More proof- Ethnic war is coming to America
Here are some articles found from all over the web, each giving you a taste of what is occurring across America and the west in general, and why an ethnic war, a war to end all wars, is without a doubt coming to America, it is certain, and probably a lot sooner then you think, the seeds have been germinating for decades, only now do we see our garden beginning to push through to the surface, white nationalism is the future, and once the economy goes, so goes ethnic tolerance, buy your Machete only $6.00 at walmart.
|More news stories on Race in Schools|
Matthew Bigg, Reuters, January 14, 2009
Black and Latino students are educated in U.S. schools that are increasingly segregated, said a report Wednesday that undercuts optimism about race in America surrounding the presidency of Barack Obama.
Blacks and Hispanics are more separate from white students than at any time since the civil rights movement and many of the schools they attend are struggling, said the report by the Civil Rights Project at the University of California.
A 2007 Supreme Court decision on voluntary desegregation is likely to intensify the trend because it reduces pressure on local authorities to promote school desegregation, said the report, which called on Obama to address the issue.
Orfield said these trends were “the result of a systematic neglect of civil rights policy and related educational and community reforms for decades.”
Part of the reason is demographic. As the percentage of white students shrinks—they now make up 56 percent of the school population—they are more integrated with students who are nonwhite.
Another factor is that residential segregation, on the rise in many parts of the country, increasingly determines the racial composition in schools in the absence of measures by education authorities to create and maintain integrated schools, Orfield said.
At the same time, Orfield said little had been done in recent years to prosecute violations of the Fair Housing Act, which forbids discrimination in the allocation of housing and was set up to foster equality in the housing market.
As a result of the trend, 39 percent of black students and 40 percent of students from the fast-growing Latino minority are increasingly isolated in schools in which there is little racial mixing, the report said.
The report also found that the average black and Latino student is now in a school that has nearly 60 percent of students from families who are near or below the poverty line.
[Editor’s Note: “Reviving the Goal of an Integrated Society: A 21st Century Challenge,” by Gary Orfield, can be read or downloaded as a PDF file here.]
(Posted on January 16, 2009)
Latin American Amerind Anti-White Populism Spreading Northward?
Steve Sailer has written a very interesting article about the rise of Amerind (a.k.a. Indian or indigenous peoples) populist political movements in Latin American countries. An example of this phenomenon which has the Bush Administration upset is Hugo Chavez who as President of Venezuela is waging class warfare against middle class and upper class Spanish (i.e. white) people on behalf of the mostly Amerind lower class. Bush supported a failed coup against democratically elected Chavez, thereby demonstrating the limits to Bush’s supposed trust in democracy as the panacea to solve the world’s ills. The coup failed because the Amerind masses supported Chavez on the streets.
Steve points out that rising Amerind resentment toward whites in Latin American countries and could (and probably will) eventually translate into a similar resentment in the United States. A rising proportion of Mexican and other Latin American immigrants are Amerinds with bottled up resentment of white middle and upper classes.
This anti-white movement in Latin America will likely make the less white Hispanics more resentful and hostile toward non-Hispanic whites in America.
This could set off massive social change.
What is often forgotten is that their grandparents viewed blacks the same way. That’s why corporations named famous food brands “Uncle Ben” and “Aunt Jemima”—the connotation was that by buying these products, you were virtually partaking of the rich man’s luxury of having your own smiling, nodding black cook.
During the Black Pride movement of the 1960s, however, blacks came to resent servant jobs.
And how much can you blame them? There’s something that’s just not very American about the master-servant relationship.
The downside, of course, was that when blacks turned against their old jobs, many ended up resorting to crime to make money.
Which is why wealthy Americans discovered illegal immigrant Hispanic service workers. They came to assume that it was the natural order of things for whites to command Latinos.
I suspect that the anti-white movements in Latin America will, sooner or later, set off a revulsion among Hispanics in this country against servile jobs roughly similar to the Black Pride reaction of the 1960s.
I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if, in a generation, wealthy Americans are smugly assuming that their new Indonesian immigrant servants are naturally deferential—unlike those sullen, crime-prone Latinos they had to let go.
And perhaps in two generations, the rich will tell each other that their new Indian Untouchable immigrant servants are born knowing their place, unlike those uppity Indonesians they had to fire.
Perhaps I’ll be proved wrong.
But what if I’m not?
Shouldn’t we at least be talking about these possibilities?
As always with American’s post 1965 Immigration Disaster: Why are we taking this risk?
I think the development of a large Hispanic servant class is a recipe for turning the political and social culture of the United States into something far more like Latin America’s culture than like America’s historical culture. We’d be much better off stopping and reversing the illegal alien influx and placing high skills and education requirements for legal immigrants while simultaneously decreasing the total number of legal immigrants.
Business interests in America focused on short term profits oppose attempts to prevent a demographic shift that will be deeply harmful in the long run. At the same time politicians in both parties are more interested in winning the immigrants over to their party than they are in doing what is best for the American people. While the Democratic Party’s leaders are correct in seeing the lower class and less educated non-whites as easy recruits the Republicans around Bush are just plain deluded.
In Bolivia the conflict between the indigenous highlands Amerinds led to an indigenous blockade of La Paz which drove the most recent Bolivian President from office. The white Spanish reaction has taken the form of a movement for regional autonomy and even talk of outright secession among the Spaniards.
SANTA CRUZ, BOLIVIA – If Lorgio Balcazar Arroyo has his way, Bolivia will soon have a system of government like the United States.
Mr. Balcazar, from the industrial eastern part of Bolivia, is general manager of the Pro-Santa Cruz Committee, a key organizer behind a controversial referendum on regional autonomy that is scheduled for Aug. 12. Broad dissatisfaction with the central government has led to an independence movement in this industrial boomtown. Leaders here say autonomy would help buttress the area against such volatility in the west as the month-long protests in May that paralyzed the capital and led to the resignation of Bolivia’s second president in less than two years.
But as the demands from Santa Cruz gain legitimacy, the rivalry between east and west here is increasingly delineated in racial terms. It’s the eastern cambas (European-descended Bolivians) versus the western collas (a term often used to refer to western indigenous people).
At one extreme are groups like the Camba Nation, which calls for independence from the indigenous cultures, described on Camba Nation’s website as “slow and miserable” and prone to “conflict and communalism.”
Bolivia’s current crisis was sparked by the resignation of President Carlos Mesa earlier this month. Mr Mesa’s political position became untenable after he opposed a hydrocarbon law calling for a tax on foreign energy companies to be increased from 18% to 50%. Foreign investors in Bolivia, including Britain’s BP and BG Group, have invested $3.5bn in the country’s gas fields since 1997.
Many among Bolivia’s indigenous majority, led by Evo Morales, an Aymara Indian, are now demanding the nationalisation of the country’s private energy assets as a way out of poverty.
Nearly 75% of Bolivia’s 3.9 million indigenous people live below the poverty level, compared to a national average of 53%. Non-indigenous Bolivians, meanwhile, earn more than twice as much as their indigenous compatriots, who collect an average monthly wage of just 513 bolivianos (£35).
Mr. Morales, leader of Bolivia’s largest opposition party, the MAS, or Movement Towards Socialism, rose to prominence as the head of Bolivia’s coca-growers association, and came a close second in Bolivia’s last presidential election in 2002.
In a strange turn, Mr. Morales was himself “blockaded” yesterday, and prevented from entering the city of San Julian in the Santa Cruz region by people still angry at the MAS blockades, which along with achieving their political objectives kept essential supplies from being distributed to ordinary people. The incident ended peacefully.
The United States of America too will develop even deeper splits along ethnic and racial lines if current immigration trends are not stopped. Even if the foreign influx is entirely halted eventually lower class and predominantly Amerind Latin American imimgrants are going to develop greater resentment at their class position in American society. Racial preferences under so-called “Affirmative Action” programs will not make the Amerinds do as well as whites. So America looks set to enter a stage of greater political divisions across racial lines.
As we move further into the 21st century whites may eventually become a market dominant minority ala Amy Chua’s World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. For more on this see my previous posts Identity Politics Building Ethnic Conflicts In Latin America and History Of American Interventions Bodes Poorly For Democracy.
Ed Balls’ confession of systemic anti-white racism
I don’t do much in the way of copy ‘n paste posting. But this story, following on the heels of the BNP’s fine showing in yesterday’s four council elections, is politically interesting. It appears to represent something of a breakthrough in that government has admitted not only that racist attacks by foreigners are committed in our schools, but also that school, police and legal authorities try to look the other way. In other words, they are institutionally racist.
Swindon school faces inquiry after brutal ‘racist’ attack by Asian teenagers
It has taken two years, a sustained lobbying campaign and an exhausting round of letter writing for Liz Webster to get some justice for her 17-year-old son.
In January Mrs Webster, 44, met schools secretary Ed Balls, who recommended an inquiry into the savage attack, on school premises, on Henry Webster by a group of Asian teenagers.
It was January 11, 2007, when Henry, then 15 and a ginger-haired star rugby player, popular with his class mates and with no history of being disciplined for poor behaviour, arrived at the tennis court at The Ridgeway School in Swindon to settle, “one on one”, an argument with a fellow pupil. Only it was a baying mob and not a single opponent waiting for him.
What happened next, witnessed by more than 100 pupils – and even filmed by one on a mobile phone – was an ambush so vicious that, at the subsequent court case, the judge described it as a ‘’savage and sustained attack”.
It was, said Judge Carol Hagen when she passed sentence on 13 boys and young men who set upon Henry, a ‘’miracle’’ that Henry had survived.
Though the 13 Asian teenagers and young men who attacked Henry – all members of a gang who called themselves the ‘’Asian Invaders’’ – were given sentences of between eight months and eight years for grievous bodily harm and conspiracy to commit GBH, no independent inquiry into how Henry was brutally assaulted, while at school, in an attack that was described in court as ‘’something out of a Quentin Tarantino film”.
During the trial, Judge Hagen was highly critical of the school, asking why there were no staff present in the tennis courts at the end of the school day, since it was known there had been trouble earlier in the day.
For the past 14 months Henry’s mother has battled for a full inquiry and, after gaining support from the Government, has now won the right to a Serious Case Review on the attack.
The inquiry, which does not seek to apportion blame but to investigate what happened and evaluate what lessons can be learned, is expected to last four months and will, for the first time, lift the lid on alleged racial tensions within a school.
‘’I’ve fought hard to find out all the facts,’’ said Mrs Webster, who is also suing The Ridgeway School for neglect. ‘’And it’s been an excruciating wait.
“The school might say otherwise but the fact is that the attack on my son was a racial one. The school knew there were tensions – there have been numerous similar attacks before but nothing was ever done.
“Everything was swept under the carpet. Neither Henry or I am racist. But I feel my son was badly failed by a school that believes racism is only ever something that is carried out by white pupils.”
It took a sustained campaign before the review was instigated by Mr Balls, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families.
After a meeting with Mrs Webster he wrote to her saying that it was ‘’unacceptable that there has not been any full investigation of such a serious incident which left your son with permanent injuries”.
Henry was repeatedly kicked, punched and battered before being beaten on the head with a claw hammer, fracturing his skull in three places and leaving him with permanent brain damage.
The Swindon local authority referred the case to their Local Safeguarding of Children Board, which has now sanctioned the review.
The headteacher of The Ridgeway School, Mr Steven Colledge, has said that he welcomes the investigation.
The case has highlighted the extent of racist incidents in our schools and, in particular, the reluctance on the part of some to treat attacks as racist when they are carried out by minority cultures.
Mrs Webster was not aware that, when those who carried out the crime came to court, it was up to the prosecution to cite the attack as racist.
Had that been proved, the sentences meted out – especially to Wasif Khan, 19, described in court as ‘’the hammer man’’ and who was jailed for eight years for wielding the weapon that fractured Henry’s skull – may well have been much stiffer.
What is particularly worrying, however, for parents in Swindon, is the light the case has shed on the number of racists attacks in the city’s schools and how such incidents escalate.
Between November 2006 and November 2008 police dealt with 337 crimes – 137 of them violent incidents – at Swindon schools.
The highest number of those attacks, some 58, occurred at Churchfields school while 52 were recorded at Ridgeway school.
In the past 12 months, admittedly, perimeter fences and bans on mobile phones has helped the school reduce its number of violent crimes.
Henry, bleeding heavily from his head, was taken to hospital and, within 35 minutes, police had rounded up several of the gang members. It was Joe, Henry’s younger brother, who telephoned his mother.
He had been standing at a bus stop when a passing pupil told him Henry had been beaten up. ‘’You can’t imagine how it feels to see your son soaked in blood,’’ Mrs Webster said, tears threatening.
‘’I just couldn’t believe that no one from the school had called me to say there had been trouble earlier. All the pupils knew something was going on.
“When I was with Henry at the local hospital’s accident and emergency unit one of Henry’s friends telephoned me to say the same thing had happened to him some time before but he had managed to get away.
“All the children knew that these ‘Asian invaders’ were terrorising white pupils.’’
For Mrs Webster the Serious Case Review will, she hopes, give some insight into how such a violent attack happened on the school premises.
‘’As far as I can see there was no control and no discipline,’’ she says. ‘’Bullying and violence were rife when Henry was attacked and I want the school to admit that.’’
Mr Colledge, the headteacher of The Ridgeway School, was unavailable for comment.
Attacks by immigrants and foreigners on indigenous White population a concern for many.
(Illustration: Blacks gang-up on White students during France’s protest march on March 8, 2005.)
by David Mullenax
A professor at Ecole Nationale d’Administration in Paris made the startling revelation that France is becoming “a new Lebanon.” He followed up his observations by stating that social upheaval was only a few years away. As evidence for his prophetic announcement is the anti-White phenomenon that is plaguing the European country, which is causing sharp divides between native White-Frenchmen and ethnic minorities.
In early March, thousands of predominately White students marched in the streets protesting reforms in France’s educational system. The demonstrators, filled with a spirit of non-violence, believed that peaceful assembly was the best way to show disappointment in the governments decision to drastically cut funds for schools. Unfortunately, non-White opposition groups felt differently.
Gangs of Black and Arab youths, numbering over 1,000, attacked the student demonstrators, according to police reports. The victims and teachers bore testimony to the violent deeds performed against them, and they were unanimous that the cause of the attacks was vicious anti-White hatred. Also, the attackers themselves bragged about their accomplishments to any media outlet that reported the event.
Repeatedly, the criminal attackers expressed their hatred by calling their victims “little French people.” Heikel, an 18-year-old participant in the attack — who holds citizenship in Tunisia — was immensely proud of his activities. In an interview with reporters, Heikel explained that he gleefully joined in on the violence so he could beat up White students, and that he still has “pleasant memories” of the event.
Rachid, another non-White attacker, stated that “little Whites” are easy prey and deserving of attacks because “they don’t know how to fight.” When asked by reporters why minorities ganged-up on the student victims he said that their desire was to “take revenge on Whites.”
Petty theft, however, was also a motivation. Working in teams, the anti-White haters would approach students and ask them for money or their cell-phones. Regardless of how the victim responded, whether students complied to their demands or refused, the attackers would start beating them up, and would take their cell-phones or possessions and smash them on the street.
Scores of victims were taken to area hospitals as a result of the attacks, and due to the unwillingness of French police to protect the innocent.
The left as an alliance of anti-white tribes
(Note: This entry was originally posted on May 27. I’ve moved it to the top of the main page because I think it’s important.)
It has been a truism for almost 20 years that the older kind of Marxist leftism has been replaced by multicultural leftism. Jeff W.’s comment, in which he describes the shift of the left from an “international workers’ movement into an alliance of ethnic tribes and disaffected groups.” is one of the most cogent explanations of this phenomenon that I have seen.
The other comments in this entry were written in response to various current entries, yet they all deal with the separate yet allied campaigns by the various factions of leftists and noniwhites to intimidate, silence, and subdue conservative whites. Therefore I’m posting them all in this entry.
Jeff W. writes:
You wrote: “that multiracial unum that so inspired [Horowitz] was a unum made possible by the anti-whiteness of nonwhites, and by whites’ approval of that anti-whiteness.”Not all whites approve of the anti-whiteness of nonwhites. I know plenty of people who do not approve of it at all, and who wish that America could truly be the land of E Pluribus Unum. But there is a group of whites who are the allies of the nonwhites in their effort to seize control of government and use a tribal/racial spoils system to distribute America’s resources. Those elite whites want to participate in dividing the spoils. I might add that the current discussion about the Sotomayor nomination shows how far this spoils system way of thinking has advanced.
Tribalism is innate to human nature. People have always formed themselves into tribes, and the tribes have always warred against each other. I don’t believe anything can change that.
What has changed in our lifetimes is that the left has morphed from an international workers’ movement into an alliance of ethnic tribes and disaffected groups. The left now stirs up tribal hostility and benefits from the hostility it creates. This makes them more dangerous than they were in the old days when they used to sing, “Workers of the world, unite!” In those days they were working against the grain of tribalism; now they are working with the grain.
Rather than uniting the workers against property owners, the left now seeks to unite nonwhites, gays, Jews, atheists, feminists, government employees, environmentalists, leftists, convicted felons, the morally depraved, the poor, and any other disaffected persons they can find, against the remaining whites. (A good definition of PC speech rules is, “You can’t say anything bad about anyone in the leftist alliance.”)
I would also note that like pirate captains, the leaders of this motley leftist crew must constantly distribute plunder in order to prevent mutiny. Distribution of spoils is thus always uppermost in their minds.
The whites who are the targets of the leftist alliance can now be spotted at the gun stores, buying up all the ammunition.
James M2 writes:
I think of Western Civilization in it’s ideal state as a cohesive sphere of civilizational components, with the nucleus and catalyst thereof being Christianity. Some of the more obvious of these components would be a government of limited freedoms, spiritually/biologically/socially correct ideals of family and gender roles, the industriousness/inventiveness/genius of Western/European man, and a desire for preservation of a definite racial and cultural identity. Christianity congealed, quickened, and directed these components and others to become something greater than the sum of its parts: Western civilization. (I agree with Bill Carpenter’s response to the “What Christianity requires in order not to be destructive of society” thread from August 2007.)No true thing can threaten another true thing, and these components, each being internally logical and “true,” can have only additive relationships with one another. They will dovetail together and remain logically consistent in any combination. And because you can only attack a truth with a falsehood, it follows that in order to attack Western civilization you must gather an array of false ideologies, and being false they will have neither internal logic when examined in isolation or integrity between one another (beyond the common focus of destroying the West.) So we have today Marxism/Socialism attacking our government, feminists and homosexualists attacking family & gender roles, environmentalists and gaia-worshipers attacking the industriousness and inventiveness of Western man, the principle of non-discrimination attacking our desire for self preservation, and Darwinism has particular importance due its ability to attack Christianity.
Each ideology in this liberal alliance of the incongruous is necessarily tyrannical due to the falsity of the alliance itself. (My belief is that the seed of tyranny may be present in each individual ideology, but their tyrannical natures are greatly amplified by the purposeful grouping together of these realms which don’t naturally fit. They must be forced upon the world in some way; people would not naturally adopt them.)
To your original question: I think it would be interesting to investigate whether the beginnings of a tyrannical inclination in Darwinists circles might be found to coincide with the grouping of these disparate anti-Western ideologies which have been positioned under the umbrella of the modern left.
Clearly there is an alliance of the incongruous. But I don’t follow how the tyrannical character of each member of the alliance stems from “the falsity of the alliance,” rather than from the nature of each member.
James N. writes:
Joseph C. writes:”Liberals (and most conservatives) do not believe any society has a right to exist, that any people has a right to call a part of the earth “theirs,” to write laws, exclude others, etc..”
I think Joseph is quite wrong. Liberals (and most conservatives) believed that the Shona tribe had the right to destroy Rhodesia, to write laws favoring their own kind and to exclude whites. Liberals believed the Khmer people had the right to possess Cambodia, and to slaughter the Vietnamese who lived there. Liberals (and most conservatives) believed that the Bantu immigrants in South Africa had the right to displace Dutch-descended whites who had been there before they were in New Amsterdam, and to make discriminatory laws to destroy their society, because they were white.
Liberals (and most conservatives) believe the Japanese have a right to Japan, the Chinese to China, the blacks to Africa, the Uzbeks to Uzbekistan, the Arabs to Iraq (and to Palestine, too).
The only society they do not believe has a right to exist is a white or Western society, even in the historic homelands of the whites, EVEN a society given by the Lord God to the nation of Israel 5000 years ago. Their antidiscrimination principle is far from universal–in fact, it is quite selective.
Ed L. writes:
Just looking at the front page of the Washington Post this morning instantly reveals how slanted and inverted the reporting priorities of the liberal media are. The top headline is “For GOP, Court Pick Is a Double-Edged Test.” Ah! So the nomination of Sotomayor should be drawing our attention not to the Democrats, but to the Republicans! That sure makes a whole lot of sense, doesn’t it? If there were any logic in modern life, one would have expected the news headline, on the morning after the selection, to be a straightforward factual disclosure, e.g., “Obama nominates Sotomayor for High Court vacancy”–but nope, an adversarial partisan spin has to be put on before it gets out of the gate.Further down on the left, we see an op-ed piece by Ruth Marcus entitled “Sotomayor’s Strengths” (Gee, I’m bowled over!). Ruth informs us that “She’s a “Newyorkican” Souter with a taste for Nancy Drew.” What’s a “Newyorkican”–are you one? How about Giuliani? Are the rest of us elsewhere in the country supposed to be impressed somehow? And what is Nancy Drew supposed to have to do with anything?
Also, note the piece directly below the Sotomayor/GOP headline about North Korea. In case you don’t readily see it, it’s in smaller print. It tells us that Pyongyang no longer feels bound by the 1953 armistice. That’s the lesser news of the day.
The same is true of the MSM reporting about the underground bomb test. I did not readily find a single news piece that made a straightforward factual disclosure of the test; it was all interwoven at the outset with politics (e.g., “North Korean detonation ups the ante for Obama”). Some news sites even put the piece under “Americas” rather than “Asia.”
James N. writes:
The subversive questions are, “Why was there no rejoicing over Miguel Estrada’s “historic” nomination? Why didn’t they turn out when Miguel Estrada was being crucified by Senate Democrats? And why didn’t the Republicans, with their majority of 55, use their power to change the rules to get Estrada confirmed? Are they rejoicing because she’s Hispanic, or are they rejoicing because she’s a tribalist?
I actually wonder whether it’s not better to describe her, and others like her, as tribalists rather than leftists. For the entire brown wing of the Obama phenomenon, the leftism is a means to an end–to smash and scatter the historic peoples of the West–rather than an economic program to actualize. They like it because Marxism splits the whites. Just ask Joe Slovo’s ghost how the classless society in South Africa is working out.
Anti-white racism revealed
Anti-white racism exists in the USA, but those who mention it are often attacked as being racist. (Just look at some of the posts exposing Sotomayor as a racist)
In the United Kingdom it is more acceptable for white people to speak out against anti-white racism
<<< FtKobbeRedDevil wrote:
The Evening Standard (U.K.) ^ | August 12, 2008
Posted on Tuesday, August 12, 2008 10:07:59 AM by Stoat
One third of whites claim they are victims of racism
And the number of whites claiming to have been refused a job or discriminated against at work for reasons of race has doubled in the last five years, according to the Government study.
Flashback: Riots in Burnley, Lancs, 2001 when whites and Asians clashed. Many white residents claimed Asians were favoured by the authorities
Seven per cent of whites believed they had failed to win a promotion because of their race, up from three per cent in 2003.
Three per cent alleged they had been turned down for a job for the same reason, up from one per cent.
In addition, the study reveals that most ethnic minorities living in Britain feel stronger ties to the nation than whites.
One in six white Britons feel only a slight sense of belonging to the nation.
Whites also now feel less able than other ethnic groups to influence decisions affecting their local area and the country as a whole.
For example, 41 per cent of black African, 36 per cent of Bangladeshi and 35 per cent of Indian people feel they have a say in decisions affecting Britain, compared to 19 per cent of white people.
The survey of 15,000 people – ordered by Communities Secretary Hazel Blears – is likely to prompt a fierce debate about the disillusionment of the white majority.
The Tories blame Labour’s race relations strategy.
Tory communities spokesman Baroness Warsi said: ‘It’s no wonder more people feel there is an increase in racism when Labour’s multicultural industry is forever talking up what divides us rather than concentrating on what unites us.’
The research found that overall, whites are more likely than those from ethnic minorities to believe that racial prejudice and discrimination is getting worse.
Fifty-eight per cent said they believe there was more racial prejudice now than five years ago, compared to 44 per cent who were interviewed in 2001.
The figure for ethnic minority communities has hardly changed, at 32 per cent.
The survey found that 29 per cent of white people expect to be treated worse than other groups by at least one of eight public services, including the police, prisons, courts, Crown Prosecution service, probation service, local housing organisations, schools or GPs.
Whites identified council housing departments or housing associations as the most likely to discriminate against them.
The proportion of members of ethnic minority groups who expected to face discrimination from one of the eight bodies fell from 38 per cent in 2001 to 34 per cent.
But it remains higher than for white people in many categories, particularly the police.
Tory MP Greg Hands, a member of the Commons communities and local government select committee, said: ‘It’s a dangerous phenomenon if any part of the population feels they are being systematically discriminated against.’
Overall, 84 per cent of people felt they belonged strongly to the country, including 45 per cent who said they belonged very strongly.
However, nine out of ten Pakistani and Indian people said they felt a strong sense of belonging, compared to 84 per cent of whites.