Chicano race organizations openly call for race war within five years

Pheonix based Chicano race hustlers openly call for race war within five years.

Chicano race organizations Calls for Race war?

Miguel Perez says he is the current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza. He says he also served as the vice president of MECHA in Fullerton California.

La Raza, or NCLA, is a militant Latino group that Obama is funding with American tax dollars. MECHA is a nationwide Latino student organization. MECHA explicitly calls for the creation of Atzlan, a new Chicano/Latino nation, in what is now the Southwest United States.

Perez is using Examiner.com to call for Latinos in the Southwest to arm themselves for race war. Perez tells his readers “Latino groups believe they have enough people in states such as California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas to successfully wage a war on the United States.  Who’s side will you be on?”

Perez is hyping a call to arms by a fellow Chicano militant…

Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.

Cecilia Maldonado of Chicanos Unidos Arizona isn’t hoping for any sort of war, but believes it may be unavoidable. “For generations, our people have prepared us to take back the lands of the Southwest that were stolen from our Mexican ancestors. Because of the bad economy and many racist laws, Latinos will be forced to fight sooner than later,” says Mrs. Maldonado.

Perez is listed as the “civil rights” writer for the Phoenix area on examiner.com. He recently praised Obama for issuing a unilateral amnesty for illegal aliens by ordering law enforcement to cease deportations.
Update: 9/1/11

The Race

Miguel Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at mperezlaraza1985@gmail.com.

Phoenix-based Nuestros Reconquistos claims that there will be a war very similar to the Civil War fought in the next five years. “La Raza and MEChA have already talked to Latinos and Phoenix and explained that Latinos need to arm themselves for war,” says Nuestros Reconquistos President Manuel Longoria.

Latino group claims Aztlán war in next five years

More from Miguel here.

Link courtesy Rebellion Blog

Locust: and the comments are even better!

6 comments:

Anonymous said…
Bring it you racist MFers! Your rhetoric is treasonous and all of you should be charged, tried, convicted and hung.

Pickdog
III

LFMayor said…
I find your terms acceptable, Perez. By all means, please let us know if you want to get started ahead of schedule. And be careful with those siestas… remember San Jacinto? We’ll bring tar again for all you great “leaders”.

xoxo
The Mayor

Anonymous said…
Ha Ha Ha! Seriously? To the halls of Montezuma again!
Mexico only exist because we allow it too.If we stopped buying their crap the entire Mexican economy would collapse.We just let you go so long out of kindness I suppose.
Really a latino insurgency? I’d give it a week.

Anonymous said…
Don’t kid yourselves, this guy and MANY MANY of his fellow travelers are quite serious…dead serious in fact. They already have the numbers in many communities and will be able to easily overrun most adjacent communities for the simple fact that most people think it can’t or won’t happen. Come on, think about it, the majority of Americans believe that they are just here to bus our tables and cut our grass…they’re just good hard working decent people who only want a better life for themselves and their families…and most importantly, they’re no threat. That is what ALL media outlets and political/community leaders have been telling the people for years now.

Maybe in some states something like this might only last a week, but in states such as CA, AZ, & N.M. it would be devastating and they could easily gain control of large portions of the state. Look at the devastation that a relatively small number of drug gang members have wrought on whole cities just south of the border…and they’re killing their own people there! These guys basically hate white people, do you think for even a moment that they would have a problem with killing entire neighborhoods just to get their point across?

Go ahead and laugh this guy off and treat what he is saying as a joke, but do so at your own peril. I live in AZ and seriously fear what I believe is coming.

The Quiet Man

Mike said…
If he could rectify the recto-cranial inversion he’s suffering from he’d realize what a f@#$%^& idiot he is. Come get some peckerhead.

Curtis said…
Well, I believe that he and his followers are serious. And I take it serious. But the numbers who think like him, while large enough to do some damage, especially in places like Los Angeles, their numbers are not large enough to take whole States or even half. I live in a predominately Hispanic neighborhood. Except for the house full of Hispanic Trannies (I shit you not) down the street, I don’t have a single problem with any of them. I don’t know if they are all legal, but they all do work except for my closet neighbor who got laid off his truck driving job. That’s not to say we don’t have a Hispanic gang problem and a few La Raza’s or a few pockets of Hispanic idiots, but for the most part, the Hispanic peoples up here where I live are quite folks.

Global black on white mob attacks

Low Level Race War going global as blacks attack and kill whites globally.

 

FOX News finally mentions black on white mob attacks.

For the past two years, CofCC.org has been exposing the bloody rise of black on white mob attacks. We have also been exposing the open media censorship.

Finally a few “mainstream” media outlets have begun to whisper “questions” about what CofCC.org has been telling you for the past two years.

From FOX News…

Questions Arise Over Whether ‘Flash Mob’ Attacks in U.S. Cities Motivated by Race

Police departments in several cities around the country are investigating what appear to be incidents of “flash mob”-generated violence, in which packs of dozens or even hundreds of youths appear seemingly out of nowhere to commit assaults, robberies and other crimes against innocent bystanders.

The motive and circumstances surrounding the attacks that have resulted in numerous arrests around the country are being investigated — and law enforcement officials in at least one city are looking into a possible racial component to the crimes.

 

Media lying. Working class fighting back against rioters.

The radical left-wing taxpayer supported NPR recently released a fictional report falsely claiming that “young working class white” people are strongly represented among the rioters. Other media outlets around the world are working overtime to falsify information about the riots. Even Rush Limbaugh was duped into saying that the rioters were working class people protesting economic conditions.

The actual rioters are largely professional thugs and gangbangers. They started as an all black race riot, and Afro-Caribbean and African immigrants continue to make up the bulk of the rioters. About 10%-12% of London is black. Half from the Caribbean and half from sub-Saharan Africa.

Working class whites in Enfield drive black rioters out of the area. Enfield is about 15% black.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=h6p4itkdLi8

Meanwhile the politically correct London police leadership, issued a warning to “vigilantes.” These same authorities ordered London police to stand down the first day of the riots! They were so afraid of political taboos that they allowed a black mob to set fires and loot stores at will.

From BBC…

The Metropolitan Police has warned Londoners against forming “vigilante patrol groups”.

The caution comes after hundreds of residents in Southall, Enfield, Hackney and Eltham patrolled their areas.

On Tuesday night Sikh men in Southall, many with hockey sticks, stood guard outside a Sikh and a Hindu temple and a mosque following Monday’s disorder.

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Stephen Kavanagh said “vigilantism” could lead to violence and drain Met’s resources.

The Met described Monday’s disorder as “the worst” in its recent history as violence began in Hackney and spread to Croydon, Clapham, Camden, Lewisham, Peckham, Newham, East Ham, Enfield, Woolwich, Ealing and Colliers Wood.

About 16,000 officers were on duty on Tuesday night – up from 6,000 – and the increased police presence will remain, the government said.

About 300 Sikh men gathered in Southall to protect religious buildings and businesses while about 100 men stood in Church Street, Enfield, vowing to “defend the streets”.

 

British MP courageously denounces politically correct coverage of London riots.

British MP Gerard Batten denounced BBC pandering and coddling of the rioters. Batten correctly describes them as thugs who do not have jobs, because they do not want to work. Batten is from London and a member of the UK Independence party. He is an outspoken critic of immigration.

Mass hate crime mob attacks in London.

Photo from UK Daily Mail.

Give me your clothes white boy! Thugs want to humiliate white pedestrians. Numerous reports of black thugs forcing white pedestrians to strip.

London riots continue for fourth day.

London based race hustler tells BBC that blacks are justified in rioting.

 

 

 

 

 

Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

Congressman Suggests People Will Don ‘White Hoods’ If Wilson Not Rebuked

More news stories on Bizarre Racism Charges

FOX News, September 15, 2009

Rep. Joe Wilson’s outburst last week is drawing new recriminations from his colleagues, with a member of the Congressional Black Caucus suggesting that a failure to rebuke the South Carolina Republican is tantamount to supporting the most blatant form of organized racism in American history.

In an obvious reference to the Ku Klux Klan, Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., said Tuesday that people will be putting on “white hoods and white uniforms again and riding through the countryside” if emerging racist attitudes, which he says were subtly supported by Wilson, are not rebuked. He said Wilson must be disciplined as an example.

The charged comments come as the House is preparing to take further action against Wilson. House Democratic leaders decided to formally discipline him Tuesday afternoon for jeering President Obama during last week’s joint session of Congress.

Wilson bellowed “You lie!” as Obama delivered his address.

{snip}

While he has been widely condemned by colleagues on both sides of the aisle for breaching protocol, some have gone a step further and accused Wilson of being racially motivated.

Johnson seemed to reference the protests held in Washington, D.C., on Saturday in making his claim. While many protesters were there to demonstrate against big government and federal over-spending, Johnson argued that a “fringe” element is motivated by race and that Wilson “winked” at that fringe with his behavior.

{snip}

The resolution is “privileged,” meaning whenever it is introduced the measure goes to the front of the legislative line. It is unclear who will call up the measure.

A “resolution of disapproval” is not one of the four forms of discipline typically meted out in the House. The most commonly used means of punishment are expulsion, censure, reprimand or fine.

For instance, in 1997, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was both reprimanded and fined for his book deal. Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., was reprimanded in 1990 for ethical breaches tied to a male prostitute. Republicans tried to censure Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., in 2007 for comments he made on the House floor about President Bush. But Democrats voted to set aside that effort.

{snip}

Original article

(Posted on September 15, 2009)

Newsweek’s War On White People

Newsweek’s War On White People

Newsweek just launched an all out war on the mental well-being of white children in their September issue.

The article is titled “See Baby Discriminate. “The article demands, with religious fanaticism, that white children be made to shun all knowledge of racial differences and taught to feel guilty. Newsweek actually printed “It’s horrifying to imagine kids being proud to be white.”

The Newsweek article actually states that white children should be made to feel guilty to “knock down their glorified view of white people,” while black children should be built up with “ethnic pride.” White parents, and only white parents, are called on to go to great lengths to brainwash their own children starting at age 3.

However, amidst the extremist statements by Newsweek, some real bombshells about racial realities are admitted. Here are some highlights:

1. “Kids as young as 6 months judge based on skin color.” – Newsweek

2. White parents who welcome multiculturalism and embrace diversity, are terrified to talk to their own children about race for fear of what their own children might say.

3. 75% of non-white parents talk to their children about race, compared to only 25% of white parents.

4. White children 5 to 7 attending racially diverse schools universally had a better opinion of their own race than other races.

5. Whites are called on to begin intense multi-cultural indoctrination using videos and parental discussions at age 3, so as not to miss the right “developmental window.”

6. White children should be made to feel guilty for alleged wrongdoings by their race, to increase positive attitudes towards blacks.

7. Black children need to be coached on “ethnic pride” to pump them up and make them more likely to succeed in life.

8. 553 scientists signed a 2007 Supreme Court school amicus brief supporting school desegregation. However, the brief used many qualifiers and only said that desegregation “may” improve black performance. There was no real confidence in desegregation on the part of the scientists.

9. Diverse schools do not lead to more cross-race relationships. In fact the opposite is true. The more diverse a school, the more students self-segregate by race.

10. White children prefer a white Santa Claus and black children prefer a black Santa Claus.

What you will see strikingly absent in Newsweek’s whitey hating diatribe of making white children feel guilty and making black children feel proud, is the fact that black children actually have higher self-esteem already than white children. In fact the people with the lowest self-esteem tend to be Orientals.

American Sociological Association (Source)Past research indicates that black adolescents consistently have higher self-esteem than white students. Other research demonstrates that self-esteem has positive effects on academic achievement. However, black students have lower academic achievement than white students while concurrently exhibiting higher self-esteem.


http://www.northwestfront.org

Morality and Abstract Thinking- How Africans may differ from Westerners

Morality and Abstract Thinking

How Africans may differ from Westerners

by Gedaliah Braun

I am an American who taught philosophy in several African universities from 1976 to 1988, and have lived since that time in South Africa. When I first came to Africa, I knew virtually nothing about the continent or its people, but I began learning quickly. I noticed, for example, that Africans rarely kept promises and saw no need to apologize when they broke them. It was as if they were unaware they had done anything that called for an apology.

It took many years for me to understand why Africans behaved this way but I think I can now explain this and other behavior that characterizes Africa. I believe that morality requires abstract thinking—as does planning for the future—and that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

What follow are not scientific findings. There could be alternative explanations for what I have observed, but my conclusions are drawn from more than 30 years of living among Africans.

.
A public service billboard in South Africa. Note old tire and gas can.

My first inklings about what may be a deficiency in abstract thinking came from what I began to learn about African languages. In a conversation with students in Nigeria I asked how you would say that a coconut is about halfway up the tree in their local language. “You can’t say that,” they explained. “All you can say is that it is ‘up’.” “How about right at the top?” “Nope; just ‘up’.” In other words, there appeared to be no way to express gradations.

A few years later, in Nairobi, I learned something else about African languages when two women expressed surprise at my English dictionary. “Isn’t English your language?” they asked. “Yes,” I said. “It’s my only language.” “Then why do you need a dictionary?”

They were puzzled that I needed a dictionary, and I was puzzled by their puzzlement. I explained that there are times when you hear a word you’re not sure about and so you look it up. “But if English is your language,” they asked, “how can there be words you don’t know?” “What?” I said. “No one knows all the words of his language.”

I have concluded that a relative deficiency in abstract thinking may explain many things that are typically African.

“But we know all the words of Kikuyu; every Kikuyu does,” they replied. I was even more surprised, but gradually it dawned on me that since their language is entirely oral, it exists only in the minds of Kikuyu speakers. Since there is a limit to what the human brain can retain, the overall size of the language remains more or less constant. A written language, on the other hand, existing as it does partly in the millions of pages of the written word, grows far beyond the capacity of anyone to know it in its entirety. But if the size of a language is limited, it follows that the number of concepts it contains will also be limited and hence that both language and thinking will be impoverished.

African languages were, of necessity, sufficient in their pre-colonial context. They are impoverished only by contrast to Western languages and in an Africa trying to emulate the West. While numerous dictionaries have been compiled between Euro­pean and African languages, there are few dictionaries within a single African language, precisely because native speakers have no need for them. I did find a Zulu-Zulu dictionary, but it was a small-format paperback of 252 pages.

My queries into Zulu began when I rang the African Language Department at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg and spoke to a white guy. Did “precision” exist in the Zulu language prior to European contact? “Oh,” he said, “that’s a very Eurocentric question!” and simply wouldn’t answer. I rang again, spoke to another white guy, and got a virtually identical response.

.
Kikuyu women do not need dictionaries.

So I called the University of South Africa, a large correspondence university in Pretoria, and spoke to a young black guy. As has so often been my experience in Africa, we hit it off from the start. He understood my interest in Zulu and found my questions of great interest. He explained that the Zulu word for “precision” means “to make like a straight line.” Was this part of indigenous Zulu? No; this was added by the compilers of the dictionary.

But, he assured me, it was otherwise for “promise.” I was skeptical. How about “obligation?” We both had the same dictionary (English-Zulu, Zulu-English Dictionary, published by Witwatersrand University Press in 1958), and looked it up. The Zulu entry means “as if to bind one’s feet.” He said that was not indigenous but was added by the compilers. But if Zulu didn’t have the concept of obligation, how could it have the concept of a promise, since a promise is simply the oral undertaking of an obligation? I was interested in this, I said, because Africans often failed to keep promises and never apologized—as if this didn’t warrant an apology.

A light bulb seemed to go on in his mind. Yes, he said; in fact, the Zulu word for promise—isithembiso—is not the correct word. When a black person “promises” he means “maybe I will and maybe I won’t.” But, I said, this makes nonsense of promising, the very purpose of which is to bind one to a course of action. When one is not sure he can do something he may say, “I will try but I can’t promise.” He said he’d heard whites say that and had never understood it till now. As a young Romanian friend so aptly summed it up, when a black person “promises” he means “I’ll try.”

The failure to keep promises is therefore not a language problem. It is hard to believe that after living with whites for so long they would not learn the correct meaning, and it is too much of a coincidence that the same phenomenon is found in Nigeria, Kenya and Papua New Guinea, where I have also lived. It is much more likely that Africans generally lack the very concept and hence cannot give the word its correct meaning. This would seem to indicate some difference in intellectual capacity.

Note the Zulu entry for obligation: “as if to bind one’s feet.” An obligation binds you, but it does so morally, not physically. It is an abstract concept, which is why there is no word for it in Zulu. So what did the authors of the dictionary do? They took this abstract concept and made it concrete. Feet, rope, and tying are all tangible and observable, and therefore things all blacks will understand, whereas many will not understand what an obligation is. The fact that they had to define it in this way is, by itself, compelling evidence for my conclusion that Zulu thought has few abstract concepts and indirect evidence for the view that Africans may be deficient in abstract thinking.

Abstract thinking

Abstract entities do not exist in space or time; they are typically intangible and can’t be perceived by the senses. They are often things that do not exist. “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere?” refers to something we hope will not happen, but we can still think about it.

African wood carving.

Everything we observe with our senses occurs in time and everything we see exists in space; yet we can perceive neither time nor space with our senses, but only with the mind. Precision is also abstract; while we can see and touch things made with precision, precision itself can only be perceived by the mind.

How do we acquire abstract concepts? Is it enough to make things with precision in order to have the concept of precision? Africans make excellent carvings, made with precision, so why isn’t the concept in their language? To have this concept we must not only do things with precision but must be aware of this phenomenon and then give it a name.

How, for example, do we acquire such concepts as belief and doubt? We all have beliefs; even animals do. When a dog wags its tail on hearing his master’s footsteps, it believes he is coming. But it has no concept of belief because it has no awareness that it has this belief and so no awareness of belief per se. In short, it has no self-consciousness, and thus is not aware of its own mental states.

It has long seemed to me that blacks tend to lack self-awareness. If such awareness is necessary for developing abstract concepts it is not surprising that African languages have so few abstract terms. A lack of self-awareness—or introspection—has advantages. In my experience neurotic behavior, characterized by excessive and unhealthy self-consciousness, is uncommon among blacks. I am also confident that sexual dysfunction, which is characterized by excessive self-consciousness, is less common among blacks than whites.

Time is another abstract concept with which Africans seem to have difficulties. I began to wonder about this in 1998. Several Africans drove up in a car and parked right in front of mine, blocking it. “Hey,” I said, “you can’t park here.” “Oh, are you about to leave?” they asked in a perfectly polite and friendly way. “No,” I said, “but I might later. Park over there”—and they did.

While the possibility that I might want to leave later was obvious to me, their thinking seemed to encompass only the here and now: “If you’re leaving right now we understand, but otherwise, what’s the problem?” I had other such encounters and the key question always seemed to be, “Are you leaving now?” The future, after all, does not exist. It will exist, but doesn’t exist now. People who have difficulty thinking of things that do not exist will ipso facto have difficulty thinking about the future.

It appears that the Zulu word for “future”—isikhati—is the same as the word for time, as well as for space. Realistically, this means that these concepts probably do not exist in Zulu thought. It also appears that there is no word for the past—meaning, the time preceding the present. The past did exist, but no longer exists. Hence, people who may have problems thinking of things that do not exist will have trouble thinking of the past as well as the future.

This has an obvious bearing on such sentiments as gratitude and loyalty, which I have long noticed are uncommon among Africans. We feel gratitude for things that happened in the past, but for those with little sense of the past such feelings are less likely to arise.

Why did it take me more than 20 years to notice all of this? I think it is because our assumptions about time are so deeply rooted that we are not even aware of making them and hence the possibility that others may not share them simply does not occur to us. And so we don’t see it, even when the evidence is staring us in the face.

Mathematics and maintenance

I quote from an article in the South African press about the problems blacks have with mathematics:

“[Xhosa] is a language where polygon and plane have the same definition … where concepts like triangle, quadrilateral, pentagon, hexagon are defined by only one word.” (“Finding New Languages for Maths and Science,” Star [Johannesburg], July 24, 2002, p. 8.)

.
Apartheid-era sign post.

More accurately, these concepts simply do not exist in Xhosa, which, along with Zulu, is one of the two most widely spoken languages in South Africa. In America, blacks are said to have a “tendency to approximate space, numbers and time instead of aiming for complete accuracy.” (Star, June 8, 1988, p.10.) In other words, they are also poor at math. Notice the identical triumvirate—space, numbers, and time. Is it just a coincidence that these three highly abstract concepts are the ones with which blacks — everywhere — seem to have such difficulties?

The entry in the Zulu dictionary for “number,” by the way — ningi — means “numerous,” which is not at all the same as the concept of number. It is clear, therefore, that there is no concept of number in Zulu.

White rule in South Africa ended in 1994. It was about ten years later that power outages began, which eventually reached crisis proportions. The principle reason for this is simply lack of maintenance on the generating equipment. Maintenance is future-oriented, and the Zulu entry in the dictionary for it is ondla, which means: “1. Nourish, rear; bring up; 2. Keep an eye on; watch (your crop).” In short, there is no such thing as maintenance in Zulu thought, and it would be hard to argue that this is wholly unrelated to the fact that when people throughout Africa say “nothing works,” it is only an exaggeration.

The New York Times reports that New York City is considering a plan (since implemented) aimed at getting blacks to “do well on standardized tests and to show up for class,” by paying them to do these things and that could “earn [them] as much as $500 a year.” Students would get money for regular school attendance, every book they read, doing well on tests, and sometimes just for taking them. Parents would be paid for “keeping a full-time job … having health insurance … and attending parent-teacher conferences.” (Jennifer Medina, “Schools Plan to Pay Cash for Marks,” New York Times, June 19, 2007.)

The clear implication is that blacks are not very motivated. Motivation involves thinking about the future and hence about things that do not exist. Given black deficiencies in this regard, it is not surprising that they would be lacking in motivation, and having to prod them in this way is further evidence for such a deficiency.

The Zulu entry for “motivate” is banga, under which we find “1. Make, cause, produce something unpleasant; … to cause trouble . … 2. Contend over a claim; … fight over inheritance; … 3. Make for, aim at, journey towards … .” Yet when I ask Africans what banga means, they have no idea. In fact, no Zulu word could refer to motivation for the simple reason that there is no such concept in Zulu; and if there is no such concept there cannot be a word for it. This helps explain the need to pay blacks to behave as if they were motivated.

.
Zulus.

The same New York Times article quotes Darwin Davis of the Urban League as “caution[ing] that the … money being offered [for attending class] was relatively paltry … and wondering … how many tests students would need to pass to buy the latest video game.”

Instead of being shamed by the very need for such a plan, this black activist complains that the payments aren’t enough! If he really is unaware how his remarks will strike most readers, he is morally obtuse, but his views may reflect a common understanding among blacks of what morality is: not something internalized but something others enforce from the outside. Hence his complaint that paying children to do things they should be motivated to do on their own is that they are not being paid enough.

In this context, I recall some remarkable discoveries by the late American linguist, William Stewart, who spent many years in Senegal studying local languages. Whereas Western cultures internalize norms—“Don’t do that!” for a child, eventually becomes “I mustn’t do that” for an adult—African cultures do not. They rely entirely on external controls on behavior from tribal elders and other sources of authority. When Africans were detribalized, these external constraints disappeared, and since there never were internal constraints, the results were crime, drugs, promiscuity, etc. Where there have been other forms of control—as in white-ruled South Africa, colonial Africa, or the segregated American South—this behavior was kept within tolerable limits. But when even these controls disappear there is often unbridled violence.

Stewart apparently never asked why African cultures did not internalize norms, that is, why they never developed moral consciousness, but it is unlikely that this was just a historical accident. More likely, it was the result of deficiencies in abstract thinking ability.

.
Public service message, South Africa.

One explanation for this lack of abstract thinking, including the diminished understanding of time, is that Africans evolved in a climate where they could live day to day without having to think ahead. They never developed this ability because they had no need for it. Whites, on the other hand, evolved under circumstances in which they had to consider what would happen if they didn’t build stout houses and store enough fuel and food for the winter. For them it was sink or swim.

Surprising confirmation of Stewart’s ideas can be found in the May/June 2006 issue of the Boston Review, a typically liberal publication. In “Do the Right Thing: Cognitive Science’s Search for a Common Morality,” Rebecca Saxe distinguishes between “conventional” and “moral” rules. Conventional rules are supported by authorities but can be changed; moral rules, on the other hand, are not based on conventional authority and are not subject to change. “Even three-year-old children … distinguish between moral and conventional transgressions,” she writes. The only exception, according to James Blair of the National Institutes of Health, are psychopaths, who exhibit “persistent aggressive behavior.” For them, all rules are based only on external authority, in whose absence “anything is permissible.” The conclusion drawn from this is that “healthy individuals in all cultures respect the distinction between conventional … and moral [rules].”

However, in the same article, another anthropologist argues that “the special status of moral rules cannot be part of human nature, but is … just … an artifact of Western values.” Anita Jacobson-Widding, writing of her experiences among the Manyika of Zimbabwe, says:

“I tried to find a word that would correspond to the English concept of ‘morality.’ I explained what I meant by asking my informants to describe the norms for good behavior toward other people. The answer was unanimous. The word for this was tsika. But when I asked my bilingual informants to translate tsika into English, they said that it was ‘good manners’ …”

.
An all-too-common problem.

She concluded that because good manners are clearly conventional rather than moral rules, the Manyika simply did not have a concept of morality. But how would one explain this absence? Miss Jacobson-Widding’s explanation is the typical nonsense that could come only from a so-called intellectual: “the concept of morality does not exist.” The far more likely explanation is that the concept of morality, while otherwise universal, is enfeebled in cultures that have a deficiency in abstract thinking.

According to now-discredited folk wisdom, blacks are “children in adult bodies,” but there may be some foundation to this view. The average African adult has the raw IQ score of the average 11-year-old white child. This is about the age at which white children begin to internalize morality and no longer need such strong external enforcers.

Gruesome cruelty

Another aspect of African behavior that liberals do their best to ignore but that nevertheless requires an explanation is gratuitous cruelty. A reviewer of Driving South, a 1993 book by David Robbins, writes:

.
Victim of Rwandan violence.

“A Cape social worker sees elements that revel in violence … It’s like a cult which has embraced a lot of people who otherwise appear normal. … At the slightest provocation their blood-lust is aroused. And then they want to see death, and they jeer and mock at the suffering involved, especially the suffering of a slow and agonizing death.” (Citizen [Johannesburg], July 12, 1993, p.6.)

There is something so unspeakably vile about this, something so beyond depravity, that the human brain recoils. This is not merely the absence of human empathy, but the positive enjoyment of human suffering, all the more so when it is “slow and agonizing.” Can you imagine jeering at and mocking someone in such horrible agony?

During the apartheid era, black activists used to kill traitors and enemies by “necklacing” them. An old tire was put around the victim’s neck, filled with gasoline, and—but it is best to let an eye-witness describe what happened next:

“The petrol-filled tyre is jammed on your shoulders and a lighter is placed within reach . … Your fingers are broken, needles are pushed up your nose and you are tortured until you put the lighter to the petrol yourself.” (Citizen; “SA’s New Nazis,” August 10, 1993, p.18.)

The author of an article in the Chicago Tribune, describing the equally gruesome way the Hutu killed Tutsi in the Burundi massacres, marveled at “the ecstasy of killing, the lust for blood; this is the most horrible thought. It’s beyond my reach.” (“Hutu Killers Danced In Blood Of Victims, Videotapes Show,” Chicago Tribune, September 14, 1995, p.8.) The lack of any moral sense is further evidenced by their having videotaped their crimes, “apparently want[ing] to record … [them] for posterity.” Unlike Nazi war criminals, who hid their deeds, these people apparently took pride in their work.

Amy Biehl marker
Where Amy Biehl was killed.

In 1993, Amy Biehl, a 26-year-old American on a Fulbright scholarship, was living in South Africa, where she spent most of her time in black townships helping blacks. One day when she was driving three African friends home, young blacks stopped the car, dragged her out, and killed her because she was white. A retired senior South African judge, Rex van Schalkwyk, in his 1998 book One Miracle is Not Enough, quotes from a newspaper report on the trial of her killers: “Supporters of the three men accused of murdering [her] … burst out laughing in the public gallery of the Supreme Court today when a witness told how the battered woman groaned in pain.” This behavior, Van Schalkwyk wrote, “is impossible to explain in terms accessible to rational minds.” (pp. 188-89.)

These incidents and the responses they evoke—“the human brain recoils,” “beyond my reach,” “impossible to explain to rational minds” — represent a pattern of behavior and thinking that cannot be wished away, and offer additional support for my claim that Africans are deficient in moral consciousness.

I have long suspected that the idea of rape is not the same in Africa as elsewhere, and now I find confirmation of this in Newsweek:

“According to a three-year study [in Johannesburg] … more than half of the young people interviewed — both male and female — believe that forcing sex with someone you know does not constitute sexual violence … [T]he casual manner in which South African teens discuss coercive relationships and unprotected sex is staggering.” (Tom Masland, “Breaking The Silence,” Newsweek, July 9, 2000.)

Clearly, many blacks do not think rape is anything to be ashamed of.

The Newsweek author is puzzled by widespread behavior that is known to lead to AIDS, asking “Why has the safe-sex effort failed so abjectly?” Well, aside from their profoundly different attitudes towards sex and violence and their heightened libido, a major factor could be their diminished concept of time and reduced ability to think ahead.

Liberian billboard
Liberian billboard

Nevertheless, I was still surprised by what I found in the Zulu dictionary. The main entry for rape reads: “1. Act hurriedly; … 2. Be greedy. 3. Rob, plunder, … take [possessions] by force.” While these entries may be related to our concept of rape, there is one small problem: there is no reference to sexual intercourse! In a male-dominated culture, where saying “no” is often not an option (as confirmed by the study just mentioned), “taking sex by force” is not really part of the African mental calculus. Rape clearly has a moral dimension, but perhaps not to Africans. To the extent they do not consider coerced sex to be wrong, then, by our conception, they cannot consider it rape because rape is wrong. If such behavior isn’t wrong it isn’t rape.

An article about gang rape in the left-wing British paper, the Guardian, confirms this when it quotes a young black woman: “The thing is, they [black men] don’t see it as rape, as us being forced. They just see it as pleasure for them.” (Rose George, “They Don’t See it as Rape. They Just See it as Pleasure for Them,” June 5, 2004.) A similar attitude seems to be shared among some American blacks who casually refer to gang rape as “running a train.” (Nathan McCall, Makes Me Wanna Holler, Vintage Books, 1995.)

If the African understanding of rape is far afield, so may be their idea of romance or love. I recently watched a South African television program about having sex for money. Of the several women in the audience who spoke up, not a single one questioned the morality of this behavior. Indeed, one plaintively asked, “Why else would I have sex with a man?”

From the casual way in which Africans throw around the word “love,” I suspect their understanding of it is, at best, childish. I suspect the notion is alien to Africans, and I would be surprised if things are very different among American blacks. Africans hear whites speak of “love” and try to give it a meaning from within their own conceptual repertoire. The result is a child’s conception of this deepest of human emotions, probably similar to their misunderstanding of the nature of a promise.

I recently located a document that was dictated to me by a young African woman in June 1993. She called it her “story,” and the final paragraph is a poignant illustration of what to Europeans would seem to be a limited understanding of love:

“On my way from school, I met a boy. And he proposed me. His name was Mokone. He tell me that he love me. And then I tell him I will give him his answer next week. At night I was crazy about him. I was always thinking about him.”

Moral blindness

Whenever I taught ethics I used the example of Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer in the French Army who was convicted of treason in 1894 even though the authorities knew he was innocent. Admitting their mistake, it was said, would have a disastrous effect on military morale and would cause great social unrest. I would in turn argue that certain things are intrinsically wrong and not just because of their consequences. Even if the results of freeing Dreyfus would be much worse than keeping him in prison, he must be freed, because it is unjust to keep an innocent man in prison.

To my amazement, an entire class in Kenya said without hesitation that he should not be freed. Call me dense if you want, but it was 20 years before the full significance of this began to dawn on me.

.
Death is certain but accidents are not.

Africans, I believe, may generally lack the concepts of subjunctivity and counterfactuality. Subjunctivity is conveyed in such statements as, “What would you have done if I hadn’t showed up?” This is contrary to fact because I did show up, and it is now impossible for me not to have shown up. We are asking someone to imagine what he would have done if something that didn’t happen (and now couldn’t happen) had happened. This requires self-consciousness, and I have already described blacks’ possible deficiency in this respect. It is obvious that animals, for example, cannot think counterfactually, because of their complete lack of self-awareness.

When someone I know tried to persuade his African workers to contribute to a health insurance policy, they asked “What’s it for?” “Well, if you have an accident, it would pay for the hospital.” Their response was immediate: “But boss, we didn’t have an accident!” “Yes, but what if you did?” Reply? “We didn’t have an accident!” End of story.

.
South African AIDS education poster.

Interestingly, blacks do plan for funerals, for although an accident is only a risk, death is a certainty. (The Zulu entries for “risk” are “danger” and “a slippery surface.”) Given the frequent all-or-nothing nature of black thinking, if it’s not certain you will have an accident, then you will not have an accident. Furthermore, death is concrete and observable: We see people grow old and die. Africans tend to be aware of time when it is manifested in the concrete and observable.

One of the pivotal ideas underpinning morality is the Golden Rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you. “How would you feel if someone stole everything you owned? Well, that’s how he would feel if you robbed him.” The subjunctivity here is obvious. But if Africans may generally lack this concept, they will have difficulty in understanding the Golden Rule and, to that extent, in understanding morality.

If this is true we might also expect their capacity for human empathy to be diminished, and this is suggested in the examples cited above. After all, how do we empathize? When we hear about things like “necklacing” we instinctively — and unconsciously — think: “How would I feel if I were that person?” Of course I am not and cannot be that person, but to imagine being that person gives us valuable moral “information:” that we wouldn’t want this to happen to us and so we shouldn’t want it to happen to others. To the extent people are deficient in such abstract thinking, they will be deficient in moral understanding and hence in human empathy—which is what we tend to find in Africans.

In his 1990 book Devil’s Night, Ze’ev Chafets quotes a black woman speaking about the problems of Detroit: “I know some people won’t like this, but whenever you get a whole lot of black people, you’re gonna have problems. Blacks are ignorant and rude.” (pp. 76-77.)

If some Africans cannot clearly imagine what their own rude behavior feels like to others—in other words, if they cannot put themselves in the other person’s shoes—they will be incapable of understanding what rudeness is. For them, what we call rude may be normal and therefore, from their perspective, not really rude. Africans may therefore not be offended by behavior we would consider rude — not keeping appointments, for example. One might even conjecture that African cruelty is not the same as white cruelty, since Africans may not be fully aware of the nature of their behavior, whereas such awareness is an essential part of “real” cruelty.

I am hardly the only one to notice this obliviousness to others that sometimes characterizes black behavior. Walt Harrington, a white liberal married to a light-skinned black, makes some surprising admissions in his 1994 book, Crossings: A White Man’s Journey Into Black America:

“I notice a small car … in the distance. Suddenly … a bag of garbage flies out its window . … I think, I’ll bet they’re blacks. Over the years I’ve noticed more blacks littering than whites. I hate to admit this because it is a prejudice. But as I pass the car, I see that my reflex was correct—[they are blacks].

“[As I pull] into a McDonald’s drive-through … [I see that] the car in front of me had four black[s] in it. Again … my mind made its unconscious calculation: We’ll be sitting here forever while these people decide what to order. I literally shook my head . … My God, my kids are half black! But then the kicker: we waited and waited and waited. Each of the four … leaned out the window and ordered individually. The order was changed several times. We sat and sat, and I again shook my head, this time at the conundrum that is race in America.

“I knew that the buried sentiment that had made me predict this disorganization … was … racist. … But my prediction was right.” (pp. 234-35.)

Africans also tend to litter. To understand this we must ask why whites don’t litter, at least not as much. We ask ourselves: “What would happen if everyone threw rubbish everywhere? It would be a mess. So you shouldn’t do it!” Blacks’ possible deficiency in abstract thinking makes such reasoning more difficult, so any behavior requiring such thinking is less likely to develop in their cultures. Even after living for generations in societies where such thinking is commonplace, many may still fail to absorb it.

.
A trash pile in Sudan.

It should go without saying that my observations about Africans are generalizations. I am not saying that none has the capacity for abstract thought or moral understanding. I am speaking of tendencies and averages, which leave room for many exceptions.

To what extent do my observations about Africans apply to American blacks? American blacks have an average IQ of 85, which is a full 15 points higher than the African average of 70. The capacity for abstract thought is unquestionably correlated with intelligence, and so we can expect American blacks generally to exceed Africans in these respects.

Still, American blacks show many of the traits so striking among Africans: low mathematical ability, diminished abstract reasoning, high crime rates, a short time-horizon, rudeness, littering, etc. If I had lived only among American blacks and not among Africans, I might never have reached the conclusions I have, but the more extreme behavior among Africans makes it easier to perceive the same tendencies among American blacks. AR

Gedhalia Braun holds a PhD in philosophy and is the author of Racism, Guilt, Self-Hatred and Self-Deceit. Anyone interested in reading his book can purchase it in PDF format at the AR website, AmRen.com.

A Day In Mudland, very very funny!!!!!!

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

A Day In Mudland

I was driving down the freeway this afternoon during heavy traffic, as thousands of wetbacks and niggers and chinks crammed the highway, heading out for the holidays. To my right was a huge semi with a long box on it. The monster was blocking traffic and weaving all over the road, scaring the crap out of everyone around him. It was obvious this clown had started partying a day early.

Suddenly the driver decided he wanted in my spot…with me still in it! His rig slid across the white line and came within one inch of taking me out, before I was able to get out of his way. I leaned on my horn, but the asshole just ignored me. I backed way off to give the nut room, because there were too many bozos on the freeway to maneuver.

After tailing him for three miles, I decided to pass him and leave the prick behind me. I’ll be dipped in shit, if this idiot didn’t choose this exact time to slide into my lane again! Once again I leaned on my horn and barely escaped a major accident. Madder than hell, I pulled up next to the prick, only to discover a black-assed coon with a bottle of Thunderbird in his hand.

This old wino nigger had no business behind the wheel of an 18-wheeler, or even a 1963 Studebaker. From the looks of him, he’d had about fifty-thousand or so of those bottles before that one over the course of his useless life. I had no doubt at this point that he stole the truck. No crew boss in his right mind is going to hand the keys to a wino Rastus! I pointed at him and yelled for him to get that rig off the freeway. And in true nigger form he flipped me off and yelled, “FUGG YOUZ, MUUFUUGGGAH!!”

It was at this point that I stuck my lips waaay out and started scratching under my arm like a chimp and going, “Oook!! Oook!” Ole’ Buckwheat really chimped out when he saw this, and damn near rolled the rig! He was so pissed that he couldn’t keep it straight on the highway! I was laughing so hard I almost pissed myself. I had really struck a nerve.

But he was only one of many encounters I had in the past 24 hours, and though perhaps unusual for many of you, what I went through is anything but rare. It’s a normal, daily thing for the few remaining whites that live in this third world pest hole called California. People worry about the muds taking it over. They have nothing to sweat. They already did, about five years ago. I can sit at a stop sign on any given day, and any given time, and 19 out of 20 cars that pass will have a mud at the wheel. Driving in this state is a real risk. That’s because this state is stuffed with immigrants from all over the world, and most of them never drove a car in their lives until they got here.

And the old saying about Asian drivers being the worst is no legend. They’re a menace. You can always spot one. He’s the guy doing 40 in a 75 zone. He’s leaning waaay forward and squinting so hard at the road you could blindfold him with dental floss. His hands are gripping the wheel so tightly his knuckles are white. Cars honk and whiz past, but he stubbornly refuses to get in the slow lane or speed up.

Thousands of deadly accidents are caused here every year by these accursed chinks. In fact I, and a dozen other people had to slam on the brakes and come skidding to a stop from 70 miles per hour today because of one such chink, who got on the freeway and promptly settled down to a break-neck 35 mph in a 70 zone. If I could have stopped him somehow, I’d have squeezed his ignorant head off like a chicken.

But as far as attitude goes, the worst are the nigger hos. Nobody has these arrogant bitches beat when it comes to thinking the world owes them a living. Talk about hateful, spiteful, vicious, violent, loud, mouthy, profane, and classless! When one of these mean bitches gets behind the wheel of a car, the whole planet had better watch out.

In fact, nigger bitches in cars is a cottage industry out here for ambulance chasers. There is an entire class of nigger out here that lives and lives good off of trumped-up lawsuits these sluts file against poor, unsuspecting white families. They do this by deliberately causing a fender bender with some poor white, then screaming that they hurt their back or sprained their lips, etc. The Jewish shyster, whom they have on a perpetual retainer, takes a 40% cut of the take, and between them the white doesn’t stand a chance. After all, this is California; home of the liberal judge and the all-nigger jury. And if you’re black, you’re a slam-dunk.

Twice now, I’ve come very close to getting nailed myself by these hos. They sit in their car with the engine idling, watching and waiting for some white to start backing out of the parking lot they’re in. As soon as they see the backup lights come on, they slam their car in gear and hit the gas, timing it so that the two cars collide. Then comes the screaming and chimping out. And brother, you aint’ seen nothin’ until you’ve seen a loud mouthed nigger ho’ get down and dirty. Talk about loud!

And the really disgusting part of all of this is the way other niggers automatically rally around their fellow coon. Oh, they all know the score. It’s a well known scam among niggers. And as we all know, they’re a clannish people, and they help each other to rob whitey every chance they get. So any bystanders that happen to be black are all running over and pointing to the white and yelling, “I sawz it all! Yazzuuhh! De crackah done it!” And of course these “good citizens” will get a small kickback from her lawyer after they win. That’s how the game is played down here. Now you know why our insurance is so damned high.

Between the thieving niggers and the thieving wetbacks stealing cars faster than they can build them, the insurance companies in this state would pull out altogether if they could, but the government won’t let them. They tried to, about ten years ago…lol…

I went to the bank this morning to cash a couple of checks, but when I got there, the place looked like a Martin Luther King convention. It was wall-to-wall coons. I couldn’t figure out what the hell had attracted so many niggers to one bank. Finally I couldn’t take it any longer, and I asked the nearest white. She said that it was their welfare checks, that the state had sent them out late(the state’s in a budget crisis..no duuh! Too many muds on the dole), and the banks would also be closed for the next three days.

It was a nasty, stinking, reeking, noisy-assed ordeal to wait in line with that many porch monkeys, let me tell you. By the time I got out of there, my eyes were bloodshot and glazed over, and I was grimacing like I had hemorrhoids and was trying to pass an armadillo. No sane person should have to go through that. The smell alone was enough to give a person brain damage. And on the ugly scale from one to ten, some of those coons rated a fifteen. One extremely fat ho had an ass that started at the back of her neck and went to her feet. I think if she’d been able to turn that big fat mouth of hers sideways, she’d have split in two. We’ve all seen them; the ones that are so fat that when they walk it looks like two rabid pit bulls fighting in a gunny sack. Every time she took a step, her ass threatened to slap the back of her head.

And what the hell is it with their predilection for purple tights? The fatter they are, the more they love really loud colored tights and leotards. This bitch had on a pair that had seen better days (and soap)a couple of years back. The thread that held the ass together was stretched to the breaking point, and I could see ass through the gap where the threads had stretched so far, that they were leaving a space large enough to toss a cat through. I was terrified that those inhumanly overworked threads would give up the ghost while I was still near her, and bury me under a mountain of reeking black ass. The thought almost sent me running out the door, gibbering, screaming and pulling out tufts of hair as I went. The “joys of diversity” my cracker ass…

But even after all that, I still didn’t escape unscathed, for no sooner had I stepped outside into breathable air, when a greasy looking wetback that had a face not even his mother could love, walked up to me and tried to sell me a pineapple. His partner was hawking them and some other sundry fruits out of the back of an old Chevy pickup with no plates(what else?). I hadn’t eaten all day and was starved, so I decided I’d grab a cantaloupe and wolf it in the parking lot, then hit the road again.

I never got the chance. No sooner had I taken three steps toward the truck when three more wetbacks came out of the woodwork and tried to mooch money off of me. They wait to see who might buy fruit. And if they walk toward the truck, that means they have money. That’s how they know who to hit. And they’ll work as a team to try to distract the gringo.And while two are in his face yelling for money, the third is behind him stealing his wallet with very expert fingers.

But as most of my readers already know by now, I’m pretty streetwise and didn’t fall for their scam. I knew immediately what they were up to and pulled my knife and popped it open. I always carry it, and it has a wickedly long and sharp blade. I showed it to them and said, “Back off or get cut, you thieving wetbacks. Your choice.” One of them looked like he might have been game anyway, but not alone, and his brothers didn’t want anything to do with me. I think it was probably the insane way I was grinning at them..lol.

I left the bastards standing there in the parking lot as I drove off. I called the local PD for all the good it would do, because half the force is now wetback, and the other half is rabid liberal. I might as well have called the local girl scout troop. Just another day in mudland…

Whites are literally stampeding out of the state as I write this, and the wetbacks are pouring in. Vacant houses are everywhere, and greedy landlords would rather let their places set empty making nothing, than drop the rent to something reasonable. They had a taste of gouge money during the real estate boom, and being mostly stupid, greedy ragheads and chinks (the government financed the property for all of them when they arrived here), they think they can still reap that kind of extortion money. They refuse to get the point that people are broke and won’t…can’t pay their insane rates any longer.

Whites are sick of the constantly increasing taxes, fees, tickets, cop harassment, muds, crime, and all the good jobs going overseas or to muds. They’re especially sick of a government that refuses to run these invaders out. California has become just an extension of northern Mexico, trash, ghettos and all.

Last week the city hired a road contractor, and naturally hired the lowest bidder, who works only fresh, unskilled wetbacks for minimum wage. They dug up a mile of street on Baseline Blvd to install some new pipe, then they filled and paved it. Yeah right. They took a formerly white-built, glass smooth road and turned it into a devil’s golf course. I kid you not. You have never driven on anything so bad in your life. A drunken blind man could have done a better job. That section of road is now tearing the hell out of the suspensions of a lot of cars, and city hall is being flooded with angry callers, demanding the city pay for all the damage.

So the mayor’s office tried to get the contractor to come out and fix the mess, but “Pedro’s Contracting” no longer exists. It’s now “Pedro’s Lawn Care”. Think I’m kidding? You reap what you sow Mr. Liberal…

I got home and turned on the TV to some fiction show straight out of Hollyweird, where the ace code breaker; the genius of the entire country mind you, was a fat, rap spouting, plate-lipped nigger punk. And his sidekick? Any guesses? You win! Yep! It was a beautiful blonde! The standard liberal formula for shows now. Just one more reason to despise this state..and Washington DC…

I could go on with this, and list quite a few more misadventures I had just trying to get through the day, but to be honest, it’s just too depressing and makes me dream visions of war, blood, and red mayhem.I think I’ll go down to the junk shop and buy a couple of their worst old TVs and put them in my bedroom. That way, when I see the inevitable program ala mud, that I know is going to send me over the edge, I’ll have some old TVs to abuse and be able to leave my good one alone. Boots through the screen are starting to get expensive.

-The Lone Haranguer

Locust: You must live in San Diego Californication. I have seen the same damn shit for some time now, I try to not go to the bank for the same exact reason, where I live, we have diversity up the ass, diversity centers, diversity training, diversity police, diversity here, there and everywhere, no mention of America’s people, you know what I mean, “white” people, yeah I said it, we are the only Americans everyone else is something else entirely. As for what you said in your post, I agree with every single aspect, I have friends who are Asian, and its all true, but you forgot to mention the “Massage” Parlors, and nail salons full of “legal” workers, who didn’t marry a cousin so they could come on over and bleed our population dry through the pedicure.  I have seen the future of America and its California, broke, tired, and hungry.  But before we go down that path, I bought a 12 ga. Tactical Shotgun, an AR-15 with 6.8 spec upper for windshields penetration, and various other tools that I will need for what’s coming to America, like a machete.  I can say without a shadow of a doubt that the white devil is about to be released, the only thing holding us back is the economy, and as we have seen over the last few months under the current illegal administration, the economy is going down hard.  But like true Americans we won’t do anything until the mud people begin to riot, and when they do it will spread like wild fire in the hills of Malibu, we will either rise up and slaughter these animals or they will eat us alive.  I know for a fact that hundreds of thousands of us are preparing for what is to come, we are buying guns and ammo, building safe rooms, buying and storing food for the long haul.  We all work with the mud’s, I work in healthcare, I know without a doubt that they sense what’s happening, they know that we know what they think about us, they know that we are buying up all the bullets and guns the factory can make, and they know we are mad as hell and are not going to take it any more.   Its time we begin to organize on the ground level, we cannot retake our homeland through the ballot box, only a revolution can save this nation, and hell fucking NO, are we going to allow the mud’s to split Our Nation up into separate smaller nations, fuck that! There are enough of us in small surrounding communities around the major cities to retake this nation, we control the police, army, navy, air fore, and the navy, we own 90% of the firearms, all we need is the will and a leader to take us there.  But I don’t think killing every mud will solve the problem, we must eliminate every liberal yes that’s true, we must give the mud’s a choice to leave with nothing but the cloths on their backs, nothing more. Primarily the male mud’s must go, every one of them, NO exceptions, All blacks MUST GO back to Africa NO exceptions, but Asian Females and Latina Females should be allowed to stay, so long as only white males remain in the nation.  Our constitution must remain the same but also include protections for our people, and additional clauses on who is allowed to run for and hold public office, only white males.  The last point Canada, must be annexed, and cleansed, and the many Mexicans south of us must be relocated on the other side of the panama canal.  Lastly, we must retake Europe, and wipe Islam off the face of the Earth.  This is just a small list, we could add some other things to it, but I think this is a good start, now all we need it a massive poverty riot, and the game will be on.

Democrat overlords: White man shut the fuck up and pay the bill! Illegal Aliens The Census Bureau Wants You!

Democrat overlords: White man shut the fuck up and pay the bill!

Locust:

For all of you who have said that we on the right are crazy, listen up, the democrat party is using the minorities to gain absolute power in America, the two party system will come to an end following the census of 2010.  They will count every illegal alien in this nation, and take political power away from those of us who pay the bill “white people,” and give the power to non-whites through the census. The DHS says that the right wing is very angry, and growing anger is fueling a resurgence of the racial consciousness within the white population, this is very true, we are not happy, I see my people being pushed aside for the benefit of non-whites, not because they are better but because they vote democrat.  If you think this will stand, think again.  The rest of the nation does not want to be California, here the Latino caucus with the democrats, redistricted the state to ensure a democrat majority rule indefinitely, and a permeate but shrinking minority status for the republican party, and we the white folks, who are now a minority in the state, who pay all the bills, are kicked to the side and told to pay the bill and shut up!

The one party overloads within the democrat party, want this for the rest of the nation, and if you disagree you are branded a racist, blackmailed, extorted, watched by the DHS, and eventually if we rebel, put in reeducation or extermination camps through FEMA.  That’s what’s coming, that’s the foundation the Obamainites are building today, civil war and revolution is coming with absolute certainty.

Minnesota officials push for full head count in 2010 census

The push is on to leave no Minnesotan uncounted in next year’s census. The State Demographic Center is holding town hall forums in Mankato, Austin and Owatonna this week to highlight the coming national head count.
(CNSNews.com )- The acting director of the U.S. Census Bureau, Thomas Mesenbourg, told CNSNews.com that the bureau intends to work with community organizations to make sure every illegal alien in the United States is counted in the 2010 Census.

The Census is used to apportion the seats in the U.S. House of Representative. There are 435 House seats that are divided among the states in proportion to their population, which is determined by the decennial census. States with more people get more seats in the U.S. House.

This means that a state harboring more illegal aliens can gain more House seats as long as the Census Bureau finds the illegal aliens and counts them. This also means that the illegal alien population resident in the United States during a census year has the potential to alter the regional and philosophical balance of power in Congress.

By John Frisby • Apr 14th, 2009 • Category: Ethics, Opinion, Politics

April 13, 2009

Who Counts?: The next U.S. census chief wants to count people who aren’t there. The acting director wants to count people who shouldn’t be here. And Acorn will help do the counting.

Back when he was the Census Bureau’s associate director of statistical design, Robert M. Groves, nominated to be the next director of the bureau, recommended that the 1990 census be statistically adjusted to correct an alleged undercount of minorities in urban areas — areas that tend to vote heavily Democratic.

Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher overruled him, saying the use of “statistical sampling,” as it’s known, was a form of “political tampering.” The Supreme Court later ruled in 1999 that statistical sampling couldn’t be used to apportion House seats among the states, but didn’t rule out using estimates to redraw district lines within a state.

Statistical sampling is a technique akin to polling. You select what you consider a representative sample and extrapolate your findings over the general population.

The problem is that Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution forbids it. It requires an “actual enumeration” of all Americans every 10 years, not a guess based on statistical sampling. That means counting real, live, breathing people. The Founding Fathers weren’t fools. Sampling techniques have changed, but human nature has not.

If the Census Bureau were allowed to use sampling, it would have to develop formulas for its samples. How you structure the formula affects the results. It’s possible a party in power might determine the desired result first, then determine the sampling formula needed to achieve it.

Commerce Secretary Gary Locke says there are no plans to use statistical sampling in the 2010 census, but there will be enormous pressure to do so. Remember that Judd Gregg withdrew his nomination to be Commerce Secretary when plans to run the census out of the White House under Chief of Staff Rahm Emmanuel were revealed.

On April 1, Secretary Locke joined several activist groups, including the National Council of La Raza and the League of United Latin American Citizens, at a press conference to talk about efforts to ensure a full count of Latinos in the 2010 census.

After the press conference, acting director Thomas Mesenbourg said the Census Bureau intended to reach out to illegal aliens through “trusted” community organizations.

“It’s more than just the Census Bureau telling them that it’s safe,” said Mesenbourg. “We need somebody that they view as a trusted voice — somebody in a community organization that can assure them it’s safe.”

One of those trusted organizations, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, infamous for its documented participation in vote fraud, signed on as a national partner with the Census Bureau in February. It will help recruit the 1.4 million temporary workers needed to go door to door. Acorn has helped ensure “people” like Mary Poppins and Jive Turkey were registered to vote. We wouldn’t want the census to miss them.

Groves has spent decades researching how to improve response rates, and apparently one of the ways being considered is to remind people of the federal goodies that come along with being counted.

Page 24 of the Census Bureau’s 351-page 2010 plan for the census advises that “messages that increase knowledge of the benefits of filling out the Census improve motivation and favorability towards Census participation.” People should be reminded that the “Census determines how over $300 billion per year in federal funds get divided among states and local areas of the country.”

This is even if the people are illegally here or are just estimated to be here.

The nation depends on an accurate count of who and where we are. But it shouldn’t be used to create a permanent class dependent on government and the drawing of lines to create a permanent Democratic majority.

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=ydkU2Gyteu

Illegal Aliens The Census Bureau Wants You!

Thursday, 2 April 2009

Recently the acting Census Bureau Fascist chief, Thomas Mesenbourg, issued an order to its workers, “you will count the illegal aliens, or you will die.” To make sure they are counted they are using community organizations like ACORN to do the illegal alien dance in the streets.

The acting director of the U.S. Census Bureau, Thomas Mesenbourg, told CNSNews.com that the bureau intends to work with community organizations to make sure every illegal alien in the United States is counted in the 2010 Census.

This means that corrupt ACORNgets to count all citizens including illegal immigrants which will change the apportionment of the House of Representatives. Simply put….Democrats will get more seats in House. The Census is just another way to illegally affect elections for years to come. This has been Pelosi, Reid and Bambi’s plan all along.

This means that a state harboring more illegal aliens can gain more House seats as long as the Census Bureau finds the illegal aliens and counts them. This also means that the illegal alien population resident in the United States during a census year has the potential to alter the regional and philosophical balance of power in Congress.

Who are some of those states? California, Nevada, Kansas has their fair share, hell their are illegal immigrants in almost all 50 states in the union….at last count there were 12 million illegal immigrants and counting especially since the violence of the Mexican drug cartels spreads across Mexico…somewhat unchecked!

See who the fascist Commerce Secretary Locke was with prior to the statement from the Fascist Census Chief:

Mesenbourg’s comments were made after a press conference on Wednesday where Commerce Secretary Gary Locke joined several interest groups, including Univision, the National Council of La Raza, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) to talk about efforts to ensure a full count of Latinos in the 2010 Census.

Not to appear racist or anything but counting white people isn’t important. The only taxpayers Census cares about counting are minorities.

Just so there is no mistake about what the fascist said!

On a side note, among illegal immigrants who will be counted is Bambi’s Aunti Zuni. Why you are asking yourself? Because some frigging liberal immigration judge is letting Aunti Zuni defy the law one more time. Yes, Aunti Zuni is back in Boston living on the taxpayers dime once more. The frigging judge said ” we will check her out again next year.” Simply put, Aunt Zuni will never be deported and neither will any other illegal. Are you pissed off enough yet?

What did Bambi’s aunt say when told she could stay?

“Praise God,” Onyango said softly, holding her head high as she was surrounded by a throng of men in suits.

God has nothing to do with it. It is because we have no policy on illegal immigrants (except to let them stay) and we don’t enforce the laws currently on the books.

Are you pissed off enough yet?

If you are pissed off enough…join me and say “screw you” to the Census Bureau…don’t answer their stupid questionnaire. And if they call you, hang up on them. If they show up on your porch tell them to pack sand and take their shit elsewhere! That’s right Stand Up! Speak Up! and Act Up! Send Pelosi, Reid and Bambi a message….!

One Comment for “Illegal Aliens The Census Bureau Wants You!”

Comments:

Another nail in the coffin of the American Citizen. I really do not know what the hell is happening, I know the Damocrats want all, and I mean all, illegals to become citizens over nite. I suspect I’m talking about 24 million crimminals sponsered and supported by the Democratic party. And what can the American people do about it, NOTHING. You voted those people in and now they are getting thier revenge against the Republican party because they were defeated so many times in the pass. It is no more what is good for our Country, it is how far can I throw this country into the sewer to get our revenge, because I don’t have to worry I’ll get re elected again with the illegal votes. The American people will listen to that smooth taking Hollywood half breed that is now in office and fall for his smooth talking propreganda again.

Sorry, I had to let off steam because there is not a damm thing I or you can do about it. I will be expecting a call from the secret service because I’m talking against the now administration. So go ahead and call me.

House Rejects Exclusion of Aliens in Census

The House has rejected an attempt to make the Census Bureau exclude illegal aliens from the population count that will be used to reapportion Congressional seats after the 1990 census.

But before the procedural ruling Tuesday that doomed the census proposal, the measure won unexpected support in a vote pointing up regional anxieties over how the 1990 census will redistribute the 435 House seats. In making the proposal, Representative Tom Ridge, a Pennsylvania Republican, was seeking to exclude the undocumented workers not from the basic census count, but from the tally used for reapportionment. A Debate Over Fairness

Meanwhile, the Commerce Department, the bureau’s parent agency, announced the census would include overseas employees of the Defense Department and their dependents, 1.2 million to 1.6 million people. Such military personnel were counted in the 1970 census at the height of the Vietnam War but not in the 1980 census.

With this decision, the department eliminated one of the arguments put forth by Representative Ridge and his supporters: that it would be unfair to include the aliens and exclude the overseas military employees in the count used for reapportionment.

Such a case was made Tuesday at a brief House subcommittee meeting on the census and later when the debate moved to the House floor.

Representative Tim Valentine, a North Carolina Democrat, argued for the exclusion of the undocumented aliens. ”I’m not asking that these people be deprived of any benefits,” he said. ”I don’t want to reward the localities where these people illegally reside. That is not fair. It may be constitutional, but it just isn’t right.”

The constitutional mandate under which the census is conducted requires the counting of all ”persons,” a term that Federal courts have interpreted to include noncitizens.

A study by Jacob S. Siegel, a former chief demographer for the Census Bureau who is now senior research scholar at Georgetown University’s Center for Population Research, estimates that the demographic shift of population southward and westward will mean 17 of the 435 Congressional seats will be reapportioned out of one state and into another.

Of the 17, about 3 seats might change hands solely as a result of the inclusion of illegal aliens in the count, Mr. Siegel’s estimates show.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 161 other followers