Lebensraum and Improving the Racial Stock, 21st century style
By David Hamilton
The dominant ideology in the western nations is built around multi-racialism or anti-racism. But its permissiveness towards white ethnic cleansing carries echoes of its philosophical opposite, Nazism. The motive – for this can only be intentional – is to push “whites” out of their communities, and that is against democratic principles and the rule of law.
More than 50 million African workers are being brought to Europe in a secret immigration agreement. This is on a scale of evil comparable to the herding of Jewish people into gas chambers, which we are constantly told is the greatest crime in history. It is intended to destroy a people: the whole of western Europe’s native people, and it has been implemented by the evil E.U. This ideology is totalitarian with only one viewpoint allowed. It is very intolerant of any complaint about the cruelty and injustice of it and brands dissidents as “haters”, “bigots”, “fascists” or “Nazis.” It is implemented by deceit and often in secret.
A “job centre” funded by money confiscated from Europe’s tax-payers has been opened in Mali, and is hailed as the beginning of “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”. The report is from the EU statistical agency Eurostat. It rationalises that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population. EU economists in Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe.
That is a lie! If the Civil Service Pensions and in particular parliamentary pensions were scaled down to sensible levels more in line with every other pensioner receiving a pension from HM Government there would be greater equality after retirement. People are paid for doing a job while they are doing it. But I don’t see why the taxpayer should be required to fund a pension which equates to a job when they have left. I know that parts of the private sector do that, but that is private and driven by profits. It is entirely different. Moreover, If we were not transferring billions of pounds in Aid to elites in the Third World, and billions as UK subscriptions to the UN and the EU, we might well be able to give our people a better pension.
The report for the EU, is by Moroccan-born French MEP Francoise Castex, who wants immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. “Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.” What they really mean is they want to destroy Europe and the people. Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.” To ensure cheap labour for the elites. The Portugal declaration urges the EU to assist African governments in setting up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU”. The first job centre was opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday 6th of October.
More centres are to open soon in other West African states, then in north Africa.” The justification provided by the media is to blame us. We are ruled by being made to feel ashamed of ourselves. The photograph illustrating this report shows a cue of Africans in western dress, presumably waiting to come here.(1) But here’s another reality:-
left: market day in Bamako; right: nice work if you can get it … whatever it is.
These Africans are prepared for immigration, including clothing essentials and language lessons, by The British Council. African lawyer Dele Oguntimojou wrote: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(2)
There was an expose in November 2006 that the Government were advertising for immigrants in a Foreign Office pamphlet distributed from Embassies around the world. ‘Multicultural Britain – A Land Of Immigrants’ encourages immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act which gives them privileges over natives and well-paid jobs. Illustrated with photos of smiling non-whites, it is an invitation to people to immigrate here. (3)
In April 2004 Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. She only resigned when she found a letter sent to her year earlier by a junior Home Office minister, Mr Ainsworth, alerting her to potential immigration frauds. There were also allegations about abuse of the European Community Association Agreement (ECAA) whichs had already been raised by James Cameron, the British consul in Romania who blew the gaff. Ms Hughes told BBC Two’s Newsnight that Mr Cameron’s claims were the first she knew of the alleged “scam”. But it emerged she sent letters previously in reply to Mr Ainsworth’s concerns.
Here is an insight. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council, and presided over what investigator, Judge Mawrey, called “massive, systematic and organised fraud” in an election campaign. It made a mockery of the election and he ruled that not less than 1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. He made the comments after upholding allegations of postal fraud relating to six seats won by Labour in the June 2004 ballot. For this, Homer was promoted to chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.(4)
A regular excuse we hear is that “The Home Office is a shambles.” Why so? How come politicians do well in other jobs but fail as Home Secretaries? The Home Office is brilliantly successful: it has been infiltrating immigrants into the country without people realising for years! But as usual the ideologues have no practical grasp and think only of the utopia of a multi-racial world and cheap labour for themselves and the corporations.
Hitler changed the concept of Lebensraum from colonisation to enlargement within Europe. “For it is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the total area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.” (5) He added a racial bias to Lebensraum and claimed that the Soviet Union was run by Jews so Germany had a right to take Russian land in search of a unity between the German Volk and the land, Blood and Soil.
In a speech and interview with The Brussels Journal, Vladimir Bukovsky, the Russian dissident, who spent twelve years in Soviet psychiatric units, told of documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to study in 1992 as a reward for helping leader Boris Yeltsin. These documents confirm a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist state and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly” (6)
I would add to his otherwise accurate analysis, that when it comes to race, the dominant western ideology is everything that Nazism is accused of. The importation of immigrants to enrich us, make us more vibrant etc is a form of Lebensraum. Some governmental revulsion at the tyrannies of Hitler’s policy in the east was inevitable, even understandable. But it has now devolved into a cruel and dangerous tyranny itself.
The Nuremberg Trials prompted official policies of medical ethics and the 1950 UNESCO statement on race. Scientific societies made similar statements on race. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was a response to abuses during the Second World War. It was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. It proclaimed:
Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family.
This was extended in the 1978 UNESCO declaration on race and racial prejudice. The fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge. But in practice racial theories are still used to justify improving the racial stock. In his three-part television series ”Mongrel nation” in June 2003, the Lebanese-born comedian Edie Izzard, claimed that Mongrel dogs are cleverer than pedigree dogs. This metaphor suggested that mongrel people are as a master race, genetically superior to the rest!
The definition of racism in the Macpherson report is:
Racism in general terms consists of conduct, words or practices which disadvantage or advantage people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin. (Para, 6.4)
Our rulers are discriminating against us because we are white! Where Hitler had proposed a “thousand –year Reich” inhabited by a “Master Race” of Pure Aryans, the inverted Multi-Racial idea is a perfect world made up of a new type of person: the Coffee-Coloured person. Totalitarianism and oppression entered into the British legal system with the Commission for Racial Equality, established in the 1976 Race Relations Act, of Home Secretary Roy Jenkins. His biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) revealed he believed:
… that immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it. Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”.
Roy Jenkins is probably the most evil British politician who ever lived.
This was the first time that race had been used in British law, and is strikingly similar to the race laws in 1950s Germany which compelled Jews to register their property. Jewish businesses were “Aryanized”, Jewish employees being replaced, and ownership was taken by Germans who bought the businesses cheaply. Jewish doctors were forbidden to treat non-Jews, and Jewish lawyers were not permitted to practice law. A similar law is being introduced by Harriet Harman, who doubtless considers herself a fine anti-racist. She is the Minister for Women, and her so-called “Equality Law” will stop white men getting jobs and allow employers to give ethnic minority and female candidates preferential treatment. The “doublespeak” is “positive action” and prevents applicants with better job credentials getting the job if they are the wrong sex or race.(7)
People in 1930s Germany had to carry identity papers, but Jews had special identifying marks: a red “J” stamped on them and new middle names for those who did not have obviously “Jewish” first names: “Israel” for males, “Sara” for females. The cards allowed the police to identify Jews easily. The Daily Mail of 26th September reported on our new EU Identity Cards
British identity cards will be covered in EU symbols
Britain’s first identity card in more than half a century was unveiled yesterday – and turned out to be covered in EU symbols to satisfy Brussels.
The plastic card, which will be issued to foreign citizens in Britain starting in November, marks the first stage in the Government’s ambitious scheme to issue biometric ID cards to all UK residents at a cost of billions of pounds.
… Foreigners issued with the cards will not have to show them to get a job or use services such as the NHS and schools
The question as to whether British nationals will, in due course, be also required to show the cards to get a job or obtain hospital treatment and education for their children has not yet been asked. But as we have racial lists kept to ensure preferential treatment for other ethnic groups, cynically known as Equal Opportunities Monitoring Forms, it seems inevitable that the cards will be used to help enforce priority for other ethnic groups.
The term “racist” is not descriptive but inhibitive. It is used to cow us while our society is transformed from a natural society to a multi-racial state. After the Second World War the terms “nazi” and “fascist” were perhaps more coercive. But as the war receded in memory “racist” has became more effective as it is universally pejorative and not as easy to deny as an alleged attachment to an often hazily understood historical ideology. Anyone can be, and is, a “racist”.
Racial theories on improving the racial stock are used to justify immigration. In the second reading of the Commonwealth immigrants Bill (16/11/1961, Lord Royle unburdened himself of the observation:
Wouldn’t we be better off with a dash of darker blood?
The multi-racialist Fenner Brockway (later Lord) wrote glowingly of mixed-race people, and in reverential terms distressingly (for him)close to the National Socialist estimation of pure Aryans:
Fifty years ago I read a book by Sir Sidney Olivier, who had been Governer of Jamaica, recording what splendid human specimens, physically and mentally, were the progeny of mixed marriages on that island. Many of us who know the sons and daughters of mixed marriages will bear out this judgement. (8)
The group Hitler valued – us – is the pariah, whereas the groups he persecuted are privileged. It is social engineering to give power to ethnics and displace whites. On 21 April 2004 the Independent reported that:
British school-leavers could be denied places leading universities for overseas students. Oxford University is to increase the number of overseas undergraduates, who pay higher fees, while freezing the total number of undergraduate places, thus cutting the number of places available to UK school-leavers.
It is corporate elites who want cheap labour imported as well as outsourcing and they operate within the “tender idealism” pushed by politicians. The large corporations expect their “diverse” work force to be loyal not to country but company. This goes well with free markets which have always been utopian and supra national.
Racial Awareness Training is a method of brainwashing that local councils send their employers, employees and decision makers on to be conditioned in correct thinking: “to challenge individual prejudices and values and change them”. It stemmed from the ideas of the Jewish-American Judith Katz who held that “racism is inherent in whites”. There were examples in the USA of blond-haired people, usually women, being racially-abused until they broke down and sobbed. The fact that it was done to blondes speaks eloquently of our victimhood of racism in the guise of anti-racism.
The pace never lets up. In the Parekh Report, or the “Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain’s”(Runnymede Trust 2002), we are told the way forward is for the ”United Kingdom to formally declare itself to be a multi-cultural society” page xxi. (9) We are inducted into our culture, community and our history and traditions, quite naturally, as we grow up. The abstract method though, requires a sort of schoolbook learning process as in the republican “Citizenship classes” which are supposed to make all foreigners British. This process only acts on the surface, on the conscious minds of the pupils, whereas our natural traditional way imbues the very nature of the person as it is slowly internalised into the deep unconscious mind as a uniting bond. The totalitarian method advocated by Parekh has to be forced by brainwashing and politicised police. At the same time the immigrants are allowed to perpetuate the divisions by inducting their own children into their own traditions. They are exempt from Multi-Racialism!
The police are being turned into a race-gestapo. Judge Mapherson began his investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence prejudiced against the police. With his mind already made up he used British law as social engineering to mould the police into an anti-racist thought force. They know what we should think from the start, and the idea is not for fair and open enquiry to ascertain the facts of a case but to reach the right conclusion.
This added more layers of totalitarianism to law: MacPherson’s Recommendation 12 states:
A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim, or any other person.
Recommendation 13 adds:
That the term “racist incident” must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be investigated with equal commitment.
Now we can be investigated for committing non-crimes.
There are frequent purges in the police. Former chief of the Metropolitan Police Sir John Stevens introduced planted informers into police training classes to spy for and report on “racist” officers. An interim report into police handling of their own racism, which was established in 2004 after a television documentary, The Secret Policeman, showed racism at a police training centre in Warrington. The report was produced by a panel led by Sir David Calvert-Smith, a former director of public prosecutions who, like Macpherson, began from prejudice not an open mind. The “enquiry” apparently looked at internal police attitudes to race, including monitoring of race policies and training, recruitment and grievance procedures, rather than operational policing. Like Macpherson this panel had decided the outcome before they started. Smith admitted that his team had decided before they started that police racism was a “major” problem. It was “commonly accepted”, he said, and reinforced by The Secret Policeman, that:
racism is still a major problem within the service. We have not set out to prove that it exists. We have taken it as a given.(10)
This is discrimination against “white” police officers.
The labelling of innocent members of our people, be they policemen, council workers, or anyone else, as “racists”, “bigots”, “haters” etc is an act of dehumanisation. It takes away our human rights and sets us up for persecution for not conforming to Establishment requirements … for thinking from our natures and not from anti-racist diktat. It is not less totalitarian than that period of German history which is so despised by these same labellers, these hypocrites. If any dissident speaks out against being dispossessed he or she will be persecuted by the state. And yet speak out we must.