Is the White Race Inferior?
Whites May Be Inferior to Other Races in Several Critical Skills
by Kevin Alfred Strom
I received an electronic mail message a while back accusing me of being a “White supremacist.” I won’t give the name of the person who wrote me with this comment, even though he left the message, including his name, in a public forum on a computer network that can be accessed by anyone. I won’t give his name because he didn’t give me permission to do so. I had left a message on the computer network, asking everyone who read the message to tune into American Dissident Voices, and giving our latest radio schedule. This fellow wrote back, without so much as a how-do-you-do, and called me a “White supremacist,” and a few other names that I won’t mention. Well, I’m not a White supremacist. But the fact that this person called me one is illustrative of just how much ignorance and malicious misinformation is out there when it comes to racial matters in general and the ADV program in particular.
My dictionary defines “White supremacy” as “The doctrine arising from the belief that the White race is superior to the Negro race and that the latter must therefore be kept in an inferior economic and social position.” To explain a little further, a White supremacist believes that the different races ought to live together in the same society, and that the Whites ought to rule over the other races. I don’t believe in that idea at all.
I believe that each race or ethnic group within a race, which considers itself to be a separate and distinct people with its own distinctive qualities and values and interests, ought to be free to pursue its destiny with perfect independence and freedom. And I am rational enough to see that when different races are forced to live together in the same society, their interests naturally collide and each group will try to get its way. This always results in one group dominating the others. Sometimes the tables will be turned and a group on the bottom will take control and wreak vengeance on their former oppressors. But whenever people are forced to live in a multiracial society, there is almost always this situation of conflict and/or supremacy. I also note that FORCE is usually necessary to create a multiracial society, since in nations, neighborhoods and school lunchrooms, human beings naturally gravitate to their own kind. This is a behavioral characteristic that is inborn in us and therefore, we must agree, of value. No matter how many “integration” laws the criminals in Washington pass, this natural tendency to want to live and work among one’s own kind, this self-segregation if you will, continues to confound the bureaucrats. Left-wing intellectuals regularly wring their hands over the supposedly terrible fact that the races in the United States are nearly as separate now as they were in those supposedly bad old days thirty years ago.
I’m not for White supremacy, Black supremacy, Jewish supremacy, or any other kind of supremacy in a multiracial nation. We’ve taken a multiracial road in America, first with slavery, and now, more than ever, with integration. It has been a disaster for everybody. It ripped America apart once, and if we let it go on too much longer, it will rip it apart again.
If you must choose a label for me, make it Nationalist or Separatist — not supremacist. Since I am a White American and I care about the future of my people — and I dare you to say that there’s anything wrong with that — I suppose you could call me a White Separatist. I find common ground with separatists and nationalists of other races, though, for they are mostly working for the same thing I am working for — the peaceful and voluntary separation of the races, and true independence and freedom for all peoples. I find more common ground with Black or American Indian nationalists, for example, than I do with White liberals who want to force us all to mix together to fit their unrealistic dream of world government, or with rich White conservatives who want to force White working people to mix with Blacks and Mexicans because cheap labor increases their bottom line. I find no common ground with Whites who think like that!
Now, it may be argued that I would have to use force to separate the races and gain for each the independence and freedom that I desire. Well, our American forefathers had to use a bit of force to gain their independence and freedom from King George III; so, I suppose there is some merit in that line of reasoning. But the separatist idea has a lot going for it that I think makes it one of the most peaceful and non-violent ideologies extant. For one thing, as I’ve already said, people naturally form families, extended families, voluntary associations, and yes, nations and governments, with those with whom they feel a kinship, with those of their own race. So if you took away the implied force of all these so-called “integration” laws we have now, people would just continue to do what they have done naturally for many thousands of years, and 90% of the separation of the races would be done automatically, without a law being passed or a shot being fired.
In addition, large numbers of people, of all races, are already on our side, although they often don’t get to hear the separatist point of view because of certain interest groups that work to keep our books out of the libraries and our programs off the air. The vast majority of decent White and Black people would prefer that their sons and daughters mate and marry among their own kind. I know this from personal experience, and the marriage statistics bear me out. Though the number of interracial unions has, tragically, increased, it is still a tiny fraction of the total despite the largest and most sustained propaganda drive in history promoting it from our pulpits, newsstands, television, Hollywood, and so-called “music videos.” Since the majority of people want freedom and independence, and prefer to live under their own government and among their own kind, once we can get our separatist message spread far and wide, the situation may evolve to the point where on one side you’ll have the global elitists and their allies in the media and the bureaucracy who promote world government and multiculturalism — and on the other side you’ll have nearly everybody else. That is why the Anti-Defamation League and the other organizations of subversives and traitors in this country are so desperate to keep American Dissident Voices off the air. They realize that more and more people are wising up to their genocidal plans, and they want to plug the hole in their dike of media lies so that no more truth leaks out.
A lot of the people who are wising up to the genocidal nature of the multicultural agenda are Black people, Black nationalists to be exact. Pondering that fact, I am concerned by the realization that my own people have not measured up to other races in this regard. So I think I will confound my critics again by devoting the rest of this essay to describing, not the superiority, but the inferiority of the White race.
The inferiority of the White race is obvious. Now there are many ways in which we are superior, at least by our own standards. We did put a man on the moon. We did invent the transistor and the computer and virtually every other technological marvel of this age. Our race has produced men like Shakespeare and Socrates, Pythagoras and Poe, Robert E. Lee and Julius Caesar, Michaelangelo and William Shockley. These men and the civilizations that we and our kind have built are worthy and admirable. We deserve to survive. I have devoted a good part of my life to saying that.
But as worthy and admirable as our race may be, by our standards, it must be admitted that there is a higher standard. It is the only objective standard. It is Nature’s standard. As one of the greatest minds of this century, Dr. Revilo Oliver, has stated in his book America’s Decline: “The only objective criterion of superiority, among human races as among all other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish. The superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge victorious — whether by its technology or by its fecundity — from the proximate struggle for life on an overcrowded planet.” In other words, if we succeed in surviving the next few centuries, we can objectively be called superior to those races that do not survive. That’s a big “if.”
White Americans are at present markedly inferior to other races in many crucial survival skills. One such skill is the ability to organize and stand up for the interests of our own race. We are all familiar with the NAACP, the Nation of Islam, the Black Caucus, the Urban League, and many other racial organizations working for what they perceive to be the interests of Black people. Those well-known names are just the tip of the iceberg. I have before me the standard reference work on organizations in the United States, the Encyclopedia of Associations. Under the category of Black organizations, I find some 300 separate listings, including the Black Book Writers Association, the National Association of Black County Officials, the National Association of Black and Minority Chambers of Commerce, the National Association of Black Veterans, National Association of African-American Students of Law, the Emergency Black Survival Fund, the Black United Fund, the Association of Black Women Historians, the National Conference of Black Mayors, the National Black-Owned Broadcasters Association, the Council for a Black Economic Agenda, the National Association of Black Journalists, etc., etc., etc. I could go on for hours.
Now let’s turn to the page which lists Jewish organizations. Numerically, there are far fewer Jews in the United States than Blacks — but in the Encyclopedia of Associations there are at least 600 Jewish organizations listed. We’ve all heard of the biggies — the B’nai B’rith, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, etc. But have you heard of the other 5 or 6 hundred? The Jewish Committee on International Affairs, the Jewish Student Press Service, the Coordinating Body of Jewish Organizations, the Jewish Documentation Center, the Association of Jewish Campus Professionals, Association of Jewish Book Publishers, and on and on and on and on . . . .
Now far be it from me to criticize Black or Jewish people for organizing themselves. It is natural and logical for them to do so.
But ask yourselves this question: Do White people have comparable organizations to these, standing up for White American interests? Clearly, we do not. There is no White Press Council, no White Broadcasters Association, no Miss White America beauty contest, etc. If there were, can you imagine the stink that would be raised in the controlled media? In regard to having the will to organize for their own self-interest, White Americans are clearly inferior. In defense of White Americans, it might be stated that there are some signs of hope. Two such hopeful signs are the organizations producing the ADV radio program and the Free Speech newsletter, and this web site — the National Alliance and National Vanguard Books. It might also be stated that the criminal politicians and the controlled media do everything they can to suppress any effort at White American self-determination. But there is no excuse, really. The existing organizations for White Americans would have to be 10,000 times as large to be comparable to non-White organizations. And they aren’t. American Whites have proven themselves inferior in this crucial survival skill.
Another area of White American inferiority is our gullibility, which at times approaches the supernatural. We seem to have willingly suspended our critical faculties, and believe almost everything we are told. One small example from recent history: I was listening to Tom Brokaw pontificate on NBC-TV a while back, and he said that Nelson Mandela was the first Black ruler of South Africa in over 300 years. Now that isn’t true. The truth is that Nelson Mandela is the first Black to rule South Africa ever. Anyone who cares to research the history of South Africa will find it recorded that the White pioneers of that land did not encounter Black tribes until they had pushed to their northern frontiers. Prior to the White settlement there was no nation of South Africa. After the White South Africans had built a civilization there, millions of Blacks willingly immigrated there because of the economic opportunities. Now the White South Africans have proved their inferiority by abandoning their fair and reasonable program of setting aside separate territories for the various White and Black peoples of that region, called apartheid, and by acquiescing in the turnover of their entire nation to the Communist ANC.
When the controlled media told Americans over the last 30 years right up to today, that Nelson Mandela is a saint, a fighter for human rights and democracy in South Africa, the gullible Americans believed it. This is the same Nelson Mandela who authored the essay How to be a Good Communist, the same Nelson Mandela who regularly speaks before huge hammer-and-sickle Communist banners, witnessed by thousands. They tell you that Nelson Mandela is a demi-god and a friend of Black people, and they tell you that I am a White supremacist. Well, I have never harmed a hair on the head of a single Black person, yet the controlled media would have you revile me as a so-called “hatemonger.” Whereas Nelson Mandela’s ANC, as has been extensively documented, has killed tens of thousands of Black people in South Africa, because they wouldn’t submit to Communist domination.
One of the main techniques used by the Communist ANC to discipline recalcitrant Blacks is called “necklacing.” In case you don’t know what necklacing is, I will describe it for you. Usually the tendons are cut in the victim’s arms and legs, so that he cannot flee or remove his “necklace.” The necklace is an old tire which has been soaked in gasoline, which is placed over the victim’s head and set on fire. Anyone unfortunate enough to witness a tire fire knows that tires burn slowly and are almost impossible to extinguish. The burning rubber slowly boils and bubbles its way into the victim’s skin. No matter how he rolls or struggles, nothing he does will put out the fire which is literally consuming him. He will die a prolonged and extremely painful death. Multiply this picture in your mind by several tens of thousands, and you will have a realistic picture of just what a great friend of Black people Nelson Mandela really is. The victims of necklacing were almost all Blacks who opposed the Communist ANC. Nelson Mandela’s wife, Winnie Mandela, spoke for the ANC when she said, “With our matches and our necklaces we will liberate this country.” All of these facts about Mandela and the ANC are in the public record. All of them could be found by anyone who wants to find out for himself. But most White Americans believe whatever they are told. The media masters in New York and Hollywood must laugh at our gullibility, at our belief in their picture of Nelson Mandela which is completely at variance with the facts. “We can make the American swine believe anything,” they must roar.
Regular readers of this newsletter well know that Nelson Mandela is just one of many things that the media masters lie about. But the point I am trying to make is that most White Americans are very, very gullible. If you told them in a serious voice that the Martians had landed in New Jersey they would believe you. They won’t or can’t check the facts for themselves, and as long as the beer and the football and the girlie magazines keep coming, they apparently don’t care that their country is being stolen from them. Fifty years of lies from the controlled media, and still they believe, still they trust. These characteristics cannot be regarded as boding well for their future survival. They must be counted as more evidence for White inferiority.
But of course, all White Americans are inferior.
There are more and more of us who are awakening to the fact that we have been used and lied to by the media and the government for our entire lives. And there are millions who may not have figured out the plan in detail, but who are nevertheless aware that something is seriously wrong in this country, who are just awakening to the fact that we have lost control of our nation and our destiny. It is my job — and it is your job too — to awaken those who can be awakened, to educate those who can be educated, those who can think for themselves — because in the next American revolution, they will be the only people who count.
An America without an American Majority
By Dr. Brent Nelson,
with an Introduction by Kevin Alfred Strom
A hurt and confused White mother recently wrote a letter to the editor of my local paper stating that her daughter had come home from public school over the Christmas holiday with materials celebrating “Kwanzaa” (the largely fictitious African-American Hanukkah analogue, which is slyly claimed by its promoters to be non-religious in order to assure its patronage with taxpayers’ money). The public school had also provided her daughter with Hanukkah candles and other materials to promote “understanding” of our Jewish brethren, whose exalted religion is somehow exempted from that pesky wall of separation between church and state. Also brought home in the daughter’s book bag were printed materials which were part of some unpronounceable Cambodian celebration, which was, of course, presented as equal with all these other celebrations of alien culture. Where, this concerned mother wanted to know, was Christmas, which was not even mentioned and might as well not have existed? Why, she asked, couldn’t Euro-American Yuletide traditions at least be mentioned in the schools and presented as a small part of our wonderful new world of diversity?
This poor, confused woman just doesn’t get it. The one connecting thread in all these crazed promotions of alien cultures, which change from year to year depending on the Politically Correct fashions and conveniences of the moment, is hatred of us, hatred of White people, and a desire to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture forever. The partly alien and partly traitorous elite which now rules this country and which of course controls the public schools is determined to wipe us and our genetic and cultural heritage off the face of the Earth. And we are letting them do it. We are entrusting our children to their most sophisticated experts in brainwashing, and one hears only a few pathetic, cringing whimpers of protest, like the mother’s letter I just mentioned. Such “protests” might at most elicit a haughty snicker of contempt from our enemies, but that is about all.
We of European descent must begin to organize, or we and our kind will not survive the coming years. The time is long past when our country was so rich and powerful we could let sentimentality rule and give away ever-increasing amounts of our wealth and our precious soil. We have lost so much, and we must not continue to pretend that this loss has not occurred. We must acknowledge that we live in a nation ruled by alien occupiers and the traitors who serve them. And we must begin to build a powerful resistance to that occupation.
Some Americans are waking up. And some of these Americans occupy positions of importance within one of the citadels of the enemy — and that does strike fear in the hearts of our enemies. One such man is Dr. Brent Nelson. A college professor, a man with much to lose, we must admire Dr. Nelson for his courage and learn from his research and his insights.
The following article is based on a speech given by Dr. Nelson to the North Carolina Council of Conservative Citizens in November, 1994. In the past I have often criticized conservatives, and not without reason. After all, modern conservatism has utterly failed to conserve either our race or our freedom, and most of its prominent spokesmen are now mere hirelings of our enemies. But Dr. Nelson and the Council are doing something very useful in moving conservative thinking away from its current obsession with multiracial moneymaking and toward concern with race and Western destiny.K.A.S.
The Balkanization of America
A year ago the U.S. Bureau of the Census published a report which revised previous estimates of the future population of the United States. According to the Census Bureau, there will be 400 million people in the United States in the year 2050. One important fact about this figure is that it is much greater than the optimum population for a land area the size of the United States. Another important fact concerns the nature of that population. In 2050 the United States will consist of several blocs of minority groups. There will be no majority group. By 2050 European Americans, who for the first 200 years of the existence of the United States had been its majority population group and who had founded and maintained its culture, laws, and economic life, will find themselves in the minority.
There is yet another important fact to be noted about this mass of 400 million people. This is a fact which suggests that the United States of 2050 will be America Balkanized, an America without Americans, an America in which citizens will identify with their minority status and forget about the nation as a whole. This is the fact that three of the four major population blocs will constitute visible minorities. Three of the four blocs — European Americans or Whites, African Americans or Blacks, Asian Americans or Yellows — will be what the anthropologist Sir Arthur Keith has called “macrodiacritic” groups. That is, more than 90 percent of their members are visibly identifiable. The fourth bloc, Hispanic Americans, is a conglomerate created by the Federal bureaucracy. Hispanics, who can belong to any race, will no doubt still be a political bloc.
Indeed, all four blocs will be relentlessly political, locked in a struggle to determine how the increasingly scarce economic goods and natural resources are to be distributed to each group. Can a nation so wracked by internal struggle long endure? History suggests not. History suggests that by the time that America lacks Americans to the extent that Yugoslavia now lacks Yugoslavs, it will undergo a more or less painful process of deconstruction. That time may, in fact, occur long before 2050.
The predicted great shift in the composition of the U.S. population is attributed by the Census Bureau to an estimated yearly influx of 1 million legal immigrants. There may be an equal number of illegal immigrants entering the United States each year. The overwhelming majority of immigrants, both legal and illegal, come from the Third World. Another factor which will radically change the ethnic composition of the population — a factor given less attention by the Census Bureau — is the differential birth rates of the various groups involved. It is quite likely that, given current trends, the European American will find himself in a minority long before 2050.
The three highly visible groups — the Whites, Yellows, and Blacks — are, of course, the three major races. Biologists refer to these races as subspecies. The differences among them go far beyond skin color. There is no point in enumerating all of those differences, but one fact about these subspecies needs to be recognized. It has been summed up in a thought-provoking essay called “Biological Subspecies of Man,” written some thirty years ago by Professor E. Raymond Hall, who was probably the foremost authority on American mammals. Dr. Hall’s observation regarding subspecies of mammals is that two subspecies of the same species do not occur in the same geographic area. Dr. Hall notes that there may be some intergradation (mixing) of subspecies, but much more often one subspecies thrives and the other goes into extinction. One subspecies proves to be more prolific than the other and wins the territory for itself. Dr. Hall concluded that the natural territory of a human subspecies is continental in scope. He warned that two different subspecies of humans will not co-exist indefinitely on the same continent. Ultimately one or the other will pass from the scene.
Territoriality is an imperative for man as it is for all other mammals. European Americans know well that much of urban America and wide areas of the South have become the territory of another subspecies. Is it too farfetched to say that what is publicized as a crime wave is really the strategy, combined with high birthrates, by which one subspecies is supplanting another, either by outbreeding European Americans or by forcing them to flee?
Territoriality is central to understanding the future America. Let current trends go for another 50 years, and it is obvious that then the Southeast will largely be African territory, and the Southwest mestizo-occupied territory, with various urban enclaves in the West under the control of Asians.
But why should we care about what will happen 50 years from now? The answer to that is the fact that the future is already with us in many areas. America Balkanized is now a reality in southern California, southern Florida, and in other places all across the continental United States. The politics of Balkanization — a recurrent cycle of polarization, confrontation, and violence — is already emerging in Los Angeles and Miami. But even where one would least expect to find it there is evidence of the coming Balkanization of America.
Let us consider one rather improbable example. The state of Arkansas is in the center of the United States. It has less than 1 percent of the U.S. population. It is almost the poorest of the 50 states. It has nothing to attract immigrants, yet the immigrant influx is apparent even in Arkansas.
Rogers is a small city of about 30,000 people, located in the middle of the Ozarks, in the extreme northwest corner of the state. Now the majority of the schoolchildren in Rogers are Spanish-speaking. Only a few years ago there were almost no Mexicans in the Ozarks. What happened? The answer is that a huge poultry processing firm, Tyson Foods, has imported thousands of Mexicans in order to use them as cheap, easily controlled labor.
In the extreme northeast corner of the state there is the small city of Jonesboro, which has approximately 45,000 people. Jonesboro also has a huge mosque with a 100-foot-tall minaret. This mosque was not built by local Black Muslims. It was built by Moslems from the Arab states, students at the local university who have come to the United States to study business administration and learn how to manage American corporations which are being bought up by their countrymen.
On the far western border of Arkansas there is Fort Smith. Almost 10,000 of the 90,000 people in Fort Smith are Asians. They have built a huge Buddhist temple. Recently one of the schools in Fort Smith had to be shut down for the day when gang warfare broke out between gangs of Cambodians and Blacks. The Asians in Fort Smith were originally refugees housed at nearby Fort Chaffee. Many of them stayed in Fort Smith when they were offered employment in local factories.
In the center of the state, in Little Rock, a group of Chinese American investors representing business interests in Hong Kong held a meeting in August of this year and announced their intention to establish a new community to be called Chinatown, Arkansas. Chinatown, Arkansas, is to be developed on 500 acres to be purchased south of Little Rock and will be the home of 2,000 Chinese immigrants. It will include a shopping center and two schools. The investors promised that at least one out of every four jobs created by Chinatown, Arkansas, will be given to local people. Moreover, they promised that if Chinatown, Arkansas, is successful in achieving its purpose of facilitating the transfer of Hong Kong businesses to the United States, then similar Chinatown developments will arise in Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Mississippi, and Louisiana.
A delegation from the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce was present and expressed its enthusiasm for the projected Chinatown, Arkansas. The mayor of Little Rock also expressed his gratitude. In his words, “A culturally diverse community really has something to offer.” The mayor said that he was happy that Chinatown would offer some jobs to local people, but he did not say whether or not any member of his own family might be ready to apply for one of those jobs.
Even where we would least expect it, there is today a foreshadowing of the coming America, an America in which European Americans will no longer be able to speak of “our country” but only of “this country.”
What is behind the immigrant invasion? The answer is obvious. It was apparent in each of the examples cited. The culprits responsible are not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the cause of America’s surrender to the immigrant invasion is simply the shameless, hoggish greed of the ruling elite of this nation!
The ruling elite can dispatch hundreds of thousands of troops to Kuwait, Somalia, Rwanda, and Haiti, but for some reason a few thousand men cannot be spared to patrol the nation’s southern border and stop the influx of illegal immigrants. The reason, of course, is that the elite is quite happy with the nation’s highly permeable borders. The Wall Street Journal has even editorialized in favor of open borders.
The strategy of the elite is clear: In the new global economy the American elite will become part of an international elite, while the mass of Americans who work for a living must accept their future place in a global labor pool. In other words, the overwhelming majority of European Americans are supposed to accept a way of life that will be somewhere between the European standard and that prevailing in the Third World.
What can be done about this threat to the future of our people?
There are at least three possible courses of action.
First, we can continue to do what we have been doing. That is, communicating our views to our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. This is an essential, never-ending task. If we cease to undertake it, there will be no voice against those who urge our representatives to open our borders to an even larger influx of immigrants.
Second, we can work to change the legislative bodies by encouraging people who agree with us to run for election. We need candidates who will express our views. It is much more cost-effective to put in office people who already agree with us than it is to attempt to convert to our views those officeholders who may be hostile to us. Even unsuccessful campaigns are useful in mobilizing the people and broadcasting our views. It is also useful to put on the ballot referenda such as Proposition 187 in the recent California elections.
Third, we can begin to work for the implementation of a long-range strategy in which we turn away from the legislative talk shops and look to the rank and file of our own people. We need to work to build a sense of community among European Americans that is as strong as the sense of community that now exists among African Americans and Asian Americans. There is now a large population of European Americans, but there is not a community of European Americans led by European Americans who are conscious, avowed leaders of that community.
There is a nationwide African American community led by African Americans who are leaders not because they are accepted as part of the ruling elite, but because they are leaders of their community as such. They are race leaders.
European Americans have no race leaders. There is no end of European Americans who belong to the ruling elite, but — claiming to represent all Americans — they are not our leaders.
In America, unlike Eastern Europe, the politics of Balkanization is the politics of race. The politics of race terrifies the ruling elite because it is a politics which is carried on outside of the legislative talk shops. It is a politics which is rooted in life, which defines friend and enemy once and for all. It is a politics which is climactic. It is a politics which is final.
A great campaign in that politics has begun. We cannot look to the ruling elite for leadership in that campaign. If it is to be found anywhere, we must look to ourselves alone.
Visions of the Future
As Signs of Decay Multiply, Prescient Persons Seek Alternatives
By Kevin Alfred Strom
A new vision of the future is taking shape all across the lands of the West. Even as the ugliness and decadence of the 20th Century seem to be reaching their zenith, this new vision is being born in the hearts and minds of men and women of European descent. The New Century, the Great New Century is starting to take shape, even as we speak.
Sometimes this new vision expresses itself in unexpected places. Military writer William Lind has glimpsed a portion of that vision which he describes in his essay From Nightmare 1995 to My Utopian 2050. Let me share a part of that vision with you.
The triumph of the Recovery was marked most clearly by the burning of the Episcopal bishop of Maine.
She was not a particularly bad bishop. She was, in fact, quite typical of Episcopal bishops of the first quarter of the 21st century: agnostic, compulsively political and radical, and given to placing a small idol of Isis on the altar when she said the Communion service. By 2037, when she was tried for heresy, convicted, and burned, she had outlived her era. By that time only a handful of Episcopalians still recognized female clergy, and it would have been easy enough to let the old fool rant out her final years in obscurity. But we are a people who do our duty.
I well remember the crowd that gathered for the execution, solemn but not sad, relieved that at last, after so many years of humiliation, the majority had taken back the culture. Civilization had recovered its nerve. The flames that soared above the lawn before the Maine statehouse that August afternoon were, as the bishopess herself might have said, liberating.
In this Year of Our Lord 2050 we Victorians have the blessed good fortune to live once again in an age of accomplishment and decency. Most of the nations that cover the territory of the former United States are starting to get things working again. The cultural revival we began is spreading outward from our rocky New England soil, displacing savagery with civilization a second time.
I am writing this down so you never forget, not you, nor your children, nor their children. You did not go through the war, though you have suffered its consequences. Your children will have grown up in a well-ordered and prosperous country, and that can be dangerously comforting. Here, they will at least read what happens when a people forget who they are.
Was the dissolution of the United States inevitable? Probably. Right up to the end the coins carried the motto E Pluribus Unu, just as the last dreadnought of the Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian navy was the Viribus Unitis. But the reality for both empires was Ex Uno, Plura.
. . . It’s funny how clearly the American century is marked: 1865 to 1965. The first Civil War made us one nation. After 1965 and another war, we disunited — deconstructed — with equal speed into Blacks, Whites, Hispanics, womyn, gays, victims, oppressors, left-handed albinos, you name it. In three decades we covered the distance that had taken Rome three centuries. As recently as the early 1960s — God, it’s hard to believe — America was still the greatest nation on earth, the most powerful, the most productive, the freest, a place of safe homes, dutiful children in good schools, strong families and a hot lunch for orphans. By the 1990s the place had the stench of a Third World country. The cities were ravaged by punks, beggars, and bums. Law applied only to the law-abiding. Schools had become daytime holding pens for illiterate, young savages. Television brought the decadence of Weimar Berlin into every home.
. . . Then the hammer blows fell. First, the currency collapsed. Inflation had been jerking upward for years because the only way the government could manage its massive debt was to pay it off in inflated dollars. People had adjusted as they did in other Third World countries, opening foreign currency accounts, bartering, burying gold in the back yard. Then, in the spring of 2001, a new administration really opened the valve. By that summer, inflation was running 40 percent per month; by fall, 400 percent. Financial Weimar had followed cultural Weimar. The middle class was wiped out.
By the year 2005, it was obvious that AIDS was spreading fast. Everyone had friends, relatives, neighbors who suddenly were stricken. But the government still pumped out the same old line. Terrified of the gay lobby, officials conspired to reassure the public that there was no cause for alarm, that “homophobia” was the real problem.
In fact, the government suppressed evidence to the contrary, fearing to cause panic. They were right. When the Los Angeles Times broke the story that it was spreading by unknown means, the cities emptied. Most people came back, because they had to go to work or starve, though they left the children in the country if they could. People demanded the quarantine of anyone diagnosed as HIV positive. Instead, the government classified the infected as “disabled,” which made any preventive measures illegal discrimination.
In the spring of 2009 the blacks of Newark rose and took over the city . . . On May 3, Gov. Ephraim Logan of Vermont told the legislature that the federal government no longer represented the people of his state and asked for a vote of secession. Vermont became a republic the next day.
The first Civil War was, on the whole, a gentlemanly affair; the second one wasn’t. Here in northern New England we were lucky. Because we didn’t have many ethnic divisions, or cults, or Deep Greeners, we didn’t have militias shelling the cities and ravaging the suburbs. Elsewhere, it was what Lebanon and Yugoslavia and the former Russian empire saw in the late 20th century. The Reconquista drove the Anglos out of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and Southern California; the Anglos drove the Hispanics out of what was left of the American West. Blacks and Hispanics in L.A. turned on each other, but there were a lot more Hispanics. Korean marines landed in Long Beach to get their people out.
. . . Elsewhere, it took about 10 years for the hate caused by decades of illegitimate government to work itself out. Not much was left of the cities or the people who had lived there, but most folks in the countryside at least had been able to eat. By 2017, the South had a second Confederacy going. Southern culture had stayed pretty strong, outside the cities anyway. Florida was a mess, of course, but otherwise Dixie didn’t see much fighting.
But it is our New England history that concerns me. We were the luckiest. Maine and New Hampshire quickly followed Vermont into secession, and upstate New York came in too — after ceding New York City to Puerto Rico. We knew we were all in this together, so we formed the Northern Confederation in 2010. Massachusetts was not invited, but in 2011 New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland joined (Canada didn’t survive into the 21st century). We had some tough economic times, but nobody starved . . .
But it was what happened on the cultural front that really made the difference for us. The Retroculture Movement had been growing quietly since the mid-1990s. It wasn’t political, just individuals and families deciding to live again in the old ways. By the early 2000s there were Retroculture books, magazines, clubs, even special communities for people who wanted to discover how Americans used to live and how to bring back the old ways. Some people liked one period, some another, but gradually more and more found themselves looking to the Victorian era as the model. The Victorians in England and America had been an astoundingly productive bunch, building, inventing, creating, conquering — all the things we needed to do again if we were to be civilized people.
The family was the first Victorian institution to make a comeback. With everything else falling apart, people saw pretty quickly how important a family is. That would have happened without Retroculture, but the Retro Movement helped us see how to make families work. We dug out the many books (most written by women) the Victorians had published on how to make a good home, raise children and live together happily (the secret was sacrificing the late 20th century’s god, the self).
. . . The schools came next. We tossed out the vast accretion of “professional” educators and found ordinary men and women who knew their subjects and were dedicated to passing on the culture to a new generation. The kids learned to read with Mr. McGaffey’s readers. . . They learned the difference between right and wrong or got their bottoms fanned until they did.
We deconstructed most of the universities. After all, they had started this “multiculturalism” hysteria that ended up with millions of people dead in the wars that followed. The ideologues gone, real scholars emerged from hiding and began offering Greek and Latin and the great books of Western civilization to anyone who wanted to learn.
. . . As the Victorian spirit spread, standards were revived. Communities decided that some things were acceptable and some weren’t. Crime wasn’t; with justice locally controlled and the lawyers digging potatoes, somebody who mugged on Tuesday hanged on Wednesday.
Entertainment was expected to be decent. In a world that had grown ugly enough, there was small desire for ugliness in art and music as well. The Victorian entertainments were revived, and young people in particular went in heavily for choral singing. The last rock concert was held in 2013 in the Cleveland arena.
. . . By the mid-2020s, people had started to speak of the Recovery. Things were starting to work again, at least for us up north. And it was obvious why: The Victorian spirit, and Victorian practices, were making them work.
. . . In gratitude to our Victorian exemplars, the Northern Confederation became, in the year 2035 A.D., the nation of Victoria.
. . . And so it was that in 2037 we burned the bishopess. We knew this act would close and seal the old book, the book that had seen us go from decay to dissolution to Recovery. The auto-da-fe was symbolic; the Recovery was in fact already on solid ground or we wouldn’t have had the moral fiber to torch the old girl.
We are hopeful as we look to the future, and not only here in Victoria. Victorian parties are growing fast in other nations in North America, in the Confederacy and in Trans-Mississippi. Only in Nueva Espana, where California’s old Hispanic Party is locked in bitter warfare with the Indian revivalist Aztec Alliance does it look hopeless. Elsewhere, there is even talk of some kind of a new union, much looser, of course, built on shared values and culture, not a shared public trough.
But there will never be another Washington. We have learned, after all, some lessons from history.
That is a part of the vision. The author, William Lind, is a conservative, and because of that he does not feel the full, radical reality of the next century in his heart as we do. And I have left out a few of the token bones he throws to the racial minorities, and some of his more ridiculous Victorian anachronisms. But the Victorians of the past, for all their faults, were a mostly healthy European people working out their destiny with stunning progress in almost every field of human endeavor, and it is to them and their heritage that we owe almost all the progress of our century. Lind sees a part of the future: the defeat of multiculturalism, new nations built on racial and cultural unity, a reawakening of European culture in the West, and a total rejection of the liberal worldview symbolized by the execution of the radical feminist bishop.
Let us look at another vision of the future, this one posted widely on the Internet and disguised as a contemporary or near-future news item:
Scores Killed, Hundreds Injured As Paramilitary Extremists Riot
BOSTON, April 20 — National guard units seeking to confiscate a cache of recently banned assault weapons were ambushed on April 19th by elements of a paramilitary extremist faction. Military and law enforcement sources estimate that 72 were killed and more than 200 injured before government forces were compelled to withdraw.
Speaking after the clash, Massachusetts Governor Thomas Gage declared that the extremist faction, which was made up of local citizens, has links to the radical right-wing tax protest movement. Gage blamed the extremists for recent incidents of vandalism directed against internal revenue offices.
The governor, who described the group’s organizers as “criminals,” issued an executive order authorizing the summary arrest of any individual who has interfered with the government’s efforts to secure law and order.
The military raid on the extremist arsenal followed widespread refusal by the local citizenry to turn over recently outlawed assault weapons. Gage issued a ban on military-style assault weapons and ammunition earlier in the week. This decision followed a meeting in early April between government and military leaders at which the governor authorized the forcible confiscation of illegal arms. One government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, pointed out that, “none of these people would have been killed had the extremists obeyed the law and turned over their weapons voluntarily.”
Government troops initially succeeded in confiscating a large supply of outlawed weapons and ammunition. However, troops attempting to seize arms and ammunition in Lexington met with resistance from heavily-armed extremists who had been tipped off regarding the government’s plans.
During a tense standoff in Lexington’s town park, National Guard Colonel Francis Smith, commander of the government operation, ordered the armed group to surrender and return to their homes. The impasse was broken by a single shot, which was reportedly fired by one of the right-wing extremists.
Eight civilians were killed in the ensuing exchange. Ironically, the local citizenry blamed government forces rather than the extremists for the civilian deaths. Before order could be restored, armed citizens from surrounding areas had descended upon the guard units. Colonel Smith, finding his forces overmatched by the armed mob, ordered a retreat.
Governor Gage has called upon citizens to support the state/national joint task force in its effort to restore law and order. The governor has also demanded the surrender of those responsible for planning and leading the attack against the government troops. Samuel Adams, Paul Revere, and John Hancock, have been identified as “ringleaders” of the right wing extremists.
As illustrated by the two selections above, America’s future is bound tightly to her past. We Americans are a unique blend of European genes, forged in hardship, in conquest, in exploration, and in our world-historical battle for freedom and independence for our people. We are restless and unhappy as worker-drones living in a Third World province of the Jewish elite’s New World Order. It seems unlikely to me that our genetic qualities and our cultural inheritance can be obliterated by one or two generations of Jewish television.
In the historic task of building a New America, it will fall to us to be examples for our media-befuddled brothers. We who are awakened to our great destiny must spread that awakening, that consciousness of the future, to others. That is the task of the National Alliance, of this web page, and of our radio program, American Dissident Voices.
Be a part of that future. Join with us, and through your support we will reach out to more and more White Americans and make the patriotic resistance so strong that none of the enemy’s lies or laws can stop us. Join us and together we will build a New America and a New Age. Not the “New Age” of the deluded “liberal” witch doctors now vending a new mixture of Communism and superstition to an ignorant delusionariat; but a New Age of steel and diamonds — the steel of the White Man’s will and the diamonds of his genius. It will be a New Age in which the productive and the great will be rewarded and not penalized for their gifts; a New Age in which all that was good in the Old America will be restored and in which the seeds of alien subversion will never be allowed to take root again.
Surround yourself with the sounds of Chopin and Liszt and Wagner and Verdi and Schumann. Fill your family’s ears with the sounds of Mozart and Haydn and be imbued with the European race-soul. Cover your walls with the greatest artworks of the West, with Waterhouse and Rosetti and Bierstadt, with Breker and Raphael and with the images of the Classical world where our people’s culture was born. Fill your bookshelves with the greatest works of all time, by all those so-called “dead White European males” and not with the Jewish pop-junk of the present. Immerse yourself in the grandeur and greatness of the world that once was ours, the world that men and women of our kind built from nothing and will build again on the ruins of the plastic, ugly thing that America has become.
Revel in Nature, and in the too-few old-growth forests that remain. Recapture the race-memories of the Titan northern woods where our race evolved. When you visit our once-great cities, ignore the concrete and glass blocks that our enemies openly call the “international” style of architecture, and gaze with pride upon the last century’s still-standing magnificent creations of the European mind — and cast your eyes upward so that you do not see the filthy undermen swarming on the street. Instead, imagine the streets filled with the gentlemen and ladies of a new American millennium.
The first step to our rebirth begins with you. Remake your lives. Remake yourselves into what you were meant to be. And together we will make history.
How to Bring Down the House
by Dr. William Pierce
This first day of a new millennium is perhaps a good time for me to respond to a letter from a listener, Alfred D., who wrote to me last week to express his appreciation for American Dissident Voices. He especially appreciates the information about crimes committed against White people by non-Whites — information that is suppressed by the controlled media because it doesn’t fit their Politically Correct agenda: an agenda that requires keeping White people feeling guilty and apologetic. And he adds that such information leaves him, “feeling powerless to do anything but feel bad about all of it.”
Mr. D. then goes on to ask:
“What can we ever do to rid our culture of the Jewish stranglehold on our media and the liberal hold on our institutions? It seems like we can’t do much without wealthy and wise people at the top, like our founders two centuries ago, who will stand up and seize the reins of our Republic to restore order and decency to our communities.”
I quoted from Mr. D.’s letter not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of many letters I receive. People tell me, “Hey, I’ve really learned a lot from your broadcasts. I understand much better now what’s going on, but what can I do about it? I’m frustrated and angry, but how can I help to fix things? It just seems that the Jews and their friends are too powerful.”
Well, before I begin answering this question of Mr. D. and of many other listeners, let me discuss with you a couple of recent news items that are relevant to the question. One of them I’m sure you’ve already heard a great deal about: it’s the uproar that came from the media when Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker made a few frank comments to the magazine Sports Illustrated. Rocker, who is a native of Georgia, expressed his dislike for New York City. He said that riding the subway in New York one finds oneself crammed in with all sorts of alien and distasteful people: freaks with purple hair, homosexuals with AIDS, Black criminals just out of jail for the umpteenth time, welfare moms surrounded by their swarms of brats. And he also said:
“The biggest thing I don’t like about New York are the foreigners. You can walk an entire block in Times Square and not hear anybody speaking English. Asians and Koreans and Vietnamese and Indians and Russians and Spanish people and everything up there. How the hell did they get in this country?”
Hey, you know, I’ve felt like that every time I’ve had to go to New York City. The subways are like a freak show. Times Square is like a freak show. New York is a disgusting and depressing place. And you know what? Millions — and I mean millions — of other White Americans feel the same way about it as John Rocker and I do. I mean, let’s face it, New York City is a disgusting place. It’s filthy, degenerate, perverse, and above all else alien. There’s nothing American about it. If I had the power to nuke the place — make a huge, self-illuminated, glass parking lot out of the place — I wouldn’t hesitate for a second.
So anyway, what happened to John Rocker when he simply expressed an opinion shared by millions of other White Americans? The Jews went berserk. Rocker was talking about their city! He was saying he didn’t like all of the wonderful diversity and multiculturalism they have worked so hard to bring to New York, to make New York the sort of place they can feel comfortable in, like a Middle Eastern bazaar. And so the Jews trotted out all of their Gentile auxiliaries — their feminists and their queers and their liberals and their bought politicians, starting with Mayor Giuliani — to demand that Rocker be punished. “Get rid of him!” demanded the terminally liberal Gentile sports editor of the Atlanta Constitution, Mark Bradley.
The Rocker story was the biggest thing in the news last week. Why? A baseball player says in public what everyone knows is true, and the Jews and everyone in their camp demand that he be banned from his profession and ostracized by all Politically Correct Americans. From the hateful tenor of their denunciations of him, I suspect that many of them would like to see him crucified in Times Square. Again, why?
Well, I’ll tell you why. It’s because the Jews have built a house of cards, and they are afraid that someone will breathe on it too hard, and it will come tumbling down. If John Rocker had said something patently false, such as announcing that the earth is flat, or if he had expressed a personal dislike for his fellow White Southerners, say, then no one would have made a fuss, even though he is a celebrity and so his publicly expressed views might conceivably have led some kids to believe that the earth is flat or to develop an irrational hatred for Southerners. But he said something that everyone knows is true, and he said he doesn’t like it, and the Jews demanded his head.
You see, we’re all supposed to pretend that we like it. We’re all supposed to pretend that we think diversity is a wonderful thing. We’re all supposed to pretend that we really appreciate the opportunity to ride the subway next to a queer with AIDS or a Black thug with dreadlocks or a welfare mom with a horde of pickaninnies. We’re supposed to pretend that we find it a culturally enriching experience to walk through Times Square and not see anyone who looks like us or hear anyone speaking English. Because if we don’t pretend, then others may stop pretending too, and the house of cards will come tumbling down. It’s like the child in the crowd of spectators who says out loud, “But, Mommy, the emperor is naked!”
The salient point here is that the Jews and their dependents know that their whole existence is built on lies, that it depends on make-believe for its continuation. The feminists and the queers and the welfare rabble and the non-Whites also know that, despite their apparent façade of strength, despite their voting majority, their position is very precarious. They know that they haven’t earned their privileged position in our society. They know that it is artificial, a device of smoke and mirrors, and that if we decide to stop supporting them and to stop tolerating their antics, they will be on their own, and they will be in trouble. The politicians feel their collars becoming tight — in their guilty fear they can imagine the rope on their necks — when someone like Rocker expresses a simple truth that threatens the whole power structure from which they draw their sustenance.
The Jewish media bosses made such a fuss about Rocker because they are frightened of the truth. If they were standing on solid ground they would have nothing to fear. But they aren’t standing on solid ground, and they know it. That’s why they become hysterical when someone states the truth loudly enough for others to hear. That’s why they’re demanding John Rocker’s head. Think about the significance of the Jewish reaction to John Rocker, and I’m sure that you’ll agree with me.
The other recent news item I’ll mention is the announcement by the Jews that they’re willing to make peace with their Arab neighbors in the Middle East — if we will pay for it. And the bill they are presenting to us is $100 billion. I’ll read you the first few lines from the front page of the English-language edition of the Jerusalem Post. This was three weeks ago, the December 10 issue:
“If all goes as planned, 10 months from now Palestinian and Israeli negotiators will be scrambling to put the final touches on a permanent peace accord as the government security and finance gurus calculate the cost of peace. The technocrats will add it all up and write down a sum — of up to $100 billion, according to some diplomats. They will then look to the U.S. government to bankroll the bulk of the agreement.”
The Jerusalem Post article then goes on to complain that not all Americans are inclined to hand over $100 billion to Israel and that it will require a bit of Jewish pressure to persuade them. The article quotes Alabama Republican Congressman Sonny Callahan, chairman of the House subcommittee on foreign aid. Calahan says:
We are happy to give Israel economic assistance, but for goodness sake! One hundred billion dollars so there will be an agreement to stop Israelis from killing Palestinians and Palestinians from killing Israelis? The President and Madeleine Albright seem to think there is a money tree here in Washington, and all they have to do is come up with an idea that sounds good and then come back and get the funds.”
Callahan went on to say that the Jews may very well get their $100 billion from the American people, but they will have to do it without his vote.
The Jerusalem Post quotes other U.S. politicians who are more sympathetic to Jewish needs than Callahan. Florida Republican Mark Foley, for example, says no price is too high to keep Israel happy:
“The price may be astronomical, but the peace process is at a critical juncture. We can spend billions of dollars on an escalating conflict defending Israel, or we can put the money up front for peace.”
How many times in the past when the Jews had their hands out have we heard that excuse about “helping the peace process” along. We have financed the Jews’ wars against their neighbors, and now we’re supposed to finance the military buildup they want so they can feel safe if they make peace with their neighbors.
And of course, the Jews are quite confident that Clinton will do whatever he is told in this matter. They believe that before Clinton leaves office they can get their $100 billion from the American taxpayers, even without Congressman Callahan’s help. They are a little more worried about continued support after that, however. Even though people close to George Bush have told the Jews not to worry, that Bush will be an obedient servant of Israel, the Jews are concerned that many Americans may be reaching the limit for how much of their blood they are willing to have sucked from them by the Jews. The Jerusalem Post cites with disapproval what it calls a “wave of neo-isolationism” sweeping the country.
You know, we’ve been coughing up money to support Israel whenever the Jews demanded it — $70 billion in the last 25 years alone — and getting kicked in the teeth in return, as the Jews spy on us, steal our military technology, and then sell it to the Chinese — not to mention what they’re doing to us in America with their government-enforced programs of diversity and multiculturalism.
Let’s look a little more closely at this latest demand. They’ve been hinting at this during most of the year, but the amounts they have talked about have been smaller, because these smaller amounts were only to pay for a pullback from occupied territory in one place or another; they never told us what the total bill would be for peace with all their neighbors. For example, they recently told us we would have to cough up $18 billion if we want them to return the Golan Heights to Syria, from whom they stole it 25 years ago — with our help, of course. They have told us that $10 billion of that $18 billion will be used to resettle 17,000 Jewish settlers from the Golan Heights to Israel.
Now, you know, these Jewish settlers tend to have larger families than city Jews, but let’s just make a very conservative estimate of 3.4 Jews per settler household: that’s 5,000 Jewish households needing to be relocated — for $10 billion, or $2 million per household. Really! The Jews are demanding $2 million dollars from us for each family of 3.4 Jews resettled from stolen Syrian territory to Israel. And these Jewish settlers were settled in the Golan Heights contrary to United Nations resolutions and contrary to requests from the United States government not to settle Jews in illegally occupied Arab land. Now we are supposed to give each of these Jewish families $2 million, from our pockets, so they can buy for themselves the sort of palatial accommodations in Israel they believe Jews are naturally entitled to. One thing I will say for these Hebes: they have a lot more brass in them than anyone thought possible.
Let’s do a little more arithmetic. There are approximately five million Jews living in Israel: let’s say 1.5 million Jewish families. Over the 51 years of Israel’s existence, Americans have coughed up approximately $100 billion in aid — as I said a moment ago, $70 billion in just the past 25 years. The German people have coughed up approximately the same amount. Now the Jews are aiming for another $100 billion from us before their boy Clinton leaves office a year from now. Three hundred billion dollars divided among 1.5 million Jewish families comes to an endowment of $200,000 per Jewish family. That doesn’t include the interest, And they’re constantly whining for more! “Oi, veh! Giff us back the gold you took from us during the war. Giff us our salaries from the time we worked as slave laborers during the war. Compensate us for this! Compensate us for that! Oi, veh! You let the Germans push us into the gas ovens during the war, and you didn’t help us. Now you must pay us for that! And if you don’t giff us $100 billion now, we won’t make peace with our neighbors, and it’ll be your fault.”
Well, now, the editors of the Jerusalem Post are pretty sure that the politicians in Washington will go along with their latest demands — and I believe they’re right about that — but they’re worried that the American taxpayers may be getting fed up. They’re worried about what they call a “wave of neo-isolationism.” They’re worried that the average American may begin doing a little arithmetic. Americans who are working double shifts now so that they can save money to put their kids through college might wonder why they should pay $2 million for each Jewish family relocated from the Golan Heights.
So will Americans begin doing a little arithmetic? Certainly not by themselves. It’s not that they can’t do the arithmetic. It’s that they won’t do it on their own initiative. And even if they did, they would be afraid to draw the right conclusions from it, because those conclusions would be Politically Incorrect. They need someone to set an example for them, someone to tell them that’s it’s all right to be outraged by Israel’s claim that it needs $2 million of our money to give to each Jewish family that is settled illegally on stolen land in the Golan Heights — just as they need someone like John Rocker to say aloud what they themselves have been thinking about the growing multicultural chaos in America.
So now you can see how these two news items we have just discussed are relevant to the question asked by Alfred D.: “What can we do to break the Jewish stranglehold?” The overblown, almost hysterical reaction to John Rocker’s simple statement shows us how precarious the Jews themselves understand their situation to be: how afraid they are that someone will awaken us from our trance and that we will be able to break their stranglehold. And their astoundingly brazen and greedy grab for another $100 billion from us before Clinton leaves office shows us one of their principal vulnerabilities. They always overreach themselves. They believe that we are so stupid, so gullible, so sheep-like, that they can get away with anything, that we’ll never figure it out and never strike back. And even if we do figure it out, they’ve got the votes to keep us under control. They have debased our electorate to the point that all of the people who are dependent on them for unearned privileges — the feminists, the homosexuals, the non-Whites, and the welfare rabble — will be able to outvote us and keep us in our place.
It’s a strange situation, the Jews greedily grabbing for more and more, and at the same time terrified that their host may wake up and decide to rid himself of them. But then, the Jews are strange creatures, to say the least. And it’s clear that the most important thing we can do at this time is to cry out, loudly and repeatedly, to an ever larger crowd: “Behold! The emperor is naked!”
We must do deliberately what John Rocker did inadvertently, and we must do it with every medium available to us, not just with magazines for sports fans. And we must talk about more than the freak show the Jews have made of New York City. We must talk about the Jews’ open-borders immigration policy, the Jews’ push to increase the rate of interracial marriage between Whites and non-Whites, about what the Jews have done to our schools, about the Jewish control of our news and entertainment media, about the Jewish grip on our government, about the Jews’ corruption of our politicians — and about the Jews’ ongoing theft of our national wealth.
Listen! Even the most jaded couch potato, even the most thoughtless lemming, can be made to feel indignant about the Jews’ plan to steal two-million-dollar of our hard-earned money and give it to each Jewish family now settled illegally in Syria’s Golan Heights, if we rub his nose in it. We may not have John Rocker’s celebrity status, but we are gaining a louder and louder voice, and you can be sure that we will not grovel and apologize the way the celebrities customarily do when the Jews rap their knuckles for Political Incorrectness. With the Jews themselves providing us with issues such as their latest demand for $100 billion to make peace with their neighbors and for us to pay for resettling Jewish families in two-million-dollar million mansions in Israel, we eventually will have even celebrities speaking out and refusing to apologize. And the house of cards will come tumbling down.
That’s the answer to Mr. D.’s question. The Jews are vulnerable. The emperor is naked. We have to speak out, without fear or hesitation or apology. We have to set an example. If we do that, others will follow, and our people will be free.