Just when you think you’ve seen it all when it comes to conservatives pandering to non-whites, you read this: affirmative action, racial quotas and minority set asides are the main causes of the sky high crime rate among blacks and Hispanics.
I swear; I’m NOT making this up.
On Townhall, Jewish neocon Jeff Jacoby proposed the lunatic left-wing idea that we should do away with all racial classifications in this country. One reader left a comment that Jacoby’s idea is nuts, because we derive a lot of valuable information from racial statistics:
Surtr Wrote: 47 minutes ago (11:13 PM)
Jeff– why would we give up valuable information with repercussions for our immigration, law enforcement and education policies?
Did you know the single best predictor of crime in a state is the % of blacks & hispanics? That ethic demographics are a huge predictor of educational outcomes?
This information tells us from what countries we should admit immigrants to both control crime and maintain our educational standards (and thereby our affluence).
It didn’t take long for someone to respond to Surtr. At first they thought his idea made sense, but then they changed their mind because, after all, it’s racial preferences that cause high crime among non-whites:
Big_D_ Wrote: 30 minutes ago (11:31 PM)
But…(I love to say but): How did blacks and hispanics get to that sad state of affairs???
I say that a major contributor to their decline has been the misguided racial “preferences” pushed and imposed by our government over the last 5 decades.
What more evidence do you need that millions of white people, even conservatives, are so filled with self hatred that they’ll stop at nothing when it comes to devising new ways of blaming the white man for the failures of non-whites?
For what our traitorous politicians of both parties have done to California. It’s truly heartbreaking.
Hanson is a neocon, so he pretends that he doesn’t understand the real meaning of Diversity:
My own farmhouse is now in an area of abject poverty and almost no ethnic diversity; the closest elementary school (my alma mater, two miles away) is 94 percent Hispanic and 1 percent white, and well below federal testing norms in math and English.
Diversity doesn’t mean a mixture of different races. That’s simply what TPTB want gullible white people to think it means. It actually means non-white. Period. Far from having “almost no ethnic diversity”, the school is actually 94% Diverse, and will soon have reached 100% Diversity when there are zero whites. Hanson is well aware of this, but he’s just being PC. But ignore that, because the rest of the article is a must read.
Here are some excerpts:
Many of the rural trailer-house compounds I saw appear to the naked eye no different from what I have seen in the Third World. There is a Caribbean look to the junked cars, electric wires crisscrossing between various outbuildings, plastic tarps substituting for replacement shingles, lean-tos cobbled together as auxiliary housing, pit bulls unleashed, and geese, goats, and chickens roaming around the yards. The public hears about all sorts of tough California regulations that stymie business — rigid zoning laws, strict building codes, constant inspections — but apparently none of that applies out here.
It is almost as if the more California regulates, the more it does not regulate. Its public employees prefer to go after misdemeanors in the upscale areas to justify our expensive oversight industry, while ignoring the felonies in the downtrodden areas, which are becoming feral and beyond the ability of any inspector to do anything but feel irrelevant. But in the regulators’ defense, where would one get the money to redo an ad hoc trailer park with a spider web of illegal bare wires?
California coastal elites may worry about the oxygen content of water available to a three-inch smelt in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta, but they seem to have no interest in the epidemic dumping of trash, furniture, and often toxic substances throughout California’s rural hinterland. Yesterday, for example, I rode my bike by a stopped van just as the occupants tossed seven plastic bags of raw refuse onto the side of the road. I rode up near their bumper and said in my broken Spanish not to throw garbage onto the public road. But there were three of them, and one of me. So I was lucky to be sworn at only. I note in passing that I would not drive into Mexico and, as a guest, dare to pull over and throw seven bags of trash into the environment of my host.
I counted eleven mobile hot-kitchen trucks that simply park by the side of the road, spread about some plastic chairs, pull down a tarp canopy, and, presto, become mini-restaurants. There are no “facilities” such as toilets or washrooms. But I do frequently see lard trails on the isolated roads I bike on, where trucks apparently have simply opened their draining tanks and sped on, leaving a slick of cooking fats and oils. Crows and ground squirrels love them; they can be seen from a distance mysteriously occupied in the middle of the road.
At crossroads, peddlers in a counter-California economy sell almost anything. Here is what I noticed at an intersection on the west side last week: shovels, rakes, hoes, gas pumps, lawnmowers, edgers, blowers, jackets, gloves, and caps. The merchandise was all new. I doubt whether in high-tax California sales taxes or income taxes were paid on any of these stop-and-go transactions.
In two supermarkets 50 miles apart, I was the only one in line who did not pay with a social-service plastic card (gone are the days when “food stamps” were embarrassing bulky coupons). But I did not see any relationship between the use of the card and poverty as we once knew it: The electrical appurtenances owned by the user and the car into which the groceries were loaded were indistinguishable from those of the upper middle class.
By that I mean that most consumers drove late-model Camrys, Accords, or Tauruses, had iPhones, Bluetooths, or BlackBerries, and bought everything in the store with public-assistance credit. This seemed a world apart from the trailers I had just ridden by the day before. I don’t editorialize here on the logic or morality of any of this, but I note only that there are vast numbers of people who apparently are not working, are on public food assistance, and enjoy the technological veneer of the middle class.
That’s what Noemie Emery says. She’s a columnist for the Washington Examiner (one of the real columnists, not one of those who wrote in and said “hey let me cover the Schenectady UFO scene”). She’s also a contributing editor of The Weekly Standard, the second most popular neocon magazine in America. So why does Noemie believe it’s in the best interests of Republicans for their presidential candidate to lose in 2012?
Because white people are yesterday’s news.
Because white people suck.
Because white people are evil.
Oh, she doesn’t come out and put it quite that bluntly. But she makes it clear enough, that’s for sure. The current GOP contenders are an underwhelming bunch of old white men. But if Republicans just wait til 2016, they’ll be able to pick and choose from the new crop of politicians who were just elected in 2009 and 2010, and many of them are young, good looking and non-white:
Republicans’ biggest problem in the 2012 presidential election isn’t President Obama: It’s time.
We don’t know where Obama’s poll numbers will be in 2012, but we do know that time is being quixotic: It has given the party an important election, with a collection of candidates one can call underwhelming; and a huge crop of superstars, turned up by the 2009 and 2010 elections, on the horizon and just out of reach. In themselves, they solve all the party’s old problems: They belong to the moment; shaped by the crash, by the debt and by Obama’s expansion of government; they bridge the Tea Party and the establishment; they are also young, and in some cases good-looking; they are brown-skinned, and female, Latino and Indian, from big states and swing states; they can rebrand, and expand, the party.
Sure, at the end she throws in a positive reference to Chris Christie, but that’s just for window dressing. He’s the exception to the general rule, which is that white politicians suck, and we need to replace them with black, Mexican and Hindu politicians if the GOP is going to have any hope of winning elections in the future.
In Washington DC, a black politician spoke at a rally opposing letting Wal-Mart build a store there, because all that nice merchandise will make black boys steal it, and we have enough black boys going to prison already.
In a part of England, there has been a rash of thefts from sheds lately, so people have begun putting wire mesh over the windows on their sheds to discourage burglars. When the local cops learned of this, they told the homeowners to knock it off, because someone breaking into a shed might injure himself on the wire.
If you’ve been paying attention, you’ve no doubt noticed that some news stories are a lot more equal than others. Like the John Wiley Price story just below this one. If a white council member in one of America’s largest cities had told a group of people “You’re all black; go to hell”, it would be nationwide, non-stop news. Liberals and conservatives alike would be demanding his resignation, and many of them, both conservative and liberal, would be calling for him to be jailed on hate crime charges. The cable news channels would be talking of nothing else. But John Wiley Price is black and told a bunch of people to go to hell because they’re white, so it’s strictly a local news story.
Here’s another buried story that would be getting huge play, especially among conservatives, if the race of the perps were different. Lara Logan is a CBS reporter who was sexually assaulted by a mob of Egyptians while covering the protests there.
For those who don’t know, Logan was with a CBS crew in Tahrir Square last Friday when they were surrounded by, a network statement said, “a mob of more than 200 people whipped into a frenzy. In the crush of the mob, [Logan] was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers.”
So Nir Rosen, a Jewish Fellow at New York University’s Center on Law and Security, used his Twitter account to mock Lara Logan:
*“Lara Logan had to outdo Anderson. Where was her buddy McCrystal.” (That is a reference to CNN journalist Anderson Cooper, and to retired Gen. Stanley Allen McChrystal, who was forced to resign as commander of troops in Afghanistan by President Obama for unflattering comments about administration officials attributed to McChrystal in a Rolling Stone article.)
*“Yes yes its wrong what happened to her. Of course. I don’t support that. But, it would have been funny if it happened to Anderson too.”
*“Jesus Christ, at a moment when she is going to become a martyr and glorified we should at least remember her role as a major war monger”
*“Look, she was probably groped like thousands of other women, which is still wrong, but if it was worse than [sic] I’m sorry.”
After complaints, Rosen resigned his NYU fellowship after the center’s executive director, Karen Greenberg saw no need to fire him.
Many people will say I’m being unfair in pointing out that Rosen is Jewish. They’ll say it was his left wing politics, not his race, that are responsible for his remarks.
Really? Then how do you explain that right wing conservative Debbie Schlussel, also Jewish, celebrated Lara Logan being sexually assaulted? This conservative Jew went much, much further than the liberal Rosen. She said it “kinda warms her heart.” She said “so sad, too bad.” That’s not even the worst of it. She mockingly calls Logan’s sexual assault her “liberation”, and says she hopes Logan is enjoying being sexually assualted:
As I’ve noted before, it bothers me not a lick when mainstream media reporters who keep telling us Muslims and Islam are peaceful get a taste of just how “peaceful” Muslims and Islam really are. In fact, it kinda warms my heart. Still, it’s also a great reminder of just how “civilized” these “people” (or, as I like to call them in Arabic, “Bahai’im” [Animals]) are.
So sad, too bad, Lara. No one told her to go there. She knew the risks. And she should have known what Islam is all about. Now she knows. Or so we’d hope. But in the case of the media vis-a-vis Islam, that’s a hope that’s generally unanswered.
This never happened to her or any other mainstream media reporter when Mubarak was allowed to treat his country of savages in the only way they can be controlled.
Now that’s all gone. How fitting that Lara Logan was “liberated” by Muslims in Liberation Square while she was gushing over the other part of the “liberation.”
Hope you’re enjoying the revolution, Lara! Alhamdilllullah [praise allah].
You can just imagine the reaction if a couple of Arabs, one liberal and one conservative, had rejoiced and mocked a white reporter being sexually assaulted by a mob. Fox “News” would be going nuts, as would Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, etc. etc. etc. etc….. and they wouldn’t hesitate to point out that the perps are Arabs. But when it’s Jews doing it, it’s minor news at best, and the racial angle is never, ever mentioned.
It’s always amusing to watch civilized white people pretend that an overgrown child like John Wiley Price is their equal. Because nothing screams “Equality!” quite like the combination of corn rows and a bow tie. But they have to pretend that he’s their equal, or they get called racist.
Of course, they get called racist anyway.
Because they’re white.
Agreeing with “conservative” Allen West who told the white people at CPAC that they’re not racist because they have a black man at their meeting, implying that if no blacks are part of a cause or gathering it’s racist, “liberal” John Wiley Price says that his critics are beneath notice because they’re all white.
Then he tells them “You’re all white; go to hell.”
If you watch the followup video, you’ll see the anchor woman stipulate that blacks like Allen West and John Wiley Price are right when they argue that it’s wrong for a political or civic group to be all white.
I love how the one guy calls it a “donkey court.” Donkey court? I’ve heard of kangaroo courts, but not donkey courts. If he had called it a monkey court, that would have made a lot more sense. But he’s clearly terrified to do that, because that would be racist. Even after John Wiley Price makes it clear that in his opinion all white people are racist, it still hasn’t sunk in, and these people continue walking on eggshells out of “respect” for an overgrown child.
And if you think I”m being too harsh, and John Wiley Price is actually quite intelligent, then you’re simply not paying attention. He’s the same cretin who (along with a black judge!) raised hell about the term “black hole”, calling it racist.
Do great minds think alike, or what? Sunday I wrote this post, and published it at midnight. It says that a lot of right wingers are being fooled by this sudden rash of European leaders saying multiculturalism has been a failure, and that we shouldn’t be fooled by it. You need to read the whole thing, but the gist of it is that all these pretty speeches are nothing but talk, meant to mollify lull back to sleep those Europeans who are concerned about the racial makeover of their countries. I pointed out that for all their talk about what a failure multiculti is, none of these heads of state have done a think to slow down immigration, let alone stop it, or, God forbid, start deporting racial aliens back to their homelands. As that is the only approach which can save Europe and America rom their impending doom, you’ll know European leaders are serious when they start implementing those steps, and until they do, you should pay no attention to them, because they obviously don’t mean a word they’re saying.
And I linked to Alex Kurtagic’s great article, which pointed out that Cameron’s “cure” for multiculturalism is even more lunatic liberalism, which is what caused the disease in the first place.
Well, it looks like PJB agrees with both Alex and me. Here’s his latest column: Will Multiculturalism End Europe?
Check out the conclusion:
“If you come to France,” said Sarkozy last week, “you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France.”
A little late for that. Some 5 million to 8 million Arabs and Muslims are in France, their birth rate is higher, and more are on the way.
The real questions: Whose idea was it to bring these people in? And what do France, Britain and Germany do if they say: This is a democracy, we will live as we wish to live, according to our beliefs, not yours.
How does a liberal, permissive society that celebrates diversity impose its values on a militant immigrant minority that rejects them?
Answer: It doesn’t. All the rest is chatter.
This is what James Burnham meant when he wrote that liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide.
I’m thrilled that PJB agrees with me that all this “tough talk” about multiculturalism being a failure is nothing but chatter!
Of course, he can say that, because he’s a Muslim.
“If you want to live under sharia law, go back to the hellhole country you came from, or go to another hellhole country that lives under shari law.”
About one dozen families who recently immigrated to Canada are demanding that the Louis Riel School Division in Winnipeg excuse their children from music and coed physical education programs for religious reasons.
The families believe that music is un-Islamic – just like the Taliban believe and then imposed on the entire population of Afghanistan – and that physical education classes should be segregated by gender even in the elementary years.
The school division is facing the music in a typically Canadian way – that is, bending itself into a trombone to try to accommodate these demands, even though in Manitoba, and indeed the rest of the country, music and phys. ed are compulsory parts of the curriculum.
Officials say they may try to have the Muslim children do a writing project on music to satisfy the curriculum’s requirements. The school officials have apparently consulted the Manitoba Human Rights Commission, and they have also spoken to a member of the Islamic community suggested by those very same Muslim parents.
In any event, the school district is trying to find a way to adapt the curriculum to fit the wishes of these families, rather than these families adapting to fit into the school and Canadian culture.
Mahfooz Kanwar, a member of the Muslim Canadian Congress, says he has some better ideas.
“I’d tell them, this is Canada, and in Canada, we teach music and physical education in our schools. If you don’t like it, leave. If you want to live under sharia law, go back to the hellhole country you came from or go to another hellhole country that lives under sharia law,” said Kanwar, who is a professor emeritus of sociology at Mount Royal University in Calgary.
Of course, conservatives here and in Canada are cheering him on. But that’s only because he’s talking about Muslims. It’s OK to speak the truth about Muslims, because Jews hate Muslims. It’s most definitely not OK to speak the truth about blacks and Hispanics, which is why, when a “former” Marxist Jew demands that every black and brown kid in America be given full tuition vouchers because vouchers are “the civil rights movement of the 21st century”, these very same conservatives cheer. Instead of telling blacks and Hispanics to “go back to the hellhole schools you came from”, they want to flood their own schools with them, turning all schools in America into hellholes.
That’s why they’re conservatives.