Baltimore: National Anthem Composer Francis Scott Key Monument Defaced

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
September 14, 2017


America’s national anthem is racist because anything relating to White people is racist and must be shut down!

Many of us were saying early on that these attacks against Confederate monuments in Southern states would lead to attacks on anything related to White historical figures. Even Donald Trump said that this was a likely scenario right after the Battle of Charlottesville. We are now seeing it start to happen.

Earlier this week, a group of domestic terrorists from anti-fascist and Black Lives Matter groups placed a tarp over a Thomas Jefferson statue. Jefferson one of the founding fathers of the United States was called a “racist rapist” by the anti-White mob.

In addition to the Jefferson statue incident, a monument dedicated to Francis Scott Key was vandalized.

Baltimore Sun:

Mayor Catherine Pugh says she has no plans to remove the Francis Scott Key monument in Bolton Hill that was vandalized before dawn Wednesday and has directed art preservation experts to determine the cost of cleaning it.

Exactly 203 years after the Maryland attorney wrote the poem that would later become the national anthem, the city awoke to find the words “Racist Anthem” spray-painted on the Eutaw Place monument and red paint splashed on it.

The third stanza of Key’s poem includes a reference accusing the British of encouraging American slaves to join the fight against their masters.

City officials said they know of no way to prevent future vandalism, short of catching the person or people responsible. Police don’t have any suspects or surveillance footage of the incident.

“Ultimately, it’s going to come down to them being caught and charged,” police spokesman T.J. Smith said.

So now the national anthem itself and the man who wrote it are racist. What is not racist at this point? They’re attacking any and all White male historical figures who played crucial roles in creating what the United States is today. It couldn’t be any more obvious that their goal is to erase White history. It doesn’t matter that the United States was founded by Whites and for Whites. Their view is that anything relating to White people is racist and that alone is justification for shutting it down.

They will not succeed with this insanity. It was one thing to attack Confederate monuments but attacking the Founding Fathers and the man who wrote the national anthem is beyond the pale. It is only going to further radicalize White people to the point where they will join us.

They’re  going way too far with this and it will be their eventual undoing. Calling every White person who ever lived a racist, White supremacist, Nazi person is not a good political strategy but I hope they keep doing it. It is becoming a great recruiting tool for our movement!

Lesson’s from the Obama Administration

Image result for black entitlement

Lesson from the Obama Administration- Non-Whites showed their true Intentions.

Image result for black entitlement

They Offer NOTHING of value to our nation and its people.

Non-Whites thought with the election of Obama they had won, they had defeated the evil racist white man, and now they were in control of America. Because non-whites always vote along racial lines against the interests of whites, they believed they were now in the majority, and it was time to turn the nation towards communism, non-white direction, and begin the genocide of the last remaining whites. Non-whites always vote for their own interest, and they assumed that whites did this as well.

Image result for black entitlement

They Hate everything about our race, Nothing you say or do will change their mind.

You see dear reader, non-whites for the most part do not do research and surveys to understand our people, they don’t realize that we have a large enemy within that due too white guilt, have betrayed their own people time and again, the inner weakness of the white race that needs to be expelled, led these white traitors to be the deciding votes in election of Obama, not only once but twice. Because of this lack of understanding, our enemies assumed they had defeated us, and the campaign to complete our dispossession, confiscate our property, and exterminate our people was pushed ahead of schedule.


The enemy. Its Us or Them, Make your choice white man.

Everything is about race, who gets what, who is fucking whom, who holds power, and has all the wealth, its all race, this is what our enemies believe, and we need to fight believing in these same ideas, or we will lose. We either suppress non-whites and destroy their capacity to wage genetic war against us, or eventually they will do this too our people. Make your choice, they have shown who they are, will you be weak and allow them to win, or will we show them why we once ruled all of the earth, and do so again. Hail Victory.

Black Teen Drug Dealer Killed That Little Texas Girl

By Phillip Marlowe

Remember that case a couple of months ago of that cute little Bedford, Texas, girl Kaytlynn Cargill, who went missing while walking her dog and her body was found in a landfill a couple of days later? I suspected immediately a black was responsible. I even downloaded all her pictures, fully expecting as much. The cops didn’t let on one bit, acting like her death was simply some sort of natural event. In a way, that was right — in today’s murderous jungle that was once America.

It was indeed a dirty black ape who killed her. The media is not naming him nor showing his photo (they have a ready excuse since he’s only 16). I bet his name really sounds black, too. The little bastard bashed the little girl’s head in with a hammer and dumped her dead body out in the apartment complex’s trash dumpster probably the night she went missing.


When they finally nailed the punk, he told the police she was there to buy pot. Others have said she was really there to collect $300 her killer owed her (never get involved with drugs around blacks). It’s still just your typical Negro excuse, like it somehow justifies what he did. Just watch the A&E show “The First 48” and you’ll see blacks come up with all kinds of convoluted, idiotic crap to explain away their criminal behavior. Cops hear laughable, retarded black explanations out on the street every minute.

It really doesn’t matter what the foolish young girl was doing. He got her alone somehow while momma was out “nightclubbing” or trying to score some crack. But because of Jewish media brainwashing, White children (or adults for that matter) are oblivious to blacks as a real world danger to life and limb. He may have tried to rape her. When she started crying over what he was doing, the primate grabbed up a hammer and smashed it repeatedly into her skull to shut her up.

People tell me “oh, INCOG MAN, what are you freaking out about, wasting your precious time about these crimes on your site? Chill out dude!” Well, I’ve personally had it with these animals. On the “DAY OF THE ROPE,” each of us White soldiers are going to have to take a name of a fellow murdered White as a personal battlefield avatar when we stick it to the brutal bastards.

Notice how the national media said nothing on the story. When they have any kind of reason to believe a White perp was responsible, they report it constantly on the national airwaves, like those two girls murdered on a hiking trail in Indiana. ABC “Nightly World News” ran the story for several days so they could show you a shot of some obviously White guy suspect. But the minute they find out a black is a “person of interest” then bingo, the story disappears down the rabbit hole.

They’ve been up to this BS for decades, actually.

I’ve had cops tell me reporters ask them over the phone “is it a black or a white suspect?” But they never put the race down in the final copy if it’s a black, which is practically all of the time. How do you like them apples, White people?


Nor did the national media report on the five White guys a black randomly ambushed and killed out in Kansas City because the shooter was going to “kill all White people.” The black simply went up to Whites walking a dog on a local trail and shot them square in the back of the head. They didn’t have a chance in hell. The last one was on a city street in broad daylight. Only clever police forensics and the fact he was already in the system solved the crime. Blacks kill Whites all the time these days.

The cops even had the nerve to blubber “we don’t know if the killings were racially driven.” Right. The line was dutifully reported by local media so stupid White liberals can go on about their day. Only us Whites can be immediately declared “racist.”

Just imagine the uproar in the media if a White guy did that to blacks?

Or how about the two White mothers working in a little neighborhood bank down in Conway, NC? The black robber pulled out what appears to be a large caliber long barreled revolver (like in Dirty Harry) and shot the first one point blank across the counter. Surveillance cameras show him jumping up over the counter to go back to a desk where another White woman was hiding — now certainly insane with fear. The black just blasted her multiple times to death right then and there. He cared nothing at all about the “Whitey byatchs.”

A bereaved relative later tearfully told a reporter “they were wives and mothers.”

I say these filthy black demons need to be hung by the neck until dead. Even publicly to dissuade other Negroes that we’re not going to take this criminal black behavior forever.

We need to start HANGING these worthless black apes, by the neck — UNTIL DEAD.


Hero Mom pulls gun on Violent Blacks assaulting her Daughter over a Notebook.



Of course the people who attacked her daughter over a foking notebook are niggers…. and niggers wonder why cops shoot their sub-humans ass’s.

Say it with me now….


There can never be peace between humans and apes, they have destroyed everything they touch, they need to be removed from the west and contained. They are parasites and contribute nothing to civilization.

Color of Crime – its either us or them, pick your side.

Black on White crime continues to climb, they need to leave.

Image result for blacks back to africa

2010. Inmates in adult facilities, by race and ethnicity. Jails, and state and federal prisons.
Race, ethnicity % of US population % of U.S.
incarcerated population
% of racial group
White (non-Hispanic) 64 39 0.45
Hispanic 16 19 0.831
Black 13 40 2.306

In 2013, number and percentage of murder arrests by race were:

Black or African Americans 4,379 = 52.2%
White Americans (including Hispanic Americans) 3,799 = 45.3%
American Indians or Alaska Natives 98 = 1.06%
Asian Americans 101 = 1.2%

Interracial homicides – black people who killed whites and whites who killed blacks – climbed to their highest levels last year since the election of President Barack Obama almost eight years ago, even as the proportion of so-called black-on-black killings dipped, according to the latest national crime figures from the FBI.

The number of black people killed by whites – a demographic in the FBI report that includes those of Hispanic descent – surged by nearly a quarter in 2015 from the year before, as the number of whites killed by blacks jumped 12 percent. Together, such interracial killings increased about 13 percent from 2014.

The picture, however, is hugely complicated – though that hasn’t mattered at a time when the topic of race and crime has played an outsized role in national politics.

Violent crime overall remained near 30-year lows last year, even as Americans’ concern about crime hit a 15-year high in March, and 7 in 10 Americans last year said crime was rising. Unrest ignited by fatal police shootings in Charlotte, North Carolina; Cleveland; and Ferguson, Missouri, have fueled fears that the Bronx could soon be burning. Yet rebutting Black Lives Matter is the common refrain: “What about black-on-black crime?”

Homicides have been on the rise since the start of 2015, but that increase has largely been driven by street violence in Chicago, Baltimore and the nation’s capital. Still, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has effectively played on Americans’ perception of crime – itself buttressed by daily crime coverage in the news – declaring that blacks were responsible for 81 percent of the killings of white Americans, that “African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape they’ve ever been in before,” and that “inner-city crime is reaching record levels.

All three claims earned “Pants on Fire” ratings from PolitiFact.

The FBI’s annual Crime in the United States analysis released this week helps clarify some of the perceptions, cataloguing violent crimes and property crimes in 2015 and offering at least some insight into the demographics of who is killing and who is being killed in America.

The most detailed racial data have limits: They are confined to cases in which one person was killed and one person did the killing, eliminating about 17 percent of homicides. Also, police have to know and provide the backgrounds of not only the victims but the perpetrators, too – meaning that thousands of cases left unsolved and with no description of the person who committed the crimes are discounted. In total, about 61 percent of the 15,696 homicides committed in 2015 are excluded.

Nonetheless, here is what the figures tell us.

Image result for blacks back to africa

Interracial Killings

The number of black people who killed whites and the number of whites who killed blacks climbed to levels not seen since 2008, accounting last year for their largest percentages of U.S. homicides of black and white victims since at least the start of the century, according to the crime data.

The statistics show that the 500 killings of white people attributed to blacks last year were the most since black perpetrators were determined to be responsible for the homicides of 504 white people nationwide in 2008. Last year’s total was up 12 percent from the 446 recorded in 2014 and 22 percent from the 409 seen in 2013, a year that saw the lowest total this century and one that capped seven years of general declines in black-on-white homicides. Prior to that, 2006 saw the most black-on-white killings since 2001, with 573.

The 229 black lives taken by white killers last year, however, marked an even larger leap from 2014, jumping more than 22 percent from the 187 black victims killed by whites that year, which was the second-lowest total since 2001. The tally was last exceeded in 2008, when 230 blacks were slain by whites. The highest total in the last 15 years came in 2007, when 245 black people were killed by whites.

Whites killed by black and blacks killed by whites.

(Alan Neuhauser for USN&WR)

Overall, killings of blacks by whites and whites by blacks accounted for about 12 percent of the roughly 6,000 homicides last year in which police had information about the race of both victim and killer – a slight increase from around 11 percent in 2014. About 15.8 percent of white victims were killed by blacks last year, and 8.6 percent of black victims were killed by whites.

Those percentages changed only slightly from previous years: The share of black-on-white killings as a subset of killings of white people and the segment of white-on-black homicides in relation to killings overall of blacks each ticked up just 1 percentage point from 2014.

Interracial homicides by victim race

(Alan Neuhauser for USN&WR)

“When we talk about trends, we need more than two data points,” says Scott Decker, a professor at Arizona State University and director of the school’s Center for Public Criminology. But, he adds, “Small changes are the lives of fathers and sons and daughters and mothers. And the police don’t have the luxury of saying, ‘We’ll wait until we have more data points.’ Police chiefs lose their jobs, captains get promoted or not based on getting out in front of trends.

“It’s worth paying attention.”

White and Black Victims

Black people have consistently accounted for close to half the country’s homicide victims, making up more than 50 percent of the broader pool of those killed overall every year since 2010. The number of black victims increased 15 percent in 2015 over 2014.

Of the 13,455 cases from last year in which the FBI listed a victim’s racial information, 7,039 victims – or 52.3 percent – were black. That compares with 5,854 cases – or 43.5 percent – in which the victim was white, an increase of about 8 percent from last year.

It’s a disparity that becomes more pronounced in the context of population, as 2015 Census estimates suggest that whites account for 77.1 percent of the overall U.S. population of roughly 321 million, while blacks comprise 13.3 percent.

Homicide victims by race

(Alan Neuhauser for USN&WR)

Black-on-Black and White-on-White Killings

The vast majority of homicide victims are killed by people of their own race. People tend to kill who they know.


“You hurt people who are a lot like you. That’s how it works,” says David Kennedy, a professor and director of the National Network for Safe Communities at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City.

Among the roughly 6,000 cases in which the race of the victim and the offender were known, the number of blacks killed by blacks rose to 2,380 last year, an increase of about 8 percent from 2014.

However, the share of black-on-black homicides as a proportion of black people killed actually fell by just under 1 percentage point, to 89.3 percent. This undoubtedly fractional decrease – which marked the third straight year of incremental reductions – still meant that for the first time since the start of the 21st century, the percentage of black victims killed by another black person stood below 90 percent of the total of black people killed.

Related image

Often less discussed – to the consternation of experts and columnists – is the phenomenon of white-on-white homicides. The number of white people killed by other whites rose 3.5 percent to 2,574 victims in 2015.

White-on-white killings as a percentage of all homicides involving a white victim also fell, to 81.3 percent, marking the lowest share of such killings since 2001.

The margins are small, fluctuating by less than 3 percentage points in the last 15 years: Since 2001, the share of black-on-black and white-on-white homicides as a proportion of those killed of each race peaked at 91.9 and 84.2 percent, respectively.

White-on-white and black-on-black homicides

(Alan Neuhauser for USN&WR)

Chicago Police Arrest 4 Suspects Who Tortured A Victim On Facebook Live
NY Daily News
Image result for blacks back to africa
For More Details, check out our color of crime 2016 update from American Renaissance.
American Renaissance

It has nothing to do with slavery, it has EVERYTHING to do with America being a WHITE nation once upon a time.

Related image

In 10 years there won’t be any monuments left to any of the founding fathers, cause they were evil racist white men. Statues of Washington and Jefferson, etc, will all be torn down if we do nothing. This is about symbols of America being founded and built by white men, and the new America, i.e. NON-WHITES want to erase that history as it opposes the fantasy they are pushing that they built America. We already have low level race war in America and the west, we already have politicians celebrating our dispossession and total replacement through affirmative action, their is already a movement to remove all symbols and images of powerful and honorable white men, they are going to strip the nation of its white past, and supplant it with a non-white fake history.

Image result for tearing down monuments

This is how communist revolutions operate, they target symbols of the hated group, and once removed they replace it with their own symbols and version of history, eventually the people themselves must be removed through state sponsored genocide. Once whites are a hated minority, non-whites will genocide whites, this has happened EVERY single time in history, over and over. There will NEVER BE PEACE. This is how it works, you are either being replaced or doing the replacing.

Image result for tearing down monuments


Destroying Symbols: Where Does It End?

What about the Washington Monument or Monticello? And what about that Lenin statue in NYC? The orgiastic glee with which protesters tore down, then beat up, a century-old monument to a generic Confederate soldier in Durham, N.C., this week was alarming. The mob seemed to have lost control of itself. Who wears out his foot kicking a lump of metal? The urge to destroy could get out of hand very quickly, especially given the mixed signals sent by authorities: Durham police stood by and did nothing. Only the following day, after an outcry, did the sheriff announce he intended to seek charges. Where does this end? Some wise conservative thinkers are calling to put the disputes over Civil War relics behind us. My esteemed former colleague Seth Mandel, op-ed editor of the New York Post and a man of deep probity, tweeted “Take down the monuments” on Sunday. My esteemed current colleague and boss Rich Lowry tweeted over the weekend, “If these monuments are going to become rallying points for neo-Nazis, maybe they do have to go.” Then he expanded on the thought in a column.

Image result for tearing down monuments

But it is a characteristic of leftists that they are always pushing the culture wars into new territory, even territory that the Left itself would have called absurd overreach a few years previously. On Monday, the mayor of Baltimore agreed to take down its Civil War statues. By later Monday, that wasn’t good enough: The city council unanimously voted not only to remove but also to destroy the statues.

Related image

One resident, Keith Scott, was skeptical about what is being accomplished here: “If you were prejudiced when it was up, you’re going to be prejudiced when it goes down,” he told the ABC affiliate in Baltimore. Prejudice hurts people. Statues just stand there, mostly unnoticed. Seth says, “Take down the monuments.” Let’s consider what that might mean to the Left. At Pepperdine University, a Christopher Columbus statue was taken down after a protest. There are statues of Columbus all over the country, including one in Central Park. If an angry mob surrounds that one and starts pulling it down, how will police react?

Image result for tearing down monuments

A statue of Teddy Roosevelt at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City drew an angry crowd demanding its removal (and for Columbus Day to be renamed) last October. If TR doesn’t belong on the Upper West Side, how does he belong on Mount Rushmore? Up in Boston, a writer hints that the city should remove local statues of historian Samuel Eliot Morison (who “used language in his writings on slavery that chafed readers”), Henry Cabot Lodge (“a staunch believer in American imperialism”), and even, I kid you not, Abraham Lincoln. (Thomas Ball, who sculpted the latter, wouldn’t let a black man into the house to pose for the statue, which depicts a freed slave kneeling at the president’s feet.) This argument isn’t on the fringe: It was contained in a column written by Pulitzer-shortlisted critic Ty Burr and published in one of the most prestigious newspapers in the country, the Boston Globe. My longtime colleague at the New York Post, film critic Lou Lumenick, carried the logic of Confederate-flag removal through to Confederate-film removal and called for Gone with the Wind to be placed in a museum. Listen to the way the Left talks about the statues: “The truth is that the desperation to preserve this particular ‘heritage’ and ‘past’ is a facade for something more malignant,” wrote Christine Emba in the Washington Post. “It’s privileged status, not history, that’s being protected.” If this is a war on symbols of “privileged status,” it can never end. We are reaching the point where, if the Washington Monument were to be blown up tomorrow, it would be anyone’s guess whether jihadists or the ‘anti-fascist’ Left did it.

Related image

Once every Confederate monument in the country is down, what then? How is a statue of an ordinary rebel soldier in Durham, N.C., more offensive than a gorgeous building-sized tribute to slave-owning racist Thomas Jefferson on the Tidal Basin? We are reaching the point where, if the Washington Monument were to be blown up tomorrow, it would be anyone’s guess whether jihadists or the “anti-fascist” Left did it.

Read more at:

FYI, removing statues is not 'erasing history'.

You know what you also wont see in Germany in a couple generations? White Germans.


Liberals will continue tearing down monuments until history is erased

LOS ANGELES, California, August 24, 2017  (LifeSiteNews) — What do Abraham Lincoln, Joan of Arc, General Robert E. Lee, St. Junipero Serra, Christopher Columbus, and Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney have in common? Each have had their statues defaced, removed, or serve as the centerpiece of national controversy during the past week.

The Junipero Serra statue, which stands in a Los Angeles park near the San Fernando Mission that he founded, is the most recent of the reported incidents.

The saint’s image was splashed with red paint with the word “Murder” in big letters written on his Franciscan habit. Serra’s arm rests on the shoulder of a Native American child, held close to the saint. Vandals allegedly painted a swastika on the boy’s head.

Where does it end?

Damaged statue honoring St. Junipero Serra in Los Angeles

“Where does this movement stop?” asked Marshall Connelly of Catholic Online. “While the public appears to be in a frenzy over controversial statues, St. Serra is a Catholic saint, and his statue is a religious icon. Of course, the non-religious do not appreciate this fact.”

Connelly continued, “There is a growing movement afoot to sweep distasteful moments and people out of history. While objective history is static, it is often clouded by time and perception. History is constantly being revised as political and social attitudes change. The heroes of one time and place are often villains in another.”

The question is, “where does the revisionism end? After the statues, what next? The names of streets, buildings, and cities? Should the money be reprinted to avoid any association with slavery? Should the Constitution be discarded or rewritten because its authors were slaveholders? And who will write the new one?”

Connelly asked the big question now on many minds. With the “statue of St. Serra vandalized, are Christian crosses next?

Old statue, new saint

Junipero Serra was a Spanish Franciscan missionary who founded nine Catholic missions along the California coast in the 18th century. He was beatified by St. John Paul II in 1988. Pope Francis canonized him during his trip to Washington, D.C., in 2015.

Pope Francis said the Franciscan priest “(w)as excited about blazing trails, going forth to meet many people, learning and valuing their particular customs and ways of life. He learned how to bring to birth and nurture God’s life in the faces of everyone he met; he made them his brothers and sisters.”

“Junipero sought to defend the dignity of the native community, to protect it from those who had mistreated and abused it,” continued the Pope. “Mistreatment and wrongs which today still trouble us, especially because of the hurt which they cause in the lives of many people.”

The others

  • Taney had his statue removed from the Maryland State House grounds in Annapolis during the middle of the night.  Taney is best known for having written the majority opinion in the infamous, much-regretted Dred Scott case.

  • Lee commanded the Confederate Army. His statue was at the center of the protests that turned violent in Charlottesville, Virginia. There were several arrests and a 32-year-old woman was killed when a car slammed into a group of counter-protesters.

  • A statue of Columbus, dedicated in 1792, was also vandalized this week. Those claiming responsibility for the attack assert that the famous explorer was responsible for “a centuries-old wave of terrorism, murder, genocide, rape, slavery, ecological degradation and capitalist exploitation of labor in the Americas.”

According to the Baltimore Sun, “The vandalism comes nearly one week after city officials swiftly removed four controversial monuments: a statue of Confederate Generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, the Confederate Women’s monument, the Confederate Soldiers and Sailors Monument, and a statue of Supreme Court Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.”

  • During the mayhem in Charlottesville, a large bust of Abraham Lincoln that stood in a Chicago neighborhood since 1926 was torched.

  • And as reported by The Times-Picayune of New Orleans, “‘Tear it Down’ was hastily sprayed in black paint across the base of the golden Joan of Arc statue on Decatur Street in the French Quarter sometime earlier this week.”

The report continued, “Amy Kirk Duvoisin, the founder of the annual Joan of Arc parade that ceremonially pauses at the statue on the first day of Carnival season, says she’s confused by the vandalism.

“If there’s a bright side to the incident,” Duvoisin said, “it’s that it’s ‘an opportunity to teach about’ the teenage warrior who was burned at the stake in 1431.”

Just like the Taliban, has a penchant for tearing down historical monuments that don’t meet with its ideological approval, Communist do the exact same thing. Its all about erasing white history.

Image result for tearing down monuments

Related image

Its ALL about RACE.

The victory of NON-Whites (communists) over the White Male.

Related image

Related image

Image result for tearing down monuments

There is ONLY one solution, non-whites must leave America and the west as a whole, or there WILL be a civil war.

Maxine Waters: We Will ‘Go After’ Pence Once Trump Impeached


Saturday in Durham, NC at the 82nd founders’ anniversary celebration of the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said after President Donald Trump was they impeached, they would “go after” Vice President Mike Pence next.

Waters said, “Who is Donald Trump? Who does he think he is? Why does he think he is going to get away with what he is doing? There are those who may be afraid of him but as the young folks say, I ain’t scared, not one bit, not one bit and neither should you be.”

She continued, “Then there are those who say what if we impeach him? What about Pence? What do you mean, what about him? We go after him because we think that not only can we connect the dots, and Mueller, who is our special counsel, will be able to connect the dots, oh Pence may have some involvement in this too.  And so don’t think that somehow if we get this president impeached, we are going to be stuck with Pence, and we can’t do anything about it.”

Waters ended with an “impeach 45” chant.


Locus says, “and we will have our civil war, and kill every one of you parasites.”