Final Story on DACA: Trump Tweeted a Semantic Disagreement and the Jig is in Fact Up

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 14, 2017

So it looks like Trump did just tweet after the backlash.

He did make an agreement, he just didn’t officially sign it.

What is he getting in return for this?

“Border security.”


President Donald Trump and Democratic congressional leaders reached a tentative agreement Wednesday night to provide a pathway to citizenship for young immigrants known as Dreamers — but after a conservative backlash, the president and his aides sent conflicting signals about how firm the agreement was.

After a meeting with Trump at the White House on Wednesday night, Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi said they had come to terms with Trump on a plan that would provide protection for Dreamers in exchange for beefed-up border security — but, notably, no additional funding for a border wall.

“We all agreed on a framework: Pass DACA protections and additional security measures, excluding the wall. We agreed that the president would support enshrining the DACA protections into law,” Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor Thursday.

The news triggered an outcry from the right, which accused Trump of abandoning his tough-on-immigration campaign stance. So Trump and his aides rebutted Democrats’ claims that an agreement had been struck — while at the same time acknowledging the outlines of a deal.

“No deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote,” Trump tweeted.

Added White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters: “By no means was any deal ever agreed upon.”

Yet it seemed to be a matter of semantics. Speaking briefly to reporters shortly after his tweet, Trump said he and the Democratic leaders were close to a deal on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, but that any agreement would hinge on “massive border security,” adding that funding for a border wall will come “a little bit later.”

He also said he had spoken to House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and that both are “on board” with a DACA-for-border-security deal with Democrats. The meeting Wednesday night did not include Ryan and McConnell, whom Trump spurned for Pelosi and Schumer on a fiscal deal last week.

“Well, we want to get massive border security, and I think that both Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, I think they agree with it … we’re fairly close, but we have to get massive border security,” the president said. “Ryan and McConnell agree with us on DACA. We’re very much on board. I spoke to them, yes.”

Responding to accusations he was backing “amnesty,” Trump also said Thursday: “We’re not looking at citizenship. We’re not looking at amnesty. We’re looking at allowing people to stay here.”

That is amnesty.

Whatever the case, they are eventually going to get citizenship if they don’t go back. And what difference does it make? They vote without citizenship.

Let’s be clear: this is not chess. There is no chess move that follows allowing these DACA bloodsucking parasites amnesty. That is called getting checkmated by the Jews.

Acting like he’s going to do it and then not doing it could potentially be some kind of chess move. I guess. But once DACA gets signed, it’s over. That will be the end of the Trump Presidency.

We will still get some things we wanted, probably, and it will of course have been better than Hillary, but the dream will be dead. The DREAMers will kill our dream.

I’m not going to flip out and have an emotional breakdown over this. It is sad, and I do feel sad. But we never really thought that Trump could bring down this entire system singlehandedly.

At least not without declaring martial law. And if he signs DACA, that isn’t in the cards either. If he was planning to do that, he would have gone all the way on Charlottesville and then held the line, pumping up the base.

It doesn’t look good.

Possibly/probably, the deals he’s making with the Democrats are to avoid impeachment. I think history would remember him better if he went down fighting. But maybe he’s too tired to care about that. Maybe he’s being threatened. Maybe AJ is right and he’s being secretly drugged.

Who knows.

It doesn’t really matter.

What matters is just coming to terms with the fact that this train is crashing, that we’re gonna need to tuck and roll and regroup down the line.


What’s Really Going Down in America Today

By Phillip Marlowe

OK, I’ll be the first to admit I got a bit pessimistic and angry over “normie” White people since Charlottesville. These half-assed bozos just turn their backs and walk away, muttering “the good times are over, oh boohoo — what can little old me ever do? Lordy, Jeebus, I don’t wan’t to turn into a big hater boy!”

But I’m actually in a lot better mood these days since I was back in the late nineties when I figured out the big scam against the White race by Globalist Jewry. I remember unwrapping a Christmas gift from a family member of a book called “The Greatest Generation” written by that beady-eyed liberal TV suck-up, Tom Brokaw, and looking down at it and thinking to myself, “I better pretend to love it right now, before burning it later.” Sure, maybe I should have said something right then and there, but hell, it was Christmas, after-all.

Let me just copy and paste a quote a lot of you might have already read before:

All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident.”

— Arthur Schopenhauer

Right now we’re at that second stage, obviously. And I should be all happy that the next stage is right around the corner. So I am. Indeed, I’ve read tons of comments over the Internet from Whites universally getting pissed and awoken. Least-wise until those commenters get censored in some way. Yet we can easily conclude such censorship will only reinforce the commentators’ original thinking; resulting in “word of mouth” activity — not observed by the rest of us, maybe, but much more powerful at the grass-roots level. That’s exactly the place where fast-spreading prairie fires start.

Let me just stop right here and tell you a fact of life: Most people won’t say or do anything “openly,” but think much the same way as we do. Sure, maybe not exactly, but along the same lines. They just don’t like to appear they have been “sold” (salespeople understand the psychology). Nixon called them “the silent majority” but in truth, it’s just the regular guy or gal trying to make a buck and have a few laughs along the way.

Oh boy, do the Jews hate Nixon! Bringing him down still gets the lousy Jews off to this day — big time. Nixon Watergate documentaries are porno to them — just like all the stuff about a defeated Hitler holed up in a Berlin bunker they run constantly on TV.

I remember coming to this conclusion after seeing them widely publish photos of the corpses of Joseph Goebbels’ (Hitler minister of propaganda) dead little children during the fall of Berlin and all the dead Nazi leadership hung almost immediately after the Nuremberg trials. Demonic Jews still get woodies over the grotesque pictures. To this day, they have zero problem having little kiddies see such photos in schoolbooks and in their brainwashing TV documentaries every other night — on every other channel.

I made a BIG connection right then and there when it came to these hypocrite Jew psychos.

Got that right, Katie!

Before I started writing my original, soon to be censored blog at the free WordPress “blogosphere” back on October 31st, 2007 (while answering the doorbell to the fewer and fewer White kids coming for Halloween candy that year from each year before); I deduced the following:

One: It’s only a matter of time before the word gets out with a free Internet. Two: It’s only a matter of time before the Jews would have to furiously censor the entire Internet. Three: They don’t have the luxury of knowing exactly when to do it, without it becoming too obvious or too late.

Once the genie was out of the bottle, all hell was going to break loose!

Long ago, I called this “critical mass.” This is when too much plutonium is put together in our universe and a runaway chain reaction occurs. Right now in the White Western World (or used to be White), we’re only grams away. Things are fast heating up. Jewry is already massively at work censoring awakened Whites (websites, blogs, Youtube videos, Facebook pages).

A Jew rabbi (can’t think of the name, maybe someone can put it in the comments) once was asked by a reporter doing your typical brainwashing piece on the holocaust, if such a thing could ever happen in America. The rabbi told her it could happen overnight. Yes, indeed rabbi. Chain reactions do happen in a blink of the eye.

That’s why I think (others too) that they’ll try to pull off another big false flag in the near future, to pin it on “White supremacists” if they got a handy patsy lined up, or maybe a geopolitical event simply to distract the hoi polloi by getting us into another big war. North Korea? Perhaps. They might just instigate a giant financial crash. They could probably do that with one or two phone calls to their insiders. They might even do all three events in quick succession, to really mix things up among the Goyim. Number of dead Americans? Doesn’t matter one bit to these self-absorbed, devious creeps.


Just your daily dose of Jewish hypocrisy. Jewish inbreeding is a major problem yet they want to force us Whites to mix with other races and thinks it’s wrong if you don’t want to date outside your race. [Ron Harper]

You got to think about it all here for a minute: Here’s the insanely hypocrite Jews telling themselves only they can “fix the world” since they are so much smarter than all us Goyim. But guess what? Jews have been the planet’s most insidious and murderous influence down through history. Most definitely. Jews have killed or have been the source of political thinking that has killed tens of millions of people.

They’ve been scamming the planet up the ying-yang for so long, it’s not funny. Oh, but they think they are so hilariously funny all the time — have you noticed?

Just think about us getting scammed with the money in our pockets the next time you go grocery shopping, for chrissakes. Inflation is a real hidden tax on each of us. Not only do they feed off our labors with the Federal Reserve banking cabal and the “FIAT” paper money scam, but the black-suited orthodox f*ckers make each of us Goyim to pay a cut to them with the Kosher tax. Look for a small circled “U” on every single box up on the shelves — they actually organize among themselves on who gets what.

The whole race is a bunch of trouble-making parasites. America has been a giant fat cow they’ve fed on since we stupidly let them immigrate here from Russia and Eastern Europe.

And wars are excellent covers for severe censorship. There were plenty of people locked up back during WWII for speaking out. The American people back then didn’t care — they just wanted to get payback for Pearl Harbor. If you notice, anti-Jap racism during those days is being played up today in the media — part of the big diversity brainwashing of us “racist” White people who are “always so hateful to non-White races.” But that’s not a factor for the war in Europe — it’s always just fine for us to kill fellow Whites! I wonder who could have put that idea into our little heads?

What’s going on these days is THE WHY you see groups like ANTIFA financed by rich subversive Jews like George Soros, non-stop Trump bashing on liberal TV and the shutting down of websites like the Daily Stormer and Stormfront. Jews understand fully that once us Goyim start freely talking among ourselves, it’s only a matter of time before their ass is grass.

But the question remains: Can we stop these crazy backstabbers before it’s too late?

I think so.



What we need to do, is stop interfering in these non-white nations, they are not us, it is none of our business what goes on outside of our civilization. Any trade we have should be limited to raw resources and land for extra food we produce, none of our technology should be transferred to non-white nations (especial weapons), no immigration from non-white nations, no culture exchange, we leave them alone, they leave us alone.

End Result of Charlottesville



Well done Jason Kessler, and every White who participated. Whatever else comes of this, you have flushed out the enemy, and thereby performed a great service for your race.

The anti-White/pro-jew regime does indeed seek to replace us. The jews, who rule, have designated Whites personae non gratae. The jews cry out in pain as they condemn “white nationalism” and “white supremacy”, while their servants, who specifically praise “the jewish people” and their parasitic alien ethnostate, obsequiously echo their masters.

How? Why? Revilo Oliver was right.


Revilo P. Oliver

Late Professor of Classics at the University of Illinois at Urbana

Revilo P. Oliver, a truly great scholar of our ageThis hypothesis is open to the objection that, so far as we can tell, a distinct change has taken place in the Jews’ activity in this century and at approximately the time of the “Protocols.” Before this, the aliens seem to have been content to exploit the Aryans and, in biological terms, feed on them; the present objective is obviously extermination of our species through mongrelization and massacres, so that it would seem that the organization and domination of the Jewish colonies by the Zionists produced a change in purpose that must, to a large extent at least, have been consciously determined and planned.

This implies some measure of rule by some kind of directorate that has the ability and power to set objectives for the race. The alternative is to explain the change as a natural result of the progressive weakening of our race by less direct attacks during the past thousand years or more, comparable to the change in the activity of a wolf pack when it senses that the harried caribou are nearing exhaustion.

Whatever the explanation, the Jews’ determination to exterminate the Aryans is not unreasonable.

One may see a good analogy in the cattle that are raised in the southwestern part of the United States. For a long time, the favorite breed was the ‘Texas Long-horn,’ which was hardy, able to fight off coyotes and other predators, and to survive in the wilds until it was rounded up by the cowboys for a long drive to the market, but it was also a dangerous animal that would attack its owners when provoked. It is now virtually extinct, having been replaced on the ranches by more docile breeds, such as the ‘Black Angus,’ since the predators have been exterminated and the cattle now graze within fences or are simply fattened on corn provided for them, and the vigor of the potentially dangerous ‘Longhorn’ is no longer needed, while the more docile and sluggish animals yield more tender meat.

Early in the Twentieth Century, Aryans had, for all practical purposes, subjugated the entire world and made it everywhere both safe and convenient for the Jews, whereas events in Germany in the 1930s proved that Aryans could be dangerous to the Master Race, if they got out of control. Elimination of the species seems therefore a logical step for the self-styled ‘God-people.’

Future Alt Right Lawsuits May Devastate Cities

The University of Florida denied Richard Spencer permission to hold an event at its campus, citing security concerns. According to the university, safety was the reason as it always is when denying “dangerous” groups permission to speak:

The Gainesville, Fla., university said on Wednesday it would deny a request by Spencer to rent event space on campus for his speech. In a statement, UF president W. Kent Fuchs cited safety concerns for the decision.

Online groups had threatened violent clashes on campus similar to the protests in Charlottesville, Va. that resulted in one woman’s death when she was struck by a car allegedly driven by a white nationalist. Fuchs said while he found Spencer’s beliefs “repugnant,” that had nothing to do with the university’s decision.

…”However, the First Amendment does not require a public institution to risk imminent violence to students and others,” Fuchs said. “The likelihood of violence and potential injury – not the words or ideas – has caused us to take this action.”

In a sense, Spencer holds universities hostage because he has a right to speak at publicly-funded institutions, but his presence brings out the Leftist groups that then create violence. Any place where he shows up, guaranteed mayhem and chaos will soon follow. In this sense, he can retaliate against any Left-leaning city by simply coming to speak there, and leaving as the place burns. This is an intelligent strategy as it raises the cost of being Leftist for cities, universities and other public institutions.

For now, perhaps, the “safety” excuse will hold, but in future lawsuits, Spencer and others will be able to destroy this excuse by pointing out that the difference between having violence and having zero violence depends on one single factor: anonymity. When Antifa are unmasked, no violence occurs; when they are allowed to keep their masks on, they tend to loot, vandalize and deposit filth.

A good approach might be for people who are injured in violence resulting from Leftist clashes to sue the institution at which this happened, pointing out that such an institution is negligent for not removing the masks from Antifa and other Leftist groups known to use violence against the Alt Right.

That way, not only are the constitutional rights of the Right protected, but the people near that institution do not suffer personal and property damage from the Leftist mob. As more lawyers come onboard the Alt Right, it is likely that high-cost lawsuits will force these institutions to unmask Antifa and allow the Alt Right to speak.

Reminder: “Science” Is Often Fake, And Diversity Never Works

For years, Leftists relied on Stephen Jay Gould’s assertion that the races were all equal because, in Gould’s writing, he claimed that earlier skull measurements were incorrect and that these alterations were motivated by “racism.”

As it turned out, we found out in 2011 that Gould was so wrong as to stretch credulity, causing us to think that as usual, “the Leftist cries out as he strikes you,” or accuses you of exactly what he is doing:

In a 1981 book, “The Mismeasure of Man,” the paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould asserted that Morton, believing that brain size was a measure of intelligence, had subconsciously manipulated the brain volumes of European, Asian and African skulls to favor his bias that Europeans had larger brains and Africans smaller ones.

…But now physical anthropologists at the University of Pennsylvania, which owns Morton’s collection, have remeasured the skulls, and in an article that does little to burnish Dr. Gould’s reputation as a scholar, they conclude that almost every detail of his analysis is wrong.

…But the Penn team finds Morton’s results were neither fudged nor influenced by his convictions. They identified and remeasured half of the skulls used in his reports, finding that in only 2 percent of cases did Morton’s measurements differ significantly from their own. These errors either were random or gave a larger than accurate volume to African skulls, the reverse of the bias that Dr. Gould imputed to Morton.

…But Dr. Gould himself omitted subgroups in his own reanalysis, and made various errors in his calculations. When these are corrected, the differences between the racial categories recognized by Morton are as he assigned them. “Ironically, Gould’s own analysis of Morton is likely the stronger example of a bias influencing results,” the Pennsylvania team writes.

It is important to realize how pervasive the mental virus of egalitarianism is by looking at cases like the above. Assumptions about systematic racism and unconscious bias were made, revealing the opposite truth: the bias was not there, and the results were the opposite of what was asserted.

When we say that we are egalitarian, we are buying into the caste revolt that has catastrophically ruined the West over the past couple centuries. In order for the proles to seize control, they have to argue that there is nothing different about a king or high IQ person from anyone else, and therefore anyone can rule, and to make that fair, we will all choose whoever that is.

As a necessary side-effect of this, we have to stop noticing differences and adopt the unconscious bias that says that, since all people are equal, different outcomes are the result of chance or “oppression” instead of a difference in ability. This society would have you look at someone with wealth and assume that he has no different abilities from someone who is poor.

Maybe in some cases that is true, but in the vast majority of cases, those who are more intelligent and capable rise above the rest. That outraged us, so we started offering workarounds: education that rewards the obedient instead of the intellectually capable, jobs that reward hours doing nonsense paperwork instead of results, government that chooses what is popular over what is true.

This causes a tension common to failing societies: what “everyone” agrees is true, is in fact not true, and since there is no reward and great risk in speaking what is true, society becomes dedicated to lies. The converse of that is that it must suppress notice of what is actually true, and by doing that, it creates an industry built around sustaining the lies.

Consider that, much as in the French Revolution people were required to pretend that peasants were equal to kings and not laugh at that, in our current day, we are still struggling with the ability to admit differences between social classes, races, ethnic groups, sexes and family lines:

There are three areas where ideology has impinged on biology, trying its best to distort data: differences between human ethnic groups (“races”), between human males and females, and the study of evolutionary psychology.

…The ideologues’ problem with all these areas is the same: were biology to show, for example, that there are genetic differences between sexes, ethnic groups, or cultures, that could be used to justify racism, sexism, and exceptionalism. And indeed, this has happened in the past: all of us know the sordid history of assuming biology translates directly into human rights, which led to eugenics, racism, the denigration of and lack of opportunity for women, and so on.

It is even more damaging than that: if we reveal that, like Stephen Jay Gould’s research, biology is true and ideology was based on lines, then we know it is time to throw out ideology, or what the authors of the above piece refer to as “ought” instead of “is” based thinking. That which is unrealistic is emotional or social in origin, and that means it puts us at a disadvantage for following an illusion.

This is the core of the struggle between the rising dissident Right and modern society: modern society is based on egalitarianism, which is an “ought”-based notion, where the Right is based on what “is,” and then improving that by selecting the best possible option. If diversity does not work, multiculturalism must go, replaced by the better option of benevolent nationalism.

That in turn threatens Leftism itself because the core of their ideology is based on the priestlike ability to grand redemption from “wrongs” that led to inequality, but if inequality is natural and equality is not, then there is no need for redemption:

Here we see redemptive liberalism’s great ingenuity: It seized proprietorship over innocence itself. It took on the power to grant or deny moral legitimacy across society. Liberals were free of the past while conservatives longed to resurrect it, bigotry and all. What else could “Make America Great Again” mean? In this way redemptive liberalism reshaped the moral culture of the entire Western world with sweeping idealisms like “diversity,” which are as common today in Europe as in America.

So today there is sweetness at the news of racism because it sets off the hunt for innocence and power. Racism and bigotry generally are the great driving engines of modern American liberalism. Even a remote hint of racism can trigger a kind of moral entrepreneurism.

…The great problem for conservatives is that they lack the moral glibness to compete with liberalism’s “innocence.” But today there are signs of what I have called race fatigue. People are becoming openly cynical toward the left’s moral muscling with racism. Add to this liberalism’s monumental failure to come even close to realizing any of its beautiful idealisms, and the makings of a new conservative mandate become clearer. As idealism was the left’s political edge, shouldn’t realism now be the right’s?

This shows us an even greater split, as noted by Samuel Huntington, which is that Leftism is inherently universalistic, or based on what humans have in common, but that is a social construct because people are increasingly concerned with what makes them and their specific local group united instead.

For that reason, identity politics is rising because as Mr. Steele notes above, Leftism has failed to “come even close to realizing any of its beautiful idealisms.” People are fleeing the Left, and turning instead to what they have in common with others that is exclusive of other groups, which causes a rise in identitarianism alongside a simultaneous rejection of universalism, or the notion that we are all the same and therefore, the largest unit within civilization is the individual:

Recent surveys suggest that roughly 47 percent of Republicans are what you might call conservative universalists and maybe 40 percent are what you might call conservative white identitarians. White universalists believe in conservative principles and think they apply to all people and their white identity is not particularly salient to them. White identitarians are conservative, but their white identity is quite important to them, sometimes even more important than their conservatism.

These white identitarians have taken the multicultural worldview taught in schools, universities and the culture and, rightly or wrongly, have applied it to themselves. As Marxism saw history through the lens of class conflict, multiculturalism sees history through the lens of racial conflict and group oppression.

…I’d love to see more research on the relationship between white identity politics and simple racism. There’s clear overlap, but I suspect they’re not quite the same thing. Racism is about feeling others are inferior. White identitarianism is about feeling downtrodden and aggrieved yourself.

The latter sentence is not quite true: white identitarianism is not just white, but focuses on ethnic groups within the European races, and is not based on feeling aggrieved so much as realizing that, if universalism (egalitarianism) is wrong, then no one else will represent the interests of a group that they do not belong to.

For members of a definable ethnic group, this means that they alone must stand up for their own interests, have their own country, ethnic self-determination or control of their future, impose their own standards and laws, defend their language and practice, maintain their genetic heritage, and do so in full knowledge that every other group is representing its own interests, which are contrary to their own.

The Left has acknowledged this, mainly by calling anyone who stands up for their ethnic interests and is also white or whitish a “white supremacist” which equates acting in self-interest while white with wanting whites to rule the world and subjugate other races:

It’s easy to focus on the angry white men in paramilitary gear who looked like they were mobilizing for a race war in the Virginia college town. But it’s the ordinary people — the voters who elected a reality TV star with a record of making racially insensitive comments, the people who move out of the neighborhood when people of color move in, the family members who ignore a relative’s anti-Semitism — who give these type of men room to operate, they say.

That was the twisted formula that made the Holocaust and Rwanda possible and allowed Jim Crow segregation to survive: Nice people looked the other way while those with an appetite for violence did the dirty work, says Mark Naison, a political activist and history professor at Fordham University in New York City.

Never mind that “nice people looking the other way” is what enables Antifa to rampage across the land while Leftists destroy vital institutions, tear down statues, censor free speech and engage in other totalitarian practices that fit within the gulags, censorship, guillotines and secret police heritage of Leftism that goes back to the French Revolution in 1789.

The Leftist argument that white self-interest is “supremacist” only if we make the assumption that multiculturalism is a permanent state, and one group wanting to be in control of itself somehow deprives other groups of something that only that group can provide, like welfare benefits and entitlements. That order has already died, although the death scene is taking some time to play out on stage.

As much as it aggrieves the Left and Leftist minorities, whites are going their own way. They do not want to be part of the multicultural tapestry of failure any longer. They are tired of being the group which is worked into the ground to pay for taxes that support a permanent minority underclass while whites face higher victimization at the hands of other groups.

Historical guilt only goes so far. Like the bad science, it was based on lies, and so now people have thrown out the entire argument. They do not want to “just get along”; they want to just get away from what is obviously another crazy ideology which is going to plunge everyone into disaster, much like Communism and National Socialism did.

This much has been apparent for some time. People trust results, but are less trustful of ideology, and so were resistant to the Tower of Babel agenda until the 1960s, when the combination of WWII anti-racism and a desire to out-compete the Soviets by offering more freedom and social benefits to living here converted the West into a Leftist ideological regime which then expanded after the fall of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s. With its competition gone, the Western capitalist-Leftist hybrid could triumph over the socialist-Leftist variety.

However, since the 1860s, Americans have been wary of the “one big happy” approach that was used to federalize the independent states so that the USA could unite behind an ideological agenda, and at that point, the Americans hit on the French Revolutionary ideal of equality for workers across the globe, and spun that into an anti-slavery narrative that surpassed previous abolitionist efforts in its dogmatic ferocity.

This agenda reached its full power with the defeat of the last ostensibly Right-leaning powers in WWII, and accelerated after the fall of the Soviets, causing an intensification of things whites had noticed about their homelands — constant ethnic violence, higher crime, loss of social trust, abolition of values and standards, and the dumbing-down of almost everything — since diversity became state policy in the 1940s.

As the 1990s approached with a post-Reagan Leftist narrative diversity and immigration, conservatives wanted to speak out, but felt they could not, and they were proven right by the ongoing destruction of careers for having said the wrong thing. The first incident to really make this popular was the crucifixion of Jimmy “The Greek” Synder in 1988, which shattered his career and left him to die, penniless and alone, eight years later.

Leftists had realized, during the Reagan years, that they could use diversity as a weapon. Given the choice, white people tended to vote for conservatives who would then interrupt the cozy arrangement that liberals had with industry. The only solution was to replace white people by using immigration, legal and illegal alike, as well as accelerated affirmative action to replace whites in positions of power.

At this point, a curious inversion began to happen. Previous diversity theory had held that whichever group was dominant was the only group that could be “racist”; newer thinkers began to realize that, with government behind an ideology, it could use diversity to replace the dominant group through forced interaction, outbreeding and civil rights and affirmative action style employment, education and quota programs in position of authority.

As a result, white people began to think the unthinkable… the despite being the historical majority, they might be entitled to have an identity and act in defense of it, too. This helped united the disparate elements of anti-modern thinking — social conservatives, human biodiversity, men’s rights, the New Right, libertarians, monarchists, traditionalists, and the Old Right — into a common movement based around the defense of the rights of the majority against the historical narrative of guilt and oppression.

These movements rediscovered the nationalism of the 1900s through 1940s, and now began to express it as a right to nationalism for all peoples which thwarted the modern agenda of globalism and diversity, or merging all peoples inevitably into one grey race that, lacking culture and identity of its own, would dependent on Soviet-style Leftist government for its sense of purpose:

But the reasoning behind the linking of the two symbols – white supremacy and Zionism – is far from torturous. The two are not strange bedfellows, but rather natural allies. Both represent a desire to establish and maintain a homogeneous society that posits itself as superior, more advanced, more civilised than the “others” who are, unfortunately, within its midst, a “demographic threat” to be contained through border walls and stricter immigration law. American fascism, then, is holding up a mirror to Zionism.

…Spencer explained that, logically, Zionists should “respect” his views: “… an Israeli citizen, someone who understands your identity, who has a sense of nationhood and peoplehood, and the history and experience of the Jewish people, you should respect someone like me, who has analogous feelings about whites. You could say that I am a white Zionist – in the sense that I care about my people, I want us to have a secure homeland for us and ourselves. Just like you want a secure homeland in Israel”.

…”Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel?” Spencer replied. “Jews exist precisely because you did not assimilate to the gentiles… I respect that about you. I want my people to have that same sense of themselves.” Rosenberg was left speechless, unable to effectively rebuke Spencer.

For too long, we have been taught a fake narrative of diversity along with fake science because both are needed to support the illusion that “equality” is desirable, functional and will lead to good things. It has failed, leaving us with a corrupt and tyrannical government, a shattered economy, social unrest and a people who are blighted by promiscuity, obesity, moral incontinence and the narcissism that is found in the intersection of hipsterism, special snowflake syndrome, and the victim narrative. The nationalist ideal is rising because the internationalist, globalist, diversity and multicultural ideal has been implemented and it is a disaster.

Diversity has already died, just like Stephen Jay Gould’s theory that all humans are the same in abilities. More importantly, the notion that we can exist without acting in our own self-interest as organic groups has died, and with it, the Leftist ideal of one world population has collapsed. Now we are fighting over how to make the transition without committing the errors of the past.

News: MGTOW in All but Name (TFM 42O)

MGTOW is unstoppable because it’s so simple and obvious that men will re-create it without ever hearing of the acronym in the first place.

The ONLY way to end MGTOW, is to end its source, which is women’s empowerment, and feminism, that is whats creating MGTOW, (((those))) who promote women’s empowerment and feminism (the war between the sex’s) need to be hunted down and removed from the earth.