Greece: Migrants Gang-Raped a Dog to Death

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 25, 2018

So is “migrants gang-rape dog to death” the point at which this argument of “they act badly because of a lack of education” stops forever?

Because they use this “they gang-raped women because they weren’t educated” line, and I guess when they do that they are referencing sex-ed class in middle school and high school. I don’t really remember sex-ed class, but I guess in the high school version, they make a big thing about consent. So they are arguing that because the migrants didn’t get that, they don’t know that sex is supposed to be consensual, and think gang-rape is a socially appropriate behavior.

But I’m just going to tell you right now: at no point in my sexual education curriculum was there any lesson about “why you’re not supposed to have sex with animals.” In fact, I am 100% sure that the concept of humans having sex with animals was never, ever brought up at any point in my education.

Because apparently, it was simply assumed that human beings are instinctively aware that they are not supposed to have sex with animals.

So then what is going on with these migrants then, Jews?

What is the deal?

Are you going to tell us they need to be educated to not gang-rape dogs to death – and then they’ll start working in high-tech industry?

What in the fuck is going on? 

Voice of Europe:

According to the Greek animal welfare webpage Zoosos, on 28th of March 2018 an outrageous denouncement was filed to the Perama police department in Athens, by the staff taking care of stray dogs living in the nearby refugee camp of Skaramagka.

The staff found a little female dog dead at the centre of the camp, covered with a blanket. The little dog had obvious signs of a brutal rape on her genitals, but no other external trauma.

The body of the dog was transferred to the Stray Animal Care Interdisciplinary Center of Athens in order to be medically examined and to determine the exact cause of the animal’s death.

According to Zoosos, the head of the refugee camp of Skaramagka, Mr. Giorgos Karoglou, has confirmed this incident.

Webpage Eksegersi Ellinon, reports that the Greek PM Mr Giannis Lagos, of the Greek Nationalist Golden Dawn party, filed a question to the responsible Minister of Justice and the Minister of the Interior, in which he asked to be informed about the exact cause of death of the dog.

He furthermore demands justice to be delivered to the perpetrators as soon as possible. Although the ministers are obliged to answer within 25 days according to the Hellenic Parliament’s Rules, almost two months have passed from the date that the question of Mr Lagos was filed.

The two ministers have not answered his question, of which we received official copies, so far.

When is enough going to be enough?

This poor little innocent dog was GANG-RAPED TO DEATH.

What fucked up thing do these animals have to do in order for people to look at them and say “THESE ARE FUCKING ANIMALS AND WE DO NOT WANT THEM IN OUR COUNTRIES”?

It’s just… it’s almost too much to even process.

Remember who called these people in.

Remember it next time a woman tells you fucking anything about fucking anything.

These fucking whores deserve to be raped – not some innocent little doggo.

Women are evil.


They are agents of the demiurge, which exist for us to overcome. They are living, but they do not have souls, and our duty as men is to keep them in line. To be challenged by them, to meet that challenge and prove we can use these monstrous beings to reproduce our offspring.

You need to understand this.

Whenever you interact with them.

They belong to us as property. They are to serve us.

You don’t have to “hate” them – in fact, that is stupid. Hating women is like hating a forest fire. They are an evil force of destruction, but a purely natural phenomenon. Hating a natural phenomenon is not logical, and you should not engage in excessively emotional, illogical behavior.

Instead, you should view them as soulless animals which exist only to serve you, and if they are not serving you, they are feral, and thus they are in need of being tamed or discarded.

Western women are feral animals.

They are dangerous and satanic.

Their behavior leads to this:


Never trust them. Any of them. Never, ever let your guard down or show weakness.


No matter how good you think she is, she will turn on you and eat your flesh as soon as she thinks she can get away with it.

And yes: I am talking about all women.





Apes Shit on Mona Lisa in New Beyonce “Apeshit” Video

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
June 17, 2018

Are you tired of this yet?

This is nigger trying to be deep. Or perhaps their Jew managers who think it would be hilarious to have a bunch of apes run wild around the Louvre, looking all smug and above it all *sigh* white peepo, shaiking mah dahm head. 

But yeah, if you don’t want to watch the video, it’s some modern interpretive dance shit, stupid lyrics and black people twerking on the ruins of Western civilization.

You know I’ve found that, with the rare exception, you have to think of niggers as a force of nature.

They’re out to get you, whitey. And it’s nothing personal, kid…except that it is.

We hate you.

We hate everything about you.

We don’t even really know why.

But we’re a force of nature. Constantly beating at the walls and wailing for White people to let them in. So that they can wreak everything of course. And then proceed to lord over it all.

Because they’re KANGZ don’t you know?

Putting on some fancy-looking clothes, a self-aware smirk and getting a video camera rolling is now a tried and true African appropriation ritual.

A territory marking ceremony that White people seem to be blissfully unaware of.

Twerking in the Louvre was Beyonce’s way of planting the nigger flag into the museum and saying, “dis shit be ours, now.”

It’s like what the Moslems did when they took Jerusalem.

In actual history, they took the crucifixes and beat them and marched them around the city.

But that’s what these niggers are doing.

Marking their territory.

What are you looking at, white man? Dis be my shit now

I’m at such high levels of negro fatigue that I get triggered by pictures of gorillas now.

In my mind there simply is no difference left whatsoever.

Bill Clinton: Media Treated Obama Favorably Possibly Because of His Race

President Bill Clinton sat down on CBS “This Morning” today along side his new co-author, James Patterson, to discuss their new thriller The President Is Missing. The story involves a president facing impeachment, which led to President Clinton giving his current opinion on the medi and his view on the ongoing Russian Investigation conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller. Mo Rocca asked point blank, “Do you think that the press has been fair to President Trump?”
“I think they have tried by and large to cover this investigation based on the facts,” Mr. Clinton said. “I think if the roles were reversed – now, this is me just talking, but it’s based on my experience! – I think if it were a Democratic president, and these facts were present, most people I know in Washington believe impeachment hearings would have begun already,” the 42nd president replied.
“If there were a Democrat in power right now?” Rocca asked his guests
“Yes. And most people I know believe that the press would have been that hard, or harder. But these are serious issues,” Clinton added.
Rocca then asked, “You hear from Trump supporters who say, ‘You know, the press slobbered all over President Obama, he could do no wrong. And now this guy can do no right. What gives, that there’s a kind of whiplash?'”
Well, they did treat him differently than other Democrats and Republicans,” Mr. Clinton replied. “That was the political press.”
When asked to explain why the media favored Obama, Clinton said, “You know, I don’t know. They liked him, and they liked having the first African-American president. And he was a good president, I think. I don’t agree with President Trump’s assessment of his service.” (Emphasis added)
This is not the first time that President Clinton has noted the mainstream media’s biased news coverage of Barack Obama. In the 2008 presidential primaries, Clinton called then Senator Obama’s presidential campaign a “fairy tale.” Clinton criticized the press for never taking Obama to task for saying he had better judgement than Hillary Clinton because Obama was the only one against the Iraq war from the beginning. This was not true.
“Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen,” Clinton can be seen saying in the following clip.
“I pointed out that he had never been asked about his statement in 2004 that he didn’t know how he would have voted on the war resolution,” Bill Clinton said the days after his remarks. “It disproves the argument that he was always against it and everybody else was wrong and he was right. I said ‘So that story is a fairy tale,’ and that doesn’t have anything to do with my respect for him.”

Roseanne Was Right

Recently, one of the few network TV shows to promote a vaguely Right-of-center politics was taken off the air. The show was cut within hours of its lead actor sending out a tweet about senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett (“vj”). 

It’s worth asking even the most racially unaware audience exactly why comparing the appearance of blacks to gorillas draws such ire.

And it’s worth following that question up with this one: if I compared the appearance of blacks to frogs, or to iguanas, or to elephants, would there be the same hostile reaction?

The obvious answer is: Of course not. Because blacks don’t look like frogs. They don’t look like iguanas. And they don’t look like elephants.

The claim would simply be too absurd to generate offense — and the reaction would be more like “what the hell is this guy talking about?” than “HOW DARE HE!!!” We generally experience more confusion than outrage when people make jokes or attempt to insult us with comparisons that simply aren’t apt or applicable at all.

In high school, if someone had made a “your momma’s so fat” joke when my mother was a triathlon-running bodybuilder who could have easily beat the whole lot of them up, it would have had no effect besides making the kid throwing the insult look like an idiot.

On the other hand, if she actually was obese and I was insecure about this and afraid she was going to die of a heart attack, I might have gotten angry enough to punch him in the face.

Blacks do visually resemble gorillas. It couldn’t be more obvious that the comparison hits a nerve because it’s true. All the amount of outrage directed at Roseanne indicates is how insecure people are over the fact that it’s true—that their mother actually is, in fact, obese.

How true is it that blacks visually resemble gorillas?

It’s so true that when the best artificial intelligence researchers at Google — one of the most diverse companies in the entire United States, hardly some bastion of white corporate power — designed a machine learning algorithm that works by inputting hundreds and thousands of example photographs until it “learns” how to recognize different objects, it began systematically misclassifying black people as gorillas. All by itself—with no human help whatsoever.

To be clear: this has quite literally never happened with any other specific combination of human race and animal. We have never had a machine learning algorithm begin systematically misidentifying black people as panthers, or Hispanics as cockroaches, or white people as turnips. The one and only example of systematic misclassification of a specific race and a specific animal by an AI that has ever occurred in all of history is the misclassification of blacks with gorillas.

And we can easily pinpoint the specific features that blacks and gorillas tend to share on common (or more specifically, the direction in which they both deviate compared to other races of man).

For one example: wider nostrils.

We know that the width of the nostril cavity is an evolutionary adaptation to the heat and humidity of the environment. In cold and dry environments, humans evolved narrow nasal passages to increase the moisture and warmth of incoming air. In hot and humid environments, the opposite happens. Blacks and gorillas both have wider nostrils as an evolutionary adaptation to the hot and humid temperatures of jungle climates (like Africa’s).

For another, the jaw tends to protrude rather significantly past the rest of the skull. And forensic scientists routinely use this knowledge in court to determine the ethnicity of deceased subjects from the structure of their skulls alone.


Do Asian men, for example, characteristically share either of these major traits in common with apes?

Obviously not.

Of course, all this is going farther than Roseanne herself ever did, given that she never compared all black people to gorillas in the first place. She compared a specific person — who for the record is half black and half Persian — to a specific (and quite notably super-intelligent ) ape creature played by Helena Bonham Carter in a specific movie.​​

​If you don’t think there actually is similarity here, you’re just lying to yourself, and it’s that simple. There most certainly is as much resemblance here as there is between Donald Trump and a Cheeto.

The whole issue may seem trivial. After all, nothing of any direct meaningful consequence hinges on whether we can admit that the features of blacks tend to resemble those of gorillas. And white people are simply good-natured—most have little desire to keep joking about things that keep making other people upset. In the minds of most of us, the validity of that upset tends to come secondary to the fact that we just don’t want to be the kinds of people who laugh at others’ misfortune.

Furthermore, Roseanne herself has chalked the tweet up to Ambien use and asked her fans not to defend her.

Well, screw it—I’ll defend what I think is right and what I think is true whether I’m given permission to or not. Roseanne should never have apologized. What she should have done is pointed out that no living black person anywhere was harmed in the making of this tweet, and brought the subject back to its original context by asking why everyone is more concerned about this tripe than they are about the state secrets that were being discussed in the discussion where her comment was made.

If there is any reason Roseanne doesn’t deserve our sympathy, it’s for caving under pressure to hypocritical enemies who are more than happy to compare white people they dislike to apes all day and say “fuck you” to anyone who finds it offensive. Wanda Sykes has done it, Jimmy Kimmel has done it, The Huffington Post has done it, and on and on the list goes.

Does this comparison really look more compelling to you than the ones posted earlier in this article? If you’re capable of being even slightly honest with yourself at all, you’re going to say “No.”

And in fact, this entire debate is really about whether you are capable of being honest with yourself. We know this, as a matter of fact, thanks to scienceResearch from 2008 by the psychologist Phillip Atiba Goff has shown that every group of Americans—whether they’re white or not, whether they’re liberal or conservative, and from the most authoritarian to the most egalitarian—hold an unconscious association between black people and apes. And that’s for the very plain and simple reason that the photographs above really do highlight cranial similarities between them—they really do in fact share a few visual traits in common.

The leading counter-argument, and defense of the hypocritical double standard whereby pundit after pundit comparing white politicians they dislike to apes is just fine and dandy, will of course be that comparing black people to apes has a uniquely “dark history” (as the Huffington Post argues here). The response to this argument is threefold.

1. No black person alive has personally experienced this “dark history.” Ask any black person in the United States who found this joke offensive to actually provide concrete details of that history, and they will not be able to do it.  So they quite literally cannot even lay claim to being triggered by the comparison. No, the reason people call for blood when this comparison is made is not, as the Huffington Post argues, because there was a rape trial taking place in 1935 after the movie King Kong was released in 1933. Note, furthermore, that this is the best that the Huffington Post can do when asked to substantiate the details of that long and sordid history. After using this example, they move on and reference the fact that AIDS originated from blood to blood contact between a human and monkey in Africa. Well, all available evidence suggests that it really did—wishful conspiracy theories about AIDS being part of a government program to kill black people aside. What else have you got?

2. This is literally the “Hitler was a vegetarian” argument. Even if we grant that some bad people did notice the similarity of blacks to gorillas in the past, that doesn’t make it any less true—any more than the fact that Hitler was a vegetarian means that all vegetarians are evil Nazis today. “You can’t notice this because some bad people noticed it in the past” is an exactly identical argument to “You can’t be a vegetarian in 2018 because Hitler was a vegetarian in 1933.” And it’s ridiculous in both cases.

3. Even granting it were true that comparing blacks to apes has a long history—and if the Huffington Post article is the best the Left can do, it really is dubious—it would only raise the question: why blacks and apes in particular? Why not blacks and panthers? Why not white people and mayonnaise? Why not Hispanics and iguanas? The only conceivable answer would be that people have noticed that it actually is in fact true for a really long time.

Because it is. So the only thing that adding to the story of how long people have been noticing it does is prove how obviously true my point here really is.

There couldn’t be a more obvious demonstration of the fact that political correctness is a war on white people daring to notice what’s right in front of our faces. The one and only real difference between comparing whites and blacks to apes is that blacks actually do resemble them and whites do not (I again refer you to ((((((((((((Bill Maher))))))))))))’s Trump/orangutan comparison above, and my photos selected off the front page of Google Images: which actually look more alike?).

And the real reason it’s socially acceptable to compare white people to apes and not blacks is because black emotions are treated as if they were sacrosanct, while white emotions aren’t. Nevermind that Valerie Jarrett really does literally have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.Nevermind that she really was a key player in the cover-up of the Fast and Furious scandal (when Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress about smuggling guns into Mexico so that they could be traced to drug cartels) Nevermind her involvement in real estate fraud. Those things don’t upset black peoples’ delicate feelings—so they aren’t the center of mass controversy and outrage. A one-off 2am tweet comparing a single individual to a single actor in a movie dominates the outrage culture of our airwaves instead.

As trivial as this particular case may seem, if we aren’t allowed to notice the trivial things, then we won’t be allowed to notice the important ones either—and that’s exactly what we see happening now across the entire Western world. The life-damaging punishment awaiting any white person who dares admit that they can see a visual similarity between even one black person and simian animal is part and parcel of the systematic gaslighting used to break down the white psyche, preventing us from trusting our own minds and senses. Resisting this programming requires balking against it when it’s used in a trivial case just as much as when it’s employed in more complex matters in academia. If they can get you to apologize for seeing what’s in front of you in trivial matters, they’ll be that much more ready to demand you do the same when we come to the things that actually matter. Shame on Roseanne Barr for handing our enemies that victory—but let’s not follow her cowering advice that we do the same.

Charlottesville: White Man Convicted for Defending Self Against Ungrateful Attacker DeAndre Harris

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
May 2, 2018

The absolute state of the US Justice System.

We have video which proves, without any doubt whatsoever, that DeAndre Harris was carrying around a flashlight attacking white people in Charlottesville. We have footage of him attacking people, unprovoked.

We’ve gone through all of this.

It’s all fine and dandy for the media to just be like “oh he’s black so he’s the victim” like they did with the ungrateful criminals Trayvon Martin, ((((((Michael Brown)))))), et al, but you can’t just send someone to prison for ten years for “defending self while white.”

Oh, actually it seems you can do that.

Fox News:

A white Arkansas man has been found guilty Tuesday of malicious wounding in the beating of a black man during a violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va., last year.

Jacob Scott Goodwin, 23, reportedly wore a military tactical helmet and brandished a large shield during the Aug. 12 attack inside a parking garage against DeAndre Harris, 20, The Washington Post reported.

Harris, a former special education instructional assistant, reportedly suffered a spinal injury, a broken arm and head lacerations that required eight staples after the assault.

Harris was charged then acquitted in March of misdemeanor assault and battery against one of the white supremacists involved in the altercation, the report said.

The long story short: he went to Charlottesville with a terrorist group to start shit. And he got his ass beat.

He wasn’t punished because he was black, the people he attacked are being punished because they are white.

This is our reality now in America.

You cannot trust the justice system not to send you to prison for being white.

Goodwin was convicted by a jury of nine women and three men, who recommended a sentence of 10 years, with the option of suspending some time and a $20,000 fine, The Post reported.

75% fucking female jury.

In Charlottesville.

Might as well have just dragged the poor bastard behind a truck, Matthew Shepherd style.

Online footage of the beating helped tracked down the alleged perpetrators’ identities, including Goodwin, who was arrested two months after the rally, the newspaper reported. Goodwin claimed self-defense.

“I thought he was a hostile . . .  to be honest, I was terrified,” Goodwin said, according to The Post. “I’d probably perish or be sent to the hospital and be terribly hurt.”

Prosecutors said it was Goodwin who wanted to fight.

It sort of speaks to the whole premise of the event.

Our guys went there to give speeches and so on, the police drove us into a violent crowd of armed terrorists, a battle royale type situation ensued, a car crash happened after the driver was chased with a gun and beat with bats, and a fat bitch had a heart attack apparently as a result of the sound of the crash.

And then the entire media went into full overdrive accusing us of being a terrorist force. And they just kept saying it over and over and over again. And now people are going to prison based on that media narrative.

The larger issue of justice and truth being irrelevant to American courts as they differ to media narratives is absolutely frightening – it’s a dystopian nightmare.

But that is where we are at.

In current year.

Mainstream Conservatives Slowly Realizing The Equality And Diversity Are Lies

by Brett Stevens on April 29, 2018

The problem with living in a gated community is that you have no idea what is going on in the world outside of your little bubble. You go to work in your private car, park in a reserved space, shop at a store too expensive for the proles, live in an area too expensive for anyone but people like you, and you do not see the others.

Even more, you watch television geared toward the college-educated and wealthy. You read magazines about world politics, science, nature, home decorating, cuisine, and the arts. You watch the movies that are foreign, deep, or intellectual. You even go to restaurants with complex food.

Not surprisingly, all of your friends are from the same group. You understand each other and are interested in the same things, including investment tips and contacts at work, where you have a similar level of employment. Your children engage in the same pursuits, preparing them for your world.

You want to look outside your world, so you turn to movies, newspapers, magazines, and the internet. However, these mainstream sources share something in common: they are products designed for people like you. As a result, they show you a DisneyLand version of the rest of the world, a constant drama of good guys versus bad guys, a simplistic understanding of every aspect of life so that you feel more comfortable in your own world.


As a teen, you may have reached out with music from other cultures. For most white people, gangsta rap is our first foray into seeing the world from another side. It tells us that wildness exists, and we are domesticated, but we would perhaps not want to live with that wildness. Again, bias confirmation delivered by products.

However that is most likely the closest you get to diversity. Of course, you know black people, Asians, and others, but they are all from your social class. They, too, have advanced degrees and tidy professional jobs. In order to get ahead, they conform, and so they behave just like you do.

You have little contact with the world out there. You exist in a subset of its culture not just by social class, but by what you do with your time. You work and have hobbies. You socialize. Really, however, you visit a dozen places in the city and maybe even fewer. You know less than a percent of its territory.

At a stoplight, you look over and see other faces in the cars. You notice that most of them are not like you. Most of those are not white, and the ones that are white are people from different classes or backgrounds entirely. You realize that you are the tiniest minority: upper half of middle class, Western European, traditional.

If you take the world at face value, you can explain this situation through economics or ideology. They are here for the freedom and stability, which gives them better job opportunities. They participate in the same economic system, so they are allies. They will fight for our ideology, er, ideals.


You may start to realize, with a slight cold sweat, that these bonds of ideology are not quite solid. People are not being forced by any tangible and solid interest to participate in these notions because as you admit yourself, they are here for the financial gain. That makes you wonder.

Could it be that you are the one getting played, the only one who sees these ideals as binding? After all, others can simply play along until the time comes when they have the power, and then abandon those nice ideals. You saw something like that after Obama got elected in the new aggression that minorities discovered in their public statements.

You realize that you would never know. Your bubble does not include anyone except those like you who have traded their time for money successfully. You do not really know them, like you do not really know your neighbors outside of the intricate game of socializing and office politics.

Then you think over history. What happens with diversity? Groups fight, the civilization declines, and years later, all that is left is a mixed-race group which never achieves greatness again. And with equality? Higher classes go away, average IQ drops, and soon the society is no longer powerful or wise.

It starts to dawn on you that the bubble may extend further than your lifestyle. It may include the assumptions that you take on in order to justify spending all that time and effort at your job, shopping around for non-failing options, or pursuing gated communities.

You trusted diversity and equality because they promised something to you. They suggested a way around the conflict that you secretly know is there, between a society of hierarchy and mob rule. After some reflection, you realize that these were lies.

This is the beginning of the journey from being a mainstream conservative to being an old school conservative. The old school saw people as they are, monkeys attempting to bridge the gap toward having the logic of the gods, and treated them accordingly. Mob rule assumes that we are gods and justifies our failures as successes.

Now you will view everything differently. You have crossed to the Other Side. You can see your bubble for the sales-job that it is. You can see your job for the make-work activity that it is. Finally, you can see your civilization for what it is: not a paragon of wealth and power, but the last stand of a dying society.