaten the project directly.  No, the threat comes from an awakening native Britain, which the Caste has recognised early, and is already acting against.

The Caste’s big fear is ethno-nationalism – the will of native peoples to have their own lands where their faith is practiced, their culture lived, their language spoken.  Ethno-nationalism caused the Balkan wars of 1912 and 1913, triggered World War I in Sarajevo, and rent asunder the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman empires.  Ethno-nationalism spawned Turkey and Israel.  Ethno-nationalism was the spur for the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, and split Czechoslovakia.  Last August, ethno-nationalism took Abkhazia and South Ossetia out of Georgia.  Russia, meanwhile, has its own ethnic worries in Chechnya, Dagestan and Ingushetia, whose Moscow-installed president was nearly blown up a couple of weeks ago and where a Chechen convoy was ambushed with 10 soldiers killed.

Ethno-nationalism split the Asian subcontinent up into Pakistan, India and Bangladesh.  Iran, Iraq and Pakistan are on the brink.  Persians are against the Azeris, Kurds, Arabs and Baluch.  Each of those minorities has kinfolk across the national border – in Azerbaijan, Kurdistan, Iraq and Pakistan.  Turkey has struggled for decades with Kurdish ethno-nationalism.  Pashtun in Pakistan outnumber Pashtun in Afghanistan, though in the latter they are the majority.  Africa is riven throughout its artificial countries, and the vicious attacks by the Luo on the Kikiyu show renewed tribalism, as did the horrors of Rwanda, where Hutu massacred thousands of Tutsi.  Morales in Bolivia, Ollanta Humala in Peru and Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez are inciting their Indian peoples to re- take what the white man took from them 500 years ago.

Why, then would not the Caste uniquely fear ethno-nationalism in these islands?  Why would they not see Islam, with its universalist ideology, as a desirable counter-weight in the long run to ethno-nationalism.  If that’s not it … if that’s not why the Caste allows Anjem Choudry, for example, to recruit openly and demand Sharia Law in an Islamic Europe, then what is?

In whatever ways the white backlash comes, the Establishment will try to subvert it and present it as something beyond the realm of decency.  Protests will be infiltrated by police and they will use agent provocateurs to incite violence.  Smug BBC talking heads and MSM scribblers like Niall Firth will be required to invent yet more stories to “reveal” these protests as the work of the “far-right” and the BNP.  The free speech of protesters will be proscribed, and their free association too.

And yet, everything will depend on the unquenchable desire of the people to win.

Posted by Guest Blogger on Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 07:20 PM in British Politics

Betrayal, self-help and civil disobedience

Betrayal, self-help and civil disobedience

by David Hamilton

The Ideological Caste in the broad sense – the corporate, banking and political classes, intellectuals and academics, media personnel, and so forth – are in league with people who are engaged in taking our country off us and taking our children’s futures from them.

Enoch once stated that immigrants are swaggering around our cities like conquerors. More people every day are also starting to see it as it becomes clearer what is really going on. I have written before that our elites are surrendering us to Islam by allowing them to take over.  At the highest levels, bankers and politicians make deals to get money from people like the Saudis, who finance Wahhabism, to conquer the West through a pincer movement of violence and cultural infiltration. The Prime Minister and Lord Mandelson asked the Saudis to put money into the IMF and offered them and other Gulf states more influence in global institutions in return. Barclays Bank, has had nearly £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.

This has consequences in ordinary life.

1. Islamist ideas are spread through our country by Islamic study centres attached to universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities – including Oxford and Cambridge – have had more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985. Prince Charles is its honorary patron.

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity’s history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for ‘the common good’. Does he intend to destroy his own church?

2. The elites submitted to Saudi threats when they abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because the Saudi authorities threatened: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and other elites are colluding with against their own people!

3. Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Sharia finance was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the Sharia banking system. The clerics who distribute the money are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel, and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the Sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.

4. With encouragement from our rulers, Muslims are creating a rival legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported that Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this, rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. There are now , with twenty-two in the Midlands alone, which shows how quickly Muslims are taking over our country with the encouragement of the decadent authorities.

5. I understand that former Chief Constable of West Yorkshire the late Colin Cramphorn told a meeting that child abuse is part of our future so “get used to it”!  In 2004 he also managed to get a Channel 4 investigation into Muslim child-grooming spiked on the grounds that it would “increase community tensions”.

When the Caste betrays us in such a fashion, sinking so low as to look the other way when Muslim men groom and rape our children, we are plainly on our own. We have to form self-help groups, and we have to contemplate civil disobedience.

The catalyst for civil disobedience was when Muslims in Luton insulted the local regiment, The Royal Anglians, on their homecoming march through the town. This rioting in Luton was covered up.

Anjem Choudary is the voice of Al Qaeda and the British front of the global Jihad to convert our nation from the Dar al-Harb, into the Dar al-Islam. He has been holding road shows throughout Britain with the blessing of the authorities to promote Sharia law for our country in a power struggle between our communities, which last week included the insult to us of the conversion to Islam of an eleven year old English boy in Birmingham. This is the sort of thing the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams is working for.

Choudrey stated that Southall should be the centre of power “when Islam takes over the UK”. His followers cheered as he called for Muslims to “rise up” and seize power in Britain.

He has allies in the British Establishment who are encouraging the introduction of Sharia Law and, out of hatred for their own people, are encouraging Muslims to push them out by massive immigration to augment their high birth levels. Several prominent lawyers have called for Sharia Law: Anne Elizabeth Oldfield Butler-Sloss, Baroness Butler-Sloss (née Havers) GBE PC; Nicholas Addison Phillips, Baron Phillips of Worth Matravers PC, (born 21 January 1938) is the Senior Lord of Appeal in Ordinary. He was Master of the Rolls from 2000 to 2005 and Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales from 2005 until 1 October 2008; and Stephen Hockman QC, an influential figure among barristers.

These evil people are the causes of the problems on our streets as they are encouraging Anjem Choudrey’s Muslim revolution.

To defend our communities and our daughters, British people are having to form self-help groups.  They are utterly disillusioned with the rich, cosy-living Caste that is having them pushed out of their communities and keeps the child-rape of young white girls of eleven and twelve by Muslims quiet.

The state deals with by media blackouts under DA-notices and oppression by the political police. A member of The English Defence League who opposed Choudry’s roadshow to spread Sharia Law on July 4th in North London explained:

During the time waiting for Choudary a small group of young Moslems who were stirring us up by passing comments, and making threats. Several times they walked past us, goading us to react which eventually we did.

Suddenly, about eight police wagons and cars arrived, police scrambled out surrounding the protesters in a heavy handed way. The group of young Moslems had phoned the police alleging that the protesters had been racially abusive to them. Two young protesters were manhandled, then arrested and then taken away in a police wagon. The rest of the protesters were searched, filmed, had personal details taken and verified, and threatened with arrest if we walked into the centre of Haringay. A Section 60 order was in force in the borough for the day.

Choudary had spotters out in the borough pinpointing where the EDL were. Then some young Muslim arrived to stir the group up, those Moslem kids then phoned the police crying ‘racism’, the police came and arrested people for racism. The arrests justify the police action? It is a group of young Moslems’ word against the EDL members who were arrested, and those members who were present who heard and saw what went on but the British legal system is biased against their own people. Will this be used as a show trial for the State to show solidarity with Muslims against us?

The group who had stayed in Wood Green learned that Choudary had set up his road show in a neighbouring borough to avoid Section 60. The group were joined by some United British Alliance members who carried out the protest without notifying anyone. They disrupted Choudary’s roadshow – he called in about twenty of his men of whom around six badly beat one of the group who was then run over by a bus and had to be taken to hospital unconscious in an ambulance. The Muslim thugs then besieged the pub where the protesters had met and smashed it up and threw objects through the windows at those inside. Remarkably the police didn’t notice this!

It took this protest for the police to authorise the Section 60 powers and move Choudry on? But shouldn’t they be using these powers wherever he sets up a roadshow that is promoting the takeover of our country, and is recruiting for that purpose? Muslims in Europe mobilize many street soldiers within a matter of minutes, consonant with Lord Ahmed’s threat to mobilise ten thousand outside parliament to prevent Dutch MP Geert Wilders showing his film “Fitna” to members of the House of Lords.

The defenders of our communities will respond by improving communications to warn others of attacks in a particular area. Muslims will increase attacking people in force and picking off those in small groups and blaming those they attack knowing the law is on their side. There seem to be many Muslims who want a fight. It would be best to be prepared as the authorities are allowing them to do it. The defenders will certainly need a digital camcorder to record these events for evidence to counter the fabrications of the State.

There was also a protest in Birmingham where the conversion of the young English boy took place. It is the city where the terrorists tried to capture and behead a Muslim soldier in the British Army. It is where, in an editorial in The Birmingham Post a couple of years ago, some drip asked, “Is there anything intrinsically wrong with Muslims becoming a majority?”

A protester in Birmingham related:

“When I arrived at the rendezvous point a police officer asked us if we were here for the meeting and directed us to the Pavilions shopping area, and from the direction of Moor Street station about fifty protesters appeared singing. The police quickly pushed them in our direction forming a line but this enabled all of us scattered in the crowds to join our band of brothers.

The police pushed everyone in a tight circle and formed a tight human chain around us. There was probably about 100 in the circle but outside there was probably more, as at one point I was outside and then went into the circle. There was constant singing from our crowd, all light-hearted which kept the stopping shoppers entertained, and the police forming the shield seem quite good natured.

After about half an hour just in front of the main Bull Ring entrance a gang of Muslims started to form and the police made a line in front of them. They were singing Abu Akhbar, I think, but it was hard to tell and the area became more crowded with supporting shoppers, and it began to get quite hot.

Then everyone started looking in the direction of New Street at the sound of sirens and it seemed that the police were reversing a number of large police wagons across New Street and High Street right in front of us? Was this to block the whole area off or were they intending to arrest the demonstrators ? We don’t know.

Suddenly, the back of the crowd made a break through the police lines to dash down High Street, the police circle quickly fell apart as many of us just blended in with the watching shoppers as there then seemed to be a police chase down High Street.

The only incident I saw was outside Marks and Spencers on the High Street, where a white pro-Palestinian was on his soap-box shouting, “They’re all BNP”. On going over and telling him “No, you’re wrong and check out some of the black lads in the group, he called the police over and told the usual lies about our conversation. The police were not fooled and told him to get off his soap-box and go home. They were OK with us. And that was it. We then went on our way.

My summary : At no one point did I witness any racism. At no point did I see the police draw a baton, nor did I see them being aggressive with the demonstrators. All I saw was a peaceful demonstration which seemed welcome by the shoppers in Birmingham city centre.

However, there was total news blackout of these two simultaneous protests. A correspondent told me she had emailed the editor of Birmingham Evening Mail on Thursday, two days in advance but he ignored her! It looks as the government are allowing democratic protest but containing it by the use of the police and keeping it quiet by the use of DA-notices to gag the media!

Posted by Guest Blogger on Thursday, July 9, 2009 at 02:45 PM in Oh Tempora, Oh Mores

There Is A Hunger Coming Like A Run Away Freight Train

There Is A Hunger Coming Like A Run Away Freight Train

Oh… you are going to like this personal observation of food that is not growing in California. Not growing you say? Yup!! At the bottom of the article, Clint is going to be my second witness as to why you had better store up on some provisions, and do it pronto. What you are about to read, will be in a journey style version of being with Clint as he made his trip from Utah down into the vast crop growing area of California. Imagine yourself, sitting in the passenger seat and seeing with your own two eyes what Clint is going to relate to you. What is here now!! And what you had best do if you want to survive what is looking you right in the face.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. Litt.
By: Clint Richardson <>
I’ve driven the almost 400 mile stretch of Interstate 5 from L.A. to Sacramento dozens of times. Quite honestly, it’s as boring as it gets. with only the usual gas stations, mini-marts, fast-food, home-cookin’ restaurants, and strangely a newer batch of Starbuck’s Coffee shops sprouting up everywhere. In between… farms, orchards, cattle, and dirt.

On July 15th, as I began my trip to Utah, I came off the Grapevine decline and hit the flat 250 or so mile stretch of interstate which begins the farming belt in the valley. Almost immediately I noticed what I had only heard about on the radio and in the papers. Where once there were vast fields of green, now there where empty, barely recognizable rows of unplanted dirt and growing weeds. Only sporadically at first, but once I passed Bakersfield and for about a 200 mile stretch, I could not believe my eyes. Field after field laid fallow. And not really fallow, but unattended… as if it was not going to be planted in the near future either.

Signs were staked in the ground on almost every patch of barren farmland. The most common one, which was yellow and obviously a group effort to wake up the sleeping travelers of thier future plight, read:


Others, which looked more homemade were posted on non-operational farm equipment parked as close to the freeway as possible, stated things like:



At one point, after 150 miles or so of seeing this horror, I broke down in tears and had to pull over to the side of the road. I saw the aqueduct, which followed Interstate 5 most of the way, and large fields of dead trees which were planted just a few feet from the flowing cement river. I imagined how those trees would feel, imprisoned in the dying dirt by their own roots, if they could indeed comprehend that their source of life was just a stones throw away.

It was like some horrific story-book come to life; science fiction in real time. I was thinking of the farmers and their families and wondering what would become of them and their land. I was thinking about the consequences of hundreds of miles of food no longer being grown, and adding together the other states like Campo, Colorado which have the same situation… only planting 60% of their crops this year.

This deadness went on until the brink of civilization once again began to show. When I approached the Stockton/Modesto highway interchange area the carnage seemed to stop, and the fields appeared to be healthy and bountiful. I can only guess that this is because more people drive on that stretch of the freeway, and so the powers that be are trying to keep up appearances. No other explaination came to mind.

To the readers of this, I can only say that living in the city has literally blinded me to the truth, even though I knew it was happening. I wonder how many other things I ignore? Many economists and trends predictors have called for food shortages and food riots in the fall, and with what I saw last week, I have new reason to believe them.

But then, that’s the real problem isn’t it? Belief

If you believe that the food will continue to flow (magically appearing on store shelves in a grocery store near you) and just dismiss the very real claims of shortages worldwide, including a severe wheat shortage in this country due to a harmfull fungus, then I might boldy say that you deserve whatever fate befalls you.

I challenge you all to take a drive up the 5 and see this for yourself. Please! Don’t let this go unseen. If you are camera or video savy, I think it would be a really great photo exibit or website showing the true nature of our common problem. And you better believe, as you take your daily shower, flush your toilet, and water your fertilized-non-edible grassy yards, that this is indeed a Congress created crisis. So please tell as many people about it as possible.

Lastly, if you haven’t already… buy storable food! Go to the dollar store and buy rice and beans. Buy pasta, canned and jar foods, or anything with a shelf-life of more than 6 months.

What’s the worse that can happen? You’ll have food for 6 months.

What’s the best that can happen? You’ll have food for 6 months.

Take care. Spread this information. Get mad. Fight tyranny. And…

Don’t be a sheep.
Clint Richardson

The Ten Commandments According to the Obama:

After observing Obama on the campaign trail and during his first six months in office, we have concluded that our President lives and governs according to his own set of “Ten Commandments.” They’re certainly NOT the Ten Commandments you learned in Sunday School. In fact, many are the direct opposite! To prove that our conclusions are correct, you will find a link to source documentation for each commandment on the Patriot Update web site..

I. Thou shalt have no God in America, except for me. For we are no longer a Christian nation and, after all, I am the chosen One. (And like God, I do not have a birth certificate.) SOURCE

II. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, unless it is my face carved on Mt. Rushmore. SOURCE

III. Thou shalt not utter my middle name in vain (or in public). Only I can say Barack Hussein Obama. SOURCE

IV. Remember tax day, April 15th, to keep it holy. SOURCE

V. Honour thy father and thy mother until they are too old and sick to care for. They will cost our public-funded health-care system too much money. SOURCE

VI. Thou shalt not kill, unless you have an unwanted, unborn baby. For it would be an abomination to punish your daughter with a baby. SOURCE

VII. Thou shalt not commit adultery if you are conservative or a Republican. Liberals and Democrats are hereby forgiven for all of their infidelity and immorality, but the careers of conservatives will be forever destroyed. SOURCE

VIII. Thou shalt not steal, until you’ve been elected to public office. Only then is it acceptable to take money from hard-working, successful citizens and give it to those who do not work, illegal immigrants, or those who do not have the motivation to better their own lives. SOURCE

IX. Thou shalt not discriminate against thy neighbor unless they are conservative, Caucasian, or Christian. SOURCE

X. Thou shalt not covet because it is simply unnecessary. I will place such a heavy tax burden on those that have achieved the American Dream that, by the end of my term as President, nobody will have any wealth or material goods left for you to covet. SOURCE

Obama Speaks At Black & Jew NAACP Against Whites

Better get a grip on yourself and understand how much the communists, Mr & Mrs. Barrack Obama HATE White people. America is being sold off and sold out by the same nest of JEWS who put the communist Mandela in power in once White South Africa. Obama is the JEW Mandela of the United States. Take your time and watch the YouTube’s below as this high-stepping gangster, smoothtalker and enchanter from Chicago fires up the Blacks against the Whites.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. Litt.

Illegal Alien, Black Racist Marxist Obama Issues Challenge to Black American Armies to Wage War Against God’s White Race in Their Own Country

He Talked to the Crowd in Their Language, Quoting the
Negro National Anthem and battle cry of the

NAACP, “Lift Ev’ry Voice and Sing.”


In Fresno, Calif., which has one of the country’s highest concentrations of poverty, homeless encampments have formed.

Louis Gill doesn’t like to turn anyone away. The director of the Bakersfield Homeless Center in California has taken to laying out cots and mattresses between the shelter’s 174 registered beds to cope with the rush of homeless families brought to his doors by the financial crisis.

Last year, we saw a 34 percent increase in homeless families and a 24 percent increase in homeless children,” he said. “Why do we go beyond capacity? Because in a just society, a child should not have to sleep outside or in a car.”

Gill is a frontline witness to the change in the makeup of the country’s homeless. The stereotype of a homeless person as a single man no longer applies. A resident of the Bakersfield center is far more likely to be a young mother with a “good, solid job and a mortgage that she just couldn’t pay.” CONTINUE

This will curdle your blood & break your heart

Interesting Statistic
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul, Minnesota, points out facts of 2008 Presidential election:

Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19
Republicans: 29

Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000
Republicans: 2,427,000

Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million

Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2
Republicans: 2.1

Professor Olson adds:
“In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won by Republicans was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country.

Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government welfare.

Professor Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the “complacency and apathy” phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reached the “governmental dependency” phase.

If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

Pass this along to help everyone realize just how much is at stake, knowing that “apathy” is the greatest danger to our freedom

Woe unto them who are evil in all ways

I could not pass this by, as my mind focused on the slaughter of the men, women, and children of Waco, Texas, Ruby Ridge and the Weaver family, Gordon Kahl, and many, many others a few years back by corrupt politicians, Judges, and agents of the federal and state governments….and military personal who MURDERED innocents at Waco, Texas.

Then the treason from within the U.S. relating to the World Trade Towers by President Bush and his Jew butchers, henchmen, and advisors and so much more. Even of my own kidnapping by those who lie under Oath, and stole 5 years of my life, with me being placed in a gulag of the Jew controlled U.S.S.A.. The Courts are so corrupt as are all federal and state agencies that there is no Justice in the land. A Civil War within the United States cannot be avoided, for it is written by the prophets, ancient sages, and wise men of years ago… as well as today. Keep your powder dry!!
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. Litt.


‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!’

“Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!’
Isaiah, Chapter 5, verses 20-21.

Army Major who challanges Obama’s Birth Certificate Loses His Civilian Job Due To Pentagon Pressure Against His Employer.

Another screw-job in the making by the JEWS in the Pentagon.
Army Major Cook is fired from his civilian job because of his courage to challenge Marxist communist Obama’s Vault Birth Certificate as to being a lawful citizen of the United States.

I would imagine the JEWS in the Pentagon ignited the fuse of threats against the private company Major Cook worked for before being called to duty. JEWS love to blackmail individuals and companies to protect their mongrel, communist mutt Obama, and their communist agenda to destroy the United States from within.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. Litt.

Pentagon orders soldier fired for challenging prez Army warrior terminated from job after questioning Obama eligibility

Dr. Orly Taitz

The Department of Defense has allegedly compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal government has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.

Cook’s attorney, Orly Taitz, wrote in her blog that Simtech CEO Larry Grice said he would try to find another position within the company for Cook, but nothing is currently available.

The Department of Defense does contracting in the general field of information technology/systems integration, at which Cook, a senior systems engineer and architect, was employed until taking a military leave of absence on July 10 in preparation for his deployment to Afghanistan.

“Grice told plaintiff, in essence, that the situation had become ‘nutty and crazy,’ and that plaintiff would no longer be able to work at his old position,” Taitz wrote.

Grice made clear that it was Defense Security Services that had compelled Simtech to fire Cook, Taitz wrote.

According to the report, Grice told Cook “there was some gossip that ‘people were disappointed in’ the plaintiff because they thought he was manipulating his deployment orders to create a platform for political purposes.”

The Simtech CEO then discussed Cook’s expectation of final paychecks, without any severance pay, and wished the soldier well.

Messages left with Grice’s office had not been returned at the time of this report.

National Rifle Association Opposes Sotomayor Nomination To Supreme Court

Marxist Obama’s nominee Sotomayor is right in tune with the communist agenda within the U.S.. As it is written, you shall know them by their fruits, and Sotomayor fruits are rotten to the core.
The Supreme court has ruled against her decisions many times ….imagine present sitting left-wing Supreme Court justices have ruled against her decisions many times. Does that tell you that Sotomayor is out in left-field of commie never, never land? She is an insult against our Founding Fathers as well as all others as to what this once great Republic was and is to be. Every household in the United States that has personal firearms for self-protection should be very concerned about losing them if Sotomayor has her way.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. litt.
NRA opposes Sotomayor nomination to Supreme Court

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The National Rifle Association announced Thursday that it opposes Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor greets Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, Thursday.

“We believe any individual who does not agree that the Second Amendment guarantees a fundamental right and who does not respect our God-given right of self-defense should not serve on any court, much less the highest court in the land,” said a joint statement by Wayne LaPierre, the NRA executive vice president, and Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Reform.

Opposition to Sotomayor by the powerful gun lobby reflects conservative unease with President Obama’s first Supreme Court nominee, but is considered unlikely to prevent her confirmation by the U.S. Senate.

Mexican war now resembles the Vietnam war and closing in on the U.S.

As you read and watch the news article below relating to the massive drug war in Mexico, what is not being told to you, is that it resembles greatly the … VIET-NAM WAR. Just replace the drug lords and hit squads with communist Viet Cong and North Vietnam regulars. You should hardly be able to see any difference in their mode of operations. All the massive killings, infiltration of police, politicians, and military fit right to a T. The drug lords are using the same form of intimidation the communists used in their war in Southeast Asia 35 – 40 years ago against our military in Vietnam. The tactics are exactly the same. BLOOD, SLAUGHTER, BRIBERY, WHORES, BLACKMAIL, MURDER, RAPE, AND TREASON!! It will flood over into the United States in greater degree very, very soon unless ‘special U.S. military hunter teams’ aided by gunships and satillites are sent in to totally decapitate all leaders and staff of the drug lords. If other members are captured, they should be put to death immediately. No questions asked. Done deal!

The only thing that the drug lords respect is them fearing to receive a greater and more brutal force of suffering and death than they give. There is no other solution, and it will only get worse as time goes on, until they take over all of Mexico and then move north into the United States and bring with them their way of inforcement of death and suffering against U.S, citizens enmass. Just replace Mexican drug lords, their men and women, … with Viet Cong. Then ask yourself as to the 25 million illegal criminal Mexicans who are already here.
Dr. James P. Wickstrom, D. Litt.

AP – FILE – This Saturday, July 11, 2009,file photo shows police escorting Arnoldo Rueda, an alleged coordinator …

MEXICO CITY – It was the boldest, most widespread coordinated offensive ever mounted by drug traffickers against the Mexican government.

Within minutes of the weekend arrest of the La Familia drug cartel’s operations chief, the gang launched deadly attacks in President Felipe Calderon’s home state. In the worst, 12 federal agents were killed execution-style, their tortured bodies piled along a roadside as a warning for all to see.

The attacks following the weekend capture of Arnoldo Rueda spread quickly to at least 10 cities, including towns in two neighboring states. Officers’ hotels were shot up. Grenades were tossed at police posts.

At least 18 federal agents and two soldiers were killed in the attacks and ambushes. Nearly two dozen officers were wounded.

Near the bloodied bodies of the 12 agents dumped in a heap Monday off a mountain highway near La Huacana was a message: “Let’s see if you try to arrest another one.”

It was a blatant challenge to Calderon, who has deployed federal police and troops in an attempt to halt the country’s escalating drug trade.

Calderon insists that the backlash to Rueda’s arrest proves the cartel has been hurt.

“The arrests of dangerous leaders by the federal government in recent months is seriously affecting their operations and generating chaos in their ranks,” Calderon said. “Thus the violent and desperate reaction that we’ve seen these days.”

Government critics said the offensive revealed that federal forces are unprepared for the battle against heavily armed crime syndicates with extensive intelligence networks embedded within police forces.