Race War is Total War

Race War is Total War


Most of the wars between the nations of Medieval Europe were limited wars in which knights fought knights and generally left the peasants alone. Those wars were limited because their objective was to extend one king’s lands and tax base at the expense of another king. In other words, they were economic wars in which the peasant class was considered to be part of the valuable property being fought over. The king whose army was advancing and winning did not want to kill off his hard-won assets.

Race wars are total wars, always. There is no honorable restraint in the fighting, such as that between nations in Medieval Europe. A race war aims at securing land and resources for a people grown aware of their biological similarity and with the kinship which that similarity implies. There can be no trace of the opposing side left alive within the territorial boundaries because such a remnant would renew the conflict when they became more numerous and able to wage war again.

Soldiers engaged in race war will rape, torture, and kill the enemy’s women, children, and little babies. There is none of this Golden Rule thinking. One race will win and gain the land; one race will lose and perish utterly, unless they flee first.

Black “criminals” already do with such things with the Whites victims who fall into their clutches. We call them criminals; they are really the vanguard troops of the enemy forces. Any limitation on their ruthlessness isn’t based in chivalry, but rather in fear of provoking an effective counterattack—a possibility even today. As the threat of counterattack becomes less creditable, the predation of non-Whites on Whites will intensify proportionately.

Dismal as they are, those are the rules. Man did not write them; nature did. The necessity of engaging in total war is simply that the enemy has been, is, and will continue to engage in total war against us. That necessity arose because of the liberal belief in racial equality and the liberal sentiment of universal human brotherhood. Let’s never make those mistakes again, assuming that we survive the catastrophic consequences of making them this time.

The Black “reverends” who wield so much influence over rioting niggers occupy a position analogous to that of commanding generals. The street nigger recognizes that the Black “reverend” does not really mean what his words say. When the Black “reverend” holds up his arms and preaches brotherhood, the street nigger understands it to be a signal for a temporary cessation of violence to allow the Jewish media time to brainwash the Whites into placidity again.

When the time comes for another riot or for another vicious wave of anti-White crime, the “reverends” will signify it by speaking more loudly than usual about White racism. Then will come another period of niggers invading the homes of Whites to rob, rape and kill. Then will come more Black riots in American cities. Then will more White teenagers be shot in the head on a snow-covered soccer field. Then will more White women be snatched off bicycles or out of cars, taken to a motel, raped, skinned alive, and drowned in a tub of bleach.

The only race not engaged in total war, to the extent they might dare, are Whites. The reason for the White failure to compete as their non-White opponents are competing is Jewish brainwashing, carried on by every major outlet of the mass media. The brainwashing induces internal divisions based on varying degrees with which Whites are insulated from the realities of racial competition. The more insulated Whites are generally more liberal, at least in their racial views. The greater is the familiarity of Whites with non-Whites, the less liberal (on race) they are.

As is typical in “democratic” societies, ignorance swamps wisdom and thereby hobbles efforts for an effective collective defense. The more liberal Whites ensure that their more sensible “racist” brothers can’t defend themselves without facing retaliation from White police officers and from ambitious White lawyers and judges.

If White people don’t kick the habit of interfering with each other’s survival tactics, the White race will become extinct. The enemy, seeing clearly what must be done to us, with a will to do those things to us, will vanquish us, unless we develop a racial consciousness that is at least the equal of that which our opponents have. We must learn to accept, and to practice, total war. Being Whites, we will never enjoy it. Like it or not, though, our survival depends on our employing it.

The White lawyer must never defend a nigger, no matter how green his money is. The White preacher must never declare that the negro is our equal in the sight of God. The White judge must understand that only Whites are citizens of the United States because the 14th Amendment is fraudulent, hence null and void. The White teacher must refuse to teach Blacks. The White school bus driver must leave Spics at the bus stop. The White policeman must shoot his gun into the crowd of rioting niggers with every intention of killing every rioting nigger. Total war. It’s the only option left.

Jerry Abbott

True Believer

“Somewhere a True Believer is training to kill you. He is training with minimal food or water, in austere conditions, training day and night. The only thing clean on him is his weapon and he made his web gear. He doesn’t worry about what workout to do – his ruck weighs what it weighs, his runs end when the enemy stops chasing him. This True Believer is not concerned about ‘how hard it is;’ he knows either he wins or dies. He doesn’t go home at 17:00, he is home. He knows only The Cause.Still want to quit?” – Unknown

FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological, political and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

New American Revolution Battle Lines have been Drawn.

http://www.cas.usf.edu/~vandello/us_collectivism.jpghttps://i1.wp.com/upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg/800px-Census-2000-Data-Top-US-Ancestries-by-County.jpg

I hope You have lots of ammo.

Report Thought Criminals!

https://i1.wp.com/www.moonbattery.com/report-thought-criminals.jpg

https://whitelocust.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/thought-crime.gif?w=300https://i1.wp.com/www.moonbattery.com/report-thought-criminals-1.jpgI’d say yes we do need a national militia movement.


“Suicide of The West” states that the success of Western civilization was based on six principal ideas . Christianity, optimism, science, economic growth, liberalism and individualism ― which are now collapsing.

Pat Buchanan: America’s Second Civil War

Patrick J. Buchanan

“They had found a leader, Robert E. Lee–and what a leader! … No military leader since Napoleon has aroused such enthusiastic devotion among troops as did Lee when he reviewed them on his horse Traveller.”

So wrote Samuel Eliot Morison in his magisterialThe Oxford History of the American People” in 1965.

First in his class at West Point, hero of the Mexican War, Lee was the man to whom President Lincoln turned to lead his army. But when Virginia seceded, Lee would not lift up his sword against his own people, and chose to defend his home state rather than wage war upon her.

This veneration of Lee, wrote Richard Weaver, “appears in the saying attributed to a Confederate soldier, ‘The rest of us may have … descended from monkeys, but it took a God to make Marse Robert.’”

Growing up after World War II, this was accepted history.

Yet, on the militant left today, the name Lee evokes raw hatred and howls of “racist and traitor.” A clamor has arisen to have all statues of him and all Confederate soldiers and statesmen pulled down from their pedestals and put in museums or tossed onto trash piles.

What has changed since 1965?

It is not history. There have been no great new discoveries about Lee.

What has changed is America herself. She is not the same country. We have passed through a great social, cultural and moral revolution that has left us irretrievably divided on separate shores.

And the politicians are in panic.

Two years ago, Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe called the giant statues of Lee and “Stonewall” Jackson on Richmond’s Monument Avenue “parts of our heritage.” After Charlottesville, New York-born-and-bred McAuliffe, entertaining higher ambitions, went full scalawag, demanding the statues be pulled down as “flashpoints for hatred, division, and violence.”

Who hates the statues, Terry? Who’s going to cause the violence? Answer: The Democratic left whom Terry must now appease.

McAuliffe is echoed by Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, the Democratic candidate in November to succeed McAuliffe. GOP nominee Ed Gillespie wants Monument Avenue left alone.

The election is the place to decide this, but the left will not wait.

In Durham, North Carolina, our Taliban smashed the statue of a Confederate soldier. Near the entrance of Duke University Chapel, a statue of Lee has been defaced, the nose broken off.

Wednesday at dawn, Baltimore carried out a cultural cleansing by taking down statues of Lee and Maryland Chief Justice Roger Taney who wrote the Dred Scott decision and opposed Lincoln’s suspension of the right of habeas corpus.

Like ISIS, which smashed the storied ruins of Palmyra, and the al-Qaida rebels who ravaged the fabled Saharan city of Timbuktu, the new barbarism has come to America. This is going to become a blazing issue, not only between but within the parties.

For there are 10 Confederates in Statuary Hall in the Capitol, among them Lee, Georgia’s Alexander Stephens, vice president to Jefferson Davis, and Davis himself. The Black Caucus wants them gone.

Mount Rushmore-sized carvings of Lee, Jackson and Davis are on Stone Mountain, Georgia. Are they to be blasted off?

There are countless universities, colleges and high schools like Washington & Lee named for Confederate statesmen and soldiers. Across the Potomac from D.C. are Jefferson Davis Highway and Leesburg Pike to Leesburg itself, 25 miles north. Are all highways, streets, towns and counties named for Confederates to be renamed? What about Fort Bragg?

On every Civil War battlefield, there are monuments to the Southern fallen. Gettysburg has hundreds of memorials, statues and markers. But if, as the left insists we accept, the Confederates were traitors trying to tear America apart to preserve an evil system, upon what ground do Democrats stand to resist the radical left’s demands?

What do we do with those battlefields where Confederates were victorious: Bull Run, Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville?

“Where does this all end?” President Trump asked.

It doesn’t. Not until America’s histories and biographies are burned and new texts written to Nazify Lee, Jackson, Davis and all the rest, will a newly indoctrinated generation of Americans accede to this demand to tear down and destroy what their fathers cherished.

And once all the Confederates are gone, one must begin with the explorers, and then the slave owners like Presidents Washington, Jefferson and Madison, who seceded from slave-free Britain. White supremacists all.

Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay of Kentucky and John Calhoun must swiftly follow.

Then there are all those segregationists. From 1865 to 1965, virtually all of the great Southern senators were white supremacists.

In the first half of the 20th century, Woodrow Wilson and FDR carried all 11 states of a rigidly segregationist South all six times they ran, and FDR rewarded Dixie by putting a Klansman on the Supreme Court.

While easy for Republicans to wash their hands of such odious elements as Nazis in Charlottesville, will they take up the defense of the monuments and statues that have defined our history, or capitulate to the icon-smashers?

In this Second American Civil War, whose side are you on?

Patrick J. Buchanan needs no introduction to VDARE.COM readers; his books State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, and Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? are available from Amazon.com. Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority.

His latest book, published May 9, is “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

Marcus Eli Ravage: A Real Case Against the Jews

 

An interesting take on the origins of antisemitism written by a Jewish-American immigrant named Marcus Eli Ravage. Published in 1928 in Century Magazine, this article explains that Christianity is basically Judaism 2.0 and that the Christianization of Europe essentially amounted to an erasure and replacement of the European people’s native pagan cultures with the national religion of Israel.

It is an interesting read– draw your own conclusions.

 

 

The Vital Importance of Nationalism

The Vital Importance of Nationalism

By Ron McVan

Much of history is recorded in the epitaphs of nations that have perished because of their internal weakness and schisms. For when a people become more preoccupied with narrow self-interest and family quarrels than with their national good, they fall easy prey to the enemy outside their gates or crumble under the stress and strains within.” ~ The American Heritage editors

Nationalism draws its strength from numerous roots, such as the love of one’s people, customs, traditions, culture, ethnic tribal-gods and homeland. Nationalism also stimulates an instinctive drive to better oneself and their nation as a whole. Folkish nationalism fills a people’s heart with pride and instills the urge to attain a unique sense of being through self-betterment, traditions and a heightened conscious awareness. One of the key elements of nationalism is that it works to unify its people under a healthy mutual ethnic aim. A strong nation leaves little place for any potential enemies to insert their claw. Unlike Marxist socialist societies, Folkish nationalism does not work against its people’s freedoms, subvert their thinking process or strive towards making them dependent upon the state. True Folkish nationalism does not put political interests or corporate interests before the interests of the people.

Men make history, but the destinies of peoples are forged by the creative force of dominating ideas. Through the genius of inspired men they perceive the light of the world and reveal that which slumbers deep in the soul of the peoples. Great ideas are like milestones on the path of humanity, they are the platforms of human progress. The torch of the spirit, born by bold men, has always illuminated the path of humanity. Such inspiring ideas, which once more bring back the laws of life itself into the conscience of the nations, have at all times decisively influenced the development of the European cultural nations, they have elevated them when they were young and promising, and thrown them to the ground when they were weak and aged and had outlived their time.” ~ Dr. Otto Dietrich

From out of the great Euro-Tribe nations were produced the eight wonders of the world along with countless exquisite works of cultural arts, science and engineering. A never-ending stream of genius and creativity. Nations, too—as Mother Nature has ordained—can only take their place in the world in proportion to their capacities and their achievements for the world. In the competitive struggle between the nations, only the best nations can occupy pre-eminent positions on the strength of their achievements and capacities.

Among a strong nationalistic system, there should be no need for secret societies, media propaganda or a government to spy, or work against its own people. The people and the government should work together in harmony with one-another. Some like to think of nationalism as a political movement, or a folkish movement, a race or cultural movement, but it must not be narrowed down to any one single direction, it should always remain a process of numerous progressive elements all combined towards the better good of the Nation at large. Tantamount to the structural strength and vitality of a nation, is its mythology. Myth is a moving and shaping-directive power and the very glue that binds a people together in unity as a folk. It resides in the person exclusively because he or she is a part of their specific race and culture. An ethnic nation is unthinkable as a purposeful group without its myth, it simply cannot survive for too long a time without it. Myth is a foremost element to the process of a folkish awakening. As Carl Jung so very aptly stated, “For a race to live without its myth is suicide!”

A nation without a vital myth drifts aimlessly throughout history. Myth gives purpose and meaning to nationalism. Myth shapes the race so that the race may fulfill the potential of its individuals. The myth reminds us that we are unique as a race and contributes towards elevating our spiritual and ethnic consciousness, and that we are not simply an arbitrary, purposeless, ill-defined conglomerate of men and women.

No one factor accounts for a myth. It is a part of one’s whole heritage. It is born in each individual. Even if a person becomes a part of another culture he is called, deep down inside, by his own myth. It is a sum total of the culture, mores, folkways, customs, art, traditions, legends, history, experience and will of his own particular race, and it is even more than these things. It is the embodied vital will of great men. It is the contributions, defeats, failures, hopes, aspiration and accomplishments of the ethnically-related members of the group.

Here, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. The myth is the scaffolding, the superstructure on which all these other things are constructed. It is the skeleton around which the organic body is built. It is the framework which is covered over by a whole beautiful building. It is the form upon which, bit by bit, piece by piece, yard by yard, a people develop. But without the ordering of a myth, the people are merely a helter-skelter collection of all these various facts and facets.” ~ Alfred Rosenberg

All nations, even great and mighty nations, ultimately perish once they become degenerate, and it is only a matter of time until they do if a nation and its people let itself become weak. America was once a proud nation of strength, unity and seemingly unlimited willpower but over the last half century, it has become increasingly more degenerate and its will more weakened with each and every year. In a strong nation there is no place or the tolerance for degeneracy, and yet today in America, degeneracy has become a badge of honor! A nation virtually dies upon that day when the primordial race-unit becomes so broken up and swamped by the influx of foreign elements, that its effective qualities have no longer a sufficient freedom of strength and action. It will not, of course, absolutely disappear, but it will in practice be so beaten down and enfeebled, that its power will be felt less and less as time goes on. When a people give into degeneracy lose there their nationhood of folkish unity and even the concern for their own self preservation, they are done for! The race enemies of that nation will swarm over them like a plaque of locusts! Nationalism is not just some definitive name, it is an actual living organism which assures the very preservation of its people and their homelands! Even common animals in Nature understand this!

Public opinion always worships the herd instinct,—i.e., the instinct of the weak,—while he, the strong man, fights for strong ideals.” ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

To most of the world nationalism appears to be an unsavory word affiliated primarily with racialism, and yet, most if not all of the races of the world are nationalists! Jews are nationalists, blacks are nationalists, Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Arabs, American Indians and Latinos and etc.. The White Race seems to be the only people that are scorned for even mentioning the idea of nationalism for the best interest of their people.

Unlike state nationalism which rules over its people, folkish nationalism grows up from the grass roots of the people. National heroes and heroines are honored and praised, while anything of universal interest is viewed with little concern. Firmly grounded in Rousseau’s doctrine of popular sovereignty, ‘folkish nationalism assumes that the proper forum for the exercise of the general will was provided by the national or ethnic community, not by the artificial frontiers of the existing states.’ Under folkish nationalism, one’s people and homelands are key, and the concept of ‘Blood and Soil’ are strongly valued and adhered to. The Folklore, or Volkskunde of a nation works towards joining the modern world of today with its most ancient cultural roots.

All of the Euro -Tribes over thousands of years passed through the phase of compiling, romanticizing, and creating the folklore and traditions of their individual nations. Rivers of blood have been spilled to preserve it. Without all of these key elements within the vibrant structure of nationalism, here discussed, we are left with only the humiliation of a defeated and soon to be extinct species. It is well known within the law of Nature that only the strong survive. The very moment that an individual or a collective people or tribe let their guard down, they become an instant target of prey to any of the many predators that choose to come in for the kill.

They Are Afraid: The Establishment Hits Out With New Bans On Alternative Right, Billy Roper and VDARE

http://www.amerika.org/politics/they-are-afraid-the-establishment-hits-out-with-new-bans-on-alternative-right-billy-roper-and-vdare/

As of this morning, Alternative Right has been removed, presumably by its corporate overlords at Google-Alphabet. Simultaneously, Billy Roper has had his accounts removed at Reddit and Twitter, all on the “interpretive logic” of violating the terms of service or content policy (1990s term: acceptable use policy).

In fact, this is part of a wider pattern of mainstream media — including social media, which has now bought into the industry — censorship of Right-wing and white-wing thinkers since what I have called the Alt Right’s victory at Charlottesville. I call this a victory because it forced the Left to admit solidarity with Antifa, and despite media wailing about neo-Nazis and “car terrorism,” this is media hype and will be dead in two weeks, while the message the Alt Right sent will remain: you will not erase us; we have a right to a history, culture, heritage, values, symbols and most of all, to act in self-interest for our self-determination as well. And we owe you nothing.

For the Left, Civil Rights is yet another gambit designed to achieve “equality,” which means caste revolt, so that the lower classes (proles) prevail over anyone who knows better (natural leaders of intelligence above 125 IQ points) with the aid of the middle classes (115-120ish). This inverts society, so that whatever is dumb and popular with the proles wins out over everything else, and while people are chasing these trends, civilization decays, as happened between the French Revolution in 1789 and the defeat of National Socialism in 1945. Since that time, we have been children of the grave, knowing that we are living in a moribund ruin but unable to stop it because, hey, it’s popular.

At Charlottesville, Civil Rights lost its veneer of being “good.” It used to be assumed that class warfare and racial equality were always good, but now, we see people protesting these things because they are doing the exact opposite of what they are intended to do, but since it is happening to white people — a majority who must be overthrown for equality to happen — no one has paid much attention. Until now, that is. And now, the Civil Rights and Equality Agenda (CREA) is being seen for what it is: warfare against those who built this society so that those who could not build it can take it over, like a cuckoo laying her egg in the nest of another type of bird. These are parasites, whether they mean to be or not, and whether they are good or not, and Western Civilization is destroyed but wants to rise again, and for it to do that, it must get rid of both these parasites and its own endogenous screwups and predators.

The Left is in full-panic over Charlottesville because they know that while they can spin the “car terrorism” meme for some time, only the media indoctrinated will believe it once they see the video of Antifa attacking the car before the incident, and when the indictment comes out, it is going to be revealed that this was not a deliberate attack, but an attempt to escape by someone who was not mentally all there. At that point, the Left knows that people will shift their views to be against the Left and its defense of parasitism. People have put up with it for decades, but now they see that it is a path to USSR-style doom, and they want out. That is what scares the Left, and is why they are deleting accounts.

President Trump out-maneuvered the press by blaming both sides, which meant that he blamed Antifa as well, which ruined the press narrative that peaceful Leftist protestors had been “attacked” by the Alt Right, and validated what the videos showed, which was police officers corralling the Alt Right into the waiting Antifa, who then attacked. So, from the average American view, we have the fact that the Alt Right tolerated some neo-Nazis the same way they tolerated Alt Lite, libertarian, Proud Boys, etc. among them, but on the other side, we have the Left showing up with bats, bottles of urine, bricks and pepper spray to attack the Alt Right. That makes the Alt-Right possibly not all good, but the Left is looking increasingly all-bad.

This resonates with everyday white Americans who are tired of double standards and a one-sided Establishment narrative to the point that they are willing to excuse the Alt Right for being the underdog in this fight, but oppose the Establishment for its decades of hypocrisy:

But the president’s words sat just fine with LaMothe. “I think when he called for the unity of the country, that should have been what was pounded on,” LaMothe said in between taking a drag on his cigarette. By pounded on, LaMothe meant respected. He loves Trump and says the president never gets a fair shake from the media.

He says he hates the idea of neo-Nazis and recalls when growing up, he had friends who were black. But now he thinks the white guys he saw on his TV marching in Charlottesville have some reasonable arguments.

“This is a different white supremacy movement than before, because I don’t think whites are saying, ‘Well, we’re better.’ They’re saying why can’t we be treated all as equal?”

LaMothe thinks affirmative action programs should be scrapped. He also thinks neo-Nazis who sparked mayhem in Charlottesville are no worse than a lot of activist groups on the left. “I didn’t hear anything from Barack Obama about Black Lives Matter and that was another hate group,” he says.

In the meantime, after seeing the same masked rioters destroy the streets of Hamburg during the G20 conference, burn and vandalize London in 2011, and savage Portland and Berkeley — looking more like the LA Riots of 1992 than the peaceful anarchist gathering the Left claimed it was — people are having a different view of Antifa, which is more fair and realistic than the sunny gloss offered by the mainstream media:

After left-wing protesters marched through downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota in response to last weekend’s demonstrations in Charlottesville, Virginia, they hoisted the flag of the violent left-wing group “Antifa,” raising it in front of the county’s government center.

…Antifa, meaning “anti-fascist,” has been responsible for several destructive riots and protests, including one in February where members of the group set fires, threw fireworks, attacked the crowd, and damaged property in order to stop Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking at the University of California, Berkeley.

Antifa also vandalized stores, broke windows and rioted during President Donald Trump’s inauguration, before being met with armed law enforcement officers.

Even more, it is clear to people out there who is winning. You do not have the world’s largest corporations, governments, and media establishment uniting to declare a group terrorist, drop it from industry standard services and censor it unless that tiny group is not just threatening them directly, but threatening to win popular appeal from those who are sick of these parasites using us and doing nothing for us. We can live without Google, Paypal, Twitter, Reddit, Facebook and the Left. We cannot live without our people, and we are being taxed to death to pay for others who now we see intend to destroy us.

They do not, as they claimed for all those years, just want to coexist with us and be treated fairly. They want to dominate us, take over our countries, destroy us genetically — some call this genocide — and do it by treating us unfairly all while claiming that they are the victim. Diversity is dead. Equality is dead. The remaining mentally alert people in America and Europe have realized that there is a new “one drop” rule: one drop of equality, socialism, diversity or pluralism means that your civilization collapses. It takes two centuries, in which time all sorts of predatory people will profit from you, but it is your death warrant. We want off the death train to nowheresville.

For the last seventy years, they have pushed diversity on us as the right thing to do; the way to avoid Nazis and the KKK; the way to finally have good “race relations”; and more recently, a way of paying for the huge pensions and benefits gap created when the more-numerous Baby Boomers are replaced by the less-numerous Gen X and Millennials. Now people have seen through the lies, and the Establishment is in full panic, so they are censoring us. While they do that, they reveal their fundamental intention toward unfairness and inequality, and since they have shown us their moral emptiness, we no longer trust them, and we are fighting to escape their clutches.

The Global Elite

https://i0.wp.com/theglobalelite.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/secret-meetings-to-shape-the-world-e1478636863796.jpg?fit=800%2C434

THE GLOBALISTS

 

The global elite march in four essential columns: Corporate, Academic, Political and Organized Religion. In general, the goals for globalism are created by Corporate. Academic then provides studies and white papers that justify Corporates goals. Political sells Academic’s arguments to the public and if necessary, changes laws to accommodate and facilitate Corporate in getting what it wants. Organized Religion along with church and state secures corporate, academic and political rule into a global order.

Trinity Of Globalist Control:

City of London Corporation – Financial power centre, established in 1067

District of Columbia – Military power centre, established in 1871

Vatican City – Religious power centre, sovereign in 1929

All three are separate states, completely independent of their respective countries.

Key Players of the One World Order
(In order of importance)

1: Lord Jacob de Rothschild. 2: His son Nathaniel. 3: Baron David de Rothschild 4: Sir Evelyn de Rothschild 5: David Rockefeller Jr. 6: Henry Kissinger 7: George Soros 8: Lloyd Blankfein

The power behind the Committee of 300 is the Anglo-Jewish cousin-hood that dominate the financial and political systems of the world. This cousin-hood includes the Rothschild, Rockefeller, Oppenheimer, Goldsmid, Mocatta, Montefiore, Sassoon, Warburg, Samuel, Kadoorie, Franklin, Worms, Stern and Cohen families.

Ruling Families
Rothschild (Bauer or Bower) family
Rockefeller (Rockenfelder) family
Oppenheimer family
Goldsmid/Goldschmidt/Goldsmith family
Mocatta family
Montefiore family
Sassoon family
Warburg (del Banco) family
Samuel family
Kadoorie family
Worms family
Stern family
Cohen family
Schiff family
Morgan family
Lazard family
Schröder family
Harriman family
Royal Family of England
Windsor (Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) family
Hanover family
Cavendish (Kennedy) family
De Medici family
Lorraine family
Plantagenet family
Habsburg/Hapsburg family
Krupp family
Bruce (Bruis, Brix, or Broase) family
Carnegie family
Mellon family
Vanderbilt family
Du Pont family
Sinclair family
Astor family
Romanov family
Li family
Onassis family
Van Duyn (Dien, or Duyne) family
Thurn und Taxis family
Guinness family
Russell family
Bush (Scherff) family
Bundy family
Taft family
Disney d’Isigny (“from Isigny”) family
Collins family
Freeman family
McDonald family
Goodyear family
Whitney family
Reynolds family
Getty family
Hearst family
Saudi (The House of Saud) family
Franklin family
Sloane family
Walton family
Koch family
Mars family
Cargill-MacMillan family
Johnson family
Cox family
Pritzker family
S.C. Johnson family
Perkins family
Kellogg family

“The United States is owned and dominated today by a hierarchy of its sixty richest families, buttressed by no more than ninety families of lesser wealth… These families are the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States, functioning discreetly under a de jure democratic form of government behind which a de facto government, absolutist and plutocratic in its lineaments, has gradually taken form since the Civil War. This de facto government is actually the government of the United States — informal, invisible, shadowy. It is the government of money in a dollar democracy.” – Ferdinand Lundberg

See more here: America’s 60 Families

These families hold monopolies over the worldwide banking system, entertainment industry, food industry, oil and gas industry, shipping industry, metals and mining industry. Through this domination of the financial markets they pull the strings of every government in the world.

The cousin-hood believes in a form of Babylonian Talmudic Judaism. The Babylonian Talmud and Shulchan Aruch contain the legal code which is the basis of today’s Judaism and Jewish law. In fact, Talmudic Judaism is primarily a legal system in a literal sense. It has little to do with religion and is more of an ancient political cult group with many followers who are not openly Jewish. This is why so many Jews openly claim to be Jewish and atheist at the same time.

Sovereigns and Popes, both, usually had one or more Jews as astrologers and advisers, and they frequently gave Jews control over their very life by employing them as physicians. Political power was thus gained by Jews in almost every Gentile nation along with financial power, since Jewish court-bankers manipulated state funds and taxes.

You will find that approximately 90% of people in the world today who call themselves Jews are actually Khazars, or as they like to be known, Ashkenazi Jews.

You are probably aware of the centuries old practice undertaken by many Ashkenazi Jews whereby they would change their name, in order for them to appear part of the dominant race of the country in which they lived, so as they could obtain influential positions in that country, which they would then exploit to serve their real masters elsewhere.

“The Rothschilds are the wonders of modern banking… We see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburg to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing… They are the brokers and counselors of the kings of Europe and of the republican chiefs of America. What more can they desire?” – Niles Weekly Register, 1835-1836

“Who controls the issuance of money controls the government!” – Nathan Meyer Rothschild

Ownership of the Federal Reserve

Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin
Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris
Israel Moses Sieff Bank of Italy
Warburg Batiks of Hamburg and Amsterdam
Lehman Brothers Bank of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (controlled by the Rockefellers)
Goldman Sachs Bank of New York

Page 1 / 8
Zoom 100%
Page 1 / 8
Zoom 100%

“Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.

“The few who understand the system will either be so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon its favours that there will be no opposition from that class, while on the other hand, the great body of people, mentally incapable of comprehending the tremendous advantage that capital derives from the system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and perhaps without even suspecting that the system is inimical to their interests.” – The Rothschild brothers of London writing to associates in New York, 1863.

“The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.” – Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Rothschild Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920s, speaking at the University of Texas in 1927.

“Money is the god of our time, and Rothschild is his prophet,” – Heinrich Heine

A List of BANKS Owned/Controlled by the Rothschild Family

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” Gutle Schnaper. – Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife.

“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison

When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes… Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.” – Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France, 1815

“It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and money system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.”  – Henry Ford, founder of the Ford Motor Company.

“From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.” – Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, on the creation of the Federal System. 1913

“The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers.” — Congressman Louis T. McFadden (Rep. Pa)

“All problems, depressions, wars, disasters, assassinations ‒ all of them were planned, caused, instigated, and implemented by the international bankers and their attempt to establish a central bank in every country in the world, which they have now done, thanks to corrupt politicians who have been bought and paid for. This is all you need to know about the history of the world.” ‒ Mary Elizabeth Croft

Read more Quotes on Banking and the Federal Reserve.

The Committee of 300 is a product of the British East India Company’s Council of 300. The East India Company was chartered by the British royal family in 1600. It made vast fortunes in the opium drug trade with China and became the largest company on earth in its time. Today, through many powerful alliances, the Committee of 300 rules the world and is the driving force behind the criminal agenda to create a “New World Order”, under a “Totalitarian Global Government”.

There is no need to use “they” or “the enemy” except as shorthand. We know who “they”, the enemy, is. The Committee of 300 with its “aristocracy”, its ownership of the U.S. Federal Reserve banking system, insurance companies, giant corporations, foundations, communications networks, presided over by a hierarchy of conspirators-this is the enemy. Secret societies exist by deception.

Each is a hierarchy with an inner circle at the top, who deceives those below with lies, such as claiming a noble agenda; thus, duping them into following a web of compartmentalized complicity. The inner circle of the Committee of 300 is the Order of the Garter, headed by Queen Elizabeth Windsor II. It is interesting to note that the Windsor’s changed their name from the Germanic Saxe-Coburg-Gotha during WWI, because of anti-German sentiment.

The enemy is clearly identifiable as the Committee of 300 and its front organizations, such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs (Chatham House), the Club of Rome, NATO, U.N., the Black Nobility, the Tavistock Institute, CFR and all its affiliated organizations, the think tanks and research institutions controlled by Stanford and the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations and last, but certainly not least, the military establishment.

The Committee of 300 is the ultimate secret society made up of an untouchable ruling class, which includes the Queen of the United Kingdom (Elizabeth II), the Queen of the Netherlands, the Queen of Denmark and the royal families of Europe. These aristocrats decided at the death of Queen Victoria, the matriarch of the Venetian Black Guelphs that, in order to gain world-wide control, it would be necessary for its aristocratic members to “go into business” with the non-aristocratic but extremely powerful leaders of corporate business on a global scale, and so the doors to ultimate power were opened to what the Queen of England likes to refer to as “the commoners”. Through their illicit banking cartel, they own the stock of the Federal Reserve, which is a private for profit corporation that violates U.S. Constitution and is a root of the problem.

The decadent American families of the unholy partnership, thoroughly corrupted and wallowing in tainted opium money, went on to become what we know today as the Eastern Liberal Establishment. Its members, under the careful guidance and direction of the British Crown, and subsequently, its foreign policy executive arm, the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), now known as Chatham House, located in England (across St. James’s Square from the Astors), ran the United States from top to bottom through their secret upper-level, parallel government, which is tightly meshed with the Committee of 300, the ultimate secret society. That secret, all-powerful government is now more in control of the United States than ever before.

The “Committee of 300” membership list as of 2010.

• Abdullah II of Jordan
• Abramovich, Roman Arkadyevich
• Ackermann, Josef
• Adeane, Edward
• Agius, Marcus Ambrose Paul
• Ahtisaari, Martti Oiva Kalevi
• Akerson, Daniel
• Albert II of Belgium
• Alexander – Crown Prince of Yugoslavia
• Alexandra (Princess) – The Honourable Lady Ogilvy
• Alphonse, Louis – Duke of Anjou
• Amato, Giuliano
• Anderson, Carl A.
• Andreotti, Giulio
• Andrew (Prince) – Duke of York
• Anne – Princess Royal
• Anstee, Nick
• Ash, Timothy Garton
• Astor, William Waldorf – 4th Viscount Astor
• August, Ernst – Prince of Hanover
• Aven, Pyotr
• Balkenende, Jan Peter
• Ballmer, Steve
• Balls, Ed
• Barroso, José Manuel
• Beatrix (Queen)
• Belka, Marek
• Bergsten, C. Fred
• Berlusconi, Silvio
• Bernake, Ben
• Bernhard (Prince) of Lippe-Biesterfeld
• Bernstein, Nils
• Berwick, Donald
• Bildt, Carl
• Bischoff, Sir Winfried Franz Wilhen “Win”
• Blair, Tony
• Blankfein, Lloyd
• Blavatnik, Leonard
• Bloomberg, Michael
• Bolkestein, Frits
• Bolkiah, Hassanal
• Bonello, Michael C
• Bonino, Emma
• Boren, David L.
• Borwin – Duke of Mecklenburg
• Bronfman, Charles Rosner
• Bronfman, Edgar Jr.
• Bruton, John
• Brzezinski, Zbigniew (Deceased)
• Budenberg, Robin
• Buffet, Warren
• Bush, George HW
• Cameron, David William Donald
• Camilla – Duchess of Cornwall
• Cardoso, Fernando Henrique
• Carington, Peter – 6th Baron Carrington
• Carlos – Duke of Parma
• Carlos, Juan – King of Spain
• Carney, Mark J.
• Carroll, Cynthia
• Caruana, Jaime
• Castell, Sir William
• Chan, Anson
• Chan, Margaret
• Chan, Norman
• Charles – Prince of Wales
• Chartres, Richard
• Chiaie, Stefano Delle
• Chipman, Dr John
• Chodiev, Patokh
• Christoph, Prince of Schleswig-Holstein
• Cicchitto, Fabrizio
• Clark, Wesley Kanne Sr. (General)
• Clarke, Kenneth
• Clegg, Nick
• Clinton, Bill
• Cohen, Abby Joseph
• Cohen, Ronald
• Cohn, Gary D.
• Colonna, Marcantonio (di Paliano) – Prince and Duke of Paliano
• Constantijn (Prince) of the Netherlands
• Constantine II Greece
• Cooksey, David
• Cowen, Brian
• Craven, Sir John
• Crockett, Andrew
• Dadush, Uri
• D’Aloisio, Tony
• Darling, Alistair
• Davies, Sir Howard
• Davignon, Étienne
• Davis, David
• De Rothschild, Benjamin
• De Rothschild, David René James
• De Rothschild, Evelyn Robert
• De Rothschild, Leopold David
• Deiss, Joseph
• Deripaska, Oleg
• Dobson, Michael
• Draghi, Mario
• Du Plessis, Jan
• Dudley, William C.
• Duisenberg, Wim
• Edward (Prince) – Duke of Kent
• Edward (The Prince) – Earl of Wessex
• Elkann, John
• Emanuele, Vittorio – Prince of Naples, Crown Prince of Italy
• Fabrizio (Prince) – Massimo-Brancaccio
• Feldstein, Martin Stuart “Marty”
• Festing, Matthew
• Fillon, François
• Fischer, Heinz
• Fischer, Joseph Martin
• Fischer, Stanley
• FitzGerald, Niall
• Franz, Duke of Bavaria
• Fridman, Mikhail
• Friedrich, Georg – Prince of Prussia
• Friso (Prince) of Orange-Nassau
• Gates, Bill
• Geidt, Christopher
• Geithner, Timothy
• Gibson-Smith, Dr Chris
• Gorbachev, Mikhail
• Gore, Al
• Gotlieb, Allan
• Green, Stephen
• Greenspan, Alan
• Grosvenor, Gerald – 6th Duke of Westminster
• Gurría, José Ángel
• Gustaf, Carl XVI of Sweden
• Hague, William
• Hampton, Sir Philip Roy
• Hans-Adam II – Prince of Liechtenstein
• Harald V Norway
• Harper, Stephen
• Heisbourg, François
• Henri – Grand Duke of Luxembourg
• Hildebrand, Philipp
• Hills, Carla Anderson
• Holbrooke, Richard
• Honohan, Patrick
• Howard, Alan
• Ibragimov, Alijan
• Ingves, Stefan Nils Magnus
• Isaacson, Walter
• Jacobs, Kenneth M.
• Julius, DeAnne
• Juncker, Jean-Claude
• Kenen, Peter
• Kerry, John Forbes
• King, Mervyn
• Kinnock, Glenys
• Kissinger, Henry
• Knight, Malcolm
• Koon, William H. II
• Krugman, Paul
• Kufuor, John
• Lajolo, Giovanni
• Lake, Anthony
• Lambert, Richard
• Lamy, Pascal
• Landau, Jean-Pierre
• Laurence, Timothy James Hamilton
• Leigh-Pemberton, James
• Leka, Crown Prince of Albania
• Leonard, Mark
• Levene, Peter – Baron Levene of Portsoken
• Leviev, Lev
• Levitt, Arthur
• Levy, Michael – Baron Levy
• Lieberman, Joe
• Livingston, Ian
• Loong, Lee Hsien
• Lorenz (Prince) of Belgium, Archduke of Austria-Este
• Louis-Dreyfus, Gérard
• Mabel (Princess) of Orange-Nassau
• Mandelson, Peter Benjamin
• Manning, Sir David Geoffrey
• Margherita – Archduchess of Austria-Este
• Margrethe II Denmark
• Martínez, Guillermo Ortiz
• Mashkevitch, Alexander
• Massimo, Stefano (Prince) – Prince of Roccasecca dei Volsci
• McDonough, William Joseph
• McLarty, Mack
• Mersch, Yves
• Michael (Prince) of Kent
• Michael of Romania
• Miliband, David
• Miliband, Ed
• Mittal, Lakshmi
• Moreno, Glen
• Moritz – Prince and Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel
• Murdoch, Rupert
• Napoléon, Charles
• Nasser, Jacques
• Niblett, Robin
• Nichols, Vincent
• Nicolás, Adolfo
• Noyer, Christian
• Ofer, Sammy
• Ogilvy, David – 13th Earl of Airlie
• Ollila, Jorma Jaakko
• Oppenheimer, Nicky
• Osborne, George
• Oudea, Frederic
• Parker, Sir John
• Patten, Chris
• Pébereau, Michel
• Penny, Gareth
• Peres, Shimon
• Philip (Prince) – Duke of Edinburgh
• Pio, Dom Duarte – Duke of Braganza
• Pöhl, Karl Otto
• Powell, Colin
• Prokhorov, Mikhail
• Quaden, Guy Baron
• Rasmussen, Anders Fogh
• Ratzinger, Joseph Alois (Pope Benedict XVI)
• Reuben, David
• Reuben, Simon
• Rhodes, William R. “Bill”
• Rice, Susan
• Richard (Prince) – Duke of Gloucester
• Rifkind, Sir Malcolm Leslie
• Ritblat, Sir John
• Roach, Stephen S.
• Robinson, Mary
• Rockefeller, David Jr.
• Rockefeller, David Sr. (Deceased)
• Rockefeller, Nicholas
• Rodríguez, Javier Echevarría
• Rogoff, Kenneth Saul “Ken”
• Roth, Jean-Pierre
• Rothschild, Jacob – 4th Baron Rothschild
• Rubenstein, David
• Rubin, Robert
• Ruspoli, Francesco – 10th Prince of Cerveteri
• Safra, Joseph
• Safra, Moises
• Sands, Peter A.
• Sarkozy, Nicolas
• Sassoon, Isaac S.D.
• Sassoon, James Meyer – Baron Sassoon
• Sawers, Sir Robert John
• Scardino, Marjorie
• Schwab, Klaus
• Schwarzenberg, Karel
• Schwarzman, Stephen A.
• Shapiro, Sidney
• Sheinwald, Nigel
• Sigismund (Archduke) – Grand Duke of Tuscany
• Simeon of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
• Snowe, Olympia
• Sofía (Queen) of Spain
• Soros, George
• Specter, Arlen
• Stern, Ernest
• Stevenson, Dennis – Baron Stevenson of Coddenham
• Steyer, Tom
• Stiglitz, Joseph E.
• Strauss-Kahn, Dominique
• Straw, Jack
• Sutherland, Peter
• Tanner, Mary
• Tedeschi, Ettore Gotti
• Thompson, Mark
• Thomson, Dr. James A.
• Tietmeyer, Hans
• Trichet, Jean-Claude
• Tucker, Paul
• Van Rompuy, Herman
• Vélez, Álvaro Uribe
• Verplaetse, Alfons Vicomte
• Villiger, Kaspar
• Vladimirovna, Maria – Grand Duchess of Russia
• Volcker, Paul
• Von Habsburg, Otto
• Waddaulah, Hassanal Bolkiah Mu’izzaddin
• Walker, Sir David Alan
• Wallenberg, Jacob
• Walsh, John
• Warburg, Max
• Weber, Axel Alfred
• Weill, Michael David
• Wellink, Nout
• Whitman, Marina von Neumann
• Willem-Alexander – Prince of Orange
• William (Prince) of Wales
• Williams, Dr Rowan
• Williams, Shirley – Baroness Williams of Crosby
• Wilson, David – Baron Wilson of Tillyorn
• Wolfensohn, James David
• Wolin, Neal S.
• Woolf, Harry – Baron Woolf
• Woolsey, R. James Jr.
• Worcester, Sir Robert Milton
• Wu, Sarah
• Zoellick, Robert Bruce

The Big Foundations and Roundtables

10 Companies Own All The World’s Food Brands

Bilderberg Group

Founded in 1954, the Bilderberg Group holds “by invitation only” annual meetings of the rich and powerful. About two-thirds of the attendees are European, the rest American. Informally named for the site of the group’s first meeting, the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands.

The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual invitation-only conference of approximately 120 to 140 guests from North America and Western Europe, most of whom are people of influence. About one-third are from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications. Meetings are closed to the public.

In the Eye of the Bilderberg group and their connections.

The Bilderbergers are so secretive that they even try to hide, until the last minute, the location of their gathering places. Attendance is by invitation only and if an invitee’s name is publicly disclosed beforehand, he or she is dis-invited.

In part one of the book The True Story of the Bilderberg Group, it states three quotes that will explain what the secrecy is all about.

The Times of London in 1977 called the Bilderbergers “a clique of the richest, economically and politically most powerful and influential men in the Western world, who meet secretly to plan events that later appear just to happen.”

“It is difficult to re-educate people who have been brought up on nationalism to the idea of relinquishing part of their sovereignty to a supranational body.” -Bilderberg Group founder Prince Bernhard of The Netherlands (The late prince has been replaced by his daughter, Queen Beatrix, who regularly attends the Bilderberg meetings.)

Former British Defense Minister Denis Healey, put it this way, “World events do not occur by accident. They are made to happen, whether it is to do with national issues or commerce; and most of them are staged and managed by those who hold the purse strings.”

Every US president since Eisenhower has either belonged to the Bilderberg Group or its older parallel group, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), or been approved by them. As Estulin wrote, the race is no contest when you own both horses. That is why no matter which political party is in power nothing really changes other than the packaging. The puppets who drink at the champagne fountains of the powerful do the bidding of their masters. The people are superfluous to the process. Read: The “REAL STORY” Told With Quotes

Bilderberg 2017 Attendee List

*Updated Annually*

The 65th Bilderberg Meeting to take place from 1 – 4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA.

The 65th Bilderberg Meeting will take place from 1-4 June 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia, USA. As of today, 131 participants from 21 countries have confirmed their attendance. As ever, a diverse group of political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media has been invited. The list of participants is available here.

The key topics for discussion this year include:

  1. The Trump Administration: A progress report
  2. Trans-Atlantic relations: options and scenarios
  3. The Trans-Atlantic defence alliance: bullets, bytes and bucks
  4. The direction of the EU
  5. Can globalisation be slowed down?
  6. Jobs, income and unrealised expectations
  7. The war on information
  8. Why is populism growing?
  9. Russia in the international order
  10. The Near East
  11. Nuclear proliferation
  12. China
  13. Current events

Final list of Participants

CHAIRMAN STEERING COMMITTEE
Castries, Henri de (FRA), President of Institut Montaigne; Former Chairman and CEO, AXA

  • Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU),Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG; Treasurer, Bilderberg Meeting
  • Adonis, Andrew (GBR),Chair, National Infrastructure Commission
  • Agius, Marcus (GBR),Chairman, PA Consulting Group
  • Akyol, Mustafa (TUR),Senior Visiting Fellow, Freedom Project at Wellesley College
  • Alstadheim, Kjetil B. (NOR),Political Editor, Dagens Næringsliv
  • Altman, Roger C. (USA),Founder and Senior Chairman, Evercore
  • Arnaut, José Luis (PRT),Managing Partner, CMS Rui Pena & Arnaut
  • Barroso, José M. Durão (PRT),Chairman, Goldman Sachs International
  • Bäte, Oliver (DEU),CEO, Allianz SE
  • Baumann, Werner (DEU),Chairman, Bayer AG
  • Baverez, Nicolas (FRA),Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
  • Benko, René (AUT),Founder and Chairman of the Advisory Board, SIGNA Holding GmbH
  • Berner, Anne-Catherine (FIN),Minister of Transport and Communications
  • Botín, Ana P. (ESP),Executive Chairman, Banco Santander
  • Brandtzæg, Svein Richard (NOR),President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
  • Brennan, John O. (USA),Senior Advisor, Kissinger Associates Inc.
  • Bsirske, Frank (DEU),Chairman, United Services Union
  • Buberl, Thomas (FRA),CEO, AXA
  • Bunn, M. Elaine (USA),Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
  • Burns, William J. (USA),President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • Çakiroglu, Levent (TUR),CEO, Koç Holding A.S.
  • Çamlibel, Cansu (TUR),Washington DC Bureau Chief, Hürriyet Newspaper
  • Cebrián, Juan Luis (ESP),Executive Chairman, PRISA and El País
  • Clemet, Kristin (NOR),CEO, Civita
  • Cohen, David S. (USA),Former Deputy Director, CIA
  • Collison, Patrick (USA),CEO, Stripe
  • Cotton, Tom (USA),Senator
  • Cui, Tiankai (CHN),Ambassador to the United States
  • Döpfner, Mathias (DEU),CEO, Axel Springer SE
  • Elkann, John (ITA),Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
  • Enders, Thomas (DEU),CEO, Airbus SE
  • Federspiel, Ulrik (DNK),Group Executive, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S
  • Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA),President and CEO, TIAA
  • Ferguson, Niall (USA),Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University
  • Gianotti, Fabiola (ITA),Director General, CERN
  • Gozi, Sandro (ITA),State Secretary for European Affairs
  • Graham, Lindsey (USA),Senator
  • Greenberg, Evan G. (USA),Chairman and CEO, Chubb Group
  • Griffin, Kenneth (USA),Founder and CEO, Citadel Investment Group, LLC
  • Gruber, Lilli (ITA),Editor-in-Chief and Anchor “Otto e mezzo”, La7 TV
    Guindos, Luis de (ESP), Minister of Economy, Industry and Competiveness
  • Haines, Avril D. (USA),Former Deputy National Security Advisor
  • Halberstadt, Victor (NLD),Professor of Economics, Leiden University; 
  • Hamers, Ralph (NLD),Chairman, ING Group
  • Hedegaard, Connie (DNK),Chair, KR Foundation
  • Hennis-Plasschaert, Jeanine (NLD),Minister of Defence, The Netherlands
  • Hobson, Mellody (USA),President, Ariel Investments LLC
  • Hoffman, Reid (USA),Co-Founder, LinkedIn and Partner, Greylock
  • Houghton, Nicholas (GBR),Former Chief of Defence
  • Ischinger, Wolfgang (INT),Chairman, Munich Security Conference
  • Jacobs, Kenneth M. (USA),Chairman and CEO, Lazard
  • Johnson, James A. (USA),Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
  • Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. (USA),Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
  • Karp, Alex (USA),CEO, Palantir Technologies
  • Kengeter, Carsten (DEU),CEO, Deutsche Börse AG
  • Kissinger, Henry A. (USA),Chairman, Kissinger Associates Inc.
  • Klatten, Susanne (DEU),Managing Director, SKion GmbH
  • Kleinfeld, Klaus (USA),Former Chairman and CEO, Arconic
  • Knot, Klaas H.W. (NLD),President, De Nederlandsche Bank
  • Koç, Ömer M. (TUR),Chairman, Koç Holding A.S.
  • Kotkin, Stephen (USA),Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University
  • Kravis, Henry R. (USA),Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, KKR
  • Kravis, Marie-Josée (USA),Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute; President, American Friends of Bilderberg
  • Kudelski, André (CHE),Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
  • Lagarde, Christine (INT),Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
  • Lenglet, François (FRA),Chief Economics Commentator, France 2
  • Leysen, Thomas (BEL),Chairman, KBC Group
  • Liddell, Christopher (USA),Assistant to the President and Director of Strategic Initiatives
  • Lööf, Annie (SWE),Party Leader, Centre Party
  • Mathews, Jessica T. (USA),Distinguished Fellow, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  • McAuliffe, Terence (USA),Governor of Virginia
  • McKay, David I. (CAN),President and CEO, Royal Bank of Canada
  • McMaster, H.R. (USA),National Security Advisor
  • Micklethwait, John (INT),Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP
  • Minton Beddoes, Zanny (INT),Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
  • Molinari, Maurizio (ITA),Editor-in-Chief, La Stampa
  • Monaco, Lisa (USA),Former Homeland Security Officer
  • Morneau, Bill (CAN),Minister of Finance
  • Mundie, Craig J. (USA),President, Mundie & Associates
  • Murtagh, Gene M. (IRL),CEO, Kingspan Group plc
  • Netherlands, H.M. the King of the (NLD)
  • Noonan, Peggy (USA),Author and Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
  • O’Leary, Michael (IRL),CEO, Ryanair D.A.C.
  • Osborne, George (GBR),Editor, London Evening Standard
  • Papahelas, Alexis (GRC),Executive Editor, Kathimerini Newspaper
  • Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC),CEO, Titan Cement Co.
  • Petraeus, David H. (USA),Chairman, KKR Global Institute
  • Pind, Søren (DNK),Minister for Higher Education and Science
  • Puga, Benoît (FRA),Grand Chancellor of the Legion of Honor and Chancellor of the National Order of Merit
  • Rachman, Gideon (GBR),Chief Foreign Affairs Commentator, The Financial Times
  • Reisman, Heather M. (CAN),Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
  • Rivera Díaz, Albert (ESP),President, Ciudadanos Party
  • Rosén, Johanna (SWE),Professor in Materials Physics, Linköping University
  • Ross, Wilbur L. (USA),Secretary of Commerce
  • Rubenstein, David M. (USA),Co-Founder and Co-CEO, The Carlyle Group
  • Rubin, Robert E. (USA),Co-Chair, Council on Foreign Relations and Former Treasury Secretary
  • Ruoff, Susanne (CHE),CEO, Swiss Post
  • Rutten, Gwendolyn (BEL),Chair, Open VLD
  • Sabia, Michael (CAN),CEO, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec
  • Sawers, John (GBR),Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners
  • Schadlow, Nadia (USA),Deputy Assistant to the President, National Security Council
  • Schmidt, Eric E. (USA),Executive Chairman, Alphabet Inc.
  • Schneider-Ammann, Johann N. (CHE),Federal Councillor, Swiss Confederation
  • Scholten, Rudolf (AUT),President, Bruno Kreisky Forum for International Dialogue
  • Severgnini, Beppe (ITA),Editor-in-Chief, 7-Corriere della Sera
  • Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL),Senior Fellow, Harvard University
  • Slat, Boyan (NLD),CEO and Founder, The Ocean Cleanup
  • Spahn, Jens (DEU),Parliamentary State Secretary and Federal Ministry of Finance
  • Stephenson, Randall L. (USA),Chairman and CEO, AT&T
  • Stern, Andrew (USA),President Emeritus, SEIU and Senior Fellow, Economic Security Project
  • Stoltenberg, Jens (INT),Secretary General, NATO
  • Summers, Lawrence H. (USA),Charles W. Eliot University Professor, Harvard University
  • Tertrais, Bruno (FRA),Deputy Director, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique
  • Thiel, Peter (USA),President, Thiel Capital
  • Topsøe, Jakob Haldor (DNK),Chairman, Haldor Topsøe Holding A/S
  • Ülgen, Sinan (TUR),Founding and Partner, Istanbul Economics
  • Wahlroos, Björn (FIN),Chairman, Sampo Group, Nordea Bank, UPM-Kymmene Corporation
  • Wallenberg, Marcus (SWE),Chairman, Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB
  • Walter, Amy (USA),Editor, The Cook Political Report
  • Weston, Galen G. (CAN),CEO and Executive Chairman, Loblaw Companies Ltd and George Weston Companies
  • White, Sharon (GBR),Chief Executive, Ofcom
  • Wieseltier, Leon (USA),Isaiah Berlin Senior Fellow in Culture and Policy, The Brookings Institution
  • Wolf, Martin H. (INT),Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times
  • Wolfensohn, James D. (USA),Chairman and CEO, Wolfensohn & Company
  • Wunsch, Pierre (BEL),Vice-Governor, National Bank of Belgium
  • Zeiler, Gerhard (AUT),President, Turner International
  • Zients, Jeffrey D. (USA),Former Director, National Economic Council
  • Zoellick, Robert B. (USA),Non-Executive Chairman, AllianceBernstein L.P.

What We Didn’t Learn At Bilderberg 2017

What do we know about the secret, behind-closed-door globalist soiree that was Bilderberg 2017 in Chantilly, Virginia? Only what the Bilderbergers told us, and we know they’re lying to us about who is in attendance so why should we trust them about anything? This year James breaks down what we were and weren’t told about what was happening at Bilderberg, and what other globalist conferences might be worth keeping our eye on.

CFR: Council on Foreign Relations

The Round-Table Group in the United States became known as the “Council on Foreign Relations”

The CFR is the promotional arm of the Ruling Elite in the United States of America. Most influential politicians, academics and media personalities are members, and it uses its influence to infiltrate the New World Order into American life.

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is also known as Pratt House.

The CFR, which was initially dominated by J.P. Morgan and later by the Rockefellers, and is the most powerful group in America today. It is even more powerful than the federal government, because almost all of the key positions in government are held by its members. In other words, it is the United States government.

Council on Foreign Relations members control both Government agency, and “private-industry” news sources. Round Table Group members in different nations control the news sources in their countries. The Council on Foreign Relations propaganda machine manipulates American Citizens to accept the particular climate of opinion the Round Table Groups are seeking to achieve in the world. Council on Foreign Relations members working in an ad hoc committee called the “Special Group” and through a vast intragovernmental undercover infrastructure called the “Secret Team” formulate this opinion in the United States.

Other branches include:

  • The Royal Institute of International Affairs
  • Council on Foreign Relations
  • Canadian Institute of International Affairs
  • Australian Institute of International Affairs
  • New Zealand Institute of International Affairs
  • Danish Institute of International Affairs
  • Japan Institute of International Affairs
  • Institute of International Relations, Prague
  • Institute of International Affairs, Italy
  • Swedish Institute of International Affairs
  • Netherlands Institute of International Relations
  • Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
  • South African Institute of International Affairs
  • Institute of International Relations Prague
  • Austrian Institute for International Affairs
  • Finnish Institute of International Affairs
  • Chinese Institute for International Studies
  • The Real Instituto Elcano de Estudios Internacionales y Estrategicos
  • The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations

The Psychological Strategy Board a.k.a. The Operations Coordination Board a.k.a. The Special Group

On 20 June 1951 Harry S. Truman signed a directive establishing the Psychological Strategy Board. The directive read,

“Directive to:

  • The Secretary of State
  • The Secretary of Defense
  • The Director of Central Intelligence

It is the purpose of this directive to authorize and provide for the more effective planning, coordination and conduct, within the framework of approved national policies, of psychological operations. There is hereby established a Psychological Strategy Board responsible, within the purposes and terms of this directive, for the formulation and promulgation, as guidance to the departments and agencies responsible for psychological operations, of over-all national psychological objectives, policies and programs, and for the coordination and evaluation of the national psychological effort.

The Board will report to the National Security Council on the Board’s activities and on its evaluation of the national psychological operations, including implementation of approved objectives, policies, and programs by the departments and agencies concerned. The Board shall be composed of:

a. The Undersecretary of State, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and the Director of Central Intelligence, or, in their absence, their appropriate designees
b. An appropriate representative of the head of each such other department or agency of the Government as may, from time to time, be determined by the Board

The Board shall designate one of its members as Chairman. A representative of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall sit with the Board as its principal military adviser in order that the Board may ensure that its objectives, policies and programs shall be related to approved plans for military operations…”

The director and architect of:

  • the Psychological Strategy Board was Gordon Gray
  • Henry Kissinger was Gray’s consultant
  • Kissinger was also the paid political consultant to Rockefeller family
  • Gray, Kissinger, and Rockefeller were members of the Council on Foreign Relations
  • Gray served in the administrations of Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Ford
  • Gordon Gray was heir to the R. J. Reynolds tobacco fortune and President of the University of North Carolina
  • Gray was a broadcast and publication media specialist
  • Gray was instrumental in keeping the uniformed electorate uninformed by Eisenhower signed Presidential Executive Order 10483 replacing the Psychological Strategy board with the Operations Coordinating Board

The Operations Coordinating Board was composed of:

(1) the Under Secretary of State, who shall represent the Secretary of State and shall be the chairman of the Board
(2) the Deputy Secretary of Defense, show shall represent the Secretary of Defense
(3) the Director of the Foreign Operations Administration
(4) the Director of Central Intelligence
(5) a representative of the President to be designated by the President
(6) the Undersecretary or corresponding official of any Presidential agency that has been assigned responsibilities for implementation of national security policy
(7) the Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
(8) the Director of the United States Information Agency

On 19 February 1961, President John F. Kennedy issued a Statement abolishing the Operations Coordinating Board.

No President ever wrote or signed an Executive order establishing the Special Group. No President had a way of abolishing the Special Group. The Special Group was not established by Executive Order, it established itself. This was no accident. This was illegal. When Kennedy killed the Operations Coordinating Board, the Special Group operated as normal without the designated Presidential representative.

The Special Group is alive and well today. It consists of:

  • the Secretary of State
  • the Secretary of Defense
  • the Director of The CIA
  • Mossad (Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations), Israel
  • none of which are elected officials

The only way to abolish this ad hoc committee is to abolish:

  • the Department of Defense
  • the Central Intelligence Agency
  • the Department of State
  • Mossad (Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations), Israel

President Clinton, Secretary of State Warren Christopher, and Director of the CIA John Deutch and his predecessor James Woolsely belong to the Council on Foreign Relations. Les Aspin, Secretary of Defense William Perry’s predecessor also belonged to the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have defined psychological operations (PSYOPS) as those that:

“Include psychological warfare and, in addition, encompass those political, military, economic and ideological actions planned and conducted to create in neutral or friendly foreign groups the emotions, attitudes, or behavior to support achievement of national objectives.” Another proposal “develops the concept of ’strategic psychological operations’ as aimed at influencing and shaping decision-makers’ power to govern or control their followers.”

Council on Foreign Relations members in:

  • the State Department
  • the National Security Council
  • the Central Intelligence Agency
  • the Department of Defense
  • Mossad (Institute for Intelligence and Special Operations), Israel

The CFR continues to control the lives of the people through well planned psycho-political operations. These psychological operations rob citizens of the present, by creating false reality worlds. These false reality worlds are created to trick the public into acting not in their own best interest but in the best interest of a group of subtle fascists intent on creating one world order under their control.

The CFR Media Empire

6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media in America

With so many channels to surf through and so much great programming, why can’t we find anything to watch? 90% of what we watch, listen to and read is owned by 6 companies. That’s a large percentage to just be divided by a factor of six. 30 years ago 90% of media was held by 50 different companies, which is what most people would assume it would be now, but thanks to mergers and buyouts, it’s down to 6 major companies (until someone else buys another). The reason we never find anything new on TV is that 70% of what is on cable is owned by the ‘Big 6.’ That’s 1 out of every 5 hours of television.

The trend in media ownership is not only towards concentration within countries but also towards the creation of ‘global media empires’ that include newspapers, television stations, magazines, movie studios and publishing houses that span many nations.

NOTE: So that 6th company is now Comcast. And Time Warner doesn’t own AOL. It still shows how much of a monopoly the ‘Big 6’ is.

Trilateral Commission

The Trilateral Commission was established in 1973. Its founder and primary financial angel was international financier, David Rockefeller, longtime chairman of the Rockefeller family-controlled Chase Manhattan Bank and undisputed overlord of his family’s global corporate empire.

Rockefeller’s idea for establishing the commission emerged after he had read a book entitled Between Two Ages written by an Establishment scholar, Prof. Zbigniew Brzezinski of Columbia University.

In his book Brzezinski proposed a vast alliance between North America, Western Europe and Japan. According to Brzezinski, changes in the modern world required it.

“Resist as it might,” Brzezinski wrote elsewhere, “the American system is compelled gradually to accommodate itself to this emerging international context, with the U.S. government called upon to negotiate, to guarantee, and, to some extent, to protect the various arrangements that have been contrived even by private business.”

In other words, it was necessary for the international upper class to band together to protect its interests, and to ensure, in the developed nations, that political leaders were brought to power who would ensure that the global financial interests (of the Rockefellers and the other ruling elites) would be protected over those of the hoi polloi.

Pocantico Hills Confabs

Although the initial arrangements for the commission were laid out in a series of meetings held at the Rockefeller’s famous Pocantico Hills estate outside New York City, Rockefeller first introduced the idea of the commission at an annual meeting of the Bilderberg group, this one held in Knokke, Belgium in the spring of 1972.

The Bilderberg group is similar to the Trilateral Commission in that it is funded and heavily influenced by the Rockefeller empire, and composed of international financiers, industrialists, media magnates, union bosses, academics and political figures.

However, the much older Bilderberg group’s membership is strictly limited to participants from the United States, Canada and Western Europe: i.e. the NATO alliance.

The Trilateral Commission was unique, though, in that it brought the Japanese ruling elite into the inner councils of the global power brokers, a recognition of Japan’s growing influence in the world economic and political arena.

Ruling Classes Unite

“The Commission’s purpose is to engineer an enduring partnership among the ruling classes of North America, Western Europe and Japan — hence the term ’Trilateral’ — in order to safeguard the interests of Western capitalism in an explosive world. The private commission is attempting to mold public policy and construct a framework for international stability in the coming decades.

“To put it simply, Trilateralists are saying: The people, governments and economies of all nations must serve the needs of multinational banks and corporations.

“In short, Trilateralism is the current attempt by ruling elites to manage both dependence and democracy — at home and abroad.”

Another Trilateral critic, now-retired Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.), views the commission as a Rockefeller family operation through and through. According to Goldwater:

“The Trilateral organization created by David Rockefeller was a surrogate — the members selected by Rockefeller, its purposes defined by Rockefeller, its funding supplied by Rockefeller. David Rockefeller screened and selected every individual who was invited to participate.”

Picking Policymakers

David Rockefeller and Brzezinski then began the process of selecting from among the “Trilateral” nations the several hundred elite power brokers who would be permitted to join in Trilateral policymaking in the coming years.

One of the commission’s primary goals was to place a Trilateral-influenced president in the White House in 1976, and to achieve that goal it was necessary to groom an appropriate candidate who would be willing to cooperate with Trilateral aims.

Rockefeller and Brzezinski selected a handful of well-known liberal Democrats and a scattering of Republicans (primarily of the liberal-internationalist bent) to serve on the commission.

And in an effort to give regional balance to the commission Rockefeller invited the then-obscure one-term Democratic governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter, to join the commission.

Rockefeller Center South

Rockefeller had longtime ties to the local Atlanta political and economic Establishment. In fact, much of Rockefeller’s personal investment portfolio is in Atlanta real estate. (According to David Horowitz, co-author of The Rockefellers, “Atlanta is Rockefeller Center South.”)

And Rockefeller himself had once even invited Carter to dine with him at the Chase Manhattan Bank several years before, as early as 1971, the year Carter began serving as governor.

Carter very definitely impressed Rockefeller and Brzezinski, more so than another Southern Democrat, Florida Gov. Reuben Askew, also selected to serve on the commission and viewed, like Carter, as a possible Trilateral candidate.

In fact, according to Brzezinski,

“It was a close thing between Carter and Askew, but we were impressed that Carter had opened up trade offices for the state of Georgia in Brussels and Tokyo. That seemed to fit perfectly into the concept of the Trilateral.”

Carter, in fact, like Askew, did announce for the 1976 Democratic presidential nomination, but because of Rockefeller’s interest, Carter had the inside shot.

So much so that in a speech at the commission’s first annual meeting in Kyoto, Japan in May of 1975, Rockefeller’s man Brzezinski promoted the then-still obscure Carter to his fellow Trilateralists as an ideal presidential candidate.

Cut and Dried

From that point on, it was all cut and dried. According to Goldwater:

“Rockefeller and Brzezinski found Carter to be their ideal candidate. They helped him win the Democratic nomination and the presidency.

“To accomplish this purpose they mobilized the money-power of the Wall Street bankers, the intellectual influence of the academic community — which is subservient to the wealth of the great tax-free foundations — and the media controllers represented in the membership of the CFR and the Trilateralists.”

The aforementioned Council on Foreign Relations — is another Rockefeller-financed foreign policy pressure group similar to the Trilateralists and the Bilderberg group, although the CFR is composed solely of American citizens.

In his book The Carter Presidency and Beyond, published in 1980 by the Ramparts Press, Prof. Laurence H. Shoup devotes an entire chapter to demonstrating how the Trilateral-linked and Trilateral-controlled Establishment media promoted the presidential candidacy in 1976 of the then-obscure Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter.

Carter, of course, campaigned as a “populist” — as a “man of the people” — as an “outsider” with no ties to the Establishment. The fact is, however, Carter, who said he’d never lie, was an elitist, an insider, the Trilateral Commission’s “man on the white horse.”

And with the power of the commission and the Rockefeller empire and its media influence behind him, Carter made his way to the presidency, establishing the first full-fledged Trilateral administration, appointing numerous Trilateralists to key policy-making positions and carrying out the Trilateral agenda to the hilt.

David Rockefeller’s book ‘Memoirs’ admits secretly conspiring for a World Government

In David Rockefeller’s book ‘Memoirs’ he admits he is part of a secret cabal working to destroy the United States and create a new world order. Here is the direct quote from his book, pg 405:

“Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” –David Rockefeller

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries” –David Rockefeller to Trilateral Commission in 1991

”The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world.”–Nick Rockefeller [Aaron Russo interview]

“For we are opposed, around the world, by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence; in infiltration instead of invasion; on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice; on guerillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined, its dissenters are silenced, not praised; no expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.” – John F. Kennedy, April 27, 1961

Note: This site is anti-plutocratic, not anti-semitic.

Do you know something we don’t?

Mankind Has a Common Enemy: The Global Elite and Their Media

Mankind Has a Common Enemy: The Global Elite and Their Media

https://relampagofurioso.com/

Soros

The face of evil, George Soros. But he’s only one of many in the elite cabal moving to seize the reigns power from We The People

Many people are only knee-jerk responding to each shock to the body politic as it occurs, and not thinking about who is responsible for each affront to freedom unfolding in America today. The time has come for us to start putting a face on who is stirring the pot – nay, also putting the ingredients in the pot before stirring it – so the public knows who they are.

Make no mistake, if the elite and their propaganda ministry (mainstream media) suddenly disappeared from the face of the earth, abducted by aliens perhaps, we would see an almost instant end to the mainstream media agitprop and throngs of alt-left thugs inciting violence in American cities.

The American Republic is in jeopardy because of these two forces.

Carefully designed agitprop, dreamed up by the Establishment and doled out in neat little doses by the echo chamber media is damned effective when it comes to creating division and inciting violence. Here’s how the evil genius behind the toppling of American institutions one by one, as well as the carefully crafted marginalization of all things traditional, common sensical, male, and Caucasian works. It’s a six step process:

  1. An incident designed to create a “newsworthy” event is crafted to bring the most radical members of the left and right together (such as the pincer tactic which brought the alt-left and alt-right together in Charlottesville, VA – a state where Terry McAuliffe is governor)
  2. Violence inevitably ensues
  3. The right is scapegoated by the whores in the media as culpable for the violence
  4. This narrative is repeated ad-nauseum, and amplified by focusing only on extremists
  5. The shockwave the violence creates is allowed to dissipate
  6. The next attack on American history, the right, or narrative to smear white people as racists is planned out

One of the primary financial backers of the alt-left Socialist revolutionaries who brought flamethrowers to Charlottesville, burned down cities across America last summer, and will no doubt be inciting violence in the future – as documented by countless blogs and other non-Establishment outposts – is George Soros.

But he’s not the only devil. There are many others. In fact, someone has been keeping a running tally of some of the major players in the economic domination of American government and the subjugation of ordinary Americans to oligarchy. According to The Global Elite blog, here are some of those making moves to topple democracy and replace it with worldwide Communism. Not surprisingly, most are bankers.

1: Lord Jacob de Rothschild.

Image result for Lord Jacob de Rothschild

2: His son Nathaniel.

Image result for Nathaniel Rothschild

3: Baron David de Rothschild

Image result for Baron David de Rothschild

4: Sir Evelyn de Rothschild

Image result for Sir Evelyn de Rothschild

5: David Rockefeller Jr.

Image result for David Rockefeller Jr.

6: Henry Kissinger

Image result for Henry Kissinger

7:George Soros

Image result for George Soros

8: Lloyd Blankfein

Image result for Lloyd Blankfein

All these people and their families, need to be executed for their crimes.

We’ve all heard those names before.

But, those men are only the top of the food chain. The Global Elite blog goes into much more detail about the real power structure in the world, and it names names. These people are our common enemy. Strip them of their fortunes, and the power of their megaphone by boycotting mainstream media, and these people have no power to oppress mankind and shape us into human machines powering their bottom line. They will have no power to further divide and conquer us.

They will have no power to turn this planet into the living embodiment of Orwell’s Animal Farm. Let’s start by refusing to listen to mainstream media except as a tactic to know what moves the elite are intending to make on us. Once their narratives no longer carry any weight, we will have won a major battle as the resistance to coming global tyranny.