California ZOG

How is it that jews persist in White societies? How is it that the jews maintain their positions of power, while wielding those positions to such deleterious effects on Whites in their own communities? Replete with drastic biological differences including readily observable distinct phenotypical traits and foreign genetics, the jews could easily be classified as a separate species from Whites. If taxonomic standards were applied consistently across the various classes of animals, Whites, jews, and the other races of man would clearly be separate species. Aside from their alien genetics, the jews are culturally unassimilable because they have their own distinct culture, which they protect with an unwavering jewish racial supremacism. They cannot tolerate the achievements of the White race and White civilization, which by their mere existence expose the degenerate jewish culture, miscegenated genetic inheritance, and the idiotic evil of their death-cult religion. It is out of hatred and envy, documented for all to see in the repellant talmud, that the jews actively work to undermine White societies and destroy the White race. Given that the jews are a dangerous and ultimately fatal parasite to White existence, it took centuries of infiltration, subversion, and indoctrination to enstupidate White societies into permitting the pernicious presence of jews, and to have them sink low enough to celebrate a thoroughly judaized culture. The current disastrously kosher state of affairs is only sustainable through an obscene act of doublethink: the jews are simultaneously the most downtrodden, persecuted, disenfranchised victims, while also occupying positions of the most extraordinary financial, political, and social power.

A cornerstone in the perpetuation of a Zionist occupied government (ZOG), is a subversion of the laws that ostensibly govern a society. The jewish corruption of governments and laws is amply described in Protocol No. 5:

We shall create an intensified centralization of government in order to grip in our hands all the forces of the community.  We shall regulate mechanically all the actions of the political life of our subjects by new laws.  These laws will withdraw one by one all the indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim, and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place in a position to wipe out any goyim who opposes us by deed or word.”

In the California failed state, a once-great White homeland that is now ruled by a ZOG, the implementation of Protocol No. 5 has proceeded at a terrifying pace. From removing the “indulgence” of freedom of assembly with draconian desegregation and anti-diversity diversity laws, to criminalizing the “liberty” of free speech with perverse “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, the California ZOG has achieved the kosher despotism sought by the evil jews. One need only look at a recent history of California’s demographics to see proof of the ZOG using its power to wipe out the Whites: the goyim who opposed the rat-faced men by deed and word. Recently, the jews of Kabbalafornia celebrated another expansion of the ZOG’s power through the enactment of yet more laws that will accelerate the destruction of the remaining Whites.

Since March, JCRC [Jewish Community Relations Council] has worked with community members, advocates and policymakers to advance bills addressing the concerns of our community. Below is a list of bills, budget items, and resolutions which we supported during the legislative session… JCRC will continue to advocate, often in coalition with other communities, for a just society and for security for all minority groups”

Always on the lookout for the best interests of the unclean meat, the rootless traveling merchant has an amazing deal for you! As experts in telling others what is The Right Thing To DoTM, the jews have organized thousands of “community relations” organizations across the USSA to ensure a never ending expansion of laws favorable to the parasite and fatal to the host. Of course, all these organizations are tax-exempt and “charitable” because these are g*d’s chosen people, and the rules only apply to the goyim.

AB 291 provides a set of legal protections for tenants against unscrupulous landlords who might otherwise try to use immigration status as a way of intimidating tenants who have exercised, or who are about to exercise, their housing rights.”

This horrific law will be used to criminalize the mere existence of rental property, and will inevitably be selectively enforced against Whites. Under this jewish-orchestrated usurpation of the law, you can now face the full brunt of state power if you refuse to rent property to illegal foreign invaders. Thanks to jewish conniving from the JCRC, California landlords now have the choice of violating federal immigration laws by renting to illegals, and violating AB 291 by refusing to rent to illegals. Combine this new, unavoidable violation of contradictory laws with the federal and state civil asset forfeiture laws, and we can look forward to a wave of people being dispossessed of their property for the benefit of greedy ZOG operatives and their jewish handlers. There never was a clearer example of the old witticism: with the jews, you lose!

AB 450 enacts a set of restrictions on California employers to ensure that the assistance they give to federal immigration enforcement activity in the workplace goes no further than what is required by law and that workers have sufficient notice and opportunity to correct any inaccuracies in their employment eligibility records before employers take adverse action against them in connection with immigration enforcement audits.”

The jews have been busy ensuring that their bipedal biological weapons are immune from repercussions. This is another example of the jewish strategy of using the natural propensity of Whites to abide by laws, to force them into untenable situations and eventually punish them with an abusive, out of control police state. California employers have to cooperate with federal immigration authorities and their enforcement operations on pain of obstruction of justice charges, but if they cooperate too much California will now brand them as criminals. How much is too much cooperation? Only the jews behind the curtains can say for certain, but be assured that if you’re a White employer being overly cooperative with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, you’ll probably be prosecuted for a hate crime under AB 450.

SB 31 prohibits the state from cooperating with any religion-based registry or watch list.  This bill, an urgency measure, prohibits public agencies and public employees from sharing specified information with federal authorities for the purpose of compiling a registry or database of individuals based on religion, national origin, or ethnicity, or otherwise assisting or participating in the creation, implementation, or enforcement of such a registry or database.”

More jewish disingenuousness in service of protecting their sewage-colored primitives being used to overwhelm White homelands and eradicate Whites through violence and miscegenation. Initially described as intended to prevent “religion-based watch lists,” a quick perusal of the semitic fine print reveals that SB 31 also prevents any consideration of national origin or ethnicity when enforcing laws. This awful law, in the best case scenario, will prevent state and local law enforcement from protecting society from crimes perpetrated by any and all hostile foreigners, whether they be immigrants, colonists, or armed invaders. Good luck getting any accurate crime statistics once the jews succeed in removing any information about national origin or ethnicity from police reports through the threat of prosecution under SB 31.

SB 54 prohibits state and local law enforcement agencies and school police and security departments from using resources to investigate, interrogate, detain, detect, or arrest persons for immigration enforcement purposes.”

The disastrous jewish march through the institutions continues with a nonsensical new law that prevents any investigation or enforcement of immigration violations; essentially a law that criminalizes enforcing laws. SB 54 is perhaps the most pernicious of these terrible Kabbalafornian laws, in that it advances Protocol No. 5 more than the others. By preventing any state or local immigration enforcement, the jews are attempting to force the “intensified centralization of government.” For without state-level support for the enforcement of immigration laws, the federal government will have to grossly expand its police presence in the state, with immigration enforcement as the pretext for doing so.

Legal Services for Immigrants: The budget which passed included $30 million for the next three years in order to augment existing funding, bringing the total to $45 million…Non-Profit Security Grants: The California Non-profit Security Grant was funded for $2 million dollars in the 2017-18 state budget.”

No kosher agenda is complete without some mention of the shekels. Predictably, the jews want the remaining Whites to pay for their own annihilation. So alien invaders, brought here by jews to destroy White homelands, will be given $45 million worth of lawyers to litigiously prey upon the native population. No need to provide legal services for the native Whites, but the jews have endless amounts of your money to spend for the benefit of the Mestizo and Moose-limb monsters who are here to savagely destroy the remaining vestiges of White civilization. And just to make sure the jewish organizations like the JCRC are well protected, Kabbalafornia is now providing publicly funded security for them!

The state of California is a walking corpse. All its utility and vitality as a homeland for the White people who created it has been defiled and consumed by the jewish parasites and the opportunistic, brown welfare colonists in their service who are here to scavenge the carrion. It exists as a sickening laboratory, in which jews experiment with the promotion of the darkest, unimaginable perversions and the most unnatural, soulless forms of diversity and miscegenation. It exists to debase Whites morally, to reverse any civilizational or genetic advances hard won by Whites, and ultimately to devolve Whites into the seething, moronic mass of brown slaves promised by the detestable talmud. The jewish parasite colonies have burrowed deeply into the body politic of this once-great White homeland, and now use its resources to fund and protect the bipedal biological weapons the jews use to ensure that no safe White homelands remain. The jews hide behind altruistic-sounding organizations in the shallowest of attempts to disguise their evil. We must stand firm and unmoved by the duplicitous jewish bleatings of “humanity” and “compassion” as they commit genocide against us. We must not allow jews to dictate the laws which govern our society. We must stop White genocide.


Source article: https://jcrc.org/news-events/blog/jcrc-legislative-wrap-up-2017

ITS THE JEWS, ITS ALWAYS THE JEWS, WAKE UP!

THEY MUST BE STOPPED.

Christopher Cantwell Got Totally and Entirely Kiked – Still in Jail

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 10, 2017

American Hero

 

Radio host and white racial advocate Christopher Cantwell had a hearing yesterday. He stood charged with three counts of violence related to using pepper spray at the Unite the Right Rally.

A tranny and a regular faggot went to a magistrate to file the charges against Cantwell and a warrant was issued (this is some weird process I wasn’t even aware of before this) and he was denied bail on fake claims that are disproved by video evidence. Meanwhile – I should remind you – you can attack a US Senator and break five of his ribs and get out on $5000 bond. Just so you understand.

We expected Cantwell’s charges dropped, given that the accusers had lied under oath and the whole thing is retarded.

They went through the video in court, and it was determined that the accusers had lied under oath – one of them admitted to it on the stand – but the judge decided to leave him to rot in jail longer anyway.

One of the charges was dropped and the other two were combined into a single charge.

It’s a charge relating to just discharging the pepper spray in a crowd. Not against any specific person. And the “malicious wounding” aspect has been removed. He was looking at a max of 60 years, now the max is 5.

It’s not clear whether he’ll get another bond hearing or not.

Basically, what this looks like is that the court knows that they’ve kept the poor bastard locked in jail for three months on fake charges and to dismiss all three would make it appear as though they were just politically persecuting this guy for no reason. Which is exactly what they are doing.

They know that he did nothing, that he will be convicted of nothing, but they are using the justice system’s processes of justice as a punishment.

If they send him to a jury trial over one of these charges, it looks better than just letting him out now and being like “whoops, we kept you in jail for three months for no reason, lol.”

It drags the whole thing out to the point where no one will even remember what it was about to begin with, and going to trial gives legitimacy to what is effectively unlawful imprisonment.

Cantwell went over this stuff yesterday on his Live From Seg podcast, which is recorded over the Charlottesville city jail phone with his friend Jared Howe.

If you haven’t yet, or if you have, donate to his legal fund.

DONATE HERE

It’s full, but he still needs money – more now that he’s gotta pay for more stuff.

And it’s important for us to do these legal funds for our guys. We need to show each other that we’ll be there to support each other.

And we’re not doing the Unite the Right type rally again. So hopefully, we’re not going to have more guys in jail any time soon.

The New Rosa Parks: White Photographer Refuses to Move to Back of Venue Due to Whiteness

Music Festival Apologizes For Volunteer’s ‘Overt Racism’ After She Refuses to Move to the Back Because She’s White

A music festival is apologizing for a volunteer who demonstrated “overt racism” after refusing to move to the back of the venue when a performer called to bring “brown” women to the front of the crowd.

The National Post reports the incident at the Halifax Pop Explosion began when singer Lido Pimienta called for “brown girls to the front” of the venue. According to an account of the event by Allie O’Manique that was confirmed by a festival spokesman, Pimienta kept repeating, “Move to the back” when a white volunteer photographer refused to move.

“Finally after saying it about 10 times — and the woman refused to move — (Pimienta) said, ‘You’re cutting into my set time and you’re disrespecting these women, and I don’t have time for this,’” she explained.

The volunteer was ultimately removed from the event after refusing to move.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDgbtq89E_M

In a Facebook post, the Halifax Pop Explosion apologized for “overt racism” the volunteer reportedly showed by refusing to move in order for minorities to take her place:

Dear attendees, fans, artists, staff, volunteers, and folks otherwise involved in the Halifax Pop Explosion. On Thursday, October 19 at the Marquee Club, a white HPX volunteer along with several other white people in the audience reacted to Lido Pimienta inviting “brown girls to the front” of the venue with overt racism. This volunteer was removed by Lido herself. They have since received notification from the festival that they are no longer welcome to volunteer with us.

We will not accept this behaviour and neither should you. Be responsible for your friends – talk to them and support them as they move towards unpacking their racism. People of Colour deserve safe spaces and it is your responsibility to help. It is also ours.

As a result of the volunteer refusing to move to give preferential treatment to people based on their race and gender, the Halifax Pop Explosion also wrote they will be providing a list of resources for people who make an “unsafe and uncomfortable space at our shows and venues by demonstrating racism, homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, and other discriminatory behaviours.”

The festival also apologized for the “aggressive and racist” behavior the volunteer showed by simply not moving and to the minorities in the audience who had their experience “perhaps ruined” by the photographer not moving:

To Lido Pimienta: we are sorry that one of our volunteers interrupted your art, your show, and your audience by being aggressive and racist. We have so much respect for the art and music you create and the space you make for women, people of colour, transgender, and non-binary people. The way you interact with the world acts and provides a thoughtful example. You are a role model to us and many people in our community. We see it. We feel it. We hope you will work with us again.

To the POC in the audience on Thursday night: we are sorry your night was interrupted, and perhaps ruined, by one of our volunteers. We are going to try our best as a festival to create ways to make our spaces safer and more accessible for you. We hope we can rebuild some trust and that you will come back to our shows.

So there you have it: it’s now “aggressive and racist” to refuse to move from your position because of the color of your skin.

Donald Trump is the Best Feeder of Fish, Okay. Nobody Feeds Fish Better Than Donald Trump, Alright?

BEST EVER!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2017

THAT’S A BAD GOYIM HE’S HURTING THE FISH THIS IS AGAINST DEMOCRACY GOYIM

The sickening and evil Jewish media has been riled into a frenzy over a picture of Donald Trump dumping his fish food for the fish at a Japanese fish-feeding event in Japan.

Look at this gif that the vile CNN slut Veronica Rocha posted to Twitter.

Notice how it weirdly zooms in on Trump’s face?

Yes, the frame was cropped.

Here’s the uncropped/non-zooming gif, where you can see that before Trump poured his fish food, PM Abe did that same action.

Here’s the still image.

“Petty” does not go far enough.

I would say “kiked” is more appropriate.

The entire Jewish media jumped all over this picture and the cropped/zoomed gif and used it as an opportunity to attack Trump as a fool.

A few of these outlets have changed their story since the goyim found out.

Here’s The Guardian’s description of the event on Twitter:

But when you click the story, it’s been updated to say that the media “overreacted.”

But of course, the press corps was there and knew that Trump was following Abe’s lead in dumping out the remaining fish food, but decided to try to trick the goyim.

This is insane that you have the media trying to deceive people like this so aggressively and openly while being aware that they’re going to get caught.

A couple of them apologized and pretended it was an accident.

But those news story screenshots above are from time of writing, at least 4 hours after it was revealed that the media (apparently it was someone from ABC) purposefully edited that clip to try to make Trump look stupid.

These “people” not only do not care about the truth, they don’t care that people know that they do not care about truth.

This fish food hoax is the epitome of fake news – you can almost see it better because it is about something totally irrelevant.

The Jewish fake news industrial complex has become a parody of itself.

These people need to be rounded up and put in camps.

In Poland. 

Diversity Is KILLING Our Tribe

WotW examines what a tribe is, how we can cooperate with other tribes to achieve our aims, and what will happen to us if we don’t.

Please support this channel at: https://www.patreon.com/wayoftheworld or by using the PayPal link on the channel homepage. https://www.facebook.com/wayoftheworld/

https://www.minds.com/WayoftheWorld https://www.bitchute.com/channel/wayo…

https://gab.ai/WayoftheWorld https://vid.me/Way_of_the_World

Posted again for your knowledge.

Science Confirms It: Diversity Destroys Civilization

The analysis offered on this site of diversity does not look at the unique traits of groups, only the necessary idea that any group is constituted around a unique values system and in order to defend that, needs to have control over its destiny and the ability to exclude other groups. This means that more than one group in the same area causes social dissolution and civilization collapse.

In fact, for more than twenty-five years, the writers collected here have been pointing out that diversity destroys social order and is dysfunctional as a policy as a result. We cannot make it work because it is paradoxical and therefore will always fail, but will fail slowly, taking our civilization down with it as that society expends all of its resources to try to make an illusion into reality, although tyrants and rioting plebs love it because the perceived goodness of diversity gives them virtually unlimited power.

As if conjured up from our laboratories, confirms that diversity results in conflict (via Heartiste via hbdchick:

However, in countries where ethnicity is more strongly predictive of culture, as captured by a high χ2, violent conflict is more likely, and public goods provision tends to be lower. Our interpretation of this empirical result is that in societies where individuals differ from each other in both ethnicity and culture, social antagonism is greater, and political economy outcomes are worse.

In other words, wherever there are groups that have united genetics to value systems (“culture”) there is conflict if more than one occupies a space.

This should not baffle us because the same condition exists in nature. Wherever two groups attempt to co-exist, conflict expands until whichever group breeds more slowly is destroyed, as we see in the case of the brown anoles versus green anoles:

Although green anoles are very territorial, the invasion of the brown anoles have chased the natives into the treetops. The brown anoles, having few enemies, have taken over the former habitat of the greens, forcing them into new territories and farther from our sight. In addition to taking the natural territories from them, the brown anoles, especially mature males, will actually kill and eat the baby green anoles. Their populations are greatly reduced from former numbers.

The invasive species, which is less discriminate in its consumption and more aggressive, has begun bullying the native species, with disastrous results that resemble the constant ethnic conflict created by diversity:

The green anole and the Cuban brown anole both occupy the same niche, or place in the ecosystem. This means that they both live on the ground and in low lying branches, and eat the same food, insects. But the brown anoles tend to out-compete green anoles on the ground and lower boles of trees. They have even been described as being more aggressive than the native green anole. Instead of toughening up, the green anoles who used to occupy these lower spaces are now more commonly found feeding in higher, flimsier branches and leaves. This is considered a shift in behavior due to resource partitioning.

…Since the encroachment of the Cuban brown anole, studies have shown that our native green anole has begun to show some morphological and behavioral changes. What scientists have found, and what you can probably witness at home, is that the green anole is now choosing to live higher off the ground and they have developed larger toe pads.

As the newer group comes in, more voracious and less thoughtful, it displaces the more capable — and therefore less preemptively defensive through aggression — native group.

This resembles the flight of those who became Europeans into the far less hospitable climates to the North: when food is abundant, intelligence is not rewarded, and so the coarser take over from the finer. When each decision about survival becomes more difficult, then nature rewards the more intelligent finer species.

It also explains the clashes we have over diversity. One group is displacing another; that group, realizing that taking to the trees will only delay its demise by outbreeding, is finding its own identity in response.

This places us in a situation where the political conflict of diversity threatens our future. We have justified diversity as an economic program, but the inevitable conflict has destabilized us:

As rich countries have fewer babies, they need immigration to grow their prime-age workforces. But as the foreign-born share of the population rises, xenophobia often festers and threatens egalitarian policymaking.

…But there is a growing body of evidence that as rich majority-white countries admit more foreign-born people, far-right parties thrive by politicizing the perceived threat of the foreign-born to national culture. That concept will sound familiar to anybody who watched the 2016 U.S. presidential race, but it’s a truly global trend. A 2015 study of immigration and far-right attitudes in Austria found that the proximity of low and medium-skilled immigrants “causes Austrian voters to turn to the far right.” The effect was strongest in areas with higher unemployment, suggesting that culture and economics might reinforce each other in this equation. Last week, the far-right Austrian party triumphed in the nation’s election.

In other words, exactly as the study — and common sense, and the parable of the anole — predicts, diversity creates endless conflict, and the only way to survive it is to end diversity.

Best Comment:

A nation will fall without race-ism. (Race-ism meaning Belief in race as reality, racial differences, and need for ethno-racial consciousness.) Race-ism means being mindful of one’s own race, one’s own people, and one’s own nation. A people of a nation must favor their own kind and their own land. If not, others will take over, gradually if not rapidly. And the people of the nation will turn traitor(even as a sign of virtue) since anti-race-ism instilled them with a notion that they would be evil to be mindful of their own identity and interests on their own territory.

When white nations were race-ist, whites looked out for one another. They circled the wagons and protected their own domain and heritage. But now that whites have been made anti-race-ist, they fear to assert their own identity and interests. Even the notion that “It’s Okay to be White” is denounced by white cuck elites and white progs. Without race-ism, a people inevitably turn cuck since they can no longer serve themselves. They must serve OTHERS. Those who keep their identity eventually win out over those who don’t. Since Jews, blacks, and Muslims keep their own identity, they will gain over whites in Europe and Canada.. and US.

Also, race-ism makes a people proud and powerful. And only a proud and powerful people are respected by others. Why? Because they are feared. A people who are not feared are not respected. At most, they are pitied.
White people were once feared and respected. But now that they are no longer feared, they are reviled. Why? Because all their past glory and all their wealth are denounced as ill-gotten, and white cucks nod along with apology.

Because whites are denied pride, purpose(except to cuck), and unity, their power keeps fading with each passing year. Also, it is race-ism that prevents giving into temptations as all individuals are wont to do. Every individual is tempted with betrayal IF there is something for him or her. Collaborate with the enemy to get something for ‘me’. It’s like Fredo betraying the family in THE GODFATHER II to have something for himself. Without a strong sense of race-ism, so many people will betray their own people or collaborate with the enemy for self-gain, pleasure, thrills, or ‘narcissism of small differences’.

Why did Jews remain Jewish even though they were tempted by betrayal all through the ages. The Covenant was race-ist in reminding Jews over and over that they must stick together, preserve identity, and put their own kind first. So, even as Jews-as-individuals were tempted to betray their own kind for self-gain, enough of them didn’t because Jewish race-ism emphasized group identity, unity, and purpose. Without such race-ist pressures, Jews would have betrayed their own kind as individuals and turned collaborator and faded as an ethnic identity.

Patriarchy is also necessary for preservation of identity. Women are likely to just run off with OTHER groups that are more powerful. And young ones are restless and wanna try something ‘new’. This makes them more likely to go over to the other side, if only for excitement.
Patriarchy imposes tribal elder male power over womenfolk and young ones. Jewish Patriarchy was instrumental in keeping the Tribe together. As Jews were often a weaker group vis-a-vis other groups, many Jewish women naturally wanted to run off with more powerful goy men. But Jewish patriarchs forbade this, and so, Jewish women had kids with Jewish men. Also, Jewish fathers made their Jewish sons stick to Jewish identity.
Though Jews still have their race-ism and identity, the ebbing of Jewish patriarchy may prove to be fatal. Without patriarchal control over Jewish women, many are just turning slut, crazy, or jungle fever. So many Jewish women are turning out like Lena Dunham and Emma Sulkowicz. With crazy Jewesses like that, more Jewish men will marry Chinese women, and their Chewish kids will have that lame yellow gene and lack chutzpah. Also, without patriarchal power over Jewish boys, too many Jewish men are turning Animal House and making total fools of themselves like Anthony Weiner and Harvey Weinstein. Also, they marry shikses who either turn out to be bimbos(thus lowering Jewish IQ) or careerist & castrating harridans.

In PORTNOY’S COMPLAINT, we are told of a cousin who wanted to go with a shiksa but the Father said NO, so, the cousin went nuts and smashed all the bottles or something. And then the father beat the crap out of him, but the cousin just took it and didn’t fight back even though he was much stronger than his pa. Patriarchy was still operative. Ultimately, the authority of the father kept the kid within the Jewish community.

But with the fading of Jewish patriarchy, too many Jewish kids grew up with endless porny jokes about dongs and schwarz, and they ended up ridiculous. Israel still has patriarchy, and thank heaven for that. With so many Israeli Jews being decadent, the society will go nuts if there isn’t some kind of patriarchy to keep things under wraps. Consider that 70% of Israelis are for ‘gay marriage’, but it is banned by the patriarchy.

In the West, the loss of race-ism has meant loss of white identity, pride, and purpose. So, even though whites still got money and status, they got no respect, and so, non-whites berate and demean them. Also, so many whites turn on their own kind and join with enemies of whites(esp blacks). This means white people will become weaker every year in demographic, political, social, and economic terms.

It is no wonder that the fading of white race-ism is leading to the rise of Jungle and Jihad.

Loss of white race-ism means that white men aren’t allowed to unite to defend white manhood and white pride. In the past, white men did just that. When faced with Zulu savages, white men all worked together to fight them like in the Michael Caine movie. And in the American South, white men united against black crime. Since a Negro could whup a whitey on a one-on-one basis, whites had to work together to catch the black thug rapist and hang him from a tree to send a message to other would-be-Negro thugs. Also, white race-ism kept Jungle Fever under control. Since white men worked together to keep the power and maintain racial pride, white women respected white men and had children with them. Also, as any white woman who went with a Negro was castigated or even criminalized, white womenfolk weren’t likely to betray their own race.

But no more white race-ism means that white men must NEVER work together against blacks. But without group effort, white men cannot win against black men. On one-on-one basis, most black guys can kick white guys in the butt. Also, without white male pride and power over their women, white women are realizing that black men got more muscle, bigger dongs, and louder voices. So, with each passing year, many more white women give their wombs over to Negroes to be colonized. Worse, the Official Power encourages and promotes such Jungle Fever among white women and cuck behavior among white men. Notice that there is no cultural condemnation of cuck behavior. It’s just reported as some new social trend, like it’s cool or something.
Blacks now sense white wussy and white pu**y. They see that whites are now addicted to jungle music and jungle power. Without white race-ism, white civilization loses out to the animal aggression and lust of Negro culture that offers thrills of domination, thug power, and funkiness.

With the rise of such savagery, one would think there would be a moral and spiritual backlash. But due to demise of white race-ism, whites are loathe to invoke God and Jesus and social responsibility to denounce black savagery. If anything, even Christianity has cucked out to homos. A truly sad state of affairs.

However, when a society is overcome with so much degeneracy and debauchery, the reaction must come from somewhere. Since it cannot come from whites, it is coming from the Muslims who are filling up parts of Europe and even Canada and the US. Since Christianity cannot do anything other than shill for Israel and worship homos and since white morality can only be about ‘white guilt’, the pride of morality can only come from non-white cultures. And it is Islam.

So, it is Islam that is stepping in to denounce and destroy the debauchery. So, while Ariana Grande sings about how her mudshark white pooter is stretched out by black dongs, Muslim terrorist blows up her concert as an act of war against modern decadence and degeneracy. Barbarism of Islamic Morality wages war on Savagery of African Jivery. But instead of Muslims fighting Africans, both wage war on weak white decadence. Blacks wage war on whites by wussifying white boys and colonizing white wombs. Black guys beat white guys in sports and in the streets and turn white men into scared wussy white boys who turn white-uncle-tom and cuck out. And white girls offer their wombs to be colonized by black seed, and this is promoted by both the state and entertainment all across Europe and America. So, blacks wage sports and sexual war on whites.

As white nations become culturally junglized, Muslims attack this degenerate white society as the ‘sick west’. Muslims find the modern West to be utterly vile and debauched, but they fail to realize that black influence(as esp enabled by Jewish power) played a huge role in turning the West into a cesspool of neo-savagery. The Great Reversion of blacks to savagery has impacted all the West. So many white elites listen to reggae as their main music, and so many ‘white trash’ masses(and white middle class) are into rap thug music.

So, blacks junglize whites, and Muslims denounce and attack a junglized white world.

Now, if whites had race-ism, they would have united to keep blacks in their world. And as they would be a powerful and proud people, Muslims would respect them and think twice about waging terror attacks on them. But whites seem weak to both groups.

Though blacks and Muslims couch their condemnation of whites in PC terms of ‘injustice’, what they really mean is ‘you weak’. Blacks don’t get morality. Blacks only understand power. They fear and respect Power. When they see weakness(no matter how good-willed and redemptive), they see it as pu**y. It’s like hyenas respect powerful lions. But if a wounded lion went to them and begged forgiveness for all the hyenas it killed in the past, the hyenas would just laugh and say ‘you weak’ and tear him limb from limb. This is why ‘white guilt’ won’t work. Black mentality only respects power. Blacks respected the old KKK more than today’s goody whites. KKK was fearsome. Blacks hated it but feared it and with fear came respeck, shoo. But no matter how nice whites today try to be, blacks just see weakness. When blacks scream and shout slogans about civil rights, they really mean ‘you weak!’

And Muslims, despite their spirituality, are also into power. Islam is about justice and POWER. Muhammad was a warrior, and there can be no justice without power. So, when whites act nice and apologetic, Muslims just see weakness. They feel that such wussy pu**y people don’t deserve to rule or own anything.

Unless whites being back race-ism, they are done for. Year after year, they will lose more and more.

Repeated Claims of 6 Million Jews Dying Decades Before Hitler Vs Ignored Soviet Death Camp Tolls

From http://www.renegadetribune.com/repeated-claims-of-6-million-jews-dying-decades-before-hitler-vs-ignored-soviet-death-camp-tolls/

By John Wear

The Atlanta Journal and Constitution newspaper estimates that only half of the Jewish “Holocaust survivors” around the world in 1985 had received restitution under the BEG.[24] If this 50% estimate is accurate, it would mean that approximately 5.8 million European Jews survived German persecution during World War II. Such a large number of surviving Jews is not consistent with a German program of genocide against European Jewry.

Did 6 Million Jews Die in World War II?

The allegation that 6 million Jews died in World War II is today widely considered to be an established historical fact. For example, the Encyclopedia Judaica states, “There can be no doubt as to the estimated figure of some 6 million victims.”[1] The U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. is described in its information sheet as a “living memorial to the 6 million Jews and millions of other victims of Nazi fanaticism who perished in the Holocaust.” However, an analysis of the 6 million Jewish wartime deaths shows that this figure is not the result of any careful investigation, research or calculation.

History of the 6 Million Jewish Deaths Figure

The 6 million figure of Jewish deaths had been used and predicted long before the end of World War II. An ancient Jewish prophecy had promised the Jews their return to the Promised Land after a loss of 6 million of their people.[2] According to the book Breaking the Spell by Nicholas Kollerstrom, publications and speakers had referred to the death or persecution of 6 million Jews on at least 166 occasions before the end of World War II.[3]

For example, the 10th edition, vol. 25 of the Encyclopedia Britannica published in 1902 states:

While there are in Russia and Rumania 6 millions of Jews who are being systematically degraded…” An article in the March 25, 1906 edition of the New York Times worried about the “condition and future of Russia’s 6 million Jews…” The article further states “…the Russian Government’s studied policy for the ‘solution’ of the Jewish question is systematic and murderous extermination.” ((((((Max Nordau)))))), cofounder of the World Zionist Organization, warned in 1911 of the “annihilation of 6 million people” at the Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland.[4]

The New York Times on December 2, 1914, made an appeal for aid for Jews. The paper stated:

The American Jewish Relief Committee, called into being at a conference of more than 100 national Jewish organizations which was held at Temple Emanu-El on October 25 to consider the plight of more than 6 million Jews who live within the war zone…”[5]

The figure of 6 million Jewish deaths was used by Martin H. Glynn, the Governor of New York. Glynn wrote an article entitled “The Crucifixion of Jews Must Stop!” that was printed in The American Hebrew magazine published by the American Jewish Committee. In this article Glynn states:

Six million men and women are dying from lack of the necessaries of life; eight hundred thousand children cry for bread. And this fate is upon them through no fault of their own, through no transgression of the laws of God or man; but through the awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for Jewish blood.”

Glynn’s article was printed on October 31, 1919. The allegation was the “threatened holocaust of human life” was occurring after the Great War.[6]

The Chicago Tribune on July 20, 1921 published an article headlined: “Begs America Save 6,000,000 in Russia.” This article claimed that “Russia’s 6 million Jews are facing extermination by massacre. As the famine is spreading, the counter-revolutionary movement is gaining and the Soviet’s control is waning.” The United Jewish Campaign of New York in 1926 set a fundraising goal of $6,000,000 to help the “dying” Jews of Europe. On December 29, 1931 a Montreal newspaper ran a baseless claim from Rabbi Stephen Wise that 6 million Jews faced starvation in southeastern Europe.[7]

The New York Times on May 31, 1936, published an article headlined “Americans Appeal for Jewish Refuge.” This article appealed to Great Britain to “…throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust.”[8] Also in 1936, ((((((Chaim Weizmann)))))) is reported to have said to the Peel Commission:

It is no exaggeration to say that 6 million Jews are sentenced to be imprisoned in this part of the world, where they are unwanted, and for whom the countries are divided into those, where they are unwanted, and those, where they are not admitted.”[9]

On January 9, 1938, the New York Times reported another false claim of 6 million Jewish victims of persecution.[10]

In an article appearing in the June 25, 1940 issue of the Palm Beach Post, Dr. ((((((Nahum Goldmann)))))), who was the administrative committee chairman of the World Jewish Congress, said “if the Nazis should achieve final victory 6 million Jews in Europe are doomed to destruction.” Not a single Jew had been interned and Hitler was still pleading for peace. Yet the so-called Holocaust and the 6 million Jews doomed to destruction was already established.[11]

The number of 6 million appeared again on January 4, 1945, when the Jewish chief of Soviet atrocity propaganda, ((((((Ilya Ehrenburg)))))), stated that this is the number of Jews that had died in World War II.[12] On January 8, 1945, the New York Timespublished an article in which Jacob Lestchinsky, a Communist correspondent for the New York Jewish Daily Forward, estimated that the Jewish population in Europe had been reduced from 9,500,000 in 1939 to 3,500,000. Lestchinsky stated: “Of the 6 million European Jews who have died, 5 million had lived in the countries under Hitler’s occupation.”[13] How Ehrenburg and Lestchinsky came up with their numbers fully four months before the end of the war is anyone’s guess.

Immediately after the end of the war in Europe, an article in the Pittsburg Press on May 13, 1945, headlined “Nazis Destroy 6 Million Jews.”[14] In June 1945, some Zionist leaders were also able to state that 6 million Jews had died during the war. These Zionist leaders made this statement even though the chaos in Europe at the time made any definitive demographic studies impossible.[15]

The figure of 6 million Jews who died in World War II reappeared at the International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg. The number of 6 million used at the IMT is based primarily on the hearsay evidence given by the written deposition of German SS-bureaucrat Wilhelm Höttl.[16] The verbal but never cross-examined testimony of Dieter Wisliceny, who said that 5 million Jews had died during the war, is also used to substantiate the figure of 6 million.[17] These two men claimed that they heard these statements from Adolf Eichmann, but Eichmann later disputed that he ever made these statements.[18] Thus, the prosecution’s claim at the IMT that 6 million Jews died in World War II is based solely on hearsay evidence from two German SS-bureaucrats seeking exemption from punishment whose only source later said that he never made the statement.

The 6 million figure of Jews murdered by Nazi Germany was regarded as a proven fact by the end of the IMT. Sir Hartley Shawcross stated in his closing address that “more than 6 million” Jews were killed by the Germans, and that

…murder [was] conducted like some mass production industry in the gas chambers and the ovens of Auschwitz, Dachau, Treblinka, Buchenwald, Mauthausen, Majdanek and Oranienburg.”[19]

Why 6 Million Is an Overstated Number

Stephen F. Pinter, who was a U.S. War department attorney stationed in Germany after the war, disputed the claim that millions of Jews were murdered by Germany. In a statement made in 1959, he wrote:

From what I was able to determine during six postwar years in Germany and Austria, there were a number of Jews killed, but the figure of a million was certainly never reached. I interviewed thousands of Jews, former inmates of concentration camps in Germany and Austria, and consider myself as well qualified as any man on this subject.”[20]

The eyewitness testimony of Jewish survivors of the German concentration camps is often cited to establish the genocide of 6 million European Jews by Germany. However, the New York Jewish publication Aufbau documents in 1965 that 3,375,000 inmates, the vast majority of whom were Jewish, had survived the German camps and were receiving reparations from Germany.[21] How could there be 3,375,000 survivors of the German concentration camps receiving reparations from Germany 20 years after the war was over if Germany had mass murdered 6 million Jews? ((((((Norman Finkelstein)))))), the author of The Holocaust Industry, quotes his mother as asking,

If everyone who claims to be a Holocaust survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?”[22]

As of January 1984, there were 4.39 million successful individual restitution claims under the terms of the German Federal Compensation Law (BEG) of 1953 and 1956. This law provides monetary compensation to individuals who were “persecuted for political, racial, religious or ideological reasons” by the wartime German government. The great majority of these successful restitution claims were from Jews. ((((((Raul Hilberg)))))) estimates that about two thirds of the allowed claims had been from Jews.[23] Using Hilberg’s conservative estimate would mean that over 2.9 million Jews had received BEG restitution claims by January 1984.

The number of 2.9 million Jewish claimants understates the number of Jews who survived World War II because as of 1985 Jews in Poland, the Soviet Union, Hungary, Romania and Czechoslovakia were not eligible for BEG restitution. Also, some European Jews who survived World War II died before the German BEG restitution law was enacted in 1953. The Atlanta Journal and Constitution newspaper estimates that only half of the Jewish “Holocaust survivors” around the world in 1985 had received restitution under the BEG.[24] If this 50% estimate is accurate, it would mean that approximately 5.8 million European Jews survived German persecution during World War II. Such a large number of surviving Jews is not consistent with a German program of genocide against European Jewry.

The Holocaust story also originally claimed that about 4 million Jews died at Auschwitz-Birkenau. As late as 1988, on page 19 of the official Auschwitz State Museum Guidebook, the official figure of 4 million Jews killed at Auschwitz-Birkenau is affirmed. The 4 million Jews who perished at Auschwitz-Birkenau had also been used by the Soviet State Extraordinary Commission for the Investigation of Nazi Crimes, the Supreme National Tribunal in Poland, and the IMT in Nuremberg. The estimate of 4 million Jews who died at Auschwitz-Birkenau was based on the evidence of hundreds of surviving prisoners and the opinion of experts.

Scholars such as Israeli Holocaust expert ((((((Yehuda Bauer)))))) and Dr. Franciszek Piper decided around 1989 to lower the Auschwitz-Birkenau death count. Dr. Piper states in his book Auschwitz: How Many Perished, “Altogether, a total of about 1,100,000 Jews ended up in Auschwitz-Birkenau in the years 1940-1945.”[25] The number of approximately 1 million Jews who died at Auschwitz-Birkenau is most often used as the official figure today, although some researchers such as Jean-Claude Pressac use much lower estimates. By dramatically lowering the figures, the camp curators were in effect admitting that the Communists and other officials had fabricated numbers that were too inflated to be believable. The 4 million Jewish deaths at Auschwitz-Birkenau had to be lowered to approximately 1 million in order to maintain the credibility of the Holocaust story.

Since the figure of 6 million Jews who died in German camps is based on the 4 million Jews who died at Auschwitz-Birkenau, one would think that the 6 million Jewish deaths in the German camps should be lowered to about 3 million. However, the official number of Jews dying in German concentration camps remains at 6 million even though this is now obviously an overstated number.[26]

Another factor making impossible the official number of 6 million Jews dying in German camps is the fact that thousands of corpses could not possibly have been cremated every day at Auschwitz-Birkenau as is commonly claimed. Ivan Lagacé, manager of a large crematory in Calgary, Canada, testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that based on his experience it would have only been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day at Birkenau. Lagacé stated that the claim that the 46 retorts at Birkenau could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was “ludicrous,” “preposterous” and “beyond the realm of reality.”[27]

The book The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry by Walter Sanning is probably the most scholarly study ever written of 20th century Jewish demography, especially in its analysis of World War II related Jewish population changes. Sanning bases his study almost exclusively on Allied, Zionist, and pro-Zionist West German sources. His analysis includes evidence given by the wartime U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, the Institute of Jewish Affairs, the American Jewish Year Book, official census publications, and the pro-Zionist Institute for Contemporary History in Munich. Sanning keeps his book as free of emotion as possible in order to contribute to a genuine discussion underlying the charge of German genocide.

While it would be impossible for anyone to give an exact number of Jews who died in the German camps during World War II, The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry proves that not anywhere close to 6 million Jews died during the war. Sanning calculates that the worldwide losses suffered by Jews during the Second World War are in the neighborhood of 1¼ million.[28] He estimates that 15,967,000 Jews were alive in 1941 before the German invasion of the Soviet Union, and that the Jewish population was reduced to approximately 14,730,000 after the war.[29]

Importantly, Sanning shows that many of these Jewish losses were caused not by the direct impact of the war or by a program of German genocide, but by Soviet barbarism. Sanning states that hundreds of thousands of Jews lost their lives during the Soviet deportation to the east or in the Siberian labor and concentration camps. Sanning concludes that the food supply, shelter, and clothing provided to the Jewish inmates in the Soviet camps was woefully inadequate, and that medical attention was almost completely lacking.[30] Sanning’s conclusion is supported by Jewish historian Gerald Reitlinger, who states:

“n Southern Siberia the death-rate was very high for…Jews….”[31]

According to Sanning’s analysis, more Jews died in Soviet camps than died in German camps during the Second World War.


Purchase Germany’s War

Read Germany’s War

 Further Reading:

The Greatest Holocaust Trial: Using Adolf Eichmann To Falsify History

Holocaust Eyewitnesses: Is The Testimony Reliable?

Do The Sonderkommandos Prove A Holocaust or Holohoax? Debating Eyewitnesses Accepted By Historians

Why The Holocaust Story Was Invented

ENDNOTES

[1] Encyclopedia Judaica, 1971 edition, s.v. “Holocaust.”

[2] Blech, Benjamin, The Secret of Hebrew Words, Northvale, NJ: Jason ((((((Aronson)))))), 1991, p. 214.

[3] Kollerstrom, Nicholas, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth and Reality, Uckfield, UK, Castle Hill Publishers, 2014, pp. 158-174.

[4] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 198.

[5] King, M. S., The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught About World War 2, 2015, p. 42.

[6] “The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop,” The American Hebrew, Vol. 105, No. 22, New York, Oct. 31, 1919, p. 582.

[7] King, M. S., The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught About World War 2, 2015, pp. 69, 83, 203.

[8] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 199.

[9] Rudolf, Germar, “Holocaust Victims: A Statistical Analysis,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 184.

[10] King, M. S., The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught About World War 2, 2015, p. 112.

[11] Ibid., p. 149.

[12] Hoffmann, Joachim, Stalins Vernichtungskrieg 1941-1945, Munich: Herbig, 1999, pp. 390-393, and in Hoffman, Joachim, Stalin’s War of Extermination 1941-1945, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2001, pp. 189-190, 402-405.

[13] King, M. S., The Bad War: The Truth Never Taught About World War 2, 2015, p. 202.

[14] Bradberry, Benton L., The Myth of German Villainy, Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 199.

[15] Irving, David, Nuremberg: The Last Battle, London: Focal Point, 1996, pp. 61-62.

[16] Rudolf, Germar, “Holocaust Victims: A Statistical Analysis W. Benz and W. N. Sanning—A Comparison,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Thesis and Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 183.

[17] Turly, Mark, Inconvenient History, Vol. 1, No. 3, Winter 2009; see also Taylor, Telford, The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992, p. 248.

[18] Aschenauer, Rudolf (ed.), Ich, Adolf Eichmann, Leoni, Bavaria: Druffel, 1980, pp. 460-461, 473-474, 494.

[19] International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, 42 Vols. Nuremberg: 1947-1949. (The “blue series”) / IMT, Vol. 19, p. 434.

[20] Stephen Pinter letter in the national Catholic weekly, Our Sunday Visitor, June 14, 1959, p. 15.

[21] Stäglich, Wilhelm, Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence, Institute for Historical Review, 1990, p. 31.

[22] Interview with ((((((Norman Finkelstein)))))), by Viktor Frölke, in Salon.com, “Shoah business,” Aug. 30, 2000. See also ((((((Finkelstein)))))), Norman, The Holocaust Industry, New York: Verso, 2000, p. 81.

[23] Hilberg testimony in Zündel case, Toronto District Court, Jan. 18, 1985. Transcript p. 1229.

[24] Atlanta Journal and Constitution, Sunday, March 31, 1985, p. 15A. See also Weber, Mark, “Wilhelm Höttl and the Elusive ‘Six Million’,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 20, No. 5/6, Sept./Dec. 2001, pp. 29-30.

[25] Piper, Franciszek, Auschwitz: How Many Perished, Krakow, 1994, p. 37.

[26] Duke, David, Jewish Supremacism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question, 2ndedition, Mandeville, LA: Free Speech Press, 2007, p. 287.

[27] Canadian Jewish News, Toronto, Feb. 12, 1985, p. M3. See also Kulaszka, Barbara, (ed.), Did Six Million Really Die: Report of Evidence in the Canadian “False News” Trial of Ernst Zündel, Toronto: Samisdat Publishers Ltd., 1992, p. 270.

[28] Sanning, Walter N., The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1990, p. 198.

[29] Ibid., p. 199.

[30] Ibid., pp. 106-109.

[31] Reitlinger, Gerald, The Final Solution, New York: A. S. Barnes & Company, Inc., 1961, p. 499.