NOW WHAT DO WE DO? By Paul Proctor – America is collapsing not because we have failed to fight our enemies, but because we have forgotten God


By Paul Proctor
October 7, 2009

Many, both here and abroad, are wondering now what will become of America. There’s a lot of intense speculation going on these days as to whether we should expect renewal, revival, revolution or the wrath of God.

People are losing their jobs, their businesses, their homes, their families, their pensions and everything they’ve worked a lifetime for. And because the problem is so profound and systemic, there’s really nothing the public or private sector can do to stop our economy from collapsing around us in spite of all the disinformation and outright propaganda to the contrary being manufactured by the government’s mainstream media machine and all those who have a vested interested in keeping the illusion of prosperity alive.

Even the money we use to buy and sell with – the world’s reserve currency – is an illusion that is quickly losing its appeal in the global marketplace. Americans may soon be the only people on earth that take U.S. dollars for goods and services – but for how long is anyone’s guess.

As I write, the Independent is reporting “the demise of the dollar” – that “Arab states have launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading.” Japan and Brazil are reportedly following suit. And, there’s no reason to believe it will stop there.

Because the dollar has long been the world’s reserve currency, most of it has been in circulation and in storage overseas. Imagine what will happen to its value when all of that unwanted currency comes back home to America from the countries that no longer want it or need it.

Remember; the more there is of something, the less it’s worth. An item’s rarity and desirability are what determines its value – not the numbers printed on it.


Take a rock from your front yard down to McDonalds and see if they’ll give you a hamburger for it. My guess is, they won’t since the owner of McDonalds can’t buy more hamburger meat and buns from his supplier with rocks that customers offer him over the counter because rocks are not rare and therefore aren’t valuable. A homeless man can fill his pockets with rocks off the street – but they won’t buy him a hamburger no matter how many he gives the guy behind the register or what numbers he scratches on the rocks that he offers. They’re still just rocks.

When Americans wake up and realize that the dollars they have in their wallets and purses and on account at the bank are little more than surplus paper, they’re not going to desire them anymore than China, Russia, France, Japan or Brazil. When this happens, it’s going to be like shopping with rocks.

The day is coming when food is going to become a lot more rare and desirable than green paper with numbers on it. Even though I’ve never tried it myself, I’m quite sure that money is not very tasty, nutritious or sanitary, for that matter, though it could be filling, I suppose, if you ate enough of it. And, if the gas and electric company quit taking dollars, we could always burn them in our furnaces and fireplaces, if we had to, to stay warm in the winter.

As if our declining economy and currency weren’t enough to bear, we Americans are losing our country as well, along with all the rights, freedoms, privileges and responsibilities that came with being a citizen. In fact, it would appear the United States no longer belongs to its citizens. Even the word “citizen” has lost its meaning here. No, our country belongs to men of great wealth, power and privilege who rule from the shadows, recognize no borders and fear little in life but the light of truth.

From the pew to the pulpit – from Main Street to Wall Street and from the voting booth to Capitol Hill – it’s mostly a charade now – driven by “the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life.” (1st John 2:16)

Should we be surprised? After all, this isn’t the Garden of Eden – nor is it the Promised Land. That means we have no eternal guarantee from God that He’ll sustain us as a nation indefinitely though He did give warning long ago about the hell that awaits nations that forget Him. But, as great and powerful as America once was, I have yet to find any mention of it in scripture. That ought to be humbling and a little disquieting for professing Christians here.

You see, empires come and go. History has taught us that their “15 minutes of fame” is a little over two hundred years which means America has statistically run its course.

So, what do we do now?

Do we take up the sword and our own perceived morality to exact vengeance on those we believe are to blame for the fall of our kingdom or do we take up our cross and follow Jesus to His?

This is the controversial question before us.

America is collapsing not because we have failed to fight our enemies, but because we have forgotten God, and in doing so, have made Him our enemy. Sure, we vehemently claim Him as our own but live day to day like He’s not there or doesn’t care what we think or say or do – like America is God’s home and we have some divine right to reside here forever.

But, that home has become a vain, vulgar and violent place under the throne of a righteous and holy God whose kingdom is not of this world. And, foreclosure is coming friends, because we’ve been living large on borrowed money, borrowed blessings and borrowed time.

“…Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” – Matthew 4:17b

Related article:

1. The demise of the dollar

© 2009 Paul Proctor – All Rights Reserved

ASSUMING THE POSITION By Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret.


By Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret.

September 16, 2009

The denizens of the 50’s and the 60’s, upon reflection, will hearken back in their minds to their school days and remember the social events of the time that were the impetus for recurring school safety programs and exercises. These were instituted by an already out of control, and intrusive upon individual choice, government bureaucracy, implemented by school boards and school administrative hierarchies, and carried out by that final supreme authority over student activities – teachers. I am addressing specifically the classic nuclear attack exercises that were an aside from the curricula of those days.

These were always kicked off by startling and incessant clanging bells or hair-raising horns, buzzers and sirens that signaled the imminent phantom approach of red star bedecked Soviet bombers loaded with the ultimate ordinance, Atom -later Hydrogen – bombs that were putatively destined to be poured out upon the heads of all the little captive enrollees in the nation’s schoolrooms and upon the Miss Betties’ Mr. Bobs’ and Mrs. Belles’ who guided their educational pursuits.

My recollection is that most teachers could have won academy awards for their singular performances as nuclear attack wardens. At the sound of the inescapable auditory alerts these would – with worried and concerned countenance affected to impress upon their often somnolent charges the urgency of the situational circumstances – direct the rooms full of tousled heads to get immediately under their tables or desks, sit upon the floor with knees raised, place their heads between their legs and prepare to kiss their fannies goodbye. The boys as I recall called it, “assuming the position”, and often provided a more colorful vernacular for fannies.

I still marvel at the utter and sheer stupidity of those long ago drills, how supposedly intelligent adults could conjure up such useless exercises as a protection against a nuclear attack simply defies an understanding of their mental mechanisms.

The message of those drills however is timely and current, the people of this nation should assume the position and prepare to kiss their fannies goodbye and they should do so expeditiously and with due diligence, because this nation’s days are numbered.


People, it is not greenhouse gasses, over population, limited resources, polar bear and snail darter numbers or ice melt that guides our destiny. It is the almighty and infallible God of all creation, the creator of the heavens and the earth and all that is within and upon the heavens and the earth.

We have arrived at that prophetic point in time of no hope, no outlook, and no reprieve. We have been delivered into the hands of those who connive our inclusion into a new order and who march to the tempo of that dragon of old, Satan the god of this world. Think not that we are conscripts of that new order, we have been delivered by decree and consigned by the holy hand of the Lord God Jehovah who controls Satan and all of his minions, there is no escape from such except by Jesus. “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.” -Acts 4:12


Out of a collective of perverse peoples have come our tormentors, like malevolent microbes they have infiltrated and infected every branch of our federal government with a despotic and virulent socialism, a precursor to a satanic one-world order, that has filtered down and likewise infected the state and local governments that have eschewed the former sovereignty granted them as independent members of a once great republic. They now drink at the well of the federal socialist revolutionaries. When one hangs out with a skunk one is going to smell like a skunk.

This nation and every one of its social and governmental institutions exude a stench of filthiness and moral decay that permeates the entire union and all of the subdivisions and social institutions thereof. Degeneracy has been institutionalized; deep sexual deviancy, soul-destroying avarice and bestiality of thought have now been woven into the fabric of the nation. Such is given character and incorporated into the structured system by legislative action, presidential decree and most especially by the subjective whims of activist judges.

The Bill of Rights is totally ignored, not one of the ten amendments to the Constitution is upheld as inviolable and all are circumvented by the connivance of the judiciary through intemperate interpretations and judicial despotism. Law enforcement officials are taught calculative procedures designed specifically to evade, circumvent and make malleable the deliberate intractable construction of the amendments of the Bill of Rights.

It has been said that if the entire world would totally obey even one of the Ten Commandments it would have a deeply profound affect upon the integrity of all society. Similarly if the infrangible quality of the ten amendments were to be respected and honored our liberties would be as inviolable as they were meant to be.

Our current judicial system is the glue that holds together all of the godless tenants of social corruption and the offending immoral statutes that have been put into effect by the social degenerates whose numbers now dominate in this nation.


“As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.” Isaiah 3:12

We are a self-willed gluttonous people chasing continually after all that is inimical and contrary to God’s will. God will not now save us for we have willfully progressed to a point of seared conscience – we have no shame.


One has only to examine the output of the movie industry and the television networks to gauge the egregious depths to which society has fallen. There is seemingly not a wholesome family program to be found on any of the broadcast networks, sodomy is celebrated, fatherless fractured families are featured as normal, and promiscuity and infidelity are given prominence as worthy and exciting. The values destroying message being delivered to young malleable minds should weigh heavily on the conscience of the entire nation, but it does not. Our families are upside down and leaderless, destroyed by our cultural deviance.

Even the TV advertisements are corrupt, the promotion of personal hygiene products and sexual aids are prominent, tasteless and tawdry. Lying actors pretending to be doctors and nurses hawk mind and body destroying pharmaceutical concoctions, and real doctors and nurses sell their integrity to do the same. A sorry stinking mess confronts one daily on the broadcast media.


Without strong leaders of integrity and strong values nations die, this nation is in the throes of that demise and the death struggle intensifies with each succeeding administration. In the main the leaders of this nation are liars and deceivers who pursue personal agendas always, they are self-indulgent and inwardly turned and without an altruistic bone in their body. It is, with them, always about political power and personal gain, their every effort is geared to aggrandizement, and the maintaining of a presence in office that allows them to amass fortunes and to be possessed of opulent perks. Our leaders are leaders in name only; we are in fact essentially leaderless.

Barack Hussein Obama is an extreme example of the foregoing assertions. Please understand that this arrogant gangling-gawky fraud cares not one whit about your health or your ability or inability to access health care. It is entirely about power, he has seized upon the issue to affect his personal agenda, that of moving the nation to totalitarian socialism. From the beginning he had no other plan than this, every time he takes the podium he wings it. He never had a blueprint for an overhaul of the health care system his is a lying endeavor, in terms that everyone can understand he makes it up as he goes along. He is filled with himself, and his self-love has been fed by the accolades and rabid worship of the dimwits in society and an insurgent socialist media. He is a dangerously character-deficient self-worshipping megalomaniac, he thinks that he is a god and will not stop until he has either destroyed himself or the nation, most likely he will destroy both.

Of course Mr. Obama has had much help and assistance in his counterfeit quest, this from the deceived and deluded that ignorantly shore up his completely selfish pursuits. Most of these groups and individuals perceive, in their mind’s eye, the many selfish benefits they believe will emanate from their support of the president; they fail to understand apparently that his goal is not health care reform, but governmental reform.

The American Medical Association and the nation’s nurses have indorsed his plan for health care reform, one wonders what plan they are addressing. If it is the mishmash pending in both houses of congress one has to wonder about the wisdom of our health care providers, it should certainly promote trepidation in those seeking their services.

These are the people that gave us ten-dollar aspirin and Tylenol tablets, twenty-five dollar sanitary napkins and surgical dressings, and five-dollar Q-tips and band-aids. The fact is that many of these have been investigated for bilking the Medicare system out of many millions of dollars through inflated and fraudulent claims. Certainly we have many very fine and ethical individuals within our health care system, but there is enough taint in the profession to question their support of Barack Obama’s boondoggle.

Then we have groups such as the AARP, which whole-heartedly supports and endorses the Obama health care push. Their support for this pending fiasco has greatly increased my already deep disaffection for the AARP. It has always galled me deeply that they claim to represent the interests of all geezers, such as I, in the entire nation. They don’t represent my interests and the fact that they claim to in their self-aggrandizing TV advertisements prompts my disdain and contempt. In reality this feigned concern for the gray and wrinkled set is a cover for the group’s true mission, which is to rake in millions of dollars by hawking a bevy of various insurance programs and sundry other social programs for a take of the loot that is put-up by the gullible elderly who are taken in by their pitch.

Now, this “we’re for the aged” purportedly non-political consortium has joined hands with Obama in his quest for what is a clearly undefined health care reform program. One must assume that they believe that somehow someway they will once again be in line for a take of the loot. This group is as non-political as ACORN, both are darlings of the liberals of both parties, and yes the Republican Party encompasses liberals, they just prefer to be called ‘moderates.”


“We have had our last chance. If we will not devise some greater and equitable system, our Armageddon will be at our door. The problem basically is theological and involves a spiritual recrudescence, an improvement of human character that will synchronize with our almost matchless advances in science, art, literature and all material and cultural developments of the past two thousand years. IT MUST BE OF THE SPIRIT IF WE ARE TO SAVE THE FLESH–General Douglas MacArthur

“And I will break the pride of your power; and I will make your heaven as iron, and your earth as brass: And your strength shall be spent in vain: for your land shall not yield her increase, neither shall the trees of the land yield their fruits. And if ye walk contrary unto me, and will not hearken unto me; I will bring seven times more plagues upon you according to your sins.” -Leviticus 26:19-21

Our worst nightmare is about to burst upon us, in one hour our time will come and none will escape, this nation’s wickedness has predestined a total calamity, only Almighty God could now save us from that ultimate fate, but the pride and arrogance of men stands between our people and God. Men will not save this nation, but you do not have to perish…know that

“If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.” -Romans 10: 9-10

© 2009 – Jim R. Schwiesow – All Rights Reserved

What’s New from

What’s New

Geert Wilders arrives in UK and explains his ‘problems with Islam’   [10/17/09]
The courageous Dutch Member of Parliament was kept out of Britain for a while because he spoke the truth about Islam. However the British courts had their say favoring free speech, and Geert Wilders arrived to howling mobs of muslims who want Islamic sharia law and an end to the freedoms of the West.

    Police held back a crowd of Muslim demonstrators as Geert Wilders met Ukip peer Lord Pearson opposite the Houses of Parliament.
    Explaining his controversial views on Islam, he said: “I have a problem with the Islamic ideology, the Islamic culture, because I feel that the more Islam that we get in our societies, the less freedom that we get.”
    The leader of the Dutch Freedom Party was allowed into Britain after overturning a Government decision led by former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith to bar him from the country.
    It was feared that his outspoken views on Islam could spark religious violence, but this was rejected by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal on Tuesday.

Intimidation is an effective tool for Muslims, at least in Britain. But western civilization won a round in this case, with Wilders being allowed to speak about the danger brought by unwise immigration policy.

As usual, the Daily Mail had some great pictures (Anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders faces Muslim protest after arriving in the UK).

The following clip begins with one muslim noting that the Koran dictates the punishment for speaking ill of Mohammed is death, and it becomes more hostile from that point. Another muslim stated, “If we had an Islamic state today, his head would be on the stake.” Not to be missed. Muslim protestors insult Geert Wilders

•   •   •

Mexico town split over Central American drifters   [10/16/09]
“Drifters” — that’s a new item for the euphemism file, and from the PC LA Times, of all sources.
Plus there is a dose of unintended hilarity of the role reversal sort, where Mexes are the townspeople calling for troublesome foreigners to be repatriated.

    Migrants fall prey to kidnappers and worse while the Mexican government does little to protect them, rights groups say. But others say the migrants are forming criminal bands and should be deported.
    Gathered below an overpass on Independence Avenue, dressed in the multiple layers typical of homeless travelers, the migrants watched for the next northbound freight train through Tultitlan.
    Many of them, mostly young men and boys, prepared to hop aboard, hobo-style, on an ever-more-precarious trip that might get them as far as the United States.
    But fewer migrants are achieving that goal. Central Americans who for years have passed through Mexico en route to the U.S. are increasingly cutting their trips short as they run out of cash or become discouraged by fewer opportunities farther away from home. […]
    A new city administration that took office in August, however, feels differently. Mayor Marco Calzada said he wants the federal government to deport the migrants. When they were just passing through, it was a manageable problem, he said, but now large numbers are staying and forming criminal bands.
    Officials say the Tultitlan municipality, with a population of more than 432,000, sees hundreds of immigrants arriving each week.
    “The numbers are over the top,” Calzada said. “They have invaded neighborhoods. They steal, they kidnap, they rape.”

When large numbers of illegal aliens congregate, they tend to form criminal gangs — what a concerpt! I’m trying to wrap my mind around it.

•   •   •

‘Islam is violent’ says President Obama’s new pastor Carey Cash   [10/15/09]
It’s nice to know the President has one voice of reason around him.

    More than a year after he was forced to disown his Chicago pastor, President Obama has begun to attend services led by a Christian chaplain who views Islam as a violent faith.
    Mr Obama has been an irregular church attender since becoming President, but has expressed a fondness for Carey Cash, the navy chaplain at the Camp David presidential retreat who has been criticised for proselytising in the military and his mistrust of Islam.
    The White House insists that the Rev Cash, the great-nephew of the singer Johnny Cash, has not become Mr Obama’s new pastor, but it appears that the President has heard more sermons by him than any other minister since taking office.
    The emergence of Mr Cash, 39, who was profiled on the front page of The Washington Post yesterday, will pose some tough questions for the White House – and for President Obama, whose father was Muslim. In a 2004 book describing his deployment to Iraq the year before, Mr Cash calls Islam violent, a faith that “from its very birth has used the edge of the sword as a means to convert or conquer those with different religious convictions”.

The Washington Post story is a little more detailed: The Pastor Who Has Obama’s Attention

    Although Cash was assigned to Camp David by the Navy, the president really likes the guy. Cash, Obama told religion reporters this summer, “delivers as powerful a sermon as I’ve heard in a while. I really think he’s excellent.”
    But don’t make the mistake of referring to the imposing 6-foot-4 Southern Baptist chaplain as the president’s pastor. The White House has said that’s not the case.

Here’s a song from Pastor Cash’s famous great uncle, who was a fine singer of hymns.

•   •   •

House Republicans accuse Muslim group of trying to plant spies   [10/15/09]
This should be a major bombshell.
The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR, mentioned below) has long pretended to be the civil rights organization for Muslims residing in America, but has used its deep pockets (Middle East money, like the $50 million it got from the United Arab Emirates) to undermine the Constitution and spread Islamic sharia law in America. Anti-CAIR calls it a “terrorist supporting front organization” and fought back a lawsuit mounted by the powerful organization to shut down the Anti-CAIR website. CAIR is a creation of the terror group Hamas and exists to destroy America, all the while squawking about “Islamophobia” and “racism.”

    Republican members of the Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus said the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) have tried to plant “spies” within key national-security committees in order to shape legislative policy.
    Reps. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.), John Shadegg (R-Ariz.), Paul Broun (R-Ga.) and Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), citing the book Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America, called for the House sergeant at arms to investigate whether CAIR had been successful in placing interns on key panels. The lawmakers are specifically focused on the House Homeland Security Committee, Intelligence Committee and Judiciary Committee.
    “If an organization is connected to or supports terrorists [and] is running influence operations or planting spies in key national security-related offices, I think this needs to be made known,” said Broun, who sits on the Homeland Security Committee. “So I join my colleagues here today in calling for action.”

Fox: CAIR – Terrorism Infiltrating Congress

Here’s another eye-opener from the book: CAIR spent $160,000 to silence Savage.

    An explosive new book based on a daring six-month undercover operation exposing the subversive agenda of the Council on American-Islamic Relations reveals the Muslim group spent $160,000 in an unsuccessful effort to run top-rated nationally syndicated radio host Michael Savage off the air.
    Internal CAIR documents uncovered in “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America” show that despite its high cost and the continued success of Savage’s show, CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad believed the campaign was “worth every penny,” because, he says, the radio star lost at least $1 million in advertising.
    Authors P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry recount how CAIR ran out of money before it could crack Savage’s most loyal sponsors.
    As WND reported, Savage sued CAIR in December 2007, two months after the Muslim lobby group began urging “people of all faiths” to contact Savage’s advertisers to protest “anti-Muslim bigotry” on the air. CAIR cited Savage calling the Quran “a throwback document” and “a book of hate” and demanding CAIR be thrown out of the country for promulgating it.

UPDATE: Myrick, Shadegg, Broun and Franks Call For CAIR Investigations
Rep Sue Myrick rocks. A couple years ago she authored a bill to require any illegal alien convicted of driving drunk to be deported after serving his sentence (the Scott Gardner Act). She has been a leader on national security issues, such as her “Wake Up America” 2.0 Agenda.

See also Daniel Pipes’ remarks about the book and CAIR’s nefarious activities: CAIR’s Inner Workings Exposed.

    The Council on American-Islamic Relations has, since its founding in 1994, served as the Islamist movement in North America’s most high-profile, belligerent, manipulative, and aggressive agency. From its headquarters in Washington, D.C., CAIR also sets the agenda and tone for the entire Wahhabi lobby.
    A substantial body of criticism about CAIR exists, some of it by me, but until now, the group’s smash-mouths and extremists have managed to survive all revelations about its record. The publication this week of Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America (WND Books) may, however, change the equation.
    Written by P. David Gaubatz and Paul Sperry, the investigation is based largely on the undercover work of Gaubatz’s son Chris who spent six months as an intern at CAIR’s D.C. headquarters in 2008. In that capacity, he acquired 12,000 pages of documentation and took 300 hours of video.

The book refutes many CAIR self-characterizations, including…

    Claim 3: CAIR receives “no support from any overseas group or government.” Fact: Gaubatz and Sperry report that 60 percent of CAIR’s income derives from two dozen donors, most of whom live outside the United States. Specifically: $978,000 from the ruler of Dubai in 2002 in exchange for controlling interest in its headquarters property on New Jersey Avenue, a $500,000 gift from Saudi prince al-Waleed bin Talal and $112,000 in 2007 from Saudi prince Abdullah bin Mosa’ad, at least $300,000 from the Saudi-based Organization of the Islamic Conference, $250,000 from the Islamic Development Bank, and at least $17,000 from the American office of the Saudi-based International Islamic Relief Organization. […]
    Combining these four facts reveals a CAIR quite unlike its public image. Almost bereft of members and dues, it sustains itself by selling its services to the Saudi and U.A.E. governments by doing their ideological and financial bidding.
    This in turn raises the obvious question: should CAIR not be required to register as a foreign agent, with the regulations, scrutiny, and lack of tax-deductible status that the designation implies? Data in Muslim Mafia certainly suggests so.

•   •   •

Public Opinion in Mexico on U.S. Immigration: Zogby Poll Examines Attitudes   [10/14/09]
They teach you in Psych 101 that when you reward a behavior you get more of it. So the headlines of this poll are no surprise, that amnesty encourages more illegal entry.

  • A clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally. Just 17 percent thought it would make Mexicans less likely to go illegally. The rest were unsure or thought it would make no difference.
  • Of Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally.
  • Two-thirds of Mexicans know someone living in the United States; one-third said an immediate member of their household was living in the United States.
  • Interest in going to the United States remains strong even in the current recession, with 36 percent of Mexicans (39 million people) saying they would move to the United States if they could. At present, 12 to 13 million Mexico-born people live in the United States.
  • A new Pew Research Center poll also found that about one-third of Mexicans would go to the United States if they could.
  • An overwhelming majority (69 percent) of people in Mexico thought that the primary loyalty of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) should be to Mexico. Just 20 percent said it should be to the United States. The rest were unsure.
  • Also, 69 percent of people in Mexico felt that the Mexican government should represent the interests of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) in the United States.
  • A plurality, 39 percent, of Mexicans thought that in the last year fewer people they know had gone to the United States as illegal immigrants compared to previous years. Only 27 percent thought more had gone. The rest thought it had stayed the same or were unsure.
  • A plurality, 40 percent, also thought that in the last year more of the illegal immigrants they know had returned to Mexico compared to previous years. Only 25 percent thought the number returning had fallen. The rest thought it had stayed the same or were unsure.
  • Both the bad economy and increased immigration enforcement were cited as reasons fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico.

•   •   •

Gutierrez on immigration reform: “We will not wait”   [10/14/09]
I saw the last of this speech last night on C-SPAN, although what I heard was a whole lot of Spanish, a language I don’t speak. So what he said may well have been far more radical than these demands in English.

See Roy Beck’s blog on the amnesty anarchists: ACLU & Catholic Bishops & Evangelicals & the Gutierrez Gang Expose Their Radical Agenda

    Although [Rep Luis] Gutierrez gave us few true details today, the amnesty for 12-20 million illegal alien workers and dependents is just a small part of his plan.
    He wants increases in every kind of immigration. The current flood of foreign labor is a trickle compared with the foreign labor that will inundate U.S. occupations if Gutierrez gets his way.
    Gutierrez’ somewhat vague remarks suggest that his bill will gut or minimize current enforcement strategies. But, according to him, we will need little enforcement to stop illegal immigration in the future because we will be allowing so much chain migration of extended family, so much importation of unskilled labor and highly skilled labor that just about anybody who thinks they can get a job will be given a visa.

This is a no-lose situation for Gutierrez. It’s unlikely there will be a monster amnesty given this wretched economy, although he could get lucky in today’s crazy Washington. Even a failure still leaves him positioned as a major loudmouth leader beloved by the Marxicans.

•   •   •

Recession over, unemployment seen at 10 percent   [10/13/09]
“Jobless recovery” is one of the biggest oxymorons ever, but the expert number crunchers have no problems uttering such gibberish.

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The worst U.S. recession since the Great Depression has ended, but weak household spending as the labor market struggles to create jobs will slow the pace of the economy’s recovery, according to a survey released on Monday.
    The survey of 44 professional forecasters released by the National Association for Business Economics, also known as the NABE, found that 80 percent of the respondents believed the economy was growing again after four straight quarters of declines.
    “The great recession is over,” NABE President-Elect Lynn Reaser said.
    “The vast majority of business economists believe that the recession has ended, but that the economic recovery is likely to be more moderate than those typically experienced following steep declines.”

And: Business Economists Forecast Lost Jobs Won’t be Restored before 2012.

•   •   •

56% Say U.S. Government Policies Encourage Illegal Immigration   [10/13/09]
Washington is busted: the majority of citizens understand their government is acting against their interests.

    U.S. voters want aggressive action to restrict illegal immigration, but they don’t think immigrants should bear the brunt of the enforcement efforts on their own. Most say the federal government and those hiring illegal immigrants also need to be brought into the discussion.
    The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% say the policies of the federal government encourage people to enter the United States illegally. Only 27% disagree, and 17% are not sure.
    Republicans and unaffiliated voters overwhelmingly believe that federal policies encourage illegal immigration. Thirty-two percent (32%) of Democrats agree, but 41% do not.
    The view that the federal government is enticing people to violate the law is consistent with earlier surveys. Among voters who are angry about immigration, 83% are angry at the federal government. Only 12% direct their anger at the immigrants.
    Voters want the laws of the land enforced but not just against illegal immigrants.
    The new survey finds that 64% believe law enforcement officers should sometimes conduct surprise raids at places where immigrants gather to find work. An even larger number (71%) say those who do the hiring also should be arrested.
    Earlier surveys have shown that voters overwhelmingly believe that those who employ illegal immigrants should be punished.
    Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona has aggressively enforced laws against illegal immigration including raids of places where illegal immigrants gather to seek work. He is viewed favorably by 68% of Arizona voters, making him one of the state’s most popular political figures. Most in the state say the tough sheriff has been good for the state’s image.

August 14 Rasmussen Reports Morning Update   [8/14/09]
The preceding link is to a video file from the polling company and has no text accompaniment that I can find now. I took a screen snap (below) of an important point, that “70% of Voters Say Gaining Control of Borders is More Important Than Legalizing Undocumented Workers.”

That’s a sensible result, but it is disappointing to see also a substantial number of people supporting a “path to citizenship.” We already have a very generous pathway, and it’s called LEGAL immigration.

Yesterday’s immigration poll focused on the likelihood for “reform”: Most Voters Say Immigration Reform Not Likely to Pass

    President Barack Obama recently suggested that immigration reform might be on the legislative agenda for early 2010. But, most voters don’t see passage of legislation as likely.
    Just 31% say Congress is even somewhat likely to pass legislation to control the borders and reduce illegal immigration. Only 6% say that’s very likely. While voters don’t expect it to pass, 66% consider such legislation Very Important.

•   •   •

New report puts world population at 7 billion by 2011   [8/14/09]
The push factor part of the immigration equation continues to increase — while the birth rate has declined in some places, much of the third world in particular is popping out more little humans than the earth can sustainably supply with resources. The planetary population at today’s writing is 6.78 billion and chugging right along.
It seems like only yesterday that population realists were lamenting the six-million-person planet. Now we are closing in on another regrettable milestone.
The sun isn’t scheduled to burn out for several billion years, so what’s the big rush? There’s plenty of time to have billions and billions of humans — but not all at once.

    By 2011, the world’s population should reach 7 billion, according to a new report put forth by the Population Reference Bureau’s 2009 World Population Data Sheet.
    The report states that 97% of global growth over the next 40 years will occur in Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean.
    “The great bulk of today’s 1.2 billion youth – nearly 90% – are in developing countries,” said Carl Haub, a co-author of the report, to CNN.
    Immigration of the rural youth into more developed places will probably continue into 2011.
    “During the next few decades, these young people will most likely continue the current trend of moving from rural areas to cities in search of education and training opportunities, gainful employment and adequate health care,” Haub told CNN.
    The U.S. and Canada will account for most of the growth in the developed world – half coming from immigration alone – the report states.
    The report also says that high fertility rates combined with a young population base is the fuel behind most of the growth in the developing world. In Africa, women give birth to six or seven children on average, compared with about two children in the U.S. and 1.5 in Canada.

•   •   •

“Exclusive: President’s aunt ends her silence”   [8/13/09]
More from Auntie Mooch, er Zeituni, who isn’t exactly silent: she was interviewed in Boston a couple weeks ago and appears to enjoy the media spotlight. (She’s the President’s welfare-freeloading illegal alien aunt who somehow has not yet been deported, even though she was ordered to be repatriated in 2004.)
The interview is pretty much a puff piece, although she did pipe up on the subject of where the nephew was born.

    She talks about the current controversy over the President Obama’s citizenship.
    “Barack was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. Ann (Obama’s mother) never stepped foot on Kenyan soil,” Onyango says defiantly. […]
    Onyango is very protective of her nephew. She won’t say whether she’s spoken to him since her deportation troubles, but says her problems are her own.
    “Right now with this controversy, I don’t want to disturb him because he’s got a big job to do. I’m not an issue. I am not Barack Obama’s daughter. I am not Barack Obama’s wife. I am not Barack Obama’s constituent. I’m Barack Obama’s auntie. So anything happening to Barack Obama, I should not be included,” Onyango says.

The President already has his mother-in-law living at the White House. If he isn’t going to have the deadbeat aunt deported, he should at least save the taxpayer a few bucks by giving her three hots and a cot.

    Mexicans say amnesty encourages them to come to US illegally; enforcement discourages them from doing so

    October 14, 2009

    Mexicans say amnesty encourages them to come to US illegally; enforcement discourages them from doing so

    A new Zogby poll exposes what amnesty proponents are aiming for. Among the key findings:

    • A clear majority of people in Mexico, 56 percent, thought giving legal status to illegal immigrants in the United States would make it more likely that people they know would go to the United States illegally. Just 17 percent thought it would make Mexicans less likely to go illegally. The rest were unsure or thought it would make no difference.

    • Of Mexicans with a member of their immediate household in the United States, 65 percent said a legalization program would make people they know more likely to go to America illegally.

    • A new Pew Research Center poll also found that about one-third of Mexicans would go to the United States if they could.

    • An overwhelming majority (69 percent) of people in Mexico thought that the primary loyalty of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) should be to Mexico. Just 20 percent said it should be to the United States. The rest were unsure.

    • Also, 69 percent of people in Mexico felt that the Mexican government should represent the interests of Mexican-Americans (Mexico- and U.S.-born) in the United States.

    •Both the bad economy and increased immigration enforcement were cited as reasons fewer people were going to America as illegal immigrants and more were coming back to Mexico.

    Granting legalization to those currently illegally residing in the US will encourage more Mexicans to come stateside illegally. Tougher internal and border enforcement of existing immigration laws, in contrast, will discourage potential illegal immigrants from coming to the US. Make life easier for illegal immigrants and more of them will show up. Make life more difficult for illegal immigrants and more of them will go home. Simple stuff.

    By more than 3 to 1, Mexicans say a McCain-Kennedy redux will lead to an increase in those leaving Mexico to settle in the US illegally.

    By 7 to 2, Mexicans believe the loyalty of their compatriots living in the US should primarily be to Mexico. Mexicans currently living in the US were these people until they headed north, so this strongly suggests that an overwhelming majority of Mexicans residing in the US right now feel closer to Mexico than they do to America.

    Among the plurality of Mexicans who think the number of Mexicans in the US has decreased in recent years, one-third cite tougher immigration enforcement as the primary reason. A couple of high-profile raids and hollow lip service about being a nation of laws is a formidable deterrent. Imagine the effects that serious enforcement and restrictionist measures would have!

    More than one-third of Mexicans living south of the border profess that they would head to the US if they had the “means and opportunity” to do so. That’s 41 million aspiring settlers from a country where the purchasing power parity is less then one-third what it is in the US. There is no better way to increase poverty in the US than to import it on such a massive scale.

    Genocidal Immigration – Of Whites, by Whites, and for Whites from

    Of Whites, by Whites, and for Whites

    In Moving Forward Prozium cites me favorably as one of the handful of people who write about White Nationalism in the blogosphere on a semi-regular basis. I’m nonplussed and will respond by expressing some recent thoughts.

    Late last week I met Prozium and a few other pro-Whites I have until now known only online. I’m neither a leader nor a joiner, and have for a variety of other reasons so far been disinclined to engage openly. I’m having a change of heart lately and like Prozium I am becoming more interested in activity and collaboration offline.

    Before anyone else bothers I’ll point out myself that the focus of my writing here hasn’t been on White nationalism per se, but mainly on jewish influence and the White/jew faultline, the purpose being to educate myself and my few visitors to various double standards and acts of jewish malfeasance. I’m growing tired of this, disgusted might be a better word, but it’s something I felt a need to do. I had climbed similar learning curves on islam and immigration in the years before, and my more recent focus has been a logical continuation of that self-education. It has also been a response to various anti-anti-semites who have since my awakening come with nothing but disinformation and dementia (see Committing PC’s Most Mortal Sin and White Nationalism and Anti-Semitism).

    I am prepared now not only to join Prozium and state openly that my ultimate goal is a jew-free, White ethnostate in North America, but also to say that I’ve come to this position after deep consideration, having gathered substantial information and arguments in support. I understand that racialism and separatism are among the most frowned upon concepts in today’s public discourse, never mind criticizing jews. What I can also see clearly however is that the same rotten thoroughly judaized regime that makes this true also advances and celebrates anti-Whitism and the slow genocide of my kind, which has only accelerated as we’ve become more deracinated and obsequious. Now that the regime’s nature is obvious to me I cannot do anything but oppose it and share what I’ve learned with others.

    What Whites need to survive is at least one place where we are not guilt-tripped, harrassed, mugged, raped, murdered and ultimately bred out of existence by shitheads who hate us. We have never had a problem dealing with our own shitheads. It’s with the non-White shitheads, and only in the last few generations, that we get all tangled up. What I know now is that it started with jewish emancipation. What Whites need to thrive is a culture composed and controlled by our own kind, exhibiting a confident and positive self-image. This has been less and less the case as jewish ownership and influence in our media, art, and entertainment has increased.

    Whether we remove ourselves, or those who hate us, or some combination of both is not as important to me as the recognition that the status quo cannot endure. If we do nothing we will surely disappear, so why not resist? It is already open season on Whites, despite our disproportionate representation in the police and military. As we lose control of these institutions and our political and financial influence wanes we will see the hostility and violence against us increase dramatically.

    A cold Winter comes. We must make preparations in order to see Spring.

    posted by Tanstaafl at 10/13/2009 09:33:00 PM 18 comments

    Saturday, October 10, 2009

    Why The Sierra Club Favors –

    It honors the memory of a jewish mega-donor’s grandparents.

    This is an old story that isn’t as widely known as it deserves to be. Brenda Walker touched on it recently in The Van Jones Fiasco—How Low Can Lefty Greens Go?

    The Man Behind The Land:

    David Gelbaum has shunned publicity while giving millions to preserve California wilderness and teach youths about nature.
    By Kenneth R. Weiss
    Times Staff Writer

    October 27, 2004

    He has given more money to conservation causes in California than anyone else. His gifts have helped protect 1,179 square miles of mountain and desert landscapes, an area the size of Yosemite National Park.

    His donations to wilderness education programs have made it possible for 437,000 inner-city schoolchildren to visit the mountains, the desert or the beach often for the first time.

    Over a decade of steadily growing contributions including more than $100 million to the Sierra Club this mathematician turned financial angel has taken great pains to remain anonymous.

    I used to live in California. It was nice, until it started turning into Mexico.

    “I did tell [Sierra Club Executive Director] Carl Pope in 1994 or 1995 that if they ever came out anti-immigration, they would never get a dollar from me.”

    Gelbaum said he was a substantial donor at the time but not yet the club’s largest benefactor. Immigration arose as an issue in 1994 because Proposition 187, which threatened to deny public education and health care to illegal immigrants, was on the state’s ballot.

    He said he was so upset by the idea of “pulling kids out of school” that he donated more than $180,000 to the campaign to oppose Proposition 187. After the measure passed, he said, he donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to civil rights lawyers who ultimately got the measure struck down in court.

    Gelbaum, who reads the Spanish-language newspaper La Opinión and is married to a Mexican American, said his views on immigration were shaped long ago by his grandfather, Abraham, a watchmaker who had come to America to escape persecution of Jews in Ukraine before World War I.

    “I asked, ‘Abe, what do you think about all of these Mexicans coming here?’ ” Gelbaum said. “Abe didn’t speak English that well. He said, ‘I came here. How can I tell them not to come?’

    “I cannot support an organization that is anti-immigration. It would dishonor the memory of my grandparents.”

    My entire extended family and most everyone I knew voted for Prop 187. It was one of the few times in my life that the government showed any interest in the citizenry’s opinion about immigration. I didn’t realize until more than 10 years later that our democracy is actually a cryptic form of plutocracy, and the plutocrats want genocidal levels of immigration.

    Prop 187 passed and the voters went about their business, thinking the matter resolved. Then a judge killed it, though most of us didn’t hear about that, because the media supports genocidal immigration too.

    Paul Craig Roberts wrote about it in Throw out-of-control Judge Pfaelzer off the bench, Apr 24, 1998:

    Judges are so out of control today that a single federal judge thinks nothing about casting aside popular referendums passed by the votes of millions of citizens and imposing outcomes that are the opposite of what was voted.

    The latest example is U.S. district judge Mariana Pfaelzer, who declared on March 13 that California citizens must tax themselves to meet the needs of illegal aliens. Pfaelzer, it seems, is under the influence of University of Chicago professor Martha Nussbaum, who teaches that the concept of national citizenship is too exclusive and “morally dangerous.” Justice and equality, she claims, require “allegiance to the worldwide community of human beings.”

    Californians think not, but who are they to matter? Pfaelzer has thrown out California’s Proposition 187, which restricted illegal aliens from living off taxpayers.

    Fast forward a decade or so and California has been bankrupted by immigration, its White population deliberately displaced and dispossessed by “diversity”. So what’s on the Sierra Club’s agenda now?

    Sierra Club Insider: Yep, We’re Too White, July 28, 2009:

    “We are proud that Sierra Club has successful diversity programs already established,” said the Sierra Club President Allison Chin. “Now, with the leadership of a diversity council and my election as our first Asian-American president, the Sierra Club is committed to becoming an even more welcoming and inclusive organization.”

    Judging by their reaction, White members did not feel either welcomed or included. Unfortunately for them, the Sierra Club has more than 100 million reasons not to care.

    Two reactions where the sense of betrayal comes through crystal clear:

    Immigrants typically come to the US with 3rd world birthrates and 1st world appetites — the WORST POSSIBLE COMBINATION from an ecological standpoint.

    I’m white and I got a vasectomy and had no kids, because long ago I realized the Earth didn’t need more humans. This was a good-faith decision on my part.

    How do open borders advocates respond when I tell them that? Almost inevitably I am mocked, often times with semi-literate obscenities and mindless machismo bluster. It doesn’t make me feel like grovelling for their approval, I’ll tell you that.

    Posted by: Pat Kittle | August 21, 2009 at 06:23 PM

    Yes, I remember during the 60s/70s, there was that jerk, Paul Ehrlich who talked about having “0 Population growth.” Our generation even had propaganda movies like: Soylent Green, Roller Ball, Logan’s Run and a couple of Star Trek episodes to drive the point home.

    Since I was a kid at the time being indoctrinated with this BS, I didn’t realize that Kennedy passed the 1965 Immigration Bill NOR did I know about La Raza, MEChA and other groups that were teaching about AZTLAN/ANAHUAC and they planned to outbreed us to reclaim lost Mexican Territory the AZTLAN plan or in the ANAHUAC case to reclaim the entire Americas and boot everyone else out.

    Now, our grand reward for watching our birth rates for Mother Earth because of Ehrlich’s (Population Bomb) is to be made fun of for “not making babies.”

    And the Sierra Club, the Rockefellers (Club of Rome)and other bogus “green” groups continue to look completely the other way when we’re being flooded with immigration (both legal and illegal) to drive down wages, displace our own legal citizens’ jobs and Balkanize our nation.

    By the way, immigrants (legal and illegal) also use water and other resources. We can cut back and conserve but that will be entirely negated with continued uncontrolled growth.

    Thanks a lot.

    Posted by: Roxan | August 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM

    What’s happening to California, with the rest of the US not far behind, is not an accident. It’s the result of a deliberate drive to “diversify” White Americans into minority status. Then non-existence. It’s genocide.

    Ted Kennedy’s Legacy: Genocidal Immigrationist

    I wrote about Ted Kennedy’s Legacy when his brain cancer was first announced in May of 2008. My opinion has only soured since. Please indulge me as I summarize his shameful legacy one more time, especially as our enemies at this moment are producing geysers of grief and love for their fallen hero.

    From Wikipedia’s Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (AKA Hart-Celler Act):

    During debate on the Senate floor, Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the act, said, “First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same…. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset…. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia…. In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think…. The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”[2] The act’s supporters not only claimed the law would not change America’s ethnic makeup, but that such a change was not desirable.[1]

    By equalizing immigration policies, the Act resulted in a flood of new immigration from non-European nations that changed the ethnic make-up of the United States.[3] Immigration doubled between 1965 and 1970 and doubled again between 1970 and 1990.[1]

    From George Borjas’ The Bush-Kennedy-McCain Sham(nesty):

    Regarding the 1986 Immigration and Reform Control Act (the first amnesty of illegal immigrants), Senator Kennedy predicted: “This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.” The 1986 legislation, by the way, ended up granting amnesty to around 3 million illegal immigrants.

    What follows now are amongst Kennedy’s final, and in my opinion most significant, words on the subject of immigration, offered just over two years ago in the wake of the failure of the comprehensive amnesty bill he had worked hard to enact. This intemperate and deeply cynical outburst has been all but memory-holed by the press. From BizzyBlog’s Bias in Coverage of Immigration-Bill Failure Extends to Protecting Ted ‘Gestapo’ Kennedy:

    We know what they’re against, we don’t know what they’re for. Time and time again they tell us “We don’t like this provision, we don’t like that provision, we don’t want that part. Well they ought to be able to explain to the American people what they are for.

    What are they going to do with the twelve and a half million who are undocumented here? Send them back? Send them back to countries around the world? More than $250 billion dollars, buses that would go from Los Angeles to New York and back again. Try and find them, develop a type of Gestapo here to seek out these people that are in the shadows. That’s their alternative?

    HotAir provides video.

    During the long arc of Kennedy’s career as a rich, famous and increasingly powerful senator-for-life he dedicated a sizable portion of his fame and power to advocating nation-wrecking levels of legal immigration, though his good will extended even to tens of millions of illegal aliens who violated the liberal immigration laws he sponsored. A notable and consistent feature of his support for immigration was mendacity. It began with a denial of the negative impact immigration would likely have on us, the citizenry whose interests he was sworn to defend. His triumphant words in 1965 were in hindsight more prophesy than denial, for the future did unfold just as he promised it would not. The mendacity continued in 1986, two decades on, when he downplayed the horrible impact even though it was by then clear for all to see. It was in fact under the pretense of addressing this impact that he again made assertions later proven false. He again mouthed promises he made no effort to keep. The mendacity continued in 2007, another two decades on, the consequences of his handiwork now an order of magnitude larger than what he had promised would never happen again. His lies now concerned the impossibility of remedy and the negative impact any such remedy would have on the aliens. The interests of the citizenry no longer even rated lip service. He openly opposed us and cast aspersions on us.

    For leaving a young woman to drown Kennedy appeared on nationwide television and apologized. For sinking our once orderly and prosperous nation, trapping 200 million Whites (and slipping) with 100 million non-Whites (and exploding), he never apologized. He went to the grave hating us.

    If Kennedy had pursued medicine instead of politics we can imagine what might have happened. He might have shot his neighbor right after saying it was crazy for them to imagine he would do so. Then he might berate them for complaining about their pain while being wheeled into surgery, telling them not to worry, he’ll fix it. Finally he might let them die on the operating table because, in his expert estimation, to remove the bullet would simply cause too much harm. No sorries and no worries. The next of kin will get the bill.

    Then he’d go out and find another neighbor to “help”. And another. And another. It would have been much better for most of us if Kennedy had gone this route. After only a few neighbors some cop or reporter would have started asking questions and his crime wave would have been stopped. What we got instead is far worse.

    The next time you read about a crime committed by an alien, or the anchor baby of an alien, think about that. Remember Ted Kennedy. It’s on his head. He did his best to open the door for them and keep them here.

    Ted’s brother Jack once called on America to put men on the moon, a quarter million miles away. Just because. And lo, with plenty of money and brainstorming and elbow grease men were there, less than a decade later. Playing golf. Ted in his turn, given an opportunity to right a wrong he helped create, argued instead that Americans should simply surrender and accept colonization by hostile, impoverished, uneducated aliens, because, we’re to believe, he couldn’t stomach the effort required to stop it.

    In comparison to the trillions our corrupt politicians have since rushed to transfer from taxpayers to international financiers, Ted’s scary $250B for deportation seems positively puny. Beside that, it would be spread broadly and domestically in pursuit of a goal the citizenry has actually expressed an interest in. It would be an investment which would pay large dividends in the form of savings on unemployment, healthcare, law enforcement, education, utilities and infrastructure, and much more. In contrast, the trillions dropped in financier laps have simply vanished. The credit that absolutely positively had to loosen? It didn’t. Beyond preserving some undeserved bonuses it seems those trillions just got sucked right into the vacuum created by a decade or more of financial fraud and false profits. Plan B seems to be to give the country, and all of us, to China.

    To hell with the money. It pales next to the genocide. Given the choice I would gladly put myself and my children on the hook for any amount to stop the immigration invasion, to send the ones already here home. As it happens I’m sure doing so would actually save money, which only makes the pain inflicted on us – the crowding, the crime, the violence, the political correctness – all the more senseless. Except it’s not. It’s genocide. We have what others want. We’re in their way. That’s the dynamic. You can see it in their furtive glare. At some point, as our numbers dwindle, order will break down. Look to Zimbabwe or South Africa to see where we’re heading.

    You may not think of immigration as genocide. I never used to. Even now I don’t think it always was, or that it has to be. But recently I decided that the senseless flood being forced down our throats definitely is genocidal. It’s obliterating who and what we are. Fast and forever.

    Allow me to offer a few of the stepping stones that brought me to this conclusion.

    “Whether you declare war or not, we are in a societal conflict” excerpts a report, published in December of 2007, less than six months after Kennedy’s “gestapo” meltdown, on the hundreds of thousands of violent, criminal gangbangers fanning out across the US. Ted Kennedy was on their side. He wanted to make them citizens.

    Pew Something Stinks describes how immigration has transformed the ethnic mix of this country. Anyone who knows anything about immigration knows this. Our corrupt politicians know we know it. In 1965 altering the mix was acknowledged, even by Kennedy, to be a bad idea. Today we’re supposed to pretend it’s a good thing, that we always wanted it to happen, otherwise we’re evil “racists”.

    Genocidal Immigrationists is my first use of the phrase, prompted by the increasingly blatant sickening enthusiasm for nation-wrecking immigration in media and self-righteous jewish organizations, lobbying more zealously than ever for their immigrant friends. What seems insane is in truth only anti-White. It’s time to wake up. Smell the genocide.

    – – –

    On Tuesday, 25 August 2009, Senator Edward Kennedy died, escaping the justice he so richly deserved. It is Kennedy’s advocacy for genocidal immigration, especially after its ghastly impact was obvious, for which he should always be remembered. In ignominy. In infamy. Good riddance.

    posted by Tanstaafl at 8/26/2009 09:51:00 PM 27 comments

    Friday, August 21, 2009

    What Anti-Migrant Anti-Hornet Racism Tells Us

    Yet another case of non-human biology providing a headline highlighting a similar, but suppressed, human reality.

    Tourists warned as Asian hornets terrorise French:

    Tourists are being warned to steer clear of Asian hornets that are colonising France, after swarms of the aggressive predators attacked seven people.

    That’s odd. The threat pales in comparison to the swarms of aggressive predatory alien muslim youths who have been permitted to colonize France and who pose a far more deadly threat, yet neither the authorities nor the media have issued correspondingly omnious warnings about that.

    Odd also that even though all of the trouble-making Asian hornets were born and raised in France nobody has started calling them French hornets, nor do they pretend they can’t or shouldn’t notice any difference from the indigenous hornets. Curiously, the article also fails to emphasize that not all of the Asian hornets are trouble-makers. Nor does it assert that they are France’s greatest strength, that France is a nation of insects, or that the undocumented migrant hornets are just coming to do the jobs French honeybees won’t do.

    Very, very strange.

    “Never attempt to destroy an Asian hornet nest yourself but call on specialist organisations, as this species charges in a group as soon as it feels its nest is threatened.”

    Whoops. Another uncomfortable similarity, and another contrast. The human invaders also attack in groups, stirred to murderous riot by the flimsiest pretexts. But “specialist organisations” will only answer calls to destroy the nests of hornets.

    As a knock-on effect of the invasive species, the European hornet has become more aggressive, due to a lack of food.

    When European people, as opposed to hornets, respond similarly, the “knock-on effect” is that the government openly militates against the indigenous species, not the invasive species. In Britain, there’s even an Asian human in charge of doing it. Labour says they will ease up on Muslim fanatics:

    We shall be putting a renewed focus on resisting right-wing racist extremism. We cannot dismiss or underestimate the threat.

    This typifies the genocidal official response all across the Eurosphere. For those of us who see this, we shall resist the reality-inverting “racist extremism” rhetoric used to pathologize our perfectly natural reactions to violent colonization. We cannot dismiss or underestimate the threat it poses.

    State of the Union. Death of the Nation.

    State of the Union.

    Posted by George Poe on Monday, July 13, 2009 · 11 Comments

    American Landscape

    Locust says: You know what needs to be done, now grow some balls and do it!

    As we edge into the second decade of the 21st century, American nationalists  must reflect on where we are, where we’ve been, and the direction we seem to be going. In 2009, the American nationalist scene is essentially non-existent. Our people (as few as they are) are fragmented, leaderless, and isolated from each other. Our politics have been hi-jacked by the dregs of society and run through the mud like clock-work in the mass media. We may have a few phantom organizations here and there, but nothing of genuine substance. Nothing that an educated, right-thinking, and concerned American can honestly throw his support behind without being associated with some of the worst elements of society. There has, no doubt, been attempts to start something here and there, some of the attempts indeed noble, but these fly-by-night organizations never seem to get anywhere and they seemingly fall apart as soon as they get off the ground.

    Let’s face it, our politics have been  successfully pushed to the fringes of proper society by our opponents and often held there by those whom would call us friends. Our politics have not been given the courtesy of proper dialogue and debate, rather, it has often been the object of ridicule, hatred, and even persecution.  Given all the troubles (real or imagined) inherent in being a Nationalist, it’s quite understandable that many who might otherwise consider Nationalism turn away for an ideology less fraught controversy. It’s human nature to want to fit in and Nationalism has been successfully portrayed as un-American and even extreme, so our numbers continue to be thin.

    Yet, the motivation behind Nationalist politics endures and the need for real alternatives mounts with each passing year – many are waking up to our politics. There is a baseline ground swell for the development of real Nationalism in the United States of America. The potential for a large and expansive grassroots movement is there, albeit tucked away. The problem for us open Nationalists is the need to become (in the eyes of our target audience) mainstream without being mainstream, which is a hard proposition to act upon because “mainstreaming” comes only with validation through numbers – something we do not currently have openly. The climate of manufactured fear that paralyzes most people considering our politics is indeed the strongest opponent fighting our need to become more mainstream. Sadly, these fears are not totally unfounded, which makes it hard to combat. Careers are on the line, livelihoods hang in the balance. It’s nothing we should scoff off as trivial, our opponents certainly do not.

    I do think it’s important for any active Nationalist to understand the fears associated with our politics, not just of the consequences of being an open Nationalist in modern America, but of the psychological conditioning exerted by the system for the better part of 60 years on the American public. If one can not understand the current political and sociological state of modern society – and act accordingly – one has  little chance of making any headway for our politics and might even hurt us in the long run. American Nationalism in 2009 is plagued by fear and ignorance, not on our part, but on the part of those whom seek to silence us. Let’s not add to the fear and ignorance by avoiding the negative perception – least of all contributing to it.

    The need for a legitimate and credible American nationalist organization is great. For the last 50 years we’ve seen not so much of a peep from American nationalists because of the fear and shame brought about by the system at large. Reject their false dichotomy and their hate. Our salvation comes through organization, networking, and hard work – banding together and creating a united front to represent our will as a unique people. We need an American National Party. We need you, lest we flounder around the political landscape for another 50 years.

    The Necessity of Having a Nationalist Party

    Posted by Thomas Gray on Monday, July 13, 2009 · 5 Comments

    whoweare2.jpg picture by icaughtyoulookin

    The Need for American Nationalist Party

    What an emotional afternoon it was for us when, thousands of miles away, our cousins in Britain saw a breakthrough victory for Britain’s budding nationalist party, the BNP. Better than a month ago, now, we saw both Andrew Brons and Party Chairman Nick Griffin, elected to the European parliament, with the party taking in nearly a million votes. I suspect that, for us – for American nationalists – the night was just as emotional as was for anyone else in the whole of the Anglosphere.

    Having had enough time to reflect on and properly gauge the enormity of the implications of the historic breakthrough, it becomes even more pressing the matter of developing our own party to represent the interests of our people in America.

    In truth, all the necessary elements for a successful nationalist party appear to exist more so in America than anywhere else, yet we have before us the task of creating from scratch a party of our own. With respect to demographics, we are far worse off than any other country in the Western world, almost to the point that a political effort is may be ultimately futile, aside from the many non-political benefits it might afford us. Nearly as a matter of simply maintaining some semblance of civilization, one would expect Whites to have already come together under the banner of a political party, where they could encapsulate in an organization their collective will to be submitted to the political establishment.

    Regarding our political system, while there isn’t any doubt that we are very much restricted by a system of ridiculous rules – no doubt put in place by the ruling elite to keep us from seeking political representation – many states have benefits that are very unique and actually favor us over our counterparts the world over. For example, in some states, like California, parties can achieve qualification, or access to be listed on the ballot, by simply having registered voters register as being affiliated with the party. While this may not appear as something of great importance, this is an amazing tool for any organization to utilize what ought to be considered a state-sponsored marketing information system, or a way to track how successful a group’s strategy as toward marketing has been. And no matter the persuasion, caliber, position, or strategy of the party, submitting to the democratic process brings to an organization an instant legitimacy in the eyes of its public.

    One would expect, too, that the altering of every aspect of our way of life would serve as the catalyst to launch a nationalist movement of our own. Certainly, there are few places on this Earth, in recent times, where the quality of life has been diminished at such an astonishing pace, with the obvious exception of South Africa and Rhodesia, which no longer even exists. Whereas the American man could afford to both own a home and quite comfortably raise a family on his income alone only a few decades ago, the very idea of home ownership is now quite troubling and an unlikely prospect for those just finishing school. For many people, moving every few years to avoid having their children endure forced “enrichment” is become quite normal. Being absolutely restricted by an ever-growing criminal element is also the status quo for Whites in any “urban” area. You get the idea. It’s pretty bad out there, and it isn’t getting better.

    Really, we’ve got absolutely no excuse for not having a party of our own. For far too long, and I am talking decades, our own supposed leaders have continually warned us against standing face to face with the political establishment, as if our positions weren’t good enough or as if they did not merit being represented. They have told us time and time again that such an effort, which has never been tried here and which has been proven absolutely successful time and time again overseas – by people who are in every way related to us – is not worth it or that we are incapable of such a feat. It’s time we drop all of these supposed leaders and do the right thing: build a party of our own.

    We don’t need to infiltrate the Republican party. We don’t need the infrastructure of the Libertarian party. We don’t need endless petitions and recalls. We need to start our own party, through hard work and sacrifice. Nothing else will do.

    One can imagine the immediate benefits that would come with such a party: legitimacy, a mission to achieving real power that does not involve illegality or violence, incredible organization and the specialization that comes with it, and economies of scale to dwarf those achieved by our counterparts in Europe.

    It’s time to stop talking about it and start doing it. Let the American National Party website serve as a place to help us facilitate this new mission.

    It’s only racist when you do it.

    Posted by George Poe on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 · 3 Comments


    One of the most distressing and downright baffling state of affairs in modern American politics is the absolute double standard in which many segments of society operates. Some of the most hypocritical examples are those within the arena of identity politics, which emanate primarily from the far-left. I am, of course, speaking to organizations such as the National Council of La Raza, NAACP, and the thousands of other organizations representing and defending minority communities in various fields. On the face of it, there shouldn’t be anything wrong with a community of people banding together to defend a common heritage for the sake of preservation and continued prosperity. I think most can sympathize with wanting some communal continuity with ancestors and the right to self-identify within a greater group. However, the aforementioned types of people reveal themselves as the true “racists” in their treatment of other communities. Particularly their treatment of and views on European-Americans organizing and defending their own communal rights as an ethnic group. These minority rights organizations (along with a willing media) often make it their business to attack, berate, and otherwise put down European-American ethnic interests. They do so under the guise of being “anti-racist” and “pro-equality”, but they allow themselves free ethnic expression and demand special consideration based on ethnicity, all the while scream  “racism” when European-Americans even mention their own ethnic extraction with any sense of worth.

    Any objective individual with any sense of fair play understands this hypocritical and, at times, hateful double-standard is nothing more than a way for these groups to get a leg up at the expense of others people’s interests, specifically European-Americans. European-Americans, for their part, allow themselves to be shamed into letting nclr_header_bannerother communities of people step all over their own rights for the sake of an American way that never existed in the first place. Even as the decades since the Civil Rights era have passed us by, these minority rights groups have only found (more like imagined) more witches (i.e. White “Racists”) to burn, even when we are supposedly in the era of post-racial politics. More and more you get the sense that these organizations are less about “rights” and more about taking advantage of White-American society. They’ve managed to exploit hard working European-Americans and blame them for their failure to operate as a fully functioning community of people.

    European-Americans, as a voiceless community of individuals, seem to be the only people that actually buy into the American pluralism myth and they do so at their own expense, as other groups only mouth American pluralism myth to progress their own ethnic interests. The effect of this has allowed over representation of extreme, anti-Western, anti-White policies to take root in all levels of government. Look no further than the appointment of Justice Sonia Sotomayor, whom was a member of a few Latino organizations (including La Raza) and has statements on record that would be considered rabidly racist had she been of European descent. However, the vicious double standard is alive and well, so she’ll get confirmed as a Justice of the Supreme Court – one of the most influential positions in the nation.  Since the media is complicit in their holding these radicals accountable, their policies have and will continue change the face and culture of America into something that, in the end, isn’t American.

    I believe we should start holding these groups to the fire and call them for what they are –  ethnocentric at best, “racist” at worst. We need to  call them and their supporters out as the hypocrites that they are and be relentless in expressing our ethnic rights in the very same way they’ve been so relentless against European-Americans. It’s time to fight fire with fire. We need to organize as European-Americans, as the founding stock of America, and take the nation back for our posterity – not for the misguided political ideals.


    Posted by George Poe on Friday, July 17, 2009 · 1 Comment


    Given the current political atmosphere, being an open ethnocentric individual can bring a lot of heartache, not just for yourself, but those around you, particularly if you are of European descent. The paranoia and  religious zealotry in which we treat the subject of race would be almost amusing, if it were not so alarming in its ferocity. The debate on how race, or ethnicity should play a role in society, or in people’s personal lives isn’t really up for negotiating in proper society these days. The views on race and ethnicity are pretty cut and dry for Euro-Americans. You either accept political dogma of multiculturalism and seek to diversify (which essentially means make more non-White), or you’re some kind of singled minded bigot that is worthy of society’s scorn. Evidently, there is very little, if any, middle ground on the issue of ethnicity and race. Personally, I find the issue of ethnicity and race far too complicated and far too critical to make such black and white (no pun intended) judgment call.

    I was born and raised in Southern California and being relatively young I was essentially born into the world of multiculturalism and liberalism. Contrary to what some of you would like to believe, I do not walk around with a chip on my shoulder. I am perfectly happily with my current life circumstances and sure, there are some things I need to improve on in life, but the last thing I am looking for is a “scapegoat”. I am by no means a bigot, nor a hater of any sort, although I realize that my politics equate to nothing short of blasphemy in modern day politics.

    I treat every individual with the utmost respect regardless of their ethnic origins, or religious disposition. I have a keen interest in anthropology and antiquity, as such, I acknowledge and appreciate the contributions other people’s have made to the sciences and arts. I’ve met some great people of  different ethnic origins than myself, some being far more capable people than I could ever hope to be.

    Many ask me, in relation to my ethnocentrism, “Shouldn’t you judge a person by the individual himself and not by his, or her race?”, to which I often reply “Who is judging in the first place?” People assume that the only reason I make a distinction based on  ethnicity is simply because I make value judgments on people based on their ethnicity. I’m not a Nationalist, nor Euro-centric because I believe there is merit in making value calls on groups of people. Even if I wanted to, what standard would I use? It’s another oversimplification used by people whom are either ignorant, or have a political axe to grind. Furthermore, people are individuals, of course, but they are also members of countless different demographics. Politically, economically, socially, and yes, ethnically. There is a reason why political analysts, commercial marketers, and focus groups get paid big bucks to break down the populace into groups – we are all individuals and members of larger groups.

    I am something of a new breed, politically speaking. I do not take for granted ethnic homogeneity, but at the same time I can incorporate some of the experiences that diversity can provide – within reason of course.  I have never considered holding a racial identity and the appreciation of other cultures to be polar opposites. In reality, I believe those whom can genuinely respect other cultures can more often than not foster even greater ties to their own communities. I can be loyal to my own ethnic community without being hateful, or distant with another group of people. Those who will tell you otherwise are lying and trying to create a false dichotomy to which you must choose an extreme. As a European-American, I love my culture, my heritage, and I will (and do) choose to make positive decisions to make sure that identity is secured. That does not mean it has to come at the expense of another ethnic group, both rhetorically, or practically. I no more “hate” other ethnic groups than an all-girls school hates boys.

    What I do hate is hypocrisy. The type of hypocrisy that allows some groups of people free and full ethnic expression as a unique people, all the while denouncing and hurting other groups of people whom want the same type of expression. I do hate the fact that European-Americans are held to a completely different standard – in their own nations no-less. I hate the fact that if I say anything about it I’m somehow less than savory. I hate the fact that these so-called “liberals” supposedly champion human rights while doing all in their power to pass thought controlling “hate” laws, racist affirmative actions policies, and celebrate the decline of White-Western culture.

    If you are an American of European descent, you need to wake up and realize that developing a sense of ethnic community is no bad thing. Defending that community is not wrong either, so long as you do it justly, responsibly and peacefully. You shouldn’t allow politically correctness  guide what you think should be acceptable, that isn’t freedom and that isn’t American. Race relations isn’t as black and white as many would have us believe. The sooner you realize that the sooner we can actually create something to the benefit of all.

    News from

    Powered by WhiteCivilRights

    October 11, 2009

    Some More Equal than Others

    Filed under:

    Will Gay Hate Crime Bill cause employers to fire straight White males to avoid investigations?

    by Ian Mosley

    In his classic anti-Communist novel Animal Farm, George Orwell wrote “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.” That appears to be the working principle of the United States government, and especially the liberal wing of the Democratic party. Thanks to racial quotas, many Democrats are first in line for jobs. Seems like a new category of crazy left wing privilege is created every year. Recently I saw an article about someone getting hired for a government job as a transgender employee. Not only do these special classes of people get first choice for jobs, they get special protection from crime. Since employment discrimination is a crime, some employers may become reluctant to fire “protected” people.

    A recent news article reports “The House voted Thursday to make it a federal crime to assault people because of their sexual orientation, significantly expanding the hate crimes law enacted in the days after Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination in 1968. With expected passage by the Senate, federal prosecutors will for the first time be able to intervene in cases of violence perpetrated against gays. Civil rights groups and their Democratic allies have been trying for more than a decade to broaden the reach of hate crimes law. This time it appears they will succeed. The measure is attached to a must-pass $680 billion defense policy bill… ‘It’s a very exciting day for us here in the Capitol,’ said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.”

    Blacks, Latinos, women and transgender individuals are all eligible for special quotas, created by Democrats, which essentially steal jobs from better-qualified White males (who tend more and more to be Republican). While hate crime laws may not seem like a “big deal”, they are. They make one group of people more protected than everyone else. (more…)

    October 9, 2009

    Another Government Stimulus Plan?!!

    Filed under:

    Great Moments in Stunning Incompetence

    by Ian Mosley

    Egads, those Democrat idiots in the White House and Congress are going to do it again!! A recent news article reports: “Confronted with big job losses and no sign the U.S. economy is ready to stand on its own, Democrats are working on a growing list of relief efforts, leaving for later how to pay for them, or whether even to bother.”

    Yes, why bother? Just fire up those printing presses and then leave it to our grandchildren to clean up the mess. Pelosi and Reid won’t be around to take the blame, and the future multi-racial population of America will be too dim-witted to understand what’s happened anymore than a herd of cattle.

    Then again, some of the Democrats must know that the last stimulus bill did little else than burn up $787 billion. Maybe it’s a case of them thinking “Let’s set up sham companies and line our pockets with this stimulus money before the economy collapses completely and grab a few million (or billion) dollars while the dollar is still worth something.”

    The article continues “Proposals include extending and perhaps expanding a popular tax credit for first-time home buyers, and creating a new credit for companies that add jobs. Taken together, the proposals look a lot like another economic stimulus package, though congressional leaders don’t want to call it that. Democratic leaders in Congress and the White House say they have no appetite for another big spending package that adds to the federal budget deficit, which hit a record $1.4 trillion for the budget year that ended last week. But with unemployment reaching nearly 10 percent, many lawmakers are feeling pressure to act.” (more…)

    October 6, 2009

    Government Spending Two Billion Dollars on New Spy Agency Facility

    Filed under:

    Despite the Depression, spying on Americans is still a top priority for the government.

    by Ian Mosley

    It looks like “spying on Americans” is one of the few growth areas in Obama’s America. The Salt Lake Tribune reports: “The National Security Agency was so confident that its nearly $2 billion plan for a new data center in Utah would be approved by Congress that it began designing the facility last November. NSA budget documents also indicate that the design of the 1-million-square- foot center should be completed by February, with building to begin in June on a project that could mean thousands of construction jobs for a state that, like many others, has been stuck in a building lull. President Barack Obama last week signed a spending bill that included $181 million for preparatory construction of the Camp Williams facility and tentatively agreed to two future phases of construction that could cost $800 million each.”

    Building a new spy center so the Feds can see every word we type on the Internet –what a “great” use of our tax dollars. Apparently we don’t have other more urgent needs like setting up soup kitchens for all those tent cities full of unemployed Americans. (Might be nice to provide bathroom facilities for the tent cities too so that cholera doesn’t break out.)

    There are rumors that FEMA is building concentration camps in remote locations around the country. I guess being able to lock up patriots is another thing more important than helping out the unemployed. (more…)

    September 24, 2009

    The H1N1 Flu… How Serious Is It?

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley

    The H1N1 flu is starting to look very odd. World Health authorities have been screaming about it since February or so, and wildly predicting a terrible catastrophic pandemic–but it’s almost October now, and no deadly killer plague has yet materialized, just a flu.

    According to the latest panicky article in the U. K. Guardian, “The swine flu pandemic could kill millions and cause anarchy in the world’s poorest nations unless £900m can be raised from rich countries to pay for vaccines and antiviral medicines, says a UN report leaked to the Observer. The disclosure will provoke concerns that health officials will not be able to stem the growth of the worldwide H1N1 pandemic in developing countries. If the virus takes hold in the poorest nations, millions could die and the economies of fragile countries could be destroyed.”

    In other words, the sky is falling! Give us more money or you’re all doomed!!! Despite a few panicky reports in the early weeks out of Mexico, the H1N1 flu has largely been a big yawn, killing fewer people than the typical flu epidemic.

    Could this whole plague thing simply be another shakedown of taxpayers in the Western world so assorted leftists, media people and bureaucrats can live large off taxpayer dollars for a few more years? The only real threat comes from a slight similarity to the disastrous Spanish Flu, and the possibility that the flu might mutate into something deadly. Can’t any flu potentially mutate into something deadly? (more…)

    September 21, 2009

    Forgotten Racial History in India

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley

    AOL News reports: “Cosmetic advertisements in Asia are targeting men with blunt campaigns aimed at skin color that one lawmaker claims is racist. In one TV commercial, two men, one with dark skin, the other with light skin; stand on a balcony overlooking a neighborhood. The dark skin guy turns to his friend and says in Hindi, ‘I am unlucky because of my face.’ His light-skinned friend replies, ‘Not because of your face, because of the color of your face.’ Suddenly the light-skinned guy throws his friend a tube of cream. It’s a whitening cream…. In a country where most people have brown skin, the message being sent to men and women has some people outraged. ‘Basically if you need a job you have to have white skin. If you want a good partner, a companion you need white skin and you always seem to get it once you’ve used the fairness cream. Basically I think it’s completely racist and highly objectionable,’ says Brinda Karat.”

    I wonder what this woman would say about a little-known aspect of her country’s history. During the days of the British Raj in India, the local rajahs, nobility and dignitaries would invite the tallest, blondest blue-eyed British officers they could find to long, luxurious house parties in their palaces. By day the young British men hunted tigers and played polo. At night, after sumptuous feasting on Indian cuisine, they were given free run of the Rajah’s harem and especially encouraged to select among his multiple wives for their nocturnal recreation.

    The reasoning behind this was cold and calculating eugenics: The Indian nobility, descended from ancient Aryan invaders themselves, wanted to replenish, improve and invigorate the racial strain of their dynasties, which had become dangerously contaminated down through the centuries with genes from the brown hordes who populate most of India. Their caste needed an intellectual boost to assure their position, and they needed an injection of new blood from the British officer class. (more…)

    September 20, 2009

    Jews Want Diversity, but Not for their Tribe

    Filed under:

    Why Can’t White Americans Oppose Diversity too?

    by Ian Mosley

    The Jews have endlessly demonized anyone who is pro-White as being a “mean, evil, hateful racist.” The average pro-White activist wants an all-White homeland, where his people can exist and control their own destiny. Curiously, the Jews stole the nation of Palestine from the former occupants, for this very same purpose for their people.

    Funny how we are endlessly told that the Jewish state of Israel is “wonderful and good” while an equivalent White nation, dedicated to Whites would be “unthinkable, racist and Nazi.”

    The Jews have always been very big on pushing diversity and assimilation and interracial mixing for other people, but especially for the hated White goyim. They even came up with a slogan: “eliminate racism by eliminating race.” But when it comes to their own little Jewish children, race-mixing is strictly forbidden!

    According to Ha’aretz, the Israeli equivalent of the New York Times: “The Prime Minister’s Office and the Jewish Agency unveiled an aggressive advertisement campaign for the Masa project which is designed to strengthen Jewish identity among youths in the Diaspora and their bonds to Israel. One video clip likens Jews who marry outside of the religion to missing persons, with fake notices and pictures which drive home the point. As part of the campaign, similar ‘missing person’ notices will be plastered on walls around the country.”

    Imagine White parents putting the picture of their 16 year old daughter on a milk carton as a missing person because she started dating a Black. Of course, we’re not allowed to shame race-mixers like that in the US, but in Israel, shaming race-mixers is state policy.

    The Ha’aretz article goes on: “Masa hopes the campaign will spur the public to commit to the cause of preventing marriage to non-Jews, which Jewish Agency officials believe is tantamount to a strategic national threat. According to figures compiled by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, over 50 percent of Jews in the Diaspora marry a non-Jewish partner.”

    How is racial dilution a threat to Israel but no one else? Race-mixing has produced disastrous results for millions of White families. The US is steadily losing its technical competency thanks to an invasion of Third World bunglers. If the White people of America are race-mixed out of existence, America will quickly become nothing more than yet another Third World nation. How well could a future Third World USA defend itself against an increasingly well-armed Red China? (more…)

    September 15, 2009

    IBM Lets you Keep your Job… in India

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley


    In the middle of the Obama Depression, the outsourcing of American jobs continues, causing more layoffs and heartbreak and destroyed lives here at home. Another three banks failed last week, which the liberal new media didn’t report. As if losing millions of jobs to outsourcing is not bad enough, some companies want Americans to help with this betrayal.

    CNN reports: “IBM employees being laid off in North America now have an alternative to joining the growing ranks of the unemployed– (they can) work for the company abroad. Big Blue is offering its outgoing workers in the United States and Canada a chance to take an IBM job in India, Nigeria, Russia or other countries. Through a program dubbed Project Match, IBM will help interested workers whose jobs are on the chopping block to ‘identify potential opportunities in growth markets and facilitate consideration by hiring managers in those markets, according to an internal company document obtained by CNN. The company also will help with moving costs and provide visa assistance, it says.”

    Will IBM pay these expatriate workers at American rates or at Indian rates? Indian and Chinese aren’t exactly popular languages in American schools so this won’t be an easy transition for the “lucky” IBM workers who get these “jobs”. Imagine living thousands of miles away from your family for months at a time. If losing the old IBM job didn’t break up the marriage, the new job just might. (more…)

    September 11, 2009

    Which Will Be Deadlier: H1N1 or the Vaccine?

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley

    There may be something to all the alarms being sounded about the H1N1 flu and the vaccine for it. WorldNetDaily reports “A ‘pandemic response bill’ currently making its way through the Massachusetts state legislature would allow authorities to forcefully quarantine citizens in the event of a health emergency, compel health providers to vaccinate citizens, authorize forceful entry into private dwellings and destruction of citizen property and impose fines on citizens for noncompliance. If citizens refuse to comply with isolation or quarantine orders in the event of a health emergency, they may be imprisoned for up to 30 days and fined $1,000 per day that the violation continues. As stated in the bill, upon declaration by the governor that an emergency exists that is considered detrimental to public health or upon declaration of a state of emergency, a local public health authority, with approval of the commissioner, may exercise the following authorities to require the owner or occupier of premises…”

    What if some of us are more fearful of the vaccine than the flu? What if the-powers-that-be want to thin out the population and the engineered virus which will kill off half the population is in the vaccine?!!! Maybe that’s why they are giving themselves such draconian powers to twist our arms to take it.

    WorldNetDaily goes on: “Local public health authorities will be required to keep records of reports containing the name and location of all people who have been reported, their disease, injury, or health condition and the name of the person reporting the case. In addition, citizens may be subject to ‘involuntary transportation.’ Line 341 of the bill states, ‘Law enforcement authorities, upon order of the commissioner or his agent or at the request of a local public health authority pursuant to such order, shall assist emergency medical technicians or other appropriate medical personnel in the involuntary transportation of such person to the tuberculosis treatment center. No law enforcement authority or medical personnel shall be held criminally or civilly liable as a result of an act or omission carried out in good faith in reliance on said order.’ ”

    It’s always a sinister development when the government absolves the police of all wrong-doing in advance. So if we refuse their vaccine, they can throw us in a holding cell full of illegal aliens with tuberculosis. Why that sounds just lovely. Is this still America, land of the free?

    Wars and natural disasters are always good excuses for seizing extreme police powers by any government. A plague will do just as well.

    It appears that, just as predicted, the H1N1 flu is returning this fall. This sounds ominously similar to the infamous Spanish Flu that killed 20 to 50 million people world-wide starting in 1918. All we need is one little deadly mutation. This fear is being used to persuade millions of people to line up for a dubious vaccine.

    A program of mandatory vaccinations of any kind is alarming. Right now, the vaccinations seem to pose a much greater danger than the flu itself. (more…)

    September 4, 2009

    Sweden Finds a Spine

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley


    Remember that story about the arrested rabbis in New Jersey, who were busted for assorted acts of illegal organ trafficking along with mob figures and Democrat Party politicians. One of the accusations leveled against these “holy men” is that they were selling Palestinian body parts for organ transplants to rich Americans, body parts that according to a Swedish source were stolen from the torsos of murdered young Palestinians in Gaza.

    The Jewish Telegraph Agency reports from Jerusalem: “Sweden’s Foreign Ministry said its embassy in Israel’s condemnation of a Swedish newspaper report that the IDF harvests Palestinian organs does not represent the government’s stance. The Swedish Embassy in Tel Aviv had released a statement calling Tuesday’s report in a Swedish newspaper appalling, but the Swedish Foreign Ministry told Ynet Thursday that, ‘The embassy in Tel Aviv responded in accordance to Israeli public opinion, however the Swedish government is committed to freedom of the press.’”

    That’s about as close to telling the Jews to “take a hike” as possible in this day and age. One has to bear in mind the usual complete subservience that the “democracies” of the world render unto Israel and the Jews. This refusal to grovel before the Jews must be a bit shocking for the Jews. One wonders if they will next demand that Sweden be added to the “Axis of Evil”. Usually when someone in some “democratic” country tells some unflattering truth about the Jews, the government of that country falls all over themselves apologizing. Not in this case, though. (more…)

    September 1, 2009

    Jewish Organ Peddlers

    Filed under:

    by Ian Mosley

    Rachel Corrie, American killed by Israelis

    That horrific story about the organ-peddling rabbis out of New Jersey just won’t die. Israel’s leading newspaper Ha’aretz states “A leading Swedish newspaper reported this week that Israeli soldiers are abducting Palestinians in order to steal their organs, a claim that prompted furious condemnation and accusations of anti-Semitic blood libel…. ‘They plunder the organs of our sons,’ read the headline in Sweden’s largest daily newspaper, the left-leaning Aftonbladet, which devoted a double spread in its cultural section to the article. The report quotes Palestinian claims that young men from the West Bank and Gaza Strip had been seized by the Israel Defense Forces, and their bodies returned to the families with missing organs.”

    Why is it that Israeli soldiers can murder peace activists -just for fun- like the American citizen Rachel Corrie, but some people won’t believe that the Jews would murder Palestinians for profit?

    The article continues ” ‘Our sons are used as involuntary organ donors,’ relatives of Khaled from Nablus said to me, as did the mother of Raed from Jenin as well as the uncles of Machmod and Nafes from Gaza, who all had disappeared for a few days and returned by night, dead and autopsied,” writes author Donald Boström in his report. Boström’s article makes a link to the recent exposure of an alleged crime syndicate in New Jersey. The syndicate includes several American rabbis, and one Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, who faces charges of conspiring to broker the sale of a human kidney for a transplant. Boström also cites an incident of alleged organ snatching from 1992, during the time of the first Palestinian intifada. He says that the IDF seized a young man known for throwing stones at Israeli troops in the Nablus area, who was shot in the chest, both legs, and the stomach before being taken to a military helicopter which transported him to “a place unknown to his loved ones. Five nights later, Boström says, the young man’s body was returned, wrapped in green hospital sheets… When Bilal was put into his grave, his chest was revealed and suddenly it became clear to the present what abuse he had been put through. Bilal was far from the only one who was buried cut-up from his stomach to his chin and the speculations about the reason why had already started,’ he writes.” (more…)

    Next Page »

    Powered by WhiteCivilRights