ABC to Air Sitcom About Illegal Immigrant Family

The topic of illegal immigration in America is getting another Hollywood treatment with ABC’s announcement Wednesday that it’s developing a comedy series about an undocumented family.

The sitcom, tentatively titled Sanctuary Family, centers on a husband and wife who constantly clash over the chaos created when they provide sanctuary for their undocumented nanny and her family, Deadline reports. The two families slowly come to learn that their similarities far outweigh their differences.

Veteran comedy scribe David Feeney (New Girl, 2 Broke Girls) will write and executive produce the project, while Christine Gernon (Speechless, New Girl) will direct and executive produce.

The ABC comedy joins a growing number of network and cable projects that take on the hot-button political issue of immigration and illegal aliens in America.

Two undocumented immigrant-focused dramas are in the works at CBS and The CW from Golden Globe Award-winning actress and activist Gina Rodriguez.

The CBS project, Have Mercy, follows a Latina doctor who, after being unable to practice when she immigrates to Miami, begins running a makeshift clinic in her apartment to serve the community. The CW series, titled Illegal, is a lighthearted hourlong “undocumented family sitcom” centered on a 16-year-old boy struggling to come to grips with his and his family’s undocumented status.

The two shows will be co-produced by Rodriguez’s I Can & I Will Productions, as part of an overall deal she struck with CBS Productions.

CBS is also developing the comedy Welcome to Maine, about a ninth-generation Maine family and an immigrant family forced to share the same workplace in a tiny rural northeast town.

From Fox, In the Country We Love centers on a woman whose family had been deported to Colombia, based on the memoir by Jane the Virgin‘s Diane Guerrero.

No Place in America or the Rest of the World for White Haters and Their Evil Ideology

The White-haters and anti-White bigots with their toxic and hateful ideology, that they hide behind terms such as anti-racism, anti-fascism, anti-White supremacy, anti-Neo-Nazi, have to be seen for what they are and what they want to do.

The haters of Whites are not just removing statutes of Confederate leaders, per se. These statutes represent all Whites. They are removing statutes, paintings, street names, college names and more of Whites.

They are symbolically erasing Whites from existence.  These symbolic erasures of Whites should be seen as trial balloons or early steps to the actual physical erasure of living White people. And, in colleges all across the land some of these anti-White bigots are teaching students to hate Whites.  You’ve seen the many news articles about this.  These people are evil and they are genocidal.

These bigoted and hateful anti-Whites include many neurotic self-hating Whites who are caught up in the evil anti-White ideology and who are able to psychologically  justify their  self hate  as hatred of  the socially acceptable boogey men who they call racists, etc.  In this way, they lie to themselves as they dehumanize ordinary Whites who express any healthy sense of self and group esteem.

What happened in Charlottesville is not difficult to understand and those who hate Whites and Whiteness are trying to hide the reality.

Here’s what Charlottesville was about.  A group of people wanted to hold a peaceful and legal rally. Under the law it doesn’t matter who they were or what they legally wanted to say. They had a Constitutional right to do so. And, they also had a legal permit to do so. They wanted to use their First Amendment rights of free speech to express their views.  All peaceful and legal.

Then, another group, with no permit, tried to keep them from exercising their free speech rights. And, the government that is supposed to protect the Constitutional right of free speech stood down and let those with no permit attack those with a permit. That’s it.  That’s all that Charlottesville was about. Evil triumphed in Charlottesville as the haters of Whites did keep peaceful people from using their first amendment rights.  It was a very sad day for those who support the Constitution and freedom.

Sadly, as we have seen so many times in history, the haters are trying to once again destroy peaceful people who just want to believe as they want to believe and live their lives in peace and happiness.

The modern evil-doers caught up in a mob frenzy against Whites who want to live peacefully and believe as they want, are no different than the past evil-doers who killed “Witches,” and various people who didn’t agree with various religious or social beliefs in their day.

You know about the hate aimed at Galileo and the persecution he faced as those all around him attacked him for his Copernican belief that the earth was not the center of the universe.  “How dare he believe such a thing?”  And, one imagines that the haters of his day, used their versions of terms such as “racist,” to describe and attack him.  But, today, we are much more enlightened, aren’t we?  Nope.  We are not. Just look at how the haters of Whites are trying to destroy us as a people.  We are the modern Galileos.

When you were in school and you read about the horrors of the past; about people being burned at the stake for not believing in certain religious creeds and about the Salem Witch Trials, you probably wondered how people could have been so ignorant to go along with such things.  Well, look around yourself. The same evil hatred thing is happening today. It is exactly the same thing.

Small minded bigots never change, they just change their targets.  The persecutors of Galileo are still with us. The killers of innocent people as Witches in Salem are still with us.  They have just changed their targets.

Even with our wonderful First Amendment, we have evil-doers today who try to subvert it as they attack others.   These evil-doers will say they are for free speech, but they side step the issue by calling speech they don’t like  “hate speech.”  And, they do this word shuffle about many other things.  They simply define what is good and just as something else and they then rely on a compliant media to repeat their evil lies to whip up the mob.

But there is more to the evil anti-White ideology.  There really is an attempt to kill off all Whites. It is genocide of Whites that they are playing at.  And, it is taking many forms. The removal of statutes and street names are just part of the bigger picture. There are calls for Whites to not have White babies.  There are moves to try to increase miscegenation by Whites.  And, it goes on and on. Whatever can remove Whites from existence is being tried.

Everyone should ask this question:  Is it okay for Whites to survive?  Isn’t the moral answer one that says that it is certainly okay for Whites to survive?  And, if it is okay for Whites to survive, what does “survive,” really mean?  Doesn’t it mean that Whites have a right to survive as Whites? That is, to be who and what we are by birth?  To try to be all that we can be?  To live in a society where we don’t have to fear being attacked in cities that we largely built?  To be treated fairly in school admissions and job placements? To be a free people not afraid to speak our minds? To be able to associate with or not associate with anyone we ourselves choose?

 

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/no-place-in-america-or-the-rest-of-the-world-for-white-haters-and-their-evil-ideology/

Time to End Birthright Citizenship – But it will NOT be enough.

Time to End Birthright Citizenship

Donald Trump took a lot of heat when he announced his candidacy for President, stating that he would build a border fence from San Diego to Brownsville and make Mexico pay for it, all to keep Mexico’s “unwanted” and “undesirables” from flooding the United States. In August 2015, on the campaign trail, he shed light on a flawed interpretation of the U.S. Constitution that has caused much of the problem of illegal immigration.

That misinterpretation of the 14th Amendment, written to guarantee the citizenship rights of freed slaves after the Civil War, has morphed the amendment into a guarantee of birthright citizenship. Merely being born on American soil is said to make you a U.S. citizen. Sneak past the U.S. Border Patrol, have your baby, and you not only have a U.S. citizen but what is called an “anchor baby” allowing you to stay and bring others in under the banner of family reunification.

During the campaign, Trump correctly called the flawed concept of birthright citizenship the “biggest magnet” for illegal immigration. He would end it, and as for family reunification, Trump is all for it, just saying it should happen on the other side of the U.S.-Mexico border. As the New York Post reported:

Trump described his expanded vision of how to secure American borders during a wide-ranging interview Sunday on NBC’s “Meet The Press,” and in a position paper he later released, saying that he would push to end the constitutionally protected citizenship rights of children of any family living illegally inside the US.

“They have to go,” Trump said. “What they’re doing, they’re having a baby. And then all of a sudden, nobody knows… the baby’s here.”

Birthright citizenship is the exception and not the rule worldwide. Even our European brethren, as fond as they are of refugees and open borders, do not embrace it. As Liz Peek writes on FoxNews.com, birthright citizenship is indeed a big magnet for illegal immigration:

The United States is one of only two developed countries in the world that still bestows citizenship on every person born on our nation’s soil. Having a child become a U.S. citizen is the greatest reward possible for someone who enters the country illegally. Such status is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in free education and benefits, not to mention the incalculable value of our country’s security and freedoms. Historically, there was bipartisan enthusiasm for dumping this program; even Democrat Harry Reid had proposed its termination.

The costs of birthright citizenship are staggering, especially when you consider the costs of what is called “chain migration. Once of age, the baby born here can sponsor others. It has even given rise to what is called “birth tourism” where pregnant women are brought to the United States, ostensibly as tourists, to give birth here and have their child dubbed an American citizen by birth As Ian Tuttle writes in National Review:

Peter and Ellie Yang,” the subjects of Benjamin Carlson’s fascinating new Rolling Stone essay, “Welcome to Maternity Hotel California,” paid $35,000 to have their second child in the United States. In 2012 Chinese state media reported 10,000 “tourist births” by Chinese couples in the United States; other estimates skew as high as 60,000

The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday. Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government…

There are long-term costs, too. U.S.-born children of illegal aliens can sponsor the immigration of family members once they come of age. At 18, an “anchor baby” can sponsor an overseas spouse and unmarried children of his own; at 21, he can sponsor parents and siblings…

Trump said he would end birthright citizenship and critics have said that the task, even if justified, is well nigh impossible, requiring amending the U.S. Constitution. In reality, it may not require altering the 14th Amendment — only correctly interpreting it — perhaps through clarifying legislation.

The Fourteenth Amendment, passed, on July 3, 1866, reads, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” This was done, again, to guarantee the citizenship rights of freed slaves, not illegal aliens. The 1857 Dred Scott decision held that no black, not even a freed black, could be considered a citizen.

In testimony before the House Judiciary Committee in October, 2008, John C. Eastman, a law professor at Chapman University and a fellow at the Claremont Institute, argued that illegal aliens are still foreign nationals and are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, except for purposes of deportation, and therefore their children born on American soil should not be automatically considered U.S. citizens.

During debate on the Fourteenth Amendment, Sen. Jacob Merritt Howard of Michigan added jurisdiction language specifically to avoid accident of birth being the sole criteria for citizenship. And if citizenship was determined just by place of birth, why did it take an act of Congress in 1922 to give American Indians birthright citizenship, if they already had citizenship by birthright under the14th Amendment?

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, who is regarded as the father of the 14th Amendment, said it meant that “every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your constitution itself. A natural born citizen…”

Rep. Nathan Deal of Georgia sought to clarify the situation through HR. 698 the Citizenship Reform Act of 2005, which would have amended the Immigration and Nationality Act to deny automatic citizenship to children born of the United States of parents who are not U.S. citizens or are not permanent resident aliens.

HR. 698 declared: “It is the purpose of this Act to deny automatic citizenship at birth to children born in the United States to parents who are not citizens or permanent resident aliens.” The bill undertook to clarify “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” to the meaning originally intended by Congress in the14th Amendment.

The current interpretation of birthright citizenship may in fact have been a huge mistake and given the burden illegal aliens have imposed on our welfare, educational, and health care systems as well as through increased crime on our legal system, a very costly one.

There may be hope of correctly interpreting the 14th Amendment through a court case as President Trump reshapes the courts, particularly the Supreme Court, with justices of a more “originalist” bent. As noted, the misinterpretation could be corrected through clarifying legislation. We can correct it judicially or legislatively and we should. Donald Trump was right — becoming a U.S. citizen should require more than your mother successfully sneaking past the U.S. Border Patrol.

We End Birthright Citizenship, but will that be enough? NO

It’s time to end ”diversity” in once mainly European inhabited countries, for it has become lethal for ”Western civilisation” and its founding ethnic group…

Whites Shouldn’t Be Forced To Live Among Non-Whites!

By H. Millard:

Black & WhiteI’m an individual human being. I am also a White human being.  I was born the same way as all other human beings.  No other human beings have any more rights than I have.  As long as I don’t harm others, no other human beings have the right to tell me how to live, who to associate with, what to think, what to believe, what I can and cannot read or do, what I can say or not say. They are not superior in rights to me.  This is what it means to be a free human being.  Anything less than this is not freedom, it is oppression, tyranny and slavery.

It is obscene that we White people have to put up with non-White crime and social problems. And, even more, it is absurd that all humans are lumped together as though we are all the same.  We are not all the same. We look different externally, and we have different DNA codes internally.  We are different peoples.  The human races are groups within the human species that have started to branch off and to become separate species if certain conditions are met.  And, this is as it should be.  This is the way of existence. We should not be forced to blend together, but should be allowed to evolve as we determine is best for each of us individually and as groups of like individuals.  Blending all human races together will not improve the species, it will force it down to the lowest common denominator.

Racial integration is a failure. Racial diversity is a failure.  Multiculturalism is a failure. These only bring non-White crime, social problems and miscegenation to once safe and, yes, pure White communities.  And, Whites are not only victimized physically by these failed social experiments, but we are also victimized by being made to pay for services and benefits for people unlike us. To be racially sensitive and not “racist” we Whites are expected to just accept being made into second class citizens and give up college seats and job opportunities and promotions to less qualified non-Whites.  We are expected to bend over backwards to understand and be sensitive to the needs of people unlike us.  This is stupid.  We Whites shouldn’t waste one second of our time or burn one calorie in such efforts.  There is no profit in this for us. Non-Whites are not our kind.  They are not our people.  We owe them nothing, other than leaving them alone to their own separate destinies.

As it is now, we Whites must pay for the welfare and medical care and housing and much more for non-Whites and we must hire more police and pay for them to keep non-Whites from attacking and murdering us since we have been forced to accept them into our communities.  The ant and the grasshopper fable comes to mind, but tenfold, as we, the industrious White ants have been forced to accept the non-White grasshoppers into our ant communities as equals.  The result is harmful to us. Even if some groups of non-Whites aren’t a direct problem, they are still not our kind and don’t belong in our communities.

Notting Hill 2Whites  should only have to put up with the crime and social problems of our own people.  We, as White individuals, have a natural right, just by having been born, to be as we are born to be, and to pursue happiness as we define it, and to choose to mix or not mix with any other humans as we alone decide is in our best interest, and to be the free human beings that nature has made us to be. And, this right that we have as White individuals extends to those who are most like us–other Whites.  Yes, we Whites are different from other kinds of humans as they are different from us. There is not a one size fits all human being.

The laws that we Whites have written over the years  are based on the innate outward manifestations and expressions of the White genetic code that makes us the people that we are.  They pretty much work for us, as a separate people living among our own kind, but they fail to work in racially blended societies.  We Whites, for example, can expect certain levels of violent crime from our own people and our laws are written to protect us from these crimes of our own kind.  However, the crime levels of some other types of humans–Blacks and Browns, in particular– are naturally far higher  from our own levels, and our laws do not protect us fully from these higher levels of violent crime brought into our White communities by non-Whites.  The laws that most of us Whites naturally obey, but which the non-Whites don’t, often work to actually put us in more danger.

Our laws, our constitution, our mores and ways were designed for us, by us and they’re about us–and they do not always fit with other peoples.  Why? Because, they are different from the ground on up, and trying to force them to be like us oppresses both them and us  and it stunts our own development and robs us of our human sovereignty and right to be as we want to be and of the right to pursue happiness as we choose and the right to be around those we want to be around and not be around those we don’t want to be around

Now, even many of the weakest seed Whites in society acknowledge that we humans come in different flavors.  After all, even they have eyes to see, so they’re pretty much forced to admit differences.  So far, so good.  Then, common sense falls apart, because many of them then try to deny that there are internal differences also.  And, as they do that, some among them also try to deny the significance of the external differences and they foolishly try to deny that violent crime levels and social dysfunction levels are color coded. Some of these weak seed Whites suffer from cognitive dissonance and jump through hoops trying to reconcile the high Black violent crime rate with their false belief that Blacks are the same as Whites except for different paint jobs.  One can almost imagine some of the weak seed Whites having smoke coming from their ears as they say “Will not compute, will not compute,” as they try to reconcile the facts of the real world with their ingrained false views, as though they’re robots in a cheap science fiction movie.

Let’s be very clear about this. Non-Whites are not Whites.  They look different because they are different.  They have different internal codes than Whites just as they have different external appearances.  This is true no matter what some dimwitted  weak seed politicians and elites try to tell us and force on us.

White Family - LargeWe Whites are a White people inside and outside and we have a God (or nature, if you prefer) given right  to our freedom as the sovereign individuals that we are.  We are no one’s slaves.  No human or group of humans have the right to keep us from being ourselves and living our lives as we want among our own kind. We are living, breathing human beings with every right to be as we were born to be and with every right to associate with or not associate with others as we alone choose.  No one has a right to herd us together with other types of humans if we don’t want to be so herded or so lumped.  They are not our kind, and intelligent, conscious Whites are aware of this fact.  We have the right to be free from non-White violent crime, non-White social problems and free from non-Whites altogether.  Let them have their ways, and we’ll have ours.  Don’t try to lump us together under some artificial national label.  The most authentic label that we have is the one we were born with:  White people.  We are our genes and our genes are us.

No one has the right to have us sacrifice our safety, our pursuit of happiness and our very existence in order to please people unlike us.  We do not have to please them at all.  We also do not have to support them, or take a back seat so they can have the front seat, or give up our dreams of college and better jobs because they are admitted or promoted based on their dark skin color.  We do not need to sacrifice ourselves, our children, our jobs our future, at all.  We have a right to be and to be more and we need to assert these rights in every way big and small or we’re going to continue to be victimized and picked off one by one.

Non-Whites are not our responsibility. We owe them absolutely nothing. Again, they are not our kind.  They are a burden to us.  We do not have to carry such a burden.  We have enough burdens of our own to carry.

We Whites have a right to self-identification, self-determination, self-destiny and a whole lot of other  positive “self” combinations.

We can’t continue trying to fit non-Whites into a White society.  They don’t fit into ours and we don’t fit into theirs.  We know who we are and many of us want to stay with  our own kind.

Diversity 3We have a right to  be White, to think White, to stay White, to evolve White.  And, we don’t need anyone’s permission to be as we were born to be.

 

When the Right Goes Low Violence the Left Goes High Violence

Joe Jones
Daily Stormer
September 25, 2017

Leftists are violent thugs who will riot at the drop of the hat in the name of their ideology of man-on-man buttsex and White genocide.

But remember, they take the moral highroad in all situations.

Immigration Is KILLING America

Our people need to accept that its time for another violent revolution. EVERYONE can see what is happening. Any white man of moderate intelligence can see who is destroying our nation, this is a genocide, and we must and need to fight back. That is our only option.

Its real, its happening, the mask is off, and white men will either start fighting for their right to exist, or they will cease to exist.

Will the media call on the Sudanese flag to be banned?

By not demanding the Sudanese flag be banned, the leftist admits they don’t give a shit about church shootings.
Its all about attacking white Americans, demoralizing our race, and the on going genocide of our people.

DO YOU SEE IT NOW WHITE MAN?

Sudan Flag | National Flags | Pinterest

The national flag of Sudan.

Reverse DyRo: Black Gunman Shoots Up White Church

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
September 25, 2017

Composite image of the shooter.

What are we to do as a society when someone shoots up a church?

Well, the Dylan Roof episode already provided us with a good template.

First, make sure to place the blame on the shooter’s entire race.

Then, you start a campaign to make their flag illegal. In Roof’s case, it was the confederate flag.

Finally, you track down whatever web sites the shooter might have been reading and agitate to shut them down – or at least implicate them in the crime.

I’m sure things will follow the same procedure with this Black shooter. Right?

Washington Post:

A gunman wearing a ski mask stormed into a Nashville-area church on Sunday, shooting seven people before attacking a church usher who then confronted the man with a weapon and subdued him, Nashville police said.

The shooting — which left a 39-year-old woman dead — occurred shortly before noon at Burnette Chapel Church of Christ in Antioch, Tenn., about 12 miles southeast of downtown Nashville. Police identified the alleged shooter as Sudan-native Emanuel Kidega Samson, 25, of Tennessee, who they said is a legal resident of the United States. Police said Samson will be charged with murder and attempted murder.

The Burnette Chapel Church seems to be a mostly White multi-culti shitlib church.

God blessed these women with niglet grand-children. Praise the Lord!

So this is pretty much a direct equivalent between this event and the Dylan Roof shooting; A Black guy shooting up a “White” church.

Don Aaron, a spokesman for the Nashville Police Department, said Samson drove up to the church and shot and killed a woman who was standing near her vehicle in the parking lot. The gunman — who police said was armed with two handguns — then entered the church through a rear door, shooting and wounding six people inside.

It’s a good thing Blacks can’t shoot, or this could have been a whole lot worse.

At some point during his rampage, the gunman also pistol-whipped a church usher, causing “significant injuries” to the man, Aaron said. The usher, 22-year-old Robert Engle, confronted the gunman, police said, and during a struggle, Samson was injured with a shot from his own gun. The usher then ran to his car and retrieved a handgun, police said.

Aaron said the usher ensured the gunman did not make any more movements until officers arrived on the scene. “It would appear he was not expecting to encounter a brave individual like the church usher,” Aaron said.

It’s a good thing Usher was on the scene.

Usher’s chief weapon is surprise.

Oh, wait, wrong usher.

 

You don’t wanna mess with these guys.

So, are we going to get non-stop coverage of this story for a few weeks, if not months? Will the media call on the Sudanese flag to be banned in order to prevent such future violence?

I wouldn’t count on it.

In fact, I’d be surprised if this is still in the news tomorrow.

Because, obviously, the Jews and their liberal golem don’t actually give a damn about church shootings. They only care about the destruction of America and the White race. So if a story doesn’t further this aim, it’s going to be buried.

The War on Whites – Exposing the Plan for White Genocide

http://www.renegadetribune.com/war-whites-exposing-plan-white-genocide/

A frank discussion on the war on whites and how the media, establishment and music industry constantly push the message that white genocide is a positive development. This poisonous message justifies anti-white violence and suggests that the world would be better off if all those of European descent were gone. However this anti-white message is not only poisonous, but it is also based on lies and false historical narratives.

Its real simple:

Altruism and Cooperation is an Evolutionary Dead End, if a people and civilization go down this path, it is doomed. We either turn towards a new direction very soon and end egalitarian nonsense or we will be wiped out.