Toronto is now majority non-white, just like London. Funny how that seems to be the common denominator in “________ now has a higher murder rate than New York.” Is this “way-ciss”? I’ll let you decide: according to the 2016 NYPD Crime and Enforcement Activity Report, 84.7% of all rapes in the city have a black or Hispanic suspect. The number of black perpetrators is far higher than the number of black victims. There are almost two white rape victims for every one white perpetrator. This suggests that about half of all white rape victims were raped by a non-white.
This dramatic overrepresentation among blacks in rape rates is even more stunning when you consider the fact that black women are far less likely to report incidents of rape and sexual assault to the police than their white counterparts. In fact, black criminality in general is even worse than the damning statistics; one example, per the same NYPD report:
Blacks made up 47.6% of suspects, but only 40.6% of the suspects arrested. For petite larceny, 51.1% of suspects were black, but only 43.7% of the people arrested were black. 53.3% of the people stopped by the NYPD under the “Stop and Frisk” initiative were black. 59.7% of the people who were targeted that turned out to be a suspect in a violent crime were black. Whites and Asians were over-targeted while blacks were under-targeted.
According to the Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN), 27% of all perpetrators of sexual violence in the United States are black; blacks are 13% of the population overall. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 white women are sexually assaulted or raped by black males each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. The number of black female rapes by white men is “statistically negligible” because there are consistently fewer than ten cases nationally per annum. In fact, because white-on-black rape is so statistically insignificant and rare, the FBI has simply stopped tracking it altogether. John F. Gaski reports:
About 90% of interracial violent crime in our nation is committed by blacks against whites. The black-on-white murder rate in the U.S. exceeds the white-on-black rate by about 2.5-to-1. The black-on-white assault and battery rate exceeds the corresponding white-on-black rate in this country by at least 10-to-1. I would rather not report what is known about U.S. interracial rape statistics because it could be taken as incendiary, but the previous numbers in terms of black/white proclivity are dwarfed. (See Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, “Victims and Offenders.”) OK, here’s a hint: Because the number of white-on-black rapes is so low nationally in any given year, the ratio ranges from 100-to-1 to infinity. Liberal, politically correct feminists need to reflect on that one. If these interracial crime ratios were randomly based, they would be uniform — that is, 1-to-1 — for the two racial groups. In other words, the population with six times as many potential victims also has six times the pool of perpetrators, so the effect of that disproportion should be perfectly offsetting arithmetically.
Yes, the relative crime stats would be moderated if adjusted for socioeconomic status (from astronomical to merely stratospheric), but by no means inverted. The baseline conclusion is straightforward, even if surprising to readers who are victims themselves — victims of racial and racist propaganda. The hysterical public mantra of epidemic white-on-black violence is thus exposed as fraud.
From the Department of Justice:
An estimated 29.1% of African American females are victimized by intimate partner violence in their lifetime (rape, physical assault or stalking). African American females experience intimate partner violence at a rate 35% higher than that of white females, and about 2.5 times the rate of women of other races. However, they are less likely than white women to use social services, battered women’s programs, or go to the hospital because of domestic violence. According to the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS), African American women experience higher rates of intimate partner homicide when compared to their White counterparts.
Before we get all riled up about racial disparities and systemic racism and all the rest of it, when we discuss intimate partner violence, we are generally speaking of intra-racial assaults; only 8.4% of marriages are inter-racial, with 2% of white women married to black men (92% of children from a white mother and black father are born out of wedlock, and 82% wind up on government assistance), and 5% of black women married to white men. Only 5% of Millennials have even dated outside of their own race. Given the former statistics, and what I am about to catalogue below, it is an indisputable fact that certain population groups have an extreme proclivity for violence, assault, and sexual assault and rape, with black males far and away the most overrepresented regardless of culture/geography, but rivaled in select contexts by Arab-Moslem males, aborigines, and mestizos. White crime rates are greatly inflated by the US Census Bureau’s classification of Arabs as white, and of many states, precincts, and crime reports failing to differentiate between white and Hispanic; granted, there is some overlap between white and Hispanic (for example, Argentines would be classified as Hispanic despite their population being 97% white), but the vast majority of Hispanic immigrants to the United States are mestizo.
With that in mind, a 2006 Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report covering the time period 1990-2002 reported that Hispanics committed 6.5 times more violent felonies than whites and represented 30% of violent felons (as opposed to whites’ 26% share). Given the wealth of representative data, we can expect similar degrees of criminality among Hispanics classified, for various reasons, as white. The data is far less known for Arabs, but given the picture in Europe, we can extrapolate. From Randall Hoven’s American Thinker article we learn:
Per Capita Crime Rates in 2000, Compared to Non-Hispanic Whites
And from official statistics ten years later:
2010. Inmates in adult facilities, by race and ethnicity. Jails, and state and federal prisons.
% of US population
% of U.S.
% of racial group
Quoting Jason L. Riley:
Between 1976 and 2005 blacks committed more than half of all murders in the United States. The black arrest rate for most offenses — including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes — is still typically two to three times their representation in the population. Blacks as a group are also overrepresented among persons arrested for so-called white-collar crimes such as counterfeiting, fraud and embezzlement. And blaming this decades-long, well-documented trend on racist cops, prosecutors, judges, sentencing guidelines and drug laws doesn’t cut it as a plausible explanation (my note: According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, blacks are 3.1 times as likely as whites to end up in emergency rooms for drug abuse). “Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and ((((((((((((Richard Herrnstein)))))))))))) in their classic 1985 study, “Crime and Human Nature.” “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) relies on crime victims to identity attackers. In 2010, 320,082 whites were victims of black violence versus 62,593 black victims of white violence. With a population in 2010 of 197 million whites and 38 million blacks, the violence rate of black-on-white was 25 times white-on-black (849 per 100,000 versus 32 per 100,000). James Simpson writes:
In the other [non-murder] categories of violent crime—rape, robbery and aggravated assault—blacks consistently committed about 40 percent of the total in 2013, 2012, 2011, and 2010. So the disproportionate arrests, incarcerations and shootings of blacks should come as no surprise. Their 40 percent representation among the prison population fairly reflects the proportion of crimes committed by blacks in the U.S. This is not evidence of institutional racism, but rather a social pathology evident within the black community. They have been committing crimes at the highest rate by far of any racial/ethnic group for decades. In recent years, blacks have committed unspeakably heinous acts against whites and other racial/ethnic groups. Probably most notorious was the brutal 2007 murder of a young Tennessee couple, Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, who were on a date when carjacked by four men and one woman. Newsom was repeatedly raped while Christian was forced to watch. He was then taken out, shot, and lit on fire. They repeatedly raped Christian, then poured bleach down her throat, stuffed her in a plastic bag and threw her in a kitchen trash bin to die. There was no national news reporting of this double murder, despite its singularly vicious nature. More recently, a 19-year-old Mississippi girl, Jessica Chambers, was burned alive by suspected black perpetrators, who poured lighter fluid down her throat, ignited it and left her to die. No arrests have been made although Chambers supposedly identified her attackers before she died. Each year in cities across the country, officials brace for widespread violence associated with black events.
Is this the product of the “systemic biases” and “systemic racism” we keep hearing about? It would seem not. The “trends” persist. Hawaii is 2.2% black, yet per the state’s 2016 crime statistics, blacks commit 5.9% of the homicides, 6.8% of robberies and 10.2% of rapes. In Georgia, which is rapidly approaching majority-minority status, for 2016, 77 whites were arrested for murder as opposed to 401 non-whites; 134 whites were arrested for rape as opposed to 192 non-whites; 364 whites were arrested for robbery as opposed to 2,057 non-whites; and 3,736 whites were arrested for aggravated assault as opposed to 6,118 non-whites.
This isn’t some recent phenomenon, either. Let’s go back in time. From Frederick Ludwig Hoffman’s Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro, we learn that in the city of Charleston, South Carolina, from 1889-1894, where blacks comprised 56.4% of the population, they committed 82% of homicides, 94.45% of rapes, and 81.2% of assaults. In 1904, blacks were 10% of the US population, but 32% of its prison population. In 1923, blacks were still 10% of the US population, but 31% of its prison population, and for 1950 the numbers are 10% and 35%, respectively. For 1960, it is a similar 10% but an even higher 38% of the prison population. In 1958, blacks were still approximately 10% of the nation’s population but were responsible for 61% of its homicides. In 1969, blacks were 11% of the US population but committed 65% of its homicides. Returning to James Simpson:
The media have relentlessly fanned the flames of racial hatred, while engaging in a systematic pattern of misinformation and blatant suppression of facts surrounding the perpetrators and victims of crime. As a result, so-called “criminal justice reform” is now being proposed to release more criminals from jails, supposedly to make amends for the unjust “mass incarceration” of black men… Of the 509 officers feloniously killed [from 2005-2015], 46 percent of the perpetrators were black, despite their representing only 13 percent of the population. Do we call this a black war against the police?…The figures come quickly but are never subjected to the necessary scrutiny. Last fall, for example, the ((((((((((((George Soros))))))))))))-funded ProPublica published a claim that black youths are killed by the police at a rate 21 times higher than white youths. Mass media parroted that claim, but the data are incomplete and biased. They represent just 1.2 percent of police departments nationwide, and most reports come from urban areas, where the population is disproportionately black.
Black dysfunction is, unfortunately, not confined to the United States, or Toronto (where in 2002, blacks were 8.1% of the population but accounted for 27% of all charges for violent crimes), or London (where in 2009-10 blacks were 12% of city’s population but committed 54% of “street crimes,” 59% of robberies, and 67% of gun crimes), but wherever blacks are found in any concentration, the quality of life is abysmal. Crime statistics are often difficult to procure for black Africans in their own homelands for obvious reasons, but what we do know is that in South Africa:
One in three of the 4,000 women questioned by the Community of Information, Empowerment and Transparency said they had been raped in the past year. More than 25 percent of South African men questioned in a survey published by the Medical Research Council (MRC) in June 2009 admitted to rape; of those, nearly half said they had raped more than one person. Three out of four of those who had admitted rape indicated that they had attacked for the first time during their teens. South Africa has amongst the highest incidences of child and baby rape in the world.
Robert Morley reports that:
One recent study examined about 250 reported rapes from 2005 to 2007 that occurred in the vicinity of one small town. More than half of the reported victims were children. Yet, only nine of the accused were convicted. Only seven received jail sentences. Two hundred and fifty rapists—seven convicted. Yet, no media firestorm. No international protest. The incomprehensible has become a fact of life for South Africans. They have a saying for this: Only in Africa. Several men were accused of five or six rapes, according to the study’s authors. Not one was convicted. Only in Africa. An astounding 66,000 rapes occur in South Africa each year—one every four minutes (note: emphasis added). Interpol says this makes South Africa the rape capital of the world. According to experts, rape is so common, justice is so rarely served, and so many women have been raped so many times that many women don’t bother reporting it.
Finally, in the words of South African judge Mabel Jansen:
Do you believe that I am even propositioned by my black colleagues who tell me that they will be in hotel x and expect me to report there at a specific time?…In their culture, a woman is there to pleasure them. Period. It is seen as an absolute right and a woman’s consent is not required…I still have [yet] to meet a black girl who was not raped at about 12…We often have to hear that it was only about the third time that [the victim] sought to report it that they were taken seriously. Mothers are so brain-washed that they tell the children that it is the father’s birthright to be the first…Murder is also not a biggy. And gang rapes of baby, daughter, and mother a pleasurable pass time. That, in reality, is the flip side of the coin. They are simply now in a position to branch out and include white women…The true facts are most definitely not that espoused by the liberals.
This is life in the “Rainbow Nation,” the kind of “enrichment” increasingly commonplace in Western countries endeavoring to create their own Rainbow Nations of diverse peoples and practices. That a wealth of diversity always leads to utter impoverishment is the real truth, but like Mabel Jansen said, it is not that espoused by the liberals.