Are There Good Jews, Blacks … ?

Whites who say there are good Jews, Blacks, Browns, Yellows and Reds, and who believe that Awakened Whites are wrong to focus on race, fail to understand the deeper meanings of what makes a people a people and of the ways of existence itself and about our survival as Whites.

Of course there are good individuals of every race. And, by good I mean people who are nice, polite, mind their own business and mean no one any harm.  But, being “good” is not the issue.

What non-Whites can never be is White and the issue is that our survival as Whites means we must stay White in all ways and not allow any non-White genes into our personal or collective White genome. In other words, we must not let ‘genome hackers’ hack into our White genome and turn our White family genetic programs into non-White family genetic programs, which then use our own DNA to spread their DNA to compromise more Whites.

All non-Whites can hack our White genetic program.  They simply have to mate with us. This takes 23 of our White chromosomes with about 10,000 of our White genes and combines these with 23 of their non-White chromosomes and about 10,000 of their non-White genes.  And, this means any children born of such matings will not be fully White and these children are then carriers of non-Whiteness which they spread through the White gene pool when they in turn mate, which is often with Whites who now find them more attractive due to their carrying some White genes along with their non-White genes.

To be clear, because  non-Whites can mate with Whites and because they carry non-White genes and because those non-White genes automatically compromise our White genome when non-Whites mate with us they cause us harm even if they have no evil intent.  The harm they can do to us is automatic.

This sexually transmitted ‘bedroom genocide’–compromises the White genome and turns White families into non-White families.  Just as  germs or other  organisms don’t have to have evil or harmful intent towards us but can still sicken and may ultimately kill us, so is it with non-Whites who can mate with us. Down at the end of this essay I’ve included a quote that explains this in other terms.

Whites need to understand that we, as Whites, are in a struggle for our existence as Whites and that anything that decreases the amount of the White genome in existence is not good for us personally or collectively and can lead to our extinction and absorption into non-White genomes, just as surely as modern White humans absorbed the genomes of Neanderthals in Europe and caused their extinction.  In this regard, you are probably aware that almost all Whites have a small percentage of Neanderthal DNA in us.

This struggle for existence–this competition–which is a struggle to be and to be more is found throughout nature and it exists as a necessary part of evolution.  The difference between us and so-called lower life forms is that we can understand this and see how it works and we can use our conscious minds to take the right path.

In its basic form–this competition–is not difficult to understand. It is nature constantly tinkering with life to adapt it to ever changing conditions so that some form of life–and all life carries the life force within it–will not only live in the changed conditions but will thrive and replace earlier types that are not as well adapted for those conditions. This is evolution and natural selection.

This struggle has been fought since the beginning of time and by all organisms and even by so called non-living matter and even before matter came into existence by all that underpins matter in the sub-atomic realm of existence.

The struggle permeates all of existence and we often convey this in the simplest way by saying there is only one best seat in the stadium  and everyone can’t sit in it so there is a struggle for that seat.   And, following on in this metaphorical vein we can say we see  the struggle playing out in many  cases among some organisms, including humans, in ritualistic or agonistic combat rather than in actual physical fighting for that best seat.

In this case, it is the one who is able and willing to pay for that best seat in the stadium who gets it.  In our real world human struggle, however, it is a struggle to the death (often unconscious) between different races  to rise to the top  and get the best seat in existence.

In Europe, Whites won the earlier competition and  got all the  seats as nature tinkered with the earliest people who were there and caused them to adapt to a less sunny area than further south and this led to white skin that could more easily make Vitamin D in such conditions.  And, in time it led to lighter eyes and hair and various other features that we now see as common among White people.  And, the further north one goes, the more pronounced are these white features usually found.

But, evolution never stops and  we can never say that this  or that White type is the end all and be all of Whites even though we do believe there is an ideal White type which we see in the best of our kind.  However, if the so-called best of our White kind don’t make more like themselves so that they fill the planet with their kind they will be replaced by others who do.  And, this leads to the dictum that if you don’t breed or if you don’t breed pure White, you will go extinct. Nature doesn’t care if you live or die, you have to care.

We cannot coexist complacently with those whose genes can harm us and wipe us out.  Our struggle is to remain White and to evolve White to become the dominant human type.  We have reached a point in our evolution where we must take over from the blind workings of nature and consciously seek to evolve along a White trajectory.  The most basic things we can do are to avoid miscegenation and to increase the number of pure White children we have.

And, the struggle is the same for all non-Whites and their genomes. Again, nature doesn’t care who wins. It is blind. One struggles, competes and wins or one loses. It is up to us to make sure we win.

Human Civilization Depends on Us Winning.

News: Sex Dolls Threaten Male Slavery

We all knew this was coming … or not cumming as it were.

Zero Hedge: Beijing Start-Up Now Offers Sex Dolls For Rent…

BBC News: Chinese sex doll rental service suspended amid controversy…

Europe’s first sex robot brothel FORCED OUT of base as prostitutes complain of competition…


Future historians will look back at the 21st century and talk about the highly lucrative underground sex doll market the way we talk about bootlegging in the 20th century. But seriously, anything that makes men happy independent of women… women seek to destroy.

The Hollywood Crash is Coming

Lots of people have been complaining about Hollywood lately but I’ve never really heard them explain how it’s worse in any way that makes sense, so I thought I’d offer a nuanced explanation of where the industry’s at, how it got there, and what it means for the future of movies. NOTE: If you are in Germany or the UK, I understand that you probably can’t see this video. Unfortunately I went out of town shortly after posting this and don’t have access to the video file but I will have a download link for you soon. Sorry about that.


PS, sorry if you prefer Let’s Watches and Let’s Plays and some of my sillier videos (aka the vast majority of my videos). This one’s more serious and a little less loose than all those, so I understand if it’s not your bag, but I hope these videos find an audience, because I enjoy making them and put effort into them. I’m gonna try to upload another Thomas video in the next couple days, so hopefully if you didn’t like this that much then that will be enough of a palate cleanser.

Final Story on DACA: Trump Tweeted a Semantic Disagreement and the Jig is in Fact Up

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 14, 2017

So it looks like Trump did just tweet after the backlash.

He did make an agreement, he just didn’t officially sign it.

What is he getting in return for this?

“Border security.”


President Donald Trump and Democratic congressional leaders reached a tentative agreement Wednesday night to provide a pathway to citizenship for young immigrants known as Dreamers — but after a conservative backlash, the president and his aides sent conflicting signals about how firm the agreement was.

After a meeting with Trump at the White House on Wednesday night, Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi said they had come to terms with Trump on a plan that would provide protection for Dreamers in exchange for beefed-up border security — but, notably, no additional funding for a border wall.

“We all agreed on a framework: Pass DACA protections and additional security measures, excluding the wall. We agreed that the president would support enshrining the DACA protections into law,” Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on the Senate floor Thursday.

The news triggered an outcry from the right, which accused Trump of abandoning his tough-on-immigration campaign stance. So Trump and his aides rebutted Democrats’ claims that an agreement had been struck — while at the same time acknowledging the outlines of a deal.

“No deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote,” Trump tweeted.

Added White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters: “By no means was any deal ever agreed upon.”

Yet it seemed to be a matter of semantics. Speaking briefly to reporters shortly after his tweet, Trump said he and the Democratic leaders were close to a deal on the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, but that any agreement would hinge on “massive border security,” adding that funding for a border wall will come “a little bit later.”

He also said he had spoken to House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and that both are “on board” with a DACA-for-border-security deal with Democrats. The meeting Wednesday night did not include Ryan and McConnell, whom Trump spurned for Pelosi and Schumer on a fiscal deal last week.

“Well, we want to get massive border security, and I think that both Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, I think they agree with it … we’re fairly close, but we have to get massive border security,” the president said. “Ryan and McConnell agree with us on DACA. We’re very much on board. I spoke to them, yes.”

Responding to accusations he was backing “amnesty,” Trump also said Thursday: “We’re not looking at citizenship. We’re not looking at amnesty. We’re looking at allowing people to stay here.”

That is amnesty.

Whatever the case, they are eventually going to get citizenship if they don’t go back. And what difference does it make? They vote without citizenship.

Let’s be clear: this is not chess. There is no chess move that follows allowing these DACA bloodsucking parasites amnesty. That is called getting checkmated by the Jews.

Acting like he’s going to do it and then not doing it could potentially be some kind of chess move. I guess. But once DACA gets signed, it’s over. That will be the end of the Trump Presidency.

We will still get some things we wanted, probably, and it will of course have been better than Hillary, but the dream will be dead. The DREAMers will kill our dream.

I’m not going to flip out and have an emotional breakdown over this. It is sad, and I do feel sad. But we never really thought that Trump could bring down this entire system singlehandedly.

At least not without declaring martial law. And if he signs DACA, that isn’t in the cards either. If he was planning to do that, he would have gone all the way on Charlottesville and then held the line, pumping up the base.

It doesn’t look good.

Possibly/probably, the deals he’s making with the Democrats are to avoid impeachment. I think history would remember him better if he went down fighting. But maybe he’s too tired to care about that. Maybe he’s being threatened. Maybe AJ is right and he’s being secretly drugged.

Who knows.

It doesn’t really matter.

What matters is just coming to terms with the fact that this train is crashing, that we’re gonna need to tuck and roll and regroup down the line.


News: Male Authority and Traditionalism (TFM 42O)

Without male authority, Traditionalism is slavery.

A segment of the 9/13/2017 episode of TFM 42O.

Do families drive men to suicide? A study from Kerala says yes…

Do families drive men to suicide? A study from Kerala says yes
A study conducted in Kerala found that 75 percent of men who take their own lives belong to the marriage rates of divorce, and the lack of mens rights in family courts.
When you take away the compensation that men received in families and relationships, because they fought and sacrificed for the family and the nation, their authority over their marriages and families, you leave no benefit for men in marriages and relationships, then you divorce rape the man over hot coals, leaving them with even less than nothing, you turn them into slaves, and they kill themselves.

Bring Back Dueling

The law is an ass. It emasculates men who would otherwise be thriving in a state of nature, so that men who could not survive in nature can feel confident enough to serve in their repetitive roles.

Men tend to be closers. By that I mean we typically, as a gender, want to seek solutions to conundrums. Drama results in anxiety, which results in bad behavior. You would almost have to live in a world where does not exist to not have seen a recent example of this play out. The Andrew Anglin vs Vox Day ego battle reminds us all why dueling unto the death was the right and proper way to restrain toxic masculinity. It does for male public behavior what a caring dad with a well-oiled white shotgun did for masculine sexual morality in teenage years.

Dueling appears to the contemporary as about the most brutal and animalistic way of settling disputes. It was actually quite the opposite. It served to civilize. It was aimed at stopping the constant escalation of feuds from The Capulets vs. The Montagues to The Hatfields vs. The McCoys. Two men, a plaintiff and a defendant, chose their weapons, came with their seconds, and then got in on and fought until one man surrendered or died. The resulting outcome squashed the beef. Might didn’t make right, fair or just. It made something better. It made over. Things got resolved and everyone else’s life went on. Drama took place onstage at The Globe Theater.

Dueling was the product of an older, perhaps better, definition of honor. In the South Seas Islands, honor was described as the sound of a man’s name. This meant what thoughts came to your mind when one person spoke the name of another. If good or positive connotations came to mind, the individual spoken of was held in high esteem and was treated well. If not so good connotations came to mind, the individual in question would suffer from being held in low esteem by everybody he lived around. Honor was a valuable possession. An intangible form of wealth. A good name was a social, financial and sexual asset in this sort of society. A bad name held a man back from all three. This version of honor held in societies throughout much of the world.

This made bad-mouthing a terrible thing. The Catholic Church made Scandal a sin as a way to make church membership a valuable asset. An honor insurance policy so to speak, against the personal depredations of others. The Catechism of The Catholic Church describes scandal this way:


You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
It was said to the men of old, “You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.”

The eighth commandment forbids misrepresenting the truth in our relations with others. This moral prescription flows from the vocation of the holy people to bear witness to their God who is the truth and wills the truth. Offenses against the truth express by word or deed a refusal to commit oneself to moral uprightness: they are fundamental infidelities to God and, in this sense, they undermine the foundations of the covenant.

The church so endeavored in order to prevent the spread of vendetta. Beginning with the Sermon on the Mount, Christian Pacifists have looked for methods of staving off and defusing vendettas between families. Much of the reasoning had to do with not just the welfare of the families involved. It also involved the commonweal of all those who lived and worked near where all the fireworks went off. Only the absence of vendetta prevents the collateral damage the comes with it.

When faith didn’t carry the day, chivalry and social custom intervened to solve the same problem. Honor could be damaged and offense could be given by anyone who chose to disregard their faith and even the saved remain sinners who will fall short of the grace of God. The duel became a mechanism to redress damaged honor. The party perceiving offense would demand satisfaction. Satisfaction could take two forms. A retraction with a humble apology or an agreement to meet and settle the issue like men of valor and vim.

In the case of Anglin and Vox Day, both men perceive slights. Vox has referred to Anglin as a retard and a false believer in Rightist politics and philosophy. Calling him a retard wasn’t good enough to justify any legitimate demand of satisfaction. I get called one by my lovely wife every other day. It’s just not a big deal if you are comfortable in your own skin. Calling Anglin a fraud is a legitimate prelude to scandal. Fraud is an actual moral defect, and that impugns a man’s honor.

Day has legitimate causus belli against Anglin. Calling someone a known pedophile is reprehensible on levels I would not care to dig far enough into the ground to reach. Some of the meme warfare against Vox Day legitimately belongs in a landfill somewhere. So it’s all pretty simple. Mr. Anglin, Mr. Day, sharpen your effing cutlasses and get it on. We the rest of the Gab Community may or may not exercise our collective option to shoot whichever of these two shaved monkeys crawls off The Plain of Mars still breathing. That or put on the Big Boy Pants and shut both of your sorry yaps about it.

Yet here is where modern emasculatory lawfare renders us castrati not men. A poor decision was made that men should stop killing one another in duels. Thus, The United States ultimately banned dueling. An even poorer decision was made that the government should become the ultimate justiciar of lost honor. This was made possible through the enactment of Defamation Laws that sought to ban both libel and slander.

This brings us to where we all want Free Speech without consequence and therefore are living a contradiction. We all like to think we can say what we want, where we want and that nobody should be able to shut us down. This obviously isn’t what we want when someone malicious and untoward starts talking about us. The redress of this insult through legal means is a complicated, messy process that often ends up like the contested inheritance in the Charles Dickens novel Bleak House. Taking this route makes the plaintiff a potential menace to anyone standing in his vicinity.

In the Day vs. Anglin dust-up, Day has decided to lawyer up and start getting people on Gab doxxed so that he can file some rip-ass defamation of character suits. Angry men act angrily. Anglin and his buddies went into the gutter to insult Vox Day. But then again, Day did call Anglin an ideological fraud. Ideologues tend to take that sort of thing as an affront to their sacred honor. It’s like telling a priest that you believe he’s kinda-sorta just kidding about the whole Jeebus Thing.

Angry men also act without consideration for others. I’m reminded immediately of what happened when CNN doxxed HanAssholeSolo and got the wrong hole. I’m also reminded that other people like having use of the platform without stray drama from jousting primadonnas who look quite ugly in their garish ballet tights. (I hope that wasn’t too defamatory, children.) Muting them both and several of their most obnoxious knob-slob fan boys (oops, more crass defamation) only goes so far to avoid the toxic spillage.

In conclusion, I urge both Day and Anglin to go settle this affair on your own time and your own dime. Let the best man win and let the rest of us who just wish you’d both go somewhere else to fornicate off and die be left in peace. Even the “winner” of this Middle School ego-dick pissing contest is a damaged good who will offer less value and substance to the Rightist cause of social renewal and rejuvenation going forwards. For the sake of the adults in the room, knock it the heck off.

Russian Hackers Using Botnets to Destroy Democracy and Support Neo-Nazis!

Joe Jones
Daily Stormer
September 12, 2017

Top authorities have PROVEN once again Russia is hacking every democracy in the world while trying to instate global Fascism by making people hate the left!

Why would the Russians do that? Well, under capitalism and democracy, Russia could never take over the world. Only under the weakness of Fascism can Russia reform the great USSR and conquer the planet with their power.

I know that these authorities are correct, because I am myself a Russian bot on a server in the Kremlin. There is one thing they got wrong however, the Russians have hired aliens to handle their hacking. That is how they do it so well, alien tech.


We’re coming for your human rights!