Sharia Law Courts In The UK Show Us The Internal Balkanization Which Happens With Diversity

Diversity makes no sense. Different groups act differently because they come from different origins, therefore different traits were rewarded, therefore they are wired differently. Even more, every group has an interest in being itself, because no one has your back like someone who is genetically bonded to you, like an extended family.

When fools — driven by the siren song of power and wealth that equality promises — decide to mix these groups, they unleash the stored tensions there. Each group realizes that its winning strategy is to appear the victim while secretly acting against other groups, so that it can assume power and either drive them out or genetically absorb them, a strategy which only works for third world groups.

These truths were well-known to those who came before us. In fact, most of what is written on this blog would appear common sense to them, but after years of assault with propaganda and the bad breeding that comes with egalitarianism, most of our people are stupefied and unable to see the plain reality of any situation.

No one is surprised when they sleep through something momentous like the adoption of sharia law in the UK:

An estimated 30 sharia councils exist in the UK, giving Islamic divorce certificates and advice on other aspects of religious law. They have garnered fierce criticism, particularly for their treatment of women seeking religious divorces, who make up the core clientele.

Sharia is the Islamic legal system, derived from the Koran and the rulings of Islamic scholars, known as fatwas. As well as providing a code for living – including prayers, fasting and donations to the poor – sharia in some countries such as Saudi Arabia also lays down punishments as extreme as cutting off a hand or death by stoning for adultery.

Diversity places the host nation into a paradox: it either demands that its newcomers “assimilate,” which destroys their culture and identity, or it hosts them in Chinatowns, where they can have their culture and practices, but still interact with the mainstream. The Chinatown model has won out, and so the UK has sharia courts.

Naturally this bodes for conflict much as diversity itself does. Sharia law is distinct from English law, or there would be no need for sharia courts; this difference means that clashes are inevitable. And when they happen, loyalty will be divided, because much as with the paradox of diversity, migrants must either reject who they are or accept being second-class citizens living in their own ghetto.

Future generations will look back on this stuff and laugh. They will see that because we chose equality, we rejected the distinction between right or wrong and good or bad, and as a result, mired ourselves in the “grey areas” and failed to see where incompatibility clearly existed. As a result, we stockpiled causes for future conflict while obediently denying that any paradox existed.

United Cuckdom: Nearly 10 People a Day Arrested in Britain for Offensive Online Posts in 2016

Spartacus
Daily Stormer
October 15, 2017

In the giant open air Moslem rape camp in northern Europe sometimes referred to as “Great Britain,” there are some terrible, terrible happenings.

Some people, blinded by vile ignorance and vile hatred for terrorism, gang-rape, pedophilia, robbery, humiliation, demographic displacement and all the other joys of a tolerant and progressive society are writing mean things on the internet.

And this is obviously something that can’t be allowed.

Because it’s mean and hateful, and it causes hurtfeels.

And the Jews and their cat ladies have decided that nothing is worse than hurtfeels.

And so causing hurtfeels is illegal. Literally.

Breitbart:

 British police forces arrested at least nine people a day for “offensive” online comments last year.

Figures obtained by The Times through the Freedom of Information Act reveal that 3,395 people across 29 forces were arrested last under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which makes it illegal to intentionally “cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another”, in 2016.

Read that bolded part again.

Causing hurtfeels is illegal in Britain. Literally.

A country where there is not a single politician that doesn’t say he supports freedom of speech.

Think about that next time you put your little paper in a box and think you’ve done something.

The true figure is likely to be significantly higher, as thirteen police forces refused to provide the requested information and two did not provide usable data.

So I was underestimating it in the title…

Around half of the investigations were abandoned before being brought to prosecution, which critics say is an indication that the authorities are being excessively strict in their interpretation of the law’s restrictions on freedom of speech.

More likely, too much affirmative action dumbed them down to the point where they can’t figure out which part of the law they actually broke, but still felt the need to give them a warning.

Nevertheless, many forces have massively stepped up their focus on so-called trolls, with the number of arrests by West Midlands Police having increased by an astonishing 877 per cent since 2014.

West Midlands… Why does that sound familiar? Oh, right:

Good to know the police there are such good little goyim, so serious about fighting those evil nazis and their evil hatred.

With Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s announcement of a special national police hub focused on online hate last week, it is expected that these numbers will only increase.

Hey look, a female politician trying to make sure no one says anything about little girls getting gang-raped. You go grrrrrl!

The seeming inconsistency in the enforcement of free speech restrictions has also been a source of contention, with the Metropolitan Police — who detained 867 people in 2016, according to the Times figures — appearing reluctant to investigate people such as Nadia Chan, the self-described Islamist who was revealed as having made a number of deeply racist remarks about white people on social media after an appearance on public broadcaster Channel 4.

Chan branded Israeli Jews “parasites” and ranted that white people were “swine” and “pasty bland bitches [who] have NO culture, no rich history, you ain’t shit, ur ancestors were cave ppl”. She also openly endorsed terror attacks on Iranian state network Press TV —  but the Met refused to say whether they would bring charges against her.

Literally thousands of people urged the Met Contact Centre on Twitter to investigate Chan, but the force did not appear to offer any public response, and individuals who contacted the account privately claim they were told the force would not accept any reports unless the complainants came to a police station in person.

That’s not hurtfeels, you stupid goyim. Whitey don’t got no feels, cuz dey iz soldja slaves maid by Yakub.

Similarly, people who reported mixed race transgender model Munroe Bergdorf for saying “the white race is the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth” in a segment produced and aired by the publicly-funded BBC — an apparent violation of the laws against ‘inciting racial hatred’ — were met with official indifference.

The Met seemed to indicate that it was not interested in investigating Bergdorf in online responses to members of the public, referring them to the complaints form for broadcast regulator Ofcom instead.

The White race is the source of literally everything good in your life and that of other shitskinned subhumans like you. But make no mistake, that’s gonna change, and very soon, and vermin like you and the kikes who your leash will get exterminated off this planet that is rightfully ours.

And when that day comes, the worst punishment will not go to the kikes and shitskins, but to our traitors, and every cop, politician and journalist in Britain falls in that category.

Only one way this is all going to end, Global White Race Revolution!!

Serbia Denounces EU Denouncement of Catalan Referendum

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 2, 2017

Serbia made this same point after the Crimea independence vote.

They had an entire part of their country stolen from them by Moslems and the West not only supported in but actually bombed in support of it.

What is the difference?

RT:

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has accused the EU of hypocrisy and double-standards following its denouncement of the Catalonian referendum as illegal, while acknowledging the independence of the breakaway province of Kosovo.

“The question every citizen of Serbia has for the European Union today is: How come that in the case of Catalonia the referendum on independence is not valid, while in the case of Kosovo secession is allowed even without a referendum,” B92 quoted Vucic as saying during a news conference.

“How did you proclaim the secession of Kosovo to be legal, even without a referendum, and how did 22 European Union countries legalize this secession, while destroying European law and the foundations of European law, on which the European policy and EU policy are based?”

On Monday the European Commission echoed the Spanish government’s stance that the referendum held in Catalonia was illegal, describing the events on Sunday, which saw voters being beaten by Spanish riot police, as an “internal matter”. By contrast in 2010, the European Parliament adopted a resolution urging its member states to recognize Kosovo’s independence.

“This is the best example of the double standards and hypocrisy of the world politics,” Vucic said.

The largely ethnic-Albanian province of Kosovo declared independence from Serbia in 2008 after a war in 1999 which saw the US and its NATO allies intervene on behalf of Albanian rebels against the government of what was then Yugoslavia.

Effectively the exact same situation. It’s an awkward question that no one from the EU is going to answer any time soon.

Another great question would be why they are so comfortable with brutal police brutality while they accuse other nations of being “police states” for being too hard on drug dealers or whatever.

If this footage was coming out of anywhere other than a place the EU supported, it would be a whole other Holocaust and they would be calling for targeted airstrikes against the regime.

EU Vice President Admits To White Genocide Plan

Alex Jones breaks down a EU bureaucrat clip of European Union VP saying will Islamify you. Muslims are allowed to rape because it is their culture and how you must accept that culture if we want to survive in diversified europe. Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we’re reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

Diversity is white genocide mr. jones.