It Was A Nightmare To Work In A 90% Female Workplace

by William Adams

William Adams is a European explorer and straightforward intellectual. Rooted in the West, he temporarily leaves home for more exotic excursions. Focuses primarily on Western and East Asian culture, and global economics.

Two years ago in Sweden I had a one-year contract at a 90% female environment, a college workplace dedicated to subjects such as beauty and fashion, where I observed many patterns regarding sex differences.

Before I continue, it is pertinent to add that there is significant variation among women. Even in schools with somewhat lower average grades and test scores, some girls are intelligent, diligent, talented, and showcase agreeable behavior. Some are even relatively competent, easy to work with, and not overly sensitive. With that said, this was a predominantly negative experience for a variety of reasons.

Widespread neuroticism

A constant problem was crying, yelling, and being absent as a consequence of depression and various psychosocial health issues. After a while all I could do is sigh.

Far-reaching coddle

Another troubling component was the never-ending coddle of female students, mainly from the female co-workers. The underlying pedagogic idea is that a safe and pleasant environment will create happy and motivated individuals. Girls need special treatment in order to fully thrive, some suggest.

Although it is indeed true that more authoritarian manners may severely backfire, coddling girls leads to a vicious cycle. If no one draws the line, it will constantly be moved, at the expense of self-discipline and responsibility.

If the principle and teachers take ridiculous claims seriously, mainly from manipulative, histrionic or neurotic girls who are the least likely to make substantial assertions on just about anything, the organization puts itself in a tenuous position.

Additionally, the entire concept of treating people, soon to be adults, as borderline retarded kids appears to be pure nonsense that only further accelerates social decline.

Backstabbing and herd mentality

If only one percent of the females decide that they will not accept that you yelled at them once when they were acting moronic during class, or they have identified “offensive” thoughts about Oriental women on your personal blog, many of their female friends will follow suit and band together. They’ll quickly flock around the female staff, the principle in particular, and even involve parents, with the aim to restore their notion of justice.

Such obstacles can be solved in the end, often through strategic diplomacy and benevolent manipulation, but they will nevertheless create stress and unease.

Male workers hunker down or quit

Two consequences of a female-dominated workplace, where masculinity has to be severely curtailed, are that males hunker down or quit. I saw a gradual decline of the percentage of male workers within the small span of just a year.

When you are not allowed to be yourself, sometimes not even in the slightest, you have to dwell inside a shell. Although it would be quite pathetic to complain about such conditions, a majorly masculine man simply wants to spend time in an environment which does not decrease his overall well-being.

The secondary becomes the primary

Instead of focusing on results, skills, and enabling students and teachers to work undisturbed, silly campaigns became the major focus. For example, for one week everyone had to say “Hello” to just all of whom they happened to meet. Even the students with the weakest intellectual faculties considered this idea, which unsurprisingly a female co-worker came up with, as peculiarly inane and stupid.

Females are generally more emotional and gregarious, whereas men are more rational and assertive. When the female elements become the dominant forces, the environment will change accordlingly.

In summary

To work in such a female-dominated environment may likely have a negative impact on a man’s well-being and is not to be recommended. The quality of work may also decline because of females’ penchant for emotional and interpersonal nonsense. A more balanced demography or a male-dominated environment are obviously preferred.

For more of William Adams’ material, check out his website Syncretic Politics.

 

Lost Argentinian Submarine has 44 People on Board, But Judenpress Only Cares About Female Officer

Men Don’t Matter in the world today, we built everything, but our lives don’t mean shit to our governments or the media.

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
November 20, 2017


Even though November 19th was supposedly “International Men’s Day,” the only name of the 44 trapped crewmen trapped on board the Argentinian submarine the media is releasing is that of the vessel’s only female officer: Eliana Krawczyk.

Women don’t belong in the military. Women should not be put in charge of other people’s lives, or heavy machinery. Krawczyk is the first woman in Latin America to be put in such a position, which makes sense since (what’s left of) Argentina is a Western country with a large Jewish population rapidly exterminating and replacing its whites.

The military of Argentina – once the gatekeeper against corruption and a check on Jewish power – is one of the major institutions where Argentine whites have become a minority in younger generations.

Even if competence wasn’t a factor, putting a female (no matter what she looks like) in a small ship with dozens of men is a recipe for morale problems, in-fighting, etc. We all know she is fucking one or multiple crew men during voyages.

This is a distraction, the battlefield is man’s sacred space.

But even in situations like this, the media promotes its feminist ideology.

AP:

Among the 44 crew members is Eliana Krawczyk, the first female submarine officer in Argentina.

So?

BFMTV:

La jeune femme de 35 ans fait partie des 44 sous-mariniers présents à bord de l’Ara San Juan, le bâtiment porté disparu depuis mercredi.

La réception de quelques signaux satellitaires a ravivé l’espoir de retrouver l’Ara San Juan, le sous-marin dont l’armée argentine est sans nouvelles depuis mercredi. Mais les 44 sous-mariniers restent pour l’heure introuvables. Parmi eux, Eliana Maria Krawczyk, 35 ans, devenue en 2012 la première femme d’Argentine officier de sous-marin et peut-être, selon sa déclaration lors d’une interview, la première d’Amérique latine.

And?

Primera Edicion:

El submarino ARA San Juan perdió todo tipo de comunicación con tierra hace más de 48 horas. Entre sus tripulantes se encuentra Eliana María Krawczyk, la obereña que es pionera en la Armada Argentina por ser la primera mujer submarinista en obtener un cargo de alto rango.

Ahora su familia espera con ansias que la misión de rescate del navío sea exitosa y que las 44 personas a bordo estén a salvo. Hasta el cierre de la edición continuaba la intensa búsqueda en la zona de Puerto Madryn, Chubut.

What about the 43 young men on the submarine, do they have families that miss them or did they pop out of the dirt like a potato?

German, Swedish, Norwegian, Italian, etc press are all profiling this woman and giving her plight special attention. Almost 0 acknowledgement is given to the rest of the crew.

Seeing the situation of this ship, there is a good chance they will die. And nobody will know who they are outside of this one woman.

But that’s not smart of the ideologues in my opinion. What if they can’t find them in time and it turns out the submarine malfunctioned thanks to an error by the “first female officer”?

I won’t be a speculative jerk, but whether that is true or not, let’s not pretend women taking roles like this in the military are anything more than a novelty put out there for propaganda reasons.

Eliana Krawczyk judging from her photos online, skipped on her maternal rite to have children to do this bullshit. If she doesn’t have health-related infertility, where is the honor in that?

That’s why they’re celebrating her.

Man Faces 15 Years In Prison After Recording His Wife Having Sex With Another Man

Female Privilege: “Mom” Who Viciously Beat Her Daughter Gets a Slap on the Wrist and the COLLAPSE of the West

Collage

An Anglo mother who beat her little girl with a spoon got a slap on the wrist in court

Proving modern Anglobitches are far from the oppressed victims of evil white men the corrupt American media makes them out to be – and that women actually have all rights and privileges, and no responsibilities or accountability in an insanely gynocentric culture, here’s the story of a woman who beat her daughter with a spoon, leaving the child with massive bruising and psychological trauma.

What did Lorien Norman get for the vicious attack on her daughter Evie? A slap on the wrist. From Daily Mail:

Evie’s mother walked free from court last week with a good behaviour bond after a judge found the baby’s injuries were ‘likely to resolve’. Despite the [fact her] offence carries a maximum sentence of 13 years Norman did not spend a day behind bars, instead given bond and ordered to pay $500.

The injustice system strikes again. Of course, if a man had beat his daughter like Lorien did, he wouldn’t have got off with such a light penalty. But men don’t get a pussy pass in Anglo culture.

Of course, mommy dearest tried to lie her way out of the crime. (TNMM has repeatedly quoted Schopenhauer when it comes to the innate female talent for lying and deception.)

Initially her mother attempted to claim the youngster had become bruised following a fall in a playground, before later pleading guilty aggravated assault causing harm.

White girls are a special kind of evil. A man doesn’t need much more proof than this.

There’s a reason I typically avoid white girls, and break my back trying to save enough money to make my way off the Anglobitch plantation as often as I can.

I won’t even go into the full story of how the last time I dated a white girl she spent 6 months trying to get me to knock her up and then faked a pregnancy, saying she was carrying my child to try to tie me down on the Anglo-American plantation. She continued with the ruse even after I had left the country to live abroad, just out of spite. It’s scary to think of what she had planned once I had become her child support slave, forced to pay up or go to debtor’s prison.

Gentlemen, there’s ice running though those veins behind cold, calculating blue eyes. Want proof?

Gloating about her escape in the hours after facing the District Court, Norman sent a series of messages to her former partner.

“So I’m not going to jail. What’s your next move?”

“I’ll send you photos in October. Cute family photos of myself, Indi, Evie, my sister, her partner and my nephew, Hudson.”

Of course, dad was treated like garbage. Nothing new here.

Speaking to Daily Mail Australia on Thursday, Mr McMahon said he was “speechless” at the soft sentence handed down.

“I’m disgusted – I’m truly speechless. Where is Evie’s justice?’ he told Daily Mail Australia. I’ve raised both these girls [Evie and India, the second child he had with Norman] single handedly, and she gets 10 months of a sentence that carries a maximum of 13 years!”

Thanks to gyncentrism in modern courts, women know they can behave however they want with impunity. Lorien told Evie’s sperm donor father:

“Even with everyone on social media against me, I still made it. And I’ll be having part custody within a year.”

If you want to know why white people are dying off en masse, look no further than white women. What man wants to have kids that will be taken away from him with evil like this skulking around society, enjoying nearly total privilege?

The end can’t come soon enough for this culture’s dominance on the world stage. The world is ready for something new. Something with less estrogen, gynocentrism, and overt female malice.

More Proof Feminism Left American Women Broke: They’re Selling Sex on Dating Apps

people-2562438_1280

The realities of the Anglo-American dating and mating markets continue to defy the culture’s Hallmark card mental imagery it foists upon millions

In the past week we’ve already established the retail collapse and the education bubble are directly tied to feminism. This morally bankrupt ideology is also financially bankrupting American women, who remain powerless against the powers of feminist persuasion.

Even as their lives turn to shit as a result of the feted fantasies of feminism, they adhere to its doxy like mindless lemmings. Modern American women are hostile, degenerate, government dependents or wage slaves of the corporate establishment, alone, broke, and statistically sterile, yet they think they’re “empowered” in ways their grandmothers never dreamed of.

The delusion is almost beyond belief. But wait, there’s more.

Witness, mainstream dating apps in major cities filled with women who have dispensed with the guise of “Looking for Mr. Right” altogether. (Which any man experienced with women knows is a ruse, anyway.) Now, Anglo-American females are going directly for the red meat: trading sex for money. Money they “need” since Big Daddy Government only doles out gibsmedats in paltry amounts, the corporate life only yields women a basic existence, and men are wising up to the child support annuity and frivorce lottery games hoes play.

Incidentally, sex for resources is the foundation of the human sexual market. TNMM has reported in the past that all marriages (and relationshits) are at their core, buried under layers of sophistry, sex for resources. (If not cash, the promise of present or future male utility.) We’ve also shown how even females in the animal kingdom trade sex for resources.

That’s just how it works. Every woman has her price. It is what it is. This state of affairs has been the norm since time immemorial, but in dystopian modern times the state has rendered men useless to women as it cucks them by providing women with resources it steals from Beta males. This is the chief reason the dating and mating markets have become completely dysfunctional in Anglo America.

Now, we have another confirmation of this idea as I did some poking around on POF, OkCupid, and Badoo dating apps, investigating the new depths our society has sunk to. It seems the dating market in America has reached an interesting new low. I didn’t go in looking for the conclusions I’m about to draw; rather these findings came up organically as I searched for eligible ladies while traveling around America.

I sent out a flurry of messages to women in several major American cities the past few weeks: New York City, Atlanta, and Chicago. At least 50% of the time, women would respond back with either innuendo the street savvy man knows meant they were looking to trade sex for money, or would send back unmistakable replies like these:

  • “$$$$”
  • “60/100/150” meaning the cost in dollars of different intervals of time for sexual encounters with her. $60 for 15 minutes, $100 for 30 minutes, $150 for 60 minutes, etc.
  • “I’m looking for a sugar daddy.”

So, once again we find feminism has not empowered women but weakened them. It’s turning them into hoes.

But, why dating apps? Because the American Police State leviathan regularly terrorizes its sex-hungry populace with constant “stings” on victimless crimes like when Beta males (loathed and turned into pariahs in modern Anglo America) find a willing ho on Backpage. A conviction for soliciting for prostitution could render a hapless corporate worker drone destitute in this age of credentialism.

Read: You dumbfuck police, useful idiots of the power structure that you are, some things aren’t going away. Like the world’s oldest profession. Your ham-fisted stings just push this normal female behavior underground onto the black market.

Personally, I believe prostitution should be legalized. The ban on sex for hire needs to end along with other pseudo-moral prohibitions foisted upon the populace by a totally immoral American government. I see nothing wrong with it, especially since it dispenses with the ridiculous façade dating has become in a post-feminist world. Feminism has exposed the reality of women and the sexual market, as a direct “sex for resources” transaction is the default setting in an uncivilized society.

Meaning, modern women just want a man around long enough to extract sufficient cash from him to power their next fix of materialism or recreational drugs.

The fact women are now selling themselves on mainstream dating apps – of their own volition – proves the matrix is beyond delusional when it purports to “protect” women from evil sexual predators by rounding up “Johns” in prostitution stings around the U.S. In reality, the men they’re rounding up are timid and/or lonesome Beta males left out in the cold, masturbating ad nauseum post-feminism.

The reality is, women make the rules for sex in any society. Men only follow them. The rules used to be sex for marriage or commitment. But now, the rules have returned to their default setting of overt sex for cash. (Rather than clandestine sex for cash via marriage/commitment.)

This isn’t new knowledge. Our society has just become dysfunctional and insane as a result of social engineering and Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))). The lessons about women and sexuality we are learning anew – the hard way – were written down in Bronze Age texts long ago.

If a woman bothers to respond to you at all these days on dating apps, there’s at least a decent shot she’s finally stopped pretending she’s interested in you as a human being, and like Capital One, is interested in “What’s in your wallet?” Have you noticed this latest social trend in your city?

Women, Unsecured Debt and the Woes of the Anglosphere

Feminism and the financial chaos left in its wake has proven women cannot remain solvent without men in their lives

Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.

RF recently posted an interesting article (The Retail Collapse) on the decline of retail stores and shopping malls in the US. Let me point out that exactly the same phenomenon has beset Britain in recent years: C&A, Woolworths, BHS, Comet, Blockbuster and Phones4U have all ‘gone West’ since the Millennium. And other retailers have had to write-off hundreds of stores just to survive. RF’s plausible argument is that women – society’s inveterate shoppers – now lack the disposable wealth to indulge their dubious passion. The jobs they hold are generally not very remunerative; and men are no longer prepared to support their profligate ways.

This incisive analysis is also supported by the figures on female debt. Most Anglo-American debtors are women, by a considerable margin; and much of their debt arises from paying expensive college fees for worthless qualifications in the arts and humanities. From Fortune magazine:

Women are now the majority on college campuses across the United States—representing 56% of all students enrolled as of fall 2016. And according to a new report, they’re also shouldering the lion’s share of the nation’s student debt problem.

A report by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) found that on average, women hold $833 billion—or almost two-thirds—of the country’s $1.3-trillion student debt, compared to the $477 billion that men hold.

Overall, after completing a bach­elor’s degree, women’s average accrued student debt is about $1,500 greater than men’s. African American women take on more student debt than any other group of women, with an average of $30,000.

In the UK, most college loans are never repaid and most graduates get jobs they could have had after leaving high school. In sum, the majority of students pursue higher education out of snobbery (it is still mistakenly considered ‘middle class’), outmoded parental expectations and the (largely false) promise of hedonistic excess.

Reality soon bites, however. Newly armed with irrelevant qualifications, the average college graduate quickly learns that a line of computer code outweighs a million lines of poetry. Now, culture is a wonderful thing and yes, it should be studied and transmitted to succeeding generations. But do we really need half the population studying it? Besides, times were when the humanities were hardcore disciplines requiring mastery of ancient languages and intimate knowledge of the great canonical works of western civilization. Since the Sixties counter-culture infiltrated academia, those rigorous days are long gone; any clown can do Cultural Studies.

In many ways, the problem of student debt arises from a long-standing mismatch between reality and expectation. The western worldview is still rooted in the post-War era, an age of unprecedented prosperity and opportunity. In those days, going to college automatically made someone ‘middle class’ for life. Although that era ended in 1974, it continues to define the West’s general outlook – a legacy worldview, if you will. Even today, most middle aged people still assume that a college degree in any subject from any institution will confer privileged status on their offspring. Indeed, the whole ‘happy families’ narrative to which Tradcon politicians cling is also a legacy of those times. These mistaken beliefs are incredibly stubborn and persistent, something only fully apparent to someone from a non-western cultural heritage.

And in many ways the misty-eyed nostalgia for those golden years is understandable: they were times of unprecedented opportunity for ordinary Brits and Americans. However, this nostalgia has become problematic now the West faces tough competition from regions armed with higher IQs and the Confucian work ethic.

Anglosphere nations are so maladjusted to existing conditions that young people can no longer expect rational guidance from their elders. This is especially true for young men, whose parents told them ‘the right girl’ would happen along if they conformed to societal expectations; or that girls prefer ‘nice guys’ to criminal thugs. Indeed, the Manosphere in all its glory arose to fill this ‘advice gap’ that yawns like a crevasse in the lives of younger men.

But the post-War legacy hobbles women, too. Armed with pointless degrees in finger painting and Womyn’s Studies, they waste their prime years riding the thug carousel (or snarled in sterile hyper-hypergamy) and shuffling papers in a ‘beauty sinecure’ (most companies keep a few babes around as morale boosters, even today). When their Wall approaches, most ‘educated’ women hastily revert to the post-War Tradcon narrative: surely Prince Beta will ride up on his white charger, write off her debts and save her ageing ass with a wave of his credit card?

Sadly, it ain’t happening. Thanks to the Manosphere, Prince Beta knows the score. Besides, with sex tourism booming in South America, Slavic Europe and the Far East, he needs dusty Anglo tail like he needs a kick in the nuts. And so our crusty Anglobitch stumbles towards middle age, accruing ever more debt, her SMV sinking with each passing year. We know where this ends: a broken-down cat lady abusing opiates on Welfare, renting her rancid ass out to gammas for the price of her next fix. The economic repercussions will be seismic in the decades to come.

I don’t claim to be an economist but even I can see that if a huge proportion of women take out massive loans they can never repay, someone somewhere must be getting shafted. Limiting college access would probably go some way to fixing things, as would expanding intermediate technical education. However, that would greatly reduce female enrolment rates – complete anathema in the gynocentric Anglosphere. In any case, American women must believe they are ‘middle class’ – a superior caste – for the post-feminist narrative to work. Even if this ‘status’ is illusionary, the illusion has to be sustained to keep females ‘onside’; an absolute imperative in our gynocentric civilization.

Ultimately, it is hard not to link the rise of Anglo-American feminism to the Anglosphere’s economic woes. Permitting trillions of dollars of unsecured debt so that mediocre Anglo princesses can feel successful, superior and ‘middle class’ is totally irrational in the competitive twenty-first century. This mass pandering to women first began in the prosperous post-War era, and doubtless hastened its end.

Essentially, women are clowns; and building societies around their infantile whims is a recipe for disaster. By nature, women are not productive; they cannot create, build or innovate. Though many of them study the arts and humanities, their contributions to these fields amount to zero. Jurisprudence, the only ‘serious’ field where they outnumber men, predictably requires no imagination. However, law does allow women to indulge their atavistic yearnings for social destruction and systemized misandry, abetted by the Pharisaic Anglo-American obsession with punitive legalism.

In Blade Runner 2049, can a relationship with a hologram be meaningful?

‘We are defined by what we love’

Photo: Alcon Entertainment

In conventional love stories, boy meets girl, boy falls for girl, girl falls for boy, and some pivotal plot point happens. Unless there’s a sequel, we assume that afterward, they live happily and inconsequentially ever after. But, what if in the future, it’s boy designs girl? In Blade Runner 2049, Officer K (Ryan Gosling) lives with his AI hologram companion Joi, who was manufactured by Wallace Corp and tailored as the perfect companion. Her product tagline is, “Everything you want to see. Everything you want to hear.”

Spoilers ahead for Blade Runner 2049.

Screenwriter ((((((((((((((((((Michael Green)))))))))))))))))) told The Thrillist, “I knew we’d be telling the story of his character’s aspiration toward ascension, so since we are defined by what we love, what he loved needed a story as well. Now, if that story is merely a projection of his fantasies combined with excellent programming, or if she is a ‘special’ version of herself who became something more because she was involved with someone unique — that’s something I hope people struggle with. When he sees the advertisement for a different Joi at the end… it hurts my feelings. And a Blade Runner film should hurt one’s feelings.”

K is an artificial person known as a replicant, but he isn’t immune to loneliness and longing. And though he and Joi seem to love each other, the tragedy lies in the illusion. If something has the illusion of being meaningful, is it still meaningful? The idea of what’s “real” and what’s not is blurred in Blade Runner 2049’s love story, but it’s clear that K takes comfort from Joi’s presence, and that she makes him feel like an individual. She gives him a human name, and with it, some sense of purpose and belief that he’s more than what he’s been designed to do. From an outside perspective, their relationship is an illusion, but it’s real to K — which means it’s real, period.

Like Theodore, the main protagonist in ((((((((((((((((((Spike Jonze))))))))))))))))))’s acclaimed Her, K projects his desires onto an AI-powered woman named Samantha, but he still derives real emotion and positive personal meaning from their relationship. It’s a paradox: he’s feeling what the AI is designed to make him feel, but the feelings still have meaning. And even if his relationship with Samantha, or K’s with Joi, is based on something artificial and designed, they still have lasting real-world consequences. K’s love gives him a purpose that drives his choices in ways with long-term ramifications for many other people.

There’s a kind of underlying hope in Blade Runner 2049 that Joi is growing to be more than her programming — that she loves K of her own agency, and isn’t an empty fantasy. Her caring behavior when he’s hurt, or when her existence might threaten his, suggests that she’s devoted to him. When her data is destroyed, K realizes how she defined him. The ascension Green references comes as a surprise to him, but it leads him to commit to the higher purpose of saving Deckard and reuniting him with his daughter. K molds Joi into what he wants her to be, but she molds him in return. They both seem to be moving beyond their programming, because of their love for each other. Their relationship — between an android boy and a holographic girl, each looking to be something more — makes for one of the most thought-provoking pairings in recent science fiction.

On another note:

The Left want to abandon math.

The Road to Matriarchy (TFM 42O)

Clintons Self-Destruct In Glorious Corruption Scandal

After decades of putting up with these people, who were the poster children of the 1968 revolution as they gained power in the early 1990s, America may finally be free of the Clintons as the Uranium One scandal, ignored by the media, finally detonates in their faces.

The Clintons represented 1968 as it wanted to see itself: not a wild bacchanal of people attempting to avoid the sterile 1950s world by creating an even more selfish and manipulative one, but as an expression of “freedom” and “rights” — because what else is acceptable to express in a democracy? — guided by people who turned out to look relatively normal, suburban and middle class.

We were all creeped out by Bill. It was not that he had an affair in office, as surely he was not the first president to do so, but that he picked a Generation X kid who was obviously overweight and thus underconfident. When you are president, you cheat on your wife with supermodels. You do not use the vulnerable, essentially victimizing them. Yet the Left was silent on that issue.

We also felt some reservations about The Clinton Foundation, which seemed like the classic scam where the politician says he cannot help you, but if you make a donation to his brother, he will reconsider your case. It is just third-world corruption made genteel in appearance, but what else would we expect from the 1968ers, who made selfishness and lust into political values?

Then there were clear abuses of power like Benghazi, where either through incompetence or malignant neglect, Hillary Clinton left Americans in the field to die. That echoed the approach Bill Clinton had taken in Somalia, where he stranded American servicemen by refusing to give them the support they needed. For the Clintons, the rest of us are a means-to-the-end of the Clintons’ wealth, power and influence.

Clearly there were signs of Clinton fatigue in this last election cycle. Younger voters preferred Bernie Sanders because he simply admitted that the Democratic platform was socialism and was honest about it, where Hillary Clinton chose a feminist-based approach which attempted to incorporate other minorities as a series of footnotes. But she bullied her way in there, probably by threatening to release her files on the other Democratic operatives, who all appear to be corrupt as well.

We should face the fact that any ideology which promises Utopian absolutes is a license to steal. No one honest will claim to be able to “solve” poverty, for example, or end racial tension, since humans disliking other groups has been a cornerstone of human behavior since the dawn of time. Nor does anyone sane talk about equality as anything but equality of birth, which is what the founding fathers referred to, as a means of correcting the then already-prevalent idea that government should create equality. The founders argued instead that nature/God/gods created equality and rights, and that government should be restricted from attempting to alter that condition. No one sane talks about spreading democracy to a world that clearly does not want it. But insanity sells because it is easier than sanity and makes us have warm feelings, and for most people, when the group has warm feelings, they feel personally safe. Time after time, they elect charlatans who then steal everything they can.

And the Clintons, it seems, were more successful than most, ending up many times multimillionaires through the power they found in office.

But now, it seems, a life of crime has caught up with them:

On Tuesday, two House investigative committees announced they would start looking into the questionable Uranium One deal that Clinton approved while serving as the nation’s top diplomat — a deal that delivered effective control of 20% of the U.S.’ uranium mining assets to Russia’s state-owned Rosatom, and led to millions of dollars in “donations” to the family Clinton Foundation.

…Under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, the State Department has processed some 32,000 pages of Hillary Clinton’s emails but, The Daily Caller reports, has “released a small fraction of those.” There are still some 40,000 other pages to be “processed,” which could take years.

…The FBI ultimately arrested and deported a 10-person Russian spy ring, including a “Cynthia Murphy” who, in 2010, had edged perilously close to Hillary’s State Department circles through a job she held with a leading Democratic financier.

Unlike the Trump dossier which the DNC purchased to use as a weapon in the 2016 presidential campaign, this shows us actual evidence with connections on both sides. If Russia intervened in the American election, and benefited Donald J. Trump, that is not evidence of corruption unless we can show the quid-pro-quo that is the hallmark of this kind of crime, essentially a trading of favors for money. But with the Clintons, we now have several instances of this.

It is only fitting that the hippies who brought us the horrors of 1968 go out in a blaze of corruption, perversion, incompetence and degradation as the Clintons are. There is a lesson here: whoever promises a world without consequences, and tells us that the obvious rules of reality do not exist, is not a saviour but a Satan, come to deceive us and take everything we have.