America’s “Nigga” Problem Forgotten

Chris Rock’s Tea Party: America’s “Nigga” Problem Forgotten

Seeing Daniel Tosh’s popularity, one realizes racism isn’t going anywhere

We forgot about one story from Esquire magazine that brought a smile to our face, and for all the wrong reasons.


Scott Raab interviews Chris Rock and admits that all good, nice white people should have cried on the day Barack “Mein” Obama was elected. This is the Stuff White People Like (SWPL) mindset or what we have termed the Disingenuous White Liberal (DWL) ideology perfectly stated in its purest form.


Because of the demographic shifts in the American population the Electoral College is almost out-of-the-hands of Republicans to win, thus the Executive branch is firmly in the hands of Democrats. National Journal reported that Obama – who is losing unprecedented support from whites – and the Democrats will soon no longer need the white vote to win.


Those tears of joy shed from blue eyes by DWLs on November 4, 2008 will be lost in the rains of time, a footnote in the inexorable march to majority-minority America. But Raab still brags of his moral superiority over Caucasians who aren’t nice and didn’t cry over Mein Obama’s election:
SR: Like many nice Caucasians, I cried the night Barack Obama was elected. It was one of the high points in American history. And all that’s happened since the election is just a shitstorm of hatred. You want to weigh in on that?
CR: I actually like it, in the sense that — you got kids? Kids always act up the most before they go to sleep. And when I see the Tea Party and all this stuff, it actually feels like racism’s almost over. Because this is the last — this is the act up before the sleep. They’re going crazy. They’re insane. You want to get rid of them — and the next thing you know, they’re fucking knocked out. And that’s what’s going on in the country right now.
SR: I hope so. Because it seems like a lot of people feel they just can’t live with this man being president.
CR: It’s a lot, man. I remember when I had my show [The Chris Rock Show on HBO], I used to run my show. It was so hard to get people to bring sketches to me. No one had ever worked for a black person before. Even the black people hadn’t worked for a black person. In show business, my God, there’s no black people in show business. I’ve never been to a black person’s office in show business, for a movie or anything. It literally took a month or two for everybody to know: I’m really running the show.
SR: Strange.
CR: It’s strange, but it’s not. Women that were running things went through the exact same thing. I could’ve went crazy about it, but I actually felt sorry for them.

What’s funny is that ultimately this demographic data doesn’t matter.

Is Chris Rock saying that white people, and thus racism, are about to go to sleep? That the Tea Party is some last great attempt at resurrecting the American spirit and that this tantrum will pass into the pages of history?


Chris Rock must be forgiven for this statement. Like Dave Chappelle, he is a Black comedian that has made quite a lot of money and a career off of making fun of Black peoples peculiarities, many nuisances, and eccentricities.

His infamous “Niggas vs. Black people” routine had the unfortunate reaction of being widely accepted by white people who thought, “my God, a charming, non-threatening Black person who agrees with us!”

Lampooned in the historic first episode of The Office, the “Niggas vs. Black people” is no longer utilized by Rock:
The controversy caused by Rock’s constant use of the word nigga led him to remove the piece from his act. In a 60 Minutes interview, Rock said, “By the way, I’ve never done that joke again, ever, and I probably never will. ‘Cause some people that were racist thought they had license to say nigger. So, I’m done with that routine.”
Dave Chappelle, like Rock, rose to unprecedented fame by poking fun at many Black stereotypes that real-life experiences with Black people consistently prove to be true. Chappelle eventually quit his financially lucrative show for reasons that register on the conspiracy addict’s radar.


What should be noted is that Daniel Tosh of Comedy Central’s Tosh.0 has eclipsed Chappelle’s racially risqué humor (more on Tosh tomorrow).


Black people don’t like jokes at their expense and now Daniel Tosh is padding his bank account treading in the murky waters of racial humor that Rock and Chappelle once embraced that helped create them immense wealth before ultimately rejecting as detrimental to the cause of Black Run America (BRA).


It’s sad that Rock didn’t slap Raab for making such a disingenuous and supercilious remark about “nice Caucasians crying.” Or at least have laughed at such a sanctimonious confession. He knows he had to play the game.


We, however, laughed.


The Economist pointed out a truth that will become obvious in the next few years: a massive exodus of Black people from every corner of the United States to the Southern states is occurring. Failed majority Black cities (think Baltimore, Atlanta, Detroit, Memphis, Birmingham) are seeing massive Black flight into the white (thriving) suburbs.


Just look at the famous Flickr maps of residential living patterns… racism isn’t almost over Chris Rock, hell, the regrettably small number of nuclear Black families (remember that more than 70 percent of Black people are born out-of-wedlock) are trying to move away from failing Black cities.


Black people (W. E. B. Dubois’s talented tenth) have no desire to around Rock’s infamous Nigga’s (90 – 95 percent of the Black population of America).


Worse, Rock fails the Brown Paper Bag Test!


The ranks of Those Who Can See grow larger by the day. Black Run America (BRA) is real, and it’s getting worse – like most things normally do before they collapse – as evidenced by this story of “indefinite jury duty” being handed down by a judge to an Asian woman who made this honest admission of three things she least admired on her juror questionnaire:
An incensed federal judge sentenced a racist Brooklyn woman to indefinite jury duty on Tuesday after she trashed the NYPD and minorities.
“This is an outrage, and so are you!” Federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis told the woman, holding up her bile-filled juror questionnaire.
Juror No. 799, an Asian woman in her 20s who said she works in the garment industry, was up for jury duty in the death penalty trial of Bonanno crime boss Vincent (Vinny Gorgeous) Basciano.
It didn’t take long for her to start looking worse than the defendant.
Asked to name three people she least admired, she wrote on her questionnaire: “African-Americans, Hispanics and Haitians.”
Tomorrow, Rush Limbaugh, Free Republic, Michael Savage, Neal Boortz, National Review and a number of other organizations and individuals could say the exact things we write and everything, everything changes instantly. BRA would end immediately.

One of the key powers of BRA is the ability to frighten those who stand to lose financially from speaking out against it. Limbaugh teases his audience of 20 million occasionally – as do all Conservative outlets – but refuses to go the distance. How’s that NFL Franchise?


Funny that a comedian like Daniel Tosh picks up the reins of racial humor and takes it to heights unimagined by Rock or Chappelle… and makes a mint doing it.

Tens of millions of people are fed up – whites, Blacks, Asians and Hispanics – with the coddling of “Nigga” behavior and the constant excuses for why it fails to dissipate.

We at Stuff Black People Don’t Like didn’t cry tears of joy on the night Mein Obama was elected like the DWL Scott Raab. Nor do we believe “racism” is almost over like Rock believes, a comedian who grew in popularity because he used “racism” as an effective punch line in his jokes. Making fun of “Niggas” was the path to riches for Rock.

Admitting America has a “Nigga” problem is the first step to restoring sanity to the United States. Rock, Chappelle and Daniel Tosh all have made piles of money by poking fun at this problem.

That Limbaugh’s audience of 20 million would nod their heads in unison if he made such a declaration is the kind of conundrum that gives those whose careers are tied to the advancement and perpetuation of BRA sleepless and restless nights.

Thomas Sowell vs. Norway: Why Failed Liberal Policies in the United States work in Scandinavia

Failed liberal polices in the US work in Norway. Why is that Mr. Sowell?

Reading a recent Thomas Sowell column bemoaning liberalism, the nanny-state mentality, and the welfare-state in the United States for some reason jogged our memory of a piece published in Inc. magazine. That latter article discussed how socialism works in the Scandinavian nation of Norway, a country that has some of the highest rates of entrepreneurship in the world. Sowell’s article discussed how Black people are now fleeing cities and states that their ancestors once fled to during “the great migration” of the early 20th century.

Sowell wrote this:

The latest published data from the 2010 census show how people are moving from place to place within the United States. In general, people are voting with their feet against places where the liberal, welfare-state policies favored by the intelligentsia are most deeply entrenched.

When you break it down by race and ethnicity, it is all too painfully clear what is happening. Both whites and blacks are leaving California, the poster state for the liberal, welfare-state and nanny-state philosophy.

Whites are also fleeing the big northeastern liberal, welfare states like Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, as well as the same kinds of states in the midwest, such as Michigan, Ohio and Illinois.

In more recent decades, blacks have been moving back to the South, however. While the overall black population of the northeastern and midwestern states has not declined in the past ten years, except in Michigan and Illinois, the net increase of the black population nationwide has increasingly been in the South. About half of the national growth of the black population took place in the South in the 1970s, two-thirds in the 1990s and three-quarters in the past 10 years.

While the mass migrations of blacks out of the South in the early 20th century was to places where there were already established black communities, such as New York, Chicago and Philadelphia, much of the current movement of blacks is away from existing concentrations of black populations.

Blacks are moving to suburbs, and even to cities like Minneapolis. Overall, the racial residential segregation patterns are declining in the great majority of the largest major metropolitan areas.

Are we the only people who caught that slippage of truth? White people with the monetary means are fleeing cities and states that have created vast nanny-states and welfare-states to take care of Black populations that fled the South. Those policies — enacted by liberals — are forcing whites to leave, because the costs associated with taking care of a Black population disproportionately reliant on the state have become too great to defend.

Sowell then went on to lament the fate of Detroit:

Detroit is perhaps the most striking example of a once thriving city ruined by years of liberal social policies. Before the ghetto riot of 1967, Detroit’s black population had the highest rate of home-ownership of any black urban population in the country, and their unemployment rate was just 3.4 percent.

It was not despair that fueled the riot. It was the riot which marked the beginning of the decline of Detroit to its current state of despair. Detroit’s population today is only half of what it once was, and its most productive people have been the ones who fled.

Treating businesses and affluent people as prey, rather than assets, often pays off politically in the short run– and elections are held in the short run. Killing the goose that lays the golden egg is a viable political strategy.

As whites were the first to start leaving Detroit, its then mayor Coleman Young saw this only as an exodus of people who were likely to vote against him, enhancing his re-election prospects.

But what was good for Mayor Young was disastrous for Detroit.

There is a lesson here somewhere, but it is very doubtful if either the intelligentsia or the politicians will learn it.

Detroit didn’t collapse because of liberal policies. Vermont (with a Black population of .5 percent) is an incredibly liberal state with a generous welfare and nanny-state, and unlike Detroit, it isn’t on the verge of completely failure (this New York Times article on how the city of Detroit is abandoning blighted neighborhoods is incredible). Detroit collapsed because white flight transferred ownership of the city (meaning control of the government, city council, school board, police, etc.) over to Black people.

If liberal policies, as Sowell contests, are the reasons behind the monumental collapse of Detroit, then what is the reason for Norway’s success. Why do entrepreneurs there have an easier time starting up businesses in a land with much higher taxation then in the United States? The liberal policies enacted in Norway benefit that homogeneous population, whereas the liberal policies passed in Detroit (and in Oakland, which was recently profiled in Townhall magazine — April 2011 issue, page 42 — as yet another city where liberal ideas doomed that city and not its majority population) seem to bring about only ruin.

Why is that? The Inc. article reports:

Norway, population five million, is a very small, very rich country. It is a cold country and, for half the year, a dark country. (The sun sets in late November in Mo i Rana. It doesn’t rise again until the end of January.) This is a place where entire cities smell of drying fish—an odor not unlike the smell of rotting fish—and where, in the most remote parts, one must be careful to avoid polar bears. The food isn’t great.

Bear strikes, darkness, and whale meat notwithstanding, Norway is also an exceedingly pleasant place to make a home. It ranked third in Gallup’s latest global happiness survey. The unemployment rate, just 3.5 percent, is the lowest in Europe and one of the lowest in the world. Thanks to a generous social welfare system, poverty is almost nonexistent.

Norway is also full of entrepreneurs like Wiggo Dalmo. Rates of start-up creation here are among the highest in the developed world, and Norway has more entrepreneurs per capita than the United States, according to the latest report by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, a Boston-based research consortium. A 2010 study released by the U.S. Small Business Administration reported a similar result: Although America remains near the top of the world in terms of entrepreneurial aspirations — that is, the percentage of people who want to start new things—in terms of actual start-up activity, our country has fallen behind not just Norway but also Canada, Denmark, and Switzerland.

Yes, people do start companies in the United States and comparing a diverse nation of 312 ( not counting illegal immigrants ) million people to a tiny, all-white nation of 5 million people isn’t exactly fair. But it is intriguing to juxtapose the two articles, and realize the truths that are so obviously inescapable.

A good friend told us over dinner recently that a nation can have a Black population or it can have a space program. The costs of both, however, no honest accountant can sign off on.

The United States is scrapping its space program for a reason; it does have something to do with the fact that NASA can’t find a Black engineer, but more to do with the rising costs of caring for a population of 36 million that disproportionately receive Federal aid to exist and subsist.

Prince George’s County in Maryland is considered to be the greatest place for upper-class Black people in the nation. Largely a creation of the out-of-control Federal government growth in Washington D.C., that county boasts an artificially-created Black middle-class. It is also home to Black people who are being displaced from Washington D.C. in that cities conversion to a white majority, which is having the unintended consequence of exploding the crime rate there.

Starting a small business in the United States is still a great idea, but eventually you must adhere to an incredible gauntlet of labor laws and be compliant with the EEOC. That is a problem the Norwegians no longer face. The costs of doing business in a diverse United States city (such as Detroit) are exponentially higher then in Norway’s worst city.

Sowell also pointed out that the Black population is exploding in Minneapolis. Situated in a state renowned for its liberal policies and generous welfare, one particular group of people took advantage of this benevolence without any shame:

Minnesota long has waved a welcome mat for war refugees — first Koreans, then Hmong, Vietnamese and Ethiopians. Minneapolis provided subsidized housing and generous benefits. The newcomers found low-wage jobs at chicken-processing factories where English was not required.

The first wave of Somalis arrived here after 1991, when the country descended into a fierce clan-based civil war that still rages. More Somalis came each year, and family members soon followed, as was mandated under U.S. law. Others moved here from other U.S. cities.

Many in the community started families, opened businesses and achieved financial stability. They wired money to relatives back home, followed Somali news in ethnic papers and websites, and in some cases invested in Somali businesses even as their children became American doctors and lawyers.

Others became mired in brutal poverty. Many of the women were illiterate, and old men who had herded goats struggled in the rugged winters. Unemployment and school dropout rates soared. So did incidents of intolerance.

“We’re an obvious minority here, and have a different religion and culture,” said Abdiaziz Warsame, 37, an interpreter and youth counselor who has worked with local gangs such as the Somali Hard Boys and RPG’s. “So people feel a high level of racism.”

A 2007 tally counted 35,000 Somalis in Minnesota, the vast majority of whom live in Little Mogadishu, the gritty Minneapolis zone between two highways and the Mississippi River.

A city; a state; a nation is but a reflection of its citizens. Detroit once thrived when it was a majority white city. under majority Black-rule it is the laughing-stock of the world. Liberal policies seem to be working fine in Vermont; strangely they fail — and conservatives point this out with glee — when Black people are in charge, as this is an easy way to blame Black failure on liberalism.

Strange that Norway can succeed and prosper under the same conditions.  Vermont too. But a sizable Black population that relies on that same nanny-state and welfare system is a lethal combination.

A nation can have a space program or a Black population, but it can’t have both. The costs to the state requires far too much capital, so one must go. The United States axed the former.

A better metaphor for 21st century America cannot be found. Sowell can blame liberal policies for wrecking Northeastern states and cities, but he shows in his column that “the great migration” by Blacks from the South to these places might have put too much stress on the nanny-state and welfare-state in these areas.

Norway, meanwhile, has high rates of taxation, high rates of employment and high rates of success.

This article is not an endorsement of socialism by any means. However, it is an endorsement of this question: Would you rather live in socialist Norway or Black-run Detroit (a city that Black people run away from and proud Black families still try and defend)?

Majority of all immigrant families receiving welfare. Most legal and illegal aliens come to America to collect welfare than jobs says census.

Majority of all immigrant families receiving welfare.

Majority of all immigrant families receiving welfare.

Locust:  Most legal and illegal aliens come to America to collect welfare than jobs says census.

The US Census has confirmed what the CofCC has been telling you for the past twenty years. More immigrants, both legal and illegal, come to the United States to collect welfare than to get “better jobs.”

In Arizona, a staggering 62% of all immigrant families receive assistance from at least one of the following; SSI, TANF, WIC, Public Housing, Food Stamps, Free Lunch, and Medicaid. A large percentage of these families have never paid anything in taxes to support these programs.

In California, New York, and Texas the rate is 61%.

By immigrant family, we mean all families with an immigrant head of household. So this even includes immigrants who married an American citizen!

Illegal alien families primarily receive food stamps and Medicaid by popping out “anchor babies.” Legal immigrants families often are receiving those benefits plus many more.

In California, New York, and Texas it is 61%.

Among immigrant families from the Dominican Republic an astronomical 80% are on welfare. Among those from Mexico and Guatemala, 75% are on welfare. Among those from Ecuador, 70% are on welfare.

It is absolutely false to say immigrants are coming here to work. It may be true for a majority of immigrants from certain Asian countries, but it is absolutely false for immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean.

They are not coming here to work. They are coming here to abuse the United States and collect welfare. A recent poll from the BBC shows that America is HATED in Mexico. Only 13% of all Mexicans said they like the United States. They do not want to embrace our form of government or way of life. They want welfare, plain and simple!

Check out these articles for more data.
US Census Information.
2009 welfare data.

The Toronto Slut March

STIHIT: The Toronto Slut March

 

The following is an installment in AltRight’s ongoing series “So This Is How It Ends” (STIHIE), which chronicles instances of decadence so advanced that one can only conclude and hope that we are living in a terminal stage of Western civilization.

 

Much as with publicly burning Korans, no, dressing like a slut does not justify violence to one’s person. That said, what I find most remarkable about these women is how angry they get by the mere suggestion that their actions might have consequences.

One can be sure that the policeman who warned against dressing skanky has been put through the sensitivity-training ringer. If he were more honest, he might have instead suggested that the women avoid looking slutty around the Diversity that Canada and the City of Toronto have been assiduously importing over the past quarter century. Though saying such a thing might have brought everyone, including the officer himself, a little too close to a recognition of the contradictions of contemporary liberalism.

The Bar Tab on the Titanic

The Bar Tab on the Titanic

 

Sure, there’s much that is praiseworthy about a budget that would cut some $6 trillion over the next decade. But Paul Ryan’s plan—and the reaction to it by politicians and the media—amount to little more than Kabuki theater.

1. Ryan isn’t serious. This is a man who voted for George W. Bush’s Medicare expansion and the 2008 Wall Street bailouts.  He also recognizes that nothing like what he proposes would ever be passed in the Senate or signed by the White House. He thus is able to put forward a make-believe budget that will convince the Tea Party of the GOP’s dedication to “limited government.” Note, too, that Ryan doesn’t suggest ending a single department or major entitlement; the cuts are “across the board.” This allows Ryan to appear as a “budget hawk” without threatening to push any voter off the gravy train.

2. Washington liberals are, most likely, fully aware of everything mentioned above; however, in order to score points, they’ll squeal that Ryan is a dangerous Social Darwinist who seeks to starve the poor and elderly.

3. The debate that has consequences—at least short-term consequences—is taking place between John Boehner and the Democrats, who are playing brinkmanship over whether to cut 30 or 60 billion from the budget. Yet even here, the battle is over figures that are utterly meaningless. 

Robert Ian put things in perspective in his latest commentary,

Last week, the U.S. debt jumped $72 billion in one day. That same day, the U.S. House voted to cut spending by $6 billion.

The media spotlight was put on all the debate surrounding the $6 billion worth of cuts.

The $6 billion worth of cuts is 100 percent totally irrelevant against the backdrop of raising the debt $72 billion the same day.

Oh, and by the way, this fiscal year, Congress has already increased the debt by 676 billion. Just to put it in perspective, they would have to cut $6 billion every three weeks for the next six and a half years just to equal the 676 billion the debt has increased so far this year.

Debates like this are the equivalent of arguing about who’s going to pay the bar tab on the Titanic. The game is already over. The ship is already sinking.