In The Heart Of Darkness

In The Heart Of Darkness

http://thecampofthesaints.org/2011/03/17/in-the-heart-of-darkness/

17 March 2011
by thecampofthesaints

One of the most reflective thinkers in the Rightosphere is TL Davis, who runs TL In Exile and contributes to the Washington Rebel.

He has a way of cutting through the unimportant and getting to the heart of the matter.

In one of his latest postings, TL writes:

The left are often the most vile, vicious people I have come across. Anyone taking the time to watch some of the footage from the siege of Wisconsin could see that these people who walk around in everyday normal people’s images are truly the most devious, insulting, disagreeable people in our nation. They wrap it all up in a sense of standing up for the little guy and compassion, but just below the surface is a willingness and even a desire to watch the pain and suffering of their enemy.

I know I’m not saying anything earth-shaking or paradigm-shifting, but it needs to be said in order to set up the other half of this post.

While I don’t condone getting down on their level, it is time to get serious about our problems. A typical leftists sees the world as this: People are greedy and will hurt other people for money. Put a mirror up to any of those in Wisconsin and we see why they come to that conclusion, because they know it is true of themselves and then they magnify that to fit their perception of others. The irony is that they then, somehow, excuse themselves from that milieu.

My point is that they have made their misperceptions actionable. They have started to pursue violent means of getting what they want. It is left now to the people to see through them and reject them, or give them credence….

The other half of his post concerns that great mushy middle [my term] that goes through life disengaged from the political actions of the day and how this situation in Wisconsin is a test of our resolve to actually change things – please do take the time to click here and read the whole posting.

That the Left is chock-full of people who are vile, I think, is beyond dispute. We see examples of their noxious vulgarity everyday in the insults and calumnies they hurl at us, in their utter contempt for the ‘Non-Enlightened’ [ie: non-Leftists], in their hatred of morality and tradition, in the way they treat their fellow human beings despite protestations of love for mankind.

These behaviors and attitudes arise out of their Nihilism. The Leftist refuses to accept the world as it is, to play the hand that’s been dealt him as best he can. This refusal fuels Leftist’s manic desire* to remake the world according to the schemes they have developed in the laboratories of their minds, where everyday is sunny and unicorns roam freely over the environmentally perfect and untouched plains, where there is no strife and discord because man has been forced into perfection, where everyone is a god [We are stars / We are golden]. Armed with a deep and abiding belief in these sterile schemes, the Leftist sets out into the world to convince his fellow men and women [and transgendered] of the brilliance of them. He finds some who agree with him, but most reject him because they see, to varying extents, just how fantastical his ideas are. This makes the Leftist angry. What also upsets him is that he finds that he himself is prone occasionally to think and act like the non-believers do, to fall short. Join those two facts with the fact that, in order to except Leftist ideas whole-hog as legitimate in the first place one must have a personality that refuses to accept things as they are, and you have a person suseptible to the Nihilist Virus. One could also call it the Nihilist Tantrum – not getting one’s [visionary] way, as the Leftist is also a Narcissist. Thus, this kind of person begins to view life, especially his own, as wretched. Thus this kind of person begins to hate himself, with that hatred, eventually for most, bursting through the skin and being projected towards other human beings in violent ways, both physical and verbal. This is the Vile stage.

Free of any allegiance to tradition and having cut loose from the bindings of morality, the miserable one can easily do and say vile things and rain calumnies down from his turgid heaven.

There are no restraints on the Leftist’s behavior because he has rejected all the restraints demanded of people with Free Will. There are no ties to the shared beliefs that make a group of people a civilization. The Leftist possesses free license to do as he pleases, but, however, as with all things in life, there is a trade-off. In holding free license, the bearer finds that he is eternally miserable because when there is no standard to live up to, no nobility to maintain, no honor to preserve. There is absolutely nothing to admire. All the Leftist is left with his self-contempt and self-hatred, like so many Gollums. He sees everyone as a reflection of himself. And he loathes himself and, as TL wrote, ‘then they magnify that to fit their perception of others’.

And violence at all levels ensues.

If we are going to effectively fight the Left, we don’t have to lower ourselves to their level, as TL points out, but it is very, very important that we know our enemy – what makes them tick – so we can clean their clocks.

*That’s one of the reasons, I think, Adobe Walls came up with the great term for the Leftists: ‘Manic Progressives’. If you’ve every been around someone who is clinically manic, you’ll understand.

This Honourable and Noble Cause

This Honourable and Noble Cause (Suppression and Prejudice)
Written by Mister Fox
Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:41
Elderly soldier with Union Jack and EDL flag

“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
– Houari Boumediene, President of Algeria, at the United Nations, 1974

This has been encouraged and facilitated by Western elites who have laws with severe penalties throughout Europe to persecute dissidents and allow Muslims to take European territory and change the culture to suit them. Don’t forget the elites brought this about by deceit and we did not realise what was happening until very late but there is a resistance building in Europe as a whole and England in particular. The Muslims know the governments and police are on their side:“You are a White man you can’t do nothing”(1)

Evil elites cover up heinous murders of innocent people like that of Charlene Downes if the perpetrators belong to the new-privileged groups. There is a noble and honourable demonstration in Blackpool on March 26th for justice for this abused young girl whose case was sabotaged by the police. This is part of a new era of nobility and heroism. It is an honourable demo for posthumous justice for this young White girl who was used for sex then allegedly chopped up and sold in kebab meat.

Homer expressed nobility in this aphorism: “I too shall lie in the dust when I am dead, but now let me win noble renown.” The ancient Greeks placed great importance on personal honor. Man was nothing without honour. One type of Honor is won by a man’s prowess, the ability to fight and be victorious in battle. I suggest that fighting for justice for your people and defending them from attack by rival communities is very honourable and noble.

In the sixth book of the Aeneid Oddysseus’ father Anchises gives a roll call of heroes. It is their renown in battle that impresses him and by setting examples they inspire others.

Alan Clarke, the former Conservative Minister of State for Defence and famous diarist praised football fans who rose to the provocation by French gendarmes as “the British military spirit”. The Independent of 18 June 1998 reported: it was “a kind of compliment to the English martial spirit” the way other groups of supporters sought them out. (1) To the traditional aristocratic ruling, class, the EDL would have been possessed of noble virtues which are now criminalized by the new elites. The great manly values like bravery, heroism,honour, and glory have been downgraded to prepare us for the lovely new world they were building.

An intrepid crew infiltrated and secretly filmed inside the Muslim area in Rochdale on the 5th of March. As usual the police took the side of Muslim extremists. In the video, the Muslims chant ”Allahu Akbar”, the chant used in Egypt as they burnt Christian churches. About 2 minutes in you can hear territorial claims as Muslims chant ”English s*** off our streets”. Note also how the police allow the Muslims to cover their faces yet EDL supporters who wore anything over their faces had them ripped off by the police, and pushed down their tops.

The politicised police used batons and dogs on the EDL but left the Muslims to do what they wanted. These people were the backbone of our traditional military prowess and should be honoured as heroes ready to defend our country and control our borders to repel the current invasion not assaulted by the police and belittled in the media. (2)

Our wounded troops are insulted in Selly Oak hospital as well as on the streets of Wootton Bassett and Luton by a rival community while the rulers invade their countries while not even providing the troops with adequate equipment to fight in. The elites are so evil they invade sovereign nation states belonging to Muslims when it is none of their business and import millions of Muslims with grudges into Europe to destroy our communities and countries.

The BBC are campaigning to get democratic protest suppressed. Jeremy Paxman expresses a lot of opinions but has not objectively examined the facts for himself. (3) When he interviewed Tommy Robinson he sat looking at his guest with contempt but knew nothing about what is going on on the streets yet he tries to rip apart guests who do. There is a wide, yawning gap between the elites and the British people: “You have no experience of what its like out there”. Telling comment by Paxman at the end: ‘Aren’t you frightened by what you have set off’. The elites like Paxman know its ready to blow but they persist in oppressing righteous reaction and present multi-racial Britain in a fairy-story way.

Robinson single handedly jumping a barrier into a crowd of jihadists burning poppies on Armistice Day is inspirational bravery. It is on youtube. The EDL are working class patriots trying to stop the destruction of Britain. Watch videos produced by EDL ‘Divisions’ and you will see the views of the vast majority of our people that the elites are trying to suppress. There are Defence Leagues spreading across the world – Europe, Canada, Australia, the US.

The problem starts when excessive numbers are allowed in and start taking over territory and changing existing communities. This threatens the indigenous population. The government has stigmatised the “far right”as bad as Islamic terrorists, So who is a Christian fundamentalist? Any believing Christian is. It is not fanciful to say persecution of Christians has begun in England such as the Christian Hoteliers were fined heavily for refusing two gay men to share a bed in their Hotel.

The Establishment have no counter argument against our new patriotic ideas and use “Nazi”, “racist”, “hater” labels. They make themselves feel morally superior by looking down on others who they arrogantly dismiss as “bigots” yet it is they who are prejudiced because our views are based on experience. Of course, it hasn’t occurred to any of them that they are prisoners of the zeitgeist as they see themselves as “free” and “radical” they are repeating received ideology they have imbibed.

The anti-racists (note the doublespeak!) are largely made up of social workers, teachers, journalists, professional trade unionists, professional “anti fascists” and people indoctrinated with “social studies” degrees. The violent wing, Antifa, is made up of anarchists usually of middle class backgrounds often in rebellion and “anti fascism” is a means of releasing their middle class angst.

They have little social interaction with the working class and view them with the contempt as Lenin did – knuckle draggers, a lumpen proletariat. Politics is a hobby or profession but not motivated by necessity or self-defence. They are a noisy rabble, often with powerful media and political connections. They find scapegoat:s: “we are a united community”, “the EDL are evil racists” – you must accept the elites ideology or be denounced as “far right” or “racist”.

Robinson has stated that Bedfordshire police have issued him with an “Osman warning”. These are given by the police to advise individuals that they are at serious risk of being killed by someone who appears to have the capability to make good their threat”. Robinson wears a bulletproof vest and received a text message threatening to kill his children. This is the new era of bravery, honour and nobility.

Totalitarian MPs threaten violence. Luton MP Kelvin Hopkins told demonstrators: I’ve lived in Luton for 42 years – we’ve not had trouble here. It’s a friendly town, a comradely town. Let’s chase the EDL out of town and make Luton a non-racist and equal town where we all get on in friendship and solidarity. What about the Black pensioners in Bury Park who are being ethnically cleansed? Does he approve of that or just pretend it isn’t happening?

Reality was expressed at the EDL rally in Luton by a local woman who told of her daughter burned to death by Muslim in a car crash:”Waqas Arshad, 24, crashed into a tree but told emergency services there was nobody inside, despite knowing 17-year-old Emily Brady was trapped in the burning wreckage. Her mother Patricia said: ‘It was despicable behaviour to make no attempt to try and pull her out of the car.’ It was only as firefighters tackled the blaze that they realised the teenager was in the car, still strapped in the passenger seat”.

While the MP pretends everything is lovely while threatening the EDL with violence the EDL are to fight her cause: “ If he is released early there will be major racial tension in Luton, message to the prison service -do not realise this man early or there will be serious incidents” Tommy Robinson said. (2) This is what the elites are trying to suppress: ordinary people defending their children.

Another totalitarian tries to stifle democratic protest and freedom of association. She is a lesbian and is too stupid to know what would happen to her under Sharia law. These demos only cost so much because the UAF and Muslims turn up and threaten violence.

The totalitarian wrote to a correspondent:

“Thank you for getting in touch with your views on the EDL and my argument for extending Police powers to ban marches, when there is a serious and proven risk to public order, to encompass rallies and parades as well as marches.

I am arguing for a relatively small change to existing law. But I do accept you comments below from a purely libertarian perspective, which you have demonstrated with much feeling.

Thank you again for your comments, I think we shall have to agree to differ.

Kind regards,
Margot”

She ignores the costs to police when the enemy within openly abuse our troops on their home coming parades and get police protection and takes their side against the EDL.

The media lie about the numbers. They claimed there were only about 1500 at Luton but this privately taken video shows about 4,500 to 5,000. (4)

BNP Scotland’s meeting in a hotel near Falkirk, to launch their manifesto for the Scottish elections was been cancelled because local MP, Labour’s Eric Joyce, pressed the hotel to renege on their deal. The hotel complied with the wishes of the totalitarian MP. Again local people are suppressed.

The media use class distinction to isolate defenders of the British people from the rest of polite and enlightened society by characterisations like “Banner-waving drunks”.

These are attempts to oppress their own populations to prevent a “White backlash” but people are realising what the corrupt Ideological Caste has been doing behind their backs. Deceitful MP Simon Hughes stated on television that it is not true that asylum seekers get more state benefits than indigenous people he deliberately misled the public by playing with words because he knows it is the illegal immigrants that are granted asylum that get more benefits than our own people.

But Hughes comment was not only deliberately, deceitful, he is secretive about what he really wants for White Britons: to let Muslims take over. (5)

The UAF is a state – backed terror group. Evil David Cameron who is busy having Libyan civilians humanely carpet-bombed is a signatory. His UAF apparatchiks are made up of idealistic students, old style Stalinists and nonwhites.They are subsidised and supported by MPs who also make Race Relations laws to oppress the indigenous people.

For sixty years the Global Capitalists have used weakening ideologies to get ideologically neo-Marxist elite has waged a psychological war against the British people. They have been devastating the communities of local people by imposing a myriad of different ethnic groups on them while living in good areas themselves and benefiting from cheap labour as British workers are forced to accept less.

The general population are only just realising that the rulers can do such awful things in the full knowledge that they re doing them. Yet there is an independent strand. If you look at the comments in the newspapers when race and immigration crops up There’s an interesting development the main opinion pieces and comment blogs are getting many opposing views. So much so that they now have to be censored.

As they are getting stronger they have started to show their true loyalties and what they are doing to us now will increase as they grow in numbers and this is beginning to show behind the veil of the Establishment cover up.

We have had 9/11, Bali, Madrid, London, India and Russia which indicates a world wide Jihad is being enacted. Then baroness Warsi whines that we are prejudiced against them! They are carrying grudges against us and the third generation turns nasty and starts threatening us. They have been encouraged to take our territory for long by the elites. The seed of conflict is in them as it is in all peoples who have been victims of surprise invasions that kill their women and children.

The Birmingham Mail of 5/1/11 reports the growing reaction to the Muslim attack on our people and values. A former soldier, who did not wish to be identified, claimed Respect Party representatives Salma Yaqoob and Mohammed Ishtiaq would require a round-the-clock guard unless they apologised for the snub at Birmingham City Council.

They refused to stand for Lance Corporal Matthew Croucher when he visited to highlight his work with the Royal British Legion. They are not part of our society nd do not belong here any more than we should be invading theee Muslim countries – Afghanistan, Iraq and now Libya. He said:

“There will be repercussions if this pair are not kicked off the council, they will need 24-hour protection,” claimed the soldier, who said he was speaking for many ex-servicemen.

Imported Predators

Imported Predators

This is Delroy Grant, probably the most prolific serial rapist ever known in this country. Unlike most rapists Grant’s tastes were directed at one of the most vulnerable sections of the community, the elderly. His youngest known victim was 68, his eldest was 93, most were old women but he also included some elderly men amongst those he abused.

He was convicted today of the rape of 22 senior citizens, although he is known to have attacked at least 128, and some police suggest that his victims may total 600, or even up to 1,000, over a 17 year rape spree.

Grant’s speciality was to confront his frail victims in the sanctuary of their own homes, and then to abuse them in their own beds. Known as the night stalker, he would often spend hours gaining access into homes and then awaken sleeping victims in the dead of night by shining a torch in their faces. Few of those he preyed upon ever slept peacefully in their beds again, and many have died waiting for justice.

Delroy Grant is the third mass serial rapist to be convicted in London in the last year, the others are Kirk Reed a black chief and John Warboys a white taxi driver, both of whom are believed to have attacked around 100 women.

We can be sure that despite the disproportionate over representation of blacks in this type of crime, whenever the subject of serial rapists is discussed in the media, the focus will be on Warboys, the single white man.

Culture not Colour?

Culture not Colour?



By Tim Heydon

Oscar Spengler and the Decline of the West

Is it about culture and not colour? This is the all-important question. Oscar Spengler thought it was. For him, culture was independent of race. The foundation of his theory that the West is in decline is that cultures are free-floating. They are as it were living things; organic , with a natural life –cycle of birth, growth, decay and death. The West has reached the period in its cultural life-cycle – ‘civilisation,’ when it is naturally in decline. Such a theory runs into difficulties immediately if it is associated with race, because race is not a temporary, changing aspect of human existence.

Spengler’s Theory accords with the Realities of Life

Spengler’s theory of our decline, which is of course a denial of the inexorable march of reason towards the sunlit uplands of utopia envisaged by ‘Progressives,’ does seem to fit into the realities of the world we live in while Progressivism does not. Everything we see about us; ourselves, the plants and animals, the mountains, plains and seas on the earth, the earth itself, the sun and other stars, the galaxy we live in and the very universe itself (according to some astronomers at least ) – they are all at some stage of the same kind of cycle. So the thought arises: why on earth is human culture supposed to be different? This thought is purely intuitive, of course. Nevertheless it shouldn’t be dismissed on that account. It fits into an overwhelming pattern of reality and because it does, the onus of proof is on those who believe in Progressivism. And there is little in modern human history to give comfort to the notion that in a secular world we are all getting morally better and better. Au contraire. The idea that human beings have somehow managed to escape the bonds of the natural doesn’t seem to be scientific; It is a form of faith: it’s religious – but religion without spirituality and therefore without the necessary motivation.

There is much which appears to support the Idea that Culture is unconnected to Race

If culture is unconnected to race, which is considered to be unimportant, it is easier to be thought of as English or Scots or Welsh or Irish or whatever regardless of one’s racial origin. In support of the idea of the exclusive importance of cultures is the fact that there have for example been several civilisations /cultures in the British Isles although the racial character of its people has remained remarkably unchanged throughout recent millennia, at least until very recently. This is despite the perversion of history visited on us by those eager to deny it. These cultures have ranged from that of the shamanistic hunter –gatherers of the Palaeolithic to the paganism of the Druids and the Germanic gods and then on through the Medieval Christian civilisation to Renaissance / Reformation Christianity and so to the debased secular ‘culture’ of ‘modernity’ which is built round belief in nothing – literally.

Agriculture came from the Near East

Furthermore, the major changes in culture which have occurred in Britain have not been the result of the kind of mass invasions which some people think are the sole reason for cultural / civilisational change. As noted above, until very recently there has been little alteration in the racial makeup of the inhabitants of these islands. This is true regardless of the relatively minor influxes of other peoples (such as Germanic / Norse settlers or the Huguenots) who were mostly in any case virtually identical racially and culturally. The arrival of farming which signalled the Neolithic era, a truly momentous cultural event which radically changed the lives of humanity forever, came with a few settlers from the Continent having spread from the Near East.

‘The English have two books; Shakespeare and the Bible. England made Shakespeare, but the Bible made England’ –
Victor Hugo

Much later, Christianity, earth-shakingly important culturally as well as religiously, arrived thanks to the efforts of a few missionaries from the Continent and Ireland, also having spread from the Near East.

Classical Learning strengthened by Scholars from Byzantium.

Classical learning, the civilisation of Greece and Rome was salvaged in Europe during the so-called Dark Ages by Monks and the teaching reforms of Alcuin in the Carolingian Renaissance. Islamic Scholars contributed something to the transmission of such works as those of Aristotle. But the most significant impact of the classics on the West arose through the arrival in Italy of Christian scholars fleeing the Islamic takeover of Constantinople. This arrival proved a decisive shot in the arm for Classical learning in the West.

The Importance of Protestantism

Protestantism, which did much to shape the native British, helping to give them their once – characteristic attributes of decency (good manners, respectability), modesty (‘British understatement’), emotional restraint ( reserve, undemonstrativeness, ‘stiff upper lip’), stoicism, hard work (the Protestant work ethic) and self reliance (through the ‘priesthood of all believers,’ ‘ we are captains of our souls’ ), though it had forerunners in Britain flowered on the Continent and came here from there. These gifts of Protestant Christianity also included assumptions of individual autonomy which, together with a sturdy lack of whole-hearted reverence for power inherited from their Saxon forebears, lay behind the growth of the democratic traditions of the British. And we have all come across members of other races who, at least when they interact with the native population, seem to be just like them culturally.

Political Correctness is Foreign

This country is now dominated by Political Correctness. This ideology is a function of Continental Philosophy which arrived in Britain principally via the USA.

So those who believe that it is Culture, not Race that matters – they have strong Case, don’t they?

___________________

Culture not Colour? Part 2


Oscar Spengler: Cultures are the Products of Particular People. ‘Mankind’ has never discovered anything.

So is it culture rather than race that matters? From the foregoing, so it seems. But look a little deeper and a different picture emerges. To go back to Oscar Spengler; although he denied the role of race in the creation of cultures, he also denied the ‘Progressives’ view that the historical reality is that there is one ‘mankind’. For Spengler, ‘Mankind’ is a zoological concept. ‘Mankind’; he wrote, ‘has never discovered anything.’ History concerns only the particular; particular groups of men living at particular times in particular places. It is they who have history and produce a culture. Universal mankind does not differ and therefore does not have history. This view is in fact compatible with the proposition that race and culture are inextricably intertwined.

It’s ‘Culture’ that counts is a ‘Nurture’ Theory

The first thing to notice is that in the context of the nature / nurture debate, the idea that it is culture, not ‘skin colour’ ie race that counts is a nurture theory. Nature is more or less ignored. But why should it be? We know for example, that IQ is 83% – 8 4% heritable in European adults. The high heritability of IQ suggests that IQ is largely determined by genes. (Richard Lynn, ‘Race Differences in Intelligence’ p28 ). IQ accurately predicts socio-economic status and a swathe of behaviours such as drug addiction, crime, single parenthood and smoking. Nature is it seems highly important in determining intelligence and all that flows from it in what might be termed as personal culture in a broad sense. So why not the culture of a nation? And why not then in high culture as well as the culture of everyday living?

The Dismissal of a Red Herring: ‘Skin Colour’

But what about Races? How far are they different through genetic inheritance, and does this affect culture? First though, let’s dispose of the red herring of ‘skin colour.’ Taken at is own value, skin colour per se can’t simply be dismissed as some would like it to be. Our skin colour is a function of the latitudes we live in. It is a characteristic which marks us out as people of the North, and the North West in particular, helping to make us as much a part of the fauna and flora of these islands as any native plant or animal; a feeling which is a deep part of our culture. For here is where our ancestors had their time, here are our roots. This is where we belong and our skin colour helps to tell us that and binds us to those who share this inheritance. It is not only USA blacks coming back to Africa who need and are entitled to their roots.

Apart from this feeling which suffuses the sensibilities of the native British whether they know it or not, skin (and eye and hair colour and other aspects of our looks) is otherwise an intrinsic part of our culture. There are innumerable allusions to it in our language. In ordinary speech one can be a pink and white rose, or tall dark and handsome (meaning dark haired). One can be fair-skinned or have fair hair, but also, ‘that’s fair’ we say, meaning that it is just. In an old usage it means ‘beautiful’. ‘Fair’ in all these linked senses comes from Old English ‘faegar’ meaning ‘pleasing’ or ‘attractive’. Our skin colour too leads on to myriad other aspects of culture. For example, our paleness suits restrained colours in our clothing while the dark skins of other races are best set off by brighter colours.

Skin Colour is the Outward and Visible Sign of Interior Differences

John Baker FRS was an Oxford Biologist whose book ‘Race’ published in 1974 remains a standard work on the subject. It was praised by the Nobel Laureate Sir Peter Medawar in the following terms; ‘No Book known to me tries to encompass everything relevant to the idea of race with such thoroughness, honesty, serious and decency.’ Prof. Arthur Jensen of UCLA said of it: ‘A most impressive display of profound scholarship and vast erudition. .. As a noted biologist, Baker provides the essential basis upon which any objective, rational and scientific discussion of racial differences must proceed.’ Recent DNA and gene expression studies have confirmed the reality of race beyond all reasonable doubt.

John Baker FRS on ‘Skin Colour’ and its Link with mental / temperamental Characteristics

Here is what Baker had to say: ‘The question arises why so many people say or imply that the races differ only in skin colour, when this is obviously untrue.(Emphasis added). Those who minimize racial differences, by speaking as though the only distinction between a European and (for instance) a Chinese or a Negro were of skin colour, appear unwittingly to admit that recognition of the more fundamental differences that actually exist might affect people’s views on the ethnic problem; for it might be regarded as unlikely that such differences could co-exist with exact similarity in the parts of the body concerned with thought and feeling.’

And those physical differences and differences of thought and feeling certainly exist. ‘The idea that the existence of manifold physical differences between certain ethnic taxa makes it probable that there are also inborn differences of mental potentiality, is by no means confined to persons trained in biological science. As Professor H J Muller has written, ‘to the vast majority of geneticists it seems absurd to suppose that psychological characteristics are subject to entirely different laws of heredity or development than other biological characteristics….Psychological comparisons of fraternal and identical twins have provided one type of empirical evidence in support of this conclusion.’ (‘Race’ pp182, 183)

Baker and J Phillippe Rushton

Baker goes in to some detail on the subject of the physical and mental differences between the races, relating them to the civilisations they have respectively produced, or in the case of negrids, have not produced. So too does J Phillippe Rushton who is Professor of Psychology at the University of Western Ontario. In the latter’s book ‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour,’ (P5) we find a table in which the physical characteristics of three main racial groups are linked to their respective mental and temperamental characteristics under the heading ‘More than Skin Deep’:-

Average differences Among Blacks, Whites and Orientals
Click to enlarge
Rushton’s Newtonian synthesis and the r-K Life History Theory

It has been Rushton’s achievement to bring together various lines of thought and the results of hundreds of studies pursued by many others as well as himself into a theory of racial development in what Richard Lynn, Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of Ulster described as a ‘Newtonian synthesis’ worthy of a Nobel Prize. The differing data about the various races are explained by applying to them the r-K Life History Theory first promulgated by the Harvard University biologist E O Wilson. This is now ‘a basic principle of modern evolutionary biology’. Every species of plant or animal, including human beings can be placed on the r-K scale. The r-strategy (for ensuring gene survival) involves having more offspring (like frog spawn or turtles), maturing earlier, having smaller brains and providing less parental care. The K end of scale means having fewer offspring, maturing later, having larger brains and providing more parental care. Human beings are the most K species of all. Among humans, Orientals are the most K, Blacks the most r and Whites fall in between’.

Why did northern peoples develop their K strategy? As human beings spread out of Africa, ‘their bodies, brains and behaviour changed. To deal with the colder winters and scarcer food supply of Europe and North East Asia, the Oriental and White races moved away from an r-strategy towards the K- strategy. This means more parenting and social organisation which requires larger brain size and a higher IQ’ (‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour’ p 89). K –strategy has many implications for human beings. For example; larger –brained babies require wide hips to be born. So Whites cannot run as fast as Blacks with their narrower hips. Blacks have more testosterone than Whites, so they are more capable of explosive action than are Whites – hence their success in sprint running, boxing etec. And so on.

The Implications of Baker, Rushton et al for Civilisation / Culture

It should be obvious from the above that race differences will lead inexorably to differing kinds of society and levels of culture /civilisation based on the differing characteristics of the races. It comes as no surprise that Orientals – mainly the Japanese, Chinese and Koreans – have a reputation of being extremely conformist, hard –working and (compared to other races) docile and law abiding. Likewise it is no surprise that sub-Saharan Africans have never achieved any kind of higher culture. As for Whites, we are not on average as intelligent in some respects anyway as Orientals, but we can comfort ourselves with the thought that our greater individuality and dynamism combined with our still-high intelligence has led us to be the world’s great inventors , innovators and discoverers what Seng;er called

Conclusion: It’s not Skin Colour / Race or Culture

We have seen how this country has taken on board key cultural influences from abroad (a fact, incidentally, which negates the idea that we need to import millions of foreigners in order for our culture to be ‘enriched’). But we have also seen that white people in general (like the other races) have powerful innate characteristics. Our own race partakes of these and, it is reasonable to think, has bred its own variety in these islands. Without outside influences these characteristics would tend to produce a particular type of society and culture in the circumstances in which our race has found itself historically. So the conclusion we draw is that our present culture is the product of our own racial characteristics and cultural tendencies reacting in a unique way with cultural influences from abroad to produce a civilisation, something new, which is our own. This civilisation which we have created would not exist if we were not the people that we are. But neither would it exist without those imported cultural influences. Race has been a necessary cause although not a sufficient one in the production of our culture, just as it has been a necessary cause in the production of all civilisations.

What about the USA?

But some may point to the USA and say; ‘Here is a society which is founded, not on race, but on ideas only: it is a cultural country, a ‘credal’ nation’. Aping the supposed superiority of the USA was Gordon Brown’s idea when he tried to redefine Britain as being founded on ‘fairness’. (Hilariously, he was immediately jumped on by an Asian pressure group which accused him of ‘racism’ in suggesting that ‘fairness’ was a particularly British characteristic). It lies behind Cameron’s pushing his ‘core principles‘ of ‘Britishness’ such as freedom of speech, the rule of law and democracy. (His own version of these characteristics which excludes the BNP as far as possible, naturally.) He has not been jumped on – yet.

But no society can exist only on ‘ideas’. Gordon Brown may have a Doctorate in History (albeit on Scottish Trade Unionism) but he seems not to have realised that the USA was always far more than the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. It was from the first a North European, Christian and specifically Protestant country.

Now that it is in the process of reinventing itself away from these characteristics, it is also in the process of falling apart socially and perhaps, eventually, politically as well. The idea that it will be much the same as it always was when the White population becomes a minority in the not too distant future is a pipe dream, nothing more. The innate characteristics of its new population will determine its character in the future, not its written constitutional documents (which can be made to mean anything) or ‘culture’.

And the same is true of Britain. The USA will survive longer than this country, because it is vast and can accommodate difference better than we can. What is to become of this tiny, crowded country when the native British are a minority in it? One thing is certain. It will no longer be British in any meaningful sense. The outlook is grim. Is the best we can hope for to be another, larger Lebanon?

Why Multiculture Will Always Fail

Why Multiculture Will Always Fail

Nicolai Sennels’ latest guest-essay concerns a topic that has greatly preoccupied Western European leaders in recent months: the failure of Multiculturalism.

Immigrants in Birmingham
Why multiculture will always fail
by Dr. Nicolai Sennels

Several leading European politicians have now declared the multicultural project dead and impossible to implement. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has concluded that the “so-called ‘multikulti’ concept — where people would ‘live side-by-side’ happily — did not work” (BBC, 17. October 2010). Merkel said straight out that the attempt to build a multicultural society has “utterly failed”. British prime minister David Cameron (BBC, 5 Feb 2011) and French president Nicolas Sarkozy (The Telegraph, 11 Feb 2011) quickly followed suit and declared multiculturalism a “failed” effort. Cameron added that the “UK needed a stronger national identity” and Sarkozy argued that “We have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.”

As a psychologist who has had hundreds of immigrants as clients, my conclusion is that the multicultural society will always fail because it is contrary to the fundamental psychological principles that are needed for building healthy communities. This basic psychological principle concerns identity — national identity. As quoted above, Cameron and Sarkozy reached the same conclusion.

National identity

For a society to succeed, its citizens must be able to unite around common core values. The most fundamental values are national identity and a wish for fellowship with one’s countrymen. National identity means that you feel like a Dane if you live in Denmark. Fellowship means that similarities — first of all the fact that you live in the same country — means more than differences, for example religion, color, or country of origin.

National identity and the feeling of fellowship increase work morale, taxpaying morale, morale in relation to social services, and respect for the country’s laws in general. People who experience themselves as part of the community will feel that they harm themselves if they harm the community. National identity is also important for respect towards the nation’s authorities.

The sense of community is crucial to the quality of life for us “pack” animals, and common core values are the foundation of the mutual trust and mutual helpfulness, openness, understanding and respect among the population. People who are deeply divided on core values and who want the community to evolve in completely different directions simply feel less fellowship with one another.

When people identify with a culture whose values are not rooted in the nation’s indigenous culture, this identification happens at the expense of identification with the greater community. The step towards acting in violation of the community’s interest is therefore shorter, which is one of the reasons for the dramatic over-representation of certain immigrant groups in crime and unemployment statistics.

Multiculturalization of a society, therefore, leads to an increased need for control, prohibitions, police, and tougher sentences in order to prevent internal factions from cheating or committing crimes against the community. Multicultural societies thus move easily towards a less democratic and more fascistic condition. The former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt concludes in hindsight: “The concept of multiculturalism is actually incompatible with a democratic society. … If one asks, where in the world are multicultural societies functioning, he quickly comes to the conclusion, that multiculturalism can only exist peacefully within strong authoritarian states.” (Hamburger Abendblatt, 24 Nov 2004).

Anti-culture

Fortunately, immigrants from almost all over the world have been able to accept and identify with our basic Western values. There are a few problems with organized crime and demographic clumping among immigrants from Asia and Eastern Europe but it has never became a threat to society.

Despite certain success stories and role models, one culture has proved impossible to integrate sufficiently, namely the Islamic one. Muslim culture and religion have demonstrated some inherent self-protective mechanisms which makes Muslim immigrants resistant to external influences from the host culture.

What we are dealing with here is a culture that in the most important areas — including true democracy, free speech, equality of women, and tolerance towards other faiths — has changed very little or not at all since it first appeared in a medieval clan society 1,400 years ago. It is almost unbelievable, given how much the rest of the world has changed during that time. The unfortunate combination of excessive Western tolerance and a lack of flexibility from the Muslim culture’s side has resulted in a kind of cultural osmosis, where Western values have not yet been able to penetrate the Islamic world while Islamization diffuses from the Muslim community into non-Muslim societies.

In multicultures which includes Muslim culture, the problems arising from lack of national identity and sense of community are therefore proportionately larger. Hence today the term “multiculture” is equivalent to societies where both Muslim and non-Muslim cultures exists. A more precise term would therefore be “bi-culture”. Instead of integrating into the common society, parallel societies appears, where benefit fraud and tax evasion are highly prevalent and where lawlessness and hostility against non-Islamic authorities are extreme and often violent.

According to police, Denmark has 25 to 30 “sensitive areas” with many immigrants, where police and fire departments can not work without risking being attacked (Midtjyllands Avis, August 7th, 2010). One among many examples is the Facebook page “Ishoj Ghetto”, which encourages its 650 members with the following battle cry: “My brothers. We shall destroy all the police cars approaching Ishoj. It is our city.” (Ekstrabladet, August 3rd, 2010). Holland, France, Britain, Belgium, Germany and most other Western European countries have cities and ghettos with similar problems. A study in Taastrup (city in Denmark) shows that immigrants and their descendants are behind 75 percent of all benefit fraud cases — although the proportion of immigrants is only 21 percent (Jyllands-Posten, August 31st, 2010).

Across Western Europe, there are parallel Muslim societies that have reached a stage so advanced that they have built their own political, economic and legal infrastructure. The executive, legislative and judicial power lies with the imams, police-like Muslim father patrol groups, homemade Sharia Courts and Islamic mediation meetings. The economy is characterized by the fact that Muslims prefer to buy goods and services from other Muslims, and the Islamic Havala banking (a system of private money transfers outside of authorities and banks) has largely replaced the normal ways of conducting financial transactions. It is too short a jump from this well-developed Islamic infrastructure and aggressive attitude toward the non-Islamic environment to the demands for autonomy and secession. Such demands have been made by Muslims throughout Islamic history, and in today’s China, Russia, Thailand, Africa, and the Balkans Muslims use guerrilla warfare, terrorism, kidnappings and threats to achieve this end.

Common sense and mature life experience could have prevented us from making the mistake to begin with. A couple of decades too late — always being the last to admit a mistake — our politicians finally admit the obvious problems (but only after opinion polls proved that the majority of voters do not want multiculture). But what will they do about it?

Three obvious solutions

The first and most basic solution is to stop immigration from countries that are not Western-oriented, which primarily applies to the Islamic world. As the Americans says: “If you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”

Secondly, we need to do as Angela Merkel, David Cameron, and Nicolas Sarkozy recommend: We must strengthen the national identity both among immigrants and the indigenous population. This is done primarily by making our educational institutions and public service media focus more on our countries’ history, culture and values. Moreover, we must force immigrants to integrate by making language proficiency, knowledge about our culture and history, adherence to the law and tax payment for e.g. 10 years a condition for receiving social benefits. Problematic demographic developments can partly be solved by limiting the state’s economic child support to the country’s average amount of children per mother (2 children). We do that in Denmark and it prevents immigrants from moving to Denmark, having/bringing a lot of kids and living on the money that the family get from the state for each child.

Thirdly, we must stop diluting and challenging our own culture and national identity through Islamization and parallel societies. The influential mosques and Islamic cultural centers makes Muslims stay in a very rigid version of their original culture. Dominant symbols like minarets, Halal food in public institutions, closure of public taxpayer-funded sports facilities in order to make Muslim women able to use them, state-supported Koranic schools, prayer rooms in public workplaces, hospitals, etc. are also harmful to the development of national identity among both immigrants and the rest of us. Islamization and parallel societies make it possible to live from cradle to grave in non-Muslim countries without ever leaving the circle of Muslim culture. It is contradictory and counterproductive to want national identity among immigrants when the government simultaneously allows and even supports Islamization.

Muslim parallel societies in the West produce tens of thousands of alienated citizens with very low or no national identity and loyalty — every year. These parallel communities must be dissolved by all means possible. This includes zero tolerance towards any breach of the law. Tax authorities, Social Services and the police play a crucial role in this context.

I would like to add that after working as a prison psychologist for years, my conclusion is that the only thing criminal immigrants really fear is being deported. We also need to do as the Danish Municipality of Aarhus does: Send female social workers or midwives into the homes of non-Western immigrants to meet with the women (without participation of male family members) to ensure that they and their daughters are safe, free and know their rights to divorce, and about family planning, contraception, women’s shelters and repatriation (state-paid emigration to the family’s country of origin).

In order to stop multiculture and challenge the rigid traditionalistic, unassimilable and widespread version of Muslim culture, the women have to be freed to choose their sexual partners, number of children, clothing style, and religion. As the Danish Muslim activist Kristina Khader, initiator of the women’s advisory centre Project New Hymen, told me in an interview: “The social control of women aims to preserve the core of the Muslim culture. A big part of the Muslim culture’s core is about female sexuality.” (JP-blog “Kulturkloeften”, November 2, 2009).

In general multiculture must be fought by making the inability or unwillingness to integrate so practically difficult and economically unprofitable that repatriation the only attractive option.

This is a long list of necessary demands and consequences, but the carrot is equally big: Participation on equal footing in the world’s freest, richest and best functioning culture — the West.


Nicolai Sennels is a psychologist and the author of “Among Criminal Muslims: A Psychologist’s experiences with the Copenhagen Municipality”.