Racial Consciousness

From Elsie Christensen’s periodical “The Odinist” (1984)

A race is a group which is set apart from other groups by spiritual and physical characteristics genetically determined and available only within this group.

Race, thus, a natural fact, a biological given. A ‘standard man’ simply doesn’t exist. And never did. The concept ‘homo sapiens’ is merely a contrivance. Distinct racial differences can be clearly observed in the Anthropoids of the Middle Pleistocene age. Prof Carlton Coon has stated that the transition from early to modern man occurred at different times among the Europeans, Asiatics and Negroes. And fully independently from each other. During the last Ice Age, five racial groups, all with distinct racial characteristics, settled in Europe, although these differences were not as marked as those which exist today between Europeans and Negroes, Asiatics and Australoids. A unified human race will never be created because even miscegenation results in new races that are as equally distinct from each other as the old races.

Race is, over a period of time, constant. It extends far into the past. Race has a much longer history than nations or countries. We have discovered that 35,000 years ago a Cro-Magnon type man inhabited Europe. The bone and skull structures of these people are quite similar to the Germanic skulls seen in Roman ruins or those which, like the Tollund-man, were unearthed in tarpits and which are identical to those seen among Germanic peoples of today. This race is thousands of years old. We inherited their racial characteristics from our ancestors through our parents and we will pass them on to our children and future generations.

Individuals will die; Race has the potential for immortality. It doesn’t have to die – and will not – if the members of the race guard themselves against racial mixing. Keeping the race pure should be, must be, more important than climbing a social ladder in the name of material success. Race can only be destroyed when its members allow themselves to intermarry. The Old Greeks are a good example. Today not much more remains but a group of old statues. The Greek Culture will never again bloom as it once did. We could have a thousand year future ahead of us but definitely will not, if we let our Gothic domes be converted into Mosques, or if within our ruins Sicilian merchants hawk their wares to hordes of tourists gawking at the architectural wonders of an age gone by.

Race is the unchangeable stable fact in the life of a person. Everything else can change; race cannot. One can shortly after birth migrate with parents to a new land and learn a foreign tongue; one can be adopted by foreign parents and be raised within a totally different culture; one can be so disappointed with one’s nation that he/she opts for another; one can change political allegiances; one can change religion. Race alone can not be changed by anyone! — Race, unlike nationality, citizenship, political or religious views, is a stamped given that everyone carries throughout life.

The value of a race is thus absolute because it cannot be learned, taught or acquired. (This does not mean that other things such as language, political and religious views and so on are completely independent of Race. Quite to the contrary, one’s race will influence how one conducts oneself within these parameters.) Thus each race must maintain its own identity, must guard against mixing because otherwise it is subjected to radical genetic alterations which destroy the unique cultural and political expressions of its being.

Each racially conscious person possesses a feel for race — an attraction for people of his own kind and an aversion for those who are different — an understanding at a glance; the joy of finding like-minded people; seeing the beauty of one another in one another — this is a feel for race. This feeling is strongest among children; it is weakened as they grow older as a result of education and social pressure. The feel for race should never be neglected; it should, yes, must, be restored.

This restoration is a consciousness of race. It is a natural feeling at root, to be attracted to one’s own kind. This consciousness makes us aware of the achievements of our Folk in culture, scientific, political and military fields. Racial consciousness looks to explore the essence of folkdom and to contrast and differentiate itself from other folk groups.

A consciousness of race leads to a recognition of racial traits which again leads to the realization that each folk group has unique racial characteristics. The appreciation of this leads to a certain feeling of pride in one’s culture and biological heritage and is useful as a means to prevent miscegenation. Racial awareness awakens a sense of responsibility to one’s own Folk. The actions of all members of the Folk, including one’s own, must be measured against the yardstick of history and the outstanding members of the Folk; the aim is to make oneself worthy.

Race is thus a governing power which arouses people and nationalities to action in politics, the arts and within the community. Whatever a person says or does may be seen in his/her race and its behavioral patterns, expressions, indeed, its very character.

Race means on the one hand unity – unity of the you and I in feeling, in the manner of expression and in how we value and carry out our distinct behavioral mannerisms.

On the other hand, race also means particularity because the unity of a Folk puts it apart with respect to other Folk groups.

Because race has such an extraordinary significance it is justifiable to view it as the focal point of ideology. Race and the world’s natural laws (actually the word ‘law’ is misleading since it implies that someone ‘made’ the law! A better word would be natural necessities or simply natural descriptions) are themselves a unity. This consciousness places race above any other considerations such as religion, class or type of government. Many rational people within each folk group now realize that polluting the gene pool of each group means a loss of uniqueness that will be almost impossible to reverse.

Further, among all races, including our own, the demands for living rights are based on what has been scientifically and culturally achieved. To be sure, there will never be full agreement on the worth of a given thing; each people and each race will view its own culture and that of other peoples differently; the goals may not be the same. Indeed, representatives of other folk groups may find that it is all the same to them what at makes the world go round; they may look at civilization or journeys to the moon as highly unnecessary; each group has its own priorities.

Thus we, as a distinct Folk group, have our special value priorities; one such important value assessment is that of freedom, enjoyed by the Germanic peoples for long periods of time. Iceland has had from its beginnings a representative form of government. And wherever absolutism or dictatorship raised its ugly head among other Germanic states, it never lasted long. On the other hand, we find that among other races there was seldom any extensive political or social freedom; when there was, it was short-lived.

Without our example these races would still have no idea of self-determination. If our Folk goes under and our social management are lost, the whole world will be subjected to political tyranny or religious dictatorship. Racial chaos means political chaos, the destruction of democratic relationships and a fostering of dictatorships. People of a common folk group are likely to trust one another. When there is harmony between political leaders and the natural leaders of the Folk, it leads to a sense of responsibility between them – and ideas of overthrowing the government are never entertained. Homogeneous partners and their relatives are not burdened with mistrust; faithfulness can develop and flourish among them. A community naturally evolves as a bond between the individual and the group, between the individual and humanity.

Our basic requirement is, therefore, to recognize the importance of race within the lives of people so that a sense of a Folkish community is established. This community must not be a paper community, it must be experienced. Only through actual participation in the community can lasting, self-determined duties to Self and Folk be combined.

At first glance the question may be raised about binding the idea of personality onto the community. Personality, however, does not exist in a vacuum, it doesn’t develop by itself. Authentic personality is not possible in the ruling materialistic society. Personality exists within the community. Personality and Community are a symbiotic relationship. The popular but destructive cult of the individual is something we want to dismantle and replace with Folkish-oriented thought patterns and perceptions which do not place the individual at the center, but the Folk. The basic way in which people look at things should therefore be changed. This is not an easy task when one considers all the encrustments of centuries of false religions, philosophies and ideologies. But such problems do not scare us; our Folk is thousands of years old; it is potentially immortal; it is the foundation of our personality. It is the Eternal Value. … J.R.


From Elsie Christensen’s periodical “The Odinist” #83 1984 issue, via Ron McVan

Gaslighting: Abuse That Makes You Question Reality

by

Renegade Editor’s Note: I am not a huge fan of this guy or his presentation, but it is a good summary of the term, which we need to understand.We’ve been gaslit by world leaders, media talking heads, controlled opposition, and even people in our regular relationships.

The term “gaslighting” has gained popularity in recent years, but what exactly does it entail?

Segregation at Comic Con: No Straight, White Males Allowed at Parties

The comics industry seems to be doubling down on their policy of completely excluding anyone who is straight, white, male, or conservative. This year’s Emerald City Comic Con released its schedule of events on its app recently. Anyone who is male, white and identifies as heterosexual found himself excluded from industry mixers and professional mixers.

A source attending the event who asked to remain anonymous for safety reasons spoke to PJM about the blatant discrimination.

“I’m disappointed that they choose to be divisive in an industry that has seen enough divisiveness as it is,” the source said. “We are not our race or gender or sexuality. Aren’t we a sum of our parts, or as MLK noted so famously, isn’t it the content of our character that should be what counts?”

But this is not the philosophy that drives the race- and sexuality-obsessed left.

If you had the misfortune to watch the Olympics this year, you’d know that the most important people in the games were two guys who like having sex with other guys. The fact that they didn’t medal in their individual sports because of their subpar performances had no bearing on the media’s desire to elevate them to god-like status for everyone to adore and beatify. They’re queer, so they win!

It seems the left is determined to create an alternate universe where discrimination still exists but is only directed at white people. This runs contrary to all the great civil rights leaders who fought for equality. Martin Luther King Jr. didn’t march in order to refuse service to white people and yet that’s where we are in 2018. And they don’t even see how wrong it is! Look at how comfortable Comic Con is admitting they did this!

PJM reached out to Emerald City Comic Con for comment and received no answer.

Lately, there have been way too many of these stories surfacing. Pamela ((((((Geller))))))’s children are being run out of their jobs because of views their mother holds that the left finds unacceptable. Simply being linked by DNA makes her daughters culpable in the left’s eyes and so they must be destroyed and put out of work, unable to support themselves or make a life for themselves because they are assumed to hold doubleplusungood views. Their current apology tour will not save them. They are untouchables because their mother refuses to bow to the politically correct dogma that insists Islam means us no harm (even though its ideological adherents refuse to stop blowing people up or running them over with trucks while screeching “Allahu Akbar!”).

Worldcon, a science fiction convention, banned conservative author Jon Del Arroz after they claimed he intends to break their rules sometime in the future and members of the Science Fiction Writers of America are actively campaigning to keep him from joining the group based on nothing but personal dislike of his outspoken conservatism. The totalitarian SJW mobs that have taken over institutions are now putting the squeeze onto unwanted members who are straight, white and male. It’s much like Kurt Schlichter’s recent viral article, “They Don’t Hate the NRA. They Hate You,” and they’re not afraid to show it.

Let’s skip the song and dance number and get right to what they really want, shall we? Instead of banning people from parties and organizations, why don’t they just invite all Christian, white, heterosexual males to meet them at the Thunderdome where they can battle zoo animals for a jeering, salivating crowd of fat, blue-haired, genderqueer activists? And maybe afterward they can light crosses on fire in the yards of family members and put the heads of dissidents on spikes. This is the end they want, isn’t it? Let’s quit playing games and get to the natural outcome already. This is getting boring.

FINALLY: Intelligence Committee Head Calls Traitor Stephen Colbert “A Danger to the Country”

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
March 5, 2018

It’s about gosh-darn time we started considering the media what they are: A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY.

These people are openly and aggressively involved in a conspiracy to undermine the United States of America. There is no excuse. This is not “free speech,” it is sedition.

RT:

Comedian Stephen Colbert is no laughing matter, according to House Intelligence Committee head Devin Nunes, who said his jokes are a “danger.” He accused Democrats of using Hollywood to deflect evidence of their own wrongdoings.

Rep. Nunes (R-California) was the butt of jokes in an episode of the Late Show, which saw Colbert travel to Washington, DC to question congressmen about the alleged Trump-Russia collusion. Colbert handed out copies of a memo which read: “Devin Nunes is a [redacted].”

“This is the danger that we have in this country,” Nunes said when asked about Colbert by Fox News’ Neil Cavuto on Saturday. “The left controls not only the universities in this country, but they also control Hollywood in this country, and the mainstream media, so conservatives in this country are under attack, and I think this is a great example of it.”

The California representative went on to dismiss the left’s excitement about the Russia investigation. “On the one hand you’ll see the left and the media running out there saying, ‘oh my gosh, it’s the end of the world, the Russians hacked our democracy, and we have evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.’ However, they can’t show it, they have no proof,” he said.

He then reversed the attack by pinning the “Russia collusion” accusation on the Democrats.  Nunes said that when Republicans present “proof that not only did the Democratic party collude and get information from the Russians, and then an investigation was opened up into the Trump campaign to spy on the Trump campaign,” the left “resort[s] to going to their friends in Hollywood to make fun of people and attack people who are trying to get to the truth.”

“I enjoy the attacks, if they want to continue to attack me, that’s fine,”he added.

Yes, we all enjoy the attacks. Until they kick you off the internet.

But what we need is attacks on them.

We need to round them up and put them in concentration camps.

All of these media people.

If we don’t want to go that far – okay. At the very least, we need to make it so these media people do not have the ability to completely silence the opposition. We need to regulate the tech industry, or nationalize it. We have to allow people to view criticism of the media.

Furthermore, we need investigations. We have already caught the media colluding with the Democrats and the FBI to hoax the population – that is a seditious conspiracy.

We need to see the records of the NYT and WaPo, and see what they were doing planting all of these news stories about the Russian conspiracy.

A secretly-organized plot to undermine an elected government by a complete and total privately-owned and unaccountable elite media establishment working in concert with deep-state government agents is not “free speech.”

We need a subpoena machine gun assault on all of these people.

The Russia collusion conspiracy theory has been proved to be a hoax and someone has to pay for it.

The Push to Turn European History Brown

Adrian Sol

Daily Stormer
March 5, 2017

You don’t have a past, and you don’t have a future.

We’ve talked a good deal about the new medieval game Kingdom Come: Deliverance and its lack of brown people. The lack of “diversity” caused an outrage in various circles, prompting a bunch of pseudo-academics to explain that Europe has always been filled to the brim with Wakandans.

This, of course, is nothing new. Hollywood has been “diversifying” our own history for decades now, subtly suggesting that our past was never White.

A superficial reason for doing this is that it creates the impression in White people that “diversity” is a normal thing, and that there was never as point in history at which things were better. After all, if it’s possible for things to be different, then some people might actually fight to change things.

But there’s a deeper, and darker reason for it.

This 2016 interview with Doctor Who producer Steven Moffat gives us a glimpse into the true reason for putting brown people in historical settings where they clearly don’t belong.

BBC:

Sometimes the nature of a particular show – historical dramas, for instance – makes diversity more of a challenge, but Doctor Who has absolutely nowhere to hide on this,” he said.

And yet, somehow, they manage.

Young people watching have to know that they have a place in the future. That really matters. You have to care profoundly what children’s shows in particular say about where you’re going to be.”

Moffat is saying here that when brown people see other brown people on television, it makes them hopeful for the future, it makes them feel like they have a place in society.

The unstated reality, of course, is that the opposite is also true for White people. As kids watch television and see images of non-Whites, it fills them with despair and alienation.

This is exactly the point of “diversity” in mass media – demoralizing the White population.

Moffat said the show must find new ways to get ethnic minority actors on screen in future.

“We’ve kind of got to tell a lie. We’ll go back into history and there will be black people where, historically, there wouldn’t have been, and we won’t dwell on that.

“We’ll say, ‘To hell with it, this is the imaginary, better version of the world. By believing in it, we’ll summon it forth’.”

“Better version of the world.”

If only there were no Whites, we’d all be living in Wakanda. Well, except White people, since we’d be dead.

In other words, history must be rewritten in order to make brown people feel more comfortable, even if this plunges Whites into despair. This is okay, since the world would be a better place without them anyway.

There’s no doubt that this is a direct attack on White people, and not genuinely done out of concern for the psychological welfare of Blacks. Otherwise, they’d be switching around the races of other people as well.

We’re not about to see a holocaust film in which all the Jews are played by niggers.

Someone desperately needs to make this, though, as a troll.

The social sciences have been infiltrated by Jews and communists for decades, and they’ve gone to great lengths to rewrite our history in this way. It’s now to the point where a shitlib can advocate for “diversifying” any given time and place in our history and find some kind of academic justification as “evidence.”

Of course, in every case, this “evidence” evaporates under the most cursory scrutiny. It’s usually something like, “well, Romans bought slaves from Africa, and they also invaded Britain, therefore Britain was always full of Blacks.” They’ll find isolated examples and claim that this represents the rule.

The Jews understand that this historical revisionism is a form of psychological warfare against gentiles, whose purpose is to demoralize our population. Whites are evil, they have no glorious past, and therefore no future.

This is the reason why any deviation from this revisionist trend is met with hysterical outrage. This rewriting of history depends on total conformity – any exposure to an accurate portrayal of the past is enough to break the spell.

This is why even a game like Kingdom Come: Deliverance represents a major danger to the Jewish agenda, and why it’s so successful among White people. It brings forth a shining light in the sea of darkness and obfuscation that Jews have created, and this creates hope.

If this has existed in the past, then it can exist again.

Oscars: Movie About a Woman Who Fucks a Fish (As a Metaphor for Fucking an Immigrant) Wins Best Picture

Andrew Anglin

Daily Stormer
March 4, 2018

And the loser is… DONALD TRUUMP!

So this movie is really super-weird on a straight-forward level. It is about a woman that fucks a fish. Like, there are actual sex scenes with this fish.

That’s I think pretty offensive. I mean, you go see a movie you think is supposed to be an artsy sci-fi movie, and then you end up in a sick bestiality porno – that’s not a good time for most folks. Gotta be pretty weird to think that’s a good time.

The metaphor of course was that the fish creature she was fucking was an immigrant. You would think comparing immigrants to jungle fish people would be offensive to someone, but I guess not if you support them.

Washington Post:

“The Shape of Water,” a Cold War fantasy about a mute woman who falls in love with a humanoid sea creature, won the Oscar for best picture Sunday at the 90th Academy Awards, a ceremony laced with social and political statements, particularly on the issues of diverse representation and sexual assault in the film industry.

“I think that the greatest thing our art does, and our industry does, is erase the lines in the sand,” said the winning film’s creator, Guillermo del Toro, whose victory for best director was the fourth time in the past five years that a Mexican filmmaker took home that prize. “We should continue doing that, when the world tells us to make them deeper.”

The movie takes place in the 1950s. premise is that this woman works at a government facility as a floor-mopper, and at the government facility is this fish man who was found in the jungle and is now being kept in captivity for scientific research. She bonds with it – even though she can’t speak its language – and breaks it out to save it from the evil heterowhite oppressors.

Another character in the film is an old gay guy who tries to pick-up a much younger straight guy. He is literally painted as both a hero and a victim in the film. I have never seen a homosexual protagonist play the role of “older man who preys on young straight men,” just as I have never seen someone fuck a fish.

That predatory faggot gets magic powers from the magic immigrant fish.

Then you have the kindly old black helper character and the evil heterowhite male villain.

Oh, and the Russian spies. You gotta have those Russian spies.

The whole film, while artistically put together on a visual level, comes across as nothing more than a lecture.

I have no idea who wants to get lectured like this in entertainment. Apparently a lot of people, because the film did relatively well at the box office.

That was hype, of course. But still.

Why do people watch this crap?

Also I want to point out that there was no message against ((((((Harvey Weinstein)))))) in the film – nothing at all about sexual harassment, which was supposed to be the Oscars theme.

It was:

  • Pro-immigrant
  • Pro-gay
  • Pro-race mixing
  • Anti-Russian
  • Anti-white
  • Anti-heterosexual

But there was no specific women’s rights issue, beyond “woman’s right to screw an animal for excitement.”

So even on the PC messaging level, this fails as an Oscar winner. We were supposed to be talking about metoo.