Dennis Rodman Blows Chris Cuomo’s Mind Out the Back of His Head

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 12, 2018

To be clear, this is from last night (early morning SG time), before the main meeting, right after the handshake, during Trump and Kim’s one-on-one. Dennis was there in Singapore for the event.

I’m used to seeing black people blow people’s minds out the backs of their heads – but not like this.

Dennis is a truly unique Colored Gentleman. You know, you do have these outliers in every group.

He told Chris Cuomo – the rat – that he talked to Kim five years ago about making a deal and he tried to talk to Obama about it and Obama just brushed him off and wouldn’t even have a conversation with him (I think rill niggas make Obama nervous because he’s such a pussy, but he also just didn’t give a shit about solving a war situation).

Cuomo couldn’t believe that a Colored Gentleman (AKA OG Based black guy in a MAGA hat) was saying these things about the anointed mulatto savior Obama.

Dennis then started crying and saying he couldn’t even go home after saying the North Koreans were good people, because he was getting so many death threats – I can only guess (((where))) those were coming from!

There’s actually a pretty good chance that none of this would have happened without Dennis.

I think he should be made ambassador to North Korea.

No joke.

That would be appropriate. And hilarious. Because the libshits would come out like “HE’S NOT QUALIFIED HE’S DUMB” and it would be like “u racist bro?”

He says he doesn’t know anything about politics and when he first went to North Korea he thought it was a charity event and didn’t know any of the history. That’s perfect.

This isn’t really a political thing anymore. The war ended on July 27th (my birthday, btw) in 1953. This whole North Korea thing is a human situation with a bunch of bizarre elements that created a situation that otherwise wouldn’t make any sense.

Like he says about Obama blowing him off – it was useful to the West to have a bad guy. That’s why they let this thing go on this long. They made North Korea into this bad guy – not the other way around. The politics are very simple. It is the human side that is complicated.

So yes.

Make Dennis Rodman the ambassador.

And hey – Ta-Nahesi Coates – let’s get an article about how Dennis Rodman is a white man in a black body oppressing other black bodies with the empowerment of white supremacy institutionalized microaggressions. I won’t read it. No one will. But it would be really fun if you did that, Ta-Nahesis.

The Great Lesson of California in America’s New Civil War

Why there’s no bipartisan way forward at this juncture in our history — one side must win

By Peter Leyden and Ruy Teixeira

The next time you call for bipartisan cooperation in America and long for Republicans and Democrats to work side by side, stop it. Remember the great lesson of California, the harbinger of America’s political future, and realize that today such bipartisan cooperation simply can’t get done.

In this current period of American politics, at this juncture in our history, there’s no way that a bipartisan path provides the way forward. The way forward is on the path California blazed about 15 years ago.

In the early 2000s, California faced a similar situation to the one America faces today. Its state politics were severely polarized, and state government was largely paralyzed. The Republican Party was trapped in the brain-dead orthodoxies of an ideology stuck in the past. The party was controlled by zealous activists and corrupt special interests who refused to face up to the reality of the new century. It was a party that refused to work with the Democrats in good faith or compromise in any way.

The solution for the people of California was to reconfigure the political landscape and shift a supermajority of citizens — and by extension their elected officials — under the Democratic Party’s big tent. The natural continuum of more progressive to more moderate solutions then got worked out within the context of the only remaining functioning party. The California Democrats actually cared about average citizens, embraced the inevitable diversity of 21st-century society, weren’t afraid of real innovation, and were ready to start solving the many challenges of our time, including climate change.

California today provides a model for America as a whole. This model of politics and government is by no means perfect, but it is far ahead of the nation in coming to terms with the inexorable digital, global, sustainable transformation of our era. It is a thriving work in progress that gives hope that America can pull out of the political mess we’re in. California today provides a playbook for America’s new way forward. It’s worth contemplating as we enter 2018, which will be a critical election year.

Understanding the Context of the New American Civil War

This is no ordinary political moment. Trump is not the reason this is no ordinary time — he’s simply the most obvious symptom that reminds us all of this each day.

The best way to understand politics in America today is to reframe it as closer to civil war. Just the phrase “civil war” is harsh, and many people may cringe. It brings up images of guns and death, the bodies of Union and Confederate soldiers.

America today is nowhere near that level of conflict or at risk of such violence. However, America today does exhibit some of the core elements that move a society from what normally is the process of working out political differences toward the slippery slope of civil war. We’ve seen it in many societies in many previous historical eras, including what happened in the United States in 1860.

Two Systems at Odds

America’s original Civil War was not just fought to emancipate slaves for humanitarian reasons. The conflict was really about the clash between two very different economic systems that were fundamentally at odds and ultimately could not coexist. The Confederacy was based on an agrarian economy dependent on slaves. The Union was based on a new kind of capitalist manufacturing economy dependent on free labor. They tried to somehow coexist from the time of the founding era, but by the middle of the 19th century, something had to give. One side or the other had to win.

America today faces a similar juncture around fundamentally incompatible energy systems. The red states held by the Republicans are deeply entrenched in carbon-based energy systems like coal and oil. They consequently deny the science of climate change, are trying to resuscitate the dying coal industry, and recently have begun to open up coastal waters to oil drilling.

The blue states held by the Democrats are increasingly shifting to clean energy like solar and installing policies that wean the energy system off carbon. In the era of climate change, with the mounting pressure of increased natural disasters, something must give. We can’t have one step forward, one step back every time an administration changes. One side or the other has to win.

Two Classes at Odds

Another driver on the road to civil war is when two classes become fundamentally at odds. This usually takes some form of rich versus poor, the wealthy and the people, the 1 percent and the 99 percent. The system gets so skewed toward those at the top that the majority at the bottom rises up and power shifts.

The last time America was in that position was in the 1930s, during the Great Depression. We were on the road of severe class conflict that could have continued toward civil war, but we worked out a power shift that prevented widespread violence. Franklin Roosevelt, the so-called traitor to his class, helped establish a supermajority New Deal coalition of Democrats that rolled all the way through the postwar boom. The conservative Republicans who had championed a politics that advantaged the rich throughout the 1920s and promoted isolationism in the 1930s were sidelined for two generations — close to 50 years.

Today’s conservative Republicans face the same risk. Since 1980, their policies have engorged the rich while flatlining the incomes of the majority of Americans, from the presidency of Ronald Reagan through to last December’s tax overhaul, which ultimately bestows 83 percent of the benefits over time to the top 1 percent. Make no mistake: A reckoning with not just Trump, but conservatism, is coming.

Two Cultures at Odds

The differences between two economic systems or two classes that are fundamentally at odds could conceivably get worked out through a political process that peacefully resolves differences. However, culture frequently gets in the way. That’s especially true when pressures are building for big system overhauls that will create new winners and losers.

Two different political cultures already at odds through different political ideologies, philosophies, and worldviews can get trapped in a polarizing process that increasingly undermines compromise. They see the world through different lenses, consume different media, and literally live in different places. They start to misunderstand the other side, then start to misrepresent them, and eventually make them the enemy. The opportunity for compromise is then lost. This is where America is today.

At some point, one side or the other must win — and win big. The side resisting change, usually the one most rooted in the past systems and incumbent interests, must be thoroughly defeated — not just for a political cycle or two, but for a generation or two. That gives the winning party or movement the time and space needed to really build up the next system without always fighting rear-guard actions and getting drawn backwards. The losing party or movement will need that same time to go through a fundamental rethink, a long-term renewal that eventually will enable them to play a new game.

Today’s American Civil War

Trump is doing exactly what America needs him to do right now. He’s becoming increasingly conservative and outrageous by the day. Trump could have come into office with a genuinely new agenda that could have helped working people. Instead, he has spent the past year becoming a caricature of all things conservative — and in the meantime has alienated most of America and certainly all the growing political constituencies of the 21st century. He is turning the Republican brand toxic for millennials, women, Latinos, people of color, college-educated people, urban centers, the tech industry, and the economic powerhouses of the coasts, to name a few.

The Republican Party is playing their part perfectly, too. They completely fell for the Trump trap — and that’s exactly what America needed them to do. The Republican Party could have maintained some distance from Trump and kept a healthy check on him through Congress. Instead, they fully embraced him in a group bear hug that culminated in a deeply flawed tax law in the waning days of 2017. This mess of a law, thrown together without traditional vetting, is riddled with outrageous loopholes that benefit the crony donor class and line the pockets of many of the politicians who passed it. The law is hugely unpopular, and everyone who voted for it is marked for the election of 2018.


Now the entire Republican Party, and the entire conservative movement that has controlled it for the past four decades, is fully positioned for the final takedown that will cast them out for a long period of time in the political wilderness. They deserve it.

Let’s just say what needs to be said: The Republican Party over the past 40 years has maneuvered itself into a position where they are the bad guys on the wrong side of history. For a long time, they have been able to hide this fact through a sophisticated series of veils, invoking cultural voodoo that fools a large enough number of Americans to stay in the game. However, Donald Trump has laid waste to that sophistication and has given America and the world the raw version of what current conservative politics is all about.

The Republican Party is all about rule by and for billionaires at the expense of working people. Trump is literally the incarnation of what the party stands for: shaping laws for the good of billionaires and the 1 percent. His cabinet is stuffed with them.

The Republican Party is the party of climate change denial. Trump is the denier-in-chief, but there are 180 climate science deniers in the current Congress (142 in the House and 38 in the Senate), and none of them are Democrats. More than 59 percent of Republicans in the House and 73 percent of Republicans in the Senate deny the scientific consensus that climate change is happening, that human activity is the main cause, and that it is a serious threat. Another way to say it is that the Republican Party is in the pocket of the oil and carbon energy industry. Trump just cut through the crap and named Exxon’s CEO as our secretary of state to unravel the United Nations climate accords. No beating around that bush for the sake of appearances — Trump burned the bush down.

The Republican Party for the past 40 years has mastered using dog whistles to gin up racial divides to get their white voters to the polls. Trump just disposes of niceties and flatly encourages white nationalists, bans Muslims, walls off Mexicans, and calls out “shithole” countries.

Trump is just making clear to all what was boiling under the surface for decades, and that’s exactly what we need him to do. Why? Because America finally needs to take the Republican Party down for a generation or two. Not just the presidency. Not just clear out the U.S. House. Not just tip back the Senate. But fundamentally beat the Republicans on all levels at once, including clearing out governorships and statehouses across the land.

The Dramatic Collapse of Republicans in California

Could such as collapse of the Republican Party really happen? Won’t it take decades of trench warfare to put the GOP on the run? Not at all. A political collapse could happen very fast, as it did in California.

California was a model of governmental dysfunction in the 1990–2005 period, with Democrats and Republicans at each other’s throats and little being accomplished. The political atmosphere became so toxic that Democratic governor Gray Davis was recalled in 2003 and replaced with populist Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger, who then proceeded to up the ante on polarization by pushing a series of conservative ballot initiatives in a special election in 2005. They were all handily defeated by the voters, marking the zenith of conservative Republican attempts to control California.

After that point, it was all downhill for the conservative GOP agenda in California. Schwarzenegger understood the sea change early and dumped right-wing populism and became far more moderate, going along with many progressive priorities. He soon started working with Democrats in the legislature on infrastructure, culminating in the passage of Proposition 1B in 2006 ($20 billion for roads and public transportation). Also in 2006, he and the legislature allocated an additional $150 million to stem cell research, supported a successful move to raise the minimum wage, and passed the Global Warming Solutions Act, which targeted a reduction of 25 percent in greenhouse gas emissions in the next 20 years. And in 2008, voters passed Prop 1A, authorizing $10 billion for high-speed rail.

Meanwhile, even though Schwarzenegger remained governor, the Democrats steadily expanded their majority in the state assembly. Then, in 2010, Democrat Jerry Brown was elected governor, and with the 2012 election, Democrats finally attained a supermajority in both houses of the state legislature. This was critical for overriding constant Republican filibusters and passing tax revenue laws (which still required a supermajority by Prop 13 dictates). The supermajority attained in 2012 was the first California legislative supermajority since 1933 and the first one for the Democrats since 1883. This is remarkable considering that in the dysfunctional 1990s, the state assembly and senate were closely divided between Republicans and Democrats, seemingly light-years away from the supermajority Democrats really needed to get things done.

Alongside these developments, Democratic domination of California representation in the U.S. House of Representatives steadily increased. Back in the 1990s, under Republican governor Pete Wilson, there was essentially parity between Republicans and Democrats in Congress. Today, there is almost a 3:1 split (39–14) in favor of the Democrats. Plus, they control both U.S. Senate seats and every single statewide elected office. There are no longer any Republicans able to mount a credible statewide election.

So, going from the zenith of right-wing populism to progressive domination in California did not take very long. That could easily happen in the country as a whole. The national GOP, after the 2016 election, controlled the presidency, the House, the Senate, and a strong majority of governorships and state legislatures. Since then, President Trump has become historically unpopular among American voters and the GOP Congress and its actions have become widely detested. Very quickly, their 2016 triumphs have morphed into a poisonous electoral environment where the GOP in 2018 is probably going to lose control of the House of Representatives and possibly the Senate, lose governorships and many hundreds of state legislative seats. And while the 2020 election is still a couple years away, an early forecast from political scientist Eric R.A.N. Smith has Trump (assuming his unpopularity continues) netting only 41 percent of electoral votes in that election.

In short, political change is slow until it’s very fast. The fall of the GOP is likely to be no different.

Life on the Other Side of Democratic One-Party Rule

There is life on the other side of that Republican political collapse. There is a clear way forward in the land of Democratic, progressive supermajorities. California is thriving right now, the economy is booming, state government budgets are setting aside surpluses, and the public is happy with its political leaders (as we have laid out in other articles in this series). California is leading the world in technological innovation and creative policies to counter climate change.

What about the need for checks and balances? Many Americans might be wary of trusting a political environment where one party has complete control of political power. How does society process the range of differences in political opinions in elections and in forming policies?

Californians faced those same questions and dealt with that new reality. In 2008, voters passed Proposition 11, which created a Citizens Redistricting Commission to redraw state legislative districts that over time had been heavily gerrymandered to protect incumbents of both political parties. That commission was insulated from politics and changed districts along more rational lines that took into consideration natural geography and longstanding contiguous communities. Then, in 2010, the voters passed Proposition 20, which applied a similar logic to congressional redistricting.

Alongside that effort, voters in 2010 also passed Proposition 14, a state constitutional amendment that established a top-two primary system in which all candidates, regardless of party, are placed on the same primary ballot, and the top two vote-getters, regardless of party, head into the general election. The immediate result was to bolster competition within almost all districts. In a district populated by Democrats, the voters still got a choice between, say, a more progressive candidate and a moderate candidate.

Politics in California today still has a range of political differences that get worked out within political bodies. The city council of San Francisco is made up of all Democrats but is often trapped in fierce policy battles between supervisors who are more left of center than their colleagues who are more moderate and supportive of the tech industry. However, everyone on that city council is a Democrat and would be considered a progressive Democrat in the national context. They all embrace creating a diverse society, fighting climate change, etc. The California Legislature holds a similar range of political opinions, from very left to pro-business Democrat, but they almost all operate within a worldview that shares much common ground — a worldview that is not shared by the few remaining Republicans still in the chambers.

In short, California has a supermajority of 60 percent of the population, and thus a supermajority of elected officials, who share a common vision of a general way forward. Their differences are worked out within the confines of that general vision. California Republicans, like their conservative national colleagues, don’t share that general vision, and so they have been pushed out of serious political discourse. They were beaten, and beaten badly. And they almost certainly won’t be part of that discourse until they go through a lengthy process of reform over many years.

The Final Battle Begins in 2018

America is desperate for a functioning political supermajority that can break out of our political stasis and boldly move ahead and take on our many 21st-century challenges. The nation can’t take much more of our one step forward, one step back politics that gets little done despite the need for massive changes.

America today has many parallels to America in the 1850s or America in the 1930s. Both of those decades ended with one side definitively winning, forming a political supermajority that restructured systems going forward to solve our problems once and for all. In the 1850s, we fought the Civil War, and the Republican Party won and then dominated American politics for 50 years. In the 1930s, the Democratic Party won and dominated American politics for roughly the same amount of time.

America today is in a similar position. Our technologies, our economy, our geopolitics are going through fundamental changes. We are facing new challenges, like climate change and massive economic inequality, that must be addressed with fundamental reforms.

America can’t afford more political paralysis. One side or the other must win. This is a civil war that can be won without firing a shot. But it is a fundamental conflict between two worldviews that must be resolved in short order.

California, as usual, resolved it early. The Democrats won; the Republicans lost. The conservative way forward lost; the progressive way forward began. As we’ve laid out in this series, California is the future, always about 15 years ahead of the rest of the country. That means that America, starting in 2018, is going to resolve it, too.

Wrong Move, Bucko: Apple Defies Lord Gaben, Rejects Steam App for iOS

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
May 26, 2018

You simply do not trifle with a man who wields such power.

There’s millions of young White men out there who have no future, and nothing to live for. They have dead end jobs, no realistic prospects of starting a traditional family and have to put up with an entire Jewish culture that demonizes them for who they are.

Their sole source of comfort is the blessed light of Gaben, lord of the vidya.

Who would be foolish enough to challenge a man who holds sway over such an army of disaffected, but fanatical young men?

Of course, none other than the delusional homo Tim Cook of the Apple ghetto.

The Verge:

Valve’s game streaming service Steam Link won’t be coming to iOS today, despite a successful Android beta launch earlier this month. According to the official Steam Database Twitter account, Apple rejected the Steam Link app over apparent “business conflicts with app guidelines.” Steam Link was first announced for mobile back in March, and the app functions as a remote desktop so users can access their Steam library of PC games from a mobile device and stream them directly for touchscreen play or for use with a Bluetooth controller.

What “conflicting business” are they talking about, exactly?

Mac has no games.

Not a single one.

Steam link could have finally given the iPhone a real purpose, beyond taking selfies or looking up crochet techniques.

But by fiat of the perfidious Cook, it is not to be.

Cook established at Apple something called “Anal Law” – in order to do business with the company, you must surrender your anus. This includes customers, whose phones he will slow down 20% as soon as they leave the store. 

Maybe the bastard reasoned that he had nothing to fear from Gaben’s forces, given that the PC master race never leaves their homes, and thus do not require cellphones.

Who needs a phone, when you have this kind of power at your fingertips?

He has grossly underestimated the damage an angry army of Gaben loyalists can deal.

It’s not exactly clear at the moment what the “business conflict” here is, and whether it has anything to do with Apple’s somewhat contentious 30 percent App Store fee for all purchases, in-app or otherwise. It may perhaps be due to the fact that Steam Link allows an iOS user to access another app store, namely Steam, within Apple’s tightly controlled ecosystem. Apple was not immediately available for comment.

Maybe Apple intends to get in on the video game market.

Or, rather, get back in. They’ve released a console before, you know…

Who can forget such classics as “Gadget” and “Shock Wave?” Lol.

“On Monday, May 7th, Apple approved the Steam Link app for release,” the statement reads. “On Wednesday, May 9th, Valve released news of the app. The following morning, Apple revoked its approval citing business conflicts with app guidelines that had allegedly not been realized by the original review team. Valve appealed, explaining the Steam Link app simply functions as a LAN-based remote desktop similar to numerous desktop applications already available on the App Store. Ultimately, the appeal was denied, leaving the Steam Link app for iOS blocked from release.”

Truly a dick move if I ever saw one. Apple approved it, waited until the app was announced, then withdrew their approval, ensuring maximum coverage of their defiance.

If Trump were still the man we elected, he would have nationalized Apple by now, taking it back from the GRIDS-ridden psycho Tim Cock and giving it back to the people.

Critique of Cultural ((((((Marxism))))))

The rise of Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) and Critical Theory has caused all social norms to be put on trial and “prove their legitimacy.” This social libertarianism is a tool to dismantle all social hierarchies that cannot (in the cultural marxist’s view) justify themselves. These Jews, who are responsible for the idea of Critical Theory, aside from dismantling racial norms, have heavily concentrated on sexuality. Taking advantage of the social ignorance of people, as well as the Jewish control over media, science, and academia, they have gained a lot of ground. In the past, people did not know why things were the way they were. They just knew that is how it was, and it just was common sense.

People just knew race mixing was wrong. People just knew homosexuality was wrong. And people just knew men were men and women were women. But saying “well it’s common sense” is not a strong argument for our side. Just like I previously mentioned, the Jews had control of media, science and academia. Therefore they could control the argument and the research. With that, they were able to dismantle these social norms and create their own.

These Jews are able with Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) to commit the greatest genocide in history. The White Race is in danger of extinction. In 1900 one out of three people on earth were white. As of 2007 (11 years ago) the white race made up only 8% of the world population. A big part of this genocide is the implementation of Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) in former White Nations.

In the 1920’s and 1930’s a group of Jewish Marxist Intellectuals met in Frankfurt Germany and formed the Institute of Social Research. This later was known as the Frankfurt School. These intellectuals were; ((((((Max Horkheimer)))))), ((((((Theodor Adorno)))))), Jürgen Habermas, Karl August Wittfogel, and Friedrick Pollock. They, of course, were all Jewish. They together created the social theory called Critical Theory.

Today we are at a tipping point. If we continue down this path, it will only lead to the death of the white race, which is the intent of the Jews with their Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) and social libertarianism. Therefore we must combat these lies with facts.

The purpose of Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) is to:

  1. Destroy the Family.
  2. Destroy Private Property.
  3. Destroy Religion.
  4. Destroy the Nation.

As I mentioned, the tool being used is Social Libertarianism. Social Libertarianism is a political views that is opposed to social hierarchies (ei authoritarianism). As one can see, those four objectives are not separate, but tie into each other. They tie into each other because the end goal ultimately is the fourth goal, the destruction of the nation. One by one I will in this article dismantle Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))), and justify these “evil authoritarian social hierarchies, and previous norms.”

1. The Family

The nuclear family is the building block of human (especially Western) society. Defining the family as one Father, one Mother, and children. Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) has used its feminism and homosexuality to destroy the Family. This of course was to pervert sexuality and divide men and women in society.

On Feminism

Feminism argues there is no definite difference between men and women, aside from “a couple physical attributes.” Some sects of the feminist movement even declare female superiority over men. These characters though are a minority. Like all egalitarianism, this one is based on lies and is false.

Men and Women/Gender Dysphoria

The differences between men and women are not “trivial” and definitely are not “social constructs.” The difference between men and women lies in biology. Sexual Dimorphism is the physical and psychological attributions of man and woman based on evolution. Men are 30% stronger than women especially in upper body strength. Also men have larger hearts and lungs. They produce more testosterone which increases more red blood cells, therefore more oxygen to the brain in muscles. If a man were to jog with 50% of his effort, a woman would need to use 70% of her effort to keep up with him.

There are also psychological differences. Men use seven times more gray matter in their brains while women use ten times more white matter. Gray matter is for more localized activity in the brain, while white matter is more networking activity connecting different areas of gray matter. That is why adult men excel in task focused activity, while women excel in more multitasking activity. Even the brain chemicals are different; men generally have less serotonin (a calming chemical), oxytocin (relationship and bonding chemical), and estrogen (the female growth and reproductive chemical.)

What sex a person is, is determined by his gender chromosomes – x and y. These determine one’s gender specific physical and psychological attributes. Through Sexual Dimorphism, evolution decides what specific physical and psychological attributes males and females have in each species. Those “evil authoritarian hierarchical gender roles” are not based on a social construct, but on biology and evolution – that is Nature itself.

People who are “transgender” are not normal. They suffer from a mental illness called Gender Dysphoria. This is because sex and gender are biological constructs. 99.2% of people (in America) identify with their gender with their sex, the .7% are abnormalities. For example: If a child is born with a tail, does that mean it is a new species of human? No, it is an abnormality. Gender is not based on a person’s “feelings”, it is based on objective biology. Nature has set up two sexes – male and female.

On Homosexuality

Homosexuality, despite the name, is not sex. It is perversion. The purpose of sex is reproduction. Yes it is fun, yes it feels great, since if it was painful and boring we wouldn’t do it, would we? If we didn’t, we wouldn’t reproduce. Hence it being enjoyable.

Sex has been made into something people do as a recreational activity. People have been taught that the point of sex is to “just have fun.” By that logic, why not let anyone have intercourse with whomever they want? That there is an intellectual mistake.

The mistake is made by assuming somehow humans are separate from nature now, and we can do whatever we want. “Man is an animal just like the rest of the animals, and he must follow nature’s laws,” said George Lincoln Rockwell. Sex will now, yesterday, and forever be for the purpose of reproduction.

This is common sense.

Marriage is between men and women. That alone is the definition and purpose of marriage. Homosexual Unions cannot be equated to heterosexual marriages. Marriage is a social institution for the advancement of society. The purpose of marriage is the following:

  1. To establish the family. The family is the essential building block of society.
  2. Through the family, to produce the next generation to inherit the society.
  3. To unite men and women in the society to build social cohesiveness. By uniting men and women to their natural gender roles, they together build two parts of a whole.

Homosexual Unions do not accomplish these goals, but harms them. Homosexuals cannot reproduce, therefore cannot pass the society to the next generation. Men and women cannot fulfill their natural roles as mothers and fathers, therefore social cohesion breaks down. Homosexual Unions by definition are not marriages.

We can even look at this from a “common sense perspective.” For example, if being a homosexual increases your risk of getting STD’s, then maybe it isn’t a natural thing to do. It is obvious the anus is not meant for sexual penetration.

2. Private Property

In nature everything belongs to itself, and therefore to collective inhabitants first. When someone or something mixes their labour with something from nature, that grants them the right of private property. If a man picks an apple from a tree to eat it, that apple becomes his private property. In the same way, if a man clears some woods, uses the timber to build a house, and starts cultivating the land, that house and that land is therefore his. That is the definition of private property. Property is only theft if the capital is generated from a collective, and is exploited by an individual.

The purpose of abolishing private property under ((((((Marxism)))))) is to establish a state capitalism. This creates a class of people who own everything in their own hands and can therefore create a new Capitalist class, and doesn’t fix the problem in the first place.

Under ((((((Marxism)))))) in practice (not necessarily by “theory”) this new class of people who would stand as an “equalizer”, actually now can exploit the working class. This is done by using the profits of production to make money for the state at the expense of the workers, as was done under Stalin in the USSR during the 1930’s. Ukrainian and Russian farmers had their grain confiscated by the Stalinist government, and that grain was put on the market. This was done while 10 million Ukrainians and Russians starved to death in the Holodomor.

The “end of private property” also is used to perpetuate class struggle. This divides a Nation, and at the end (as said before) starts an era of State Capitalism.

Private Ownership of the means of production is an issue, but ((((((Marxism)))))) clearly takes the problem and amplifies it. There should be a balance between private property and collective property. This is to bring the Nation together, allowing people to be able to work for themselves, but also have social justice where there is no exploitation of the working class.

In conclusion, the destruction of private property is not for altruistic aims. It is being used as a tool to divide and destroy the nation. And to deliver the property of private citizens into the hands of a ((parasitical class)).

3. Religion

Man for all of his existence has been spiritual. Religion has been as natural to man as sexuality. Religion creates social cohesion and binds a nation together.

Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) has been used to destroy a nation’s sense of spirituality. This has been done by perpetuating Organized Atheism and Zionist Christianity.

Organized Atheism

American society started as a secular society, where the State did not have a say in religion, as the average man was able to believe what he wishes. This is enforced by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting free exercise thereof…”

There is a difference between a Secular Society and an Atheistical Society. For example in the USSR, Christians were persecuted because they held loyalty to a power above the State, therefore they were seen as enemies of the state. This, of course, was to replace “god” with the state. A Communist society is an Atheistical Society.

Organized Atheism today strives to deprive the nation of any spiritual tradition and replace it by blind Materialism. Although most individual atheists wish to have a secular society, their motives and outcomes are not congruent. Atheism embraces a “you only live once” lifestyle. Therefore one should only live for themselves, and ideas like Nation, Race, Family, a Higher Power is non existent. This allows room for degeneracy in the social atmosphere of the nation.

In the past Atheism was used by Classical ((((((Marxism)))))) to embrace extreme collectivism, because of the allegiance to the State. Under Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) the tactic is to embrace extreme individualism to void the ideal of “the Nation.”

Atheism on its own, as the product of free thinking and coming to one’s own conclusion, is not harmful. Classical ((((((Marxism)))))) and Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) has weaponized it to destroy the will of a Nation. The Jews have created this as a controlled opposition to religion.

The God Question

The question of god has been asked through generations. The common conclusion brought to us by the ((powers that be)) is, there is only you here and now, and a ton of plastic garbage to buy. Man, however, cannot stop looking to the heavens and asking “is there a god? Is there a higher purpose?”

No, science has not found some bearded man in the clouds with a son that looks like swiss cheese and angels. There is, though, evidence of a god, and a creator.

The Whole, the universe, is god. From the Gas Giants of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. To the ice covered mountains of the moon, to the earthly forests. That is the physical manifestation of God.

The Universe is predictable. There is a pattern to everything, a mathematical equation to the universal forces. So much that mathematics is a universal language. That is the intelligent mind of the universe, which is god.

The Universe evolves, changes to ever more complexity and higher consciousness. It once was a singularity then expanded to form heat and protons and electrons. Then atoms like hydrogen and helium. The formation of gas clouds, then stars, then planets, then eventually life. [Ren Ed: Jesuit Big Bang theory is not fact.] There is a constant urge upward, to improvement, and higher consciousness. As seen through the evolution of the universe, to biological evolution. This is the spiritual manifestation of god.

We are part of the whole. We are made from the same stardust everything else is made of. Nature therefore is not separate from us, but we live with in it. Nature’s laws are God’s laws, and we must follow nature’s laws. This is because again, we are part of the whole – which is the Creator. As Dr. William Pierce said, “….we are not the playthings of god, but ourselves are physical manifestations of god….”

This gives us a purpose. The higher purpose is the Will of the Creator. The only end we live for is the end of the creator. We are just a means to his end. That is our higher purpose, to serve the creator’s purpose. To rise from man, to superman, then eventually Godhood.

Our ancient Aryan ancestors understood this. The Gods were the different aspects of the Creator. The High One (Wotan, Óðinn) being the All Father (the Whole), the seeker of knowledge (universal mind), and Sieg Vater (the upward drive.) All the other gods being different manifestations of him.

This reflects the philosophy of Plato in his theory of Forms. The highest form of being is “The Good” which is reason. The “Good” is also seen as God. This is not coincidence because in the Germanic tongues the word for god comes from good (Ger. gut, gott old Ger. got; Is. góð, guð.)

God is the good, reason, and the whole.

Zionist Christianity

American Christians once had loyalty to their Nation and their God. Although there were natural flaws in White Europeans worshiping an Abrahamic God that was not native to them, the religion was not a lethal poison in White European culture in America.

Under the powers of International Jewry, the Christian Churches have been subverted. The average modern American Christian now has more loyalty towards Jews in Israel than their own people. This Zionist Christianity has been a poison to the White European people, not just in America but around the world, making Aryans loyal slaves to their Jewish masters.

Between Organized Atheism and Zionist Christianity, there has been a dichotomy created. One is either a Christian who loves Israel or an atheist with only personal loyalty. The Cultural Marxists have destroyed religion, not by abolishing it, but by subverting it. Christianity under this Jewish subversion has erased its social cohesiveness, therefore destroying the purpose to religion.

4. The Nation

The whole purpose of the Jewish Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) is the destruction of the Nation. As already covered; through destroying the family, property, and religion are their ways of slowly strangling a nation to death. They also destroy a nation by denying Race and Social Hierarchy, especially through the State. A Nation is a group of people connected through common genetic bonds. For a Nation to succeed it needs strong leadership. When Race and the Purpose of the State is denied, the Nation is no longer a nation.


The Marxists often claim, “there is only one race- the human race.” This conclusion is ultra unscientific and ignorant. Man is an animal just like all other animals. Animals vary by breed, and you can breed better and worse animals. This means there are fundamental differences between animals. How come then when we come to this two legged animal called man, all rules are off? How does science not apply to man? White Europeans evolved for tens of thousands of years in Europe. We became suited for the cold winters and short summers. Sub Saharan Africans evolved in Africa. They became suited for a hot climate, and bountiful food.

Our ancestors around 4,000 years ago divided into different tribes and cultures around Europe, Forming Germanic, Italianics, Hellenics, Celts, and Slavs. From those we built city states, the nation states. We created White Western Civilization, and the whole world has benefited off of it.

In the far east, the East Asian people evolved in to fit their own climate. They formed their tribes, then cities, then Nation States off their own culture, which is part of them. These people formed the Chinese, Mongolians, Japanese, etc.

Evolution applies to man, not just animals. One cannot ignore that. Because of our different journeys through evolution we developed differences – physically, mentally, and socially. Race goes deeper than skin color. Just like the difference between a Seagull and an Eagle is not just “feather color.”

Again the Marxists claim that, “there is only 0.5% difference in DNA between a black man and a white man.” Because of that we aren’t much different genetically. The difference between any mammal is 5%, therefore that is a big difference. That 5% judges if a particular mammal is a Whale, a mouse, or a Horse. A 0.5% differences genetically is a big difference in the big scheme of things. That 0.5% determines if the particular mammal is a European, an African, or an Inuit.

Each people should preserve their differences. Each Nation is for the binding together of the people who have common roots, that is to preserve the Race.

The State

Leadership is a necessity. All animal species have a hierarchical system of leadership, such as in a wolf pack, or even an ant colony. Leadership is an evolutionary trait because it is essential for survival. When humans were in tribes there were chieftains. The modern Nation State is no exception. For a people to survive, there needs to be leadership.

Government is a tool. No more a tool than a labor union, or a political party. They are not inherently good or bad. For all tools, it depends on what its use is. In a capitalist system the state is for the interests of a Rich Elite.

The purpose of the folkish state is, “…the preservation and advancement of a community of physically and psychically homogeneous creatures.” (Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf Vol. 2 Chapter 2). A folkish state assumes its natural role, unlike in capitalism where it does not and eventually collapses.

As the “philosopher of Fascism” Giovanni Gentile said in La Dottrina del Fascismo,  “…the nation is created by the state, which gives the people, conscious of their own moral unity, the will, and thereby an effective existence.” Without a state, a nation cannot be. The states purpose is to preserve and progress the Nation. Again from Gentile, “In Fascism, man is an individual who IS the nation and country. He is by moral law which embraces and binds together individuals and generations in an established tradition and mission, a moral law which suppresses the instinct to lead a life confined to a brief cycle of pleasure in order, instead, to replace it within the orbit of duty in a superior conception of life…”

Without a hierarchical system of Leadership there can be no nation. The Nation would fall and disappear.


International Jewry has used Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))) to destroy Aryan Civilization for the past century. The poison has made us forget why these things were just a matter of principle, but with a greater understanding when the enemy is destroyed we will be able to create a better world, and never let this virus infect us again. We must secure the existence of our people, and a future for Aryan Children. Hail Victory.

The Caravan is Now in Tijuana – These Animals are Trying to Get Into Our Home

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
April 25, 2018

The Caravan, though a third of the size it was initially, has continued on and has finally made it to the bordertown of Tijuana.

These bloodsucking animals are attempting to enter OUR HOME and take what BELONGS TO US.

And they have an extreme sense of entitlement.

They believe they have a right to take what is ours.


Busloads of Central American migrants arrived in this Mexican border city on Tuesday. And more are coming.

But it will likely be days before members of the group — which organizers say is about 600 people in total — head to the US-Mexico border to turn themselves in and ask for asylum.

They’re part of a caravan that convened at Mexico’s southern border weeks ago, then trekked through the country as part of an annual pilgrimage organized to bring light to the plights of migrants.

What plight?

The fact that the poverty-stricken country that they built is riddled with violence and crime?

But somehow isn’t a shithole for some reason?

I think everyone already knows “El Salvador and Honduras are really poor, violent countries.”

A large number of people in this year’s caravan are from Honduras. Among the reasons they’ve given CNN for fleeing the country: widespread gang violence, domestic violence, poverty, political repression after a contested presidential election and discrimination against the transgender community.

lol I seriously doubt the tranny thing is on the mind of a single one of these individuals.

What a joke, adding that Western issue of the day onto the whole “we don’t deserve to live in a shithole” bit.

US officials have already made it clear they’re skeptical of the migrants’ motives, warning that anyone with an invalid claim will be swiftly deported and that anyone who tries to cross the border illegally will face prosecution.

At the outset, about 1,200 migrants from Central America were part of the caravan. But some individuals and smaller groups have split off along the way. Some sought asylum in Mexico, saying the risk of trying to make it in the United States wasn’t worth it.

The members of the caravan arriving in Tijuana say they’re well aware of the risks, but decided to continue the journey because they had no other choice.

Except the choice in the last sentence. Seeking asylum in Mexico.

You also had a choice to remain in your shithole.

It’s not like there is a 100% murder rate. Lots of people there hanging out in jungle huts, eating fruits, sitting around.

Billions of people on earth live in shitholes. The option that you have in such a shithole is to attempt to make your country less shitty.

I know it’s easier to flee to a white country, but I don’t know how you expect people to feel sorry for you when that is your decision.

Angry tweets from US President Donald Trump didn’t sway them. Neither did the deployment of National Guard troops.

I understand that we may not be welcomed by all,” a 38-year-old woman from El Salvador told CNN on Tuesday. “But I don’t have an option. If I stay in El Salvador, I’m going to be killed.”




The Right to Access White People?

People need to understand that this is the context of the entire immigration discussion: the right to access to white people.

That is the bottom line of this entire thing.

These brown people are saying: we have a right to live around you, and to take advantage of the things you create.

The concept of massive nonwhite immigration into white countries is fundamentally a promotion of the concept of white supremacy.

They want to be within proximity to us.

As such, the anti-immigration position is “we have a right to be left alone” – which is in no way a “white supremacist” position, it is simply a “please just leave us alone so we can live our lives in peace” position.

So when they call you “white supremacist” for being against immigration, they are projecting their own ideological position onto you.

If white people were not supreme, then brown people would not have this obsession with wanting to be around us. If they were equal to us, they could figure out their own situations and make their own countries work.

Integration in the US was the same thing – Jews gave blacks the idea that they were failing because they didn’t have enough access to white people, and if they were given access to white people, it would magically up their achievement level.

Spoiler: it didn’t work.

But hey, it worked out for a couple of them.

Jordan Peele, for example.

He did pretty well.

Just Leave Us Alone

The Jews have to do endless mental gymnastics, going into bizarre realms of confused gibberish, to try to explain away the basic fact of what the Alt-Right and “racists” in general are asking for: just leave us alone.

That is all.

That is the only thing that any of us are actually asking for:




Call the White House

We got a good response when we called the White House last time about the caravan.

They broke it up, a bunch of of them gave up and dispersed, and Trump got aggressive.

No harm in trying to call again.

You can also write a letter here.

This is very much about making noise.

Whether they get the “asylum” or not, people are very angry. And people being angry is good for us.

The left is coming for your ability to defend yourself from Tyranny.

Vermont moving to ban high cap magazines and raise legal age limit to 21.

So you can literally be drafted to go and die for jews in the middle east, but can’t buy a fucking gun to defend your wife and young family. Fuck this government, Civil War Now!

This is only going to end when we put a round in every liberals skull,  literally, its them or us people. Wake the Fuck up to your own genocide.