by Jeff Davis
The long and the short of it all is that the Obama Agenda is based on a massive redistribution of wealth from the shrinking White population to the increasing millions of Black and Brown people. The few Black and Brown yuppies who have good paying jobs and who actually pay some taxes, need an asterisk because the vast majority of Black and Brown yuppies got their jobs thanks to racial quotas –at the expense of a White person, who must spend additional months looking for work until he or she gets a lower-paying second rate job.
As if stealing jobs through racial quotas and creating a massive tax burden isn’t bad enough, some liberal in Congress devised the idea of a “tan tax”.
The Washington Post reports: “Mention the new ‘tan tax’ in a major news outlet and cries of discrimination and reverse racism often follow. The complaint surfaced on reader comment boards to blogs and news Web sites back in December, when it became clear that the levy — a 10 percent surcharge on the use of ultraviolet tanning beds — was likely to be included in the new health-care overhaul bill. Since then, it’s been repeated by conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Doc Thompson, a fill-in host for Glenn Beck who intoned in March, ‘I now know the pain of racism.’ ”
Whites have known the pain of racial discrimination since the early 1970s, ever since racial quotas and Affirmative Action became the law of the land.
The Post article notes “When an article about the fallout from the tax — which took effect last week — appeared on the Washington Post’s Web site Wednesday, dozens of commenters questioned the tax’s legality. The case can seem deceptively simple: Since patrons of tanning salons are almost exclusively white, the tax will be almost entirely paid by white people and, therefore, violates their constitutional right to equal protection under the law. But does the argument have any merit? Not remotely said Randall Kennedy, a professor at Harvard Law School specializing in racial conflict and law. ‘There is no constitutional problem at all, because a plaintiff would have to show that the government intended to disadvantage a particular group, not simply that the group is disadvantaged in effect,’ he said.”
Universities used to admit only the people with the best SAT scores until some judge ruled this practice was discriminatory because it resulted in de facto discrimination. Funny how the Jews and liberals keep doing back flips to say discrimination against Whites is OK and discrimination against Blacks –even if it results from color-blind testing is NOT OK.
Maybe the bottom line is that Jews and liberals are the enemies of White people. That’s the de facto result of what they do when they make new laws or arbitrary rulings as judges.
The article continues “What would it take to prove that President Obama or members of Congress intended to discriminate against white people when they included the tan tax in the health-care law? There would have to be some record of direct or indirect comments by the officials involved, Kennedy said.”
A Republican Congress with its subpoena power might be able to find the smoking gun.
Look, we all know what’s going on here. Obama and his far left cronies are simply formalizing a situation which has existed in this country for decades now. Blacks and Browns play, and the White man pays. It’s as simple as that.
I am really looking forward to the last two years of Obama’s first term, if the Republicans can seize control of all those Congressional committees and start slinging subpoenas and compelling testimony. It will be the glorious get-Clinton years all over again. I have the feeling we ain’t seen nothing yet.