The Loss of Reality

The Loss of Reality

The Ideological Caste and its Tyranny

The Loss of Reality A world built on abstractions soon loses its reality

There is a distinction between natural and artificial societies. Natural societies grow organically within a group of people with a shared ancestry. This is why patriotism is natural – it grows from emotional relationships and does not need a theory or ideological underpinning. There is more to human nature than reason and the act of bonding with your people and territory is a process of feeling, instinct, intuition and other human qualities.

I live in England so I will use England as my exemplar. England has been a nation since the time of Alfred the Great, and it is an emotional, organic growth, not an intellectual agreement. Intellectual nationalism came from the Enlightenment and, like other forms of thinking derived from the Enlightenment, is theory to be applied to men and women, that is, forced on people. It is a mistake for The New Right to adopt rationalist theorising in imitation of Marxist thinkers.

Education in the liberal era emphasised ideas, with people thinking that we are in a battle of ideas, as if ideas rule the world. In actual fact the world at a Global and local level is run by rich power groups. Power groups are changing our towns and cities into something different and separating us from our culture and history. These are being made un-British. Local councillors stand for election and promise benefits to the local community. If elected they act as agents for corporations and finance. The new buildings in London are financed by money from other countries and built and designed by global corporations using imported labour while our people remain unemployed.

We are educated to be unrealistic and naïve. We are encouraged not to judge others, but the way to live safely is to assess human nature and make judgements on the suitability of others as friends or people we do business with. We are told it is prejudice to decide who to associate with, but making such decisions is essential human wisdom. To neglect this is to open oneself up to being harmed or taken advantage of.

Running a family is a practical activity, as is running a nation. The use of concrete nouns instead of abstract ones would effect how people think and would return them to reality. The abstract way of thinking was brought in by the French Revolution and has led people out of the world of reality into the realm of fantasy, because the words they think in have no substance. This is why immigrants, for instance, are thought to be the same as us, but if you believe they share the same basic human nature with us, then immigration is alarming because they are taking over our territory as earlier invasions have done.

It is their human nature to do so, as it was ours when we were in their countries. The mode of entry is not the point. The point is that, once in a country, human nature decrees that a people start claiming territory and that includes women. The widespread raping of young White girls some as young as eleven and twelve (and some Indian and Black) by the rival Muslim community is for them the taking of the spoils of war. The police and social services have been covering these child-rapes for years. They can not face the fact that their imported pets are not bringing us benefits and enriching our culture.

The use of concrete nouns instead of abstract ones would have an immense effect on how people think – it would bring them back to reality. The French Revolution and its abstract way of thinking have led people from reality into fantasy, because the words they think in have no substance.

When a world view becomes dominant it marginalises the opposing view, and that is what has happened to traditional or national conservatism. Another complication is that new Liberalism is different from Classical Liberalism. Liberalism was replaced by Cultural Marxism in the late 1960s.  They kept the name but changed the content so that there were two Liberalisms – Classical and New. New Liberals changed the nature of the ideology into what we now see as Identity Politics and Political Correctness. For example, individual rights became group rights, and that worked against us, as we are “oppressors” and the immigrants are “victims.”

The Progressive way of thinking that stems from the Enlightenment marginalizes traditional systems in favour of a way of thinking that disdains the past and looks forward to a future perfection. Progressives think that we are ineluctably destined for the brotherhood of man – an obvious Utopia! This is no more than an irrational superstition, and any examination of the world around them would show that the opposite is happening. They think human nature is malleable and can be re-fashioned to fit into their ideology and future utopia.

A formal ideology is written down like a “How to” book, which tells people how to think and behave. Ideology grew out of the Enlightenment as a secular replacement for religion with a programme of correct thinking and behaving, and with intolerance for deviation. The rulers changed from an aristocratic class, based on blood and land, to a secular elite defined by their ability to think and say the right things – in other words an “Ideological Caste.”

Ideological thinking starts with first principles and requires underpinnings to support or justify beliefs. Conservatism by contrast is a view of the world that grows out of our emotional bonds with our families and expands outwards through neighbourhood and community to the nation. It emanates out to Europe and the Anglosphere, though weaker. For example, we feel for the South African Boers in these days of their genocide. It is stronger at home, and a parent who wishes other children to do better than their own is perverse.

The Ideological uses of language

The elites try to change people’s thinking by changing the vocabulary: the British government guidelines to the media suggest certain words about non-white crime be replaced. The words to be suppressed included immigrant, illegal immigrant, illegal asylum seeker, bogus asylum seeker, non-white, non-Christian, mixed race, half-caste, mulatto. There is the substitution of euphemistic terms for those that reflect reality, as in the official designation of Anti-Islamic activity for Muslim terrorists.

The use of Political Correctness is a way of training people to think of, and to perceive, reality in the official way. If you think differently you are a “hater,” a “racist.”

Ideological change of the meaning of words passes for common usage as people innocently adopt them: bigot and tolerance are prominent examples. Bigot means one who refuses to listen to the opinions of others but is misused as a connotative word that only applies to “right-wingers.” A classic example of this Doublespeak was during the 2010 general election campaign when Gordon Brown described a woman who asked him about imported labour as a bigot; but he was the one being bigoted because he refused to listen to her opinions! Tolerance meant to tolerate an action or to put up with something one did not like, but is now misused to make indigenous British people passive and accept being replaced by immigrants.

We need a concrete, definite vocabulary, not vague linguistic terms like person and humanity, but terms like Englishman or Englishwoman, Welshman or Welshwoman, Scotsman or Scotswoman or Irishman or Irishwoman, boy and girl; land rather than country. They are more specific and convey a solid idea of substance; they get away from the woolly vocabulary that is a cause of our collective loss of touch with reality. This would clarify what we are referring to and make our common intercourse more realistic.

The great Welsh national anthem Land of My Fathers is a pertinent example as it makes a clear statement of debt to ancestors and suggests the piety necessary to honour what the ancestors have left us, and our obligation to hand it on to our descendants. This is embodied in the Fifth Commandment to honour thy mother and father; unless they are very cruel parents, of course.

On abstractions, the counter-revolutionary Josef de Maistre stated:  

“there is no such thing as Man in the world. In my lifetime I have seen Frenchmen, Italians, Russians, etc… I declare that I have never in my life met him; if he exists, he is unknown to me.” 

Brainwashing 

A television programme Gypsy Wars contrasted a local woman with tinkers who had invaded her land, and effectively reversed the roles. The intellectual and media elites think our traditional view of the world is pathological and try to correct it for us. No young Gypsy men were shown, because they would be aggressive, and the programme makers did not want to show them as a threat; village life was not shown because that is appealing and viewers would sympathise with the woman; the woman was selected because she is not typical of rural people but was a bit eccentric and could be set up as the aggressor even though she was in fact the victim. This role-reversal was undertaken to mould the public’s views and change attitudes. This was an example of how television re-structures thought in accordance with the establishment’s Progressive ideology. 

In August 2011, police closed the largest gypsy camp in Britain at Dale Farm and the biased television news reports once again left gypsy men out of their news reports. 

For years vacancies in television were only advertised in the Bourgeois-Socialist Guardian newspaper to help filter out applicants with the wrong attitudes. 

We are derided as prejudiced if we protest against the elites having us dispossessed, which is used to mean ignorant and narrow-minded, but prejudice is in fact traditional wisdom passed down by our ancestors, and is knowledge which is much broader-based than the narrow solipsism of the contemporary era. It saves us learning the hard way, and we would have been spared this dispossession if natural prejudices had been followed after the last war. 

The great Conservative satirist Michael Wharton would have recommended Prejudometers. 

We are being dehumanised and made a non-people. We must abandon this inculcated niceness, this apologetic approach and assert ourselves. We need to give our people a sense of their collective worth for the common good, and succeeding generations need to be built up to inherit the responsibility for our life and culture. The media are occupying them with trivialities like what to wear, how to get your hair done and where to have a tat! It is done to get their money, and is morally evil, as they are being debauched by temptations and distractions. 

Government from Brussels, economic control by global corporations, and Afro-Asian colonization is part of the progressives’ new dream for an ideal future, but in practice it disinherits our children of community and association with their own kind, which we are duty bound to preserve for them. 

Throughout history wars have been fought for territory, and by allowing newcomers to stake claims, our emasculated ‘elite’ are encouraging them to fight for yet more. Our rulers are handing our ancestral homeland to invaders and protecting their welfare over and above that of their own people. 

MPs also want children taught how to have relationships and make “informed decisions” about when to have sex. Propagandising homosexuality is another threat to our demographics.

A world view to unite us 

How do we counter the dominant ideology? The way to develop a new world view is to gather examples from the world around us, of what is really happening as a result of, say, immigration, collate it and form our version of reality. The first thing is to understand human nature and what people are capable of doing to one another. We also need to consider what gives life meaning, and this leads to the idea that nationalism is about our nation and a nation means a group of racially linked people with whom we belong by emotional attachments. I openly admit to being a racialist because I believe in racial differences between people, but do not hate other peoples and do not accept the Marxist pejorative term “racist.” 

Power groups are changing our towns and cities into something different and separating us from our culture and history. We must not endlessly rehearse what has come to pass but what we are going to do. How will people cope in the social disorder the elites are plunging us into.

 We have a responsibility for our kin and a duty to them. We have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture and we must honour that. 

The elites promote a version of progress and see the past as obsolete. But the present grows from the past as the future grows from the present, which is why we have to get things right now, in the beginning of our revival. 

The attitude of those who control public life is to transfer power away from their own people and disinherit their descendants for the benefit of rival communities. We are morally obliged to put our people first, as we do with our families, even when foreigners are more in need of help. Supporting outsiders against our own people is morally wrong. 

We have natural bonds with our families, a responsibility for them and a duty to them as we have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. This extends to our fellow nationals who share the same ancestral descent. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture, and we must honour that. 

A people need the numinous things in life – religion, art, culture, a wholesome countryside. The numinous is a feeling of, and a need for, the sacred, the holy, and the transcendent; not just the material and the hedonistic. 

Simple people say, “So what? It doesn’t matter if different people take over!” This shows a failure to understand human nature. They think it will be painless, like handing the baton on in a relay race, but examples from history like the Norman Conquest, show the oppression the conquered have to endure; other countries like South Africa and Zimbabwe show what will befall our children if the evil elites are not countered. 

The ideology of multi-racialism was a righteous reaction to the opening of the camps and the watchword was, “It must never happen again.” This has come full circle and now the Jews are being persecuted in France, Sweden and elsewhere by imported Muslims. Everyone must have seen Muslims brandishing placards that read: “God Bless Hitler” and chanting “Jews to the gas!”  They must know that The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is on sale in Muslim shops all over not only England but Europe. I have written elsewhere and repeat it here: if David Cameron and Ed Milliband and the other fantasists succeed in getting Turkey into the EU the number of Muslims will be so large that the EU forces will not be able to protect European Jews from, I dare say it, possible extermination. This has been imported by the elites who are not facing the reality of what they are doing. 

Unlike the rational ideologies that have been manifold since the Enlightenment, our views derive from an emotional and instinctive relationship with our people and our territory. It is more profound than rationalising an ideology to be learnt from a book because it grows from natural, human instinct and emotion. 

To give favourable treatment to aliens over our own people is morally wrong. A nation’s manners, morals, religions, political institutions, and social structures, are inherited from its ancestors and our loyalties begin with affection within families and this emanates outward to neighbourhood and nation. We belong to our kin, above strangers. 

Look at data from the Office of National Statistics (which doesn’t take into account the births to mothers born here), then look at your children and ask yourselves: “Am I betraying my children? Where will they live and work?”

 

Recommended Reading

A conservative classic: The Quest for Community by Robert A.Nisbit 

For the New Left’s takeover of Liberalism: The Politics of the Forked Tongue by Aidan Rankin 

For Ideology: Suicide of the West by James Burnham.

For the conservative interpretation of history: Anything by Keith Feiling

In Defence of the Natural Society by David Hamilton

The way forward not found

Eulogy to the west.

As the end came near for mankind’s greatest civilization, barbarians from all corners of the earth flooded across her borders, wreaking havoc, spreading the corruption and chaos so prevalent in their own homelands. The body nations of the western world shook to their collective cores, birth rates already below replacement levels, culture almost nonexistent, racial strife in many major cities, the core populations knew only the corporate capitalist of live for now, for them their is no future. Years of entitlement spending and unrelenting wars of aggression to spread the demon of materialism to the non-western world had bankrupted the oligarchs of the west, leaving broken, confused nations, without purpose, without a common identity, without loyalty or honor. The convergence of cataclysmic crises created generations past, sealed the western world’s end, the final chapter of a 1600 year struggle was about to begin.

It was during the last years when the financial upheavals brought the western world to it’s knees, populations already under the oppressive weight of massive corporate fascist nanny state and stripped the population of thrift and savings, the resulting collapse of the four pillars of the west, took away any belief of a revival and renewal, leaving only the fear and hatred experienced by many people’s of the past when confronted with reality.

Equality driven principles in which all are created equal created an everlasting distrust, fragmented society, fostered continued balkanization of the nations. Never mind genetic predisposition, hereditary intelligence, and social biology, the priests of universal brotherhood would not be stopped from reaching the lowest common denominator.

“Thus they needed a reason to feel important and justify their increasingly selfishness. A cult of victimhood was born, leading to the lynch mob that demands equality for all, which turns out to be a code-word for tearing down the higher so aimlessness, mediocrity and deviance are tolerated.”

“As these people voted, they drove an ordinarily vapid cluster of democracies into overdrive. These democracies opted to buy out their own citizens, literally offering them social programs in exchange for political allegiance. The result was a surge of expensive programs designed to create the Utopia of liberal ideals, in which all were equal, no national borders existed, and all lifestyle choices were as valid as any others. There was no longer a “right” way or a “wrong” way. Everything was the same.”

“While this state of entropy destroyed people from within, the consequences of their social equality drive began to show. First, many more people went to college and entered the work-force. Second, new rules like affirmative action and anti-discrimination legislation made it close to impossible to fire or refuse to hire certain groups, including women, homosexuals and minorities. Finally, in order to accommodate the rebellion against standards, everything was dumbed down and made simplistic.”

Liberal democracy founded on property owners and civil duty, degenerated into one body one vote, popularity contest, What’s real and what really matters, no one cares, they ignored the mass of parasites, predators, and cries from the productive, tax and spend, became a way of life, not only in government but in the life of the individual, why work hard when the state will punish one for it. Tax loopholes allowed the wealthy to avoid the burden of the middle-class, and in the end the gap between rich and poor grew ever more massive, while those on government payrolls swelled to unprecedented levels. As a result, people are encouraged to cast aside concern for how their actions will affect civilization as a whole, and encouraged to think in terms of short range personal reward. They think the way they think about products on the shelf, in the here and now, of things falling into their hands, when in reality their nations are morally bankrupt, culturally degenerate, their infrastructure incapable of meeting the needs, in disrepair, Social decay now set in, the long collapse all but certain.

Consumerism bleed the west dry, it’s inhabitants moving about like busy little bee’s, spending their life’s earnings on the latest and greatest technical marvel, vacations to no Where, and a luxury car in every garage, trying to keep up with the jones created a society of jealous, ungrateful, unreasonable, unapologetic, unrealistic, delusion childless narcissistic aging children. These very habits destroyed the populace. The people’s only concern in life was money, and every relationship was judged by this Daily fact. The people dehumanized themselves through this process, the family order crumbled, the human element decayed, a herd of sheep the people’s of the west had become, ripe for the slaughter they most definitely were.

The system is so corrupt and beyond repair, that a solution that we can live with cannot be found, the stench of denial is hiding what is at the core of this corrupt society. The foundation of this nation “currently” is equality driven multicultural diversity in the form of population replacement, pro-minority laws, anti-white media, and the resulting ethnic cleansing of white population in totality. We cannot educate the populace away from this direction, we cannot vote our nation off this path, we cannot convince the dark skinned masses that this is self-destructive for everyone involved and will not work. We can only sit back and enjoy the ride, if we are right, which I’m sure we are, then the west has seen the last years of existence, the western economy will slowly and at some points rapidly, go down the tube, cities one by one will go bankrupt, states will run out of money, in the end some cities and states will push for economic and political sovereignty from the dieing parts of their nations. Where are the solutions, there are none, this is the terminal stage of civilization, you are responsible for all that has occurred and all that is to come, you have no one to blame but yourselves.

Many in the United States and Europe are currently so enraged with their elected leaders that they want to throw them out, or jail them, or worse. What they forget is that these are elected leaders. They managed to get into office by convincing people with their words. But we trust these people to make the right decision. Either these words are witchcraft, and should be banned, or the people made a bad decision. It’s amusing to watch the old white males struggle to understand what they see before them, a society which has regulated them to the pages of history, that somehow somewhere along the road to Utopia they were mislead, they are enraged at society because they Know in their hearts, that they did this to themselves, their own weak human selfishness, they thought they were so better than everyone else, and low and behold, their inability to live up to the standards of their ancestors has doomed this civilization. Take a walk in their shoes, everything you once believed is wrong, the natural order consumes all, and the cosmic balance always in every way wins out in the end. Tell them that their father’s, brothers, and uncle’s, died for nothing in the wars of the last 100 years, watch their reaction.

In the end, history books will be written, universities will teach what once was, what came, and what went wrong. This all has meaning, it is merely the end of one path for humanity, we tried to go against God in all his creation, and in his role as our teacher, he will teach us what our ancestors learned through centuries of blood, sweat, and suffering. There exists a cosmic order, one that applies to all things, you, me, the air we breath, and everything in between. The wisdom of the ages is never lost, it must simply be rediscovered the hard way. While those in the future may read this, we wish them to understand that not all of us were like the whole, many of us looked for meaning, tried to find our place in the whole of creation, while we could see the gut wrenching upheavals approaching our voices mattered not. Learn from our mistakes, and forgive our blindness.

“Far right” to rally this weekend in Europa

(CNN) — Far-right groups from across Europe are gathering in Denmark on Saturday for a rally they say is meant to make their governments act against the threat of Islamic extremism.
Those attending want to send a “clear message to the leaders of Europe,” according to the English Defence League (EDL), one of the organizers of the event.

The rally is due to take place in the port city of Aarhus, with speeches from a dozen speakers.

“Our governments and our media behave as if Islamic extremism exists only in the head of a few extremists, and claim that it is unfair to make the connection between Islam and extremism,” an online EDL statement says.

“This is ridiculous, just as it is ridiculous to claim that anyone who criticizes Islam must be an extremist in their own right. We believe in fair criticism of Islam and in the defence of our cultures, our nations, and the rights and freedoms that they have long protected.”

America is Dying! About damn time!

The Power of Genetics Once More Proven in Major Study

http://www.whitecivilrights.com/

Locust: Are You Ready? Everything is going to change, whatever it means to be an American, to be a member of the historical majority, to believe in the false hopes of universal brotherhood and democracy is going to change. Get Ready to defend yourself, rebuild our civilization, and take the battle to the enemy.

 

 

Commentary by Dr. Duke — A new, extensive study of adopted children in Sweden shows that adopted children who have biological parents who abused drugs are twice as likely to abuse drugs as adopted children whose biological parents had no drug problems. Once more the power of genetics is proven even in areas of social behavior. Just a few decades ago most people believed that such behavior was completely the effect of environment alone. For instance many studies have shown that Scottish people and Amerindians have much greater tendency toward alcoholism than say Italians or Frenchmen, no matter where they may live. Genetics is real, ethnic variations are real, and understanding differences helps deal with and lesson societal problems rather than pretending the differences don’t Exist –DD

 

(CBS News) – Adopted children are twice as likely to use drugs if their biological parents used them, according a study of more than 18,000 adopted children in Sweden.

 

But don’t discount a child’s environment in the nature vs. nurture debate just yet: The same study showed that adopted children who lived with families with problems, such as divorce, death or criminal activity, also had a high risk of drug abuse.

 

“For an adoptee, having a biological parent with drug abuse who did not raise you doubles your risk for drug abuse,” said first author Dr. Kenneth Kendler, director of the VCU Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, said in the press release. “But we also found an important role for environmental factors.”

 

The study was conducted by researchers at Virginia Commonwealth University and Lund University in Sweden, who looked at 18,115 children born and adopted in Sweden between 1950 and 1993, as well as over 78,000 biological family members and over 51,000 adoptive family members.

 

Read More

 

 

Jewish Groups Fight Demographic Shift in Israel But Work for It in America!

 

 

 

Jewish groups support immigration invasion While Demanding America Support Israel as a Jewish State!

 

Commentary by Dr. David Duke

 

It is mixed irony that mixed-race Barack Obama had to grovel before AIPAC and express his concern about the “demographic shift” of Israel when he has relentlessly supported every policy meant to insure a demographic shift for America and Europe. Imagine the ultimate contradiction of the President swearing his allegiance to Israel as a “Jewish State.”

 

Of course the ultimate irony is that the same Jewish-influenced government and media that supports Israel as a “Jewish State” has been working relentlessly to displace the European majorities of America and Europe. A perfect example is shown below.

 

One of the leading Jewish lobbies in Washington is the Hebrew Aid Immigrant Society, formed for the purpose of bringing Jews by the boatload from Europe to the United States. It is a society totally dedicated to the Jewish State of Israel and Jewish interests, but for some reason supports massive immigration into America of people different than the American majority, but has not a word of criticism of Israel preserving their “Jewish State.”

 

So, if they think that preserving Jewish heritage is so vital, why are they trying to destroy European and American heritage. Obviously they must know that it harms nation that becomes ethnically divided. Alien Immigration then becomes something that Zionists oppose for Jews, but support for everyone else. Some European Americans suffer under the illusion that organized Jewish power in America is now an ally in our efforts to stop immigration and preserve the heritage and freedom of our American and European homelands. An article in one of the leading Jewish newspapers in the United States, The Forward, thoroughly crushes that illusion.

 

Aronoff of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society

 

It shows that the organization that “tends to set policy for the Jewish community,” the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), has been instrumental in supporting the new amnesty for illegal aliens legislation passed by Senate Judiciary Committee and opposing a contrary bill by Sen. Bill Frist. It also shows the great power and influence of the Jewish lobby on this vital issue. Finally, the article reveals how leading Jewish organizations backed the recent illegal alien march in Los Angeles.

 

Of course, none of this is new. As my book, Jewish Supremacism, thoroughly documents, the drive and movement to overturn protective American immigration policies of the last century have been so dominated by Jews that prominent Jewish organizations routinely label it a “Jewish movement.” My book, as well as Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s articles and papers, and numerous articles on http://www.davidduke.com thoroughly document this undisputed fact.

 

It is true that a small smattering of Jews oppose immigration from what they see as a danger to their own political power, and it is true some Jewish organizations are for tighter controls to stop the infiltration of terrorists who are themselves driven in no small part by America’s support for the terrorist and criminal state of Israel. But, the evidence is clear that the overwhelming organized power of Jewry been historically influential in an “open borders” American immigration policy. Such continues today.

 

There is growing understanding that the Iraq War is a war created by Jewish extremist Neocons and their allies in government and media. It is clearly a war waged for Israel’s strategic objectives, and not America’s. This war for Israel has deeply harmed not only the over 20,000 Americans maimed or killed, but American interests across a broad spectrum. Indeed, it is Jewish extremist influence over America’s foreign policy that has led to hatred and terrorism against Americans. But, as the article in The Forward shows, it must not be forgotten that the same Jewish-Israeli Lobby that influences American foreign policy also influences critical American domestic policy.

 

In a starkly revealing article obviously written for their Jewish audience, The Forward shows how the organized Jewish community has been instrumental against the effort to halt the illegal and legal immigration that steadily is destroying the heritage of European Americans in the American nation.

 

By E.J. KESSLER
Forward Friday 31 March 2006
http://www.forward.com/articles/7589

WASHINGTON — As the Senate struggled this week to hammer out legislation on the contentious issue of immigration reform, Jewish groups were in boardrooms and on the streets advocating for the most liberal approaches to the issue.

 

The article goes on to cite Jewish Senator Arlen Specter’s spearheading of the illegal alien amnesty bill recently passed by Senate Judiciary Committee. All the excerpts indicated are from The Forward, March 30, 2006.

 

On Monday, in a surprise move, the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Senator Arlen Specter [ an Jewish extremist Israeli Partisan] of Pennsylvania, approved by a 12-6 vote amendments that would create a guest worker program and give undocumented immigrants a path toward legalizing their status—moves that are opposed by many conservative Republicans. The committee also rejected provisions of a House bill passed last December that would have made it a felony to enter the country illegally or to aid someone who did so.

 

Hebrew society blasts immigration restrictions

 

Frist’s approach was blasted by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the organization that tends to set policy for the Jewish community.

 

HIAS is part of faith-based coalitions supporting the more liberal approaches to immigration reform proposed by the late Senator Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Senator John McCain, an Arizona Republican.

 

In recent years, some Jewish groups that were concerned about terrorism have come to stress border enforcement. But HIAS and other Jewish groups argue that such concerns can be accommodated within laws that help undocumented immigrants come out of the shadows. Immigration critics and advocates estimate that 10 million to 12 million undocumented migrants are living in the country…

 

It then goes on to show that the most powerful Jewish organization in America, the American Jewish Committee is solidly behind the amnesty bill:

 

Richard Foltin, legislative director and counsel of the American Jewish Committee—a group that often is hawkish on security—said the relatively liberal bill that was passed by the judiciary committee was the right approach. “It strikes the right note in striving for the appropriate balance of enhancing our national security while protecting those who are most vulnerable in our society through earned legalization and increased worker protections,” Foltin said.

 

Powerful Jewish organizations have long seen a multicultural America as one which they can “divide and conquer” and continue to dominate. Former head of National Policy for the American Jewish Committee, Dr. Stephen Steinlight, put it very succinctly in an article he wrote for his fellow Jews in an article he wrote in October of 2001.

 

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda.

 

Jewish groups join rallies for illegals

 

As The Forward points out, officials of the leading Jewish organizations supported the rallies for illegal aliens such as the recent illegal alien march in Los Angeles:

 

As HIAS pressed its approach, other Jewish groups were joining the giant rallies in Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington in support of immigration and against the punitive approaches of the House bill. About a half-million people demonstrated in Los Angeles, while the protests in Chicago, Washington and other cities drew tens of thousands.

The PJA’s executive director, Daniel Sokatch, said that Jewish communal groups could do more…Sokatch called immigrants’ rights “a major focus of our organizing,” saying: “We’re arguing that, like economic justice, this is a profoundly Jewish issue. Our soul hinges on this debate. It’s the issue of what kind of country we want to be and who we are as an American people.”

 

It is certainly the height of hypocrisy when Jewish activist groups dedicated to the preservation and interests of the Jewish people, the same Jewish groups that support a racist, apartheid State which has a Jewish-only immigration policy, one based not simply on religion but primarily on Jewish genetics – now work to destroy the overwhelming European heritage of America.

 

Israel, of course, is a segregated society that divides Jews from non-Jews in schools, neighborhoods, even in many whole towns and settlements. The same liberal Jews who are upset because our country is overwhelmingly European-American, support the Israeli state where Jews and non-Jews cannot legally marry!

 

Gideon Aronoff, the head of HIAS, is quoted in The Forward once more confirming the inordinate Jewish political power. Now that’s the same Jewish political power cited by the recent Harvard Kennedy School of Government paper called “The Israeli Lobby and US Foreign Policy.

 

Jewish critics call all the talk of Jewish power in the Harvard paper an “anti-Semitic lie only worthy of David Duke,” but their own publications quote Jews such as Aronoff bragging of “inside group pressure from a broad spectrum of Jewish groups…” Aronoff praises the rallies such as had occurred in Los Angeles, but talks about the real power, the inside Jewish power swaying Republicans to betray America on the immigration issue. Read this and marvel at it:

 

Gideon Aronoff, the new president and CEO of HIAS, said that while “the rallies have been very important and have contributed to highlighting support on this issue, inside group pressure from a broad spectrum of Jewish groups is a significant player in a game where you need to turn only a small number of Republican senators.”

“I don’t know if Republican senators are going to be swayed by big rallies,” Aronoff said, “but a careful analysis by Jewish and faith-based immigrant advocates can make a statement that moral values are involved in the debate.”

 

Let’s talk about those “moral values” for a second and find out who this Aronoff is. The HIAS website says this about their new leader:

 

Teller stated that Aronoff has a keen and insightful knowledge of government relations and refugee issues in Washington, D.C. and brings a strong sense of traditional core Jewish values to drive the timeless mission of HIAS.

Aronoff has been a respected voice of the American Jewish community in Washington, D.C. on refugee and immigration issues and has earned the admiration of those in the immigration advocacy field. He has been an integral force behind a number of key legislative successes with Congress and the White House…

Aronoff earned a JD from Cornell Law School and a BA in History from Brandeis University. He is a member of the board of directors of the National Immigration Forum and has brought to the fore his knowledge of Jewish community institutions, interests and community relations concerns throughout his career…

 

So, there it is. By the HIAS own words, the man setting the Jewish community’s position on immigration into the United States and greatly affecting American immigration policy is man totally dedicated to “Jewish community institutions” and “interests.” And, they say he has been “an integral force behind a number of key legislative successes with Congress and the White House.”

 

There I go again, imaging Jewish power brokers working for what they see as Jewish interests! Mr. Aronoff is obviously one of those “neo-nazi, anti-Semitic” folks who believe that Jews exert powerful influence in the American political structure, in fact, he boasts of their influence! But, Lord help a Gentile who mentions it! I hope my readers notice the “integral” Jewish influence the immigration issue openly spoken about by major Jewish publications. This from a Jewish leader not http://www.davidduke.com. Can you imagine the level of influence they exert over the important issues discussed in the Harvard paper: the control over American foreign policies directly important to nation of Israel!

 

If Mr. Aronoff and the other Jewish extremists are really interested in open immigration and human rights and moral values, why do they support a Jewish state that has terrorized and driven out hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, that doesn’t let those Palestinians return to their own homes, businesses, and farms, and that now steals more of their precious land in the West Bank for Jewish-only settlements? Where is Mr. Aronoff’s rage about the Israeli State’s policies that far more fit the bill of being labelled “neo-nazi” than anything I advocate. Where is the rage of the clearly Jewish influenced mass media?

 

This issue is at the core of what I repeatedly speak about in exposing Jewish extremism. Not all Jews endorse these extremist policies, but radical, supremacist Jews control the most powerful Jewish organizations as well as now influencing the American government and media at large.

 

It is unfortunate that I am among but a very few political figures in the United States that dare to discuss these important issues, but it is understandable when you see that if someone dares to speak out – an unholy torrent of Jewish supremacist power and hate will be turned upon them. Yet, the truth is growing, as shown by the Harvard paper, and an awakening is coming. There is nothing more they can say about me, they have made almost every slander humanly possible against me. But, those of you who can think for yourself who will read my words will see the sense and indeed i say it, the humanity in them!

 

If you are moved by my words you have a responsibility to help the truth to power. Spread this article across the Web. Reprint it on broadsides for your school or work and quietly distribute them. If you feel bold enough, speak out openly about this issue as I do! Support those who stand up for principles you believe in. Your heritage and your freedom is at stake.

 

David Duke, http://www.davidduke.com

 

http://www.forward.com/articles/7589

ICE Agent Shot Dead by Another ICE Agent

 

 

 

by Jeff Davis

 

A Yahoo News article reports: “A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent is dead after a workplace dispute erupted into gunfire at the agency’s offices in a California federal building, officials said. In the incident at the Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building in Long Beach, Calif., an ICE agent allegedly opened fire on a colleague Thursday evening, leaving that colleague hospitalized in stable condition with multiple gunshot wounds.”

 

“’This situation began with what we can characterize as an incident of workplace violence,’ Steven Martinez, assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles office, told reporters late Thursday Pacific Time. However, a third ICE agent evidently intervened by firing at the initial shooter. ‘This resulted in the death of the shooter,’ Martinez said. ‘At this time, we believe this was an isolated incident and the shooter was acting alone.’ The intervening ICE agent was unharmed, officials said.”

 

“The incident occurred at approximately 5:30 p.m. PT inside the ICE offices, according to a written statement by ICE, which added that the victims were with ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations unit.”

 

Bear in mind a couple of things:

 

A large percentage of ICE agents are Latinos so this may be just a case of drunken Mexicans going berserk with government-issue guns. The Democrats want to undermine immigration enforcement in as many ways as possible so they hire Latinos, including -no doubt- Latinos, whose parents were illegal aliens.

 

Secondly, ICE doesn’t really have much to do since Obama ordered by Imperial Edict, an executive order bypassing Congress and the lawmaking process, that ICE stop arresting and deporting illegal aliens, whom the regime views as potential Democrat voters once they get legalized. So it could be the agents were simply bored from having nothing to do and getting on one another’s nerves.

 

In any event, we have an entire government agency which is supposed to be enforcing immigration laws, which is not doing its job, and to add insult to injury, we’re still paying them. Arizona tried to step in and enforce immigration law for the Feds, but Barack Obama had federal employees file a lawsuit to prevent Arizona from enforcing the law. Amazingly, no one in Congress saw fit to impeach Obama over this. Then again, the failure to control the border is a bipartisan betrayal. The Tea Party needs to clean out the phony pro-illegal Republicans before we can expect that party not to betray us on immigration.

 

Israel Media Says What American Media Won’t Dare: Israel Controls America!

 

Commentary By Dr. David DukeHaaretz is one of the leading newspapers in Israel. The Jewish State of Israel allows Jews to have a much freer media than the Jewish dominators of the American media allow. The article pictured to the left tells the naked truth that Israel literally controls the American government and warns that the American people “will get tired of it.” Well, I hope and pray so!

 

One could not even imagine the NY Times or the Washington Post having such an editorial.

 

That fact alone should tell Americans just how controlled we Americans are.

 

We are not even allowed to know that we are controlled!

 

Read the first two paragraphs of the article:

 

An elephant and an ant will meet in Washington on Monday for a critical summit. But wait, who here is the elephant and who the ant? Who is the superpower and who the patronage state?

 

A new chapter is being written in the history of nations. Never before has a small country dictated to a superpower; never before has the chirp of the cricket sounded like a roar; never has the elephant resembled the ant – and vice versa. No Roman province dared tell Julius Caesar what to do, no tribe ever dreamed of forcing Genghis Khan to act in accordance with its own tribal interests. Only Israel does this. On Monday, when Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu meet at the White House, it will be hard to tell which one is the real leader of the world.

 

Read these juicy excerpts:

 

…on the list of the seven wonders of the world than the statue of Christ the Redeemer in Rio de Janeiro, than the Roman Colosseum or the Great Wall of China: Israel’s wondrous power in the face of the United States.

 

…Israel features in the American presidential campaign as no other foreign country does, with the candidates vying for the sobriquet of “biggest Israel-lover” to the point where it often seems to be the main issue. Rich Jews like Sheldon Adelson donate enormous war chests to candidates for the sole purpose of buying their support for Israel, while the president of the United States, who won with a message of change, was forced to fold up, at lightning speed, the flag of planting peace in the Middle East simply because Israel said “No.” If last week a British member of the House of Lords was forced to resign from Parliament after daring to criticize Israel, in the United States she would never have even considered making her views known.

 

…Israel is teaching the world a lesson in international relations: Size doesn’t matter. When it comes to foreign policy Europe toes the U.S. line much more than tiny Israel does. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also taught the world that it’s possible to tell the American president “No,” bluntly and explicitly, and not only remain alive but even to gain in strength. So Obama begged for an extension of the settlement construction freeze – so what? Netanyahu will take care of it: He took the issue off the agenda.

 

When he goes to the White House on Monday he will make a new demand: Either you or we (attack Iran ), putting the leader of the free world in a tight spot. Obama does not want to ensnare his country in another war or in an energy crisis, but when Netanyahu hath demanded, who will not fear?

 

No, you won’t read this article in America’s newspapers at all, much less on the editorial page!

 

You won’t hear this sentiment so straightforwardly pronounced by any of the talking heads on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News or the BBC!

 

One man who skirted the issue with very careful guarding of very word for the Jewish thought police, Pat Buchanan, was sacked from MSNBC because of very mild references to the fact that America is under the thumb of Israel.

 

I will say the unsayable for an American political figure:

 

America is now run by traitors who put the interests of Israel first, with catastrophic affects for the American people and for the world.

 

Just a few of them include:

 

The Iraq War and a dangerously approaching, insane war against Iran. How many more tens of thousands of Americans must be maimed or killed? How many more trillions of dollars of cost, how much more fostering of hate and terrorism upon all Americans because of these insane wars for Israel?

 

Got to Haaretz and read the entire article, then go to the search engine of http://www.davidduke.com and search for Zionist war. Watch my videos on these subjects, and listen to my daily radio show on the Rense Radio Network.

 

Read, listen learn, think for yourself. Free your mind from Zionist brainwashing.

 

Free yourself, your children, your family and your country from the tribalist invaders who rule over you and lead you to destruction.

 

Why Conservatives Always Lose

Why Conservatives Always Lose

In our modern Western societies, liberals do all the laughing, and conservatives do all the crying. Liberals may find this an extraordinary assertion, given that over the past century their preferred political parties have spent more time out of power than their conservative rivals, and, indeed, no radical Left party has ever held a parliamentary or congressional majority. Yet, this view is only possible if one regards a Labour or a Democratic party as ‘the Left’, and a Conservative or a Republican party as ‘the Right’—that is, if one considers politics to be limited to liberal politics, and regards the negation of liberalism as a negation of politics. The reality is that in modern Western societies, both ‘the Left’ and ‘the Right’ consist of liberals, only they come in two flavours: radical and less radical. And whether one is called liberal or conservative is simply a matter of degree, not of having a fundamentally different worldview. The result has been that the dominant political outlook in the West has drifted ever ‘Leftwards’. It has been only the speed of the drift that has changed from time to time.

This is not to deny the existence of conservatism. Conservatism is real. This is to say that conservatism, even in its most extreme forms, operates against, and is inevitably dragged along by, this Leftward-drifting background. And this is crucial if we are to have a true understanding of modern conservatism and why conservatives are always losing, even when electoral victories create the illusion that conservatives are frequently winning.

It would be wrong, however, to attribute the endless defeat of conservatism entirely to the Leftward drift of the modern political cosmos. That would an abrogation of conservatives’ responsibility for their own defeats. Conservatives are responsible for their own defeats. The causes stem less from liberalism’s dominance, than from the very premise of conservatism. Triumphant liberalism is made possible by conservatism, while triumphant conservatism leads eventually to liberalism. Anyone dreaming of ‘taking back his country’ by supporting the conservative movement, and baffled by its inability to stop the march of liberalism, has yet to understand the nature of his cause. The brutal truth: he is wasting his time.

Defeating liberalism requires acceptance of two fundamental statements.

  • Traditionalism is not conservatism.
  • Liberal defeat implies conservative defeat.

Much of our ongoing conversation about the future of Western society has focused on the deconstruction of liberalism. Not much of it has focused on a deconstruction of conservatism. Most deconstructions of conservatism have come from the Left, and, as we will see, there is good reason for this. It is time conservatism be deconstructed from outside the Left (and therefore also the Right). I say ‘also’ because neither conservatism nor traditionalism I class as ‘the Right’. Neither do I accept that ‘Right wing’ is the opposite of ‘Left wing’; ‘the Right’ is predicated on ‘the Left’, and is therefore not independent of ‘the Left’. Consequently, any use of the terms ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ coming from this camp is and has always been expedient; I expect such terms to disappear from current usage once the political paradigm has fundamentally changed.

Below I describe eight salient traits that define conservatism, explain the long-term pattern of conservative defeats, and show how liberalism and conservatism are complementary and mutually reinforcing partners, rather than contrasting enemies.

Anatomy of Conservatism

Fear

Proponents of the radical Left like to describe the politics of the Right as ‘the politics of fear’. Leftist propaganda may be full of invidious characterisations, false dichotomies, and outright lies, but this is one observation that, when applied to conservatism, is entirely correct. The reason conservatives conserve and are suspicious of youth and innovation is that they fear change. Conservatives prefer order, fixity, stability, and predictable outcomes. One of their favourite refrains is ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’. There is some wisdom in that, and there are, indeed, advantages to this view, since it requires less effort, permits forward planning, and reduces the likelihood of stressful situations. Once a successful business or living formula is found, one can settle quite comfortably into a reassuring routine in a slow world of certainties, which at best allows for gradual and tightly controlled evolution. Change ends the routine, breaks the formula, disrupts plans, and lead to stressful situations that demand effort and speed, cause stress and uncertainty, and may have unpredictable outcomes. Conserving is therefore an avoidance strategy by risk-averse individuals who do not enjoy the challenge of thinking creatively and adapting to new situations. For conservatives change is an evil to be feared.

No answers

We can deduce then that the reason conservatives fear change is that they are not very creative. Creativity, after all, involves breaking the mould, startling associations, unpredictability. Conservatives are disturbed by change because they generally know not how to respond. This is the primary reason why, when change does occur, as it inevitably does, their response tends to be slow and to focus on managing symptoms rather than addressing causes. This is also the primary reason why they either plan well ahead against every imaginable contingency or remain in a state of denial until faced with immediate unavoidable danger. Conservatives are first motivated by fear and then paralysed by it.

Defensive

Unfortunately for conservatives, the world is ever changing, the universe runs in cycles, and anything alive is always subject to unpredictable changes in state. Because they generally have no answers, this puts conservatives always on the defensive. The only time conservatives take aggressive action is when planning against possible disruptions to their placid life. They are the last to show initiative in anything else because being a pioneer is risky, fraught with stress and uncertainties. Thus, conservatism is always a resistance movement, a movement permanently on the back foot, fighting a tide that keeps on coming. The conservatives’ main preoccupation is holding on to their positions, and ensuring that, when retreat becomes inevitable, their new position is as close as possible to their old one. Once settled into a new position, any lull in the tide becomes an opportunity to recover the previous position. However, because lulls do not last long enough and recovering lost positions is difficult, the recovery is at best partial, never wholly successful. Conservatives are consequently always seen as failures and sell-outs, since eventually they are always forced to compromise.

Necrophiles

Their lack of creativity leads conservatives to look for answers in the past. This goes beyond learning the lessons from history. Averse to risk, they mistrust novelty, which makes their present merely a continuation of the past. In this they contrast against both liberals and traditionalists: for the former the present is a delay of the future, for the latter it is a moment between what was and will be. At the same time, conservatives resemble the liberals, and contrast against traditionalists more than they think. One reason is that they confuse tradition with conservation, overlooking that tradition involves cyclical renewal rather than museological restoration. Museological restoration is what conservatives are about. Their domain is the domain of the dead, embalmed or kept alive artificially with systems of life support. Another reason is that both liberals and conservatives are obsessed with the past: because they love it much, conservatives complain that things of the past are dying out; because they hate it much, liberals complain that things of the past are not dying out soon enough! One is necrophile, the other a murderer. Both are about death. In contrast, traditionalism is about life, for life is a cycle of birth, growth, maturity, death, and renewal.

Boring

Fear, resistance to change, lack of creativity, and an infatuation with dead things makes conservatives boring. Dead things can be interesting, of course, and in our modern throwaway society, dead things can have the appeal of the exotic, particularly since they belong to a time when the emphasis was on quality rather than quantity. Quality, understood both as high quality and possessing qualities, is linked to rarity or uniqueness, excitement or surprise, and, therefore, creativity or unpredictability. Conservatives, however, conserve because they long for a world of certainties—slow, secure, comfortable, and with predictable outcomes. Granted: such an existence can be pleasant given optimal conditions, and it may indeed be recommended in a variety of situations, but it is not exciting. Excitement involves precisely the conditions and altered states that conservatives fear and seek to avoid. It thus becomes difficult to get excited about anything conservative.

Old

There are good reasons why conservatism is associated with old age. As a person grows old he loses his taste for excitement; his constitution is less robust, he has less energy, he has fewer reserves, he has rigidified in mind and body, and he is less capable of the rapid, flexible responses demanded by intense situations and sudden shocks. It makes sense for a person to become more conservative as he grows old, but this is hardly a process relished by anyone. Once old enough to be taken seriously, the desire is always to remain young and delay the signs of old age. Expressing boredom by saying that something ‘got old’ implies a periodic need for change. Conservatives oppose change, so they get old very fast.

Irrelevant

Preoccupation with the past, resistance to change, and mistrust of novelty eventually makes conservatives irrelevant. This is particularly the case in a world predicated on the desirability of progress and constant innovation. Conservatives end up becoming political antiquarians, rather than effective powerbrokers: they operate not as leaders of men, but as curators in a museum.

Losers

Sooner of later, through their refusal to adapt until they become irrelevant, conservatives are constantly left behind, waving a fist at the world with angry incomprehension. Because eventually survival necessitates periodic surrenders and regroupings at positions further to the Left, conservatives come to be seen as spineless, as people always in retreat, as, in short, losers. The effective function of a conservative in present-day society is to organise surrender, to ensure retreats are orderly, to keep up vain hopes or a restoration, so that there is never risk of a revolutionary uprising.

Liberalism’s Best Ally

With the above in mind, it is hard not to see conservatism as liberalism’s own controlled opposition: it may not be that way, but the effect is certainly the same. Conservatism provides periodic respite after a bout of liberalism, allowing citizens to adapt and grow accustomed to its effects before the next wave of liberalisation. Worse still, conservative causes, because they eventually always become irrelevant, provide a rationale for liberalism, supplying proof for the Left of why it is and should remain the only game in town. Liberals love conservatives.

Conservatism and Tradition

Conservatism does not have to be liberalism’s best ally: conservatism can be the best ally of any anti-establishment movement, since it always comes to represent the boring alternative. Conservatives defend the familiar, but familiarity breeds contempt, so over time people lose respect for what is and grow willing to experience some turbulence—results may be unpredictable and may indeed turn out to be negative, but at least the turbulence makes people feel alive, like there is something they can be actively involved in. In the age of liberalism, conservatism is fundamentally liberal: it does not defend tradition, since liberalism has caused it to be forgotten for the most part, but an earlier version of liberalism. In an age of tradition, conservatism could well be the best ally of a rival tradition, since conservatism always stagnates what is, thus increasing receptivity over time to any kind of change. Thus conservatism sets the conditions for destructive forms of change.

By contrast, tradition is evolution, and so long as it avoids the trap of conservatism (stagnation), those within the tradition remain engaged with it. This is not to say that traditions are immune from self-destructive events and should never be abandoned: hypertely, maladaption, or pathological evolution, for example, can destroy a tradition from within. However, that is outside our scope here.

Confusion of Tradition and Conservation

In the age of liberalism, because it has forgotten tradition, tradition is confused with conservation. Thus some conservatives describe themselves as traditionalists, even though they are just archaic liberals. Some self-described traditionalists may erroneously adopt conservative traits, perhaps out of a confused desire to reject liberalism’s notions of progress. Tradition and conservation are distinct and separate processes. Liberalism may contain its own traditions. Liberalism may also become conservative in its rejection of tradition. Likewise for conservatism, except that it rejects liberalism and does so only ostensibly, not in practice.

End of Liberalism

Ending liberalism requires an end to conservatism. We should never call ourselves conservatives. The distinction between tradition and conservation must always be made, for transcending the present ‘Left’-‘Right’ paradigm of modern democratic politics in the West demands a great sorting of what is traditional from what is conservative, so that the former can be rediscovered, and the latter discarded as part of the liberal apparatus.

In doing so we must be alert to the trap of reaction. Reactionaries are defined by their enemies, and thus become trapped in their enemies’ constructions, false dichotomies, and unspoken assumptions. Rather than rejection, the key word is transcendence. The end of liberalism is achieved through its transcendence, its relegation into irrelevance.

Given the confusion of our times, it must be stressed that tradition is not about returning to an imagined past, or about reviving a practice that was forgotten so that it may be continued exactly as it was when it was abandoned. There may have been a valid reason for abandoning a particular practice, and the institution of a new practice may have been required in order for the tradition successfully to continue. A tradition, once rediscovered, must be carried forward. Continuation is not endless replication.

After Liberalism

The measure of our success in this enterprise will be seen in the language.

We know liberalism has been successful because many of us ended up defining ourselves as a negation of everything that defined liberalism. Many of the words used to describe our political positions are prefixed with ‘anti-‘. This represented an adoption by ‘anti-liberals’ of negative identities manufactured by liberals for purposes of affirming themselves in ways that suited their convenience and flattered their vanity.

Ending liberalism implies, therefore, the development of a terminology that transcends liberalism’s constructions. Only when they begin describing themselves as a negation of what we are will we know we have been successful, for their lack of an affirmative, positive vocabulary will be indicative that their identity has been fully deconstructed and is then socially, morally, and philosophically beyond the pale.

Developing such a vocabulary, however, is a function of our determining once again who we are and what we are about. Without a metaphysics to define the tradition and drive it forward, any attempt at a cultural revolution will fail. A people need a metaphysics if they are to tell their story. If the story of who we are and where we are going cannot be told for lack of a defining metaphysic, any attempt at a cultural revolution will need to rely on former stories, will therefore lapse into conservatism, and thus into tedium and irrelevance.

After Conservatism

One cannot be for Western culture if one is not for the things that define Western culture. A metaphysics, and therefore ‘our story’, is defined through art. Art, in the broadest possible sense, gives expression to values, ideals, and sentiments that a people share and feel in the core of their beings, but which often cannot be articulated in words. Therefore, the battle for Western identity is waged at this level, not in the political field, even if identity is a political matter. Similarly, any attempt to use art for political purposes fails, because politics, being merely the art of the possible, is defined by culture, not the other way around.

In the search for ‘our story’, we must not confuse art with craft. Craftmanship may be defined by tradition, and a tradition may find expression in crafts, making them ‘traditional’, but the two are not synonymous. Similarly, craftsmanship may improve art, but craft is not art anymore than art is craft. Art explores and defines. Craft reproduces and perpetuates. Thus, art is to tradition what craft is to conservatism. This is why contemporary art, being an extreme expression of liberal ideals, is without craftsmanship, and why art with craftsmanship is considered conservative, illustration, or ‘outsider’.

Those concerned with the continuity of the West often treat reading strictly non-fiction and classics as proof of their seriousness and dedication, but ironically it will be when they start reading fiction and making new fiction that they will be at their most serious and dedicated. If tradition implies continuity and not simple replication, then it also implies ongoing creation and not simple preservation.

After Tradition

No tradition has eternal life. Ours will some day end. Liberalism sees its fulfilment as the end of history, but that is their cosmology, not ours. Therefore, liberalism does not—and should never—indicate to us that we have reached the end of the line. The degeneration of the West is tied to the degeneration of liberalism. The West will be renewed when the liberals come crashing down. They will be reduced to an obsolete and irrelevant subculture living off memories and preoccupied with conserving whatever they have left. Once regenerated, the West will continue until its tradition self-destructs or is replaced by another. Whatever tradition replaces ours may be autochthonous, but it could well be the tradition of another race. If that proves so, that will be the end of our race. Thus, so long as our race remains vibrant, able to give birth to new metaphysics when old ones die, we may live on, and be masters of our destiny.

Directly links the decline in America’s power, the dire state of her economy and near collapse of social cohesion on multiculturalism, mass non-European immigration and shrinking of the white majority

Pat Buchanan in Exile

By Richard Spencer

I’ve read rumors of it for a couple of days; it now appears to be quasi-official—Patrick Buchanan is out at MSNBC . . . or at least his future is decidedly “murky” at the network.

Sarah, Maid of Albion, writes:

It appears that the new policy of US Cable News channel MSNBC is to punish, and where possible suppress, free speech.1 Regular conservative contributor, ex adviser to three American presidents and two time presidential election candidate, Pat Buchanan has been permanently suspended and may not be allowed back on air.  MSNBC have taken this action because they do not like what he said in his new book “The Suicide of a Superpower” which analyses and explains the reasons behind the decline of the once great nation of America.

MSNBC President Phil Griffin is quoted as saying : “I don’t think the ideas that Buchanan put forth are appropriate for national dialogue on MSNBC. He won’t be coming back during the book tour.” Asked if Buchanan would be be back at all, Griffin replied “I have not made my decision.”

The Liberal elite in America is outraged that Buchanan’s brilliantly researched book directly links the decline in America’s power, the dire state of her economy and near collapse of social cohesion on multiculturalism, mass non-European immigration and shrinking of the white majority. These are views which are an anathema to those who currently have their jackboots on the throats of the Western media, and views which they will go to any length to prevent being expressed, especially by individuals with the profile of Pat Buchanan.

To paraphrase George Orwell, we have reached a point within our society where to speak the truth is an act of revolution, it is an act which puts you and your livelihood at significant risk, because, if you speak the truth the liars and the tyrants will try to crush you. It is no longer just the little man, or woman, who speaks out of turn on a tram or a football terrace who they seek to destroy, they are now going after the titans.

However, we have seen it all before, in the last century and further east, in cultures which were our current leaders spiritual homes, where the truth became a crime, as it is now becoming throughout the west.

It seems easy and trite to say that the Soviet Union did not die, it just moved west, but in fact, in many of the ways that matter, that is the truth.  It is the same beast, it wears a different mask, but the same snarling jaws lurk behind it.

But before we relegate Pat to the history books, it’s worth remembering that he’s weathered countless attempts to to derail his career for the past 20 years—all of which have failed. These include a press-release-per-month issued from the ADL, as well as William F. Buckley’s more equivocal purge (if that’s the right word) in his “search” for anti-Semitism in the early ’90s.2 Buckley, in one of his many efforts to ingratiate neocons and placate organizations like the ADL, ended up declaring that Pat was not quite an anti-Semite, simply “iconoclastic” . . .  Even this description reveals much about the Conservative Movement’s twin shibboleths of Majority advocacy and Israel, as well as Buckley’s own jealousy. Whatever the case, at the end of the day, Pat was simply too much of a good guy, to much of a friend to Washington insiders, and too much of a serious writer to be purged. So, I wouldn’t bet against Pat overcoming this latest turn of events.

If the Beltway and New York media do succeed in collectively shunning Pat, however, we will have entered a new phase of PC (and Majority dispossession.)

From a cynical standpoint, one might say that Pat wasn’t just tolerated by the mainline media for his experience and political acumen; he was kept on board as one of the last avatars of a traditional, Christian, and European America—if only to capture a particular viewing demographic and give Rachel Maddow something to express righteous liberal outrage over.

The absence of Pat would mean that the mainline media no longer tolerate a single voice that projects traditionalism and Majority nationalism. Not a hint. Nothing. Nada. (In such a case, we’re lucky that Pat’s book and writings remain.)

Thinking about Pat’s significance in the mainstream, I’m left with this thought. In 2001, Pat warned White Americans about demographic displacement and a general cultural decline. In 2011, Pat sounded the same themes; in many ways, Suicide of a Superpower was a sequel or reworking of the earlier volume.

In the decade that separates the two books, NOTHING WAS DONE.

The self-styled “Conservative Movement,” with which Pat identified throughout his early years, engaged in Middle East war-mongering for democracy and other pointless pursuits. No serious pro-White movement arose in response to Buchanan’s dire warnings—or at least none was successful.

A third “Death/Suicide” volume in 2021 probably would be greeted with less outrage than confused contempt. The Brazil-America of the foreseeable future—one with a large-and-growing African and Hispanic underclasses, an egalitarian civic creed, and an increasingly totalitarian state—will, no doubt, exist under dramatically reduced economic circumstances. But there’s no reason to believe that it would be any less self-confident and nationalistic than the country is today. Such a nation would view Pat’s defense of a paleo-America not as “conservative” and “right-wing”—but as heretical and absurd. At some point, Barack Obama and Rihanna will replace Davy Crocket and Vince Lombardi as representatives of the real America.

______

1 — I don’t want to quibble with dear Sarah, but it’s not really an issue of “free speech.” MSNBC is a private entity that can air what it pleases. Certainly, if we were in charge of major media outlets, we’d be “suppressing free speech” left and right—and featuring programming like Jonathan Bowden on Everything, The James Edwards Channel, and our daily soap opera, As the World Eternally Recurs. The issue is political correctness.

2 — Clearly, Buckley wanted to re-orient National Review towards the neocons and their patrons. The magazine did, however, endorse Pat in ’92, no doubt, at the behest of then-editor John O’Sullivan.

Beta Male of the World

America: Beta Male of the World

Know Who You Are Fighting.

America does nice things all the time all around the world, and we are rewarded with contempt, hatred, and hostility.  We are like the “Nice Guy” who gets to be alternately a sucker and an emotional punching bag, while the “Bad Boys” get to do what (and whom) they want.

Today, an Albanian Muslim terrorist was arrested in my neck of the woods. He’s from Kosovo, a criminal neighborhood that the Serbs were cleaning up until NATO decided to align with the Albanian terrorists in 1999 and bombed the hell out of the Serbs.  The false pretenses of the war were soon exposed; indeed, they were many times flimsier than the WMD claims in Iraq.  But it’s all down the memory hole now.
Thanks to American airpower, these Albanian clients run prostitution and drugs through the Balkans with little interference.  Even their criminal leader Hacim Thaci  is in on the act.  Sometimes we get to harvest the fruits of their civilization, as in today’s terrorist bomb scare in Tampa.  One of the worst consequence of Humanitarian Wars is that we often get a flood of refugees, even though these wars themselves are supposed to render fleeing from atrocities obsolete.  We have Somalis, Haitians, Palestinians, Egyptians, Kurds, Iraqis, and every other people from the planet Earth living here on various asylum and refugee visas, often engaged in menial work at best and criminal terorrism at worst. We stupidly think the Muslim newcomers will be greatful for us “helping them” or for being exposed to our wonderful way of life, but let’s look at the record.  We’ve helped them in Afghanistan it the 80s, in the entire Israeli-Palestinian peace process, today in Egypt and Afghanistan, yesterday in Somalia and Kuwait and Kosovo, and it makes no difference.  We are hated.  And sometimes we are killed.  Let’s not forget Mohammad Atta and Khalid Sheikh Mohammad both spent a lot of time in the West.  They hated the place too.  Sami Osmakac’s ingratitude and hostility is not new.

Of course, not all Muslims are terrorists.  Indeed, the vast majority are not.  But Muslims are probably 100X more likely to be terrorists. When they’re not terrorists, they often obfuscate and make excuses for terrorism.  They often are hostile to our country, even if they are nonviolent and do not formally endorse terrorism.  Their marginal contributions to our collective life make their presence in our country a luxury (and more like a liability) that we simply cannot afford.  Indeed, when the US acted tougher–as in bombing Libya to smithereens in 1986–its tough and unapologetic actions have paid much better dividends than our Nice Guy routine today in Iraq and Afghanistan.  And when we acted tougher at home, such as in our rough treatment of Japanese and German agents and supporters in World War II, we found relatively little sabotage and domestic terrorism.

To deal with militant Islam we don’t necessarily need to do any favors for Muslims in Muslim lands.  But whether we shoudl be activist or isolationist, we certainly don’t need to add to the Muslim threat at home by inviting “refugees” and others from the most alien and hostile civilization on earth.  We must live in reality to remain an independent nation, just as we must learn about and master reality to live as self-respecting individual men.

Emma West: England’s John Rocker Moment

Emma West: England’s John Rocker Moment

http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/
Years from now, a young, impressionable student will ask where you were on that day.
Those who can see — Emma West’s John Rocker moment

The teacher, thinking of the many hours that were once spent – for decades – inculcating students about the horrors and depredations that Rosa Parks went through to integrate public transportation (so that only Black people could ride), smiles, remembering that during those dark days major media outlets tried to claim that white babies were inherently racist.

“There was something called Teach for America,” she replies, all of the eyes in the classroom fixed on her. “It was widely accepted in that time that with more money and resources, and the best and brightest dedicated their abilities to teaching minority students, that we could improve their test scores to the standard established by whites.”
 The memory of the two years she spent in one of the worst schools in St. Louis, with 10 resources officers dedicated to maintaining the peace and metal detectors spread throughout the school to warn of guns or knives being brought in by “students” floods her mind.
“No matter how passionately people believed in change, there was no hope,” she muttered, while slowly running her left hand across the scar on her back where one of those students in St. Louis stabbed her.
After a moment of hesitation, the teacher slowly rises to her feet. “The news media made the sensational claim that a mother, much like the one who cares for you and loves you at home, was evil for daring to point out that her country was overrun with people who didn’t belong there.”
It was this incident that the young student had hoped to have addressed.
“Early that same year riots had broken out all across that country, where people who looked similar to the ones that this mother addressed on a train in London, burned, looted, and pillaged the cities when – 60 years earlier – there weren’t any of those people in the country. In some cases, these people made us undress as a form of humiliation.”
Shuddering at the recollection of the tyranny that once existed, where people who voiced opposition to the ruling regime were denounced as mentally deranged for espousing such views, the teacher finally answers the student’s question.
“I was in a coffee shop in St. Louis. A friend e-mailed over this video of that very mother who would say things that anyone who ever rode public transportation would privately think to themselves, but publicly refrain from saying for fear of the consequences.”
Walking to one of the windows in the classroom, the teacher stared outside to view a world where that tyranny was now gone. Turning to nothing but anxious young faces hoping to soak up as much knowledge as possible, she said, “for her words, she was arrested. In the eyes of ruling establishment, she had committed treason by daring to articulate what those in power knew a large percentage of the population were privately thinking.”
Every student in the room knew the details of this story.
“But then I read where they took her son away and placed her in “protective care” which meant she was to be treated as clinically sick. I sat in my chair at that coffee shop for two hours without moving. It was at that moment I realized that the concept of freedom – which was birthed in the very nation where that mother was now in custody – had failed.”
Hunching ever so slightly on her desk with her hands propping her up, the teacher stared right at the little boy who had posed the question, and, with a smile, said, “I wasn’t the only one.”
History is full of minor moments that become the impetus for major change; incidents that are seemingly trivial at the time they transpire, but end up as powerful rallying points because they address the private concerns of millions.
As one of Albion’s Seed, the rise of tyranny in England is sad, but the rise of tyranny in Black-Run America (BRA) is even worse. Recall when Atlanta Braves pitcher was forced to undergo mental evaluation for saying this to a Sports Illustrated reporter:
JOHN ROCKER has opinions, and there’s no way to sugarcoat them. They are politically incorrect, to say the least, and he likes to express them. 
·  On ever playing for a New York team: “I would retire first. It’s the most hectic, nerve-racking city. Imagine having to take the [Number] 7 train to the ballpark, looking like you’re [riding through] Beirut next to some kid with purple hair next to some queer with AIDS right next to some dude who just got out of jail for the fourth time right next to some 20-year-old mom with four kids. It’s depressing.”
·  On New York City itself: “The biggest thing I don’t like about New York are the foreigners. I’m not a very big fan of foreigners. You can walk an entire block in Times Square and not hear anybody speaking English. Asians and Koreans and Vietnamese and Indians and Russians and Spanish people and everything up there. How the hell did they get in this country?”
 For these comments, Rocker was suspended, forced to undergo psychological testing and endure “sensitivity” training, not to mention paying a $20,000 fine.
Those who have ever wondered the origins of “Paul Kersey” need look no further than this incident. What he said was true and for speaking this he was sent to have his sanity tested.
The same thing that happened to Rocker now has happened to Emma West in England. Worse, her young child has been removed from her (while in America, this is allowed to produced 15 children, all paid for by the state).
 Whitopias allow bus routes or a train station to be built near their city, inevitably the Black Undertow will follow, immediately dropping property value.
Or in Cleveland, because Black people refuse to pay for public transit, fares go up for everyone else. In Detroit, Black bus drivers are afraid to go into parts of that city because Black people beat them up. In Atlanta and Montgomery, public transportation is basically a jobs program for otherwise unemployable Black people and a mode of transportation that is exclusively Black. DART in Dallas isn’t much different.
Once, a person asked if you could quantify the cost of Black people to America. The answer is no, because you’d have to factor in car repairs, gas, road maintenance, lost of productivity from commuting to and from work, etc., for those who have fled major cities to Whitopias. It could be argued that massive traffic jams all around America’s major metropolitan areas are directly related to white flight from cities that are now majority Black — which means by virtue of that fact, they are unlivable.
The age of Black-Run America (BRA) will end; but it will only end when people realize that this tyranny must be confronted.
Though a seemingly insignificant event that YouTube and other social media has helped go viral, the Emma West video – the Epic Tram Lady – and the subsequent reaction by the state (her arrest and the removal of her son from her custody) show that courage in the face of tyranny and persecution is our only ally.
Not only America, but England and all of the West is ruled by anarcho-tyranny (how many Muslims have been arrested for calling for the death of Englishmen while protesting in London?) which ensures that anyone who voices reasonable opposition to BRA or the entrenched political class – Disingenuous White Liberals bent on globalization – will be declared insane and forced to undergo mental evaluation.
So that they can be made an example of, lest others realize their “marginalized” views are actually shared by millions.

An open letter to Emma West, the racist on the tram

Posted by ⋅ November 29, 2011 ⋅ 873 Comments

Dear Emma,

You don’t know me. You’re not even aware of my existence, and you’ll never meet me. However, thanks to the power of the internet and the quick thinking of a young woman with a smartphone on the Croydon Tramlink last Sunday, I know of you. I’ve watched you repeatedly as you spat your racist venom all over a tram carriage full of non-whites, while your child sat on your lap.

We’re both 34, Emma. We both grew up in Britain and are both British. That’s where our common ground ends. You wouldn’t be able to tell what my background is from my face or accent, but I am one of the myriad people to whom you object so revoltingly strongly. My father is an immigrant. He’s lived, raised a family, educated his children, built a business and paid taxes in this country. He and his fellows are the backbone of this nation’s economy and culture; they are part of Britain’s history and her future.

Only you and your ilk are blind to this rather obvious fact.

Let me tell you a little bit about Britain, my dear.

Britain’s days as a colonial power ended long ago. Because Britannia so plundered and abused the countries that formed part of her ‘glorious’ empire, her subjects had no option but to come to Britain and build lives for themselves. Not only that, but Britain actively encouraged immigration to rebuild the country after a devastating war in which colonial subjects fought alongside white Britons. And not only that, but Britain has always been a racial melting pot. ALWAYS. You need only look at a history book to see that.

But someone like you won’t do that, will you? It’s far easier for you to remain ignorant and bigoted, to be fed outdated views that have been spoon-fed to you by other, equally ignorant and bigoted individuals. You have a distorted view of history, a perverse sense of your own racial superiority and your place in a modern society.

Forgive me for shattering your illusions, Emma, but “your Britain” doesn’t exist. It hasn’t existed for a long time, and her current survival is to be credited entirely to immigrants. All those jobs that you pass up because they’re ‘beneath’ you? They go to immigrants. The jobs to which you may aspire – though aspiration may be beyond you – will never be yours, because you’re simply too uneducated and ignorant to work in them. So you see people who aren’t the same colour as you making their way in life, while you sway drunkenly on a tram and berate them in the vilest of terms.

So now you’re on remand, charged with a racially aggravated public order offence. No doubt your cause will be championed by the National Front and the EDL. You’ll be a martyr in their eyes when you’re convicted, even if the sentence is little more than a fine. You’ll achieve a degree of fame within a very narrow circle, and notoriety in the wider community. You’ll be reviled, possibly attacked, and you’ll never find work with that kind of offence on your criminal record. Who wants to employ a convicted racist? Tell you what, luv, my dad certainly doesn’t.

What about your poor child? Using that kind of language around him is one disgusting thing; doing it in public is worse; and using it to express the hateful and hate-filled views that you espouse in public is utterly unacceptable. What kind of life are you giving him? And what life will he have once you’re convicted? Because believe you me, you certainly will be convicted.

We have laws against your actions, and laws against your views, precisely because they are unacceptable in a civilised, multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-racial society. The law sanctions them because they cannot and will not be tolerated in Britain.

This is the Britain you live in, Emma. Welcome.

Comments:

“We have laws against your actions, and laws against your views, precisely because they are unacceptable in a civilised, multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-racial society. The law sanctions them because they cannot and will not be tolerated in Britain.”

Yes, “you” have (a few) laws on “your” side (which are changeable, every time). But what do “we” have on “our” sides: The human nature. Emma West is right. And no law on this earth can change the truth. But it is obviously that a few politicians try to change the thoughts of the people by poenalizing to tell the truth.

That did not work in the USSR, and in the last days of hitler, wehen germany was defeated but it was prohibited to speak out the obvious. And at last the laws against the truth won’t work in history.

The existance of those “laws” is the best evidence that “your” bureaucrats thought that this is necessary to spin the truth.

The peoples who think that the laws against truth are right and the truth is not are the ever brainwashed people. You were the 110% Nazis, you were the 110% Stalinists you were the 110% Maoists and today you are the 110% “multi-racists”. And you will ever loose. In this case you just deny the fact that in history all multi-racial “societies” are ineffective and will be defeated by a mono-racial one. That will be the fate of todays Britannia. Britannia ruling nothing. Not even London.

You Brits lost your former Empire because you began to believe your self made fairy tales you told since 1914 and 1939.

 

Posted by F.S.

I don’t want to have immigrants in my own house neither in my own homeland. To defend my homeland from invasions (and I do not care of the skin colour the invaders have) is my holiest right and duty! And be shure the time for that will come! The more people will understand the great fraud of “our” governments and politicians in support of the globalisation winners, who paid them politicians their election campaigns – the nearer this day will come. Mass imigration is nothing than the sinking of job payment by rising the number of the jobless and working poors like Emma West. She spoke out the truth in rage and not by cool analysing the facts. But the conclusions are exactly the same.

This all is not a question of skin colour. It is a question of the right to defend your own country against invaders. It is a question of the indspensable right for self defense!

The heart of Emma West’s speech was not racism: It was to claim her native right of home and homeland! And I support her an everybody doing this!

“Home” should mean the same as “peace” – for everybody in this world. So: Invasion means war – everywhere. Better do not forget who started this by invading us! Sooner or later you will get reminded. (The same to the fraudsters in politics!)

 

Posted by MDCNM

The recent video of a woman in the UK identified as Emma West, venting her frustration with non-White minorities aboard a Tram has generated worldwide attention. Unfortunately, she has been arrested since the video went viral and now she will truly feel the wrath of the Marxists that have utterly destroyed the UK with their genocidal immigration and multicultural policies. In the UK it is illegal for Whites to express their frustration over the fact that their country has quickly become a non-White hellhole by design. If a White mother is frustrated over the destruction of her homeland and is willing to vocalize it on a public tram filled with non-White immigrants, surely many other Whites in Britain must share her frustration but are obviously too fearful of expressing it. Emma West can see the future for her little boy in the UK and it scares her to death. Hopefully, her children are not subjected to re-education programs that will teach them to hate their own kind in order to progress the Judeo Marxist agenda that so many of our White youth have already been subjected to.

Enemies of the White race are portraying Emma West as mentally unstable because she openly vocalized her opposition to White genocide aboard a Tram filled with the people who have turned the UK into a non-White dumping ground. By attempting to portray Emma West as someone who has mental problems, our enemies are trying to convey a message that it is morally wrong for White people to openly oppose their own genocide. It is that simple. White people have two choices. They can sit back and watch their homelands be destroyed or they can stand up for their people and risk getting insulted, threatened, and possibly imprisoned.

Notice how all of the people who are attacking this White mother are completely ignoring the fact that non-White immigration has turned the UK into a non-White cesspool. It is not debatable. White people know what is going on but are simply too afraid to do or say anything about it. What is truly appalling is that many Whites are calling for violence against her and even her death. This just proves how much our people have been poisoned by the Jew. Aryans have been poisoned so deeply and effectively by the Jews and their Marxist/Communist agenda that they have actually trained us to fight each other when we fight back against those who wish for our destruction. This must end.

If our enemies are willing to jail a White mother for vocalizing her opposition to the genocide of her people there is nothing that our enemies will not do to destroy each and every one of us. Those of you who denounce National Socialism and shun Hitler but still call yourselves Nationalists need to open your eyes and stop playing the Jews game thinking that you will be safer while winning the White masses over at the same time.

When more and more Aryans are treated like Emma West and they begin to fully realize the scope and magnitude of the situation they are in, they will yearn for another Hitler, and they will get him. The greatest disgrace on that Tram that day were the numerous Whites who attempted to look busy, texting, looking away, or rushing over to comfort the non-whites, when in reality they agree with everything Emma West said.

Ryan J. Murdough
National Political Director
National Socialist American Labor Party

 

Posted by Ryan J. Murdough

First point:

The 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

It is the contention of many nationalists that the importation into a territory of millions of unassimilable aliens, the passing of ever more stringent laws and developing a wide range of social costs against the domestic population to enforce adherence and dissuade widespread rejection will lead to genocide. As can be seen above, for genocide to occur it does not require every member of a population to be killed. Article C suggests that if there was an intention to flood the UK with immigrants at the expense of the native population that will result in its physical destruction then an act of genocide will have occurred.

Consider the below as one exhibit. Three Jewish members of the government (0.42% of the population) Jack Straw, Barbara Roche, Jonathan Portes were responsible for the Portes Report, suggesting that the UK should be made more multicultural. The political purpose for this was redacted and surfaced during an interview with Andrew Neather later. Millions were let in during the Labour term.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

There are various estimates of when native Britons will become a minority in their own country but the figures range from 2050 to 2060. References on request.

Just these two items here I believe give a very good case for the prosecution.

Now I do not favour the UN as a body but the detail above goes to show that the elements of a case for genocide can be sketched out. If Neather had not discussed that policy, we would not have been any the wiser at to intent, but the numbers would have been suggestive.

Cameron as a campaign pledge promised to drastically reduce immigration. Yet, so far this promise has been as successfully accomplished as have so many others made by that quarter. Last year over 500k entered the UK. With officially almost 3 million out of work, 8% of the UK workforce this is a full frontal attack on our country and our people. It will have genocidal consequences if it is allowed to continue and will incur charges of treason if it can be reversed.

Other points:

Fucking ashamed wos yer? What at the young lady’s effin language or at the fact she was less than impressed with the multiracial carriage she was on? Ever swear in front of your own children Jen? Or ever have a tipple Jen and get public transport home? I doubt it, by your choice of language I have no doubt of your being collected by your chauffeur and being whisked back to a late supper.

This is the ancestral land of the British people. This population regardless of regional differences, or broad celt /AngSax rivalries is largely genetically cohesive as a people.

Estimates differ but the assumption is that native Britons will become a minority in this country at some stage between 2050 and 2066. Britons overwhelmingly have opposed mass immigration in every poll that has been conducted yet the leading political parties have offered no serious restriction of this trend (even Thatcher after her ‘swamping’ speech.)

Britons have a self-interest in advancing the interests of their children and to ensure their security. This is the bottom line. There is no moral court that places a measurement on one side of the scales for supposed wrongdoing and balances it with a number of immigrants or some other unit of progressive ‘karma’ on the other. We have historically not had the best representation even after the whole population over 18 gained the right to vote. In fact all European nations are under an influx of mass immigration, many of whom had no empires or significant historical skeletons. Nor is it good enough to suggest some sort of superstitious historical inevitability, some ineluctable linearity that cannot be interrupted just ‘because’. ‘Our’ situation is now a dire existential threat and arguments based on contestable ethical considerations viewed from the rear view mirror are redundant.

A modern Briton is the sort of person who apologises when a stranger steps on their toe. So it was shocking in this culture for some to see a very unhappy working class mother rage at ethnic travellers on the bus. But most people while having the natural reticence of our culture still understood her complaint. Her complaint was just. Those more fragile (or drunk) are perhaps best considered early vocalisers, canaries in the mine, an early warning system symptomatic of the bubbling magma under the genteel surface.

Things will quieten, but last year the Conservatives let in over 500,000 immigrants while 9% of the workforce was unemployed and almost 3 million were claiming. That is without considering the hidden unemployment rate or the unofficial immigration level. To many of us, this situation is pure treason and sooner or later those mini-eruptions that modern liberals manage to become so exasperated about will increase in number and ferocity.

Let’s try a thought experiment: the global economy implodes, we live on a heavily populated isle that imports most of its food but we have little money to pay for it, millions in urbanised stratified and segregated semi ghettos and to top it all the oil economy is suffering too: dropping production and rising prices imperilling further the cheap industrial age. Who is your natural ally, who do you consider offering that small surplus of food you have to?

This is just a way of suggesting where your natural interests lie: your ethnic family, those who share most of your genes, look like you do, have similar social norms and who have (largely) shared your island story for millennia. Those who might consider giving their lives so that your children can survive.

 

Posted by Liberal Heretic

 

Rubbish. Learn some history and genetics, we are a nation of immigrants and mixers and have been for thousands of years.

 

Posted by Rufus

Hilarious. The sun will always rise, taxes will be collected and some ideologically driven progressive will always stand on the sidelines and shout “but we are all mongrels, it doesn’t matter.”

Unfortunately Rufie, you are wrong on both counts. Best get your head out of whatever ideological comic you prefer and do some of that wider reading you suggest yourself:

* Europeans as a whole are a remarkably homogenous group relative to other global populations.
* Those people who immigrated to or invaded the UK came from a very narrow group within that homogenous racial family.
*Lastly, the numbers who came were themselves a very small proportion of the domestic population (except for a number of Jews who until their own Jewish enlightenment practiced endogamy.) Here, let a liberal tell you a watered down version of the same story: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3639378/A-nation-of-newcomers.html

As a final point Rufie, it always amuses me that people such as yourself, who make this argument see absolutely no difference between, say an English man procreating with a German woman and calling that mongrelisation (or mixing) and an English man doing the same with a Pakistani or Nigerian woman. They seem to think that once there is a ‘taint’ to the blood everything is allowed as that pedigree is destroyed. You must have internalized a racial border much stricter than even Heinrich Himmler.

Thankfully those members of the public who understand the points above become immune to such nonsense.

 

Posted by Liberal Heresy

well , I`m Polish and I`m an immigrant myself . Sorry, I cannot see anything in the
video that would justify her being arrested. You are abusing her by saying :“ though aspiration may be beyond you …“ or “ because you’re simply too uneducated and ignorant …“ You know Emma West ? You know her story ?
Whatever. The point is ,your letter proves her right. Freedom of speech is the freedom to speak freely . It doesn`t matter if she`s racist or not. She has the right to express her opinion. Since you obviously can`t accept that right – ( or maybe Freedom of Speech only applies to Muslims ? ) you simply don`t belong here. It doesn`t matter if you`re an immigrant or not . You don`t or don`t want to understand what Western Culture is all about.
Yes I`m afraid that you`re right .She`ll be convicted. As you may know Polish and British soldiers fought and died side by side for five long years . Today they still fight side by side . What for ? To have such :“ laws against your actions, and laws against your views “ ? As I was born half a century ago Iron Curtain was there. At last I left my Coutry to live in a Free World .You know how bitter and sad is it for me today to see Soviet Union shadow falling over Europe ? This time however we`re creating this Orwell`s World ourselves. To us Poles ,Great Britain was always one of the few Defenders of Freedom. What the heck happened to your Country people ?

( by the way ,I live in Germany )

 

Posted by Charlie

Pathetic, racist letter, which nobody should be agreeing with.

The person who wrote it, seems to hate this country, its native British people, and its history.

Oh, and she is also completely factually wrong in most of what she says, for example;

‘And not only that, but Britain has always been a racial melting pot. ALWAYS. You need only look at a history book to see that’

Clearly this person has not ever read a history book, because Britain has most certainly NOT always been a ‘racial melting pot’, it has been indigenous white and British for thousands of years, and the DNA makeup on white British people alive today, is almost identical to those of 2000 years ago. You are completely, and utterely wrong. Its only the past 20-30 years where Britain has become more ‘diverse’ and a ‘melting pot’ in certain areas. Though many would call those ‘ghettos’ and not ‘melting pots’.

Ridiculous letter, wrong in just about ever way, written by somebody with no clue about this countrys history, its people, its culture, and somebody who clearly is ashamed of our past.

Anybody agreeing with her, I can only assume is also as anti-white british as she comes across as.

I am proud to be white and British, and I am proud of this countrys historic and cultural past, clearly you are not. If that makes me a racist, then so be it.

 

Posted by Openyoueyes

 

 

 

The Great Deluge

War is a natural force of nature, it is neither good nor evil, its cleansing effects make boys into men, its only requirement is that you do not fail to act, in that family, race, and way of life must be defended.

Warrior monks we must be.

The warrior is merely a disciple in the art of warfare, studying its natural currents and flows like the rage of a flash flood, its torrential river of change sculpting the landscape, moving boulders, carving out valleys, up rooting long held trees and casting all aside in a new path, or even reaffirming older more ancient paths. Barriers only serve to make the deluge greater in strength and ferocity, eventually it will pick away at the base of such barriers, removing its weak unnatural foundation, wiping away to such an extent that nothing of the barrier shall remain.

You see history flows like a river in time, societies and nations themselves function like streams and rivers feeding themselves new ideas and information, leading resources and energy into pools that serve to give them character and/or value, or moral failure in stagnate pools waters devoid of oxygen. But war is not a stream, its energy is to great, its force even shorter lived. It is not a river, but like a river it changes the landscape sometimes with unpredictable effects, no a deluge or flash flood it is, sometimes without warning, always with great effects, always destroying everything in its path that is weak.

In this coming conflict it has been foretold of our great victory, we have already won, now we must wade through the coming deluge creating new roots if we are to survive. A new civilization is needed, new ideas, new paths.

Cause for war

Cause for war

People think in binary terms: would I want this? Would other people want this?

It doesn’t occur to them that beneath this rigid, conformist and authoritarian yes / no view, there’s another angle.

That angle is want.

We have at this blog long championed the conservative position that life is a struggle for moral, intellectual and spiritual clarity. Few people get very far on that path. Most people remain selfish, easily manipulated, confused and directionless.

What they “want” is usually to be promised something impossible, lied to when it fails, and then for a scapegoat to produce itself for a little bit of the ol’ ultra-violence.

In other words, if you have bad leaders, the voters elected them. If you have a totalitarian Communist state, the peasants who revolted are at fault. If you have bad corporations, the consumers are at fault. If there’s a lot of crime, the citizens are not upholding community standards.

This is the opposite of what you hear in the press, which is a reliance on externalized authorities. Blame the leaders. Blame the corporations. Blame poverty for criminality. If there’s a revolution, it just “went bad” because some evil person stole it away.

Except that what most people don’t realize is that history expresses patterns, and these patterns repeat themselves, making almost all of our human disasters predictable and avoidable.

That means the fault lies on The People.

Bad leaders deceive, but they do this by promising things that appeal to the greed, vengeance, resentment, powerlust, megalomania and fears of ordinary people. Without those people to elect or approve the selection of the bad leader, that manipulator is powerless. We the people gave them the power.

Bad corporations pollute, destroy economies, and churn out wasteful products. They do this by knowing that (a) there’s an audience just clueless enough to buy them and (b) the community won’t oppose them. Without clueless consumers and a community that just shrugs and says “oh well,” bad corporations don’t exist.

Bad people — thieves, perverts, rapists and abusers — proliferate because no one stands up to them. If the first kid to vandalize a car on a block goes directly to jail, everyone calms down. If one little old lady phones in to the cops each time something suspicious happens, crime plummets.

Instead, there’s a lot of shrugging and casting the blame around. “It’s poverty,” says one woman. “It makes them do it.” Translation: I don’t want to get involved.

Even ardent Communists who graduate from Harvard insist that Stalin was not a logical result of the Russian revolution. He took over and perverted it, corrupted it. But what part of “power vacuum” and a political climate where killing your adversaries is de rigeur does not foster a Stalin?

Even now, we’re seeing the world shocked — shocked, I tell you! — that history is repeating itself:

There was a moment Friday in the Egyptian capital when the people’s vaunted uprising brought to mind Tehran in 1979: Just when the left-wing secularists thought they had ousted the Shah, the Islamists ousted them.

Hundreds of thousands of ultra-religious Islamists packed this capital’s central Tahrir Square in an unprecedented show of support for the creation of an Islamic republic, rather than the planned unity demonstration in collaboration with secularists. In doing so, they drove a stake through the heart of a united revolutionary movement that had brought together Egyptian Islamists and secularists, Muslims and Christians, and shared the goal of democratic elections and the punishment of the corrupt regime of Hosni Mubarak. – Effete News

Gosh, who could have predicted this?

Let’s oust the strongman and then everything will turn out magical.

Wait, why did we have a strongman in the first place?

Could it be that our country’s a total mess, and inhabited by several fanatical groups (not just Islamists), and that these forced us to have a strong tyrant to keep everyone in line?

Then we ousted that tyrant, and made it clear power was up for grabs, and suddenly our coalition fell apart. I guess “we hate the strongman” wasn’t a political party after all.

Efforts by insurgents to topple Muammar Gaddafi are in disarray after a senior Libyan opposition figure admitted that rebel soldiers were responsible for the murder of their most senior army commander.

The transitional government’s oil minister said that General Abdel Fatah Younis had been shot dead by Islamist-linked militia within the anti-Gaddafi forces, provoking fears of future unrest and instability among those fighting the old regime. The revelation will raise doubts over the wisdom of the British government’s decision last week officially to recognise the rebel transitional government, declaring that it had proved its democratic credentials.

Only a day later, the bullet-riddled and burnt bodies of Younis and two of his aides were found dumped on the outskirts of Benghazi, the rebel capital.

Labour’s former defence secretary Bob Ainsworth said that the murder and the identities of the killers were evidence that the government had not thought through its policy in Libya.

“One of the biggest risk factors in this was our lack of understanding of the people we were working with and I think that lack of understanding still stands,” he said. – The Guardian

You have to wonder what they were thinking. Did no one there read history? Had no one there graduated from a political science degree?

Here’s another example:

Pluralism.

Right now, in the West, pluralism is also de rigeur. Pluralism is the idea that we can have a society where no one has anything in common.

The central concept of pluralism is tolerance, which is that if my neighbor follows a path that would obliterate my own, we smile and nod and agree to “tolerate” each other.

While we both plot to obliterate the other through passive means, or by waiting for “tolerance” to come to an end.

The fact is that in a pluralist system, anyone with any beliefs or culture is doomed, because the society advances on the lowest common denominator. An LCD is universal, or compatible with everything else.

This means that instead of having a bright tapestry of many different colors, after a few generations you have a dull grey sheen of everything smashed down to the average.

Norway, after all, has some of the toughest and most restrictive immigration policies in Europe. Its refugee process is unusually strict too.

As a result, even after 40 years of immigration driven by a booming oil economy’s labour shortages, barely more than 10 per cent of its population are immigrants or their descendents – and the majority of those are Swedes, people from Baltic countries, Poles or other Nordics, most of them indistinguishable from the native population. Members of visible minorities are few, mostly clustered in the capital.

Even Norway’s Muslims, mostly Pakistani or Somali and considered well-integrated by European standards, did not consider these rising voices of intolerance a major threat. Not until last Friday, at least.

“We knew that there were anti-Muslim movements, but not to this degree. We always thought that they would keep to their argument that there were too many Muslims,” says Kadra Yusuf, a Norwegian of Somali descent whose activism had been directed against religious conservatives in the mosques of Oslo, notably in the fight against female genital mutilation. – Effete News

The Western news media — that is: people who couldn’t make it into the professions, so decided to seize power through popular notions instead — still doesn’t get it.

This isn’t about Muslims. In fact, most anti-Islamists are not hostile to Islam or Muslims.

This is about diversity (or “multiculturalism,” for the technical term) not working.

That in turn is an example of pluralism not working.

The point is that society needs to have a unifying agreement and culture, or it becomes a giant shopping mall where people wander around like zombies because no knowledge, purpose, identity or customs are passed down between the generations. These are the gray people and anyone with an IQ over 92 does not want to be one.

Pluralism doesn’t work. Diversity is a form of pluralism. It also doesn’t work. Society needs an identity, which is to say it needs a purpose, which is to say it needs a culture.

Religion, philosophy, science and art can help explicate that culture and make it evolve to be a better form of what it is. It doesn’t need to become universal in some perverse sense of morality that insists we must all be equal or we will all burn in hell.

The fact is that pluralism is intolerant of one idea: anti-pluralism.

The thought that any person might say, “You know, I’d like a Nordic Norway” — or a Christian Norway, a Norwegian Norway or even a conservative Norway — sends the pluralists into spasms of anger and fear. This challenges their idea that a universal morality exists that can be applied in every nation.

Pluralists, who claim to accept every belief, are hypocritical. They accept every belief — wait, we mean every belief that endorses pluralism. It’s a fancy way of saying that since they have low standards, they accept nearly everyone, except those who disagree. It’s a method of social control based in a fake morality.

The pluralists have made up this “universal” morality as a way of opposing anything that opposes pluralism. They have as a result become intolerant of anything but pluralism. This is the way we do it around here. Get with the program or you’re an ignorant jerk.

And that is an honest cause for war.

World Doomed by Demographic Decline and Economic Collapse?

World Doomed by Demographic Decline and Economic Collapse?

http://alfin2100.blogspot.com/2011/07/world-doomed-by-demographic-decline-and.html

Bulgaria’s population shrank by 7 percent over the past decade while the number of people over 65 grew, census results showed on Thursday, a trend that will put pressure on its already outdated pension and health systems.

Population decline is a problem across former-communist central and eastern Europe, particularly in Russia, where a demographic crisis could slow growth and hurt its bid to compete with China and India. _Reuters

What is true for central and eastern Europe is also true for southern Europe, and increasingly for Europe as a whole.

Image Source
Is Southern Europe a preview of coming attractions for the rest of the developed world? Can the modern world survive in the face of its ongoing demographic collapse? The problem is unprecedented in modern times. We do not know if modern technology will present a solution to the “perfect storm of dissolution” of the modern world. Russia is one of the nations most threatened by demographic collapse, and is beginning to require health warnings on all advertisements for abortions.

Russia understands that its very future as a nation is threatened by the inability of its core population to reproduce itself. And slowly but surely, the rest of Europe is beginning to comprehend that it is in the same demographic (and consequently, economic) boat as Russia.

The opportunism of political correctness prevents the Union from tackling the problem of demographic collapse head-on, since the current concept of human rights advocates behaviour oriented in the opposite direction. _presseurop

The US first recognised a modern baby bust and some of its economic consequences back in the 1980s. The “global baby bust” was recognised in the early 2000s by Phillip Longman. Awareness of the concentration of the baby bust within university educated, leftist oriented populations has grown recently, leading to a sense of urgency within leftist political circles to encourage the immigration (both legal and illegal) of larger numbers of fertile, uneducated, government-dependent populations from southern nations.

In Europe, such leftist-instigated attempts to transform the core populations of European nations via immigration is being met by a nativist backlash of sorts. Most native Europeans prefer Europe the way it is, and do not want to see it tranformed into a third-world hellhole. Unfortunately, their leaders — for the most part — are thinking only about political power, and not about the future of Europe.

As advanced nations see their core populations shrink only to be replaced by immigrant populations with less aptitude, on average, to deal with a high technology infrastructure, their economies will go the way of Greece’s. Crime rates will explode, opportunities for advancement and growth will evaporate. This is the destiny that the demographic collapse of a high achieving civilisation leads to.

It will not happen all at once, across the modern world. There will be time for surviving regions to react to conserve their core civilisation. But will political correctness allow this to occur? Sweden is as good as lost, but what about Finland?

The answer will be different for various countries and regions of countries. What will you do?

Sending a message to the elites

Breivik: Sending a message to the elites

Is this the very first time that a gathering of leftists in a Western Nation, post 1960, has been made to pay the ultimate price for their anti democratic multicultural impositions?

If so, then I suspect that the pictures of dead young adults will have a rather powerful deterrent effect on parents who might otherwise encourage their kids to be leftists.

It is hard to imagine a more powerful and socially compelling deterrent than to inject the sort of horrific risk that these pictures implant into the minds of multiculturally inclined parents .

Viewed without emotion, this incident implies a multi-layered level of calculation that I find quite remarkable –  an example not to be emulated to be sure – but remarkable nonetheless.

Thus far, Islamic terrorism has been confined to subway commuters in Spain, Street car commuters in Britain, and primarily, office workers in Manhattan – all nobodies that the elites could, quite frankly, care less about losing.

All that the Islamic terror attacks carried out on average working stiffs accomplished was to generate broad popular support for the war on terror and the vast increase in budgets for the security state. In short, their targeting was terrible as they never terrorized the elites responsible for their grievances.

This attack was entirely different, as it appears designed to inject an element of extreme risk into volunteering to join the ranks of the multicultural political elite.

Further, the soft sort of totalitarianism of the Frankfurt School variety that is spreading throughout the West is carefully designed to avoid pushing its victims over the edge to the kind of violent reaction that occurred in Norway.

Multiculturalism was supposed to be something you could impose on the proles without any cost!

This attack seems to be a rather remarkable demonstration that the velvet glove totalitarianism that we all live under has failed in its primary mission to keep the elites safe from harm. What are they going to do? Have platoons of guards armed with automatic rifles patrolling the campus of Harvard to protect the future elites from the townies?

Wouldn’t that be a bit obvious?

After Norway hasn’t the task of obliterating the White race become a bit more “messy”?

The analogies of others to the killings commanded by Bush and Western butchers are apt, but miss the point. This job had the kind of purposefulness that one would expect from a state planned attack, not an attack prompted by the rage of some lone nutter. And the fact that these same Norwegian multi-culturalists were about to recognize the Palestinian state and that the attack occurred on the anniversary of the bombing of the King David Hotel does nothing to allay those suspicions.

As James Bond would say; “Do you want a clean kill, or do you want me to send a message?”

It hit the aspiring elites were it hurts, in their training camp for future leaders, and it hit the proud, self righteous multi-culti parents where it hurts as well.

It revealed the soft underbelly of the multicultural regime for all to see.

On a personal level, I feel sad for the parents and relatives of these dead young adults. After all most were lured into a wildly risky scheme of Quisling oppression of their fellow countrymen thinking that the enterprise was riskless and profitable.

But putting on the cap of an intelligence analyst, I see a picture of profound significance and meaning, one sure to be a major turning point.

INVASION OF EUROPE 10000 years ago

Resistance to INVASION OF EUROPE 10000 years ago

Resource Wars: Revolution or World War III

VII: Resource Wars

The Road to World War III – The Global Banking Cartel Has One Card Left to PlayAdd to this picture rapidly declining natural resources and an increasingly hostile and polluted environment with extreme weather events frequently pounding the globe. In the past decade the global corporate elite have already engaged in three major resource wars in Iraq, Af-Pak and Northern Africa.

With a growing global population and an increasing demand for declining resources, we have already crossed a tipping point and are now in the ecological red. For the first time in human history, we are now consuming resources faster than nature can produce them. As developing countries like China and India attempt to live like western countries, there are simply not enough resources. The global economy is built on an unsustainable foundation. Instead of evolving and changing course, the entrenched banking power base is digging in further, and they run NATO, the private military complex and the US government. Based on the current policies that are in place, they have clearly already decided that they want to keep living business as usual and refuse to evolve and adapt to a rapidly changing environment. With this decision, they have effectively already decided to further escalate their oppression of the overwhelming majority of humanity, and this will lead to the death of literally hundreds of millions of people.

The global banking cartel view the world’s limited resources as their property, and they have consistently proven that they have absolutely no hesitation in killing millions upon millions of people for these resources – just look at what they have already done in the recent past throughout Northern Africa, the Middle East and Latin America.

In the years since Northern Africa was discovered to be “the richest patch of earth” due to large deposits of natural minerals that are needed to power computer technologies, over five million Africans, in just that region, have died as a result of war.

The global elite have consistently used a strategy of arming and funding both sides of armed conflicts. While opposing populations kill each other off, they make off with their natural resources. When they confront a government that cannot be bribed or provoked into civil or regional war, they fund brutal death squads, attempt military coups and intimidate them by giving weapons to undemocratic neighboring regimes. If all that doesn’t work, they are declared a threat to national security and the US military, private contractors and NATO forces invade and occupy the country.

These terrorist strategies are not limited to the Middle East and Africa, just ask our neighbors throughout Latin America about the School of the Americas. Contrary to popular belief, the horrendous torture techniques inflicted upon people in Abu Ghraib, Iraq were not an isolated incident. Many of those brutal torture techniques were developed over years by torturing innocent civilians throughout Latin America.

The picture in Latin America today is one of inspiration. People throughout the region are rising up against the global corporate elite and claiming their rights and natural resources as their own, from Bolivia to Ecuador to Venezuela. This is another factor driving the “endangered oligarchy” into resorting to military desperation. The military coup in Honduras, the attempted coup in Venezuela, and the failed attempt to provoke Columbia and Venezuela into an armed conflict all clearly indicate where this situation is headed if the imperialist bankers get their way.

The average American is dreadfully unaware of just how depraved these people are. The little regard they have for human life is beyond common comprehension.

VIII: Private Military Complex

The global elite have already used the “War on Terror” as a pretext to drastically increase military spending and build a massive private military and intelligence complex on the backs of the American taxpayer. According to an extensive report from the Washington Post, a stunning 1.2 million private contractors work in this complex. Most Americans are not aware that 69 percent of the soldiers deployed in our name are private contractors, and 80 percent of them are foreign nationals, meaning they are not even from the United States. Half of the people we have deployed in our name, who are funded by our tax dollars, are not even fighting for our country, they are fighting for a paycheck.

Wars are a highly profitable racket, which gives an enormous incentive to keep them going. This is one of the reasons why the war in Afghanistan is now the longest war in US history. This system has led to a perpetual state of war. Military spending, although widely reported as being around $680 billion per year, is more accurately totaling over $1 Trillion per year. Of this staggering amount of annual spending, 25 percent of it goes unaccounted for, not counting the billions of our tax dollars lost to over-charging and all-out fraud.

This private military complex has become so out of control that politicians are now forced to admit that they have no idea what is happening within it. As the Washington Post report revealed:

“The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work.

These are some of the findings of a two-year investigation by The Washington Post that discovered what amounts to an alternative geography of the United States, a Top Secret America hidden from public view and lacking in thorough oversight. After nine years of unprecedented spending and growth, the result is that the system put in place to keep the United States safe is so massive that its effectiveness is impossible to determine.

The investigation’s other findings include:

* Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.

* An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.”

There are so many unaccountable cells and competing factions within this complex, any one of them could go rogue and launch an attack on the US soil and make it look like another “terrorist” organization or nation executed it. This may sound too conspiratorial to the casual observer, but it would be stunningly naïve to think that in a massive complex like this, with so little oversight and accountability, given the huge sums of money at stake, that something tragic wouldn’t eventually occur. The implications are ominous, to say the least.

We already had a proven act of internal domestic terror occur with the Anthrax attacks in 2001. It is not a stretch to think that any moves away from a state of permanent war, and any cut to military spending that would threaten the existence of many of the world’s largest and most powerful and profitable corporations, would result in an attack in hopes of inciting a military conflict. Former President Dwight Eisenhower’s warning against the “unwarranted influence” of the military industrial complex, and “the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power” pales in comparison to the modern private military complex. While many of these companies currently rely on US tax dollars, they are not part of the government, they are global private entities with their own interests at heart, similar to the Federal Reserve banking system. In fact, when you peel back the layers, many of these private military companies are funded by the global banking cartel.

When you understand the forces behind war, you must acknowledge the words of famed two-time Congressional Medal of Honor recipient US Brigadier General Smedley D. Butler. He accurately summed up the situation when he said:

“I spent 33 years in the Marines, most of my time being a high-class muscle man for big business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer for Capitalism…. The general public shoulders the bill. This bill renders a horrible accounting. Newly placed gravestones, Mangled bodies. Shattered minds. Broken hearts and homes. Economic instability. Back-breaking taxation for generations and generations.”

To give just two brief examples of how the banking cartel operates behind the scenes during wars, consider the following. The genocidal carnage in Northern Africa that killed over 5.4 million people was enthusiastically supported by the IMF and World Bank. In a news report entitled, “The Business of War in the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Dena Montague and Frida Berrigan explained:

“The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank have knowingly contributed to the war effort. The international lending institutions praised both Rwanda and Uganda for increasing their gross domestic product (GDP), which resulted from the illegal mining of DRC resources. Although the IMF and World Bank were aware that the rise in GDP coincided with the DRC war… they nonetheless touted both nations as economic success stories….”

In another example of grotesque profiting off massive levels of death, banking cartel members made a fortune on the production of cluster bombs. The Guardian revealed the details:

“The deadly trade in cluster bombs is funded by the world’s biggest banks who have loaned or arranged finance worth $20bn to firms producing the controversial weapons, despite growing international efforts to ban them.

HSBC… has profited more than any other institution from companies that manufacture cluster bombs. The British bank… has earned a total of £657.3m in fees arranging bonds and share offerings for Textron, which makes cluster munitions…. Campaigners maintain the deadly weapons can explode years after combat, killing or maiming innocent people….

Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, JP Morgan and UK-based Barclays Bank are also named among the worst banks [funding the production of cluster bombs]….

Goldman Sachs, the US bank which made £3.19bn proft in just three months, earned $588.82m for bank services and lent $250m to [cluster bomb manufactures] Alliant Techsystems and Textron.”

To sum all of this up, the global banking cartel and private military complex are a runaway virus that demands a permanent state of warfare. They are intrinsically parasitic in nature, they have devolved into a fascist enterprise that survives and profits off of destruction. If they don’t get a war, they will create one in the interest of their own self preservation. As former CIA Station Chief John Stockwell once explained: “Enemies are necessary for the wheels of the US military machine to turn.” This insight can now be extended to the global banking cartel. Enemies are now necessary for the wheels of the global banking cartel to turn.

Under the cover of the “War on Terror” they have launched a massive campaign of violence abroad and have been systematically looting our economy and stripping of us civil liberties at home.

So as the US and global population becomes more radical, and as the environment becomes more hostile, with increasingly limited natural resources, in a desperate attempt to maintain power the global banking cartel will escalate from economic attacks to worldwide military-based assaults. This is the clear path we are on – the road to World War III.

Bomb rocks government offices in Oslo, two said dead

Bomb rocks government offices in Oslo, two said dead

In this video image taken from television, smoke is seen billowing from a damaged building as debris is strewn across the street after an explosion in Oslo, Norway Friday July 22, 2011. A loud explosion shattered windows Friday at the government headquarters in Oslo which includes the prime minister's office, injuring several people. Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg is safe, government spokeswoman Camilla Ryste told The Associated Press. (AP Photo/TV2 NORWAY via APTN) NORWAY OUT
OSLO, Norway (Reuters) – A massive bomb shattered Norway’s main government building in Oslo Friday, killing two people police were quoted as saying by local news agency NTB.

There was no claim of responsibility, though NATO member Norway has been the target of threats, if not bombs, before, notably over its involvement in conflicts in Afghanistan and Libya. Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg was safe, NTB said.

NRK radio said at least two people were killed in an attack that may have brought global political violence to the quiet Scandinavian city.

“It exploded — it must have been a bomb. People ran in panic and ran. I counted at least 10 injured people,” said bystander Kjersti Vedun, who was leaving the area.

A Reuters reporter at the scene said the blast scattered debris across the streets and shook the entire city center around 3:30 p.m. (9:30 a.m. EDT). He saw eight people injured, one covered in a sheet and apparently dead.

“So far I can confirm that we have received seven people at Oslo University Hospital,” a press officer at the clinic said.

“I don’t know how seriously wounded they are.”

The explosion blew out most of the windows of the 17-storey central government building, cast a huge pall of smoke over the city and scattered shards of metal and other debris for hundreds of meters.

Nearby ministries were also hit, including the oil ministry, which was on fire. Heavy debris littered the streets.

John Drake, senior risk consultant, at London-based consultancy AKE said: “It may not be too dissimilar to the terrorist attack in Stockholm in December which saw a car bomb and secondary explosion shortly after in the downtown area.

“That attack was later claimed as reprisal for Sweden’s contribution to the efforts in Afghanistan.”

The Reuters correspondent said the streets had been fairly quiet in mid-afternoon on a Friday in high summer, when many Oslo residents take vacation or leave for weekend breaks.

The tangled wreckage of a car was outside one building, as well as the damage to the buildings, appeared consistent to witnesses with that from car bombs.

THREATS

NATO member Norway has sometimes in the past been threatened by leaders of al Qaeda for its involvement in Afghanistan. But political violence is virtually unknown in a country known for sponsoring the Nobel Peace Prize and mediating in international conflicts, including in the Middle East and Sri Lanka.

It has also taken part the NATO bombing of Libya, where Muammar Gaddafi has threatened to strike back in Europe.

David Lea, Western Europe analyst, at Control Risks said: “There certainly aren’t any domestic Norwegian terrorist groups although there have been some al Qaeda-linked arrests from time to time. They are in Afghanistan and were involved in Libya, but it’s far too soon to draw any conclusions.”

(Additional reporting by Gwladys Fouche in Oslo and Peter Apps and William Maclean in London; Writing by Alister Doyle; Editing by Alastair Macdonald)

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 154 other followers