If you disarm a population and only arm the agents of the state, you are only allowing the state to do whatever the hell they want without any fear of repercussions.
“Gun control” is just code for population control.
What event would have to happen for the United States to have another Civil War or Revolution?
Okay, it’s a pretty unlikely event, at least in the near future, but we can still have fun trying to come up with a sort-vaguely-plausible scenario.
To really get in the spirit of the question, let’s start with an all-too-possible trigger for a dystopian scenario: the U.S. slides into another recession, but this time interest rates are already at rock bottom, so the Fed is helpless to prevent deflation. Spiraling deflation turns the recession into a major depression that drags on for years, rapidly turning the U.S. into a second-rate power.
The level of hostility and ideological rhetoric gripping the country is deep and vicious. Each party is convinced that the solutions advocated by the other side are exactly the things that are destroying the country. Each accuses the other of treason.
One party has rigid control of the House and just barely controls the Senate, but not the presidency. The party in control of the legislature blames all the problems on the president and vice versa.
Congress blocks all presidential initiatives and refuses to fund the government. The president vetoes what he sees as disastrous crackpot bills and, citing lack of funds and changed circumstances, refuses to enforce old laws that he believes are contributing to the decline.
Stalemate continues, neither side backs down, the U.S. defaults on its debts, the world economy collapses, and all major problems suddenly get much, much worse. People are starving, riots break out and are bloodily suppressed, Democrats are lynched in red states, and Republicans are hunted down by angry mobs in blue states.
Sensational news stories break, claiming that the president and senior members of his party had met to secretly decide to suspend the constitution and declare martial law during the next Congressional recess. The House immediately votes to impeach the president, the vice president, and 47 senators from the president’s party on charges of treason.
The Senate, on a simple majority vote, rules that given the clear and present danger of a traitorous coup attempt, the impeached senators and accused traitors are to be be arrested and cannot vote on questions of impeachment or expulsion. Immediately afterward, a two-thirds majority of the unimpeached senators vote to expel the impeached senators and to convict the president, the vice president, and the 47 senators of “high crimes and misdemeanors” and remove them from office.
The Supreme Court fractures along ideological lines and issues a 4-4-1 split decision invalidating the decision to “suspend” the 47 senators and therefore invalidating the removal of the president and vice president. However, the Chief Justice chooses to interpret the murky wording of the 1 separate opinion as meaning that the verdict is “advisory” only, and proceeds to swear in the Speaker of the House as president.
The “new president” orders military units to surround the White House and arrest the “old president” and his criminal supporters. A Virginia National Guard mechanized battalion makes a pre-arranged dash for the White House in an attempt to comply, but several companies of marines are hastily scrambled from the Navy Yard to block its path. Civilians throwing Molotov cocktails force the armored units to retreat.
Meanwhile, the “old president” declares a state of civil insurrection and orders a battalion of MPs from Fort Meade and several other nearby units to move on Capital Hill in order to arrest the former Speaker and presidential “pretender.”
More units enter the city from all sides. Pitched battles are fought along Pennsylvania Avenue, around Capitol Hill, and for control of essential bridges and avenues. Memorial Bridge is destroyed and the Capitol Building and the White House both take severe damage as all the politicians scatter and retreat to their home states.
Both presidents declare martial law and issue a call for obedience and order. Red and blue states align according to party. Fighting breaks out as military units refuse to accept orders from “renegade” officials of the opposite faction.
Mutinies occur in many units, and both sides rapidly purge officers and NCOs who refuse to go along with the winning side. Pitched battles are fought on some military bases as units choose opposite sides.
Aided by Rutgers ROTC units and a hastily organized Loyalist militia from Newark, the New Jersey Guard is one of several state forces that defy orders and arrest their own governors.
The Joint Chiefs hastily declare neutrality and seize control of northern Virgina and most of DC. Many military units that have avoided partisan clashes take up defensive positions and attempt to impose martial law in their immediate areas, but the old south and many midwestern states quickly declare for the “Patriots.”
Most of the navy stays neutral, but some ships have to put to sea in haste with skeleton crews and deckloads of refugees as southern naval bases are overrun by Patriot militias and National Guard units.
A guerrilla war breaks out in California, where Patriot militias seize large parts of the state in the east, the south, and the central valley.
The Loyalist states of Colorado and New Mexico are invaded by Patriot units from neighboring states seeking to control strategic air and nuclear assets. Although officially neutral, Air Force units cripple the invading units and force them to retreat.
The Montana National Guard and local Patriot militias overrun and capture numerous missile silos, but not before the determinedly neutral missile crews manage to sabotage all of the ICBMs and the launch equipment.
The Patriot president calls for a cease fire and immediate partition of the country, effectively calling for the expulsion of the Loyalist states. A low-yield nuclear explosion is detected in Kansas where Patriot delegates are gathered for a constitutional convention.
The disintegration continues.
Okay, I could go on, but you can see where this is going.
The point is that one of the flaws in our constitutional system – and a crucial flaw in the “it couldn’t happen here” argument – is that each house of congress has the sole, unchecked, and arbitrary authority to determine its own rules. If one party controls both houses, it is then possible to use those rules and the impeachment powers to expel any sitting members of either house, making a legislative coup d’etat an ever-tempting prospect in times of deep ideological division.
All it takes is belief that the other side is completely evil. Then any good pretext will do.
Ref: Article I, Section 5 of the United States Constitution provides that “Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member.”
The confessed killer in a deadly Florida school shooting last week that left 17 dead, regularly espoused antisemitic, racist and homophobic views via a private Instagram group chat, CNN reported on Saturday.
Nikolas Cruz, 19, who stormed Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, with a semiautomatic rifle on Wednesday, would frequently state that he hated “Jews, n*****s, immigrants,” and believed that Jews wanted to destroy the world.
In one tirade against his biological mother, Cruz said: “My real mom was a Jew. I am glad I never met her,” according to CNN.
He also expressed a desire to kill Blacks and Hispanics, and said that members of the gay community should be shot “in the back of the head.”
Those sentiments are often shared by Israeli Jews, who generally hate both blacks and homosexuals.
So it is not especially strange that a Jew would feel this way.
Although I will give it to the Jews that it is strange that he killed other Jews.
But it isn’t really that strange. This was a weird, disenfranchised Jew.
Cruz confessed to the massacre on Thursday, after he was brought before a judge via video conference at the Broward County court, according to The Washington Post.
Among the dead in Parkland were five Jews – four students and a teacher.
According to informal reports from family members, the media and social media, the following victims were identified as Jewish: students Jaime Guttenberg, 14, Alyssa Alhadeff, 14, Meadow Pollack, 18, and Alex Schachter, 19, as well as Scott Beigel, 35, a geography teacher who saved students’ lives by closing a classroom door as he was shot.
Guttenberg’s brother, Jesse, managed to escape. Their father, Fred, wrote on Facebook: “My heart is broken… I am broken as I write this trying to figure out how my family gets through this…. Hugs to all and hold your children tight.”
Diaspora Affairs Minister ((((((Naftali Bennett)))))) sent a condolence letter to the Jewish community in Parkland on Friday.
All in all, though we are going to see articles like this in the Israeli media, the mainstream media is going to back off of the “Nazi” angle because they know that we are just going to keep pointing out that Cruz is a Jew, and that makes their whole narrative seem weird and dishonest to any normal person looking at it.
Certainly, the weirdest fact is that Cruz killed other Jews, but again, that isn’t really that weird. Being adopted, he was alienated from the larger Jew community, and it is not hard to see why he would have resented them because of this. The fact that he said he was happy he never knew his Jew mother shows a type of anger toward his biological parents, and that anger was no doubt projected onto his entire tribe.
But the fact remains that it is the biology of the Jew that led him to perform this act. That and, I would assume, SSRI medications.
The bottom line from a White Nationalist perspective is that if we had deported all Jews, this shooting never would have happened.
“Thankful that Vanessa & my children are safe and unharmed after the incredibly scary situation that occurred this morning,” Trump Jr. said. “Truly disgusting that certain individuals choose to express their opposing views with such disturbing behavior.”
The U.S. Secret Service said in a statement: “The Secret Service and our law enforcement partners in New York City are investigating a suspicious package addressed to one of our protectees received today in New York, New York. This is an active investigation and we cannot comment any further.”
Ivanka Trump, Vanessa’s sister-in-law, tweeted Monday afternoon, “No one deserves to be frightened this way. There is no excuse.”
Leftist terrorism no doubt. Anyone who gets in the way of the left and their globalist masters, (the people of the lie) find out quickly why they have been expelled from every nation they have ever parasitized from.
People can be found guilty of a crime even when no evidence is presented that they committed a crime.”
Censorship of Holocaust Revisionism
Initially relatively little was written about the alleged genocide of European Jewry. For example, three of the best known works on World War II history are Gen. Eisenhower’s 559-page Crusade in Europe, Winston Churchill’s six-volume The Second World War (4,448 pages total), and Gen. de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre (2,054 pages total). Published from 1948 to 1959, these books in 7,061 pages of writing make no mention of anything related to the Holocaust story.
Most of what was written about the Holocaust story was primarily based on eyewitness testimony from Jewish survivors of the German camps. The historical blackout forces sought to intimidate German eyewitnesses from writing about their observations in the German concentration camps. When Thies Christophersen published The Auschwitz Lie in 1973, he was charged with “popular incitement,” “contempt against the state,” and defamation of the Jews. Christophersen spent a year in prison even though the charge of popular incitement was eventually dropped. All Christophersen had done was to write about his experiences while he was working in Auschwitz in 1944.
“Until 1989, it was forbidden in eastern Europe to dispute the official finding that four million were killed at Auschwitz. At the Auschwitz State Museum, staff members who expressed doubts about this figure were threatened with disciplinary measures. In 1989 Israeli Holocaust historian ((((((Yehuda Bauer)))))) said that it is time to finally acknowledge that the familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth.” Luckily, the application of “denial” or “revisionist” math by various Jewish historians did not result in prison time for them!
German Judge Wilhelm Stäglich later published an account of his Auschwitz observations in the October 1973 issue of the magazine Nation Europa. Stäglich’s public challenge to the official version of life at Auschwitz brought forth severe reprisals from the German government. Stäglich was induced to resign his job as a judge in Hamburg, his health having been affected by a harassment campaign against him. German authorities also attempted to deprive Stäglich of his pension, eventually settling on a 20% reduction in his pension over a five-year period. Finally, in a crowning absurdity, Stäglich was deprived of the doctoral degree he had earned at the University of Göttingen in 1951.
Prematurely retired by force, Stäglich worked for several years on an extensive study of the evidence supposedly substantiating systematic murder by gassing at Auschwitz. The book resulting from his study, Der Auschwitz Mythos, disputes the various “proofs” offered for the Auschwitz myth and is a damning analysis of the postwar trials staged by the Allies. The publication of Der Auschwitz Mythos in West Germany in 1979 caused the defenders of the Holocaust story to censor Stäglich’s book. Nevertheless, all but seven of the 10,000 copies of the first edition of Der Auschwitz Mythos (pictured above with Ursula Haverbeck) had been sold by the time the book was ordered seized by the German government.
Wilhelm Stäglich wrote in 1984 concerning the intellectual subservience and guilt inculcated in most Germans since the end of World War II:
…We Germans, in spite of the repeated assurances to the contrary of our puppet politicians, are politically and intellectually no longer a sovereign nation since our defeat in the Second World War. Our political subservience, which is apparent in the fact of the breaking up of the Reich and the incorporation of the individual pieces into the extant power blocks of the East and of the West, has had as its consequence a corresponding intellectual subservience. Escape from this intellectual subservience is prevented primarily by the guilt complex inculcated in most Germans through the “reeducation” instituted in 1945. This guilt complex is based primarily on the Holocaust Legend. Therefore for we Germans the struggle against what I have called the “Auschwitz Myth” is so frightfully important.
Germany passed laws soon after the publication of Stäglich’s book making it a felony to dispute any aspect of the Holocaust story. Similar laws were eventually passed in the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, and the European Union. The obvious question is:
What kind of historical truth needs criminal sanctions to protect it? The Holocaust story would not need criminal sanctions to protect it if it was historically accurate.
Prior, during and post-WWII ethnic Europeans were being starved, tortured and slaughtered in the 10’s millions by a “government” they did not elect nor want. These crimes are largely ignored perhaps due largely to: The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolutionand Russia’s Early Soviet Regime. Further there was genuine terror in other nations that this blood-lust would continue invading their countries deeper into central and western Europe: “Winston Churchill, for one, warned in an article published in the February 8, 1920, issue of the London Illustrated Sunday Herald that Bolshevism is a “worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality.”
European scholars who have questioned the Holocaust story have suffered tremendous hardships. For example, French revisionist Dr. Robert Faurisson lost his professorship in 1991, has been viciously beaten by thugs who were never caught or prosecuted, and has been the defendant in numerous law suits. Faurisson believes that revisionist historians are up against a religion. Faurisson said:
The belief in the Holocaust is a religion. We have to fight against this religion, but I don’t know how to fight a religion. Revisionists can look at demographic figures, historical documents, forensic evidence, etc., but there is no example in history of reason destroying a religion.”
Revisionists have also been persecuted in countries where questioning the Holocaust story is still legal. Canadian revisionist Ernst Zündel was tried in 1985 and 1988 in Toronto, Canada for the alleged crime of knowingly publishing false news. All Zündel had ever done was publicly dispute the Holocaust story. Even though Zündel won both cases on appeal, he continued to be attacked and persecuted in Canada. In 1995 his Toronto residence was the subject of an arson attack resulting in over $400,000 of damages. Zündel was also the recipient of a parcel bomb that was defused by the Toronto Police bomb squad.
Zündel later moved to rural Tennessee to live with his wife Ingrid Rimland. In February 2003 Zündel was arrested in Tennessee for alleged immigration violations and deported back to Canada. Zündel was forced to spend over two years in solitary confinement in a Toronto jail cell even though he was never charged with a crime. Zündel was deported to Germany in March 2005 where he was tried and convicted of inciting racial hatred and defaming the memory of the dead. Zündel spent five years in prison in Germany.
Ernst Zündel’s persecution illustrates the power of the historical blackout forces. Zündel wrote from his Toronto jail cell:
The media and educational system have dumbed the people down to a level hitherto unknown in the civilized world. They are modern-day zombie populations, led around by the nose—mentally so manipulated that they cannot think straight, much less act in their own self-interest, either as individuals or as societies and states. Both in spirit and in reality, they have become the tax-paying cash cows and playthings of an alien oligarchy.”
Some people in the United States have been forced to abandon their revisionist work even though U.S. citizens enjoy the First Amendment right to free speech. For example, David Cole, whose parents are both Jewish, was very effective in the 1990s in promulgating revisionist viewpoints. He was so effective that the Jewish Defense League threatened him into recanting his views. In January 1998 Cole changed his name to David ((((((Stein)))))) to protect himself, and he became publicly known as a right-wing Hollywood Republican. In May 2013 David Cole was exposed by a former friend and is now using his original name again. Hopefully his right to free speech as an American, will be respected in the future.
Traditional historians and academics are all forced to uphold the Holocaust story to keep their jobs. Most historians write as if all aspects of the Holocaust story are well-documented and irrefutable. For example, one historian who laments the outlawing of Holocaust revisionism states:
However, as outlined in Chapter Eight of Germany’s War, major aspects of the Holocaust story are easily contestable. It is a felony in many European countries to question the Holocaust story because major aspects of the Holocaust story are easy to disprove.
Defenders of the Holocaust story have also taken extreme measures to prosecute perpetrators of the alleged crimes. John Demjanjuk, for example, was found not guilty by the Israeli Supreme Court in 1993 of being Ivan the Terrible at Treblinka. Demjanjuk returned to his home in Cleveland, Ohio and looked forward to a peaceful retirement after spending years on death row in Israel. Unfortunately, in 2001 Demjanjuk was charged again on the grounds that he had instead allegedly been a guard named Ivan Demjanjuk at the Sobibór camp in Poland.
On May 11, 2009, Demjanjuk was deported from Cleveland to be tried in Germany. On May 12, 2011, Demjanjuk was convicted by a German criminal court as an accessory to the murder of 27,900 people at Sobibór and sentenced to five years in prison. No evidence was presented at Demjanjuk’s trial linking him to specific crimes. Instead, Demjanjuk was convicted under a new line of German legal thinking that a person who served at an alleged death camp can be charged as an accessory to murder because the camp’s sole function was to kill people. No proof of participation in a specific crime is required. Demjanjuk died in Germany before his appeal could be heard by a German Appellate Court.
This new line of German legal thinking is breathtaking in its unfairness. It incorrectly assumes that some German concentration camps were used for the sole purpose of exterminating people when, in fact, none of them were. Moreover, this proposed German law finds a person guilty merely for being at a certain camp. People can be found guilty of a crime even when no evidence is presented that they committed a crime. The ((((((Simon Wiesenthal)))))) Center has been looking to help prosecute and convict other elderly German guards under this line of German legal thinking.
The Holocaust story is being used to increasingly restrict free speech. ((((((Moshe Kantor)))))), President of the European Jewish Congress, spoke at the International Holocaust Remembrance Day at the European Parliament ceremony in Brussels on January 27, 2014. ((((((Kantor)))))) rejected free speech arguments over what he called the worldwide spread of anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semitism is “not an opinion—it’s a crime,” he said.
((((((Kantor)))))) apparently wants to criminalize any speech, symbols, or gestures that Jews consider to be anti-Semitic.
You can have your own opinions, You can’t have your own facts. We have facts….”
Even though those facts cannot be disputed in law courts by means of normal due process? Even though those “official” facts keep changing? Even though the facts came from the camps in Soviet occupied territories that were hidden for decades behind the iron curtain while they were running Gulag death camps? Even though ((((((Steven Spielberg))))))’s Horror Stories For The Family intentionally hides from worldview Jewish survivor testimony that contradicted these facts?
Is it any wonder that Canadian Monika Schaefer languishes in a German Gulag without being charged for having her own opinion despite ((((((Deborah Lipstadt))))))’s words?
Update: In response to the decision by Amazon to ban the book The Six Million: Fact or Fiction? (7th edition) worldwide from its platform, author Peter Winter has now released the very latest edition freeto read on the internet. #ReleaseMonikaSchaefer.
 Faurisson, Robert, “The Detail,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 17, No. 2, March/April 1998, p. 19.
 Christophersen, Thies, “Reflections on Auschwitz and West German Justice,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 1985, p. 117.
 Stäglich, Wilhelm, Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, Institute for Historical Review, 1990, pp. vii-viii, 292.
 Stäglich, Wilhelm, “Der Auschwitz Mythos: A Book and its Fate in the German Federal Republic,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 5, No. 1, Spring 1984, p. 65.
 Thorn, Victor, The Holocaust Hoax Exposed: Debunking the 20th Century’s Biggest Lie, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2012, p. 2 of Foreword.
 Speech at the 1992 11th International Revisionist Conference in Irvine, CA, October 10-12. Quoted in Weintraub, Ben, The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism: Keystone of the New World Order, Robert L. Brock, Publisher, 1995, p. xiii.
 Zündel, Ernst, Setting the Record Straight: Letters from Cell #7, Pigeon Forge, TN: Soaring Eagles Gallery, 2004, pp. 80-81.
 Davies, Norman, No Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939-1945, New York: Viking Penguin, 2006, p. 489.
If amateur war planners do strategy and good journey professionals nail down the logistics, what then do the geniuses figure out? Networks. They do what Nick Sabin does in College Football. The Alabama Crimson Tide will already be halfway down the road to defending their recent National Championship before the first ball is snapped in Spring Practice. Why? They already built the mannerbund with years of Top Five recruiting classes. The logistics and strategy pretty much don’t matter anymore when ‘Bama plays Vandy or Texas Art and Music University. Once the team bus safely arrives, the Crimson Tide has a 99% probability of success.
So how does this relate to anything other than sportsball? Take away the Gawdallmiddy Crimson Tide and Tuscaloosa could very well have a subpar Montessori School instead of a university. Give me Coach Sabin’s budget and I’d say “Thank You!” Then sit on my ass, live off the proceeds, and never feel forced to wake up earlier than 7AM for the rest of my sorry existence. But that’s just the point. I don’t have Coach Sabin’s Dough-Rae-Me and don’t know how to legally talk anyone into handing it to me. 124 out of the 128 “Big-Time” college football coaches are working 80-hour weeks and are about as close to Coach Sabin’s level as I am. The typical head coach, even in SEC Land, is a pretty much a squirrel digging for a few remaining buried nuts. Darth Sabin gets to play a rigged game because he was smart enough to tie together the requisite rigging.
And that’s how the coming societal conflict in Amerika is playing out behind the scenes. Two sets of impostors and thugs are quietly picking their teams and lining up their mannerbunds. The Soroses and Bonos on one side and the Steve Wynns and The Koch Foundation on the other. Neither side has any brief for you or gives a damn about your future success. Both hate Donald J. Trump with the intense fire of about 1,000 blazing stars of Betelgeuse magnitude. Whether they are Team Blue or Team Red – NeverTrump Edition neither cares a fig about you accept to the extent that they can rape you for whatever it’s worth.
And why hate Trump so much? He competes against them for recruits. He is a 3rd way. As Alice Cooper once described it: “A new party, a third party, a wild party!” Donald J Trump was a way out. The bird you could flick to the detestable gaggle of Washington, DC turkeys. He represented the loud, angry shotgun to fire at the murder of officious and bureaucratic crows.
He broke the monopoly and now they worry as both sides gather their armies on the darkling plain of a dying Amerikan Civilization. Just as Trump broke the Cuck line, The Officially Official Left now faces an insurgency of its own. Many on the far fringes of the Left believe they have found their Maud D’ib..
The radical transformation Sanders seeks is surprisingly hard to pin down, but the increasingly popular idea that drives him and his fans is clear: In their minds, government is and should be the primary solution to every single problem in the world. “What kind of morals do these people have?” he booms, questioning Republican spending cuts as supporters nod in solemn approval. Government spending, of course, does not always relate to “morals,” and “progressive” policies often fail to help the poor in rather disastrous ways. But no matter: They’re rolling, people. Buckle up, and get ready to feel the Bern.
And this is the opportunity afoot. There is no Nick Sabin here when it comes to having a monopoly on where Amerika goes next. The Cathedral is still powerful and the Deep State still packs a nasty rip tide. However, neither boasts an immaculate pope. And in the end the Left will never offer you any radical transformation. It all gets back to the politics of Who and Whom. Who applies “The Bern” or The Drumpfenreich to whom. While they struggle to organize, there is hope they can be laid to nines and deposed.
And what of Amerika while these overgrown infants seek the power to despoil and exploit us rather than to lead? It goes further down hill. Our diversity becomes our the fault lines of our crystalline fracture. Our arguments over who has what privilege become the facile disingenuous justifications of the blackguards, the wag halters and the ne’er-do-wells. The parasite tax of our welfare and affirmative actions systems become the fountainhead of our resentments. Our arguments become our undying vendettas. And then, as Daniel ((((((Greenfield)))))) so eloquently puts it.
But it’s not guns that make a civil war. It’s politics. Guns are how a civil war ends. Politics is how it begins.
So the intelligent questions become as follows. How do we defuse the politics? How do we find the right people to stand in our viking circle when it all winds down and the guns come out? The political, social and moral restoration of Freedom of Association and an aristocracy of virtue, competence and valor as the highest of American values will kill the current divisive politics. The proper selecting of your mannerbund will properly man your Viking Circle. The bar is closing and it may well be tending towards last call. As T.S. Eliot put simply put it.
HURRY UP PLEASE ITS TIME
If you don’t like it you can get on with it, I said.
Others can pick and choose if you can’t.