Senator Harry Reid tried to start the “conversation about race” that the Attorney General and President insist that we must have, and it didn’t turn out well.
I’ve had many preachers tell me, quite sincerely, that using old-fashioned words is sinful, because they carry with them a connotation of hatred. “Negro” must now be added to this list since Reid’s use of it culminated in threatened job loss as well as the expectation that he must apologize to a representative sample of The Duly Aggrieved, including the emperor himself. Of course, what Reid said, that Obama is “light-skinned” and has “no Negro dialect, unless he wants to have one,” is patently true. As for appearance, how is noticing the shade of Obama’s skin any different than Obama himself referring to his father as an “ink-black Luo”? As for blacking it up, it’s hard to top Oprah, but here is Obama in action. Anyway, let’s not allow facts to get in the way of a good racist-hunt. And above all, let’s not dwell on the fact that what Reid said was actually a compliment about being articulate.
On ABC’s This Week, George Will exulted that finally, someone (Reid) had said something about race on which everyone could agree, but Dick Cheney’s daughter, clearly shocked by Will’s defense of the anachronism, said it was unquestionably racist. How can there be such disagreement? As Steve Sailer observes, it has everything to do with the widespread refusal to believe that limitations are inherited genetically. Thus, it’s fine to notice that skin color, hair color, and eye color come to us by nature.
It’s fine to recognize, for example, that “Samoans are born big.” But nothing about the brain or character or potential for achievement can have anything to do with nature. Those are entirely products of nurture, it is said. So along comes Obama, black by nature and white by nurture; the messiah who will conquer race as Christ conquered the grave; who will prove to liberals that their lives have not been in vain. (Notice the White Supremacist assumption which liberals cannot avoid, try as they might, that whiteness is divine and blackness carnal. The Obamessiah, from his incarnation in the womb of a whore to his apotheosis, spans both worlds, and to be absolved by him is to be born again.)
The vicious reactions to Reid are too numerous to list. Here is Mychal Massie, one of those rare black “conservatives” beloved of Judeochristians:
Reid is a loathsome individual whose apology was based on exposure not repentance. Reid’s comments are proof positive that the racial animus of the past is alive and prevalent among liberals today…
Could someone let Massie know that Reid did not actually commit murder or rape? He only used the word NEGRO!
Another of these Afro-conservatives, Robert George, writes, sarcastically:
Thank goodness no jive-talkin’ darky ever thought about running for president! No way Reid could have supported him!!
Does Mr. George insinuate that he would support a jive-talker for the office of president? If so, what does this tell us about black “conservatism”?
Someone at BeliefNet, one of the most banal sites on the intertubez, asks rhetorically: “Americans wouldn’t vote for a black politician if he had a ‘Negro’ dialect?” Well, no, sweetie, and I hate to shatter your juvenile illusions.
This incident will force everyone to say “African-American” all the more. It’s kind of funny that Glenn Beck, before this story broke, had the perfect timing to recognize that “African-American” is a phony term.
Jive-talker Michael Steele has asked Reid to resign for uttering the evil word “Negro,” and he’s correct that it would be justice after what was done to that weasel, Trent Lott. But Steele doesn’t simply point to the double standard, which was applied to him as well when he said the words “honest Injun.” No, according to Steele, an evil word like Negro “harkens back to the 1950s and 60s, and it confirms to me a mind-set that’s out of step with where America is today.” We honestly thank God whenever we find a man who is “out of step” with the perverted time in which we live.
Just think about what’s happening here. This phony government has a death rattle in its throat, and everyone is frantic because of words like “Injun” and “Negro” being used. It’s just unbelievable; it’s as though children are in charge. At first glance, it seems silly that there is such hyperventilation and threatened ruination over words like “Negro” and “Injun” when we are teetering on the verge of total economic collapse, but it actually makes perfect sense. Despite what Judeochristians believe, it’s not possible to mix races under a system of pretended equality and expect to retain liberty in anything but name. Loving equality is like spitting in the face of God. The gift of God is liberty, not equality. Christians have always been faced with a choice between liberty and equality, and before they lost their faith they were able to choose wisely. Where there is liberty, white men govern themselves, for the most part. They are never without law, but they are less in need of being forced to obey it. Totalitarianism follows equality as night follows day, and it’s bloody expensive. Eventually, the totalitarians run out of money, a revolution follows, and white men rediscover their lost liberties. (There is no evidence that non-whites ever have.) As Christians, we recognize that there is no guarantee that the cycle will come back around, and if it does at all, it is because men repent of their refusal to obey God’s law, which was the source of the cancerous equality in the first place.
We see that America is on an arc that culminates in what is happening in Europe today. The condition of free speech in England is such that a man was arrested, fingerprinted, and detained for four hours, at a cost of £12,000, for being linked (falsely) to an email that contained the words “do as you likey,” which rhymes with “pikey,” which is a euphemism for gypsies. His predictable defense: “one of his best friends is a gypsy.” In a country that once helped to teach the world about liberty, it is a crime for a white man to offend someone who is not white. I know what will save us from this tyranny in America, though. What we need is for Christians to adopt millions of black boys and Chinese girls, since that’s why Jesus died on the cross, and they can be the first non-whites in the history of the world who really understand liberty. Then the rights of the white minority will be protected as the non-white population explodes. What could go wrong?
This video makes me severely nauseous. What kind of sickness rots the minds of white people to make them think they can only show love to strangers by taking them into their families and making them heirs, equal to their own children? God gave us very clear rules for how to show love to both neighbors and to those who are far off. Commandments Five through Ten have nothing to do with this madness.
Florida, our camp of the saints. For “jobs that Americans won’t do” we have 200,000 Haitians on the way, which is only slightly less than the number of slaves in that small country. Ah, the pungent odor of irony.
Despite the outpouring of emotion over Haiti, our politicians know where their bread is buttered, and it’s not in Port-au-Prince.
President Obama has allocated $2.775 billion to Israel in the 2010 foreign aid budget. Israel is set to receive over $30 billion in U.S. foreign aid over the next decade. In the wake of the devastating earthquake, Obama promised Haiti a mere $100 million for its recovery effort.
Obama calls this mandatory deduction from your paycheck an “investment,” which is true in the same sense that you invest in the septic tank every time you flush. Remember when racists used to give their money to their own children? Those were the good old days.
Sailer asks: “Does President Barack Obama have any more idea what to do with Haiti after the horrific earthquake than did President Woodrow Wilson when he sent the Marines in back in 1915?” This line from Obama makes me feel all warm inside: “We look into the eyes of another and see ourselves.”
Just as is true of every war in which Jewmerica asserts itself, no one has even thought about an exit strategy from Haiti.
Garrett Hardin’s maxim that you “can’t just do one thing” foretells of the likely permanent albatross for the U.S. and other western nations…
In Newsweek’s feature article, President Obama writes, “In the days, months, and years ahead, we’ll need to work closely with the government and people of Haiti to reclaim the momentum that they achieved before the earthquake… The United States will be there with the Haitian government and the United Nations every step of the way.”
Obama could have added “decades” and beyond to the duration of assistance.
And no one even asked you if you wanted to throw money at these savages for eternity. How does it feel to be the world’s sugar daddy? We have no one but ourselves to blame for it. Long ago, our forebears decided that Jews are pretty much like Christians, and Jews taught us that whites are pretty much like everyone else.
This is an unintentionally funny article by a Jew about Haiti’s “glorious past” but unfortunate run of bad “luck.” The 800-pound gorilla called Race, which is about to take a massive dump on the Queen Anne furniture in your sitting room, is never mentioned in the article, of course. That would be racist.
The word “looting” is racist.
Collard greens are racist.
White Dating on Facebook is racist.
Pickup trucks are racist.
“Soul food” is the new blackface.
Economic stimulus, Congo-style.
“Germans paying to bang on bongo drums in celebration of a Negro president in charge of 60,000 troops stationed on German soil, it’s like a bad film, or at least a comedy.”
The Sons of Confederate Veterans in Cross City, Florida (Dixie County), marched in the MLK parade last week. “Black Confederate” H.K. Edgerton, who dishonorably dresses as a soldier, led the procession, and was chosen for the occasion to symbolize King’s vision of “All men sitting together at the table of Brotherhood” (with the white women evenly distributed). As a friend of mine mocks, we’ve got the Yankees on the run! The League of the South calls Edgerton a “champion of true liberty.” They would never say any such thing about a white “racist” who agrees wholeheartedly with his Confederate ancestors.
First Word asks why Westminster Theological Seminary honors an adulterer and plagiarist with a holiday. “Anyone can guess: Because Martin Luther King, Jr. is a popular Negro, and they want to ‘reach out’ to the Negro community with Reformed theology, by ’showing solidarity’ or whatever the current buzzword might be. The only problem is, honesty is more important than being Reformed.” Needless to say, no seminary would ever “reach out” to “racists” under any circumstances.
Solzhenitsyn on slavery.
Nick Griffin quoting 1 Timothy 5:8 on the floor of the European Parliament: Priceless.