Hating Whitey Makes Unexpected Comeback

Hating Whitey Makes Unexpected Comeback

By Kyle-Anne Shiver

Here we are only nine months into the ubiquitously proclaimed “post-racial presidency,” and all that promised harmony among the races has disappeared faster than a Chicago minute. All it took for addled minds to conjure shadows of racism behind every whitey tree in the whole American forest were voices raised in dissent over the President’s far-left policies.
No sooner had congress’ summer recess begun — without the President’s hoped-for passage of Obamacare — than the racist cries began their assent. Nancy Pelosi threw down the “swastika” gauntlet aimed at townhall attendees, which essentially tarred those citizens with white-supremacy slander. In early August an African-American MSNBC newsman actually declared that the word, “socialist,” being used to define Obama policies, was a new “code word” for “N**ger.”
Then, Joe Wilson’s impolite, but factually accurate blurt of “You lie,” aimed at the President’s claim regarding illegal alien coverage in the healthcare bill, was hailed as racially motivated by liberals at every level. Maureen Dowd penned a wicked screed, swearing she heard Wilson use the word, “Boy,” even though no one else did – not even the recording devices. Jimmy Carter doddered forth with his feeble opinion in public, concluding that of course, the outpouring dissent had to be racist.  Even Bill Cosby chimed in on the so-called white-racist motivations.
Interestingly enough, before the election, far-left feminist icon, Erica Jong, gave an interview to the Italian press, details of which were reported by the U.K. Telegraph. Jong was taking daily doses of Valium, she said, just to deal with her “pre-election anxiety.” If Obama were not elected, she contended, then it would start a “second civil war” and “blood would run in the streets.” Jong confided that her writer friends were equally traumatized, that Naomi Wolf was calling her every day, that Ken Follett was “extremely worried” and that Jane Fonda had sent her an email claiming that she “cried all night and can’t cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves.”
Well, we had the election. White America came through. Now, where’s all that absolution, honey?
From anyone’s pre-election calculations, an Obama presidency held the promise of relieving America’s white citizens of their centuries-long guilt over slavery and civil-rights injustices. Such, however, has not been at all the case and hating whitey is making an unexpected comeback.
There was President Obama’s own “teaching moment” on race wherein he reminded us we are still a racist nation where white police officers act “stupidly” against black professor-types just because of the color of their skin. Even the beer-fest afterward left divisive hard feelings and rancor among unjustly accused police officers.
Last week we saw the racist fires stoked against Rush Limbaugh for the “crime” of wishing to purchase part ownership in the St. Louis Rams. Media outlets from coast to coast used false and slanderous quotes to justify the rhetorical lynching of Limbaugh. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, both with more than a few anti-Semitic slurs in their pasts, blasted Limbaugh with false racist charges. An MSNBC contributor remarked that many NFL players had said they wouldn’t play for a team owned by Limbaugh because he “would just love to say he owned a plantation full of black men.”
But the real cake-taker in this poisonous concoction is the proclamation by Louis Farrakhan in Memphis this week. Farrakhan spoke to a hall full of people who were gathered to celebrate the 14th anniversary of his Million Man March (attended by Barack Obama). This week he warned his Nation of Islam followers not to “become complacent” because of the election of the first black president. Speaking of Obama’s election, Farrakhan said “This can pacify you and lull you to sleep in a dangerous time, making you think that we live in a post-racial America-when the opposite is true.”
Now, I’m not one generally inclined to agree with the audaciously Hitler-celebrating head of the Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan. But on the matter of a post-racial America he would seem to be nailing it. Anyone still believing in the promise of Barack Obama bringing racial peace, harmony and Christian forgiveness to White America might be suffering from a severe case of willful blindness.
When every utterance of disagreement with a president is framed as bigotry and racism, then the old black separatists’ call to hate whitey has made a sure comeback and there isn’t a thing Christian about it.
In fact, it would seem a very Jeremiah Wright inspired phenomenon. Lest we forget, Jeremiah Wright bestowed the lifetime service award from his church on Louis Farrakhan. Barack Obama seems to have soaked up a whole lot more from Wright and Farrakhan than he let on during the campaign. If the President is not stoking the resurgence of racial hatred, he certainly has done nothing substantial to stop it either.
Perhaps we should have paid a bit more heed to those racist associations of Barack Obama’s, because in the infamous words of Spike Lee’s Malcolm X, it certainly appears we whitey Americans have been utterly and thoroughly “bamboozled.”
Copyright Creators Syndicate 2009. Appearing by special arrangement.

on “Hating Whitey Makes Unexpected Comeback

News from selwynduke.com

Obama Pushing Secular UN Anti-Free Speech Resolution

Silenced Girl By Selwyn Duke

Those who would accuse Barack Obama of pandering to — if not sympathy for — Islamists have been handed some powerful new ammunition. In a disturbing move, the Obama administration is joining Muslim nations in supporting a UN resolution restricting criticism of religion, a measure reflective of those nations’ blasphemy laws.

Treating the matter in USA Today, Professor Jonathan Turley writes:

While attracting surprisingly little attention, the Obama administration supported the effort of largely Muslim nations in the U.N. Human Rights Council to recognize exceptions to free speech for any “negative racial and religious stereotyping.” The exception was made as part of a resolution supporting free speech that passed this month, but it is the exception, not the rule that worries civil libertarians…. It is viewed as a transparent bid to appeal to the “Muslim street” and our Arab allies, with the administration seeking greater coexistence through the curtailment of objectionable speech. Though it has no direct enforcement (and is weaker than earlier versions), it is still viewed as a victory for those who sought to juxtapose and balance the rights of speech and religion.

Read the rest here.

Big Government or Small Government?

Big Man Stepping on Small Man Our love affair with big government becomes more intense as our nation ages. But are we looking for love in all the wrong places?

By Selwyn Duke

After giving a speech in Toronto, Canada, several years ago, I spoke to some of the high school students in attendance. While talking about the role of the state with one of them, he said: “Government is there to make people happy.” He was a nice, intelligent young man, and he made the statement in a non-confrontational, matter-of-fact manner.While such an attitude reminds one of what a certain road is paved with, unfortunately, his perspective is shared by millions of Americans. Of course, some of these people are well-meaning, but they nevertheless are lacking in a very traditional American quality: distrust of government. How American is it? Columnist Dr. Walter Williams treats this in his piece, “American Idea,” writing:

Read the rest here.

Boy Set on Fire in Brutal Revenge Attack

By Selwyn Duke

In one of the most heinous crimes imaginable, a 15-year-old Florida boy was set ablaze by five other teens in a revenge attack stemming from a dispute over a video game.

The victim, Michael Brewer of Deerfield Beach, suffered mainly second-degree burns on 65 percent of his body and is currently hospitalized at Jackson Memorial Hospital’s burn center in critical condition.

The youths charged in the attack are Jesus Mendez, 15; Steven Shelton, who will be 16 on Thursday; Matthew Bent, 15; and two brothers, Denver and Jeremy Jarvis, 15 and 13 respectively. The boys are accused of dousing Brewer with rubbing alcohol and then igniting it with a lighter. All five are charged with aggravated assault, and Mendez, who is said to have set the victim ablaze, is also charged with attempted second-degree murder. Writing about the events leading up to the vicious act, CBSNews.com tells us:

Read the rest here.

The Debt Death Spiral

The Debt Death Spiral

By Steve McCann

America’s economy faces a miserable future, according to an important government report. The media collectively have yawned, and official Washington has barely blinked. The Government Accountability Office recently issued its report to the Congress on the long-term fiscal outlook for the United States.   It is a bleak picture.  The report opens:
Weakness in the economy and financial markets — and the government’s response to them — have contributed to near-term increases in federal deficits, which reached record level in fiscal year 2009.  While a lot of attention has been given to the recent fiscal deterioration, the federal government faces even larger fiscal challenges that will persist long after the return of financial stability and economic growth.
And:
…the federal government is on an unsustainable fiscal path.
Unfortunately few in Congress will ever read this memorandum, as their interest lies in a) getting their ideology and agenda passed; and b) letting others worry about tomorrow.   By the nature of economic reporting and the enormity of the numbers involved this work of the GAO will not be seen or understood by the vast majority of the population.
The projections by the GAO can best be understood if we were to use the underlying statistics and apply them to a family’s financial situation.
Assume a family has prosperous middle class assets of $500,000.00 and annual income of $105,000.00, but as with many families, they spend much more (a deficit) and charge it to their credit card. The family income is made up of salaries and revenue from an annuity owned by the grandparents that live in the same household.
The report focuses on four years:  2009, 2019, 2030 and 2040.  Using the GAO simulation and assumptions plus constant 2009 dollars this hypothetical family situation would be as follows:
2009:  The long term debt:  $199,000.00
Spending:                 Interest:             $        6,500.00
Grandparents             23,000.00
Other                       130,500.00
Deficit                     ( 55,000.00)
2019:  The long term debt:  $521,500.00
Spending:                 Interest:              $     25,000.00
Grandparents             55,000.00
Other                         73,500.00
Deficit                     ( 48,560.00)
2030:  The long term debt:  $911,500.00
Spending:                 Interest:               $     44,000.00
Grandparents              70,000.00
Other                           67,000.00
Deficit                      ( 76,000.00)
2040:  The long term debt: $1,466,000.00
Spending:                Interest:                 $     72,000.00
Grandparents                80,000.00
Other                             66,560.00
Deficit                       (113,560.00)
The borrowing begins to spiral out of control in order to meet the spending requirement which in turn increases interest costs until the entire house of cards collapses under its own weight.
In the case of the family example used above, bankruptcy is the inevitable result of this uncontrolled spending and borrowing.   For a country the options are not so clear cut.
It has been generally accepted that a country’s economy is a good credit risk as long as its debt remains in the 50% range of that nation’s annual Gross Domestic Product.  Per the GAO the prospects for the United States are as follows:
Debt Held by the Public as a Per Cent of GDP
There are three options a country has to avoid complete economic collapse:  1) raise taxes, 2) cut spending and 3) inflate the value of the currency.
Per the GAO: revenue would have to be increased by 47% and noninterest spending cut by 33% or a combination of the two over the next 75 years to keep debt at the same level as the end of 2008 (40.8% of GDP).  Waiting another ten years to address this issue would require a revenue increase of 58% and noninterest spending cuts of 39% or a combination of the two.
Yet the Congress is discussing a Health Care Reform bill that could add over 5 Trillion dollars in new spending over the next 30 years and a Carbon Cap and Tax bill which will hamstring the economy and reduce potential and much needed growth in revenue.  The only way for the government to increase revenue is for the economy to expand.
(It should be noted the impact of the various Health Care Reform bills in Congress were not included in the GAO study)
The option of hyper-inflating the currency, while having the effect of paying off the debt with near worthless dollars, will destroy the country’s economy and relegate the nation to a “banana republic’ status unable to compete in the world economy.
Nothing lays out the future better than this GAO report.   The alarm has been sounded.  Those in the Congress who will not pay heed must be replaced.  Do not leave a shell of a once magnificent country to your children and grandchildren.

on “The Debt Death Spiral

UN Agenda 21 – Coming to a Neighborhood near You

UN Agenda 21 – Coming to a Neighborhood near You

By Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild

Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nations program known as Agenda 21. The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.

 

 

 

A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development.  The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggests a cleverly named alternative: “smart growth.” The United Nations Millennium Papers – Issue 2 (page 5) says this of Agenda 21 and smart growth:
Participating in a UN-advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our process something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth [emphasis added].
Undoubtedly, residents of any town, county, or city in the United States that treasure their freedom, liberty, and property rights couldn’t care less whether it’s called Agenda 21 or smart growth. A recent example of this can be found in Carroll County, Maryland, where a smart growth plan called Pathways was drafted by the County Planning Department. The plan, if enacted, proposed a breathtaking reshuffling of land rights:
  • Rezoning of thousands of acres of beautiful, low-density agricultural farmland and protected residential conservation land into office parks
  • Down-zoning of agriculture land to prevent future subdivision by farmers
  • Up-zoning of low-density residential land around small towns into higher density zoning to permit construction of hundreds or possibly thousands of inclusive housing units, including apartments and condominiums
  • Inclusive housing with placement of multi-family construction on in-fill lots within existing residential single family communities
  • Endorsement of government-sponsored housing initiatives (subsidies) to ensure healthier, balanced neighborhoods
Carroll County, Maryland is one of 1,168 cities, towns, and counties worldwide that are members of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) – Local Governments for Sustainability, which is an international association of local governments as well as national and regional local government organizations that have made a commitment to sustainable development. The ICLEI mission statement closely resembles that of Agenda 21. In fact, the ICLEI has Special Consultative Status with the UN Economic and Social Council and coordinates local government representation in the UN processes related to Agenda 21.
Community leaders working together in Carroll County recently defended their county against overreaching smart growth initiatives. Richard Rothschild, a candidate for Commissioner, emphatically remarks, “Smart growth is not science; it is political dogma combined with an insidious dose of social engineering. Smart growth is a wedding wherein zoning code is married with government-sponsored housing initiatives to accomplish government’s goal of social re-engineering. It urbanizes rural towns with high-density development, and gerrymanders population centers through the use of housing initiatives that enable people with weak patterns of personal financial responsibility to acquire homes in higher-income areas. This has the effect of shifting the voting patterns of rural municipalities from Right to Left.”
Smart growth plans usurp property rights and constitutional rights. Local officials, at the behest of State Government, revise zoning laws to fit into a “smart code” zoning template. A massive reshuffling of property rights ensues. Farmers may lose subdivision rights; conservation land adjacent to population centers may be rezoned into commercial employment centers; and low-density land in small towns is re-designated as growth area and rezoned to accommodate diverse housing including high-density apartments and condominiums.
Finally, a healthy dose of federal- or state-sponsored housing initiatives is embraced to ensure communities are properly balanced. The net effect of these plans is to create highly urbanized population centers throughout otherwise-rural counties, while simultaneously limiting the availability of land for suburban and estate subdivisions, as these are considered an unsustainable waste of land by Agenda 21 disciples.
Clearly, smart growth plans will impact Americans’ future choices in where and how they live. Furthermore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other federal and state agencies may attempt to deny grant funds to states and cities that do not adopt smart growth plans.
Most Americans will remain unaware of the implications of smart growth and Agenda 21 until after it is promulgated in their own backyards. Ironically, these plans are more insidious than the Eminent Domain ruling by the Supreme Court in the case of Kelo v City of New London. Under Eminent Domain rulings, property owners usually receive compensation for their losses.
Conversely, smart growth municipal plans, required by statute, enable municipalities to change zoning laws and engage in other regulatory actions that devalue property, restrict off-conveyances, and otherwise erode property values without payment of any compensation to the property owner.
Smart growth has another interesting unintended consequence: it can disrupt conventional alliances and lead to strange political bedfellows. Rural urbanization plans may raise the ire of environmental groups while simultaneously stirring the wrath of both conservative and liberal residents that want to maintain the rural fabric of their communities. Conversely, developers, sensing opportunity, may side with government smart growth bureaucrats in support of these plans.
Regardless of political orientation, two indisputable facts remain. Agenda 21 is a direct assault on private property rights and American sovereignty, and it is coming to a neighborhood near you.

on “UN Agenda 21 – Coming to a Neighborhood near You

The Savage Nation news

Detroit mosque leader
killed in FBI raid

(Detroit News) Imam Luqman Ameen Abdullah, leader of a “radical fundamentalist,” black-separatist Detroit mosque was shot and killed during a series of FBI raids …

Obama signs bill widening
hate crimes law
(WorldNetDaily.com) A “hate crimes” bill opponents claim will be used to crack down on Christian speech, even the reading of the Bible, was signed into law today by President Obama …

 

SIGN THE SAVAGE PETITION
TO DEFEND FREE SPEECH
(MichaelSavage.com) Michael Savage was the first victim, but others – maybe even you – will soon follow. Fighting back can work, and it must be done! …

 

SF bridge closed — outsourced
repair at fault — China!
(Yobie Benjamin, San Francisco Chronicle) Outsourcing, free trade and globalization are the hallmarks of the Reagan, Bush I, Bush II and the Clinton administrations …

Private insurance premiums
could triple under ObamaCare
(Wall Street Journal) Not even two hours after Wellpoint had presented its materials on the Hill, Democrats were already trashing it …

How Dems outsmarted GOP on ACORN(Byron York, Washington Examiner) when the dust settled, Democrats had outmaneuvered Republicans, and the new bill they approved could allow organizations like ACORN to play a role in the highest levels of the new consumer protection agency …

NYC ‘Hezbollah’ dad tried
to help terrorists
(New York Post) Two men — including a married father of two from Queens — were hit with federal terrorism charges for trying to provide weapons, ammunition and vehicles to Hezbollah …

Chicago offers bounties to
turn in tax-cheating neighbors

(Chicago Sun-Times) Would you be willing to rat out a business that’s cheating Chicago on taxes in exchange for a share of back taxes recovered? …

Tax refugees staging
escape from New York
(New York Post) More than 1.5 million state residents left for other parts of the United States from 2000 to 2008, according to the report …

 

Illegals given pass on
lack of driver’s license
(San Francisco Chronicle) “We recognize that this is a problem within the Hispanic community, where people working here can’t get a driver’s license because of their immigration status” …

 

Shocked – Shocked To Find Corruption At A Mexican Consulate!

Memo From Middle America (Formerly Known As Memo From Mexico), By Allan Wall

Shocked – Shocked To Find Corruption At A Mexican Consulate!

Have you heard the news? The Mexican consulate in Dallas is currently undergoing a change of leadership. Enrique Hubbard, the former consul general, is being replaced by Juan Carlos Cue. The new chief Mexican in Dallas has formerly served as consul general in El Paso, and comes to Dallas from his post as Mexican ambassador to Kenya. Maybe that means he’ll get along well with Obama! [Mexico Appoints New Head of Mexican Consulate for Dallas Diane Solis, Dallas Morning News, October 13, 2009]

Is this change at the consulate just a routine shuffling of diplomatic personnel? It’s true that Mexican diplomats usually serve in a post for two to four years, and Hubbard has just finished three years.

But it’s quite likely that Hubbard is being moved out because the Dallas consulate is the scene of a major scandal still under investigation by the Mexican government.

More on that later.

The Mexican consulate in Dallas, visited by 700 people a day, is considered Mexico’s most important consulate after those in Los Angeles and Chicago.

And that’s no small feat. Mexico runs the biggest network of foreign consulates in the U.S. As a matter of fact, it’s also the biggest network of consulates in the world.  According to Wikipedia, not other country has as many consulates in one host country. Is this all really necessary? Think about it, Mexico is our neighbor. It’s not that far for Mexicans in the U.S. to return to Mexico and take care of business if they need to. So why does Mexico have so many consulates on U.S. soil?

Of course, the consulates do some legitimate work, although it could be handled by a smaller number. Thus they deal with American citizen business. For example, in 1991, before I moved to Mexico to work, I had to have my college diploma approved and stamped by the Mexican consulate in Dallas. Of course, Mexico didn’t issue me my diploma, but they had to stamp it anyway as part of my process to apply for work in the country.

Needless to say, there are no such requirements for Mexicans immigrating to the U.S.—even apart from the fact that so many do so illegally.

The bottom line on Mexico’s massive network of consulates: from an American point of view, they do a lot of damage.

Mexican consulates in the U.S. are centers of Mexican political activism. They get away with things that no self-respecting country would allow. They give advice to illegal aliens and link up with activists who promote illegal immigration and the Hispanicization of our country. Mexican diplomats frequently make public pronouncements on U.S. immigration policy and put pressure on our immigration authorities not to enforce the law. But our government has never reprimanded any of these undiplomatic meddlers.

You don’t have to take my Word for it. The Mexicans boast about it, Arturo Sarukhan, currently Mexican ambassador to the U.S., had this to say about the Mexican diplomatic network in the U.S.:

“Certainly the only way in which Mexico can advance a comprehensive agenda with the United States is if we use the (Mexican) embassy and the network of consulates as beachheads of lobbying for the image, the interests and the agenda of Mexico in all of U.S. territory and with all sectors of American society.”

Mexican consulates distribute the matricula consular cards, which are used to keep illegals from being deported. The Dallas consulate issued about 50,000 of these things a year.

Of course, these cards only work because so many local U.S. governments accept them. If we didn’t accept them, they’d be harmless.

Here at VDARE.COM, we’ve been writing about meddling Mexican diplomats for years, see here for example .

Back to the Dallas consulate. Enrique Hubbard, the outgoing consul general, was in that position since 2006.

Enrique Hubbard’s Anglo-Saxon surname indicates he had an American or British ancestor, as some other prominent Mexicans. But don’t be deceived by the surname—he’s still a loyal Mexican. There is no Anglo-Mexican lobby existing south of the border comparable to the Hispanic lobby in the U.S.

When living in Mexico I fancifully speculated from time to time about such a possibility. Mexico, however, would never allow such a thing.

While in Dallas, Hubbard certainly did his share of meddling.

The Dallas Morning News’ Alfredo Corchado reported

“During his three years as consul general in Dallas, Hubbard gained a reputation as a strong advocate of immigrant rights. He took what many considered to be tough and bold stances against groups who painted Mexican immigrants as villains. He was also vocal against policies that targeted illegal immigrants living and working in Farmers Branch and Irving.”

Mexico Removing Dallas Consul General Amid Investigation, August 15, 2009

Throughout 2007, from January to December, Hubbard was publicly bellyaching, on TV and radio stations, about immigration raids that detained illegal aliens, as a result of cooperation between local police and immigration authorities. Then he complained about receiving negative mail from Americans for his bellyaching.

In Mexico, however, local police are not only allowed, they are required to enforce Mexican immigration law.

Also during Hubbard’s time, the Dallas consulate aided illegal alien “refugees” fleeing tougher laws in Oklahoma, Georgia and Arizona.

So what about the corruption scandal for which the Dallas consulate is being investigated by the Mexican government?

Obviously, they are not being investigated for meddling in U.S. politics, since that’s part of the consulate’s mission.

No, the corruption consisted of defrauding fellow Mexicans.

Here’s the story from the Dallas Morning News, which has been following the case:

“The Mexican Foreign Ministry on Saturday reiterated that any financial irregularities committed at its consulates would not be tolerated and that appropriate action would be taken to weed out corruption.”

“The announcement followed a report Saturday in The Dallas Morning News about alleged financial irregularities at the Mexican Consulate in Dallas, the nation’s third busiest. The report, citing as sources a senior Mexican official familiar with the investigation and three other Mexican officials, said that consulate staff members had personally profited from selling passport photos and from skimming money from passport fees paid by customers. “

[Mexico Vows to Weed Out Consulate Corruption After Passport-Scam Inquiry, Alfredo Corchado, Dallas Morning News, Aug. 16th, 2009]

“Skimming money from passport fees”? Can you believe it?

Hubbard has claimed to know nothing of all this.

I’m reminded of that famous scene from Casablanca in which Captain Renault declares that “I’m shocked – shocked to find that gambling is going on in here.”

Not that all this started under Hubbard’s watch, either. This particular passport scam is said to have been going on for at least seven years. But Hubbard failed to do anything about it, and has claimed not to have known about it.

Nevertheless, he’s been transferred out of Dallas. But don’t worry, he’s not leaving the U.S. He’s going to the American University in Washington, to teach and do research!

So you can expect to hear his pronouncements on U.S. politics from time to time.

OK, so there’s corruption in the Mexican diplomatic corps. There are way too many Mexican consuls in the U.S. And Mexican diplomats too often meddle in our own internal affairs.

But when has Washington done anything about all this? When has a Mexican diplomat ever been reprimanded for meddling?

The next time some arrogant Mexican diplomat starts haranguing our policemen for enforcing the law, or making pronouncements about U.S. legislation, or any such brazen meddling, his diplomatic credentials should be revoked and he should be kicked out of the country.

Can you imagine the outcry among the Treason Lobby crowd and the Mexican government?

Oh, it would be entertaining.

What if it became a U.S. policy to protect our sovereignty like this? Wouldn’t Mexican diplomats finally get the message and start behaving like diplomats—not as representatives of an emerging state within a state?

Add it to the to-do list—for when we get a patriot President.

American citizen Allan Wall (email him) recently moved back to the U.S.A. after many years residing in Mexico. In 2005, Allan served a tour of duty in Iraq with the Texas Army National Guard. His VDARE.COM articles are archived here; his Mexidata.info articles are archived here and his website is here.