Israel to Deport 40,000 Black Refugees to Random African Country

But Israel is against America deporting Mexicans?

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2017


40,000 blacks from Eritrea and Sudan currently held against their will in Israel’s Holot concentration camp will now be deported to a random country in Africa.

This announcement comes in the same week that the Israeli government condemned the Poles marching against immigration and globalism, while demanding the Polish government arrest the organizers.

With that kind of chutzpah, they might as well come out and start making fun of our noses.

Suddenly the international conventions and human rights treaties that Western plutocrats claim force us to take in unlimited millions of immigrants from Africa and Asia don’t apply to Israel.

The Jewish groups in America unanimously oppose Trump’s wall but support Israel. Jewish groups unanimously support an uncapped number of refugees to white countries, but support Israel. Jewish groups unanimously spout 1960s style world-citizen globalism but support Israel.

Jerusalem Post:

It is time to increase the pace of deporting African migrants, Prime Minister ((((((Benjamin Netanyahu)))))) told the cabinet on Sunday.

((((((Netanyahu)))))) said he has a three-pronged policy regarding getting migrants to leave the country, with the current focus being to encourage most of them to self-deport to a third country – which reports have identified as Rwanda.

In the years prior to 2012, a flood of African migrants crossed into Israel illegally, at one point reaching around 64,000 annually.

((((((Netanyahu)))))) said that the state had already carried out the first two prongs of its strategy: stopping the flow of new migrants by building a wall and through legislation, as well as getting more than 20,000 migrants to leave.


The third stage of deporting migrants at an increased pace, he said, “can be carried out thanks to an international agreement which I obtained which allows us to deport the 40,000 remaining infiltrators against their will.”

“This is very important. This will allow us to empty the Holot Detention Center in the future and to redirect portions of the large resources we are using there,” from guarding the migrants, to other needs of the state.

((((((Netanyahu)))))) was discussing an initiative announced last week by Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan and Interior Minister Arye Deri to close Holot, an “open” detention center where a few thousand migrants have been sent to try to convince them to self-deport.

Erdan and Deri’s idea would be to offer migrants the choice of “voluntarily” deporting to a third country or being put in regular prison indefinitely
.

Just as an aside, Sudan and Eritrea are the origin nations of most of Europe’s African invaders pillaging and raping from Italy to Sweden.

Somehow these states are totally powerless and incapable of obtaining “agreements” like Israel thanks, well, to Jews!

But here’s the best part: the country these blacks are being dumped in, Rwanda, is a notorious human trafficking hub.

It is unclear if Israel is going to continue to pay blacks it has been deporting to these “third countries” $3,500, but if so, that’s enough to pay for the trip from East Africa to Libya, and then to Europe.

Don’t be surprised if these Africans Israel is throwing out all “end up” in Europe. Two years ago, the Africans ISIS killed in Libya were deported from ((((((Our Greatest Ally)))))) and planning to enter Europe.

Keep calling Jews misguided liberals and keep looking like a smart-idiot. Or my new term for smart-idiot: “a Jordan Peterson.”

Jews are cut throats. Jews are bandits. Jews have no mercy for anyone who is different from them, white or black or Arab. Jews don’t believe what they say, they lie. A few people bring up the obvious “Holocaust” comparison, and they either laugh or don’t give a shit.

Now that they are able to express themselves through a state just for them, all speculation on who they really are is over.

Israel deports blacks because they know diversity is bad and negroes are violent criminals.

Israel and Jewish diaspora demands the West not even put quotas on negro immigration because they know diversity is bad and negroes are violent criminals.

How hard is the Jewish question to understand?

California ZOG

How is it that jews persist in White societies? How is it that the jews maintain their positions of power, while wielding those positions to such deleterious effects on Whites in their own communities? Replete with drastic biological differences including readily observable distinct phenotypical traits and foreign genetics, the jews could easily be classified as a separate species from Whites. If taxonomic standards were applied consistently across the various classes of animals, Whites, jews, and the other races of man would clearly be separate species. Aside from their alien genetics, the jews are culturally unassimilable because they have their own distinct culture, which they protect with an unwavering jewish racial supremacism. They cannot tolerate the achievements of the White race and White civilization, which by their mere existence expose the degenerate jewish culture, miscegenated genetic inheritance, and the idiotic evil of their death-cult religion. It is out of hatred and envy, documented for all to see in the repellant talmud, that the jews actively work to undermine White societies and destroy the White race. Given that the jews are a dangerous and ultimately fatal parasite to White existence, it took centuries of infiltration, subversion, and indoctrination to enstupidate White societies into permitting the pernicious presence of jews, and to have them sink low enough to celebrate a thoroughly judaized culture. The current disastrously kosher state of affairs is only sustainable through an obscene act of doublethink: the jews are simultaneously the most downtrodden, persecuted, disenfranchised victims, while also occupying positions of the most extraordinary financial, political, and social power.

A cornerstone in the perpetuation of a Zionist occupied government (ZOG), is a subversion of the laws that ostensibly govern a society. The jewish corruption of governments and laws is amply described in Protocol No. 5:

We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community.  We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws.  These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who opposes us by deed or word.”

In the California failed state, a once-great White homeland that is now ruled by a ZOG, the implementation of Protocol No. 5 has proceeded at a terrifying pace. From removing the “indulgence” of freedom of assembly with draconian desegregation and anti-diversity diversity laws, to criminalizing the “liberty” of free speech with perverse “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, the California ZOG has achieved the kosher despotism sought by the evil jews. One need only look at a recent history of California’s demographics to see proof of the ZOG using its power to wipe out the Whites: the goyim who opposed the rat-faced men by deed and word. Recently, the jews of Kabbalafornia celebrated another expansion of the ZOG’s power through the enactment of yet more laws that will accelerate the destruction of the remaining Whites.

Since March, JCRC [Jewish Community Relations Council] has worked with community members, advocates and policymakers to advance bills addressing the concerns of our community. Below is a list of bills, budget items, and resolutions which we supported during the legislative session… JCRC will continue to advocate, often in coalition with other communities, for a just society and for security for all minority groups”

Always on the lookout for the best interests of the unclean meat, the rootless traveling merchant has an amazing deal for you! As experts in telling others what is The Right Thing To DoTM, the jews have organized thousands of “community relations” organizations across the USSA to ensure a never ending expansion of laws favorable to the parasite and fatal to the host. Of course, all these organizations are tax-exempt and “charitable” because these are g*d’s chosen people, and the rules only apply to the goyim.

AB 291 provides a set of legal protections for tenants against unscrupulous landlords who might otherwise try to use immigration status as a way of intimidating tenants who have exercised, or who are about to exercise, their housing rights.”

This horrific law will be used to criminalize the mere existence of rental property, and will inevitably be selectively enforced against Whites. Under this jewish-orchestrated usurpation of the law, you can now face the full brunt of state power if you refuse to rent property to illegal foreign invaders. Thanks to jewish conniving from the JCRC, California landlords now have the choice of violating federal immigration laws by renting to illegals, and violating AB 291 by refusing to rent to illegals. Combine this new, unavoidable violation of contradictory laws with the federal and state civil asset forfeiture laws, and we can look forward to a wave of people being dispossessed of their property for the benefit of greedy ZOG operatives and their jewish handlers. There never was a clearer example of the old witticism: with the jews, you lose!

AB 450 enacts a set of restrictions on California employers to ensure that the assistance they give to federal immigration enforcement activity in the workplace goes no further than what is required by law and that workers have sufficient notice and opportunity to correct any inaccuracies in their employment eligibility records before employers take adverse action against them in connection with immigration enforcement audits.”

The jews have been busy ensuring that their bipedal biological weapons are immune from repercussions. This is another example of the jewish strategy of using the natural propensity of Whites to abide by laws, to force them into untenable situations and eventually punish them with an abusive, out of control police state. California employers have to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and their enforcement operations on pain of obstruction of justice charges, but if they cooperate too much California will now brand them as criminals. How much is too much cooperation? Only the jews behind the curtains can say for certain, but be assured that if you’re a White employer being overly cooperative with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, you’ll probably be prosecuted for a hate crime under AB 450.

SB 31 prohibits the state from cooperating with any religion-based registry or watch list.  This bill, an urgency measure, prohibits public agencies and public employees from sharing specified information with federal authorities for the purpose of compiling a registry or database of individuals based on religion, national origin, or ethnicity, or otherwise assisting or participating in the creation, implementation, or enforcement of such a registry or database.”

More jewish disingenuousness in service of protecting their sewage-colored primitives being used to overwhelm White homelands and eradicate Whites through violence and miscegenation. Initially described as intended to prevent “religion-based watch lists,” a quick perusal of the semitic fine print reveals that SB 31 also prevents any consideration of national origin or ethnicity when enforcing laws. This awful law, in the best case scenario, will prevent state and local law enforcement from protecting society from crimes perpetrated by any and all hostile foreigners, whether they be immigrants, colonists, or armed invaders. Good luck getting any accurate crime statistics once the jews succeed in removing any information about national origin or ethnicity from police reports through the threat of prosecution under SB 31.

SB 54 prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies and school police and security departments from using resources to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes.”

The disastrous jewish march through the institutions continues with a nonsensical new law that prevents any investigation or enforcement of immigration violations; essentially a law that criminalizes enforcing laws. SB 54 is perhaps the most pernicious of these terrible Kabbalafornian laws, in that it advances Protocol No. 5 more than the others. By preventing any state or local immigration enforcement, the jews are attempting to force the “intensified centralization of government.” For without state-level support for the enforcement of immigration laws, the federal government will have to grossly expand its police presence in the state, with immigration enforcement as the pretext for doing so.

Legal Services for Immigrants: The budget which passed included $30 million for the next three years in order to augment existing funding, bringing the total to $45 million…Non-Profit Security Grants: The California Non-profit Security Grant was funded for $2 million dollars in the 2017-18 state budget.”

No kosher agenda is complete without some mention of the shekels. Predictably, the jews want the remaining Whites to pay for their own annihilation. So alien invaders, brought here by jews to destroy White homelands, will be given $45 million worth of lawyers to litigiously prey upon the native population. No need to provide legal services for the native Whites, but the jews have endless amounts of your money to spend for the benefit of the Mestizo and Moose-limb monsters who are here to savagely destroy the remaining vestiges of White civilization. And just to make sure the jewish organizations like the JCRC are well protected, Kabbalafornia is now providing publicly funded security for them!

The state of California is a walking corpse. All its utility and vitality as a homeland for the White people who created it has been defiled and consumed by the jewish parasites and the opportunistic, brown welfare colonists in their service who are here to scavenge the carrion. It exists as a sickening laboratory, in which jews experiment with the promotion of the darkest, unimaginable perversions and the most unnatural, soulless forms of diversity and miscegenation. It exists to debase Whites morally, to reverse any civilizational or genetic advances hard won by Whites, and ultimately to devolve Whites into the seething, moronic mass of brown slaves promised by the detestable talmud. The jewish parasite colonies have burrowed deeply into the body politic of this once-great White homeland, and now use its resources to fund and protect the bipedal biological weapons the jews use to ensure that no safe White homelands remain. The jews hide behind altruistic-sounding organizations in the shallowest of attempts to disguise their evil. We must stand firm and unmoved by the duplicitous jewish bleatings of “humanity” and “compassion” as they commit genocide against us. We must not allow jews to dictate the laws which govern our society. We must stop White genocide.


Source article: https://jcrc.org/news-events/blog/jcrc-legislative-wrap-up-2017

ITS THE JEWS, ITS ALWAYS THE JEWS, WAKE UP!

THEY MUST BE STOPPED.

Mexican Border State Cops Executed U.S. Tourists and Covered It Up

by Cartel Chronicles

SALTILLO, Coahuila — Authorities in this border state set their sights on a group of police officers believed to have executed two U.S. tourists and then covered up the crime by claiming the victims were armed drug smugglers.

Initially, members of a metropolitan special response unit known as “GROM” claimed that two men riding in a maroon pickup ran a checkpoint along the highway that connects this state with Zacatecas. As Breitbart Texas initially reported, Coahuila state authorities falsely claimed that the two men ran a checkpoint and then opened fire on police officers, who chased them. In response, police officers opened fire and killed the two alleged gunmen. The two men have since been identified as U.S. tourists. According to Mexico’s Reforma, the victims were identified as Demetrius Atkins and Edgar Valdez Rodriguez, a Mexican national but legal resident in Missouri.

State officials revealed to Breitbart Texas that the theory presented by the cops has not held up to scrutiny and obtained arrest warrants against three members of the GROM. Two of those officers, Ivan Vladimir “El Hermano” Monsivais Martinez and Felix Enrique “La Piraña” Moreno Vasquez were arrested and are named in the ongoing investigation. The two cops remain in custody at a state prison facility in Coahuila.

According to Coahuila law enforcement officials, the tourists were not armed and did not elude the checkpoint. While authorities now believe the rogue police officers executed them in cold blood, a motive remains unclear.

 

Cartel Chronicles:

EXCLUSIVO — GRAFICO: Cártel Mexicano Desmembra y Asa a Víctimas Inocentes

MORELIA, Michoacán – Uno de los cárteles mexicanos que lucha por el control de este estado ha escalado en los horrores de sus actividades terroristas a un nuevo nivel de depravación al no solo desmembrar a las víctimas inocentes sino también al asar las partes del cuerpo. Los horrores son parte de lo que se ha convertido en algo cotidiano en este estado, mientras que las autoridades del gobierno continúan minimizando la violencia y aseguran que la región es segura.

VIDEO: Sicario Dispara a Camión en Carretera Fronteriza

REYNOSA, Tamaulipas — Sicarios del Cartel Del Golfo en esta ciudad fronteriza han comenzado a dispararle a los vehículos que transitan por las carreteras de esta ciudad como una táctica de robo. Los vehículos que han sido robados en esta ciudad a punta de pistola han sido utilizados para narco-bloqueos durante los enfrentamientos que siguen azotando esta ciudad.

Narco-Terror: Cartel Planeaba Usar Dron Con Explosivos

Sicarios mexicanos pertenecientes a un cartel planeaban utilizar un dron como una arma de terrorismo al pegar una carga explosiva al popular aparato electronico volador. La nueva tactica se lleva acabo en una zona que ah visto un repunte de narco-violencia.

Virginia’s election results – RIP America

Immigrants helped to give Democrats a decisive win in Virginia. Like California, Virginia is now a solidly blue state.

New California: Mass Immigration Turning Virginia Blue

by Julia Hahn

A remarkable transformation is underway in the Commonwealth of Virginia.

The birthplace and final resting place of George Washington, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson—and once one of the most reliably-red of red states—is being rapidly turned into a progressive stronghold.

These changes are not the result of an inside agency, or a natural evolution in political thinking, but rather the result of one of the most impactful yet least-discussed policies of the federal government.

Each year the federal government prints millions of visas and distributes these admission tickets to the poorest and least-developed nations in the world.

A middle-aged person living in parts of Virginia today will have witnessed more demographic change in the span of her life than many societies have experienced in millennia.

A census study entitled “Immigrants in Virginia,” released by University of Virginia (UVA) researchers, documented the phenomenon: “Until 1970, only 1 in 100 Virginians was born outside of the United States; by 2012, 1 in every 9 Virginians is foreign-born.”

Fairfax Connection, a community newspaper, offered more detail:

In the span of one generation, Fairfax County has seen an explosion in its immigrant population. In 1970, more than 93 percent of Fairfax County’s population was white and middle-class. In the fall of 1970, a white 6-year-old child beginning elementary school in one of the county’s developing towns… could look to his left, or look to his right, and see a classroom full of children who, at least 90 percent of the time, looked like him and who spoke English. By 2010, a child entering elementary school in Fairfax County would almost certainly encounter a classmate who did not speak English as a primary language, and whose parents or grandparents immigrated from places such as Vietnam, India, Korea or a country in Africa.

UVA’s report explains that more than three out of four of Virginia immigrants (77 percent) are coming from either Latin America or Asia—immigration from Europe, the report writes, “lag[s] far behind” representing only 10 percent of Virginia’s immigrant population. This is consistent with trends nationwide. According to the 2013 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Immigration Yearbook, only 8.7 percent of green cards issued by the federal government went to immigrants born in Europe, a product of immigration changes pushed through by Ted Kennedy in 1965.

DHS’ yearbook, however, does not provide information on parental nativity– in other words, it doesn’t say whether an immigrant from the United Kingdom may be the child of Saudi parents.

Additionally, according to DHS, of those refugees issued admissions slips into the United States, 75 percent came from four countries– Iraq, Burma, Somalia and Bhutan– while another 15 percent came from Iran, Sudan, Ethiopia, Eritrea and the Dominican Republic.

Large numbers of these settlers handpicked by the federal government have come to Virginia. A 2011 article from The Washington Post explains: “Soaring number of Hispanics and Asians pushed Virginia’s population over 8 million in the past decade.”

“Statewide the number of Hispanics almost doubled to 632,000. Hispanics now make up 8 percent of Virginia residents.” The Post continues, “The state’s Asian population also took off, climbing by 68 percent in 10 years.”

The Post notes that“as recently as 1990, non-Hispanic whites made up 76 percent of the state’s residents. A decade later, their numbers had fallen to 70 percent, and [in 2010], they accounted for less than two-thirds of the state’s residents.”

Because these newcomers to Virginia have largely been invited into the country with green cards or other visas, they can collect public benefits, fill any job, rely on federal retirement programs, and become naturalized voting citizens.

Year after year, the United States continues its annual dispensation of one million plus new green cards, the admission of one million foreign workers, refugees and dependents, and the importation of half a million foreign youths sought by college administrators.

One in four U.S. residents is either an immigrant himself or has immigrant parents. The Census Bureau projects that the U.S. will add another 14 million immigrants over the following ten years if green card programs aren’t slashed, pushing the U.S. past all documented historical immigration records in terms of immigrant to population ratio. When a high point was hit last century, then-President Calvin Coolidge hit the pause button for roughly fifty years– producing an era of explosive wage growth. That pause continued until Ted Kennedy ushered in legislation that granted millions of immigration visas to the entire world.

The steady gusher of visas happens silently and with little media recognition, yet its effects are more permanent and transformative than many of the most far-reaching foreign policy accords.

In 2012, the Richmond Times Dispatch highlighted the political effects of issuing visas to so many migrants from outside the Western World: “The population shift, most notably in Northern Virginia, is changing the state’s educational, political and social landscape.”

The Times Dispatch continues, “Virginia’s demographic changes have also transformed political leanings in the state that, before President Barack Obama’s win of electoral votes in 2008, had not backed a Democratic presidential candidate since 1964.”

The blue-ing of Virginia brought about by continued immigration is not calculated only by measuring the voting habits of immigrants themselves, but is multiplied outward through the voting habits of immigrants’ children and grandchildren. As the Times Dispatch notes: “Not all minority voters are foreign-born, of course, but many have participated in the changing political landscape.” The increase in the minority vote share stems from immigration itself: “Many immigrants come to the U.S. between the ages of 25 and 44, during the prime of their careers, and are more likely to have families here.” The results, per the Times Dispatch, are striking: “During the 2012 presidential election, when 71 percent of the state’s voters went to the polls, two-thirds of Hispanic and Asian voters backed Obama. Obama carried 93 percent of the black vote, 64 percent of the Hispanic vote and 66 percent of the Asian vote, according to exit polls reported by The New York Times.”

Under current U.S. policy, any child born to an immigrant is guaranteed U.S. citizenship and voting rights. UVA researchers found that, “among children of immigrants, 96 percent are U.S. citizens, either by birth or through naturalization.” In today’s Virginia, “almost a fifth of native-born children under the age of 18 have at least one foreign-born parent.”

As Reuters reported in a recent article on U.S. visa policies: “Immigrants favor Democratic candidates and liberal policies by a wide margin, surveys show, and they have moved formerly competitive states like Illinois firmly into the Democratic column and could turn Republican strongholds like Georgia and Texas into battlegrounds in the years to come.”

A 2014 report authored by University of Maryland professor James Gimpel, similarly found that, “the enormous flow of legal immigrants in to the country — 29.5 million 1980 to 2012 — has remade and continues to remake the nation’s electorate in favor of the Democratic Party.”

The report cites a 2012 study conducted by YouGov that, “gauged the partisan preferences of over 2,900 naturalized immigrants, finding 62.5 percent to be Democratic identifiers, 24.6 percent Republican, and 12.9 percent independent.”

Examining the data in this study led Washington Examiner columnist Byron York to conclude: “The bottom line is that more immigration favors Democrats; there is no prediction of Democratic electoral ascendancy that doesn’t rely on demographic factors as the main engine of the party’s dominance.”

Yet the effects, national and local media have observed, are not limited to electoral patterns.

Crime patterns have changed markedly as well.

Today, according to the Migration Policy Institute, “about one-fifth of the total population of El Salvador” resides in the United States. The Associated Press reports that, “El Salvador is the top country of birth for immigrants to Virginia.” Indeed, the Migration Policy Institute found that from 2000 to 2008 Virginia saw its Salvadorian immigrant population grow by 13,000 persons. With it, this migration has brought the arrival of the feared Salvadorian gang, Mara Salvatrucha, also known as MS-13.

As The Washington Post reported in 2011: “Controlled by ringleaders or ‘big homies’ imprisoned in El Salvador or at large in Central America or Mexico, MS-13 ‘cliques’ with such names as the Sailors, Normandy, Peajes, Uniones and Fultons collaborate across the District, Maryland and Virginia.”

The Post explains that presence of the Salvadorian gang has become so problematic in the Commonwealth that federal officials have been forced to engage in “a targeted, sustained effort to dismantle MS-13 and other violent gangs that threaten our neighborhoods.” Describing one of the gangland slayings, The Post documents how, “Victims included a 14-year-old boy, Giovanni Sanchez, who was stabbed to death and left in the street.”

Last year, The Washington Post reported: “[A]rmed with two machetes and a sawed-off shotgun, MS-13 gang members allegedly set off in a car… to carry out an assassination at a location as brazen as it was chilling: a Prince William County school.”

Virginia has become a study in contrasts. The attempted assassination at Prince William County school is only a two-and-a-half hour drive from Colonial Williamsburg, where themed actors create a living museum to throngs of tourists.

Each year, the U.S. issues more green cards than the collective population of the 13 colonies the year Virginia’s Patrick Henry was born. In a single year, the U.S. will issue five times more green cards than there are members of Daughters of the American Revolution.

America’s visa programs have also impacted the fiscal landscape as well.

As Manhattan Institute Scholar Heather Mac Donald observed in 2005: “The foreign-born Hispanic welfare rate was nearly three times that of native-born whites.” This trend continues for the children of immigrants as well: “Native-born Hispanics collected welfare at over twice the rate as native-born whites.” Washington Post columnist Robert Samuelson reported that from 1990 to 2004: “The number of Hispanics with incomes below the government’s poverty line [rose] 52 percent; that [represents] almost all (92 percent) of the increase in poor people… Among children, disparities are greater. Over the same period, Hispanic children in poverty [rose] 43 percent; meanwhile, the numbers of black and non-Hispanic white children in poverty declined 16.9 percent and 18.5 percent, respectively.”

The federal government’s policy of resettling poor foreign populations in U.S. communities has presented substantial challenges for educators as well.  As the Washington Post reported in 2012 about Fairfax County, “31,5000 students are projected to enroll in English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL), representing 17 percent of the total county student population and an increase of nearly one-third from last year [2011]. Those numbers have profound implications for the schools system… with 7,652 new students in ESOL this year, that represents an additional $25.3 million.”

Washington Post article from last year examining Fairfax county kindergarteners noted, “The white student population is receding and is being replaced with fast-growing numbers of poor students and children of immigrants for whom English is a second language… The demographic changes in Fairfax are likely to have long-term implications for the school system… Schools officials believe that the challenges that come with a less-affluent and less-prepared population will exacerbate the system’s struggles with a widening achievement gap for minorities and ballooning class sizes.”

The Post notes that these changes extend into neighboring Maryland as well: “School systems across the region have experienced rapid increases in the number of Hispanic students as well as the number of pupils who qualify for subsidized meals. In Montgomery County, more than 35 percent of students receive free or reduced-priced meals, compared with 22 percent in 2000. Poor students now account for 68 percent of the kindergarten class in Prince George’s County, and 3 in 10 kindergartners this year received additional English instruction.”

The Post continues: “Elementary school teachers say they spend an increasing amount of their time on remedial education… Grace Choi, a kindergarten language teacher at London Towne [Elementary], said children from poor families often arrive for the first day of school not knowing the alphabet, a standard lesson in preschool. Many cannot differentiate animal words such as cat, lion and cheetah or food words such as potato, eggs and tomato. ‘The things you think are a given, they don’t know,’ Choi said.”

As one school board member told The Post, “We are required to educate their children, and we want to. But there is a cost… There is a cost to having these children in the system.”

Economist Christine Chmura told the Richmond Times Dispatch that, “some members of Virginia’s increasing immigrant population come from a culture in which college education is not encouraged. ‘In particular, I’m referring to the Hispanic population’ [Chmura] said. ‘From this perspective, an increase in immigrants in the state could decrease our educational attainment levels, which has been one of our competitive advantages over other states.’”

A 2011 study examining education attainment in the United States found that of Hispanic immigrants (aged 25 to 34), only nine percent obtain a Bachelor’s degree. For second generation Hispanic immigrants of that same age group, that number increases only slightly: 19 percent obtain a Bachelor’s degree. Amongst the third generation, however, the number recedes: only 16 percent obtain a Bachelor’s degree.

In this sense, the ongoing dispensations of green cards, refugee admittances, and foreign worker visas to developing nations exacerbates income inequality in two ways: it increases job competition for the current minority population while also straining educational resources in these communities. While this income inequality is helpful to large political donors whose financial enterprises gain profit from reduced wages, it adds substantially to the challenges facing dedicated educators and social workers.

In order to remedy the difference in educational outcomes produced by historic amounts of immigration, many university boards adopt affirmative action policies, which may award or subtract points based on a candidate’s ancestry. A 2012 Washington Post article on affirmative action explained that, “College leaders in the Washington region and across the country are hoping to preserve their power to use race and ethnicity as factors in admissions.”

Cash-strapped schools are also looking to increase spending in response to the educational hardships created by immigration. As the Fairfax Times reports, “In 2014, Hispanic and black students posted pass rates 25 percentage points fewer than white and Asian students on math assessments, and 24 percentage points fewer on reading assessments. The results mirror achievement gaps in school districts across the state… Many of the board members pointed to expanding preschool programs as an accepted tool for boosting minority achievement… [Yet] lack of funds thwarts school officials’ desire to add more preschool classes, just as it hampers other endeavours that could help close the achievement gap.”

While the influence of conservative voters in the Commonwealth continues to diminish, it is ironically Republican officials in Virginia who have led the push to resettle even larger numbers of immigrants inside the state. Former House Majority Leader ((((((Eric Cantor)))))), for instance, in the months before his titanic fall from power, engineered the effort to provide more labor to Virginia employers through foreign worker visas.

Former-executive director of the Virginia Republican Party, Shaun Kenney, described conservatives who wanted to trim the ongoing resettlement efforts as “nativists” who “have no home in the modern Republican Party,” thundering, “drive ‘em out.” Ironically, Kenney’s immigration policies are having that exact effect.

Congressman Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, has proposed two bills that would add substantially to the millions of foreign visas already annually distributed by the United States. One of those bills, the SKILLS Visa Act, would increase foreign worker visas for technology corporations. The other bill, the Agricultural Guestworker “AG” Act, would increase foreign worker visas issued to food manufacturers who wield substantial influence within the modern Republican Party. Since Goodlatte’s foreign workers would arrive on visas, Republican donors who own businesses would be able to legally replace Americans workers with these newcomers.

The Washington Post reports the effects of the visas policies supported by Goodlatte in his own district: “Immigrants are a fast-growing part of the landscape and workforce—from the Mexicans who pick apples and process poultry to the Indians who work in high-tech and medical fields… Leader’s of the state’s $3.8 billion poultry industry say they favor immigration reform”. “Immigration reform,” as used by The Washington Post in this context, refers to adding greater and greater numbers of foreign workers to the labor pool in a manner employers hope will reduce wages.

As political scientist Steve Farnsworth told the Richmond Times Dispatch“burgeoning employment opportunities in Virginia” are not necessarily going to the states current residents but “waves of foreign-born workers and foreign-born college graduates looking for jobs.”

UVA researchers found that more than one in seven people in Virginia’s workforce are foreign-born, and positions in the workforce are more likely to go to them than those born in the state:

Labor force participation for natives is at about 65 percent in comparison to more than 73 percent for the foreign-born… A large number of foreign-born workers are employed as computer software engineers, managers, cashiers, accountants and auditors, and retail salespersons, making these highly common occupations for immigrants.

The impact mass visa admissions has had on job opportunities for Virginia workers is representative of nationwide trends. For instance, according to a report from the Center for Immigration Studies, all net jobs created in the United States from 2000-2014 went to immigrants.

But the flood of new immigrants also threatens the job prospects of past immigrants. As Bill ((((((Kristol)))))) and Rich Lowry wrote in their joint op-ed opposing the ((((((Schumer))))))-Rubio plan to triple green card admissions as part of the Gang of Eight bill:

 The last thing low-skilled native and immigrant workers already here should have to deal with is wage-depressing competition from newly arriving workers.

A poll from Kellyanne Conway found that minorities overwhelmingly support visa reductions. By a greater than 6:1 margin, Hispanic voters believe that jobs should go to those already living inside the United States instead of importing new workers from foreign countries. Black voters believe the same, by an extraordinary ratio of almost 30:1. Both groups suffer every day from the federal government’s policy of adding millions of new competitors to the labor pool.

In a state where recent races have been decided by razor-thin margins, and where Democrats have relied heavily on pulling huge numbers from the black vote, the addition of so many new voters from post-1970 immigration was keenly felt in the recent governor’s race. Following Democratic Gov. Terry McAullife’s rise to oldest occupied Executive Mansion in the country, The Atlantic wrote:

Terry McAuliffe’s narrow win Tuesday to become governor of Virginia was the result of the changing and growing population of Northern Virginia. It was also the product of an electorate just as diverse—though not as large—as the ones that twice elected Barack Obama… McAuliffe won even though 56 percent of white non-Hispanic voters voted for Republican Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, according to exit polls, thanks to the strength of McAuliffe’s support among Latinos and Asians. Together, those two demographic groups contributed more than 50,000 more votes to McAuliffe than to Cuccinelli… That’s enormously significant, considering that McAuliffe only won by 55,220 votes.

The Atlantic continued, “With McAuliffe’s victory, Virginia can now be looked at as ‘sort of a purple state leaning blue,’ said [Ruy] Teixeira, co-author of 2002’s The Emerging Democratic Majority. That book predicted that changes in the demographics of the electorate would ultimately swing red states into the blue column; those shifts took some time to show up, but now that they are here they show little sign of abating.”

California provides a look at Virginia’s— as well as Georgia’s, Arizona’s, Florida’s, and many other state’s— electoral path if the visa gusher continues apace.

In 1988, at a campaign rally for George H.W. Bush in Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan addressed the crowd: “So, here’s my last request to you. Put California in the Republican column this November. Send Pete Wilson back to the Senate. Send George Bush to the White House. And yes, I know I’m copying something that was just said here once before, but I don’t mind saying it again: Go out and win one last one for the Gipper!”

California Republicans went out did just that– delivered “one last one for the Gipper.” It would be the last time California would ever send a Republican to the Senate or to the White House.

In 1988, few other than the most ardent observers of immigration would have believed that the state that launched Nixon into the Senate, Vice-Presidency and White House, that launched Reagan into the Governor’s Mansion and the Executive Mansion, and that launched Reagan’s Vice President into the Oval Office, would have turned a deep and permanent shade of blue— never to revert again. Conservatives will of course still be able to win in Virginia for the time being, but as the visa gusher continues, it will become a steeper and steeper climb.

Today, the only reason Republican presidential campaigns go to California is not to rally voters but to meet with Los Angeles donors and Silicon Valley tycoons.

Conservative columnist Ann Coulter illustrated: “In 1980, Reagan won the biggest electoral landslide in history against an incumbent president, Jimmy Carter. Without the last 40 years of immigration, in 2012, Mitt Romney would have won a bigger landslide than Reagan did. He got more of the ‘Reagan coalition’ than Reagan did.”

In a separate article, Byron York explained that Romney’s problem was not so much his inability to make inroads with Hispanic voters, but paradoxically his inability to appeal to white, blue-collar workers:

Romney would have had to win 73 percent of the Hispanic vote to prevail in 2012. Which suggests that Romney, and Republicans, had bigger problems than Hispanic voters. The most serious of those problems was that Romney was not able to connect with white voters who were so turned off by the campaign that they abandoned the GOP and in many cases stayed away from the polls altogether. Recent reports suggest as many as 5 million white voters simply stayed home on Election Day. If they had voted at the same rate they did in 2004, even with the demographic changes since then, Romney would have won…an improvement of 4 points [amongst the white vote] would have won the race for Romney.

Conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly published a report last year about the impact of green cards and concluded: “Limit immigration or watch conservative efforts become irrelevant.” In her work, Schlafly emphasized that these changes were less about whether the two-party system would survive, but more about whether the Republican Party could continue on as a party of limited government with an immigration policy that was bringing in millions of big-government voters. Echoing Schlafly, immigration activist Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) threatened to convert green cards into Democratic votes on the House floor only days ago.

Nonetheless, as the tidal flood of green cards remakes the electoral map, Republican officeholders continue to bow to donors’ demands for ever-more foreign visas. None of the top polling GOP candidates– except for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker– has even suggested a willingness to reduce the number of visas issued each year by the federal government. Polling shows that a call for such reductions would present a winning populist issues for Republican candidates.

In fact, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), a favorite politician of both media and donors, partnered with Arizona’s John McCain and New York’s ((((((Chuck Schumer)))))) on their proposal to triple green cards. There are currently more than 30 million permanent immigrants inside the U.S who are here on green cards or have already converted their green cards into citizenship: the Gang of Eight’s program would have added another 30 million green card holders in the span of one decade. In interviews, Rubio described these immigration expansions euphemistically. He told Rush Limbaugh in 2013 that “our legal immigration system needs to be reformed.” He told ((((((Mark Levin)))))) in 2013 that “legal immigration is good for America.” He told Sean Hannity in 2014 that he wanted to “modernize our immigration system.” Rubio did not tell Limbaugh, ((((((Levin)))))), or Hannity that he wanted to permanently resettle more than 30 million foreign citizens inside the United States within one decade. Rubio was not asked why waves of unskilled immigration from poor countries like El Salvador would be “good for America” as long as these intending migrants were printed green cards on their way into the United States.

Federal government spending is also “legal,” but most conservatives would like to see much of it reduced or eliminated entirely.

Rubio has never wavered or altered his stand for exploding net immigration levels. In fact, Rubio recently introduced legislation known as the Immigration Innovation Act – or I-Squared – which would triple wage-depressing H-1B visas and remove university green card caps. The latter Rubio policy would take the current existing policy of importing  100,000 permanent immigrants from the Middle East, and grow it significantly.

The media has already coined a term to describe the different landscape emerging as a result of immigration. The National Journal news site, for instance, has created a vertical entitled, “The Next America,” which the site describes as an “initiative” intended to document “the political, economic and social impacts of profound racial and cultural change facing our nation.” The White House has named its naturalization initiative “The New Americans Project”.

Or, to borrow Senator Rubio’s campaign slogan, “A New American Century.”

DOJ Has Plan to Accelerate Deportation of Brown Invaders

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2017

Cages are always a good first step.

President Trump recently announced that he intended to eliminate the “diversity lottery” visa system, which should help reduce the number of useless and dangerous brown people coming in. But it’s not nearly enough.

What’s most pressing is getting rid of the people already here.

Luckily, it seems the Trump administration also has that covered.

Washington Post:

The Department of Justice said Friday it is aiming to slash the massive immigration court backlog in half by 2020 by adding judges, upgrading technology and refusing to tolerate repeated delays in deportation cases.

Officials, who briefed reporters on condition that they not be identified by name, said the effort is part of the Trump administration’s broad plan to more efficiently handle cases of undocumented immigrants, who number 11 million nationwide.

They’ve been telling us we have “11 million” illegals here for a decade now. It’s a bold-faced lie. The reality is probably closer to 30 million – and possibly as high as 50 million.

The administration has reversed Obama-era policies that allowed prosecutors to indefinitely postpone low-priority cases, which the Justice Department officials said allowed some immigrants to delay “inevitable” deportations. In other cases, they said, immigrants who deserved to win their cases were delayed for years because of the backlog.

The immigration court backlog has tripled since 2009, the year former president Obama took office, to more than 630,000 cases in October.

“That is what this administration is committed to, getting this done right, ensuring that we’re never in this place again,” a Justice Department official said. “Really and truly, when you look at the numbers . . . it reflects the fact that the last administration likely wasn’t as committed to ensuring that the system worked the way that Congress intended it to.

The agency, which oversees the administrative immigration courts, said it plans to hire new immigration judges, use technology such as videoconferencing, and increase judges’ productivity by setting case-completion guidelines, though officials would not give details.

We’re going to deport these people over Skype?

You’re out!

I like it.

But yeah, the Democrats obviously never intended for the system to work, because they reap immense benefit from there being as many immigrants, legal or not, in the country. Beaners disproportionately vote for Democrats, after all.

Also, they’re Jews and they hate White people.

If Hillary had won in 2016, you can be sure that the backlog of deportation cases would have grown by leaps and bounds, and none of these invasive parasites would be getting the boot.

We’re on the right timeline, gents.

Mestizo Murderer of Kate Steinle on Trial

The California failed state recently declared itself a sanctuary. But a sanctuary for what? The question can be answered by a quick glance through recent headlines. There is simply no better place to avoid the consequences of being a (((Hollywood))) sex pervert or child molester, a homosexual degenerate who wants to intentionally spread GRIDS, or a Moloch-worshipping transsexual who likes corrupting children. Of course, in a state that lies prostrate in worship to the toxic jewish agenda of White genocide, sanctuary is most readily bestowed on the hordes of hostile, bowel-movement brown invaders who serve as biological weapons for the rat-faced men seeking to destroy a formerly safe White homeland.

Kabbalafornia’s abject collaboration with the insane talmudic plan to extinguish the White race by flooding White nations with violent, low-IQ savages has a long history. In San Francisco alone, there was the infamous “migrant-offender shield” program that used taxpayer dollars to protect Honduran illegal alien crack cocaine dealers from deportation by flying them outside of US jurisdiction temporarily, before assisting to bring them back to the US. And who can fail to appreciate the supposedly critical contributions of the Aztexican invader to the violent “vibrancy” that the jews want us to believe is (((our))) greatest strength? Reaching into the memory hole, one can still find the not-too-distant case of the murderous Edwin Ramos and the cold-blooded “mistaken” execution of a father and two children. Never mind that this Aztexican primitive had a history of murdering its fellow Mestizo monsters, the sanctuary state protected its dangerous pet from deportation and ensured a continuation of violence. It must be a complete coincidence that the Yiddocracy then uses the existence of the violence it promotes through the untenable proximity of incompatible racial groups as a pretext to browbeat Whites about “racism,” take away any remaining meaningful liberties, and promote the eradication of Whites through miscegenation with lower, darker forms of humanity.

For the jews, it is important that we learn absolutely nothing from the past and remain ignorant about the true, disastrous effects of flooding our homelands with dangerous animalistic dullards from the Central American sewer. That’s why the murder of Kate Steinle by Jose Garcia Zarate, despite getting some national attention when it occurred (primarily as part of an effort to further restrict gun rights and disarm the population), has been tagged for expurgation. Now safely out of the media spotlight, the Mestizo who, after being deported five times, gunned down a beautiful, innocent Aryan woman in the prime of her life is being put on trial. In the Californian clown-court, the despicable Jose Garcia Zarate is being prosecuted by his co-ethnic tribal compatriot Diana Garcia.  Don’t hold your breath waiting for justice to be served.

A beautiful Aryan woman sacrificed to jewish lies about multiculturalism and economics.

The undocumented immigrant accused of shooting and killing Pleasanton native Kate Steinle was aiming toward her and knew what he was doing.”

An undocumented invader uses an undocumented shooting range, and something goes terribly wrong. Despite its resemblance to a creature from The Island of Dr. Moreau, the Zarate animal was at least dimly aware that it was viciously attacking a White woman as it took aim and shot her in the back. Pay no attention to the Mestizos overrunning your communities and gunning down your women, White man. Hey isn’t that negro ball on the talmudvision?

This piece of Aztexican garbage purposefully gunned down a White woman. The jews want more of this in our homelands.

The closely watched case has attracted national attention because of its connection to immigration policy – Garcia Zarate, a Mexican citizen, was released from a San Francisco jail two and a half months before the shooting instead of being deported because of the city’s sanctuary city policy.”

The conspicuous surrender of our borders to rampaging inferiors is explained away by rat-faced men, bleating about immigration policy and “the right thing to do.” It’s never mentioned that Zarate and the millions of identically hostile, anti-White Aztexicans have nothing to do with immigration, and everything to do with invasion, colonization, and the displacement of Whites from the communities they built. To the unredeemable and corrupt jewish puppets running San Francisco, hunting down and violently diversifying every last White person is much more important than your safety or the life of Kate Steinle.

Garcia Zarate, who was spinning around in a chair on the pier, aimed “towards” Steinle with the gun and fired, Garcia argued. Steinle, who was walking with her father, fell forward…The only thing she could say was ‘dad, help me, help me.’”

With an IQ that would be considered retarded in a White, the “hardworking” Mestizo monster spends its day hanging around the pier and spinning in a chair. Reaffirming those strong Aztexican family values we hear about, Zarate then shoots Kate Steinle dead in front of her father’s eyes. Apparently this is all perfectly acceptable because a jew said It’s The Right Thing To DoTM and muh GDP. How about another million of these morlocks next year?

[Defense lawyer Matt Gonzalez] said Garcia Zarate, who was homeless, had found the gun on the pier, wrapped in a cloth, and picked it up. “He did not know he was handling a firearm,” he said.”

A primitive, brown-skinned idiot, living a listless parasitic life in the remnants of a once-great culture it cannot understand and can only destroy.  The moronic malevolence of the Central American simpleton on full display.  It didn’t know it was handling a gun, but it somehow could aim, and put its paw on the trigger. All those years ago, Kipling was right:

Take up the White Man’s burden –
Send forth the best ye breed –
Go bind your sons to exile
To serve your captives’ need;
To wait in heavy harness
On fluttered folk and wild –
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half devil and half child.

The Kate Steinle tragedy is symbolic of what the catastrophic jewish century has wrought on our once proud and prosperous society. The needless and avoidable death of a young lady who epitomized the peerless beauty of Aryan women, at the hands of a malformed genetic alien from a miscegenated, degenerated branch of humanity. The jews brought the Mestizo creatures to our homeland with lies about how important it is for the White race to sell its birthright and its future so that a meaningless economic indicator will increase by a fraction of a percent. The Mestizos may be here for a better life, or for family values, or because they’re natural conservatives; but they will never be here for a better life for Whites, or the values of a White family, or the conservation of the White race. They are a separate, competing species and their presence in White homelands can only lead to the violence exemplified by the nightmare that befell the Steinle family. A nation does not exist for an economy. It exists to provide a safe space for a race and that race’s culture to flourish, or it doesn’t exist at all. The Mestizos continue to invade our country at the behest of the jews, who use them to impoverish, displace, and violently kill Whites. They are a tool of the jewish-orchestrated White genocide, and we should not forget the human faces of their victims, like that of Kate Steinle.


Source article: http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/23/kate-steinle-shooting-trial-san-francisco-opening-statements/