Hate Crime? What Hate Crime?
by Jeff Davis
One of the most poorly kept secrets in American jurisprudence is the fact that blacks and other minorities are effectively immune from prosecution for hate crimes no matter how obvious such attacks may be.
An article on Philly.com reports: “Three juveniles” (read huge
muscular black male animals) “accused of assaulting a
cabdriver and his passenger in Center City Saturday night while
shouting racial slurs will not be charged with a hate crime, the
District Attorney’s Office said yesterday. The teens, who are
black, were not charged with hate crimes because there was no
evidence that the assault had been motivated by the race of the
victims, who are white, said (black) Tasha Jamerson, D.A.
spokeswoman. Just shouting racial epithets during the
commission of a crime doesn’t rise to the level of ethnic
intimidation, she said.”
Oh, yeah? And if Whites had done it while whupping up on a
black, does anyone think that it would not be used as “proof” of
a hate crime?
Philly.com goes on: “However, the three teens – two of whom
are 17 and one who is 15 – have all been hit with additional
counts of aggravated assault, since the passenger in the cab,
Brian Goldman, came forward Monday.”
So one of the “Whites” assaulted was in fact a Jew. If that hadn’t
been the case, I wonder if the cops in black-run Philadelphia
probably would even have bothered with an arrest.
The article notes “About 8:30 p.m. Saturday, Goldman was in a
cab that was stopped at a red light at 15th and Chestnut streets
when he and his 53-year-old cabdriver were assaulted at
random. Goldman escaped. The cabbie, whom police have not
identified, was able to flag down officers who nabbed the
attackers. Goldman said that he hadn’t heard any of the
attackers make racial comments, but police said that the cabbie
The litmus test for these things is simple: Reverse the races of
attackers and victims, and decide whether hate crime charges
would have been made in that case.
The truth is that the government assumes that almost 100
percent of attacks on Blacks by Whites are hate crimes, not
drunken brawls or anything else. If that’s the criteria for hate
crimes by Whites, then the government should assume that ALL
attacks by one race on a different race are hate crimes. Instead,
the government assumes that 0 percent of attacks by Blacks on
Whites are hate crimes and 100 percent of White attacks on
Blacks are hate crimes.
In reality, virtually all attacks by Blacks on Whites are hate
crimes. Even property crimes and thefts can be hate crimes by
Blacks against Whites. Black teenagers will frequently “key” a
new car with a nice paint job, especially if they think that a
White person owns the car. Most Blacks have a deep hatred for
White people which is often encouraged by the Jewish media.
The obvious solution would be to abolish the idea of the “hate
crime” since it involves the state reading the mind of the
perpetrator to see if there was a racist motivation. The Jews
have introduced the idea of hate crimes for political reasons.
Eventually hate crime laws will punish mere thoughts with
criminal penalties unless we put a stop to this. Applying these
laws in an equal manner to Blacks, who clearly hate Whites, was
never intended by the Jews and the courts show this bias.