‘White Thoughts’ White be Gone

“Do you suffer from Acute Viral Perceptive Albinitis?” From the mind of Terence Nance, Random Acts of Flyness airs Fridays at midnight on HBO, and it is clearly another leftist anti-white hit piece.

Obviously people see this is anti-white:

Time is coming, all these non-whites need to leave white nations or be buried in mass graves. NO MORE FUCKING AROUND, PREPARE FOR WAR!

Why are Media, TV, Hollywood, and Universities, all rabidly Anti-White? America is a European founded country, with a European majority, (for now) and yet all of our institutions are Anti-European. Does that make sense to anyone? It’s as if a hostile alien parasite had taken over these institutions, and was working to destroy the founding group, from within…. JEWS

The Comments for this video are some of the best ever:

The masterminds behind white genocide are the jewish race they dont give a shit if the brown people starve to death as long as they can rule the world.

Everyone can see what these jews are doing, they are not hiding the fact that they mean to exterminate the white race.

This was just…bizarre. I went to YouTube and read the comments there: Random Acts of Flyness ? it’s an ENTIRE CHANNEL dedicated to more of the same !

He seems a bit thick; his video was awkward and egotistical. His acting always seemed a bit off, but now I really never want to see him or watch anything he appears in ever again.

What on earth was going through the mind and who on earth wrote and edited this bizarre piece of shit?

I think we all know the answer to that question.

ONLY one way all this ends, and its coming sooner than you think.

A Racist Communist Famine Grows in South Africa – Leftist land seizures and racist politics will lead to genocide.

Leftist land seizures and racist politics will lead to genocide.

Daniel ((((((Greenfield)))))), a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical left and Islamic terrorism.

“Strongman politics are ascendant,” Barack Obama warned in South Africa. He spoke passionately about “the politics of fear and resentment” at the Mandela Lecture. He worried that we were entering a world, “where might makes right and politics is a hostile competition between tribes and races and religions.”

While the media used the remarks to attack Trump’s meeting with Putin, Obama had shared a stage with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa who had come to power promising to seize land from white farmers. Ramaphosa was the latest in a series of ANC strongmen, including his predecessor, an alleged rapist, beginning with the Communist terrorist whose legacy Obama was commemorating.

President Ramaphosa had vowed early on to seize land from white farmers without compensation.  “The expropriation of land without compensation is envisaged as one of the measures that we will use to accelerate redistribution of land to black South Africans,” he had declared. And denied that such racist Communist tactics were unconstitutional. Now he’s moving to modify South Africa’s constitution.

Initially, the ANC, which is partnered with the South African Communist Party, had claimed that seizing land would not violate the law. Now it’s actually going to change the South African constitution.

“It has become pertinently clear that our people want the constitution to be more explicit about expropriation of land without compensation,” President Ramaphosa announced.

When your only rule is mob rule by ANC thugs, it doesn’t really matter what a piece of paper says.

“We will accelerate our land redistribution programme not only to redress a grave historical injustice, but also to bring more producers into the agricultural sector and to make more land available for cultivation,” Ramaphosa claimed in his State of the Nation address.

Zimbabwe had already made great strides in improving agriculture through land seizures.

Land was stolen from the farmers who knew how to work it and handed out to politically connected thugs. Soon the former “bread basket” of Southern Africa was starving. Black groups pleaded with the white farmers to remain. Rural Zimbabwe died. Hyperinflation made the currency worthless. A trillion dollars might not be enough to buy one egg. A former food exporter was forced to rely on food aid.

“If white settlers just took the land from us without paying for it,” Mugabe had declared, “we can, in a similar way, just take it from them without paying for it.”

Ramaphosa’s rhetoric is an echo of one of Africa’s worst racist strongmen. Land seizures won’t bring South African land into “full use”, as he claims. It will mean productive land falling into the hands of ANC thugs who will be too corrupt, incompetent and greedy to do the hard work of working the land.

South Africa’s agricultural sector will go the way of Zimbabwe.

Cyril Ramaphosa is one of South Africa’s richest men and has an estimated net worth of $550 million. How did a socialist student activist make a mint? The answer is an inevitable as it is unsurprising.

South Africa’s agricultural sector has been steadily in decline. Farms used to provide millions of jobs. Now they offer less than a million. Wheat planting has fallen to a third. Cotton to a tenth.  A country that once exported wheat, is now importing millions of tons while its agriculture sector fails.

The decline of South Africa’s agriculture has gone hand in hand with what it euphemistically calls its land reforms. White farmers have been murdered or driven off their land. But land seizures, legal and illegal, with compensation or with a hatchet, haven’t made South African agriculture more productive.

Instead South Africa is becoming increasingly dependent on agricultural imports to feed its people.

Like Zimbabwe, South Africa is due to revisit the same implacable economic consequences of land seizures that took the Soviet Union down the road to famine and terror. Toward its end, the USSR, despite possessing territories that had once bulged with rich harvests, had gone deep into debt to buy food from the United States. The African National Congress’ Communist roots are taking South Africa down the same path as its fallen Communist masters. And with the same miserable results.

Comrade Ramaphosa, as Comrade Mandela liked to call him, is less of a strongman, than a weak man. More afraid of thugs like Julius Malema and the greed of his ANC comrades than of dooming his people to hunger. The ANC is populated with thugs who are impatiently waiting to loot South Africa’s corpse. And they’ve grown tired of pretending that they are anything more than a failed state’s Marxist mob.

The constitutional gambit is a desperate attempt to legitimize racist mob violence and ANC corruption. It takes the constant assaults on white farmers and tries to disguise lawlessness under the color of law.

1 white farmer in South Africa has been murdered every 5 days. This ethnic cleansing has been going on with the same regular clockwork as the tributes to Nelson Mandela and his even more murderous wife. The racist violence, the murders, rapes and land seizures, the chants of, “Shoot the Boer” are backed by lies about a shadow white majority somehow still ruling South Africa even after all the years of ANC rule.

The media frequently repeats fake news statistics which claim that white farmers own 70% or more of the country’s farmland. The actual number is less than a quarter. Some of the best land in South Africa is already in black hands. And, just as in Zimbabwe, it hasn’t remedied the agricultural or social problems.

South Africa’s agricultural sector is already on its deathbed. Its corrupt economy is incapable of competing on the world stage. Its exports are not at issue, its ability to feed its own people is.  Aggressive land seizures won’t do much more damage to South Africa’s economy, though it will discourage investors and drive out more white farmers, but will bring its society to its knees.

Meanwhile the plight of South Africa’s white farmers continues to be ignored. The ANC genocide has been slowly unfolding for a generation with the complicity of the same leftist leaders who covered up Communist genocides in the Soviet Union, Communist China and Cambodia. But this latest legitimization of land seizures by the ANC will only encourage a further outpouring of racist attacks on white farmers.

Australian Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton has urged helping the persecuted white farmers of South Africa receive political asylum. But while every “persecuted” group is fast tracked for asylum, the door still remains shut for a productive population that has been targeted for economic ethnic cleansing.

In his State of the Nation speech, President Ramaphos declared, “We are building a country where a person’s prospects are determined by their own initiative and hard work, and not by the color of their skin, place of birth, gender, language or income of their parents.” Seizing land from people because of the color of their skin and giving it to those who haven’t worked for it is the opposite of that vision.

And yet it’s easy to see why Obama was so comfortable with a politician who could twist the language of equality to justify identity politics theft and the verbiage of tolerance to justify racial oppression.

South Africa, like the Soviet Union and Venezuela, like Cambodia and Cuba, is not just an atrocity, it’s a cautionary tale. Ideology, more than race, connects the scattered strands of the leftist killing fields. To pretend that what happened there cannot happen here would be ignoring the lessons of history.

And a new red famine is growing where the red blood of white farmers flows into the dying earth.


ESCALATION: ANC Calls All White People “Murderers”

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
August 7, 2018

Things are heating up in South Africa.


The official account of ANC’s parliamentary caucus was forced to delete a tweet that appeared to suggest that white people are murderers. The statement provoked an outcry and has since been disowned.

The controversial tweet published by @ANCParliament account last Thursday read: “The biggest mistake we are making is to consult murderers. White people are 9% of the population, they own 79% of land. They never came and consulted us for the land. If they want us to forgive them now, then let us share the land, the mineral resources.”


Funny Part is, these african niggers didn’t live in South Africa when whites colonized the area, it was uninhabited. These niggers showed up after white people built all the roads and buildings, making it livable, which is what niggers always do (as they are incapable of building anything), and why they all must be expelled from every western nation back to africa, or exterminated.

Some clever kike stepped in to cover up the ANC’s stupidy, I’m sure.

The gaffe comes as the country is considering an amendment to the national constitution, which would allow the expropriation of land from owners with no compensation. Announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa last week, the legal change is likely to target the white minority, which has owned most of the country’s land since colonial times.

The ANC said that the tweets were meant to be quotes from members of the public, but this was not made clear. They presumably originate from public hearings held by the ANC to debate the proposed amendment. 

These guys are pretty openly telegraphing their intentions to genocide the farmers to everyone who will listen.

I never thought it would get so bad so quickly, but here we are. I do wonder what the Boer are going to do about it.

This is like the run-up to the Hutus slaughtering the Tutsis.

I hope that the Boer have had time to prepare. Otherwise, they’re in big, big trouble.

Stranger Danger + Political Viagra

Toronto is now majority non-white, just like London. Funny how that seems to be the common denominator in “________ now has a higher murder rate than New York.” Is this “way-ciss”? I’ll let you decide: according to the 2016 NYPD Crime and Enforcement Activity Report, 84.7% of all rapes in the city have a black or Hispanic suspect. The number of black perpetrators is far higher than the number of black victims. There are almost two white rape victims for every one white perpetrator. This suggests that about half of all white rape victims were raped by a non-white.

This dramatic overrepresentation among blacks in rape rates is even more stunning when you consider the fact that black women are far less likely to report incidents of rape and sexual assault to the police than their white counterparts. In fact, black criminality in general is even worse than the damning statistics; one example, per the same NYPD report:

Blacks made up 47.6% of suspects, but only 40.6% of the suspects arrested. For petite larceny, 51.1% of suspects were black, but only 43.7% of the people arrested were black. 53.3% of the people stopped by the NYPD under the “Stop and Frisk” initiative were black. 59.7% of the people who were targeted that turned out to be a suspect in a violent crime were black. Whites and Asians were over-targeted while blacks were under-targeted.[1]

According to the Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN), 27% of all perpetrators of sexual violence in the United States are black; blacks are 13% of the population overall. According to U.S. Justice Department figures over 34,460 white women are sexually assaulted or raped by black males each year, and most authorities believe that the actual rape figures are at least twice the reported number. The number of black female rapes by white men is “statistically negligible” because there are consistently fewer than ten cases nationally per annum. In fact, because white-on-black rape is so statistically insignificant and rare, the FBI has simply stopped tracking it altogether. John F. Gaski reports:

About 90% of interracial violent crime in our nation is committed by blacks against whites. The black-on-white murder rate in the U.S. exceeds the white-on-black rate by about 2.5-to-1.  The black-on-white assault and battery rate exceeds the corresponding white-on-black rate in this country by at least 10-to-1. I would rather not report what is known about U.S. interracial rape statistics because it could be taken as incendiary, but the previous numbers in terms of black/white proclivity are dwarfed. (See Department of Justice, Criminal Victimization in the United States, “Victims and Offenders.”) OK, here’s a hint: Because the number of white-on-black rapes is so low nationally in any given year, the ratio ranges from 100-to-1 to infinity. Liberal, politically correct feminists need to reflect on that one. If these interracial crime ratios were randomly based, they would be uniform — that is, 1-to-1 — for the two racial groups. In other words, the population with six times as many potential victims also has six times the pool of perpetrators, so the effect of that disproportion should be perfectly offsetting arithmetically.

Yes, the relative crime stats would be moderated if adjusted for socioeconomic status (from astronomical to merely stratospheric), but by no means inverted. The baseline conclusion is straightforward, even if surprising to readers who are victims themselves — victims of racial and racist propaganda. The hysterical public mantra of epidemic white-on-black violence is thus exposed as fraud.[2]

From the Department of Justice:

An estimated 29.1% of African American females are victimized by intimate partner violence in their lifetime (rape, physical assault or stalking). African American females experience intimate partner violence at a rate 35% higher than that of white females, and about 2.5 times the rate of women of other races. However, they are less likely than white women to use social services, battered women’s programs, or go to the hospital because of domestic violence. According to the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS), African American women experience higher rates of intimate partner homicide when compared to their White counterparts.[3]

Before we get all riled up about racial disparities and systemic racism and all the rest of it, when we discuss intimate partner violence, we are generally speaking of intra-racial assaults; only 8.4% of marriages are inter-racial, with 2% of white women married to black men (92% of children from a white mother and black father are born out of wedlock, and 82% wind up on government assistance), and 5% of black women married to white men. Only 5% of Millennials have even dated outside of their own race. Given the former statistics, and what I am about to catalogue below, it is an indisputable fact that certain population groups have an extreme proclivity for violence, assault, and sexual assault and rape, with black males far and away the most overrepresented regardless of culture/geography, but rivaled in select contexts by Arab-Moslem males, aborigines, and mestizos. White crime rates are greatly inflated by the US Census Bureau’s classification of Arabs as white, and of many states, precincts, and crime reports failing to differentiate between white and Hispanic; granted, there is some overlap between white and Hispanic (for example, Argentines would be classified as Hispanic despite their population being 97% white), but the vast majority of Hispanic immigrants to the United States are mestizo.

With that in mind, a 2006 Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report covering the time period 1990-2002 reported that Hispanics committed 6.5 times more violent felonies than whites and represented 30% of violent felons (as opposed to whites’ 26% share). Given the wealth of representative data, we can expect similar degrees of criminality among Hispanics classified, for various reasons, as white. The data is far less known for Arabs, but given the picture in Europe, we can extrapolate. From Randall Hoven’s American Thinker article we learn:

Per Capita Crime Rates in 2000, Compared to Non-Hispanic Whites[4]

Violent Felons




Felony Assault

Black, non-Hispanic












And from official statistics ten years later:

2010. Inmates in adult facilities, by race and ethnicity. Jails, and state and federal prisons.

Race, ethnicity

% of US population

% of U.S.
incarcerated population

% of racial group

White (non-Hispanic)












Quoting Jason L. Riley:

Between 1976 and 2005 blacks com­mitted more than half of all murders in the United States. The black arrest rate for most offenses — including robbery, aggravated assault and property crimes — is still typically two to three times their representation in the population. Blacks as a group are also overrepresented among persons arrested for so-called white-collar crimes such as counterfeiting, fraud and embezzlement. And blaming this decades-long, well-documented trend on racist cops, prosecutors, judges, sentencing guidelines and drug laws doesn’t cut it as a plausible explanation (my note: According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, blacks are 3.1 times as likely as whites to end up in emergency rooms for drug abuse[5]). “Even allowing for the existence of discrimination in the criminal justice system, the higher rates of crime among black Americans cannot be denied,” wrote James Q. Wilson and ((((((((((((Richard Herrnstein)))))))))))) in their classic 1985 study, “Crime and Human Nature.” “Every study of crime using official data shows blacks to be overrepresented among persons arrested, convicted, and imprisoned for street crimes.” This was true decades before the authors put it to paper, and it remains the case decades later.[6]

The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) relies on crime victims to identity attackers. In 2010, 320,082 whites were victims of black violence versus 62,593 black victims of white violence. With a population in 2010 of 197 million whites and 38 million blacks, the violence rate of black-on-white was 25 times white-on-black (849 per 100,000 versus 32 per 100,000). James Simpson writes:

In the other [non-murder] categories of violent crime—rape, robbery and aggravated assault—blacks consistently committed about 40 percent of the total in 201320122011, and 2010. So the disproportionate arrests, incarcerations and shootings of blacks should come as no surprise. Their 40 percent representation among the prison population fairly reflects the proportion of crimes committed by blacks in the U.S. This is not evidence of institutional racism, but rather a social pathology evident within the black community. They have been committing crimes at the highest rate by far of any racial/ethnic group for decades. In recent years, blacks have committed unspeakably heinous acts against whites and other racial/ethnic groups. Probably most notorious was the brutal 2007 murder of a young Tennessee couple, Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, who were on a date when carjacked by four men and one woman. Newsom was repeatedly raped while Christian was forced to watch. He was then taken out, shot, and lit on fire. They repeatedly raped Christian, then poured bleach down her throat, stuffed her in a plastic bag and threw her in a kitchen trash bin to die. There was no national news reporting of this double murder, despite its singularly vicious nature. More recently, a 19-year-old Mississippi girl, Jessica Chambers, was burned alive by suspected black perpetrators, who poured lighter fluid down her throat, ignited it and left her to die. No arrests have been made although Chambers supposedly identified her attackers before she died. Each year in cities across the country, officials brace for widespread violence associated with black events.[7]

Is this the product of the “systemic biases” and “systemic racism” we keep hearing about? It would seem not. The “trends” persist. Hawaii is 2.2% black, yet per the state’s 2016 crime statistics, blacks commit 5.9% of the homicides, 6.8% of robberies and 10.2% of rapes.[8] In Georgia, which is rapidly approaching majority-minority status, for 2016, 77 whites were arrested for murder as opposed to 401 non-whites; 134 whites were arrested for rape as opposed to 192 non-whites; 364 whites were arrested for robbery as opposed to 2,057 non-whites; and 3,736 whites were arrested for aggravated assault as opposed to 6,118 non-whites.[9]

This isn’t some recent phenomenon, either. Let’s go back in time. From Frederick Ludwig Hoffman’s Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro, we learn that in the city of Charleston, South Carolina, from 1889-1894, where blacks comprised 56.4% of the population, they committed 82% of homicides, 94.45% of rapes, and 81.2% of assaults. In 1904, blacks were 10% of the US population, but 32% of its prison population. In 1923, blacks were still 10% of the US population, but 31% of its prison population, and for 1950 the numbers are 10% and 35%, respectively. For 1960, it is a similar 10% but an even higher 38% of the prison population. In 1958, blacks were still approximately 10% of the nation’s population but were responsible for 61% of its homicides. In 1969, blacks were 11% of the US population but committed 65% of its homicides. Returning to James Simpson:

The media have relentlessly fanned the flames of racial hatred, while engaging in a systematic pattern of misinformation and blatant suppression of facts surrounding the perpetrators and victims of crime. As a result, so-called “criminal justice reform” is now being proposed to release more criminals from jails, supposedly to make amends for the unjust “mass incarceration” of black men… Of the 509 officers feloniously killed [from 2005-2015], 46 percent of the perpetrators were black, despite their representing only 13 percent of the population. Do we call this a black war against the police?…The figures come quickly but are never subjected to the necessary scrutiny. Last fall, for example, the ((((((((((((George Soros))))))))))))-funded ProPublica published a claim that black youths are killed by the police at a rate 21 times higher than white youths. Mass media parroted that claim, but the data are incomplete and biased. They represent just 1.2 percent of police departments nationwide, and most reports come from urban areas, where the population is disproportionately black.[10]

Black dysfunction is, unfortunately, not confined to the United States, or Toronto (where in 2002, blacks were 8.1% of the population but accounted for 27% of all charges for violent crimes), or London (where in 2009-10 blacks were 12% of city’s population but committed 54% of “street crimes,” 59% of robberies, and 67% of gun crimes), but wherever blacks are found in any concentration, the quality of life is abysmal. Crime statistics are often difficult to procure for black Africans in their own homelands for obvious reasons, but what we do know is that in South Africa:

One in three of the 4,000 women questioned by the Community of Information, Empowerment and Transparency said they had been raped in the past year. More than 25 percent of South African men questioned in a survey published by the Medical Research Council (MRC) in June 2009 admitted to rape; of those, nearly half said they had raped more than one person. Three out of four of those who had admitted rape indicated that they had attacked for the first time during their teens. South Africa has amongst the highest incidences of child and baby rape in the world.[11]

Robert Morley reports that:

One recent study examined about 250 reported rapes from 2005 to 2007 that occurred in the vicinity of one small town. More than half of the reported victims were children. Yet, only nine of the accused were convicted. Only seven received jail sentences. Two hundred and fifty rapists—seven convicted. Yet, no media firestorm. No international protest. The incomprehensible has become a fact of life for South Africans. They have a saying for this: Only in Africa. Several men were accused of five or six rapes, according to the study’s authors. Not one was convicted. Only in Africa. An astounding 66,000 rapes occur in South Africa each year—one every four minutes (note: emphasis added). Interpol says this makes South Africa the rape capital of the world. According to experts, rape is so common, justice is so rarely served, and so many women have been raped so many times that many women don’t bother reporting it.[12]

Finally, in the words of South African judge Mabel Jansen:

Do you believe that I am even propositioned by my black colleagues who tell me that they will be in hotel x and expect me to report there at a specific time?…In their culture, a woman is there to pleasure them. Period. It is seen as an absolute right and a woman’s consent is not required…I still have [yet] to meet a black girl who was not raped at about 12…We often have to hear that it was only about the third time that [the victim] sought to report it that they were taken seriously. Mothers are so brain-washed that they tell the children that it is the father’s birthright to be the first…Murder is also not a biggy. And gang rapes of baby, daughter, and mother a pleasurable pass time. That, in reality, is the flip side of the coin. They are simply now in a position to branch out and include white women…The true facts are most definitely not that espoused by the liberals.[13]

This is life in the “Rainbow Nation,” the kind of “enrichment” increasingly commonplace in Western countries endeavoring to create their own Rainbow Nations of diverse peoples and practices. That a wealth of diversity always leads to utter impoverishment is the real truth, but like Mabel Jansen said, it is not that espoused by the liberals.



[1] http://narrative-collapse.com/2017/05/13/nypd-blacks-latinos-commit-overwhelming-majority-of-crime/

[2] https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/epidemic-of-white-on-black-violence-is-a-fraud/

[3] http://www.doj.state.or.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/women_of_color_network_facts_domestic_violence_2006.pdf

[4] https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/07/hispanics_in_the_us_are_more_violent_than_nonhispanic_whites.html#ixzz5M19v8sH4

[5] http://www.sullivan-county.com/racism/crime_missouri.htm

[6] https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/21/family-secret-what-the-left-wont-tell-you-about-bl/

[7] https://www.aim.org/special-report/black-criminals-white-victims-and-white-guilt/

[8] https://ag.hawaii.gov/cpja/files/2017/08/Crime-in-Hawaii-2016.pdf

[9] https://gbi.georgia.gov/sites/gbi.georgia.gov/files/related_files/site_page/2016%20Crime%20Statistics%20Summary%20Report_Revised.pdf

[10] https://www.aim.org/special-report/black-criminals-white-victims-and-white-guilt/

[11] http://www.bristolblog.com/news/viana_murder.htm

[12] http://www.genocidewatch.org/images/South_Africa_2013-10-xx_SA,_where_corruption_is_normal.pdf

[13] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/05/12/rape-is-black-peoples-pastime-says-white-south-african-judge-in-facebook-rant/?utm_term=.43999a9734d

The First Purge

Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, July 31, 2018

Movie stands racial reality on its head.

They are no longer subtle. In the original 2013 movie, The Purge, anti-white themes were camouflaged. The “purge,” a one-night period during which no crime will be punished, was the backdrop to a home-invasion movie in which a white family, helped by a shabby-looking black man with a heart of gold, fights off murderous villains dressed like WASP stereotypes. One could vaguely sense themes of race and class, but there was also an attempt to create suspense and drama over the characters’ fates.

There’s no such pretense in The First Purge, a 2018 prequel about the first such social “experiment,” which the government conducts in the hope that the rabble will exterminate each other and work the worst out of their systems. This is the fourth film in this series, and now there are no shades of grey: As with stand-up comedy in the age of Trump, it’s naked propaganda with the message that white people are bad and non-white people are good—the cinematic equivalent of a bumper sticker.

The film’s premise is that a new political party, the New Founding Fathers of America (NFFA), has taken over the country. The NFFA’s conquest of both Republicans and Democrats is left unexplained except for the revelation that it was supported by the NRA. Thus, from the beginning, we know that the NFFA represents conservatives. Almost all the members of the NFFA we see are white, while all of the main characters are non-white. Indeed, there is not one positive white character in the entire film.

The non-whites are a collection of stock characters. There’s Nya, who is the street-smart yet woke activist black woman who wants to organize the “community.” She lives in a leaky apartment, so we know she is oppressed by The Man. There’s Isaiah, her brother, the naive and soft youth seduced by the temptations of revenge and the criminal life. And of course, there’s Dmitri, Nya’s ex-boyfriend, the drug dealer/crime boss who considers himself a leader of the neighborhood he’s destroying. Dmitri upholds certain standards, such as trying to keep Isaiah out of the criminal life, and thus the audience is encouraged not to think he is responsible for more deaths in the “community” than the purge itself. The leading actors are virtually unknown and it shows—they try to sound erudite and “ghetto” at the same time, and can’t quite pull it off.

These wise characters want the thwart the “purge” by keeping the peace in the “community.” However, the naive brother Isaiah is secretly working as a dealer for Dmitri’s organization, unknown to both his sister Nya and Dmitri. While Nya is protesting NFFA policy, shouting “do not participate [in the purge]!” he is slashed by a deranged man known as “Skeletor.” Dmitri promises to keep Nya and her brother safe during the night of mayhem, but Isaiah is eager to get revenge, and decides to take advantage of the purge instead of lying low or leaving the neighborhood.

The plot is now telegraphed: Isaiah will join the purge, find he’s not up to it, will be rescued by Nya, and then both will need to be rescued by Dmitri, who will atone for his criminal past through heroism. For the first half of the movie, there’s little violence, no suspense, and not much forward momentum. The older Purge was a horror film with a gimmicky premise, but The First Purge has a message. It’s hard to care about the characters, who seem incidental.

Dmitri’s plan is to hunker down with his gang, but Isaiah goes out and confronts Skeletor. He finds he is unable to kill him, runs away, gets in trouble, and calls Nya. Nya leaves the church where she was hiding to rescue him. The movie really takes off only when NFFA leaders, disappointed that blacks in the “community” are not killing enough of each other, send in the white racists to stir things up.

Nya and Isaiah return to the church only to find that a group of middle-aged whites in white polo shirts and khaki pants (where have we seen that before?) have shot it up. They are riding motorcycles and waving something like the crusader cross. Men dressed as police officers beat a prostrate black man. Dmitri and his crew hear Russian on the radios of their attackers. By the time fully robed Klansmen are storming buildings, you may be roaring with laughter, but the filmmakers want you to take this seriously.

Producer Jason Blum argues that with Donald Trump in the White House, “the purge doesn’t seem all that crazy.” The film’s marketing used Trump’s trademark red hats in the posters. The national media also gave the film a major boost when President Trump announced that his 2020 re-election slogan would be “Keep America Great”—the slogan used in a 2016 Purge installment. There’s also a dig at the president when Nya is accosted by a white man grabbing at her crotch. She fires mace and flees, screaming, “P***y grabbing mother***er!” Van Jones appears in the film as a journalist asking critical questions about the purge, implicitly supporting the idea that we are supposed to find all this “realistic.”

As the action proceeds, a viewer may experience his first real sensation of fear not from the action, but from a suspicion that people in the theater may think something like the NFFA could actually exist. Of course, the virtuous non-whites—with the exception of the deranged “Skeletor”—defy the NFFA and host block parties instead of murdering each other. Alas, in the real world, despite constant pleas for nonviolence and community events organized to promote it, non-whites can’t seem to keep from shooting each other at major public events such as concerts and block parties. The idea that they would be celebrating peacefully if not pushed into violence by whites is pure Hollywood.

At the same time, the idea behind the Purge series and much of leftism generally is that the economic elite supports nationalism, social conservatism, and even racism. Yet the reality is that most elites donate to leftist causes and support globalist, socially liberal, and open-borders causes. Fictional portrayals such as the The Purge reinforce the idea that the state is somehow backing white nationalists and that the non-white masses are oppressed by an ethnocentric white elite.

The film ends with Dmitri and his compatriots heroically gunning down the right-wing death squad moving through their housing project. Black director Gerard McMurray carefully zooms in on the gore as Dmitri effortlessly butchers white paramilitaries. After choking one to death, the Dmitri rips off his mask to reveal blonde hair and blue eyes and orders the corpse to get out of his neighborhood. When the slaughter is finished and the night is over, Dmitri is asked what they are supposed to do now. He grimly replies, “We fight.”

The First Purge implicitly urges its audience to take pleasure in the slaughter of whites even as it supposedly pleads for nonviolence. It demonizes whites in a film that even East Germany would have regarded as propaganda. The political situation it portrays is almost a perfect inverse of reality: European-Americans actually live under a ruling class that is replacing them in their own country. The closest thing to The First Purge in real life is not Donald Trump’s America, but Nelson Mandela’s South Africa. This film fails as both satire and entertainment, but it’s a warning about how an increasing number of people see us—and for that reason, it is well worth watching.


See also Gregory Hood’s review of the earlier film, The Purge.

Young Mother Stabbed to Death While She Nursed Her Newborn at Home in South Africa

A young mum was attacked by a crazed knifeman and brutally butchered in her own home while nursing her new born baby daughter.

Kelly Bain, 26, was on maternity leave with the one-month-old tot when an unknown man slipped into her home and locked her maid in the loo.

Then he stabbed the pretty blonde mother-of-two twice in the neck severing an artery and once in the body leaving her on the floor in a pool of blood.

Moments later her fiance Christopher Bonus, 34, had returned home to pay the maid her wages and heard the maid screaming for help in the bathroom.

He walked straight into his bride-to-be’s attacker and the pair of them scuffled but the attacker broke free and is said to have vaulted a fence and escaped.

The couple were engaged last November and were planning to marry in the next few months and had just celebrated the birth of their first child together.

Their unnamed daughter was in a nearby cot and was unhurt during their attack.

Kelly has another daughter Holly, 5, from a previous relationship who was not at home of the time of the attack in their townhouse in Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

It is believed the young mum who worked at the nearby Nelson Mandela University was murdered for her engagement ring which was missing from her finger.

A team of detectives assigned to the case specialise in serious and violent crimes.

Police said they were still investigating whether or not a man caught on CCTV running from the scene and hitching a lift on a passing truck was the killer.

Police spokesman Captain Johan Rheeder said: ‘The victim’s fiance, 34, arrived home at lunch time and confronted the attacker in the bedroom.

‘A scuffle ensued between them but the attacker managed to flee. The woman sustained stab wounds to her neck and body and was lying on the bedroom floor.

‘She succumbed to her injuries. The domestic worker was allegedly locked in the bathroom by the suspect and the baby was found unharmed in the house.

‘There appears to be no forced entry however detectives are still on the scene gathering evidence. We are investigating a case of murder and robbery’ he said.

Captain Rheeder said a large knife was found in the house and taken away by forensic experts and CCTV images captured by neighbours was being studied.

A 70-year-old neighbour Hans Frahm said: ‘I saw Mr Bonus running into the road screaming for help and I ran outside to find out what was going on.

‘He said ‘get your gun’ so I returned armed but by the time I got outside the guy had already fled. We have robberies around here but not a murder before’.

Mr Bonus who works in the family plastic manufacturing business had been with Kelly for nearly two years ago and they got engaged last November on a beach.

In a Facebook post in April last year he wrote above a pic of them together: ‘My Absolute World you. Thank you for letting our paths cross. Lots of Loves’.