Third World America: California’s Exploding Homeless Population Causing Hepatitis Outbreak by Defecating in the Street

Eric Striker

Daily Stormer
November 24, 2017


California is a canary in the coal mine. As one of America’s “majority-minority” states with a mega-wealthy Jewish aristocracy (Silicon Valley and Hollywood), its cities have the living standards of Oaxaca at Geneva prices.

The average apartment in LA goes for $2,107. This is the new world order price for housing, a product of: real estate speculation, illegal immigrant fueled overpopulation and wage stagnation, and mass unemployment (was at 25% in 2010 and probably not much better now). Since local governments are run by corrupt Mexicans (on the city council level) and Jews (like Mayor ((((((Eric Garcetti))))))), they’re all taken care of or in on it.

You get a blanket under a bridge!

Add the low trust society multiculturalism creates, and the fact that some of these hobos are violent and filthy blacks or junkies, and public toilets are few and far between.

So the streets of Los Angeles are filled with human feces.

Fox News:

An outbreak of hepatitis A is spreading through Los Angeles County after leaping from a large homeless contingent in San Diego, threatening thousands of people and fueling criticism that local officials have not done enough to contain the deadly liver disease.

Hundreds of cases have turned up in southern California as well as Michigan — but conditions in Los Angeles, where roughly 50,000 people live on the streets, have prompted deeper concerns.

Reports compiled by volunteer organizations have faulted city officials for not providing enough accessible toilets as the homeless population sharply increased by 23 percent this year.

In a prescient warning, a June 2017 report by a collection of nonprofits called the LA Central Providers Collaborative sounded the alarm about crowding and living conditions on Skid Row, citing the city’s own predictions about the increased risk for hepatitis A and other diseases.

“One would think that Los Angeles, one of the greatest cities in the world, would exceed these minimal standards. However, this Audit finds that in Skid Row, Los Angeles fails to meet even the standards for a refugee camp,” the report said. “During overnight hours, there are only nine public toilets available for 1,777 unsheltered homeless people on Skid Row, and these toilets are largely inaccessible.”

The report noted that United Nations’ refugee camp standards are one toilet for every 20 people.

Even United Nations’ camps in Haiti have superior public sanitation than LA.

There’s no reason that one of the most resource rich states with such beautiful weather has to be such a horrible place to live. Until the 90s it was one of the most prosperous states in America.

When you replace your population with third world people, it’s a toilet that sinks all boats except the Jewish and billionaire ones. Everyone in California is doing badly, including the white minority, which is discriminated against by the state for jobs and educational opportunities. Basically if you can’t get a job with the municipality, you’re going to be struggling to subsist in a run down 65% Mexican gang run “middle class” neighborhood. Or knee deep in shit on Skid Row.

Want to see America’s near future? Visit sunny California!

Gentrification – white people taking back whats theirs.

 Don’t you just love it when businesses that cater to well to do white folks make light of people of color being displaced from their neighborhoods? Shame on you .

This Nation, called America belongs to the White man, not to the useless farm equipment, not the banksters, not the globalists, not the jews, its belongs to us, we built it, we maintain it, we pay the taxes, all the rest of you are just visiting, and the time is coming where you will all be going home.

‘Non-White’ Student Behind Racist Graffiti At Missouri High School – This was a “racist hate incident” — against white people.

Hate Hoax: ‘Non-White’ Student Behind Racist Graffiti At Missouri High School

By Chris Menahan

A “non-white” student at Parkway Central High School in Chesterfield, Missouri reportedly confessed to writing “White Lives Matter Ni**ers!” on a mirror inside of a girls’ bathroom.

It’s past time for the Department of Justice to officially declare these hate hoaxes an epidemic.

From Fox News:

Parkway schools Superintendent Keith Marty said in a statement Tuesday that the revelation that a non-white student was involved was surprising, but it did not “diminish the hurt” caused by the incident at Parkway Central High School in Chesterfield.

“The behavior was wrong and the student will be held accountable for this serious act according to our student discipline policy,” said Marty, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. “It is important to understand why this happened and why we are often quick to assume who is responsible,” he added.

It happened because minority students know faking such hate crimes is a one way ticket to coveted victimhood status and social justice stardom.

The racial slur was found in a girls’ restroom on campus last week, prompting the local community to organize and stand against racism.  “I was horrified,” West County anti-racism activist Joy Weese Moll told KTVI last week. “A lot of us in West County have a really hard time saying racism exists here. It makes me sad for the person who wrote it because they have not been taught and not learned how beautiful our society can be.”

Parents who have children going to the school also reacted. “This is very much a white person issue that we need to tackle as white people and speak up against,” parent Alexandria Lane-Detwiler said.

This was a “racist hate incident” — against white people.

White people as a group were framed for this hoax.

According to the latest FBI report on 2016 Hate Crime Statisticsanti-white hate crimes are the fastest growing racial hate crimes in America, jumping 19.34 percent in just one year from 2015 to 2016.


This article originally appeared on Information Liberation.

Israeli minister rebuked for disparaging remarks about US Jews

((((((Netanyahu)))))) condemns ((((((Tzipi Hotovely))))))’s claim they ‘never send their children to fight’

((((((Tzipi Hotovely))))))’s comments underscore political divide between more liberal US Jews and conservative Israeli government
by Ilan Ben Zion in Jerusalem
Israeli prime minister ((((((Benjamin Netanyahu)))))) has rebuked his deputy foreign minister for making disparaging remarks about American Jews in a television interview.
There were calls from Israeli opposition lawmakers for ((((((Tzipi Hotovely)))))) to resign after she told Israel’s i24 News that Jews in the US were “people that never send their children to fight for their country”.
Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))), who is also Israel’s foreign minister, condemned the “offensive remarks regarding the American Jewish community”.
The comments underscored the political divide between more liberal American Jews and the conservative Israeli government. Jews in the US are generally affiliated with more liberal streams of Judaism than their Israeli counterparts.
Many US Jews were upset when Israel’s government earlier this year scrapped a plan to allocate part of Jerusalem’s Western Wall — the holiest place for Jews to pray — to egalitarian prayer.
The head of the Union for Reform Judaism in North America, the largest North American Jewish movement, subsequently cancelled a meeting with Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))), saying that scrapping the plan caused “an acute crisis between the Israeli government and Diaspora Jewry”. They don’t feel how it feels to be attacked by rockets, and I think part of it is to actually experience what Israel is dealing with on a daily basis ((((((Tzipi Hotovely)))))), deputy foreign minister The TV interview with Ms Hotovely, who is from the right of Mr ((((((Netanyahu))))))’s Likud party, came after she had been earlier this month uninvited from giving a speech to Jewish students at Princeton University because of her hardline views on the Palestinians. Asked about the political difference between Israeli and American Jewry, she blamed the US community, saying it stemmed from a failure to understand the “complexity” of Israel’s situation.
She hit out at “people that never send their children to fight for their country, most of the Jews don’t have children serving as soldiers, going to the Marines, going to Afghanistan or to Iraq, most of them are having quite convenient lives. “They don’t feel how it feels to be attacked by rockets, and I think part of it is to actually experience what Israel is dealing with on a daily basis.”
The US military does not keeps records about the religious affiliation of service members, but a 2009 study by a US government military diversity commission estimated that 1 per cent of service members were Jewish, compared with about 2 per cent of the general population. Ms Hotovely did not serve in the Israeli military, but took part in a non-military two-year national service program.
She apologised on Thursday if her comments caused offence. Mr ((((((Netanyahu)))))) said: “The Jews of the diaspora are dear to us and are an inseparable part of our people. There is no place for such attacks, and her remarks do not reflect the position of the state of Israel.”
((((((Tzipi Livni)))))), a former foreign minister from the opposition Zionist Union, said that to “patch up the rift with the diaspora, we need an actual policy that will embrace and accept all streams within Judaism,” while Nachman Shai, another Zionist Union lawmaker, asked on Twitter how Ms Hotovely remained in her position after making the remarks. ((((((Yair Lapid)))))), leader of Yesh Atid and a former minister, called for Mr ((((((Netanyahu))))))’s government to “stop trying to divide the Jewish people, both in Israel and abroad”.

And some people still don’t believe there is an anti-white jewish cabal in America, its the deep state people, (((they))) all share the same goal, the enslavement of the world, and the extermination of the white race. Question is, what the fuck are we gonna do about it?

No-Go Zones, Bombs & Rape: Swedish Police Helpless …Unless Swedes Break the Law

Sweden is slowly descending into a civil war and the police is helpless …or so it seems. A recent flash mob in Gothenburg by the Nordic Resistance Movement shows a very different police force than the one that claim its unable to keep crime at bay in the 60 no-go zones in Sweden.

Help support our work: https://paypal.me/redice

Help keep us ad free, sign up for a membership at http://www.redicemembers.com. You’ll receive full access to our extensive archives. Stream or download over 1400 programs, including radio, video, TV segments & Weekend Warrior.

Civilization has made most western people soft, now it’s time to get uncivilized again. If we don’t go back to survival mode, we will no longer have a future. Democracy will never fix this problem, because democracy created the problem. There is only one solution, and we all know it by instinct. Our Time is coming that is a Fact.

Examining The Carnage Of The Sexual Revolution

Most stories about civilization decline begin with the phrase, “We were told,” as in, “We were told that the famine was the fault of the kings, and that the new regime would ensure that there was always plenty,” and then launch into a description of how human wishful thinking did not match reality much at all, leading to horrors. This is why all revolutions fail.

Revolutions, after all, are based on human conjecture about what might be true, and since we like the thought of that, what should be true, but they rely on the “excluded middles” — the points between extremes — filled out by all the other details that are not part of the explanation. Secondary effects, implications and unintended consequences spring up like demons.

As with all ideas, we ask ourselves whether the argument is for an actual purpose, or simply a pretext or rationalization designed to explain how people want to feel about life, instead of what they see as its actual parameters. Since most people seem discontented, and can reliably be counted on to blame others for their own failings, it looks more like justification than purposeful action.

The sexual revolution fits this pattern as well despite being a cultural change brought about by a loose coalition of Leftist believers instead of purely a State action. We were told that we could keep living as we had, but that this way, people would not face the consequences for relatively “innocent” behavior. Instead we got the utter destruction of the family.

While many blame the Pill, the broader move toward the sexual revolution was present even a century before when women’s rights advocates demanded the ability to have sex outside of marriage, and Bohemians back into the 1600s endorsed polyamory and extra-marital sex. With the 1940s, it became a possibility since women had jobs and were living alone in big anonymous cities.

As with all things Leftist, the goal of sexual liberation was to avoid having the individual lose rank for bad behavior, or otherwise be less included because of the consequences of her or his actions. But fifty plus years later, we can see that whatever intentions, desires, or fantasies were behind the sexual revolution, it ended in horrors.

First, the family has been replaced by the single mother, in emulation of third world patterns:

Since 1970, out-of-wedlock birth rates have soared. In 1965, 24 percent of black infants and 3.1 percent of white infants were born to single mothers. By 1990 the rates had risen to 64 percent for black infants, 18 percent for whites. Every year about one million more children are born into fatherless families.

In fact, this emulation has led to a decline in first world breeding habits, which not surprisingly will have dysgenic effect:

Over the same period the white out-of-wedlock birth ratio experienced yet faster growth- albeit from a lower-level-more then quintupling, from 3.1 percent to 18 percent.

Not surprising, many of these babies are unwanted, which led to a massive surge in abortions until checked by Republican laws making access more difficult:

In 2011, the U.S. abortion rate was 16.9 abortions per every 1,000 women aged 15 to 44, the lowest it’s been since abortion was legalized in 1973.

Between 2008 and 2010, 44 laws related to abortion were implemented in 18 states, according to the report. Most did not likely have an effect on the abortion rate, the study authors say, but a few may have. For example, a new law in Missouri that requires a woman to attend an in-person counseling session 24 hours before an abortion may have attributed to the state’s 17% decline.

Until the 1960s, abortion — the disposal of unwanted children who were mostly produced by casual sex — was relatively unknown in America, where now it is a commonplace event.

At the same time, while teen pregnancy has slowed of late, it has risen massively since the 1940s, resulting in its creation as a fixture of our social landscape:

Fewer babies were born to teenagers in 2010 than in any year since 1946.

How does this shatter the family? In addition to the replacement of the family with the single-parent home, those who have more sex are the least likely to form lifelong bonds, meaning that they may reproduce, but will then end up alone and possibly with their children in one-parent homes or the dreaded parent plus significant other unstable relationship which seems to often end in molestation or violence:

‘The highest five-year divorce rates of all are associated with marrying in the 2000s and having 10 or more premarital sex partners: 33 percent,’ he wrote in the report.

And women who were virgins on their wedding night were the least likely to get divorced, according to the study.

It is not surprising, then, that fewer people are getting married and are doing so later in life:

According to census data cited in the report, barely half of adults ages 18 and older are married — 51% in 2010, compared with 72% in 1960. This decline is especially notable for young adults: 20% of 18- to 29-year-olds were married in 2010, compared with 59% in 1960.

…In 2011, the median age at first marriage is an estimated 28.7 for men and 26.5 for women. That means half of men don’t marry until at least about age 29, and half of women don’t marry until at least about age 27. In 1960, the median age at first marriage for both men and women was in the early 20s.

…Although 39% of Americans say they agree that marriage is becoming obsolete, most people who have never married say they would like to marry someday (including many who agree that marriage is becoming obsolete).

This is why divorce rates are falling:

The divorce surge is over. (Or most people believe it is: this paper offers an alternate take.) In truth, the rise in divorce has been over for 20 years. Divorce rates peaked in the early 1980s when Ronald Reagan was president and the Internet was only a mite in the eye of wierdos hanging out in California garages.

…The younger generation, whether they know divorce is declining or not, believes that marriage is on the rocks. From their vantage point, they’re right. While fewer American adults have been divorcing over the past decades, a growing number of people in their own cohort have grown up apart from one parent, almost always their fathers.

…How can divorce be declining but at the same time more children growing up with single parents? Because—and this is the story that Miller underplays—so many parents never marry in the first place. A little history is in order here: When divorce rates skyrocketed in the 1970s, American were not simply suddenly looking at their spouses and deciding en masse that they couldn’t take it anymore. They were reacting to a changing understanding about what marriage meant. Instead of an arrangement largely centered around providing for and rearing the next generation, it was becoming an adult-centric union based on love and shared happiness, which as an upper middle class grew in size, became closely linked to granite countered kitchens, European and spa vacations, and weddings with 200 guests.

…If marriage and childbearing were no longer tightly linked but rather discreet—even unrelated—life events, and if they were not earning enough to enjoy the middle class status objects enjoyed by their more educated peers, then why marry at all? Why not just have kids without getting married?

This fits with the data about children being born out of wedlock. The Left replaced the family with the individual, part of a process called “atomization” which separates society into individual and State, and so now people simply reproduce, then abandon those children to day care, public schools, and jobs, and only wonder about whether this was a good idea when they get dropped off at nursing homes and abandoned.

As it becomes clear that the new Leftist method leads to misery, people are waiting out the casual sex carousel and finding family-oriented partners with whom to reproduce, but this does not offer the bond of affection and trust that the family did back when we had those.

The carnage of the sexual revolution is just beginning to reveal itself. The “Greatest Generation” experienced the first of it, the Baby Boomers lived it, and Generation X reacted to it, with the lockstep ideologues indoctrinated at public schools from the millennials embracing it as long as it was “safe sex,” but Generation Z finds itself looking back over the carnage and wanting away. It will take another few generations for us to see secondary effects such as lower transfer of social capital, greater neurosis, inability to attach, alienation, and other effects on kids who lack the benefits of a stable, family-oriented home situation.

Perhaps the sexual revolution will then be known as just another revolution: a fantasy, applied with violence, that destroyed its host and left behind a wandering, cultureless, and isolated herd of individuals who could not recall a life before everything became grey and meaningless.