An Anglo mother who beat her little girl with a spoon got a slap on the wrist in court
Proving modern Anglobitches are far from the oppressed victims of evil white men the corrupt American media makes them out to be – and that women actually have all rights and privileges, and no responsibilities or accountability in an insanely gynocentric culture, here’s the story of a woman who beat her daughter with a spoon, leaving the child with massive bruising and psychological trauma.
What did Lorien Norman get for the vicious attack on her daughter Evie? A slap on the wrist. From Daily Mail:
Evie’s mother walked free from court last week with a good behaviour bond after a judge found the baby’s injuries were ‘likely to resolve’. Despite the [fact her] offence carries a maximum sentence of 13 years Norman did not spend a day behind bars, instead given bond and ordered to pay $500.
The injustice system strikes again. Of course, if a man had beat his daughter like Lorien did, he wouldn’t have got off with such a light penalty. But men don’t get a pussy pass in Anglo culture.
Of course, mommy dearest tried to lie her way out of the crime. (TNMM has repeatedly quoted Schopenhauer when it comes to the innate female talent for lying and deception.)
Initially her mother attempted to claim the youngster had become bruised following a fall in a playground, before later pleading guilty aggravated assault causing harm.
White girls are a special kind of evil. A man doesn’t need much more proof than this.
There’s a reason I typically avoid white girls, and break my back trying to save enough money to make my way off the Anglobitch plantation as often as I can.
I won’t even go into the full story of how the last time I dated a white girl she spent 6 months trying to get me to knock her up and then faked a pregnancy, saying she was carrying my child to try to tie me down on the Anglo-American plantation. She continued with the ruse even after I had left the country to live abroad, just out of spite. It’s scary to think of what she had planned once I had become her child support slave, forced to pay up or go to debtor’s prison.
Gentlemen, there’s ice running though those veins behind cold, calculating blue eyes. Want proof?
Gloating about her escape in the hours after facing the District Court, Norman sent a series of messages to her former partner.
“So I’m not going to jail. What’s your next move?”
“I’ll send you photos in October. Cute family photos of myself, Indi, Evie, my sister, her partner and my nephew, Hudson.”
Of course, dad was treated like garbage. Nothing new here.
Speaking to Daily Mail Australia on Thursday, Mr McMahon said he was “speechless” at the soft sentence handed down.
“I’m disgusted – I’m truly speechless. Where is Evie’s justice?’ he told Daily Mail Australia. I’ve raised both these girls [Evie and India, the second child he had with Norman] single handedly, and she gets 10 months of a sentence that carries a maximum of 13 years!”
Thanks to gyncentrism in modern courts, women know they can behave however they want with impunity. Lorien told Evie’s
sperm donor father:
“Even with everyone on social media against me, I still made it. And I’ll be having part custody within a year.”
If you want to know why white people are dying off en masse, look no further than white women. What man wants to have kids that will be taken away from him with evil like this skulking around society, enjoying nearly total privilege?
The end can’t come soon enough for this culture’s dominance on the world stage. The world is ready for something new. Something with less estrogen, gynocentrism, and overt female malice.
The realities of the Anglo-American dating and mating markets continue to defy the culture’s Hallmark card mental imagery it foists upon millions
In the past week we’ve already established the retail collapse and the education bubble are directly tied to feminism. This morally bankrupt ideology is also financially bankrupting American women, who remain powerless against the powers of feminist persuasion.
Even as their lives turn to shit as a result of the feted fantasies of feminism, they adhere to its doxy like mindless lemmings. Modern American women are hostile, degenerate, government dependents or wage slaves of the corporate establishment, alone, broke, and statistically sterile, yet they think they’re “empowered” in ways their grandmothers never dreamed of.
The delusion is almost beyond belief. But wait, there’s more.
Witness, mainstream dating apps in major cities filled with women who have dispensed with the guise of “Looking for Mr. Right” altogether. (Which any man experienced with women knows is a ruse, anyway.) Now, Anglo-American females are going directly for the red meat: trading sex for money. Money they “need” since Big Daddy Government only doles out gibsmedats in paltry amounts, the corporate life only yields women a basic existence, and men are wising up to the child support annuity and frivorce lottery games hoes play.
Incidentally, sex for resources is the foundation of the human sexual market. TNMM has reported in the past that all marriages (and relationshits) are at their core, buried under layers of sophistry, sex for resources. (If not cash, the promise of present or future male utility.) We’ve also shown how even females in the animal kingdom trade sex for resources.
That’s just how it works. Every woman has her price. It is what it is. This state of affairs has been the norm since time immemorial, but in dystopian modern times the state has rendered men useless to women as it cucks them by providing women with resources it steals from Beta males. This is the chief reason the dating and mating markets have become completely dysfunctional in Anglo America.
Now, we have another confirmation of this idea as I did some poking around on POF, OkCupid, and Badoo dating apps, investigating the new depths our society has sunk to. It seems the dating market in America has reached an interesting new low. I didn’t go in looking for the conclusions I’m about to draw; rather these findings came up organically as I searched for eligible ladies while traveling around America.
I sent out a flurry of messages to women in several major American cities the past few weeks: New York City, Atlanta, and Chicago. At least 50% of the time, women would respond back with either innuendo the street savvy man knows meant they were looking to trade sex for money, or would send back unmistakable replies like these:
- “60/100/150” meaning the cost in dollars of different intervals of time for sexual encounters with her. $60 for 15 minutes, $100 for 30 minutes, $150 for 60 minutes, etc.
- “I’m looking for a sugar daddy.”
So, once again we find feminism has not empowered women but weakened them. It’s turning them into hoes.
But, why dating apps? Because the American Police State leviathan regularly terrorizes its sex-hungry populace with constant “stings” on victimless crimes like when Beta males (loathed and turned into pariahs in modern Anglo America) find a willing ho on Backpage. A conviction for soliciting for prostitution could render a hapless corporate worker drone destitute in this age of credentialism.
Read: You dumbfuck police, useful idiots of the power structure that you are, some things aren’t going away. Like the world’s oldest profession. Your ham-fisted stings just push this normal female behavior underground onto the black market.
Personally, I believe prostitution should be legalized. The ban on sex for hire needs to end along with other pseudo-moral prohibitions foisted upon the populace by a totally immoral American government. I see nothing wrong with it, especially since it dispenses with the ridiculous façade dating has become in a post-feminist world. Feminism has exposed the reality of women and the sexual market, as a direct “sex for resources” transaction is the default setting in an uncivilized society.
Meaning, modern women just want a man around long enough to extract sufficient cash from him to power their next fix of materialism or recreational drugs.
The fact women are now selling themselves on mainstream dating apps – of their own volition – proves the matrix is beyond delusional when it purports to “protect” women from evil sexual predators by rounding up “Johns” in prostitution stings around the U.S. In reality, the men they’re rounding up are timid and/or lonesome Beta males left out in the cold, masturbating ad nauseum post-feminism.
The reality is, women make the rules for sex in any society. Men only follow them. The rules used to be sex for marriage or commitment. But now, the rules have returned to their default setting of overt sex for cash. (Rather than clandestine sex for cash via marriage/commitment.)
This isn’t new knowledge. Our society has just become dysfunctional and insane as a result of social engineering and Cultural ((((((Marxism)))))). The lessons about women and sexuality we are learning anew – the hard way – were written down in Bronze Age texts long ago.
If a woman bothers to respond to you at all these days on dating apps, there’s at least a decent shot she’s finally stopped pretending she’s interested in you as a human being, and like Capital One, is interested in “What’s in your wallet?” Have you noticed this latest social trend in your city?
Feminism and the financial chaos left in its wake has proven women cannot remain solvent without men in their lives
Rookh Kshatriya is the creator of the Anglobitch blog, The Anglobitch Thesis and the author of Havok: How Anglo-American Feminism Ruined Society.
RF recently posted an interesting article (The Retail Collapse) on the decline of retail stores and shopping malls in the US. Let me point out that exactly the same phenomenon has beset Britain in recent years: C&A, Woolworths, BHS, Comet, Blockbuster and Phones4U have all ‘gone West’ since the Millennium. And other retailers have had to write-off hundreds of stores just to survive. RF’s plausible argument is that women – society’s inveterate shoppers – now lack the disposable wealth to indulge their dubious passion. The jobs they hold are generally not very remunerative; and men are no longer prepared to support their profligate ways.
This incisive analysis is also supported by the figures on female debt. Most Anglo-American debtors are women, by a considerable margin; and much of their debt arises from paying expensive college fees for worthless qualifications in the arts and humanities. From Fortune magazine:
Women are now the majority on college campuses across the United States—representing 56% of all students enrolled as of fall 2016. And according to a new report, they’re also shouldering the lion’s share of the nation’s student debt problem.
A report by the American Association of University Women (AAUW) found that on average, women hold $833 billion—or almost two-thirds—of the country’s $1.3-trillion student debt, compared to the $477 billion that men hold.
Overall, after completing a bachelor’s degree, women’s average accrued student debt is about $1,500 greater than men’s. African American women take on more student debt than any other group of women, with an average of $30,000.
In the UK, most college loans are never repaid and most graduates get jobs they could have had after leaving high school. In sum, the majority of students pursue higher education out of snobbery (it is still mistakenly considered ‘middle class’), outmoded parental expectations and the (largely false) promise of hedonistic excess.
Reality soon bites, however. Newly armed with irrelevant qualifications, the average college graduate quickly learns that a line of computer code outweighs a million lines of poetry. Now, culture is a wonderful thing and yes, it should be studied and transmitted to succeeding generations. But do we really need half the population studying it? Besides, times were when the humanities were hardcore disciplines requiring mastery of ancient languages and intimate knowledge of the great canonical works of western civilization. Since the Sixties counter-culture infiltrated academia, those rigorous days are long gone; any clown can do Cultural Studies.
In many ways, the problem of student debt arises from a long-standing mismatch between reality and expectation. The western worldview is still rooted in the post-War era, an age of unprecedented prosperity and opportunity. In those days, going to college automatically made someone ‘middle class’ for life. Although that era ended in 1974, it continues to define the West’s general outlook – a legacy worldview, if you will. Even today, most middle aged people still assume that a college degree in any subject from any institution will confer privileged status on their offspring. Indeed, the whole ‘happy families’ narrative to which Tradcon politicians cling is also a legacy of those times. These mistaken beliefs are incredibly stubborn and persistent, something only fully apparent to someone from a non-western cultural heritage.
And in many ways the misty-eyed nostalgia for those golden years is understandable: they were times of unprecedented opportunity for ordinary Brits and Americans. However, this nostalgia has become problematic now the West faces tough competition from regions armed with higher IQs and the Confucian work ethic.
Anglosphere nations are so maladjusted to existing conditions that young people can no longer expect rational guidance from their elders. This is especially true for young men, whose parents told them ‘the right girl’ would happen along if they conformed to societal expectations; or that girls prefer ‘nice guys’ to criminal thugs. Indeed, the Manosphere in all its glory arose to fill this ‘advice gap’ that yawns like a crevasse in the lives of younger men.
But the post-War legacy hobbles women, too. Armed with pointless degrees in finger painting and Womyn’s Studies, they waste their prime years riding the thug carousel (or snarled in sterile hyper-hypergamy) and shuffling papers in a ‘beauty sinecure’ (most companies keep a few babes around as morale boosters, even today). When their Wall approaches, most ‘educated’ women hastily revert to the post-War Tradcon narrative: surely Prince Beta will ride up on his white charger, write off her debts and save her ageing ass with a wave of his credit card?
Sadly, it ain’t happening. Thanks to the Manosphere, Prince Beta knows the score. Besides, with sex tourism booming in South America, Slavic Europe and the Far East, he needs dusty Anglo tail like he needs a kick in the nuts. And so our crusty Anglobitch stumbles towards middle age, accruing ever more debt, her SMV sinking with each passing year. We know where this ends: a broken-down cat lady abusing opiates on Welfare, renting her rancid ass out to gammas for the price of her next fix. The economic repercussions will be seismic in the decades to come.
I don’t claim to be an economist but even I can see that if a huge proportion of women take out massive loans they can never repay, someone somewhere must be getting shafted. Limiting college access would probably go some way to fixing things, as would expanding intermediate technical education. However, that would greatly reduce female enrolment rates – complete anathema in the gynocentric Anglosphere. In any case, American women must believe they are ‘middle class’ – a superior caste – for the post-feminist narrative to work. Even if this ‘status’ is illusionary, the illusion has to be sustained to keep females ‘onside’; an absolute imperative in our gynocentric civilization.
Ultimately, it is hard not to link the rise of Anglo-American feminism to the Anglosphere’s economic woes. Permitting trillions of dollars of unsecured debt so that mediocre Anglo princesses can feel successful, superior and ‘middle class’ is totally irrational in the competitive twenty-first century. This mass pandering to women first began in the prosperous post-War era, and doubtless hastened its end.
Essentially, women are clowns; and building societies around their infantile whims is a recipe for disaster. By nature, women are not productive; they cannot create, build or innovate. Though many of them study the arts and humanities, their contributions to these fields amount to zero. Jurisprudence, the only ‘serious’ field where they outnumber men, predictably requires no imagination. However, law does allow women to indulge their atavistic yearnings for social destruction and systemized misandry, abetted by the Pharisaic Anglo-American obsession with punitive legalism.