Haiti’s “African Spartacus” was a pro-French, eurocentric, egomaniac slave owner.

Haiti’s “African Spartacus” was a pro-French, eurocentric, egomaniac slave owner.

The taxpayer financed left-wing propaganda machine is re-airing documentaries on Haiti that bring out the typical condescending white liberal Negrophile liberal arts professors.

One of the outlandish tales being told is of the great “African Spartacus.” These condescending whites proudly boast that Haiti would be a great nation today if Toussaint hadn’t been “exiled and replaced by a series of despots.”

Let’s examine this “African Spartacus.”

1. Toussaint was a house servant to a wealthy French family who freed him at the age of 33. Toussaint protected his former owners from being murdered by a black mob around 1793 and took them to safety in Hispaniola.

2. Toussaint became wealthy and owned two plantations, which included many Negro slaves. Toussaint was a devoted Catholic, a member of the Freemasons, and a supporter of the French. Toussaint saw himself as the natural leader of Haiti’s black population and thought he could teach them to be more like the French. He chastised Haiti’s blacks for their behavior, especially the practice of voodoo. He took the ego-maniacal name “L’Ouverture,” which means “to show the way.”

3. In 1791, the voodoo priest Boukamn held a rally commonly called “Haiti’s pact with the devil.” He sacrificed a pig and led his followers in drinking the pig’s blood. He called his followers to “cast down the image of the white God.” All in attendance swore an oath to launch a murderous racial cleansing of the island in two weeks.

4. The followers of Boukamn went on a rampage burning hundreds of plantations and murdering about 2,000 whites. Boukamn was killed on the third week and his followers fled into the woods.

5. The French parliament, which had already been considering freeing all the colonial slaves, passed an anti-slavery bill one year later. Freed slaves in Haiti were granted French citizenship and a plan was put into place for a phasing out of slavery. France sent three new pro-abolition commissioners to Haiti to enforce the new act.

6. The slaves in rebellion continued to fight. Toussaint was given special permission from the French rulers to move about the island. He tried to organize the surrender of the slaves in rebellion and restore French control to the whole island. In 1793, Toussaint and a small group of followers took possession of 200 white captives. They turned them over to the French and offered a treaty where Toussaint and his right hand men would be given positions of leadership over the rest of the Negro population in exchange for ordering the slaves to return to their plantations and go back to work. No one believed that the slaves in rebellion would really do this, and the offer was turned down.

7. In 1794 the French parliament freed all slaves in all their territories. Toussaint joined the French army in 1794 and led pro-French Negros in fighting the Spanish and the British. A spill over from the Napoleonic wars in Europe.

8. Toussaint became a Brigadier General in the French army and helped win battles against the Spanish. Toussaint also suppressed multiple black led anti-French and secessionist uprisings on the island. In 1798 the British withdrew from the Island, but signed a secret trade agreement with Toussaint that included supplying him with weapons. During this time Toussaint sent two of his sons to schools in France.

9. In 1801 he was in control of Haiti and wrote his own constitution. In his constitution he declares that all Haitian’s were citizens of France and outlaws voodoo.

10. In July, 1801 he overran Hispaniola with his troops and called for a united pro-French island. He dubbed himself “Governor-General” (for life) with the powers of a dictator. He asked for and was granted approval of his titled from Napoleon. In a letter he assured Napoleon that he was a loyal French citizen and started the letter with “”From the First of the Blacks to the First of the Whites.”

11. Napoleon decided that the island would never regain it’s profitability under black rule and sent his brother in law to assume control one year later. Toussaint’s army completely evaporated when more French troops landed. Toussaint was arrested and taken to France where he died of pneumonia.

12. In 1804, Napoleon abandoned the New World because he needed the troops in Europe. One out of every three French troops sent to Haiti died of disease. All whites, Mulattoes, and Mestizos, who didn’t flee the island in time were mass murdered. Like Napoleon predicted, the Haitians have never restored the profitability of the island. Once its single most profitable tract of land, Haiti has consistently been the most dismal place in the Western Hemisphere ever since.

13. In the early days of the American civil rights movement, Toussaint was denounced by American black leaders as one of the biggest “uncle Toms” in history. It is only more recently that white liberals have attempted to re-write him as one of the great leaders of Negro rights.

Israel under fire for alledged “racist” eugenics program.

Israel under fire for alledged “racist” eugenics program.


A while back we reported that Israel had halted African immigration claiming that Ethiopian immigrants had failed to assimilate. Today, Africans attempting to get into Israel are promptly deported. Many are even shot by the Egyptian border patrol who say they are under pressure from the Israel government to halt the flow of illegals.

A new report claims that 57% of women who are taking Depo-Provera, a three month birth control injection, in Israel are Ethiopian immigrants.

Israel government documents allegedly show that the use of Depo-Provera has skyrocketed three fold in the past few years. Ethiopian immigrants accounts for less than 2% of the population of Israel, but 57% of Depo-Provera. This statistic suggests that Ethiopian immigrants have been targeted as part of an eugenics program.

Eugenics programs were once common in the US and Europe during the 20’s and 30’s. However, they were for preventing those with extremely low IQs from having children. After WWII advocates of eugenics were denounced as “nazis” and “racists.” Programs were completely eliminated and some US states even paid financial compensation to people who had been subjected to forced birth control.

Depo-Provera is manufactured by Pfizer. Women receive an injection in the thigh four times a year. Once injections stop, it usually takes 9-10 months for fertility to return. 30 million women have used it since 1967, however it was not given FDA approval until 1992. The drug is now used in 90 different countries, most heavily in India and the third world.

Haiti as a Real-Life District 9

Haiti as a Real-Life District 9

Much has changed in the world since this site was launched. The God-like ability of one Mien Obama is apparently gone, and it appears his ascension to the presidency is but a Pyrrhic victory for Black people.

The Haitian Earthquake – a tragedy to be sure, but Haiti and its Black population already was an exhibition of calamity before the Richter scale picked up the first tremors – has showcased to the world the truth of what happens when Black people are in charge.

Hurricane Katrina gave us a few glimpses, but Haiti sheds a light on one of the oldest Black people run nations on earth that penetrates deep into the falsities that protect egalitarianism and give fodder to those who can see.

Black people in America understand this, and despite a deep connection with the plight of the Haitians, realize the Black faces that continually are shown on television in horrific, squalid conditions from Port-au-Prince showcase the global condition of their race in poetic exactness.

Disingenuous White Liberals (DWL) are working overtime to increase the already incredibly generous donations that are sent by more than 10000 organizations annually (this was before the earthquake mind you, much like the complete lack of sanitary drinking water in Haiti BEFORE the ‘quake) to sustain a population of 9 million Black people who are incapable of sustaining themselves.

It’s time to bring up a phrase that applies directly to this crisis – that affects Black people only and is merely prolonged by the intrusion of pity-intoxicated, self-righteous palefaces – and is the reason why Black people don’t like global warming and its implications: Malthusian Catastrophe.

Few people dare bring up Thomas Malthus anymore, for population explosions are occurring among only the colored masses of the world (Africa, China, India) and anytime Stuff White People Like individuals discuss global warming they find themselves entering a world where race realism is the white elephant they dare not mention.

What did Malthus predict?:

A Malthusian catastrophe (also called a Malthusian check, crisis, disaster, or nightmare) was originally foreseen to be a forced return to subsistence-level conditions once population growth had outpaced agricultural production. Later formulations consider economic growth limits as well…

A series that is increasing in geometric progression is defined by the fact that the ratio of any two successive members of the sequence is a constant. For example, a population with an average annual growth rate of, say, 2% will grow by a ratio of 1.02 per year. In other words, the ratio of each year’s population to the previous year’s population will be 1.02. In modern terminology, a population that is increasing in geometric progression is said to be experiencing exponential growth.

Alternately, in an arithmetic progression, any two successive members of the sequence have a constant difference. In modern terminology, this is called linear growth.

If unchecked over a sufficient period of time, and if the ratio between successive sequence members is larger than 1.0, then exponential growth will always outrun linear growth. Malthus saw the difference between population growth and resource growth as being analogous to this difference between exponential and linear growth. Even when a population inhabits a new habitat – such as the American continent at Malthus’ time, or when recovering from wars and epidemic plagues – the growth of population will eventually reach the limit of the resource base.”

Watching the Haitian earthquake unfold on television screens in the United States leaves DWLs feeling queasy and desirous of hearing “We are the World” and “Do They Know It’s Christmas?” for they only feel pride and a sense of emotional self-worth when they showcase their moral superiority over those unenlightened souls who dare point out that no amount of money could ever save Haiti (indeed, billions upon billions have done little over the past 30 years).

Worse, a film depicts the Malthusian principle at work profoundly and works to belie the notion of egalitarianism in a manner few Black people wish to admit. District 9, a film set in South Africa, shows us the most distressing situation where an impoverished alien race lands on earth and inconveniences the citizens of that nation with their increased crime and reliance on handouts to sustain their race:

“If you look at the film as an apartheid allegory, it has problems right off the bat. The aliens are loathsome, trash-eating vermin who fight endlessly, destroy property for no reason, and piss on their own homes, which isn’t a truthful or flattering allegorical comparison for actual black South Africans under apartheid.

Apartheid is terrible because humans were denied rights. The “apartheid” of these aliens isn’t that terrible – it’s kind of justifiable, because they’re actually dangerous, violent and destructive.”

Sadly, this description of the aliens in the film has a correlation to the behavior of Black people in Haiti and post-apartheid South Africa (and New Orleans and Detroit) that few wish to admit:

“It was lunchtime in one of Haiti’s worst slums and Charlene Dumas was eating mud.

With food prices rising, Haiti’s poorest can’t afford even a daily plate of rice, and some take desperate measures to fill their bellies.”

This story is dated from 2008, before the tragic quake hit Haiti. This story is after the earthquake:

“Sanitary conditions in tent cities like this one in Port-au-Prince’s once elegant Champs de Mars park around Haiti’s crumbled presidential palace are worsening by the day as hundreds of thousands of survivors of last week’s earthquake cram together to eat, sleep, wash and defecate.

“It’s miserable here. It’s dirty and it’s boring. There’s nothing to do but walk about,” said Judeline Pierre-Rose, 12, who misses her comfortable home with its couch and TV.

“People go to the toilet everywhere here and I’m scared of getting sick. My twin sisters vomited last night,” she said.”

When Black people became the rulers of South Africa, a once-glorious 54-story building in Johannesburg – Ponte Tower – was reduced to the world’s largest trashcan:

“Life in the building became truly brutal after the fall of Apartheid. As crime rose in the once-upscale Hillbrow neighborhood, numerous gangs moved into building. Ponte Tower became a center of organized crime activity, and life in the building become extremely unsafe. Owners all but abandoned the structure to decay. At one point the garbage piled five stories high in the open inner courtyard of the building.”

Yes, five stories of trash piled up inside the Ponte Tower after Black people took over the everyday affairs in South Africa. And worse, Haiti too has had tremendous trash problems as NPR pointed out in 2007!:

“First, we’re starting with garbage. Haiti’s trash collection system is so bad that on the streets of the capital, Port-au-Prince, garbage blocks roads and clogs the city’s drainage system and canals.”

Worse, garbage and deforestation were leading to an ecological disaster that would have startled even Malthus (and this was all before the earthquake!), all eerily similar to the condition of the Ponte Tower and the city that recently saw the Pontiac Silverdome go for $500,000.

District 9 has come alive in Haiti, and a place that few wish exists is now center-stage for the entire world to see, and yet some families in America are working overtime to bring kids from Haiti to this nation, thus proving SBPDL’s view on adoption. It was that evil Steve Sailer who first pointed out the connections between that film and dire population warnings:

“A screen title at the end of the movie reveals that since the events depicted, the number of aliens (who are, by the way, bigger and hungrier than humans) has grown to 2.5 million. That’s up from 1.8 million just three years before.

Blomkamp may not have chosen those numbers randomly. At this 11.5 percent annual growth rate, the number of aliens on Earth crosses the 100,000,000,000 mark in exactly 100 years.”

Most strange is the phenomenon of dirt eating that had overtaken Black people in Haiti prior to the earthquake, which is extraordinarily similar to actions undertaken by Black people in the United States of America. Geophagia is a trait that is a Black one:

“Rena Bronson of Macon comes home from work and makes a pot of coffee before sneaking off to the bathroom to feed her habit. She pulls out a plastic baggie full of hard, crumbling white chunks and then pops a piece in her mouth.

“I eat dirt with the door closed,” she said, laughing and a little embarrassed because she is a nurse at the Bibb County Health Department. “I just call it eating dirt. That’s what I do. Every day that God sends that’s what I do. Technically, I guess I’m supposed to be crazy for eating this stuff?”

The “dirt” in question is kaolin, a white clay mined in Georgia and South Carolina that is used for everything from making ceramics and textiles to diarrhea medicine. For decades, it has also been a folk medicine that pregnant women, particularly black women in the rural South, have used to combat cravings during pregnancy. A recent study published in the Southern Medical Journal argues that kaolin-eating should be classed as a particular kind of problem known as a “culture-bound syndrome,”…

Haiti as a true version of the aliens in District 9 is a difficult point that must be made, for Ponte Tower and Haiti both have one thing in common: a lot of Black people and an incredible amount of trash.

We have stated without sports, any positive images of Black people would be difficult to find. Without charity, Haiti would scarcely exist. Without pity, where would Black people in any nation and for that matter, Africa, be? That question is one that is the Stuff Black People Don’t Like to hear.

When you pop in District 9 in your DVD player, try not to think of Haiti. We dare you.

More From stuff black people don’t like: #341. Jersey Shore

#341. Jersey Shore

Few shows resonate with the general public like the ones broadcast on Music Television (MTV). Consider the incredible popularity of Real World, a reality show in its 24 season that puts diverse young adults into a remarkably beautiful home and merely rolls the camera as the drama unfolds.

Black people love these shows, because Token Blacks appear in each season and bring a semblance of peace to the show and act as the beacon of morality.

However, one show is currently airing on MTV that Black people find befuddling, for it appears to be a show about white people, yet curiously, the white people have a rather dark tint to their skin that can’t be explained away by prolonged exposure to tanning beds.

Yes, SBPDL is bringing up Jersey Shore, a show so incredibly mind-numbing that one finds illumination in the commercials between each episode:

Jersey Shore is a reality television series on MTV that follows eight housemates spending their summer on the New Jersey Shore. The show was filmed in August 2009 in a summer share in Seaside Heights but was also filmed in other towns such as Toms River and Neptune. It follows the eight housemates in a Real World-type style while they live, work and party at the Jersey Shore. The show debuted amid large amounts of controversy regarding the use of the words “Guido/Guidette”, portrayals of Italian-American stereotypes and scrutiny from locals because the cast members are not residents from the area.

Americans of Italian descent have found the show incredibly offensive, for the varying personalities on the show all reflect certain aspects of Italian-American subculture that the gatekeepers of Italian refinement wish to be kept secret:

“The show plays upon the stereotype of the guido, prompting criticism from groups such as the National Italian American Foundation,[62][63] UNICO National,[64] and the Order Sons of Italy in America[64] for using “ethnic slurs, violence and poor behavior to marginalize and stereotype Italian-Americans“.[3][64] Prior to the premiere of the show UNICO asked MTV to cancel the show because of the apparent play on stereotypes from the promos.[65] UNICO National President Andre DiMino said that the behavior in the promos is offensive and stereotype-promoting and that “MTV is using very pejorative terms, ‘Guido’ and ‘Guidette,’ to promote a program and as a corporation that is not correct.”[66] After the show premiered, UNICO National claims they “can’t keep up with the volume of calls” from “outraged” Italian Americans.[67]

UNICO National President Andre DiMino said in a statement “MTV has festooned the ‘bordello-like’ house set with Italian flags and red, white and green maps of New Jersey while every other cutaway shot is of Italian signs and symbols. They are blatantly as well as subliminally bashing Italian-Americans with every technique possible. … (The cast members) are an embarrassment to themselves, their heritage and their families.[64]

Linda Stasi, an Italian-American New York Post columnist, criticized MTV saying that Jersey Shore is a show “…in which Italian-Americans are stereotyped (clearly at the urging of its producer) into degrading and debasing themselves — and, by extension, all Italian-Americans — and furthering the popular TV notion that Italian-Americans are gel-haired, thuggish, ignoramuses with fake tans, no manners, no diction, no taste, no education, no sexual discretion, no hairdressers (for sure), no real knowledge of Italian culture and no ambition beyond expanding steroid-and silicone-enhanced bodies into sizes best suited for floating over Macy’s on Thanksgiving.”

Wait, what exactly is a guido?:

Guido is a slang term for a working class urban Italian American. The guido stereotype is multi-faceted. Primarily, it is used as a demeaning term towards Italian Americans, as the word guido is derived from either the Italian proper name Guido or a conjugation of the Italian verb guidare.

Yet, all the fuss over the continued denigration of Italians on Jersey Shore is lost when one views the show, for the participants appear to have incredibly dark skin that shockingly might not pass the paper bag test.

Some of the individuals of Italian descent appear to be light-skinned Black people and their cultural predilections appear to coincide with the Black ghetto norms.

Why is that? Why do these white people look Black? Well, we have the Moors who conquered Sicily to thank for that and these “Italians” on Jersey Shore all appear to have a plethora of Sicilian blood pumping through their veins:

The Arabs, who in medieval times were sometimes called “Saracens” or “Moors,” have been identified since antiquity (in Assyrian records dated to circa 850 BC), but until the Middle Ages they were not unified as a people. In the Early Middle Ages, it was Islam that united the Arabs and established the framework of Arab law. Initially, most Muslims were Arabs, and during the Arab rule of Sicily their Islamic faith was closely identified with them. (Even today, many principles believed to be tenets of Islam are, in fact, Arab practices unrelated to Muslim ethics.)

The rapid growth of Arab culture could be said to parallel the dissemination of Islam. Except for some poetry, the first major work of literature published entirely in Arabic was the Koran (Quran), the holy book of Islam, and one may loosely define Arabs by the regions where Arabic was spoken in the Middle Ages and afterwards. Arabs were a Semitic people of the Middle East. The Berbers of northwest Africa and the Sahara were not Arabs, though many converted to Islam, adopted Arabic as their language and assimilated with Arab society. Though most parts of Sicily were conquered by Arabs, certain areas where settled by people who, strictly speaking, were Muslim Berbers. Like many Berbers, some Arabs were nomadic.

Wait, you may be wondering, what does this mean? Simply put, genetic evidence through DNA sequencing shows that modern-day Italians of Sicilian descent carry an abnormally large amount of African mtDNA and more so, genetic evidence from the Y chromosome- lineage in Sicily confirms the presence of Black ancestry.

Thus, why the Jersey Shore stars lack the skin tone of white people and reflect the darker pigmentation of their great, great, great ancestors.

Perhaps, a scene from True Romance can best punctuate the reality of Sicilians and how this relates to Jersey Shore. The scene has Christopher Walken – playing a Sicilian – and Dennis Hopper discuss the history of Sicily. Hopper’s character knows he is about to die, so he lets history speak for itself:

Coccotti: Sicilians are great liars. The best in the world. I’m a Sicilian. And my old man was the world heavyweight champion of Sicilian liars. And from growin’ up with him I learned the pantomime. Now there are seventeen different things a guy can do when he lies to give him away. A guy has seventeen pantomimes. A woman’s got twenty, but a guy’s got seventeen. And if you know ‘em like ya know your own face, they beat lie detectors to hell. What we got here is a little game of show and tell. You don’t wanna show me nothin’. But you’re tellin’ me everything. Now I know you know where they are. So tell me, before I do some damage you won’t walk away from.

Clifford: Could I have one of those Chesterfields now?

Coccotti: Sure.

Clifford: Got a match? Oh, don’t bother. I got one.

Coccotti: …your son, the cowboy, it’s claimed, came in the room blazin’, and didn’t stop ’till they were pretty sure everybody was dead…

Clifford: You’re Sicilian, huh?

Coccotti: Yeah, Sicilian.

Clifford: You know, I read a lot. Especially about things that have to do with history. I find that shit fascinating. Here’s a fact, I don’t know if you know or not, Sicilians were spawned by niggers.
Coccotti: Come again?

Clifford: It’s a fact. You see, Sicilians have black blood pumpin’ through their hearts. If you don’t believe me, you can look it up. Hundreds and hundreds of years ago, you see, the Moors conquered Sicily. And Moors are niggers.

Coccotti: Yes…

Clifford: So you see, way back then, uh, Sicilians were like, uh, wops from Northern Italy. Ah, they all had blonde hair and blue eyes, but, uh, well, then the Moors moved in there, and uh, well, they changed the whole country. They did so much fuckin’ with Sicilian women, huh? That they changed the whole bloodline forever. That’s why blonde hair and blue eyes became black hair and dark skin. You know, it’s absolutely amazing to me to think that to this day, hundreds of years later, that, uh, that Sicilians still carry that nigger gene. Now this…[Coccotti laughs]

Clifford: No, I’m, no, I’m quoting… history. It’s written. It’s a fact, it’s written.
Coccotti: [laughing] I love this guy.

Clifford: Your ancestors are niggers. Uh-huh. Hey. Yeah. And, and your great-great-great-great grandmother fucked a nigger, ho, ho, yeah, and she had a half-nigger kid… now, if that’s a fact, tell me, am I lying? ‘Cause you, you’re part eggplant.

Coccotti: Ohhh!

Clifford: Huh? Hey! Hey! Hey!

Coccotti: You’re a cantaloupe. [shoots Cliff in the face]

Jersey Shore is a show that people find funny, amusing and infuriating. But Black people find it perplexing, for these purported Italians have a strange look to them that can only be explained through the prodigious copulation rates of the Moors and the white people in Sicily.

Stuff Black People Don’t Like includes Jersey Shore, for the “white people” featured in the show carry the genetic markers of their Moorish ancestry and, if the one-drop rule is in effect, are really Black people.

Thus, the strange behavior of the characters on the show shouldn’t create consternation among Americans of Italian descent, but merely infuriate Black people everywhere.Hey, are we lying?

Scoping Out Pepe: Why We Should Get It Right, But Won’t

Scoping Out Pepe: Why We Should Get It Right, But Won’t


March 26, 2008 by Fred Reed

Gringos here in Mexico talk endlessly about how they love and admire the Mexican people, how friendly the natives are, how wonderful the culture is and, by strong implication, how wonderful the gringos are for appreciating Mexico. Actually they don’t. They live in gated communities in the hills, can’t speak three words of Spanish, and have surprisingly little contact with the country. They have invented a Mexico that doesn’t exist, and have fallen in love with it.

Thus many of their ideas about Mexicans are wrong, compounded equally of ideology and wishful thinking. The same happens in America. This will one day give birth to surprising children.

The truth is that Mexicans are about like people the world over, which means that regarding them with syrupy condescension as fuzzy heartwarming Pedros and Marias is a mistake. They don’t much like Americans, regarding them as arrogant and rich. The distaste is no more than distaste: they do not dream of lynching Yanquis. Nonetheless, regarding Mexico as a nation of smiling maids and obedient gardeners overlooks a somewhat darker picture. They would not be quite so smiling and obedient if they had a better economic choice.

An interesting observation: In five years I have encountered no hostility from Mexicans who have always lived in Mexico. The five or six men who were aggressively hostile all spoke barrio English. They had spent time in the US. Think about it.

The US would be well advised to take certain realities into account when it ponders today’s unrestricted immigration. Those who favor immigration tend to hold an idealized view of the newcomers. They are so-o-o-o hardworking! Yes, in the first generation. They just want a better life! So they do. They are just like Italian and Polish immigrants of the last century. No, they are not. They are Mexicans.

Mexico is a third-world country-yes, an upper third-world Latin American country, functioning reasonably well, and not Haiti or Bangladesh. It’s a nice place to live, which is why a half million North Americans are here. Yet Mexico is very, very different from America. If America and England are a few inches apart, Americans and France a few more, Mexico is several feet off in the distance.

While gringos and Mexicans live next to each other here in amity, they do not mix. They can’t. A retired executive from Boeing has nothing in common with a man with a fourth-grade education who will never read a book in his life. Pepe is smiling and amiable while working in the garden. He is also a grown man, not a teddy bear. If the retired engineer met Pepe in Pepe’s favorite bar, the engineer might come to a very different understanding of Pepe.

It is one thing to have Mexicans in America while they still fearful of being deported. They are polite and brown and eager to work. This encourages the tendency to which Americans are prone, to patronize them as just the nicest babysitters and garbage men. Why, they are almost like real people.

It will be a different thing when they are legal and have a voting majority in the Southwest. They understand perfectly that their day is coming. A couple of years back I listened on the radio to a Mexican-American politician from Texas. He pointed out that when the Mexican children now in school reach the age of eighteen, they will control the government of the state. He was not hostile, did not say as Barack Obama’s minister did, “God damn America.” Yet he saw what was coming, and was well pleased. From the Mexican point of view, they are getting back states which rightly belong to them.

They assuredly are. Shortly the US will have a southern tier of states under Mexican-American control.

The hopeful idea is that they will meld as did the Irish and Italians and Vietnamese. The flaw in this happy ointment is that they do very poorly in school-better than blacks, but well below whites and Asians. This is not a problem of the first generation only, in which case it might eventually cure itself, but of later generations also. It looks innate, or at least as if it will continue. Then what?

Then they will have no choice but to be waiters and garbage collectors. The first generation will tolerate it, happy to be making what seems to them good money. A few will succeed and move up. Most won’t. The second generation, relegated forever to jobs of low pay and less esteem, will become resentful. Inevitably they will see the relegation as indicating discrimination, not incapacity. The young, unable to compete, will gravitate toward others who can’t and we will have another permanent underclass. If you don’t believe me, watch.

The United States advertises itself as a land of opportunity, and in fact is, but only for the bright. A poor kid who pops 1500 on his SATs can get into a good university and come out as anything he chooses. Universities look for such students. A kid who barely reads has no chance. For him, there are no opportunities.

Why is it unlikely that the immigrants will improve scholastically? For reasons a fair few understand but nobody talks about. Intelligence. Mexico consists of three layers, or maybe two layers with a spectrum between. The governing class is white, and at about the European level on IQ tests, not surprising because they are European. You have the mestizos, who do conspicuously less well, and the pure Indians, lower yet. The white upper class is not swimming the river.

IQ is a forbidden topic, but it tracks reality depressingly well. No country below Laredo has ever produced anything important in the sciences. And while in any group there are exceptions, it is the majority who determine social results. This bears thinking about. Reality does not respect politics. Holding one’s breath and turning blue will change nothing. Insisting that something can’t be so or shouldn’t be so doesn’t change whether it is so.

Inequality can be seen in the streets here. In Guadalajara, una ciudad muy guera, a very white city, you have highly sophisticated people who talk of the arts on the radio as intelligently as any in America. They go to the opera, buy in good bookstores, and serve competently as doctors and technicians. In the villages you find people with far more Indian blood and almost no academic achievement or interest. Out in the hills there is, dead serious, a lot of witchcraft.

It’s a different world. And coming to a mall near you.

Copyright by Fred Reed, used by permission.

Thomas Sowell, man of reason Race dialogue: same old stuff: It’s Culture, Not Racism

Thomas Sowell, man of reason

Race dialogue: same old stuff: It’s Culture, Not Racism

Thomas Sowell July 14, 1998

me to listen to the same old arguments of the 1960s being rehashed once
again as part of Bill Clinton’s supposedly new national “dialogue” on
race. It so happens that I have spent the past 16 years researching and
writing a series of three books on race and culture around the world.
What I found in the course of this long project contradicts virtually
everything that is being said and assumed in the one-sided “dialogue”
being conducted by Clinton and his supporters. At the heart of these
retreaded 1960s arguments is the notion that statistical disparities
between groups are strange and sinister, and can only be explained by
discrimination based on “stereotypes.”

What I discovered in the
course of my 16 years of research, including circling the globe twice
in the process, is that statistical disparities among groups is the
rule — not the exception — in countries around the world. Many of
these disparities, whether in income or IQ, are at least as great as
those between blacks and whites in the United States. Most of these
other countries have histories that are very different from the history
of the United States, so the factors that supposedly explain inter
group differences here are often not present there. Yet the differences
are. Nor are these differences due to “stereotypes,” as some keep
repeating like a mantra. Differences in performances are quite real, so
it can hardly be surprising that there are differences in rewards.
Moreover, these differences often endure for centuries.

In Malaysia, for example,
the Chinese minority received a hundred times as many engineering
degrees as the Malay majority during the decade of the 1960s. They
received these degrees at institutions controlled by Malays. There was
no way these disparities were due to discrimination, because the
Chinese were in no position to discriminate against the Malays. At the
same time, the majority population of Nigeria, living in its northern
provinces, provided less than 10 percent of that country’s university
students. In Poland and Hungary between the two world wars, Jews were
no larger percentage of the populations of these countries than blacks
are today in the United States. Yet an absolute majority of the
physicians in both countries were Jews.

In the heyday of the
Ottoman Empire, the Turks who ran the empire were wholly unrepresented
among the leading financiers in its capital city of Istanbul. In
earlier centuries, the leading financiers in London were not Englishmen
but Italians, which is why there is today a Lombard Street in London’s
financial district. None of this was due to discrimination, but to
differences in skills. Yet we treat a pattern that is common around the
world as if it were strange and sinister here. And we take as our norm
something that is virtually nowhere to be found on this planet — an
even distribution of peoples in occupations, institutions and income

Even though blacks in the
United States have been subject to far more discrimination than blacks
in Brazil, the black-white difference in income is greater in Brazil.
This would be inexplicable if discrimination were the overwhelming
factor that it is claimed to be. But such differences are readily
explainable in terms of the different cultural histories of blacks in
the two countries. If discrimination were the key factor, then blacks
in the United States would be among the poorest blacks in the
hemisphere and blacks in Haiti would be the most prosperous, since
Haitians have been free of white rule for two centuries. Yet it is
Haitian blacks who are the poorest in the hemisphere and American
blacks who are the most prosperous in world.

You don’t even need to
leave Washington, D.C., to see that discrimination is not the be-all
and end-all depicted by Clinton and his supporters. Until the 1950s,
the Washington public school system was racially segregated and
discrimination was rampant. Yet the black academic high school in
Washington held its own and often outperformed most of the white
academic high schools in the city on tests as far back as 1899, nearly
a century ago. Today, with far more resources and a city controlled by
blacks, there is no hope of any such academic performance within the
foreseeable future. There are many reasons for this, but the
all-purpose explanation of discrimination just does not fit these
facts. You are not going to solve today’s problem with yesterday’s

Why the terms Islamic or Liberal Fascism? by Lewis Loflin

Why the terms Islamic or Liberal Fascism?

by Lewis Loflin

Many people today use terms such as Islamo-fascism or Islamism. Many of radical Islam’s allies on the left claim the term ‘fascism” has no relation to Islam, but never hesitate to use the term in ration to Christians and Jews. Fascism as a term is thrown around by all kinds of people to attack their foes. Like yelling racism it’s simply used to silence open debate on a number of political and social issues. In a provocative new book by Jonah Goldberg entitled Liberal Fascism, Goldberg rightly goes through how both Hitler and Mussolini were both socialists. (Nazi means National Socialist German Workers’ party and Mussolini was a former communist.) From Rousseau’s “general will” to the paranoid (and atheist) Jacobins and their reign of terror in France, all of this was entirely secular. The idea in socialism and fascism was to rearrange the social order from the top down.

Both Nazism, socialism, and fascism trace their origins directly to the atheistic and genocidal French Revolution. Many American and Western Progressives at times viewed both Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini with great reverence in the 20s and 30s. Notable is the famous H.G. Wells, who coined the term “liberal fascists.” To quote Wells in a speech given to the Young Liberals at Oxford in 1932, “Progressives must become liberal fascists and enlightened Nazis.” Wells was a major “Progressive influence.”

We must be very careful that “liberal” changed meaning during the early 20th Century when it “stressing individual freedom, free markets, and limited government. This includes the importance of human rationality, individual property rights, natural rights, the protection of civil liberties, individual freedom from restraint, equality under the law, constitutional limitation of government, free markets, etc as exemplified in the writings of John Locke, Adam Smith, David Hume, Thomas Jefferson, Voltaire, Bastiat, Montesquieu.” (Wiki) This change arose in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in response industrialization, the rise of nationalism, and the decline of older religious values, in particular after World War I. So what Goldberg called liberal fascism would be properly called today Progressivism.

The biggest change overall was the rise of statism over individualism. This nonsense is embedded like a cancer in Western academia and the idle, wealthy elite in Europe, America, and even Israel. Traditional conservatives and classical liberals, the children of the American Revolution, utterly rejected this nonsense. It was imported into America from Europe and spread though elite universities.

It differs from outright socialism/Marxism in that private property is retained, but is heavily taxed/controlled if not outright a public-private partnership. In Virginia and other states a form of this is encouraged where state functions are contracted to private sector companies to the point they become the same institutions. This is how an oligarchy develops much as was seen in Nazi Germany and fascist Italy under Mussolini. Even communist states such as the Soviet Union and East Germany had their oligarchies and ruling class by the fact special stores were set aside for party members only selling goods unavailable to the masses.

A big difference from outright fascism is lack of a nationalist element. Like Marxists, Progressives think in terms of world, not country or people. Another factor is fascists, communists, and Progressives are irreligious. The decline of traditional faith and values left a vacuum to filled by the state and assorted social gospels. The state became the power to promote these new secular “gospels” and even god itself. Yes Progressives do retain “democracy” if we wish to call democracy simply voting when the majority simply imposes it will on the minority or “common good” overrules individual liberty and the Constitution

But America wasn’t the only place to import this poison from Europe. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, most of the Muslim Middle East was chopped up by various European powers. (The exception was Saudi Arabia, never really under Ottoman control.) The various European powers exported fascism and communism into the Muslim world. It would come by first by Arab Christians and later by Muslims attending European universities and the Cold War. England, France, Communist Russia, and Nazi Germany openly exported their ideas into the Muslim world.

After the failure of these secular experiments in so many parts of the Muslim world, the extremists (Baathists, Arab Nationalists, Palestinians, etc.) went over to Islam, melded many of the military and social structures they learned from Europeans into Islam. Be they Saudi Wahhabis, Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hizballah, Iran, etc. they all employ terror tactics and social structures from Europe combined with Islam as the central religion. Most Muslims see Islam as a nation and all Muslims within that Islamic Nation. Thus Islamic Nationalism is Islamic Fascism. Under Islam the state is Islam. And Sharia Law regulates every facet of ones life.

So Jonah Goldberg defined “fascism” as the following:

Fascism is a religion of the state. It assumes the organic unity of the body politic and longs for a national leader attuned to the will of the people. It is totalitarian in that it views everything as political and holds that any action by the state is justified to achieve the common good. It takes responsibility for all aspects of life, including our health and well being, and seeks uniformity of thought and action, whether by force or through regulation and social pressure. Everything including the economy and religion, must be aligned with the objectives. Any rival identity is part of “the problem” and therefore defined as the enemy.

Ref. Goldberg 12-21.

Modern American “liberals” are the polar opposite to classical liberals such as Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington. They are as H.G. Wells suggested, “liberal fascists.” While they often reject traditional Judeo-Christian faith, they are still religious either opting for syncretistic’ nonsense such as New Age religion or Eastern mysticism or even the state itself. But this secular pseudo-religious fascism versus religious fascism are identical in practical terms. To secular socialists and fascists, the state is everything. It’s the same in fascist’ Islam where there is no separation of anything under Sharia Law. Sharia dictates everything, and Muslims also long for a Islamic international leader to control the world. Liberal fascism (Progressivism) is all for “democracy” on paper, but like Islam there is no individual freedom over the collective.

So this is why those from Muslim nations trying to bring true freedom and tolerance are met by deafening silence as the American (and European) leftist’ Progressives often ignore their pleas for help while they scream week after week about how evil Israel and America really are instead. They are silent as the Kurds are murdered by Arab nationalists, while “Queers for Palestine” voices support for Hamas and Fatah while both murder homosexuals.

Liberal fascists or Progressives and Islamic fascists are evil twins borne of the same whore. They have similar goals and economic social structures, but differ only in their core religious beliefs. They are beyond reason and compromise in their goals of destroying Western culture, symbolized by Israel and America. They are uneasy allies for now, just as the Iranian communists and Islamist Mullahs were when they overthrew the Shah with help of anther Progressive known as President Jimmy Carter.

Isn’t Iran a democracy? Sure it is just asked those murdered in the elections of 2009. They did vote just as the citizens of the Soviet Union had a vote. Didn’t Hamas get elected in the Arab terrorist state of Gaza? Modern Islamic fascism is anti-Semitic just as Nazism was. But modern liberal fascists are as well. In fact the origin of modern antisemitism is on the left.

So I submit that the term Islamic fascism is an appropriate term. I also submit that most of these leftist’ Jews are not Jews in any real sense of the term. Judaism is tied up with G-d/Torah, just as an atheist has no real concept of America, tied into a belief in G-d as the American Founders saw it. (This is not the Jesus as God of Christian fundamentalists.) Both atheist’ Jews and Gentiles alike seek a substitute religion, the state. What was it God said about idols?

How Marxism became racism by Lewis Loflin

How Marxism became racism

by Lewis Loflin

My position here should be clear in that black/Hispanic failure is culture and not race. It is self-inflicted and it is their fault and general society owes them nothing if they want to maintain those failed cultures.

Yet racist left-wing organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center deride white “nativism” as racist, but the Hispanic nationalist racism of La Raza is perfectly acceptable. This double standard is racism in itself.

Wikipedia defines pseudoreligion (or pseudotheology) as “a generally pejorative term applied to a non-mainstream belief system or philosophy which is functionally similar to religious practices…” Marxism in its various forms have led to the deaths of over 100 million people in the 20th century. It’s almost a fundamentalist religion to its followers that need a cause in their atheist lives. It’s an irrational utopianism nightmare.

Marxism’s roots are in the leftist’ French Revolution and the Jacobins, the first modern example of a secular government committing state-sanctioned murder. Jean-Jacques Rousseau invented the term “the general will” referring to the desire or interest of a people as a whole and often “associated with socialist traditions in politics.” Rousseau was somewhat a mystic and this idea is ill defined, but have no doubt the welfare of the individual is subordinate to the “will” of the masses.

One would do well to study Rousseau because he is everywhere around us. In his The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality to quote, “that human beings are basically good by nature, but were corrupted by the complex historical events that resulted in present day civil society.” Thus the secular “Original Sin” is the fault of society in general, not human weakness. Society is broke and must be “fixed.”

And his Emile or On Education Rousseau concocted the idea “that the goal of education should be to cultivate our natural tendencies…of ensuring that the pupil’s character be developed in such a way as to have a healthy sense of self-worth and morality.” This is what I call knowledge free education or simply indoctrination. He rejected the teaching of science, history, etc. He was a direct influence on socialist John Dewey, the father of our failed modern education system and it’s insistence on “outcome.” The concept of the “noble savage,” the Romance period in literature, and even modern environmentalism can be traced back to Rousseau, whom some considered a madman.

Nearly all of these people of the French Enlightenment and the violence it produced during the French Revolution were atheist, agnostic, or at the very least anti-Christian. The French Enlightenment and its offshoots sought a new society based on a total destruction of all traditional values and beliefs. What these “atheist” types do is develop a new religion or ideology to substitute for the one they sought to destroy. (Christianity and Judaism) They are just as “fundamentalist” as the most fanatical Muslim or Christian. Their god becomes the state and the state overrules all. They are the state’s “prophets.” The state is the collective “general will” and those outside the state are the enemy. The beheadings and show trials during the Reign of Terror mirrored the Christian Inquisition of earlier times.

See Left vs Right, Montesquieu, Corporatism

This was the belief of “Progressives” the ancestors of modern liberalism. H.G. Wells coined the term “liberal fascists.” To quote Wells in a speech given to the Young Liberals at Oxford in 1932, “Progressives must become liberal fascists and enlightened Nazis.” This is the nonsense that fills the minds of those in our elite colleges. And fascism and socialism are really the much same thing in practical terms. Nazi means National Socialist German Worker’ party and Mussolini was a former communist. Our form today is milder, preferring to “remake” society by destroying it from the inside.

Marxism and other secular “isms” in their various forms are a failure and are today discredited. It has mutated to a new form, employing the same “us versus them mentality.” It’s not workers versus the factory owner, but western culture in total that is evil versus the world. The down-trodden are there not because they are stupid, lazy, or unable to succeed on their own, but because they are exploited and held down. So they must put an end to what George Soros calls “excessive individualism.” (Ref. “The Capitalist Threat” Atlantic Monthly, Volume 279, No. 2, February 1997) They then applied this pseudo-religious dogma to race.

Paul Baran is the author of The Political Economy of Growth (Monthly Review Press, 1957). For the first time in Marxist literature, Baran propounded a causal connection between the prosperity of the advanced capitalist countries (white for the most part) and the impoverishment of the Third World. (non-white) Prior to Baran, no Marxist had ever suspected that capitalism was the cause of the poverty of poverty based on race. (Or in the case of America, it went along racial lines.) So they went from class to race. In fact it became anti-Semitic as well seeing anyone having any success as somehow evil turned on Jews, who often invented this nonsense. So all of the world’s problems are not because of internal problems whatever selected group own failures, but because white racism, the force behind hated capitalism, caused it. Only socialism can fix the problem. Their faith in socialism is like a fundamentalist’ religion.

According to the left, failure and inequality of blacks and Hispanics in America is the fault of racist’ society, not their own personal actions. Charges of racism are merely part of a concerted effort by the far-left to destroy Western culture and society in general. But what if society is not at fault, then the “state” can’t “fix” the problem, then who needs the all powerful Marxist’ style state?

Most of the press and the Progressive elite in this country were brainwashed at our top universities with the nonsense of Rousseau, Marx, and Dewey. They see everything in terns of feelings, conflict, victims, and exploiters, reason be damned. They must remake society and end “excessive individualism” for collectivism or “general will.” They do not believe in individual autonomy or individual responsibility. They believe society must be controlled in every aspect to enforce this “general will.” That is why blacks and Hispanics and other multi-generational groups of failures (including some whites in Appalachia) can’t be blamed for their condition. But the double standard is everywhere: David Duke is a racist because he is white, while Obama’s Reverend Wright and Louis Farrakhan are not because they are “victims.” A victim is responsible for nothing. They are all racists to me.

So Marxism in its new form of modern Progressivism or liberal fascism is a type of pseudo-religion to its followers. To these “useful idiots,” these beliefs are articles of secular fundamentalist’ faith. If the “faith” can preached loud enough, long enough, and they can silence the skeptics, then the faith must be the truth. All tyrannies practice this be they secular or religious. That is the point of political correctness, in the past known as censorship and brainwashing. The new trinity of the leftist’ race cult is Diversity, Multiculturalism, and Affirmative Action. I call this anti-white racism.

To quote one opinion,

Scientists and Educators are beginning to realize that low intelligence is possibly due to genetic inheritance of historically low African American IQ levels… Some have suggested intermarriage with whites to raise black IQ levels, but many in both groups have found this to be a distasteful solution with fascist underpinnings. So, it is generally opposed. This leaves African Americans with a permanently low IQ with no hope of remediation, because IQ is not a function of education. The tragedy is found in the mere 17%-25% graduation rates in African American high school statistics as children with low IQ who are forced to act as though they have high IQ predictably fail, giving them feelings of low self-esteem and worthlessness, and may precipitate their later tendency toward violent criminal behavior.

The New York Times raises this alarm as well that IQ is genetic and not just cultural. In In DNA Era, New Worries About Prejudice (New York Times Nov. 11, 2007) the political correctness police are already going into panic mode. To quote,

Such developments are providing some of the first tangible benefits of the genetic revolution. Yet some social critics fear they may also be giving long-discredited racial prejudices a new potency. The notion that race is more than skin deep, they fear, could undermine principles of equal treatment and opportunity that have relied on the presumption that we are all fundamentally equal…We will all be walking a fine line between using biology and allowing it to be abused…

Just the existence of such genetic differences between races…means “the egalitarian theory,” that all races are equal, is proven false…many geneticists, wary of fueling discrimination and worried that speaking openly about race could endanger support for their research, are loath to discuss the social implications of their findings…There are clear differences between people of different continental ancestries, said Marcus W. Feldman, a professor of biological sciences at Stanford University. It’s not there yet for things like I.Q., but I can see it coming. And it has the potential to spark a new era of racism if we do not start explaining it better.”

…the conversation is already flashing forward to what might happen if genetically encoded racial differences in socially desirable – or undesirable – traits are identified. If I were to believe the ‘facts’ in this post, what should I do? Should I advocate discrimination against blacks because they are less smart? Should I not hire them to my company because odds are I could find a smarter white person? Stop trying to prove that one group of people are genetically inferior to your group. Just stop…African-Americans have lately been discussing opting out of genetic research until it’s clear we’re not going to use science to validate prejudices…Such discussions are among thousands that followed the geneticist James D. Watson’s assertion last month that Africans are innately less intelligent than other races. Dr. Watson, a Nobel Prize winner, subsequently apologized and quit his post at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island.

But the incident has added to uneasiness about whether society is prepared to handle the consequences of science that may eventually reveal appreciable differences between races in the genes that influence socially important traits. New genetic information, some liberal critics say, could become the latest rallying point for a conservative political camp that objects to social policies like affirmative action, as happened with “The Bell Curve,” the controversial 1994 book that examined the relationship between race and I.Q. Yet even some self-described liberals argue that accepting that there may be genetic differences between races is important in preparing to address them politically…

Let’s say the genetic data says we’ll have to spend two times as much for every black child to close the achievement gap,” said Jason Malloy, 28, an artist in Madison, Wis., who wrote a defense of Dr. Watson for the widely read science blog Gene Expression. Society, he said, would need to consider how individuals ‘can be given educational and occupational opportunities that work best for their unique talents and limitations…

But does that mean they again silence proof that undermines what might be only wishful thinking? If the genetic link for IQ is proven, then the entire left-wing race agenda is undermined. And we already have racism against whites because of black and Hispanic failure which at minimum is their own fault if culture, and just reality if genetic. Whites today are constantly penalized and attacked for non-existent crimes. Black IQ is 85, Hispanic is about 90 as are American Indians north and south of the border. Thomas Sowell believes the IQ problem is culture and cites some valid examples. The problem that remains is IQ gap, which immigration isn’t helping as Asians cause the same problems for both Hispanics and blacks that whites do. Are Asians going the be targeted as the next “racist” group by the left-wing racists? Asians are already barred from affirmative action programs just like whites. To quote another writer,

(data)…shows that European Americans are not the smartest people in America is the fact that the Asian Americans are smarter as a group than European Americans. Asians have an IQ of 103 IQ compared to 100 IQ for European Americans. Jews are the very highest. Jews have an IQ of 115 points. Probably as a result of their higher IQ, Jews have been the most productive people in the world for the size of their population. If Hitler had utilized the Jews in Germany, he would have won World War Two. Einstein, Oppenheimer, Ferme, and Teller, who were Jews, developed the atomic and hydrogen bombs that ended World War Two and kept the United States and Europe secure since 1945 when the first atomic bomb, developed in large part by brilliant, high IQ Jewish scientists, was exploded on Hiroshima.

But Hitler too was just another irrational left-wing racist.

Norway Pays Bitter Price for Mass Third World Immigration

Norway Pays Bitter Price for Mass Third World Immigration

BNP News Team

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.

Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK. She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

When she was asked by NRK if the police were not “stigmatising an entire community” by releasing the statistics, Ms Rohde said she “wants to contribute to a better and safe world. That’s why the truth needs to be told. I hope the debate will focus on that,” she told NRK.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008. According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant. At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.”

The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background. Four people have been arrested. In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language. Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.” (more…)

On the Terms ‘Racist’ and ‘Racism’

On the Terms ‘Racist’ and ‘Racism’

‘Anti-racist’ would be more accurately referred to as ‘anti-race’, as in they rather dysfunctionally do not like the fact (or cannot deal with it) that the various races of man do indeed exist, often as a very large part of what constitutes a people’s ethnicity.  In the 19th century, when the variant of slavery euphemistically referred to as cheap labor met serious resistance across the world, both from those preyed upon as a source and those who by diktat were on the receiving end, that the various peoples of the world naturally wished to preserve that physical part of themselves known as race was certainly seen as a major hindrance to the obtaining of the profits to be had….It is also an issue of control.  If they can genocide (in the truest sense of that modern term) all the races and ethnicities of man by ‘mixing’ them away and create an artificial new single race of man, it would make humanity a lot easier to control, in the same way a small boy finds it easier to control just one marble rather than a profusion of them.

An anti-race (aka ‘anti-racism’) protest in Rome in 2008.  Adding insult to injury, those already exploited by Capitalism as cheap labor or the flimsy fig leaf for the same, the easily 95% plus fraudulent asylum seeker, are exploited and manipulated once again against the indigenous Italian population…who might just stand in the way of the profits to be made.

The terms racist and racism are being used by Marxists (rad/libs, multic-cultists, etc) specifically as part of the deconstructing (aka destroying) process of European peoples.  Trotsky is the person who first used the word “racism” in the 1920’s.  Being that European peoples have been homogenous for thousands of years it is entirely natural that would be a big part of our identity as peoples. In an effort to destroy that massive part of our identity as Europeans the entirely legitimate term race has been married to negativity with the words racist and racism and as has been stated been specifically aimed at our peoples to enhance its destructive effect…a verbal smart bomb if you will. The gold ring for the folks who promote the newly invented words is when Europeans themselves use the terms in conversation or even to describe themselves.

Most people among the European ancestried general public see the two terms as referring to abuse between races (particularly Europeans see it this way). Those who promote the terms (ie multi-cultists, rad-libs, reds, non-Europeans, etc) see it as meaning any expression by Europeans of their unique identity, bad or good. Even the simple acknowledgment that European peoples exist is slapped with the label.  Those we deal with have pronounced that only Europeans can be racist or engage in racism.


Haiti—The Ultimate Symbol Of Planet Earth’s Headlong Plunge To Disaster

Haiti—The Ultimate Symbol Of Planet Earth’s Headlong Plunge To Disaster

By Donald A. Collins

When asked about the level of violent disruption now going on in Haiti, one military man on NBC’s Tuesday, January 19, 2010 Today Show said something like “Well, it’s now at a lower level than before the quake.” Today’s Matt Lauer then reported that the estimated death toll could reach 200,000.  Then another 6.1 quake early Wednesday, January 20th.  A hard way to reduce violence, eh?

Haiti, long a nearly-failed state, will likely fall even lower toward that unenviable condition. Lots of other countries around the world are in the same pickle.  Is Yemen one? Is Afghanistan one? Is North Korea one? Will Pakistan become one?

Take your pick.

Sans earthquakes, many countries around the world are moving toward disasters based on the huge growth of their populations and the mindlessness of their leaders. They either ignore the urgent need for more family planning, or are even pro-natalist leaders, like some my wife and I met on our trip to Africa this past year, wanting more people so their “sort” can be equal in numbers to other “sorts”!

Traveling around the world for over 40 years, I have personally seen this rumbling tsunami tidal wave of humans rising against resource limitations. It gets worse daily.

This grisly Haitian situation epitomizes the kind of future that many, including me, have been predicting for years—unless we empower women and give them the means to regulate their fertility.

53 Haitian youngsters are being given new families in Pittsburgh, PA. Bet you that they will never again see Haiti!

A friend emailed me on January 19th: “I just saw that the Red Cross has air lifted 2000 Haitians into Orlando and is planning to bring 45,000 more to Florida with Obama’s support”.

And as Steve Sailer so eloquently suggested in his superb January 17 VDARE.com piece, Why Haiti Is So Hopeless; And A Very Modest Proposal. He ends his perceptive piece by saying,

“But today, it’s hard to find much on Google about Haiti and contraceptives. According to a 2001 World Health Organization report: “Among sexually active women, 13% used a modern method of contraception and 4% relied on traditional methods”.

“And the other 83 percent?

“It appears that Haitian women now wisely want to reduce the number of children they have—Haiti’s total fertility rate is said to be down to 3.8 babies per lifetime, the same as Saudi Arabia’s. But Haitians need to bring their fertility down to European below-replacement rates for a couple of generations to allow the land to recover—and the people, hopefully, improve their “human capital”.

“Let’s make long lasting Depo Provera contraceptive injections free to Haitian women.

“Anyone got any better ideas?”

Mr. Sailer, you are really on the right track!

Talk about Nero fiddling while Rome burned! Our own leaders have been building up our killing machines for the profit of today’s Andrew Undershafts (Major Barbara’s father in GBS’s 1905 immortal play, who made a huge fortune from selling munitions), while missing the true Trojan Horse of massive immigration into the West.

The unmet birth control needs of most of the world’s women in poor, underdeveloped countries has directly led to the massive migration of persons whose countries can no longer support them.  Ah, Mexico, you are but one of many!

As for Depo Provera, which is being distributed by Population Services International (PSI) in Haiti (my wife is a member of the board of directors), it is an effective method of birth control. But it only lasts for 3 months and must be renewed by injection at that point. In a place where medical services are scarce, more permanent long-term methods are required.

My colleagues and I have been working to gain approval for one such long-term method for many years. It is called QS: An Inexpensive, Easily Administered Contraceptive Option for Women. It has yet to be approved by FDA, but certainly would be useful.

QS (the quinacrine method of non-surgical permanent contraception for women) is one family planning option currently under study that shows great potential. It offers the advantages of being discreet, easily administered and inexpensive, and can it be used in many settings by healthcare providers capable of performing IUD insertions.

The amount of money now spent worldwide on reproductive services and maternal and child health is a joke—under $1 billion, compared to what we is spent on armaments. (Our Congress just passed a $626 billion annual defense budget).

Another great need is for emergency contraceptives (EC) which FDA has already determined are safe, effective and yet which were, when I last looked, prohibited at Wal-Mart Pharmacies. EC, like other contraceptives, prevents pregnancy.

Unlike other contraceptives, EC only works within 72-hours AFTER sexual intercourse—after a condom breaks, or a birth control pill is forgotten. About half of all unintended pregnancies occur because of some type of contraceptive failure. It could happen to anyone who is sexually active. In 2000, there were an estimated 3 million unintended pregnancies and 800,000 abortions in the United States. And we are a developed country, not (yet) a failed state.

Sort of makes the UN Population Fund’s hope seem dim: “All couples and individuals have the right to decide freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have access to the information and means to do so.”

With the election of Scott Brown on Tuesday, Obamacare is at serious if not terminal risk. But if passed it will surely not include paying for contraceptive services for women (although Viagra and Cialis will likely get covered for men).

Our immigration invasion, alarmingly ignored by our own leaders as they grapple ineffectively with our comparatively minor problems, stands only to worsen.

Donald A. Collins [email him] is a freelance writer living in Washington DC, and is Co-Chair of the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s (FAIR) National Advisory Board. His view are his own.

They’re Going To Sneak Obamacare Through This Week

They’re Going To Sneak Obamacare Through This Week

[This is from Dick "Toe-Sucker" Morris, one of Bill and Hillary's Jews whom Hillary ran out of the White House in '97 or so, after Morris was exposed as taking long lunch breaks in expensive Washington DC hotels with high-priced hookers whom he paid (on his White House expense account, of course) in order to suck their toes, among other deviations. Morris has hated Hillary with a black passion ever since, has switched to the Republicans, and done everything he can to destroy Hill and Bill and their Democrat friends ever since.

As repulsive as the Jew Morris is personally, it must be conceded that he is probably one of the sharpest and best-informed political animals in DC, and we should bend an ear to what he says on occasion. He does this for a living, after all. - HAC]

Highly informed sources on Capitol Hill have revealed to me details of the Democratic plan to sneak Obamacare through Congress, despite collapsing public approval for healthcare “reform” and disintegrating congressional support in the wake of Republican Scott Brown’s victory in Massachusetts. President Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid all have agreed to the basic framework of the plan.

Their plan is clever but can be stopped if opponents of radical healthcare reform act quickly and focus on a core group of 23 Democratic Congressman. If just a few of these 23 Democrats are “flipped” and decide to oppose the bill, the whole Obama-Pelosi-Reid stratagem falls apart.

Here’s what I learned top Democrats are planning to implement. [Interestingly, they are doing it in the week when the feared-by-liberals Rush Limbaugh is on vacation from his show judging some moronic beauty pagent in Arizona or somewhere. I'm surprised Limbaugh would go on vacation when he is clearly needed behind his so-called golden EIB microphone, but apparently ogling semi-naked women is more important to him than the welfare of the country. - HAC] Senate Democrats will go to the House with a two-part deal. First, the House will pass the Senate’s Obamacare bill that passed the Senate in December. The House leadership will vote on the Senate bill, and Pelosi will allow no amendments or modifications to the Senate bill.

How will Pelosi’s deal fly with rambunctious liberal members of her majority who don’t like the Senate bill, especially its failure to include a public option, put heavy fines on those who don’t get insurance, and offering no income tax surcharge on the so-called “rich?” That’s where the second part of the Pelosi-deal comes in. Behind closed doors, Reid and Pelosi have agreed in principle that changes to the Senate bill will be made to satisfy liberal House members — but only after the Senate bill is passed and signed into law by Obama.

This deal will be secured by a pledge from Reid and the Senate’s Democratic caucus that they will make “fixes” to the Senate bill after it becomes law with Obama’s John Hancock. But you may ask what about the fact that, without Republican Scott Brown and independent Democrats such as Joe Lieberman, Reid simply doesn’t have the 60 votes in the Senate to overcome a Republican filibuster that typically can stop major legislation?

According to my source, Reid will provide to Pelosi a letter signed by 52 Democratic senators indicating they will pass the major changes, or “fixes,” the House Democrats are demanding. Again, these fixes will be approved by the Senate only after Obama signs the Senate bill into law. Reid also has agreed to bypass Senate cloture and filibuster rules and claim that these modifications fall under “reconciliation” and don’t require 60 Senate votes.

To pass the fixes, he won’t need one Republican; he won’t even need Joe Lieberman or wavering Democrats such as Jim Webb of Virginia. His 52 pledged senators give him a simple majority to pass any changes they want, which will later be rubber-stamped by Pelosi’s House and signed by Obama.

This plan, of course, is a total subversion of the legislative process. Typically, the Senate and House pass their own unique legislation and then both bills go to a conference committee. In conference, the leadership of both Democrat-dominated houses wheels and deals and irons out differences. The final compromise bill is then sent back to the full Senate and full House for a vote and has to pass both to go to the president. In the House, a simple majority passes the legislation. But under Senate rules, major legislation requires 60 votes to end a filibuster.

As it stands, the House bill and Senate bill have major discrepancies. Reid does not have 60 votes to pass a compromise bill that would no doubt include some of the radical provisions House members have been demanding. But if the House passes the exact Senate bill that passed by a 60-39 Senate vote last month, there is no need for a conference on the bill. It will go directly to the president’s desk.

There is a rub to all of this. This secret plan being hatched by Pelosi and Reid requires not only a pledge by 52 Democratic senators to vote later for the House modifications. House liberals must actually believe these Senators will live up to their pledge and pass the fixes at some future date. A Senate source cautions: “Senators more than House members and both more than ordinary people, lie.”

Still, my Senate source and others in Washington believe that the liberals in the House, grasping at straws after the stunning Massachusetts defeat, will go along with the Reid-Pelosi plan to bypass a conference bill and ultimately will vote for the Senate version without changes.

Among the key “fixes” House liberals are demanding the Senate pass in reconciliation at some later date include a carve out for unions from the “Cadillac policy” insurance tax. The Senate plan funds their healthcare plan by heavy taxes on so-called Cadillac insurance plans that provide those insured with exceptionally good coverage including almost unlimited health access with little or no co-payments. The Senate’s view was that rich people have such plans and should be taxed for them to pay the less fortunate.

But many unions have Cadillac plans for their members, and they are furious their members will be hit with the Senate tax. The unions have told their minions in the House to oppose the Senate Cadillac plan tax. House liberals also are requiring a fix that increases fines for those who flout the law and don’t buy health insurance (the Pelosi-passed plan includes criminal penalties, including possible prison time if a person doesn’t purchase insurance.) Another fix will raise subsidies for low-income families seeking to buy insurance.

[The whole idea behind Obamacare is to transfer wealth from White people to people with black and brown skins, in the form of free health care for blacks and illegal immigrants, with the insurance companies taking a big cut along the way. - HAC]

In the original House bill that passed, healthcare expansion costs would have been paid for by an income tax surcharge on the “rich.” House liberals are pushing for that fix as well.

So what is the counter-move? How do opponents of Obamacare stop this? Opponents cannot rely on liberal Democrats in the House who might balk at passing the Senate bill with just a “pledge” from 52 senators. I have no doubt House liberals, despite their skepticism, will fade under pressure from Pelosi and Obama. They will do their duty and pass the Senate bill, whatever their current posturing.

Instead, the key to stopping the Pelosi-Reid plan lies with conservative or “moderate” Democrats who voted for the healthcare bill the first time. There are 23 of these conservative-leaning Democratic House members who voted for Pelosi’s Obamacare back in November, which passed by just five votes, with 39 Democrats defecting to vote against the bill. All 23 of these congressmen who did vote for the Pelosi bill are extremely vulnerable.

Opponents of Obamacare need to climb all over these 23 congressmen with TV ads and advocacy campaigns in their districts to get them to change their vote this time, to vote “no” to the Senate bill when it comes before the House. Voters need to say, “You voted for Obamacare the first time. But your district opposes it by 2 to 1. Now it is coming up for a vote again. Listen to your constituents and vote no. We don’t want Medicare cuts or premium increases or rationing of medical care. Don’t monkey with our healthcare. Vote no this time.”

Since the House healthcare bill passed by five votes, much has happened and the political landscape has changed dramatically. The Massachusetts election of a Republican to Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat has sent shock waves through Washington. Every one of these 23 Democrats knows they will face an angry backlash in their districts if they vote for the Senate bill and go along with Pelosi-Reid plan to ram through Obamacare.

I believe now is the time for opponents to act. The truth is that Obamacare is hanging by a thread. Opponents, if they move now, can drive a stake through its heart. Once these congressmen hear from their aroused constituents, they won’t be able to back Obamacare.

As I mentioned, the Pelosi health bill passed the House by only 220-215. Nancy Pelosi knows she has no margin for error. If only a handful of these 23 congressmen change their vote under public pressure, the Pelosi-Reid plan is stopped and Obamacare is dead.

Gold Going Bonkers

Thanks to the incompetence of Barack Hussein Obama and the Jews who are running him, the American economy is now collapsing all around us, and along with the American economy the American dollar is becoming completely worthless, nothing but little pieces of green paper. On the other hand, precious metals like gold that are still actually worth something as a medium of international exchange have leaped to unprecedented levels.

The Bloomberg business site reports: “Gold climbed to the highest price ever as the dollar’s slump deepened and on a report that India may buy more bullion for its central-bank reserves. Gold reached a record $1,184.70 an ounce and has rallied 12 percent since Nov. 2, after India said it bought 200 metric tons from the International Monetary Fund. The country, the world’s largest gold consumer, may buy more from the IMF, the Financial Chronicle reported. The U.S. Dollar Index, a six-currency gauge of the greenback’s strength, fell to a 15-month low.”

“Gold futures for February delivery climbed $14.30, or 1.2 percent, to $1,181.70 at 10:47 a.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange’s Comex division. Up for a ninth straight session, the most-active contract is headed for the longest rally since August 1982…In London, gold for immediate delivery advanced $10.64, or 0.9 percent, to $1,180.04 an ounce after touching a record of $1,182.95. Prices may reach $1,200 next week.”

This is one of the things that happen when you have an insane government like the Weimar Republic, or Robert Mugabe, or Barack Obama, that simply prints up money as needed without any regard for, or knowledge of, the basic facts of economics.

Gold and silver originally became valuable because they were rare. Casting them into coinage in ancient times made these metals easier to transport and workable for smaller transactions like buying a sausage or having one’s sandals mended. If these metals were as common as iron or sand or coal, they would be valueless, because anyone could just pick them up off the ground.

For millennia, all money was coin in gold, silver, and occasionally copper. Paper money did not begin appearing on the scene until the 18th century. The first experiments in it, such as the infamous South Sea Bubble in France in the 1720s, were disastrous and nearly wrecked the European economy, because the rulers of the time thought they could just create value by printing pieces of paper. You would think that 300 years would be enough for the people in charge of nations to learn this basic fact, but apparently not.

Barry is essentially creating not even paper money, just figures on a computer terminal, with his bailouts and stimulus and the Jewish idiot at the Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke, seems either not to understand or not to care.

Paper currency will soon be worthless at this rate, and so it’s no wonder people are beginning to hoard gold and drive up the price. The problem, though, will be this: what use is even gold when society has collapsed and there is nothing left to buy? Americans might want to contemplate taking their paychecks in the form of vouchers for other local goods and services. Or maybe in live chickens.

The Cultural Defeat of the White Race by guywhite

The Cultural Defeat of the White Race

What is a nerd? Mary Bucholtz, a linguist at the University of California, Santa Barbara, has been working on the question for the last 12 years. She has gone to high schools and colleges, mainly in California, and asked students from different crowds to think about the idea of nerdiness and who among their peers should be considered a nerd; students have also “reported” themselves. Nerdiness, she has concluded, is largely a matter of racially tinged behavior. People who are considered nerds tend to act in ways that are, as she puts it, “hyperwhite.”

With America’s culture being more diverse (sorry) in recent decades, one often sees white kids acting “black”

The dominant race always has an easy time reproducing. Women in particular are attracted to dominant men. More than anything dominant (as opposed to domineering) behavior is attractive to women. More than anything, more than looks, more than money, women want leaders, men who can decide, who can rule, who are confident.

Women want these men, and men want to be these men.

A hundred years ago, blacks tried to act white. Why? Because whites were the dominant race. If a black person could “pass”, he would often move to another town and pretend to be white. Being white was good.

Today, whites are acting black and being white is nerdy. Whatever else you can say about nerds, they are not sexually appealing. This is particularly true for men. Women don’t want nerds, not matter what they say.

It sounds nice so some women feel compelled to say that they like nerds because they think it makes them a better person by being attracted to someone who is stereotypically smart. But the reality is that when push comes to shove, the women will say that the nerd is “nice, but I just don’t see him that way.”

This isn’t to say that women like dumb men because clearly they don’t. What they like are smart men who are well-adjusted, which the nerds are just not. Nerds are people who may get high grades, but are utterly inept in social situations. They are out of place. They don’t belong.

They are like whites in the New America.

The white race is the nerdy kid of the New America. This is not our America anymore and we don’t belong here. In this New America, we are inept socially and have to pretend to be like the “diverse” populations.

“Negro” is the New “N” Word?

“Negro” is the New “N” Word?

Senator Harry Reid tried to start the “conversation about race” that the Attorney General and President insist that we must have, and it didn’t turn out well.

I’ve had many preachers tell me, quite sincerely, that using old-fashioned words is sinful, because they carry with them a connotation of hatred. “Negro” must now be added to this list since Reid’s use of it culminated in threatened job loss as well as the expectation that he must apologize to a representative sample of The Duly Aggrieved, including the emperor himself. Of course, what Reid said, that Obama is “light-skinned” and has “no Negro dialect, unless he wants to have one,” is patently true. As for appearance, how is noticing the shade of Obama’s skin any different than Obama himself referring to his father as an “ink-black Luo”? As for blacking it up, it’s hard to top Oprah, but here is Obama in action. Anyway, let’s not allow facts to get in the way of a good racist-hunt. And above all, let’s not dwell on the fact that what Reid said was actually a compliment about being articulate.

On ABC’s This Week, George Will exulted that finally, someone (Reid) had said something about race on which everyone could agree, but Dick Cheney’s daughter, clearly shocked by Will’s defense of the anachronism, said it was unquestionably racist. How can there be such disagreement? As Steve Sailer observes, it has everything to do with the widespread refusal to believe that limitations are inherited genetically. Thus, it’s fine to notice that skin color, hair color, and eye color come to us by nature.

It’s fine to recognize, for example, that “Samoans are born big.” But nothing about the brain or character or potential for achievement can have anything to do with nature. Those are entirely products of nurture, it is said. So along comes Obama, black by nature and white by nurture; the messiah who will conquer race as Christ conquered the grave; who will prove to liberals that their lives have not been in vain. (Notice the White Supremacist assumption which liberals cannot avoid, try as they might, that whiteness is divine and blackness carnal. The Obamessiah, from his incarnation in the womb of a whore to his apotheosis, spans both worlds, and to be absolved by him is to be born again.)

The vicious reactions to Reid are too numerous to list. Here is Mychal Massie, one of those rare black “conservatives” beloved of Judeochristians:

Reid is a loathsome individual whose apology was based on exposure not repentance. Reid’s comments are proof positive that the racial animus of the past is alive and prevalent among liberals today…

Could someone let Massie know that Reid did not actually commit murder or rape? He only used the word NEGRO!

Another of these Afro-conservatives, Robert George, writes, sarcastically:

Thank goodness no jive-talkin’ darky ever thought about running for president! No way Reid could have supported him!!

Does Mr. George insinuate that he would support a jive-talker for the office of president? If so, what does this tell us about black “conservatism”?

Someone at BeliefNet, one of the most banal sites on the intertubez, asks rhetorically: “Americans wouldn’t vote for a black politician if he had a ‘Negro’ dialect?” Well, no, sweetie, and I hate to shatter your juvenile illusions.

This incident will force everyone to say “African-American” all the more. It’s kind of funny that Glenn Beck, before this story broke, had the perfect timing to recognize that “African-American” is a phony term.

Jive-talker Michael Steele has asked Reid to resign for uttering the evil word “Negro,” and he’s correct that it would be justice after what was done to that weasel, Trent Lott. But Steele doesn’t simply point to the double standard, which was applied to him as well when he said the words “honest Injun.” No, according to Steele, an evil word like Negro “harkens back to the 1950s and 60s, and it confirms to me a mind-set that’s out of step with where America is today.” We honestly thank God whenever we find a man who is “out of step” with the perverted time in which we live.

Just think about what’s happening here. This phony government has a death rattle in its throat, and everyone is frantic because of words like “Injun” and “Negro” being used. It’s just unbelievable; it’s as though children are in charge. At first glance, it seems silly that there is such hyperventilation and threatened ruination over words like “Negro” and “Injun” when we are teetering on the verge of total economic collapse, but it actually makes perfect sense. Despite what Judeochristians believe, it’s not possible to mix races under a system of pretended equality and expect to retain liberty in anything but name. Loving equality is like spitting in the face of God. The gift of God is liberty, not equality. Christians have always been faced with a choice between liberty and equality, and before they lost their faith they were able to choose wisely. Where there is liberty, white men govern themselves, for the most part. They are never without law, but they are less in need of being forced to obey it. Totalitarianism follows equality as night follows day, and it’s bloody expensive. Eventually, the totalitarians run out of money, a revolution follows, and white men rediscover their lost liberties. (There is no evidence that non-whites ever have.) As Christians, we recognize that there is no guarantee that the cycle will come back around, and if it does at all, it is because men repent of their refusal to obey God’s law, which was the source of the cancerous equality in the first place.

We see that America is on an arc that culminates in what is happening in Europe today. The condition of free speech in England is such that a man was arrested, fingerprinted, and detained for four hours, at a cost of £12,000, for being linked (falsely) to an email that contained the words “do as you likey,” which rhymes with “pikey,” which is a euphemism for gypsies. His predictable defense: “one of his best friends is a gypsy.” In a country that once helped to teach the world about liberty, it is a crime for a white man to offend someone who is not white. I know what will save us from this tyranny in America, though. What we need is for Christians to adopt millions of black boys and Chinese girls, since that’s why Jesus died on the cross, and they can be the first non-whites in the history of the world who really understand liberty. Then the rights of the white minority will be protected as the non-white population explodes. What could go wrong?

This video makes me severely nauseous. What kind of sickness rots the minds of white people to make them think they can only show love to strangers by taking them into their families and making them heirs, equal to their own children? God gave us very clear rules for how to show love to both neighbors and to those who are far off. Commandments Five through Ten have nothing to do with this madness.

Florida, our camp of the saints. For “jobs that Americans won’t do” we have 200,000 Haitians on the way, which is only slightly less than the number of slaves in that small country. Ah, the pungent odor of irony.

Despite the outpouring of emotion over Haiti, our politicians know where their bread is buttered, and it’s not in Port-au-Prince.

President Obama has allocated $2.775 billion to Israel in the 2010 foreign aid budget. Israel is set to receive over $30 billion in U.S. foreign aid over the next decade. In the wake of the devastating earthquake, Obama promised Haiti a mere $100 million for its recovery effort.

Obama calls this mandatory deduction from your paycheck an “investment,” which is true in the same sense that you invest in the septic tank every time you flush. Remember when racists used to give their money to their own children? Those were the good old days.

Sailer asks: “Does President Barack Obama have any more idea what to do with Haiti after the horrific earthquake than did President Woodrow Wilson when he sent the Marines in back in 1915?” This line from Obama makes me feel all warm inside: “We look into the eyes of another and see ourselves.”

Just as is true of every war in which Jewmerica asserts itself, no one has even thought about an exit strategy from Haiti.

Garrett Hardin’s maxim that you “can’t just do one thing” foretells of the likely permanent albatross for the U.S. and other western nations…

In Newsweek’s feature article, President Obama writes, “In the days, months, and years ahead, we’ll need to work closely with the government and people of Haiti to reclaim the momentum that they achieved before the earthquake… The United States will be there with the Haitian government and the United Nations every step of the way.”

Obama could have added “decades” and beyond to the duration of assistance.

And no one even asked you if you wanted to throw money at these savages for eternity. How does it feel to be the world’s sugar daddy? We have no one but ourselves to blame for it. Long ago, our forebears decided that Jews are pretty much like Christians, and Jews taught us that whites are pretty much like everyone else.

This is an unintentionally funny article by a Jew about Haiti’s “glorious past” but unfortunate run of bad “luck.” The 800-pound gorilla called Race, which is about to take a massive dump on the Queen Anne furniture in your sitting room, is never mentioned in the article, of course. That would be racist.

The word “looting” is racist.

Collard greens are racist.

White Dating on Facebook is racist.

Pickup trucks are racist.

Soul food” is the new blackface.

Economic stimulus, Congo-style.

“Germans paying to bang on bongo drums in celebration of a Negro president in charge of 60,000 troops stationed on German soil, it’s like a bad film, or at least a comedy.”

The Sons of Confederate Veterans in Cross City, Florida (Dixie County), marched in the MLK parade last week. “Black Confederate” H.K. Edgerton, who dishonorably dresses as a soldier, led the procession, and was chosen for the occasion to symbolize King’s vision of “All men sitting together at the table of Brotherhood” (with the white women evenly distributed). As a friend of mine mocks, we’ve got the Yankees on the run! The League of the South calls Edgerton a “champion of true liberty.” They would never say any such thing about a white “racist” who agrees wholeheartedly with his Confederate ancestors.

First Word asks why Westminster Theological Seminary honors an adulterer and plagiarist with a holiday. “Anyone can guess: Because Martin Luther King, Jr. is a popular Negro, and they want to ‘reach out’ to the Negro community with Reformed theology, by ’showing solidarity’ or whatever the current buzzword might be. The only problem is, honesty is more important than being Reformed.” Needless to say, no seminary would ever “reach out” to “racists” under any circumstances.

Solzhenitsyn on slavery.

Nick Griffin quoting 1 Timothy 5:8 on the floor of the European Parliament: Priceless.

Is Science Racist? Liberals Want to Drop Science Classes, Haitian Refugees Flood White Nations from http://www.whitecivilrights.com/

Is Science Racist? Liberals Want to Drop Science Classes

by Jeff Davis

One thing about science and math courses is that there’s no room for fakers. Either you know the material or you don’t. While liberal history or english professors can ignore massive spelling and grammatical errors and give generous grades to the quota-students for scribbling out some attempt at writing an essay. Math and science are not so forgiving. You either get the question right or you don’t. I guess that makes science “racist” since it frequently gives minorities poor grades.

An article from the East Bay Express tells us: “Berkeley High School is considering a controversial proposal to eliminate science labs and the five science teachers who teach them to free up more resources to help struggling students. The proposal to put the science-lab cuts on the table was approved recently by Berkeley High’s School Governance Council, a body of teachers, parents, and students who oversee a plan to change the structure of the high school to address Berkeley’s dismal racial achievement gap, where white students are doing far better than the state average while black and Latino students are doing worse.”

During poor economic times, public schools have been known to cut music, art and some sports classes. But cut science classes?

The liberal loons aren’t very good at thinking ahead. Well, frankly they never are. But if no one teaches the White kids science because it’s “racist”, how will our technical, medical, and engineering infrastructure be maintained 20 or 30 years from now? Are we supposed to import Hindu and Paki macacas to do all the technical jobs (ignoring a serious drop in competency that may result in airplanes crashing and the occasional nuclear reactor meltdown)? Or maybe these hippie retreads want us all to go back to the Stone Age? That actually seems to be a vague part of the liberal Agenda: Forcing Americans back onto bicycles and limiting everyone to 200 milli-watts of solar power. I really wonder how some of these left-wing fools would survive if they ever create the kind of world they seem intent on creating. (more…)

Haitian Refugees Flood White Nations

by Jeff Davis

Once again, a natural disaster in the Third World looks like it will result in a wave of refugees into White nations. Seems like White liberals think the best way to solve Third World problems is to bring the Third Worlders here.

An NBC article reports: “Some of Haiti’s most fragile – its children – have arrived at Miami area hospitals and for a few, Miami may become their new home. So far, 23 patients from the earthquake have been treated at Jackson Memorial Hospital, with countless more likely to be airlifted from the island for treatment. Florida Sen. Bill Nelson (Democrat, of course) has contacted all the children’s hospitals in Florida and requested that they receive critically injured Haitian children in the aftermath of the earthquake. Nelson on Friday said he also plans to introduce a ‘major Haitian relief bill.’ But the injured won’t likely be the only children coming to Florida. ‘Operation Pierre Pan,’ as its being called, is an effort to relocate the thousands of children likely orphaned by the natural disaster in Port-au-Prince. Many of the children could already have relatives in Miami and around the U.S.”

If they don’t have relatives in the US, they can serve as future “anchor babies” to bring in tens of thousands of adult Haitians and complete the process of turning south Florida into a Third World country. (more…)

January 22, 2010

Stunningly Bad Christmas Sales

by Jeff Davis

It takes a few weeks for the real economic statistics to seep out after all the cheery Democrat propaganda about a fictitious “recovery.” Now the truth about the 2009 Christmas season is finally starting to emerge, and it ain’t pretty.

A recent news article reports: “Retail sales fell in December as demand for autos, clothing and appliances all slipped, a disappointing finish to a year in which sales had the largest drop on record. The weakness in consumer demand highlighted the formidable hurdles facing the economy as it struggles to recover from the deepest recession in seven decades. The Commerce Department said Thursday that retail sales declined 0.3 percent in December compared with November, much weaker than the 0.5 percent rise that economists had been expecting.”

Now a sales decline in December is a catastrophe. This never happens during a normal Christmas. Apparently millions of children all over America got a lump of coal in their stockings or an equally disappointing sweater instead of that $300 Playstation 3.

The article notes “For the year, sales fell 6.2 percent, the biggest decline on records that go back to 1992. The only other year that annual sales fell was in 2008, when they slipped by 0.5 percent… Consumer spending is considered critical to any sustained economic revival since consumer spending accounts for 70 percent of total economic activity… The weakness over the year reflected the battering that consumers have taken from the worst recession since the Great Depression, a downturn that has cost 7.2 million jobs and left households trying to rebuild savings depleted by losses on Wall Street and a crash in housing prices.”

Millions of Americans have been foreclosed out of their homes. Many have moved into Obamaville tent cities. Millions of people were going to the mall this Christmas not to buy anything, but to stay warm and even then the malls were not that crowded. (more…)

January 21, 2010

Derailing the Obama Regime

by Jeff Davis

The Senate race in Massachusetts has just ruined the Democrat’s supermajority in the Senate and has likely stopped the deranged Obamacare bill. All of this comes courtesy of the demise of the most disgraceful Senator in recent history, Senator Ted Kennedy himself.

The Washington Times reports: “Coming off stinging election losses in Virginia and New Jersey — not to mention Copenhagen, where he failed to win the 2018 Olympics for his hometown of Chicago — President Obama is staying away from what could become another painful loss. Even though the campaign of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley has been making quiet entreaties, the president has no plans to visit her in the last week of the special election to fill the Senate seat once held by the late Edward M. Kennedy. ‘It’s not on our schedule to go to next week,’ White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said matter-of-factly.’ ”

In other words, Barack Obama is the equivalent of political toxic waste –even in Massachusetts. It took George W. Bush several years of arrogance and an illegal war in Iraq to alienate the American public. Obama has done this in less than one year.

The Times article goes on: “With Mrs. Coakley flagging in the polls and Republican Scott Brown closing fast — one recent poll puts him 2 points ahead — Mr. Obama has decided to keep his fingerprints off a race that would be an embarrassment for Democrats should they lose, given that Mr. Obama won the state in 2008 by a 27 point margin. Mr. Obama last year lost a high-profile bid to bring the Olympics to his hometown, even after he flew to Copenhagen to make a personal pitch. That slight followed the gubernatorial losses last November in Virginia and New Jersey, where Mr. Obama campaigned hard for the Democrats only to see them defeated.” (more…)