California Shows Us Where The Leftist Arc Ends

by Brett Stevens on February 20, 2018

You can prove to yourself that history is cyclic. Watch what happens to your favorite restaurant. It starts out as a fragmentary idea, then figures out the details, then tries to maximize its position, then… becomes a lot less good. Corners have been cut, or the atmosphere is dead. So you move on.

The “moving on” is the far side of a cycle which is composed of two arcs, a life-arc and a death-arc. The life-arc is the lifespan of any individual thing, and the death-arc is the process that creates a need for it to come around again. It takes a decade for most to realize that a favorite restaurant has become mediocre and overpriced.

Events in life are cyclic, but the human mind thinks in terms of a perpetual present instant only. This “absolute” mindset confuses the solidity of our thoughts with the process of reality, which demands that we look at events from start to finish as an arc, sort of like our own life cycle.

When we understand that we are looking at a process, and not a static thing like an object, we realize that attempting to design for the end of the cycle produces entropy. Instead, we need to design for the middle, which means a deliberate imperfection. This means “Wild West” and not “Utopia.”

Indeed, throughout human history, any time we have tried to perfect nature or design a perfect human system, we have made it worse. Any time we have tried to control a situation, rather than allowing the best to rise and worst to fall, we have self-destructed. Utopia is not just fanciful illusion, but a fatal mistake!

When historians look back on 2016, they will see many arcs ending. The growth arc, the humanism arc, the constitutionalism arc, and their originating germ, the Leftist arc, are all ending. They are ending because they ran their course and people saw that the state that these ideas produced was in fact horrible and quasi-Soviet, so those paths have been debunked and abandoned.

The Leftist arc ended because instead of bringing peace and prosperity, it brought poverty, internal conflict, and militarism of the “war without end” variety. In other words, even mild Leftism — classical liberalism, constitutionalism, and an entitlements state — quickly went to the same state that the Soviet Union and Napoleonic France reached. To people who want to thrive and achieve sanity, this is total failure.

Leftism represents many things, but its real innovation was to use centralization to enforce individualism by binding together individualists into a kind of gang, club, fad, cult, or mob that then demanded that all realists cease pointing out that the world beyond humans existed too. They wanted a world comprised only of human desires, where everyone and everything else was designed to be convenient for the individualists.

As the Leftist arc ends, we are seeing how many of their policies and arguments are simply rationalizations for the idea of continuing unfettered individualism. These things are ending in vast disaster. California, as the state with the most Leftist policies, will lead the way in showing us the long-term consequences of 1930s and 1960s ideas.

Among other things, California shows us that Leftism leads to social breakdown:

The NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit surveyed 153 blocks of downtown San Francisco in search of trash, needles, and feces. The investigation revealed trash littered across every block. The survey also found 41 blocks dotted with needles and 96 blocks sullied with piles of feces.

…The Investigate Unit spent three days assessing conditions on the streets of downtown San Francisco and discovered trash on each of the 153 blocks surveyed. While some streets were littered with items as small as a candy wrapper, the vast majority of trash found included large heaps of garbage, food, and discarded junk. The investigation also found 100 drug needles and more than 300 piles of feces throughout downtown.

The 2016-2017 budget for San Francisco Public Works includes $60.1 million for “Street Environmental Services.” The budget has nearly doubled over the past five years. Originally, that money, was intended to clean streets, not sidewalks. According to city ordinances, sidewalks are the responsibility of property owners. However, due to the severity of the contamination in San Francisco, Public Works has inherited the problem of washing sidewalks. Nuru estimates that half of his street cleaning budget – about $30 million – goes towards cleaning up feces and needles from homeless encampments and sidewalks.

So this is how Leftism ends — a giant industry that does nothing of practical value, neurotics and perverts floating around, a vast third-world mixed-race underclass, and piles of feces everywhere with bonus syringes — despite the best Utopian intentions and egalitarian notions of the Californians. It is their epitaph: They Meant Well.

The Leftist idea centers on egalitarianism, or the notion that everyone is equal or should be. This means that if something goes wrong for someone, it was not their fault, because whatever choice they want to make is equal to any other, lest we start ranking people by their choices and thus make them unequal.

For Leftists, homeless people are not the result of their own choices, but of misfortunes, and so the solution is to throw money at the problem and assume that homeless people are 100% as logical, functional, and dedicated as suburban people. This leads to a paradox where we must “explain away” the behavior of the homeless.

That mentality allows us only one course of action: the rest of us fund more money for the homeless to make them equal, because otherwise we have to admit that equality — and thus, we — have failed. This is why California spending on the homeless increases as do numbers of the homeless:

Los Angeles County’s homeless population is increasing faster than the supply of new housing, even with the addition of thousands of beds in the last two years and millions of dollars beginning to flow in from two ballot measures targeting the crisis, according to a long-awaited report by the region’s homelessness agency.

…The original analysis was prepared to quantify the difference between the housing and services existing at the time and what would be needed to get all the chronically homeless off the streets and quickly restore housing for those falling into homelessness.

The report became the basis for both Proposition HHH, the homeless housing bond approved by Los Angeles city voters in 2016, and the countywide Measure H sales tax for homeless services approved last year.

As we say around here a lot, “What you tolerate, you get more of.” This is the case with homelessness, and the perpetual Leftist solution amounts to subsidizing it, which increases rather than decreases the problem. It provides a cash-based incentive to be homeless.

In San Francisco, the usual homeless problem accelerates because of rising housing prices, but there is no legal way to remove these people, so they stay around because they are tolerated. Then people want to subsidize them. Soon the city is taken over by the homeless, which damages and penalizes those who work for a living.

Just like everything else in the West, this question has become toxic because we have inverted the dialogue by refusing to consider how equality leads us toward doom. In our zeal to eliminate risk, and make ourselves good, we have perpetuated and exacerbated a longstanding problem with no end in sight.

Futility loops like this have created an exodus from Leftism as people realize that this ideology did not simply go too far; it was always paradoxical and incoherent, and when it goes far enough, it is already too far. California just shows us concrete examples of this failure, with mounds of feces on top of them.

THE RACIAL WAR OF BLACK AGAINST WHITE

By Paul Sheehan

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It determined the result of last year’s congressional election.

Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War, which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let’s start suggesting, immediately.

No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent retribution against white America.

And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years, violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than young whites.

Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not been reported in America:

According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.

Most victims of race crime — about 90 per cent — are white, according to the survey “Highlights From 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims,” published in 1993.

Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by whites, according to the same survey.

Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the violent racial crimes of whites.

According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate that whites murder blacks.

These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge which, not co- incidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of the modern civil rights movement.

Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed, overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more than 45,000 people were killed in inter- racial murders. By comparisons 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean War.

When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2 per cent in the reverse).

When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of American life and American ideals since World War II.

All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double standard in its coverage of black America, a lower standard.

[Source: Sydney Morning Herald, May 20, 1995]

Leftist terrorists attack trumps family. 

From: Foxnews.com

Vanessa Trump hospitalized after opening suspicious envelope

Donald Trump Jr.’s wife Vanessa Trump and two others were taken to a New York City hospital for evaluation after opening a suspicious envelope containing an unidentified substance.

Donald Trump Jr.’s wife, Vanessa Trump, was taken to the hospital Monday after receiving a letter containing white powder that was later deemed to be non-hazardous, New York City police told Fox News.

FILE - In this Thursday, Nov. 30, 2017, file photo, Donald Trump Jr., far second right, his wife Vanessa Trump, center, and their family, watch performances during the National Christmas Tree lighting ceremony at the Ellipse near the White House in Washington. New York police said Donald Trump Jr.'s wife, Vanessa Trump, opened an envelope, Monday, Feb. 12, 2018, that contained white powder, felt ill and was taken to New York City hospital as a precaution. They said Vanessa Trump called 911 Monday morning after opening a letter addressed to Donald Trump Jr. at their midtown Manhattan apartment. Police said she said she was coughing and felt nauseous. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Vanessa Trump, center, was taken to a hospital in New York City Monday after opening a letter containing white powder.  (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Vanessa Trump was taken to the hospital as a precaution, police said. Two other people who were also exposed to the powder were taken to the hospital. 

Trump Jr. tweeted of the “scary situation” on Monday afternoon, and blamed the incident on people with “opposing views.”

“Thankful that Vanessa & my children are safe and unharmed after the incredibly scary situation that occurred this morning,” Trump Jr. said. “Truly disgusting that certain individuals choose to express their opposing views with such disturbing behavior.”

The U.S. Secret Service said in a statement: “The Secret Service and our law enforcement partners in New York City are investigating a suspicious package addressed to one of our protectees received today in New York, New York. This is an active investigation and we cannot comment any further.” 

Ivanka Trump, Vanessa’s sister-in-law, tweeted Monday afternoon, “No one deserves to be frightened this way. There is no excuse.”

Leftist terrorism no doubt. Anyone who gets in the way of the left and their globalist masters, (the people of the lie) find out quickly why they have been expelled from every nation they have ever parasitized from.

Andrew Anglin Brutally Humiliates the Vile Slob Sargon of Akkad

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
February 12, 2018

On Saturday night, I had a showdown with Sargon of Akkad, wherein he was brutally humiliated.

I have watched it now and can give comments on just how outrageous the WINNING was.

Firstly, there was clearly a problem with my mic – it was half as loud as Sargon’s. I asked Baked Alaska about that, and he says he kept adjusting my sound on his end and Sargon just kept turning up his own mic. After listening, I am 100% sure that Sargon was purposefully turning up his own mic so he could better interrupt and talk over me, and I agree that this succeeded in making me look weak. I never even would have imagined someone doing something like that. So there you go: the boy-scout Nazi unprepared for the wily ways of the anti-racist trickster.

The debate was supposed to be “do white people have a right to exist?” but Sargon came in claiming he didn’t want to have a debate and instead wanted to do Freudian analysis on me and find the secrets of my psychology (that really happened). I refused that game and he refused the debate, so we just had a largely incoherent argument for two hours.

I’m not going to claim that I functioned brilliantly in the capacity of a debater. But that was impossible. Firstly, I’m not trained in debating, it’s not something I’ve ever done at all, I’m used to having conversations with people who argue in good faith, rather than use bizarre and deranged evasion methods and audience manipulation techniques.

What I did do: I accomplished my goals.

Firstly, Sargon’s goal was to portray me as some kind of sadistic, psychopathic monster that just wants to slaughter a bunch of people. I successfully fended that off. And I presented myself as a reasonable and genuine person who wants to get at the truth and solve real world problems. He presented himself as a snakelike trickster, with zero care about truth or solving any problems.

So.

Goal of Not Being a Monster: Accomplished. 

Next, I had the goal of getting him to say a bunch of things that will come back to haunt him.

Things he said:

  • He does not believe Hitler was a bad person and his biggest mistake was invading Russia.
  • He agrees with white nationalism as an ideal (just doesn’t think it is moral to remove people).
  • People who are not Nazis are cowards/you have to be brave to be a Nazi.
  • America’s Founding Fathers were Nazis.
  • “Germans are worse than niggers” (but he doesn’t collectivize).
  • His morality supports gang-rape and sex trafficking gangs.
  • It is horrible that my hometown was overrun by Somalians.
  • He believes I am personally oppressed by Jews and that Jews oppress other people also.

Goal of Getting Sargon to Say Things He’ll Regret: Accomplished.

I also wanted to demonstrate that Sargon is an asshole and a hoaxer with zero interest in truth and reality.

All I had to do that is say reasonable things and let him dance around. The entire stream was Sargon using dirty tricks, refusing to hold any position, constantly interrupting, changing the subject, etc.

Three times he brought up the Atlantic article about me, saying he wanted to psychoanalyze me. In the middle of an ideological debate. That is the sort of depths this fat slob is willing to sink to. He is unhinged.

He had no arguments other than that I was planning to slaughter people, and when I said I was not he just kept saying I needed to admit my plan to slaughter people. He asserted that the only way to get a white country is through mass slaughter, without ever explaining what that meant. He framed this as a logistical problem. Hence we had “the morality of logistics.”

I continually asserted that I was simply interested in making the moral case for the existence of white countries, and he would just say that he agreed with that but that it doesn’t matter now because there are already nonwhites in white countries and there is no way to get them out.

He also claimed that the existence of Thomas Sowell justifies the existence of billions of black people, none of which do anything productive. That is just an example of the kind of arguments he was using.

He was like a child, doing nothing but appealing to emotion and trying to confuse issues with gibberish.

Goal of Demonstrating that Sargon is a Lying Snake: Accomplished.

Lastly, I wanted to show that Sargon had no solutions.

That I did better than I could have imagined.

His overarching solution is to “promote British culture and be proud of it,” and that this will make Moslems stop forming rape-gangs. He also said that this will make Moslem immigrants want to leave the country.

Most hilariously, he said that he had a plan to defeat the SJWs – but it’s a secret! A secret plan!

Goal of Proving There is No “Sargon Plan”: Accomplished. 

Sargon Destroyed

He cannot recover from this.

All of the comments everywhere are negative. Even people who hate me are saying he made himself look like a tricky liar with no interest in truth. Even people who say I didn’t perform well are saying that.

I did perform well – insanely well – because I accomplished my goals.

As you saw, there was nothing to argue with Sargon about. His plan is just a 30 second thing about culture. He agrees with everything else. Watch the video and count how many times he starts into something and then I say something and he just agrees. It’s nuts.

So no, debating is not my thing. I had to do it in this case because I am the Alt-Right celebrity, and it was important to show the skeptic audience that regardless of media claims, I am not a sadistic lunatic. I am a writer, and it is well-known that good writers do not tend to be good orators.

Against all odds, I conquered, and the internet will never be the same.

Sargon is no longer a viable actor, both because his own people have lost confidence in him and because he said all that insane shit, including agreeing with me, the most hated racist, on everything other than logistics.

Hail Victory. 

Jews Claim “White Nationalism” Spreading Among Orthodox Jews

Adrian Sol

Daily Stormer
Febuary 6, 2017

Stranger things have happened. I just can’t think of any at the moment.

A few months back, Yair ((((((Netanyahu)))))), son of Israel’s Prime Minister, published an accurate Alt-Right meme to underline the Jewish problem in Israel. Needless to say, he was viciously attacked.

Yair’s meme. Where’s the lie?

Unexpectedly, it appears as though Yair’s anti-Semitic Alt-Right philosophy has borne fruit and now Jews are adopting full-blown White nationalism en-masse.

I’m just not sure about the logistics of the whole thing though. Will they just hop into ovens on their own, or will a subset of the Jews be responsible for gassing the rest? Either way, this is an exciting development.

Jewish Daily Forward :

Something disturbing has been happening in the Orthodox world. White Nationalist language is infiltrating our public spaces. It’s happening in our synagogues, in our communities, in our schools and, of course, online. And those of us who see it are looking on in increasing horror.

Good going, Yair.

Yair brought forth the urgent message that Israel, like America, is suffering under a Zionist occupational government. It’s definitely time that Israelis learned of the corrosive influence of the Jews.

Now the Jews of America are awakening to this same reality as well.

There was always some racism in our communities, of course; we’d begun to address it around the time Barack Obama was elected president, when calling black people shvartze — a derogatory term for a black person in Yiddish — finally started to become taboo.

But what we’re seeing now is new. It’s different. It’s not just plain racism, or hatred and judgment of a group of people because of their skin pigment. Rather, what I and others have been noticing in our communities is the emergence of a philosophy, one that the Trump era is increasingly bringing into stark relief.

It’s the philosophy of white nationalism that justifies racism, and it’s spreading like a virus among many Orthodox Jews.

After reading this whole article, my chin was worn down to the bone. In a good way, though.

A few weeks ago, President Trump reportedly called Haiti and other countries in Africa “shithole” countries. The white nationalists crowed. “I must come to the defense of #Haiti!” tweeted Richard Spencer, a leader of the nativist “alt-right.” “It’s a potentially beautiful and productive country. The problem is that it’s filled with shithole people. If the French dominated, they could make it great again.” David Duke of the Ku Klux Klan was also thrilled. “Trump spoke Blunt, hard truth that makes PERFECT TRUTH!” he tweeted.

But they were far from alone. When I posted my dismay about Trump’s “shithole” comment on my Facebook page, I was amazed at how similar many of the pro-Trump Orthodox Jews I knew sounded in comparison with Spencer, Duke and Trump himself.

As one argued, “Option A: El Salvador isn’t a ‘shithole,’ so they don’t need 17 years of Temporary Protected Status, and migrants from there should be sent home immediately. Option B: El Salvador is, in fact, a ‘shithole.’”

Another Orthodox friend, who had left South Africa for Israel, remarked, “I’m so glad I emigrated from a shithole.”

And another frum Jew wrote, “So, how many snowflakes would like to move to Haiti?”

25 Jews in Haiti, huh? I guess their cosmopolitanism only goes so far.

Since a majority of Orthodox Jews voted for Trump, they are the only group in the United States reporting growing approval ratings of Trump — up to 71%, according to AJC. So approving are they that immediately following the neo-Nazi march in Charlottesville, Virginia, and Trump’s subsequent defense of white supremacists with the claim that some neo-Nazis are “fine people”, there was the same deafening silence from Orthodox leadership, at least at first, the same defenses, and the same parroting of white nationalist talking points.

Of course. These new “Alt-Right” Jews are fully on board with our anti-Jew agenda, so there’s no reason they’d be offended.

Case in point.

But what’s this liberal Jew’s explanation for this sudden White nationalist shift?

How this is even possible? How could Jews, any Jews, no matter their affiliation, possibly embrace white nationalist ideology?

Look to their influencers for the answer. It’s not Spencer or Duke who Orthodox Jews are parroting. Right wing Jewish commentators, some Orthodox, have an enormous impact on the right wing Orthodox community. These establishment figures aren’t in any way as marginal as Duke and Spencer, and yet, their response to Trump’s “shithole” comment was almost identical. Think of ((((((Dennis Prager)))))) who said, “Those who truly care about Africans, many of whom are terrific people, need to honestly describe the moral state of many or most African countries.” Or think of ((((((Ben Shapiro)))))) who wrote, “The argument that Trump is wrong to call some countries s***holes comes down to nicety, not truth.” Joel Pollack, senior-editor-at-large for Breitbart, warned his followers not to ask U.S. military personnel serving in Africa to describe some of those countries: “You may be disappointed.”

Oh, the sweet irony.

The Jews infiltrated the right in order to redirect the goyim away from dangerous anti-Semitic ideas. But as a result, guys like ((((((Shapiro)))))) and Prager, who have very little pull in the American Alt-Right, actually ended up with a large Jewish audience who are getting turned into Nazis.

This solves a mystery that’s been bugging me for a while: where do ((((((Shapiro)))))) et al. actually get all their views? Now it all makes sense. Their public, unwitting to them, is actually composed mainly of other Jews.

But in all seriousness, it’s not surprising that orthodox Jews, who tend to keep to themselves, would revert back to a rabidly xenophobic attitude without worrying about White people.

Jews don’t destroy our societies as part of an elaborate conspiracy of which they’re all part. Their behavior is purely instinctual, and triggered by environmental cues. In the absence of the correct stimulus (White people), especially over several generations, they’ll revert back to the next programmed behavior pattern.

Their whole psychology goes something like this:

  1. Destroy whitey using the shvartzes. If no Whitey around, then…
  2. Destroy/enslave the shvartzes. If no shvartzes around, then…
  3. Jew-over other Jews.

This is why, in the absence of non-Jews, Israel quickly turned into a haven for fraud, tax evasion and anti-social behavior. Their solidarity goes out the window unless there’s an outside group compelling them to unite.

This is exactly the opposite of the White man’s behavior pattern, where diversity reduces cooperation, networking and solidarity, while homogeneous societies bring us together.

Time to Drop the Jew Taboo: It’s Making Discussion of Russian History Impossible

Source: russia-insider.com

Charles Bausman, Russia Insider, 15 January 2018

Most people know about, but few are willing to condemn, the strict taboo in the media, of criticizing Jews as a group, using that term. One cannot even criticize a small subsection of Jews, a miniscule percentage of the Jewish population, even when they richly deserve it.

Obviously, this is a ridiculous way to run a publication whose object is to get to the truth, so I am writing this to explain why, from now on, the pages of Russia Insider will be open to articles which fairly and honestly address the influence of Jewish elites, including pointing out when it is malevolent, which it often is, and try to understand it and explain it, with malice towards none.

I have become convinced that unless we break this taboo, nothing will improve in the human catastrophe unfolding in geopolitics. Millions have died over the past 30 years, and if we want it to stop, and to avoid a cataclysm which seems to approach inexorably, we have to have the freedom to criticize those responsible. It is very clear to me, as it is to many others, that much of the guilt for this comes from Jewish pressure groups, particularly in the media.

I can see as an editor, that much of what is written about geopolitics in the ‘public square’, admirable though it may be in other respects, makes itself irrelevant by tiptoeing around this crucial issue.

I am a newcomer to the media world, unexpectedly thrust three years ago into the role of owner, publisher and editor of this fairly widely read publication. We get about 10 million visits per month across all of our platforms from a sophisticated audience, and we are widely followed by so-called ‘influencers’. We’ve made a big mark in a short time, and we did it by saying what others were not willing to say. Many subjects which we were the first to speak about on a major platform have now entered the mainstream.

Russia Insider is a grassroots phenomenon, and sometimes resembles a political movement as much as it does a publication. We exist solely because of small donations from readers. We get no funding from major donors, not to mention governments, foundations, or other organized groups. It is all private individuals. Our single largest donation over the past year was $5000, and the median gift is $30. We raised about $80,000 last year. This gives us the freedom to pretty much say what we want, something that can be said of very few publications, even in the alternative media space, most of whom are beholden to large donors.

I see everyday how one can influence the public agenda by addressing or ignoring certain topics. One really can make a difference, and I have tried to make a positive impact, as I understand it. It has been a remarkable education in the power of the media, including our relatively small publication, Russia Insider.

This taboo is the great exception. It really is quite extraordinary to realize that you can publish just about anything, except that. Almost everyone knows about the taboo, just as I did in my previous career in business, but it is another thing altogether to enforce it. I felt, until recently, compelled to do so. I felt that I was having my nose rubbed in it as I tried to make sense of world events.

Read the rest at Russia Insider.