Third World America: California’s Exploding Homeless Population Causing Hepatitis Outbreak by Defecating in the Street

Eric Striker

Daily Stormer
November 24, 2017


California is a canary in the coal mine. As one of America’s “majority-minority” states with a mega-wealthy Jewish aristocracy (Silicon Valley and Hollywood), its cities have the living standards of Oaxaca at Geneva prices.

The average apartment in LA goes for $2,107. This is the new world order price for housing, a product of: real estate speculation, illegal immigrant fueled overpopulation and wage stagnation, and mass unemployment (was at 25% in 2010 and probably not much better now). Since local governments are run by corrupt Mexicans (on the city council level) and Jews (like Mayor ((((((Eric Garcetti))))))), they’re all taken care of or in on it.

You get a blanket under a bridge!

Add the low trust society multiculturalism creates, and the fact that some of these hobos are violent and filthy blacks or junkies, and public toilets are few and far between.

So the streets of Los Angeles are filled with human feces.

Fox News:

An outbreak of hepatitis A is spreading through Los Angeles County after leaping from a large homeless contingent in San Diego, threatening thousands of people and fueling criticism that local officials have not done enough to contain the deadly liver disease.

Hundreds of cases have turned up in southern California as well as Michigan — but conditions in Los Angeles, where roughly 50,000 people live on the streets, have prompted deeper concerns.

Reports compiled by volunteer organizations have faulted city officials for not providing enough accessible toilets as the homeless population sharply increased by 23 percent this year.

In a prescient warning, a June 2017 report by a collection of nonprofits called the LA Central Providers Collaborative sounded the alarm about crowding and living conditions on Skid Row, citing the city’s own predictions about the increased risk for hepatitis A and other diseases.

“One would think that Los Angeles, one of the greatest cities in the world, would exceed these minimal standards. However, this Audit finds that in Skid Row, Los Angeles fails to meet even the standards for a refugee camp,” the report said. “During overnight hours, there are only nine public toilets available for 1,777 unsheltered homeless people on Skid Row, and these toilets are largely inaccessible.”

The report noted that United Nations’ refugee camp standards are one toilet for every 20 people.

Even United Nations’ camps in Haiti have superior public sanitation than LA.

There’s no reason that one of the most resource rich states with such beautiful weather has to be such a horrible place to live. Until the 90s it was one of the most prosperous states in America.

When you replace your population with third world people, it’s a toilet that sinks all boats except the Jewish and billionaire ones. Everyone in California is doing badly, including the white minority, which is discriminated against by the state for jobs and educational opportunities. Basically if you can’t get a job with the municipality, you’re going to be struggling to subsist in a run down 65% Mexican gang run “middle class” neighborhood. Or knee deep in shit on Skid Row.

Want to see America’s near future? Visit sunny California!

Polish hostel bans entry to all ‘Jews, communists and traitors’

Polish hostel bans entry to all ‘Jews, communists and traitors’
A hostel in southwestern Poland has stirred controversy and drawn condemnation after social media users called attention to a huge banner, reportedly hanging outside the establishment for several months, which bars entry to all “Jews, communists, thieves and traitors.”

Earlier this week, users on Twitter and Google Maps spotted the banner on the Dom Polski hostel in the small village of Cesarzowice in the Lower Silesia Voivodeship, which reads: “Polish House – ban on entry to Jews, communists and all thieves and traitors of Poland.” Most were appalled and quick to express their anger and indignation, with one tagging it “the Nazi House.”

The banner had apparently been hanging outside for several months, with authorities reportedly reluctant to act as the hostel sits on private property. Although there are conflicting reports on whether or not he is the actual owner, it’s the known as the address of one Piotr Rybak, a notorious local nationalist and member of the National Radical Camp (ONR) movement.

Rybak is currently serving a short jail term for inciting racial hatred from an incident dating back to November 2015, where at a nationalist rally in Wroclaw, he burnt an effigy of a Jew. His defense at the time, was that he was burning an effigy of ((((((George Soros)))))), but didn’t know what he looked like.

After two years of legal wrangling, Rybak managed to get his sentence reduced from ten months to only three, and was fitted with an electronic tag. But last week, a court found him to be in breach of his ‘tag’ conditions after taking part in another nationalist march on 11 November, as well as his behavior at the event. At the rally, Rybak called for violence against leftists, while in two separate videos that emerged, he could be seen calling Polish First Lady Agatha Kornhauser-Duda a “Jew,” as well as going on an anti-Semitic rant outside a synagogue.
Despite the hostel owner’s aggressive right-wing rhetoric, it seems as though exceptions can be made, so long as foreigners pay their bills. Local media reported that some of the rooms in the hostel are being rented out by Ukrainians, for whom Poles still bear enough animosity stemming from last century’s ethnic conflicts.
This latest controversy comes amid a resurgence in nationalist sentiment in Poland, highlighted by the Independence Day celebrations in Warsaw on November 11. Along with displays of national pride, the rally also attracted more unsavory elements such as members of the neo-fascist ONR, the National Movement (RN) and the All-Polish Youth (MW). Far-right supporters also held up flags with the emblem of the National Armed Forces and the words, “Death to the enemies of the homeland.” One of the activists brazenly told TVP news he was taking part “to remove Jewry from power.”
Coming soon to an American City near you…People are waking up.

Every Western country would be wise to do the same. Jews are parasites.

Israeli minister rebuked for disparaging remarks about US Jews

((((((Netanyahu)))))) condemns ((((((Tzipi Hotovely))))))’s claim they ‘never send their children to fight’

((((((Tzipi Hotovely))))))’s comments underscore political divide between more liberal US Jews and conservative Israeli government
by Ilan Ben Zion in Jerusalem
Israeli prime minister ((((((Benjamin Netanyahu)))))) has rebuked his deputy foreign minister for making disparaging remarks about American Jews in a television interview.
There were calls from Israeli opposition lawmakers for ((((((Tzipi Hotovely)))))) to resign after she told Israel’s i24 News that Jews in the US were “people that never send their children to fight for their country”.
Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))), who is also Israel’s foreign minister, condemned the “offensive remarks regarding the American Jewish community”.
The comments underscored the political divide between more liberal American Jews and the conservative Israeli government. Jews in the US are generally affiliated with more liberal streams of Judaism than their Israeli counterparts.
Many US Jews were upset when Israel’s government earlier this year scrapped a plan to allocate part of Jerusalem’s Western Wall — the holiest place for Jews to pray — to egalitarian prayer.
The head of the Union for Reform Judaism in North America, the largest North American Jewish movement, subsequently cancelled a meeting with Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))), saying that scrapping the plan caused “an acute crisis between the Israeli government and Diaspora Jewry”. They don’t feel how it feels to be attacked by rockets, and I think part of it is to actually experience what Israel is dealing with on a daily basis ((((((Tzipi Hotovely)))))), deputy foreign minister The TV interview with Ms Hotovely, who is from the right of Mr ((((((Netanyahu))))))’s Likud party, came after she had been earlier this month uninvited from giving a speech to Jewish students at Princeton University because of her hardline views on the Palestinians. Asked about the political difference between Israeli and American Jewry, she blamed the US community, saying it stemmed from a failure to understand the “complexity” of Israel’s situation.
She hit out at “people that never send their children to fight for their country, most of the Jews don’t have children serving as soldiers, going to the Marines, going to Afghanistan or to Iraq, most of them are having quite convenient lives. “They don’t feel how it feels to be attacked by rockets, and I think part of it is to actually experience what Israel is dealing with on a daily basis.”
The US military does not keeps records about the religious affiliation of service members, but a 2009 study by a US government military diversity commission estimated that 1 per cent of service members were Jewish, compared with about 2 per cent of the general population. Ms Hotovely did not serve in the Israeli military, but took part in a non-military two-year national service program.
She apologised on Thursday if her comments caused offence. Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))) said: “The Jews of the diaspora are dear to us and are an inseparable part of our people. There is no place for such attacks, and her remarks do not reflect the position of the state of Israel.”
((((((Tzipi Livni)))))), a former foreign minister from the opposition Zionist Union, said that to “patch up the rift with the diaspora, we need an actual policy that will embrace and accept all streams within Judaism,” while Nachman Shai, another Zionist Union lawmaker, asked on Twitter how Ms Hotovely remained in her position after making the remarks. ((((((Yair Lapid)))))), leader of Yesh Atid and a former minister, called for Mr ((((((Netanyahu))))))’s government to “stop trying to divide the Jewish people, both in Israel and abroad”.

And some people still don’t believe there is an anti-white jewish cabal in America, its the deep state people, (((they))) all share the same goal, the enslavement of the world, and the extermination of the white race. Question is, what the fuck are we gonna do about it?

How To Deprogram Yourself After Becoming A Male Feminist

Male feminists seem ridiculous, but it’s a serious matter. Enabling feminist dysfunction makes things worse for all guys, including themselves. It’s bad for women too.

What made you a male feminist?

Most of you simply care about women and want what’s best for them. However, there’s no reason you must believe a weaponized ideology for that! We care too, but traditionalism has better answers.  Note well, what’s good for women is not identical with modern feminism.

Perhaps you have a guilt trip. For example, if you took a women’s studies class, you got a very one-sided spiel. The professor said the last six thousand years were all about oppression of women—and it’s your fault (as if you could change the past). You weren’t told about all the men who sweated in the fields, factories, and mines year after year. They were doing this for their families, by the way. Sex roles work both ways, get it? It was the men who got drafted to fight for their nations; millions came back badly injured, or in coffins.

Others mistakenly believe that espousing feminism will make women like them. It doesn’t work that way. First of all, most women actually don’t support feminism, and it continues to lose credibility. Also, subduing your “toxic masculinity” and reciting talking points like a Chatty Cathy doll won’t get you a single girlfriend—trust us on this. If that’s you, how’s that worked so far? What women really want is someone who looks and acts like a man. So forget about virtue-signaling your way into someone’s panties.

What does modern feminism want?

Everyone has heard feminism is only about equality, still a common belief. When it began, that’s basically what it was. They finalized their major objective of universal women’s suffrage in 1920, and the job was finished with the Equal Pay Act of 1963. Since they got equality under the law, why is there still feminism? It’s simple: they moved the goalposts. Then it became hostility and radical demands to rearrange society, and even create a unisex world.

By the 1960s, feminism had changed drastically. Radicals, neurotics, lesbians, and others with a grudge against society came to the forefront—while claiming to speak for all women. Their rhetoric became extremely shrill and divisive. In a healthy society, the sexes have good regard for each other. So feminists sought to achieve their political goals by driving a wedge between women and men, a very foul deed. Radical feminism poisoned the social environment, and that’s good for neither women nor men.

Perhaps you’re thinking—“But that’s not real feminism!” Indeed, it has dozens of offshoots—now a sometimes self-contradictory hodgepodge—so we’ll have to consider the general consensus. The most radical are still the loudest, and the moderates can’t (or won’t) rein them in or even disavow them.

By the way, they certainly expect their male feminist allies to shut up and follow the Party Line. If you dissent about something—perhaps you say that paternity fraud is unjust, for example—there’s a good chance they’ll denounce you over just one item. All your past support will mean nothing.

Modern feminism seeks to turn women into a radicalized social class, united against men by unending grievances and victimhood rhetoric. They want government power to grant them advantages, typically involving income redistribution and reducing the consequences of bad life choices. Is that a formula for a healthy society?

What about male privilege?

At least these men have their male privilege.

Quite effectively, feminists have delegitimized “male privilege” (as they see it), although life certainly isn’t as easy for us as they think. However, they’re certainly not relinquishing advantages that society still gives them. Feminism only demands equality when it serves their interests. They want to have their cake and eat it.

Divorce law is still grounded in 19th century notions, providing the ex-wife an allowance long after the relationship ended, among other problems. Women still don’t get drafted in most countries. They’ve also acquired new advantages, such as hiring quotas and set-asides. Criminal law gives them preferential treatment. Then there are multitudes of women-only scholarships, social agencies, associations, and government programs. Feel privileged yet? Tell your feminist friends that this has to be changed because it’s structural inequality, and see how far that gets you.

How about the “wage gap”? What they don’t tell you is that comparatively few women choose high-paying STEM careers, because they’re not interested in nerdy stuff. They also don’t like dirty, exhausting, and dangerous jobs either. Further, men work more overtime. Why does being extra productive make us the bad guys? The truth is that the “wage gap” results from individual career choices, but feminists dishonestly blame “The Patriarchy”.

What about rape culture?

She lied because she got dumped, and then wanted attention.

It’s a dirty lie to say that we live in a “rape culture”. Since it’s a felony punishable by a prison sentence, that means it’s not culturally approved. Feminists trying to make men look like savages—including you—are fundamentally dishonest. The truth is that this (along with other violent crimes) has declined greatly from the early 1990s. The job isn’t finished yet, but demagoguery for shock value won’t help.

Early on, they may have merely intended to draw attention to the crime. However, things got worse when they started using phony statistics to bolster their argument. Further, they altered the definition of rape far beyond what it actually means. Lately, they include several other things under the category of “rape culture” (like flirting or “the male gaze“), conflating things that are impolite—at most—with dreadful crimes.

The resulting witch hunt climate led to a wave of false accusations. Some very highly publicized cases have turned out to be complete fabrications. With all the redefining and inflammatory rhetoric, consensual encounters which are later regretted (“buyer’s remorse”) can get you falsely accused. Campus tribunals resembling Star Chamber proceedings have the power to expel students without due process. When a crime actually takes place, the police should handle it.

This is bad for genuine victims who may face more doubts and scrutiny after this witch hunt. It’s also bad for all the people whose lives have been ruined unjustly. That could be you some day. Being a male feminist will not save you.

How feminism affects society

For half a century, radical feminists have been pushing their toxic ideology on the public, aided by useful idiots in the media. Even women who don’t identify with feminism have soaked up some of this. They’ve been told that it’s okay to get a divorce without good reason, single motherhood is super, abortion is wonderful, and so forth. It’s irresponsible to change the things that made society work. Much of the civilizational decline over the last fifty years is attributable to the feminist agenda’s unquestioned acceptance.

By themselves, the feminists couldn’t have gone nearly as far as they did without help from men. Most of their allies misunderstood the nature of feminism, considering it simply a matter of equality and justice. It’s time to stop supporting these dishonest radicals who have taken advantage of your benevolent instincts and will show you no gratitude in return, no matter how useful or self-abasing you are.

Being a male feminist is like being a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders. After all they’ve lied to you, do you still want to be their useful idiot?

 

I would add another step would be to understand the history of feminism and its Jewish role in destabilizing the west by destroying the family.

A Pattern Emerges of Emotional Terrorism By Jewish Men in Power

By Torchy Blane

While we observe one abuser after another being taken down by sex scandals, one has to wonder: Why now? The system has covered for powerful Jewish men for decades, but it appears some sort of revelation and justice is at hand. Are there white hats behind the takedown? It seems directed mostly at Hollywood and Media, which The New Nationalist (TNN) holds as the root of much of the low culture infecting the world. Whatever the reason, it’s an amazing phenomena to say this least. ((((((Larry David)))))) notices a pattern.

The other aspect of this behavior is the nature of it. One gets the impression it’s more about dominating shiksas than about sex. In reading the accounts and viewing the images, it doesn’t seem likely that most of the perpetrators could perform sexually with these women even if their lives depended on it.

Mostly, it’s about depraved banality — and rather stupid banality at that. It is straight out of (((Portnoy’s Complaint))). According to its Jewish author ((((((Philip Roth)))))), “Portnoy’s Complaint is a ‘disorder’ in which strongly felt ethical and altruistic impulses are perpetually warring with extreme sexual longings, often of a perverse nature.” And the perversion wins out as does the so called altruistic hypocrisy.

We have the account of ((((((Harvey Weinstein)))))) masturbating into a potted plant in front of an actress. In ((((((Weinstein))))))’s case, we learn he hired ex-Mossad agents to run herd over 91 women, which adds a whole new level of emotional terrorism to the equation. This is also the guy who preached that Jews should organize like the Mafia to go after anti-Semites. It is hard to imagine anything more horrific than all this. It is also surprising that the media is revealing this.

Tribe member Mark ((((((Halperin)))))) has been accused by three women of pressing an erection against their bodies — emotional terror as well as plying his supervisory position to receive sexual favors from underlings.

Last week, we were shown this photo of Jewish Senator ((((((Al Franken)))))) with a smirk on his face, simulating a breast fondling of a sleeping woman. This woman was also subjected to ((((((Franken))))))’s tongue in her ear. In this case, the hypocrisy is stark as ((((((Franken)))))) is a well-known pro-feminist who is quick to condemn others for sexual abuse.

On Friday, came another accusation levied against “Mad Men” creator Matthew ((((((Weiner)))))), who is also Jewish.

In a series of tweets on Friday, the television writer-producer — who formerly worked on the AMC drama as a senior consultant — described ((((((Weiner)))))) as an “emotional terrorist, who will badger, seduce and even tantrum in an attempt to get his needs met.” She added that “everyone at Mad Men, regardless of gender or position, was affected by this atmosphere.”

While co-writing late one night on the series with ((((((Weiner)))))), former “Mad Men” assistant-turned-writer Kater Gordon was told that she owed it to him to see her naked. After winning an Emmy for co-writing the episode with ((((((Weiner)))))), Gordon was let go from the drama and never worked in Hollywood again.

This is not rape per se but rather an extreme abuse of power and emotional terrorism. Curiously, ((((((Weiner)))))) often imbued his white male “Mad Men” characters with these same disgusting traits. White-male demonization transference is evident throughout the series and is another form of Jewish emotional terrorism. The “dear fellow white people” litany that Jewish “intellectual” quacks write about is in reality defacto emotional terrorism. [See “A Who’s-Who List of Anti-White Jewish ‘Pseudo-Intellectual’ Quackery.”]

Beauty and the Beast

((((((Harvey Weinstein)))))) set himself apart from his brethren in that he targeted shiksas that were not only beautiful but also either intelligent, well-connected or already famous. Perhaps after spending a lifetime preying on secretaries and assistants, he felt the need to go after bigger game in the same manner that a deer hunter eventually graduates to African antelope. But it’s about more than that.

If you’ve ever spent time in the company of a stunningly beautiful woman, you’ve observed the power of that beauty. Wherever you go, all eyes are on them. People will want to do things for them, to be near them, to know them. The impossible is made possible for them. If that woman is also intelligent, charming or famous, then she owns any room she enters. Often times, such women don’t fully realize the power they hold until they grow older and it starts to diminish.

Harvey, on the other hand, is a troll. No matter how much money he makes, no matter how much power he has in Hollywood or influence he buys in politics, no woman of real substance will ever desire him. From the looks of him, it appears he’s accepted his role in life as a beast and revels in it. Many of the stories related by his targets involved random acts of masturbation, exposure, groping and sexual bullying. I imagine most men cannot fathom that in the presence of a beautiful self-established woman, their primary instinct would be to whip it out and beat off in front of her. Tribe members, it seems, are wired differently.

In sum, it’s important to remember that these are not sexual acts. It’s about humiliation of the women. It’s about a transference of power from beauty to beast through emotional terrorism. The only defense is not to allow yourself to be terrorized. Don’t be a victim. Take control of the situation. Simply put: Laugh at and mock the troll — and carry pepper spray.


This article originally appeared on The New Nationalist and was republished here with permission.

Renegade Editor’s Recommendation: Carry something a bit stronger than pepper spray if you have to be anywhere near such sadistic psychopaths.