Australia: Upcoming Romper Stomper TV Series Attempts to Demonize White Nationalists

Michael Byron
Daily Stormer
November 22, 2017

Before American History X, there was Romper Stomper.

Released in 1992 and starring the lead actor from Gladiator and Fightin’ Around the World, Romper Stomper followed the lives of a bunch of Australian neo-Nazis who delivered a virtuous ARSE-KICKING to gooks and other invasive species in suburban Melbourne.

And, as with American History X, Romper Stomper’s aspirations often clashed with its legacy: though intended to depict neo-Nazis as jackbooted thugs who hated Asians simply because they look weird and make soup with chicken feet floating in it, it ended up making Nazis look cool, rebellious and masculine.

“Ewww, I’d rather sleep with a liberal!” – said no woman, ever.

Alas, it looks like the Eternal Boomers and Jews who control Australia’s television industry haven’t learned from their past mistakes. In yet another attempt to force-feed us the overused “Evil Nazis vs. Righteous Leftists” narrative that no one believes in any more, they’ve commissioned a new TV series of Romper Stomper for release in 2018.

Stuff:

The new year will get off to a riotous start in Australia, with all six episodes of the Romper Stomper series set to drop on streaming service Stan on January 1.

“Romper Stomper the series is nothing like the original movie in terms of how it presents,” said Stan CEO Mike Sneesby at the Screen Forever conference on Thursday, just hours before the first trailer for the show dropped. “It’s a continuation, and some of the characters are coming back, but it brings it into a modern context and it sheds light on what is a very important topic.”

The trailer features a clash between white nationalists – calling themselves Patriot Blue – and a group of masked antifa (anti-fascist activists) at a multicultural festival.

That scene drew its inspiration from a real world incident in which anti-Muslim protesters and anti-racism activists clashed violently at a halal festival in Melbourne last April.

In a bizarre case of life imitating art imitating life, Stan recently took legal action against a white racist group that had adopted the name Patriot Blue. The group gained a moment of notoriety earlier this month when it posted video of a verbal attack on Labor Senator Sam Dastyari in a NSW pub.

Sneesby says he is prepared for a divided response to the decision to revisit the subject matter of Romper Stomper.

“There have been questions about why is Stan doing this show, it [white extremism] doesn’t deserve a platform,” he said. “But the reality is if you go out there into middle Australia, you can absolutely see a world where people get roped into it.

“Dastyari only got coverage because he’s a senator, but that shit happens all day, every day, in corners of Australia.

“For us to lay it all out in context, and show what happens, is important. If we cop flak for it, so be it. I think it’s an issue that needs to have light shed on it.”

So I suffered through the entire three-minute trailer (don’t say I’ve never made any sacrifices for you, goys) and determined the following:

  • The series will depict White Nationalists as forces of oppression, the antifa as heroic freedom fighters braving their lives for a noble cause, and non-white immigrants as victims of the former group’s public marches (imagine my shock!)
  • The right-wing characters look rough and masculine, while the antifa and immigrants look faggy and unwashed
  • The series’ leading White Nationalist character – Faramir from Lord of the Rings – might deliver some Derek Vinyard-style speeches about immigration that inadvertently awaken viewers

In other words, Romper Stomper seems poised to make the same mistakes that American History X and its 1992 predecessor did, though we won’t know for sure until it is released.

Indeed, the only thing we can ascertain at this point is that it looks… well…

Crap.

lol.

ISIS is Defeated But US Says They’re Just Going to Stay in Syria and Chill

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 17, 2017

This is kinda like when you break up with your girlfriend but you decide to stay living in her apartment because it’s free and there is someone there you can have sex with.

And also you’re planning on murdering her for revenge and it’s easier to murder her while you’re living in her house than to break in and kill her.

Morning Edition:

Raqqa, the de facto capital of the Islamic State, is taken and in ruins.

U.S. troops and civilian aid workers are in the Syrian city, helping local officials restore basic services such as food, water and electricity.

But the recapture of ISIS-held territory in Iraq and Syria is only a partial win for U.S. policy. After seven years of civil war, the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad remains in power. The other U.S. objectives — the end of Assad, a new Syrian constitution and democratic elections — remain unfulfilled.

Despite the defeat of ISIS, Defense Secretary James Mattis told reporters this week that U.S. forces will remain in Syria.

The intention, he said, is to prevent the appearance of “ISIS 2.0.”

There are hundreds of U.S. troops in Syria. Pentagon officials say the U.S. is on solid legal ground to be there because the U.N. Security Council endorsed the anti-ISIS mission. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says the U.S. presence is “illegitimate.”

It’s illegitimate even by UN rules. The US is illegally occupying a sovereign nation against the declared wishes of the elected leader.

ISIS 1.0 only happened because the CIA and the Jews funded it. As such, there is zero chance of an ISIS 2.0 as long as Donald Trump doesn’t return the terror-funding funds he cut earlier this year.

“There are a lot of questions to ask about the United States’ goals in Syria,” Lavrov said, according to the Russian news agency TASS. “U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has told me many times that their only goal is to defeat IS.”

A change in regime “runs counter to the Geneva agreements and … assurances that the U.S.’s only goal in Syria is to fight terrorism,” Lavrov said.

Assad and his Russian and Iranian allies are demanding the U.S. leave Syria.

So are the American people.

So who wants them there then?

The next meeting of the Geneva peace talks is Nov. 28. The U.S. is pressing for the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian Kurds to be included at the negotiating table.

It’s unlikely that Assad and the Russians will agree. With Russian and Iranian military assistance, Assad has emerged as the dominant political and military force in Syria with no need to accommodate his opponents.

Pentagon officials say the Russians and Syrians continue to move east toward rebel-held territory. The U.S. is attempting to work with Russia to establish “de-confliction zones,” but it’s not clear the effort will succeed.

Yes.

They are still protecting terrorists.

Still.

Even Donald Trump can’t manage to shut that down.

Though he shut it down enough that Russia was able to win the war. And I think he’s going to be able to get these troops out of there so they can finish the job, clear out the remaining ZOGroaches, and get things back to normalcy.

What we’re still waiting on here is that dogfaced fat fucking whore Angela Merkel to tell us when she’s going to send back the 2 million monkeys that flooded Europe under the pretext of “fleeing the brutal civil war in Syria.”

Because surely, with the war totally over, these “people” can return home now.

Why the Holocaust Story Was Invented

“…the minimum estimate of 9.3 million Germans who died needlessly after the war. This is far more Germans than died during the Second World War. Millions of these Germans slowly starved to death while the Allies withheld available food. The majority of these postwar dead Germans were women, children and very old men. Their deaths have never been honestly reported…”

 

I have been asked the questions: “Why was the Holocaust story invented? Who benefits from this falsification of history?” This article will answer these questions.

Justification for War with Germany

palestine

World War II was by far the bloodiest and most destructive war in human history. Many people wondered whether all of the death and destruction caused by the war had been necessary.

The so-called Holocaust was used by the Allies to demonize Germany and prove that their war effort was necessary to defeat such an evil nation.

With the liberation of Ohrdruf, Buchenwald and Dachau by the American army and the liberation of Bergen-Belsen by British troops, large groups of Western observers confronted the horrors of the German camps for the first time. The gruesome scenes of huge piles of dead bodies and emaciated and diseased surviving inmates were filmed and photographed for posterity by the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to Germany to see the harrowing evidence at the camps for themselves. The horrific scenes in the German camps were used by the Allies to justify their participation in the war.[1]

Jewish historian Robert Jan van Pelt writes:

To the Allies, the discovery of the camps proved a final justification of their war effort. In 1940, Churchill had proclaimed that a Nazi victory would bring “a new Dark Age made more sinister by perverted science.” The liberation of the camps proved that Churchill had not exaggerated the danger. And even though Auschwitz had been liberated by the Russians, the English and Americans heard many stories about that camp.[2]

 

Establishment of Israel

       The Holocaust story has also been used to justify the creation of the State of Israel. ((((((Simon Wiesenthal)))))) writes:

“The creation of Israel was the only possible and the only correct reaction to Auschwitz. There had to be a country in the world where the Jews were the landlords instead of tolerated guests, a place of refuge in the truest meaning of the word, even for Jews who live in other countries.”[3]

((((((David Ben-Gurion)))))) stated at the beginning of World War II that the war should end by giving the Zionists their own state. After the war, ((((((Ben-Gurion)))))) and other Israeli leaders said that the Holocaust had proven once again that the only solution to the Jewish problem was an independent state in Israel. ((((((David Ben-Gurion)))))) again mentioned during Adolf Eichmann’s trial that the Holocaust happened because Jews did not live in their own country.[4]

Israeli historian ((((((Tom Segev)))))) explains why the Holocaust story is so important to Israel:

      Israel differs from other countries in its need to justify—to the rest of the world, and to itself—its very right to exist. Most countries need no such ideological justifications. But Israel does—because most of its Arab neighbors have not recognized it and because most of the Jews of the world prefer to live in other countries. So long as these factors remain true, Zionism will be on the defensive. As a justification for the State of Israel, the Holocaust is comparable only to the divine promise contained in the Bible: It seems to be definitive proof of the Zionist argument that Jews can live in security and with full equal rights only in their own country and that they therefore must have an autonomous and sovereign state, strong enough to defend its existence.[5]

((((((Tom Segev)))))) further writes:

“The demonization of Nazism and its mythologizing, in general, were also necessary since the Holocaust served as the main justification for the creation and existence of the State of Israel.”[6]

 

Justification of Israeli Violence

       There were at least 33 massacres of Palestinian villages during Israel’s “War of Independence.” Zionist forces were larger and better equipped than their opponents, and by the end of the war over 750,000 Palestinians were ruthlessly expelled from their homes.[7] As ((((((Tom Segev)))))) writes, “Israel was born of terror, war, and revolution, and its creation required a measure of fanaticism and of cruelty.”[8]

Entire cities and hundreds of villages in Israel were left empty and repopulated with new Jewish immigrants. The Jewish immigrants numbered 100,000 in April 1949, most of them survivors of the so-called Holocaust. The Palestinians lost everything they had and became destitute refugees, while the Jewish immigrants to Israel stole the Palestinians’ property and confiscated everything they needed.[9]

 The Holocaust story has been repeatedly used to justify Israel’s aggression against its neighbors. Israeli Prime Minister ((((((Menachem Begin)))))) justified the demolition of an alleged Iraqi nuclear facility in June 1981 with the words, “We must protect our nation, a million and a half of whose children were murdered by the Nazis in the gas chambers.”[10]

Before Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in June 1982, Begin told his cabinet:

“You know what I have done and what we have all done to prevent war and loss of life. But such is our fate in Israel. There is no way other than to fight selflessly. Believe me, the alternative is Treblinka, and we have decided that there will be no more Treblinkas.”[11]

A few weeks after Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, Begin stated that after the Holocaust the international community had lost its right to demand that Israel answer for its actions. Begin declared in the Knesset,

“No one, anywhere in the world, can preach morality to our people.”

A similar statement was included in the resolution adopted by Begin’s cabinet after the massacres in Palestinian refugee camps on the outskirts of Beirut.[12]

By the late 1980s there was hardly a day when the Holocaust story was not mentioned in one of the Israeli newspapers. Such constant exposure encouraged many Israeli soldiers to plan ways to exterminate the Arabs. According to Israeli education-corps officer Ehud Praver,

“too many soldiers were deducing that the Holocaust justifies every kind of disgraceful action.”[13]

 

German Guilt

The so-called Holocaust has also been effectively used to induce guilt in the German people. As British historian Ian Kershaw writes: “Decades would not fully erase the simple but compelling sentiment…‘I am ashamed to be German.’”[14]

Friedrich Grimm, a renowned German authority on international law, was shown samples of new leaflets printed soon after the war in German to be distributed by the Allies throughout Germany. Describing German war crimes, the leaflets were the first step in the reeducation program designed for Germany. Grimm suggested to an Allied officer that since the war was over, it was time to stop the libel. The Allied officer replied:

“Why no, we’re just getting started. We’ll continue this atrocity campaign, we’ll increase it till no one will want to hear a good word about the Germans anymore, till whatever sympathy there is for you in other countries is completely destroyed, and until the Germans themselves become so mixed up they won’t know what they’re doing!”[15]

The Allied campaign to make Germans feel guilty concerning the so-called Holocaust has been highly successful. German guilt is so powerful that it has caused the German government to make enormous reparations and offer humble apologies to the Allies. Millions of German expellees have paid reparations to survivors of the German concentration camps even though these German expellees had their land and personal possessions stolen from them.

James Bacque writes in regard to German feelings of guilt:

      Guilt pervades Germany like a religion. It is the “Canossa Republic,” penitent in pain before its judges. Guilt is so powerful that it has caused the Canossa Republic repeatedly to deny any intention of reclaiming sovereignty over the eastern lands, although it is a well-established UN principle that no government has the right to waive the claims of individuals to their property. Nor may it impede their right of return to their former homeland.[16]

 

Cover Up of Allied War Crimes

The Holocaust story has also been used to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans after World War II. German deaths after the war can be divided into three groups of people. The first group is the German prisoners of war (POW) in both Europe and the Soviet Union. The second group is the German expellees, and the third group is the Germans already residing in Germany. While no one will ever know how many Germans died from 1945 to 1950, it is certain that the deaths far exceed most traditional estimates. The great majority of these deaths were caused by the lethal policies imposed by the Allies against Germany after the war.              

A conservative estimate of German deaths in the Allied POW camps is 1.5 million. This includes over 517,000 POW deaths in the Soviet Union, 100,000 POW deaths in Yugoslavia, Poland and other countries, with the remaining POW deaths in U.S. and French camps. The Germans who died in these Allied POW camps suffered miserably from exposure, disease, and slow starvation. This well-documented Allied atrocity is still denied by most historians today.

Probably a minimum of 2.1 million German expellees died in what was supposed to be an “orderly and humane” transfer. The estimate of 2.1 million German expellee deaths is acknowledged to be valid by most traditional historians. Notable authorities have estimated a much higher number of German expellee deaths.[17]

An estimated 5.7 million Germans already residing in Germany died from the starvation policies implemented by the Allies after the war. James Bacque details how this 5.7 million death total is calculated:

The population of all occupied Germany in October 1946 was 65,000,000, according to the census prepared under the ACC. The returning prisoners who were added to the population in the period October 1946-September 1950 numbered 2,600,000 (rounded), according to records in the archives of the four principal Allies. Births according to the official German statistical agency, Statistisches Bundesamt, added another 4,176,430 newcomers to Germany. The expellees arriving totaled 6,000,000. Thus the total population in 1950 before losses would have been 77,776,430, according to the Allies themselves. Deaths officially recorded in the period 1946-50 were 3,235,539, according to the UN Yearbook and the German government. Emigration was about 600,000, according to the German government. Thus the population found should have been 73,940,891. But the census of 1950 done by the German government under Allied supervision found only 68,230,796. There was a shortage of 5,710,095 people, according to the official Allied figures (rounded to 5,700,000).[18]

The sum of 1.5 million German POWs, 2.1 million German expellees, and 5.7 million German residents equals the minimum estimate of 9.3 million Germans who died needlessly after the war. This is far more Germans than died during the Second World War. Millions of these Germans slowly starved to death while the Allies withheld available food. The majority of these postwar dead Germans were women, children and very old men. Their deaths have never been honestly reported by the Allies, the German government or most historians. Instead, all we ever hear about is the alleged genocide of European Jewry.   

 

Allied Guilt and Apathy

The Allies have also been declared guilty of not doing more to prevent the alleged genocide of European Jewry. Jewish historian ((((((Deborah Lipstadt)))))) writes:

      A real antipathy toward Jews certainly affected the Allied response. While no one among the Allies or in the press wanted to see Jews killed, virtually no one was willing to advocate that steps be taken to try to stop the carnage. Many Allied officials in positions of power in London and Washington were tired of hearing about Jews and even more tired of being asked to do something about them even though there were steps that could have been taken.[19]

((((((Elie Wiesel)))))) writes in regard to the Allies’ failure to rescue European Jewry, “It almost seems as if both diplomats and statesmen spent more time inventing reasons not to save the Jews than trying to find a way to save them.”[20]

U.S. Presidents Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, and George H. W. Bush have all made statements that the United States will never again fail to act to stop something as evil as the genocide of European Jewry. At the dedication of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, President Bill Clinton spoke in a similar vein: “For those of us here today representing the nations of the West, we must live forever with this knowledge: Even as our fragmentary awareness of crimes grew into indisputable facts, far too little was done.”[21]

((((((Michael Goldberg)))))) says in regard to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum:

“The museum stands as a grim reminder that for all its purported ideals, America nevertheless turned its back on Jews fleeing Hitler…Hence, the museum’s recalling what happened to Jews in the past may move Americans and their national policymakers in Washington to support Israel in the present, lest in the future, the same fate lie in store for Jews again—and the same moral failure await Americans once more.”[22]

President Barack Obama affirmed on the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Dachau: “…we fervently vow that such atrocities will never happen again” and “History will not repeat itself.”[23] Of course, President Obama forgot to tell his audience that most of the inmates at Dachau died of natural causes. Obama also conveniently failed to mention that the single biggest atrocity that occurred at Dachau was the mass murder by American troops of 520 German guards on the day Dachau was liberated.[24]

 

Reparations to Jews

German guilt for the so-called Holocaust has resulted in massive reparations being paid to Holocaust survivors and the State of Israel. German reparations to Jews were discussed from the beginning of World War II.  ((((((Tom Segev)))))) writes:

      The idea [of reparations] seems to have been in the air from the time the war started, apparently sparked by the punitive reparations payments imposed on Germany at the end of World War I. Ben-Guiron received a memorandum on the subject as early as 1940. Berl Katznelson spoke of it publicly toward the end of that year. By December 1942, there was already a private organization in Tel Aviv called Justicia that offered to help Nazi victims draft compensation demands.[25]

Hatred of Germans in Israel was intense after the war. Many advocated a special law barring Israelis from all social contacts with German citizens. However, since most Israelis felt that the Germans owed them massive reparations for the so-called Holocaust, Germany and Israel began negotiating reparations on March 20, 1952. The Luxembourg Agreement was reached six months later and committed the German government to paying massive reparations to Holocaust survivors.[26]

((((((Nahum Goldmann)))))) said in a 1976 interview that the Luxembourg Agreement “constituted an extraordinary innovation in the matter of international rights.” Goldmann also boasted that he had obtained 10 to 14 times more from the Bonn government than he had originally expected.[27]

Millions of Jews eventually received personal compensation for their pain and suffering in the so-called Holocaust. The German federal government as of 1998 had paid reparations to Israel and Third Reich victims of about $61.8 billion. In addition, Germans had paid many additional billions in private and other public funds to wartime forced laborers.[28] German reparations to Israel and Jews continue to this day.[29]

 

Jewish Solidarity

The Holocaust story is described by many Jewish leaders as a uniquely evil event. An example of this view was expressed by Abraham H. ((((((Foxman)))))) when he was the National Director of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith:

      …The Holocaust is something different. It is a singular event. It is not simply one example of genocide but a near successful attempt on the life of God’s chosen children and, thus, on God Himself. It is an event that is the antithesis of Creation as recorded in the Bible; and like its direct opposite, which is relived weekly with the Sabbath and yearly with the Torah, it must be remembered from generation to generation.[30]

((((((Michael Goldberg)))))) confirms that the Holocaust story has become a religion to many Jews: “As the Holocaust has become many contemporary Jews’ master story, so, too, its perpetual observance has become their paramount Jewish practice, its veneration their religion. And as with any organized church, this Holocaust cult has its own tenets of faith, rites, and shrines.[31]

Israelis are obsessed with the history and heritage of the Holocaust. A 1992 study of Israeli college students found that close to 80% of those asked identified with the statement, “We are all Holocaust survivors.” The so-called Holocaust has become a way for secular Jews to feel connected to their Jewish heritage.[32]

The Holocaust, which is remembered ritually through the observance of Holocaust Remembrance Day, is a major means of creating solidarity among Jews. While some Jewish communities experience conflicts among Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform Jews, they set aside their differences and join together to remember the so-called Holocaust. Any truth in Judaism’s slogan of “Jews Are One” manifests itself ritually on Holocaust Remembrance Day.[33]

 

Conclusion   

The alleged genocide of European Jewry has been used to justify the Allied war effort, to establish the State of Israel, to justify Israeli violence against its neighbors, to induce guilt in both Germans and the Allied nations, to cover up and ignore Allied crimes against Germans, to allow Jews to receive massive reparations from Germany, and to create solidarity in the Jewish community. The extreme importance of the Holocaust story in advancing Zionist/Jewish interests ensures that this falsification of history will continue in the future, and allow the continuation of the on going plan to overwhelm the western world with 3rd world invaders and genocide the European people globally, whether in Europe, America or Australia.

 

 

ENDNOTES    

[1] Van Pelt, Robert Jan, The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2002, p. 165.

[2] Ibid.

[3] ((((((Wiesenthal)))))), Simon, Justice Not Vengeance: New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1989, p. 224.

[4] Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 82, 185, 330.

[5] Ibid., p. 514.

[6] Ibid., p. 480.

[7] Weir, Alison, Against Our Better Judgement: The Hidden History of How the U.S. was Used to Create Israel, 2014, p. 58.

[8] Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, p. 63.

[9] Ibid., pp. 161-162.

[10] Ibid., p. 399.

[11] Ibid.

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid., pp. 407, 412.

[14] Kershaw, Ian, Hitler 1936-45: Nemesis, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, p. 840.

[15] Tedor, Richard, Hitler’s Revolution, Chicago: 2013, p. 263.

[16] Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 175-176.

[17] Ibid., p. 124.

[18] Bacque, James, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950, 2nd edition, Vancouver, British Columbia: Talonbooks, 2007, pp. 115-116.

[19] Lipstatdt, Deborah E., Beyond Belief: The American Press & the Coming of the Holocaust 1933-1945, New York: The Free Press, 1986, p. 277.

[20] Wyman, David S., The Abandonment of the Jews: America and the Holocaust, 1941-1945, New York: The New Press, 2007, p. x.

[21] Ibid., pp. 342-343.

[22] ((((((Goldberg)))))), Michael, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 55.

[23] http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Obama-vows-never-again-on-70th-anniversary-of-liberation-of-Nazis-Dachau-camp-400570.

[24] Buechner, Howard A., Dachau: The Hour of the Avenger, Metairie, LA: Thunderbird Press, Inc., 1986, pp. 5, 29, 96-97.

[25] Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, p. 104.

[26] Ibid., pp. 190-191, 227, 233.

[27] “West Germany’s Holocaust Payoff to Israel and World Jewry,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, Summer 1988, p. 245.

[28] “Germany Has Paid Out More Than $61.8 Billion in Third Reich Reparations,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 17, No. 6, November/December 1998, p. 19.

[29] See http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/world/europe/for-60th-year-germany-honors-duty-to-pay-holocaust-victims.html and http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Germany-to-pay-250-Million-to-child-Holocaust-survivors-374596.

[30] ADL on the Frontline, January 1994, p. 2.

[31] ((((((Goldberg)))))), Michael, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 41.

[32] Segev, Tom, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust, New York: Hill and Wang, pp. 513, 515-516.

[33] ((((((Goldberg)))))), Michael, Why Should Jews Survive?: Looking Past the Holocaust Toward a Jewish Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, p. 50.

 

 

Donald Trump is the Best Feeder of Fish, Okay. Nobody Feeds Fish Better Than Donald Trump, Alright?

BEST EVER!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2017

THAT’S A BAD GOYIM HE’S HURTING THE FISH THIS IS AGAINST DEMOCRACY GOYIM

The sickening and evil Jewish media has been riled into a frenzy over a picture of Donald Trump dumping his fish food for the fish at a Japanese fish-feeding event in Japan.

Look at this gif that the vile CNN slut Veronica Rocha posted to Twitter.

Notice how it weirdly zooms in on Trump’s face?

Yes, the frame was cropped.

Here’s the uncropped/non-zooming gif, where you can see that before Trump poured his fish food, PM Abe did that same action.

Here’s the still image.

“Petty” does not go far enough.

I would say “kiked” is more appropriate.

The entire Jewish media jumped all over this picture and the cropped/zoomed gif and used it as an opportunity to attack Trump as a fool.

A few of these outlets have changed their story since the goyim found out.

Here’s The Guardian’s description of the event on Twitter:

But when you click the story, it’s been updated to say that the media “overreacted.”

But of course, the press corps was there and knew that Trump was following Abe’s lead in dumping out the remaining fish food, but decided to try to trick the goyim.

This is insane that you have the media trying to deceive people like this so aggressively and openly while being aware that they’re going to get caught.

A couple of them apologized and pretended it was an accident.

But those news story screenshots above are from time of writing, at least 4 hours after it was revealed that the media (apparently it was someone from ABC) purposefully edited that clip to try to make Trump look stupid.

These “people” not only do not care about the truth, they don’t care that people know that they do not care about truth.

This fish food hoax is the epitome of fake news – you can almost see it better because it is about something totally irrelevant.

The Jewish fake news industrial complex has become a parody of itself.

These people need to be rounded up and put in camps.

In Poland. 

((((((Bobby Fischer))))))’s “Notes on the Jew”

Benjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2017

((((((Bobby Fischer)))))) is seen by many as the greatest chess player of all time. Whether that is true or not, is impossible to know. But that he is the most famous, important and influential player of all time is not even up for dispute. He captivated the world with his prodigious talent and genius, and pretty much singlehandedly put chess on the map.

The 1972 World Chess Championship, in which he defeated Boris Spassky 12½–8½, was seen as a Cold War proxy battle between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which was at the time the source of the majority of the world’s most formidable players.

Fischer was only 28 years old at the time. His victory over Spassky and the Soviets, and the meteoric rise that led to it (Fischer had become both the youngest grandmaster and the youngest U.S. Chess Champion by the age of 15) was a source of great pride for our nation, and he became a national hero.

Despite his unfortunate partial Jewish heritage, Fischer also absolutely hated the Jews. He saw what they had done and were doing to the world, and was not at all ashamed or afraid to openly call them out for it, regardless of the negative consequences it brought upon him and his legacy.

Living in Brooklyn, New York, from the age of 6, Fischer had many bad experiences dealing with Jews throughout his life. The chess world was also riddled with them. According to Fischer, in a 1961 interview with Jew pornographer Ralph ((((((Ginzburg)))))), there were “too many Jews in chess” and they had “taken away the class of the game.”

In the video above, we hear what is probably his most poignant statement against the Jews. It comes from an interview Fischer gave to Philippino grandmaster Eugenio Torre, while he was locked in jail in Japan as a political prisoner in 2005.

Here is a transcript:

A few notes on the Jew:

Jews are anti-social, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, deceitful, et cetera. They wish to destroy, rule and kill, rob whoever gets in their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle.

Even though they live off the non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order, because it’s pure and beautiful, and also because it’s bigger and stronger than they are, and they feel that they can not fully control it. Nature’s beauty and harmony stands in stark contrast to their squalidness and ugliness, and that makes them hate it all the more.

Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. The anti-human Jew hates and wants to destroy all non-Jews. He will also destroy even other Jews who are less destructive and evil than he is, if they get in his way.

Apparently, the wickedness of the Jew is genetically based. Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. By the act of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody, cruel, senseless act, he shows his cruelty and sadism, and that he will stop at nothing to obtain his ends. Surely the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumcision, which serves as an ideal cover and distraction from their own wickedness in this regard.

Jews are truly anti-human and anti-nature. Jews are intensely selfish, intolerant and anti-social, et cetera. They are full of hate, greed, malice, et cetera. Naturally, other people, i.e. the non-Jews, don’t like being bulldozed aside, robbed and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or later resist. That is where the lies and deceit of the Jews come into place.

Following this, the interviewer objects with some platitudes about “peace and unity” and everybody all getting along, to which Fischer replies “I don’t think there’ll be any peace until these Jews are dealt with Eugene – these people are animals.”

And he was absolutely right. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

The Jews dismiss Fischer’s truthful anti-Semitic statements by slandering him as being nothing more than a crazy paranoiac (here is their most recent hit piece against him).

It’s true he maybe was a bit crazy and a bit paranoid at times, especially in his later years, but that doesn’t change the fact that he was spot-on about the evil and destructive nature of the Jew.

Fischer had an IQ somewhere between 180 and 187 – the kikes weren’t fooling him.

USC Prof Stands By His Call For ‘Whiteness and therefore white people’ To Be ‘Destroyed’

The University of Southern California professor who said “whiteness” “must be by any and all means, destroyed,” said Wednesday that he stands behind his statements.

In an email to The College Fix, self-described “black identity extremist” assistant professor Charles H.F. Davis wrote: “Yes, I stand behind my statements against white supremacy, heterosexism and homophobia, and patriarchy as systems of oppression, all of which are both embodied and advanced by the violent and dehumanizing rhetoric and policy decisions of the current President of the United States.”


USC defended Davis’ “right” to express his views.

“Statements made by our faculty members are not endorsed by the University; indeed, we sometimes profoundly disagree with the statements,” they said in a statement to The College Fix. “Nevertheless, we protect their right to express those views. However, USC does not condone violence or threats of violence in any form.”

As The College Fix reports:

Davis told The Fix that he refutes InformationLiberation’s accusation that his Twitter account includes “anti-white hate” and promotes violence against law enforcement, saying it is a “perfect and intentional misrepresentation.” However, the professor did not deny harboring anti-police and anti-whiteness sentiments.

“To be clear, I am decidedly against whiteness as a social and political ideology, which systematically marginalize and disenfranchise people of color from opportunities for societal advancement,” he said. “In addition, I am against the institution of policing, which has historically and continuously enacted racial terror, sexual violence, and economic exploitation against racial minorities, women and LGBTQ communities, and economically disadvantaged working-class people.”

It’s a “perfect and intentional misrepresentation” to say he’s pushing “anti-white hate” – he just hates everything white people have created and wants to see it destroyed because we thrive on “marginalizing and disenfranchising” people of color, understand?

Referring to his background photo on his Twitter account, Davis said he thinks photos that show resistance to police violence are necessary and said the photo of a black woman shooting a pig in a police officer’s uniform “is an intentional political statement.”

Davis said he defines whiteness as an ideology of racial superiority based in racist practices and beliefs and added the concept “is neither synonymous with nor exclusive to white people.” However, he said all white people reap in its benefits and that it must be eradicated because it “allows for both passive and active forms of violence to be enacted upon people of color, many of which result material and potentially fatal consequences.”

Indeed, it takes a high level of wokeness to realize black people can be white supremacists.

Davis is not against white people, he’s just against our very essence – our “whiteness” – which he and Marxist professors much smarter than himself get to arbitrarily define without our input.

Thanks for clearing all that up, Professor.

If you would like to file a complaint against this professor and his anti-white black extremist ideology:

Complaint process

Initial interview

If you feel someone has sexually harassed you, or has discriminated against or harassed you because of your membership in a protected class (such as race, gender, sexual identity, military status, marital status, age, national origin or religion), call our office at (213) 740-5086. We will arrange for an investigator to interview you. Although we encourage you to make an appointment, complaint investigators are frequently available for walk-in appointments as well.

To make an appointment call (213) 740-5086 at UPC or (323) 442-2020 at HSC, or email the office at oed@usc.edu. This appointment does not automatically initiate an investigation, but will serve to determine the nature of any concerns, and start the process of determining how best to address those concerns.