LOL: Kike Bourdain Wasn’t Even High When He Hanged Himself! Pathetic Kike!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 25, 2018

I know people who have killed themselves while high on drugs. I think we all probably do in this modern world.

It happens and it’s at least on some level understandable – someone is all fucked up, you don’t know what is going through their head.

But to kill yourself while totally sober?

You gotta be a real pathetic loser.

USA Today:

((((((Anthony Bourdain)))))) did not have narcotics in his system at the time of his death earlier this month in France

Christian de Rocquigny, the public prosecutor who is overseeing the investigation, confirmed the result of his toxicology report to USA TODAY. (The New York Times was the first outlet to report the news about his toxicology report.)

CNN reported on June 8 that Bourdain’s friend chef Eric Ripert found him unresponsive in his hotel room in Kaysersberg, located in the eastern region of Alsace, close to the German border. Bourdain, 61, was there shooting footage for his CNN show “Parts Unknown.”

De Rocquigny had previously confirmed to theTimes and People magazine that the cause of death was suicide by hanging.

In addition to the absence of narcotics, the Times reports “a nonnarcotic medicine in a therapeutic dose” was present, according to de Rocquigny .

This reenforces my theory that he was haunted by visions of his gf, Asia Argento, fucking ((((((Harvey Weinstein)))))).

I guess this guy had been repeatedly cucked by women.

He had previously been cucked by his MMA wife. I read it on Return of Kings. I don’t know why you would want an MMA wife unless you were already mentally ill.

Asia was also awkwardly buff.

And his current gf – the one that was fucking Harvey back when – was fucking some other guy, apparently, while he was alone in his 5 star Paris hotel hanging himself with a bathrobe while stone sober.

This is her in Italy on June 5 (Bourdain tied the bathrobe on June 8):

I’m not going to say I’m not happy Bourdain is dead.

A dead Jew is a dead Jew – and that is always a good thing.

But there is a lesson here – no amount of fame and money can overcome female hypergamy.

Every woman, when given the chance, will fuck you over, because women take pleasure in destroying men.

The Truth About ‘Spiderman’ and the emotional manipulation of the West

Muslim ‘refugee’ invasion of Europe

Exclusive: Pamela ((((((Geller)))))) flays media’s ’emotional manipulation of the vilest kind’

The photo of a child washed up on a beach has become iconic of the massive Muslim migration to Europe. The child’s death is tragic, but the media’s cynical exploitation of the image is grotesque.

While the media hand-wring and wail about the poor migrants overwhelming Europe, it is a crisis, but not the crisis that the media would have you believe it is. The international media obscure the reality of this flood of “refugees” into Europe, in an attempt to blunt legitimate concern over it.

Here’s a typical headline: “Hungary police force migrants from train tracks; dead boy’s image shocks Europe.”

CNN says of the photo of the toddler: “It took a tragic photo of a drowned toddler on a Turkish beach to make the refugee torrent pouring into Europe a problem for America too.”

The mother and two boys died – the father lived. The boy died because his father wanted new teeth. That speaks volumes.

Also, the father’s story is riddled with inconsistencies that show him to be thoroughly dishonest. In a deeply damning report on his numerous self-contradictory stories, the Muslim Issue surveys his various statements and then adds this devastating conclusion:

Although Abdullah claims to have seen the dead bodies of his two children and his wife after their boat was hit by two large waves, his story then changes and he claims that he made it safely to the beach. He now assumed that the wife, who had laid bloated and drowned, and the two small boys who he had seen drowned right in front of him and he knew were dead, had managed somehow to make it alive to the beach. He could not find them on the beach so he assumed they had “become scared and ran away.” He now sees these dead people nowhere. But he only finds the “truth” about their death after going to the hospital where their bodies were kept. Can someone explain to us how dead bodies run away? In other words, he only knew they were dead after the pictures of his son started showing up in the media reports.

The victims of the Christian, Yazidi and religious minority genocide in Islamic wars are no less valuable or important as the Muslim child on the beach. They are all victims of the global jihad.

Where are the photos of the little girls gang-raped and bought and sold in ISIS slave markets to fighters and wealthy Muslims? Why don’t their deaths spur the West to decisive action against the jihadic doctrine and its adherents? And how many jihadis are among the refugees?

The father whose wife and children drowned is a tragedy – a casualty of war, a war being brought to the continent of Europe by this massive invasion.

That image is not iconic of the invasion, but the media say it is. Take, for example, this caption on another photo: “BUDAPEST: Hundreds of migrants stormed Budapest’s main international rail station after police reopened it on Thursday (Sep 3), in an escalating refugee crisis seared into European hearts by horrifying pictures of a drowned Syrian toddler.”

This is just emotional manipulation of the vilest kind, as we’ve already seen so many times with the Gaza conflict, the Bosnian civil war, the supposed “genocide” of Muslims in Burma, etc.

In 732, the Battle of Tours ended the “last of the great Islamic invasions of Europe.” How this new invasion will end is anyone’s guess – but it won’t be pretty. Today’s refugee is tomorrow’s jihadist: Already jihadis have been discovered among the refugees, and there will be more of that.

In February, the Islamic State threatened to send half-a-million Muslim migrants to Europe in a “psychological” attack against the West. And lest we forget, back in May, I reported that the Islamic State was making a fortune smuggling Muslim “migrants” into Europe.

Immigration jihad, or hijrah, is the migration or journey of Muhammad and his followers from Mecca to Yathrib, later renamed by him to Medina, in the year 622 CE. It was after the hijrah that Muhammad for the first time became not just a preacher of religious ideas, but a political and military leader. That was what occasioned his new “revelations” exhorting his followers to commit violence against unbelievers. Significantly, the Islamic calendar counts the hijrah, not Muhammad’s birth or the occasion of his first “revelation,” as the beginning of Islam, implying that Islam is not fully itself without a political and military component.

The EU is telling its members that they must take in these migrants or lose important grants. Yet meanwhile, the oil-rich Muslim countries, chiefly Saudi Arabia, are doing nothing for the refugees. Muslim countries are not taking a single refugee. No, non-Muslim Europe must absorb them all, so as to be all the more easily conquered and Islamized.

The fact is, the mass Muslim migration is symptomatic – it’s not the problem. ISIS is the problem. Iran fueling and fighting Assad’s civil war is the problem. All of this chaos has resulted from Obama’s disastrous and incoherent foreign policy.

Yet the media’s callous and cynical spin is that those who voice legitimate concerns and oppose the refugee influx into Europe are just like the Nazis. That hyperventilation was in the Washington Post. The U.K.’s Daily Mail was even worse, likening the trains carrying refugees to settlement camps to the Nazi trains that carried Jews to their deaths: “You did not need to be a historian to sense the chilling echo of Europe’s not-too-distant past. The last time people were duped on to trains around here, they ended up in Auschwitz.”

The crisis is crushing – the scale of which is one not seen in Europe since the end of World War II. Obama’s “junior varsity” team has overturned the order of the world. And it’s only just begun.

Homosexuality as a Weapon

Renegade Editor’s Note: Almost 40 years ago, the good professor saw this trend figured out. Just imagine if he could see the current level of degeneracy. Also, male homosexuality should be opposed for its physical and psychological destructiveness, especially since it is being promoted to young children as a healthy alternative lifestyle.

By Revilo P. Oliver (1979)

HOMOSEXUALITY is being intensively promoted by the Jews as one phase of their campaign to liquidate our race, which they evidently regard as unreliable livestock. And no one is offering any rational opposition to what is becoming a homosexual epidemic.

Anita Bryant and David Noebel are probably sincere (I am acquainted with the latter, and I feel certain that he is; I have not met the former, but see no reason to doubt her sincerity), but their efforts are necessarily ineffectual and for that reason are mildly encouraged by the Jews, who give them some publicity in their press as typical opponents of “sexual freedom.” Both base part of their opposition on the Christian superstition (i.e., the Jews’ greatest hoax) and tell people that sexual perversion is wrong ’cause Jesus says “naughty, naughty” — an argument which merely excites laughter in persons who are rational and have a modicum of education.

The argument is self-defeating for several reasons. To begin with, it is not true. The recent recovery by Professor Mortimer Smith of part of the homosexual episode that was deleted from the gospel of “Mark” (the one that was included in the “New Testament” when it was thrown together in the Fourth Century by the sect that became “orthodox”) shows that the Christian sects which overtly practiced homosexuality had good authority for it in the then-current tales about Jesus. And, of course, the Christian holy men have in all ages been the foremost practitioners of male homosexuality, and are notoriously so today, probably because the salvation-business attracts males who are insufficiently masculine.

There are undoubtedly two causes of homosexuality, biological degeneracy and induced perversion, and the great difficulty is in determining the relative importance of the two causes, since we know so little about the inheritance of mental characteristics that the biological cause is certain only when accompanied by anatomical abnormality. Induced perversion is our principal concern, since it is the only one that we can try to check at present. Here there is a further division, for we must distinguish between exclusive homosexuality (or virtually exclusive, since some perverts marry and beget children, presumably as protective covering) and “bisexuality,” which is so much in fashion now.

For example, according to reports that I see no reason to doubt, one of the largest fraternities on the campus of the local university, which, perhaps significantly, is the one that particularly tries to enlist White athletes, has a homosexual orgy as its ceremony of initiation into the fraternity to make certain that all the members enjoy such fun, but they also bring in “co-eds” frequently for general copulation, which all the members are said to enjoy also. The phenomenal vogue of “bisexuality” in our time is almost certainly a matter of fashion, i.e., induced by current education, but it also makes it difficult to distinguish between the two types who practice homosexuality.

As you probably know, pornography is one of the most lucrative businesses in the United States as well as a principal weapon of Jewish subversion. Recent trends in that field include: (1) The major pornographic periodicals (of which there are ten, all with paid circulations of from 2,000,000 to 7,000,000, which are for sale on all newsstands) are still heterosexual in their photography, showing attractive females and copulation between male and female, with occasional copulation between females, but never between males. A major part of these journals, however, consists of articles that are not illustrated, comprising both letters from readers who have new ideas about copulation or advice from experts on that subject. These now show a marked increase in emphasis on “bisexuality.” (2) Pornographic periodicals for homosexuals are still a specialized field, and the magazines devoted to it have comparatively small circulations (all under 1,000,000, and all but one under 500,000), and are usually sold only in the pornographic stores, not generally on the newsstands.) (3) The same division of fields is found in the motion picture films which are sold for private viewing. The major business is heterosexual. The significant trend in the past two years has been an ever-increasing emphasis on copulation between White women and Congoid males, with copulation between White males and Mongolian females a secondary trend. (4) Films showing males copulating with males have thus far been a specialized business, i.e., are produced by different firms and advertised to different mailing lists. Very recently, however, two of the principal major distributors, who heretofore confined their business to heterosexual films, have begun to offer “bisexual” films and one even offers homosexual films. It will be interesting to see whether these firms find the homosexual element “good business.”

The Kinsey reports make the claim that 37% of the male population has had some homosexual adventures. I can express no opinion concerning the reports’ reliability, but I observe that the scientific method requires that findings that are to be generally accepted must be subject to independent verification, i.e., the experiment can be duplicated by other investigators with the same results.

This is not true of the Kinsey reports, which, by the way, were financed by one of the Rockefeller foundations. The reports purport to be conclusions drawn from the interrogation of persons (not classified by race or social status and selected by procedures not clearly defined) whose answers were recorded in a code known only to the investigators on cards that are kept secret with a provision for their immediate destruction, should anyone obtain from a court an order for inspection of the data. In these circumstances, it is possible that the data were partly or entirely fabricated by Kinsey and/or his assistants. One cannot accuse them of fraud, but neither can one absolve them of suspicion of it.

The Kinsey report has been attacked by many psychiatrists, who are usually polite enough to profess belief in Kinsey’s good faith. I note, for example, that his “37%” conclusion is dismissed as ”fantastic” by Drs. Edmund Bergler and William S. Kroger in their book, Kinsey’s Myth of Female Sexuality (New York, 1954), p. 185, where they also comment that the effect of his erroneous report (in which they earlier identify twelve methodological errors that “eliminated the last possibility of arriving at even approximately correct results”) would be to increase the practice of male homosexuality by convincing the young that it is common and therefore presumably normal. That, undoubtedly, has been the effect.

In fact, if Kinsey had been hired to destroy what was left of sexual morality in this country, he would have manufactured his ostensibly objective report as the most efficacious means of doing so.

However that may be, I believe the only effective opposition to homosexuality must be based on racial grounds, i.e., on considerations that will be disregarded so long as the Jews control the mentality of our hapless race.

At that point, of course, the problem of homosexuality becomes merged with that of the general prostitution of American females. Our public schools try to get children to start copulating as early as possible (that was one of the stated objectives in the “consolidation” of schools, requiring the hauling of children long distances and away from the communities in which their parents reside, while the unstated objective was preparation for “integration” to force White children into the most degrading association with sub-humans). Most schools in which the children are puberate now have special classes to teach copulation, and “health programs” which supply contraceptives to the females so that they will have no hesitation about copulating with any male. No stable family can be founded on a marriage between a man and an unpaid whore for whom he cannot have the slightest respect.

Memes That Capture The True Nature Of Women

By Jean-Batave Poqueliche

Despite their simplicity, memes have a true power. They are essential tools to spread an opinion and convince a vast audience.

They are effective because they are relatable, easily shared and above all, viral if successful.  A meme is the digital response to paper propaganda.

A nearly perfect video, but you also seem to omit the fact that many men pushed the mainstreamization of geek culture for females, therefore male mother need. Women partake in those activities as long as they aren’t made fun of or criticized and quite opposite, praised. If cleaning a septic tank would become the next trending thing they’ll just jump in shit right away, but only because it’s hip. If geek culture wasn’t pushed like this in the past 10 years by males to impress females, we wouldn’t have seen that much female presence in comic con events, gaming and so on. The problem isn’t that some twats stick their noses in other’s people business, but they are also encouraged to do that without men thinking of the consequences. Maybe I’m wrong, but food for though.

And memes have done a lot to explain vital principles of game to beginners. Here are a few nuggets:

If all those could be condensed in a few words it would be: “Do not listen to what women say. Observe what they do”.

Memeologists in the audience might criticise the fact that all those images are not “memes” per se. I would argue that cold, brutal reality makes the best memes.

I had to narrow it down to twenty, but feel more than welcome to add classics that I might have forgotten.


Aryan Origin

By Ron McVan

In man’s analysis of understanding of himself, it is as well to know whence he came as whither he is going.” ~ Edgar Cayce

The dawn of man’s history follows on the twilight of a preceding history of man. The birth and death of a complete history of mankind is not unlike civilizations themselves, or, the cycle of man’s own physical body. It is said that a man’s life consists of twelve seven-year cycles, which in the final state of decline is extinguished by the inevitable process of physical death. A history of mankind is extinguished by a cyclic death as well, which comes in the form of a natural, or in some cases unnatural, catastrophe. This is a period upon which all previous knowledge is extinguished and scrubbed clean with perchance a few mysterious remaining vestiges left behind. When man is born he at first has very little, if any, remembrance of his past lives, due primarily to the fact that he has a new brain. There are fortunate few who retain the ability to accurately remember their past life through flashes of blood memory or psychic ability.

All men and women living today, whether they care to admit it or not, possess an anxious feeling within themselves, a feeling of impending doom concerning mankind and the planet upon which we chart our daily lives. We feel this way because we have been through it all before in a previous life, perhaps in a far distant prehistoric civilization. Our short memories can insulate us from the immediate potential dangers beneath our feet, as long as we choose to ignore the hot, bubbling reality below the earth’s crust, or the hurling random matter, ever moving precariously through space. The fact that we are alive and conscious in our world at this very moment is not just phenomenal, it is an absolute miracle! The entire Planet Earth has the potential to blow apart at any given time; whole continents can at any moment sink beneath the ocean, or rip in half from a violent axis shift caused by sliding polar ice. A leading scientist in underground nuclear testing stated that we are just a few more underground nuclear explosions away from splitting the entire planet apart. Even the slightest rise in the ocean level or temperature change, could extinguish all human life. We blot these many variable looming potential catastrophes out of our mind, but we shall never erase the reality that such dreadful occurrences have happened before and they ‘will’ happen again.

The short ten thousand years of our recorded history are barely enough time for a significant upgrading of mankind, yet it would be laughable to say that we are now living in a pinnacle Golden Age of human development. Our great forefathers who built the magnificent civilizations and wonders of our historical past would recoil in disgust at what we have become after such glorious and noble beginnings. We have not devolved spiritually and academically as well and abuse and violate Nature and this planet with utter impunity! Many geneticists believe that civilization itself causes the human stock to slowly degenerate, not only from its obvious artificial, unnatural and unhealthy habitat but also by enabling persons with unfavorable mutations to live and breed—when in a wild natural state, they would quickly perish. Not only do many Aryans today not consider themselves Aryan, most do not even have a clue that the very word itself signifies their unique biological species among the races of mankind. All books throughout history have always referred to the White Race as Aryans up until about the mid 1970’s when all the craftily fabricated anti-White Race shame stigma really kicked into gear. Aryan families have progressively been producing less and less children, falling victim to government forced integration and immigration and increasing non-Aryan adoptions highly encouraged by the media and Christian churches, while the silent genocide, abortion and birth control pills totally devastate any chance of restoring a balance in the numbers of our people worldwide which only hastens the Aryan race towards total extinction in the very near future.

One of the most poignant scientific discoveries of the 19th century was that which officially traced descent of all Indo-European peoples from that of the Aryans while today the enemies of Aryan-kind work overtime to brainwash our children that Aryans are not a race at all but only a language. The major Aryan tribal branches are roughly five in number: the Greeks, the Latins, the Celts, the Teutons, and the Slavs. To understand the origin and evolution of the Aryan Tribes, one must know something about the reasons for their major emigrations. To do this we must return to the last great cataclysmic events that changed the geography of the world. This was the time of the great migration of the races, a time when whole continents sank, and once temperate living areas in the world became lost and all but forgotten under the sea or lost beneath polar icecaps. Let us begin with one of the great civilizations of the former historical era, which was the mystical and never to be forgotten continent of Atlantis, for it was from the survivors of that great cataclysmic catastrophe (circa) 11,600 years ago that our current Western World received the light of highest knowledge and wisdom that would produce the new Golden Era and the Seven Wonders of the World.

One can only imagine the awesome horror of witnessing the sinking of an entire continent. It is, also, only natural that the few who did survive would be inclined to migrate as far away from such a nightmarish geological havoc as fast as their legs or boats could carry them. These Aryan Tribes would later become referred to as Indo-Europeans, traveling and settling to the far reaches of the East and South. Traveling to the West Americas was impossible at that time as today what we know as the Atlantic Ocean was a literal ocean of mud and not navigable for centuries thereafter. A more in-depth study of Atlantis and its most recent scientific facts and findings can be found in the book, “Atlantis The Eighth Continent” by Charles Berlitz, or, “The Secret of Atlantis” by Otto Muck.

At the beginning of our new historical era, Atlantis was gone, but not forgotten. It survived in memory of the Aryan Tribes by many assorted names. Along the north coast of Africa it was referred to by ancient writers as Atlantes, Atarantes and Atlantioi. Carthaginian seafarers knew it as Antilla. The Welsh and English named this lost paradise Avalon. The Basques, who still believe themselves to be direct descendants of Atlantis, called it Atlantika, the Portuguese, Atlántida, the Spanish Atalaya. The Babylonians called the Western paradise Arallu. Found upon Egyptian hieroglyphs are exhibited major sea battles with the Atlanteans, whom they referred to as “the Amenti, from the paradise of the West abode of the dead and part of the divine sun boat.” The ancient Arabians referred to Atlantis as the Land of Ad. It may well be that the name of the new man in the Christian bible, Ad-am, was a derivative of the two. Notice in the word Amenti the name Amen, which seems more than coincidence that the first Egyptian Aryan god would be named Amen Ra. Christians today still end their prayers with the word Amen, most all of whom are unaware that they are still paying their respects to Amen Ra and likely to Atlantis as well. This is the way in which many names are originated. For instance, the Jews call their nation Israel, which is the combined name of three gods: Isis, Ra, and El.

Throughout Mexico and Central America we continue to find remnants of Atlantean memory in names such as Tlapallan, Tollan, Azatlan and Aztlan. Further down in South America, Conquistadores in Venezuela found a settlement called Atlan, peopled by what they referred to as “White Indians”. Early explorers in Wisconsin USA, found a fortified village near Lake Michigan which its inhabitants called Azatlan.

The Vikings believed that Atili was a wondrous land in the West, and it was there that the Teutonic races placed Valhalla, a mystic land of self-renewing, battle, drinking and feasting. The Aryans who went eastward after Atlantis submerged settled in Bactria, which is today Central Asia. There was situated, according to the accounts of ancients, a nation called Arii, and a country known as Aria. Here the Aryan god Wotan (pronounced Vo-tahn) is supposed to have come with the Asen from the region of what is today part of Asia. Recent diggings in China have unearthed many tombs containing tall, fair haired Aryans, which adds credence to that mystery in history. The ancient Aryan city of Troy, now a part of Asia Minor, was also said to have distant links with the patriarchal Allfather Wotan.

After the fall of Atlantis the name Wotan surfaced in diverse areas, even as distant as South America. Pedro Corzo, a pilot who sailed up and down the Peruvian coast for years, reported that everywhere in the temples he found wooden or stone statues of a god called Guaton. The name means ‘whirlwind’, an equivalent to the Teutonic name Wotan, also known as a god of ‘storm’, and the Maya called him Votan, or Quetzalcoatal and Kukulcan, all were known as fair haired, blue eyed, and of White complexion, bearing striking similarities and impact throughout the leading centers of civilization at the time. It is the belief of some scholars that historically, Hermes and Wotan are both one and the same entity, perhaps all three in one, if we add Quetzalcoatal. It seems apparent that some singular individual or perhaps several highly intelligent beings were spreading the high science and technology of Atlantis around and construction of pyramids after the deluge and setting up the beginnings of the new great civilizations to come.

Aryan spiritualism has been primarily solar based. This idea of never dying fire is surely the oldest form of the religions of the Aryan Race. The early tribes who settled in Italy introduced the vesta fire cults there, further exampled in the mythos of Prometheus. The winged solar disk was a trademark symbol of the early Aryan civilizations. Aryans were always warlike, just as the gods they worshiped, as well as agricultural; above all they possessed the divine gifts of artistic creativity, high intellect and ingenuity.

The name Aryan is derived from the Indo-European Sanskrit language and means noble. “Aryan” is the correct actual name that defines the biological origins of what most people mistakenly refer to as the White Race. White is a color, not a name that defines a species, European is simply a name of a place, not a species. The name European in its origin started with the goddess Europa. Most are familiar with the mythological story of Europa and the Bull. Caucasian, likewise does not define a species, it is derived from the word Caucus which is the name of a place or region in the Caucus mountains. It is much like calling ourselves “Americans” as a race and just as ludicrous, neither name defines a species, they are merely the names of a geographical place. The word “Gentile” is of Jewish biblical origin and is used to signify those who are non-Jews. Again not the race defining name of a specific genetic human species.

The Aryan Race has always had a tendency to divide itself up into nations and make the quite common mistake in proclaiming that such nations are who and what we are as a race. It is no different than an Aryan in California stating that he is a different people than the Aryans who live in New York. Ask any Aryan today what race they are and they will name off some of the nations in Europe or worse, say that they are “Heinz 57”, which is to say, a little bit of everything. Someone says that they are German, French and Scandinavian. What does that mean genetically? All are Teutonic tribal branch names but they are all Aryan as a species.

There are only two primary root tribes of Aryans in Europe, the Celts and the Teutons, all other tribes of Aryans are a derivative of those two. It is certainly not the place called Europe which has made the Aryans what they have become over the many centuries of our history. We were Aryans before we settled there and this we owe simply too far distant root origins and the far-reaching influence of the migratory period after the fall of Atlantis, which hardened our people and developed the hearty and viril character of our ancestors. It is not to say that all Aryans were bottled up in the area of Atlantis alone before the great cataclysm, Hyperborea and ancient Aryan Egypt co-existed with Atlantis and likewise there were many tribes of our people spread far and wide in between. There remains Egyptian hieroglyphs that depict great naval battles between the Atlanteans and the Egyptians. In fact both were in the midst of a fierce battle with one another the day that Atlantis was submerged which we have now learned was the result of an asteroid striking the earth in the region of the Sargasso sea. What serves as a testament to the distant age of Egypt is that it survived the last great flood and axis shift. There still exists salt water tide marks on the interior of the pyramid of Giza which is not even the oldest pyramid. The Sphinx itself is far older than the pyramids in Egypt. Look at the globe of the world and you will see that the Nile river is the only river which has its delta pointing towards the north, That it survived the last axis shift is also evident in that upper Egypt is still called lower Egypt and lower Egypt is still called upper Egypt.

How was the Indo-European evolved from the Aryan? He certainly left his home a different man from what he had become when he set foot on European soil—at the time when he first made his appearance in history. Nor is he invariably the same. The Greek differs from the Roman, the Roman from the Celt, the Celt from the Teuton, the Teuton from the Slav. Yet, one bonding genetic element runs through all Aryan Tribes, which defines them back to the original source. It is genetic physiognomy which defines the Aryan species, not the language or temporary political boundaries, or language which many are taught to believe from today’s Aryan culture distorters. A race is not to be determined by skin color alone, it is genetic, it is the defining DNA of a specific race of humankind. There are Aryans of light, medium and dark skin complexions. There are Chinese of skin color ranging from yellowish skin to pure white skin. Negroes can range from darkest black skin to brown, tan and in some cases pure white albino Negroes. Indians skin color can vary from reddish complexion to tan, white or to darkest black as in East Indian species from India. The Indians from the America’s it has been found co-existed with the Aryans during the age of Atlantis. The name “Indian” was not the original name used to define their race, they were all known in those days of Atlantis as Toltec’s.

Above all, a man’s conduct is clearly the result of his character and the circumstances that surround his action. His character is the product of his past environment (back to his conception) and his heredity. ‘We are the tail-end of a tape-worm of ancestry.’ We originate nothing and we decide nothing; we are moved, directed, and compelled by forces ultimately external to us, and over which, in the last analysis, we have no control. Choice is a delusion; it is only a composition of determining forces. ‘Men think themselves free because they are conscious of their volitions and desires, but are ignorant of the causes by which they are led to wish and desire. In truth our behavior is as rigidly determined by the forces that produce and encompass us, as the fall of a stone is fixed in time and space by its mass, its velocity, and its direction. It is in this sense that man is a machine.” ~ Will Durant

The entire condition of present day Aryan culture is seriously ill and degenerating in an alarming manner. Having come under the custody of men who are inwardly indifferent, self hating and even hostile to it, and whose mental and moral attitude differs drastically from our noble race-conscious forebears. At this juncture in history Aryan man is fighting for the battle of his life, with the ever-present specter of impending extinction of his entire species hanging in the balance before him. In a report by the United States Immigration Commission dated 1911, it states that: “The Aryan ‘races’ comprise nearly half the population of the Earth, say 700,000,000 out of a total of 1,500,000,000.” In less than one century, the Aryan Race has dwindled to a most shocking 8% of the World population and still rapidly declining, while the world population has more than quadrupled, now in excess of 6 billion. A front page article in a national periodical back in 1960 stated, “It is one of the riddles of our time why the White man, lord of the earth from pole to pole, should, in the short space of a single human generation, renounce his rule, draw back wearily from a position of world-wide power, so that today he is in a panic-stricken flight, where yesterday he still governed inviolably.”

If the Aryan Race does not regain control of its survival instincts, then certain extinction from the face of the Earth within a space of one century but perhaps more likely 50 years is inevitable. The battle that must be faced is not from any enemy without, but from the enemy within our own self and our people. That special something which made our ancestors the literal sovereigns of the earth, developed from an indigenous inborn yearning in our DNA. It is this yearning that builds uncommon valor, makes men take chances and risk their lives and limbs for the greater glory of their people. Such a yearning has always been a genetic characteristic of Aryan man, matched with an indomitable will and biological determination. This yearning is perhaps more accurately defined as “The Vital Spark”.

The Aryan Race certainly has never been submissive in the past, which is why it has reigned supreme in might and creative genius since the dawn of history. Should it fully adopt the submissive, turn-the-other-cheek, resist-not-evil, all-men-are-created-equal pabulum of alien Semitic Christian dogma, (which the Semites themselves would never follow) or the universalist and self-hating ‘anything goes’ concept, then we shall perish from the face of the earth, surely as the sun sets in the west! Jewish religion and history works fine for the Jews, but it is not our religion, nor is it our history or Aryan heroes. We shall never find the path to our race ethnic soul and indigenous spirituality by following a Jewish road-map or any path or system which is not our own. Only the dare to be strong and great as a people, dare to be vigilant against all odds for the right and honor of your family, culture and race will be capable of finding their own true inner essence. The inner strength of our roots and identity as a proud and glorious race is what filled our ancestors with the Vital Spark to produce the Wonders of the World! The Alfa Aryan must ever remain thick-skinned to bear his or her steadfast non-conformity to the maddening and unconscious world which is always ready to pull us down into the mire at the first opportunity. Always remember that from the grinding, grating friction within the oyster comes the pearl. There is no growth without adversity, and there is no life worth the living without your ethnic roots, heritage, and indigenous mythology which bears your identity and the treasure of your Vital Spark, your Will to Be, which is your God given Quest and Holy Grail by divine right!

Our culture is superficial today, and our knowledge dangerous, because we are rich in mechanisms and poor in purposes. The balance of mind which once came of a warm religious faith is gone; science has taken from us the supernatural bases of our mortality, and all the world seems consumed in a disorderly individualism that reflects the chaotic fragmentation of our character.” ~ Will Durant

A Model of Enlightenment

“Enlightenment,” like “humanism” or “romanticism,” is a big general term through which we try to build up a mental construct out of a very great number of facts. No such construct can possibly include, without exception, all the facts of eighteenth-century culture. We might attempt to take a single real individual, and build from his life and work a man “typical” of the Enlightenment. Were we to do so, we could do much worse than to pick Thomas Jefferson. Even more representative would be a combination of Jefferson, Franklin, and Thomas Paine; in fact, the construction of a nonexistent but “typical” enlightened man is by no means a bad approach to this classical problem. (It should be noted that colonial and early national America was very much a part of the Enlightenment.) Here, however, we shall deal directly with ideas in order to construct a kind of “model” of the world view of the Enlightenment, fully aware that in fact we are not constructing a model even in the sense now fashionable in such social sciences as economics, but are using an old and well-tried literary device–that is, empirical, even commonsensical, generalization. Three key clusters of ideas form our model of the world view of the Enlightenment; Reason, Nature, Progress.


Reason was to the enlightened man a kind of common sense sharpened and made subtler by training in logic and “natural philosophy” (science). Like any other physiological function, reason was held to work always and in substantially the same way in all human beings as Nature designed them. But–and this is important–in enlightened eyes, environmental conditions (institutional and cultural environment, rather than physical environment–in temperate climates at any rate), had in the West in the eighteenth century corrupted the normal physiological working of Reason in most human beings. For this corruption the eighteenth century held especially responsible the wider cultural environment. Church, state, social, and economic class, superstition, ignorance, prejudice, poverty, and vice all seemed to work together to impede the proper functioning of Reason.

The philosophes, could they have been polled in the modern way, would probably have ranked the Roman Catholic church—indeed, all Christian churches—as the greatest single corrupting influence. Priests were selfish, cruel, intolerant. Voltaire’s “crush the infamous thing” rang through the century. But at bottom the greatest evil of the church, for the enlightened, was its transcendental and supernatural base, which put faith and revelation above reason.

In the great French Encyclopedia, under the article on philosophe, appears the revealing sentence, “Reason is to the philosophe what grace is to the Christian.” And just as grace is available to the true Christian, so Reason, for the philosophe, is available to the truly enlightened, once the proper environmental conditions are achieved. The philosophes and their followers certainly held that the necessary environmental changes would take some time and effort, though Condorcet in his Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Human Mind (1794) held that Western man was on the threshold of the final push into a wholly reasonable world. Moreover, in this reasonable world, if there might persist some inequalities in reasoning power among men, these would not be considerable. Helvetius, in his Concerning the Mind (1758), is convinced that potentially all men have roughly equal powers of understanding.

Locke, in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), provided the philosophical and psychological foundation on which the philosophes constructed their faith in Reason. For Locke denied all “innate ideas,” among which were the Christian truths of revelation, and held the mind to be a tabula rasa on which experience (that is, environment) inscribed a content. Obviously, if you can control this experience you can control the formation of the mind, the character—all that counts in a man. That sturdy faith in “cultural engineering,” new, as a widespread one, in its assertion of the possibility of changing all human beings for the good by changing their environment, and in particular their education, from infancy on, has survived in diminished forms to this day.


Nature, the second great cluster of ideas in our model of Enlightenment, is closely meshed with that of Reason. In perhaps over-simple terms, reason, properly working, enabled human beings to discover, or rediscover, Nature beneath the concealing corruptions of religion, social structure, convention, and indeed, beneath the often misleading impressions of sense experience not properly organized by Reason. Though the average enlightened man would not have admitted it, this Nature was in part a hypostatized conception of the beautiful and the good. It must be understood against two antitheses. First, there is the “super-” or “supernatural” —the miracle, the revealed truths of religion. For the enlightened, all these are simply figments of the imagination, nonexistent, indeed at bottom priestly inventions designed to keep men ignorant of the ways of Reason and Nature. Second, there is the “unnatural.” Unlike the supernatural, the unnatural does indeed exist. The unnatural, the artificial, the burdens of irrational customs and traditions accumulated through historic time, are for the enlightened the form of evil takes in this world. It must be noted that in simple naive logic the enlightened had as much trouble over the problem of the origin of evil as did the Christian. How the natural got to be unnatural was a question as difficult to answer as how an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God allowed Adam to bite into the apple. Rousseau, for example, in the Essay on the Origin of Inequality (1754), blames the lapse from the state of Nature on the first man to fence in a piece of land and say, “This is mine.” He does not explain why this natural man acted so unnaturally.

Nature, then, is quite simply the “good” —a set of ethical and aesthetic goals or standards. In specific content these standards were not in fact greatly different from those of the Judaeo-Christian tradition. There was no doubt a strong touch of Hellenism in the eighteenth, as in the sixteenth, century. The Enlightened was this-worldly enough, and by no means ascetic. Its characteristic ethics (Helvetius again, or Jeremy Bentham, will do as examples) was hedonist and instrumentalist. Yet only among a few circles of court and nobility was the eighteenth century a time of moral looseness, cynicism, and corruption, and even in such circles, there often cropped up what we should call the strain of social consciousness. The enlightened despot (Joseph II of Austria), the enlightened nobleman (Lafayette), were hardly self-indulgent sensualists. There was, in fact, a touch of puritanism in the enlightened, as in almost all who really hope to make men over completely.

Some writers, especially in the second half of the the century, were “primitivists.” They held that there had once been on earth a state of Nature in which men lived free from evil. Some placed this state of Nature in a distant, semi-classical past, the Golden Age of Hellenistic tradition. Others found this state of Nature in their own time, though Chinese who believed in decency, not in a theistic God, and among those noble savages, the Red Indians of America. But for the most part, eighteenth century writers seem to have had at most no more than a half belief in the historical reality of an idyllic state of Nature; even Rousseau seemed aware that the state of Nature is what we would now call a myth, a useful form of what we would now call propaganda for the new order. So too was that very popular political concept, the “social contract”; this device brought “natural” ethics into practical politics as the natural rights of man.


The third cluster of ideas is summed up in the word “progress”” Americans especially are so accustomed to accepting the notion of Progress as something self-evident that they find it hard to realize how new this doctrine really is. The central doctrine of development in the Judaeo-Christian tradition is that of a lapse from an original perfect state, that of the Garden of Eden; and in so representative a Christian view of world history as Augustine’s City of God, a better state, though seen to be ahead as well as behind, is not one attained by the steady improvement of man’s lot on this earth in the civitas terrena, but by a promise of a Second Coming of Christ. The Hellenistic tradition favored a variety of cyclical theories, with a Golden Age degenerating to a Silver Age and thence to an Iron Age before the process started all over again. The humanists of the Renaissance, as well as the leaders of the Protestant Reformation were trying to recapture a past they both believed much superior to their present.

The clearest beginnings of a belief that the present is better than the past came in the late seventeenth century in what in France was called the “quarrel of the ancients and the moderns” and in England the “battle of the books.” The issue was a literary one: can a writer in the late seventeenth century achieve work equal to, perhaps better than, that of the great writers of Greece and Rome? At the moment the battle was no more than a draw, but in the early eighteenth century the moderns began to win out in public opinion. The French reformer and philosopher Turgot, in a speech at the Sorbonne “On the Successive Advances of the Human Mind” (1750), outlined a complete doctrine of progress, which at the hands of his friend and disciple Condorcet in the above-mentioned Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Human Mind becomes an extraordinarily optimistic utopia of indefinite progress toward what has been called a doctrine of “natural salvation” —the attainment by everyone of immortality in this flesh on this earth.

The average man, even though enlightened, could hardly fly as high as did Condorcet. Moreover, the eighteenth century lacked what Darwin in the nineteenth century was to provide, a systematic theoretical explanation of the biological workings of an evolutionary process from “lower” to “higher,” interpreted as Progress. The enlightened man tended toward a simple view that the agent of progress is the increasingly effective application of Reason to the control of the physical and cultural environment. Education became one of the major ways in which Reason was to do its work of reform. From Locke to Rousseau and Pestalozzi, the Enlightenment produced a series of very important writings on educational theory, and saw the beginnings of serious experimentation in the field.

This is hardly the place to attack the knotty problem of the relation between the key ideas of the Enlightenment and the complex currents of the full historical record of the period. There is clearly no single one-way “cause” involved, but many among them the example of natural science, clearly cumulative and “progressive”; the beginnings of the extraordinary technological advances of our Western civilization; a very considerable and widespread economic growth—of course not evenly distributed as to class and geographical location, but still much greater, in France above all, than historians once believed; and reinforcing all, a “climate of opinion” favorable to enterprise. These factors, and many others which are by no means well understood, helped make the Enlightenment the take-off point of modern Western civilization, so unique in its concrete material achievements.

From the “Encyclopedia of Philosophy” by Collier-Macmillan limited, 1967