Antifa Escalates Doxxing Ice Employees by Publishing Home Addresses

An Antifa-linked Twitter account has taken doxxing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers one step further by publishing their home addresses Wednesday.

The names, pictures, spouses and home addresses of seven ICE employees in Oregon were originally tweeted by user @NAmirite, who identifies himself on Twitter as Nathaniel Amirite. The account was retweeted by the Pacific Northwest Antifascist Workers Collective and @PNWAWC on Twitter.

“It’s the public’s right to know the faces of the gestapo and who is creating, enforcing, and filling concentration camps in our name,” Amirite tweeted on Wednesday after he published the personal information of the employees. The Person Doxxing ICE Employees Is A Professor At NYU.

The posts were accompanied by the hashtags “#DoxxAllIce” and “WhatsUpBootlickers.”

@PNWAWC has over 3,000 Twitter followers and describes itself as “a coalition of activists and allies dedicated to opposing and outing fascism and bigotry within the community.”

Antifa groups have previously come under fire for doxxing, or revealing personal information, of several ICE employees. Antifa members circulated a database of all of the public LinkedIn profiles of ICE employees on Twitter on Tuesday. The link to the list, which was previously was posted on Medium and GitHub, now directs to an error page.

Boring, Inane Kike ((((((Charles Krauthammer)))))) Finally Dead!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 22, 2018

And not a minute too soon, the boring kike ((((((Charles Krauthammer)))))) has bit the dust!

Fox News:

((((((Charles Krauthammer)))))), a longtime Fox News contributor, Pulitzer Prize winner, Harvard-trained psychiatrist and best-selling author who came to be known as the dean of conservative commentators, died Thursday. He was 68.

His death had been expected after he wrote a heartbreaking letter to colleagues, friends and viewers on June 8 that said in part “I have been uncharacteristically silent these past ten months. I had thought that silence would soon be coming to an end, but I’m afraid I must tell you now that fate has decided on a different course for me…

“Recent tests have revealed that the cancer has returned. There was no sign of it as recently as a month ago, which means it is aggressive and spreading rapidly. My doctors tell me their best estimate is that I have only a few weeks left to live. This is the final verdict. My fight is over.” The letter continued, “I leave this life with no regrets. It was a wonderful life — full and complete with the great loves and great endeavors that make it worth living.”

In recent years, ((((((Krauthammer)))))) was best known for his nightly appearance as a panelist on Fox News’ “Special Report with Bret Baier” and as a commentator on various Fox news shows.

Following the news of the death of his “good friend,” Baier posted on Twitter, “I am sure you will be owning the panel discussion in heaven as well. And we’ll make sure your wise words and thoughts – your legacy – will live on here.”

Someone seems to have forgotten to remind Bret O’Baier that all kikes go to hell!

They killed Christ, O’Baier! Why would they not burn eternally in the fiery pits???

Eternal damnation!


Big, Big Win

This shifty-eyed Cardassian Jew could play boomers like tiny fiddles.

The Jew pushed for wars, for immigration, for whatever – and made it all a droning mess.

This was an emperor has no clothes situation, where these boomtards would sit an listen to this boring, babbling kike spew gibberish and say “oh well it must make sense – why else would he be on Fox News?”

Meanwhile, this “conservakike” was allying against goy conservatives with regular kikes, getting prizes from the rats of the ADL.

Ironically – actually it isn’t ironic, it is simply a mockery of the goyim – the ADL gave him a “First Amendment” award.

The ADL has the primary purpose of shutting down free speech, and yet they are giving Jewish propagandists “First Amendment” awards.

Watch the new leader of the ADL, low IQ kike ((((((Jonathan Greenblatt)))))) attack the Alt-Right and say that it needs to be shut down because the goyim know too much.

They also are the heads of shutting down free speech on social media.

They run the twitter ban squad, and recently suspended the anti-Zionist activist Luke O’Brien for doxing the Zio-kike shill Amy Mekelstein. O’Brien was well within his First Amendment rights when he stalked this kike, doxed her family and then faked sources to ensure her entire extended family had their lives destroyed – but the ADL doesn’t like that First Amendment speech, do they?

This is an extremist liberal Jew-terrorist organization that pushes for an end to freedom of speech so they can flood the goyim with infinity brown people while the stupid goyim have no ability to even complain about it.

But they also support infinity wars for Israel, and every other ((((((AIPAC))))))-type Israeli Jew agenda.

Which is why an extremist liberal kike group gave ((((((Krauthammer)))))) an award – for dazzling the conservative goyim into supporting their forever war agenda in the Middle East.

It’s all so transparent, this Jew stuff, which is why the goyim must be continually dazzled.

((((((Krauthammer)))))) was a shitty cyborg cripple as well, you might recall.

I am not anti-cyborg.

One might even say that I am pro-cyborg.

What I do not like is shitty cyborgs.

I like cyborgs that are winners.

I like cyborgs that can kill humans.

I like cyborgs that can beat humans at sports.

I like cyborgs that can provide humans with a superior sexual experience.

I do not like kike shitborgs that simply go on TV to dazzle the goyim with their low-tier hypnotic gibberish.

It is a great thing that this evil kike cyborg (shitborg) is finally dead.

Without his hypnotic gibberish on the TV dazzling their infantile minds, maybe boomers will be able to come a little baby step closer to reality.

I will leave you with this classic campaign Trump, from just after the announcement.

Rot in hell, ((((((Krauthammer)))))), you filthy cripple kike bastard.

FINALLY: Media Admits Swedes Being Flooded by Hordes of Rat Invaders

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
June 22, 2018


This is the kind of language we need to here.

These aren’t people, these are vermin.

But don’t take my word for it, look what RT had to say.


A Swedish city is battling a merciless enemy, rats ‘the size of cats’, prompting authorities to call on residents to keep doors and windows closed and pre-schoolchildren inside during breaks.

Yes, those Somalis sure love to attack children and rape them. This is known and now confirmed to be happening in Sweden now as well. Very sad to see that this is spreading.

“There aren’t the normal rats you see in the forest. They’re as big as cats,” Benny Sagmo from the planning office of Sundsvall city in northern Sweden, explained to the national TT news agency.

Odd way of describing the situation I must admit. I guess they’re trying to say that brown people don’t like to live close to nature, because of their orc-like nature.

The rats have already spread out towards a residential area, according to Sagmo. “If we don’t put a stop to it, they can get bigger and bigger…Those who live there can’t even have their front doors or balcony doors open. I’ve told pest control that we’re going all in!” he added.

Yes, the menace is indeed spreading. Communities that could keep their doors open once, now have to lock them and take precautions to make sure no invaders can get it.

Residents were told to keep doors and windows closed to prevent rats from getting access to food. They were also told to avoid having food for pets outdoors.

Moslems eating cat food? Well…can you get high off of it or something? Is it like khat? I think RT misunderstood something here.

These invaders are eating Khat food, not cat food. 

A simple mistake if one is not personally acquainted with brown people culture.

I hope that RT issues a correction in the coming days.

Although who knows, maybe these people are stealing cat food as well, you never know with brown people tbh.

What is this TIME Cover Supposed to Communicate?

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 22, 2018

So this TIME cover.

There is an article with it.

It’s by this guy:

Karl Vick. He doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page.

Article summary: OMG SO SAD THE CHILDRENS.

“Are values” boilerplate.

It’s just filler for the cover.

But what is the cover saying? 

What is the implication of this image?

That it is sad that a poor child would not simply be allowed to come into America and feed off of us.

Well, here’s the thing.

If there were a couple thousand or a few million poor children in the world, then okay. You would have an argument that we could just absorb all of these poor children, to end the sadness that they are poor.

I wouldn’t agree with the argument, but the argument would exist.

But the actual reality is this.

According to the World Bank, there are 385 million children in the world living in “extreme poverty.”

And the ones coming here probably don’t even qualify for that rating. That bitch that got shot at the border a few weeks back had an ACCOUNTING DEGREE and just wanted to make more money.

According to UNICEF, “extreme poverty, measured at $1.90 per person per day, disproportionately affects children – 387 million, or 19.5% of the world’s children live in extreme poverty.”

But let’s just go with that number.

The child on the cover must represent all poor brown children. Because surely, there is no difference between one poor brown child and another. So when they say “you have to let this one crying brown child in,” what they are saying is that you have to allow ALL crying brown children in.

With 325 million people, the United States is already overpopulated.

How can we possibly take in 385 million poor brown children?

It is physically impossible.

And even if we did take in that many poor brown children, and more than double our population, creating massive centers to feed and clothe these poor brown children, within approximately a decade, there would be another 400 or so million brown children born into poverty in the third world.

So would we do another round? Another full amnesty for all the world’s poor brown children?

And of course, by that time the poor brown children we’d taken in in the first round would be producing their own poor brown children, which we’d be feeding along with their parents.

If you haven’t watched the famous gumball presentation of Roy Beck, watch it now. If you’ve watched it before, watch it again. It is always relevant.

It is probably worth adding that all of these people are well-fed.

At this point in time, industrialized food production is so cheap, that virtually nowhere in the world is anyone starving. The only places where people are legitimately starving are places like Somalia and The Sudan, where warlords block food aid coming in from the UN.

We have to go beyond feelings of “it is sad that this child is crying, and we have to ask ourselves: “is this why we exist as a nation?”

Is this why each and every American was born – to serve as a workhorse to feed poor brown people who have failed to create wealth in their own countries?

This is all really baby-tier stuff.

Yes, a crying child is sad. But how much of yourself do you owe that crying child? If we decide that it is the duty of Americans to work overtime and sacrifice the wellbeing of their own children to “improve the lives” of random crying brown children, where does that end?

How many extra hours a day are you willing to work to improve the lives of these crying brown children? How much are you willing to take from your own children to improve the lives of these random brown children?

That is the question that needs to be asked.

Because this is a lot more complicated than “OMG SAD A CHILD CRYING – MEAN MAN TRUMP MADE THIS BROWN CHILD CRY.”

But the Jews pushing that narrative don’t want to discuss numbers or facts.

And honestly, neither do I. Because it doesn’t go anywhere. They will simply come back with emotional blackmail, as a response to any series of facts.

So my response to the TIME cover is simply this:

‘People Of Light’: New Campaign Seeks To Redefine What It Means To Be ‘White’

Renegade Editor’s Note: This has been shared by InfoWars and originated from /pol, so I am not endorsing this campaign (which could have nefarious intentions), but I did get a chuckle out of some responses and I figured I should bring it to your attention.

By Chris Menahan

A new campaign is seeking to redefine the “outdated” term “white people” with the “people-first” term “people of light,” which is short for “people of light skin.”

“People of light,” also known as “persons of light,” or “PoL” for short, say the term “white” is racist and outdated and they want everyone to use “people-first language.”

The campaign got momentum after being shared on the internet message board 4chan, where users were encouraged to correct people using the term “white people” by asking they use PoL’s preferred term, “people of light.”

A conceptual Wikipedia page was created to define the term:

As with all progressive struggles, the campaign is getting a lot of pushback from those afraid of change:


Others said it’s perfectly valid:

You can check out how the campaign is working out by searching “people of light” on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on Information Liberation.

Affirmative Action Deathwatch Intensifies As Cultural Wave Pushes Back Against “We Are All One”

Some ideas affect our minds like highly addictive drugs. Take equality: speak it to a room, and you instantly have a majority, because what it signifies is that everyone will be given the same social status and so will have access to things they desire that they do not merit.

If all men are equal, the beautiful girl might take home the scrawny nerd. If all minds are equal, the plodding Joe might have an idea of genius instead of the genius having that idea. If all social classes are equal, the poor can go to the high class shops and pretend to be lords and ladies of old.

Somewhere in all of us is the desire for power over our life circumstances, where we want to be king for a day despite being born a peasant. We want the Cinderella story, rising from rags to riches, or the Revenge of the Nerds experience, where what we are becomes arbitrary and only what we desire matters.

We call this individualism, and individualism is the basis of Leftism:

Liberalism has always been concerned with security, albeit the security of the individual; institutions, including the state, are all established and sustained by individuals and instrumental to their desires. Indeed, liberalism cannot be understood apart from its normative commitment to individualism. The tradition insists that all persons deserve, and it evaluates institutions according to how far they help individuals achieve these goals. Nor is liberalism anti-statist. Liberal theory has paid particular attention to the state as the institution defined by its ability to make individuals secure and aid their commodious living…Liberalism’s history can be traced from the proto-liberalism in the Reformation to the emergence of the social contract theory and neo-theories, as well as liberalism’s focus on increasing security.

You may have read this before or noticed individualism as the root of Leftism through egalitarianism which ultimately is a cover story for the selfishness of the individual. The individual wants to suffer no consequences for his desires and actions, no matter how greedy, selfish, or perverse they are, and so wants to abolish the threat of loss of social status — in the informal hierarchy of human rank — that occurs when other people notice that his actions are unrealistic, immoral, or just dumb.

Leftism (the root of “liberalism,” which is actually an attempt to tame the extremes of Leftism) defends the individual in his desire to play the game of civilization. An individual seeks to (1) not lose rank for his choices or opinions, (2) still be able to do whatever he wants especially when it results in externalized costs including loss of social order, values, or standards, and (3) conceal the fact that the first is cover for the second. This is why every scam artist since the dawn of time has come on with a message of unselfishness, universal acceptance, equality, pity, love, joy, art, wisdom, the divine, etc. They know how to hack the human brain: tell it that you are not doing what you are doing, then make it a partner in your duplicity so that they are afraid to attack you and afraid to back out. This is the core of Leftism.

Once you are roped into Leftism, however, you have joined a runaway train because “equality” is a concept that expands to fit all situations. At first, it means that you treat people the same when they come to court, whether rich or poor. Few have trouble with that, mainly because few are rich. Then it becomes a demand that we treat people by exactly the same process — bureaucracy, in other words — because this is fair since then no one receives an advantage. You can see how this would please a troupe of monkeys or herd of sheep; no one gets to the fruit or green grass first, so I have a good chance of winning the food lottery!

Over time, however, Leftism expands to crazy places. Give it another fifty years and you have denied the genetic differences between social classes, races, and ethnic groups; you have 75 genders including one for people who love blenders in a Platonic way but find colanders sexy in a breathtaking way; anyone who can prove that they or their group failed at anything can point to whoever succeeded and say, “That’s rightfully mine!” Yes, you have entered a crazy time, and — wake up! smack — it will destroy you, your descendants, your civilization, and everything you value including “muh freedom” and “muh Constitution” unless you destroy it first.

For the last sixty years, since the hippies took over in 1968, we have been a conquered nation. The founding group of Anglo-Americans were exiled and replaced with the Napoleon Dynamite rag-tag of Southern, Eastern, Irish, and Mediterranean European peoples. This group, elected for its SAT scores and degrees instead of its applied intelligence and force of moral character, ran the nation into the ground by chasing the ideological agenda of equality and ignoring other issues.

They ignored our rotting infrastructure. They ignored the collapse of our job market. They ignored the falling value of our currency, and the rising uncertainty as social order collapsed. Now neighbors are strangers, cities are wastelands, men and women are alienated from one another, and just about everything — public or private sector — seems to be run by incompetent bureaucrats who specialize more in grabbing headlines than being effective in a way that is also good. This nation has collapsed from within, and few dare mention it but everyone is thinking about it.

Their biggest single weapon and largest goal has been diversity, or the intent to bring in enough different groups that there can be no culture, standards, values systems, beliefs, genetic heritage, and behaviors in common in this nation anymore. They want to destroy all that is organic, or naturally arising from the circumstances of survival, and all that is connected to our heritage; they want to destroy these things so that they can replace them with Leftist indoctrination. How do we know this? They did it before: the French Revolutionaries were “internationalists” who appealed to all workers of the world, as were the Marxists, the Leninists, and finally we got to the Soviets who explicitly endorsed diversity and tried to make it work by shipping people around the USSR and “naturalizing” them. When that failed, the Russians — and their allies, the Chinese — began to slowly back away from diversity, all the while criticizing the US for its lack of racial equality.

That criticism may have crushed America and Europe. In a desire not to appear unfair to African-Americans and other minorities, these two continents contorted themselves to be accepting of those groups despite the massive cost of diversity. Diversity meant there could no longer be a right way to do anything; we had to accept however any group did it. This ethno-pluralism guaranteed moral relativism and after that, standards collapsed and people raced toward lowest common denominator behavior in sexuality, family, business, and even daily comportment.

Look at films or news reports from fifty years ago. Well-dressed people on streets, acting orderly, participating in shared rituals like church and cultural holidays, able to converse with each other intelligibly, and spending less time on trivialities like red tape, who’s offended today, and other drama, show us what our society could be. Instead, in 1965 we chose to go the diversity route so that the Left could have a permanent voting base, which it got because no minority group votes for Rightists in any significant number. Apparently, the Right slept right through this while fighting its internal battle over trying to work with the Left (cucking) or outright fighting it.

What the Left fears is exposure: once one person speaks of the bare realities of diversity, everyone will know it, and they will start repeating it. This will tear down the web — immigration, both legal and illegal; affirmative action; civil rights; hate crimes law; disparate impact; advertising featuring minorities prominently; miscegenation propaganda in schools — because the hidden truth about diversity will stand revealed. Trump realizes, at some level, that the hidden truth of diversity is that it is designed to replace the historical heritage of Americans with mixed-race people just so they vote Leftist.

Trump has made statements which disturb the Left but strike everyone else as correct. For example, he has pointed out that Leftists are using immigration as a weapon because our laws, based on affirmative action, cause us to give preference to these groups:

“Democrats are the problem,” he wrote. “They don’t care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13. They can’t win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!” he wrote.

…”You have to stand for something and you have to stand for safety and security of our country. We can’t let people pour in,” he said. “Maybe it’s politically correct or maybe it’s not. We’ve got to stop separation of the families, but politically correct or not, we have a country that needs security, that needs safety, that has to be protected.”

Trump has taken a stand against the affirmative action view, which holds that if someone is not “privileged” like we are that we owe them a redistribution of our wealth including national citizenship, by pointing out that affirmative action results in the needy many overrunning the few, as we see in Europe. He pointedly referred to the threat of America, like Europe, becoming a “migrant camp”:

The United States will not be a migrant camp, and it will not be a refugee holding facility. Won’t be. You look at what’s happening in Europe, you look at what’s happening in other places; we can’t allow that to happen to the United States. Not on my watch.

…But just remember: A country without borders is not a country at all. We need borders. We need security. We need safety. We have to take care of our people.

For now, “our people” means people legally here, but the backlash is spreading further as other conservatives wake from their Ichabod Crane-esque stupor and point out that what we are seeing here is population replacement, not merely ethnic restaurants, and wants to avoid fundamental transformation of their nation into a third world mixed-race state:

The existential question, however, thus remains: How does the West, America included, stop the flood tide of migrants before it alters forever the political and demographic character of our nations and our civilization?

The U.S. Hispanic population, already estimated at nearly 60 million, is predicted to exceed 100 million by 2050, just 32 years away.

…And Trump is not backing down. Monday he tweeted:

“The people of Germany are turning against their leadership as migration is rocking the already tenuous Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is way up. Big mistake made all over Europe in allowing millions of people in who have so strongly and violently changed their culture!”

…We are truly dealing here with an ideology of Western suicide.

The Left has paralyzed our brains with the notion of affirmative action because affirmative action style thinking is pure egalitarian thinking: we want all people to be equal, so take from those who have more and give it to those who have less. That way, everyone is equal and no one wants, which since we assume want is the basis of conflict, means that we can have “peace.”

Against this view a new outlook arises which states that we do not owe anyone else anything. We owe it to ourselves to succeed, and others can see what we did and emulate us. We need to stand on our own, not replace ourselves with guilt for how unequal the world is, has always been, and is apparently designed to be. Our best path belongs to ourselves and if we succeed at it, everyone benefits.

We want identities of our own. This does not mean political identities, like “Communist” or “muh Constitution,” but civilizational identities, where we can say that we are a people with a common heritage, shared values arising from our shared genetics, and a shared destiny in becoming what we were always destined to be. We cannot have this with immigration, diversity, affirmative action, and any egalitarian programs because those will always prioritize the Other over us.

A vast change stalks the West. Europe and America are slowly coming out of the stupor of the past fifty years. As the first layers peel away, we see the beginnings of what will be a long path of throwing out bad ideas and replacing them not with moral or ideological ideas, but realistic ones. From this we will emerge stronger, with the possibility of creating a great future for ourselves instead of merely surviving what has obviously become a dying system.