Goyim Questions And Jewish Answers

Goyim Questions

And Jewish Answers


Goyim Questions Francesco Hayez, “The Destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem” (1867)

Ellison Lodge’s attempt to bring order to the debate about Jewish nationalism and influence in America was very laudable and plausible. His categories have the appearance of fairness and balance, which is an achievement in an area that generates so much “heat” and miasma. His four categories also have a pleasing symmetry and simplicity that almost reminded me of Newton’s laws of planetary motion. However, after a few days rolling them around in various portions of my rather convoluted and un-geometrical mind, I couldn’t help thinking that they made the classic Western (or White) intellectual error of equivalence, which is treating things as if they all exist on the same plane.

This sort of thinking, rather like Newtonian physics, has the appearance of rationality, extension, and universal applicability, and, more than this, just like Newtonian physics, it almost always works. For example, there is certainly equivalence between German and French national rights and interests. Although these might have been addressed at various times by different methods—politics, economics, and war—the idea that both countries had roughly equal national rights and weight has always informed their history and their relationship.

When France was dominant at the time of Napoleon’s ascendancy, the idea of a German national interest mobilized things beneath the surface and prepared the way for his downfall. Likewise, when France was crushed by the superior military genius of the Germans in 1870 and 1940, the idea that France was somehow still equal to Germany kept the national flame burning strongly. This idea of a just equivalence of national interests between all the European nations has led at various times to wars and more recently to the unfortunate situation where the nations have agreed—based on the idea of a kind of negative equivalence—to temporarily subsume their legitimate national interests in the bureaucratic swamp of the European Superstate.

In the intellectual culture of the West, which has basically been shaped by Christian universalist notions, equivalence seems both logical and moral, but the case of Jewish nationalism actually serves to show the flaws in the system. Just as Newtonian physics breaks down where the space/time fabric seems to be bent and distorted by Black Holes and Dark Matter, so the idea of equivalence becomes an increasing absurdity when applied to the issue of Jewish nationalism.

This is essentially because the Jews have not existed as a nation (people + land), but merely as a people, since the fall of Masada in the year 73.  To continue existing as a separate people, the Jews have been forced to adopt policies that are the very antithesis of equivalence. Indeed, any attempt at “equivalence” in the Dark Age or Medieval periods, or before the so-called European Enlightenment, when legal restrictions against Jews started to be removed, would surely have seen the Jewish people wiped out.

In essence, the Jews survived by existing on a different plane and in a different dimension from other peoples, their only equivalents being minor ones like the Romany or Parsees. In Newtonian terms, they retreated from the clear, straight spaces of upstanding national assertion into the Dark Matter of ghettoes and the Black Holes of behind-the-scenes influence.

Although the world has clearly changed a lot since the so-called Enlightenment, the example of the Nazis, Stalin’s intended pogrom before his death, the rabid hatred of Jews in the Islamic world, and the smouldering distrust of Jews in the Orient, should remind us that the more things change the more they stay the same. Anti-Semitism may have been in abeyance in the West, especially in America, where it seems to be mitigated by Judeophilic versions of Christianity, and Jews may have attained the undue cultural and political influence in that country that is needed to support their guilt-bought state of Israel.

But how stable is this really?

American power is on the wane, the guilt-bought state is now morally over-mortgaged, and old notions of the Jew as a parasite and manipulator seem set to make a comeback—even in America, as the economy slides and the culture becomes less Anglo. The fact is, any idea of an equivalence for Jewish nationalism is purely based on extreme and temporary factors. Unlike my nation, Scotland, and a host of others, which won their right to exist through incredible moral and physical courage, the Jews lost their battles and chose instead to exist in a shadow world until the artificial creation of the Neo-Jewish state attempted to thrust their national interests onto the same plane as others; and while that state has so far vindicated itself militarily, how much of this is due to “special assistance”?

Let us consider Jewish interests through Lodge’s four categories in the light of the full historical and likely future picture.

  1. Pro-ethno-politics for Israel + Anti-ethno-politics for Europeans and the West
  2. Anti-ethno-politics for Israel + Anti-ethno-politics for Europeans and the West
  3. Pro-ethno-politics for Israel + Pro-ethno-politics for Europeans and the West
  4. Anti-ethno-politics for Israel + Pro-ethno-politics for Europeans and the West

Option 1 is short-termist and, as Lodge rightly points out, and is blatantly intellectually inconsistent in our dominant intellectual culture. This view will only lead to growing hatred of the Jews and a final repudiation and isolation of the Israeli state.

Option 2 is generally acceptable in the same way that most European nations “accept” the European superstate, but this also reveals the essential artificiality of the Israeli state. While the European nations can pristinely survive a few decades of bureaucratic standardization, Israel, situated where it is, can’t survive without rabid ethno-politics.

Option 3 sounds good, but with America pursuing its own interests and cozying up to the far more numerous and economically important Arab world, Israel will have to go it alone; estimated time of survival 20 to 30 years.

In short, none of the first three options work for the Jews, which leaves the fourth option—anti-ethno-politics for Israel plus pro-ethno-politics for Europeans and the West. Lodge calls this intellectually inconsistent, and it is—but only based on the premise of the equivalence of Jewish nationalism. It is at this point that the flaws of equivalence and “intellectual consistency” become most apparent, because option four is actually the best option for the Jewish people as it reflects the conditions that have allowed them to survive as a people, although not a nation, for nearly 2000 years.

By throwing away their Zionism, by remembering that their nation was totally crushed, and by accepting the historical fact that they have always subsisted by existing on a different level from other peoples, the Jews will ensure their survival as a people for another 2000  year. The alternatives will crush them as a people as surely as the Roman legions at Masada crushed any hope of a Jewish state.

Jewish Questions

Jewish Questions


The crux of Byron Roth’s disagreement with Kevin MacDonald is essentially that Prof. MacDonald makes criticisms of Israeli nationalism that he would never make about European peoples. This critique is frequently leveled against Patrick Buchanan by writers like Larry Auster.

This is, in many ways, the inverse of one of the easiest criticisms some White Nationalists make about Jewish Leftists: namely, that they hypocritically support Israeli nationalism, while screaming that enforcing our immigration laws is “racist.”

If one were to try to sort out views on nationalism in Israel and the West, it could be neatly split into four categories:

  1. Those who support ethno-politics for Israel but not for Europeans and the West.  (neoliberals and neoconservatives like Abe Foxman, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Kristol et al.)
  2. Those who oppose ethno-politics for Israel and the West (Noam Chomsky, Max Blumenthal et al.)
  3. Those who support ethno-politics in the West and in Israel  (Lawrence Auster, Diana West, Michael Savage)
  4. Those who oppose ethno-politics for Israel but support it for the West (Pat Buchanan, Kevin MacDonald)

Presumably, the intellectually consistent views would be 2 and 3. Group 1 could be seen as Jewish hypocrites, and group 4 must be anti-Semitic.

It is not that simple, however.

Pat Buchanan is not a “White Nationalist.”  He simply defends the right of European peoples to retain their majorities in their own countries. He has criticized Israel for bombing Arabs and tearing down their homes, and he opposes what he considers to be Israeli partisans’ subversion of America’s national interest. But Buchanan explicitly accepts the legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state and to the best of my knowledge, has never questioned its ethno-religious citizenship requirements.  He has never advocated anything like that for America, however. Yet the current zeitgeist is so skewed to position 1, that Pat can be called out as a hypocrite or worse.

And given the incredible hostility Buchanan, as well as Kevin MacDonald, has faced at the hands of the hypocritically pro-Israel, anti-West establishment, they can be forgiven for going a bit overboard once in awhile.

Certainly, the Ron Paul supporters whom David Horowitz denounces would go into position 2. They are likely anti-racist, open borders libertarians. They also virtually worship Jewish economists such as Murray Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises. They’re not prime candidates for “Jew Haters,” that’s for sure.

Personally, I align myself with position 3. I have no sympathy for Arab good intentions, and I am fine with Israel establishing its own ethnic state and doing what it feels necessary to preserve it.

However, there are three important qualifications to this position.

The first is that Israel should preserve itself on its own dime. While I may wish Israel well, this does not make them America’s vital ally.  Our support of Israel has caused needless enmity within the Arab world.

The second is that while I would rather live in Israel than any other Middle Eastern country, I do not value it as equal to or greater than the West.  The idea that the fate of European or American Civilization is somehow tied up in Israel, as Geert Wilders & Co. often claim, has absolutely no basis in reality; the same goes for the ahistorical, made-up term “Judeo-Christian tradition.” (Let’s not forget who sided with the Muslims in the Crusades!)  Furthermore, even if you consider European Jews to be White (which I do), only one third of Israeli Jews have roots in America or Europe.

The third qualification is that while Islam is an immediate threat to Israel and Europe, it is not a threat to America. Arab Muslims are a tiny fraction of our immigrant population, and the idea that Shariah will be imposed in this country is completely absurd. Yet this obsession with stopping Muslim Immigration, while ignoring the Hispanicization of America, by the likes of Robert Spencer and Mark Steyn shows a complete lack of priorities.

Let’s Attack Iran!

Let’s Attack Iran!

by Fred Reed

(Editor’s note: Fred gets top billing over Hyperinflation, ’cause God knows we need a laugh. Check tomorrow’s post for Part II of the series.)

Oh good. I see that Senator Lindsey Graham wants to attack Iran. The US, he says, should “sink their navy, destroy their air force and deliver a decisive blow to the Revolutionary Guard.”

Senator Graham has the brains of a tapeworm, making him eminently qualified for the Senate. Tapeworms, I note, do not have brains. It is characteristic of warlike innocents, to include the Pentagon, to believe that if you destroy navies and air forces, you win wars. This worked well in Vietnam, you will recall, and as soon as we destroy the Taliban’s navy, Afghanistan will be a cakewalk.

Now, I understand that practicality and realism are alien concepts in American politics, to be approached with trepidation, but maybe, just once, we should think before sticking our private parts into a wood-chipper. Just once. I do not propose consistent rationality, forethought, or intelligent behavior. I profoundly respect my country’s traditions.

However, folk wisdom from West Virginia: Before you say, “I can whip any man in the bar!” it is well to scout the bar.

Note that the United States cannot defeat Iran militarily, short of using nuclear weapons. It is easy to start a war. Finishing one is harder. I could punch out Mike Tyson. Things thereafter might not go as well as hoped.

Some will find the thought of American martial incapacity outrageous. Can’t beat Iran? Buncha towel monkeys? Among grrr-bowwow-woof patriots, there exists a heady delusion of American potency, that the US has “the greatest military power the world has ever seen.” Ah. And when did it last win a war? In Afghanistan, for ten years the gloriousest military ever known, the expensivist, and whoosh-bangiest, hasn’t managed to defeat a bunch of pissed-off illiterates with AKs and RPGs.

At this point Lindsey of Persia will doubtless allude to the wonders of air power, of “precision-guided weapons,” of smart bombs that presumably read Kant on the way down. Those pitiable Iranians would have no hope of stopping our mighty bombers. True.

Implicit in this Thomistic fantasy (Clancy, I mean, not Aquinas) is that Iran wouldn’t, couldn’t, wouldn’t dare fight back without a navy, etc. Lindsey had better be very sure that Iran couldn’t block the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation. Enough of the world’s petroleum comes from the Gulf that the price would rise drastically if the Straits were blocked. Some economies would simply stop.

How many supertankers going up in flames would be tolerated before operators of tankers refused to risk it?

Iran recently began serial production of the Nasr 1, an anti-ship cruise missile. Tankers are thin-skinned and highly flammable. The Nasr 1 can be fired from the back of a truck. Trucks by their nature are mobile. They are easy to hide.

Fly Mach II Go Boom

The Air Force, to include Naval Air, may be confident that it can destroy all of Iran’s missiles. The Air Force always believes that air power can do anything and everything—make coffee, win at marbles, everything. After all, don’t its airplanes say “Vrooom!” and “Swoosh!”? Don’t cockpits have lots of portentous buttons and spiffy little screens? Unfortunately the Air Force is regularly wrong.

In fact the entire military is regularly wrong about the ease and duration of its adventures. For example, it had no idea that Viet Nam would turn into an endless war ending in defeat (if that makes sense). Iraq notoriously was going to be a walk in the park. That the war on Afghanistan would last ten years with a distinct possibility of defeat…this never occurred to the soldiers.

It is barely conceivable that the Five-Sided Wind Box could do what Field Marshal Graham thinks it could do. The unexpected is always a possibility. But, the stakes being what they would be in Hormuz, hoo-boy….

Another possibility is that Israel will attack Iran, as it has threatened. I would like to think that even Bibi Nut-and-Yahoo has better sense but, it the US can produce gibbering wingnuts, why not Israel? The practical effects of an Israeli attack would be indistinguishable from those of an American attack: America would have to solve the problem. Which it probably couldn’t. Israel can bomb Iran’s nuclear codpieces, but it can’t defeat Iran. And if the Strait were blocked after an Israeli attack, the entire globe would holler, “Israel did it!” which would be true.

The distance from “Israel did it” to “The Jews did it,” though logically great, is emotionally short. People think in collective terms. Remember that after some Saudis dropped the Towers, the alleged war on terror morphed almost instantly into intense hostility for Moslems. It doesn’t make sense, but what has that got to do with anything?

I know a lot of Jews, who are all over the place politically and intellectually. They have in common a complete lack of resemblance to the scheming, hand-rubbing, heh-heh-heh Jews of Neo-nazi imagination. Few sacrifice Christian children (a temptation strongest, I can attest, among Christian parents). But…people think collectively.

Congress doesn’t support Israel because it likes Israel, but from political expediency. If the wind blows the other way, so will Congress. Gasoline at twelve dollars is a lot of wind in a commuting country.

Things worsen for America, yet we really don’t know where the country is going or how it will react. The last domestic catastrophe was the Great Depression, when America was a very different place. How bad can things get, economically, politically, internationally? How does a pampered population incapable of planting a garden respond to genuinely hard times? “It can’t happen here,” one hears. What can’t? I suspect that all sorts of things could happen, given sufficiently hard times.

The United States is today an edgy, unhappy country, sliding toward poverty, increasingly dictatorial, inchoately angry, hostile to blacks, the French, Mexicans, Moslems and, creepingly, the Chinese. (Jews, perhaps to their surprise, don’t make the enemies list.) Americans don’t do cosmopolitan. The federal pressure for diversity exists because otherwise no one would associate with anyone else. The Persian Gulf is one of few places that plausibly might wreck the industrial world. There would have to be someone to blame. And Israel can’t survive without American support.

Maybe I’m crazy. But if I were an Israeli, I’d find a nice café on Diesengoff and enjoy a double cappuccino, watch the girls, and keep my bombs in my pocket. Let somebody else take the fall.

Copyright 2010 Fred Reed.

Top Israeli rabbi: Gentiles exist only to serve Jews

Top Israeli rabbi: Gentiles exist only to serve Jews

Don’t look for this story on the mainstream conservative sites. Wouldn’t be prudent. They might get Sobraned.

Sephardi leader Yosef: Non-Jews exist to serve Jews

October 18, 2010

JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat,” he said to some laughter.

Yosef, the spiritual leader of the Shas Party and the former chief Sephardi rabbi of Israel, also said that the lives of non-Jews are protected in order to prevent financial loss to Jews.

“With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” said the rabbi, who recently turned 90.

An audio recording of some of the rabbi’s remarks was broadcast on Israel’s Channel 10.

This is hardly an aberration; this is what Orthodox Jews believe and teach their children, no matter what they say in public. A few years ago another one of Israel’s top rabbis said that the difference between Jews and non-Jews is greater than the difference between men and cattle:

What particularly concerns the authors is the total contempt which Jewish fundamentalists show toward non-Jews. Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency of Jewish fundamentalism, said, “The difference between a Jewish soul and souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”

Here is the whole article:


JERUSALEM (JTA) — Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews.

“Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat.

“Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat,” he said to some laughter.

Yosef, the spiritual leader of the Shas Party and the former chief Sephardi rabbi of Israel, also said that the lives of non-Jews are protected in order to prevent financial loss to Jews.

“With gentiles, it will be like any person: They need to die, but God will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant. That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew,” said the rabbi, who recently turned 90.

An audio recording of some of the rabbi’s remarks was broadcast on Israel’s Channel 10.

The American Jewish Committee condemned the rabbi’s remarks in a statement issued Monday.

“Rabbi Yosef’s remarks — suggesting outrageously that Jewish scripture asserts non-Jews exist to serve Jews — are abhorrent and an offense to human dignity and human equality,” said AJC Executive Director David Harris. “Judaism first taught the world that all individuals are created in the divine image, which helped form the basis of our moral code. A rabbi should be the first, not the last, to reflect that bedrock teaching of our tradition.”

Are the Jews Getting Nervous?

Are the Jews Getting Nervous?

by Jeff Davis

World Jewry has always been keenly aware of the potential of White Americans rebelling against the sham two-party government, that the Jews have controlled for decades. An ADL press release claims “Rumors about gun confiscations. Angry protests about the government’s tax policies, replete with Nazi comparisons. A resurgent militia movement. Rage at the election of a president deemed to be illegitimate and threatening. Distrust and anger toward the government fueled by paranoia and conspiracy theories… In the year since we marked the historic election of the nation’s first African-American president we have seen a tremendous amount of anger and hostility…There is a toxic atmosphere of rage in America being witnessed at many levels, and it raises fundamental questions for our society.”

What the ADL sees as an alarming development is a positive development in the eyes of White patriots. The ADL wants the illegal alien invasion of America to continue without a peep of protest from angry White Americans. And why does the ADL want this? The result of a limitless brown invasion of America will be the extermination of the White race. Seems like the Jews are trying to commit genocide against us. A real genocide, not a phony one like that ridiculous Holocaust story of theirs.

The ADL gibbers on “One of the most disturbing trends in the rise of anti-government sentiment has been the resurrection and proliferation of conspiracy theories alleging dark, violent designs on the part of the federal government to declare martial law and end democratic government, to confiscate firearms from American citizens and to build hundreds of concentration camps to house dissidents. These theories have spread far and wide on social-networking sites.”

Of course, if the government is in fact planning to do this, it is a conspiracy, and NOT a theory. History is full of conspiracies. One of the biggest conspiracies in world history is The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It talks about the Jews using their control of the media to control White nations. The ADL should know about this particular conspiracy; they’re an active part of it.

The ADL whines on “In the summer of 2009 a variety of anti-government protests and disruptions occurred at town hall meetings organized by senators and representatives across the country to discuss health-care reform… These events became a fertile ground for anti-Obama protests and stunts, with some individuals angrily launching verbal attacks against the president and other office holders…”

It’s called democracy, something the Jews complain about whenever it goes against their interests. And those people speaking out at town hall meetings are using their Freedom of Speech –something the Jews don’t think we should have.

White American Identity Politics

White American Identity Politics

The American political arena and mainstream media is rigged against White American solidarity. Almost every single race or ethnicity has a political organization to serve its specific racial or ethnic interests. The glaring exception is a mainstream-credited or nationally-recognized political group dedicated to White American interests. There are groups dedicated to White advocacy, but they are invariably plagued by accusations of “extremism” or “hate” or “bigotry.”

The Preamble to the United States Constitution lists one of its purposes as to “secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Perhaps this explicit dedication to the interests of the White founding stock means that no White advocacy groups are needed. Maybe the explicit mandate of the Constitution demands the protection of liberty for the posterity of the White race, so White advocacy groups are superfluous. Until the middle of the twentieth century, this view might hold water. In light of the onslaught of anti-White propaganda, legislation, indoctrination, and social policy that has since followed, this explanation is a recipe for White political suicide.

Under oppressive legislation, a hostile media, and an anti-White educational system, the interests of White people have been subverted in favor of a cacophony of minority voices, all of which are alien to the original aims of the Founding Fathers. White Americans can no longer rest assured that the Constitution means what it says, or that the United States exists to preserve the interests of its White founding stock and their progeny. Instead, White Americans must organize specifically and purposefully on racial grounds, realizing that all other groups are slowly destroying each liberty and privilege that White Americans used to take for granted.

White Americans have no choice but to participate in racial identity politics. If White Americans remain unorganized and without a unified voice of advocacy, they will eventually succumb to being nothing more than demoralized tax-producers for the growing entitlement class. Even worse, White Americans will face a perfect storm of skyrocketing entitlements, smoldering racial grievances, and violent uprisings emanating from the non-White racial groups. This will not be a safe or secure future for White Americans. Look to the fates of Whites in the formerly productive countries of South Africa or Zimbabwe for examples of what happens when Whites are subject to a ruling majority of non-Whites. South Africa used to be the jewel of Africa. Rhodesia (the predecessor to the failed state of Zimbabwe) was the breadbasket of Africa, exporting food to its neighbors. Now, South Africa and Zimbabwe are the rape and murder capitols of the world, and Zimbabwe cannot even feed itself, let alone its neighbors. More than five thousand Whites have been murdered since the transition to a black government in South Africa, and the numbers of rapes and robberies are too many to accurately list. American Whites need to take decisive and organized political action before they become a hated minority in their own nation.

Latinos, Hispanics, and mestizos– whatever the gatekeepers of morality decide to call them– are free to organize, protest, and advance political goals strictly on the basis of race or ethnicity. Consider some of the mission statements of these advocacy groups: The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is busy “[a]dvancing the economic condition, educational attainment, political influence, health, and civil rights of the Hispanic population in the United States.” The National Council of La Raza “is the largest national Hispanic civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States” and “works to improve opportunities for Hispanic Americans.” Note that the translation of “la raza” into English is “the race.”

Jews are free to advocate specifically and exclusively for other Jewish people. Among other goals, the Anti-Defamation League “defends the security of Israel and Jews worldwide.” The American Jewish Congress is “organized to defend Jewish interests at home and abroad through public policy advocacy– using diplomacy, legislation and the courts.” Similarly, Asians are free to rally around race. The Asian American Justice Center exists “to advance civil and human rights for Asian Americans.” Blacks have a multitude of race-based advocacy groups. A special group for black practitioners exists for almost every professional occupation. Furthermore, the Congressional Black Caucus exists as an exclusively black organization and is comprised of exclusively black Congressmen advancing exclusively black interests.

In fact, all “people of color” (meaning all non-White people) have an implicit license to politically organize according to racial identity. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) states: “The NAACP’s principal objective is to ensure the political, educational, social and economic equality of minority group citizens of United States.” Blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, “people of color”– all of these groups advocate and organize on the basis of race or ethnicity. Yet White Americans may do no such thing without an onslaught of defamatory remarks, negative press coverage, and accusations of “hate” or “extremism.”

The knee-jerk negative reaction to a White identity organization is not natural. Suspicion regarding an explicitly White political group is the product of intense conditioning from a very young age. The origin and methodology of this conditioning is too complicated to adequately explain herein, but much of it stems from public education, globalist elites, and the corporate media. In short, from a very young age, White Americans are taught that love and admiration for the race and ethnicity of non-Whites is a healthy and sociable trait, but love and admiration for Whites by Whites is strictly forbidden. White Americans are conditioned to scorn their own heritage and to fawn over all other races. According to the ruling orthodoxy, admiration of non-Whites is tolerance and love but admiration of Whites is hate and bigotry.

No other group in America is taught or conditioned to have the same amount of self-sacrificial aims or self-loathing emotions. In fact, most other ethnic groups are encouraged to have a deep and profound sense of heritage and ethnic identity. Perversely, Whites are expected to enthusiastically jump on the non-White bandwagon while abandoning their own families. Whites must celebrate the achievements of every other race and ethnicity. Only Whites are forbidden from celebrating their own extended family, heritage, and history. Any sense of pride or identity stemming from a genetic origin must only be experienced vicariously for White Americans. An entire month has been dedicated to a celebration of the contributions to high culture, technology, art, philosophy, and civilization produced by black Americans. If someone protests that an entire month seems like immense favoritism towards blacks, then calls of “racism” are certain. Any opposition to the politically correct viewpoint is met with swift “justice” and the punishment is summary social execution.

The mere accusation of “racism” is enough to ruin a career, sink a political campaign, cancel an entertainment show, or alienate an individual. Perhaps this is a better explanation for the dearth of White political groups. Most of the nonsensical “truths” that modern Americans are forced to swallow are nothing more than shibboleths. If the shibboleth is met with anything other than the proper response, the “outsider” has been successfully identified, and swift countermeasures will be undertaken.

Instead of American spies inside Germany’s Third Reich being discovered by holding up the pointer, middle, and ring fingers to signify the number three, American citizens within the border are identified as racist outcasts by merely questioning the dubious notion that “diversity is our greatest strength.” Instead of asking a gringo to pronounce a Spanish word with a rolling ‘r’, ask the sociology professor who is up for tenure about her thoughts about the long-term viability of an increasingly diverse America. She had better work on her “accent” and toe the party line if she wants to have a successful academic career. Otherwise, she may infect future legions with the disease of critical thought, healthy dissent, or individuality. Heaven forbid, she may even fail in her greatest duty– to indoctrinate her pupils with the glorious fonts of wisdom which are Political Correctness and Tolerance for Diversity. Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this efficient method for political cleansing. A Soviet apparatchik would shriek with joy at the simplicity of this plan for purging the undesirables from the New Plan for Humanity.

As non-White Americans are free to create political organizations for the sole purpose of advancing the interests of a specific ethnicity, and White Americans are forbidden to do so, non-Whites enjoy fundamental rights and benefits which are denied to Whites. The logical implications of these thoughts and observations are non-controversial, but the act of drawing attention to it is definitely controversial. It might even be . . . “racist.”

As White Americans are prevented from organizing, thinking, or acting in a unified manner, and yet all other non-White groups are permitted and encouraged to do so, White Americans are at a distinct political disadvantage. Social pressure, media influence, legislation, and educational indoctrination combine to influence Whites against organizing or even thinking on the basis of race. This injustice must not stand. White Americans must organize to advance their own interests or they will fade into a dispossessed minority in the nation their forefathers carved from the unforgiving wilderness. White Americans must regain the political power they have implicitly relinquished. White Americans need not fear their own shadows any longer. Instead, White Americans must take back the reins and restore the conditions that made the United States of America into an exemplary society and a first-rate civilization.

Locust: If we fail to unite and stand against the darkness, this awaits our people.



Goldberg Variations

Goldberg Variations

Goldberg Variations Jonah Goldberg (photo: Heritage Foundation)

A column by Jonah Goldberg published in the dead-tree National Review (August 30) “A Muslim Gay Bar by the Mosque?” typifies the utterly infantile quality of our current movement conservative discourse. Goldberg writes in glowing defense of Fox News celebrity Greg Gutfeld, who had just advocated (presumably in a serious way) the creation of a Muslim gay bar in the vicinity of Ground Zero. Goldberg happily embraces this idea as a “tough-minded libertarian.” After all, freedom, he insists, “is a cultural institution that needs to be defended, even if that means offending people.” Moreover, “whatever you may think of gay bars, they’re not going away in the freedom-loving West. Pretty much everybody else in American life has learned how to live-and-let-live with such places to one extent or another.”

One might ask Goldberg, the “tough-minded libertarian,” why just one month earlier he had denounced Rand Paul in a column for raising hesitant objections to Provision Two of the Civil Rights Act, a provision that restricts an employer’s right to hire whom he wants for a job. According to Goldberg in one of the most ferocious tirades I’ve seen coming from his pen, unless the subject is the critics of Israel or “Obama fascism,” he let loose against the Republican candidate for U.S. Senate from Kentucky for “lamenting the lost right of bigots.”

Apparently the anti-discrimination mechanism created by Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave this country “economic freedom” for the first time, although it is not at all clear how it did so. But in any case why is my historic right to hire or accommodate whom I want in my business establishment less of a right than the right to run a gay bar, to the consternation of religious and moral traditionalists? Why should I have less of a right not to confer a job on a prospective employee than to scandalize devout Christians by establishing a sodomy recruiting agency in their neighborhood?

We all know the answer. Like his pals on FOX News and NR, Goldberg occasionally mimics a politically correct leftist even while working for GOP electoral victories. There is nothing noticeably rightwing about him or his chums, Rich Lowry, Glenn Beck, or the other movement conservatives who are working overtime trying to demonstrate their sensitivity to minorities and cultural liberals. Whether it is Glenn Beck quoting Martin Luther King and deploring the mildness of Reconstruction, Rich Lowry congratulating Abe Foxman and the ADL for taking a “courageous” position against building a mosque near Ground Zero or Laura Schlesinger ranting against the N-word, all of these personalities are as nauseatingly obsequious as they’re predictable. I’ve no idea why the only people who seem to notice this obvious fact are contributors to and readers of this website. Whenever I mention the same tics to white-bread Republicans or NR-subscribers, their response is to tell me they didn’t notice the offending behavior.

Are movement conservatives who denounced Obama for bowing to the Emperor of Japan blind to the infinitely greater indignity committed by W, who apologized for slavery in West Africa in 2003? Why was there no “conservative” outcry similar to the one against Obama when a Republican insulted White Americans? Further: was Steve Sailer the only writer who noticed when FOX “conservative” Karl Rove pushed sub-prime rate loans for Hispanics before the financial crash at the end of Bush’s reign? One might think that conservatives would be up in arms over such an outrage.

Somehow such facts never register when I bring them up to movement conservatives. My interlocutors prefer to go into a song and dance about Obama’s being bad news. They also insist that the people I complain about must be rightwing because the Left says so. And, equally important, FOX News describes them as “conservatives.”  Moreover, these good folks have no choice but to butter up minorities and gays. Otherwise the Left would attack them even more vigorously than it does as racists, sexists, and homophobes. The question left begging is this: If the Left rushes to attack their mild opposition as politically incorrect, no matter how furiously Goldberg, Lowry, and Schlesinger suck up to PC victims, why do movement conservatives bother to grovel — to no avail? They might as well move to the right openly — or at least stop groveling. The reason they don’t is they themselves are captive to the Left psychologically and socially. These authorized opponents of the Left reflect what they intermittently claim to be against. In the media industry, cultural-social differences are far less significant than elsewhere in the country.

As a scholar it behooves me to mention some possible objection to my assertions. There are movement conservative critics, it might be argued, who, contrary to what I seem to be suggesting, have moved away from Goldberg, Ross Douthat, and David Frum by going after the gay lobby. Just about any issue of First Things would show the persistence of this other view. Also (and this too I may be missing) articles in mainstream movement conservative publications take critical stands against illegal immigration, more gay rights, and other recent demands of the social Left. Certainly the conservative movement does not uniformly resemble the establishment Left on every question relating to race, gender, lifestyle, and the war against discrimination.

But counter-objections could be raised to these arguments. One, most prominent movement conservative journalists and TV personalities associated with the Right behave very much like Lowry, Goldberg, etc. Beside feeling obliged to express joy over the civil rights revolutions for black, women and other minorities, these prominent conservatives are slavishly tied to the GOP. Fox News and NR stars have become tiresome adjuncts of that party. And movement conservative celebrities seem to be following the Bush-Rove strategy of throwing under the bus traditional conservative groups like Southern Whites in order to appeal to the civil rights lobby, AIPAC, and “moderate” minorities. Why bother worrying about insulting crackers, which Lowry did in a glaring manner when he described the alleged racist murder of Shirley Sherrod’s father as “demographically representative” of the South before the feds got into enforcing the civil rights revolution? The Southern whites will vote for the GOP no matter what.

Two, the morally traditionalist, predominantly Catholic wing of the conservative movement will be allowed to spin its wheels, as long as it doesn’t show too much independence. About twelve years ago, R.J. Neuhaus and others associated with First Things began talking about the moral decadence of the “American regime.” But the grousers were promptly disciplined by Decter, Himmelfarb, and other female custodians of the neocon hegemony. These ladies explained to the obstinate priest and his friends who it was who controlled their finances and access to the media. Almost immediately the complaints against the “regime” stopped.

Moreover, it is permissible for conservative movement-affiliated traditionalists to go their own way on abortion, gay marriage, and a few other family issues, providing they swear fealty to their masters in other matters. To the latter belong such weighty things as backing neocon-promoted wars to spread liberal democracy and end “Islamofascism,” celebrating the triumphs of the civil rights movement and the canonization of Martin Luther King, and praising the American example of global, propositional democracy. Opponents of abortion treat their pro-life stand as an extension of the civil rights movement, and they counterfactually identify the pro-choice lobby as “anti-black.” (Of course blacks take the diametrically opposite position, as one learns from their predictable political choices.) The same traditionalists, typified by Michael Novak and Cal Thomas, enjoy attacking the Left as “anti-Semitic,” although this warning has certainly not affected Jews’ voting patterns. The traditionalist wing of the conservative movement pays a heavy price indeed for its limited right to expression under neocon surveillance. Catholic and other traditionalists are clearly not in the driver’s seat, and they can be effortlessly pushed off the bus or demeaned, the way NR treats unreconstructed Southerners.

Gerald Celente: US Depression Will Lead to Another Fake War

Gerald Celente: US Depression Will Lead to Another Fake War

Trends analyst Gerald Celente joins Alex Jones to discuss where the country is headed economically, and the potential for war with Iran (in four parts).

Gerald Celente is founder and director of The Trends Research Institute, author of Trends 2000 and Trend Tracking (Warner Books), and publisher of The Trends Journal. He has been forecasting trends since 1980, and recently called “The Collapse of ’09.”

The Best of Gerald Celente

Take The Ceausescu Challenge!

Take The Ceausescu Challenge!


[I considered running this with all kinds of caveats and disclaimers, but what the hell? The author probably intended this as comedy, but there's many a true word in jest. It's not likely to incite anyone to violence, since American White males don't fight any more, they write their Congressman or bitch to a radio talk show host or hire a lawyer to file a malicious lawsuit.

I figure that once--just once--I am going to publish what everybody in this country with any remaining sense of decency truly feels in their heart, no matter what their race or political persuasion. I'll probably get all kinds of flak---so what else is new? Enjoy! - HAC]

Take the Ceausescu Challenge!
by Mustapha Gormsby

The vermin on Capitol Hill are stealing over half of your income, eroding away your rights and taking our country on a fast track to the Third World. These miserable thrice-damned whoresons will never stop unless we stop them! It’s time to:


How can we kill them all now? Any way you like. You could hang them, behead them, roast them over an open fire, strangle them with your bare hands (very satisfying), impale them, sell them to a vivisectionist (profitable), run them over with a large vehicle once or with a small vehicle several times, stab them, shoot them, burn them at the stake, string them up with piano wire, chop them up with an axe (don’t use your good chef’s knife or you could notch the blade), bury them up to their necks near an anthill and pour honey on them, use them for chum when you go shark fishing, or any other method that you can imagine.

The more horrible it is, the better you will feel about it.

Don’t we need politicians and bureaucrats for anything?

Nope. They don’t even make good firewood, so there’s really no good use for them at all. Remember, these people have stolen a substantial part of your income for the last 80 years. They have spent even more than they have stolen, leaving the country with a 5 trillion dollar debt! They have stolen property from innocent people and used the law as an instrument of plunder and tyranny.

Do we need them? No, but they need us. Without us to bleed, they wouldn’t be able to live because they are incapable of producing anything for themselves. The miserable bastards don’t deserve to live.

Scum! Vicious, conniving, baby-eating vermin! They must die, die, DIE!


What Would We Do Without Them?

Live like free men instead of slaves, that’s what. When this country was founded people knew about things like natural rights. Now thesefestering, swilling pigs at the public trough have decided that the people of this country have too much freedom and that it is up to them to curtail it!

BASTARDS!!!!! Who do they think they are? Eighty years ago the budget was small enough to be paid for on what the government collects today even if you got rid of all personal income taxes! But these horrific sons-of-bitches just keep taking and taking as if there was no limit to what we will tolerate.

Is There Any Precedent for Killing Them All Now?

Yes! All over the world and throughout history, people who have suffered at the hands of corrupt politicians have eventually said enough is enough. The French Revolution was a fine example of what to do with politicians out of control. The people of Romania, having suffered under the Communist dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu for too many years, finally dragged him out into the street and shot him and his Jew bitch-dogslut of a wife through the head, an event which was videotaped and shown on national television to the thunderous cheers of the multitudes and which causes real Americans to heave a sigh of envy.


Are you tired of being told how to live? Of being told what you can and cannot eat, smoke, drink or do with your property? Are you tired of the government taking away your money and spending it on more government? Are you sick and tired of the fact that every time you turn around another thing you enjoy has been outlawed? There’s only one solution:


Hurry, before the United States starts looking like Mexico, Brazil or the old Soviet Union. March on your state capitol with pitchforks and torches. Lock the bastards in and burn the place down. Then march on WashingtonD.C. and do the same.

That is where the real evil is. You cannot vote these people out of office, because the new ones you vote in will begin to look like the old ones within just weeks. They are a slime and they spread like malaria. They are a disease! Voting won’t do any good. It’s time to KILL!

Just The Elected Officials?

No! The number of elected Federal officials is limited to congress, the president and the vice president. That’s only 537 people. The Federal bureaucracy numbers in the millions; between the military, the IRS, BATF,CIA, FBI, EPA, DEA, FDA and all of the other bureaus and departments,you’ve got millions of people who have power over your life and you never elected them! My god, the Post Office!!

Don’t let them escape: KILL THEM ALL NOW!

Filthy, horrible, miserable, statist, liberal, feminist, pervert, politically correct, lying, thieving, baby-killing vermin scum!!!!!

If you don’t kill them all now there’s no telling what they might do to you next. They could use your children to feed starving peasants in India. They could sell your wife or husband to the British to pay off part of their debt. They might turn your children into prostitutes for the government to help continue to fund PBS! Do you want your children to become Barney’s whores?!


For most of the 20th century, these stinking, loathsome, festering, boil-ridden, poor excuses for life forms have been bleeding the American people dry.

And not just at home! The government of the United States has screwed over plenty of people around the world. Not only that, but these shifty-eyed, mindless, drooling, horrible, vicious, evil, demonic, flea-bearing, pestilent, snivelling, whining, toadying, child-molesting power mongers are the world’s number one cause of apoplexy!!!!!!! They’ll steal your children and sacrifice them in bizarre Satanic rituals!

They must be stopped. Voting won’t stop them, petitioning won’t stop them, ballot initiatives won’t stop them.

Bullets will stop them! Baseball bats will stop them! Pitchforks will stop them! Skinning them alive will stop them!

The only thing that will stop them dead is Death!

Isn’t Killing Them All Now Kind of Drastic?

No! They signed up for the job. They stole from you, they lied to you, they stole from you some more, they destroyed the town you live in, they caused the increase in crime across the country, Mister Rogers has been brainwashing your children to make blind obedient followers of them! They are evil and they must be killed!

Don’t let another day of their depredations go by unchallenged! Kill them all now!

Yours etc. GRE (Mrs.)
Somewhere USA
Have a nice day.

[God, that felt good! - HAC]

Den of Thieves

Den of Thieves

For most of our history, our leaders have been honest, sincere men that genuinely cared about this country and its people. To have one of them be a treasonous, communist enemy of the nation was unthinkable, and there were plenty of safeguards in place to prevent that sort from ever getting into power.

But through the long years, Jews and the other enemies of America have used their considerable wealth and power to slowly work their way into every facet of our government, all the way to the top.

Sure, we’ve had plenty of fools and idiots in the presidency, and in the House and Senate, but at least they were honest fools. The trash occupying those positions today are the worst sort of human filth imaginable. They are nothing less than career criminals, that have even less morals and ethics than the worst street gangsta serving time in one of our supermax prisons.

The only difference is that they’re protected by their wealth and power, both of which come from a huge cadre of fellow monsters. I’m always amazed at the stark idiocy of the public when it comes to our leaders. They’ll fight like the devil to convict and jail some murderer, but when it comes to someone who has sent tens of thousands of our fine young men to their deaths, just to defend their own personal wealth on foreign shores, they say and do nothing, but instead actually reelect the beasts. The old saying about reaping what you sow comes to mind.

But the evil infesting our leaders isn’t the end of it by any means. Every single department and division of our government is also corrupt to the bone.

When the Secret Service came to my door a few months ago, in an attempt to intimidate me into silence, their agents caused a deep anger to well up inside me. I had to fight hard not to let my disgust with those clowns spill over into my conversation with them. But I have to tell you, it was extremely difficult, especially when I was forced to tolerate their arrogance and condescending behavior.

One agent in particular, a regular moose of a man who towered at least 6-foot seven, was a perfect example of the fruits of a lifetime of liberal brainwashing. I can guarantee you that this clown would shoot any of you without thinking twice about it if he was so ordered, and he wouldn’t lose a minute’s sleep over it either.

He had the arrogant self confidence and self-righteousness that only government agents possess. He stood there in my living room, refusing to sit and glowering at me with a look of open hostility on his face.

It was the face of a man that has busted and wrecked the lives of countless people and families, all for the sake of some abstract that he doesn’t even understand. All he knows is that those are his orders, and that’s enough for him. He never questions his orders, or the laws that demand it, or the bastards ordering the enforcement of those laws. This is why we call them goons in the first place. And brothers and sisters, this was indeed a goon.

I closely examined these agents as they sat beside me, attempting to squeeze information out of me, and I gathered far more information about them than they ever did about me. It took almost the entire length of the visit before this clown finally realized they were the ones being interrogated, and it infuriated him. He gathered up his female partner, and the Homeland Security officer that accompanied them to my door, and left in a huff. I just smiled at them sublimely and offered my hand as they left. The lady agent took it, but the moose just turned and stomped off.

I left them with a parting gift however, that I’m sure still burns his ass every time he thinks about it. As the door closed, and they were only a few feet from the porch, I broke into a laugh. I really couldn’t help it. It wasn’t deliberate, it’s just the ridiculousness of the whole situation suddenly struck me. I’m sure he heard me. They should never come to a battle of wits unarmed…lol.

This man was a thief, who is working for thieves, who are working for other thieves, who are they themselves controlled by the biggest thieves on earth, the Jews. It seems like no matter where you look or what you discover in the world of corruption andpolitical evil, you find a Jew behind it.

Take the new candidate for the Supreme Court, that rabid progressive communist Kagan. She’s..get this..another damned JEW. That’s right. A Progressive Jew on the Supreme Court? That’s like hiring a starved wetback to guard a plate full of fresh tacos. Pure, unadulterated insanity.

The enemy wants her there for the reasons you suspect; to help destroy our constitution. This fat Jewess bitch wants to allow faggots to serve in our military. This is a queer’s wet dream..living in close quarters with thousands of men.

Homosexuality isn’t an “alternative lifestyle”, it’s a sickness, an obsession and in the minds of many, and in the old days they looked upon it as a form of demon possession. They won’t be serving more than a few days before all sorts of fights will start breaking out among servicemen because some faggot tried to crawl into their bunk at night. Fags have this need to have sex with as many men as possible, as often as possible. They are insatiable. They are also extremely violent and murderous, and can fly into a killing rage over nothing. In fact the most hated call of all cops is a homosexual domestic dispute. They almost always involve extreme violence. And this isn’t counting all the diseases these lowlifes bring with them.
Kagan couldn’t give a rat’s ass about faggot’s rights and everybody in her cadre knows it and feels the same way. But it is a great way to help destroy the morale of our military, and the moral fiber of our nation. One more step toward America’s grave.

She wants to rob us of yet another virtue that made our nation great. It wasn’t our size, or our location, or our leaders that made America the greatest, most powerful nation in history, it was the white race that built her. Their moral integrity and honesty were the strength of this nation. Patriotism, honor, morality, integrity, honesty, hard work, and a respect for the laws of this country made it what it was. These traits were the backbone of America..and our enemies knew it and despised us for our superiority. And ever since then, our enemy the Jew has spend countless sleepless nights scheming and plotting ways to destroy it..and us.

We all have a sacred duty to awaken as many other whites to the names and faces of the enemy. For centuries these maggots have done their evil behind the curtain while their cronies did all the dirty work for them. We must drag these slugs screaming and kicking out into the bright light of day, showing the world who is really behind all our woes.

Of late the Jews and their liberal boot-licks have become openly vicious, attacking us on every front for the first time in history. This is out of fear. For the first time in America’s history whites are rising up, naming names and pointing fingers and demanding retribution. And this is terrifying the Jews, who are now pointing their fingers at others..anyone but themselves..in an attempt to once again escape the justice they so sorely deserve.

You’d think that after so many of them we executed for their evil during WWII, they’d have learned their lesson and backed off and started minding their own business. But Jews are incapable of learning. Their evil, greed, and never ending jealousy of our race continues to urge them on to ever greater heights of depravity and evil against us. This leaves us with only one inevitable option, which is their destruction..before they destroy us.

We are now controlled by a den of thieves that have our destruction as their ultimate goal. It’s time white America stopped worrying about who they offend and start offending the hell out of them and hope they don’t like it. We are at war folks, whether you want to face it or not. And if we’re to have any hope of survival, we must turn our plowshares back into swords.

-The Lone Haranguer

The Great Tea Party-NAACP Racism Fiasco. Jewish Shadow Gov.

The Great Tea Party-NAACP Racism Fiasco.

From The Political Cesspool

Oh, man…if only they had read my book! Racism, Schmacism. All of this unpleasantness could’ve been avoided. This thing is such a mess I don’t even know where to start, and it’s pathetic and hilarious at the same time. I wanted to write about it last week, but I was just swamped, and now things have gotten even crazier with the whole NAACP/Tea Party brouhaha, so I might as well go for it.

Well, let’s just start at the beginning. Last week, the NAACP passed a resolution condemning the “racism” of the Tea Party movement, and demanding that the movement purge itself of those hideous “racists” in their grass roots movement. Yes, the very same mental midgets who just a few weeks ago were condemning a Hallmark greeting card with an outer space theme because they think “black holes” means “black hos”, an organization which is explicitly organized for the exclusive benefit of one race of people, and whose name contains the words “Colored People”, actually had the gall to pass this resolution.

This was a great opportunity for the Tea Party movement to show some backbone by laughing in the face of the imbeciles at the NAACP. But did they? Of course not. Predictably, they responded in the same tired, pusillanimous manner with which they always respond to these never ending accusations. Instead of replying with a loud BWAHAHAHA! or a “Yeah? What’s your point?” or “So what?” or “Of course we’re racists -we’re white people.

That’s what “racist” means or “Can any of you race hustlers even spell “racist”?”, they predictably went into their usual bend over and grab their ankles mode. They protested that oh no, we’re not racists at all, we don’t tolerate racists at our rallies which are really huge rainbow coalitions, and it’s the NAACP and the liberals who are the real racists, etc., etc. You know, the lame “Bull Connor was a Democrat!” defense. It never works, but they just keep trotting it out like some lucky charm in the vain hope that this time it will work.

Racist means white person. Period. Until the Tea Partiers get that through their heads, nothing’s going to change, and they’re never going to be an effective political force. They really, really need to read Racism, Schmacism.

Read Article

Israel “deceit rape” law used to deter mixed relationships.

Probably the most well financed extreme left-wing organization in the US is the Anti-Defamation League(ADL). This groups takes in $50 million a year and advocates for every extreme left-wing cause in US politics. It is also widely accused of being an unregistered foreign lobby for Israel (and more recently for Turkey as well). The group uses its Jewishness and the WWII Jewish Holocaust as a weapon against criticism. However, at the same time it has lobbied to deny recognition that the Christian Holocaust in Turkey or the Ukrainian Holocaust in the Soviet Union constitute “genocide.” The ADL is also one of the leading advocates of censorship in the US.

However, while the ADL screams “nazi” and “racist” at mainstream conservatives in the US, it ignores the right-wing nationalist ruling coalition in Israel. A nation that the ADL fanatically and unconditionally supports.

Israel has banned all immigration from Sub-Saharan Africa, including so-called “Ethiopian Jews.” Last year numerous Sub-Saharan illegal immigrants were shot and killed by Egyptian border security trying to cross into Israel. Egypt says that the use of deadly force is due to intense pressure from the Israeli government to halt the flow of illegals.

Israel gives free Depo-Provera injections, a highly effective long term birth control, to Ethiopian immigrant women on welfare.

Foreign guest workers are allowed from Asian countries, but they must sign a form promising not to have sexual relations with an Israel girl.

Now a new tactic is being used to deter mixed relations. An Arab Israeli citizen was just sentenced to 18 months in prison for having consensual sex with a Jewish Israeli girl. The prosecutor called it “deceit rape,” because the Arab allegedly told the girl he was also Jewish. Click here for more info.

Obviously, if any US conservative group even advocated doing any of these things in the US, the ADL would be screaming “nazi” and “racist” at the top of its lungs.

The Crucifixion of Mel Gibson.

The Crucifixion of Mel Gibson.

From The Political Cesspool

The William Morris Endeavor Agency has announced that they’re dropping Mel Gibson from their talent roster, and will no longer represent him. Because he used a “bad word”, about no one in particular, and in a moment of passion.

Let’s be absolutely clear about what’s going on here. This isn’t about “the N word”, or about Grigorieva’s unproven claim that Mel Gibson slapped her around. It has nothing to do with any of that, and I’ll prove it.

This is Hollywood paying Mel Gibson back for the unforgivable crime of making a movie about Jesus Christ several years ago. And for refusing to condemn his own father when Hollywood scum attacked Hutton Gibson for having his own views about World War 2. And for Mel telling a cop that Jews are behind all the wars of the world, which might’ve been an exaggeration, but not a huge one. They certainly were behind the Iraq quagmire – over in Israel, the main newspaper bragged in 2003 that the Iraq War was a Jewish creation.

The Hollywood-DC-New York axis of evil have never forgiven Mel Gibson for making what they regard as the most disgusting movie in history, and they’ve been trying to bring him down ever since. The people who run Hollywood absolutely despise Jesus Christ, and they despise Mel Gibson for making a movie about Him. That’s what this is about. It has nothing to do with “the N word.”

Ari Emanuel, the head of the William Morris Endeavor agency, emailed his colleague to say “we can’t represent a guy who said the N word.” Really? Check out some of WME’s other clients – P. Diddy, Kanye West, Snoop Dogg, Mary J. Blige, 50 Cent, and many other rappers who toss the N word around like confetti. Just do a quick search for the lyrics of any of those people, and you’ll see that their “songs” are filled with “the N word” . But Ari Emanuel hasn’t announced that he’s dropping any of these performers.

And tell it to Charlie Sheen. He’s another actor who’s also represented by the William Morris Endeavor agency. He’s the star of one of the most popular shows on TV, Two and a Half Men, which he’s been starring in since 2003.

Has he fired Charlie Sheen because “we can’t represent a guy who said the N word’? Uh, no. In fact, the William Morris Endeavor agency just negotiated a huge new contract for Sheen which pays him nearly $2 million an episode. But Charlie Sheen never made a movie glorifying Jesus Christ.

That’s why they’re going after Mel Gibson. I told you I’d prove it, and I did. Ari Emanuel’s agency has lots of performers who use the “N word”, including the very white Charlie Sheen.

Read Article

Breaking the Grip of the Jewish Intellectual Cultural Hegemony Machine

Breaking the Grip of the Jewish Intellectual Cultural Hegemony Machine

I came across an article in the Hoover institution’s Policy Review entitled ‘The Tea Party vs. the Intellectuals’ by Lee Harris, who has recently written a book entitled The Next American Civil War: The Populist Revolt Against the Liberal Elite. Although the right has historically attempted to combat the brainwashing forces of the liberal intellectual elites on their own terms, the current social upheaval is something else:

Intellectual critics of the Tea Party movement most often attack it for its lack of ideas, especially new ideas — and these critics have a point. But the point they are making reveals as much about them as it does about the Tea Party. Behind the criticism lies the implicit assumption that comes quite naturally to American intellectuals: Namely, that a political movement ought be motivated by ideas and that a new political movement should provide new ideas. But the Tea Party movement is not about ideas. It is all about attitude, like the attitude expressed by the popular poster seen at all Tea Party rallies. Over the head of a hissing rattlesnake threatening to strike is inscribed the defiant slogan so popular among our revolutionary ancestors: “Don’t tread on me!” The old defiant motto is certainly not a new idea. In fact, it is not an idea at all. It is a warning.

If you are an intellectual, you can debate an idea, but how do you debate a warning? No evidence can be adduced to refute it. No logic can be introduced to poke holes in it. All you can do with a warning is to heed it or disregard it. “Don’t tread on me!” is not the deliberate articulation of a well-thought-out political ideology, but rather the expression of an attitude — the attitude of pugnacious and even truculent defiance.

The biggest threat of this upheaval is not so much to ‘the left’, but to the beltway ‘conservative leadership’ which has long misdirected the political actions of well-meaning and patriotic white Americans:

Anti-Tea Party intellectuals who are liberal have a luxury that their conservative brethren don’t have. Liberals can attack and deride the Tea Party without fear of alienating their traditional allies among ordinary voters. Indeed, their mockery of the Tea Party makes good sense to them politically. It is throwing red meat to their base. But conservative intellectuals are in a wholly different position.

As the Tea Party gains in momentum, conservative intellectuals are faced with a dilemma: to join the party or denounce it. If they join, they risk losing their status as respectable public intellectuals. If they denounce the party, they risk losing influence over the traditional Republican base.

There is something puzzling about the dilemma confronting conservative intellectuals. The Tea Partiers, after all, are emphatic in their insistence that they are true-blue conservatives. Shouldn’t conservative intellectuals be delighted at the rise of populist movement made up of conservatives like themselves? But that is just the problem: The Tea Partiers are not conservatives like themselves. Eminent conservatives, such as David Frum and David Brooks, have made this point by their serial put-downs of the Tea Party movement, largely on the grounds that it lacks intellectual respectability.

‘Eminent conservatives’ David Frum and David Brooks are both jewish, of course.

For example, shortly after the Tea Party’s Nashville convention, Arianna Huffington warned that too much emphasis on the “ugly” aspect of the Tea Party movement should not blind us to “the fact that some of what’s fueling the movement is based on a completely legitimate anger directed at Washington and the political establishment of both parties. Think of the Tea Party movement as a boil alerting us to the infection lurking under the skin of the body politic.” Though Arianna Huffington is usually put in the liberal camp, she is here expressing the sentiments of many leading conservatives more sympathetic to the Tea Party movement than Brooks or Frum. According to this point of view, the anger and frustration expressed by the Tea Party movement is understandable. They are the ugly symptoms of a serious problem. But the remedies proposed by the Tea Party to deal with these problems are simplistic and often downright wacko.

If this is the closest that our public intellectuals can get to empathizing with the Tea Party — by looking upon it as a “boil” on the body politic — then perhaps we should consider the possibility that America’s intellectual elite has become radically out of touch with the visceral sensibility of a large chunk of their nation’s population. This might not be a serious problem for liberal intellectuals, who, by and large, have long since ceased to have any interest in influencing the many Americans who have expressed sympathy with the Tea Party movement (according to various polls, as much as 40 percent of the population). But it poses a very grave problem for conservative intellectuals loyal to the Republican Party. Since the election of Nixon in 1968, the Republicans’ political successes have been predicated on winning over the bulk of those Americans who have come to look on “liberal” as a dirty word. Nixon called them “the silent majority.” Pundits after the 2000 election observed that they tended to live in the red states. Alienated by the causes championed by liberal intellectuals, they have reliably voted the Republican ticket, often simply because Republicans were not liberals. They may still vote Republican in the future, but only for those Republican candidates who are willing to join the party — the Tea Party, that is.

This is what concerns the jews and other beltway/intellectual conservatives the most: the ‘controlled opposition’ may be about to turn into true, uncontrolled opposition.  Attacks by the jewish ‘conservatives’ like Frum and Brooks no longer have any effect other than to alienate themselves from the whites they wish to influence: whites appear to be finally developing an immune system to jewish phony-‘conservatism’:

Continue Reading »