Black Kills Coalburner Wife and Leaves Her Body in a Dumpster

Joe Jones

Daily Stormer
April 12, 2018

Donnell Stafford, Leuh Moore.

I seems like a lot of coalburners end up dead.

I wonder why it keeps happening…

KAKE:

Police say the husband of a 37-year-old woman whose body was found in a Wichita dumpster has been arrested in Iowa.

Lt. Todd Ojile said the suspect, identified through booking records as Donnell Stafford, was arrested at around 9:20 a.m. Tuesday in Davenport. An Iowa state trooper found the victim’s stolen vehicle in a hotel parking lot and the 30-year-old suspect was located inside the hotel and taken into custody without incident.

“Investigators were able to piece together the events and we issued a felony pickup for her 30-year-old husband,” Ojile said, adding that the case would be presented to the district attorney’s office on Tuesday.

The website for the Scott County Sheriff’s Office in Iowa states Stafford was booked just after noon for a felony interstate detainer.

Ojile said Leuh Moore was killed early Sunday morning at her home in the 1100 block of West Dayton and her body was then put in the dumpster less than a mile away. Police say she suffered blunt force trauma.

Boomer Environmentalist Whines About “Xenophobic” Attitudes Toward Invasive Species

Michael Byron

Daily Stormer
April 12, 2018

Due to their focus on plants and animals, environmentalists are able to use language that would, in an anthropological context, be considered “problematic” and “racist.”

For example, it’s considered acceptable to say “Japanese knotweed is a menace to gardens, we need to purge it from Britain,” but not “African niggers are a menace to humans, we need to purge them from Earth.”

Likewise, it’s considered acceptable to say “gray squirrels destroy forest trees and contribute to the decline of woodland birds,” but not “Pakis destroy white civilizations and contribute to the decline of national IQs.”

If a certain boomer from Bongland gets his way, however, then even that sort of thing will be set to change.

Breitbart:

Discussion of the threats posed by invasive non-native species such as the grey squirrel is “terrifyingly similar” to concerns over mass migration, according to an environmentalist.

A consultant for New Scientist magazine, Fred Pearce argues that foreign flora and fauna are being “demonised” unfairly while the problematic species which are native to Britain are given a free pass.

Speaking to the Daily Mail ahead of a planned talk at Edinburgh Science Festival on the topic, Pearce decried the language used to describe “invasive species” as “very xenophobic”, stating it “suggests that anything foreign is bad”.

You’re being racist against wildlife, goyim.

Racist and mean.

Look at these innocent knotweeds who fled from the brutal civil war in Japan:

Don’t you think it’s right to let them stay in your garden?

We all bleed chlorophyll, you know. ;_;

What about this handsome sea lamprey, who migrated to the Great Lakes in search of a better life?

Cold-hearted Canadians consider him an “invasive species,” but we all know what really motivates them: hatred for the color of his teeth.

“It is terrifyingly similar to the language which can be used about immigrants invading the country,” added the environmentalist, who claims scientists are more likely to present species as dangerous if they are foreign in his book The New Wild: Why Invasive Species Will Be Nature’s Salvation.

This arch-boomer literally wrote a book arguing that invasive species benefit nature.

Not foreign species; invasive ones. Ones that are proven to damage the ecosystem.

He wants to bring more of them to Europe.

According to Pearce, the dangers of Japanese knotweed — a plant so destructive, fast-growing, and difficult to kill that allowing it to spread beyond one’s own property is a criminal offence — have been overhyped, wrongly drawing attention away from native menaces such as nettles.

Yeah, except that Japanese knotweed is foreign to Europe, so the destruction it caused wouldn’t have happened if it had remained in Asia. Meanwhile, we lose nothing with nettles, because they belong to Europe in the first place.

Hmm, I’m sure that logic can be applied elsewhere…

Pearce is not the first person to link xenophobia to discussions on horticulture. In 2014, academic Ben Pitcher claimed that people who enjoy talking about gardening are closet racists who use the hobby as a covert way to promote white identity.

Claiming terms like “invasive” and “non-native” are used by plant enthusiasts to express their opposition to migrants, the senior lecturer in sociology at Westminster University alleged the BBC Radio 4 panel show Gardeners’ Question Time is “saturated with racial meanings”.

Appearing on another Radio 4 programme, Thinking Allowed, Pitcher received support for his assertion from crossbench peer and former cultural studies professor Lola Young, who likened gardeners’ concerns about rhododendrons to anti-Pakistani sentiment.

“I remember back in the late 80s-early 90s when rhododendrons were seen as this huge problem, and people were talking about going out rhododendron-bashing.

“That was at a time when P***-bashing was something that was all too prevalent on our streets,” she said.

I don’t think it’s fair to compare rhododendrons to Pakis, Lola.

It’s not the 1980s or 90s anymore. It’s 2018, and while rhododendrons haven’t given Brits too many problems, Pakis have transformed the entire island into a free-range Moslem rape pen.

But at least Lola has an excuse for her stupidity: she’s black as night.

What’s Fred Pearce’s excuse for his stupidity?

Oh yeah; Jews circumcised his brain.

The left is coming for your ability to defend yourself from Tyranny.

Vermont moving to ban high cap magazines and raise legal age limit to 21.

So you can literally be drafted to go and die for jews in the middle east, but can’t buy a fucking gun to defend your wife and young family. Fuck this government, Civil War Now!

This is only going to end when we put a round in every liberals skull,  literally, its them or us people. Wake the Fuck up to your own genocide. 

South African Parliament Votes To Take Land From White People Without Compensation

By

Members of the South African parliament have overwhelmingly voted to take land from white people—without any compensation. Best of all, they have produced virtually no plan as to how this will be achieved, leading to speculation that any expropriation is going to resemble the terrible violence that occurred against white farmers in neighboring Zimbabwe under dictator Robert Mugabe. Even with a plan, the proposed measures would reek of racism, bullying, and intimidation.

Since the resignation of Jacob Zuma in February, President Cyril Ramaphosa has used rather inflammatory rhetoric in support of land expropriation. This is unsurprising when one considers both South Africa’s long-term problems and more recent scandals involving inexcusable economic and social mismanagement. For example, Cape Town, an area home to four or five million people, is about to run completely out of water. Catastrophes or impending catastrophes in South Africa are almost certainly being swept under the carpet via racially charged mischief like calls for land seizures from whites.

It has been nearly 25 years since Nelson Mandela became the first black leader of South Africa and whites are still being scapegoated for the country’s numerous woes. Given the disdain many elites, both black and white, have for everyday white South Africans, you can be sure that many in the latter group feel betrayed by the present political climate. They threw their weight behind Nelson Mandela in the past as they expected reconciliation and peace, not aggression, theft, racism, and the use of force against them.

Is your country not working? Blame and bully white farmers

A white Zimbabwean couple nearly killed during land expropriations under Robert Mugabe. White South African farmers can expect similar treatment–and many have already received it.

Anyone who has been to South Africa like I have can remember a very conflicted, crisis-ridden country “boasting”…

  • ridiculous general crime rates, defying both the country’s relatively non-violent history and many of its economic indicators, which are actually above the African average in most cases;
  • an astronomical murder rate, typically meaning roughly as many people die every year from homicide as perished from decades of white-controlled apartheid;
  • an HIV/AIDS crisis, accelerated by moronic levels of negligence under Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki, and Jacob Zuma;
  • shocking levels of corruption, including a major farce where Zuma used public funds to renovate his own home and described his luxurious new swimming pool as anti-fire protection; and
  • frequent demands for the genocide of white people, particularly by extremists such as Julius Malema, infamous for singing about the murder of Boers, a predominantly Dutch, German, and French white ethnic group.

Incidentally, Malema and his far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) were behind the expropriation motion later backed by the ruling African National Congress (ANC). Having lost much public support following a series of controversies, the ANC is increasingly adopting the EFF’s anti-white language to win back votes.

Where are CNN and the other usual suspects?

Calling on ((((((Jake Tapper)))))) and other “fearless journalists” from CNN.

CNN has been silent on a country’s parliament voting to take land from people based on their race. They did, however, report on “news” that South Africa and Wales plan to play a one-off rugby match in Washington D.C. Sport can be a very important part of our lives, true, yet I doubt most people in Washington—or anywhere else in the US—will take note of a sport virtually no Americans play.

Amidst constantly regurgitated minutiae about “the Russia investigation,” CNN and comparably biased leftist “news” outlets have no time for proven events that are going to severely impact on people’s lives, regardless of whether violence does or does not accompany the taking of land from whites in South Africa (it probably will). This has been standard procedure for a long time and we can bet it shall continue well into the future.

Is South Africa’s path going to be emulated by America?

Far-left activists in the US insist on “reparations” for slavery, an incredibly tone-deaf proposal, not just because the vast majority of African slaves were initially enslaved by fellow blacks. Native American extremists are usually provided with less airtime but have also been known to espouse very revanchist ideas toward various US governments. So is any South African model for anti-white land-grabbing going to inspire angry elements in America?

In 10 or 20 years’ time, maybe even just five, do not be shocked if the kinds of news you read online today concerning attacked white farmers or land expropriation “discussions” in Africa start to repeat themselves in the American south-west or south. And if CNN and other leftist outlets are saying virtually nothing in relation to South Africa now, would you really expect them to sternly oppose such measures when they begin to be pursued in North America? Of course not.

 

On Women in the Alt-Right

Best Comment:

Women should definitely be in the movement. But their problem is their refusal to acknowledge today’s mismatch between authority and responsibility. Today, women are given authority and rights without responsibility. They can falsely accuse men of rape, and get away with it. They take more than half a man’s assets, and his children, during a divorce. The laws favor women over men, even though women aren’t held to the same levels of responsibility as men are. And there are so many privileges and services available to women in society and not men eg. domestic helplines, reproductive services, affirmative action. Women in the alt-right, and the alt-right in general, don’t address any of these problems. These problems need to be addressed, because they are a big contributing factor to the current sorry state of the west. The faster these problems are done away with, the faster we can get on track to saving the west.

Now a little reality check from DS:

Against Camwhore Nationalism

Women offer nothing to the Alt-Right other than camwhoring. Because women are stupid as shit. They don’t have ideas.

They listen to men’s ideas, then repeat them on video, with varying degrees of sexiness. Mostly, this is watched by men who already believe what is on the videos, because they like to pretend the female is their girlfriend (even if they don’t consciously know they’re doing that, that is the psychological process involved – the subconscious mind doesn’t have a function to process the concept that a person on an LED screen in front of you is not actually in front of you, talking directly to you). And yes, they masturbate to these videos.

The argument is that “new people will be brought into the movement” by these whores because they will click on a video with a woman and realize how smart she is. I have repeatedly called bullshit on this. No one – not even bugmen – genuinely believe women have something important or interesting to say. Sure, it is technically possible that they click on a video and hear something cited as a fact and Google it. But 99% of the clicks on these “trad chick” videos are regular watchers who are involved in a fantasy involving the girl. That is who is watching the videos, that is who is doing the donating.

The donating – look. Men have a desire to give money to women. It is an actual biological drive.

There is a dopamine rush when you go out with a woman and she tries to pay for her coffee or drinks and you insist she puts away her wallet. This is basic primitive behavior. It’s the same dopamine rush cavemen got laying a stag at the feet of a woman.

“I have killed an animal, I will feed it to this female, she will give me access to her vagina through which I can reproduce my genes.”

This is followed by: “she is my vessel of reproduction and the keeper of those I will produce, my duty is to defend.”

It is a fundamental aspect of male identity – nigh the most fundamental, second only to his ability to be accepted and valued by the men of the tribe – to be able to provide materially for and physically protect a woman.

NOTE: In fact, a woman knows that it is
emasculating to a man to not be able to pay for her. And it is a shit
test for her to attempt to pay - she is testing you. Usually I've been
pretty good at controlling for skankism, but at least once in my life, I
went on a date with a woman who made a big thing of paying -
calculating what exactly she ate and calling the waiter over and making
him take the money. I left enough money to cover the bill and a generous
tip on the table and got up and walked out. I refused to see her again
(and believe me, she wanted to). Of course, that situation is only
possible under feminism, where the state, through welfare and
affirmative action programs, forcibly transfers male wealth to females.

Just so, it is a woman’s biological function to receive these resources. A bitch gotta eat, and she sure as fuck isn’t killing a deer herself. Just as she sure as fuck isn’t coming up with any interesting ideas today.

This camwhore situation, and the amount of money these women are making by leeching off of a political movement, as you fight to protect them, is a perversion of basic biological drives.

But I don’t blame these whores. I blame you, bro. You’re the one with the ability to rationally reflect on your biological drives and alter your behavior accordingly.

“BUT WE NEED WOMEN IN THE MOVEMENT!!!!!1111”

The alt-bugman response is always that I am “alienating women” and that “we need them in the movement.”

It is the worst form of snakelike Freudian horseshit to call someone who questions women’s right to influence a male space a homosexual or otherwise question their masculinity. It is horseshit because it is a lie. But if we are going to psychoanalyze people over their positions on this issue, then let me tell you something: when you say “if we don’t pander to women, we will alienate them,” you are effectively screaming “I AM A MAN-VIRGIN” to anyone who knows shit about women.

And you all know that. It’s your life. You know what’s going on in it. Maybe you’re not literally a virgin – maybe you’ve had one or two girlfriends, maybe you’ve gotten lucky on a drunk bitch a few times, but you are not Chad. If you were Chad, you would know that the interest of women has a direct inverse correlation to your interest in them.

good women vs. bad women

There is also a conflation by Alt-Right feminists between camwhores and women who support the movement – the term “women in the movement” applies to both. Obviously, maximizing the number of women who support the movement should be a goal. Not a top goal – that is, not a goal that we sacrifice other more pressing priorities for – but something we should be aware of. Clearly, the easiest way to do this is by having the men in the Alt-Right have girlfriends and wives. Unless the bitch is a filthy godless whore and the man a complete cuck and their relationship on the highway to collapse, women will take on the political beliefs of a permanent partner. To that point, if we were extremely concerned about “women in the movement,” we would be doing two things:

  • Helping guys already in the movement get girlfriends and wives
  • Directing messaging more toward men who already have girlfriends and wives (we have more single men than partnered men in the movement)

But the assumption is always “single female supporters,” which demonstrates how fucking dishonest the alt-bugmen are. Just as dishonest as any other form of male feminist pervert. They are trying to use the movement as a singles club, rather than an engine of political revolution. Of course, if you could pin down a male Alt-Right feminist – protip: you can’t, because they are slimy, gelatinous creatures – they would claim that “it can be both” – I am saying no, it can’t be both, and if you can’t already meet women, you aren’t going to be able to meet women in our political movement.

But okay.

Sure.

Let’s talk about single women.

This website, The Daily Stormer, where my official position on women is “they deserve to be locked in cages,” has more single young female readers than any other Alt-Right site. That is an empirical fact.

This is because women are drawn to political ideologies that don’t pander to them for the same reasons they are drawn to individual men who don’t pander to them:

  • They are interested in gaining acceptance from men who don’t immediately offer it
  • Not acting as though you need women is a sign you have something to offer women
  • A lack of pandering is a sign of strength, meaning that you would be able to provide good genes and physical resources
  • Women in their sexual prime – white women in particular – tend to have a sexual fixation with men who either are or are perceived as dangerous and potentially violent, rather than kind and caring

If you don’t already know all that, you are not doing well with women in your personal life, and what you are trying to do by promoting them in the Alt-Right is trying to increase your chances of getting laid by applying your failed personal seduction strategy to a political movement.

And it is fucking pathetic.

I see this shit on social media, and this is what it looks like to me:

That is you, alt-bugman.

You are something which is fundamentally repulsive on a visceral level to emotionally developed, self-respecting adult males.

Leftism and the Single Skank: A Hard Wall of Material Resource Reality

As long as the political left has the ability to use force to take the resources of men and hand them over to women, single women are overwhelmingly going to support the political left.

That’s a hard fact.

There is a small amount of wiggle room, of course. But the only appeal you are going to be able to muster is a sex appeal. Not an offer of something. The left already offers everything.

And no – “we’ll give you a male provider so you can settle down and have children” is not an offer. Women already have the option of doing that. All young women in modern society have the option of finding a male of average sexual market value with enough money to pay for them to have children if they were to make a decision to do that. Instead, they chase Chad cock and claim that “men don’t want to commit” – speaking of the high value men who will fuck them one night and then not return their texts. Because they all think they deserve the highest value man available, that he should commit to them, and anything less is not enough.

However, if I’m playing the game and answering the “single female appeal” question: by taking a masculine approach to our political movement, we’re going to maximize the number of women who want to support it – and that appeal INCREASES if we are actively trolling and silencing camwhores who are attempting to infiltrate us to get attention and money, as it is a demonstration of principled masculine strength.

Its not enough that women join our movement, they must denounce feminist bullshit wherever they see it, and attack women who don’t fucking get it.

I am right about this and if you disagree with me you are wrong.

Period.

The alt-bugmen pushing “women in the movement” have never and will never respond to any of the points I just made, regardless of the fact that I’ve been making the same points for years. They will just keep screaming that I’m “alienating women,” and then question my masculinity. Because they are maggots who do not want to engage in the masculine activity of using logic to come to reasoned conclusions.

When “you’re just a loser who can’t get laid” doesn’t work, they pivot (note: this is a real tweet from an alt-bugman trying to attack me as a #WeakWhiteMan for refusing to embrace female empowerment). 

tfw

And look. I’m not trying to shit on betas. I am trying to protect you, as my brothers, just as much as I’m trying to protect this movement.

You had single mothers or weak beta fathers, and you need to recover.

That’s what I’m here to help you with, bro.

You’re not doing yourself any favors by going to bat for these whores.

And it isn’t going to get you laid.

“Pity fucks” by women – which is the only thing you could possibly be going for as a white knight – are largely a myth. They are usually mislabeled “drunk accidental fucks” (which are now being widely mislabeled as “rape,” btw – so be careful out there, white knights).

And I’ll end with this: if you are a beta white knight – and if you are pushing this “women in the movement” horseshit and are older than 14, you are – you need to deal with your testosterone levels.

A human being’s thoughts and emotions exist in a mushy organ that functions on chemicals, and different chemicals being input into this organ produce different thoughts and emotions. That is the entire “bugman” concept – they are pudgy, low-muscle mass wormlike “men,” and this is directly correlated to their worldview.

The basic rule is that fat on your body lowers testosterone levels and muscle on your body increases it. You don’t have to be huge super-muscleman, but getting lean and fit – which is easiest through strength training, and through removing processed foods (especially grains, including beer) from your diet – will make your thoughts and feelings make a lot more sense.

You won’t just get rid of this “need women in the movement” bugman horseshit, but you’ll do better with women in your personal life. You’ll also do better professionally, creatively and just do better at life generally.

A political movement is made up of individuals, and just as I want our political movement to succeed, I want all of you to succeed as individuals. Everything I write here I write with that in mind.

You’re all my brothers, regardless of whether or not you’ve got a bad case of the thirst.

And if you’re thirsty, I know this article was tough. But it is tough love.

We’re all in this together.

Hail Victory.

 

Trump Points Out That Virtually All Crime in Britain is Committed by or Because of Nonwhites

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 21, 2017

On Friday, Trump tweeted that as immigration rises in Britain, so does crime.

The actual statistic is that crime is rising 13% annually on Cuck Island.

Of course, not all crime is committed by nonwhites. No one makes that claim.

However, virtually all crime can be attributed to the collapse of our Western societies that is largely due to mass immigration.

Firstly, you have the issue of economic troubles caused by immigration. The reason these people come to our countries in the first place – other than to rape our women – is that we have more money than their countries. Therefore, either by defaulting to public funds (welfare) or by taking jobs from locals, they are taking money out of the economy.

They also are generally unhealthy, and put a massive burden on the healthcare system, which increases taxes.

As such, white people are more likely to turn to drugs or other forms of crime due to what the immigrants do to the economy.

Moreover, we know from studies that so-called “diversity” causes social trust to dissolve. The more “multicultural” a society is, the more alienated each individual is. Low-trust societies are directly associated with higher crime rates.

Robert Putnam’s research showed that in multicultural societies, people not only withdraw from persons of other cultures, but withdraw from members of their own culture as well, due to generally collapsing social bonds.

If white people feel alienated from each other, they are more likely to commit crimes against one another.

So, although it is true that local Britons are committing increased crime (not most of that 13%, but presumably some of it), it is still the nonwhite immigration which can and should be held responsible for that shift.

The people “fact checking” Trump on this are wrong.

Obviously, nothing is absolute – there are always going to be white people committing crimes. However, given that we are moving into the future, and all that this should imply, the number should, all things being equal, be declining. Not increasing by an absurd 13% a year.