California skin games

From a SurveyUSA poll conducted back in April, illustration 364,140 of how in a multiracial society, democracy inevitably devolves into a skins game, even on the left. The following shows the percentages of whites, Hispanics, and Asians who said they were supporting gubernatorial hopefuls Gavin Newsome, Antonio Villaraigosa, and John Chiang:

The racial percentages all fall short of 100% because the poll asked about eight candidates in addition to an “other” candidate option–these three were the top (D)s. The black sample was too small for SurveyUSA to break those out by candidate.

Although California is majority-minority, non-Hispanic whites still comprise a majority of the electorate because Hispanics and Asians are slackers. Newsome won the primary and so consequently will be California’s next governor.

A couple other noteworthy observations. Firstly, political dissolution is on the horizon. No matter how it’s sliced, Gen Z and millennials are more favorably predisposed to political dissolution than boomers and silents. When the latter disappears, the political landscape will look a lot different. Support for the CAL3 initiative that would break the state up into three new smaller states, by age:

Secondly, even in a state like California where blacks make up a small and shrinking proportion of the non-white coalition, they are open borders fanatics. The survey asked respondents whether the national guard should be used to secure the southern border and what it should focus on if used. The percentages who said the national guard should not be utilized, with “not sure” responses excluded, by race:

The other two possible responses were the based “patrol for those crossing [the border illegally]” and the cucked “focus on gangs and drugs”.

A plurality of all respondents chose the cucked answer, so don’t optimistically come away thinking the inverse of the bars above are the percentages who want the National Guard to stop illegal alien crossings. Most of the residuals just say they want the drugs and gang activity halted. The invasion itself is okay–we’d just like it to be a little more peaceful and sober is all!

This is a finding that crops up everywhere. For example, from Pew Research:

Blacks are more inclined to accept rapefugees than Hispanics. Hispanics are also twice as supportive of Trump’s immigration stances as blacks.

If I retained an ounce of hope in civic nationalism, this reality would challenge that hope. Since I don’t, it serves as another battering ram to smash into the quixotic civic nationalists who think a multiracial democracy can do anything other than devolve into a skins game.

Dispatches From Occupied France: The Hajis are Using AK’s Now

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
May 26, 2018

One gets the feeling that things are escalating.

RT:

Two men in their thirties were killed near a football stadium in Marseille at around 1am on Saturday, according to La Provence. The victims reportedly died at the scene after being shot with a Kalashnikov. It is the second such incident this week. On Monday, Kalashnikov-wielding gunmen opened fire in another part of the city, injuring one person. 

That’s all the news has to report.

I’m sure in this case, we’ll find out more info in the coming days.

But there might come a point when the information just stops. We’ll know people are being shot and killed by AK’s in cities and that the police/military isn’t doing anything about it, but the news won’t be reporting on it anymore.

Or if they will be reporting on it – it’ll just be quick news bulletins: “AK Attack in Marseilles, Two Dead” and that’s all.

Saying any more would reveal too much. Like that there’s straight up a Moslem terror group trying to take over the city – and succeeding.

I’d say we’ve got about 5 years left before the takeover kicks off in earnest. And then maybe 15 years from that, a native resistance might emerge.

But whatever, that’s all speculation. For now, all we know is that Moslems have AKs in Marseilles and they’re getting some target practice in.

In 1996, Charlize Theron Admitted She Left Black-Run South Africa Because “there was no future for a white South African…”

Shot. [That Thing She Does, People, October 14, 1996]:

CHARLIZE THERON STRETCHES HER LITHE, 5’9″ frame over her purple couch and smiles as she remembers the first time she rented the movie Splash. “I was in love with Tom Hanks instantly,” she says. “I hated Daryl Hannah. I was sitting there saying, ‘I could have done that part so much better. That should be me!’ ”

Deep in her heart, Theron knows the truth, but to have a career in Hollywood, she sold her racial soul for momentary glory.

At the time, Theron was all of 9 years old and watching the film on the living room floor of her parents’ farmhouse in the remote South African village of Benoni. But if her dreams were big, she wasn’t afraid to pursue them: Twelve years later, the actress, now 21, is appearing with Hanks in his directorial debut, That Thing You Do!, the story of a ’60s rock band. Theron plays Tina, the prim, self-absorbed girlfriend of the lead character, played by Tom Everett Scott. Meanwhile she is blowing away critics as the hit woman Helga in the violent 2 Days in the Valley.

“She’s this Amazonian beauty,” says James Spader, Theron’s lover in Valley. “She carries an enormous presence.” Director John Herzfeld was equally impressed with Theron’s acting debut, particularly in light of her quick recovery after a mishap during a fight scene with co-star Teri Hatcher. “Teri actually hit Charlize with the first punch,” he says. “When you see Charlize’s head go back, that’s real.”

According to Theron, that was just her first experience with screen combat. “I got smacked in the face, kicked in the ribs and thrown into walls,” she says. “But it’s fun!”

Theron also enjoyed the collegial atmosphere on the set. Growing up an only child on her family’s farm, Theron says, her pet goat Bok “was like my best friend.” As an outlet for her boundless energy, she took up ballet at age 6 and soon was dancing professionally in Johannesburg. But at 15, she says, “everything just went wrong.”

Her father, Charles, died, leaving the family’s road-construction business in the hands of her mother, Gerda. Theron had little time to grieve; with the dismantling of apartheid and the creation of new affirmative action laws, she became convinced “there was no future for a white South African.” One week after turning 16, she accepted an offer from an Italian model scout, and—with her mother’s blessing—headed for Milan. Looking back, she says, “I just ran.”

So Charlize Theron left South Africa because once blacks took over the country in 1994 she feared “there was no future for a white South African.”

Chaser. [Charlize Theron Considers Leaving America as ‘Racism Alive and Well’, Breitbart.com, 4-13-18]:

South African actress Charlize Theron has revealed she is considering leaving the United States because of a perceived increase in racism under the Trump administration.

“I don’t even know how to talk about the last year under our new administration,” Theron said in an interview for Elle conducted by the comedian ((((((Chelsea Handler)))))).

“But racism is much more alive and well than people thought. We can’t deny it anymore. We have to be vocal. ”

Theron, who was born and raised in apartheid South Africa, went on to claim that she fears for the safety of her adopted children, both of whom are African-American.

“There are places in this country where, if I got a job, I wouldn’t take it. I wouldn’t travel with my kids to some parts of America, and that’s really problematic,” she said.

“There are a lot of times when I look at my kids and I’m like, if this continues, I might have to [leave America]. Because the last thing I want is for my children to feel unsafe,” she continued. “But they’re going to have to know that it’s a different climate for them than it is for me, and how unfair that is.

So Charlize Theron left South Africa because once blacks took over the country in 1994 she feared “there was no future for a white South African.”
She then sold her soul to act in Hollywood, and now owes her entire career to spitting in the face of her people and white Americans.

Theron left South Africa because it was unsafe for white people (under black rule, she correctly ascertained white people had no future) and she now parrots the anti-white lies our elite mandate all of their puppets espouse.

She surrendered her racial soul for a few decades of glory.

The Bizarre Lies Told At Nuremberg To Execute Germans They Wish You’d Forget

The Bizarre Lies Told At Nuremberg To Execute Germans They Wish You’d Forget

From Wear’s War

…many of the charges made at Nuremberg are so bizarre that most defenders of the Holocaust story have long since let them lapse”.

After Germany’s defeat in WWII, the Nuremberg and later trials were organized primarily for political purposes rather than to dispense impartial justice. Wears War brings to you each week a quote from the many fine men and women who were openly appalled by the trials. All of these people were highly respected and prominent in their field, at least until they spoke out against the trials.

Healthy Inmates Celebrate Liberation With Alcohol, Buchenwald, 1945

Many defenders of the Holocaust story maintain that the 42-volume Trial of the Major War Criminals (The Blue Series) supplies a massive compilation of damning evidence against Germany’s National Socialist regime. In his book Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Carlos Porter confronts the evidence directly by reproducing page after page from the Blue Series. Porter shows that many of the charges made at Nuremberg are so bizarre that most defenders of the Holocaust story have long since let them lapse. In addition to killing Jews in homicidal gas chambers, the Germans at Nuremberg were accused of:

–building special electrical appliances to zap inmates to death with mass electrical shocks;

–killing 20,000 Jews in a village near Auschwitz with an atomic bomb;

–forcing prisoners to climb trees and then killing the prisoners by cutting down the trees;

–killing 840,000 Russian prisoners at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp using a pedal-driven brain-bashing machine, and then burning the bodies in four mobile crematories;

–torturing and executing people at the Yanov camp in Russia in time to musiccreated by a special orchestra selected from among the prisoners, and then shooting every member of the orchestra;

grinding the bones of 200 people at one time as described in documents and photographs that have disappeared;

making lampshades, handbags, driving gloves for SS officers, book bindings, saddles, house slippers, etc. out of human skin;

–killing prisoners and concentration camp inmates for everything from having soiled underwear to having armpit hair; and

steaming people to death like lobsters in steam chambers at Treblinka.

After this incredible survey of Nuremberg atrocity evidence, Carlos Porter provides numerous examples of improper prosecution tactics at Nuremberg. The defendants at Nuremberg were rarely able to confront their accusers, since affidavits from witnesses who had been deposed months before sufficed. The prosecution made it difficult for the defense lawyers to have timely access to the documents introduced into evidence by the prosecution. Also, photocopies and transcripts were usually submitted into evidence instead of the original German documents, which in many cases seemed to have disappeared. Finally, the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case. The defense had no right to review the tons of remaining documents that might help them defend their clients.

American soldiers with deloused clothing airing outside the dis-infestation chambers, 1945. The dis-infestation chambers and Zyklon-B continued to be used after the Allied liberation of the camp, something that the Holocaust storytellers always neglect to tell.

Quote Source: Porter, Carlos Whitlock, Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Historical Review Press, 1988.

Repeat After Me: “The Nuremberg Trials Dispensed Fair & Objective Justice For The Greater Good Of Humanity!”
Decades Later Americans Pay To Administer Reparation Agreements: “…the State Department has waived ‘quite considerable’ administrative costs”. After Survivors Interfered In U.S. State & Federal Contract Tenders In 2016. Repeat After Me: “The Nuremberg Trials Dispensed Fair & Objective Justice For The Greater GUILT Of Humanity!”
The Book That Requires Trolls On A Salary To Attempt To Discredit It.

It’s You or Them When The Dreamers Dream

by Jonathan Peter Wilkinson on January 19, 2018

There is no diversity with Freedom of Association. Under forced integration, there is an absence of armed conflict, only as a delaying action until sufficient numbers can be imported to overpower you.

It is common knowledge that people who are not part of an indigenous culture will feel they are denied opportunities in direct proportion to the strength of that culture. Therefore, when given a vote, they will exercise economic and social self-interest by voting to weaken or destroy that culture.

The Drexel University Professor who asked for White Genocide as a Christmas Present in 2016 was just stupid enough to be honest. Our current US President understands this and when possible, he pushes back.

The Trump administration has declined to renew the temporary protected status of Salvadoran immigrants to the US, giving an estimated 263,000 people less than two years to leave the country or be deported. The Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designation has allowed immigrants from El Salvador to live and work in the US since 2001, when a pair of earthquakes crippled much of the Central American nation.

There are two aspects of this story that require further flushing out. First of all, this was supposed to be a temporary amnesty starting in 2001. It was for people specifically displaced as a result of a natural disaster. Once the disaster was cleaned up, there was no legitimate reason for 263,000 non-citizens to be given free reign in the US. Even El Salvador doesn’t need fifteen years to rebuild housing. These people could have returned 10 years ago.

But the earthquake was an excuse, the point was to get these people into the US, not away from any earthquake. There is a specific reason why a fifteen year vacation in Mexico, Argentina or Brazil was not acceptable. It just had to be the Good Ol’ US of A! Why make that sort of a paranoid statement? Well, President Trump has been forced to remove 60,000 Haitians after a 2010 earthquake, and about 60,000 more Nicauraguans and Hondurans who were given temporary status after a hurricane in 1998.

All three revocations have been met with similar types of protests. ¡It’s simply heartless and cruel to send hordes of foreigners who disrespect our country while loudly proclaiming allegiance to their own back home to the Motherland! There is only one cure for homesickness and that would be home. Yet this sort of thing, even when it fulfills both the letter and the condition of the law under which these people have been brought in, is seen as cruel and inhumane.

Amanda Baran, a consultant to the Immigrant Legal Resource Centre, called Monday’s decision “reckless and heartless”.
“El Salvador is one of the world’s most dangerous countries, and will be unable to absorb the return of these thousands of people whose lives are inextricably intertwined with those of ours here in the United States,” she said in a statement. Amnesty International also decried the decision, claiming the US “could be sending people to their deaths”.

Now Amanda Baran may or may not consider these “refugees” more or less than a paycheck. But if the Center For American Progress memorandum on DACA is accurate, these people are the new Hessians employed on behalf of the Amerikan Left. “Conservatives” who claim they can reason with La Raza, or that these people are Good Catholics who are natural conservatives, are deluded at best. At worst, they have put an industrial demand for cheap, transient labor over the needs and wants of citizenry born in their own nation. Maybe the mercenary Senator Jeff Flake has more in common with the aforementioned Hessians than I previously thought.

To understand why you can’t reason with La Raza or that these people are Good Catholics who are natural conservatives, here is what Malcolm X had to say on the subject of race relations from the logical and well-reasoned viewpoint of a minority.

This isn’t a crazy, illiterate or ignorant human being at all. He thinks, reasons lucidly and can only conclude that your cracka ass deserves a dirt nap from his point of view. There is no logical reason to think that well-spoken, clean-shaved and intellectually perspicacious “refugees” from Syria, Liberia or El Salvador would otherwise reason with respect to their own self-interest.

When the resistance to Donald Trump demands DACA, they are threatening to shut down a whole lot more than just THe Federal Government. Under the laws and regulations of our current system of forced integration; they have to go back or Amerika has to die in a bonfire. Which is it, Ladies and Germs?

Trump Says No to Immigration From “Shithole Countries” – Wants People from Norway Instead!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 12, 2018

It is certainly fair to ask why it is that you would want immigration from shithole countries. Presumably, this is a question a lot of people have.

Washington Post:

President Trump grew frustrated with lawmakers Thursday in the Oval Office when they discussed protecting immigrants from Haiti, El Salvador and African countries as part of a bipartisan immigration deal, according to several people briefed on the meeting.

“Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?” Trump said, according to these people, referring to countries mentioned by the lawmakers.

Trump then suggested that the United States should instead bring more people from countries such as Norway, whose prime minister he met with Wednesday. The president, according to a White House official, also suggested he would be open to more immigrants from Asian countries because he felt they help the United States economically.

In addition, the president singled out Haiti, telling lawmakers that immigrants from that country must be left out of any deal, these people said.

“Why do we need more Haitians?” Trump said, according to people familiar with the meeting. “Take them out.”

Lawmakers were taken aback by the comments, according to people familiar with their reactions. Sens. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) had proposed cutting the visa lottery program by 50 percent and then prioritizing countries already in the system, a White House official said.

A White House spokesman defended Trump’s position on immigration without directly addressing his remarks. White House officials did not dispute the account.

“Certain Washington politicians choose to fight for foreign countries, but President Trump will always fight for the American people,” spokesman Raj Shah said in a statement issued after The Washington Post first reported Trump’s remarks. “. . . Like other nations that have merit-based immigration, President Trump is fighting for permanent solutions that make our country stronger by welcoming those who can contribute to our society, grow our economy and assimilate into our great nation.”

The fact that they issued a response without denying the comments themselves indicates these were the actual words that Trump used.

This is encouraging and refreshing, as it indicates Trump is more or less on the same page as us with regards to race and immigration. Yes, he said the thing about Asian countries, which shows that he is not actually a racist and is instead concerned about merit, but that is a huge leap from where the rest of the entirety of the political system in this country is at.

The problem with Asian immigration, aside from the fact that they are not us and thus create social problems (not on the scale of other nonwhites, because they don’t commit the crimes and are not leeches, but it is certainly alienating to be surrounded by Asians), is that they actually take jobs and of course places in universities away from our people.

Of course, he may have just made the comment about Asians so as to not seem racist. I think it is clear that Trump’s ideal America the one he grew up with in the 1950s. And the closer we get to that, the closer we are to our own goals of a white race-state.

The other thing about Asians is that if people who think like us take power, they aren’t going to throw a fit about being forced to leave. We can give them a year to make arrangements, and they will just go, for the most part without even complaining. A certain small percentage of them may be allowed to stay, though of course not with citizenship or citizen’s rights. Anyway, it’s a non-issue right now.

The real issue is all of these shitty brown people who come to the country exclusively to parasite off of us.