Sacramento: First Big Chimpout of 2018! Enter the Summer of BLOOD!

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
March 31, 2018

So the Sacramento gud boi who ran from the cops after they found him looting cars was shot in the back, apparently.

His brother crashing the town hall kicked things off earlier this week.

(Here’s the full video of that event, btw. For the record.)

Now Old Al is in the mix.

This is definitely going to be a big one.

The first big one of the Summer of Blood.

Btw, we’re calling this the Summer of Blood. Because it’s gonna be a fucking mess and yall better just get ready. There ain’t no getting off this ride.

Last night, the protests – in their forth night – raged.

But they haven’t really gotten hot yet. The cops are doing their “let the nogs nig” bit, and the nigs are nogin but… not that hard.

Yet.

Fox News:

For the fourth consecutive evening, hundreds of protesters marched through downtown Sacramento, Calif., on Friday, calling for charges against two police officers linked to the March 18 fatal shooting of unarmed 22-year-old Stephon Clark.

But despite sporadic moments of tension – including attempts to block freeway exits and shut down a nightclub – the protests yielded no arrests or property damage.

Autopsy results from pathologist Dr. Bennet Omalu revealed Friday morning that Clark was shot from behind seven times, contradicting the department’s narrative that Clark was approaching the officers when he was killed.

The autopsy was released a day after an emotional funeral service at which the Rev. Al Sharpton, founder of the National Action Network, delivered the eulogy.

Sharpton praised demonstrators for their restraint and urged them to follow the lead of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and his advocacy of nonviolent protest. Wednesday will be the 50th anniversary of King’s assassination by gunfire.

They’re doing a good job with the restraint for sure.

But it will not last.

Last night they rushed a hotel.

I think they might pop-off tonight, hard.

These things usually have a build-up, with violence increasing day by day as white people fail to respond in the way they are looking for them to respond.

We shall see.

Srs Business

They’re taking this seriously.

Blacks can crash and shut down a city government meeting, but white people aren’t allowed to take issue with anything blacks do.

Fox News:

A nurse was placed on leave from a Sacramento, Calif., hospital Friday for writing on Facebook that Stephon Clark, the unarmed black man who was fatally shot by police, “deserved it for being stupid.”

Faith Linthicum, a labor and delivery nurse at Kaiser Permanente Roseville Medical Center in California, provoked a social media frenzy when she commented on a post about Clark’s death, the Sacramento Bee reported.

“Yeah but he was running from the police jumping over fences and breaking in peoples house…why run??!!! He deserved it for being stupid,” the post reportedly read.

Her comments widely circulated on social media. One user reportedly wrote, “How can we trust our lives, the lives of our black and brown babies to these people? Nurses are supposed to help people not be happy when people die.”

“Kaiser Permanente does not tolerate hate or discrimination and has a long history of embracing diversity and inclusion – it remains a place where we welcome everyone,” a statement from the company read. “We want to emphasize that the comments expressed by this employee, who is no longer with the organization, do not in any way reflect Kaiser Permanente’s views or actions.”

So, the thing is building up momentum throughout the society.

I thought the narrative wasn’t stable enough, but they’re running with it.

Online Searches for Hotels in Wakanda Increase by 620% Since “Black Panther” Release

Michael Byron

Daily Stormer
March 15, 2018

Black Panther recently exceeded $1.1 billion at the box office, and has become one of the top 20 highest-grossing films of all time.

I wish that weren’t the case, but it is – and I’m not surprised. The film had one of the most aggressive marketing campaigns in cinema history, and several review aggregation websites – most notoriously Rotten Tomatoes – manipulated its critical reception in an apparent attempt to convince the public that a movie about a vibranium-powered supernigger is better than The Godfather.

But that isn’t the saddest thing about Black Panther.

The saddest (also, funniest) thing about Black Panther is that a sizable percentage of its black audience left the cinema believing that Wakanda is (a) real, and (b) would be a bretty gud place to catch some sun.

Daily Mail:

It seems that the Black Panther movie has done such a good job of immersing audiences in its world that many people think it’s real.

Two hotel booking sites have revealed that site searches for the word ‘Wakanda’ – the name of the fictional African country the movie is set in – have risen dramatically.

Hotelscan.com reported that the number of people landing on its Wisconsin Wakanda Water Park page is up by 620 per cent and Hotels.com reported that searches for neighbouring Wakanda Park are up by 55 per cent year on year.

A spokesperson for hotelscan.com commented: ‘The fact we’ve seen such an increase in the number of site visits to the Wakanda Water Park destination page on our website since the launch of Black Panther suggests that, until people visit our website searching for trips, they’re not aware it’s a fictional destination.

‘Either that, or people are more interested than ever in attending the Water Park, but we think that the movie has something to do with it!’

Boy, that’s a cruel twist of fate.

Blacks search for hotels in Wakanda and discover that the “real” Wakanda is the last place on Earth they want to be: a goddamn water park.

Sheeeit…

Hotels.com, meanwhile, said it had spotted spikes in searches to other Wakanda namesakes around the world.

It said searches for Wauconda, Illinois (pronounced identically to Wakanda), are up more than 25 per cent and Makanda, also in Illinois, are up over 40 per cent year on year.

Further afield, Wakaya, in Fiji, are up over 235 per cent and Wakkanai in Japan is enjoying a more than 55 per cent year-on-year uplift.

Anyone want to bet that these cities are in the process of changing their names to avoid attracting a bunch of blacks who are expecting to meet T’Challa?

The Japs probably will. These people are so disgusted by the sight of negroes that their Black Panther posters needed to hide the race of the lead actor:

Seriously, Asians were led to believe that this film wasn’t about Africans. The Chinese were pissed af after seeing it.

All things considered, though, this is pretty heavy stuff.

I mean, just think about it: blacks have no history, so two ratfaced kikes (((((((Stan Lee)))))) and ((((((Jack Kirby))))))) created Wakanda for them in comic book form. Jewish Hollywood brings Wakanda to the silver screen and encourages blacks to identify with it. Blacks do so, and, in many cases, believe that Wakanda – a futuristic metropolis where trains operate via electromagnetism – is real and can be visited like Johannesburg or Cancún.

Wew.

At the risk of sounding like a racist writing for the meanest neo-Nazi site in existence, I’m starting to think that these blacks are not as clever as Morgan Freeman has led me to believe.

South African Parliament Votes To Take Land From White People Without Compensation

By

Members of the South African parliament have overwhelmingly voted to take land from white people—without any compensation. Best of all, they have produced virtually no plan as to how this will be achieved, leading to speculation that any expropriation is going to resemble the terrible violence that occurred against white farmers in neighboring Zimbabwe under dictator Robert Mugabe. Even with a plan, the proposed measures would reek of racism, bullying, and intimidation.

Since the resignation of Jacob Zuma in February, President Cyril Ramaphosa has used rather inflammatory rhetoric in support of land expropriation. This is unsurprising when one considers both South Africa’s long-term problems and more recent scandals involving inexcusable economic and social mismanagement. For example, Cape Town, an area home to four or five million people, is about to run completely out of water. Catastrophes or impending catastrophes in South Africa are almost certainly being swept under the carpet via racially charged mischief like calls for land seizures from whites.

It has been nearly 25 years since Nelson Mandela became the first black leader of South Africa and whites are still being scapegoated for the country’s numerous woes. Given the disdain many elites, both black and white, have for everyday white South Africans, you can be sure that many in the latter group feel betrayed by the present political climate. They threw their weight behind Nelson Mandela in the past as they expected reconciliation and peace, not aggression, theft, racism, and the use of force against them.

Is your country not working? Blame and bully white farmers

A white Zimbabwean couple nearly killed during land expropriations under Robert Mugabe. White South African farmers can expect similar treatment–and many have already received it.

Anyone who has been to South Africa like I have can remember a very conflicted, crisis-ridden country “boasting”…

  • ridiculous general crime rates, defying both the country’s relatively non-violent history and many of its economic indicators, which are actually above the African average in most cases;
  • an astronomical murder rate, typically meaning roughly as many people die every year from homicide as perished from decades of white-controlled apartheid;
  • an HIV/AIDS crisis, accelerated by moronic levels of negligence under Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki, and Jacob Zuma;
  • shocking levels of corruption, including a major farce where Zuma used public funds to renovate his own home and described his luxurious new swimming pool as anti-fire protection; and
  • frequent demands for the genocide of white people, particularly by extremists such as Julius Malema, infamous for singing about the murder of Boers, a predominantly Dutch, German, and French white ethnic group.

Incidentally, Malema and his far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) were behind the expropriation motion later backed by the ruling African National Congress (ANC). Having lost much public support following a series of controversies, the ANC is increasingly adopting the EFF’s anti-white language to win back votes.

Where are CNN and the other usual suspects?

Calling on ((((((Jake Tapper)))))) and other “fearless journalists” from CNN.

CNN has been silent on a country’s parliament voting to take land from people based on their race. They did, however, report on “news” that South Africa and Wales plan to play a one-off rugby match in Washington D.C. Sport can be a very important part of our lives, true, yet I doubt most people in Washington—or anywhere else in the US—will take note of a sport virtually no Americans play.

Amidst constantly regurgitated minutiae about “the Russia investigation,” CNN and comparably biased leftist “news” outlets have no time for proven events that are going to severely impact on people’s lives, regardless of whether violence does or does not accompany the taking of land from whites in South Africa (it probably will). This has been standard procedure for a long time and we can bet it shall continue well into the future.

Is South Africa’s path going to be emulated by America?

Far-left activists in the US insist on “reparations” for slavery, an incredibly tone-deaf proposal, not just because the vast majority of African slaves were initially enslaved by fellow blacks. Native American extremists are usually provided with less airtime but have also been known to espouse very revanchist ideas toward various US governments. So is any South African model for anti-white land-grabbing going to inspire angry elements in America?

In 10 or 20 years’ time, maybe even just five, do not be shocked if the kinds of news you read online today concerning attacked white farmers or land expropriation “discussions” in Africa start to repeat themselves in the American south-west or south. And if CNN and other leftist outlets are saying virtually nothing in relation to South Africa now, would you really expect them to sternly oppose such measures when they begin to be pursued in North America? Of course not.

 

Thoughts of the Day: If Whites Become a Minority – GL 030618

gl 030618

Another week has gone by already, which means it’s time once again for Grandpa Lampshade’s Thoughts of the Day and we have a lot to cover this week so we’re not going to spend much time beating around the bush.

Sometimes the way we relate to one another in this movement is much like the way you may relate to someone in a personal relationship. I don’t care how good a match you are, you are not going to see eye to eye 100% of the time, it’s just not going to happen. This seems like common sense, right? Yet in this movement we have a lot of different people with a lot of different ideas and yet, we seem to be shocked when all these different people don’t agree with us 100% of the time. Too often this winds up devolving into name calling and worse, accusations of secret Jewyness or other such things. The simple fact of the matter is that when it comes to an end goal, 88% (lol) of us want the same thing, we simply have different ideas on how to get there. In the end, the one who is correct will be shown to be correct and the one who is wrong will at some point either fail miserably or will be forced to admit they were wrong and alter their tactics. When we inevitably have these differences, I say let us work together where it’s practical and part ways when it is not. It’s as simple as that. No need for anger and name calling and accusations of being a secret Jew or whatever.

Along this same line, one of the points of disagreement I’ve observed as of late is American Nationalism. Is promoting ‘Murica! and American flags selling out and going soft or a sly political strategy? Well, my answer is both and it depends. The thing that’s hard to accept is the America I grew up in is long gone. It’s sad to accept but that’s the reality. America is gone and it’s not coming back. The struggle now is to see who will be in power and what will they establish. I truly believe that when we build something new there are quite a few National Socialist principles that would be very beneficial in moving forward. I also acknowledge that you’re not going to actually call those principles “National Socialism” but I don’t really care about what you call it. What I care about is the end result and that should be your concern as well.

Most of us are quite aware of the plight of White people in South Africa but I want to devote a segment to discussing South Africa once again. This isn’t the first time we’ve discussed the country and it won’t be the last. The important thing that people must understand when it comes to South Africa is that it is the prototype for what the Jew wants to happen to all our societies. Yes, we want to raise awareness of the plight of white South Africans and hopefully do something to help them, but at the same time we need to use this to make the masses understand that this is their future and not that far down the road either. We will of course discuss this in much greater detail but know this: once you are the minority and once you have given up your power advantage, the mask of “equality and justice” that the enemy wears will quickly come off and the hideous monster will bare it’s fangs.

In case you haven’t noticed, Cold War 2.0 is now full on. In this Cold War sequel the U.S. plays the part of global villain. Russia has reached out it’s hand in a gesture of peace time and time again and time and time again the U.S. has swatted that hand away and spit in their face. Putin, it would appear, has now had enough. He’s upped his game on Russia’s nuclear arsenal and says he’s not bluffing. I believe him. 50 years ago, we could have confidence that perhaps saner and calmer voices would prevail. Today, not so much. Could we ultimately wind up in a nuclear war that sees millions and millions of people wiped off the face of the planet? I believe we could and I also believe the reason why is quite simple: the Jew.

For this week’s sermon in the Church of the Lampshade, we’re going to discuss the topic of pre-tribulation rapture. Evangelicals are really big on this one. I had a listener ask my opinion on this earlier this past week and I thought it was an excellent topic to do a sermon on. So what about this idea that if you are a special snowflake then Jesus isn’t going to make you go through the really bad stuff but instead, he will swoop you up to heaven so you can sit on the sidelines? Is it biblical? We’ll explore this in great depth this week and put this silly idea to rest.

As always, I hope that you enjoy this week’s show as I know I enjoyed the pleasure of sitting down with all of you once again for this visit. It seems like the weeks are flying by faster and faster, perhaps that’s an age thing. Either way, you can bet that we plan to gather up once again right here next week, for Grandpa Lampshade’s Thoughts of the Day.

***I neglected to mention it in the show but outro music this week comes to us courtesy of Filbert Applebag!***

You can sponsor Grandpa Lampshade at this Google wallet address: oilylizzard@gmail.com
Or by sending Bitcoin to this wallet: 13nY3S5QKnezh5U7th5jxsU81D9m1VzR1g

Presented by Grandpa Lampshade

Thoughts of the Day: If Whites Become a Minority – GL 030618

https://archive.org/embed/GL030618

Download (01:14:30)

Grandpa Lampshade will be back next Tuesday on Radio Aryan at 3pm EST/8pm GMT with more Thoughts of the Day.
See the daily radio schedule for more alt-right audio available for download.
Join the chatroom, visit the bootleg archive and follow the feed
Grandpa Lampshade’s Semitic Truth Center
Grandpa on Gab

Subscribe on Android

We can accept donations with this Bitcoin Wallet:

1DUSX2dez4DJHcixzK7cwMvg1e8eYdssDi

http://player.radioforge.com/v2/nota.html?radiolink=http://107.170.101.165:8000/stream_128&radiotype=icecast&bcolor=&image=http://i.imgur.com/dVVLjTh.jpg&facebook=&twitter=&title=Radio%20Aryan&artist=

Radio Aryan on Gab
Online Radiobox app
Radio Aryan smartphone app
Live Online Radio
Player.FM

You can also find our content on this Channel

Sherman’s March To The Pacific (If Only…) 2nd Civil war is coming.

by Jonathan Peter Wilkinson on March 11, 2018

When the Framers drafted the original US Constitution, it was hardly considered a slam-dunk. Ten Amendments followed in very short order. Several of the former colonies that ratified it did so by slim margins. Suffice it to say, The United States of America was not the solid rock it gets portrayed as. Several early historical crisis brought the chaos inherent to democracy into bas relief.

The Hartford Convention convened in protest of Mr. Madison’s War. Andrew Jackson led an Pre-Trumpian populist uprising that culminated with the condign deletion of the United States Bank. The rather mild tariff policies proposed by President Trump this month are nothing in comparsion to The Tariff of Abominations. Canings took place on the floor of The US Senate. People played hardball. For Keeps. Particularly from 1861 to 1865.

General Sherman typified how political disputes were viewed by 19th Century Americans when he said the following about his opponents in The American Civil War.

The young bloods of the South; sons of planters, lawyers about towns, good billiard players and sportsmen, men who never did any work and never will. War suits them. They are splendid riders, first rate shots and utterly reckless. These men must all be killed or employed by us before we can hope for peace….Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman

US Attorney General compares situation in California to pre-Civil war America:

One only wonders what General Sherman would have thought about Twenty-first Century Californians. Attorney General Jeff Sessions suggested that their opposition to Federal Law regarding immigration bordered on insurrection worthy of the outbreak of hostilities at Ft. Sumter.

“This administration and this Justice Department are determined to make [immigration laws] work effectively for all our people,” Sessions said. “The law is already in the books. There is no nullification,” he declared, citing the failed pre-Civil War doctrine of Sen. John Calhoun (R-SC). Calhoun argued that states could ignore federal laws with which they disagreed, especially on slavery, an issue that the Civil War resolved. “There is no secession. Federal law is the supreme law of the land,” Sessions continued, comparing the situation to the circumstances that led to the Civil War. “I would invite any doubters to go to Gettysburg or go to the tombstones of John C. Calhoun or Abraham Lincoln. This matter has been settled.”

Sessions should know. Alabama, the state he represented in the US Senate, was burned to the ground the last time we had nullification issues. As Attorney General, he has opened a can, so to speak, on California. The DOJ has filed suit to revoke three California state laws that designate them as a sanctuary for illegal immigrants.

Governor Jerry Brown was predictably modest. Assuming the demeanor of a Fire-Eater, he responded below.

“You called this an act of war from the federal government,” a reporter began asking Brown. Brown seemed to be confused by the reporter’s quote. “An act of war? That’s pretty strong. But I reincorporate that comment,” Brown responded.

So clearly we have two options. We can let CalExit occur or, as General Sherman famously put it…

Look to the South and you who went with us through that land can best say if they have not been fearfully punished. Mourning is in every household, desolation written in broad characters across the whole face of their country, cities in ashes and fields laid waste, their commerce gone, their system of labor annihilated and destroyed. Ruin and poverty and distress everywhere, and now pestilence adding to the very cap sheaf of their stack of misery.

This is from the man who left a 60 mile wide, 300 mile long path of death and desolation across GA and up through SC. Oakland Radical Huey Newton had a more concise way to describe what would teach Jerry Brown to stop considering himself Dominus et Deus. “Burn, Baby burn!”

South Africa Nearing the Point of No Return

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, 20 February 2018

For those ostensibly interested in building a multiracial democracy, the recent history of Zimbabwe should be a warning, not a model. However, South Africa appears poised to follow its northern neighbor’s disastrous policies of land confiscation and white scapegoating, accelerating the former First World nation’s decline. International observers are cheered by the departure of the “Rainbow Nation’s” famously corrupt president Jacob Zuma, but the new South African President, Cyril Ramaphosa, faces the all but impossible task of repairing the country’s crumbling economy while appeasing a black electorate that wants to seize white farmland.

President Ramaphosa, leader of South Africa’s dominant African National Congress (ANC), is taking office with sky-high expectations from both South Africans and the international community. However, there has been so much economic damage from Mr. Zuma’s administration that both S&P Global and Fitch have downgraded South Africa’s long term debt to “junk,” and Moody’s has put the country on review. If Moody’s follows S&P and Fitch, South Africa’s government will have to spend more on debt payments, and investment capital would flee the country, making it even more difficult to fund social programs. South Africa’s finance minister (who is seen as a Zuma loyalist and whose job is in doubt) says repairing South Africa’s credit rating will be a top priority for the new government.

The markets are responding positively to Mr. Ramaphosa’s inauguration; the rand increased in value and stocks soared after Mr. Zuma was forced out. Optimistic press reports claim South Africa is ready to “explode” economically. Also, racial tensions are said to be exaggerated, since Mr. Zuma failed in his attempt to cling to power by blaming white people. South Africa’s legal process functioned as it should, and Mr. Zuma was forced out peacefully, despite fears he was going to use militant tactics to stay in power. Since Mr. Ramaphosa’s main priorities are economic, he hardly sounds like a radical.

JOHANNESBURG, March 14, 2017 South Africa’s Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa addresses the Global Entrepreneurship Congress (GEC) 2017 at Sandton Convention Center, Johannesburg,?South?Africa, on March 14, 2017.?The Global Entrepreneurship Congress (GEC) 2017 opened on Tuesday in Johannesburg by South Africa’s Deputy President Cyril Ramaphosa with the aim of sharing ideas on how small businesses can grow and make positive contributions to their countries. (Credit Image: © Xinhua via ZUMA Wire)

Nevertheless, Mr. Ramaphosa’s margin for maneuver is far narrower than enthusiastic coverage would suggest. While trying to calm international markets, he has also called for confronting “inequality,” a question that in South Africa carries major racial overtones. He will find it hard to do both.

First, more than anything else, Mr. Ramaphosa has to tackle the problems of corruption and mismanagement in state-owned companies, problems that got worse under Mr. Zuma. Mr. Zuma built his power on a network of patronage and political obligations, and rooting out his loyalists will take time. It is also likely to be divisive for the already fragmented ANC, since Mr. Zuma still has supporters, especially in his stronghold of KwaZulu-Natal. Mr. Zuma is reported to have had corrupt partnerships with the Guptas—an Indian immigrant family with a huge holdings in South Africa’s resources—and his upcoming trial will only heighten tensions within the ANC.

The very trait that makes Mr. Ramaphosa attractive to foreign investors—his perceived friendliness to the free market—also opens up a line of attack for his opponents inside and outside the ANC. Mr. Ramaphosa is, by South African standards, soft on the question of race and redistribution of wealth. The main division is around the term “white monopoly capital.” Mr. Zuma and his allies wanted the term, with its explicit racial identification, designated in party propaganda as an enemy to be fought. Mr. Ramaphosa argued that the term, which once formed part of the ANC’s revolutionary lexicon, should be left in the past. Others still use such language. For example, Jacob Zuma’s son Edward, even while calling for party unity behind Mr. Ramaphosa, declared his father’s fall a victory for “white monopoly capital and the Western agents who are hell-bent on destroying our country.”

Julius Malema of the leftist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party has vowed to give Mr. Ramaphosa even more trouble than he gave Mr. Zuma. He recirculated reports of Mr. Ramaphosa’s involvement in a massacre of striking mine workers in 2012 and reportedly said that he “wanted to show white capitalists that Ramaphosa will not save them.” Since Mr. Malema is already blasting Mr. Ramaphosa for having “no plan,” the new president will be under pressure to act quickly. While the EFF has a small political following compared to that of the ANC, the fact Mr. Malema is a former head of the ANC Youth League shows the potential for the ANC to splinter on questions of economic redistribution and race.

Mr. Malema is already finding something to cheer about, since Mr. Ramaphosa has declared his support for a program of taking land without compensation. This would seem to conflict with his promise to increase economic growth and attract foreign investment. Foreign capital shies away from countries where it can be seized without recompense, but Mr. Ramaphosa probably felt he had to offer the Left something. However, he suggests farmland should be taken only in a way that “increases agricultural production, improves food security.”

It is not clear how this can be done.

The agricultural association Agri SA has warned that any attempt to change the constitution to legalize taking land without compensation would be economic suicide. Some analysts suggest such a plan wouldn’t even do much to reduce economic inequality but would simply harm investment and food security. Even ministers from Zimbabwe are telling South Africa that following the Robert Mugabe model is a bad idea.

Mr. Ramaphosa seems to be trying to have it both ways. He has recommended in the past that people remain calm about the land issue. In January, he acknowledged that it was a “delicate” problem, distancing himself from the Mr. Malema’s EFF and the radicals. Yet telling white farmers their land could be taken and that without them South Africa could be a “garden of Eden” is hardly conducive to calm. The Boer Afrikaner Volksraad, an Afrikaner activist group, said any land seizure would be a “declaration of war” and promised retaliation. Since Mr. Malema told his followers last year to simply “take” land they like, there is a strong possibility of either a violent confrontation or a political debacle.

If confidence in Mr. Ramaphosa is shattered, that could be the final blow to South Africa’s rickety credit ratings. Even if Mr. Ramaphosa succeeds in one aspect of his economic program, that may increase pressure for him to confiscate land. One of South Africa’s most important industries is mining, where there are especially high expectations for Mr. Ramaphosa. However, as mining operations expand, they may spill over onto arable land, which edges out tribal communities and could increase demands for redistribution of white farms.

What’s more, it’s questionable whether any redistribution program can be efficiently administered until corruption is rooted out, since redistribution would probably spawn new forms of fraud and bribery. Given the confusion about who actually owns a great deal of South Africa’s farmland, even the most careful tallies would be marred with inaccuracies and arbitrary judgments.

White South Africans are facing more immediate threats than the legal ones coming from the new head of state. After the ANC takeover, the South African government implemented strict gun control and outlawed the “commandos,” or Afrikaner self-defense groups, making it far harder for farmers to protect themselves. Not surprisingly, the murder rate for Boer farmers is famously high. On October 30, 2017, white South Africans hosted nationwide #BlackMonday protests, which Afrikaner advocate Dan Roodt credits with creating a “sense of community and solidarity” among whites, who now realize the ANC government will not protect them. Organizations such as the Suidlanders claim they will be able to safeguard the white population in the event of a crisis, but there is already a constant low-level crisis. Just last Friday, there was yet another farm murder, with a 73-year-old man killed after three gun-toting men broke into his house.

The violence against white South African farmers is already on the brink of mainstream attention. Well-known British columnist Katie Hopkins created a media hubub after being banned from South Africa earlier this month for “racist views”—that is, for pointing out the frequency of farm murders—and Lauren Southern’s firsthand reporting on violence against white South Africans is already in post-production as a documentary entitled “Farmlands.” Last summer, Ann Coulter said “White South African farmers facing genocide” were “the only real refugees.”

There’s another major crisis looming for Mr. Ramaphosa. Cape Town is on the verge of running out of water. “Day Zero,” the day when the municipal water supply will be cut off, has been set for June 4. Cape Town has dramatically increased in population over the last two decades, adding more strain on an already buckling infrastructure. Like the rest of South Africa, Cape Town faces huge divisions between its white and black population. Although there has been so much advance warning that serious civil disorder seems unlikely, the spectacle of one of the country’s greatest cities running out of water will hardly inspire investor confidence.

The situation of white South Africans is nearing a turning point. Lawless violence and “lawful” confiscation could end Afrikaner farming. Whites are being increasingly scapegoated for the country’s problems by the likes of Mr. Malema’s EFF and the left wing of the ANC. And while Mr. Ramaphosa may symbolize a return to sanity, his call for land confiscation suggests he fears losing the left wing of his party. Even if he does not follow through with confiscation, raising the hopes of black leftists could have dangerous consequences for white South Africans, who are now essentially hostages in their own country.

However, apocalypse is probably not around the corner. Some of the more excitable conservative and white advocacy websites have long warned of impending “white genocide,” but the handover of power to the ANC did not trigger mass extermination. There was no Haitian-style orgy of bloodletting after the death of Nelson Mandela. Though the ANC continues to sing violent songs such as “Bring Me My Machine Gun,” President Ramaphosa is trying to strike a conciliatory tone and even suggests land confiscation will be done in an orderly way after a process of study, not through Mr. Malema’s preferred tactic of arbitrarily claiming land. The main priority of the South African government is appeasing the international financial system, not slaughtering white farmers.

If Mr. Ramaphosa succeeds, it would make South Africa’s political situation more repressive. South Africa’s ANC seems to have found a model to emulate in China’s political system, which unites the interest of the ruling party with that of the state. The rightist Democratic Alliance and the forthrightly leftist Economic Freedom Fighters EFF gained ground at the expense of the ANC as South Africans revolted against Jacob Zuma’s corruption. Now that Mr. Zuma is gone, there is a possibility the ANC will be able to reestablish its all-but-all-powerful place in South African politics. If Mr. Ramaphosa can give the ANC political hegemony, South Africa could gradually become a de jure, rather than a de facto, one party state. Whites would have even less power under such a system than they have now.

For now, the most likely outcome is that Mr. Ramaphosa will to try to please “white monopoly capital” abroad while appealing to leftists at home through land confiscation, ultimately satisfying no one. Black crime and violence will rise, and public trust will diminish. Whites are already in danger, with each house operating as a kind of fortress. Private security services are practically a necessity.

As long as the violence proceeds at a level low enough not to draw mainstream media attention, there will be no real political pressure to change. Ultimately, South African whites pose little political threat to the South African elite. The government will be indifferent to their welfare, provided they are not killed suddenly enough to cause a media outcry. Whites will simply be whittled down. Eventually, to speak of a Boer “people” will be as fanciful as speaking of a Rhodesian “people.”

The solution is for white South Africans to break away from the ANC-controlled system. A number of white leaders during the final months of apartheid did commit to seceding from South Africa and creating a “Boer Volkstaat.” However, one of the most influential right-wing leaders, General Constand Viljoen, betrayed the movement at the last minute, instead suggesting participation in “democratic elections”—a strange strategy when facing an overwhelming black majority. Gerneral Viljoen supposedly extracted a promise from the new government to “consider” a Volkstaat, but, predictably enough, none was ever really considered. He dedicated himself to creating an Afrikaner political party, “Freedom Front Plus,” which generally wins less than 1 percent of the vote. Boers cannot vote their way out of this problem.

But votes do count for something, and there is one place where the Freedom Front Plus wins landslides: the thriving Boer community of Orania. And Orania’s leadership believes now is the time to start pushing for a homeland, arguing that conditions are more favorable than ever. Julius Malema has made a cordial visit to the town, and, incredibly, the EFF won four votes there.

Yet, there is great antipathy towards Orania, and the South African government is unlikely to let the Boers go their own way. South Africa’s powerful trade unions are urging the government to crush Orania and its plans to introduce a new e-currency. It is so obvious that a Boer Volkstaat would be a success that even a National Review columnist has called for a white South African city-state. But that’s precisely why the ANC can’t let the Afrikaners go. Losing their resources and tax revenue would be a heavy blow to South Africa’s struggling economy.

There will be no easy road to Afrikaner freedom. This great people must be ready either to seize a sudden opportunity in the midst of violence or continue cautiously to build a community as the country grows more desperate and divided.

White advocates around the world ought to be deeply concerned with the fate of the Afrikaners, even aside from humanitarian reasons. South Africa shows the future for white people in a majority non-white world. Whites are rendered collectively powerless, politically oppressed, and somehow still labeled as privileged. And while the government provides some minimum level of protection of property to keep the economy going, leftist political parities representing the non-white masses are constantly urging—and gradually getting—an ever larger share of white property.

The Boers can’t fight this battle alone. The status quo is untenable and dangerous, and the only likely alternatives are worse. White advocates must denounce the constant violence against the Boers, ensure no action is taken against Orania, and lobby for white South Africans to be treated as refugees if they flee their homeland. Most importantly, white South Africans need support from our people’s larger diaspora, whether the attack continues against them at its current pace or whether it accelerates as Mr. Ramaphosa moves to seize their land.

White South Africans have inhabited their country as long as white Americans have inhabited ours. In the long run, their fate will be our fate. Mr. Ramaphosa must learn there is a line not to be crossed. Land confiscation is that line. If he decides to fight the Boers, whites around the world must send him a message: He’s fighting us all.