ISIS is Defeated But US Says They’re Just Going to Stay in Syria and Chill

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 17, 2017

This is kinda like when you break up with your girlfriend but you decide to stay living in her apartment because it’s free and there is someone there you can have sex with.

And also you’re planning on murdering her for revenge and it’s easier to murder her while you’re living in her house than to break in and kill her.

Morning Edition:

Raqqa, the de facto capital of the Islamic State, is taken and in ruins.

U.S. troops and civilian aid workers are in the Syrian city, helping local officials restore basic services such as food, water and electricity.

But the recapture of ISIS-held territory in Iraq and Syria is only a partial win for U.S. policy. After seven years of civil war, the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad remains in power. The other U.S. objectives — the end of Assad, a new Syrian constitution and democratic elections — remain unfulfilled.

Despite the defeat of ISIS, Defense Secretary James Mattis told reporters this week that U.S. forces will remain in Syria.

The intention, he said, is to prevent the appearance of “ISIS 2.0.”

There are hundreds of U.S. troops in Syria. Pentagon officials say the U.S. is on solid legal ground to be there because the U.N. Security Council endorsed the anti-ISIS mission. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says the U.S. presence is “illegitimate.”

It’s illegitimate even by UN rules. The US is illegally occupying a sovereign nation against the declared wishes of the elected leader.

ISIS 1.0 only happened because the CIA and the Jews funded it. As such, there is zero chance of an ISIS 2.0 as long as Donald Trump doesn’t return the terror-funding funds he cut earlier this year.

“There are a lot of questions to ask about the United States’ goals in Syria,” Lavrov said, according to the Russian news agency TASS. “U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has told me many times that their only goal is to defeat IS.”

A change in regime “runs counter to the Geneva agreements and … assurances that the U.S.’s only goal in Syria is to fight terrorism,” Lavrov said.

Assad and his Russian and Iranian allies are demanding the U.S. leave Syria.

So are the American people.

So who wants them there then?

The next meeting of the Geneva peace talks is Nov. 28. The U.S. is pressing for the Syrian Democratic Forces and the Syrian Kurds to be included at the negotiating table.

It’s unlikely that Assad and the Russians will agree. With Russian and Iranian military assistance, Assad has emerged as the dominant political and military force in Syria with no need to accommodate his opponents.

Pentagon officials say the Russians and Syrians continue to move east toward rebel-held territory. The U.S. is attempting to work with Russia to establish “de-confliction zones,” but it’s not clear the effort will succeed.

Yes.

They are still protecting terrorists.

Still.

Even Donald Trump can’t manage to shut that down.

Though he shut it down enough that Russia was able to win the war. And I think he’s going to be able to get these troops out of there so they can finish the job, clear out the remaining ZOGroaches, and get things back to normalcy.

What we’re still waiting on here is that dogfaced fat fucking whore Angela Merkel to tell us when she’s going to send back the 2 million monkeys that flooded Europe under the pretext of “fleeing the brutal civil war in Syria.”

Because surely, with the war totally over, these “people” can return home now.

The two heroic locals who exchanged gunfire with ANTIFA shooter in Texas Terrorist Attack

Two heroic locals have been praised for stopping the worst mass shooting in Texas which left at least 27 dead.

Devin Patrick Kelley, 26, was leaving First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs after he opened fire on parishioners during mass when Stephen Willeford, 55, confronted him.

Texas Department of Public Safety Regional Director Freeman Martin said Willeford, a keen biker, had ‘grabbed his rifle and engaged the suspect.’

A local resident told DailyMail.com that Willeford, who attends a different church, was first alerted to the shooting when his daughter called him saying there was a man in body armor gunning down church goers.

4610566A00000578-5053013-Stephen_Willeford_-a-44_1509954871061

Johnnie Langendorff

Stephen Willeford, 55, (Top) and Johnnie Langendorff (Bottom) have been praised as heroes after they were able to stop Texas gunman Devin Kelley’s rampage

He grabbed his gun and bravely headed down to confront the killer.

The local said that while Willeford has no military experience, he is an excellent shot, and when he came face to face with Kelley, he didn’t hesitate; he shot in between Kelley’s body armor, hitting him in his side.

The 26-year-old had dropped his Ruger assault rifle and climbed in an SUV to flee the scene.

He said that Kelley had taken a hostage in the passenger seat as he fled.

But another local resident, Johnnie Langendorff, who had witnessed the confrontation refused to let the shooter get away. Both he and Willeford, a local plumber, jumped in his truck and gave chase.

In a Facebook post, Langendorff’s girlfriend Summer Caddel described how the pair had ‘jumped in my boyfriend’s truck and they chased that sick b*****d down in pursuit until the cops could catch up. He was able to run the shooter off of the road on 539!’

Langendorff told KSAT 12 that he’d been speeding at 95mph, while on the phone to dispatch, while Willeford kept his rifle trained on the gunman’s car.

The local, who is familiar with the heroes, said that Willeford made sure the passenger Kelley had taken hostage was on the ground out of the way when they approached the car.

But he claims that Kelley was already dead when they found him, having succumb to blood loss from the gunshot wound he suffered at the church.

Martin confirmed that police had found Kelley dead, saying that: ‘We are not sure if it was self inflicted or if he was shot by a local resident.’

Donald Trump is the Best Feeder of Fish, Okay. Nobody Feeds Fish Better Than Donald Trump, Alright?

BEST EVER!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 6, 2017

THAT’S A BAD GOYIM HE’S HURTING THE FISH THIS IS AGAINST DEMOCRACY GOYIM

The sickening and evil Jewish media has been riled into a frenzy over a picture of Donald Trump dumping his fish food for the fish at a Japanese fish-feeding event in Japan.

Look at this gif that the vile CNN slut Veronica Rocha posted to Twitter.

Notice how it weirdly zooms in on Trump’s face?

Yes, the frame was cropped.

Here’s the uncropped/non-zooming gif, where you can see that before Trump poured his fish food, PM Abe did that same action.

Here’s the still image.

“Petty” does not go far enough.

I would say “kiked” is more appropriate.

The entire Jewish media jumped all over this picture and the cropped/zoomed gif and used it as an opportunity to attack Trump as a fool.

A few of these outlets have changed their story since the goyim found out.

Here’s The Guardian’s description of the event on Twitter:

But when you click the story, it’s been updated to say that the media “overreacted.”

But of course, the press corps was there and knew that Trump was following Abe’s lead in dumping out the remaining fish food, but decided to try to trick the goyim.

This is insane that you have the media trying to deceive people like this so aggressively and openly while being aware that they’re going to get caught.

A couple of them apologized and pretended it was an accident.

But those news story screenshots above are from time of writing, at least 4 hours after it was revealed that the media (apparently it was someone from ABC) purposefully edited that clip to try to make Trump look stupid.

These “people” not only do not care about the truth, they don’t care that people know that they do not care about truth.

This fish food hoax is the epitome of fake news – you can almost see it better because it is about something totally irrelevant.

The Jewish fake news industrial complex has become a parody of itself.

These people need to be rounded up and put in camps.

In Poland. 

((((((Bobby Fischer))))))’s “Notes on the Jew”

Benjamin Garland
Daily Stormer
October 30, 2017

((((((Bobby Fischer)))))) is seen by many as the greatest chess player of all time. Whether that is true or not, is impossible to know. But that he is the most famous, important and influential player of all time is not even up for dispute. He captivated the world with his prodigious talent and genius, and pretty much singlehandedly put chess on the map.

The 1972 World Chess Championship, in which he defeated Boris Spassky 12½–8½, was seen as a Cold War proxy battle between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which was at the time the source of the majority of the world’s most formidable players.

Fischer was only 28 years old at the time. His victory over Spassky and the Soviets, and the meteoric rise that led to it (Fischer had become both the youngest grandmaster and the youngest U.S. Chess Champion by the age of 15) was a source of great pride for our nation, and he became a national hero.

Despite his unfortunate partial Jewish heritage, Fischer also absolutely hated the Jews. He saw what they had done and were doing to the world, and was not at all ashamed or afraid to openly call them out for it, regardless of the negative consequences it brought upon him and his legacy.

Living in Brooklyn, New York, from the age of 6, Fischer had many bad experiences dealing with Jews throughout his life. The chess world was also riddled with them. According to Fischer, in a 1961 interview with Jew pornographer Ralph ((((((Ginzburg)))))), there were “too many Jews in chess” and they had “taken away the class of the game.”

In the video above, we hear what is probably his most poignant statement against the Jews. It comes from an interview Fischer gave to Philippino grandmaster Eugenio Torre, while he was locked in jail in Japan as a political prisoner in 2005.

Here is a transcript:

A few notes on the Jew:

Jews are anti-social, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, deceitful, et cetera. They wish to destroy, rule and kill, rob whoever gets in their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle.

Even though they live off the non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order, because it’s pure and beautiful, and also because it’s bigger and stronger than they are, and they feel that they can not fully control it. Nature’s beauty and harmony stands in stark contrast to their squalidness and ugliness, and that makes them hate it all the more.

Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. The anti-human Jew hates and wants to destroy all non-Jews. He will also destroy even other Jews who are less destructive and evil than he is, if they get in his way.

Apparently, the wickedness of the Jew is genetically based. Jews are destroyers. They are anti-humans. By the act of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody, cruel, senseless act, he shows his cruelty and sadism, and that he will stop at nothing to obtain his ends. Surely the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumcision, which serves as an ideal cover and distraction from their own wickedness in this regard.

Jews are truly anti-human and anti-nature. Jews are intensely selfish, intolerant and anti-social, et cetera. They are full of hate, greed, malice, et cetera. Naturally, other people, i.e. the non-Jews, don’t like being bulldozed aside, robbed and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or later resist. That is where the lies and deceit of the Jews come into place.

Following this, the interviewer objects with some platitudes about “peace and unity” and everybody all getting along, to which Fischer replies “I don’t think there’ll be any peace until these Jews are dealt with Eugene – these people are animals.”

And he was absolutely right. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

The Jews dismiss Fischer’s truthful anti-Semitic statements by slandering him as being nothing more than a crazy paranoiac (here is their most recent hit piece against him).

It’s true he maybe was a bit crazy and a bit paranoid at times, especially in his later years, but that doesn’t change the fact that he was spot-on about the evil and destructive nature of the Jew.

Fischer had an IQ somewhere between 180 and 187 – the kikes weren’t fooling him.

USC Prof Stands By His Call For ‘Whiteness and therefore white people’ To Be ‘Destroyed’

The University of Southern California professor who said “whiteness” “must be by any and all means, destroyed,” said Wednesday that he stands behind his statements.

In an email to The College Fix, self-described “black identity extremist” assistant professor Charles H.F. Davis wrote: “Yes, I stand behind my statements against white supremacy, heterosexism and homophobia, and patriarchy as systems of oppression, all of which are both embodied and advanced by the violent and dehumanizing rhetoric and policy decisions of the current President of the United States.”


USC defended Davis’ “right” to express his views.

“Statements made by our faculty members are not endorsed by the University; indeed, we sometimes profoundly disagree with the statements,” they said in a statement to The College Fix. “Nevertheless, we protect their right to express those views. However, USC does not condone violence or threats of violence in any form.”

As The College Fix reports:

Davis told The Fix that he refutes InformationLiberation’s accusation that his Twitter account includes “anti-white hate” and promotes violence against law enforcement, saying it is a “perfect and intentional misrepresentation.” However, the professor did not deny harboring anti-police and anti-whiteness sentiments.

“To be clear, I am decidedly against whiteness as a social and political ideology, which systematically marginalize and disenfranchise people of color from opportunities for societal advancement,” he said. “In addition, I am against the institution of policing, which has historically and continuously enacted racial terror, sexual violence, and economic exploitation against racial minorities, women and LGBTQ communities, and economically disadvantaged working-class people.”

It’s a “perfect and intentional misrepresentation” to say he’s pushing “anti-white hate” – he just hates everything white people have created and wants to see it destroyed because we thrive on “marginalizing and disenfranchising” people of color, understand?

Referring to his background photo on his Twitter account, Davis said he thinks photos that show resistance to police violence are necessary and said the photo of a black woman shooting a pig in a police officer’s uniform “is an intentional political statement.”

Davis said he defines whiteness as an ideology of racial superiority based in racist practices and beliefs and added the concept “is neither synonymous with nor exclusive to white people.” However, he said all white people reap in its benefits and that it must be eradicated because it “allows for both passive and active forms of violence to be enacted upon people of color, many of which result material and potentially fatal consequences.”

Indeed, it takes a high level of wokeness to realize black people can be white supremacists.

Davis is not against white people, he’s just against our very essence – our “whiteness” – which he and Marxist professors much smarter than himself get to arbitrarily define without our input.

Thanks for clearing all that up, Professor.

If you would like to file a complaint against this professor and his anti-white black extremist ideology:

Complaint process

Initial interview

If you feel someone has sexually harassed you, or has discriminated against or harassed you because of your membership in a protected class (such as race, gender, sexual identity, military status, marital status, age, national origin or religion), call our office at (213) 740-5086. We will arrange for an investigator to interview you. Although we encourage you to make an appointment, complaint investigators are frequently available for walk-in appointments as well.

To make an appointment call (213) 740-5086 at UPC or (323) 442-2020 at HSC, or email the office at oed@usc.edu. This appointment does not automatically initiate an investigation, but will serve to determine the nature of any concerns, and start the process of determining how best to address those concerns.

Article Removed for Saying Intelligence is Mainly a Gene Thing

Diversity Macht Frei
October 29, 2017

Heresy against the Cult of Equality is no longer permitted in the public sphere. Its dogma – that people have equal genetic potential which is simply shaped differently by their divergent lifetime experiences – must go unchallenged.

Here we have a mainstream conservative just summarising the results of basic research findings about the heritability of intelligence. To put it in simple terms, he says stupid people are born stupid and there’s not much you can do about it. But, of course, he phrases it much more politely. Didn’t help him, though.

So what are the things that schools cannot change? Having immersed myself in psychology, particularly psychometrics, I’ve reluctantly come to the conclusion that it is naïve to think schools can do much to ameliorate the effects of inequality. I don’t just mean socio-economic inequality; I also mean differences in intelligence. A child’s general cognitive ability is the strongest single predictor of how well they do in their GCSEs, with differences in IQ accounting for more than half of the variance in exam results. See this 2007 study, for instance, which involved tracking 70,000 English schoolchildren over a five-year period. It’s a finding that has been replicated several times.

Can schools do anything to raise children’s general cognitive ability? The answer is maybe, but we haven’t yet discovered how to do it. Intelligence is a highly heritable characteristic, which is to say that more than half the variance in IQ at a population level is due to genetic differences, with less than half due to environmental differences. It’s true that the heritability of IQ is lower among children than it is among adults, with the environment playing a bigger role during adolescence. But the impact of the environment on children’s attainment, even during these formative years, is still fairly negligible – lower than most educationalists believe. Overall, children’s genes account for between 60 and 70 per cent of the variance in GCSE results, with IQ accounting for about half that genetic influence.

Source

This appeared as one side of a debate, meaning a contrary view was published at the same time. But this wasn’t enough. After a storm of criticism, the article was taken down and an apology given.

One of the pieces submitted, by Toby Young, we disagreed with. We wanted to give the opposing view, so we published Toby’s piece alongside a rebuttal from Sonia Blandford, who has recently written on similar subjects. The aim was to drive debate. But we shouldn’t have published his blog, even with the rebuttal: it was against what we believe is true and against our values and vision. We apologise. Although we don’t want to provide a platform for those views we also don’t want to cover over our mistake, so this note also serves as a record.

Source

At its irrational core, the Equality Movement is a rebellion against the very idea of natural difference, a rejection of nature itself; and, since science is just nature elucidated, a repudiation of science too.

Race is real, race matters, we are not the same.