Remember That Thing John Travolta Said About Who Controls Hollywood?

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
October 7, 2017

I think there is a very real chance that following these Harvey Weinstein revelations, a dam could burst.

We could be looking straight at the monsters who created this evil that is the Hollywood entertainment industry.

And by “we” I don’t mean those of us at the Daily Stormer who are already looking at them.

By “we” I mean all of us. All of our people.

Right now, we have:

  1. Hollywood is controlled by sick perverts who purposefully spread filth to erode the fabric of our society
  2. Do these sick perverts have something in common?
  3. If so, what is it?

We are inches away.

And I have a feeling in my spine that our good friend in the oval office might casually drop something which could lead in the direction of an answer to parts two and three of the above current state of mass understanding.

When this mask is pulled off, the goyim are not going to be happy.

In fact, I believe they are going to be very, very angry.

Remember: our people have gotten angry about this before.

Really angry.

its coming…….. they know it….. they know what they have done……. and they know they deserve it………….


In a recent Ipsos poll for Thomson Reuters and the University of Virginia Center for Politics — conducted in the wake of Charlottesville — 31% of respondees agreed that “America must protect and preserve its white European heritage.”
This is more than a mere percentage. This is 100 million people, and represents a population larger than Vietnam, Egypt, or Germany, and one almost as big as the Philippines.
The poll also found that 8% of those responding also support actual White Nationalism “as a group or movement.” In other words, literally 26 million Americans are dyed-in-the-wool White Nationalists, a political position that implies an extremely strong degree of commitment.
Because of the costs of admitting this in today’s America, we have to assume that the real number is in fact much higher. But even if the true number was in fact 26 million, this is still an enormous group of people. To give you some idea of what this means This represents a population large enough to fill Australia, which has 24 million people.
As white people continue to fall as a percentage of the US population, the percentage and total number of Whites who support White Nationalism can only grow. But already it is clear that there are enough racially conscious White people to either form their own large ethnostate or to seize control of America itself. After all, the Bolshevik Revolution that took over the vastness of Russia was carried out by a tiny, but highly motivated, minority, in fact less than 1%.
This poll must be extremely worrying for the  ruling elites of the USA as it shows very clearly the path on which the country is set, a path that leads to their own disempowerment and perhaps something much worse.

Beneath this alienation lurks, or so the elite fears, a seething mix of fear and anger.

by Dr. Brent Nelson

The America that European Americans founded and sustained for over two hundred years will, given no change in current trends, be swept into oblivion in another generation. Given the same trends for two generations, America will find itself closer to Third World status than to the European way of life. Already, in the last decade of the twentieth century, this oncoming doom of European America has become glaringly apparent in many different areas of the country.

Despite a growing awareness of a coming national demise, the masses of European Americans seem to be unconcerned. We are often told that “things must get much worse before people wake up.” Yet all the evidence is that people are awake, but preoccupied with other interests. Their unconcern about the decline of European America is so deep-seated, so pervasive, that it obviously arises from something more than a lack of knowledge.

Why the apathy?

To attempt to answer this question, which must be done before we can hope to formulate a strategy to dispel the apathy, we must take an unflinching look at certain fundamental changes which have taken place in the lives of the average European American during the past hundred years.

Looking at this reality will not be a pleasant experience, but looking away from it and denying it can only lead to a final defeat.

this is what diversity brings us

The American Dream once included not simply a vision of a life of reasonable comfort, but also a life of maximum freedom. European Americans sought economic independence for themselves even before they won political independence for their nation. Against royal decrees, they moved into the lands west of the coastal colonies, seeking to carve out from the wilderness a life for themselves. At least half the colonists knew servitude as indentured servants and wanted no more of it. The land was before them, seemingly limitless. In the following decades, they were joined by millions of immigrants from Europe, who were also fleeing serfdom in the Old World. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the overwhelming majority of Americans were self-employed as farmers, craftsmen and tradesmen. No matter how poor their standards of consumption might have been or how backbreaking their work might have been, it was theirs, theirs alone, not dependent on the dictates of a “master” (as in eighteenth century England) or a “boss” (as in early industrial America) or a “supervisor” (as in today’s post-industrial America.)

Today, of course, 90 percent of European Americans (leaving out their dependents and those who are retired) know no such freedom because they are simply someone else’s employee. The loss of freedom has been gradual and insidious, but it has been all the more real and is now almost beyond the memories of all living today. The new serfdom is an internalized sense of servility which arises from the unending need of every employee to obey the will of a supervisor if he is to keep his job. The employee’s habituation to acting only upon the instructions of a supervisor develops within him or her a passivity which is all the stronger for its being almost subconscious. The resulting apathy about public affairs among most of the working people of America suggests that Jefferson may have known something when he warned that “Dependence begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares fit tools for the designs of ambition.”

Today most European Americans belong to a great middle mass — caught between a ruling elite and what is often called an “underclass.” The most important fact for this middle American is that he or she is dependent on employment paying a wage or a salary. He or she holds a job which is dependent on factors beyond the employee’s control. The factors can be as immediate as a supervisor’s whim or as distant (and irresistible) as “market forces” that economists talk about the way people once talked about Providence or Fate.

Alienated from their work, which is work in a place they do not own and under the direction of others, these middle Americans jealously guard their “free time” as if time spent in productive activity were time spent in slavery. The average man, who resents the time he spends working under the supervision of someone else, is almost ferociously determined to spend his “free time” in play, much the way a child, weary of adult tutelage, runs amuck on the playground as soon as the school lets out. Practically all time not spent on the job is expended in recreation, in personal concerns. It is as if being deprived of the most important kind of private property — the property which enables a man to earn his own livelihood with his own possessions in self-respect and dignity — makes the proletarianized American all the more determined to privatize the small sphere of his life that does belong to him.

Traitors only deserve death.

Most civic activity arises from the ranks of the upper middle class and upper class European American. The upper middle class, which comprises the self-employed (mostly independent professionals and small business owners) generates many political and civic leaders, and cannot be said to be apathetic in the commonly accepted sense of the term. Although less than 10 per cent of the population, this group produces the overwhelming majority of civic leaders on a local and state level.

While not apathetic, the European American upper middle class has rather narrow interests. For these successful people, political interests are largely limited to concerns about taxes and government regulation of their businesses. The doom of European America means little to them. Usually living far from the areas which feel the impact of the Third World underclass, the upper middle class entrepeneur is only anxious to ignore any issue having racial overtones.

Increasingly, the upper middle class American is not of European origin. This is even more true of the small but very powerful upper class or ruling elite, the one percent of the population which owns most of the means of production and distribution. Moreover, the ruling elite, whether or not it is of European origin, greatly fears civil disorder. Threats of disorder from the Third World underclass generally result in compromise, if not total capitulation. Any evidence of militancy on the part of European Americans generates an extreme overreaction from the ruling elite. The elite will mobilize literally thousands of police and military to subdue a mere half-dozen supposed “White supremacists” in Idaho or Montana or Arizona.

It is likely that most members of the ruling elite recognize the real meaning behind Multicultural America as well as its formal meaning. The real meaning of Multicultural America is that (1) it is a makeshift to sustain liberal democracy by maintaining inter-ethnic peace, and (2) a means of enhancing profit margins by flooding the labor market with cheap immigrant labor. The resulting brake on wages and salaries is probably essential to the survival of not simply single industries, but of the profit system as a whole.

Its us or them, everyone see’s what is coming.

It is also likely that the ruling elite recognizes that the apathy of the European American middle mass is simply a mask for a much deeper layer of alienation or estrangement from the system. Beneath this alienation lurks, or so the elite fears, a seething mix of fear and anger. Conflict management and control — both among the visibly distinct racial groups and within the mass mind of the European American working class — is essential to the continued existence of the system. Could racial conflict be the primer to set off a critical mass of working class alienation? The elite does not wish to learn the answer to this question.

European American change agents can come from all strata of the population. Exceptional individuals at the outset, it is their task to increase their ranks until they grow into a movement while simultaneously stripping away the layering of mass apathy through the building of a sense of community among European Americans. No opinion will be offered here as to the chances for their success, for the American situation is one which is historically unique. Whatever may come of it, there has never been any nation comparable with the synthetic composite nation that is America.

Letter to the Others on the Eve of Their Departure

Time for non-whites to leave all white nations.

Good Morning! We hope this letter finds you well.

Look, this diversity thing just isn’t working out. It’s not you… but it’s also not us, the descendants of those who build this nation. It’s all of us, because diversity itself can never work.

In truth, this has all been a huge mistake. The people who invited you here were mentally defective and shamefully ignorant. Really, this is quite embarrassing for us as we realize how bad of a decision it was to give them power. We’re kicking ourselves about it.

Some of them were deluded into believing that there are no real biological differences between us, which apart from being just plain pseudoscience, raises the question of why they felt it was so important to bring you here in the first place. If there’s no difference between us and you, then why did they think it was so important to bring you here?

Most likely they did not think things through to that point. Actually, they were likely not thinking at all; they were just repeating what people they foolishly esteemed said in an attempt to gain for themselves some of that esteem. Others claimed to be trying to help you, but rather than simply try to help you where you were, they vainly believed that the best way to help you was to bring you into our presence, as if denying you from basking in our wondrous proximity was somehow cruel. Yes, their low estimation of you and their paternalistic attitude truly is shameful. As I said, it’s really become clear how stupid it was for us to put any trust in these clowns.

This series of bad decisions has led us all (you and us together) to where we are now: as fractured and mutually resentful as we are diverse. In this mixed environment, any interaction between members of these groups carries with it an inherent group aspect. One is forced to consider whether a disparity or an offense was due to a group preference. Did he get ahead because members of his group treated him more beneficially than members of other groups? Was her attack on a member of an out-group motivated by an in-group preference? Even if we wanted to, how can we expect to remove each group’s in-group preference without destroying that which makes them unique? Because of the obvious benefits an in-group preference give a group, this is a Mexican standoff in which the last group to disarm itself of its group identity wins, and the other groups are suckers.

By attempting to share a nation-state, we find ourselves in a zero-sum situation, where the ascendance of any one group is necessarily the decline of the others. Ignoring these group dynamics puts one at a disadvantage as surely as any ignorance. In addition, any direction we as a whole might choose to pursue would necessitate a set of standards of behavior and success that could be achieved in differing degrees by different groups, with the inevitable result being that any direction or goal is unfair to some group. This has made it impossible have any standards but the most basic. Ultimately, beneath their rationalizations, this may be what those who invited you here wanted. Those who have no confidence in themselves and believe themselves to be weak can find a selfish comfort in tearing down all standards.

But enough about them and the problems they’ve caused; let’s get to the solution. We find ourselves in a situation where we cannot coexist safely, sanely, or satisfactorily within the same nation-state, and yet we have no desire to treat you ill. If you understand this, and similarly harbor no ill intent towards us, then the solution is clear: you will return home with mutual goodwill and our aid.

We know this will not be too much trouble because for the vast majority of you, either you or your parents came here as a simple “move” not too much more involved than moving from New York to Los Angeles, and so a return will have a similar simplicity.

Those of you who have known no homes but ours because you were born in our nations may feel concern that your home nations will be foreign to you. This is understandable, but we would like to point out to you that there will be many others like you, and that amongst them you will find a community that is most fitting. Further, the skills and knowledge you’ve gained here may prove quite valuable to your group as a whole.

In addition to the wealth you have accumulated in our nations, which may be worth more in your new old homes, we would like to provide you with a cash award to help get you settled. Consider this an apology for the regrettable misunderstandings that brought you into this mess.

We wish you well and have great hope that you will all flourish and thrive in your own ways when you are finally free to decide for yourselves just exactly what success means for you. If you’d like to keep in touch, we’d be excited to hear all about it.

Letter from a non-white:

Dear Anglo dumbass,

Your kin drove us out of our homes into this land, starving the Irish to death and giving us very few options where my ancestors died to fight in your wars and not only once; by our sweat and sacrifice you have built your wealth, of which we have struggled and finally gained acceptance. By your argument that you were mentally unstable then, it does no favors to believe that you are any more mentally stable now: instead, you are the eternal Anglo, profitting off others and then seeking rid them when it becomes too uncomfortable.

So instead, I shall present to you the two results of the result of what you seek for trying to uproot my family from our land:

1) You will fail. Most likely you were fail totally for few enough will buy into your nonsense in a land where most of us are white mutts anyway. You are outnumbered and in employing us in the main to bleed for you, you have also forced us to learn the same crafts of violence that you seek to displace us with. In defeat, others will marvel

2) You will somehow, miraculously succeed in purging your land of all “non-founding stock” whites, but we will not go easily. We will struggle, we will defend ourselves from your efforts at plundering what we have built and all that we have made, and even as you crush us, you will be wounded terribly. In the end, foreign entities who have not been possessed by madness will take what they wish from your crippled selves and you will never be anything but, at best, a colony of others.

You are a wolf without teeth, a bow without an arrow, and a cause without any chance for victory. If you cannot learn to negotiate like human beings, but continue to behave as clothed wolves, then you should rightfully be put down.

Response to DEAR WHITE MEN:



You are persons of privilege.

We are not.

Since you think that we are, you should identify the source of those privileges. Who’s privileging White people? Other than us, I mean. It isn’t a privilege if we work and keep what we make. That’s a right. It isn’t a privilege if we earn, and then keep our earnings. That’s a right, too.

Whites and non-Whites should have the same right and the same opportunity of doing things for themselves. And, to the extent that the rights are augmented by privileges, the favor is most definitely on the non-White side. Those non-White races are the ones privileged with official favor, with Affirmative Action, with welfare money, and with political correctness. The non-Whites are persons of PRIVILEGE, the source of which are laws and governmental policies which, by right, should not exist.

The reason Whites are still better off, despite not having the privileges that non-Whites have, is that Whites are just better people.

You didn’t earn it.

On the contrary. We did earn what we have. We still do. The non-White races are the races that get most of the benefits that they didn’t earn. Such benefits are a privilege that require Whites to labor, so that non-Whites could enjoy.

More than likely aren’t yet prepared to either admit to it or lose it.

Admitting to lies would make us liars like you. Why should we lose what we have earned? We already do lose (to the Blacks) money that we have earned, but why shouldn’t we act to redress the injustice of these robberies-under-color-of-law?

This letter, written by one of you, is offered to invite you on a journey of insight, honesty, hard truth and just living.

Your letter, whatever your race is, is pure deception, and you invite us on a journey though a pile of bullshit.

Privilege can be hard to see, mostly because of what doesn’t happen to us when we have it.

Privilege, where it actually exists, can be easy to see. An EBT card, for example, is easy to see. The stuff you can buy with it, with money you didn’t work to earn, is also easy to see. The reason so-called “White privilege” is hard to see is that it isn’t there. It doesn’t exist. The only privilege Whites have is their own nature, which is distinguished from that of lesser races by being relatively more intelligent, more honest, more willing to delay gratification, and less violent.

One of the four reasons James Cone offers in his landmark essay “Theology’s Great Sin: Silence in the Face of White Supremacy” for why men of privilege remain silent in the face of so much racial injustice is: “They don’t have to speak.”

This isn’t one of theology’s sins, and James Cone is a Black radical preacher who has been very vocal in his resentment of White people. He thinks Whites are privileged, but he is wrong. Nobody has privileged Whites, unless it is God doing the privileging by making Whites a better race in general. And God can do whatever He wants to do, even if it seems “racist” to those who don’t like what He did.

We aren’t getting arrested at four times our population rate.

We aren’t committing murder, arson, rape, assault, and robbery at ten times our population rate, either.

We aren’t being followed when walking through a department store wearing a sweat shirt with a hood.

Because experience has shown those who guard department stores that we aren’t exceptionally likely to steal merchandise.

Real estate agencies didn’t write codes, rules and laws that kept us out of the high rent districts and middle class neighborhoods.

Those rules were a good idea, while they lasted. It makes sense to distance oneself from groups who DO commit murder, arson, rape, assault, and robbery at ten times the population rate.

While we’re on the subject of quality neighborhoods, there are some good questions to be asked and answered. First, who made the places where White people live nice places to be? The answer is: Whites did. Second, who made the places where Black people live awful places to be? The answer is: Blacks. Whites aren’t preventing Blacks from doing what Whites did to make their neighborhoods into nice places. The reason Blacks aren’t doing those things is that Blacks and Whites aren’t equal in ability, nor do Blacks behave as Whites behave, and neither of those things is the fault of Whites.

Property values don’t go down when more than 10 percent of our neighborhood is saturated with people of our race.

The market price of housing in an area is not set by a conspiracy. It is set by how much people are willing to pay to buy a house in that area. If an area is saturated with people from a race whose per capita rate for committing violent crimes is ten times the population rate, then not many people will bid high for the right to live there. They’ll bid higher to live in safer places. That isn’t privilege. It’s wisdom.

Our children aren’t sitting in classrooms with teachers who are likely not to have even a minor degree in the courses they are teaching.

Then let non-White teachers get those degrees. Whites aren’t stopping them. Non-Whites are the ones with apparently no end of favor with providers of financial aid for college. If non-White teachers don’t have degrees, then they probably don’t have the brains required to get one. And that isn’t any fault of White people. It’s one of those grievances you’ll have to take up with God, because He’s the one who parceled out the IQ points to the races. White people didn’t do it themselves.

Young white men are not being gunned down by Black police officers in epidemic numbers.

Young White men aren’t running around selling drugs, pimping hos, or doing drive-by gangsta shooting. Young White men aren’t raping 18,000 Black women each year. White people don’t attack Blacks at the slightest excuse, or with no excuse at all. Black police officers don’t often find a reason to shoot young White men.

But young Black men do run around selling drugs. Young Black men do pimp hos. Young Black men do perpetrate drive-by gangsta shootings. Young Black men do rape 18,000 White women each year. Young Black men do attack Whites at the slightest excuse, or with no excuse at all. White police officers do sometimes find that they must, in self-defense, shoot a young Black man.

The races aren’t equals in their behavior. Any argument that implicitly depends on racial equality in behavior is an argument flawed by a false premise.

… I invite the White men of America with me on this journey of discovery.

What you do is brainwashing, not discovery. By the “journey” of repeatedly imputing undeserved guilt.

Ask those who don’t share your privilege to tell you what they see. It may not have escaped your attention that whether we are talking about Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, Michael Brown, what Whites see and what Blacks see are not the same thing. There is a reason for that.

Yes. Some people see more clearly than others do. Because some people are more intelligent than others are. There is no parity in the perspectives of Whites and Blacks regarding such persons as Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown. The Whites are usually right, and what they say is usually the truth. The Blacks are usually wrong, and what they say is usually lies. When a sharp disagreement occurs along racial lines, and you wish to know the truth, you will listen to the Whites and tune out the Blacks. The only time that doesn’t work is in a movie, a TV-drama, or other fantasy whose script was written by Blacks or by Jews. The idea that Blacks are as truthful as Whites is as fictional as a typical ghost story.

Privilege comes at a price — and the price is the loss of a vision that admits facts that make accepting the privilege uncomfortable.

Whites are not privileged. A privilege is something you get unearned. Whites earned what they have. If you’re looking for privileges, then you’ll find them wherever people are getting what they have not earned. EBT credit accounts and hiring quotas are good places to start looking.

Whites Shouldn’t Be Forced To Live Among Non-Whites

by H. Millard

I’m an individual human being. I am also a White human being. I was born the same way as all other human beings. No other human beings have any more rights than I have. As long as I don’t harm others, no other human beings have the right to tell me how to live, who to associate with, what to think, what to believe, what I can and cannot read or do, what I can say or not say. They are not superior in rights to me. This is what it means to be a free human being. Anything less than this is not freedom, it is oppression, tyranny and slavery.

It is obscene that we White people have to put up with non-White crime and social problems. And, even more, it is absurd that all humans are lumped together as though we are all the same. We are not all the same. We look different externally, and we have different DNA codes internally. We are different peoples. The human races are groups within the human species that have started to branch off and to become separate species if certain conditions are met. And, this is as it should be. This is the way of existence. We should not be forced to blend together, but should be allowed to evolve as we determine is best for each of us individually and as groups of like individuals. Blending all human races together will not improve the species, it will force it down to the lowest common denominator.


Racial integration is a failure. Racial diversity is a failure. Multiculturalism is a failure. These only bring non-White crime, social problems and miscegenation to once safe and, yes, pure White communities. And, Whites are not only victimized physically by these failed social experiments, but we are also victimized by being made to pay for services and benefits for people unlike us. To be racially sensitive and not “racist” we Whites are expected to just accept being made into second class citizens and give up college seats and job opportunities and promotions to less qualified non-Whites. We are expected to bend over backwards to understand and be sensitive to the needs of people unlike us. This is stupid. We Whites shouldn’t waste one second of our time or burn one calorie in such efforts. There is no profit in this for us. Non-Whites are not our kind. They are not our people. We owe them nothing, other than leaving them alone to their own separate destinies.

As it is now, we Whites must pay for the welfare and medical care and housing and much more for non-Whites and we must hire more police and pay for them to keep non-Whites from attacking and murdering us since we have been forced to accept them into our communities. The ant and the grasshopper fable comes to mind, but tenfold, as we, the industrious White ants have been forced to accept the non-White grasshoppers into our ant communities as equals. The result is harmful to us. Even if some groups of non-Whites aren’t a direct problem, they are still not our kind and don’t belong in our communities.

Whites should only have to put up with the crime and social problems of our own people. We, as White individuals, have a natural right, just by having been born, to be as we are born to be, and to pursue happiness as we define it, and to choose to mix or not mix with any other humans as we alone decide is in our best interest, and to be the free human beings that nature has made us to be. And, this right that we have as White individuals extends to those who are most like us–other Whites. Yes, we Whites are different from other kinds of humans as they are different from us. There is not a one size fits all human being.

The laws that we Whites have written over the years are based on the innate outward manifestations and expressions of the White genetic code that makes us the people that we are. They pretty much work for us, as a separate people living among our own kind, but they fail to work in racially blended societies. We Whites, for example, can expect certain levels of violent crime from our own people and our laws are written to protect us from these crimes of our own kind. However, the crime levels of some other types of humans–Blacks and Browns, in particular– are naturally far higher from our own levels, and our laws do not protect us fully from these higher levels of violent crime brought into our White communities by non-Whites. The laws that most of us Whites naturally obey, but which the non-Whites don’t, often work to actually put us in more danger.

Our laws, our constitution, our mores and ways were designed for us, by us and they’re about us–and they do not always fit with other peoples. Why? Because, they are different from the ground on up, and trying to force them to be like us oppresses both them and us and it stunts our own development and robs us of our human sovereignty and right to be as we want to be and of the right to pursue happiness as we choose and the right to be around those we want to be around and not be around those we don’t want to be around

Now, even many of the weakest seed Whites in society acknowledge that we humans come in different flavors. After all, even they have eyes to see, so they’re pretty much forced to admit differences. So far, so good. Then, common sense falls apart, because many of them then try to deny that there are internal differences also. And, as they do that, some among them also try to deny the significance of the external differences and they foolishly try to deny that violent crime levels and social dysfunction levels are color coded. Some of these weak seed Whites suffer from cognitive dissonance and jump through hoops trying to reconcile the high Black violent crime rate with their false belief that Blacks are the same as Whites except for different paint jobs. One can almost imagine some of the weak seed Whites having smoke coming from their ears as they say “Will not compute, will not compute,” as they try to reconcile the facts of the real world with their ingrained false views, as though they’re robots in a cheap science fiction movie.

Let’s be very clear about this. Non-Whites are not Whites. They look different because they are different. They have different internal codes than Whites just as they have different external appearances. This is true no matter what some dimwitted weak seed politicians and elites try to tell us and force on us.

We Whites are a White people inside and outside and we have a God (or nature, if you prefer) given right to our freedom as the sovereign individuals that we are. We are no one’s slaves. No human or group of humans have the right to keep us from being ourselves and living our lives as we want among our own kind. We are living, breathing human beings with every right to be as we were born to be and with every right to associate with or not associate with others as we alone choose. No one has a right to herd us together with other types of humans if we don’t want to be so herded or so lumped. They are not our kind, and intelligent, conscious Whites are aware of this fact. We have the right to be free from non-White violent crime, non-White social problems and free from non-Whites altogether. Let them have their ways, and we’ll have ours. Don’t try to lump us together under some artificial national label. The most authentic label that we have is the one we were born with: White people. We are our genes and our genes are us.

No one has the right to have us sacrifice our safety, our pursuit of happiness and our very existence in order to please people unlike us. We do not have to please them at all. We also do not have to support them, or take a back seat so they can have the front seat, or give up our dreams of college and better jobs because they are admitted or promoted based on their dark skin color. We do not need to sacrifice ourselves, our children, our jobs our future, at all. We have a right to be and to be more and we need to assert these rights in every way big and small or we’re going to continue to be victimized and picked off one by one.

Non-Whites are not our responsibility. We owe them absolutely nothing. Again, they are not our kind. They are a burden to us. We do not have to carry such a burden. We have enough burdens of our own to carry.

We Whites have a right to self-identification, self-determination, self-destiny and a whole lot of other positive “self” combinations.

We can’t continue trying to fit non-Whites into a White society. They don’t fit into ours and we don’t fit into theirs. We know who we are and many of us want to stay with our own kind.

We have a right to be White, to think White, to stay White, to evolve White. And, we don’t need anyone’s permission to be as we were born to be.

Las Vegas Shows Us The Rationalization Process In Progress

It is probably only day eight, but it feels like day eighty, since Stephen Craig Paddock shot up a country music concert in Las Vegas, killing and injuring some egregious number of people. And still, we have no motive.

Despite the killer leaving some form of note, possessing a wide social media presence, and having walked this Earth for sixty-four years, we apparently still have no idea why he did what he did.

The Occam’s Razor answer is that his father was a violent paranoid psychopath, and that mental illness is mostly heritable like any other trait, so latent traits manifested — probably accelerated by news of a long-term illness, or other personal life trauma — and the son went on the type of violent paranoid psychopathic shooting spree that he probably feared doing for his whole life.

In the meantime, the Las Vegas shooting was a massive assertion of white supremacy. If you want a spree killing done right, send in a white guy. No wonder minorities (“POCs”), feminists, transgender activists and every other type of special snowflake (all snowflakes are equal, which means every snowflake is a star, or maybe that none are) is squealing and mewling about this event.

The conspiracy theories came out too. A good conspiracy theory explains what the official narrative will not; a bad conspiracy theory contorts interpretation of the facts in order to explain away troubling ideas, sort of like an official narrative does. The troubling point here is that there may be no “big” reason for this event; it is just another sign of the decline, more of entropy winning on display.

While that does not seem as interesting as the conspiracy theories, it is the broader conspiracy; it shows us both the crisis of our time and the implicit task of humanity in one moment. Our civilization is in decline and that will defeat everything that we do. Our goal is to gain personal clarity about reality, and to adapt to it through civilization, as a species. In both we are failing.

And so the rationalization continues. No healthy society has events like the Las Vegas shooting happen, and it has zero to do with gun control. Any powerful society has powerful objects and knowledge, and whether he needs to run people over with a truck, make an ANFO bomb, run people over with a harvester or laboratory engineer anthrax pathogens, the determined killer will do it.

We keep slapping band-aids on the problem. Anti-drug laws, workplace regulations, locks on cockpit doors, chemical signatures in gunpowder. But we will be defeated by the fact that when you have a country of people who have nothing in common and no purpose, the only remaining task is to destroy each other in outrage at how meaningless, tedious and humiliating modern life has become.

Take a walk down a modern Western street. The obese blue-haired feminists have nothing in common with the Muslim Arabs they walk alongside, but in the grand tradition of human stupidity, they try to find “common ground” and alight on a few lowest common denominator ideas, like that everyone wants a paycheck and not to be punished for their own mistakes, and so they agree to be Leftists together. This is not progress, but decline.

An average middle class white family finds themselves surrounded by Chinese, Mexicans, Italians, Russians, Jews, Falun Gong, Juggalos, Black Panthers, Flat Earthers, Pentacostals and Scientologists. They have nothing in common with these groups, but are sure to tell people how they knew their own marriage was right because “we have so much in common.” They do not mean that they both possess a copy of Unknown Pleasures (1979), or that they like watching tennis, but that they come from the same origins, have the same abilities and inclinations hard-wired into them, see the world through the same frame as a result, and have the same rough goals and purpose, which is to be what they are — Western Europeans — while improving themselves a bit, and fighting off this insane modern world.

Insane modern world? But look at all of our technology, medicine and knowledge! Yes, that is what we are expected to say. But in reality, few of us take advantage of the medicine, because if you are healthy, you really need very little except to fight off epidemics, and that has been done successfully since the dawn of time through quarantine.

The technology makes life more efficient, perhaps, but we are still doing the same stuff, and working longer hours than before, and it seems that nine times out of ten when that latest project is done, it turns out to have been a waste of time, or most of what was done for it to have been a waste of time, where common sense could have saved everyone a lot of time.

But people need to work to eat, and so we are addicted to work, just like we sit on freeways for an hour every morning because commuting is what everyone else does, and watch blockhead sports played by people we do not know while swilling watery and overly sweet beer, trying to convince ourselves that this is what we want out of life.

And then, we hit age sixty-four and shoot up a country concert, or something. It seems that quite a few men in Stephen Craig Paddock’s cohort kill themselves, and they tend to do with guns:

While suicide is the 11th leading cause of death in the United States, with 11 suicide deaths per 100,000 Americans, white men over the age of 65 commit suicide at almost triple that overall rate.

…In 2001, 73 percent of all suicide deaths and 80 percent of all firearm suicide deaths were white males.

Why after age sixty-five? I will tell you why: you realize that your life was stolen by your career. You went to work because everyone told you that you had to, and you needed money; you found out that most of what you did was stupid, or designed to advance the careers of other idiots, or to take care of people who had money and power but no sense, but it paid the bills, so you did it. In fact, you got good at it, so you did a lot of it. Then you retired, or got old enough that people figure you ought to, and two things happened. First, you looked back over your life and wondered where it went, since you last recall being thirty-one and excited about your first real promotion, and second, you realize that your only relevance to people has been through work for all these years, and so now, you are irrelevant, your life timeline is nearly over, and you got none of what you wanted. You got played, and now you are furious at the world but even more, at yourself for having gone along with this insane scam. Might as well just blow out your own brain, since it did not do what it was supposed to, and take out some of the other monkeys whose needs you have been wasting your life with for decades.

Look at them down there, the oblivious fatheads. Bloated on corn beer and television, full of self-importance because someone gave them the title of assistant moron in charge of moron corralling, excited about their stupid slut girlfriends — the good women married young, and the rest lie about the panoply of penises that pass through their reproductive parts in a desperate search for meaning, relevance, love, or something else they will never find — and full of hope that this event will give their lives some importance, or at least connection. They are chasing lies, the same lies that you chased, and you are filled with rage and a desire to interrupt them.

A 7.62mm round through the skull might do just that. It just might.

To a cynical realist, all of human history consists of a few people who found a link to a sense of inner meaning in life, something which is intensely tied to perception of the external as sacred, supremely logical and beautiful. Then there were the rest: milling about, distracting, promoting entropy, raging through their own drama, screaming and shaking fists at the empty sky, and so on. Basically, there is a tiny group that does everything good and the rest just gunk up the works.

That group of the rest spend most of their time trying to figure out why things are not the way they are. Of course, that makes no sense, and once they embark down that path of insanity, they find all sorts of curious things. The person with the least reason to be proud has the greatest pride, not in accomplishments outside of himself, but in how cool or sociable he is. It resembles schizophrenia, the paranoid ideation that re-orders the world as being directed at the self, like narcissism inverted. From that solipsistic self-importance, this person goes on to discover all other sorts of nonsensical theories, including that people are equal, because they are all him, and that those who do not agree must die, because they affront him by contradicting his personal narrative. The inner monkey comes out and snarls.

When you let the inner monkey take over your society, everything you do from that point on is doomed to failure. They will reject anything they do not understand, and since their understanding is limited to the self, this means they reject anything of meaning and try to destroy it.

No matter what motivated this latest shooting in a series of public massacres and terrorist events, the takeaway point is this: your civilization is failing, no one has anything in common, daily life destroys the soul, and people become enraged and self-destructive as a result. The reasons for drug abuse, vandalism, everyday sadism and mass killings are the same; people are miserable, and they are taking it out on the others who, by participating in this insane farce, compel them to suffer under it, prompting retaliation.

The Failure of the Boomer Generation

Pull the Plug on Baby Boomers


This is a pic of a boomer

Born into the country’s most prosperous times, the baby boomers took the most greedy, self serving aspects of individualism and American capitalism and pushed them to the fringes.  At a young age, they overthrew all of the cultural institutions protecting American civilization and pushed the repulsive vanities of meaningless sex, drug use, pornography, and civil disobedience into the mainstream.

Through the Boomers, morality was effectively weeded out of media, politics, and journalism as the race was on to turn every aspect of life and culture into a financial gain.  And thus, by the hands of the baby boomers came the acceleration of the credit system and the mass creation of nonexistent capital… both effectively setting the stage for an unprecedented global economic meltdown.

Throughout their entire existence the generation remained stubborn, selfish, greedy, and self serving. Even after their terrible decisions plunged the country into recession, the baby boomers continued to evade responsibility by remaining in the workforce and draining the country’s depleted resources.  Despite their children being in poverty, despite America’s debt being in the trillions, and despite a lifetime of material consumption, the baby boomers continue to collect paychecks from the government to keep themselves alive in a vegetated state.

They remain in massive houses as their children are forced to share housing after marriage, they remain with free healthcare while their children go uninsured, and they collect social security paychecks despite experiencing years of wealth and abundance that their children successfully are not likely to ever see.

While millennials could attempt nuclear war to erase their generations debt and economic devastation, a more practical solution is available: Pull the plug on the baby boomers and let the nation’s worst generation die.  Since millennials outnumber baby boomers it would theoretically be possible to use the channels of democracy to vote away the latter’s Medicare and social security benefits.

Without federal assistance fueling the life and safe retirement of a generation useless to society, massive die offs would ensue.  Housing prices would dive as more and more homes would become available.  The job market would surge and whatever government assistance there is could be used to strengthen a generation able to efficiently partake in the workforce (although a better solution would be eliminating it entirely in favor of enhancing the stability of the economy).

Unfortunately, this solution is likely to remain a fantasy as the baby boomers have cleverly (though perhaps unwittingly) conditioned millennials to serve in the former’s best interest.  They have discouraged the young generation from engaging in politics, thereby enabling themselves to continue to dominate the vote in their favor.  They have passed on their infatuation with material consumption and journalistic distraction, leading for millennials to pursue empty and needless desires over the strengthening of humanity’s future.  They have effectively convinced the future generations that the failed policies they championed will eventually work as the institutions crumble around them.  The millennials, conditioned to be dependent and obedient, allow their masters to walk them into hopelessness.

Without pulling the plug on baby boomers and their ideas capitalism is destined to fall.  And when it does, the failures of the baby boomers will long be the propaganda of whomever assumes power next.

They Admit It: “American Prosperity Depends On A Non-White Future”

Listen. Listen quietly. Wait patiently. If you take enough time, your enemies will tell you exactly what they think. Give them the space and they will eventually justify themselves to you, and then you can see the plan in full.

One of the leading business publications in the world, Bloomberg News offers us the clearest statement of white genocide ever offered in the media:

If the U.S. economy is going to prosper, it needs to keep taking in immigrants. Fertility is below replacement levels, and no country has discovered a way to raise native birthrates. That means that immigration is necessary for the survival of the Social Security system and the solvency of pension funds.

It is so blatant that you might have missed it: immigration is needed to pay for the pensions for Baby Boomers, and it is necessary because we are not having as many babies as occurred in that boom. Our largest and most Leftist generation ever is fading out, and in the ruins of a society ravaged by their political ideals, there is not enough wealth to keep them in a state of comfortable retirement.

They even tell you in the next few lines:

Immigrants will allow small cities to grow and expand their tax bases, instead of shriveling into ghost towns. Immigrants support the housing market and the stock market. They take care of elderly Americans and provide invaluable skills for U.S. corporations. Without continued robust immigration, the U.S. population will shrink and gray, and the country will start having the same problems as aging societies like Japan, South Korea, and East Europe.

They are promising yesterday its retirement funds by sacrificing today. As usual, drugged by the dogma of egalitarianism, business and voters assume that all people are the same, so they can move in a bunch of third world people and have America keep operating just as it has. They are relying on their laws, economic theories, Constitution, and police power.

We know this is true because Europe is doing the same thing:

Western governments are broke because of their social programs and yet cannot reduce them because the voters will panic and rage.

The demographic squeeze could be eased by the influx of more than a million migrants in the past year. If many of them eventually join the working population, the result could be increased tax revenue to keep the pension model afloat. Before migrants are even given the right to work, however, they require housing, food, education and medical treatment. Their arrival will have effects on public finances that officials have only started to assess.

There are many problems with the immigration plan. First, it stimulates overpopulation by creating an escape valve from the already-overburdened third world, which in turn causes people to breed more because the cause of that overpopulation is a Tragedy of the Commons style need to have a large enough family to subsidize each person in old age, so when that family leaves, they make more of them. Second, it destroys Western civilization entirely by ethnically replacing its one unique component, namely its people and their genetics. Third, it assumes that people from third world countries will produce at the level needed, when if they could have done that, they would have back at home where living is cheaper.

Now you see the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News telling you what the rest of the mainstream media will not: the great rush toward diversity has always been about ensuring an easy retirement for people raised on the socialist programs of the 1930s.

They were told back in the day that these programs could not sustain themselves; they paid out more than they took in, and investing the money only made it unpredictable as to how much would be there in the future. And so, our society slipped itself on the needle of stealing from everyone to give to a subset of the group. We are addicted to funding our retirees.

Socialism always kills societies this way. When you give out free things, people shape their lives around a negative incentive to save and be responsible. For them, it is easy; all they have to do is keep going to work for thirty five or forty years and then they retire with a pension or generous social security. It is a paradise for workers, much like Soviet Communism promised to be.

But like all our great human failings, this one starts with a simple pitfall. People who are working for the system, instead of working to achieve results, are not effective or efficient. They phone it in and do the minimum they must do in order to avoid criticism from others. In turn, the quality of output falls, and so does the value of the economy.

This rushes us into a death cycle. Millions work long hours at jobs doing tasks that ultimately are not necessary, just so their bosses can get promoted for being effective at the ineffective. They are taxed mercilessly and that money is dumped on the underclass, which spends it on consumer products. This puts money into fast motion, and causes the economy to switch to demand-based economics.

Right now, we are being erased as a people so that a generation can get the benefits it voted for after being promised them by people who knew the scheme would never work. What do they care, they got their retirement benefits already, and all of them are hoping to be very dead by the time the bubble pops.

Look at what else they are celebrating:

But even more encouraging are the numbers on interracial marriage. Marriage is proof that diversity isn’t just creating tensions between new and unfamiliar neighbors, but positive and lasting social bonds. A new report by the Pew Research Center provides some amazing numbers. Half a century after laws against interracial marriage were struck down by the courts, the share of new marriages that are interracial has risen from 3 percent to 17 percent. For black Americans, the rise in intermarriage has been particularly strong.

With unique races gone, you will have nothing but your job, government ideology and consumer shopping. This will create the perfect citizens: a grey race of people without culture, values, heritage, customs or religion. The perfect raw material to be shaped by the machine of government and media.

Amazingly, your leaders think this is a good idea. To them, the voters are dupes — here they are correct: even smart people in groups vote like morons through compromise, the lottery mentality and gaming the system — who will approve ridiculous schemes. A politician realizes that either he offers free stuff, or the next guy will, and that guy will take the election. So they all lie.

We know this means the end of the chance for the West, shattered by two world wars, to rebirth itself. With the loss of its people, so goes the possibility of their civilization. And all of this to pay for votes, bought with social welfare entitlements programs we could not afford, so that people would feel comfortable in an obviously declining, unstable society!

The U.S. is becoming more integrated at the regional, neighborhood and household level. Americans say they like diversity, and they are voting with both their feet and their ring fingers. The future of the U.S. as a successful multiracial nation isn’t assured, but it’s looking more and more likely. And that should be good news for the U.S. economy, since it means growth won’t create noxious social divisions.

Listen again. They tell you their fears: they fear noxious social divisions, meaning that they know diversity will not work. This is why they are rushing toward intermarriage, because if you destroy all of the races, then you have no social divisions. In other words, the same reason why they wanted class warfare; they want to eliminate all conflict through pacifism, and make us all obedient sheep.

The only way out of this mess is to stand up against diversity and its parent theory, egalitarianism. You cannot say that all people are equal and not invite the world to come live among you. But a group composed of every race has no race, and a country for everyone is a country for no one. Oh well, at least the Me Generation will have comfortable retirements as civilization dies out around them.

Baby Boomers Show The Crisis Of Individualism

When you have a society, culture and ethnic group that you can believe in, you tend to give back. But for the Baby Boomers, the “Me Generation” known for its individualism, none of that matters. With their families shattered by their own divorces and bad parenting, Baby Boomers are hoarding wealth as society crumbles around them by their own acts:

Younger generations aren’t saving enough as their income slips further behind previous generations. Older Americans meanwhile sit atop unprecedented piles of assets built through stock market and real estate booms.

Yet these retirees, or at least the affluent ones, aren’t spending it. It turns out they’re afraid of the unknown.

A new study finds many U.S. retirees keep saving even after they’ve retired. The average American over the age of 60 cuts spending 2.5 percent per year, or about 20 percent over a 10-year period, according to an analysis of University of Michigan survey data by financial planning software company United Income.

Younger generations are engaging in an Ayn Rand style “Galt’s Gulch” strategy of earning less and paying less in taxes, then taking out more in benefits than they put in. This will eventually crash the system, which is already starving as third world immigrants perform below the native population in tasks and thus, bring in less income.

The older generations, dedicated to individualism or “me first before all else” thinking, intend to hoard their wealth and use it to evade the catastrophe that they saw coming for decades but did nothing to stop. Born of the victory of the Allies in WWII and the Leftism of the 1930s, Baby Boomers show us the ultimate idea of collectivism: a crowd of individuals, all wanting to take all they can and give nothing back.

What Made The Baby Boomers So Destructive?

Future historians will write about the Baby Boomers less admiringly than past historians, but perhaps with more compassion. They will see them as a bridge between the 1930s and the 1990s, a generation doomed that struck back without trying to actually fix the situation.

We might summarize them as a teenage tantrum, and like all such outbursts, have sympathy for their sentiments but dislike their methods.

The Baby Boomers were born when it was clear that the Allies would win WWII, and in anticipation of the great boom of wealth and power this would bestow. At the same time, they inherited a dead system: a hybrid capitalist-socialist state which had already shattered its cultural integrity through white diversity, attempting to mix Southern, Western and Eastern Europeans into a new people.

This created a helpless environment for them to grow up in, and one that was too popular to change, so they knew they were born doomed and retaliated by taking all they could and leaving destruction in their wake:

Boomers took over the government in the early 1990s, when Bill Clinton’s 1992 victory installed them in the White House and Newt Gingrich’s Republican Revolution of 1994 gave the generation a majority in the House that persists to this day.

And how has that worked out for them? Well, the Greatest Generation survived the Great Depression, won the Second World War, brought about the enormous postwar economic boom, outlasted the Soviet Union in the Cold War and established the United States as the sole superpower. Since then, the boomers — the Worst Generation, if you will — have squandered most of that.

The United States, challenged all over the world, is receding and turning inward. The economy still hasn’t recovered fully from the financial collapse of 2008, the worst since the Great Depression. The federal debt is out of control, and inequality is worse. Boomers expanded entitlement programs that are wrecking the nation’s finances; they failed to act on global warming; they presided over declining faith in virtually all institutions, from religion to the Supreme Court; and their children may be the first generation with dim prospects of doing better than their parents did.

With the victory in World War Two, it seemed that the new horrible version of the USA had succeeded, and so it was never going to be rolled back. The social programs of the 1930s, brought on by a neo-Communist leader, were there to stay, mostly because democracies never vote against benefits once already established. Those acts would never be repealed, it seemed, and this made the Boomers hopeless, negative and destructive from irritation and frustration at an intractable, slowly dying system.

The resentment of having their fate sealed before their birth, and their outrage at the hypocrisy of a modern West which feasted on killing its best for illusions like equality, made the Boomers into a relentlessly self-serving generation; perhaps they were the ultimate individualists, or the “last man” that Nietzsche described.

They demonstrated this approach in their response to the Vietnam war:

While dad sweated on the Pacific Ocean and learned the joys of monsoon season, millions of other American men protested the unjust, expensive and bloody war and helped bring it to an end. The popular conception of that period is one of free love and political turmoil. It was an era when old men started unpopular wars and the righteous stayed behind.

…Gibney shows Boomers overwhelmingly supported the war until they had to serve in it. Worse, most who wanted to avoid the war could seek conscientious objector status but instead abused the deferment system.

Boomers sat out one of the most vital conflicts of the Cold War, in which the West prevailed against Sino-Soviet Communist aggression. The “Me Generation” got its name from being unwilling to do anything but act for its own individual pleasures, a third world mentality exhibited by those who took the past for granted because they hated what it had become.

You Can Have Any Right You Are Willing To Kill For

Black Lives Matter can really amuse me sometimes. They cut through the nauseating social pretenses of the Jonathan Chaits and Lindsey Grahamaphrodites around the world with a double-edge bastard sword. Here they address the quaint honkey custom of the First Amendment.

Students affiliated with the Black Lives Matter movement crashed an event at the College of William & Mary, rushed the stage, and prevented the invited guest—the American Civil Liberties Union’s Claire Gastañaga, a W & M alum—from speaking. Ironically, Gastañaga had intended to speak on the subject, “Students and the First Amendment.”

And it gets more amusing. Senora Gastanaga then attempted to pat them on their cute little Malcom X heads and patronize them. Because of her arrogant presumption that she had rights, she choose poorly.

At first, she attempted to spin the demonstration as a welcome example of the kind of thing she had come to campus to discuss, commenting “Good, I like this,” as they lined up and raised their signs. “I’m going to talk to you about knowing your rights, and protests and demonstrations, which this illustrates very well. Then I’m going to respond to questions from the moderators, and then questions from the audience.” It was the last remark she was able to make before protesters drowned her out with cries of, “ACLU, you protect Hitler, too.” They also chanted, “the oppressed are not impressed,” “shame, shame, shame, shame,” (an ode to the Faith Militant’s treatment of Cersei Lannister in Game of Thrones, though why anyone would want to be associated with the religious fanatics in that particular conflict is beyond me), “blood on your hands,” “the revolution will not uphold the Constitution,” and, uh, “liberalism is white supremacy.” This went on for nearly 20 minutes.

Others around the blogosphere tried to defend our precious narrative. Rick Moran cucks quite cuckingly over at American Thinker.

The forces of tyranny on college campuses are becoming louder and more incoherent and have now reached the point where they are attacking those in the establishment who support them.

Witness what happened at William and Mary College when a speaker from the ACLU tried to address a gathering on the subject of free speech. BLM is completely oblivious to the irony. This makes the BLM people not only ignorant, but also a threat to liberty. Of course, BLM isn’t the only radical group looking to destroy the traditional concepts that underlie free expression. Antifa and its affiliates, student groups of all races, even “mainstream” leftist groups are all insisting that speech they don’t agree with be suppressed. There is no rational justification for suppressing free speech, so these groups use irrational reasons to defend their actions.

There is nothing incoherent. BLM told the ACLU to shut up and accept their demotion. The ACLU heifer still ran her yap. BLM reared back, applied the pimp slap. “I’m Rick James, bitch!” They explained. I mean what else did the five fingers say to the face?

So once the ACLU has taken Bill Clinton’s advise and gotten some ice for that, we should now discuss students and the first amendment. Do you know when you have a first amendment right in Amerika? There are four occasions.

  1. You are surrounded by law-abiding individuals who actually accept their socialization into our current managerial state. They will voluntarily allow you to say things they may or may not like without brutalizing you.
  2. You are Chuck Norris.
  3. You come armed well enough to not have to be Chuck Norris.
  4. The State enforces on whomever would like to forcibly shut you up.

So neither one nor four happened at The College of William and Mary in Virginia. If they consistently don’t happen, then you either become a hard, hard man or fornicate and forget whatever right you have some delusional belief in from your High School Civics Class. “The Revolution will not uphold the Constitution.” Not much will. Absent a determined willingness from the state and the voluntary acceptance of a vast majority of the population, a constitution is a rather expensive pile of toilet paper.

Next, we get “Liberalism is white supremacy.” Perhaps compared to Senator Lindsey Grahamaphrodite it truly is. But still, it really should clarify things. BLM is not just Mau-Mauing the contemporary version of Leftist Flak-Catcher. They think that Barack Obama’s Presidency signified their ownership of American Leftism. They are convinced that if America is truly racist, they are truly entitled to make those crackas dig the ditch before the machine guns fire.

It’s a little late in the game to patiently explain that anything built on their backs was built with our brains. They are not listening because you cannot make them listen. Paul Mirengoff sounds rather like a mouse who hasn’t belled any cats lately below.

College students, like the rest of us, can believe and spout whatever idiotic propositions — e.g. “liberalism is white supremacy” — capture their fancy. But they cannot be allowed to shutdown speakers — either liberal or conservative — who hold differing views. William & Mary is a state school. It likely will be under pressure to respond to the outrageous treatment of the ACLU speaker with more than just slaps on the wrist. But that doesn’t mean it will so respond. This is a good test case. We’ll be watching closely..

Yep. And according to Hillaire Belloc, they are not the only ones watching.

We sit by and watch the barbarian. We tolerate him in the long stretches of peace, we are not afraid. We are tickled by his irreverence; his comic inversion of our old certitudes and our fixed creed refreshes us; we laugh. But as we laugh we are watched by large and awful faces from beyond, and on these faces there are no smiles.

They are watching indeed. They will take from you any right that you would not shoot to kill in order to defend.