In 2014, Latinos will surpass whites as largest racial/ethnic group in California. … In 2000, California’s 33.9 million residents were 46.6% white non-Hispanic, 32.3% Latino, 11.1% Asian American or Pacific Islander, 6.4% black non-Hispanic and about 1% Native American.Jan 24, 2014
The demographers agreed: At some point in 2014, Latinos would pass whites as the largest ethnic group in California.
Determining when exactly that milestone would occur was more of a tricky question. Counting people isn’t like counting movie ticket receipts.
The official confirmation had to wait until new population figures were released by the Census Bureau this summer. The new tally, released in late June, shows that as of July 1, 2014, about 14.99 million Latinos live in California, edging out the 14.92 million whites in the state.
The shift shouldn’t come as a surprise. State demographers had previously expected the change to occur sometime in 2013, but slow population growth pushed back projections. In January 2014, the state Department of Finance estimated the shift would take place at some point in March.
Ethnic Civil War in California is Unavoidable
From the Chicago Tribune:
The past has never been the past. We are a country that has been at war with itself for most of its existence.
But it isn’t just a case of white versus black or dysfunctional party politics. Conflict never stands apart from systemic failure, but peaks at a time of convergence. And that is where we are.
Of course, President Donald Trump is the poison in the water, but he came along at a time when black churches, once front and center of the civil rights movement, haven’t really shown any sign of an organized effort to publicly call out bigotry.
And Trump is not responsible for the NAACP becoming as outdated as its acronym, relegating itself to a booking company that issues travel warnings.
It is not Trump’s fault that for eight years of the Obama administration, Democrats rested on self-righteousness at having elected the first black president — blind to the fact that one victory, no matter the magnitude, doesn’t guarantee the health of the party or the nation.
Being anti-Trump is not policy, but with serious issues like global warming cast aside, opposing Trump is the only way for Democrats to stand for something, anything.
And even though only second-string Republicans show up for interviews in defense of Trump, not enough Republicans have had the courage to act in favor of saving the democracy.
Indeed, for many in Trump’s administration, this moment in history is more than they were ever due, and they’ll hold on to it with both hands.
Meanwhile, progressive whites have for the most part retired to the suburbs, satisfied that being friendly and accepting was enough to outweigh bigotry.
And the generations that sprang from this unintentional complacency took their own path forward.
Regarding Hispanic and Latino Americans, now the largest ethnic minority in the U.S., Trump has done a good job intimidating this population to the extent that even legal immigrants would rather be silent than risk becoming a target of bigots.
Having witnessed the mob mentality at Trump rallies, and the skirmishes that have already taken place in some communities, is it really too far a stretch to imagine chaos in our neighborhoods?
That common purpose cannot reside comfortably with individual rights is proof of our lack of courage in the face of adversity.
In this moment we are nothing like our Founding Fathers.
America is dying, and diversity and multiculturalism advanced by jewish interests to control, manipulate, ethnically cleanse and eventually genocide the founding white majority of America is why America is dying. This process CANNOT BE UNDONE. The only remaining option is trial by fire, whites must prepare themselves, physically, economically, and materially for the collapse of their nations, for only then do we have a chance at taking back what is ours by birthright, and removing the threats to our people. Collapse is without a doubt coming.
We have the ONLY argument that is undeniable in our moral right to fight and remove any and all threats to our people:
They’re not us: In-group preference
‘Birds of a feather flock together.’ With the glaring exception of ethno-masochistic modern NW Euros, preferring to be with one’s own kind is the norm in all times and places. Even today, does anyone raise an eyebrow at Chinatown, Greektown, or Little Havana?
Sticking with our own kind in NYC
As it is a sentiment so universally indulged in by all ethnic groups, one can hardly fault our forebears for sharing it.
Founding father and polyglot Benjamin Franklin, for example, in his 1755 Observations concerning the increase of mankind, &c:
‘Which leads me to add one remark: That the number of purely white people in the world is proportionally very small. … I could wish their numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, scouring our planet, by clearing America of woods, …, ‘Why should we in the sight of superior beings, darken its people? Why increase the sons of Africa, by planting them in America, where we have so fair an opportunity, by excluding all blacks and tawneys, of increasing the lovely white and red?’
Why indeed? And even he admitted his bias:
‘But perhaps I am partial to the complexion of my Country, for such kind of partiality is natural to Mankind.’
Jefferson, quoted above, expounds further on these differences:
Dancing slaves in Brazil
‘[Blacks] are at least as brave, and more adventuresome. But this may perhaps proceed from a want of forethought, which prevents their seeing a danger till it be present. When present, they do not go through it with more coolness or steadiness than the whites. They are more ardent after their female: but love seems with them to be more an eager desire, than a tender delicate mixture of sentiment and sensation. Their griefs are transient. … In general, their existence appears to participate more of sensation than reflection. . . .’
Diversity Has Failed, Only question remains is how long do we have before this nation begins to break along racial lines. With the way things are accelerating, not much time is left.
If you doubt the jewish Influence in the collapse of our nation your deny reality in your stupidity.
Winston Churchill on the jew said:
The Bolshevik movement was widely seen as being fomented by powerful Jews. Winston Churchill, in a 1920 editorial, Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People:
‘There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews.
‘Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders . . . In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.’
Germany’s Kaiser Wilhelm, in a 1922 editorial in the Chicago Tribune, shared the same view:
‘A Jew cannot be a true patriot. He is something different, like a bad insect. He must be kept apart, out of a place where he can do mischief – even by pogroms, if necessary. The Jews are responsible for Bolshevism in Russia, and Germany too. I was far too indulgent with them during my reign, and I bitterly regret the favors I showed the prominent Jewish bankers.’
Richard Nixon on the Jew
Nixon, quoted earlier, said this in a 1973 phone call with ((((((Henry Kissinger)))))) on an upcoming US-Soviet summit:
An old trope still hanging on (‘((((((AIPAC))))))’ = American Jewish Lobby)
‘Let me say, Henry, it’s gonna be the worst thing that happened to Jews in American history,’ Nixon said. ‘If they torpedo this summit — and it might go down for other reasons — I’m gonna put the blame on them, and I’m going to do it publicly at 9 o’clock at night before 80 million people,’ he vowed. ‘I won’t mind one goddamn but to have a little anti-Semitism if it’s on that issue,’ adding: ‘They put the Jewish interest above America’s interest and it’s about goddamn time that the Jew in America realizes he’s an American first and a Jew second.’
Truman too resented them pushing their own group interests. Henry Wallace, Sec. of Commerce, in his memoirs on 1946 negotiations over the new Jewish state:
May 16, 1948 headline
Truman was ‘exasperated’ over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. Wallace added ‘Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much ‘put out’ with the Jews. He said that “Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on Earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?” Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn’t care what happened to them.’
Author H.G. Wells pointed out the same:
‘Zionism is an expression of Jewish refusal to assimilate. If the Jews have suffered, it is because they have regarded themselves as a chosen people.
‘A careful study of anti-Semitism prejudice and accusations might be of great value to many Jews, who do not adequately realize the irritations they inflict.’
Some of our favorite novelists were ethnic realtalkers
Beloved writer Roald Dahl (of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory fame) said in a New Statesman interview:
‘There is a trait in the Jewish character that does provoke animosity, maybe it’s a kind of lack of generosity towards non-Jews. I mean, there’s always a reason why anti-anything crops up anywhere; even a stinker like Hitler didn’t just pick on them for no reason.’
Jews have long been criticized for their perceived dishonesty towards out-groups.
Dostoevsky, cited above in Diary of a Writer (1877), also says:
The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia, Alphonse Mucha, 1914
‘And, in truth, the whole activity of the Jews in these border regions of ours consisted of rendering the native population as much as possible inescapably dependent on them, taking advantage of the local laws. …. ‘In this respect the Jew preserves all his originality as compared with other Russian aliens, and of course, the reason therefore is that status of his, that spirit of which specifically breathes pitilessness for everything that is not Jew, with disrespect for any people and tribe, for every human creature who is not a Jew.’
Twain, whom we cited earlier, mounted a spirited defense of the Jew as a fine upstanding citizen and good businessman, yet still conceded (1899) that:
‘He has a reputation for various small forms of cheating, and for practising oppressive usury, and for burning himself out to get the insurance, and for arranging cunning contracts which leave him an exit but lock the other man in, and for smart evasions which find him safe and comfortable just within the strict letter of the law, when court and jury know very well that he has violated the spirit of it.’
No less than Napoleon accused them of exploiting outsiders. From an 1806 speech before the Council of State:
‘The Jews have practiced usury since the time of Moses, and oppressed the other peoples. Meanwhile, the Christians were only rarely usurers, falling into disgrace when they did so. We ought to ban the Jews from commerce because they abuse it . . . The evils of the Jews do not stem from individuals but from the fundamental nature of this people.’
Philosopher ((((((Emmanuel)))))) Kant, from an anthropology lecture he gave throughout the latter 1700s:
1910 postcard satirizing Jews’ exploitation of out-groups
The Palestinians [Jews] living among us have, for the most part, earned a not unfounded reputation for being cheaters, because of their spirit of usury since their exile. Certainly, it seems strange to conceive of a nation of cheaters; but it is just as odd to think of a nation of merchants, the great majority of whom, bound by an ancient superstition that is recognized by the State they live in, seek no civil dignity and try to make up for this loss by the advantage of duping the people among whom they find refuge, and even one another.
French Enlightenment hero Voltaire made similar observations, worded somewhat more harshly:
‘We find in them only an ignorant and barbarous people, who have long united the most sordid avarice with the most detestable superstition and the most invincible hatred for every people by whom they are tolerated and enriched.’
Writer H.L. Mencken characterized them as vain and lacking in courage:
‘The Jews could be put down very plausibly as the most unpleasant race ever heard of. As commonly encountered they lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized man: courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, confidence. They have vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. Their fortitude, such as it is, is wasted upon puerile objects, and their charity is mainly a form of display.’
Poet T.S. Eliot, in a 1925 personal letter, found them envious:
The poet whose work spawned ‘Cats’
‘I am always inclined to suspect the racial envy and jealousy which makes that people [Jews] inclined to bolshevism in some form (not always political).’ Later, in a 1933 lecture, he talked about the importance of ‘unity of religious background…. Reasons of race and religion combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable.’
((((((Karl Marx)))))), himself of Jewish descent, accused his own group of being money-hungry:
‘What is the object of the Jew’s worship in this world? Usury.What is his worldly god? Money. . . . What is the foundation of the Jew in this world? Practical necessity, private advantage. . . . The bill of exchange is the Jew’s real God. His God is the illusory bill of exchange.’
Some of the most intelligent, pragmatic, driven and ruthless Men in History Understood the Jewish question. It is undeniable their role in the destruction of the west and its white nations.
Differences in character– in future orientation, in out-group attitude, in patriotism– tend to kill multiculturalist dreams in the egg. Ethnic groups with vastly different characters simply do not live comfortably side-by-side. Our forebears, we now see, were not so squeamish about these prickly truths as we are.
Time is here for whites to cast of their white guilt, and start think whats good for our race and people, WE COME FIRST.