Liberal professor INSULTS Michael Savage, Instantly regrets it

People like this who ignore facts and keep right on talking and do not show any effort to assimilate those facts into their future talking…these are dangerous people folks. Anyone who ignores facts and keeps talking is someone who shouldn’t be listen too and ignored and moved on from. For god sakes if you’re a good person who can do something to change things do something. People like this have been trained for the past 25 years at least. They don’t care about truth or fact, they just want to get their way and talking is how they do it. If you listen to their Babble and try to find sense in it you could be confused. Stick to the facts. Stick to what you find out to be true. And assimilate it into your thinking.

the face of an invader

These kinds of people are destroying society around us. I’m not willing to go all the way to tolerating religious shunning but I damn sure believing morality that leads to Healthy Families. In a way it’s more the fault of the people who hired these kind of people than it is the people themselves. The corruption goes deep. I have always said that if the employees of a company are crappy in any way in a very general term, then the plant manager or owner of the company is only reflecting himself in the people he’s hired. Washington is full of alligators and when you drain the swamp every one of them will show up. And this is why they are saying so many stupid things. They’re backed into a corner. Do you use a metaphor from boxing, instead of coming out strong and fighting with their fists and their mind, they’re slapping and biting tricking gouging. They reminds me of the Harkonnens of Frank Herbert novel Dune.

The Enemy, memorize that face, and double tap.

Vile Wicked heartless cruel without Mercy social psychological idiots. And America like the Atreides have grown soft. We’ve got a shit some of this naivete and these niceties and get tough. The war is coming whether we want it or not. And as always if we don’t fight it earlier we’ll fight it harder later.

The Boomer Generation is a Generation of Complete Failure

Joe Jones
Daily Stormer
October 15, 2017

The Boomer generation is one of the largest groups responsible for our destruction as a civilization, probably only second to modern women.

Even then, that’s a close second.

Their continued failures and reckless actions put us all at risk.

We need to start rounding these people up.

White Women Line Up to Flirt with Newly Paroled OJ Simpson

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
October 15, 2017


OJ Simpson is 70-years-old and broke. The only thing he has going for him is that he murdered some coalburner and her queer Jew pal.

This is the part where I pretend to be offended.

Nevertheless, America’s bored and stupid women jumped on the opportunity to hit on the newly released eligible bachelor at a “sophisticated” Las Vegas lounge.

NY Daily News:

Looks like O.J.’s still got game — and incredibly, some women are still willing to play along.

The recently-paroled Simpson — swapping his prison jumpsuit for a white dress shirt and black pants — was spied chatting up a trio of women at a Las Vegas bar this weekend.

Two were blondes, like the 70-year-old Simpson’s murdered wife Nicole Brown Simpson. The Juice appeared animated in a series of Friday night photos taken inside the Grape Street Wine Bar & Cellar.

The football Hall of Famer, his collar open at the neck and his shirt untucked, was sipping a drink from a martini glass during the evening.

Women don’t think for themselves, they are programmed. Most of these “educated” women twirling their hair within stabbing distance of OJ would act frightened and become emotionally unhinged if you let slip the word “nigger.”

No “authority” ever specifically told blonde women to stay away from OJ Simpson, so they’re either apathetic or eager to sleep with that black guy that was on TV.

Hence, White Sharia or nothing. If men do not lock down and instill a moral compass in their women, Harvey Weinstein and OJ Simpson will mold them in their image.

What are you going to do about it, white boy?

SJW Nutjob Can’t Play New Middle-Earth Game Because of Anti-Orc Racism

The Left can’t be Helped, they have to be put down for human civilization to survive.

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
October 14, 2017

Anti-Orc racism must be abolished! Middle Earth must embrace diversity.

I’ve always thought that liberalism was basically a form of mental illness.

I mean, what sane man would empathize with people who hate him and want to destroy him? That has to be some kind of disorder, like Stockholm syndrome or whatever.

And what happens when you let the mentally ill run wild with their delusions, and pretend like they’re normal? Their lunacy gets progressively worse and worse.

This is what we’re seeing.

After decades of liberals bleeding their hearts out for inner city thugs, Mexican cartel assassins and Islamic jihadists, they’ve now turned to a new defenseless victim group.

Orcs.

Hey, that Elf was probably in the KKK. Down with Elven racism!

Motherboard:

Middle-earth: Shadow of War is amazing. Middle-earth: Shadow of War is terrible. Horza the Dead taught me that. I love him and I hope I have the strength to let him go. To let him get some well-earned rest.

That’s “Horza the Dead,” the poor Orc this writer “loves.”

Developer Monolith Productions’s newest game is set in the Lord of the Rings universe. Players take control of a Talion, a dead ranger haunted and animated by Celebrimbor—the elf who forged the one ring. The pair both hate Sauron and criss-cross Mordor killing his soldiers and building an army of orcs to take him down. It’s a great game with solid systems, but enslaving the army of orcs to hunt your enemies is the real draw.

These orcs aren’t your typical video game NPC cannon fodder. They have backstories, passions, and conflicts among themselves. They’re so well rendered that I’ve become deeply uncomfortable playing the game. The heroes treat them terribly. The wraith and ranger abuse and slaughter orcs and dominate their feeble minds.

He… He feels bad for the Orcs…

There are consequences to your actions. The orcs remember things, hold grudges, and react to your leadership accordingly. In most games, this would be fun, but in Shadow of War, the orcs’ AI and personalities are so vivid that it’s also an emotional burden. I’m serious. I feel bad about Talion’s—and by extension my—treatment of the orcs.

Wow.

But somehow, I’m not surprised. These people have started trying to make Orcs sympathetic for a while now.

Of course, since Orcs share basically all their characteristics with Blacks and Moslems, and liberals know they’re supposed to love them, it makes sense that they’d feel guilty about hurting Orcs, too.

This isn’t the first game to give players a group of soldiers or followers. In the X-COM series, those soldiers are like paper dolls. Their personality is what the player projects onto them. Death is permanent, and you’re sad to lose people, but you shrug and move on. In the Mass Effect series, players develop relationships with the NPCs and some of them die and sometimes it’s your fault, but there’s still a narrative remove.

The other problem is that the NPCs of Mass Effect and X-COM are heroes, soldiers, and colleagues. There’s camaraderie between them and the player. The orcs of Shadow of War are slaves. The player kidnaps them and uses magic to destroy their free will. They have no choice. Which might be kind of OK if Talion didn’t then constantly treat them like garbage.

He and his wraith companion talk about the orcs as if they were discussing brood mares and racing horses. They compare their relative traits, discuss what might make a good slave—I mean soldier—and then constantly belittle orc culture. I mean, they’re orcs. They eat people, cause chaos, and murder their own, but that doesn’t stop me from empathizing with them.

They constantly belittle Orc culture!

Wew.

I can’t believe that in 2017, we get a game where the main character is a literal Nazi. Hell, this Talion guy probably would have voted for Trump.

This is highly problematic.

But seriously, can you imagine being so braindead that the treatment of evil, cannibalistic monsters in a video game is troubling you like this? Also, the fact that he felt the need to write this essay probably signals peak-virtue-signal is coming near.

I haven’t played this game, but the reviews are good. I’d buy it just to piss off liberals at this point.

Overpopulation & Hyperimmigration

by Peter Goodchild

Overpopulation

Mass immigration is a story that has two aspects: (1) ecological and (2) political. The “ecological” and the “political” are closely related elements of systemic collapse, “the decline of the West.”

By “ecological aspect” I mean that human overpopulation is always destructive to the planet Earth, and that migration across borders merely shifts the problem of overpopulation from one country to another. By “political aspect” I mean that, in spite of all the fraudulent appeals to humanitarianism and other pseudo-values, the unfortunate reality is that hordes of impoverished and uneducated barbarians will eventually be profitable for the capitalists who are creating a new Utopia. That is why every politician of every party runs after “the ethnic vote” like a dog after a car. It is quite obvious, though, that many “refugees” are actually robbers and rapists, and that the coming Utopia could bear a close resemblance to the world of the Middle Ages, with an extremely wealthy elite class dominating a lower class that is kept permanently at an almost subhuman level of development. The final Utopia will be quite a Dystopia.

The following remarks focus largely on the “ecological” aspect, but that aspect overlaps seamlessly with the “political.” Canada is a perfect example of such an overlap. The fact that most of Canada is uninhabitable rock leads to the “ecological” fact that the enormous growth of Canada’s population will have disastrous effects on the habitability of the land. In reality, the habitable part of Canada, roughly speaking, is a strip of land, 150 km wide, running along the southern border, with a population density roughly equal to that of most other industrialized countries. Canada is not “vacant land” looking for buyers. At the same time, we must consider the “political” fact that mass immigration pushes out some of those troublesome white people who refuse to be converted to the new “ism” — “multiculturalism.”

The world’s population has risen from about 1.7 billion in 1900 to 2.5 in 1950, and is now well over 7 billion. Most of this increase, of course, has been in “developing” countries, suggesting that the term “developing” is rather misleading: a combination of environmental degradation and rapid population growth often makes “development” impossible (Catton, 1982; Kaplan, 2001). It has been said that as fossil-fuel production declines the global population must drop to far below its present size. In terms of agriculture alone we would not be able to accommodate even the present number of people as fossil fuels become scarce, with manual labour therefore replacing automation, and without the hydrocarbon-based fertilizers and pesticides that make modern yields triple those of earlier times (Pimentel & Hall, 1984). Even then we have not factored in war, epidemics, and other aspects of social breakdown.

Overpopulation is the fundamental cause of systemic collapse (Catton, 1982). All of the flash-in-the-pan ideas that are presented as solutions to modern dilemmas — solar power, biofuels, hybrid cars, desalination, permaculture, enormous dams — have value only as desperate attempts to solve an underlying problem that has never been addressed in a more direct manner.

American foreign aid has always included only trivial amounts for family planning (Spiedel, Sinding, Gillespie, Maguire, & Neuse, 2009, January). It would seem that the most powerful country in the world has done very little to solve the biggest problem in the world. However, there is the frightful possibility that one reason why the US government now gives so little aid to some countries is that the problem of overpopulation is regarded as hopeless, and that any assistance would be just money down the drain (Kaplan, 2001).

The problem of overpopulation is worsened by the fact that there are so many people busy either transmitting or receiving disinformation about the subject (Kolankiewicz & Beck, 2001, April). For left-wingers, discussion of high population is seen as persecution of the world’s poor. For rightwingers, high population is seen as providing more buyers, more workers, and more investors. For politicians, more people means more votes. For many religious groups, high population reflects God’s command to go forth and multiply. Corporate funding of several major environmentalist groups has also done quite a job of disconnecting them from discussion of population: they may be “green” but they are no longer “clean.”

Overpopulation can always be passed off as somebody else’s problem. It is the fundamental case of what Garrett Hardin calls “the tragedy of the commons” (1968, 1995): although an oversize family may have a vague suspicion that the world will suffer slightly from that fecundity, no family wants to lose out by being the first to back down. Without a central governing body that is both strong and honest, however, the evasion is perpetual, and it is that very lack of strength and honesty that makes traditional democracy an anachronism to some extent.

The Chinese have made quite an effort at dealing with excess population growth, but even they have not been very successful. Since 1953, the year of the first proper Chinese census and approximately the start of concerns with excessive fertility, the population has gone from 583 million to over 1.4 billion. For that matter, since the official starting of the one-child campaign in 1979, the population has grown by over 300 million (Riley, 2004, June); in other words, China’s increase is equal to the entire population of the US.

Overpopulation, however, is a problem that occurs not only in poor countries. The evidence is also clear in the US:

Mounting traffic congestion; endless disruptive road construction; spreading smog; worsening water pollution and tightening water supplies; disappearing wildlife habitats, farmland, and open spaces; overcrowded schools; overused parks and outdoor recreation facilities; the end of small-town life in communities that until recently had been beyond the city; the impending merging together of separate, unwieldy metropolitan areas into vast megalopolitan miasmas; and the overall deterioration in quality of life and the increasing social tensions of urban dwellers reflected in such phenomena as gated communities and road rage (Kolankiewicz & Beck, 2001, April).

It is only in the hinterlands, away from the cities, that the opposite occurs: depopulation and “rural flight.” The causes of depopulation are many, but they begin with the industrialization of agriculture and the growth of enormous corporate farms, “agri-business.” As the farming population is impoverished and reduced, the peripheral economy also shrinks, and crime and other social problems are the result. Nevertheless, the urban population of a country increasingly outweighs the rural. Worldwide, slightly more than half the human population now lives in urban areas, but these places will be death traps as resources disappear.

Actually, “overpopulation” tends to be a euphemism for “over-immigration,” and again we return to the “political.” Every country in the world is already well populated, in most cases quite overpopulated. The conception of some sort of land that is lying empty, waiting for the blessing of new arrivals, is a fiction invented by dishonest politicians. Family planning organizations sometimes inadvertently help to propagate this myth by euphemism, excessive caution in phraseology, and an unwillingness to risk antagonism. Although “family planning” is an admirable goal, what such organizations rarely state is that it is not where a child is born that really matters, demographically and economically, but where that person is eventually living — not the moment of birth, but the decades between birth and death, during which time that person will be consuming the world’s resources, along with more than 7 billion other people doing the same. Emigration and immigration, transferring the problem of overcrowding from one country to another, do no good at all; if anything, they simply perpetuate the illusion that birth control is unnecessary.

Discussion of overpopulation, however, is a great taboo. Politicians will rarely touch the issue. The many documents on population published by the United Nations merely sidestep the issue by discussing how to cater to large populations, in spite of the fact that such catering is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

To speak against overpopulation is an exercise in futility. How likely is it that the required massive change in human thinking will ever take place? Even in “developed” countries, to broach the topic of overpopulation is often to invite charges of racism and elitism. And there seems something both naïve and presumptuous in the common belief that people in poor countries are just waiting to be enlightened to “modern” ideals. On the contrary, the inhabitants of poor countries are often quite determined to hang on to their present systems of politics and religion, no matter how archaic and oppressive those systems may seem to outsiders, and would prefer that any proselytizing go in the opposite direction.

References

Mexican MAGA Hat Thief Will Be Charged with a Felony

For America it would look like this, which is why they need to leave, and we need to begin eugenics programs to repair the damage done to our race.

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
October 13, 2017

In most of America, if you are a heterosexual white male without a lot of money, expecting the police to protect your rights is a shot in the dark. This is why Young Republican types like the one in this video look so pathetic: he is such a gullible dork that he thinks appealing to rights that only exist on paper (muh Constitution) matters in the real world.

In this case, Matthew Vitale lucked out. The footage of the Indio student robbing him of his MAGA hat went viral, which led to a nationwide campaign to force the police in Riverside to (begrudgingly) do their job.

Yahoo:

Late last week, a viral video surfaced of two college students facing off over a red Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” cap. In the video, Edith Macias is seen brandishing the cap of fellow student Matthew Vitale. Macias had snatched the hat off of Vitale’s head following a conference the two were attending on the University of California, Riverside campus.

Macias is seen taking the hat to the university’s student life office, demanding something be done about the hat and Vitale. “This belongs to me. I bought it and she took it from me,” Vitale can be heard saying off-camera.

“Look at the kind of s*** he’s wearing,” Macias responds. “This represents genocide of a bunch of people.”

The two then proceed to argue over issues including freedom of speech and personal property, among other topics, while the university staff attempt to quell the intense emotions of the moment. After nine minutes of discussion and arguing, the staff finally return Vitale’s hat to him and the campus police show up to deal with the situation.

Vitale’s own video didn’t show the theft happening, but a video that Macias herself uploaded following the events did reveal the incident. Vitale soon learned from campus police that the release of that video showing Macias taking the hat off of Vitale could possibly lead to felony charges, and the Republican student then decided to proceed.

A lot of the third world people transplanted into the USA in recent decades seem to think that physical force is the only way to resolve political differences.

They’re correct. When multiple groups with irreconcilable desires are forced to live together, compromise becomes increasingly difficult. Demands become more radical as the demographics of one group gain ground on the other.


Edith Macias is a Mesoamerican nationalist who wants to replace white people with her own. At the same time she reserves the right to enjoy Gringo infrastructure and federal tax dollars without giving anything back. She knows on some level that her desires are irreconcilable with the interests of most Americans, but she wants it both ways, so Edith and her fellow Jew radicalized invaders in California understand that violence and intimidation is the only way to get Gringos to go along.

There’s nothing in the water that makes California so insane. California is what happens when whites dip below 50%: Jews (Silicon Valley, Hollywood, State government) at the top, corrupt and inept non-whites in the middle and whites as marginalized racial scapegoats with no rights at the bottom. 

The Young Republicans may have won a small victory here, but they won’t win the war.

The only rights you have are those you can physically defend.