Nancy Pelosi Gets Shouted Down by “Dreamers” Demanding Amnesty for 11 Million Bean People

Lee Rogers
Daily Stormer
September 18, 2017

One of the things that has happened as a result of Donald Trump trying to work with some of the Democrats is that it has caused their base to go completely insane. They can’t fathom how Democrats would ever consider working with a Neo-Nazi, White supremacist like Trump.

Take in point what happened with Nancy Pelosi today. She was holding a news conference defending the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program or DACA and she was met with an angry mob of anchor babies demanding amnesty for 11 million bean people.

NY Post:

Democratic Rep. Nancy Pelosi was shouted out of a news conference she was holding to defend the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program on Monday by a vocal group of Dreamers who blamed Democrats for being complicit with President Trump in ending the Obama-era initiative.

Pelosi, standing behind a podium decorated with a sign that said ​#protectdreamers, said, “Make America dream again. We must strike while the iron is hot and get this done in a matter of days.”

But a group of about 30 young people descended on the large room where the House minority leader stood with other local lawmakers from the San Francisco area and began chanting slogans.

“We, the undocumented youth, will not be a marketing chip for Trump,” they recited in unison. “Democrats created an out-of-control deportation machine and handed it over to Trump. We demand accountability.”

As Pelosi stood there with her staff, the crowd of protesters closed in on her, surrounding those assembled for the news conference.

The footage is pretty funny. They completely shut her news conference down and called her a liar.

The problem the Democrats are having is that their base mostly consists of radical Communists and non-Whites. These are groups of people who can’t be reasoned with. It is dragging the party more and more towards Marxism and away from the political center. It has left longtime Democrat mainstays like Pelosi in a tough spot. There is so much hatred for Trump among their base that any attempt to work with him is seen as a massive betrayal.

As you can see in the clip, they did about Pelosi actually being a big supporter of DACA. They’re angry that she’s not pushing hard enough for amnesty and even angrier that she’s been working with Trump.

We’ll probably see more clips like this over the next year or so leading into the 2018 mid-term election. The Democrat base is completely unhinged.

California, the Insane State

CA vs. AZ

My prediction, in the coming ethnic civil war, Nevada and Arizona will invade and liberate Californians from liberal fascist state government, then break it up into 2 or 3 smaller states.

California, the Insane State

by Jeff Davis

Why don’t the last remaining productive White people in California march on Sacramento and burn the legislative buildings down? The incredible governmental waste continues in the face of the state’s current desperate financial straits. Is anybody paying any taxes in California at all any more, or are they all just drawing state salaries of borrowed money?

An article from reports: “The chief psychiatrist for California’s overcrowded prison system was paid $838,706 in 2010, more than any other state employee that year, payroll figures released today show. The doctor, whose name wasn’t released, had a salary range of $261,408 to $308,640, according to data released today by California Controller John Chiang. The total compensation was raised by bonuses or payout of unused vacation time, according to the controller’s office.”

Bonuses and unused vacation time to the tune of almost half a million dollars? Oh, come on now! This is truly truly mind-boggling. The state unions fund the Democrat Party and the Democrats give the unions these insanely lucrative contracts, and I mean INSANE.

The article continues “The figures show that the 10 highest-paid state employees each earned more than $500,000 in 2010, for a total of $6.2 million. All but three were doctors or dentists for the Corrections Department. Joe Dear, the chief investment officer at the California Public Employees Retirement System, ranked seventh with a gross pay of $548,142, the data show. Terry Thornton, a spokeswoman for the prison system, didn’t immediately respond to a telephone request for comment.”

No, I imagine she didn’t. I mean, what the devil is she going to say? California spends about three times as much per prisoner as Texas or Florida does. There is absolutely no reason for these astronomical salaries and benefits. In fact, a prison could probably be run much better with remote-controlled robots, reducing the danger and therefore eliminating any “need” for high-salaried prison guards.

I don’t care what the excuse for these insane salaries is. This is corruption. Period. It simply has to be. There is no conceivable legitimate reason for paying that kind of money to state-employed medical people, in any field. It is a kick-back system for the Democrat party at the expense of California taxpayers.

Who is running this lunatic state? California is borrowing $40 million dollars per day just to pay welfare alone.

The organization FAIR has estimated the cost of illegal aliens to California to be $35.89 million per day ($13.1 billion per year). California could wipe out it’s borrowing by 90 percent if they simply deported the illegal aliens. Unfortunately illegal alien-lovers like Senate President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and Governor Jerry Brown see illegal aliens as future Democrat voters, and they refuse to do anything to discourage illegals such as passing laws making it impossible for illegals to get jobs or rent apartments as other states have done.

California has a majority non-White population, and non-Whites consistently vote Democrat. Apparently they lack the common sense of White people, who will give the other political party a chance in times of desperation. The Republicans apparently never will have control of the legislature again and the state will continue to slide toward bankruptcy and a Third World status.

No wonder there’s a movement to split the state in two, leaving the welfare cities of Los Angeles and San Francisco in one half, and the more productive counties in the other half.

Racist Ethnic Studies Banned in Arizona’s Public Schools

by Jeff Davis

The Mexican conquest of the Southwest has been slightly slowed by a judge’s ruling in Phoenix although it remains to be seen whether anybody will pay any attention to it. The Obama regime has demonstrated that they’re simply going to ignore any law or legal obligation to deport illegal aliens.

A recent news article reports: “An administrative law judge ruled Tuesday that a Tucson school district’s ethnic studies program violates state law, agreeing with the findings of Arizona’s public schools chief. Judge Lewis Kowal’s ruling marked a defeat for the Tucson Unified School District, which appealed the findings issued in June by Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal. Kowal’s ruling, first reported by The Arizona Daily Star, said the district’s Mexican-American Studies program violated state law by having one or more classes designed primarily for one ethnic group, promoting racial resentment and advocating ethnic solidarity instead of treating students as individuals.”

“The judge, who found grounds to withhold 10 percent of the district’s monthly state aid until it comes into compliance, said the law permits the objective instruction about the oppression of people that may result in racial resentment or ethnic solidarity. ‘However, teaching oppression objectively is quite different than actively presenting material in a biased, political and emotionally charged manner, which is what occurred in (Mexican-American Studies) classes,’ Kowal wrote.”

In other words, Latinos have been taught in publicly-funded schools to hate White people for years now. The aging White population of Arizona including some escapees from California are desperately trying to undo years of liberalism through the creaking, senile workings of the democratic (small d) system and the law.

Several laws have been passed, most notably SB1070, the bill that would have actually done something to round up illegal aliens, but the Communist in the White House with the assistance of an activist federal judge has overruled the will of the people of Arizona… for now.

The “hate Whitey” curriculum at some public schools was a little harder to defend, and it’s been shot down for now. Will Obama continue to defy the will of the people or will the Supreme court apply some sanity to SB1070 and let Arizona help the Feds round up illegal aliens? Our court system is highly corrupted and unpredictable. Freemasons and Zionists make decision based on special interests instead of justice. One day the activist judges will be retired, and some of them may wind up in the same trucks deporting the illegal aliens.

Compton to slash 30% of city workers.

Compton to slash 30% of city workers.

What is the end result of mass immigration from the 3rd world? What percent of the residents of Compton do you think are living off of welfare?

From CBS Los Angeles

The Compton City Council has diverted a potential government shutdown by approving a budget Tuesday night that calls for massive layoffs.

The new budget would require the city to slash 30 percent of its workforce.

* Hispanic – 59,219 (62.9%)
* Black alone – 31,522 (33.5%)
* Two or more races – 1,314 (1.4%)
* White alone – 750 (0.8%)
* Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone – 797 (0.8%)
* Asian alone – 400 (0.4%)
* Other race alone – 143 (0.2%)
* American Indian alone – 111 (0.1%)

Part of California Wants to be New State

Part of California Wants to be New State

South California

by Jeff Davis

A CBS news article reports: “Is the state of California about to go South? Riverside County Supervisor Jeff Stone apparently thinks so, after proposing that the county lead a campaign for as many as 13 Southern California counties to secede from the state. Stone said in a statement late Thursday that Riverside, Imperial, San Diego, Orange, San Bernardino, Kings, Kern, Fresno, Tulare, Inyo, Madera, Mariposa and Mono counties should form the new state of South California.”

In other words, “Get us the hell away from that cesspool in Los Angeles, those homosexuals in San Francisco and those corrupt, incompetent bastards in Sacramento!” Ironically, when people hear the expression “southern California” they think of L.A. which is one of the disaster areas that South California would be divorcing itself from.

Most people don’t know that illegal aliens invading California like to go straight for Los Angeles where they can disappear into the millions of other illegal aliens already there. San Diego, near the border, is a smaller city with fewer opportunities for illegals, and psychologically, many illegals may not want to be that close to the border, fearing that it’s easier to be deported there. Believe it or not there is a secondary check point run
by the border patrol on the I-5 freeway about 50 miles north of San Diego on the way to L.A.

CBS goes on: “The creation of the new state would allow officials to focus on securing borders, balancing budgets, improving schools and creating a vibrant economy, he said. ‘Our taxes are too high, our schools don’t educate our children well enough, unions and other special interests have more clout in the legislature than the general public,’ Stone said in his statement.”

Mr. Stone did not, of course, use the terms “race” or “illegal immigrants” or “democrats,” but it’s obvious to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that’s what he was talking about.

More CBS: “He unveiled his proposal on the day Gov. Jerry Brown signed budget legislation that will divert about $14 million in 2011-12 vehicle license fee revenue from four new Riverside County cities. Officials fear the cut will cripple the new cities of Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Menifee and Wildomar. Stone said he would present his proposal to the Board of Supervisors July 12. The new state would have no term limits, only a part-time legislature and limits on property taxes.”

It’s a pity that this movement for a new state is based on money, but it’s at least a step in the right direction. The reason California is spiraling toward bankruptcy is the crushing burden of the illegal aliens ($13.1 billion per year) combined with the cost imposed by state union workers, who got insanely lucrative contracts from Democrats, who were buying their votes with public money. When leftist hacks in Sacramento were making hysterical statements condemning Arizona’s new immigration law SB1070, the White people in south California were thinking SB1070 is a great idea, which could easily become law there if they were only a state.

I’m tempted to say the Federal government will never allow this new state, and Obama of course won’t, but suppose Obama and the Democrats get turfed out in November 2012 and a Republican president and Congress gets in? The new state of South California could happen then.

A new state like that would virtually guarantee two more Republican senators and create a healthy prosperous state, reducing the size of liberal California and reducing the magnitude of the disaster that will result when liberal California inevitably goes bankrupt.

It would also create a new border state that would be interested in stopping the flow of illegal aliens into the US, which would be something the Tea Party Republicans would strongly support.

Whites in CA ‘below the replacement’ level

Whites in CA ‘below the replacement’ level

California’s white population has declined since 2000 at an unprecedented rate, hastening the day when Hispanics will be the state’s largest population group, according to newly released state figures.

There were half a million fewer whites in California in 2008 than in 2000, a period when the state’s overall population grew by 4 million to 38.1 million, according to a study released Thursday by the state Department of Finance.

By 2008, whites made up 40 percent of Californians, down from 47 percent at the turn of the century. In 2000, Hispanics comprised 32 percent of the population; that number grew to 37 percent in 2008.

Analysts said the decline can be attributed to two main causes – a natural population decrease as Baby Boomers enter their later years and die at a faster rate than younger whites have children, and a migration from California since 2001 among whites who sought affordable housing as real estate costs soared.

“This is the first decade to see a year-over-year consistent population decrease due to natural causes,” said Mary Heim, chief of the Finance Department’s demographic research unit.

The study also confirmed projections that a steadily growing Hispanic population will surpass whites as the state’s largest racial demographic in 2016. Hispanics are expected to become a majority of all Californians in 2042, Heim said.

Most Bay Area counties reflected the state’s shifting numbers – Alameda County, for example, dropped from 41 percent white to 36 percent – while showing spikes in Hispanic, Asian and multirace categories.

Yet, San Francisco’s racial mix remained consistent. Forty-four percent of the city was white in 2008, 30 percent was Asian and 14 percent was Hispanic, just as it was in 2000. Only the city’s African American population showed a slight decline, from 7 percent to 6 percent.

Below replacement level

Hans Johnson, a demographer at the Public Policy Institute of California, said white women in recent decades have tended to pursue higher-education degrees and stay in the workplace, leading them to have fewer children. The white population is now “below the replacement” level, Johnson said. “They’re simply not replacing themselves.”

The median age among California’s whites is 44, while the median age for the Hispanic population is 28, according to the study.

Stephen Levy, director of the Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy, said the study also reflected how skyrocketing real estate prices pushed workers from California during the housing bubble from 2005 through 2007.

“This is a good look at what happens when your housing prices get way out of line with the rest of the nation,” Levy said. “It will be interesting to see what happens when the market corrects itself.”

Reverse of a trend

Johnson said migration into California was a national trend until the 1990s, when the number of out-of-state transplants began to decline.

Lower-paid California workers headed to cities like Phoenix, Las Vegas and Seattle, where they could make similar wages but pay less for housing.

“California is no longer attracting large numbers of people from other states,” Johnson said. “And a lot of those who did come to California from other states were white, reflecting the ethnic composition of the country as a whole.

“Now,” he said, “that flow has dried up.”

The decline among whites and increase in other groups in California is a long-standing trend, Johnson said.

“It’s just faster now.”

Census data shows white middle class flight from California’s socialist confiscatory taxation and regulatory policies

Posted on May 1, 2008 by BGR

The Times reports that new Census data shows California is losing its white, middle class Baby Boomers who can no longer afford to live in California. Leave it to a Brookings Institution policy wonk to blame it on the private sector and economy when he says, “people leaving…can’t afford to stay, given the housing prices and the cost of living.”

As if California’s confiscatory taxes, emissions fees, business regulations, sales tax, and building fees and prohibitions on development have nothing to do with creating such a dysfunctional economic climate.

During the same period, California gained 268M Hispanics. That half million swing has to cut into state tax revenue like a buzz saw through balsa. Meanwhile, California has the 4th highest tax burden of all 50 states. You have to wonder how much longer voters will allow the Democratic Legislature in Sacramento to flush the rest of California down the toilet in its effort to subsidize Socialism in One State.

California sees smallest white population in 40 years.

From Sean Murphy.
(Murphy is working on a demographic mapping add-on for google earth that will soon be available as a free download on

Murphy created this pdf file that shows the rapid decline of the white majority in the United States. Note: Only the states whose 2010 census information has been released are completed.

Today the census bureau released California’s population total for last year. Bottom line: whites continue to leave California (or opt not to move there in the first place).

white: 14,956,253 (The lowest since at least the 1970s)
black: 2,163,804
hispanic: 14,013,719
other: 6,120,180
total: 37,253,956

The 1980, 1990 and 2000 censuses had showed white populations well over 15 million. The peak was in 1990 at over 17 million, as you can find in the pdf file.

More notes:

So far only 24 states have complete data.  By the end of the month, it should be finished.  The Census Bureau is required by law to finish its complete count by April 1.

Some findings:
All states so far show substantial growth in the number of Hispanics. In several states, the Hispanic population more than doubled from 2000 to 2010.  For example (in thousands)

Alabama (76 to 186)
Arkansas (87 to 186)
Maryland (228 to 470)
Mississippi (40 to 81)
North Carolina (379 to 800)
South Dakota (11 to 22)

White populations are declining across US.

Exclusive to
by Dr. Sean Murphy

As the census numbers have been coming in, I’ve been looking a little bit at state population trends since 1970.  One thing that strikes me is that when you look at the white population, several states are on a continuous losing streak.

For example – New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Illinois combined have lost 6 million whites in the last 40 years.

I believe every state saw an increase in the white population during the 1960s. But since 1970, you cannot make that statement about any decade since.

Mostly, the states losing whites are in the rust belt, and those gaining whites are in the sun belt.  That is nothing new.  But I wonder to what extent these population changes result in a state being “red” or “blue” politically.

Here’s my big question though:  do you think that politicians in these states losing population are pushing for more immigration
in order to prop up their state populations?  In other words, as they see whites leave, rather than encouraging whites to
return or stay (which would be politically destructive), they look to immigration as a way to replace the departing white people?
The purpose of a census is to reapportion Congress.  If a state did nothing and just watched its population fall as the whites leave,
they will lose Representatives in Congress, and they would lose electoral votes in every Presidential election.  Thus, each state
is in competition to maintain a high population relative to others.

A zero immigration policy would, in the short term, result in those northern states losing some clout.  But, maybe it would eventually
encourage them to reach out and market themselves to a whiter clientele, such as retirees.

I don’t mean to oversimplify the issue:
Not all northern states are seeing a white decline, and liberal/pro-immigration forces can easily be found in places where whites flock to such as Oregon.

BTW – more comments about the numbers:

I looked at California again, and the result is even more extreme than I first thought.  There were more whites there in 1970 than today.
I quickly looked at county results in California.  Santa Clara county, the home of Silicon Valley, today is only 35% white, and they lost about
15% of their white population in the last 10 years.  There were only 2 counties that saw a significant increase in white population.  Placer county, just north of Sacramento, was one.  The other was Riverside county, a booming area far east of LA.  Unfortunately this area is also a huge magnet for immigrants, so we should not think of it as any kind of white oasis within California. Being landlocked and mostly desert (think of Palm Springs), it probably is attracting people who can no longer afford to live in nicer parts of southern California.

During 2000-2010, so large was California’s white decline, that California’s 3 neighboring states saw a white population increase less than California’s white decline.

On the other hand, North Carolina’s white increase over the last 40 years has been fairly consistent at around 600,000 per decade.  A few other states, such as Georgia, Utah, Tennessee (and presumably South Carolina, but no data yet) are also doing well under the circumstances.

Blacks Leaving California–For The Same Reason Whites Are

This is from John Rosenberg at Discriminations:

Discriminations: Does Colorblind Equality Cause Population Loss?

You probably think I’m joking, but I’m not. A California organization in favor of racial preferences and opposed to colorblind racial equality points to Prop. 209 as causing a drop in the black population of California on “a scale not seen since the Exodus of 1858, when blacks left San Francisco for British Columbia due to the Fugitive Slave Act….”

Who’d a thunk: equality as a form of population control!

One of his commenters noted the violent ethnic cleansing that Mexican gangs are attempting in black neighborhoods, but even without that, “it’s the immigration, stupid,” that’s making blacks and whites leave California for greener pastures.

See In California, Immigration Is The Real Terminator in which Sam Francis quoted an LA Times article to the effect that “More than 1.4 million people in the U.S. migrated to California from 1995 to 2000, while 2.2 million left–the highest migration numbers in the country.” More about the impact of immigration from Linda Thom here and from Two Blowhards here.

I’d never heard of the “Exodus of 1858,” by the way, it was apparently caused largely by a gold rush on the Fraser River which led to a labor shortage in British Columbia.

The Minority Subprime Mortgage Disaster

The Minority Subprime Mortgage Disaster

Minority Subprime Disaster Costs US at Least $1.5 Trillion.

by James Buchanan

If you estimate an average loss in value of about $200,000 combined depreciation and damage to each home that was in the minority subprime loan program and that about 7.5 million Blacks and Latinos got these loans with no down payments and failed to pay them off, the total lost to the banking industry would be $200k times 7.5 million or $1.5 trillion dollars.

One source confirms the magnitude of this loss noting that: “The IMF estimates that financial institutions around the globe will eventually have to write off $1.5 trillion of their holdings of subprime MBSs. About $750 billion in such losses had been recognized as of November 2008. These losses have wiped out much of the capital of the world banking system.”

Various leftists have attempted to blame banks or predatory lenders for the subprime disaster. The truth is that minorities and liberal policies forced on the banks by federal courts caused this disaster. While it’s true that many banks offered one or two percent “teaser rates” for the first year of the mortgage, that doesn’t give the minorities an excuse. Just how unintelligent are people who don’t understand that the teaser interest rate is going to climb rapidly after the first year?

Most of the people who took these minority subprime loans were NOT serious first time home buyers, but were in fact doing real estate speculation, hoping to sell their house for a $50k to $100k profit after living in it for a year. Unfortunately for them (and for us) the housing bubble burst, millions of Blacks and Latinos (predictably) walked away from their financially underwater homes, and stuck the banks with the full financial loss since the liberals insanely waved the requirement for minorities to put down payments on their homes.

Very few articles in the mainstream media have discussed the role of minorities in the subprime disaster. A New York Post article reports that “a ‘landmark’ 1992 study from the Boston Fed concluded that mortgage-lending discrimination was systemic. That study was tremendously flawed – a colleague and I later showed that the data it had used contained thousands of egregious typos, such as loans with negative interest rates. Our study found no evidence of discrimination. Yet the political agenda triumphed – with the president of the Boston Fed saying no new studies were needed, and the US comptroller of the currency seconding the motion. No sooner had the ink dried on its discrimination study than the Boston Fed, clearly speaking for the entire Fed, produced a manual for mortgage lenders stating that: ‘discrimination may be observed when a lender’s underwriting policies contain arbitrary or outdated criteria that effectively disqualify many urban or lower-income minority applicants.’ Some of these ‘outdated’ criteria included the size of the mortgage payment relative to income, credit history, savings history and income verification. Instead, the Boston Fed ruled that participation in a credit-counseling program should be taken as evidence of an applicant’s ability to manage debt. Sound crazy? You bet… On the Web, you can still find CRA loans available via ACORN with ’100 percent financing . . . no credit scores . . . undocumented income . . . even if you don’t report it on your tax returns.’ ”

So a fabricated “study” by the Boston Fed claimed that minorities were being discriminated against for home loans. In reality, Blacks and Latinos were failing to qualify for home loans because their average income is lower, their average credit history is worse and their ability to make a down payment is worse than the average for White people. Unfortunately, liberals entrenched in powerful positions in our government and court system chose to ignore all the evidence that ordinary Blacks and Latinos have certain inherent, persistent flaws that make them bad candidates for home loans.

Not only did the Feds demand that more loans be made to minorities, they insisted that traditional criteria like proof of employment and the ability to make a down payment should not be used to disqualify loan applicants. Lending to unqualified minorities was the first big reason for the subprime crisis. Eliminating down payments was the second big reason. The down payment is critically necessary in the mortgage industry. By forcing people to make a 20 percent down payment, the chances of the borrower “walking away” from a home loan (if the housing prices start to drop or the monthly payments increase) are greatly reduced.

The bottom line is that Third World people are financially bad for the US. Huge amounts of money are squandered on them to supply them with Section 8 apartments to live in, food stamps, welfare and now they will receive “Obamacare” and this additional tax burden will be dumped primarily on the shoulders of White taxpayers. Most of the good-paying jobs, that Blacks and Latinos get, are stolen from better qualified Whites thanks to Affirmative Action. The vast majority of Blacks and Latinos are poor and impose a gigantic tax burden on the rest of us. The state of California is rapidly plunging toward bankruptcy thanks to its non-White majority. Too many needy Third World poor and too few productive White taxpayers.

Perhaps, the most incredible thing about the Minority Subprime Mortgage Crisis is that most people did not know it was building up. It basically came out of nowhere with a price tag of 1.5 trillion dollars and it has greatly accelerated the financial collapse of California and the United States.