Boomers are Filing for Bankruptcy at a Record Pace

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
August 7, 2018

Boomers are filing for bankruptcy at a record pace because they chose to buy all sorts of dumb shit that they couldn’t afford. We should not feel the least bit sorry for them.

The baby boomer generation is going to go down in history as the most selfish and irresponsible generation of all time. This is not hyperbole either, this is just a stone cold fact. Despite growing up in an era of tremendous prosperity, they collectively chose to squander all that they were given in favor of sex, music, drugs and material pleasures.

And on top of destroying Western civilization, boomers are filing for bankruptcy at a record pace as they enter their final years.

Fox Business:

Older Americans have a higher presence in the U.S. bankruptcy system than ever before, according to a new report.

The rate at which Americans ages 65 and older are filing for bankruptcy has increased two-fold since 2013, the study by the Consumer Bankruptcy Project found.

Meanwhile, there has been a nearly 500% increase in the number of older Americans in the bankruptcy system, the study – first reported by The New York Times – showed. While more than 12% of filers are now seniors, just 2.1% were in 1991.

The average senior files for bankruptcy more than $17,390 in the red.

It’s honestly hard for me to comprehend just how insane all this is. These people grew up in an era when people could obtain a blue collar job out of high school and immediately earn enough money to buy a modest home and raise a family. College if you adjust for inflation was much more affordable back in the 1960s and 1970s compared to what it is today. Yet despite all of those advantages, a large number of them are filing for bankruptcy as seniors and will leave their children with nothing.

So just what in the hell did these people do with their money? Apparently spending it on expensive automobiles, vacation home mortgages, pleasure trips and a myriad of worthless shit was more important than saving something tangible that they could pass down to their children. That’s really the only explanation as to why so many of them are in this situation.

I’m a young member of Generation X. I entered the workforce in the early 2000s after the 1990s dotcom bubble burst. There were certainly far fewer opportunities when I entered the workforce versus when the boomers started looking for work. Yet despite that, I was able to find a way through hard work to payoff my own home while still in my 30s and establish a decent amount of savings for myself. I’ve even had the chance to enjoy myself from time to time, but never to excess. And perhaps most importantly, I avoided racking up credit card debt.

This is why I don’t feel the least bit sorry for these people. They’re responsible for their own misery because they chose materialism over substance.

There’s a scene from the 1999 movie “Fight Club” where Tyler Durden talks about the perils of consumerism and buying shit that you don’t need.

Wise words.

I’ve always believed in living a minimalist lifestyle. In fact, I would have no problem living out of a tent or a trailer if needed. Just so long as I have access to food, shelter, a few changes of clothes and some type of mobile Internet connection, there really isn’t a whole lot else I would require. This type of life philosophy was obviously foreign to most boomers as this story so obviously proves.

The boomer generation will serve as a stark example of what not to do for future generations. Almost everything they collectively decided to do was wrong and we are all dealing with the consequences of their decisions today. This is what their unfortunate and sorry legacy will be and it is up to all of us to fix it.

Hypocrisy When it Comes to Whites

After seeing a lot of pro Palestinian accounts on twitter (no matter if they are White or Arabs), I stopped supporting the Palestinian cause because of their huge hypocrisy. They refuse for us what they want for themselves.

They want to kick out the zionists and the settlers, great! But if you, as a White person, say that you want to kick the zionists/jews and the alien colonizers
in your country, they immediately call you a racist, bigot, nazi, fascist and so on.

They will immediately use the same arguments jews use to defend Israel, like “they are born here,” “they are more French than you” or “you can’t send him to Haiti, he doesn’t even know the country,”

Don’t make any mistake, I’m against Israel because they are our nemesis, but that doesn’t make me a pro-Palestinian after seeing this behavior over the years.

We have seen some great memes like “It’s okay to be white” or whites are “people of light” that show the double standards employed by some of these people. I have been thinking about smalls slogans like those that could show this hypocrisy to bring more people on our side.

For example:

When Palestinians resist colonisation, it’s heroic.
When Swedish people resist colonisation, it’s racist.

When israel occupies Palestine, everyone loses their mind.
When Turkey occupies Greece and Cyprus, nobody cares.

Or reply to leftist arguement like:

– Whites are colonialist in America. Go back to Europe.
– When the turks go back to mongolia.

– You want to help only white people, that’s Nazi stuff.
– But when associations only help Africans, it’s ok. Why?

– America can’t build a wall, it’s racist!
– So why when Turkey builds a wall, you don’t care?

I think we need to some kind of centralised campaign or maybe a radio host could bring such people on a show and ask them why Whites can’t be a free people in our countries amongst our own. Muslims who follow a fake religion made up by jews, like Charles Giuliani has shown, can have countries of their own all they want.

The militant Left’s new DARLING, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, calls for protesters to invade, occupy and control all U.S. airports — Is she trying to start a civil war?

(National SentinelExtremist: When Democratic Socialist of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated 10-term incumbent Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley during a New York primary earlier this month, the far-Left establishment media rejoiced, as did a few currently-serving Democrats who are right there with her at the Marxist end of the political spectrum.

This is the new face of the Democratic Party, they all said as they feted the 28-year-old political novice as some kind of conquering hero. This is who Democrats want to be now and this is the force that will drive POTUS Donald Trump from office and vanquish his supporters.

But then something happened: Ocasio-Cortez, no doubt feeling empowered by all of the outsized attention, began showing her true colors: She really is a Marxist revolutionary in the truest sense of the term. She really does want to overturn the existing constitutional order in America, and by force if necessary.

Earlier this week Ocasio-Cortez began calling on supporters to “occupy” U.S. airports, border crossings and, of course, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) offices, the extreme Left’s newest boogeyman.

“We have to occupy all of it,” she told Democracy Now! on Monday, as Infowars noted. “We need to occupy every airport. We need to occupy every border. We need to occupy every ICE office until those kids are back with their parents, period.”

Who’s this “we” and is she out of her mind?

Let’s take the first part.

“We” is a growing number of Americans who have been duped (by Left-wing kooks like Ocasio-Cortez and Barack Obama) into believing they have been ‘disenfranchised’ from American society. They’ve been brainwashed by Left-wing politicians, academics, and their peers into believing they’ve been treated unfairly, cheated, denied, and subdued by the ‘predatory capitalist system’ that transformed our country in the planet’s No. 1 economy (and by a lot). This isn’t a hunch; the data bear it out. And the number of capitalism-haters is growing. 

Is Ocasio-Cortez insane? It’s easy to dismiss someone who is calling on people to “occupy” airports; that’s not even remotely legal, given strict federal security guidelines that only got more strict after 9/11. Simple protesting is only semi-legal and even then only under certain circumstances.

But she’s not a lunatic; she’s just a committed Leftist, and those are people who tend to gin up the most unrest.

There isn’t anything that’s more likely to turn people against you and your cause than forbidding them from catching a flight or, in the most extreme instances, preventing planes from landing over security concerns. It’s like when Black Lives Matter protesters started blocking highways and bridges; even people who might have agreed with them politically were outraged because they were prevented from reaching their destinations (like work).

But crazy she isn’t, and support she’ll get. That’s what should worry us.

“First of all, ICE is not [U.S. Customs and Border Protection],” Ocasio-Cortez told Democracy Now. “When we talk about abolishing ICE, we’re talking about ending family detention. We’re talking about ending an agency and ending a practice and a structure that is not accountable to the U.S. Department of Justice, that often takes on things that look a lot like enforcement activities.”

“We have to show people that we’re willing to walk the walk and put our money where our mouth is,” she said.

This is militant Left-wing rabble-rousing at its finest. And it is very likely going to be effective over the long term as younger Democrats force the once-reasonable party into the camp of ((((((Karl Marx)))))) and ((((((Vladimir Lenin)))))).

The Left Calls for The Extermination of the Right – America’s Next Civil War Will Be Worse Than Our Last

Is America on the verge of a second civil war?

Americans are concerned about the deep political divide in their country that has been turning into political violence. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Read Story Transcript

Following the recent string of violent events that have unfolded across the U.S., like the fatal stabbings in Portland and the shooting in Virginia, Americans are concerned that the political divide in their nation is spilling out of the corridors of Washington and into the streets.

Many fear that the political discord is increasingly turning into political violence.

In January, conservative commentator ((((((Dennis Prager)))))) blamed the left for pushing the nation to the brink of what he calls America’s second civil war.

Omar El Akkad, author of American War and former Globe and Mail journalist, says the U.S. is not headed for a civil war, but the country seems to be more polarized now than at any point during his lifetime.

“There have been more violent times in this country. But the fact that we need to go back and compare to something like the civil rights era in the 1960s or even a hundred years earlier — the 1860s — is not a particularly encouraging sign,” he tells The Current’s Anna Maria Tremonti.

Unlike Prager, Matt ((((((Mayer)))))), CEO of Opportunity Ohio and former official at the U.S. department of Homeland Security, believes the left and the right are to blame for the current political divide.

“I think it started in the 80s. It got fuelled in the 90s … in the last eight years it got fuelled and now Trump is getting it fuelled even more,” he explains.

“So I think both sides are guilty of fuelling their version of it, whether it’s Occupy Wall Street or it’s the far-right and some of the fringe groups over there.”

However, El Akkad points out that in a country with over 300 million people, you can find fringes on both ends of the political spectrum.

“But in my mind, what matters more right now is which of those sides feels most empowered,” he says, giving an example of the incident in Portland, Ore., where a man fatally stabbed two passengers who confronted him for yelling anti-Muslim slurs.

“What worries me is that the far right in this country appears to be far more energized and far more empowered than certainly I’ve seen it in many years,” says El Akkad.

Alexander Livingston, assistant professor at Cornell University, argues that this divisiveness in the country is nothing new, except that it’s now being driven by growing racial and economic inequality. He warns of the danger behind calling it a civil war because America is “historically very violent, historically very unequal and that violence is disproportionately imposed on people of colour.”

“I think this rhetoric of civil war obscures that. It makes it sound like a conflict of two equal powers,” he says.

“But really there’s a disproportionate number and amount of violence being subjected to the most vulnerable people in society.”

By H. W. Crocker III

July 26, 2018

In the summer of 1862, just weeks before the Battle of Sharpsburg (or Antietam) — the bloodiest single day of fighting in American history — Union Captain George Armstrong Custer attended the wedding of Confederate Captain John “Gimlet” Lea at Bassett Hall in Williamsburg, Virginia, as best man. The Union officer was dressed in blue, the Confederate officer in grey, and Custer being Custer spent the next two weeks flirting with the Southern belle cousin of the bride, even joining her in singing “Dixie.”

At one point she told him, “You ought to be in our army.”

“What would you give me if I resigned my commission in the Northern army and joined the Southern?”

“You are not in earnest, are you?”

He wasn’t, of course. Custer was nothing if not loyal, and he believed that he was bound to the Union by the oath he had sworn at West Point, whatever his affection for Southern officers and their ladies.

Such gallantry seems unthinkable today, when members of the Trump administration are hounded from restaurants and theatres, and Confederate officers like John Lea, if they are remembered at all, are considered precursors of the German National Socialists, and their once famous and respected commanders like Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and Jeb Stuart have their statues toppled and banished from public squares, their names stripped from public schools, and their memories spat upon and disgraced.

The difference between the America of today and the America of what seems like just yesterday is that we once had a common culture. As recently as 1990, Ken Burns could make a Civil War documentary for PBS and let historian Shelby Foote wax eloquent on the martial prowess of Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest —  something that now would likely get them both tarred, feathered, and Twitter-banned.

Yes, there were big differences between North and South a century and a half ago. The South was a slave-holding, free-trading, libertarian-leaning, conservative Christian, agricultural, aristocratic Sparta, while the North was a commercial, industrial, protectionist, Transcendentalist, social gospel, democratic Athens. But they held far more in common than separated them — beginning with the fact that, as Lincoln observed, “Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God.”

In the end, the war was fought over a single legal issue: whether the states that had freely ratified the Constitution to form the Union could freely leave the Union if they felt it no longer served their interests.

One need only compare the Confederate Constitution to the United States Constitution to see that the former bears a striking resemblance to the latter. And far from being a national socialist charter, the Confederate Constitution puts even more restraints on federal power and limits the president to one six-year term.

The great seal of the Confederacy bears the image of George Washington, many of whose relatives served with the Confederacy, including Lieutenant James B. Washington, a West Point classmate of Custer’s (the two had a famous picture taken together — Washington was a prisoner of war — a few weeks before Lea’s wedding).

North and South venerated the Founders. They shared the same language, the same religion, and, in large part, the same general stock. Most of all, they shared what Jeff Sessions was recently rebuked for calling an “Anglo-American heritage” of liberty under law, stretching from the mists of medieval England — even before Magna Carta — to our own Bill of Rights.

Today, however, our divisions are so deep and fundamental that Americans cannot even agree on what marriage is or what a man or a woman is (which is pretty darn fundamental).

The lunatic self-righteousness of the Left (and yes, I’m afraid one must point fingers here), where disagreement is bigotry to be prohibited by law or even condemned and prosecuted as treason, is a consuming, destructive fire that will not be easily quenched, and cannot be reached by cool waters of rational argument.

So what to do? We can start by trying to stop the Left’s war on America’s past, which is poisoning the well-spring of our national identity. If William McKinley, a Union officer turned president, could approve a Confederate memorial at Arlington Cemetery, it seems to me that we can at least be as understanding of our own history. Let us remember that President Dwight D. Eisenhower, who ordered the 101stAirborne Division to help desegregate Arkansas’s public schools, kept a portrait of Robert E. Lee in his office at the White House and admired him as a hero (as did, incidentally, George C. Marshall, whose anti-fascist bona fides are rather more profound than Antifa’s, I reckon).

We could also try to lighten the mood a little. I’ve conscripted Custer for this very purpose in a series of novels that imagine he survived the Battle of the Little Big Horn to become a gun-slinging Western do-gooder, riding under the pseudonym of Marshal Armstrong. There’s some real history in these books, but the point is to regain a rational, even if nostalgic, perspective on our past by eliciting laughter. America’s story is a glorious adventure — not a grim catalogue of irredeemable sins. The sinners-in-the-hands-of-an-angry-progressive-god sermonizing that comes at us in endless, stultifying repetition from the press, Hollywood, and academia — today’s hysterical, bug-eyed, Puritan witch-burners — is the acid-bath dissolving our culture and our nation.

If America is to come together again, it will do so only through the restoration of what Lincoln called our mystic chords of memory, a common culture that emerges from a shared and sympathetic understanding of our past — the sort of shared understanding that can bring a Union and a Confederate officer to a wedding, and former Union General George Armstrong Custer, alias Marshal Armstrong, to the rescue.

Historian and novelist H. W. Crocker III’s most recent book, Armstrong, publishes August 14 and is available for pre-order at Amazon and all good book shops.   

 

133 Trump Supporters Attacked Following Maxine Waters’ Call for Violence Civil war has already begun in America

http://www.neonnettle.com/features/1436-133-trump-supporters-attacked-following-maxine-waters-call-for-violence

 

 

To Kill A People

It’s as if there was a plan.

Crazy talk.

You can and should have it all.

Youth participation in soccer continues to decline, despite the best efforts of the cultural elite to promote it.

Over the past three years, the percentage of 6- to 12-year-olds playing soccer regularly has dropped nearly 14 percent, to 2.3 million players, according to a study by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association, which has analyzed youth athletic trends for 40 years. The number of children who touched a soccer ball even once during the year, in organized play or otherwise, also has fallen significantly.

In general, participation in youth sports nationwide has declined in the past decade, as children gravitate to electronic diversions and other distractions.

Yet in recent years, while soccer continued declining, baseball and basketball experienced upticks, buoyed by developmental programs begun by Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association.

This was always predictable, as soccer never had strong appeal. Youth soccer leagues were middle-class suburban creations, designed as safe spaces for white kids. No one says it that way, but that’s the reality of youth soccer in America. As a result, the soccer infrastructure is labor intensive. It requires lots of parents volunteering to make it work. It also requires a lot of cash. Maintaining a segregated anything in modern America is expensive, which is why real estate in a place like San Francisco is so pricey.

In fairness, all sports have seen a decline in youth participation. People like to blame video games and social media, but those are symptoms. Youth sports require a high degree of parental support and involvement. They also require infrastructure. That local ball field exists because the city, town or county makes it a priority. That happens when you have a society of strong families adhering to traditional roles. When those families are not there to volunteer and agitate for youth sports leagues, inevitably those leagues atrophy.

Most people struggle to understand long term trends, so it is not surprising that it is easy to peddle the idea that video games are the cause of this. Parents today see the decline and just assume it is a new thing. The fact is, kids vegetating in front of a video screen is just another symptom of the same main cause. When most kids grew up in normal homes, there was more organic structure to their lives, so they were less likely to indulge in whatever strikes the fancy of a child. There was a parent around to provide guidance.

It is the hidden cost of ripping women from their homes and putting them to work. Those mothers and grandmothers, staying home to raise their kids, provided a hidden infrastructure to American life. In stable, healthy societies, women maintain the social organizations and the social life of the community. When women are working ten hours a day at an office, that social work does not get done, so something fills the void. That has been the sewage of popular culture, along with state provided stand-ins for the parents.

Traditional sex roles also work as a bulwark against mischief. Fifty years ago, even public schools in poor areas could expect plenty of mothers volunteering to help with various school projects. They would also be the main labor pool at the church and other voluntary community organizations. It’s hard to corrupt these organization when mothers and grandmothers, people with skin in the game, are there to make sure those organizations serve their interests. Take away the mothers and the degenerates run wild.

The fact is, if you were looking to exterminate a people, by that I mean destroy their culture and identity, the first thing you would do is put the women to work. It’s not an accident that invaders who kill off the men and marry the women almost always adapt to the culture they conquered. That’s because the culture of a people is their women. Men have a role, but primarily as the guardians of the engine of their culture. Women are the ovens that bake the bread. Take away the oven and there can be no bread.

By ripping women out of their homes and putting them to work like field slaves, modernity has destroyed the natural framework of society. The state has tried to fill the void, which is why per capita, inflation adjusted government spending has quadrupled as women moved from the home to the workplace. All that government supervision of children and maintenance of synthetic community organizations comes with a direct cost, which shows up in paychecks and the cost of goods. It’s one reason the middle class is broke.

On a more esoteric note, what the modern age has been is an elaborate strip mining operation, where the hidden capital is monetized and carried away. Another example is what we see with Amazon destroying retail. The price of cheap stuff delivered to your office is the harvesting of the social value of local business. Instead of Johnny’s Appliance Warehouse sponsoring your kid’s baseball team, it is a government run program paid for by your property taxes. Without local business, there are no local sponsors.

Again, if the point is to kill a people, the first step is to put their women to work, turning them into economic units, like farm animals. From there,. it is easy to strip out the rest of their organic infrastructure that maintains their culture. Before long you have a collection of people with no identity of their own, wholly dependent upon their masters. That’s where we are headed as a society. It’s also why fertility rates are falling in the West. Why would anyone bring a child into the world when life is just pointless work and consumption?

From http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=14443

A B S O L U T E L Y Z E R O F U C K S: God Emperor of Mankind Labels the EU a “Foe”!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 15, 2018

We voted for a man who did not give a single fuck.

Then when he came in a few problems happened and we were like “wait does this guy give a fuck or something?”

Turns out that no, he does not – he never did. He just had some problems he had to deal with.

Now, the man is a whirlwind.

He is tearing across the entire planet, reshaping it in his own image – and his image is nothing other than the image that we projected onto him.

Because he is no longer a man. He is an embodiment of the collective will of the American people, and of the entire white race.

ABC News:

Coming off a contentious NATO summit and a trip to the U.K. in which he seemed to undercut the government of America’s closest ally, President Trump took aim at another Western institution just days before his high-stakes meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

In an interview with “CBS Evening News” anchor Jeff Glor in Scotland on Saturday, President Trump named the European Union — comprising some of America’s oldest allies — when asked to identify his “biggest foe globally right now.”

Well, I think we have a lot of foes. I think the European Union is a foe, what they do to us in trade. Now, you wouldn’t think of the European Union, but they’re a foe. Russia is foe in certain respects. China is a foe economically, certainly they are a foe. But that doesn’t mean they are bad. It doesn’t mean anything. It means that they are competitive,” Mr. Trump said at his golf club in Turnberry, Scotland.

This is after he said that Russia isn’t a foe.

He is absolutely correct.

Russia has shown no hostility towards him. The EU has shown nothing but disdain for him, going back even before he was the candidate. When he was still in the primaries, these faggots were attacking him – and all of WE THE PEOPLE by proxy – as pure evil.

Russia wants to be friends.

Tomorrow, history will change.

The seeds of a new alliance will be planted – an alliance that will grow into a WHITE EMPIRE that that will conquer the stars.