Why Reparations Cannot Be Separated From Repatriation

People on the Left resist repatriation because they fear the end of their votes-through-diversity agenda; people on the Right resist Reparations because they think it unfair to throw even more money at the diversity problem. Both will be proven wrong because the two are linked.

Reparations, to a business person, symbolize the end of a deal that was successful for a long time: Africa sold us their slaves, we used them as labor and kept them safer than they kept themselves or would be at home, and then we decided that slavery was immoral so we abolished it.

At that point, cleanup is needed, and not of the crass and horrific kind that many imagine. If you take a group of people from their native environment to a new place with the promise of supporting them, which slavery did, then when you end that support, you have to fix the problem.

That fix has two parts: first, you give them some starter capital to get their lives going again; next, you return them to their native environment where they can thrive. Our stingy conservatives of the past refused to acknowledge this and simply make a one-time payment and relocation, causing diversity to become an even bigger problem.

If we are fair-minded, we realize that whether slavery was an evil or not, it ended, and that one does not simply end a business or social relationship in an inappropriate condition. The greedy North, emboldened by victory in a war designed to seize Southern agriculture to enable vertical integration of Northern industries, promptly refused all responsibility for fixing the actual problem, which was African dislocation.

Every tribe — comprised of an overlap of religion, race, culture, ethnic group, and values system — needs the ability to control its own future. Under diversity, it cannot do that, no matter how many affirmative action bills we pass, blacks we make President, or brown emoji we make standard on our phones. Once blacks were freed, they were condemned to a life of servitude to a system which they could not support because it was not theirs, and which would never support them because their needs were different.

Now, I am writing this on a Right-wing site, and so most of you want to hear a simple characterization of reality. You want to hear about how those Negroes are ungrateful, racist, and generally doing everything they can to screw up our great democracy. However, the root of the Right is realism, and as a realist, I must point to the more nuanced reality: diversity will never work. It never has in history. It will destroy all groups involve. The problem is not the dusky people, but the diversity that binds different groups together in hostility.

As Western Europeans, we have had a unique approach to existence. We avoid the insect-like individualism of the East and the unselfconscious impulsivity of the South, even ducking the symbol-worship of ancient religious cults or the rationalization from the material of the atheists. We have our own path, and it starts with seeing reality not as something that merely is, but an outpouring of goodness, and life as a gift. That gives us the will to dig into its knotty problems and to try to improve them without violating the basic patterns that are inherent to life.

Since that is our approach, we know that we cannot just wish a problem away. We cannot make an empty moral statement like “blacks should pull themselves up by their bootstraps!” or “whites should die out for the sins of slavery!” Instead, we need to roll up our sleeves, get in there, understand the issue, and then find a reasonable fix. After that, we can fine-tune, but it all starts with having a plan that is both realistic and aims for the basic goodness that we see in life.

As argued here before, reparations-with-repatriation is the only fair and realistic response to the horrors of diversity. We can end diversity with all parties coming out ahead, and it will cost us less than ten more years of what we have done for the past five decades.

Legendary Pan-African Nationalist Osiris Akkebala writes convincingly of this same truth:

The Honorable Marcus Garvey was A Black Afrikan Afrika Nationalist Pan Afrikan in Divine Style, he hesitated not, when the need demanded Justice be the prime objective for Black Afrikan People and Justice For Black Afrikan people, is Freedom, and Reparation for our Enslaved Ancestors is Freedom for Afrika and Unity for Black Afrikan People, no if and buts about that Divine Truth, you either acknowledge that Divine Truth or ignore such a quality of Truth concerning the need of Black Afrikan people.

…So, to not be active with a Garvey like mind when making claim to be in a fight for Justice for Afrika and the Black Afrikan people, which will only come from the collecting of our Enslaved Ancestors Reparation and you have no leadership with a Garvey like Mind to Divinely inform you about what the Black Afrikan is entitled too and has a plan of how to get what is already yours, which is not equality with Lucifer the Human Being, but to get Freedom, Justice, and Independence for the Black Afrikan People, to be enjoyed in Afrika being for the Black Afrikan people.

When we talk about justice, we cannot use the simplistic logic that says that it is taking from one and giving to another to create the perception of equality. Instead, we have to use the older definition: placing each person in the circumstance that fits their needs so that none are unjustly harmed.

For African-Americans, life after slavery has been unpleasant to the point that we have constant race riots, ethnic conflict, and political discontent. The same will prove true of every other minority group. Since our ancestors got this one wrong, the only solution is to fix it, and that solution is reparations-with-repatriation.

Apes Shit on Mona Lisa in New Beyonce “Apeshit” Video

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
June 17, 2018

Are you tired of this yet?

This is nigger trying to be deep. Or perhaps their Jew managers who think it would be hilarious to have a bunch of apes run wild around the Louvre, looking all smug and above it all *sigh* white peepo, shaiking mah dahm head. 

But yeah, if you don’t want to watch the video, it’s some modern interpretive dance shit, stupid lyrics and black people twerking on the ruins of Western civilization.

You know I’ve found that, with the rare exception, you have to think of niggers as a force of nature.

They’re out to get you, whitey. And it’s nothing personal, kid…except that it is.

We hate you.

We hate everything about you.

We don’t even really know why.

But we’re a force of nature. Constantly beating at the walls and wailing for White people to let them in. So that they can wreak everything of course. And then proceed to lord over it all.

Because they’re KANGZ don’t you know?

Putting on some fancy-looking clothes, a self-aware smirk and getting a video camera rolling is now a tried and true African appropriation ritual.

A territory marking ceremony that White people seem to be blissfully unaware of.

Twerking in the Louvre was Beyonce’s way of planting the nigger flag into the museum and saying, “dis shit be ours, now.”

It’s like what the Moslems did when they took Jerusalem.

In actual history, they took the crucifixes and beat them and marched them around the city.

But that’s what these niggers are doing.

Marking their territory.

What are you looking at, white man? Dis be my shit now

I’m at such high levels of negro fatigue that I get triggered by pictures of gorillas now.

In my mind there simply is no difference left whatsoever.

Bill Clinton: Media Treated Obama Favorably Possibly Because of His Race

President Bill Clinton sat down on CBS “This Morning” today along side his new co-author, James Patterson, to discuss their new thriller The President Is Missing. The story involves a president facing impeachment, which led to President Clinton giving his current opinion on the medi and his view on the ongoing Russian Investigation conducted by special counsel Robert Mueller. Mo Rocca asked point blank, “Do you think that the press has been fair to President Trump?”
“I think they have tried by and large to cover this investigation based on the facts,” Mr. Clinton said. “I think if the roles were reversed – now, this is me just talking, but it’s based on my experience! – I think if it were a Democratic president, and these facts were present, most people I know in Washington believe impeachment hearings would have begun already,” the 42nd president replied.
“If there were a Democrat in power right now?” Rocca asked his guests
“Yes. And most people I know believe that the press would have been that hard, or harder. But these are serious issues,” Clinton added.
Rocca then asked, “You hear from Trump supporters who say, ‘You know, the press slobbered all over President Obama, he could do no wrong. And now this guy can do no right. What gives, that there’s a kind of whiplash?'”
Well, they did treat him differently than other Democrats and Republicans,” Mr. Clinton replied. “That was the political press.”
When asked to explain why the media favored Obama, Clinton said, “You know, I don’t know. They liked him, and they liked having the first African-American president. And he was a good president, I think. I don’t agree with President Trump’s assessment of his service.” (Emphasis added)
This is not the first time that President Clinton has noted the mainstream media’s biased news coverage of Barack Obama. In the 2008 presidential primaries, Clinton called then Senator Obama’s presidential campaign a “fairy tale.” Clinton criticized the press for never taking Obama to task for saying he had better judgement than Hillary Clinton because Obama was the only one against the Iraq war from the beginning. This was not true.
“Give me a break. This whole thing is the biggest fairy tale I’ve ever seen,” Clinton can be seen saying in the following clip.
“I pointed out that he had never been asked about his statement in 2004 that he didn’t know how he would have voted on the war resolution,” Bill Clinton said the days after his remarks. “It disproves the argument that he was always against it and everybody else was wrong and he was right. I said ‘So that story is a fairy tale,’ and that doesn’t have anything to do with my respect for him.”

Roseanne Was Right

Recently, one of the few network TV shows to promote a vaguely Right-of-center politics was taken off the air. The show was cut within hours of its lead actor sending out a tweet about senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett (“vj”). 

It’s worth asking even the most racially unaware audience exactly why comparing the appearance of blacks to gorillas draws such ire.

And it’s worth following that question up with this one: if I compared the appearance of blacks to frogs, or to iguanas, or to elephants, would there be the same hostile reaction?

The obvious answer is: Of course not. Because blacks don’t look like frogs. They don’t look like iguanas. And they don’t look like elephants.

The claim would simply be too absurd to generate offense — and the reaction would be more like “what the hell is this guy talking about?” than “HOW DARE HE!!!” We generally experience more confusion than outrage when people make jokes or attempt to insult us with comparisons that simply aren’t apt or applicable at all.

In high school, if someone had made a “your momma’s so fat” joke when my mother was a triathlon-running bodybuilder who could have easily beat the whole lot of them up, it would have had no effect besides making the kid throwing the insult look like an idiot.

On the other hand, if she actually was obese and I was insecure about this and afraid she was going to die of a heart attack, I might have gotten angry enough to punch him in the face.

Blacks do visually resemble gorillas. It couldn’t be more obvious that the comparison hits a nerve because it’s true. All the amount of outrage directed at Roseanne indicates is how insecure people are over the fact that it’s true—that their mother actually is, in fact, obese.

How true is it that blacks visually resemble gorillas?

It’s so true that when the best artificial intelligence researchers at Google — one of the most diverse companies in the entire United States, hardly some bastion of white corporate power — designed a machine learning algorithm that works by inputting hundreds and thousands of example photographs until it “learns” how to recognize different objects, it began systematically misclassifying black people as gorillas. All by itself—with no human help whatsoever.

To be clear: this has quite literally never happened with any other specific combination of human race and animal. We have never had a machine learning algorithm begin systematically misidentifying black people as panthers, or Hispanics as cockroaches, or white people as turnips. The one and only example of systematic misclassification of a specific race and a specific animal by an AI that has ever occurred in all of history is the misclassification of blacks with gorillas.

And we can easily pinpoint the specific features that blacks and gorillas tend to share on common (or more specifically, the direction in which they both deviate compared to other races of man).

For one example: wider nostrils.

We know that the width of the nostril cavity is an evolutionary adaptation to the heat and humidity of the environment. In cold and dry environments, humans evolved narrow nasal passages to increase the moisture and warmth of incoming air. In hot and humid environments, the opposite happens. Blacks and gorillas both have wider nostrils as an evolutionary adaptation to the hot and humid temperatures of jungle climates (like Africa’s).

For another, the jaw tends to protrude rather significantly past the rest of the skull. And forensic scientists routinely use this knowledge in court to determine the ethnicity of deceased subjects from the structure of their skulls alone.


Do Asian men, for example, characteristically share either of these major traits in common with apes?

Obviously not.

Of course, all this is going farther than Roseanne herself ever did, given that she never compared all black people to gorillas in the first place. She compared a specific person — who for the record is half black and half Persian — to a specific (and quite notably super-intelligent ) ape creature played by Helena Bonham Carter in a specific movie.​​

​If you don’t think there actually is similarity here, you’re just lying to yourself, and it’s that simple. There most certainly is as much resemblance here as there is between Donald Trump and a Cheeto.

The whole issue may seem trivial. After all, nothing of any direct meaningful consequence hinges on whether we can admit that the features of blacks tend to resemble those of gorillas. And white people are simply good-natured—most have little desire to keep joking about things that keep making other people upset. In the minds of most of us, the validity of that upset tends to come secondary to the fact that we just don’t want to be the kinds of people who laugh at others’ misfortune.

Furthermore, Roseanne herself has chalked the tweet up to Ambien use and asked her fans not to defend her.

Well, screw it—I’ll defend what I think is right and what I think is true whether I’m given permission to or not. Roseanne should never have apologized. What she should have done is pointed out that no living black person anywhere was harmed in the making of this tweet, and brought the subject back to its original context by asking why everyone is more concerned about this tripe than they are about the state secrets that were being discussed in the discussion where her comment was made.

If there is any reason Roseanne doesn’t deserve our sympathy, it’s for caving under pressure to hypocritical enemies who are more than happy to compare white people they dislike to apes all day and say “fuck you” to anyone who finds it offensive. Wanda Sykes has done it, Jimmy Kimmel has done it, The Huffington Post has done it, and on and on the list goes.

Does this comparison really look more compelling to you than the ones posted earlier in this article? If you’re capable of being even slightly honest with yourself at all, you’re going to say “No.”

And in fact, this entire debate is really about whether you are capable of being honest with yourself. We know this, as a matter of fact, thanks to scienceResearch from 2008 by the psychologist Phillip Atiba Goff has shown that every group of Americans—whether they’re white or not, whether they’re liberal or conservative, and from the most authoritarian to the most egalitarian—hold an unconscious association between black people and apes. And that’s for the very plain and simple reason that the photographs above really do highlight cranial similarities between them—they really do in fact share a few visual traits in common.

The leading counter-argument, and defense of the hypocritical double standard whereby pundit after pundit comparing white politicians they dislike to apes is just fine and dandy, will of course be that comparing black people to apes has a uniquely “dark history” (as the Huffington Post argues here). The response to this argument is threefold.

1. No black person alive has personally experienced this “dark history.” Ask any black person in the United States who found this joke offensive to actually provide concrete details of that history, and they will not be able to do it.  So they quite literally cannot even lay claim to being triggered by the comparison. No, the reason people call for blood when this comparison is made is not, as the Huffington Post argues, because there was a rape trial taking place in 1935 after the movie King Kong was released in 1933. Note, furthermore, that this is the best that the Huffington Post can do when asked to substantiate the details of that long and sordid history. After using this example, they move on and reference the fact that AIDS originated from blood to blood contact between a human and monkey in Africa. Well, all available evidence suggests that it really did—wishful conspiracy theories about AIDS being part of a government program to kill black people aside. What else have you got?

2. This is literally the “Hitler was a vegetarian” argument. Even if we grant that some bad people did notice the similarity of blacks to gorillas in the past, that doesn’t make it any less true—any more than the fact that Hitler was a vegetarian means that all vegetarians are evil Nazis today. “You can’t notice this because some bad people noticed it in the past” is an exactly identical argument to “You can’t be a vegetarian in 2018 because Hitler was a vegetarian in 1933.” And it’s ridiculous in both cases.

3. Even granting it were true that comparing blacks to apes has a long history—and if the Huffington Post article is the best the Left can do, it really is dubious—it would only raise the question: why blacks and apes in particular? Why not blacks and panthers? Why not white people and mayonnaise? Why not Hispanics and iguanas? The only conceivable answer would be that people have noticed that it actually is in fact true for a really long time.

Because it is. So the only thing that adding to the story of how long people have been noticing it does is prove how obviously true my point here really is.

There couldn’t be a more obvious demonstration of the fact that political correctness is a war on white people daring to notice what’s right in front of our faces. The one and only real difference between comparing whites and blacks to apes is that blacks actually do resemble them and whites do not (I again refer you to ((((((((((((Bill Maher))))))))))))’s Trump/orangutan comparison above, and my photos selected off the front page of Google Images: which actually look more alike?).

And the real reason it’s socially acceptable to compare white people to apes and not blacks is because black emotions are treated as if they were sacrosanct, while white emotions aren’t. Nevermind that Valerie Jarrett really does literally have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.Nevermind that she really was a key player in the cover-up of the Fast and Furious scandal (when Attorney General Eric Holder lied to Congress about smuggling guns into Mexico so that they could be traced to drug cartels) Nevermind her involvement in real estate fraud. Those things don’t upset black peoples’ delicate feelings—so they aren’t the center of mass controversy and outrage. A one-off 2am tweet comparing a single individual to a single actor in a movie dominates the outrage culture of our airwaves instead.

As trivial as this particular case may seem, if we aren’t allowed to notice the trivial things, then we won’t be allowed to notice the important ones either—and that’s exactly what we see happening now across the entire Western world. The life-damaging punishment awaiting any white person who dares admit that they can see a visual similarity between even one black person and simian animal is part and parcel of the systematic gaslighting used to break down the white psyche, preventing us from trusting our own minds and senses. Resisting this programming requires balking against it when it’s used in a trivial case just as much as when it’s employed in more complex matters in academia. If they can get you to apologize for seeing what’s in front of you in trivial matters, they’ll be that much more ready to demand you do the same when we come to the things that actually matter. Shame on Roseanne Barr for handing our enemies that victory—but let’s not follow her cowering advice that we do the same.

Charlottesville: White Man Convicted for Defending Self Against Ungrateful Attacker DeAndre Harris

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
May 2, 2018

The absolute state of the US Justice System.

We have video which proves, without any doubt whatsoever, that DeAndre Harris was carrying around a flashlight attacking white people in Charlottesville. We have footage of him attacking people, unprovoked.

We’ve gone through all of this.

It’s all fine and dandy for the media to just be like “oh he’s black so he’s the victim” like they did with the ungrateful criminals Trayvon Martin, ((((((Michael Brown)))))), et al, but you can’t just send someone to prison for ten years for “defending self while white.”

Oh, actually it seems you can do that.

Fox News:

A white Arkansas man has been found guilty Tuesday of malicious wounding in the beating of a black man during a violent white nationalist rally in Charlottesville, Va., last year.

Jacob Scott Goodwin, 23, reportedly wore a military tactical helmet and brandished a large shield during the Aug. 12 attack inside a parking garage against DeAndre Harris, 20, The Washington Post reported.

Harris, a former special education instructional assistant, reportedly suffered a spinal injury, a broken arm and head lacerations that required eight staples after the assault.

Harris was charged then acquitted in March of misdemeanor assault and battery against one of the white supremacists involved in the altercation, the report said.

The long story short: he went to Charlottesville with a terrorist group to start shit. And he got his ass beat.

He wasn’t punished because he was black, the people he attacked are being punished because they are white.

This is our reality now in America.

You cannot trust the justice system not to send you to prison for being white.

Goodwin was convicted by a jury of nine women and three men, who recommended a sentence of 10 years, with the option of suspending some time and a $20,000 fine, The Post reported.

75% fucking female jury.

In Charlottesville.

Might as well have just dragged the poor bastard behind a truck, Matthew Shepherd style.

Online footage of the beating helped tracked down the alleged perpetrators’ identities, including Goodwin, who was arrested two months after the rally, the newspaper reported. Goodwin claimed self-defense.

“I thought he was a hostile . . .  to be honest, I was terrified,” Goodwin said, according to The Post. “I’d probably perish or be sent to the hospital and be terribly hurt.”

Prosecutors said it was Goodwin who wanted to fight.

It sort of speaks to the whole premise of the event.

Our guys went there to give speeches and so on, the police drove us into a violent crowd of armed terrorists, a battle royale type situation ensued, a car crash happened after the driver was chased with a gun and beat with bats, and a fat bitch had a heart attack apparently as a result of the sound of the crash.

And then the entire media went into full overdrive accusing us of being a terrorist force. And they just kept saying it over and over and over again. And now people are going to prison based on that media narrative.

The larger issue of justice and truth being irrelevant to American courts as they differ to media narratives is absolutely frightening – it’s a dystopian nightmare.

But that is where we are at.

In current year.

Black Kills Coalburner Wife and Leaves Her Body in a Dumpster

Joe Jones

Daily Stormer
April 12, 2018

Donnell Stafford, Leuh Moore.

I seems like a lot of coalburners end up dead.

I wonder why it keeps happening…


Police say the husband of a 37-year-old woman whose body was found in a Wichita dumpster has been arrested in Iowa.

Lt. Todd Ojile said the suspect, identified through booking records as Donnell Stafford, was arrested at around 9:20 a.m. Tuesday in Davenport. An Iowa state trooper found the victim’s stolen vehicle in a hotel parking lot and the 30-year-old suspect was located inside the hotel and taken into custody without incident.

“Investigators were able to piece together the events and we issued a felony pickup for her 30-year-old husband,” Ojile said, adding that the case would be presented to the district attorney’s office on Tuesday.

The website for the Scott County Sheriff’s Office in Iowa states Stafford was booked just after noon for a felony interstate detainer.

Ojile said Leuh Moore was killed early Sunday morning at her home in the 1100 block of West Dayton and her body was then put in the dumpster less than a mile away. Police say she suffered blunt force trauma.