On Women in the Alt-Right

Best Comment:

Women should definitely be in the movement. But their problem is their refusal to acknowledge today’s mismatch between authority and responsibility. Today, women are given authority and rights without responsibility. They can falsely accuse men of rape, and get away with it. They take more than half a man’s assets, and his children, during a divorce. The laws favor women over men, even though women aren’t held to the same levels of responsibility as men are. And there are so many privileges and services available to women in society and not men eg. domestic helplines, reproductive services, affirmative action. Women in the alt-right, and the alt-right in general, don’t address any of these problems. These problems need to be addressed, because they are a big contributing factor to the current sorry state of the west. The faster these problems are done away with, the faster we can get on track to saving the west.

Now a little reality check from DS:

Against Camwhore Nationalism

Women offer nothing to the Alt-Right other than camwhoring. Because women are stupid as shit. They don’t have ideas.

They listen to men’s ideas, then repeat them on video, with varying degrees of sexiness. Mostly, this is watched by men who already believe what is on the videos, because they like to pretend the female is their girlfriend (even if they don’t consciously know they’re doing that, that is the psychological process involved – the subconscious mind doesn’t have a function to process the concept that a person on an LED screen in front of you is not actually in front of you, talking directly to you). And yes, they masturbate to these videos.

The argument is that “new people will be brought into the movement” by these whores because they will click on a video with a woman and realize how smart she is. I have repeatedly called bullshit on this. No one – not even bugmen – genuinely believe women have something important or interesting to say. Sure, it is technically possible that they click on a video and hear something cited as a fact and Google it. But 99% of the clicks on these “trad chick” videos are regular watchers who are involved in a fantasy involving the girl. That is who is watching the videos, that is who is doing the donating.

The donating – look. Men have a desire to give money to women. It is an actual biological drive.

There is a dopamine rush when you go out with a woman and she tries to pay for her coffee or drinks and you insist she puts away her wallet. This is basic primitive behavior. It’s the same dopamine rush cavemen got laying a stag at the feet of a woman.

“I have killed an animal, I will feed it to this female, she will give me access to her vagina through which I can reproduce my genes.”

This is followed by: “she is my vessel of reproduction and the keeper of those I will produce, my duty is to defend.”

It is a fundamental aspect of male identity – nigh the most fundamental, second only to his ability to be accepted and valued by the men of the tribe – to be able to provide materially for and physically protect a woman.

NOTE: In fact, a woman knows that it is
emasculating to a man to not be able to pay for her. And it is a shit
test for her to attempt to pay - she is testing you. Usually I've been
pretty good at controlling for skankism, but at least once in my life, I
went on a date with a woman who made a big thing of paying -
calculating what exactly she ate and calling the waiter over and making
him take the money. I left enough money to cover the bill and a generous
tip on the table and got up and walked out. I refused to see her again
(and believe me, she wanted to). Of course, that situation is only
possible under feminism, where the state, through welfare and
affirmative action programs, forcibly transfers male wealth to females.

Just so, it is a woman’s biological function to receive these resources. A bitch gotta eat, and she sure as fuck isn’t killing a deer herself. Just as she sure as fuck isn’t coming up with any interesting ideas today.

This camwhore situation, and the amount of money these women are making by leeching off of a political movement, as you fight to protect them, is a perversion of basic biological drives.

But I don’t blame these whores. I blame you, bro. You’re the one with the ability to rationally reflect on your biological drives and alter your behavior accordingly.

“BUT WE NEED WOMEN IN THE MOVEMENT!!!!!1111”

The alt-bugman response is always that I am “alienating women” and that “we need them in the movement.”

It is the worst form of snakelike Freudian horseshit to call someone who questions women’s right to influence a male space a homosexual or otherwise question their masculinity. It is horseshit because it is a lie. But if we are going to psychoanalyze people over their positions on this issue, then let me tell you something: when you say “if we don’t pander to women, we will alienate them,” you are effectively screaming “I AM A MAN-VIRGIN” to anyone who knows shit about women.

And you all know that. It’s your life. You know what’s going on in it. Maybe you’re not literally a virgin – maybe you’ve had one or two girlfriends, maybe you’ve gotten lucky on a drunk bitch a few times, but you are not Chad. If you were Chad, you would know that the interest of women has a direct inverse correlation to your interest in them.

good women vs. bad women

There is also a conflation by Alt-Right feminists between camwhores and women who support the movement – the term “women in the movement” applies to both. Obviously, maximizing the number of women who support the movement should be a goal. Not a top goal – that is, not a goal that we sacrifice other more pressing priorities for – but something we should be aware of. Clearly, the easiest way to do this is by having the men in the Alt-Right have girlfriends and wives. Unless the bitch is a filthy godless whore and the man a complete cuck and their relationship on the highway to collapse, women will take on the political beliefs of a permanent partner. To that point, if we were extremely concerned about “women in the movement,” we would be doing two things:

  • Helping guys already in the movement get girlfriends and wives
  • Directing messaging more toward men who already have girlfriends and wives (we have more single men than partnered men in the movement)

But the assumption is always “single female supporters,” which demonstrates how fucking dishonest the alt-bugmen are. Just as dishonest as any other form of male feminist pervert. They are trying to use the movement as a singles club, rather than an engine of political revolution. Of course, if you could pin down a male Alt-Right feminist – protip: you can’t, because they are slimy, gelatinous creatures – they would claim that “it can be both” – I am saying no, it can’t be both, and if you can’t already meet women, you aren’t going to be able to meet women in our political movement.

But okay.

Sure.

Let’s talk about single women.

This website, The Daily Stormer, where my official position on women is “they deserve to be locked in cages,” has more single young female readers than any other Alt-Right site. That is an empirical fact.

This is because women are drawn to political ideologies that don’t pander to them for the same reasons they are drawn to individual men who don’t pander to them:

  • They are interested in gaining acceptance from men who don’t immediately offer it
  • Not acting as though you need women is a sign you have something to offer women
  • A lack of pandering is a sign of strength, meaning that you would be able to provide good genes and physical resources
  • Women in their sexual prime – white women in particular – tend to have a sexual fixation with men who either are or are perceived as dangerous and potentially violent, rather than kind and caring

If you don’t already know all that, you are not doing well with women in your personal life, and what you are trying to do by promoting them in the Alt-Right is trying to increase your chances of getting laid by applying your failed personal seduction strategy to a political movement.

And it is fucking pathetic.

I see this shit on social media, and this is what it looks like to me:

That is you, alt-bugman.

You are something which is fundamentally repulsive on a visceral level to emotionally developed, self-respecting adult males.

Leftism and the Single Skank: A Hard Wall of Material Resource Reality

As long as the political left has the ability to use force to take the resources of men and hand them over to women, single women are overwhelmingly going to support the political left.

That’s a hard fact.

There is a small amount of wiggle room, of course. But the only appeal you are going to be able to muster is a sex appeal. Not an offer of something. The left already offers everything.

And no – “we’ll give you a male provider so you can settle down and have children” is not an offer. Women already have the option of doing that. All young women in modern society have the option of finding a male of average sexual market value with enough money to pay for them to have children if they were to make a decision to do that. Instead, they chase Chad cock and claim that “men don’t want to commit” – speaking of the high value men who will fuck them one night and then not return their texts. Because they all think they deserve the highest value man available, that he should commit to them, and anything less is not enough.

However, if I’m playing the game and answering the “single female appeal” question: by taking a masculine approach to our political movement, we’re going to maximize the number of women who want to support it – and that appeal INCREASES if we are actively trolling and silencing camwhores who are attempting to infiltrate us to get attention and money, as it is a demonstration of principled masculine strength.

Its not enough that women join our movement, they must denounce feminist bullshit wherever they see it, and attack women who don’t fucking get it.

I am right about this and if you disagree with me you are wrong.

Period.

The alt-bugmen pushing “women in the movement” have never and will never respond to any of the points I just made, regardless of the fact that I’ve been making the same points for years. They will just keep screaming that I’m “alienating women,” and then question my masculinity. Because they are maggots who do not want to engage in the masculine activity of using logic to come to reasoned conclusions.

When “you’re just a loser who can’t get laid” doesn’t work, they pivot (note: this is a real tweet from an alt-bugman trying to attack me as a #WeakWhiteMan for refusing to embrace female empowerment). 

tfw

And look. I’m not trying to shit on betas. I am trying to protect you, as my brothers, just as much as I’m trying to protect this movement.

You had single mothers or weak beta fathers, and you need to recover.

That’s what I’m here to help you with, bro.

You’re not doing yourself any favors by going to bat for these whores.

And it isn’t going to get you laid.

“Pity fucks” by women – which is the only thing you could possibly be going for as a white knight – are largely a myth. They are usually mislabeled “drunk accidental fucks” (which are now being widely mislabeled as “rape,” btw – so be careful out there, white knights).

And I’ll end with this: if you are a beta white knight – and if you are pushing this “women in the movement” horseshit and are older than 14, you are – you need to deal with your testosterone levels.

A human being’s thoughts and emotions exist in a mushy organ that functions on chemicals, and different chemicals being input into this organ produce different thoughts and emotions. That is the entire “bugman” concept – they are pudgy, low-muscle mass wormlike “men,” and this is directly correlated to their worldview.

The basic rule is that fat on your body lowers testosterone levels and muscle on your body increases it. You don’t have to be huge super-muscleman, but getting lean and fit – which is easiest through strength training, and through removing processed foods (especially grains, including beer) from your diet – will make your thoughts and feelings make a lot more sense.

You won’t just get rid of this “need women in the movement” bugman horseshit, but you’ll do better with women in your personal life. You’ll also do better professionally, creatively and just do better at life generally.

A political movement is made up of individuals, and just as I want our political movement to succeed, I want all of you to succeed as individuals. Everything I write here I write with that in mind.

You’re all my brothers, regardless of whether or not you’ve got a bad case of the thirst.

And if you’re thirsty, I know this article was tough. But it is tough love.

We’re all in this together.

Hail Victory.

 

UK: Two Moslems Jailed for Acid Attacks

Tim Hort
Daily Stormer
December 10, 2017

Joshua Jordan, Sadik Kamara.

Can you remember a time when acid attacks in the west weren’t something anyone ever thought about?

The Journal:

TWO LONDON MEN have been jailed for a combined 28 years after two attacks on two women in a crime spree earlier this year.

Joshua Jordan and Sadik Kamara were today sentenced to 14 years each for the March attacks that were committed as part of a gang robbery.

The court had heard that Kamara, who is a well established rap artist under the name ‘Trizzy Trapz’, and Jordan travelled from Newham to Hackney to commit the robberies on Friday 10 March.

In the first attack, the pair were part of a gang of five that targeted a supermarket after staking it out for the evening. A woman in her 50s was the lone shopkeeper in the store when they entered.

Trump Wall: Prototype Tests Begin

Source: newobserveronline.com

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has started with physical tests of the  “Trump Wall” border prototypes as part of the final determination of which build will be best able to withstand invasion attempts from Mexico.

The official start of the testing period was November 27, but physical tests began this past week, Carlos Diaz, CBP’s public affairs branch chief for the southwest border told ABC radio.

The physical testing will include attempts to scale and breach the prototypes with jackhammers, saws and hydraulic tools.

During the procurement process, the companies were required to build the walls at least 6 feet deep. The depth of the walls was evaluated during the construction process, according to Diaz.

Read the rest at The New Observer.

Swedish State TV Brings on Old Hags to Talk About Farting Out Semen

Roy Batty

Daily Stormer
December 10, 2017

There are times when I can’t even believe what I am seeing. I mean, I know things are bad, but sometimes you forget. You go about your day, spend some time with the folks for the holidays, get some Pad Thai and think, “hey, its not so bad, really.”

I knew a guy that worked in Africa. He was a total libshit, but he would tell me that the shit he saw there never even gets reported.

Why?

No one would even believe what these ‘people’ get up to in Africa if they reported it in the West. I’m talking amputating limbs and eating them for magical cures, fucking pigmy chieftans in the ass (also for magical cures), and designated men ‘hyenas’ that pop all the girls cherries in a village when they hit 12.

But now I’m at that same level with Sweden.

No one even believes me anymore.

Like what if I told them about this:

You know, that state sponsored TV has a show talking about farting out cum loads from your ass and thinks that this is instructional for young girls.

I mean, try and put yourself in a basic bitch normie conservative’s shoes.

He would not believe you. And even if he saw it, he wouldn’t know how to respond. He might ask for additional proof. And then you’d show him what the producers of the show themselves said.

(in video description)

”In the talk show: ”Really good sex – now also for girls” Amanda, Anna and Isabelle speak about their common interest – exciting, fun and good sex. Is it really nice to have sex to music, what’s the easiest way to get a ”fountain orgasm”, and in what position is it nicest? We believe that girls have a great neeed to relate to and be inspired by others experience of fun and enjoyable sex. Throughout history female sexuality has been constructed as something passive and the male [sexuality] as something active, which has led to female sexuality being labelled as shameful, to be controlled and be tabu. Examples of ”slut-shaming” are normal even today. Many women have also been exposed to different forms of sexual harassment, to a degree that has become painfully clear during #metoo Because society to a certain degree silences girls sexuality, and teache women to feel shame for being horny, many have a difficult time fully enjoying sex. Harassment and assault can complicate the access to sexual feelings and hornyness further. We think it is high time that women are allowed to be the center of sex and are allowed to speak freely instead. In ”Really good sex”, different poses, elevetaro sex, the first masturbation session, and sexual fantasies at the gynecologist are discussed. Threesomes, anal sex, and which form of hornyness is greatest – the one with new or old partners? Women rarely speak like that about sex on television – it is even more common that they are portrayed as sexual objects. We believe that personal stories, which are neither hard facts or dramatized fiction, fills a hole when it comes to sex programs. Our hope is that the program can led to more women daring to like sex without feeling shame, and maybe even having better sex. If not, it’s wonderful to be able to relate to and laugh at sex-anecdotes. Because, as Isabelle says in the program. ”It’s fun to talk about fucking!” Stina Schedwin, executive producer at SVT Edit”

Look, I’m not a prude by any means.

But this has practically nothing to do with sex whatsoever. This has to do with public humiliation, and with the Jews trying to pull us down to the level of niggers.

They try to couch it in trendy, empowering, feminist poop-dick talk, but that’s what it really is. They get a kick out of seeing us like this. When we’re talking about Brown Gold or whatever, is when the Jews start cackling their loudest.

And non-Whites see this too.

What do you think they think of us? It’s embarrassing to be quite honest fam. It’s like having a stranger see you wash your dirty underwear and see the shart stains from the Chipotle you had earlier in the day.

Fuck this gay earth, fam. Weimar had nothing on this.

I’m just happy that this is all being documented in ways that would have been impossible 100 years ago. We’re never going to forgive, and we’re never going to forget.

Ethics and Wotanism

Ethics and Wotanism

By Ron McVan

Man is The Animal who can reflect. Like other animals, no doubt, he spends much of his time in merely reacting to the pressures and urgencies of his environment. But being a man he has moments also of conscious stock-taking, when he becomes aware not only of his world but of himself confronting his world, evaluating it, and making choices with regard to it. It is this ability to know himself and on the basis of self-knowledge to make evaluations and reflective choices that differentiates man from his subhuman cousins.” ~ Philip Wheelwright

The roots of philosophical ethics stretch back to ancient Greece. Socrates and a group of teachers from ancient Athens known as the ‘Sophists’ are said to be the first moral philosophers in Western Civilization.

In the field of ethics one begins to wrestle with systematic choices of right and wrong. What is right for some may be wrong for others, and so it is that the philosophy of ethics can often challenge ones conceptions and perceptions towards the actual validities of its concepts of what is actually bad and what is the highest good. Ethics is often defined as the study of morality, but a more detailed and revealing definition is provided by John Deigh in his book “Introduction To Ethics”. Ethical theory calls for moral practice, and the full meaning of ethics becomes intelligible only as we translate theories into moral principles that can be made effective forces in the struggle between what we determine to be bad in essence and towards that which is good in the truest sense. A person’s choice of ethics essentially forms an individual’s personal behavior throughout their brief living life on earth, as well as the societies of which they are a part as a whole. So many people go through their everyday lives with no real conscious moral guidelines of right and wrong firmly established, not much different than an a common animal. Religions seem to all provide a system of ethics fixed in place but some individuals feel the need to lessen the demands or perhaps take them to a further or higher degree. The function of ethics is to provide a simple and sure rule by which moral problems can be ‘solved.’ An active intelligence revolts against whatever doctrine claims to utter the last word on any matter. In ethics proper the standpoint taken is (as far as humanly possible) that of an ideal humanity capable of rising above the common limitations of time and place.

The problems of ethics turn chiefly on the following conceptions: (1) the highest good of human conduct, or its ultimate ideal aim, which may serve as the ultimate standard of right conduct; (2) the origin or source of our knowledge of the highest good or of right and wrong; (3) the sanctions of moral conduct; and (4) the motives that prompt right conduct. Another problem discussed by moral philosophers is that of the freedom of the will.

Ethics is a study of what are good and bad ends to pursue in life and what it is right and wrong to do in the conduct of life. It is therefore above all a practical discipline. Its primary aim is to determine how one ought to live and what actions one ought to do in the conduct of one’s life.” ~ John Deigh

To unravel the roles concerning both good and evil among human kind we shall now go to Plato. Samuel Enoch Stumpf, in his book “Socrates To Sartre, A History Of Philosophy” states that “throughout Plato’s account of the moral experience of men, Plato alternates between an optimistic view of man’s capacity for virtue and a rather negative opinion about whether men will fulfill their potentiality for virtue. This double attitude rests upon Plato’s theory of moral evil. We have already said that evil or vice is caused by ignorance, by false knowledge.

False knowledge occurs when the passions influence the reason to think that what appears to bring happiness will do so, although in reality it cannot. When the appetites thus overcome the reason, the unity of the soul is adversely affected. While there is still a unity, this new unity of the soul is inverted, since now the reason is subordinated to the appetites and has thereby lost its rightful place. What makes it possible for this disordered unity to occur, or what makes false knowledge possible? In short, what is the cause of moral evil?

The cause of evil is discovered in the very nature of the soul and in the relation of the soul to the body. Before it enters the body, says Plato, the soul has a prior existence. As we have seen, the soul has two main parts, the rational and the irrational. This irrational part in turn is made up of two sections, the spirit and the appetites. Each of the two original parts has a different origin. The rational part of the soul is created by the Demiurge out of the same receptacle as the World Soul, whereas the irrational part is created by the celestial gods, who also form the body. Thus even before it enters the body, the soul is composed of two different kinds of ingredients. In the soul’s prior existence, the rational part has a clear vision of the Forms, of truth, though at the same time, the spirit and appetites already, by their very nature, have a tendency to descend. If one asks why it is that the soul descends into a body, Plato says that it is simply the tendency of the irrational part, the part of the soul that is not perfect, to be unruly and to pull the soul toward the earth. For Plato says that “when perfect and fully winged she [the soul] soars upward … whereas the imperfect soul, losing her wings and drooping in her flight at last settles on the solid ground—there, finding a home, she receives an earthly frame…and this composition of soul and body is called a living and mortal creation.” The soul “falls,” and that is how it comes to be in a body. But the point is that the soul has an unruly and evil nature in its irrational parts even before it enters the body, so that in one sense the cause of evil is present even in the soul’s preexistent state.”

Those who follow Wotanism and or the old ancestral Nordic mythology tend to build their emphasis on the living of ‘Right Life’, around the foundation of honor, freedom and inner worth, as well as a strong sense of the heroic and warrior ethic. Without race, the myth is impossible, for it would be without roots. Likewise, myth, without a strong system of ethics would not hold for the overall good and best interest of its people and society. The Aryan race in its natural essence is known to be creative, incisive, reflective, open, honest and loyal, so long as it holds to its ancestral tribal ethics. Tribal loyalty, for instance, and courage, and maternal affection for the young are approved in most societies; meanness and treachery against one’s friends and fellow-tribesmen are rather widely condemned. The anti-race, if you will, is precisely the opposite, openly self-hating, self-defeating and parasitical, which we witness so often today within world controlling Globalism and liberal Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))).

The Hero is he who lives in the inward sphere of things, in the True, Divine and Eternal, which exists always, unseen to most, under the Temporary, Trivial: his being is in that; he declares that abroad, by act or speech as it may be, in declaring himself abroad. His life, is a piece of the everlasting heart of Nature herself: all men’s life is,—but the weak many, know not the fact, and are untrue to it, in most times; the strong few are strong, heroic, perennial, because it cannot be hidden from them. The man of Letters, like every Hero, is there to proclaim this in such sort as he can. Intrinsically it is the same function which the old generations named a man Prophet, Priest, Divinity for doing; which all manner of Heroes, by speech or by act, are sent into the world.” ~ Thomas Carlyle

Philip Wheelwright in his book, “A Critical Introduction To Ethics” (1935) states: “The great man will appear to his inferiors as a kind of monster, for their morality condemns those who defy it—like a jealous god who will have no other gods beside him. Themselves and those who accept their code, therefore, the inferior ones call good; whereas the rebels, those with intelligence and courage enough to trample down their conventions, they call wicked.

But the aristocratic man has only contempt for their petty morality. Morality for him is a triumphant affirmation of his own demands. He is a creator of new values. He ‘transvaluates’ the old values, passing ‘beyond the good and the wicked’ and substituting his own valuations: ‘good’ for the aristocratic warrior is the perfect moralist, although by the resentful man he will be called immoral. For he opposes their attempt to pull everyone down to their level, to treat every will as equal; he perceives that their ideal is “a principle hostile to life, a destroyer and dissolver of man, an outrage on the future of man, a symptom of fatigue, a short cut to Nothingness.” As the attacking, aggressive man, he is nearer to justice than the man who merely reacts, for he has no need to adopt the tactics, necessary in the case of the reacting man, of making false and biased valuations of his object. He enjoys, therefore, the freer outlook and the better conscience.”

It is has been said that; “Good without honor cannot be regarded as a good, and a body without honor, one is rightly accustomed to hold for dead.” In Wotanism, honor, is held in a place of high esteem for those who have earned it. The value breathed into a god or hero is what is eternal in good and evil. Attributed to the Euro-Tribe Allfather Wotan, is a book of sound values and wisdom known as “The Havamal”. In a more condensed form of values to live by, is what is known within Wotanism as “The Nine Noble Virtues” which are: (Truth – Courage – Fidelity – Honor – Discipline – Hospitality – Self-Reliance – Industriousness – Perseverance.) Add to this a more present day code of right living which are known as The “14 Codes of the Aryan Ethic”, which are as follows:

(1) – Honor no gods but those of your own Folk – as alien gods destroy you.
(2) – Nature’s laws evidence the divine plan – as the natural world is the work of All-Father.
(3) – Act nobly and courageously, always carefully considering the consequences – as the effects of your deeds live on after you pass from Midgard.
(4) – Live within the reality of this life; fear not your fate – as fear is for fools and cowards; a valorous man boldly faces what the Norn’s decree.
(5) – Love, protect, reproduce and advance your Folk – as natural instinct prohibits miscegenation and self-destruction.
(6) – Be honest, be disciplined, be productive and loyal to friends – as the Aryan spirit strives for excellence in all things.
(7) – Treasure your history, heritage and racial identity – as your ancestors have entrusted, it falls with you, it will rise with you.
(8) – Honor the memory of your kith and kin, especially those who have given their lives or freedom for the Folk – as your race lives on through your blood and your will.
(9) – Respect the wisdom of your elders – as every moment of your lives links the infinite past with the infinite future.
(10) – Honor your mate, provide for your children and carry no quarrel with family to sleeptime – as family is your purpose and fulfillment.
(11) – May your word to a kinsman be a bond of steel – as your troth is your dignity and strength of character.
(12) – Be cunning as the fox with enemies and Skraelings – as their goal is your extinction.
(13) – Secure, defend and cherish your homeland – as Nature’s Territorial Imperative demands.
(14) – Live in harmony with Nature and the Folk and compromise not with evil – as racial survival is your perpetual struggle.

In Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” he states: “It cannot be right to follow the changes of fortune. It is not upon these that good or evil depends; they are necessary accessories of human life. But it is a man’s activities in accordance with virtue that constitute his happiness and the opposite activities that constitute his misery. The difficulty which has now been discussed is itself a witness that this is the true view. For there is no human function so constant as the activities in accordance with virtue; they seem to be more permanent than the sciences themselves. Among these activities, too, it is the most honorable which are the most permanent, as it is in them that the life of the fortunate chiefly and most continuously consists. For this is apparently the reason why such activities are not liable to be forgotten.

The element of permanency which is required will be found in the happy man, and he will preserve his character throughout life; for he will constantly or in a preeminent degree pursue such actions and speculations as accord with virtue; nor is there anybody who will bear the chances of life so nobly, with such good and “foursquare without a flaw.” Now the events of chance are numerous and of different magnitudes. It is clear then that small incidents of good fortune, or the reverse, do not turn the scale of life, but that such incidents as are great and numerous augment the felicity of life, if they are fortunate as they tend naturally to embellish it and the use of them is noble and virtuous, and on the other hand, if they are of a contrary character, mar and mutilate its felicity by causing pains and hindrances to various activities. Still even in these circumstances nobility shines out, when a person bears the weight of accumulated misfortunes with calmness, not from insensibility but from innate dignity and magnanimity.”

The philosophy of life which involves no sacrifice turns out in the end to be merely an excuse for being the sort of person one is.” ~ T.S. Eliot

Ethics is one among the six disciplines of philosophy, which commonly classified are: 1 – (Metaphysics), which deals with such abstract subjects as cosmology, theology, and the nature of being; 2 – (Logic), which deals with the laws governing rational thinking, or, as it has been called, “the doctrine of fallacies”; 3 – (Ethics), which is the science of morality, individual responsibility, and character—concerned chiefly with an effort to determine the nature of good; 4 – (Psychology), which is devoted to investigation and classification of those forms of phenomena referable to a mental origin; 5 – (Epistemology), which is the science concerned primarily with the nature of knowledge itself and the question of whether it may exist in an absolute form; and 6 – (Aesthetics), which is the science of the nature of and the reactions awakened by the beautiful, the harmonious, the elegant, and the noble.

“He who has not even a knowledge of common things is a brute among men. He who has an accurate knowledge of human concerns alone is a man among brutes. But he who knows all that can be known by intellectual energy, is a God among men.” The great orator Cicero was known to have exclaimed: “O philosophy, life’s guide! O searcher-out of virtue and expeller of vices! What could we and every age of men have been without thee? Thou hast produced cities; thou hast called men scattered about into the social enjoyment of life.”

The Norse god Wotan, Allfather of the Aryan tribes was a passionate seeker of knowledge and wisdom. To gain the all-knowing high knowledge of the giant Mimir, Wotan sacrificed his left eye into Mimir’s well. He also hung on the mighty Yggdrasil Tree for nine days and nine nights to gain complete wisdom of the runes. Practicing Wotanists today, likewise pride themselves in an ongoing pursuit of knowledge to its fullest. Through Wotanism one develops a strong spiritual ethic which involves a deep dedication to ancestral roots and the ethnic European tribal gods of their people and culture, as well as an enlightened awareness of Nature, the universe, and man’s place within it. Wotanism builds character, courage and an unyielding physical and mental self confidence as was the nature of the Viking and Euro-Tribe forebears of earlier times.

To understand the field of the ethic philosophies, creates the advantage of insight to direct the course of the Western World towards an intelligent and healthy future. This is why some of the most brilliant minds throughout history have given the study in this field so much attention and regard to its importance.

A living culture and an organized civilization—representing, so to speak, the soul and body of human societies—are built up in harmonious conjunction. But the entire constructive phase has been made possible by the difference of ‘potential’ between the material impulses of the society and its ideal aspirations. As in the world of matter what generates physical energy is the unequal degree of heat in two interacting particles, so in human societies what generates cultural energy is the unequal degree of spiritual intensity in the secular and religious propulsions of human living. When a society feels that its destiny is a higher and more inspiring thing than its actual condition—when it feels this with indwelling certitude and not just says it as a means of jacking up its courage or acquiescing in the prevalent ideology—then, unless circumstances are overwhelmingly unfavorable, that society is alive, on the move, and spiritually progressing. Life and action have for it a significance that transcends the here and now, and are guided by something distinctively more than utilitarian considerations.” ~ Philip Wheelwright

With this brief insight into Ethics I close now with some reflective words from Arthur de Gobineau (1816-82). “I think that a decent man, a man who feels that he has some soul, has now, more than ever, the strict duty of falling back upon himself and, since he can’t save others, of striving for his own betterment. That is the essential task in times like ours.

Everything that is being lost by society does not disappear but takes refuge in individual lives. The mass is petty, wretched, shameful and repugnant. The isolated being can rise above this and, just as in the ruins of Egypt, amidst heaps of rubble, broken and unrecognizable fragments, walls that have collapsed or subsided and are often difficult to repair, there will have survived some colossus or some obelisks thrusting into the sky which, by their very height, preserve an idea (perhaps even an exaggerated one) of the nobility of the temple or town, now razed to the ground for ever, so in the same way these isolated men, still more remarkable and praiseworthy than their forerunners, can help to preserve our conception of what God’s noblest and finest creatures ought to be like. Such people existed even at the very height of Roman decadence. There were many such men, many more than had been realized before, and they were to be found among Pagans and Christians alike. For we mustn’t think that all those who professed the new religion were equally free from the wretchedness of the time. Legend deceives us on this point. Most of the zealots of the new religion from Judaea were weak when confronted by adversity and even more so in the face of prosperity. If already, in the time of the apostles, there were Ananiases and Sapphiras, then just imagine how many more there were under Constantine’s successors! The Fathers of the Church are sparing neither in their indignation nor in their sarcasm regarding the luxury, frivolity and moral baseness of Christian ladies. They depict them shocking the towns with displays of laxity and scandalous behavior. Noble minds were rare among them, just as much as among the Pagans! But they were there upon both sides and it is of those that I am speaking. It is those that I say we must try to imitate, and it is like them that we must act. We have t work upon ourselves, improving the good we have within us and spurning the evil, stifling our worst parts, or at least restraining them. From now on that is our duty – and it is the only duty of value.”

“Thus the reasoning faculties were organized by a simple process of mental culture, for it was asserted that where reason reigns supreme, inconsistency cannot exist. Wisdom, it was maintained, lifts man to the condition of Godhood, a fact which explains the enigmatical statement, that the Mysteries-transformed “roaring beasts into divinities.”

Women Should Shut the Fuck Up

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 8, 2017

I have tolerated certain females in the Alt-Right, even though I did not agree with it. It has always been the policy of this site to not allow women to contribute, and to encourage that policy for the movement generally. My reasoning has been simple: no political movement has ever involved women because politics are the realm of men and women who attempt to infiltrate male realms do so generally to seek attention (money secondarily), and they are able to maximize attention on themselves by creating conflict between men.

This is the same reasoning behind the decision by men, throughout the entire history of Western civilization before the last century, to prohibit women from being involved in public life.

If I had lived 100 years ago, maybe I would have been interested in the idea of liberating women just to see what would happen. I doubt it, but maybe I would have been swayed by the argument of “look, we’ve never tried this before – it could work.” However, now it has been tried, it has been the greatest disaster in all of history, and it feels to me that people who wish to see it continue must be severely psychologically damaged, benefit from it financially in some way or have malicious intent.

Unshockingly, we now have a situation where females who have been given a voice in far right internet circles are following the #metoo sisterhood, and whining about how men should be doing more for them. Of course, originally, they entered under the pretext that they were going to be “just like one of the guys.”

The purpose, of course, is to draw attention to themselves, to cause white knights to rally around, to cause men to fight over them.

Those of you in the Alt-Right playing into this are as low as any bugman VICE reporter.

You are the alt-bugman.

What Must be Done Here

If a woman says she is going to “leave the movement” because she’s not getting respect, tell her to get the fuck out.

Then ignore.

GOODBYE TARA, GOODBYE! BYE! GOODBYE!

More importantly, attack the faggot males supporting them. That is why they are getting power. They are stupid, they do not have ideas, they enter male spaces only to gain attention and destroy the concept of male spaces. Then they claim you’re a wimp or a homosexual if you don’t accept it.

Well, they’re not playing that shit on me – because I have a fucking spine.

You little worms bending to this do not.

You are lower than insects.

You should not be able to look into the mirror without crying.

You are the ones that make me sick.

These whores are just whores being whores.

Against Camwhore Nationalism

Women offer nothing to the Alt-Right other than camwhoring. Because women are stupid as shit. They don’t have ideas.

They listen to men’s ideas, then repeat them on video, with varying degrees of sexiness. Mostly, this is watched by men who already believe what is on the videos, because they like to pretend the female is their girlfriend (even if they don’t consciously know they’re doing that, that is the psychological process involved – the subconscious mind doesn’t have a function to process the concept that a person on an LED screen in front of you is not actually in front of you, talking directly to you). And yes, they masturbate to these videos.

The argument is that “new people will be brought into the movement” by these whores because they will click on a video with a woman and realize how smart she is. I have repeatedly called bullshit on this. No one – not even bugmen – genuinely believe women have something important or interesting to say. Sure, it is technically possible that they click on a video and hear something cited as a fact and Google it. But 99% of the clicks on these “trad chick” videos are regular watchers who are involved in a fantasy involving the girl. That is who is watching the videos, that is who is doing the donating.

The donating – look. Men have a desire to give money to women. It is an actual biological drive.

There is a dopamine rush when you go out with a woman and she tries to pay for her coffee or drinks and you insist she puts away her wallet. This is basic primitive behavior. It’s the same dopamine rush cavemen got laying a stag at the feet of a woman.

“I have killed an animal, I will feed it to this female, she will give me access to her vagina through which I can reproduce my genes.”

This is followed by: “she is my vessel of reproduction and the keeper of those I will produce, my duty is to defend.”

It is a fundamental aspect of male identity – nigh the most fundamental, second only to his ability to be accepted and valued by the men of the tribe – to be able to provide materially for and physically protect a woman.

NOTE: In fact, a woman knows that it is
emasculating to a man to not be able to pay for her. And it is a shit
test for her to attempt to pay - she is testing you. Usually I've been
pretty good at controlling for skankism, but at least once in my life, I
went on a date with a woman who made a big thing of paying -
calculating what exactly she ate and calling the waiter over and making
him take the money. I left enough money to cover the bill and a generous
tip on the table and got up and walked out. I refused to see her again
(and believe me, she wanted to). Of course, that situation is only
possible under feminism, where the state, through welfare and
affirmative action programs, forcibly transfers male wealth to females.

Just so, it is a woman’s biological function to receive these resources. A bitch gotta eat, and she sure as fuck isn’t killing a deer herself. Just as she sure as fuck isn’t coming up with any interesting ideas today.

This camwhore situation, and the amount of money these women are making by leeching off of a political movement, as you fight to protect them, is a perversion of basic biological drives.

But I don’t blame these whores. I blame you, bro. You’re the one with the ability to rationally reflect on your biological drives and alter your behavior accordingly.

“BUT WE NEED WOMEN IN THE MOVEMENT!!!!!1111”

The alt-bugman response is always that I am “alienating women” and that “we need them in the movement.”

It is the worst form of snakelike Freudian horseshit to call someone who questions women’s right to influence a male space a homosexual or otherwise question their masculinity. It is horseshit because it is a lie. But if we are going to psychoanalyze people over their positions on this issue, then let me tell you something: when you say “if we don’t pander to women, we will alienate them,” you are effectively screaming “I AM A MAN-VIRGIN” to anyone who knows shit about women.

And you all know that. It’s your life. You know what’s going on in it. Maybe you’re not literally a virgin – maybe you’ve had one or two girlfriends, maybe you’ve gotten lucky on a drunk bitch a few times, but you are not Chad. If you were Chad, you would know that the interest of women has a direct inverse correlation to your interest in them.

There is also a conflation by Alt-Right feminists between camwhores and women who support the movement – the term “women in the movement” applies to both. Obviously, maximizing the number of women who support the movement should be a goal. Not a top goal – that is, not a goal that we sacrifice other more pressing priorities for – but something we should be aware of. Clearly, the easiest way to do this is by having the men in the Alt-Right have girlfriends and wives. Unless the bitch is a filthy godless whore and the man a complete cuck and their relationship on the highway to collapse, women will take on the political beliefs of a permanent partner. To that point, if we were extremely concerned about “women in the movement,” we would be doing two things:

  • Helping guys already in the movement get girlfriends and wives
  • Directing messaging more toward men who already have girlfriends and wives (we have more single men than partnered men in the movement)

But the assumption is always “single female supporters,” which demonstrates how fucking dishonest the alt-bugmen are. Just as dishonest as any other form of male feminist pervert. They are trying to use the movement as a singles club, rather than an engine of political revolution. Of course, if you could pin down a male Alt-Right feminist – protip: you can’t, because they are slimy, gelatinous creatures – they would claim that “it can be both” – I am saying no, it can’t be both, and if you can’t already meet women, you aren’t going to be able to meet women in our political movement.

But okay.

Sure.

Let’s talk about single women.

This website, The Daily Stormer, where my official position on women is “they deserve to be locked in cages,” has more single young female readers than any other Alt-Right site. That is an empirical fact.

This is because women are drawn to political ideologies that don’t pander to them for the same reasons they are drawn to individual men who don’t pander to them:

  • They are interested in gaining acceptance from men who don’t immediately offer it
  • Not acting as though you need women is a sign you have something to offer women
  • A lack of pandering is a sign of strength, meaning that you would be able to provide good genes and physical resources
  • Women in their sexual prime – white women in particular – tend to have a sexual fixation with men who either are or are perceived as dangerous and potentially violent, rather than kind and caring

If you don’t already know all that, you are not doing well with women in your personal life, and what you are trying to do by promoting them in the Alt-Right is trying to increase your chances of getting laid by applying your failed personal seduction strategy to a political movement.

And it is fucking pathetic.

I see this shit on social media, and this is what it looks like to me:

That is you, alt-bugman.

You are something which is fundamentally repulsive on a visceral level to emotionally developed, self-respecting adult males.

Leftism and the Single Skank: A Hard Wall of Material Resource Reality

As long as the political left has the ability to use force to take the resources of men and hand them over to women, single women are overwhelmingly going to support the political left.

That’s a hard fact.

There is a small amount of wiggle room, of course. But the only appeal you are going to be able to muster is a sex appeal. Not an offer of something. The left already offers everything.

And no – “we’ll give you a male provider so you can settle down and have children” is not an offer. Women already have the option of doing that. All young women in modern society have the option of finding a male of average sexual market value with enough money to pay for them to have children if they were to make a decision to do that. Instead, they chase Chad cock and claim that “men don’t want to commit” – speaking of the high value men who will fuck them one night and then not return their texts. Because they all think they deserve the highest value man available, that he should commit to them, and anything less is not enough.

However, if I’m playing the game and answering the “single female appeal” question: by taking a masculine approach to our political movement, we’re going to maximize the number of women who want to support it – and that appeal INCREASES if we are actively trolling and silencing camwhores who are attempting to infiltrate us to get attention and money, as it is a demonstration of principled masculine strength.

I am right about this and if you disagree with me you are wrong.

Period.

The alt-bugmen pushing “women in the movement” have never and will never respond to any of the points I just made, regardless of the fact that I’ve been making the same points for years. They will just keep screaming that I’m “alienating women,” and then question my masculinity. Because they are maggots who do not want to engage in the masculine activity of using logic to come to reasoned conclusions.

When “you’re just a loser who can’t get laid” doesn’t work, they pivot (note: this is a real tweet from an alt-bugman trying to attack me as a #WeakWhiteMan for refusing to embrace female empowerment). 

tfw

And look. I’m not trying to shit on betas. I am trying to protect you, as my brothers, just as much as I’m trying to protect this movement.

You had single mothers or weak beta fathers, and you need to recover.

That’s what I’m here to help you with, bro.

You’re not doing yourself any favors by going to bat for these whores.

And it isn’t going to get you laid.

“Pity fucks” by women – which is the only thing you could possibly be going for as a white knight – are largely a myth. They are usually mislabeled “drunk accidental fucks” (which are now being widely mislabeled as “rape,” btw – so be careful out there, white knights).

And I’ll end with this: if you are a beta white knight – and if you are pushing this “women in the movement” horseshit and are older than 14, you are – you need to deal with your testosterone levels.

A human being’s thoughts and emotions exist in a mushy organ that functions on chemicals, and different chemicals being input into this organ produce different thoughts and emotions. That is the entire “bugman” concept – they are pudgy, low-muscle mass wormlike “men,” and this is directly correlated to their worldview.

The basic rule is that fat on your body lowers testosterone levels and muscle on your body increases it. You don’t have to be huge super-muscleman, but getting lean and fit – which is easiest through strength training, and through removing processed foods (especially grains, including beer) from your diet – will make your thoughts and feelings make a lot more sense.

You won’t just get rid of this “need women in the movement” bugman horseshit, but you’ll do better with women in your personal life. You’ll also do better professionally, creatively and just do better at life generally.

A political movement is made up of individuals, and just as I want our political movement to succeed, I want all of you to succeed as individuals. Everything I write here I write with that in mind.

You’re all my brothers, regardless of whether or not you’ve got a bad case of the thirst.

And if you’re thirsty, I know this article was tough. But it is tough love.

We’re all in this together.

Hail Victory.